Right After Suing Trump, Rahm's Busted Siphoning Off $55 Million In Massive Scandal
President Trump knows that Rahm Emanuel is a liar.
He is the mayor of Chicago and is one of the most corrupt individuals in politics.
He is one in a long line of corrupt Chicago mayors.
The lawsuit that Rahm Emanuel brought against the DOJ is clearly a fake.
His fake lawsuit against the DOJ's promise to pull funding from sanctuary cities is a
distraction from the $55 million scandal in Chicago that hit airwaves last week.
Advertisement
The aldermen of Chicago and city officials have called out Emanuel of redirecting $55
million in TIF funds that were designated to aid the poor, and mostly black portion
of Chicago's South Side.
He instead rerouted the tax funds and no one noticed because it wasn't disclosed on the
tax bills.
What happens in Chicago – stays in Chicago.
You can understand why Emanuel would be so desperate to divert attention from this scandal
and, so far, it's worked.
By Sunday, Emanuel had announced his $3 million federal lawsuit, claiming the Trump Administration
was blackmailing the City of Chicago and the national news outlets ate it up: Rahm versus
Trump.
Unsurprisingly that the mainstream media is refusing to cover the debacle in Chicago.
He claims he is worried about the $3 million that Chicago will lose if they refuse to cooperate
with immigration laws.
He said he wanted the money to purchase some cop cars.
What is he doing with that $55 million he redirected?
It's been dubbed a slush fund scheme for money laundering.
That $55 million could have helped Chicago's struggling public schools.
It could have purchased those police vehicles Rahm says he's so concerned about or put
more cops on the street.
Chicago ended July with more than 400 murders, putting the city on pace to exceed the number
of killings in 2016 with 781 homicides.
Lord knows Chicago could use more cops.
Yes, the poor of Chicago are suffering because Emanuel embezzled $55 million that was designated
to assist them.
Advertisement
Should Trump
sue him?
No comments:
Post a Comment