Tuesday, August 21, 2018

Trump news on Youtube Aug 21 2018

fantastic show for you tonight with so much news I don't know how we're gonna

get it all fit in president Trump is once again attacking the media this time

over the White House counsel's interview with the Muller probe did dawn McGann

turn on the president I don't think so we'll tell you the real story in just a

few minutes while many Democrats are calling for ice to be abolished

President Trump was honoring the heroes of ice and Border Patrol at the White

House today the latest controversy though iced taking heat for arresting an

international murder suspect unbelievable details coming up plus a

new wave of violence sweeping Chicago over the weekend and you won't believe

how city officials are responding now but first our top story Donald Trump

versus John Brennan jut last week the White House announced that Trump had

stripped Obama CIA director turned left-wing cable news pundit John Brennan

of his security clearance how dare he do that Brennan isn't going away quietly

threatening legal action and doubling down on his most outrageous claims

I called his behavior treasonous which is to betray one's trust and to aid and

abet the enemy and I stand very much by that claim I have seen the lights

blinking red in terms of what mr. Trump has done and is doing and is bringing

this country down on the global stage and he's fueling and feeding

divisiveness within our country he continually lies the American people the

types of things that he's doing I think I need to speak out and so I've been

speaking out rather forcefully because I believe it's important to do so I don't

believe I'm being political at all I'm not a Republican I'm not a Democrat not

being political right president Trump's attorney Rudy Giuliani struck back at

Brennan's a political claim earlier tonight John Brennan was not a

particularly distinguished anything he was a political operative

he hasn't been an intelligence officer in a long time he's been a political

hitman his language demonstrates that the president committed treason

treason come on well Brennan might want to be careful because it's not just

Trump's allies that are criticizing him now

well there are intelligence officials who are uncomfortable with how far

Brennan has not I think Mayo John is sort of like a freight train and he's

gonna say what's on his mind I think though that the common denominator among

all of us that have been speaking up though is genuine concern about the

Jeopardy or threats to our institutions and values and although we may express

that in in different ways and I think that's what this this really is about

but John and his rhetoric have become I think an issue in and of itself yeah

they have become an issue joining me now for reaction are dawn Dan Hoffman a Fox

News contributor a former CIA station chief chris swagger former assistant FBI

director and roger fisk former aide to Secretary of State John Kerry and a

Democratic strategist Roger I want to go to you first give you the first shot at

this treason do we really think that says

treasonous to do this types of thing well mr. Brennan is you know perfectly

capable of speaking for himself so I don't feel like I need to amplify or

defend his points but you think what can you defend you this point or are you

supportive of is the point I mean probably a finger for your opinion of

and he's making you know the the penalty for treason is death so do you really

believe that the president is being treasonous I I again mr. Brennan can

quantify this or classify it however they lie beside it it's it's it's it's

up to him to speak for himself I think what's really interesting is how many

other folks that normally don't speak out publicly at all are willing to join

into this conversation and I think people should take notice of that so I

mean I take it for that that really isn't a defense to go that far Chris

legally the president can take away a security clearance right I mean is there

is there any judge in the world that's gonna say no the president

doesn't have the authority to take away somebody's security clearance

yeah they act like there's some sort of property right to keep a security

clearance post government work and there is no such thing I mean what he's doing

is irresponsible and selfish because it make he is identified with the

intelligence community you know I was a member of that and it makes it makes all

of us look like a bunch of partisan hacks when he goes off you know in every

direction spewing all this vitriol it really reflects poorly on the

intelligence community people sit back and say well now we know what he was

thinking back when he was the head of the CIA

it just doesn't reflect well no I do I think it I think I think it does

undercut the credibility of an agency that prides itself on being a

nonpartisan and in a political Newt Gingrich was on Fox & Friends this

morning let's listen to his point of view Indiana I'd like you to react to it

how would you like to have a Director of Central Intelligence so lacking in

common sense that he thinks he can write a tweet accusing the president of the

equivalent of treason high crimes and misdemeanors and then explain that he's

really not political look John Brennan is totally political he was basically a

toady to President Obama he participated in

lying to the American people about what happened in Libya and Benghazi and

frankly Brennan should never have been director of the Central Intelligence Dan

what's your reaction is Newt Gingrich the speaker I was he correct I think so

I mean we've got troops in Syria and Afghanistan we've got some we got Dan

gets in there okay yeah thanks a couple points here John Brennan has made some

outrageous claims including that Vladimir Putin could blackmail president

Trump and he called President Trump guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors

after the Helsinki summit if John Brennan really believes these things I

think he would have been better off as a professional intelligence officer rather

than saying this on MSNBC or writing it in the press he might have gone straight

to the special counsel and explained what his concerns were but the problem

is that it's not just our own citizens who are listening to John Brennan there

are foreign governments and foreign spies stealing secrets

our behalf who are going to believe that that John Brennan knows something that

maybe we don't and their trust in our government is going to be degraded our

national security as a result will be impacted negatively the second point I

would make quickly is that those who signed this letter might question

whether they want to be tethered to John Brennan who's really kind of the weak

link in this chain here he's not a credible witness and I think that those

who were concerned about the security clearance issue and maybe feel like the

CIA who held Brennan's clearance should have been responsible for either

revoking it or not I think their argument is really damaged because so

again Brennan is just not a credible witness at all

so Roger does he does then make a point here that is we undercut the credibility

with our foreign adversaries of a sitting president doesn't that concern

you at all I think it does but there's plenty of things to concern me in that

same realm the president leaking intelligence that we got from Israeli

sources to the Russian ambassador in the Oval Office whatever happened in the two

hours in Helsinki this I think which concern you wait why did sudden why do

suddenly Democrats get concerned with that the idea that the president is

engaging in diplomacy is something that I've always thought that Democrats

engaged in and supported and then brought up Donald Trump does it and

suddenly he's criticized for it well I've actually been in those rooms I'm

assuming some of the rest of the panel have as well and probably you as well

congressman but there's always no takers there's always interpreters there's

always some kind of official record and it's it's no accident that as soon as

Helsinki was over we come home from that and then there's the announcement that

there's not going to be readouts from phone calls with foreign leaders so I

think I agree with the instincts about being concerned about what's going on

I think the Brennan Trump thing is kind of taken on its own life in the last 48

hours that I don't think anyone is necessarily proud of our happy with but

if one is if one has the instincts and the antenna for being concerned about

national security I wouldn't put in mr. Brennan and his

actions in the last four or five days at the top of that list yeah I I would

because I think he uses that as a tool for his own personal political gain and

financial game that's my own personal printing but Chris it begs the question

why do people in perpetuity continue to get security clearances after they leave

office I mean it's expensive to do right but

what what is this really justified in this day and age I don't think so I

think there are far too many people post government service who retain their

clearances they're expensive they've got to do reinvestigations periodically and

it really the test is or the criteria is is it is it in the best interest of the

government that for them to keep their clearances and I would say the number of

people that can retain those clearances the answer is no it's a commercial gain

for them not so much benefit to the government and the cost is exorbitant my

understanding is that I think it was some 15,000 dollars to reap and do this

and you really ought to go back to what senator Patrick mining from New York did

some 27 years ago he spearheaded a commission that said when everybody has

a security clearance nobody has a security clearance when everything's

classified nothing is classified and what I would really like to see actually

is the government in a bipartisan way to have Trump and the speaker and the

majority leader appoint a bipartisan panel to review this whole thing soup to

nuts top to bottom and come up with a real solution because we got to get on

both sides of the aisle take the politics out of it and figure this out

now dan I got to ask you we've had some terrific things that Brennan has done in

taking away security clearances what do you say to those men and women who were

saying in Benghazi or other places and they see this Brennan out there spewing

what he's feeling today I'll be honest I don't think it impacts

our intelligence community at all we've historically and I think it carries on

today we're just we just don't pay attention to those things John Brennan

can say what he wishes but there's no impact on the men and women of the CIA

who were just going about their jobs focused on the mission focused on on

recruiting spies and stealing secrets even those even though John Brennan

didn't like to say that we steal secrets that's what we do and right all-source

analysis so the president can make educated foreign policy decisions and I

think John Brennan is bringing dishonor on himself but I I really don't think

he's impacting the intelligence unity in the league well good I hope

he's a hundred percent right and the men and women who are serving in our

intelligence services can't thank them enough for the great work and I hope

these little sideshows that this former director had put in place are dismissed

for the shenanigans that they are gentlemen I thank you for joining us

tonight the media overhyped yet another leak in the Muller probe we'll have the

real story up next

For more infomation >> INGRAHAM: TRUMP AND BRENNAN BATTLE IT OUT OVER SECURITY CLEARANCE ISSUE - Duration: 11:38.

-------------------------------------------

5 Reasons That Trump's Big Coal Bailout Is A Bad Idea - Duration: 1:52.

For more infomation >> 5 Reasons That Trump's Big Coal Bailout Is A Bad Idea - Duration: 1:52.

-------------------------------------------

Investigation Into Former Trump "Fixer" Michael Cohen Winding Down - Duration: 0:29.

For more infomation >> Investigation Into Former Trump "Fixer" Michael Cohen Winding Down - Duration: 0:29.

-------------------------------------------

With Rudy's Deadline Looming, Trump Turns Up The Heat On Mueller's 'Witch Hunt' - Duration: 2:52.

For more infomation >> With Rudy's Deadline Looming, Trump Turns Up The Heat On Mueller's 'Witch Hunt' - Duration: 2:52.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Says He Could Run The Russia Probe - Duration: 0:46.

For more infomation >> Trump Says He Could Run The Russia Probe - Duration: 0:46.

-------------------------------------------

Black Communities Praising Trump For An Incredible 400% Increase In ONE Year - Duration: 6:01.

For more infomation >> Black Communities Praising Trump For An Incredible 400% Increase In ONE Year - Duration: 6:01.

-------------------------------------------

Trump calls out Wheeler over Occupy ICE response - Duration: 0:52.

For more infomation >> Trump calls out Wheeler over Occupy ICE response - Duration: 0:52.

-------------------------------------------

After Melania's Outfit Causes Trump-Haters To Go Nuts, She Tells Them 'Go Pound Sand' - Duration: 5:38.

For more infomation >> After Melania's Outfit Causes Trump-Haters To Go Nuts, She Tells Them 'Go Pound Sand' - Duration: 5:38.

-------------------------------------------

Former White House Special Counsel Explains Why Trump And Giuliani Are Freaked Out About Don McGahn - Duration: 1:42.

So I think that you're seeing a

president increasingly lash out

as this gets closer to him,

Andrea.

>> Kathy, you are a former white

house counsel.

And I want to be clear because

I'm not sure the president, at

least initially, understood

this.

Don mcgahn is not the

president's personal lawyer and

he's not even the president's

lawyer, per se.

He's the lawyer for the office

of the presidency.

So there is, yes, you tell me is

there an executive privilege?

Rudy was suggesting there is

executive and lawyer/client

privilege but a weak

lawyer/client privilege here if

at all.

But you're the lawyer.

Help me out here.

>> That's exactly right.

I think Rudy is wrong.

I understand why the president

is wanting to take credit for

the fact that his white house

counsel has apparently provided

a lot of information to the

special counsel, but it really

wasn't a choice.

Wasn't a matter of strategy.

Don mcgahn is the white house

was a fact witness in a criminal

investigation, and he has an

obligation to answer questions

that are put to him.

It's as simple as that.

The D.C. Circuit court of

appeals in 1998 decided this

question pretty defin of itly

and said if you are a government

lawyer working on behalf of the

American people, and you are

advising the president or other

government officials, there is

not a traditional

attorney/client privilege in the

way we think about if you would

go out and hire a lawyer as a

private citizen and you are able

to talk to your lawyer with an

expectation of confidentiality.

So that ship has sailed.

And, you know, did the idea that

somehow president trump allowed

For more infomation >> Former White House Special Counsel Explains Why Trump And Giuliani Are Freaked Out About Don McGahn - Duration: 1:42.

-------------------------------------------

Karma Hits Trump Hating Comedian - Duration: 12:42.

Karma Hits Trump Hating Comedian

Comedians have long targeted presidents in their comedic scripts.

It used to be, however, that the jabs were light and the candor of the comedian was friendly,

maybe borderline insulting.

That's changed now that Trump is in office.

Now, comedians seem to believe he's fair game for all kinds of terrible/lewd/crude

jokes.

This was especially evident when comedian Michelle Wolf hosted the White House correspondents

dinner a few months ago.

The correspondent's dinner is filled with members of the media on both the left and

the right and has been one of the few places where comedians could go after any President…right

in front of his face.

But Wolf took it to another level entirely when she "roasted" the president.

This included making jokes about pedophilia, pornography, orgasming and more.

Well, come to find out, that kind of behavior isn't well tolerated.

Even by the left (not because the left doesn't enjoy these things, but because there's

no money made in selling trash).

Wolf, who has recently been given her own TV show on Netflix, recently found out she'd

be losing that coveted spot on the "boob tube."

It turns out that her show on Netflix was pulled after just a few short months on the

air.

As the Blaze writes:

Her [Michelle Wolf]show, "The Break with Michelle Wolf," premiered in May.

The 33-year-old had then joked that she would be airing "the types of jokes my former

bosses would tell me we couldn't do on TV."

Netflix confirmed to Fox News that they would not be ordering more episodes of the show.

Wolf was widely criticized for her jokes at the White House Correspondents' Dinner that

targeted White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders.

"I'm never really sure what to call Sarah Huckabee Sanders, you know?"

Wolf said.

"Is it Sarah Sanders?

Is it Sarah Huckabee Sander?

Is it Cousin Huckabee?

Is it Auntie Huckabee Sanders?"

"Like, what is Uncle Tom but for white women who disappoint other white women?" she added.

"I know…

Aunt Coulter."

This is quite surprising considering NetFlix is filled with vile TV shows containing some

of the banalest plot lines imaginable.

But, at the end of the day, NetFlix is a business, and it would appear there's no market for

an acerbic and controversial comedian like Wolf.

Her frequent jokes about incest, pedophilia, and abortion may have won her some fans, but

support for her kind of comedy is obviously not worth spending money on…

Or listening to ever…

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your

friends

and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> Karma Hits Trump Hating Comedian - Duration: 12:42.

-------------------------------------------

Hateful CNN Analyst Bashes Conservative Guest, Trump Intervenes & Makes Him Pay - Duration: 5:00.

For more infomation >> Hateful CNN Analyst Bashes Conservative Guest, Trump Intervenes & Makes Him Pay - Duration: 5:00.

-------------------------------------------

Survivor Keşanlı Trump vs Laz Putin (Özcan Show) - Duration: 10:48.

For more infomation >> Survivor Keşanlı Trump vs Laz Putin (Özcan Show) - Duration: 10:48.

-------------------------------------------

FBI searching for man who threatened to shoot President Trump - Duration: 1:00.

For more infomation >> FBI searching for man who threatened to shoot President Trump - Duration: 1:00.

-------------------------------------------

Top Democrat Challenger To Trump Just Ended His Career With These Five Words - Duration: 3:29.

For more infomation >> Top Democrat Challenger To Trump Just Ended His Career With These Five Words - Duration: 3:29.

-------------------------------------------

Nicolle Wallace Lays Out The Trump Obstruction Of Justice That Don McGhan May Have Witnessed - Duration: 1:18.

early strategy of full

cooperation was a potentially

damaging mistake.

So here's some of the flash

points in the investigation into

obstruction of justice that don

mcgahn's 30 hours of defendant

may have helped make more clear

to Robert Mueller.

First, trump's campaign to

pressure his A.G. To unrecuse

himself in the investigation.

In March trump ordered mcgahn to

stop sessions from recusing.

Next the firing of FBI director

James Comey.

Mcgahn's aides at the center and

how trump would explain it

publicly.

Then there was trump's attempt

to fire Robert Mueller.

Trump directed mcgahn to fire

the special counsel last June.

Mcgahn this time refused.

There are also concerns of

witness tampering.

"The New York Times" reporting

in March Mueller learned of two

conversations in which trump

asked key witnesses, one of them

don mcgahn, about matters they

discussed with the special

counsel, raising concerns that

the president was acting

improperly.

And then there is the spark that

ignited it all, the firing of

national security advisor Mike

mcgahn was at the center of

that, too.

He was the one who briefed trump

on Flynn's dishonesty.

And what trump knew about

Flynn's deception and when he

could -- when he knew he could

determine whether his pressure

on Comey to drop the Flynn

For more infomation >> Nicolle Wallace Lays Out The Trump Obstruction Of Justice That Don McGhan May Have Witnessed - Duration: 1:18.

-------------------------------------------

Debating Donald Trump, Climate Change, and the Paris Climate Agreement - Duration: 8:43.

Hey there guys, I'm Jesse Crowe, The Travelling Scientist, here in Northern California

Now yesterday I had an interesting discussion about climate change

with an American gentleman who is pro Trump and anti Paris climate agreement

now I'm anti Trump and Pro Paris climate agreement, so it was an interesting discussion.

check it out

Hey there guys, I'm here chatting with my American friend Tom and today we're gonna be talking a little bit about climate change

So Tom I want to start by asking you about your president Donald Trump

How do you think Donald Trump is doing as the president of America

I think he's doing great

What about the fact that he's pulling a lot of money out of funding

for like our renewable energy sources and trying to pull America out of the

Paris climate agreement and putting a lot of money into fossil fuels which is

bad for the environment and what do you say to that?

Well I'd say that that one of those three assertions is correct

putting money into fossil fuels how...

how is he putting money into fossil fuels?

from my understanding, Donald Trump is very pro-coal, which is a particularly dirty fossil fuel

okay so there's big difference though between utilising the resources that we have and actually committing public funds towards that resource right?

in other words I don't think he's subsidising the industry at all, is he?

and you start off by saying... what was your first assertion?

he's taking funding away from research into renewable energies, like solar, wind power

Oh Okay...I, I don't think he has...

well so you agree that he has he is trying to remove America out of the Paris Climate Agreement?

oh no no, that is a fate of complete, he HAS removed us,

and I think that was probably one of the the reasons that I'm most proud of

because it's really easy to fill the campaign pledges, we're gonna lower your taxes

we're gonna do tax better, politicians they go and do that

but it took a real stroke of courage for him to go and get out of the Paris Climate Accords

The Paris climate agreement is basically bringing together countries

Almost all the countries in the world, uniting them for the cause that is

trying to reduce and stop the climate change caused by humans

So by America being such a big powerful country, being one of the only countries

to disagree and pull out of the Paris Climate Agreement, that's kind of like

That's bad for the environment, is it not?

WHY?

Right, so they're doing research into finding out what humans impact is on climate change

and it's been shown that since the Industrial Revolution over 100 years ago, atmospheric carbon dioxide emissions have increased greatly

along with a slowly increasing temperature which is more rapid than it has been before the Industrial Revolution

and so basically the Paris climate agreement has recognised that and is trying to get

human kind to do what they can to minimize this human impact of climate

change to try and slow down the increase in temperatures

And so, How are they trying to effect a change?

By reducing human emissions,

things like transportation, fossil fuels, agriculture, these things that

produce the most the biggest impact from humans into climate change

And is it effective? It will be!

Tell me what plan that they have to reduce anthropogenic carbon emissions?

Through research into renewable energy sources that produce less carbon

emissions by researching more efficient modes of transport and basically finding

ways that we can try and continue to live the lifestyle we live now without

causing the pollution that we're currently producing

WHY?

Because it's been shown that climate change has a direct impact on atmospheric temperatures and

those temperatures we can see over the last couple hundred years that they are

slowly rising if they continue arise they're going to cause all sorts of problems

Rising sea levels and reduced crop output, reduced... depleted food sources

that's going to directly affect human security, our food security and our way

of life is a threat here

I can tell you that back when Al Gore released his movie, sea-levels right now it should be 15 feet higher

right now there's there might be some evidence

that sea levels have risen on order of less than an inch

okay that's one interesting statistic what about...

You know, it's been a hot summer do you think that temperatures aren't increasing to some extent globally?

Why is that going to be harmful?

Because hotter temperatures are going to make more difficult for things like growing food and maintaining water supplies

Really? you know the empirical evidence out there

shows that, guess what, we as a species actually do a whole lot better when it's warmer

so I don't think that the emperical evidence really shows that there's necessarily a problem with that!

I think that humans would just like to

have more control over the climate, rather than

having it projected to just increase in temperature and atmospheric carbon emissions

increasing and things like that so I think that the Paris climate agreement

is working towards having a better understanding and gaining more control over

our climate as a protective means for the future for the future generations it

might not be a problem in you or me in 20 or 50 years or something but maybe a

hundred years from now or two hundred years from now, you know there is potential

that the temperatures could skyrocket, sea levels could rise, or they could stay the same

Like you said, the climate models aren't perfect and the science isn't clear

but it it seems to be indicating at this point in time that

in the future, there could be real problems

I don't think that, I disagree with that

so let's just disagree let's just say that

Humans want to be in control

I think that's part of all of us

we all want to control our environment

What is it that the IPCC wants big westernised countries like the United States to do?

Well you've just got to reduce your carbon footprint

You know, United States, It's really not fair for you to have your own steel industry

let all the steel be produced in developing countries like China and India, and let them catch up to you economically

you can go ahead and spew all the carbon out that you want

As long as you pay a tax on it

So we can talk about all the money that the IPCC has absolutely wasted

And continues to waste, which is one of the reasons why Donald Trump pulled the United States out of it

and I am very proud of him doing it

because it's an absolute waste of resources

It is a corrupt body, the UN is a corrupt body and I don't believe that the best research will come out of some collective..

world body which includes disparate countries like China and India who are the biggest polluters per capita

It's just a corrupt organisation and, I hate to put it to you but they are absolutely the wrong body in the world to be the one setting policy for

something as important as alternative fossil fuel that's that's just how I feel

Beautiful, well I respect your opinions and I appreciate your time

Thanks so much for chatting with me

So there we go guys thanks for watching that interview

So who do you think was right?

do you think that we should be working on climate change and doing everything we can help the Paris climate agreement?

Or do you think that America is doing the right thing by pulling out and that the United Nations is really corrupt?

Let us know in the comments section down below and subscribe for more travelling science every week!

I'll see you guys next time, Cheers!

For more infomation >> Debating Donald Trump, Climate Change, and the Paris Climate Agreement - Duration: 8:43.

-------------------------------------------

Trump says he would "most likely" meet again with N. Korean leader Kim Jong-un - Duration: 2:25.

When President Trump concluded his summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un in Singapore

last June, he said they would be meeting again more often in the future.

The American leader has stoked that prospect once again in an interview on Monday, reiterating

his, quote, "great chemistry" with Kim.

It seems that despite the slow progress on the regime's denuclearization in recent weeks,

it hasn't put off Trump from wanting another sit-down.

Our foreign ministry correspondent Lee Ji-won has this report.

U.S. President Donald Trump says he would most likely meet again with North Korean leader

Kim Jong-un,... hinting at a possible second summit between the leaders of two long-time

adversaries, following their historic first-ever summit in June.

Speaking to Reuters on Monday, President Trump answered a question on another meeting with

Kim,... but added that he did not want to comment further.

He also offered no details on the timing or venue.

And despite the widespread skepticism that Pyongyang is not taking concrete measures

in dismantling its nuclear program, President Trump said he believes the North Koreans had

taken specific steps to denuclearize, without elaborating.

President Trump also pointed at how Kim Jong-un handed over three American detainees even

before the Singapore summit.

Trump has come under fire from his critics for making too many concessions to Pyongyang,

including his decision to actually hold the Singapore summit and suspending Washington's

joint military drills with South Korea.

President Trump, however, remains optimistic, insisting that a lot of good things are happening

with North Korea.

But he also complained that China is not helping as much as it had in the past because of its

trade dispute with the U.S.

During the interview, President Trump patted himself on the back, saying that he, someone

who's only been working on the North Korean issue for a matter of months, stopped the

regime's nuclear and missile testing, something his predecessors who had been working on the

issue for 30 years couldn't do.

Trump also pointed to the great chemistry he shared with Kim as one reason that helped

ease last year's tensions between the two sides.

Trump said he and the North Korean leader like each other,... adding he has very good

personal relations with Kim, which is what he thinks is holding the situation together.

Lee Ji-won, Arirang News.

No comments:

Post a Comment