Thursday, August 2, 2018

Trump news on Youtube Aug 3 2018

BREAKING: Trump Just Made His Move Against Hillary.

BOOM

Hillary Clinton is without a doubt one of the most corrupt officials this country has

ever endured.

Trump finally had enough, and is finally pushing back in a BIG way!

World Net Daily is reporting that Hillary Clinton is officially under investigation

by the U.S. State Department.

The "formal inquiry" is centered around whether or not Clinton was careless with the

classified information that was accessible by both herself and her aides.

The accusations started upon the discovery that she set up a private server in her basement

that was completely unsecured.

Talk about reckless behavior!

If it is determined Clinton engaged in illegal acts — and let's be honest, she is criminal

to the core — she will lose her security clearance privileges.

We know for a fact there were shady dealings between Clinton and virtually everyone willing

to work with or for the Clinton Foundation.

Mishandling documents is chump change compared to some of the crimes this woman committed.

In truth, this all ties to what former FBI Director James Comey stated last July.

He ADMITTED that Clinton and her aides were grossly mishandling Top Secret documents.

Comey said, "[Hillary and aides were] extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive,

highly classified information."

Since Comey made that statement, why is there even an investigation?

He made it clear that there was something shady going on.

We even found out why Comey decided not to prosecute Clinton after telling the world

what she was doing.

At the end of the day, Comey was in the Clintons pocket.

During his testimony in front of the Senate Intelligence Committee recently, Comey ADMITTED

that people on the Left were influencing him to drop the case.

He explicitly stated that former-Attorney General Loretta Lynch told him that he should

quit calling the Clinton scandal an "investigation" and instead, call it a "matter."

The whole situation reeks of corruption, and answers are right around the corner.

Personally, we can't wait to see that smug look knocked off of Hillary Clinton's face.

Once Clinton's emails were exposed many people noticed that the PRIVATE emails were

marked with tags such as "Top Secret" and "Special Access Program," which for

the record, is the top classification of government secrecy.

Think about it, why on earth would she have information THIS secret in her BASEMENT?

It doesn't make any sense.

Nick Merrill, a spokesman for Clinton, revealed just how far they would go to protect their

lies.

He told FOX News that there is no reason for an investigation; the case was closed.

In other words, nothing to see here, move along.

We will NOT accept that as an answer, especially coming from someone whose ipso facto job title

was "Make sure Hillary doesn't look stupid."

We are not buying it.

The Patriots of this country deserve answers.

Clinton and all of her little criminal buddies need to be stripped of their clearances NOW.

What else are they hiding that we don't know about yet?

The truth WILL be released to the world.

Once that happens we have a feeling we won't be hearing much from Hillary Clinton anymore.

Good riddance.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends

and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> BREAKING: Trump Just Made His Move Against Hillary. BOOM - Duration: 11:30.

-------------------------------------------

JUST IN: Cops Learn Their Fate For Forcing 20 Trump Supporters Into Violent Riot Leading To Beating - Duration: 4:50.

JUST IN: Cops Learn Their Fate For Forcing 20 Trump Supporters Into Violent Riot Leading

To Beating

Two years ago in San Jose, California, the police allegedly forced 20 Trump supporters

to walk directly into and through a violent mob of anti-Trump rioters after a Trump rally.

The police should have been protecting these people and instead, put them in harm's way.

This led to a lawsuit on the part of those Trump supporters against the San Jose Police

Department.

Attorney Harmeet K. Dhillon appeared on the Tucker Carlson show to discuss the case.

Most people may have forgotten about this horrific incident.

However, a others still remember the ordeal and believe it was intentional to some degree

by some in the police department.

The victims and their sympathizers have awaited the day of justice and now, after two years,

are getting that opportunity.

The police involved are now learning of their fate after all of this.

Dhillon reported last night that the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will not

allow the police officers to seek immunity in the case.

That is good news, but I would note that I believe the police were following orders and

the ones who really should be held accountable here are further up the political food chain.

Trump supporters – many sporting red Make America Great Again hats – who were attending

a rally at the McEnery Convention Center, were met with hundreds of anti-Trump protesters

as they were shepherded out of the building via a single exit.

The 20 Trump supporters were beaten and bloodied by communist anarchists who destroyed cars,

brandished Mexican flags and spread chaos and havoc in the streets.

They chased down and beat the Trump supporters.

These are some of the forerunners of the Antifa movement.

They threw eggs at these people and hit them in the back of their heads with bags of rocks.

Elderly people were not spared either and it is a wonder that no one was k****d during

all of this.

Some Trump supporters were sucker punched as they tried to get to their vehicles.

A video shows the angry mob kicking and attacking vehicles as the Trump supporters attempted

to leave the mob scene.

Clothes were ripped off their backs and glasses were snatched as Trump supporters tried to

get the heck out of there… it was definitely like being in a third world country and just

as violent and terrifying.

Dhillion told Tucker that they believe the order to send the Trump supporters into the

violent mob came "from the top."

That means the mayor, the chief of police and supervisors were all complicit in this.

Police just stood there as this happened and told others not to interfere.

From 100PercentFedUp.com:

"According to Law.com, a three-judge panel unanimously affirmed U.S. District Judge Lucy

Koh of the Northern District of California's 2017 ruling denying the city of San Jose's

efforts to dismiss the suit against seven police officers.

The plaintiffs say the officers channeled them into a violent crowd on June 2, 2016,

as they exited a rally for then-presidential candidate Trump at the McEnery Convention

Center.

Rally-goers say they were punched and pelted with eggs while nearby law enforcement officers

did nothing to protect them.

""We find the officers violated clearly established rights and are not entitled to

qualified immunity at this stage of the proceedings," Senior Judge Dorothy Wright Nelson wrote for

the panel, which also included Judges Andrew Kleinfeld and William Fletcher.

""Being attacked by anti-Trump protesters was only a possibility when the attendees

arrived at the rally," Nelson wrote.

"The officers greatly increased that risk of violence when they shepherded and directed

the attendees towards the unruly mob waiting outside the Convention Center."

""Regardless of whether you're a supporter of Donald Trump, every citizen should cheer

that our government will be held accountable in cases where they put citizens in harm's

way," said the plaintiffs' attorney, Harmeet Dhillon of Dhillon Law Group in San Francisco.

Dhillon, a Republican National Committee member, attended the 2016 rally with her husband and

a law firm partner and said she was appalled by the "vicious assaults."

""After two years of waiting, my clients are thrilled and I'm thrilled" by the

ruling, Dhillon said."

From the very beginning of Trump's campaign to become president, the overwhelming incidents

of violence have come from the left.

Many times they are facilitated by those in power, such as mayors and the chief of police

where these attacks occur.

It is long past due that the Trump supporters who have been brutalized and victimized by

these bullies get their say in court and hold these thugs accountable.

And the police should not be immune… they do take orders, but in the end they have to

decide what is right and what is wrong no matter who tells them what to do.

The treatment of these Trump rally attendees was unconstitutional and disgraceful and the

actions of the San Jose police were just unfathomable.

They aided and abetted in violence towards these people when they should have been protecting

them.

That's their job.

We haven't forgotten the attacks over the last two years and we are not blind to the

ones occurring now.

A reckoning over all of this will come at some point, hopefully in the legal system

and not in the streets.

For more infomation >> JUST IN: Cops Learn Their Fate For Forcing 20 Trump Supporters Into Violent Riot Leading To Beating - Duration: 4:50.

-------------------------------------------

After Michael Cohen Leaked Trump's Private Phone Call to CNN, Trump Embarrassed Him - Duration: 12:09.

after michael cohen leaked Trump's private phone call to CNN trump

embarrassed him as I'm sure you've heard by now CNN obtained audio of President

Trump's private phone call with his former lawyer Michael Cohen

this was leaked to them by either Cohen or someone else but it was aired on live

TV last night the edited and muddled audio clip is not incriminating and was

not the bombshell CNN figured it would be but President Trump just responded to

it this morning uh-oh President Trump might know

something about the rest of this tape and the other tapes yet to come could he

have leaked at himself many believe Michael Cohen was pressured into turning

president Trump by Bob Mueller who is trying to flip everyone around the

president against him but President Trump won't back down and he doesn't

seem worried because he knows he did nothing wrong

Fox News legal expert Gregg Jarrett confirmed this saying this conversation

President Trump had with his lawyer was completely standard and no laws were

broken late last night President Trump's new lawyer Rudy Giuliani responded to

the tape on the Laura Ingraham show reiterating that this tape is a big

nothing bigger joining us now on the phone is Rudy Giuliani personal attorney

for President Trump speaking with us exclusively after the release of this

recording mayor Giuliani thank you so much for

checking in with us tonight first of all your reaction to this tapes release well

I think it's first of all the major point is it's outrageous that someone

would tape his client surreptitiously and number two it's also foolhardy for

them to try to kind of yell and scream and make believe what's on the tape I

agree with you the tape it's a little bit hard to hear but I assure you that

we listen to it numerous numerous times and the transcript makes it quite clear

at the end that President Trump says Oh don't pay with cash cohen dan interrupts

and says no no no I got it and then you hear distinctly if you're careful and

you slow it down check and then Cohen follows with no no no and then quickly

cuts off the tape which indicates exactly what's there she was saying that

Cohen doesn't want the rest of the court because it was to expel Satori from the

point of view of the press there's no way the president is gonna be talking

about setting up a corporation and then using cash

unless you're that's complete idiot any presidents not really there's a moment

tonight on CNN where where Lonny Davis he kept saying well we are going we're

showing you that what Giuliani claimed that Michael Cohen was the one who

brought up the issue of cash not his client Donald Trump we're showing you

with this tape that it was Trump who brought it up so he seemed to say that

the release of the tape Rudy was because of you and what you said well the fact

is that the president does bring up cash but he says don't pay with cash and then

Cohen says no no no and the president says check and then Cohen says I got it

point if the president want the transaction to be memorial Rudy there

was a some concern about the decision to waive privilege in this case a lot of

legal commentators we just talked to Dershowitz so that's that's all well and

good that's all well and good for them to say that but the reality is that the

tape was leaked not by us nobody believes that

last week we were treated to how we leaked it which Jay and I were laughing

about Jay Sekulow this was leaked on us with a very very scurrilous description

of what was on this day probably by the same people who are lying on CNN and we

had it we had to correct the record so we have no problem making this limited

release because it is it is collaborative of the president's

statement now are so are you still maintaining then tonight that the

recording that was released this evening is 100

sent exculpatory toward the president in his previous statements about this I

think your two guests just said that there's no indication of any crime being

committed on this state and that is absolutely right so that is why we go

ahead now the the you know what the left is gonna say you know what they do

they've been doing it for months that the president gave the impression that

he didn't know about any of these transactions that this was this might

have been happening but he didn't know about the comment on Air Force One saw

references in in the previous statement he said I didn't know but it sounds like

he knew that something was being set up to perhaps buy the rights to this

MacDougal story correct no in fact if you go back a little further on the

prints because I don't get the whole thing Cohen says did we need financing

and the president spent wait a second what for anthing then he asked explain

it the President did not know about this before this conversation at least with

regard to the transaction that we're talking about I mean he may have he may

or may not have known about the Google's claims I don't know that but he didn't

know about he didn't know about this transaction this is the conversation in

which they talk about how they're going to buy the rights and the rights people

have to understand who are watching tonight the rights to this story from

the National Enquirer the company that owns a National Enquirer were never

purchased so that transaction did not go to that's another thing that's absurd

about this what it makes clear is this is at most an attempt to do something I

don't know of any attempt in this category of of crime that they're

looking at so in any event I don't think anyone can suggest that this represents

anything where the present did anything wrong and that's the reason why we

waived it would we have put it out had it not been leaked no we would not have

put it out had it not been leaked but it was being leaked visiting our time under

very very false which false statements being made about it which even a word

they're the ones you're hearing now were you given were you given a heads-up Rudy

that this was coming out tonight at all or was this a surprise to you yes what

found out at six o'clock the staff business and look we've been over the

tape over the weekend about five times what I urge people to do is just go on

and on wine listen to your broadcast you played the tape plenty of three times

the third time you play it'll become clear I bet dates even longer than Alan

Dershowitz how about four thousand hours of mafia people on tapes I know how to

listen to them I know how to transcribe this tape is crystal clear when you

listen to it I've dealt with much worse shape than this are you concerned that

there are other recordings out there between Cohan and the President as a

lawyer as someone who's dealt with people have been in a lot of trouble

before just like you have Rudy the idea of a lawyer taping a client is I think

it takes your breath away but you know are there other tapes that you're aware

of what would you release them yourself today today someone was leaking from I'm

sure their side it can't be ours that there were 12 tapes of Cohan with the

President may have been avenatti somebody else don't quote me on that

he's leaked things like there are a lot more tapes with the President and dursa

which yesterday asked him how because it would be illegal for him to have that

information and unethical but in any event there are no other takes with the

president we have all the tapes in our possession we have transcripts of all of

them we're comfortable with them and there are no there are no others now

Rudy you've known Lanny Davis a long time and like I've known him going back

20 years during the Clinton saga do you do you have any thoughts about his

decision to represent Michael Cohen given his long ties to the Clintons no

not at all I don't have any any any any concerns about that he's a lawyer he has

a right to represent who we want and Michael has a right I question the

strategy of doing this of trying to make a tape stay what it doesn't say or if

putting out a tape in which you're kind of proud of the fact that you're a

lawyer taping your client and then thinking you could cooperate with the

government you know to cooperate with the government you've got to have

credibility first thing that happens is this guy's

gonna be disbarred I mean it's ridiculous he's a pariah to the legal

profession there was a moment tonight on CNN I'm gonna play it for you Rudy we're

Chris Cuomo actually asks about this recording and whether it might taint the

entire substance of it let's watch listen this recording could be argued to

be fruit of the poisonous tree that as counsel Michael Cohen shouldn't have

been recording his counsel his client van Donald J Trump now President Trump

how do you get past that that this whole thing can't look good for Cohen cuz he

should have never done it well I'm not gonna shift the topic it's up to mr.

Cohen to explain why he was taping so he didn't want to go this is great what if

I get was dead it's up to the President to explain that just look that's his

lawyer being interviewed by Cuomo and he throws the ball to his client I mean if

this is crazy representation have you ever heard of anything like this you put

out a tape of your client you then make believe it says something it doesn't say

believe me there were three other versions of this before we got to this

one that were even worse and the transcript belies that if you analyze it

have the patience to analyze it don't become like forgetting about it and now

we saying well you know give the ball to give the ball through to my client so

you're mean I don't mean to harp on the Clinton you know connection here but it

is interesting that Cohen chooses the longtime confidant booster defender of

the Clintons after everything that happened during the campaign to

represent him here I mean was he was he I mean you know this how this deal goes

really was he was Cohen trying to send some kind of message to the president

you know look out here we come and you better watch out I mean it's an odd

choice of lawyer in my view it's an odd choice well I don't know I can't comment

on that Laura I don't know Eddie you know someone else and interfering with

like the counsel if I do that I don't want to do that and I just question the

whole tactic and nice comment tonight shifting the thing

to cold instead of throwing them on the bus and Rudi finally here you got to be

able to answer this you gotta be able to answer via client or not answer at all

and and finally Rudi on on the issue of talking to Muller special counsel here

the reports came out that you all will talk about collusion and nothing else

there any developments on that that you can tell us tonight oh no I think we've

been distracted the last couple days and they've been distracted with the with

the they're getting ready for the metaphor case so I you know we'll

probably get an answer in the next hopefully next couple of days a week all

right Rudy Giuliani we really appreciate writing us tonight

exclusively thank you so much

For more infomation >> After Michael Cohen Leaked Trump's Private Phone Call to CNN, Trump Embarrassed Him - Duration: 12:09.

-------------------------------------------

Robert Mueller Discovered One Phone Call That Is Devastating News For Trump - Duration: 13:48.

A Democrat Connection Destroyed All Of Robert Mueller's Credibility

Despite virtually zero evidence being presented, Robert Mueller's anti-Trump Russia investigation

continues to dredge on.

It has been rumored for months that Trump has been close to firing him.

And one newly revealed Democrat connection could be enough to destroy every bit of Mueller's

credibility, and take down his entire investigation.

Republican Representative Sean Duffy (R-WI) created an uproar when he attacked Robert

Mueller Democrat donors that are on his team helping investigate the so-called connected

between Donald Trump and Russia.

Democrats immediately scrambled trying to deflect and prove the investigation is unbiased.

But the facts don't lie.

And as it turns out the majority of the lawyers on Robert Mueller's team have donated over

$65,000 in total to national Democrat candidates and organizations.

Only one of Mueller's lawyers has donated to Republicans, but he is also a major donor

to Democrat causes.

As reported by The Daily Caller:

"THE MUELLER PROBE HAS BEEN INVESTIGATING RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL

ELECTION SINCE MAY 2017, INCLUDING WHETHER THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN COLLUDED WITH RUSSIA.

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP HAS REPEATEDLY DENIED ALLEGATIONS OF COLLUSION AND HAS EVEN REFERRED

TO THE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION AS A "TAXPAYER FUNDED CHARADE."

REPUBLICANS LIKE DUFFY HAVE VOICED MORE MEASURED CONCERNS ABOUT THE MUELLER TEAM'S ABILITY

TO BE IMPARTIAL.

"DO I BELIEVE THERE'S ANY EVIDENCE OF RUSSIA COLLUSION BETWEEN DONALD TRUMP CAMPAIGN

AND RUSSIA?

NO.

BUT SHOULD HE BE CONCERNED?

YES.

WHEN YOU BRING IN DEMOCRAT DONORS, HILLARY CLINTON DONORS, INTO THE BOB MUELLER INVESTIGATION,

YEAH, YOU SHOULD BE CONCERNED," DUFFY SAID ON FOX BUSINESS.

"SO, I HOPE THAT MUELLER DOES THIS THE RIGHT WAY, BUT WE SHOULD ALL BE CONCERNED BASED

ON THE PEOPLE WHO ARE INSIDE HELPING MUELLER RUN THE INVESTIGATION."

DUFFY HAS MADE SIMILAR STATEMENTS OVER THE PAST YEAR ABOUT THE POTENTIAL BIAS OF "DEMOCRAT

DONORS" ON THE PROBE."ATTO

Rep. Duffy, and many other concerned Americans contend that it is virtually impossible for

the investigation to be fair when the majority of the lawyers investigating the claims financially

supported President Trump's opponent.

Having Democrat donors on the legal team investigating the President is a huge conflict of interest.

And some of the conflicts of interest go even further.

Attorney Jeannie Rhee donated the maximum of $2,700 in 2015 and 2016 to Hillary Clinton.

Rhee also represented the Clinton foundation in 2015 to protect Hillary Clinton, who was

at the center of a racketeering lawsuit related to her tenure as Secretary of State.

DOJ Prosecutor Andrew Weissmann has donated thousands of dollars to the Democratic National

Committee, and was in attendance of Hillary Clinton's election night party.

He also sent a letter to then-Attorney General Sally Yates, thanking her

for refusing to enforce Trump's controversial, but legal, travel ban.

When asked about these conflicts of interest, the Special Counsel's office cited the Civil

Service Reform Act, which prohibits using some personal political affiliations into

account when hiring and taking other personal actions with regards to career attorneys.

I wonder if that same argument would be used if the cards were reversed, and it was a legal

team of Republican donors investigating Hillary Clinton.

Do you think the Russia investigation into President Trump has been fair and unbiased?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments section below.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your

friends

and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> Robert Mueller Discovered One Phone Call That Is Devastating News For Trump - Duration: 13:48.

-------------------------------------------

The Director Of National Intelligence Just Said That He Doesn't Know What Trump And Putin Discussed - Duration: 1:05.

particular party?

Is there any particular party

benefiting from 2018 Russian

efforts?

>> What we see are the Russians

are looking for every

opportunity, regardless of

party, regardless of whether or

not it applies to the election,

to continue their pervasive

efforts to undermine our

fundamental values.

>> In the run-up to --

>> I'll try --

>> Perhaps ambassador Bolton can

weigh in as well.

In the run-up to the Helsinki

summit, officials, ambassadors

to nato, to Russia, said that

the president would raise the

issue of malign activity with

president Putin.

He didn't discuss that, at least

at the press conference.

You're saying today the

president has directed you to

make the issue of election

meddle ago priority.

How do you explain the

disconnect between what you are

saying, his advisers, and what

the president has said about

this issue?

>> I'm not in a position to

either understand fully or talk

about what happened in Helsinki.

For more infomation >> The Director Of National Intelligence Just Said That He Doesn't Know What Trump And Putin Discussed - Duration: 1:05.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's Press Secretary just gave the lamest excuse for his weird remarks about needing ID to buy - Duration: 1:27.

For more infomation >> Trump's Press Secretary just gave the lamest excuse for his weird remarks about needing ID to buy - Duration: 1:27.

-------------------------------------------

Trump just demanded Sessions end the Russia probe. Adam Schiff's response is spot on - Duration: 1:40.

For more infomation >> Trump just demanded Sessions end the Russia probe. Adam Schiff's response is spot on - Duration: 1:40.

-------------------------------------------

Former Congresswoman Calls Trump A Coward And A Wimp Who Fears Mueller - Duration: 1:40.

seems to suggest he's had it

with Donald Trump and now he's

in negotiations to talking with

Robert Mueller.

What do you make of it?

>> Well, think what it shows is

Mueller is tightening thes into,

slowly, slowly, brick by brick,

building a very potentially

devastating case against Donald

Trump.

I have to agree with bill.

I happen to think Donald Trump

has no intention whatsoever of

going before the special

prosecutor because Donald Trump

happens to be be a coward.

You saw him right next to Putin.

This is the great tough man?

This is America?

No, he was a wimp.

He's not going in there.

He doesn't want to be

prosecuted.

He's very concerned that he

might not tell the truth because

he hasn't and we know he

falsified a statement about the

trump tower meeting.

So I think that aga -- however

you pronounce his name.

>> Agalarov --

>> Or others are likely to come

forward here.

Mueller's not finished with this

investigation.

I think one of the really

outrageous things is we have a

trial.

The president is the chief law

enforcement officer of the

United States.

His comments could be affecting

the trial.

The attack on the special

prosecutor.

The attack on his

investigations.

>> You think it's the

obstruction case.

>> Definitely.

But it could actually affect

this trial.

He's the president.

He shouldn't be undermine ago

trial in the United States court

by United States prosecutors.

What side is he on?

>> As we're waiting for the

briefing to get under way,

again, it was scheduled for the

top of the hour.

I want to play the response or

show you the response on Twitter

last night from -- this is from

For more infomation >> Former Congresswoman Calls Trump A Coward And A Wimp Who Fears Mueller - Duration: 1:40.

-------------------------------------------

Trump thanks Kim for repatriation of U.S. war dead, and for a 'nice letter' - Duration: 0:24.

Just a couple of hours after the remains arrived in Hawaii,... Donald Trump tweeted a thank

you to his North Korean counterpart.

On Thursday, local time,... the U.S. president wrote, he was not surprised that Kim Jong-un

acted to honor the promise made at their summit in Singapore.

Trump also thanked the young leader for a (quote) "nice letter."

There were no details about whether a letter was sent with the 55 caskets... nor its contents.

For more infomation >> Trump thanks Kim for repatriation of U.S. war dead, and for a 'nice letter' - Duration: 0:24.

-------------------------------------------

INGRAHAM: AND THE PUNDITS WONDER HOW TRUMP GOT ELECTED! - Duration: 10:31.

if you want to see just how radical how extreme Democrats have become on

immigration check out the freaks at their anti-ice

protests the siege of the at the portland oregon ice building started on

june 17th and continues today o testers even followed them home to the

residences followed them when they went to pick up their kids at daycare

repeatedly threatening their lives this was an absolute siege of a nice facility

a lot of people don't know this this really isn't getting covered out in the

mainstream media we lost that building for ten days almost two weeks

the protesters took control of that that building and these were again these were

not normal protesters there's you know folks like an Tifa violent militant

groups you notice you haven't seen the media coverage of that aspect of it

we're gonna get into more in just a moment we have new information for you

tonight but to top it all off Portland mayor Ted wheeler shot down the

terrified ice officers calls for help saying that police would respond to them

quote when there were imminent life safety threats okay and last week we

lured Emin straight errs to peacefully disengage for their own safety heck with

the safety of the ice employees this is totally out of control and it's

backfiring big-time on the Democrats a recent Reuters Ipsos poll found that

immigration was the top issue for us voters heading into the November 2018

midterm elections it edged out even the economy and it's hard to believe that

the voters concern about immigration here is focused on what the left wants

to do this phony concern for the kids at the border I don't think so

remember not so long ago Democrats at least gave lip service to our basic

right to border enforcement it is wrong and ultimately self-defeating

for a nation of immigrants to permit the kind of abuse of our immigration laws we

have seen in recent years illegal immigration is wrong and a primary goal

of comprehensive immigration reform must be to dramatically curtail future

illegal immigration look I voted numerous times when I was a

senator to spend money to build a a barrier to try to prevent illegal

immigrants from coming in and remember this from President Obama back in 2014

who sounded a lot like Trump on this issue except for the no protests or

marches part do not send your children to the borders if they do make it

they'll get sent back more importantly they may not make it of course none of

them were sent back but instead of warning of the dangers of making family

treks across the border like President Obama just did the knew more and Tifa

friendly Democrats warned about an America that actually punishes border

jumpers and they are never happier on the Left when they're than when they're

using kids as political pawns I've heard of the stories and with ice year-old

infants being before the the judges and it's it's almost Kefka chuck-e-cheese

uses things like this to check parents in their children when they're they're

okay with that absurd analysis Vermont would be better off with the Chuckie

Cheese mascot it's one of their senators oh my god Oh Chuckie Cheese does a

better job of keeping parents here is a nice official Matthew Albin attempting

to introduce this concept called applying the facts to the law to this

Democrat senator from Hawaii mazie Hirono again I think we're missing

the point these individuals are there because they

have broken a law there has to be a process they have broken

as deemed so by the president with his no ma'am they're there for violation of

title 8 of the immigration illegal entry is both a criminal and civil violation

my understanding is that other than zero tolerance these are no longer civil

civil proceedings but in fact we're criminal proceedings

they're both I'm confused okay okay god bless her she's confused has all that

oak a volcanic ash blowing across Hawaii begun to affect the good Senators

cognitive skills what part don't you understand laws on the books violate the

laws there will be a penalty and the pundits wonder how Trump got elected out

of the roughly 2500 children who are separated from their family units at the

us-mexico border more than 1,800 have already been reunited with their parents

and of the 700 children or so who still not been reunited 431 have parents now

outside the United States those parents were either deported or voluntarily

abandoned their children a fact that is conveniently omitted from the DEM Tifa

crowd democrats wailing over the plight of the remaining children are completely

ignoring the facts due to domestic or drug abuse many of these parents are now

deemed unfit to care for their children or dangerous for their children so

newsflash the US government is protecting the border kids today or

order order the Democrats want them to be reunited with parents who could

traffic them or who are criminals themselves is that what they want and by

the way the kids who may have a chance of being deported back home to be in

their homeland with their parents are now being blocked in a lawsuit by the

ACLU by the way wasn't that American Civil Liberties Union now it's illegal

immigrant Civil Liberties Union in the meantime we're caring for these children

and the US taxpayers are footing the bill but who cares about these facts

when peddling emotion dripping with concern is so much easier Melania Trump

went to the border and nasties and questions about when and how these

families will be put back together she doesn't care she's planning

Christmas at the White House are you idiots running this country you seem

like child abusers to me ask any doctor ask any child where welfare specialist

ask any psychiatrist ask yourself is this abuse this is abuse that was abuse

just watching that you ever notice how the empathy though just runs one way

it's never the same kind of empathy for the families victimized by violent

illegal alien crime or DWI deaths because of illegal immigrants or drug

trafficking gun running never any empathy for Americans who've been pushed

out of their jobs in the workforce for cheaper illegal labor never any empathy

for ice agents who have their reputation smeared or lives threatened for just

doing their jobs our commitment to consistent and fair enforcement of the

law is demonstrated on a daily basis by the integrity the unbiased

professionalism and the compassion that the men and women of CBP exhibit towards

the aliens we encounter particularly towards the most vulnerable we do not

leave our humanity behind when we report for duty that's a great line now

Americans are just a lot smarter let's face it than the left and their media

poodles think Americans understand that we are not a country without borders of

course we have compassion that's why we're taking as I think pretty good care

of them all things considered they're not with their families but they're

being fed clothed doctor's appointments entertainment sports schooling

interpreters lawyers that's not nothing and Americans will not be guilted into

supporting politicians who put the interests of illegal aliens ahead of our

own citizens here's why congressman Ron De Santis will be the next governor of

Florida he gets it we can fight illegal immigration

all we got to do is enact a verify and stop sanctuary cities we want maximum

border security and respect for our heroes ice Border Patrol and law

enforcement and we're going to have tremendous border security that will

include the wall that will include the wall the applause went on and on last

night the biggest applause lines when the issue of immigration came up look

it's in my mind it's actually sad it's really sad to see what's happened to the

party of FDR and John F Kennedy the Democrat Party on this issue and so many

others they used to believe America was worth defending her laws her

Constitution the Declaration her borders her history now their most vocal voices

believe it's time to destroy that old order and replace it with something kind

of closer to socialism but we're not about to let that happen

and that's the angle

you

For more infomation >> INGRAHAM: AND THE PUNDITS WONDER HOW TRUMP GOT ELECTED! - Duration: 10:31.

-------------------------------------------

Mueller Offers To Reduce Number Of Questions In Sit Down With Trump - Duration: 1:55.

For more infomation >> Mueller Offers To Reduce Number Of Questions In Sit Down With Trump - Duration: 1:55.

-------------------------------------------

Congress, Trump React to 3D-Printed Guns - Duration: 2:17.

As the future of 3D-printed gun blueprints remains in limbo, Democrats on Capitol Hill

are working to prevent them from ever being downloaded again.

U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson held a press conference with Sens. Chuck Schumer, Ed Markey, Richard

Blumenthal and Bob Menendez where they introduced a bill to block the release of the 3D-printed

gun blueprints.

Additionally, U.S. Rep. Seth Moulton said he'll be introducing a bill to ban 3D-printed

guns altogether.

It isn't just Democrats who are worried, though.

The news got the attention of President Donald Trump, who wrote on Twitter that "plastic

guns" being sold to the public "doesn't seem to make much sense."

Even the State Department chimed in.

"The reason that the State Department got involved — our only equity in this is because

of our role in controlling foreign access to U.S. defense technology.

In simpler words, the State Department wants to prevent the wrong people from acquiring

weapons overseas."

This comes months after the U.S. government reached a settlement with Defense Distributed,

a Texas-based company that creates 3D-printed gun blueprints.

After a three-year court battle, the company was granted permission to make its blueprints

available to the public.

But that news quickly garnered lots of criticism; eight states and the District of Columbia

sued the Trump administration to block the agreement, prompting a judge on Tuesday to

temporarily block the blueprints from becoming available for download.

"It will prevent solving crimes that are virtually undetectable.

It can slip through all kinds of different security measures.

This is just an open invitation to criminals, to terrorists, and I don't think that's what

the Second Amendment is designed to do."

Republicans in Congress haven't said much about the issue.

However, U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie wrote on Twitter: "Even Congress can't ban 3D printers,

the internet, or the 1st Amendment.

The President certainly can't.

And besides, there's already a law against undetectable guns."

Cody Wilson, founder of Defense Distributed, told CBS his goal is to keep publishing the

blueprints until they're available to everyone.

For more infomation >> Congress, Trump React to 3D-Printed Guns - Duration: 2:17.

-------------------------------------------

Supreme Court Victory – Trump's Former Opponent Delivers Him A Resounding Win - Duration: 4:03.

Supreme Court Victory – Trump's Former Opponent Delivers Him A Resounding Win

It's a good day when Donald Trump's former opponent in the 2016 election decides to support

the president in a major decision.

It was Senator Rand Paul who stated that he will officially support Trump's Supreme

Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh.

This was decided, apparently, during a meeting that Rand Paul had with Brett last week.

Trump's position as the president puts him in the middle of the Democrats and Republicans

as any decision he makes is fair grounds for being supported or not.

Some Republicans have chosen not to support the president, such as John McCain.

Even though Trump ran on the side of the GOP, he still found himself to be a target of many

who were supposed to be on his side.

Rand Paul was considered a swing vote in just about anything Trump attempted.

Paul's support of Kavanaugh is what makes it a win for Trump.

Each time the president makes a decision, it's as though he's being watched with

a hawk's eyes and then pounced upon at every little mistake.

Each president makes mistakes, big or small, but it sometimes seems like Trump's mistakes

are exaggerated by mainstream media.

That's just my opinion on it, not to be mixed or perceived as a fact.

Rand Paul supporting Trump's decision on Kavanaugh is a good thing for Trump.

It shows that some people are not afraid to support their president.

It's also good that it took some time for Paul to come along.

That means Rand Paul may have been weighing his options and thinking about his decision

instead of automatically accepting or supporting the decision.

It's better for people to put some thought into their own actions before making a supportive

announcement of any type.

Rand Paul might face some opposition, but that seems to be fair game in the political

world these days.

After all, isn't facing opposition in politics all part of a days work?

Fox News stated on Paul's decision: "I believe he will carefully adhere to the Constitution

and will take his job to protect individual liberty seriously," Paul said in a statement.

The Kentucky senator was one of the few Republicans considered a possible swing vote on Kavanaugh's

confirmation.

Sens. Susan Collins, R-Maine, and Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, also are being closely watched.

But with Paul voicing clear support — and Collins and Murkowski signaling potential

support in recent weeks — Kavanaugh's prospects appear to be improving as GOP leaders

aim to engineer a swift confirmation by the fall.

In another sign of congressional outreach, Kavanaugh is having his first meeting Monday

with a Democratic senator since becoming Trump's high court nominee.

He plans to sit down with Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, one of a handful of Democratic

senators who could cross the aisle to vote for Kavanaugh as most Democrats line up against

him.

Paul, meanwhile, has taken issue with Kavanaugh's record supporting the warrantless collection

of telephone metadata.

"I have expressed my concern over Judge Kavanaugh's record on warrantless bulk collection

of data and how that might apply to very important privacy cases before the Supreme Court,"

he said Monday.

But he said his vote is not a "single-issue" decision and voiced confidence in Kavanaugh's

record on other issues.

"My conversation with Judge Kavanaugh reinforces my belief that he will evaluate cases before

the Supreme Court from a textual and originalist point of view," Paul said.

"On issues such as property rights and reining in the administrative state, Judge Kavanaugh

has a strong record and showed a deep commitment during our meeting.

… Finally, his strong defenses of the First and Second Amendments in landmark cases show

someone who isn't afraid to challenge the status quo and will fight with backbone.

Judge Kavanaugh will have my support and my vote to confirm him to the Supreme Court."

Republicans, with a 51-49 majority, have little wiggle room on the Kavanaugh vote.

And with Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., out battling brain cancer, GOP leaders cannot spare a single

vote unless they attract Democratic support.

The Associated Press contributed to this report."

For more infomation >> Supreme Court Victory – Trump's Former Opponent Delivers Him A Resounding Win - Duration: 4:03.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's Latest Approval Numbers Will Have Obama Blowing a GASKET! - Duration: 11:12.

Trump's Latest Approval Numbers Will Have Obama Blowing a GASKET!

Despite all of the fake news slander, the Democrat attacks, and obstruction, and the

phony Russia witch-hunt, the American people remain unphased as this new Rasmussen report

shows.

As a matter of fact, Trump's approval ratings are 4 points higher than Obama at the same

point in his presidency!

Whatever the lying liberal media is selling, Americans are not buying it.

So, will they ramp up and create more phony scandals, or ease back?

Let us know what you think in the comments.

From Gateway Pundit

And President Trump's approval rating is currently at 48% on Rasmussen Reports.

Media darling Barack Obama had an approval rating of 44% on July 31, 2010.

President Trump is still 4 points ahead of Barack Obama at a similar point in his presidency.

And this is while 90% of network media coverage has been negative of President Trump.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends

and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> Trump's Latest Approval Numbers Will Have Obama Blowing a GASKET! - Duration: 11:12.

-------------------------------------------

Trump rally moved to Olentangy Orange High School - Duration: 0:23.

For more infomation >> Trump rally moved to Olentangy Orange High School - Duration: 0:23.

-------------------------------------------

Pastor John Gray reacts to criticism of Trump meeting - Duration: 2:58.

For more infomation >> Pastor John Gray reacts to criticism of Trump meeting - Duration: 2:58.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Sets Mueller's Case ABLAZE! Calls Out Who Really Should Be Investigated for 'Collusion' - Duration: 11:12.

Trump Sets Mueller's Case ABLAZE!

Calls Out Who Really Should Be Investigated for 'Collusion'

President Trump is yet again not holding back in dismantling Mueller's flimsy investigation,

this time targeting the term "collusion" and how little merit it holds.

He also was sure to highlight that if anyone "colluded" it was Hillary and DNC, and

perhaps THEY should be the ones under investigation!

From The Daily Caller

President Donald Trump doubled down on the utterances of his personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani

saying that collusion is not a crime, in a Tuesday morning tweet.

Trump repeated his frequent refrain that the only people who colluded with the Russian

government are the Democratic National Committee and his former opponent Hillary Clinton.

Giuliani originally stated that collusion is not a crime in two separate media appearances

Monday morning.

"I have been sitting here looking in the federal code trying to find collusion as a

crime," Giuliani told Fox News Monday, flatly declaring "Collusion is not a crime."

The personal lawyer to the President continued to CNN "four months, they're not going

to be colluding with Russia, which I don't even know if that's a crime, colluding about

Russians," adding "You start analyzing the crime — the hacking is the crime.

… The President didn't hack."

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> Trump Sets Mueller's Case ABLAZE! Calls Out Who Really Should Be Investigated for 'Collusion' - Duration: 11:12.

-------------------------------------------

Judge Jeanine Issues PERFECT Warning To GOP – Trump Is SMILING - Duration: 13:01.

Judge Jeanine Issues PERFECT Warning To GOP – Trump Is SMILING

Judge Jeanine Pirro is known for her sharp tongue and even sharper wit.

She offers a serious warning to the people running our country, and they BETTER listen!

Pirro started her show with the usual opening statement on FOX News.

Her opener caught many people off guard because she was speaking about REPUBLICANS and their

"do nothing" attitude.

"You're in power, d*mn it.

Do something.

Pass something.

Cut this Kumbaya crap."

BOOM!

By the time she is finished talking you just want to stand up and clap.

She made such BRILLIANT points throughout the entire opening and then into the show.

The Republicans SEE all of this crazy stuff happening around them, yet they are doing

nothing about it.

Pirro proceeds to speculate on a much bigger plot than the evil Left.

Judge Pirro suggests that maybe not all of the Republicans are playing on our team because

they are in the pockets of the same big money forces as the Democrats.

It didn't matter to them if Hillary or Trump won because it would just be business as usual.

It is a frightening notion to consider, but the only one that makes sense at this point.

The Left has metaphorically spit in the face of the rest of the country on multiple occasions,

and nothing has been done about it from either side.

If there are any rational people remaining on the Left they should be telling their party

to CALM DOWN and explain how idiotic they are acting.

On that same note, Republicans should be freaking out at how hard the Dems are trying to pound

the rest of this country into the ground.

The rights of every American are being stripped by the Left.

Freedom of speech is being destroyed on college campuses across the country, people are walking

on eggshells, and of course, we have the constant promise that they are going to come for our

weapons.

We would LOVE to see them try THAT move.

Our country is in danger, and it is up to the Republicans to get the Democrats back

in check.

Liberals are acting like a bunch of angry toddlers, and Republicans are SUPPOSED to

be the adults, but many of them are acting like they don't see what is going on.

Just because they are not YOUR children — so to speak — doesn't mean you should let

them ruin the house, or in this case, our country.

The country needs to stand together and put our foot down where the idiotic Left is concerned.

They need to know that their days of walking all over everyone are officially over.

If we don't stop them, it is hard to say what could happen next.

If the baseball field shootings are any inkling of things to come, we had better prepare.

It is not a problem that is going to get solved overnight.

However, if we don't do ANYTHING, we are going to crash

and burn.

It

is time for the Patriots of

this

country

to

take a STAND!

For more infomation >> Judge Jeanine Issues PERFECT Warning To GOP – Trump Is SMILING - Duration: 13:01.

-------------------------------------------

The FBI's Anti Trump Conspiracy Just Took An Awful Turn For The Worse - Duration: 12:17.

The FBI's Anti-Trump Conspiracy Just Took An Awful Turn For The Worse

Americans were shocked to learn about the corruption at the top of the FBI.

Under James Comey's leadership, the Bureau weaponized the surveillance state to spy on

the Trump campaign.

But a bombshell report revealed the conspiracy took an awful turn for the worse.

Critics accused the FBI of obtaining a FISA warrant against former Trump campaign aide

Carter Page – and then extending it four times – as a backdoor method to spy on Trump.

The FBI used the fake news Christopher Steele dossier as the backbone for their warrant

application.

Now it turns out the critics were right.

The FBI likely intercepted a call to Page from Trump chief strategist Steve Bannon during

the transition period where Bannon told Page he should not do an interview on MSNBC.

Politico reports:

"THE FBI WAS MONITORING CARTER PAGE WHEN THE FORMER TRUMP CAMPAIGN ADVISER SAYS HE

SPOKE WITH TRUMP ADVISER STEVE BANNON ABOUT RUSSIA IN JANUARY 2017, RAISING THE STRONG

POSSIBILITY THAT THE FBI INTERCEPTED A CONVERSATION BETWEEN THE TWO MEN.

PAGE TOLD CONGRESS IN NOVEMBER ABOUT THE CALL.

BUT IT HAS BEEN CAST INTO A NEW LIGHT BY LAST WEEK'S RELEASE OF A REPUBLICAN MEMO REVEALING

THAT THE FBI WAS MONITORING PAGE'S COMMUNICATIONS AT THE TIME.

"IF PAGE WAS USING ONE OF HIS STANDARD PHONES, IT WAS PROBABLY PICKED UP," SAID ELIZABETH

GOITEIN, A FORMER JUSTICE DEPARTMENT TRIAL ATTORNEY AND CONGRESSIONAL COUNSEL WHO CO-DIRECTS

THE BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE'S LIBERTY AND NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAM.

THE SIGNIFICANCE OF A POSSIBLE FBI RECORDING DEPENDS ON THE EXACT CONTENT OF THE CONVERSATION

BETWEEN BANNON AND PAGE, ABOUT WHICH PAGE HAS BEEN VAGUE.

BUT IT MEANS THE FBI'S SURVEILLANCE OF PAGE — WHICH HAS BEEN THE SUBJECT OF INTENSE

PARTISAN ANGER IN WASHINGTON — MAY HAVE TOUCHED ONE OF THE HIGHEST-RANKING FIGURES

IN TRUMP'S INCOMING ADMINISTRATION JUST DAYS BEFORE INAUGURATION.

BANNON HASN'T BEEN ACCUSED OF ANY IMPROPRIETY.

NEITHER HE NOR HIS LAWYER WOULD COMMENT ON PAGE'S ACCOUNT OF THE PURPORTED CONVERSATION.

EXPERTS IN NATIONAL SECURITY LAW SAID THE FBI WOULD HAVE RETAINED THE CONVERSATION AS

EVIDENCE IF IT SEEMED PERTINENT TO THEIR INVESTIGATION INTO ALLEGATIONS THAT TRUMP ASSOCIATES COORDINATED

WITH THE KREMLIN — AN INQUIRY THAT HAS SINCE WIDENED TO FOCUS ON WHETHER ANY OFFICIALS,

INCLUDING TRUMP HIMSELF, TRIED TO OBSTRUCT THE PROBE.

BANNON, ONCE AMONG TRUMP'S MOST TRUSTED CAMPAIGN AND WHITE HOUSE ADVISERS, IS EXPECTED

TO MEET SOON WITH SPECIAL COUNSEL ROBERT MUELLER."

James Comey's ugly leadership of the FBI is a stain on America.

He corrupted a great institution because he was blinded by partisan hatred of the President.

When Americans receive a full accounting of this scandal, they will demand Comey and his

crew stand for their crimes.

Do you agree?

Let us know your thoughts in the comment section.

For more infomation >> The FBI's Anti Trump Conspiracy Just Took An Awful Turn For The Worse - Duration: 12:17.

-------------------------------------------

Entire Border Wall Could Be Paid For Through Illegals – Should Trump Do This? - Duration: 6:47.

Entire Border Wall Could Be Paid For Through Illegals – Should Trump Do This?

The debate on President Trump's border wall rages on.

Some of it has been paid for and construction has already begun, but billions more are needed

to complete the project.

I have said from the very beginning that there are multiple ways to fund building the wall.

If our leaders did what they are supposed to, they would just approve the entire $18

billion or so that Trump has requested.

After all, it is a significantly lower amount in comparison to what we actually pay to have

illegal aliens here in the first place.

But as long as progressive Republicans benefit from cheap labor and Marxist Democrats benefit

from padded voter rolls, it's not likely to come from our politicos unless something

radically changes or gives.

There is a way that pays for the wall that does not involve Mexico or US taxpayers paying

for it.

It's so simple, even a bureaucrat should be able to embrace the idea.

If we just close the border and don't let anymore illegal immigrants in to sit on the

federal dole and get free bennies, the wall would be self-funding.

That's right, but there are those who are asking if Trump should do this.

Heck yeah, he should.

The brilliance here is in the simplicity of the move.

A number of recent immigration studies show that the $18 billion or so wall that President

Trump has in the works will pay for itself by curbing the importation of not only crime

and drugs, but poverty.

Not to mention the elimination of federal welfare for illegal immigrants which should

not exist in the first place.

"The wall could pay for itself even if it only modestly reduced illegal crossings and

drug smuggling," Steven A. Camarota, director of research at the Center for Immigration

Studies stated.

Even the rusty, poorly constructed two-story corrugated metal fence in El Paso, Texas has

reduced illegal immigration by 89 percent over the five-year period during which it

was built.

That was constructed under the Bush administration.

The wall that Trump is building is better constructed and is built in such a way as

to deter even more illegal immigrants from even trying to scale it.

Democrats of course want any company even submitting a bid on the wall to be blacklisted,

but capitalism wins out every time in this country.

So does innovation.

Without the wall and security, the Homeland Security Department forecasts an additional

1.7 million illegal crossings at the US-Mexico border over the next decade.

I think that is a severe underestimation of an invading force trying to make its way into

the United States, encouraged by the new Mexican president.

From the New York Post:

"If a wall stopped just 200,000 of those future crossings, Camarota says, it would

pay for itself in fiscal savings from welfare, public education, refundable tax credits and

other benefits currently given to low-income, illegal immigrants from Mexico and Central

America.

"If a wall stopped 50 percent of those expected crossings, he says, it would save American

taxpayers a whopping $64 billion — almost four times the wall's cost — to say nothing

of the additional billions in federal savings from reduced federal drug interdiction and

border-security enforcement.

"Camarota explains that illegal border-crossers from Mexico and Central America — who account

for more than 75 percent of the illegal immigrant population in the US — are overwhelmingly

poor, uneducated and lack English language and other skills.

In fact, the average Latino illegal immigrant has less than a 10th-grade education.

That means if they work, they tend to make low wages; and as a result pay relatively

little in taxes while using public services.

And if they have children while in the US, they more often than not receive welfare benefits

on behalf of those US-born children, who have the same welfare eligibility as any other

citizen.

""A large share of the welfare used by immigrant households is received on behalf

of their US-born children," Camarota said.

"This is especially true of households headed by illegal immigrants."

"Therefore, illegal border-crossers create an average fiscal burden of more than $72,000

during their lifetimes, Camarota says.

Including costs for their US-born children, the fiscal drain jumps to more than $94,000."

Did you know that according to the Census Bureau, 62 percent of illegal-immigrant-headed

households are on the federal dole?

That's more than double the rate for households headed by native-born Americans.

This includes households where one or more workers are present.

These illegal-immigrant-headed households are where welfare is the highest for food

stamps and Medicaid.

Some illegal immigrants use fraud to get federal bennies through green-card holders.

The administrators handling their cases also tend to screw up a lot and give out benefits

they shouldn't.

Using Medicaid, some pregnant women who are illegal aliens are at times enrolled in welfare

as well.

An Emergency Medicaid program also covers the supposed needs of illegal immigrants.

If adult illegal aliens can't pay their hospital bills, this multi-billion dollar

program offsets those costs for the hospitals that treat them.

This not only includes ER visits, but chemotherapy and radiation therapy for illegal immigrants.

It's very costly.

And it goes on.

The IRS every year pays out billions to illegal immigrants in refundable child tax credits

and the earned income tax credit as well.

I'm sure there is a whole list of other programs that feed this beast too.

The benefits are massive to illegal immigrants and their families.

From the beginning, Democrats have screeched over the $18 billion price tag of the wall.

But the "Dreamers" amnesty bill would cost US taxpayers even more than the construction

of the border wall over 10 years.

"The cost of the DREAM Act has been estimated as very large — a $26 billion net cost in

the first 10 years," Camarota said.

The Congressional Budget Office recently estimated that 3 million DREAM Act recipients would

receive an estimated $12 billion-plus in ObamaCare subsidies, more than $5.5 billion in Medicaid

benefits, $5.5 billion in earned-income and child-tax credits and more than $2 billion

in food stamps.

That's just obscene.

Actual Americans don't feed at the federal trough like this and they shouldn't… neither

should illegal immigrants regardless of their age.

Since the DREAM Act was shot down in the Senate, Trump has given a go-ahead to a tougher border

bill introduced by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), which limits the number of DACA beneficiaries

to 1.8 million, curbs family visas, or so-called chain migration, and phases out the diversity

visa lottery, while earmarking $25 billion in funding for the wall and other border security.

But it's stalled as well to a certain extent because of obstructionist Democrats.

If we would just clamp down hard on the border and stop these people from illegally crossing,

it would do the entire nation a favor and fund the wall, while stopping the economic

bleed out over free benefits to illegal aliens.

Just do it.

No comments:

Post a Comment