Presenter: Next is the question from Artem and Victor connected with the meeting of Henry Kissinger with Donald Trump:
"Recently, a huge number of various publications and analysts are discussing this meeting.
It is pointed out that already the 95-year-old participant of the Bilderberg Club introduced the concept of a new foreign policy strategy to Donald Trump.
Its essence boils down to intensifying Russian-American relations and provoking a split between Moscow and Beijing.
If in the 1970s and 1980s, Kissinger advised to use China to isolate the USSR,
now he advises doing the opposite: he suggested that Trump cooperates with Russia to curb China's growing power.
Why is this happening?
And why was Henry Kissinger wanted for this? And what changes should we expect in US foreign policy?"
Valeriy Pyakin: Henry Kissinger is 95 years old, and the old man still cannot calm down.
He flies around the world, meets with leaders of states.
This suggests that the Global Predictor has serious problems with the personnel base
and that a person at that age cannot be allowed to rest, and he is forced to engage himself in governing processes of global significance level.
Kissinger meets Trump much more often, only it is not always made public.
Kissinger meets [with him] before all sorts of momentous events, when Trump needs to do something, take some kind of step.
And only those [meetings] are announced which require some kind of additional support to Trump's decision.
If we talk about the opposition in the triangle Russia, China and the United States,
then I should note that here the confrontation finished in the second half of the 20th century: first the Soviet Union and China against the United States,
then United States and China against the Soviet Union, then the Soviet Union with the United States against China.
And all this was happening depending on what kind of governing task had to be solved
to create a center of governance concentration in China — even then, the future center of governance concentration was being created in China
to replace the Euro-Atlantic block, which is now [located] in Great Britain and the United States.
What I mean is that each such union allows [the following]: if you are an ally,
[then] you can receive some kind of support, information, technology, etc. from this block,
and if you are in some kind of opposition, then you can all this knowledge, skills, resources, etc. bring to an autonomous level of functioning.
And as a result of this…
There is a saying: "With such a friend one needs no enemies."
What was happening?
Both the Soviet Union and the United States gave China technology and developed [it].
So, for example, nuclear weapons were given to China by two countries: the Soviet Union and the United States each executed their own block.
And China always grows in this case: whoever it has as an ally, it always grows.
But when the United States is an ally of Russia, Russia (the Soviet Union) always goes into decline ("With such a friend one needs no enemies"),
that is, the USA constantly keeps impeding, impeding and impeding Russia.
To let China grow further, the United States became shackles for the Soviet Union (Russia).
This algorithm has been functioning all the time since the creation of a governance concentration centre represented by China entered the active phase.
Kissinger carries out this [algorithm].
And, accordingly, the friendship between the United States and Russia is all about getting all the dividends from Russia, imposing its policy on Russia, slowing it down.
And while Russia is turning towards the United States (doing something [for] allied relations), at certain points the alignment of interests with China begins to fail.
This allows China to be fully controlled by the Euro-Atlantic block of the Global Predictor,
[and enables] turning China into a governing center without the influence of Russia.
And Russia in its turn is being prepared for absorption, dismemberment and creation of numerous souvenir states united by the "New Silk Road" on its territory.
Here any union is anti-Russian. Kissinger as well as Trump always offers an anti-Russian solution to the problem.
So, there is nothing that we haven't faced yet and the 20th century shows us all of it. Been there, done that.
No comments:
Post a Comment