MASSIVE NEWS TRUMP JUST DROPPED THE GIANT BOMB ON THE MEDIA AFTER HE DID THIS
Trump just dropped the goliath bomb on the media after he did this well the Trump organization
is
endeavoring to in general the country's nourishment stamp program by growing work prerequisites
for beneficiaries Georgia now.
one of the main states to uphold those stricter standards allegedly dismissing 8,000 individuals
from nourishment stamps in the wake of deciding
those beneficiaries as jobless capable grown-ups who are fit for working yet some in the left-wing
media
pummeling the move with features like these see that Trump intends to make individuals
work for nourishment stamps original thought.
here to respond Fox News giver and editorial manager in-boss camps change Lawrence Jones
most importantly well done the morning
much thanks to you valued the original thought that he would work in case you're physically
fit you realize you should work before you.
get government benefits yes so I believe it's vital for individuals to comprehend this was
a law as of now
set up it returned away before the Clinton organization however amid the Clinton organization
the administrators
removed that amid the subsidence however they never executed it back so what this law expects
you to do is in any event.
work at 20 hours get some type of training or if nothing else demonstrate that you can
work that you make it so all these
individuals jump on the framework and they remain on it thus this was a scourge that
get them associated with the procedure really
search for an occupation so they simply don't be reliant on this program isn't requiring
work having work prerequisites.
for welfare or sustenance stamps anyway we need to profit by the whether it's lodging
or something different doesn't that
empower individuals to escape neediness instead of remain in it right I know many individuals
on the Left needed to trap.
individuals in this since they will have their casting a ballot bowl they don't need to
work to really concentrate on the issues that influence unfavorably Americans yet the truth
is this a great deal of this
arrangements have influenced my locale by and by numerous individuals of the general
population in my locale end up remain on these projects.
since it's a device it's a legislature caught keep them in there that is the reason the
first program was to permit individuals
to have some type of help get a leg up however not be caught on it perpetually with the goal
that's the realities of it as Pete
referenced those features before so what is the doing for what reason are they failing
to understand the situation well they're playing this.
hostile to trump amusement that preceded Trump so the way that the issue is the president
is a few seconds ago implementing the law
Chicago Illinois Chicago Illinois Louisiana's one of those that mean a portion of those
states are as yet battling the.
endowments is in Georgia was too they're one of the primary states to begin this yet by
the day's end this is a
government law there was route set up path before Trump is offending to advise individuals
that they shouldn't need to function admirably.
it's annoying and it's likewise you need to scrutinize the thought processes right for
what reason do you need individuals to remain on a government framework
that implies that you're some of the time at the lowest pay permitted by law in some
cases it's you're in a neediness level or underneath the destitution level
for what reason would you need individuals to remain on this framework and I think numerous
individuals that are on those program need to address.
those administration authorities that are really supporting for the Lord's in case I'm
correct you used to be a Democrat however
you saw the world contrastingly for what reason did you see it that way and for what reason
did you change the manner in which you see the world well.
by the day's end you know look I needed to be useful as a Democrat yet when you begin
seeing the devices of the
left where they endeavor to hold you down in each part of your life where they feel
like as a result of the shade of.
your skin or your social monetary status that you can withdraw and didn't remarkable government
to do that that gets
disappointed into somebody that originated from the mother that had him as 16 and it
was shown diligent work by his mom and
father I couldn't be a liberal any longer since it's simply didn't line up with the
qualities that I was educated in my home and.
there's a left playing governmental issues with low-salary individuals as well as old
individuals better believe it they're playing legislative issues yet
they likewise are playing a monetary amusement okay this isn't only a run of the mill legislative
issues as you see everyday this is
saying I'm going to hold you down in each American that are on these projects should
I'm not saying that we ought to get.
free of them since that would be improbable Congress could never pass that however the
truth this is
not a program this ought to be changeless this is something to surrender you a leg not
only a hand down welcome my companion I
need you to investigate this world war one Memorial it stands 40 feet tall and has been
there for about a hundred.
a long time now some non-christians are clearly set up to brawl over its shape and they need
to bring him down back now new
subtleties is Fox News boss reporter Jonathan and Jonathan what's happening here great night
again Lisa this is a.
instance of spotlights on only one Memorial and Maryland however it could have broad outcomes
affecting landmarks over
the country including some at Arlington National Cemetery the dedication at the focal point
of this cases over the donners.
World War one veteran's and Bladensburg Maryland its development was begun by collective individuals
and moms whose children kicked the bucket in
World War one and it was finished by the American Legion a lower court has decided that a cross
ought to be expelled
since it disregards the Establishment Clause of the Constitution which obviously peruses
quote Congress will make.
no law regarding a foundation of religion or restricting the free exercise thereof however
an amicus brief
documented by thirty states says the Supreme Court statement should turn around the lower
court's require its demolition as a
place in our national convention and more extensive social setting clarified the Bladensburg
remembrance praises both the.
servicemembers it was worked to respect and the sacred standards incorporating into the
First Amendment they kicked the bucket to shield
in West Virginia's Attorney General who drove the gathering of 30 states and testing the
lower courts that quote
we owe a lot of appreciation to the daring people who penance everything for our nation
respecting that.
penance with commemorations that incorporate religious images does not abuse the US Constitution
and is one of the numerous
opportunities these people battle to protect now this tested the 93 old cross started with
the American Humanist.
Affiliation and philanthropic a topics to association that starting at course rent documented
comparable claims over the
nation Lisa thank you Jonathan going along with us currently is West Virginia Attorney
General Patrick Moore CA is driving the 30 state
charge to secure this dedication and furthermore Fred Edwards previous official chief of the
American Humanist Association and.
an offended party for the situation Fred I needed to begin with you my are you against
a dedication that respects the individuals who paid the
extreme penance to secure our opportunities like the First Amendment since we need to
respect them all and
that is our central purpose we even have a hashtag respect them all since we have an
inclination that we perceive that at 40.
foot tall and cross on the administration land communicate obviously that just Christian
officers are being regarded
fred is regarding law the men who passed on that are recorded on that remembrance how
is it how is it respecting since in spite of your
hashtag in 1985 the cross was proclaimed to be a respect of all veterans of all wars all
veterans were not Christians.
Why Trump's zigzagging speech made perfect sense
President Donald Trump's State of the Union address, as it unfolded, was a dizzying and
even disorienting experience, a cascade of rhetorical passages that seemed to contradict
each other every few moments.
Appeals for unity and bipartisanship jostled with ideological and cultural scab-picking.
At first blush this all may have seemed like incoherence, as though the speech was a composite
of recommendations from warring factions, every zig offset by a whiplashing zag.
Taken as a whole, the address revealed a clear strategic purpose - one designed to revive
and strengthen the ideological connection between the Trump of 2019 with the Trump who
first began his astonishingly effective takeover of the Republican Party four years ago.
That Trump stood in condemnation of both parties as mired in a swamp of self-dealing and dysfunction.
Yes, it takes brass ones - no doubt he's got 'em - for this Trump to deliver a sermon on
putting the national interest over vindictiveness and partisanship.
It was also a sign that Trump recognizes the potential damage he incurred by offering to
"Own" the federal government shutdown and that being seen as the leader of an unpopular
establishment party sacrifices the insurgent and outsider nature of his own brand.
The Trump brand is, at its core, against free trade, against illegal immigration and against
"Endless wars."
So, long sections of his speech Tuesday night made the case on these subjects anew, in plain-spoken
language that in the past has won nods of affirmation from millions of working class
white voters who in an earlier age were natural Democrats.
His calls for big spending on infrastructure rubbed the same muscles; ditto for pledges
to use federal power to lower what he called unfairly high drug prices.
So there was an homage to the 75th anniversary of D-Day, still several months away, by introducing
very old veterans of the invasion, who actually were not all that old 35 years ago, the first
time Ronald Reagan merged D-Day commemoration with a presidential reelection in 1984.
For all of Trump's boasts that he could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue without dimming the
loyalties of his supporters, he knows that for many of them this is not true.
They vote for him because they think the alternatives are corrupt or left-wing kooks.
So it was no surprise that he found time to inveigh against "The new calls to adopt socialism
in our country."
It can be too reductionist, arguably, to interpret every word of a major presidential address
through the prism of reelection politics.
Historically the State of the Union immediately following a president's first midterm has
served as the de facto first major statement of the campaign to follow.
It was that for Bill Clinton, and for George W. Bush and for Barack Obama.
It is precisely through this prism that all the jolts and swerves of Trump's speech can
actually be seen as logical and linear.
The speech started out with a brief glimpse into an alternative universe, one in which
Trump embraces the populist rhetoric and category-killing brand of politics that propelled him past
conventional politicians of both parties in 2016 but discarded the vulgarity and taunting
and egomania that is also central to his persona.
Trump on Tuesday night played along with the what-if game for a couple minutes.
"Victory is not winning for our party.
Victory is winning for our country.
We must reject the politics of revenge, resistance and retribution - and embrace the boundless
potential of cooperation, compromise, and the common good."
Trump's alliterative lullaby soon ended.
A few lines later he made clear that his notion of bipartisanship would be for the opposition
to drop "Ridiculous partisan investigations," even as a prosecutor with a Republican lineage
has already secured convictions against several of his former close aides.
For more infomation >> TÜRKİYE VENEZUELA İÇİN NE YAPACAK? ERDOĞAN - MADURO - TRUMP - Duration: 3:28. 
For more infomation >> BREAKING How Trump's Tax Returns Could Become Public - News - Duration: 5:26. 
For more infomation >> What does Wang Qishan say about President Trump? How did CCP betray Kim Jong Un 王岐山如何评价特朗普，怎么出卖金正恩的 - Duration: 2:12. 
For more infomation >> BOLSONARO QUER DISCUTIR COM TRUMP DERRUBADA DE MADURO - Duration: 4:31. 
For more infomation >> Them Trumps: State of the Union - SNL - Duration: 2:15. 
For more infomation >> President Trump holds firm on his push for a border wall as the deadline for a deal approaches - Duration: 3:55. 
For more infomation >> Gutfeld: Trump's week was about as good as the Democrats' week was bad - Duration: 13:26. 
For more infomation >> Chris Christie opens up on the 2016 presidential campaign and the Trump presidency - Duration: 7:42. 
For more infomation >> Lara Trump: The left would rather see the country fail than see the president succeed - Duration: 5:31. 
For more infomation >> Trump's SOTU Was Garbage, And Dems Who Clapped Are Garbage Too - Duration: 4:58. 
No comments:
Post a Comment