Thursday, November 22, 2018

Trump news on Youtube Nov 22 2018

It's been a WEEK since Michael Avenatti was arrested on charges of suspected domestic

violence.

"We can confirm that today LAPD Detectives arrested Michael Avenatti on suspicion of

domestic violence," according to the LAPD.

"We can confirm that Michael Avenatti (DOB: 02-16-71) was booked this afternoon on a felony

domestic violence charge (273.5 PC).

His bail is set at $50,000."

President Trump hasn't said anything about it… until now.

@TheAmandaShea

Isn't it ironic how 'Creepy porn star' attorney #MichaelAvenatti who became known by representing

lying female accusers is now being accused of abusing a woman...which he says is false?

#Karma While addressing reporters, President Trump

was asked, "Do you have any reaction to Michael Avenatti being arrested for domestic

violence?"

✔@LAPDHQ

We can confirm that today LAPD Detectives arrested Michael Avenatti on suspicion of

domestic violence.

This is an ongoing investigation and we will provide more details as they become available.

✔@LAPDHQ

We can confirm that today LAPD Detectives arrested Michael Avenatti on suspicion of

domestic violence.

This is an ongoing investigation and we will provide more details as they become available.

✔@LAPDHQ

Update: We can confirm that Michael Avenatti (DOB: 02-16-71) was booked this afternoon

on a felony domestic violence charge (273.5 PC).

His bail is set at $50,000.

"No, I wish him the best of luck."

✔@RealSaavedra

President Donald Trump on @MichaelAvenatti being arrested for domestic violence: "I wish

him the best of luck.

I wish him the best of luck."

I wish him the best of luck!" Trump emphatically repeated, with a sly smirk.

According to this: Avenatti has maintained that he is innocent

and has blamed "the right" and controversial figure Jacob Wohl for the charges against

him.

"I'm going to make this very brief and very succinct.

… I have never struck a woman.

I never will strike a woman.

I have been an advocate for women's rights my entire career, and I'm going to continue

to be an advocate," Avenatti told reporters after posting bail.

"I am not going to be intimidated from stopping what I am doing," he continued.

"I am a father to two beautiful, smart daughters.

I would never disrespect them by touching a woman inappropriately or striking a woman.

I am looking forward to a full investigation at which point I am confident that I will

be fully exonerated.

I also want to thank everyone for their support that has reached out.

You know my character, you know me as a man, and I appreciate it."

And if you're wondering why this seems SO familiar?

Well…

POTUS had something similar to say when Alec Baldwin was recently arrested.

✔@ABC

• MORE: Actor Alec Baldwin is in custody and

expected to be charged with assault after punching someone following what officials

described as a dispute near his East 10th Street home in New York City's East Village.

✔@ABC

"I wish him luck," Pres. Trump says of Baldwin after being asked about the incident at the

White House.

"WISH HIM LUCK" is the new "Bless his heart."

Twitter Ads info and privacy HA.

For more infomation >> President Trump Just Dropped The Anvil On Avenatti's Domestic Violence Arrest - Duration: 3:26.

-------------------------------------------

Giuliani:Trump would REFUSE Mueller subpoena over 'obstruction' claim - Daily News - Duration: 4:16.

Presidential lawyer Rudy Giuliani says Special Counsel Robert Mueller's written questions to Donald Trump included nothing about obstruction of justice, and didn't touch on his activities since he took office in January 2017

And that's a good thing, Giuliani told Axios, because Trump would refuse to cooperate if Mueller demanded answers along those lines

 'We answered every question they asked that was legitimately pre-election and focussed on Russia,' Giuliani told Reuters in an interview

'Nothing post-election. And we've told them we're not going to do that.'Trump sent Mueller answers on Tuesday to his questions about Democrats' white-whale 'collusion' claim – the unproven allegation that aides to his 2016 campaign partnered with Russian agents to tilt the election in his favor

As he left the White House for his Thanksgiving break Tuesday afternoon, the president said he had handed his lawyers 'the written answers to the witch hunt that's been going on forever

No collusion. No nothing.' Trump made no mention of the parallel investigation Mueller has reportedly pursued, one focused on whether Trump obstructed justice when he fired FBI Director James Comey in 2017

Mueller's questions, according to Giuliani, showed no indication that he's engaged on that front

While it's still possible Mueller would send the White House a subpoena for Trump's testimony about his activities in office, Giuliani said, the president would refuse

'I think that he [Mueller] would not win a legal battle if he did that, and I think it would consume months,' he said

Giuliani believes an assertion of executive privilege would be enough to parry Mueller's inquiries

But executive privilege is a muscle usually flexed to fend off demands from Congress or the federal courts

Mueller works for the Department of Justice, an executive branch that Trump technically controls

Giuliani added, however, that an obstruction-of-justice subpoena from Mueller could only cover information that he has no other way of obtaining

And just as other witnesses have already spoken with Mueller, Trump himself has put his views on the record 'in interviews [and] tweets,' he added

'I think their obstruction case, as a legal matter, doesn't exist,' he declared.And he added that he doesn't believe 'they have any evidence of collusion of any kind

' Share this article Share Giuliani disclosed that Mueller's questions included some that focused on whether Trump knew ahead of time about a Trump Tower meeting Donald Trump Jr

convened with a group that included a Kremlin-tied Russian lawyer.The president has insisted in the past that he didn't know at the time about the meeting, which was initially expected to be about opposition research related to Hillary Clinton

Mueller also asked about Russia-inspired hacks that followed a joking barb Trump offered during a July 2016 press conference in Florida, saying: 'Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 [Hillary Clinton] emails that are missing

'At the time Trump made that remark, the computer server where Clinton's emails resided had been offline for a year, according to the FBI

For more infomation >> Giuliani:Trump would REFUSE Mueller subpoena over 'obstruction' claim - Daily News - Duration: 4:16.

-------------------------------------------

The Iranian Foreign Minister Just Brutally Mocked Trump Over His Morning Khashoggi Statement - Duration: 2:24.

For more infomation >> The Iranian Foreign Minister Just Brutally Mocked Trump Over His Morning Khashoggi Statement - Duration: 2:24.

-------------------------------------------

Does Trump Hate Nature? | 25 Environmental Policy & Related Changes | Koaw Nature - Duration: 29:29.

Today we're going to look at 25 policy changes

that the Trump administration has done or tried to do

thus far pertaining to the global environment

and how that relates to your health

and the health of the global ecosystem.

And as is the verbiage of the current generation—

It is time to get woke.

So firstly, let me tell you

why this video jumped to the top of my list to produce

and some history as to why the United States has had

strict restrictions for protecting the environment.

And it began a few weeks ago

when I was having a discussion with one of my Patrons.

And we were talking about how

environmental issues in the U.S. are much more polarized

and less bipartisan than they were when, say,

Bush was campaigning in the late 80's

promoting environmental stewardship.

Yes! Not many years back,

as some of you older viewers probably remember,

Republicans and Democrats were in much more agreement

about seeking remedies to our anthropogenic injustices to nature.

And then the Tea Party happened

and the Trump administration—

and that gap on environmental issues really started to widen.

So that Patron and I began discussing

how the Environmental Protection Agency—the EPA—

is now under assault by the Trump administration

and what vulnerabilities that will cause to our health,

the health of our children,

and the health of the ecosystem here in the United States

but also across the globe.

And I wasn't around in 1970 when the EPA was formed.

But again, I'm sure some of you older viewers remember

the absolutely deplorable conditions of our rivers,

our cities, our lands

before the EPA was imposing these

federal restrictions on individual polluters

that not only protected our health

and the health of the environment

but it also protected companies because they were liable

for all of these people getting sick and dying.

I remember my father telling me about the

Cuyahoga River catching fire in 1969—

a river that was so polluted with oil and toxic waste—and sewage,

that it caught fire around a dozen times before that.

Man narrator - "The Cuyahoga River, as it reaches Lake Erie,

after one-hundred mile twisting and turning journey from its headwaters,

is an exhausted stream—

abused and misused by man and his machines."

And my grandmother,

who has spent the last 50 years

living near the Potomac River right next to D.C.,

told me that the river was so polluted from sewage

as well as agriculture and mining waste

that it smelled horrible

and it couldn't even sustain healthy fish populations.

The Clean Water Act of 1972 is the reason why

we don't hear about our rivers catching fire anymore

and why the Potomac River is now no longer considered,

as former President Lyndon Johnson once said,

a "national disgrace."

Los Angeles used to have smog so bad

it was notorious.

It was the most polluted basin in the United States.

Our air became cleaner under the Clean Air Act

and the newly founded EPA that was

consolidating federal enforcements for protecting the environment.

And a recent study done on millennials who grew up in Southern California

—that's my generation—people born in the late 80's to early 90's.

This study showed that these millennials were 50% less likely

to have developed a serious lung deficit

compared to those people who grew up in the late 90's.

Now that is a strong parallel between cleaner air and healthier lungs.

So if you're a millennial and you do not have a serious deficit—

there is a chance that the EPA

and the Clean Air Act are to thank.

And now we have a Trump administration

that is working very hard to dismantle and gut the EPA,

an organization that has been restoring

a healthier environment and saving our lives.

So as that conversation with my Patron progressed,

we began wondering how this dismantling of the EPA—

and what dire ramifications

that will cause to our health and the health of our children.

And eventually I was asked,

"Do you think Donald Trump hates nature?"

And of course that question is hyperbolic

but it did have me wondering:

Does Donald Trump have any genuine concern for nature—

where here I suppose we would have to define nature as

the global environment, including the entire ecosystem

and all of its living inhabitants.

But Trump has said and I quote,

"As someone who cares deeply about the environment, which I do..."

Well that does seem reassuring but

if there's one thing we've learned about Donald Trump thus far,

it's that he has a proclivity for lying,

for spewing falsified information to please a crowd or even cause an uproar.

The Washington Post's Fact Checker

has generously been keeping track of all these falsities

and I suggest you check that out sometime,

as well as National Geographic's timeline

on how Trump is affecting policies

regarding science and the environment. I will put those links down below.

And when it comes to Trump,

environmental issues just seem to get lost

amongst the tantrum of Tweets,

the alleged affairs,

the overt sexism,

[Trump speaking] : "You can do anything…grab 'em by the p****."

—the mental competencies,

and the plethora of other issues.

And even though all of that should be addressed

with fair criticism and reaction,

I believe that the state of our global ecosystem,

our environment should not be ignored.

It should not be sidelined.

This is a priority issue.

It is THE priority issue

considering the existential dependencies of all of our lives

and the lives of millions of other species.

Okay, let's take a look at these 25 policy changes

—good and bad—

and you can decide for yourself whether or not

Trump and his administration

are trying to grab Mother Nature by the pu—

[♪ theme music ♪]

Hey there! I am Koaw of Koaw Nature

where we are spreading knowledge about nature,

science, adventures in the outdoors,

and of course in this episode,

how U.S. politics are impacting

the ecological aspects of the world that we live in.

So subscribe, like, share this video and all of that.

And of course all of my sources are below.

Let's get into this.

[♪ deep transition tune ♪]

In short time after Trump lost the popular vote

but won the presidency—

—'cause that makes sense, right?

scientists and journalists worried the oncoming administration

would delete valuable scientific data,

thus the Environmental Data and Governance Initiative

and other data refuges came into place.

A later report by the EDGI

shows that although governmental websites

have been forced by Trump to be censored and altered

when it comes to mentioning climate change,

no deletions of scientific data sets have occurred.

So basically Trump and his administration

are trying to censor from you

what is the greatest threat

that humanity has ever faced.

But you're smarter than that—I know.

[♪deep transition tune ♪]

Trump issues memoranda to hasten

the constructing of the Dakota Access

and Keystone XL Pipelines,

of which the Obama administration had previously delayed

citing its negative impacts

towards our progress on climate change initiatives.

In March the Keystone XL Pipeline would be approved.

In November of 2017, the Keystone Pipeline leaked

about 407,000 gallons of oil in South Dakota.

And not but a couple of days ago

after I got this script going,

a federal judge in Montana said,

(paraphrasing) 'Hey Trump--

You ignored the actualities of climate change.

You didn't look at the science

and you are not following the books

when it comes to building the Keystone XL pipeline.

So, I'm putting a halt on it.'

You'll see the trend.

But Trump and the fossil fuel industry are like this:

They are very, very close.

[♪deep transition tune ♪]

Not hiding his agenda

to pull away from renewable energy development

and instead promote fossil fuels,

especially that of coal,

Trump appoints ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson

as Secretary of State.

And let's keep in mind that

Exxon was a company in the 1970's

doing unprecedented research on greenhouse gas emissions.

That company was on the forefront

of understanding that climate change existed—

and what did they do?

They hid this information from the world

and then they proceeded to deny its existence for profits.

And Rex and Donald would have a falling out later

[♪deep transition tune ♪]

Trump signs a joint resolution

that eliminated the U.S. Department of the Interior's

"Stream Protection Rule,"

that was meant to place stricter restrictions

on how mining waste enters nearby waterways.

It was a burden to these polluting industries

and it got revoked

[♪deep transition tune ♪]

Trump nominates Scott Pruitt to head the EPA,

a man who spent a good portion

of his career suing the EPA

and who has close ties with oil and gas companies.

And so it would make sense that a president

who called global warming a "hoax"

would nominate a man like Scott Pruitt

who does not believe that carbon dioxide

is a primary contributor to

our rising global temperatures.

And just in case you are unaware—

but I'm sure you probably know this:

There is an international agreement among scientists

that our rising (atmospheric) carbon levels

are connected to our rising global temperatures.

We, as in humans,

are causing climate change.

A great resource offering understandable

and scientific-based information about climate change

comes from 350.org.

They do great work.

So if you need to understand more about climate change

or even what it is,

or even how to discuss it,

check out their resources—they do some great work.

I'll put that link below.

[♪ light transition tune ♪]

Trump donates a quarter of his salary

to the National Parks Service.

So that does seem like a genuine gesture

and that is a good thing.

And for someone like me—

yeah, that's a lot of money but

coming from a billionaire—no.

Or thinking about how much money

the National Parks Service actually needs—no.

And if you look at—

that doesn't even cover the airfare

and security costs of flying Donald Trump

down to Florida so that he can go golfing.

[♪deep transition tune ♪]

Trump announces his new budget

that suggests severely cutting the funding

going towards scientific research

and programs that protect the environment.

Under the budget plan,

the EPA would receive a 31% decrease in funding.

The Interior Department a 12% cut

and the Department of Energy a 6% cut.

So when I see cuts like this

not only attacking scientific progress

but also directly attacking

programs that protect my health,

my family's health,

my communities health,

it hurts.

But we must also keep in mind that

these are proposed budgets—

not actually what happens.

Even what has been,

before our recent election,

a Republican dominated congress—

they have been rational enough to be rejecting

most of what Donald Trump and his administration

have been proposing.

But as I believe you have probably known before

or are starting to see now,

the stance of the Trump administration

on environmental policies

remains very conspicuous nonetheless.

[ ♪ deep transition tune ♪ ]

[ ♪ somber music ♪ ]

Trump announces his withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accord

of which the United States and 194 other countries

had joined to unify

towards curbing climate change

and lessening greenhouse gas emissions

because the world understands

that climate change is real and it is scary.

Now, when I read this statement,

like what happens when I read many of Donald Trump's statements,

is that a sense of bafflement overcomes me.

I am dumbfounded

wondering how a man with so much ignorance

about his own country, as well as the world,

holds what used to be such a

respected position of power within the world.

On this day, when he announced that

he was going to withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accord,

not only did he relinquish

the United States' leadership role

on climate change initiatives

but we also lost the respect

of so many peoples

and so many world leaders.

Here are some words

as he bailed on the United States' promises to the world:

"The United States, under the Trump administration,

will continue to be the cleanest

and most environmentally friendly country on Earth.

We'll be the cleanest.

We're going to have the cleanest air."

Yeah, that sounds great, but once again,

that is all BS.

In no way has the U.S. or is the U.S. now

the most environmentally friendly

and cleanest country on Earth.

And there is no way we will even approach that mark

if we continue to divert funding away

from renewable energy resources

and pump more money into industries like coal

—exactly what Trump is doing right now.

And Trump loves talking about 'clean coal'

but clean coal does not exist

because mining and burning coal,

even with the new techniques,

is anything but clean.

And yes, if you're a coal miner that was out of work

or one that is currently in the industry

—yeah, you might have some job stability for a little bit

under the Trump administration.

But your health,

the health of your children,

the health of your community will suffer.

And there is no reason that jobs

could not have opened up in the renewable energy sector.

And we humans burning fossil fuels

that contributes to the greenhouse effect is,

without a doubt,

the number one causation of our rapidly changing climate.

We will see more floods,

more heatwaves,

more fires,

more droughts,

more famine,

more intense storms,

more dying reefs,

more extinctions,

and more wars.

Yes this situation is absolutely terrifying.

And here in the United States

we have an administration

that is not seeking to solve these problems

but instead making them more severe.

[♪ light transition tune ♪ ]

After being sued by 15 states and the District of Columbia,

the Trump Administration's EPA said

they would undo the decision to delay

Obama-era regulations to clean up the ozone.

So, that's a good thing for the ozone

—they had to be sued first—but that's a good thing.

[♪ deep transition tune ♪ ]

Trump and Pruitt's EPA declare that

they will eliminate the Obama Administration's

Clean Power Plan.

And as you probably know,

the CPP was designed to

clean up the U.S. power sector's

carbon footprint.

And this plan,

as ambitious and as great as it could have been

—it never really had a foothold in the first place.

[♪ deep transition tune ♪ ]

Trump decides to reduce national monuments

which are large areas of land

preserving beautiful wildernesses

and habits for many creatures

as well as lands with deep ties to our native cultures.

Bear Ears National Monument was reduced by 85%

and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument

by almost 47%.

Why?

well...

You've guessed it!

Fossil fuel extractions.

[♪ deep transition tune ♪ ]

Trump no longer allows climate change

to be listed as a national security threat.

For real?

This is the largest national security threat

or global security threat humanity has ever faced.

And former Secretary of State John Kerry

said it so well when he described climate change:

"In a sense, climate change can now be considered

the world's largest weapon of mass destruction,

perhaps even the world's most fearsome

weapon of mass destruction."

And that's not an exaggeration.

Even for us people that live in the United States,

a well-off, developed country,

we are not going to be immune to these changes.

We are seeing them now.

Right now California is burning like crazy as it has been.

We are breaking record temperatures

all the time now.

The hurricanes—the severity of those—

All of this will get progressively worse.

And many, many peoples, animals, habitats will suffer.

[♪ deep transition tune ♪ ]

Trump's EPA dropped the 'once in, always in' policy

that set to lock in hazardous air pollutants

from industrial sources.

Basically, this one was a policy that

prevented companies from taking advantage of a loophole

when it came to their toxic emissions.

And it was the Clean Air Director at the NRDC that

said it well when he said,

"This is among the most dangerous actions

that the Trump EPA has taken yet

against public health."

[♪ deep transition tune ♪ ]

More budget cuts:

Trump proposes budgets cuts to programs

focusing on clean-energy and climate.

This includes the Global Climate Change Initiative,

the EPA's Report on the Environment,

and Human Health Risk Assessment.

So while it was knocking down funding

for these programs

it was promoting more funding for fossil fuels

including that of coal,

a dying industry—a dying dirty industry.

[♪ deep transition tune ♪ ]

Pruitt announces the future rollback

of car emissions standards because

well, it's a thorn in the butt

of the automobile industry.

So this is a big step backwards

but there are states,

like California, a state that,

as you know,

already is aware of the terrible health problems

that arise from dirty air

and so they will be imposing stricter standards.

And keep in mind too, there are companies within the automobile industry

that want these strict restrictions

because they know it's going to be inevitable in time.

It's needed. It's necessary.

[♪ deep transition tune ♪ ]

[♪ soft music ♪ ]

Trump proposes tweaking the Endangered Species Act

because it is a burden to businesses.

Well first let's take a look

at a handful of species

saved by the Endangered Species Act.

♪ ♪

And whether or not

the ESA needs clarification and updating,

this is just not the administration

to be doing such a thing.

That is like letting a bunch of meth junkies

watch over your kids' daycare center.

They don't care about the kids

and all they care about is getting more money

to get more dangerous chemicals

to spend on hedonistic purposes.

It's not a win.

So let's just look at some species

that the Center for Biological Diversity claims that

Trump and his administration are driving extinct

via their policy changes.

♪ ♪

[♪ deep transition tune ♪ ]

Adding more contradictions

to the actions of the Trump Administration,

an environmental impact statement

released by the NHTSA

suggests by the end of the century

our planet will warm by seven degrees Fahrenheit

or about four degrees Celsius.

So if you're like me,

your head must be spinning.

Whether you read this a couple months ago

or you're hearing it now.

Not only have they admitted that this

global warming is occurring but

they're using it to

justify their rollbacks of car emissions standards.

They're saying that—

This extreme global warming is inevitable

and any changes we make

to emissions standards are

sort of irrelevant in the grand scheme of things

so why should we force our industries to pay more money?

They have given up trying.

That's what it sounds like.

[♪ deep transition tune ♪ ]

Trump's EPA decides to squash federal rules

on coal power plants, giving regulatory authority to each state.

So yes, some states would indeed make even

more restrictive rules

on the emissions they would allow into the environment

but coal-rich states, like West Virginia,

would lessen their rules.

So this is just another example of Trump

and his administration dismantling

and revamping a system so that

he is able to satisfy his constituents,

especially those in the coal industry.

And-

just losing the federal authority on this

fragments a situation. It's messy now.

It is dirty

in the literal sense and figurative sense of the word.

[♪ deep transition tune ♪ ]

Trump's EPA reduces requirements on energy companies

and their methane monitoring and mitigation.

So as you probably know,

methane is worse than CO2 as a greenhouse gas.

That is, methane is better at trapping in heat

into our atmosphere than CO2. [sighs]

[♪ light transition tune ♪ ]

Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke

added 20 years to a ban on mining 30,000 acres of land

near Yellowstone Park in Montana.

That's cool and that is a good thing

but I think Aaron Weiss' of Center for Western Priorities

said it well when he said,

"Secretary Zinke always seems to support conservation

in his home state of Montana,

while backing the most aggressive forms

of industrial development in the other 49 states."

Remember those national monuments that got slashed.

Yeah.

And Ryan Zinke is an oddity.

Why? Well—

He used to be for clean energy.

He used to be for legislations addressing climate change.

And then his tune shifted

and he said,

"…it's not a hoax but it's not proven science either."

Yes Ryan, the science is there.

It's quite real.

And we have plenty of data to back it up.

[♪ deep transition tune ♪ ]

The Trump EPA says it will disband

an air pollution review panel.

It will be replaced by a seven member panel

with what conservationists say

only has one independent researcher.

Again this is just a way that

Trump is able to support his constituents

in the polluting industries

and it will directly impact our health

in a negative way.

It's like playing a game of football

but firing all of the referees except for one beforehand.

[♪ light transition tune ♪ ]

Amending the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's

Marine Debris Act,

Trump signs the Save Our Seas Act

that works to clean plastics from the world's ocean water.

I love this act. I love the one it is amending.

This is a good thing indeed.

But it's not like Trump wouldn't sign it

as it passed the Senate unanimously.

And I love bipartisan support on issues like this

—so props to both parties.

[♪ light transition tune ♪ ]

Trump puts a signature on the Water Infrastructure Act of 2018.

This act will upgrade wastewater

as well as systems for drinking and irrigation

as well as help organize what projects

can and cannot be reasonably accomplished.

I believe this act will do some good things

for our health and the health of our

local ecosystems here in the United States.

And again this one almost passed

the Senate unanimously with a 99-1 ratio.

[♪ deep transition tune ♪ ]

The federally-controlled Artic will receive its first offshore oil wells.

And this is just absolutely terrible.

Besides the noise, water and air pollution

that will come from the drilling and sea traffic,

a spill, which is inevitable,

will be near impossible to clean up.

And apparently Trump and his administration

are once again not following the books

when it comes to

the necessary environmental checklists

required for projects like this

as Alli Harvey of the Sierra Club has said,

"Donald Trump and Ryan Zinke are in such a hurry

to sell off the Arctic Refuge for corporate profit

that they're no longer even pretending

they take the legally mandated environmental reviews

of this proposal seriously."

I'm just glad that [ ♪ inspirational music ♪]

organizations like the Sierra Club, Oceana,

the NRDC, 350.org, and so many others

are monitoring and battling

and they're out there helping save our lives

with the lives of millions of other species.

And I hope that you are on the battlefield

in some way or another.

And there are many ways to do that

but first and foremost, it's about understanding

the actualities of our world.

And so that

if you understand that climate change

is real and it's happening,

that is actually a big step.

There are many people

that are ignorant to this fact in the world.

And if you had voted for Donald Trump

and you care about the environment

and you're feeling a little silly, that's okay.

We make mistakes and we move on.

We always try to just better what decisions we make in the future.

[♪ deep transition tune ♪ ]

And finally, let's briefly discuss

Trump's gigantic border wall additions

that will more than likely never get constructed,

a fundamental promise to his constituents

during his campaign and even now.

And as a biologist,

when I think of a giant border wall,

aside from all the controversial topics

and reasons it shouldn't be built,

I think of it blocking corridors.

Animals are unable to properly migrate and disseminate—

and plants as well.

It is terrible to have these walls for habitats.

Black bear populations will become

even more at risk because of interbreeding

as they can't find mates across these blocked borders.

The recovery for jaguar populations in the U.S. will be impossible.

Sonoran pronghorn will struggle

and even difficulties are presented to flying creatures

like the ferruginous pygmy owls.

[ ♪ deep transition tune ♪ ]

[ ♪ calm music ♪ ]

Okay, so that wasn't a complete list

but I think you get the point of what

Donald Trump and his administration are trying to do.

Number one:

Support the fossil fuel industry especially that of coal,

a dying industry, while diverting funding and support

for renewable energy resources.

Number two:

Completely disregard

and even try to censor from the people of the United States

of climate change, of the biggest threat that humanity has ever faced.

And number three:

It just seems

making money trumps the lives of

humanity and millions of other species.

Sadly that pun is intended.

So let's go back to my Patron's original question:

'Does Donald Trump hate nature?'

No, I don't think Donald Trump hates nature.

I don't think that he has any genuine concern for nature,

for global environment and its living inhabitants.

I think his intentions are quite clear.

And I haven't decided yet

whether Donald Trump is just too ignorant

to understand the dire setbacks

of what his policy changes will do. [♪ profound music ♪]

Or if he's just too corrupt

as he lies in bed with his wealthy constituents

to even care.

And perhaps it's both.

But either way, on this course,

many people and animals and habitats will die

because of what he is doing.

And as another one of my Patrons pointed out,

a different Patron—

—everything seems to be about winning and losing with Donald Trump.

He loves to win.

So if only we could get him to see

that the true victory is investing money

and time and research into renewable energy

instead of coal and other fossil fuels

that would be amazing.

But I'm not an optimist on that matter

and I am not even an optimist on our

global society's ability to curb climate change.

But that doesn't mean I give up the fight.

And I hope you don't either.

And I hope you don't work backwards

like the Trump administration is doing.

The superstorms are already here

and they're only going to get progressively worse.

The next world war will not be fought over religion,

or political or other ideological differences.

It will be a grand war over resources

as our changing climate makes life very hard.

I really appreciate you watching this video.

And I hope you share it with a friend or family member or even an enemy.

I think we should all be woke on these environmental issues.

So you are welcome to watch another video.

You could subscribe if you wish.

We're a small community but we are growing.

Goodnight. Good day.

For more infomation >> Does Trump Hate Nature? | 25 Environmental Policy & Related Changes | Koaw Nature - Duration: 29:29.

-------------------------------------------

RECEP RECEP,YES TRUMP (alıntıdır yapan KEBAB'S) - Duration: 1:04.

EVET TRUMP

S-400 MÜ ALIYORSUN?

Tutuklanan çoban

hayır trump

ver bana

çoban Not:Pastore diye bir kelime ingilizcede yoktur İtalyancada çoban anlama gelir

ver bana

ver bana

çoban

hayır 2x

dollar hakkında ne düşünüon

altyazı ASRİEL THE TR YAPIMCI:KEBAB'S

For more infomation >> RECEP RECEP,YES TRUMP (alıntıdır yapan KEBAB'S) - Duration: 1:04.

-------------------------------------------

Tiffany Trump Rocks Mini & Bare Legs As She Heads To Mar A Lago With Ivanka For Thanksgiving – Pics - Duration: 2:42.

Tiffany Trump braved the cold and wore one of her signature minis for Thanksgiving with sister Ivanka! We've got the pics of Tiff's sassy look!    President Donald Trump's youngest daughter, Tiffany Trump, skipped the White House turkey pardon on November 20, but she was spotted with the family getting ready to celebrate Thanksgiving in style! Tiffany hopped off Air Force One in Palm Beach, Florida with sister Ivanka Trump and her kids, looking totally glam in a matching peacoat and minidress

Despite the fact that the low temperature in DC was 26 degrees this morning (brr!), Tiffany paid that no mind and went without tights

 Tiffany was giving us some serious Elle Woods vibes in this vibrant, pink outfit

The asymmetrical, tuxedo-style jacket covered up her dress completely, but you could see a hint of the skirt

It's a low-cut number with a lace hem. Cute! She was wearing an adorable pair of gold pumps that appear to be brand new — she left the price tags on the bottoms! Overall, this outfit is a total win

   Tiffany is a big fan of minidresses, and we don't blame her — girl has amazing, long legs! You can see all the times Tiff rocked a micro miniskirt in THIS gallery! Last Thanksgiving, at the White House turkey pardon, the first daughter came out to support dear old dad while wearing a super-short dress, only covered up by an equally short peacoat

So cute, and so impractical. Obviously, we were eager to see what she wore this year! REX/Shutterstock  Sister Ivanka looked so pretty, too! The White House advisor wore a smart, longline houndstooth coat, a black midi dress, and red riding boots, giving us a sort of "prep school chic look

" That huge, velvet headband? A $170 Lele Sadoughi accessory. Can't wait to see what Melania Trump wears!

For more infomation >> Tiffany Trump Rocks Mini & Bare Legs As She Heads To Mar A Lago With Ivanka For Thanksgiving – Pics - Duration: 2:42.

-------------------------------------------

Con tanto frío, ¿qué pasó con el calentamiento global?: Donald Trump - Duration: 2:06.

Previo al Día de Acción de Gracias en Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, volvió a encender la mecha de la controversia con el cambio climático al preguntar "dónde está", en medio de las bajas temperaturas registradas en su país

Esta tarde, en su cuenta de Twitter, el mandatario soltó este tuit —con tintes de sarcasmo—: "Una ola de frío brutal y prolongada puede romper todos los récords; ¿qué pasó con el calentamiento global"

De acuerdo con el Servicio Meteorológico de Estados Unidos, se espera un "enfriamiento" significativo en el noroeste del país, ya que la temperatura estará por debajo de la medida normal —por ejemplo, en Boston y Filadelfia se prevé que la noche del 23 de noviembre alcancen los -9 grados—

Y, bueno, de manera literal lo ha tomado Trump, quien ha dudado de los efectos del cambio climático —vale recordar que este año le concedió la duda y declaró que el cambio climático existe pero NO por la mano y actividades del ser humano—

En este tenor, Trump se ha apoyado en un discurso proteccionista para defender la producción industrial de su país, escapar –como lo hizo en 2017— del Acuerdo de París e ignorar las recomendaciones que la Organización de las Naciones Unidas (ONU) emitió sobre la reducción de los gases de efecto invernadero para evitar mayores consecuencias entre 2030-2052

En octubre pasado, la alerta la lanzó el Grupo Intergubernamental de Expertos sobre el Cambio Climático (IPCC, por sus siglas en inglés)

En su informe, ha quedado claro que el principal objetivo del Acuerdo de París está en riesgo: reducir las emisiones de los gases de efecto invernadero, manteniendo el aumento en 1,5 grados, para limitar el calentamiento antes de que llegue a 2 grados

Pero para Donald Trump se trata de un juego de discursos en donde el análisis y los hechos se pierden ante la necesidad de generar más dinero y producción para un país que intenta desmarcarse de su mandatario —como se mostró en las elecciones intermedias de este año—

For more infomation >> Con tanto frío, ¿qué pasó con el calentamiento global?: Donald Trump - Duration: 2:06.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Administration Paying Undercover Informants In Migrant Caravan - They Got All The Intel! - Duration: 2:41.

For more infomation >> Trump Administration Paying Undercover Informants In Migrant Caravan - They Got All The Intel! - Duration: 2:41.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Administration Paying Undercover Informants In Migrant Caravan -They Got All The Intel! - Duration: 2:54.

For more infomation >> Trump Administration Paying Undercover Informants In Migrant Caravan -They Got All The Intel! - Duration: 2:54.

-------------------------------------------

President Donald Trump Again Casts Doubt On CIA Report Into Jamal Khashoggi Killing | MSNBC - Duration: 3:13.

For more infomation >> President Donald Trump Again Casts Doubt On CIA Report Into Jamal Khashoggi Killing | MSNBC - Duration: 3:13.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Stands With Saudi Arabia - Duration: 2:07.

For more infomation >> Trump Stands With Saudi Arabia - Duration: 2:07.

-------------------------------------------

Trump slams John Roberts after suggesting 'Obama judges' are biased - Duration: 7:26.

President Donald Trump fired back Wednesday at Chief Justice John Roberts, who had bashed him for claiming the federal judiciary's most liberal court circuit was subject to political bias from an 'Obama judge' who invalidated his newest asylum policy

 'We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges,' Roberts said in a statement distributed by the Supreme Court

 'What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them

'Trump was on the golf course in Palm Beach, Florida at the time. He tweeted his response after the back nine

'Sorry Chief Justice John Roberts, but you do indeed have "Obama judges," and they have a much different point of view than the people who are charged with the safety of our country,' Trump tweeted

'It would be great if the 9th Circuit was indeed an "independent judiciary",' he added, 'but if it is why are so many opposing view (on Border and Safety) cases filed there, and why are a vast number of those cases overturned

' 'Please study the numbers, they are shocking,' Trump urged Roberts. 'We need protection and security - these rulings are making our country unsafe! Very dangerous and unwise!'Roberts' pushback against Trump marked the first time the Republican-appointed leader of the federal judiciary has offered even a hint of criticism of the president, even though Trump has previously blasted federal judges who ruled against him

Roberts said Wednesday, one day before Thanksgiving Day, that an 'independent judiciary is something we should all be thankful for

'The president's latest remarks came as the Supreme Court is enmeshed in controversy over his appointment of Justice Brett Kavanaugh

  Several justices have spoken out about judicial independence and the danger of having the court viewed as a political institution that is divided between five conservative Republicans and four liberal Democrats

Trump had spoken Tuesday when a reporter asked for his reaction to a ruling by U

S. District Judge Jon Tigar in San Francisco that put the administration's asylum policy on hold

The president complained that his opponents file their lawsuits in courts that are part of the liberal-leaning Ninth U

S. Circuit Court of Appeals.'Every case that gets filed in the Ninth Circuit, we get beaten

And then we end up having to go to the Supreme Court, like the travel ban, and we won,' Trump said

The president went on to say about the asylum ruling: 'This was an Obama judge.'The initial travel ban ruling in 2017 was issued by U

S. District Judge James Robart, an appointee of President George W. Bush. Roberts also was appointed by Bush

RELATED ARTICLES Previous 1 Next Trump attacks judges for stopping his ban on illegal border

Department of Homeland Security is 'gathering intelligence. Major blow for Trump's border policy as federal judge rules

More than FIVE HUNDRED criminals are found traveling in. Share this article Share 1

1k shares The White House had no immediate response to a request for comment on Roberts' criticism on Wednesday

Last year the president used the term a 'so-called judge' after the first federal ruling against his travel ban

 During the presidential campaign, Trump criticized Roberts himself for the chief justice's decisive vote in 2012 to preserve the Obama health care overhaul

Trump also referred to a judge who was presiding over a fraud lawsuit against Trump University as a Mexican who would be unable to rule fairly because of Trump's proposal to build a wall along the U

S.-Mexican border.On Tuesday he suggested the entire Ninth Circuit is a liberal playground where Republican policies can't get a fair shake

  'Everybody that wants to sue the United States, they file their case in – almost – they file their case in the Ninth Circuit,' he told reporters

'And it means an automatic loss no matter what you do, no matter how good your case is

'

For more infomation >> Trump slams John Roberts after suggesting 'Obama judges' are biased - Duration: 7:26.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Blindsides Democrats – MAJOR Breakthrough Announced In Mueller Investigation - Duration: 4:04.

For more infomation >> Trump Blindsides Democrats – MAJOR Breakthrough Announced In Mueller Investigation - Duration: 4:04.

-------------------------------------------

Mark Levin Slams Justice Roberts for Criticizing Trump "He's Not Being Honest" - Duration: 1:32.

For more infomation >> Mark Levin Slams Justice Roberts for Criticizing Trump "He's Not Being Honest" - Duration: 1:32.

-------------------------------------------

The Most Dangerous Aspect of the Donald Trump presidency - Duration: 1:46.

Quite possibly the most dangerous aspects of the Donald Trump presidency isn't necessarily

the legislation and proposals being put out, but the damage that is being done to our society

and world as a whole.

Bills and legislation and proposals can all be reversed or struck down with the stroke

of a pen, however the standing and respect of the United States will take years to improve.

When you have the leader who stands on the world stage or tweets about how much he's

in love with a foreign dictator, or how much he doesn't trust his own intelligence communities,

and blindly repeats conspiracy theories as his own personal beliefs, the rest of the

world laughs.

More than this, what we have seen as a direct result of this presidency is a greater and

deepening divide and more hate and rhetoric and vitriol being spewed across the entire

country and the world.

And how about how all of this has impacted our relationships with our friends and family

members?

We may have had our suspicions about our friends and family members over the years, but now

we have seen many families come to terms with knowing exactly where each other stands on

political and social issues and it ain't always pretty.

Our views and beliefs have split and divided us to the tenth degree.

Where once we could have civil disagreements with each other, we've now ended up hating

each other, and how exactly we can work to repair these relationships is beyond me.

I'm not so sure that we can.

It's gonna take us many years to recover from this.

The Trump presidency might be 4 years or 8 years at most should he be elected for a second

term and I don't see the divisiveness going down.

I don't see the hate going down and I don't see people being nasty for the sake of nasty

stopping all of the sudden.

If it was going to happen it would have already.

Can we move forward at this point?

I'd like to think that we can but I'm not exactly sure.

What do you think?

What do you think is the worst aspect of this current administration and how they are affecting

society and the world?

Can we recover or did we really need this as a country in order to understand who we

are and who we're around?

For more infomation >> The Most Dangerous Aspect of the Donald Trump presidency - Duration: 1:46.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump spars with Chief Justice John Roberts - Duration: 1:04.

For more infomation >> President Trump spars with Chief Justice John Roberts - Duration: 1:04.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Stands With Saudi Arabia - Duration: 2:06.

For more infomation >> Trump Stands With Saudi Arabia - Duration: 2:06.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's rare rebuke - Duration: 0:31.

For more infomation >> Trump's rare rebuke - Duration: 0:31.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Suggests He May Attend Next Year's White House Correspondents' Dinner | THR News - Duration: 1:35.

President Donald Trump has suggested that he may show his face at the 2019 White

House Correspondents' Dinner. In what was, presumably, a joke, the commander in

chief took to Twitter to suggest that he could attend the annual event, safe in

the knowledge that it will not be hosted by a comedian who would mock at him. The White

House Correspondents' Association has named author and historian Ron Chernow as

next year's featured speaker, following comedian Michelle Wolf's routine which sparked

criticism and outrage from the administration - most notably press secretary

Sarah Huckabee Sanders.

"I have to say I'm a little starstruck. I love you as Aunt Lydia in the Handmaid's Tale"

In his full tweet Tuesday, Trump wrote, "So-called comedian Michelle Wolf bombed so

badly last year at the White House Correspondents' Dinner that this year, for the first time

in decades, they will have an author instead of a comedian. Good first step in comeback

of a dying evening and tradition! Maybe I will go?"

Wolf, who called the WHCA "cowards" on Monday after they picked a historian to speak,

hit back by calling on Trump's support of the Saudi Kingdom in the face of evidence

suggesting its direct involvement in the murder of Washington Post contributor

Jamal Khashoggi. "I bet you'd be on my side if I had killed a journalist," she wrote.

The relationship between the media and the current administration has been shaky at

best thanks to Trump's frequent attacks on outlets such as CNN - going so far as to

temporarily suspend reporter Jim Acosta's press pass on November 7. Acosta and CNN

subsequently won their court case against the White House with Acosta's pass being

reinstated, for now.

To read more on this story, head to THR.com.

For The Hollywood Reporter News, I'm Lyndsey Rodrigues.

For more infomation >> Trump Suggests He May Attend Next Year's White House Correspondents' Dinner | THR News - Duration: 1:35.

-------------------------------------------

Democrats Sue To Stop Trump's AG Appointment - Duration: 3:56.

A group of Democratic senators have filed a lawsuit in the US District Court for the

district of Columbia, arguing that the appointment of Mathew Whitaker as acting attorney general

by President Donald Trump was completely unconstitutional.

Their argument says that Whitaker's appointment violates the constitution appointments clause

because the US Senate never confirmed Whitaker to any post, so this means that had Whitaker

previously gone through any kind of Senate hearings, Senate confirmations, any kind of

vote whatsoever.

This wouldn't be an issue of him temporarily taking over as attorney general since he did

not go through those processes and was never interrogated by the Senate, never answered

questions, never had to be held accountable for anything.

His appointment to and a confirmed position is unconstitutional according to this constitution

appointments clause.

That's what they're arguing the lawsuit.

Now, on the other side of it, the White House is saying that this absolutely is permitted

through the vacancies reform act, which says the president can appoint a non confirmed

person to a confirmed post for as many as 210 days without them having to go through

the nomination process.

The White House's office of legal counsel has also said, no, no, no.

What trump is doing is 100 percent constitutional.

Now, before we get into the problems with Whitaker, I mean let's focus on the legality

of this for just a minute.

If the Democrats are correct, which it would seem that they are on the surface then yes,

Whitaker could not serve as the acting attorney general and that temporary position would

have to be given to someone who has been confirmed to another position by the Senate.

Makes perfect sense, right?

It's vetting, it's transparency.

It's knowing who this person is in showing that yes, at one point they did have a majority

to put them in office so they could temporarily serve in this capacity.

Whitaker's never had that.

The problem here is that this is going to end up going to a higher court and whatever

that court decides is forever going to change the way things work in Washington DC.

This is bigger than Matthew Whitaker.

This is bigger than Donald Trump.

At least you know in the long run, but what this would mean if a judge rules with the

trump administration is that any idiot off the street quite literally could be appointed

as an acting attorney general.

They can be appointed as any agency head without ever having to sit in front of the Senate

and they could sit there for at least 210 days.

That is a major threat to our democracy.

That is a major threat to the Republic of the United States in the way the government

functions.

Now back to Whitaker.

Obviously this man has huge conflicts of interest and that is exactly why Donald trump put him

in that position.

This is a guy who already laid out in an op ed over a year ago, how he would get rid of

Robert Mueller by essentially defunding the investigation and watching it all unravel.

That is why Donald trump put him there.

Unfortunately, you can't argue that from a legal standpoint, you can't challenge somebody

just because of that, and that's unfortunate because we know that's why it happened, but

that's why the Democrats have to go this alternate route.

Using this obscure clause in the constitution to hopefully force Whitaker out before he's

ever able to do anything drastic in terms of this investigation.

This is a tricky one.

It's one that's going to be appealed, and again, this is a court case like so many others

that is going to have a dramatic effect on the future of this country.

No comments:

Post a Comment