Monday, January 28, 2019

Trump news on Youtube Jan 28 2019

Acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney says President Trump is ready to shut down

the government again if a deal on border security is not reached.

Mick Mulvaney made the remarks on CBS' 'Face the Nation' and comes less than two days after

Trump agreed to reopen the government for three weeks to allow further negotiations.

It ended a 35-day government shutdown - the longest in American history - that saw 800,000

furloughed federal workers miss two paychecks.

Mulvaney said talks may be different this time as Democrats agree with Trump's plan

to better secure the border.

For more infomation >> White House Chief of Staff says Trump is prepared for another government shutdown - Duration: 0:37.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Clarifies Shutdown Deal In No Way a Concession, Wall Coming - Duration: 2:10.

For more infomation >> Trump Clarifies Shutdown Deal In No Way a Concession, Wall Coming - Duration: 2:10.

-------------------------------------------

¡Trump reabrió el gobierno pero insiste con el muro! | Un Nuevo Día | Telemundo - Duration: 5:37.

For more infomation >> ¡Trump reabrió el gobierno pero insiste con el muro! | Un Nuevo Día | Telemundo - Duration: 5:37.

-------------------------------------------

White House Chief of Staff says Trump is prepared for another government shutdown - Duration: 0:41.

acting-wise House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney has says President Trump is

ready to shut down the government again if a deal on border security is not

reached with the Democrats Mick Mulvaney made the remarks on CBS's Face the

Nation and comes in less than two days after Trump agreed to reopen the

government for three weeks to allow further negotiations it ended a 35 day

government shutdown the longest in American history that saw 800,000

furloughed federal workers missed two paychecks Mulvaney said talks may be

different this time as Democrats agree with Trump's plan to better secure the

border

For more infomation >> White House Chief of Staff says Trump is prepared for another government shutdown - Duration: 0:41.

-------------------------------------------

SENADOR REVELA QUE TRUMP DISCUTIU ATAQUE MILITAR À VENEZUELA - Duration: 3:18.

For more infomation >> SENADOR REVELA QUE TRUMP DISCUTIU ATAQUE MILITAR À VENEZUELA - Duration: 3:18.

-------------------------------------------

Trump NY Golf Club Discovers Illegal Employees, Promptly Fires Them - Duration: 2:46.

For more infomation >> Trump NY Golf Club Discovers Illegal Employees, Promptly Fires Them - Duration: 2:46.

-------------------------------------------

Трамп против ФРС - Duration: 6:45.

Hello, dear friends! I am Professor Panarin Igor Nikolaevich, Doctor of

Political Sciences. Today we will look at the themes of the US federal

reserve. The theme of our video: Trump vs. the Fed.

I remind you that the US Federal Reserve was created

in 1913 by a group of private individuals from London and is still

owned by these London private individuals. Also, once again I will

say that there is a hypothesis that 88

percent of the shares of the US Federal

Reserve belonged to Nicholas II, the Russian emperor. Just the

deprivation of the right of the Russian

emperor to the Fed's management was one of the goals and goals of the

February 1917 Masonic coup d'etat.

But this is a hypothesis; There are facts for there are facts and not

confirming this hypothesis. What is happening today with the US Federal

Reserve System, I emphasize, a private structure? Well, I would like

to remind you that John F. Kennedy, the US president was killed in

Dallas in November 1963 just because of my point of view that he printed

red dollars. We all see green dollars. The green dollars are the US

Federal Reserve dollars, which the London-based bankers have imposed

on the US state. Kennedy wanted to liberate the United States, but was

shot dead, and the next day the red dollars were destroyed. And now Trump

has been fighting the US Federal Reserve since coming to power in the

USA and now this fight has entered the public sphere. He remembers

Kennedy's experience and tries to act more flexibly and yet in December

2018 the fight between them went into

the public sphere. What is the matter?

In that Trump, thanks to his

energetic line on fulfilling his election

commitments, achieved US economic

growth of 3 percent. But the US Federal

Reserve, despite repeated calls from Trump himself, from the end of

November to the end of December, raised the interest rate four, four,

think about it. This hinders economic growth, in principle, hinders the

implementation of those programs,

goals and objectives that are implemented

by US President Donald Trump. And after the second increase, Donald

Trump publicly declared the Fed the main enemy of America. Not LIH,

not Russia, not Kit, but namely the Fed. That's right: "The Federal

Reserve is the main enemy of the

United States"; and urged not to raise

further the interest rate, which was ignored. And on December 20, for

the fourth time, I emphasize, in a month that the kingdom was made

unprecedentedly anti-Tramp and

anti-economic decision against the rise

of US industrial production. After that, Trump told the press that he

was going to dismiss the director of the US Federal Reserve System, which,

at the beginning of January 2019, said that "I will not resign myself

and will continue the same line". The most curious thing is that

Jerome Powell is the head of the US Federal Reserve, who was recently

appointed by Trump more than a year ago, and seemed to be listening to

Trump's voice. But, nevertheless, this

did not happen. What does this mean? The fact that the clash of two

groups: the nationally oriented

industrial capital of the United States,

which is represented by Donald Trump, and the financial globalists, who

are controlled from London, the "third Carthage", approached such a

tough confrontation point, behind which

only two scenarios are possible: either Donald Trump will put Hillary

Clinton and all these liberal globalists, financial, first of all,

behind bars, and he has the basis for this, or they will organize the

impeachment of Donald Trump and, in fact, suppress the uprising of the

industrialists of the nationalist

flax-based capital. What are the chances

of winning Donald Trump? I would

rate them as 60 to 40. Why? We recently

had a video about Trump's alliance with the Bush clan. For a long

time, hesitation was 50 to 50, and here Trump's decisions related to the

victory of Cavanaugh, the Supreme Court claimant and Trump's clear

supporter, now have an advantage in the US Supreme Court on Trump's side

and an alliance with the Bush clan. conditions for Trump to win in this

fiercest bout of financial globalists.

The control center is located in London.

And London itself is in front of the abyss and on March 19 there

will be a separate point, and maybe already the final point, of

the London financial crisis. So my sympathy is definitely on the side

of Trump. I would like to wish him success, because this success will

create more positive conditions for

the economic prosperity of our country

- Russia. Thanks for attention!

For more infomation >> Трамп против ФРС - Duration: 6:45.

-------------------------------------------

Author Claims Trump Tried To Bribe Reporter To Reveal Leakers - Duration: 5:10.

So the new book team of Vipers by Cliff simms is supposed to be hitting bookstores this

coming Tuesday, January 29th, but as is often the case, as we've seen last two years, anytime

one of these new tell all books about the Trump administration comes out, a reporters

get their hands on the copies, they release excerpts, they talk about things that happened

in the book and we've got another one of those that I feel is worthy of sharing.

Again, if you're not familiar.

We had talked about this before.

Cliff sims worked on the Trump campaign and then he worked in the Trump white house until

this past May.

So he was a guy who was there during the campaign.

He was there during the administration.

He saw a lot of things, he remembered a lot of things and he wrote a lot of things.

But today one of the things we want to talk about is the fact that according to Sims,

one of the accounts, he talks about his books, is it Donald Trump was absolutely obsessed

with the media coverage of him.

And here's the thing though, that Sim says he didn't care if it was good or bad, he just

wanted there to be coverage.

He likes to talk a lot about fake news and how they're so mean to him.

But at the same time he thrives off of people just talking about him and saying his name.

But there is one paper, he did care what they wrote about him and that was the New York

Times.

Obviously Trump's in New Yorker, he wants to know what his hometown paper has to say

about him.

And that is why according to this account from Simms, Trump was on the phone with a

prominent White House reporter trying to get the reporter to give up their sources inside

the administration.

Because Trump was also obsessed with finding the leakers, wanted to know who the hell they

were.

And so when the reporter wouldn't give up the names of their sources inside the White

House, Trump said, well, here's the deal.

My offer you this.

I'm going to bribe you a bit here.

I'll give you better stories than any of those people could give you.

So you tell me who it is and then from now on I'll be the one feeding you stories and

you'll be getting it straight from me.

So you know you can believe it.

Luckily the reporter said, yeah, I don't believe that at all.

So I'm not going to tell you who the names of these people are.

Have a wonderful day.

Talk to you later.

So Trump tried to bribe this reporter by saying, how give you all the stories you.

I'll give you all the dirt and this White House.

Just tell me, tell me who my leakers are.

Tell me who the bad ones are.

Who can I trust?

Who can not trust?

I think that's hilarious and I think that is exactly how this conversation probably

went down, but if you think that's bad, it actually gets a lot worse because it turns

out that one of the people who is apparently been leaking some stories, at least according

to Cliff sims and according to a previous reporting, is Kellyanne Conway.

You see, according to Sims, most people in the White House did not like Kellyanne Conway.

They didn't know why she was what she did or why she even existed, but she did and they

had to deal with it, but even Donald Trump himself came to a point where he didn't exactly

trust Kellyanne Conway.

So according to one account by Sims a, he took her Mac book and was looking on it and

found messages were Kellyanne Conway was badmouthing the administration.

She was sending it to the New York Times, CNN and the Washington Post, you know, the

three top ones that Trump loves the call fake news, Kellyanne Conway.

Again, that is, if this account is accurate, and I hate having to say that because you

got to say that about everything nowadays, but according to Cliff Sims, that 100 percent

happened.

Trump took Kellyanne Conway's Mac book, saw these messages that she's sending out to these

other news outlets and probably wasn't too happy.

Uh, but you know, they say she was playing a double game, you know, trying to tell Trump

like, oh, I'm out here doing my best for you.

And also like, Hey, media outlets, look how stupid all these idiots are.

Wow.

And again, we have seen Kellyanne conway do things like that in the past where she has

attempted to say something bad about somebody and then tried to tell the reporter, like,

by the way, put that down as from an anonymous source, but the reporter said, you've already

been telling me things and you didn't tell me that beforehand.

So I'm not going to do it.

I don't have to.

So again, both of these stories from the book seem incredibly plausible, but you know, anything

coming from anyone who spent a couple years working for Donald Trump kind of have to take

it with a grain of salt because you don't survive that long working for a comprehensive,

you know, disgusting Liar, without picking up a few of their bad habits.

For more infomation >> Author Claims Trump Tried To Bribe Reporter To Reveal Leakers - Duration: 5:10.

-------------------------------------------

Why Trump Won - Duration: 5:23.

I was elected to the Parliament of Canada seven times—three times as Prime Minister.

I did not expect Donald Trump to be elected President of the United States.

But unlike most observers, I did think it was at least possible.

Why?

Because I sensed, as Mr. Trump surely did, that the political landscape had shifted.

The underlying issue is this: Over the last few decades, thanks to globalization, a billion

people—mostly in the emerging markets of Asia—have lifted themselves out of poverty.

This, of course, is a good thing.

Yet, in many Western countries, the incomes of working people have stagnated or even declined

over the same period.

In short, many Americans voted for Donald Trump because the global economy has not been

working for them.

We can pretend that this is a false perception.

We can keep trying to convince people that they misunderstand their own lives.

Or we can try to understand what they are saying and offer some solutions.

I prefer the latter approach.

Let me begin with this:

In our contemporary world, there are, as British journalist David Goodhart describes it, those

who can live "Anywhere," and those who live "Somewhere."

Imagine you work for an international bank, computer company, or consulting firm.

You can wake up in New York, London, or Singapore and feel at home.

Your work is not threatened by import competition or technological dislocation.

You vocally support all international trade agreements and high levels of immigration.

You are one of those who can live Anywhere.

There are a lot of those people.

But there are a lot more completely unlike them.

Let's say you're a factory worker, a small-businessperson, or in retail sales.

Your work has been disrupted by outsourcing, cheap imports and technological change.

Your children attend the local schools and your aging parents live nearby.

Your social life is connected to a local church, sports team, or community group.

If things go badly at your company, or if policy choices by politicians turn out to

be wrong, you can't just shift your life to somewhere else.

Like it or not, you depend on the economic policies of your national or state government.

When it doesn't come through for you, you're not happy.

And when it ignores you entirely, you get angry.

It's easy for Anywheres to dismiss these concerns.

But the Anywheres' faith in global solutions and multi-national political bodies is founded

more on fantasy than fact.

The fact is, the critical functions of laws and regulations and monetary and fiscal stability,

among other things, are provided by nations, not global institutions.

The nation, with all its flaws, is a concrete reality.

The "global community" is little more than a concept.

Yet it is the Anywheres, with their faith in globalization—not the Somewheres—who

have dominated the politics of almost every advanced country.

That is, until now.

This sea-change is not limited to the United States.

The same dynamics—"Anywhere" elites versus "Somewhere" populists—is playing

out all across the Western world.

These populists, as I've tried to show, are not the ignorant and misguided "deplorables"

depicted in mainstream media.

They are our family, friends, and neighbors.

The populists represent, by definition, the interests of ordinary people.

And, in a democratic system, the people are supposed to be our customers.

So, how then can we best serve them?

I propose an approach I call "populist conservatism."

Grounding ourselves in tried and true conservative values, we must speak to the issues that concern

the Somewheres and their families—those of ordinary people, not elites.

Those issues include market economics, trade, globalization, and immigration.

In addressing these issues, conservatives should remain pro-free market, pro-trade,

pro-globalization and pro-immigration.

Going in a completely opposite direction in any of these areas is a mistake.

But being pro-market does not mean that all regulations should be dismantled or that governments

should never intervene to protect workers.

Being pro-trade does not imply that every trade agreement is a good one.

Being pro-globalization should not entail abdicating loyalty or responsibility

to our country and our local communities.

And being pro-immigration should never mean sanctioning illegal immigration, erasing our

borders, or ignoring the interests of our citizens.

I call this "populist conservatism," but it's really just conservatism.

Conservatism is about seeing the world as it is.

It's also inherently populist because it is about serving real people rather than theories.

I'm Stephen Harper, author of Right Here, Right Now: Politics and Leadership in the

Age of Disruption, for Prager University.

For more infomation >> Why Trump Won - Duration: 5:23.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's DOJ Narrows Definitions Of "Sexual Assault" And "Domestic Violence" - Duration: 4:02.

Recently, the Justice Department's Office on violence against women did something that

is incredibly bizarre and incredibly damaging for women here in the United States, and what

they did was they rewrote and narrowed the definitions of domestic violence and sexual

assault.

It's not really clear at the moment why they decided to do this, but we do know that during

the Obama administration, the definitions of these two things, sexual assault, domestic

violence were broadened a little bit.

They included more things including for domestic violence, psychological abuse and manipulation,

things that experts in domestic violence counselors, therapists, law enforcement people say are

absolutely part of domestic violence.

In fact, those are usually the beginnings of worst domestic violence to come.

If somebody engages, a spouse, engages in psychological abuse or manipulation, they

do eventually most of them escalate into physical violence, and if that is not stopped, that

could eventually and frequently does escalate into homicide.

The Obama administration heard from these experts, they talk to these experts and that's

why they broadened that definition because they recognize that as a threat to women here

in this country, the trump administration has decided to do away with that from now

on, coordinator the Justice Department's own definitions.

Domestic violence is just hitting or kicking or, you know, doing something physical to

them to cause them physical harm, psychological abuse.

Now, okay, they don't care about that.

You do that?

Sure.

Whatever manipulation go forward.

We don't care.

Just don't hit her sexual assaults even worse.

Uh, they have narrowed the definition of sexual assault to only include here we find it, uh,

any nonconsensual sexual act, the Obama administration, their definition was sexual assault is any

type of sexual contact or behavior that occurs without the explicit consent of the recipient

falling out of the definition of sexual assault or sexual activities as for sexual intercourse,

forceable, sodomy, child molestation, incest, fondling and attempted rape.

There's just any nonconsensual sexual act.

It's not going to include groping, fondling, you know, verbal threats or humiliation.

None of that things that women experience all the time.

In this country and that experts have told us half to be included in these definitions,

but the trump administration for some reason to just do away with this and that to me is

the.

The weirdest part of this is why this doesn't seem like something that they needed to do,

and yet they did it and it shows one of two things to me.

Either they're trying to cover their own asses to make sure nothing bad happens to them in

the future or their buddies in the future seems plausible, unlikely, or the other, which

is also plausible and incredibly likely is that they just hate women so much that they

are willing to let them go through a little bit more hell in their lives just because

they have the authority to do so.

Whichever one of those two reasons are correct, it's an absolute disaster and a threat to

every woman in the United States.

For more infomation >> Trump's DOJ Narrows Definitions Of "Sexual Assault" And "Domestic Violence" - Duration: 4:02.

-------------------------------------------

Joe: Donald Trump's Phony Crisis Created A Real National Security Risk | Morning Joe | MSNBC - Duration: 11:30.

For more infomation >> Joe: Donald Trump's Phony Crisis Created A Real National Security Risk | Morning Joe | MSNBC - Duration: 11:30.

-------------------------------------------

GAME OVER! Some House Dems BETRAYS Pelosi & SUPPORT Trump's Wall! President Trump WINS HUGE(VIDEO)!! - Duration: 11:48.

GAME OVER! Some House Dems BETRAYS Pelosi & SUPPORT Trump's Wall! President Trump WINS HUGE

welcome back president Trump doubles down on his demands for a border wall as

he calls on Democrats to restart negotiations on funding the government

past February 15th a new number of House Democrats appear to be supporting the

idea of at least a vote on wall funding one of them joins me right now Utah

Democratic congressman ben mcadams he's a member of the House Financial Services

Committee and the Blue Dog Coalition congressman it's nice to have you on the

program this morning thanks so much for being here Thank You Maria good to be

with you you were among 30 House Democrats who sent Nancy Pelosi a letter

urging her to give Trump a vote on the wall funding tell me what you think

would come out of that vote you know first and foremost what the the purpose

of that letter was to say that the shutdown is doing no good for anybody

we're harming the US economy we're risking a recession we're harming the

federal employees who are just working to put food on the table and let's open

the government there are processes in the in the Congress in our government

laid out by the founders to have debates like this that's what Congress has

intended to do so let's open the government and then let's have this

negotiation the president has a proposal that should be heard in the Congress we

should debate it and we should work to build common ground and try and move

forward a solution on border security on immigration reform and let's go through

the proper channels of the Congress that that are built and intended to have this

exact conversation but let's not do it in the context of a shutdown that harms

the American people that harms our economy and risks the pocketbooks of

every American what I'm trying to better understand is really the makeup of the

new Congress because of course we know that there's a pocket of Democrats who

just want the president out and much of it is politics and they are resisting

anything that he would like we know that Nancy Pelosi and many of her colleagues

voted for a wall and voted for wall fencing years ago many times we know

that there's a wall right now a border wall in Nancy Pelosi zone state of

California separating Tijuana and San Diego but because President Trump has

the idea it's resist resist resist so you come from a red state you beat out

your your opponent on the Republican side do you think

a movement within your new Congress to actually get things done putting

politics aside and not necessarily resisting everything the president says

because you don't like his personality absolutely you know there are a lot of

me and my colleagues who were elected this last year a lot of us are just

pragmatist who just want to get something done before I was elected to

Congress I was a mayor and mayor's just have this attitude of okay what can we

do to move forward to solve the problem as a Democrat in a very red state I

never got anything done unless I could reach out and build bridges across the

aisle so as long as the debate is focused on you know as long as we're

defining a win is meaning somebody else loses we're never gonna have consensus

so we've got to find that win win and I don't know at this time what the win

looks that win win looks like but we have to find it and I know that a lot of

my freshman colleagues are moderates who want to find that win win that probably

we should look at some things to address immigration reform and dreamers I think

is something important permanent protections for dreamers but also border

security as a mayor I saw illegal drugs and and the impacts of that in my in my

city and I want to do more to stop the flow of illegal drugs into the end of

the country so I think there's a lot of common ground and I think the way to

approach this and the way that I would approach it if I was mayor is to say you

know there's a conversation a debate about wall or no wall let's step back

from that conversation where there's it's divided divisive and let's talk

about what we have in common let's find that thread of commonality amongst

Republicans and Democrats I think the threat of commonality is we all want to

protect the border we can find common ground on that so in some places that's

going to mean technology other places in other ways immigration reform and in

some places it may mean a barrier and I think if we step back and reframe the

conversation about protecting the border and what can we do and what's the most

effective way to do that instead of debating a wall or no wall let's debate

border security and I think there's a lot of common ground yeah I think you

make a lot of good points because there are areas of the country where they're

wide open and perhaps maybe you don't need an actual fence or wall there

because you can use technology and drones they're wide open areas that if

illegals come in you can actually apprehend them easily because it's so

wide open but then there are areas like the wall we've been looking

at in Nancy Pelosi state separating Tijuana from San Diego where you have a

very dense population three million people on one side of the wall through a

Tijuana another three million people on the other side of the wall in San Diego

so what is your thoughts in terms of how much is needed for actual barrier on the

southern border and will you vote YES for wall creation and more wall

extension of what we're seeing in this picture so what I've tried to do is not

draw any lines in the sand I want to vote to say have border protection to

have border security to reduce the flow of drugs and evil even illegal

immigration that may include a barrier sure I wouldn't rule out

barriers and places where it's appropriate I think that's I think

that's acceptable but let's have this conversation in the context of committee

hearings at the Congress with a goal of finding common ground I also think one

of the things we can do to protect the border is to reduce illegal immigration

by fixing a broken immigration system if we can make sure that those good people

who are who are just looking for a job our economy is asking to brainian

workers let's find it let's make it easier for them to immigrate legally so

they're not tempted to cross the border illegally so I think part of it part of

the border part of the border protection strategy has to be fixing a broken

immigration system our laws do you feel that you have a voice I mean I know that

you did not support Nancy Pelosi's bid to become the speaker for a second time

do you feel like you're being listened to you will you have the influence with

these practical ideas that you're putting forth I think so I mean we're

just up getting up and going as a congress right now I've been pleasantly

surprised at people both on the Republican side and even more

progressive on the Democratic side who who I felt that my voice is welcome

let's let's hope that as we go into this negotiation people can allow all voices

to be at the table some of the pragmatists can on both

sides of the aisle again can really push for common ground and trying to find

that you know that solution that will really garner a majority of support in

Congress and help us to to reopen the border I'm somebody who you know we're

gonna have disagreements from time to time but once one disagreements behind

us we move to the next issue we try and find common ground we

don't carry baggage forward for debate to debate and that's how I'd go into

this the same way we've got that behind us let's go further disagreements that

are also radical on the economic side of things you're on the Financial Services

Committee what are your thoughts on Elizabeth Warren's idea to confiscate

income to put attacks on overall assets and wealth or Alexandrian costea's idea

of having a seventy percent tax rate for the top earners well I think I've

jokingly said before if you if people think that there are only two political

parties in this country watch the Financial Services Committee over the

next several years you're gonna see a broad array of people across the

political spectrum you're gonna see someone on the more progressive side

like representative Ocasio Cortez myself who's you know a moderate a centrist

that believes in in the power of business and markets properly regulated

of course to make sure their protections for for consumers and individuals that

the power of markets can really do a lot of good and has done all that force high

earners to hide income where you won't get the revenue anyway will it change

behavior in terms of philanthropy will it what do you think that does to an

economy if you see those kinds of tax rates seventy percent tax on on assets

and wealth I'm not kidding you know I'm not convinced that a seventy percent tax

rate is the way to go any time you have you know tax policy drives behavior and

so we you know that's not a direction I think we should go in as a country I

we should look you know what's what behavior are we in trying to drive and

what is good for the American economy and good for the American people I'm

sure when you make a lot of good points we so appreciate your time this morning

thank you sir Thank You Maria congressman ben mcadams there president

Trump and Democrats reaching a three-week deal to end the longest

government shutdown in history it does not include funding for a border wall as

the president had demanded House Minority Whip Louisiana Republican

Congressman Steve Scalise joins me right now and Congressman it is a pleasure to

see you thanks so much for joining us good morning Maria always great to be

back with you do you expect to have border wall funding in the next three

weeks before the next deadline I sure hope it's gonna be part of a final

agreement and you know while President Trump said we're going to give you

another three weeks kind of call in the Democrats Bluff who were saying we won't

negotiate on while while the while the government's closed

okay now the government's reopened we have to have a real specific

conversation about how much money they will support president said and it's not

the president it's our experts who protect the border

who say it's gonna cost 5.7 billion for all the technology including wall what

are the Democrats willing to support they're gonna have to put a real number

to paper now in these next three weeks Maria so what do you think they will

support I know that you've actually had support from your colleagues on the

other side some college on the other side but is the Democratic Party facing

its own division where part of it is to part of the party is just resist resist

resist whatever the president comes up with yeah I think we were starting to

see fissures and in fact you saw even the House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer

saying physical barriers should be part of the solution you had committee

chairmen on the Democrat side saying give the president the money for the

wall and so I think this growing drumbeat got Pelosi nervous but at the

same time she's gonna now have to confront it because in every negotiation

I've been in when we've had meetings in the White House with the president when

pressed on what what about a money will she support she always said I won't talk

about numbers while the government's shut down okay now the government's back

open it's time to get serious about these negotiations hopefully there is a

State of the Union that happens in the next two weeks which I think there will

be and the president can make even a stronger case to the rest of the country

because it's that growing support across the country that ultimately will push

more Democrats to our side no wait a minute what do you mean that you think

there will be a State of the Union the American people want a State of the

Union the State of the Union was supposed to be this Tuesday it feels

like Nancy Pelosi has bested the president obviously she now forced him

to not have the State of the Union this week I'm being told it's going to be

February 5th is the State of the Union happening on February 5 well the the

Nancy Pelosi was holding the state in the Union hostage and ultimately the

speaker has to invite the president the Constitution requires the president to

give a State of the Union doesn't mean it has to be in Congress but it ought to

be in Congress and in Moorea I'm hearing similar things that February 5th is

likely the date but all that's something that's up to the

speaker the house if it's going to be in the House chamber which it should be I

thought it was disgraceful that she removed the State of the Union from the

invitation that she had already issued to the president to say that she was

going to uninvite him it had never happened before in the history of our

country I think Nancy Pelosi is afraid of the country hearing this message that

the president has about why we need to secure the border

Kandra stay with us we're gonna slip in a short break I've got more to talk with

you about this situation it certainly feels like politics House Minority Whip

Steve Scalise thank you god bless you and God bless america

For more infomation >> GAME OVER! Some House Dems BETRAYS Pelosi & SUPPORT Trump's Wall! President Trump WINS HUGE(VIDEO)!! - Duration: 11:48.

-------------------------------------------

President Donald Trump Poll Numbers Slip As He Ups Pressure For A Deal | Morning Joe | MSNBC - Duration: 9:23.

For more infomation >> President Donald Trump Poll Numbers Slip As He Ups Pressure For A Deal | Morning Joe | MSNBC - Duration: 9:23.

-------------------------------------------

Some House Dems call on Pelosi to give Trump a vote on wall funding if he reopens the government - Duration: 8:09.

For more infomation >> Some House Dems call on Pelosi to give Trump a vote on wall funding if he reopens the government - Duration: 8:09.

-------------------------------------------

IT'S HAPPENING!! DID YOU SEE! TRUMP JUST STUNS WASHINGTON DC WITH THE UNTHINKABLE ACT! - Duration: 14:24.

IT'S HAPPENING!!

DID YOU SEE!

TRUMP JUST STUNS WASHINGTON DC WITH THE UNTHINKABLE ACT!

breaking news night we start this morning before sunrise heavily armed FBI agents dressed

in full tactical gear surrounding the home of a 66

year old man drawing their weapons pounding on the door and they took him into

custody now this was not a

suspected murderer drug kingpin not a part of the mob no this was Roger stone accused

of making a false statement to Congress stone is just the latest

American to be persecuted by Robert Miller's witch-hunt because of his connection

to President Trump now coming up tonight longtime Roger stone

confidant and fellow mulher target he's identified as person number one in this indictment jerome

corsi he will join us for an exclusive interview but first big news

we start with the partial government shutdown President Trump

announced today that after 35 days a deal has been reached to reopen the government

temporarily until February

the 15th he's given Congress now three weeks to agree on legislation to build

the wall secure our borders and he was speaking earlier today from the Rose

Garden and here's what the president had to say it's just common sense walls work that's

why most of the Democrats in Congress have voted in the past four bills that include

walls and physical barriers and very powerful fences these barriers are made

of Steel have seeped through visibility which is very important and

are equipped with sensors monitors and cutting-edge technology right in our Hannity watch segment

we have the real behind-the-scenes story nobody else in the

media will tell you numerous Democrats both in the House and

the Senate for the last two weeks they have been speaking to their Republican colleagues

they have been asking them to

broker this three-week opportunity to support the wall and negotiate other parties like

another issues like daca and dreamers they've been begging their Republican

colleagues to make that deal with the president so the president well

he showed leadership rose above the partisan bickering in the swamp or bring relief to

federal workers all

while sticking to his commitment to secure our border now the president was very clear

no ambiguity in three weeks if Congress cannot do their job secure a deal

to protect our borders then the president will do what he lawfully has

the right to do and that's declare a national emergency and he will be

building the wall with funds that he allocates most likely from the Defense Department this

is indeed a real crisis in three weeks he will declare a national

emergency and look at what the president's done up till now he's

offered concessions things the Democrats say they wanted daca dreamers TPA he's standing

up for life versus death to him

he's been arguing safety and security for the people of this country but tonight we

have to ask ourselves this question what are the Democrats what are the

Nancy and Chuck been standing up for actually nothing

there's no position here they have only been placating what is now the radical extreme

base of the socialist Democratic

Party of today and all they do is fuel their daily anti Trump rage and hate ask that question

of tonight Democrats what did they do they went on vacation the president

stayed at the White House luxurious junkets really paid for by

lobbyists while the president stays at the White House refusing invitation after invitation

to sit down with the president who's saying I'm willing to work

with you I'll work on Doc I'll work on dreamers but we've got to secure the

border to save the lives of our fellow countrymen because of the problem with open borders now

these other Democrats privately they have been going behind the

leadership in their own party asking leaders like Lindsey Graham and others

hey help us get this period where we can try to get this job done they want the wall as

well but they're just not

telling Schumer and Pelosi if not they know the president will declare that national emergency

now the president to his credit he has tried every single thing

he could possibly do he has been reasonable he has been fair

he's offered concessions but in the end it's his job as commander-in-chief to keep us safe

he'll do his job

so now Congress they have their three weeks to do their job and secure our border Democrats

we need Republicans they to remember the facts now we have built

so far 654 miles of border wall over the

last 15 years with notable results for example the wall in Yuma Arizona after it went from

5 miles to 60 Plus miles well that led to a 91% drop in crime remember

Democrats they actually used to be for strong borders just a few years

ago that's when Obama was president actually if they sounded more like Trump

than Trump before they were consumed with all this anti Trump hate and rage every day

take a look people who enter the United States without our permission are

illegal aliens and illegal aliens should not be treated the same as people who entered

the US legally to so many

Americans we do not want the wall to be a symbol of America much preferring the Statue

of Liberty be that simple all of us agree that we need to have comprehensive

bipartisan immigration reform that can only begin strong border

control we must have that we must control our borders is an immorality it's not who

we are as a nation walls work but we've got to finish the job I've

said so many times on this program the cost of a porous border they're

enormous and it's growing more serious every single day human trafficking drug trafficking

gangs cartels it is a life-and-death situation talk to angel moms

and Angel dads talk to the parents that have lost their kids

because of the opioid crisis and then to make matters worse another ten thousand person

migrant Caravan right now as we speak is headed our way so you say tonight

to Chuck and Nancy all right behind your back your fellow Democrats

they want that wall they also want to deal with daca they want to solve problems they

want solutions will you work for it now you can either work with this

president do what's right for the country or the American people will see

you for who you are just obstructionist hating a president and anyone out there by the way

thinking president Trump cave today you don't really

know that Donald Trump I know he right now holds all the cards he will

secure the border one way or another and what President Trump works hard to solve

serious issues of life death facing the country well we do have another issue tonight Hannity

watch on

the deep state robert muller and his merry band of democratic donors they continue their

quest literally to destroy the lives of everyone and anyone that's

associated with Donald Trump today Roger stone was their latest

target our own trace Gallagher has the very latest pre-dawn raid on the Fort Lauderdale

home of longtime president Trump confidant Roger stone began with the

FBI shouting opened the door it ended with stone being led away in handcuffs the seven

count indictment is

the first criminal case in months from special counsel robert muller and alleges that senior

members of the trump campaign tried to benefit from the release

by wikileaks of hacked democratic emails damaging to the

Clinton campaign Stone called the special counsel politically motivated and vowed to

fight the charges

saying

he

For more infomation >> IT'S HAPPENING!! DID YOU SEE! TRUMP JUST STUNS WASHINGTON DC WITH THE UNTHINKABLE ACT! - Duration: 14:24.

-------------------------------------------

Steve Says: Advice to President Trump - Duration: 3:58.

For more infomation >> Steve Says: Advice to President Trump - Duration: 3:58.

-------------------------------------------

CEOs Panic As Trump Cuts Off Supply Of Cheap Immigrant Labor - Duration: 6:25.

Earlier this week, some of the top ceos in the United States met for their little business

round table group discussion, and as part of this business round table organization,

they issued a report talking about how much this current Trump administration sucks.

Now, it didn't say Trump administration sucks, but they did say that all of his policies

are hurting everything they hold dear and buy everything they hold dear.

I'm talking about money specifically.

They did call out government shutdowns and the fact that the, uh, you know, national

science foundation hasn't been able to grant any grants for over a month now.

And that hurts innovation here in the United States.

You know, schools are star for funding so people can't get proper educations and that

also hurts what the business round table wants to do.

They talked about that in the report as well.

They also talked about the fact that without immigrants, how the hell are we going to stay

in business?

See, that was a part of the report that was actually kind of buried in it.

But to me it's the most important part.

Yes, this administration is hurting innovation.

They are hurting science, they are hurting the future generation of American leaders.

Those are very important and those need to be addressed.

And the business round table is 100 percent correct about those.

They're wrong about immigration.

No.

Well, here's the weird thing, their rights about immigration, but the write about it

for the wrong reason because here's the thing, they're talking about the fact that all immigrants

come over, we, we depend on them.

We need them.

We need their support, we need their dollars, but more importantly we need their bodies.

We need the cheap labor.

We need these people coming over the border and we need them to work for $5 an hour, $3

an hour out there in the fields, picking crops, you know, cleaning up our offices, whatever

it is, making our textiles.

We need that cheap later labor building, our roads, our bridges, our schools, our infrastructure.

We need that cheap labor and Trump's cutting off the spigot.

We can't get as many immigrants over here to work for.

Nothing as we used to be able to do.

He's cut back on visa programs, although he's getting a more than 100 a year.

Uh, but yeah, he's hurting it for the rest of them.

And listen, I fully understand the need to have migrant workers come into the United

States.

We have plenty of industries and businesses that are 100 percent dependent upon those

migrant workers.

The sad reality though, is that most of those businesses take advantage of these people.

They pay them less money than they're allowed to, but they don't necessarily always report

that they take advantage of them.

They screw them over, but these people need work.

They need the job.

So they do it anyway, but the business roundtables pissed off because they're not able to get

that cheap supply of labor anymore.

And Oh my God, what happens then?

Do either fold up shop or do we have to hire an American citizen to do it for $15 an hour?

We don't want to pay people more money.

We don't want to help the economy.

We want to help our bottom line.

I want to help my bank account have more Zeros at the end of it.

That's what the business round table is whining about and what's interesting about this, several

things actually is one, the US Chamber of Commerce has basically been on that same side

of immigration for decades.

The US Chamber of Commerce and the most powerful businesses here in the United States love

immigrants.

They are the only ones who have ever said, yeah, let them all in.

Let's open up the boarders.

Come on guys, because they want cheap labor.

They want people to take advantage of us.

Chamber comment was commerce was very vocal during the Bush administration when they thought

just thought about clamping down on immigration.

Trump understands this too.

I mean how his business is his own personal businesses are dependent upon cheap immigrant

labor.

People he can take advantage of and he had no intention ever of building the wall.

It was a campaign ploy and then it was an administration ploy because if he was serious

about it, he had done it in the first two years when the Republicans controlled everything

in this damn country.

It wasn't until Democrats took over that.

He was like, Oh crap, I gotta do something here.

Oh, I'll just say that the Democrats aren't playing nice and then I don't have to build

the wall and I can keep the cheap labor.

Business Roundtable can keep their cheap labor.

Chamber of Commerce can keep their cheap labor and then incomes.

Ann Coulter Saying, Oh, hell no.

You're building that wall.

We're getting that wall.

You're giving us that wall to which Trump says yes, yes ma'am.

Ms Ann Colter.

I will get that done.

Don't you worry about it.

It's, it's happening.

I'll shut down.

The government all declare a national emergency.

All create a constitutional crisis to give you your wall, and now the businesses are

freaking out because they like Trump himself, believed the wall was just a talking point

to drum up the Republican base and it was until Ann Coulter, so now they're panicked.

Now they're freaking out because if that wall goes up, if they are cheap labor dries up,

then so too with their profits, and that is something that corporations are never happy

to have happen.

But here's the thing, you want immigrants to come in, you want them to be your labor

supply.

Fantastic, but we need somebody looking over their shoulders, making sure they're not getting

taken advantage of, making sure that they are being paid comparable wages to the area

in which they live, making sure they are at least making minimum wage because without

those immigrants, according to the businesses themselves, these businesses won't survive.

No comments:

Post a Comment