Tuesday, August 21, 2018

Trump news on Youtube Aug 21 2018

fantastic show for you tonight with so much news I don't know how we're gonna

get it all fit in president Trump is once again attacking the media this time

over the White House counsel's interview with the Muller probe did dawn McGann

turn on the president I don't think so we'll tell you the real story in just a

few minutes while many Democrats are calling for ice to be abolished

President Trump was honoring the heroes of ice and Border Patrol at the White

House today the latest controversy though iced taking heat for arresting an

international murder suspect unbelievable details coming up plus a

new wave of violence sweeping Chicago over the weekend and you won't believe

how city officials are responding now but first our top story Donald Trump

versus John Brennan jut last week the White House announced that Trump had

stripped Obama CIA director turned left-wing cable news pundit John Brennan

of his security clearance how dare he do that Brennan isn't going away quietly

threatening legal action and doubling down on his most outrageous claims

I called his behavior treasonous which is to betray one's trust and to aid and

abet the enemy and I stand very much by that claim I have seen the lights

blinking red in terms of what mr. Trump has done and is doing and is bringing

this country down on the global stage and he's fueling and feeding

divisiveness within our country he continually lies the American people the

types of things that he's doing I think I need to speak out and so I've been

speaking out rather forcefully because I believe it's important to do so I don't

believe I'm being political at all I'm not a Republican I'm not a Democrat not

being political right president Trump's attorney Rudy Giuliani struck back at

Brennan's a political claim earlier tonight John Brennan was not a

particularly distinguished anything he was a political operative

he hasn't been an intelligence officer in a long time he's been a political

hitman his language demonstrates that the president committed treason

treason come on well Brennan might want to be careful because it's not just

Trump's allies that are criticizing him now

well there are intelligence officials who are uncomfortable with how far

Brennan has not I think Mayo John is sort of like a freight train and he's

gonna say what's on his mind I think though that the common denominator among

all of us that have been speaking up though is genuine concern about the

Jeopardy or threats to our institutions and values and although we may express

that in in different ways and I think that's what this this really is about

but John and his rhetoric have become I think an issue in and of itself yeah

they have become an issue joining me now for reaction are dawn Dan Hoffman a Fox

News contributor a former CIA station chief chris swagger former assistant FBI

director and roger fisk former aide to Secretary of State John Kerry and a

Democratic strategist Roger I want to go to you first give you the first shot at

this treason do we really think that says

treasonous to do this types of thing well mr. Brennan is you know perfectly

capable of speaking for himself so I don't feel like I need to amplify or

defend his points but you think what can you defend you this point or are you

supportive of is the point I mean probably a finger for your opinion of

and he's making you know the the penalty for treason is death so do you really

believe that the president is being treasonous I I again mr. Brennan can

quantify this or classify it however they lie beside it it's it's it's it's

up to him to speak for himself I think what's really interesting is how many

other folks that normally don't speak out publicly at all are willing to join

into this conversation and I think people should take notice of that so I

mean I take it for that that really isn't a defense to go that far Chris

legally the president can take away a security clearance right I mean is there

is there any judge in the world that's gonna say no the president

doesn't have the authority to take away somebody's security clearance

yeah they act like there's some sort of property right to keep a security

clearance post government work and there is no such thing I mean what he's doing

is irresponsible and selfish because it make he is identified with the

intelligence community you know I was a member of that and it makes it makes all

of us look like a bunch of partisan hacks when he goes off you know in every

direction spewing all this vitriol it really reflects poorly on the

intelligence community people sit back and say well now we know what he was

thinking back when he was the head of the CIA

it just doesn't reflect well no I do I think it I think I think it does

undercut the credibility of an agency that prides itself on being a

nonpartisan and in a political Newt Gingrich was on Fox & Friends this

morning let's listen to his point of view Indiana I'd like you to react to it

how would you like to have a Director of Central Intelligence so lacking in

common sense that he thinks he can write a tweet accusing the president of the

equivalent of treason high crimes and misdemeanors and then explain that he's

really not political look John Brennan is totally political he was basically a

toady to President Obama he participated in

lying to the American people about what happened in Libya and Benghazi and

frankly Brennan should never have been director of the Central Intelligence Dan

what's your reaction is Newt Gingrich the speaker I was he correct I think so

I mean we've got troops in Syria and Afghanistan we've got some we got Dan

gets in there okay yeah thanks a couple points here John Brennan has made some

outrageous claims including that Vladimir Putin could blackmail president

Trump and he called President Trump guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors

after the Helsinki summit if John Brennan really believes these things I

think he would have been better off as a professional intelligence officer rather

than saying this on MSNBC or writing it in the press he might have gone straight

to the special counsel and explained what his concerns were but the problem

is that it's not just our own citizens who are listening to John Brennan there

are foreign governments and foreign spies stealing secrets

our behalf who are going to believe that that John Brennan knows something that

maybe we don't and their trust in our government is going to be degraded our

national security as a result will be impacted negatively the second point I

would make quickly is that those who signed this letter might question

whether they want to be tethered to John Brennan who's really kind of the weak

link in this chain here he's not a credible witness and I think that those

who were concerned about the security clearance issue and maybe feel like the

CIA who held Brennan's clearance should have been responsible for either

revoking it or not I think their argument is really damaged because so

again Brennan is just not a credible witness at all

so Roger does he does then make a point here that is we undercut the credibility

with our foreign adversaries of a sitting president doesn't that concern

you at all I think it does but there's plenty of things to concern me in that

same realm the president leaking intelligence that we got from Israeli

sources to the Russian ambassador in the Oval Office whatever happened in the two

hours in Helsinki this I think which concern you wait why did sudden why do

suddenly Democrats get concerned with that the idea that the president is

engaging in diplomacy is something that I've always thought that Democrats

engaged in and supported and then brought up Donald Trump does it and

suddenly he's criticized for it well I've actually been in those rooms I'm

assuming some of the rest of the panel have as well and probably you as well

congressman but there's always no takers there's always interpreters there's

always some kind of official record and it's it's no accident that as soon as

Helsinki was over we come home from that and then there's the announcement that

there's not going to be readouts from phone calls with foreign leaders so I

think I agree with the instincts about being concerned about what's going on

I think the Brennan Trump thing is kind of taken on its own life in the last 48

hours that I don't think anyone is necessarily proud of our happy with but

if one is if one has the instincts and the antenna for being concerned about

national security I wouldn't put in mr. Brennan and his

actions in the last four or five days at the top of that list yeah I I would

because I think he uses that as a tool for his own personal political gain and

financial game that's my own personal printing but Chris it begs the question

why do people in perpetuity continue to get security clearances after they leave

office I mean it's expensive to do right but

what what is this really justified in this day and age I don't think so I

think there are far too many people post government service who retain their

clearances they're expensive they've got to do reinvestigations periodically and

it really the test is or the criteria is is it is it in the best interest of the

government that for them to keep their clearances and I would say the number of

people that can retain those clearances the answer is no it's a commercial gain

for them not so much benefit to the government and the cost is exorbitant my

understanding is that I think it was some 15,000 dollars to reap and do this

and you really ought to go back to what senator Patrick mining from New York did

some 27 years ago he spearheaded a commission that said when everybody has

a security clearance nobody has a security clearance when everything's

classified nothing is classified and what I would really like to see actually

is the government in a bipartisan way to have Trump and the speaker and the

majority leader appoint a bipartisan panel to review this whole thing soup to

nuts top to bottom and come up with a real solution because we got to get on

both sides of the aisle take the politics out of it and figure this out

now dan I got to ask you we've had some terrific things that Brennan has done in

taking away security clearances what do you say to those men and women who were

saying in Benghazi or other places and they see this Brennan out there spewing

what he's feeling today I'll be honest I don't think it impacts

our intelligence community at all we've historically and I think it carries on

today we're just we just don't pay attention to those things John Brennan

can say what he wishes but there's no impact on the men and women of the CIA

who were just going about their jobs focused on the mission focused on on

recruiting spies and stealing secrets even those even though John Brennan

didn't like to say that we steal secrets that's what we do and right all-source

analysis so the president can make educated foreign policy decisions and I

think John Brennan is bringing dishonor on himself but I I really don't think

he's impacting the intelligence unity in the league well good I hope

he's a hundred percent right and the men and women who are serving in our

intelligence services can't thank them enough for the great work and I hope

these little sideshows that this former director had put in place are dismissed

for the shenanigans that they are gentlemen I thank you for joining us

tonight the media overhyped yet another leak in the Muller probe we'll have the

real story up next

For more infomation >> INGRAHAM: TRUMP AND BRENNAN BATTLE IT OUT OVER SECURITY CLEARANCE ISSUE - Duration: 11:38.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Says He Could Run The Russia Probe - Duration: 0:46.

For more infomation >> Trump Says He Could Run The Russia Probe - Duration: 0:46.

-------------------------------------------

Trump calls out Wheeler over Occupy ICE response - Duration: 0:52.

For more infomation >> Trump calls out Wheeler over Occupy ICE response - Duration: 0:52.

-------------------------------------------

Karma Hits Trump Hating Comedian - Duration: 12:42.

Karma Hits Trump Hating Comedian

Comedians have long targeted presidents in their comedic scripts.

It used to be, however, that the jabs were light and the candor of the comedian was friendly,

maybe borderline insulting.

That's changed now that Trump is in office.

Now, comedians seem to believe he's fair game for all kinds of terrible/lewd/crude

jokes.

This was especially evident when comedian Michelle Wolf hosted the White House correspondents

dinner a few months ago.

The correspondent's dinner is filled with members of the media on both the left and

the right and has been one of the few places where comedians could go after any President…right

in front of his face.

But Wolf took it to another level entirely when she "roasted" the president.

This included making jokes about pedophilia, pornography, orgasming and more.

Well, come to find out, that kind of behavior isn't well tolerated.

Even by the left (not because the left doesn't enjoy these things, but because there's

no money made in selling trash).

Wolf, who has recently been given her own TV show on Netflix, recently found out she'd

be losing that coveted spot on the "boob tube."

It turns out that her show on Netflix was pulled after just a few short months on the

air.

As the Blaze writes:

Her [Michelle Wolf]show, "The Break with Michelle Wolf," premiered in May.

The 33-year-old had then joked that she would be airing "the types of jokes my former

bosses would tell me we couldn't do on TV."

Netflix confirmed to Fox News that they would not be ordering more episodes of the show.

Wolf was widely criticized for her jokes at the White House Correspondents' Dinner that

targeted White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders.

"I'm never really sure what to call Sarah Huckabee Sanders, you know?"

Wolf said.

"Is it Sarah Sanders?

Is it Sarah Huckabee Sander?

Is it Cousin Huckabee?

Is it Auntie Huckabee Sanders?"

"Like, what is Uncle Tom but for white women who disappoint other white women?" she added.

"I know…

Aunt Coulter."

This is quite surprising considering NetFlix is filled with vile TV shows containing some

of the banalest plot lines imaginable.

But, at the end of the day, NetFlix is a business, and it would appear there's no market for

an acerbic and controversial comedian like Wolf.

Her frequent jokes about incest, pedophilia, and abortion may have won her some fans, but

support for her kind of comedy is obviously not worth spending money on…

Or listening to ever…

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your

friends

and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> Karma Hits Trump Hating Comedian - Duration: 12:42.

-------------------------------------------

Hateful CNN Analyst Bashes Conservative Guest, Trump Intervenes & Makes Him Pay - Duration: 5:00.

For more infomation >> Hateful CNN Analyst Bashes Conservative Guest, Trump Intervenes & Makes Him Pay - Duration: 5:00.

-------------------------------------------

How China can retaliate to Trump's tariffs - Duration: 4:21.

For more infomation >> How China can retaliate to Trump's tariffs - Duration: 4:21.

-------------------------------------------

Trump just threatened to personally take over and run Mueller's Russia investigation - Duration: 2:32.

For more infomation >> Trump just threatened to personally take over and run Mueller's Russia investigation - Duration: 2:32.

-------------------------------------------

FBI searching for man who threatened to shoot President Trump - Duration: 1:00.

For more infomation >> FBI searching for man who threatened to shoot President Trump - Duration: 1:00.

-------------------------------------------

Top Democrat Challenger To Trump Just Ended His Career With These Five Words - Duration: 3:29.

For more infomation >> Top Democrat Challenger To Trump Just Ended His Career With These Five Words - Duration: 3:29.

-------------------------------------------

Pres Trump Takes Former Intel Officer To The Cleaners After Becoming TOTALLY UNGLUED - Duration: 3:04.

For more infomation >> Pres Trump Takes Former Intel Officer To The Cleaners After Becoming TOTALLY UNGLUED - Duration: 3:04.

-------------------------------------------

Nicolle Wallace Lays Out The Trump Obstruction Of Justice That Don McGhan May Have Witnessed - Duration: 1:18.

early strategy of full

cooperation was a potentially

damaging mistake.

So here's some of the flash

points in the investigation into

obstruction of justice that don

mcgahn's 30 hours of defendant

may have helped make more clear

to Robert Mueller.

First, trump's campaign to

pressure his A.G. To unrecuse

himself in the investigation.

In March trump ordered mcgahn to

stop sessions from recusing.

Next the firing of FBI director

James Comey.

Mcgahn's aides at the center and

how trump would explain it

publicly.

Then there was trump's attempt

to fire Robert Mueller.

Trump directed mcgahn to fire

the special counsel last June.

Mcgahn this time refused.

There are also concerns of

witness tampering.

"The New York Times" reporting

in March Mueller learned of two

conversations in which trump

asked key witnesses, one of them

don mcgahn, about matters they

discussed with the special

counsel, raising concerns that

the president was acting

improperly.

And then there is the spark that

ignited it all, the firing of

national security advisor Mike

mcgahn was at the center of

that, too.

He was the one who briefed trump

on Flynn's dishonesty.

And what trump knew about

Flynn's deception and when he

could -- when he knew he could

determine whether his pressure

on Comey to drop the Flynn

For more infomation >> Nicolle Wallace Lays Out The Trump Obstruction Of Justice That Don McGhan May Have Witnessed - Duration: 1:18.

-------------------------------------------

It Is 100% Certain That Michael Cohen Is Going To Provide Damaging Info On Trump - Duration: 1:40.

about this tape.

Michael avenatti, I want to get

your reaction to the news you're

hearing with the rest of us.

>> Well, I'm not surprised by

the news.

The only thing I'm surprised

about is that it took this long.

I think for the first time on

MSNBC back in April I stated

that ultimately he was going to

be charged and roll over on the

president and I'm going to

maintain that position.

I think the likelihood -- well,

I know the likelihood of him

providing information damaging

about the president is 100%.

>> How do you know that the

likelihood is 100%?

>> Because I've been active in

connection with the case on

behalf of my client.

I've been active in

communicating with people in law

enforcement.

There's no question that he's

going to be providing and has

provided information that's

damaging to th president.

>> Information of what nature?

How specific?

What would you know there in

terms of what the information

would be?

>> Information relating to

financial dealings that had gone

on between him and the president

during the 10 to 12-year time

period for which Michael Cohen

served as the president's

personal counsel.

Of all the people that the

president should have showed

loyalty to beyond Vladimir

Putin, Michael Cohen should have

been second on the list.

Some would have argued that he

should have been first on the

list.

You don't put a guy that has

your inner most secrets on an

island and treat him the way

that Donald Trump has treated

Michael Cohen and ultimately

it's going to come back and bite

him.

>> I'm trying to make sense

here.

Are you saying that the

information would be related to

this hush money payment, the

potential there for a campaign

finance violation?

For more infomation >> It Is 100% Certain That Michael Cohen Is Going To Provide Damaging Info On Trump - Duration: 1:40.

-------------------------------------------

TRUMP IN INTERVIEW SAYS HE COULD "RUN" MUELLER PROBE IF HE WANTED - Duration: 19:25.

10news and the Paul Manafort financial fraud trial jurors seeming to indicate

they are now struggling to reach a unanimous verdict on all 18 counts i'm

harris faulkner you're watching outnumbered over time the jury

submitting a note to the court on the fourth day of deliberations just a short

time ago we've been covering this in the past hour that note asking the judge

what it would mean for the verdict if they are unable to reach a consensus on

at least one of those counts the judge responding that this is not unusual and

urged them to keep deliberating Peter Doocy live outside the federal

courthouse in Alexandria Virginia now Peter I just read an email from you

you're telling our team that there was something specific that we need to know

about that note and Harris that thing is that the note was edited I have spoken

since court went into recess with somebody who saw the note and said that

there was something crossed out before the word single so the belief is that

originally when the jury decided that they wanted to go to the judge with a

question about what happens that they can't get to me unanimous verdict they

were not just writing to ask without a single count a few minutes ago before it

really started pouring rain here in Alexandria the manna Fork team came out

and they said they have no idea how many counts the jury is deadlocked on

Peter deadlock in every counter just one oh we don't would you make it a question

Kevin it's a good point in this trying to have

a question like that that defense attorney Kevin downing also asked the

judge Alice if he could just tell the jury while they were out of the

courtroom that they're allowed to say they are hung but the judge said he

would not do that he told attorneys he needs to be really careful not to say

anything that could prejudice the jury right now and the judge said that even

though there is a precedent here in the Fourth Circuit for him to accept a

partial verdict he still wants them to come back with unanimous verdicts on all

18 counts the judge also said if the jury sends him a message that they

cannot get to a unanimous verdict on every single count he will consider

asking them where they stand the judge then brought the jury into the room and

he told jurors that they should not surrender their honest opinions they

must decide the case for themselves and he told them they are not partisans they

are judges and with that the judge sent them back to continue deliberating

something they have been doing now Paris for more than 25 hours all right Peter

Doocy we will come back to you as the news warrants since this case has been

changing by the hour thank you very much and just want to let you know we do have

a formal federal prosecutor coming up Fred TC will join me a little bit later

this hour to talk more about the developments there and Catherine

Harridge a lead correspondent for us as well as inside the courtroom so as that

story comes together we'll bring you all the breaking details this is also

developing at this hour reaction to President Trump and a wide-ranging

interview with Reuters insisting he has the power to step in and run the Russia

investigation himself if he wants to the president's saying quote I can go in and

I can do whatever I could run it if I want but I decided to stay out I'm

totally allowed to be involved if I want it to be so far I haven't chosen to be

involved I'll stay out in quote and the president did not rule out revoking the

special counsel security clearance in that interview we're joined now by my

first guest counselor to the president Kellyanne Conway great to see you today

thank you for having me House let's start with what the president means when

he says that he could actually run the Russia investigation

well the president and his team have been incredibly compliant and

cooperative with the Muller investigation you have over 1 million

documents produced 233 some witnesses have gone and visited the Muller

investigation and testified under oath thusly and so this is a president who

also thinks that it completely ridicules the system of justice if we're not

looking at the other side of this investigation

you had corrupt dealings all the way up the chain the FBI some of many of them

have lost their jobs now in security clearances Andrew McCabe obviously Peter

struck Lisa Paige is gone she left Jim Comey the shenanigans he pulled in front

of Congress and in his silly book and and the fact is that Peter or is still

there and we know that his wife Nellie were was paid by fusion GPS the research

firm that started the ridiculous dossier may I remind your audience is just a

fancy French word for a load of crap along with Christopher still and now it

because it is and the president there's there's a level of frustration and

consternation that we're not looking at all sides of this equation so the

president also looked the special counsels under his purview but he's been

very cooperative as have the other people have been asked to speak with mr.

Muller all right you mentioned Bruce or and his

wife Nellie he's on the list that the president has said he might strip away

security clearances some criticism that it looks more political and retaliatory

than something that protects the nation I want to give you a chance to respond

and then we'll move on so not everyone has had a security clearance keeps them

when they leave office when they leave the public service I should say some do

but there are two primary reasons by somebody would is number one if you want

to have a continuum if that person wants to be helpful to the next administration

and mr. Brennan has proven that he does not wish to be helpful this

administration in fact he's a variant critic of this administration this

president's policies on cable TV where he's not paid for his opinions that is

his right but this is somebody whose claims were completely rebut advice

doctor general's report in 2014 is someone who had a difficult time being

truthful when when brought before a congressional committee

and chairman Burfoot at best last week why if mr. Brennan

the former seed CIA director but current pundit on a cable news station a lower

rated one than yours why why would mr. Brennan not have told the Senate

Intelligence Committee what he thought with respect to Russia collusion and

other matters why did he make it part of either his testimony the information

that he provided why does he wait to say that so this isn't about silencing

critics this is about the fact that it's security clearances our privileges they

are not rights and it's a professional courtesy to keep it extended to somebody

who's no longer in public service and or somebody who wishes to be helpful to the

successive administration he's proven that he doesn't want to be helpful well

it's certainly not about silencing because we have heard more from that's

right we given him a larger platform by the way mr. clapper went and the

president some pretty tough words for mr. Brennan as have some others all

right the president also today is pushing back on a report

kelly-ann that his advisors urged him to block President Obama's access to

intelligence briefings until HR McMaster had to step in the president tweeted

this fake news of which there is so much this time the very tired New Yorker

falsely reported that I was going to take the extraordinary step of denying

Intel briefings to President Obama never discussed or thought of I want to get

the White House response to that as well it's nothing that I've ever discussed

with the president he's never raised it with me and I so I'm not aware of that

at all and I'll take the president at his word because he is actually he's

explaining it to the whole world he has been very very helpful I think a very

respectful of marma President Obama's access to intelligence information as

that may be necessary I mean I remember standing in many places during the

transition and commending what we thought to be then a desire for a smooth

transition between the outgoing administration and the incoming

administration I was invited to the White House by Valerie Jarrett a very

close who served all eight years to President

Obama President Obama himself had instructed many people in his

administration to be helpful to us and coming in so the president has returned

the courtesy many times as for others what they were doing and perhaps what

they were doing at the upper echelon of the FBI and the DOJ at the time we

should all like to know especially those who are calling for accountability and

transparency and pretending that other things happen which they can't seem to

prove or find Wow I want to talk with you about opioid addiction now because

this was something that was popping on the horizon yesterday we've heard that

the life expectancy inside the United States has fallen and partly due to the

drug addiction that we haven't going on in our nation the president urged the

republican-led Senate to pass legislation aimed at attacking the

crisis he tweeted this it is outrageous that poisonous synthetic heroin fentanyl

comes pouring into the u.s. postal system from China we can and must end

this now the Senate should pass the stop act and firmly stop the poison from

killing our children and destroying our country no more delay I have talked with

Congress members including Walden chairman Walden who has led a charge on

getting legislation on the house side as well can you give me kind of a progress

report because you you and the president we're tweeting about this yesterday

that's right Harris and this will be absolutely by far the most important

part of our interview would have we the one that gets the least amount of

coverage because it's a complicated topic that many don't want to dig into

an understanding affects many lives drug overdoses in this country hits 72,000

last year that's a 10% increase over the year before and the year before that it

was a 22% increase so it still is going up it's being slowed down in large part

because the president's three point plan to help combat the opioid crisis and

drug supply drug demand epidemic loyal in our country is includes a 30%

reduction in prescribing over the three years and we're already seeing less

prescribing on the matter of fentanyl at the N ta n yl ment '''l please I beg

everybody who's got a platform to start informing America

about this it claimed 29,000 plus American lives last year we have more

people dying from drug overdoses than breast cancer and/or gun violence or

plane crashes certainly things that get a ton of attention and rightly so but

fentanyl is a synthetic opioid being brought to our country through China and

increasingly from Mexico is from China and increasingly from Mexico so the

president in asking to send it to pass the sawed back and put it on his desk

for signature that would have enhanced and advanced electronic data on packages

that come from China for example through the US Postal Service these private

carriers are already compelled to list the sender the recipients and the

contents of the package USPS should do the same because we are

getting fentanyl through our own mails and into our communities at Paris over

almost 30,000 people died of fentanyl overdoses last year most of the country

has no idea what fentanyl is let alone it's being laced into heroin meth

marijuana cocaine in Cincinnati recently there was a report that 36 people went

to the emergency room because of that the Border Patrol stopped a 19 year-old

he's not even legal to drink in this country 19 year old so much heroin

cocaine and fentanyl on him seized at the border

recently Maryland State Troopers thought the tractor-trailer had so much fun till

could have wiped out all of DC Americans need to know that because I want to

bring you back and also talk a little bit about moving forward you've seen

senators Rob Portman and others make a difference in his home state of Ohio

seen some progress with this but that number of 72,000 dead is staggering

compared to where we were even a decade ago appreciate your time on this it's a

very salacious nation past the house over 350 I think 353 to 52 yes and so

put it on the President's desk and he will sign themselves up like my oldest

son is you so it's hugely bipartisan nonpartisan issue but it's starving for

bipartisan solutions this past January the President signed into law the

interdict Act also bipartisan it passed the house 412 to 3 and it passed the

Senate by Unanimous Consent he signed it with Democrats around him and you

office Kelly and Conway again I want to bring you back to talk more about this

because there is more after the holiday that I know legislatively will be

happening with this I hit you on a lot of counts today appreciate your time you

got it take care now for reaction from the other side of the political aisle we

are joined by Democratic congressman Raj Krishnamoorthy of Illinois a member of

the House Oversight Committee great to see you today so we ended up there with

something that is bipartisan and I want to give you a chance to talk about

opioids if you want to but there will be more to report coming up so a quick

maybe word from you on that and then let's hop into the day's news as well

yes thank you so much for bringing attention to that and I agree with what

Kellyanne Conway said that is an issue that is completely bipartisan or

nonpartisan whatever you want to call it because you know the opioid crisis

ravages every single community across the country it's it's hurting my

district um I have one piece of legislation that's part of that package

that passed through the House overwhelmingly which is trying to figure

out what are alternatives to opioid treatment and making sure that Americans

have greater access to that I'm hopeful that the Senate takes action because you

know this is an issue that you know goes beyond politics that transcends party

lines and we have to act in unison as quickly as possible congressman thank

you very much I mentioned I had talked with chairman Walden about this as well

so I know on the house side that it is something that you all are discussing

yes let's talk about the news of the day with the president and Bob Muller and

you know the president in this Reuters conversation interview that he had kind

of hinted at the fact that maybe a little bit of a change he's not

necessarily advocating now that he himself sit down with Robert Muller he

might even be able to run that investigation you heard Kellyanne Conway

making news on the fact that you know that the president has hands-off with

this for now and he believes in transparency in your response

well it's true that the law-enforcement agencies and specifically Special

Counsel mulher fall within the purview of the executive branch which obviously

yes it falls under the president's jurisdiction that being said I would

strongly caution the president against you know getting involved in this

independent investigation by a special counsel mauler obviously at the end of

the day the president can do what he wants but Congress obviously has

oversight as well and anything that would be seen as dear ailing the

investigation or somehow obstructing justice I believe would not be welcomed

by Republicans or Democrats on Capitol Hill well that's confusing because if

the president can weigh in how could it be obstruction I just want to follow

with that sure absolutely so as you know obstruction of justice in

and of itself is a crime and we're somebody who is being investigated or

where's an investigation of someone else is happening if any individual impedes

that investigation knowingly or intentionally or otherwise that could be

viewed as a crime in and of itself so at this point transparency and cooperation

is a good idea and I think that's something that would be helpful in this

investigation all right let's talk security clearances now I'm even hearing

a drumbeat from some Democrats who say that the politics of former CIA director

John Brennan are complicated and problematic in fact I park him back to a

time when Democrats wanted to see him out completely wanted to senator Udall

of Colorado wanted to see him kicked out resign over past behavior that he had

put forth as the CIA director looking at Senate Intel staffers information where

are we in terms of the how you see security clearances they're not a right

it's not a right it's it's usually something that former administration

officials former officers and so forth access to for one particular reason

Harris and that is to assist the current administration with their institutional

knowledge if they're mean if that exactly now what I believe is really

problematic and is is we got to take the politics out of the intelligence

community we got to make sure that nobody is somehow penalize or their

security clearances reverse me here because I'm gonna lose you in just a few

seconds and I want to get this question in if you don't mind

Robert dollars clearance security clearance on the line perhaps do you

what would you say about the president being able to wipe that away should he

choose to and he hasn't said one way or the other if he would but he didn't deny

that that was an option when he talked with Reuters you know that would be a

big problem Harris I think that that would again be something that would be

impeding the investigation because obviously mr. Muller has to have access

to some of the information that is at the heart of this investigation that

might be classified and so I think that revoking is clearance but again in my

humble opinion would be something that would be critiqued not only by Democrats

but also Republicans today by our nation from Democrats I think it's interesting

your first word that you went to is that it would be a problem so it's not

illegal it doesn't sound like it would cause Democrats to be apoplectic on the

hill I just want to kind of go ahead I think I think I I think I might have

understated the reaction I think that I think that numerous Democrats and

Republicans would be extremely upset about it the last thing I want to say is

you know the Russians are our adversaries here the Russians today

we've learned are attacking not only democratic institutions but Republican

institutions we learn today they want a map in a report they want a medal and

we've got to protect ourselves from the Russians okay not from each other not

from Democratic the Republicans we've got to be one country against the

Russians we've had a lot of British moves and we are in verdict watch right

now so I wanted to give you a chance to get to a lot of topics today yes

Gersh manic Krishnamoorthy thank you very much I'll see you soon Thank You

Harris thank you and again I say it we are on verdict watching the Paul

Manafort trial in Virginia after the jury signaled it is having some

difficulty reaching consensus on a single count we don't know if that is

one of 18 or all of 18 what exactly that means there was some editing to a note

that was handed to the judge we are all over the story a former federal

prosecutor will join me to talk about where the case is headed next and a

tragic development in the search for missing college students Molly Tibbets

her father has now confirmed his daughter is dead a live report stay

close

you

For more infomation >> TRUMP IN INTERVIEW SAYS HE COULD "RUN" MUELLER PROBE IF HE WANTED - Duration: 19:25.

-------------------------------------------

Debating Donald Trump, Climate Change, and the Paris Climate Agreement - Duration: 8:43.

Hey there guys, I'm Jesse Crowe, The Travelling Scientist, here in Northern California

Now yesterday I had an interesting discussion about climate change

with an American gentleman who is pro Trump and anti Paris climate agreement

now I'm anti Trump and Pro Paris climate agreement, so it was an interesting discussion.

check it out

Hey there guys, I'm here chatting with my American friend Tom and today we're gonna be talking a little bit about climate change

So Tom I want to start by asking you about your president Donald Trump

How do you think Donald Trump is doing as the president of America

I think he's doing great

What about the fact that he's pulling a lot of money out of funding

for like our renewable energy sources and trying to pull America out of the

Paris climate agreement and putting a lot of money into fossil fuels which is

bad for the environment and what do you say to that?

Well I'd say that that one of those three assertions is correct

putting money into fossil fuels how...

how is he putting money into fossil fuels?

from my understanding, Donald Trump is very pro-coal, which is a particularly dirty fossil fuel

okay so there's big difference though between utilising the resources that we have and actually committing public funds towards that resource right?

in other words I don't think he's subsidising the industry at all, is he?

and you start off by saying... what was your first assertion?

he's taking funding away from research into renewable energies, like solar, wind power

Oh Okay...I, I don't think he has...

well so you agree that he has he is trying to remove America out of the Paris Climate Agreement?

oh no no, that is a fate of complete, he HAS removed us,

and I think that was probably one of the the reasons that I'm most proud of

because it's really easy to fill the campaign pledges, we're gonna lower your taxes

we're gonna do tax better, politicians they go and do that

but it took a real stroke of courage for him to go and get out of the Paris Climate Accords

The Paris climate agreement is basically bringing together countries

Almost all the countries in the world, uniting them for the cause that is

trying to reduce and stop the climate change caused by humans

So by America being such a big powerful country, being one of the only countries

to disagree and pull out of the Paris Climate Agreement, that's kind of like

That's bad for the environment, is it not?

WHY?

Right, so they're doing research into finding out what humans impact is on climate change

and it's been shown that since the Industrial Revolution over 100 years ago, atmospheric carbon dioxide emissions have increased greatly

along with a slowly increasing temperature which is more rapid than it has been before the Industrial Revolution

and so basically the Paris climate agreement has recognised that and is trying to get

human kind to do what they can to minimize this human impact of climate

change to try and slow down the increase in temperatures

And so, How are they trying to effect a change?

By reducing human emissions,

things like transportation, fossil fuels, agriculture, these things that

produce the most the biggest impact from humans into climate change

And is it effective? It will be!

Tell me what plan that they have to reduce anthropogenic carbon emissions?

Through research into renewable energy sources that produce less carbon

emissions by researching more efficient modes of transport and basically finding

ways that we can try and continue to live the lifestyle we live now without

causing the pollution that we're currently producing

WHY?

Because it's been shown that climate change has a direct impact on atmospheric temperatures and

those temperatures we can see over the last couple hundred years that they are

slowly rising if they continue arise they're going to cause all sorts of problems

Rising sea levels and reduced crop output, reduced... depleted food sources

that's going to directly affect human security, our food security and our way

of life is a threat here

I can tell you that back when Al Gore released his movie, sea-levels right now it should be 15 feet higher

right now there's there might be some evidence

that sea levels have risen on order of less than an inch

okay that's one interesting statistic what about...

You know, it's been a hot summer do you think that temperatures aren't increasing to some extent globally?

Why is that going to be harmful?

Because hotter temperatures are going to make more difficult for things like growing food and maintaining water supplies

Really? you know the empirical evidence out there

shows that, guess what, we as a species actually do a whole lot better when it's warmer

so I don't think that the emperical evidence really shows that there's necessarily a problem with that!

I think that humans would just like to

have more control over the climate, rather than

having it projected to just increase in temperature and atmospheric carbon emissions

increasing and things like that so I think that the Paris climate agreement

is working towards having a better understanding and gaining more control over

our climate as a protective means for the future for the future generations it

might not be a problem in you or me in 20 or 50 years or something but maybe a

hundred years from now or two hundred years from now, you know there is potential

that the temperatures could skyrocket, sea levels could rise, or they could stay the same

Like you said, the climate models aren't perfect and the science isn't clear

but it it seems to be indicating at this point in time that

in the future, there could be real problems

I don't think that, I disagree with that

so let's just disagree let's just say that

Humans want to be in control

I think that's part of all of us

we all want to control our environment

What is it that the IPCC wants big westernised countries like the United States to do?

Well you've just got to reduce your carbon footprint

You know, United States, It's really not fair for you to have your own steel industry

let all the steel be produced in developing countries like China and India, and let them catch up to you economically

you can go ahead and spew all the carbon out that you want

As long as you pay a tax on it

So we can talk about all the money that the IPCC has absolutely wasted

And continues to waste, which is one of the reasons why Donald Trump pulled the United States out of it

and I am very proud of him doing it

because it's an absolute waste of resources

It is a corrupt body, the UN is a corrupt body and I don't believe that the best research will come out of some collective..

world body which includes disparate countries like China and India who are the biggest polluters per capita

It's just a corrupt organisation and, I hate to put it to you but they are absolutely the wrong body in the world to be the one setting policy for

something as important as alternative fossil fuel that's that's just how I feel

Beautiful, well I respect your opinions and I appreciate your time

Thanks so much for chatting with me

So there we go guys thanks for watching that interview

So who do you think was right?

do you think that we should be working on climate change and doing everything we can help the Paris climate agreement?

Or do you think that America is doing the right thing by pulling out and that the United Nations is really corrupt?

Let us know in the comments section down below and subscribe for more travelling science every week!

I'll see you guys next time, Cheers!

For more infomation >> Debating Donald Trump, Climate Change, and the Paris Climate Agreement - Duration: 8:43.

-------------------------------------------

Trump says he would "most likely" meet again with N. Korean leader Kim Jong-un - Duration: 2:25.

When President Trump concluded his summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un in Singapore

last June, he said they would be meeting again more often in the future.

The American leader has stoked that prospect once again in an interview on Monday, reiterating

his, quote, "great chemistry" with Kim.

It seems that despite the slow progress on the regime's denuclearization in recent weeks,

it hasn't put off Trump from wanting another sit-down.

Our foreign ministry correspondent Lee Ji-won has this report.

U.S. President Donald Trump says he would most likely meet again with North Korean leader

Kim Jong-un,... hinting at a possible second summit between the leaders of two long-time

adversaries, following their historic first-ever summit in June.

Speaking to Reuters on Monday, President Trump answered a question on another meeting with

Kim,... but added that he did not want to comment further.

He also offered no details on the timing or venue.

And despite the widespread skepticism that Pyongyang is not taking concrete measures

in dismantling its nuclear program, President Trump said he believes the North Koreans had

taken specific steps to denuclearize, without elaborating.

President Trump also pointed at how Kim Jong-un handed over three American detainees even

before the Singapore summit.

Trump has come under fire from his critics for making too many concessions to Pyongyang,

including his decision to actually hold the Singapore summit and suspending Washington's

joint military drills with South Korea.

President Trump, however, remains optimistic, insisting that a lot of good things are happening

with North Korea.

But he also complained that China is not helping as much as it had in the past because of its

trade dispute with the U.S.

During the interview, President Trump patted himself on the back, saying that he, someone

who's only been working on the North Korean issue for a matter of months, stopped the

regime's nuclear and missile testing, something his predecessors who had been working on the

issue for 30 years couldn't do.

Trump also pointed to the great chemistry he shared with Kim as one reason that helped

ease last year's tensions between the two sides.

Trump said he and the North Korean leader like each other,... adding he has very good

personal relations with Kim, which is what he thinks is holding the situation together.

Lee Ji-won, Arirang News.

For more infomation >> Trump says he would "most likely" meet again with N. Korean leader Kim Jong-un - Duration: 2:25.

-------------------------------------------

TRUMP UND „Q" – HOFFNUNGSTRÄGER ODER INSTRUMENTE DER KABALE? 20. August 2018 - Duration: 18:09.

For more infomation >> TRUMP UND „Q" – HOFFNUNGSTRÄGER ODER INSTRUMENTE DER KABALE? 20. August 2018 - Duration: 18:09.

-------------------------------------------

Trump officials dodge senators' Russia questions - Duration: 1:47.

Again senator I'm not gonna get into it.

I know you don't want but the answer is

yes or no that the sanctions were pulled back.

I'm not going to discuss another agency, Senator.

What happened between her announcement and the inaction taken?

But apparently, you're not going to answer that.

The answer is simple I'm not quite sure why we are having such a difficult time

answering simple questions. We seem to be more evasive than helpful.

It would be nice to get answers to the questions I am as frustrated as the folks who come before me.

Am I to take from your unwillingness to answer that kind of question

It sounds like you're not you're not going to answer, so no offense I'm

going to keep moving Mr. Krebs.

We had one of these hearings in a

classified session that was worthless, and it wasn't worthless because the

Chairman and ranking member is worthless because you guys have filibuster down to an art.

With all due respect I've heard you say this. You're very good

at repeating the same thing that doesn't help me.

so that's a simple question, yes or no. Either you were told or you weren't.

And when are you ready for that briefing?

Excuse me?

When?

That was my whole question, it's a short question.

Look I don't want to use my time.

If you're not gonna answer the question just tell me.

I'm out of time sorry Mr. chairman.

Sorry guys I couldn't do any better, I've tried to get answers.

No comments:

Post a Comment