Saturday, February 9, 2019

Trump news on Youtube Feb 9 2019

hey in this room it's so hot in here maybe I'll start to believe in myself

she's a jackass jackass she's a jackass

Ah I don't know what I said Ah I don't remember

I don't wear a toupee I don't wear a toupee

I don't wear a toupee I don't wear a toupee

what I say is what I say I'm sorry we need money

I've been very nice to you although I could probably maybe not be

based on the way you have treated me

but i wouldn't do that

what I say is what i say

so i spent a long time this morning

on making my shoes so beautiful so shiny

This is the legacy death destruction terrorism and weakness

wouldn't that be embarrassing

and we're gonna load it up with some bad dudes

believe me we're gonna load it up

I will be the greatest jobs president that God ever created

I just sold an apartment for fifteen million dollars

to somebody from China

I don't wear a toupee I don't wear a toupee

I don't wear a toupee I don't wear a toupee

every woman lied

when they came forward to hurt my campaign

if Hillary Clinton were a man

i don't think she will get 5% of the vote

Russia if you're listening I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails

they are missing

President Obama he is the founder of ISIS

he is the founder of ISIS

Obamacare

I don't wear a toupee I don't wear a toupee

I don't wear a toupee I don't wear a toupee

i would build a great wall

and nobody builds walls better than me believe me

free trade can be wonderful if you have smart people

but we have people that are stupid

The American dream is dead

but mr. Trump you're not a nice person I think I am a nice person

we have losers we have losers

I don't wear a toupee I don't wear a toupee

For more infomation >> I don't wear a toupee featuring Donald Trump - Duration: 3:10.

-------------------------------------------

Russia investigation highlights Trump's conditional loyalty - Duration: 3:46.

You see, I'm so loyal to people and maybe I'm loyal to a fault.

For as long as Trump has been in the public eye, he's described himself as loyal.

Here's the thing, I'm a loyal person.

I love loyalty.

I'm loyal.

I'm a loyal person.

But now, six members of Trump's orbit have been indicted on a range of crimes,

from tax fraud to conspiracy against the United States.

How has Trump's famous loyalty held up?

Early in 2019, Trump's longtime ally and supporter,

Roger Stone was indicted on seven counts of false statements, obstruction, and witness tampering.

Before the indictment, Stone was praised by the president for his guts.

I am a fervent supporter of the president.

Even though Stone pleaded not guilty and seems unwilling to cooperate with the investigation,

Trump made sure to distance himself.

Your friend Roger Stone was just indicted for his involvement.

First of all, Roger Stone didn't work on the campaign,

except way way at the beginning long before we're talking about.

And then there's Michael Cohen, Trump's longtime personal lawyer and "fixer"

I'll do anything to protect Mr. Trump.

When Cohen's house was first raided by the FBI in April 2018, Trump had strong words of support.

But after Cohen started cooperating with authorities, he was a bad lawyer and a rat.

And what about the other Michael who's been in hot water since Trump became president?

We do not need a reckless president who believes she is above the law.

Trump's first national security adviser, Michael Flynn, resigned just 24 days after Trump's inauguration

for lying about his contacts with then-Russian ambassador, Sergey Kislyak .

This man has served for many years, he's a general, he's a — in my opinion — a very good person.

By the end of 2017, Flynn pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI

and started cooperating with the Mueller investigation.

And now, according to his former boss, Flynn was tricked into cooperating.

They took a General that they said didn't lie and they convinced him he did lie

And apparently, the only reason Mueller recommended no prison time for Flynn in December of 2018

was not because of his 'substantial assistance', but because

they were embarrassed that they got caught.

Paul Manafort, Trump's former campaign chair, is the exception that proves the rule.

This is the ultimate reality show, it's the presidency of the United States.

A year after Manafort left the campaign, the FBI raided his house

to seize materials related to the Russia investigation.

After the raid, Trump began to distance himself from Manafort.

I know Mr. Manafort – I haven't spoken to him in a long time, but I know him.

He was with the campaign, as you know, for a very short period of time.

Fast forward to November of 2018.

After Manafort was found guilty on eight counts, he entered into a plea deal with prosecutors,

but Mueller rescinded the deal after it was clear Manafort wasn't actually cooperating.

With respect to Paul Manafort, who, it's very sad what's happened to Paul, the way he's being treated.

I've never seen anybody treated so poorly.

The only person Trump stood by was the only one who lost his plea deal because of his repeated lies to the FBI.

I am a very loyal person, I am an extremely loyal person, to a fault, frankly.

Trump's loyalty is conditional on whether or not

his associates are willing to impede the Russia investigation.

consequences for the individual be damned.

For more infomation >> Russia investigation highlights Trump's conditional loyalty - Duration: 3:46.

-------------------------------------------

ideaHeute vom 8 2 2019 - Trump - Samuel Koch - Vesperkirche - Duration: 3:01.

For more infomation >> ideaHeute vom 8 2 2019 - Trump - Samuel Koch - Vesperkirche - Duration: 3:01.

-------------------------------------------

Kellyanne: Trump-hating woman assaulted me in DC restaurant in October - Daily News - Duration: 4:05.

A Maryland woman faces charges that she assaulted White House counselor Kellyanne Conway in front of her teenage daughter during a confrontation last year at a restaurant in a Washington suburb

Mary Elizabeth Inabinett, 63, of Chevy Chase, was charged in November with second-degree assault and disorderly conduct and has a trial tentatively scheduled to start March 29, court records show

Conway told police she was attending a birthday party Oct. 14 at a Mexican restaurant in Bethesda when she felt somebody grab her shoulders from behind and shake her, according to a charging document prepared by Montgomery County police

 The woman who confronted Conway yelled, 'Shame on you,' and 'other comments believed to about Conway's political views,' the document says

Inabinett's attorney, William Alden McDaniel, Jr., said in a statement that his client exercised her First Amendment right 'to express her personal opinions' about a public figure in a public place

McDaniel said his client didn't assault Conway and will plead not guilty to the misdemeanor charges

'The facts at trial will show this to be true, and show Ms. Conway's account to be false,' the lawyer's statement says

'Her "First Amendment" right to scream like a lunatic does not include touching me or anyone else,' Conway told The Associated Press in an email

In a CNN interview broadcast Friday, Conway said she was standing next to her middle school-aged daughter and some of her daughter's friends when the woman began shaking her 'to the point where I thought maybe somebody was hugging me

' She said it felt 'weird' and 'a little aggressive,' so she turned around to face the woman

'She was just unhinged. She was out of control,' she said. 'Her whole face was terror and anger

She was right here, and my daughter was right there. And she ought to pay for that

She ought to pay for that because she has no right to touch anybody.'The restaurant's manager told police the woman who confronted Conway had to be forcibly removed from the premises

Conway told police the woman yelled and gestured at her for 8 to 10 minutes before she was escorted out of the restaurant

Share this article Share Conway wasn't injured, according to the charging document

The woman who confronted her was gone by the time police arrived, but restaurant staff helped police identify her as a suspect, and Conway's daughter provided officers with a short video clip and photograph of the encounter

Conway said she told President Donald Trump about the incident 'long after' it happened

She said Trump asked her, 'Are you OK? Is your daughter OK? Are the other girls OK?'

For more infomation >> Kellyanne: Trump-hating woman assaulted me in DC restaurant in October - Daily News - Duration: 4:05.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Shouldn't Be Allowed To Hide The Mueller Report From The Public - Duration: 3:40.

Here's the sad reality about being online, if you have used Facebook, if you have tried

to get a credit score or if you've had a yahoo email account anytime within the last three

years for any of those things, then the chances that your data has either been leaked out

to unsavory characters or just straight up sold by those corporations, the chances of

that are roughly 99 percent.

If you are a US citizen and you've done any of those three, uh, three things within the

last three years, that's pretty remarkable, right?

We're almost at almost 100 percent of us have either had our data leaked or stolen.

If we're in one of those online communities, some of us, depending on how many of those

years have had our data stolen and leaked multiple different times by multiple different

companies.

And here's the real kicker.

Nobody's gone to jail, no CEO, no executive running these companies that routinely lose

our data.

None of them have ever faced any kind of actual consequence for this except maybe a few class

action lawsuits.

Democratic Senator Ron Wyden for months now has been trying to change that.

And He seems to be fighting an uphill battle all by himself to get some kind of accountability

for these massive tech companies that continuously take our data.

Ron Wyden back in the fall, introduced legislation that would set a new standard.

It would create new rules that these tech companies would have to follow with regards

to our privacy and our data, and if they lied about it or didn't do everything properly,

they could face massive fines of up to four percent of their annual revenue, which would

result in billions upon billions of dollars for some of these companies and possibly even

jail time, jail sentences, prison for the CEOs and executives of these companies who

knowingly leak our data or sell our data and then lie to us about it.

They would go to jail under Ron Wyden's new bill that he is still pushing to this day.

And again, this is a piece of legislation that desperately needs to be enacted.

This is something that has to happen here in the United States.

The tech companies, whether knowingly or unwittingly are giving away our data and the worst part

of those who know that they're doing it right, it's one thing to just be bad at your job

and you leak a bunch of data and oops, you didn't notice that a hacker was in your system

like a Kofax for months.

Stealing people's data and social security numbers and addresses and drivers license

numbers.

Oops, we didn't notice, but it's another to be a company like Facebook that takes your

private messages and sells that data.

It takes your address, it takes your interest, it takes your browsing history and sells that

to people without your permission Wydens.

Bill would change that.

You could opt in to a do not share list and companies would no longer be able to sell

your data.

You might have to pay a small fee to be put on that list, but it would then protect your

data.

And if the company has lied about it in their annual reports to Congress, that would be

mandatory at this point.

Or reports to regulator, excuse me.

Um, if they lied about it, they would go to jail and they would lose a lot of their profits.

Isn't that the way this should work?

If a company lies about what they're doing to you, if they're putting your personal data

up there on the auction block without your knowledge, and then they not only lie to you

about it, but lie to regulators about it.

Shouldn't that person be in jail?

Shouldn't that person be made to be an example of what not to do?

And that's what's missing in this country right now.

It's been missing for decades.

The example of what not to do, white collar criminals are rampant on Wall Street in the

tech industry, in the oil industry, the fossil fuel industry, the chemical industry.

We have seen nothing but criminal behavior from a lot of these CEOs and shareholders

and executives, pharmaceutical companies too.

They're about the worst of the worst and the reason they continue engaging in this kind

of criminal behavior, putting out a medication that they know is going to kill people, but

also make them lots of money, dumping their toxins into a waterway, knowing they're going

to poison 40,000 people, but they don't want to spend the money to properly get rid of

it.

None of those CEOs or executives who made those decisions ever went to prison, and what

that does is it sends a message to everybody else that it'll be okay.

You can afford the fine.

You don't have to worry about jail time and everybody's going to be okay.

It except of course all those people you gave cancer too who are dying slow, horrible, painful

deaths.

They're not okay, but that's not used.

So what does it matter?

Wydens.

Bill seeks to change that.

At least for the tech industry.

There is no reason why any person on Capitol Hill should vote against this.

This is about our privacy.

This is about our data.

This is about our livelihoods and if you're one of those people who have had your data

stolen and then had the deal with the fallout of that, the phone calls to credit card companies,

getting them to cancel, change your numbers, you know, try and get your money back from

a bank after your debit card number was stolen.

I've been through that.

It is hell.

And anyone who's gone through any of that understands the same thing.

The companies that allowed this to happen, they need to see their CEO's pushed out of

their pit houses, pushed out of their mansions, pushed out of the board rooms and shoved in

the back of a police car.

Not to be seen again for the next 10 years.

For more infomation >> Trump Shouldn't Be Allowed To Hide The Mueller Report From The Public - Duration: 3:40.

-------------------------------------------

Republicans BEG Democrats To Not Look At Trump's Tax Returns - Duration: 3:01.

Here's the sad reality about being online, if you have used Facebook, if you have tried

to get a credit score or if you've had a yahoo email account anytime within the last three

years for any of those things, then the chances that your data has either been leaked out

to unsavory characters or just straight up sold by those corporations, the chances of

that are roughly 99 percent.

If you are a US citizen and you've done any of those three, uh, three things within the

last three years, that's pretty remarkable, right?

We're almost at almost 100 percent of us have either had our data leaked or stolen.

If we're in one of those online communities, some of us, depending on how many of those

years have had our data stolen and leaked multiple different times by multiple different

companies.

And here's the real kicker.

Nobody's gone to jail, no CEO, no executive running these companies that routinely lose

our data.

None of them have ever faced any kind of actual consequence for this except maybe a few class

action lawsuits.

Democratic Senator Ron Wyden for months now has been trying to change that.

And He seems to be fighting an uphill battle all by himself to get some kind of accountability

for these massive tech companies that continuously take our data.

Ron Wyden back in the fall, introduced legislation that would set a new standard.

It would create new rules that these tech companies would have to follow with regards

to our privacy and our data, and if they lied about it or didn't do everything properly,

they could face massive fines of up to four percent of their annual revenue, which would

result in billions upon billions of dollars for some of these companies and possibly even

jail time, jail sentences, prison for the CEOs and executives of these companies who

knowingly leak our data or sell our data and then lie to us about it.

They would go to jail under Ron Wyden's new bill that he is still pushing to this day.

And again, this is a piece of legislation that desperately needs to be enacted.

This is something that has to happen here in the United States.

The tech companies, whether knowingly or unwittingly are giving away our data and the worst part

of those who know that they're doing it right, it's one thing to just be bad at your job

and you leak a bunch of data and oops, you didn't notice that a hacker was in your system

like a Kofax for months.

Stealing people's data and social security numbers and addresses and drivers license

numbers.

Oops, we didn't notice, but it's another to be a company like Facebook that takes your

private messages and sells that data.

It takes your address, it takes your interest, it takes your browsing history and sells that

to people without your permission Wydens.

Bill would change that.

You could opt in to a do not share list and companies would no longer be able to sell

your data.

You might have to pay a small fee to be put on that list, but it would then protect your

data.

And if the company has lied about it in their annual reports to Congress, that would be

mandatory at this point.

Or reports to regulator, excuse me.

Um, if they lied about it, they would go to jail and they would lose a lot of their profits.

Isn't that the way this should work?

If a company lies about what they're doing to you, if they're putting your personal data

up there on the auction block without your knowledge, and then they not only lie to you

about it, but lie to regulators about it.

Shouldn't that person be in jail?

Shouldn't that person be made to be an example of what not to do?

And that's what's missing in this country right now.

It's been missing for decades.

The example of what not to do, white collar criminals are rampant on Wall Street in the

tech industry, in the oil industry, the fossil fuel industry, the chemical industry.

We have seen nothing but criminal behavior from a lot of these CEOs and shareholders

and executives, pharmaceutical companies too.

They're about the worst of the worst and the reason they continue engaging in this kind

of criminal behavior, putting out a medication that they know is going to kill people, but

also make them lots of money, dumping their toxins into a waterway, knowing they're going

to poison 40,000 people, but they don't want to spend the money to properly get rid of

it.

None of those CEOs or executives who made those decisions ever went to prison, and what

that does is it sends a message to everybody else that it'll be okay.

You can afford the fine.

You don't have to worry about jail time and everybody's going to be okay.

It except of course all those people you gave cancer too who are dying slow, horrible, painful

deaths.

They're not okay, but that's not used.

So what does it matter?

Wydens.

Bill seeks to change that.

At least for the tech industry.

There is no reason why any person on Capitol Hill should vote against this.

This is about our privacy.

This is about our data.

This is about our livelihoods and if you're one of those people who have had your data

stolen and then had the deal with the fallout of that, the phone calls to credit card companies,

getting them to cancel, change your numbers, you know, try and get your money back from

a bank after your debit card number was stolen.

I've been through that.

It is hell.

And anyone who's gone through any of that understands the same thing.

The companies that allowed this to happen, they need to see their CEO's pushed out of

their pit houses, pushed out of their mansions, pushed out of the board rooms and shoved in

the back of a police car.

Not to be seen again for the next 10 years.

For more infomation >> Republicans BEG Democrats To Not Look At Trump's Tax Returns - Duration: 3:01.

-------------------------------------------

Seth's Favorite Jokes of the Week: Black History Month, Trump's Childhood Home - Duration: 1:20.

♪♪

-Hey, everybody. That's J.J. I'm Seth.

These are our favorite Jokes of the Week.

February is Black History Month.

"Oh, my God. I don't even have a costume yet,"

said Virginia governor Ralph Northam.

[ Audience "Oh"s ]

President Trump delivered his

State of the Union address tonight.

The president was interrupted 105 times by applause

and once by Robert Mueller.

[ Laughter ]

Supermodel Tyra Banks has announced she will be opening

a beauty-focused theme park later this year

called "Modelland."

And Leonardo DiCaprio has already been on all the rides.

A Cleveland mom was arrested this week

after a child brought marijuana-infused

gummy candies to school

and shared them with at least 12 other students.

Teachers became suspicious when the school band sounded good.

President Trump's childhood home in Queens, New York

is currently on sale for almost $3 million,

and it still has all the original teeth marks

on the lead-painted window sills.

[ Laughter ]

♪♪

For more infomation >> Seth's Favorite Jokes of the Week: Black History Month, Trump's Childhood Home - Duration: 1:20.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Singles Out China in State of the Union Address | China News Headlines | China Uncensored - Duration: 13:09.

President Trump's State of the Union Address

singles out Chinese theft of US jobs

as US-China trade talks continue.

That and more on this week's China news headlines.

Welcome to China Uncensored.

I'm Chris Chappell.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel for the latest China news,

and click the notification bell so you get an alert

each time we publish a new episode.

This week's China news headlines.

You've been waiting all year for it.

No, not the last Stars Wars movie.

President Trump's State of the Union address.

They hyped it up big time,

what with that whole, Nancy Pelosi blocking it

if we don't have a government thing.

Man, they know how to sell out a show.

And may I just ask, have you been enjoying

your government shutdown purge?

I know I have.

What's that Shelley?

Crime is still illegal during a government shutdown?

Yes of course I know that.

Anyway, this week we finally got

this year's State of the Union address,

and the state of the union is…great...again?

I assume.

But in the hour plus long speech,

President Trump delivered on his crowd pleasing favorite—

China.

"We are now making it clear to China

that after years of targeting our industries

and stealing our intellectual property,

the theft of American jobs and wealth

has come to an end."

And the crowd goes wild!

Although, that's still just aspirational.

The Chinese Communist Party hasn't actually

stopped stealing American jobs and wealth.

But that's what Trump hopes to get out of

the latest round of trade negotiations.

There's less than a month left for the US and China

to agree to a new trade deal.

If that fails, President Trump will levy a 25% tariff

on 200 billion dollars worth of Chinese imports.

Or, I guess, they'll just extend the deadline.

Which would be great,

since if all the US-China conflicts are suddenly solved,

I'd go out of business.

I'm not worried though,

because getting the kind of trade deal

will be tough.

"I have great respect for President Xi

and we are now working on a new trade deal with China.

But it must include real structural change

to end unfair trade practices,

reduce our chronic trade deficit,

and protect American jobs."

All of that would mean real structural changes

to the Chinese Communist Party's rule—

the kind authoritarian states don't like to make.

According to Bloomberg,

"U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer

and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin

will lead a delegation to Beijing next week

to lay the groundwork for a meeting

between Trump and Xi later this month."

The last time Trump was in China,

Xi Jinping pulled out all the stops,

including giving Trump a rare tour of the Forbidden City.

And man, Trump had an unreadable poker face.

Do, do dooo, no plans to launch a trade war.

And then he launched a trade war.

We'll have more on the trade war as it develops.

Unless it ends in a few weeks.

But it's not going to.

The Chinese Communist Party has been,

let's say, encouraging wealthy

Chinese billionaires around the world

to influence politics in foreign countries.

Australia had a bad case of it—

thanks to loose campaign financing laws.

So loose, Chinese nationals like this guy,

Huang Xiangmo,

could contribute to their favorite political parties.

Over the years, Huang donated millions

to various Australian political parties.

The problem is—

he's connected to the Communist Party's

United Front Work Department,

"an arm of the Chinese Communist Party

that promotes Chinese foreign policy abroad."

But last year,

the Australian government changed campaign finance laws

to restrict foreign donations.

And just this week,

Australia canceled Huang Xiangmo' permanent residency,

and denied his citizenship request,

and effectively banned him from the country.

Of course, the shady links to the Communist Party

and generous donations played no part in the decision.

No, not at all.

According to the Sydney Morning Herald,

which first broke the story,

it was for a range of reasons,

including character grounds.

Obviously, I mean,

who wears a belt with his initial on it the buckle.

That's pretty tasteless.

Shelley!

You take that down!

Happy Lunar New Year!

Or as they call it in China, "New Year."

February 5th marked the year of the pig.

Not the capitalist pig, mind you.

More like, the animal farm pig.

Anyway, both China and Taiwan

decided to use the Lunar New Year Celebrations

as an excuse to release propaganda videos.

Now with all these beautiful shots of Taiwan,

you might think the Taiwan tourism department

made this one.

Nope!

It was the Chinese People's Liberation Army.

They juxtaposed images of PLA jets and bombers

soaring through the sky

is kind of the giveaway.

It's kind of like taking a girl out for Valentine's Day, saying,

"Babe, I got you a little something.

It's a gun!

For me.

To force you to marry me.

Which I'd like to do peacefully."

So Taiwan released this video

with tanks firing and missiles launching

saying we are ready

Which is like the girl saying, "Bring it."

I never thought I'd say it,

but, by comparison,

I have to give the Chinese PLA points for subtlety.

Though Taiwan's Premier did win

some subtlety points back in this video,

where he criticized the Chinese Communist Party's

handling of swine flu.

Why Winnie the Pooh?

It's a reference to Xi Jinping,

that Xi Jinping does not like.

Good news in a kind of...horrible news sort of way.

An Australian-led study is calling for the retraction

of 400 scientific papers because the organs

may have come from people

who didn't voluntarily give them up.

We've known for a while now that

the Chinese Communist Party kills both criminal prisoners

and prisoners of conscience for their organs.

But apparently, some in the medical community

have been a bit slow on the uptake.

Probably because they don't watch enough China Uncensored.

Anyway, the study "exposes a mass failure

of English language medical journals

to comply with international ethical standards in place

to ensure organ donors provide consent for transplantation."

This is not the first time something like this has happened.

In 2017, the prestigious medical journal Liver International,

retracted a scientific paper by Chinese surgeons.

Over four years,

Chinese surgeons examined the outcomes

of almost 600 liver transplants.

Problem is, it's basically impossible

for a single hospital to do that many liver transplants,

especially at a time when China barely had any organ donors.

But hey, to save a few lives,

you have to commit a few crimes against humanity, right?

China's Skynet is really making progress.

And no, I'm not talking about Skynet from Terminator.

Chinese authorities actually named

their mass surveillance program Skynet.

And according to Radio Free Asia,

by 2022,

there will be almost three billion surveillance cameras in China.

In other words,

there will be about two cameras for every person in China.

Smile!

Chinese hackers have...hacked...

a Norwegian software company.

"Visma is one of Europe's largest

cloud-based managed service providers,

with over 850,000 customers

and net revenue of over $1 billion."

The hackers released malware in Visma's internal system,

but the company says none of their client servers were infected.

The attacks were carried about by

a well known state-backed hackers

called APT10.

In December, the US Justice Department

charged two Chinese nationals believe

to be a part of APT10.

They were charged with being part of

hacks on 45 US companies

and many more in 11 other countries.

Very prolific.

A group of human rights... groups...

are calling on the UN

to look into the Chinese Communist Party's

persecution of the Uighur ethnic minority in Xinjiang.

Human Rights Watch,

Amnesty International,

the Geneva-based International Service for Human Rights,

and the World Uyghur Congress,

have called on the UN's Human Rights Council

to investigate the mass detention of Muslims in China.

"Human rights activists say it is

one of the dozens of political reeducation camps

where up to a million Muslims are said to

have been detained in China's northwest Xinjiang province

in recent years."

Now, appealing to the UN Human Rights Council is a good thing.

The problem is, China sits on the UN Human Rights Council...

for some reason.

But if the Chinese Communist Party

uses its position on the UN's Human rights council

to block this inquiry, well,

these human rights groups can always go over their heads

and appeal to the UN Security Council.

And I'm sure that'll put

the Chinese Communist Party in its place.

I'm just kidding,

China's on the UN Security Council too.

I'm sad now.

And finally, in a story that really stinks,

Malaysian rainforests are being threatened..

.by Chinese demand for durians.

If you don't know what a durian is,

I'm envious of your ignorance.

Durian has been called the king of fruits.

It smells like a mix of rotting garbage,

an everything bagel,

and my grandma's basement.

And yet, "Soaring demand for durians in China

is being blamed for a new wave of deforestation in Malaysia,

with environmentalists warning

vast amounts of jungle is being cleared

to make way for massive plantations of the spiky,

pungent fruit."

And it's looking pretty bad.

This is a durian plantation on the outskirts of Kuala Lumpur.

If you put your nose up to the screen,

you can actually smell it.

And look,

there's a lot of great reasons to destroy our planet,

but durian is not one of them!

Do it for money,

or power,

or to eliminate pandas...

but don't do it for durian.

That's this week's China news headlines.

Before we go,

now is the time when I answer questions from you,

my loyal 50-cent army—

fans of the show who support what we do

through the crowd funding website Patreon.

Largezo asks,

"Does the PRC have universal healthcare?"

Good question!

Despite all the promises of communism,

or socialism with Chinese characteristics,

it turns out, taking care of the people

isn't one of the Communist Party's top priorities.

It's more interested in...taking care of the people.

According to the New York Times,

"The country does not have

a functioning primary care system,

the first line of defense for illness and injury.

China has one general practitioner

for every 6,666 people,

compared with the international standard

of one for every 1,500 to 2,000 people,

according to the World Health Organization."

Hospitals are understaffed,

overworked,

and doctors underpaid.

Plus, constant vaccine scandals.

It's gotten to the point where public hospitals

rely on bribery to survive.

And people are literally scalping tickets to see doctors.

Now in 2016,

Xi Jinping launched Healthy China 2030.

It's basically the first long term plan

to improve China's health care

since the communists took over in 1949.

On paper,

China has some degree of

cradle to grave healthcare coverage.

But in practice, well,

it's socialism with Chinese characteristics.

Thanks for you question.

Why am I answering questions on the show?

It's because a lot of advertisers

don't dare to work with a show

that criticizes the Chinese Communist Party.

So we rely on support from viewers like you

on the crowdfunding website Patreon.

Answering your questions on the show

is one of my ways of saying thanks.

So head over to patreon.com/chinaucnensored

to find out how you can keep China uncensored.

Thanks for watching.

Once again I'm your host Chris Chappell.

See you next time.

For more infomation >> Trump Singles Out China in State of the Union Address | China News Headlines | China Uncensored - Duration: 13:09.

-------------------------------------------

Whitaker Makes A Fool Of Himself For Trump - Duration: 15:50.

For more infomation >> Whitaker Makes A Fool Of Himself For Trump - Duration: 15:50.

-------------------------------------------

MIGRANT CARAVAN LATEST NEWS TODAY , TRUMP RIPS Democrat ON border Wall funds - Duration: 10:39.

For more infomation >> MIGRANT CARAVAN LATEST NEWS TODAY , TRUMP RIPS Democrat ON border Wall funds - Duration: 10:39.

-------------------------------------------

Will Trump Be '239 Pounds' At This Year's Physical? - Duration: 4:37.

WELCOME TO "THE LATE SHOW," EVERYBODY."

I'M YOUR HOST, STEPHEN COLBERT.

IT IS-- IT IS FRIDAY.

AND FOR MEMBERS OF TRUMP'S CABINET, THAT MEANS THEY'VE MADE

IT THROUGH A WHOLE OTHER WEEK WITHOUT BEING FIRED OR INDICTED.

AS YOU KNOW, THERE HAS BEEN A LOT OF TURNOVER IN THE TRUMP

WHITE HOUSE IN THE PAST YEAR.

IN THIS PHOTO FROM LAST YEAR'S STATE OF THE UNION, EIGHT

HIGH-RANKING STAFFERS ARE NO LONGER WORKING FOR TRUMP.

( LAUGHTER ) TRUMP SEEMS TO THINK--

( CHEERS AND APPLAUSE ) YEAH.

A LOT OF TURNOVER.

>> Jon: DROPPING LIKE FLIES.

>> Stephen: TRUMP SEEMS TO THINK BRINGING IN NEW PEOPLE IS

GOING TO HELP BRING HIS PRESIDENCY ON THE RIGHT TRACK.

BUT UNLIKE A STAINED HOTEL MATTRESS IN RUSSIA, THIS IS NOT

A PROBLEM THAT CAN BE SOLVED BY TURNOVER.

THANK YOU, THANK YOU.

>> Jon: THANK YOU, CITIZEN.

>> Stephen: AND THE LATEST WHITE HOUSE OFFICIAL ALLEGEDLY EYEING

THE EXITS IS ACTING CHIEF OF STAFF AND SIMON FROM "ALVIN AND

THE CHIPMUNKS," MICK MULVANEY.

( LAUGHTER ) ALVIN.

EVEN THOUGH MULVANEY HAS ONLY BEEN SERVING AS TRUMP'S CHIEF OF

STAFF FOR A FEW WEEKS, REPORTEDLY, HE'S ALREADY

PLANNING HIS ESCAPE.

THE ESCAPE PLAN IS TO CLIMB DOWN FROM A THIRD-FLOOR WUNDTO OF THE

WHITE HOUSE USING ONE OF TRUMP'S TIES.

NOW HERE'S THE-- CORE STRENGTH.

YOU NEED CORE STRENGTH FOR THAT.

>> Jon: YOU GOTTA HAVE IT.

>> Stephe: HOW WAS MICK TO KNOW THE JOB WOULD BE SO MISERABLE?

HIS PREDECESSOR, JOHN KELLY, ALWAYS LOOKED SO HAPPY TO BE

ALIVE.

HERE'S THE DEAL.

HE'S PLANNINGS HAD ESCAPE.

BUT TRUMP MIGHT BE PUSHING HIM OUT THE DOOR BECAUSE THE

PRESIDENT BLAMES MULVANEY FOR THE TERRIBLE PRESS INSPIRED BY

THE 35-DAY GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN.

(AS TRUMP ): "WHY'D YOU LET ME SAY I WOULD TAKE CREDIT FOR THE

SHUTDOWN, MICK?

IT'S YOUR JOB TO STOP ME.

WHEN YOU SEE ME START TO TALK, YOU DIVE IN AND FILL THE

WORD-HOLE WITH THE MOST BEAUTIFUL SLICE OF CHOCOLATE

CAKE!" ( LAUGHTER )

NOW, WHAT'S NEXT-- "WORD HOLE.

WORD HOLE."

( APPLAUSE ) WHAT'S NEXT FOR MULVANEY?

RUMOR HAS IT HE'S INTERESTED IN BECOMING THE COMMERCE SECRETARY.

WOW.

THAT'S A BALLSY MOVE TO WANT A JOB WORKING FOR THE SAME BOSS

WHO IS ABOUT TO FIRE YOU.

"YOU CAN'T FIRE ME.

I QUIT!

ALSO, HERE'S MY RESUME.

I AM PROFICIENT IN MICROSOFT XCEL."

BUT TRUMP WAS TOO BUSY TO FIRE ANYONE TODAY, BECAUSE THIS

AFTERNOON, HE GOT HIS ANNUAL PHYSICAL EXAM AT WALTER REED

HOSPITAL, HIS ANNUAL PHYSICAL, WHICH WILL BE FOLLOWED BY HIS

ANNUAL VEGETABLE.

( LAUGHTER ) NOW, I HOPE YOU ALL REMEMBER

LAST YEAR'S EXAM WHERE DOCTOR RONNY JACKSON CLAIMED TRUMP WAS

IN PERFECT HEALTH BECAUSE OF HIS EXCELLENT GENES AND WEIGHED 239

POUNDS.

THE PRESIDENT WAS SO IMPRESSED WITH HIS ABILITY TO LIE ON

QUEUE, HE DECIDED TO NOMINATE DR. RONNY TO LEAD VETERANS

AFFAIRS, DESPITE THE FACT THAT HE HAD HAD NO EXPERIENCE

MANAGING A LARGE BUREAUCRACY.

(AS TRUMP ): "LOOK, I CAN TEACH HIM EVERYTHING HE NEEDS TO KNOW

ABOUT MANAGING VETERANS AFFAIRS: $130,000, AND THE VETERAN SHUTS

UP, ALL RIGHT.

( CHEERS AND APPLAUSE ) I WILL TAKE IT.

I WILL 100% TAKE IT."

>> Jon: YEAH.

>> Stephe: AND IF BEING MASSIVELY UNQUALIFIED FOR THE

JOB WASN'T ENOUGH, DR. RONNY HAD TO WITHDRAW HIS NOMINATION AFTER

IT CAME OUT THAT WAS KNOWN FOR DRINKING ON THE JOB AND

OVER-PRESCRIBING DRUGS, SO MUCH SO THAT FORMER COLLEAGUES SAID

HE WAS NICKNAMED THE "CANDYMAN."

( LAUGHTER ) YES.

AND LEGEND IS, IF YOU SAY THE NAME "CANDYMAN" THREE TIMES IN A

WHITE HOUSE MIRROR, HE PRESCRIBES YOU A PRESCRIPTION

FOR ADDERALL TO CRUSH UP AND SNORT OFF THAT MIRROR.

( APPLAUSE ) BUT NOW, JUST IN TIME FOR

TRUMP'S PHYSICAL, DR. RONNY'S BACK!

BECAUSE TRUMP HAS CHOSEN HIM TO BE HIS TOP MEDICAL ADVISER,

DESPITE THE FACT THAT HE IS STILL UNDER INVESTIGATION.

OH, THE "HE" IN THAT SENTENCE, OF COURSE, REFERS TO EITHER ONE

OF THEM.

For more infomation >> Will Trump Be '239 Pounds' At This Year's Physical? - Duration: 4:37.

-------------------------------------------

Explosive Bezos Allegation Could Jeopardize Trump Ally Immunity | The Beat With Ari Melber | MSNBC - Duration: 8:15.

For more infomation >> Explosive Bezos Allegation Could Jeopardize Trump Ally Immunity | The Beat With Ari Melber | MSNBC - Duration: 8:15.

-------------------------------------------

Trump EXPOSED By Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez - Duration: 9:00.

For more infomation >> Trump EXPOSED By Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez - Duration: 9:00.

-------------------------------------------

Donald Trump's Secret Weapon: NOFAP - Duration: 4:27.

whenever someone asks my brother hey what's the biggest benefit in nofap he

usually says 180 2.5 hours does that even mean that's how many hours you save

per year when you choose not to FAP hundred hours that you can put into

anything a gaming career freelance business saving up for traveling school

boxing you name it in fact Donald Trump actually supports this claim and in a

minute from now I'm going to show you that Trump is in fact on no FAP

love him or hate him this man is a juggernaut he took a million dollar loan

and turned it into a multi-billion dollar empire people have always been

hard on him for that but you also have to understand that 98% of businesses

fail that is not something that is easy to do he dominates social scenarios with

his unbreakable frame and maneuvers through social pressure like it's

Splinter Cell you cannot break this man he is unfazed he almost always takes a

negative situation and turns it into his favor there's a reason why this guy's

president and it's not from mere luck look I'm not here to argue how he became

president I don't think you want to sit here for three hours and listen to me

talking about politics but I do want to talk about how President Trump is on

nofap for any newcomers out there no FAP is a website a resource and a lifestyle

choice that helps people conquer their problems in bed re-enable their

productivity and ultimately give them the freedom of time to build something

epic what I'm about to show you is a podcast with Howard stem and Trump there

will be a link in the description if you guys are interested in seeing the clip

yourself we do match them you have to take care of the problem so you have

when's the last time you ministered a long time ago honestly some time

previous to knowing women you know it's a lot of work and it gets you nowhere

you know I'm shocked to hear you say that no I'm not I was never big into

that world I want you all to watch Donald Trump's

no prommos you don't sit there on the computer and no he literally said

fapping is a lot of work that leads to nowhere a very simple logical and

analytical way of looking at it that means before this guy got big before he

started at his reign he stopped jerking his trumpet he stumped and I'm not

saying that's the sole reason why this guy's crushing it trust me there's a lot

of other factors but he's a businessman he understands that his time equals

money and slinging your hot dog has no ROI at least with women you can build a

relationship have children pass on your lineage you cannot do that with a screen

any sort of mindless activity like binging Netflix you know doing

all-nighters playing video games binge drinking partying every night will get

you nowhere and Trump understands this and it's no different with fapping they

are time wasters unless you're trying to build a career off partying seven times

a week or becoming a competitive csgo player you're wasting your time that's

not to say that you shouldn't have fun but you have to be conscious of where

you're placing your eggs there's a lot of baskets out there in the world and

you only have so many eggs you can place in them choose wisely so if you're still

watching this go ahead and drop a like if you found this informative and you

got some value out of it I want you to drop a comment down below on how you

plan on filling up your free time while on no FAP getting something down on

paper manifesting it makes it more real and builds the connection from your

brain to the physical world personally in 10 years I want to be in

the best physical shape possible with an automated business making money as I

sleep and spend most of my time traveling meeting my fans in person and

making unforgettable memories where do you want to be in 10 years

For more infomation >> Donald Trump's Secret Weapon: NOFAP - Duration: 4:27.

-------------------------------------------

President Donald Trump Campaign, GOP Donations Being Put To Dubious Use | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC - Duration: 3:41.

For more infomation >> President Donald Trump Campaign, GOP Donations Being Put To Dubious Use | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC - Duration: 3:41.

-------------------------------------------

Matthew Whitaker Claims Executive Privilege In Conversations With Trump | Velshi & Ruhle | MSNBC - Duration: 6:57.

For more infomation >> Matthew Whitaker Claims Executive Privilege In Conversations With Trump | Velshi & Ruhle | MSNBC - Duration: 6:57.

-------------------------------------------

Ivanka Trump Pleads Ignorance On Trump Tower Moscow Deal - Duration: 5:16.

Here's the sad reality about being online, if you have used Facebook, if you have tried

to get a credit score or if you've had a yahoo email account anytime within the last three

years for any of those things, then the chances that your data has either been leaked out

to unsavory characters or just straight up sold by those corporations, the chances of

that are roughly 99 percent.

If you are a US citizen and you've done any of those three, uh, three things within the

last three years, that's pretty remarkable, right?

We're almost at almost 100 percent of us have either had our data leaked or stolen.

If we're in one of those online communities, some of us, depending on how many of those

years have had our data stolen and leaked multiple different times by multiple different

companies.

And here's the real kicker.

Nobody's gone to jail, no CEO, no executive running these companies that routinely lose

our data.

None of them have ever faced any kind of actual consequence for this except maybe a few class

action lawsuits.

Democratic Senator Ron Wyden for months now has been trying to change that.

And He seems to be fighting an uphill battle all by himself to get some kind of accountability

for these massive tech companies that continuously take our data.

Ron Wyden back in the fall, introduced legislation that would set a new standard.

It would create new rules that these tech companies would have to follow with regards

to our privacy and our data, and if they lied about it or didn't do everything properly,

they could face massive fines of up to four percent of their annual revenue, which would

result in billions upon billions of dollars for some of these companies and possibly even

jail time, jail sentences, prison for the CEOs and executives of these companies who

knowingly leak our data or sell our data and then lie to us about it.

They would go to jail under Ron Wyden's new bill that he is still pushing to this day.

And again, this is a piece of legislation that desperately needs to be enacted.

This is something that has to happen here in the United States.

The tech companies, whether knowingly or unwittingly are giving away our data and the worst part

of those who know that they're doing it right, it's one thing to just be bad at your job

and you leak a bunch of data and oops, you didn't notice that a hacker was in your system

like a Kofax for months.

Stealing people's data and social security numbers and addresses and drivers license

numbers.

Oops, we didn't notice, but it's another to be a company like Facebook that takes your

private messages and sells that data.

It takes your address, it takes your interest, it takes your browsing history and sells that

to people without your permission Wydens.

Bill would change that.

You could opt in to a do not share list and companies would no longer be able to sell

your data.

You might have to pay a small fee to be put on that list, but it would then protect your

data.

And if the company has lied about it in their annual reports to Congress, that would be

mandatory at this point.

Or reports to regulator, excuse me.

Um, if they lied about it, they would go to jail and they would lose a lot of their profits.

Isn't that the way this should work?

If a company lies about what they're doing to you, if they're putting your personal data

up there on the auction block without your knowledge, and then they not only lie to you

about it, but lie to regulators about it.

Shouldn't that person be in jail?

Shouldn't that person be made to be an example of what not to do?

And that's what's missing in this country right now.

It's been missing for decades.

The example of what not to do, white collar criminals are rampant on Wall Street in the

tech industry, in the oil industry, the fossil fuel industry, the chemical industry.

We have seen nothing but criminal behavior from a lot of these CEOs and shareholders

and executives, pharmaceutical companies too.

They're about the worst of the worst and the reason they continue engaging in this kind

of criminal behavior, putting out a medication that they know is going to kill people, but

also make them lots of money, dumping their toxins into a waterway, knowing they're going

to poison 40,000 people, but they don't want to spend the money to properly get rid of

it.

None of those CEOs or executives who made those decisions ever went to prison, and what

that does is it sends a message to everybody else that it'll be okay.

You can afford the fine.

You don't have to worry about jail time and everybody's going to be okay.

It except of course all those people you gave cancer too who are dying slow, horrible, painful

deaths.

They're not okay, but that's not used.

So what does it matter?

Wydens.

Bill seeks to change that.

At least for the tech industry.

There is no reason why any person on Capitol Hill should vote against this.

This is about our privacy.

This is about our data.

This is about our livelihoods and if you're one of those people who have had your data

stolen and then had the deal with the fallout of that, the phone calls to credit card companies,

getting them to cancel, change your numbers, you know, try and get your money back from

a bank after your debit card number was stolen.

I've been through that.

It is hell.

And anyone who's gone through any of that understands the same thing.

The companies that allowed this to happen, they need to see their CEO's pushed out of

their pit houses, pushed out of their mansions, pushed out of the board rooms and shoved in

the back of a police car.

Not to be seen again for the next 10 years.

No comments:

Post a Comment