Thursday, January 31, 2019

Trump news on Youtube Feb 1 2019

A ver si luego no quiere también intervenir, digo, exigir el respeto a los derechos humanos en México… mientras tanto, el presidente Donald Trump se conforma con que, debido al alza de homicidios reportados en nuestro país (según sus cuentas, estamos per que Afganistán),  se construya el muro fronterizo

Como ya es una tradición (pero de las más gachas), Trump se aventó sus tuits mañaneros y en esta ocasión (otra vez), fueron para señalar por qué es urgente –según él– que se construya el muro fronterizo México-Estados Unidos

Entre muchas razones para que se otorgue financiamiento para concretar su promesa de campaña, el republicano refirió estadísticas que indican que, en 2018, los asesinatos en nuestro país tuvieron un incremento del 33% con relación al año anterior

Tanta muerte violenta (33 mil 341 casos registrados), "es una gran contribución a la crisis humanitaria que tiene lugar en nuestra frontera sur y luego se extiende por todo nuestro país

Peor que en Afganistán. Muchas causadas por drogas, ¡el muro está construyéndose"", escribió Trump en su cuenta Twitter

De acuerdo con Trump, con el incremento de 33% en asesinatos en México, ninguna persona "en su sano juicio" tendría alguna razón para oponerse a la construcción del muro fronterizo… así que "la construcción ha comenzado y no se detendrá hasta que esté terminada", remató en otro tuitazo

Pero bien, será muy manchado y todo el presidente de Estados Unidos… pero, lamentablemente tiene razón

No en que sea urgente el muro fronterizo, sino en lo relacionado con el número de muertes en nuestro país, en comparación con Afganistán… al menos si tomamos en cuenta los datos que ofrece Semáforo Delictivo y los pronósticos que por ahí de junio lanzaba Uppsala Conflict Data Program

El dato al que hizo referencia Trump fue el que hace unos días dio a conocer Semáforo Delictivo: 2018 fue el peor de los últimos 20 años para México, en cuestión de violencia: se rompió récord, con 28 mil 816 carpetas por homicidios, y con más de 33 mil víctimas por hechos violentos… lo que equivale a 90 muertes por día

Por otra parte, según Business Insider (con datos de Uppsala Conflict Data Program), en agosto del año pasado se preveía que la cifra de asesinatos en Afganistán "apenas" rebasara 20 mil, esto incluyendo civiles y combatientes, de ambos lados

Recordemos que este país lleva varios años en guerra  y que 2017 lo cerró con cerca de 19 mil decesos

Y nosotros si guerra (en teoría), pero alcanzando esas cifras criminales… algo, definitivamente, no está bien

For more infomation >> En asesinatos México está "peor que Afganistán", asegura Trump - Duration: 3:10.

-------------------------------------------

One Of Trump's Biggest Job Creating Promises Just Combusted Before His Eyes - Duration: 4:05.

For more infomation >> One Of Trump's Biggest Job Creating Promises Just Combusted Before His Eyes - Duration: 4:05.

-------------------------------------------

Democrat Gov. Sanctions Killing Babies After Delivery, Trump Jr. Destroys Him - Duration: 7:00.

For more infomation >> Democrat Gov. Sanctions Killing Babies After Delivery, Trump Jr. Destroys Him - Duration: 7:00.

-------------------------------------------

Pelosi 'Slurs' Bible Quote To Prove Trump's Wrong On Illegals & Wall, Gets Destroyed - Duration: 5:15.

For more infomation >> Pelosi 'Slurs' Bible Quote To Prove Trump's Wrong On Illegals & Wall, Gets Destroyed - Duration: 5:15.

-------------------------------------------

CHUCK SCHUMER SUFFERS ANOTHER BETRAYAL IN HIS FIGHT AGAINST TRUMP'S WALL - Duration: 10:21.

CHUCK SCHUMER SUFFERS ANOTHER BETRAYAL IN HIS FIGHT AGAINST TRUMP'S WALL

Chuck Schumer thought he had President Trump on the ropes.

The Democratic Senator believed he had won in the battle over the President's proposed

border wall with Mexico.

But Schumer is now reeling from another shocking betrayal in his fight against Trump's wall.

Chuck Schumer has a major problem.

Democratic Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer thought he had the votes to forever stonewall,

obstruct, and block a vote on any aspect of President Trump's proposed border wall with

Mexico.

With an agreement to end the shutdown now taking effect, Schumer had every reason to

gloat.

He thought his stranglehold over the Senate was unbreakable.

But he was wrong.

Schumer never thought Senators in his own party would betray him.

But that's no longer the case.

The Daily Caller reports, "Democratic New Hampshire Sen. Maggie Hassan said on Monday

that she supports "strategic fencing" on the southern border based on the opinions

of experts on the ground."

"Last Thursday we had a bipartisan discussion on the Senate floor about the importance of

ending the shutdown, which, there was bipartisan agreement, was needless and harmful to the

American people and our economy," the New Hampshire Democrat said to CNN.

"We all pledged to work in good faith to find common ground on border security.

That's what I'm committed to doing, and I think that really starts with making sure

we're listening to the experts on the front lines on this, and that may include strategic

fencing in certain places," Senator Hassan added.

It's now clear Schumer is losing support in the Senate in his bid to block any advancement

of President Trump's proposed border security measures.

With Senator Hassan signaling that she is open to backing the wall, or at least portions

of the wall, based on the input of experts and as part of a bipartisan compromise, Schumer

is now in a tough spot.

He either needs to quell dissent immediately, or begin working with President Trump to strike

a compromise.

And it may be too late to quell dissent.

Hardline opposition to President Trump is beginning to crumble among Congressional Democrats,

many of whom represent states or districts that Trump won or came close to winning in

2016.

With the 2020 elections just around the corner, many Congressional Democrats are going to

be casting votes with an eye on swing voters which will be crucial for their re-election.

And Hassan barely won election to the Senate in the first place.

Schumer can't keep his caucus in line behind the "no deals" pledge he effectively made

earlier in the shutdown.

And if the Senate passes a bipartisan bill to construct even parts of Trump's wall,

the House will be under even more pressure to do the same.

It's unclear what the final details of such a compromise bill will look like, and whether

it can pass the GOP-held Senate and the Democratic House.

But it's obvious that many Democrats are beginning to break ranks with Chuck Schumer

and Nancy Pelosi.

We will keep you up to date with any new developments in this ongoing story.

For more infomation >> CHUCK SCHUMER SUFFERS ANOTHER BETRAYAL IN HIS FIGHT AGAINST TRUMP'S WALL - Duration: 10:21.

-------------------------------------------

Trump sees 'decent chance' of N. Korea's denuclearization - Duration: 1:58.

president Trump apparently disagrees with his top intelligence chiefs who say

North Korea probably won't give up its nuclear weapons he tweeted Wednesday

that there's a decent chance that it will and he said he looks forward to

seeing Kim jong-un again emj reports

president Trump is projecting optimism about his ability to get North Korea to

denuclearize despite recent remarks by one of his top Intel chiefs Dan Coates

who told senators this week that Pyongyang is unlikely to fully give up

its nuclear weapons program in a flurry of tweets on Wednesday Trump said

Washington's relationship with North Korea is the best it has ever been and

there is quote a decent chance the north will Bandhan its nuclear weapons however

this week's comments by the Director of National Intelligence aren't the first

from a senior Trump administration official to suggest a North isn't

serious about denuclearization in a report released Wednesday the Center for

Strategic and International Studies citing commercial satellite imagery from

January 20th also said there has been no new dismantling activity at the missile

facility in North Korea's Tonkinese since August after their summit in

Singapore last June Kim jong-un committed to permanently shut down the

missile engine test site and launch pad under the observation of international

experts along with his optimism over North Korea's eventual demolition

president Trump also patting himself on the back for his other successes with

North Korea he held the North's lack of nuclear and missile tests the return of

remains of some American troops killed during the Korean War and the safe

release of American hostages calling it a whole different story

compared to the previous Obama administration President Trump said he

looks for to see the North Korean leader at their next summit easing Jay Arirang

news

For more infomation >> Trump sees 'decent chance' of N. Korea's denuclearization - Duration: 1:58.

-------------------------------------------

After Trump Fan Wears MAGA Hat On Plane – Airline Takes Troubling Action - Duration: 1:57.

For more infomation >> After Trump Fan Wears MAGA Hat On Plane – Airline Takes Troubling Action - Duration: 1:57.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Just Publicly Insulted His "Intelligence People" In A Disgraceful Twitter Rant - Duration: 2:07.

For more infomation >> Trump Just Publicly Insulted His "Intelligence People" In A Disgraceful Twitter Rant - Duration: 2:07.

-------------------------------------------

After Caravan Rushes Border, Trump Delivers New Order To Military - Duration: 1:52.

For more infomation >> After Caravan Rushes Border, Trump Delivers New Order To Military - Duration: 1:52.

-------------------------------------------

Trump-Daughter Relationship (Disturbing) - Duration: 2:32.

For more infomation >> Trump-Daughter Relationship (Disturbing) - Duration: 2:32.

-------------------------------------------

LIBERALS Hoảng Loạn Khi Nghe Tin TRUMP THẮNG cử Phần 1 - Duration: 7:00.

For more infomation >> LIBERALS Hoảng Loạn Khi Nghe Tin TRUMP THẮNG cử Phần 1 - Duration: 7:00.

-------------------------------------------

After Caravan Rushes Border, Trump Delivers New Order To Military - Duration: 1:48.

For more infomation >> After Caravan Rushes Border, Trump Delivers New Order To Military - Duration: 1:48.

-------------------------------------------

Obama's CIA Chief Just Shredded Trump For Claiming He's Smarter Than U.S. Intel Leaders - Duration: 2:29.

For more infomation >> Obama's CIA Chief Just Shredded Trump For Claiming He's Smarter Than U.S. Intel Leaders - Duration: 2:29.

-------------------------------------------

En asesinatos México está "peor que Afganistán", asegura Trump - Duration: 5:32.

A ver si luego no quiere también intervenir, digo, exigir el respeto a los derechos humanos en México… mientras tanto, el presidente Donald Trump se conforma con que, debido al alza de homicidios reportados en nuestro país (según sus cuentas, estamos per que Afganistán),  se construya el muro fronterizo

Como ya es una tradición (pero de las más gachas), Trump se aventó sus tuits mañaneros y en esta ocasión (otra vez), fueron para señalar por qué es urgente –según él– que se construya el muro fronterizo México-Estados Unidos

Entre muchas razones para que se otorgue financiamiento para concretar su promesa de campaña, el republicano refirió estadísticas que indican que, en 2018, los asesinatos en nuestro país tuvieron un incremento del 33% con relación al año anterior

Tanta muerte violenta (33 mil 341 casos registrados), "es una gran contribución a la crisis humanitaria que tiene lugar en nuestra frontera sur y luego se extiende por todo nuestro país

Peor que en Afganistán. Muchas causadas por drogas, ¡el muro está construyéndose"", escribió Trump en su cuenta Twitter

De acuerdo con Trump, con el incremento de 33% en asesinatos en México, ninguna persona "en su sano juicio" tendría alguna razón para oponerse a la construcción del muro fronterizo… así que "la construcción ha comenzado y no se detendrá hasta que esté terminada", remató en otro tuitazo

Foto: GettyImages Pero bien, será muy manchado y todo el presidente de Estados Unidos… pero, lamentablemente tiene razón

No en que sea urgente el muro fronterizo, sino en lo relacionado con el número de muertes en nuestro país, en comparación con Afganistán… al menos si tomamos en cuenta los datos que ofrece Semáforo Delictivo y los pronósticos que por ahí de junio lanzaba Uppsala Conflict Data Program

Trends suggest that the total number of battle deaths in Afghanistan will exceed 20,000 this year, including civilians and combatants on both sides

Historical data is flawed, but the war may be growing more intense than anything since the 1980s

https://t.co/ac7K73CZjM pic.twitter.com/qiweTv8I8M  — Graeme Smith (@smithkabul) 23 de julio de 2018   El dato al que hizo referencia Trump fue el que hace unos días dio a conocer Semáforo Delictivo: 2018 fue el peor de los últimos 20 años para México, en cuestión de violencia: se rompió récord, con 28 mil 816 carpetas por homicidios, y con más de 33 mil víctimas por hechos violentos… lo que equivale a 90 muertes por día

Por otra parte, según Business Insider (con datos de Uppsala Conflict Data Program), en agosto del año pasado se preveía que la cifra de asesinatos en Afganistán "apenas" rebasara 20 mil, esto incluyendo civiles y combatientes, de ambos lados

Recordemos que este país lleva varios años en guerra  y que 2017 lo cerró con cerca de 19 mil decesos

Y nosotros si guerra (en teoría), pero alcanzando esas cifras criminales… algo, definitivamente, no está bien

For more infomation >> En asesinatos México está "peor que Afganistán", asegura Trump - Duration: 5:32.

-------------------------------------------

After Congress Fails To Fund Wall – Trump Blindsides Congress With Border Hammer - Duration: 3:22.

For more infomation >> After Congress Fails To Fund Wall – Trump Blindsides Congress With Border Hammer - Duration: 3:22.

-------------------------------------------

What happens when Trump goes off script? - Duration: 4:18.

- [Trump] My fellow Americans,

tonight I am speaking to you--

- A lot of people have criticized

the president's use of language.

- He speaks like everybody else.

- Oddly adolescent.

- Not the typical vague and politically correct.

- But really the president's use

of language depends on the audience.

There are unscripted moments where

he feeds off the energy from the crowd.

- [Trump] Any guy that can do a body slam, he's my kind.

- Twitter and more formal

or scripted responses like the address he gave

from the Oval Office over border security

and the State of the Union.

- [Trump] Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President,

members of Congress.

- So we talked to two language experts

to determine what impact these different

platforms can have on those listening.

- [Gomez] Language is purposeful and it's never innocent.

When he's talking from a script,

we can see that he's more measured, more deliberate.

- [Trump] The United States needs a physical barrier,

needs a wall to stop illegal immigration and to halt dead--

- Here, you see him look up

from his prepared statement.

- [Trump] You have human traffickers.

It's a thing that's horrible.

Think of it, human trafficking.

- [Gomez] Sometimes in communicating in trying to persuade,

we use a pallette of words that convey different emotions.

And speaking off the cuff then that person is coloring

the message with a lot of emotion and a lot of passion.

- After comparing different videos

of the president, Mr. Gomez had a few takeaways.

Scripted speeches aren't natural to the president

and he often looks tense because he's reading

another person's words that have been written for him.

His language is more effective off-script

when he can feed of the energy of a crowd.

Using emotionally descriptive words is used to persuade.

It seems like the president empathizes emotion

even more when he's tweeting.

- [Ott] There's a very strong structural similarity

between the way the president speaks naturally

and his use of Twitter.

- Brian Ott has studied the relationship

between rhetoric and media for over 20 years and

he's the co-author of a book titled The Twitter Presidency.

- [Ott] This is why, however, he's so effective on Twitter

because with it's 280 character cap

it's impossible to say anything complex.

- According to Dr. Ott's analysis,

Twitter is his most effective form of communication

because the platform mirrors the way he speaks naturally,

short and not complex.

And he often uses negative or degrading rhetoric on Twitter

because it travels faster and further on social media.

Compartmentalizing these forms of communication

is something the president uses again and again.

- [Trump] Earlier today there was a horrific shooting

targeting and killing Jewish Americans.

This wicked act, hard to believe.

- [Gomez] It looked very clearly teleprompted

so he was reading the lines that were prepared for him

and it was informative and evaluative.

- And now take a look at how he speaks

when he's answering questions from reporters.

- [Reporter] Mr. President, do you think

you need to revisit gun laws?

- [Trump] Well again, this has little to do with it

if you take a look if they had protection inside,

the results would have been far better.

- [Gomez] The second video clip, it lacked data.

He basically was providing a point of view.

- On Twitter, the president

blamed the Pittsburgh shooting on the media.

- [Ott] Every time the president speaks in impromptu or

in extemporaneous situation, I'm talking about

press conferences, campaign rallies, Twitter,

he is only addressing 38 to 48% of the public.

And that group in particular is angry.

- [Trump] I thought her testimony was very compelling,

very fine woman.

- [Gomez] That's what the president is very good at.

He knows his audience and he has the ability

to use the right tools in order to communicate his ideas.

- [Trump] 36 years ago this happened.

How did you get home?

I don't remember.

How did you get there?

I don't remember.

I don't know, I don't know. (crowd cheering)

- [Gomez] One of the principles of communication is

that the speaker already knows the response

that he's trying to get from the listener.

And the message is complete only

when the listener hears it and reacts appropriately.

- And it's probably safe to assume

that this president won't be the last president

to use different modes of communicating

to spread different messages far and wide.

For more infomation >> What happens when Trump goes off script? - Duration: 4:18.

-------------------------------------------

A Viral Video Just Sent Kamala Harris' Challenge To Trump Down In Flames - Duration: 3:16.

For more infomation >> A Viral Video Just Sent Kamala Harris' Challenge To Trump Down In Flames - Duration: 3:16.

-------------------------------------------

Democrat Gov. Sanctions Killing Babies After Delivery, Trump Jr. Destroys Him - Duration: 7:04.

For more infomation >> Democrat Gov. Sanctions Killing Babies After Delivery, Trump Jr. Destroys Him - Duration: 7:04.

-------------------------------------------

Trump sees 'decent chance' of N. Korea's denuclearization - Duration: 2:10.

now US president Donald Trump has hit out at his top Intel Chiefs for their

comments on North Korea taking to Twitter he said there's a decent chance

the regime will abandon its nuclear weapons his tweets came shortly after

the US intelligence community said they can't see Kim jong-un giving up his

nukes as they are a big form of leverage he sent Jay reports President Trump is

projecting optimism about his ability to get North Korea to denuclearize despite

recent remarks by one of his top Intel chiefs Dan Coates who told senators this

week that Pyongyang is unlikely to fully give up its nuclear weapons program in a

flurry of tweets on Wednesday Trump said Washington's relationship with North

Korea is the best it has ever been and there is quote a decent chance the north

will Bandhan its nuclear weapons however this week's comments by the Director of

National Intelligence aren't the first from a senior Trump administration

official to suggest a North isn't serious about denuclearization in a

report released Wednesday the Center for Strategic and International Studies

citing commercial satellite imagery from January 20th also said there has been no

new dismantling activity at the missile facility in North Korea's Tonkinese

since August after their summit in Singapore last June Kim jong-un

committed to permanently shut down the missile engine test site and launch pad

under the observation of international experts along with this optimism over

North Korea's eventual demolition president Trump also patting himself on

the back for his other successes with North Korea he held the North's lack of

nuclear and missile tests the return of remains of some American troops killed

during the Korean War and the safe release of American hostages calling it

a whole different story compared to the previous Obama

administration President Trump said he looks for to seeing the North Korean

leader at their next summit easing Jay Arirang news

For more infomation >> Trump sees 'decent chance' of N. Korea's denuclearization - Duration: 2:10.

-------------------------------------------

Compromised Sources Feeding Media Fake Trump-Russia 'Bombshell Stories' - Duration: 9:30.

Hello, and welcome. I'm Gina Shakespeare. Today on Declassified:

The Media Can't Admit That The Trump Russia Sources Are Compromised

Therefore feeding the public plenty of fake news.

This story by Brian Cates. You can find Brian on Twitter at @drawandstrike

If you've been following the Spygate twists and turns since this whole thing began

you've noticed a recent trend in the Democratic National Committee (DNC) media complex:

The number of over-hyped Trump–Russia collusion "bombshell"

stories being published are coming faster and faster—and they quickly blow up and fall apart within just a few days.

As Brian detailed in recent columns, The Guardian and McClatchy News both had spectacular

launches of "bombshells" that supposedly provided evidence, at long last, that Trump campaign affiliates were involved in WikiLeaks'

publication of stolen Hillary Clinton and DNC emails during the 2016

election. In both reports, anonymous sources claimed to have seen evidence

proving the allegations but provided nothing to the reporters to back up what they were alleging.

That's where journalism is today.

Reporters don't have to produce any evidence themselves for their stories before they go public with serious accusations

against designated targets. In fact, in modern DNC media "journalism,"

it's often the case that reporters don't even need to see any of the evidence themselves before

publishing a story. All they need are anonymous sources who make a claim

they saw something. The mere claim from a few anonymous sources is now enough to launch stories containing

explosive accusations that come to dominate a daily or weekly news cycle before they are exposed as being fake.

This brings us to just the latest media fiasco that erupted recently: The BuzzFeed fake news report that the Special Counsel had documentary evidence

proving President Donald Trump directed his then-lawyer Michael Cohen to lie to Congress about a deal to build a Trump Tower in Moscow.

Written by intrepid BuzzFeed reporters Jason Leopold and Anthony Cormier, the story quickly took off upon publication and

dominated the national news for an entire day. And then it fell apart.

This BuzzFeed story was so wrong that special counsel Robert Mueller's office took the almost unprecedented step of

issuing a public statement.

"BuzzFeed's description of specific statements to the Special Counsel's Office, and characterization of documents and testimony

obtained by this office,

regarding Michael Cohen's Congressional testimony are not accurate." That was said by Peter Carr, a spokesman for Mueller's office.

Following the announcement from the Special Counsel's Office, many in the media finally stopped loudly promoting the BuzzFeed story and actually began

carefully examining it. It certainly didn't help BuzzFeed's case when the two reporters of the article

couldn't even get their stories straight about the supposed evidence upon which their entire

"bombshell" report was based.

Leopold went on MSNBC and said during a phone interview that he had seen some of the documents;

Cormier went on CNN and in his phone interview said he'd seen no documents.

Trying to save the story, Cormier appeared with chief BuzzFeed editor Ben Smith on CNN, during which host Brian Stelter

pressed them on the discrepancy. Leopold wasn't there; Smith claimed that he was out working on a story and wasn't available. When

Stelter directly asked the vital question about why Cormier said he hadn't seen any documents, while Leopold said he did, Cormier

Cormier ludicrously said, "I can't really get into,

"I can't really get into, like, the details there." The host then presses Cormier about if he's seen any evidence since BuzzFeed published the story.

Cormier states he's received more "confirmation,"

which only means he went back to the anonymous sources who simply told him the same things over again.

He hasn't seen any more evidence because he didn't see any evidence before BuzzFeed hit the publish button on this fake news.

It's becoming increasingly clear that Cormier and Leopold published this story based solely on claims made to them by anonymous sources.

Smith says the media outlet has spoken to the leakers again and is standing

100% behind its report. Note that Smith hasn't claimed that the leakers showed BuzzFeed any documents. He and Cormier continue to blather about

BuzzFeed's awesome vetting process, which apparently doesn't include actually seeing anything that backs up the claims their sources are making.

All that's happened since the story blew up is that the anonymous sources totally pinky-swore they saw the documents

they claim they did, and so

BuzzFeed is choosing to believe them. That's a mistake, and let us explain why, beginning with compromised sources:

Most people are assuming that if the Special Counsel's office is telling the truth and

there really are no documents in that office saying what the sources claim, it means the sources are lying.

In fact,

there's another explanation about why Leopold's and Cormier's sources claimed they saw

documents that said Trump directed Cohen to lie, while the special counsel's office still isn't lying about saying they don't have any such

documents in their possession. That's because, in this explanation, the documents the leakers viewed actually do say Trump told Cohen to lie;

it's just that the documents they viewed weren't real. They were fakes. To explain what happened,

let us go back to another massive media scandal from last year

involving CNN. The network had multiple leakers who were sources for a "bombshell" report claiming that Donald Trump Jr.

got an offer via email to get early access to stolen emails in the possession of WikiLeaks. That Trump Jr.

was offered this early access was evident from the date on the email, Sept. 4,

2016. After CNN published that report, the email was quickly produced, and to the absolute

consternation of the entire DNC media complex,

somehow, through some miracle, at least two independent

leaking sources, who supposedly had looked at that same email, saw the same date on it, and

subsequently reported that same date to CNN's reporters, got the date wrong.

The actual email had the date of Sept. 14, 2016.

There are only two possibilities here.

Let's take a look at number one.

1. Both sources saw the real email, both got the date wrong, and both gave the same wrong date to the reporters.

This is most unlikely. Let's take a look at number two.

Both sources saw a fake email with a fake date on it and accurately reported what they saw to the CNN reporters.

Why has the news media refused to entertain that second possibility for even a second? It

actually makes far more sense than the first possibility.

They won't entertain it because it means their trusted leaking sources have been compromised. And they've been compromised for some time.

It's not just the political partisans inside the government playing the strategic leaking game anymore. As I detailed last year,

this is a very serious,

professional FBI leak-hunting unit at work, and laying traps using fake documents is just one of the things they have been doing.

Most people assume that once you catch a leaker, he or she is

immediately arrested and charged. That only happens in some cases. In other cases,

the leak hunters leave those people in place and either flip them into double agents or feed them fake information.

That's right: You have FBI agents and counterintelligence operatives

deliberately

putting fake documents where leakers, who don't know they've been spotted, will see them and pass them on to their media contacts.

So why would they leave in place some of these anonymous sources who are leaking to the media?

It's so they can keep the media busy doing something useless.

Right now, there are many serious investigations underway beneath the surface that involve massive national-security issues.

Not just the Uranium One and the Spygate-related investigations that we've been covering here in depth on Declassified.

There are others. There is always the danger that reporters are going to start getting in the way and blowing the cover of these

investigations.

So how do you keep inquisitive media investigative reporters out of the way and distracted so they can't thwart anything you are really doing?

It's simple. You map out their leaking network, then you flip some of the leakers or send them new leakers, who are actually disinformation

agents. You then keep all these media hacks super-busy doing what they really want to be doing—

fervently and enthusiastically chasing their Trump/Russia collusion Holy Grail, by having all the leakers

you control constantly feeding them Fake News

that is almost instantly debunked. And you keep them locked into doing this for months on end.

You turn the constant, relentless need for more Trump–Russia collusion stories against them by feeding them fake news.

It took some time—it didn't happen overnight—

but now most of the leaking networks have been mapped out and the leakers who were left in place—either willingly or not—

have been turned into disinformation agents feeding constant fake leaks to the media. And the media is continuing to fall for it.

The DNC media complex is actually accelerating the shredding of any credibility it had left over the past few months.

It's launched one quickly debunked Trump–Russia "bombshell" after another in recent months, and the pace of these absurd stories

actually is increasing. This isn't an accident. It's being guided into doing this.

Someone told the media at the very beginning: "The leaks are real; the news is fake." They didn't listen. And they're still not listening.

So what are your thoughts on the rampant leaking that is taking place in the media?

Please leave them below. From all of us here at Declassified, thank you for watching and we'll see you soon.

No comments:

Post a Comment