Thursday, August 16, 2018

Trump news on Youtube Aug 16 2018

Former CIA Director John Brennan fired back at President Donald

Trump for revoking his security clearance in an op-ed published

Thursday in The New York Times. In it, Brennan said the

president's decision was "politically motivated" and "an

attempt to scare into silence others who might dare to

challenge him." Brennan also wrote that Trump's repeated

claim about there being no collusion between his campaign

and Russia is "hogwash." The former head of the CIA has been

a very vocal critic of President Trump, often responding to the

president on Twitter. In a statement relayed by White House

press secretary Sarah Sanders on Wednesday, Trump said Brennan

had "leveraged" his security clearance to make "wild

outbursts" about the administration. Trump also said

Brennan — who served as CIA director from 2013 to 2017 —

"has a history that calls into question his objectivity and

credibility." However, in an interview with the Wall Street

Journal on Wednesday, the president said the ongoing

investigation into possible Russia collusion in the 2016

election was the reason behind his decision to revoke Brennan's

clearance. He said, "I call it the rigged witch hunt, it is a

sham. And these people led it. ... So I think it's something

that had to be done." The White House is still considering

revoking security clearances for a number of other former

intelligence officials, most of whom have also been critical of

President Trump.

For more infomation >> Brennan hits back at Trump in NYT op-ed - Duration: 1:21.

-------------------------------------------

OUT:NEW REACTION TO TRUMP REVOKING FORMER CIA DIRECTOR JOHN BRENNAN'S SECURITY CLEARANCE - Duration: 13:56.

good to be back see you mañana yes sir Wow mornin thanks for joining us

outnumbered starts right now and we begin with a Fox News Alert

President Trump is holding a cabinet meeting at the White House right now

we're awaiting possible remarks from that on camera as it is closed-door for

the moment but we are getting notes from the meeting and we will share them

contemporaneously with you this is following his decision to revoke the

security clearance of former CIA director John Brennan that set off

critics as you may know some who accuse the president of an abuse of power right

now the White House is reviewing the status of other former and current top

intelligence and Justice Department officials and we are all over the story

this is outnumbered i'm harris faulkner here today fox news contributor lisa

booth town hall editor and Fox News contributor Katie Pavlich former deputy

spokesperson for the State Department Fox News analysts and host of Benson and

harf Marie harf and in the center seat former White House press secretary for

President Trump Sean Spicer is outnumbered today with your fancy socks

on well you know get a little color now I like it red white red white no thank

you for having a lot for you to weigh in on this news cycle is fierce I don't

know that there's been too many that haven't been here basically been like

like all normal all right let's get to normal then shall we as we were await

those remarks from the president more reaction to his decision is coming in to

revoke former CIA director John Brennan security clearance White House press

secretary Sarah Sanders says the president is upholding his duty to

safeguard the nation's secrets watch it president has a constitutional

responsibility to protect classified information and who has access to it and

that's what he's doing is fulfilling that responsibility and this

this is actually a specific to mr. Brennan and the others are currently

under review written responding and a New York Times op-ed accusing the

president of using his power to play defense among the ongoing Russia

investigation here's what he wrote quote mr. Trump clearly has become more

desperate to protect himself in those close to him which is why he made the

politically motivated decision to revoke my security clearance and an attempt to

scare into silence others who might dare to challenge him in quote the top

Democrat on the Senate Intel committee mark Warner also went after the

president's decision this had an eerie memory of an enemies list these people

were being singled out to have either deponent is revoked or the process of

being revoked Denis Max of election Sounion type practices of trying to

silence anyone who's willing to criticize this president that puts us

again in uncharted territory but Republican Senator John Kennedy says

Brennan had it coming well I made my feelings known about mr. Brennan I think

I think most Americans look at our our national intelligence experts as being

above politics mr. Brennan has demonstrated that that's

not the case he's been totally political I think I

called him a Butthead and I'm in it I think he's given the national

intelligence community a bad name now you know that's gonna hash tag is gonna

trend and now the White House is reviewing the security clearances of

nine other former and current DOJ and FBI officials some have already lost

their clearance may not be able to have it reinstated Sean Spicer how different

is this from anything that we've seen in the past with presidents in terms of

security clearances well it's different in a lot of ways but it's also different

that you don't have the heads of these organizations going out and becoming

overtly political I mean you don't have generally speaking a CIA director that

goes out and attacks the current commander in chief uses words like

treasonous and high crimes and misdemeanors so I think it's it's on

both sides right you have these individuals who are going out using

positions of trust and ones that have generally been non-political and

engaging in a very political way so in some ways you're seeing a political

response to a political action you know Marie you're the only one on the couch I

think probably who really had a clearance to well know what I was going

to say probably who in this instance would have worked with some of the

people who are having their I wasn't done yet with their security clearance

giving him Craigan thank you but so I'm curious as to your thoughts because you

know some of these people I do a well I know John Brennan and I think that there

are a few things to keep in mind here first there are rules for why you get

security clearances revoked and John Brennan did not break any of them the

ability for former officials to maintain their clearances isn't a gift to the

former officials it's so their successors can call on their

predecessors to get guidance to get support to get ahead of that still

happen though holding if they be reinstated most of them at a high level

not all I don't know if there's a way to overrule the President on this but the

point but if there were a big national standpoint is it's it's not a gift to

these former officials and I will also say that you know the idea that because

former officials are speaking out publicly that somehow they got on a list

and now they're being punished for by taking their clearance away it's not

gonna change anything John Brennan does but I do agree with him and then it

smacks of sort of going against his to speak freely he has done nothing to

abuse his classified access because he probably doesn't if I ask you what do

you think then what do they do to the intelligence community to have someone

like John Brennan accused President Trump of unfounded things like treason

well I will say I talk to a lot of my former colleagues the CIA a lot of them

were very upset yesterday because they still really like John Brennan now some

of them don't and I will say ID be out there saying look I worked there under

george w bush in under Barack Obama and Mike Hayden who I love and I worked for

was critical of the Obama administration's policies after he left

office so the question is what's the line right but I think it's far and

Donald Trump is taking this 4-part but I think that there's a difference between

being critical of the policies in talking about things that he would have

had direct knowledge of and is still questioned whether he has not if you

have a clearance and you're talking about an investigation active

investigation it clouds the idea for the viewer to know whether or not you're

speaking based on experience or based on your access to information so it's one

thing to be critical of overall policy so if Brennan was out there talking

about our foreign policy that would be one thing and then I think we'd be

having a completely different discussion but the fact is he's talking about an

active investigation about intelligence that he's had access to and he's not out

there making it clear which is saying he's not out there saying I have not

looked at anything new I have no new information he is not allowing the

viewer to discern whether or not what he knows is based on active intelligence

that he has access to actually said that he I haven't gone in and this isn't

based on anything I I know we don't petty like the Wall Street but they're

not paying about hiring him based on the fact that they like him they're paying

him and hiring him because they know that he had and I'll give I'll give

Comey at least I mean I'll give director Comey some credit here because my

understanding is that Comey that proactively went out and said I don't

want a clearance anymore because I don't want there to be was that before after

the book was after the book I think when they've asked him to review something

but the fact the matter is at some point at least making it clear that I don't

have access therefore I can't be blamed or no one can view what I think of as an

opinion they on any kind of active intelligence well

so this is not just president Trump making this argument that security

clearances should be not revoked but could put it away after these officials

leave their office Senator Rand Paul has made the point that you just did about

the fact that when John Brennan is going out on cable television and he still has

access to classified information we don't know who he's talking to

there you run a serious risk of accidentally unprovoked exposing

classified information in an unclassified setting when it comes to

what the requirements are for getting a security clearance there are a number of

them there are also reasons why our security clearances get revoked right

would never look at this situation and you look at the requirements character

trustworthiness honesty reliability discretion and sound judgment are all

requirements to obtain a security clearance so based on how John Brennan

has behaved over the course of the last year over the course of the Trump

presidency the White House is looking at it and saying he is doing the country a

disservice by going out with the security clearance and acting in this

fashion now they argued that this is an attack on their free speech no it's not

they said the ability to go and criticize the president talk about their

experiences you are not entitled under the First Amendment to a security claim

well all right I want to get it here with us because we have this live shot

of the White House off to the left side of your screen and that is because the

president right now is holding a cabinet meeting inside the White House now

contemporaneously we're getting some notes coming out of there but there is a

camera that is not going to show it live so we will show it in its entirety when

we gain ass access but meanwhile the president opening his remarks now in

that cabinet meeting I want to begin by expressing my condolences of a person I

knew well Aretha Franklin she was given a great gift of her voice my warmest

best wishes and sympathies and then he went on to talk about the economy

he called on larry cudlow economic advisor and is touting that for right

now so as we get more notes out and certainly if in that pool there is a

reporter who would ask a question about the situation with John Brennan we will

bring you that information as quickly as possible so all I was gonna say is I

find it a little bit rich the guy John Brennan while he was at the

helm of the CIA had to apologize to Senate Intel committee members for

spying on them and then lying to them about the fact that he spied on them so

I find it a little rich that he's out there now bemoaning abuse of power were

clearly when clearly he well at the helmets the CIA abused his power he said

here's what bothers making battle and I don't think it's quite as addictive as

using the IRS to go after a Pluto opponents either let's talk about

security clearances Mike Flynn maintained his clearance by all accounts

when he left DIA he went on the campaign trail he stood on stage at political

rallies and called for Hillary Clinton to be locked up his clearance wasn't

revoked Donald Trump didn't call on him to have his clearance revoked so it just

looks like Donald Trump wants to revoke clearances of people who criticize him

politically and I don't like that i think it's it's politicizing the

security clearance process and maybe people should stop focusing on John

Brennan's clearance and actually on what he's saying cuz he's raising some

interesting things I think people should think about you also look at someone

like Peter struck he just got fired like how do you respond to my Flynn I mean

they asked I actually agree with you I think this idea that Mike Flynn you know

it does it's not that just Democrats who happened to be in the intelligence

agencies then go out and find out I'm not sure Brennan's actually Democrat

then whatever he's certainly anti the current administration the point is that

there are Republicans who serve in administrations and Democrats and they

both go out and then benefit from their experience but when it comes to the time

now we're in a different time than we were two years ago Hillary Clinton was

not the president of the United States trying to take care of the country's

business and and keep the country safe John Brennan and his commentary again

there's a line there if he still has access to classified information as he

has done in the past he has exposed CIA operatives on the ground inadvertently

there is a case to be made that he shouldn't have that access anymore

whether he's using or not to prevent that national security risk from coming

and one of the questions is are we just too generous with the words inadvertent

accidentally in terms of this should there be a stark or bright line on just

cutting people off when administration's change I don't know I mean I I think

look at look as someone who's had one for 20

years I can I think Murray's right you want to be able to call people active

back into government or that what the cost that the American taxpayer funds

for people to get them there's a reason you want them to maintain you easily

reinstate it's not reinstate you it's active so secret clearance is active for

10 attea tab top secret is active for five and in if if they don't get renewed

then they go away but the idea that you want to maintain them allows people who

come in and out of government service or maybe their contractor that gets pulled

onto a classified project you can't wait right now the backlog that's months and

so we want to be able to take this when it comes up I apologize what I'm being

told by our producers one of the things that might be asked about with the

president inside this cabinet meeting and again we're just getting dribs and

drabs right now so as it happens we'll take you there might be about this john

brennan thing which is exactly what Sean Spicer

is talking about now I would ask the question could the president have gone

through on one of the other venues an agency FBI just to have them review the

process before doing this that that just might be a question asked to the

president now responding after hundreds of newspapers ran coordinated editorials

today going after what they're calling the president's assaults on the Free

Press Sean of course faced many of those daily what will get your reaction Chuck

and the moment of truth for Paul Manafort could come today we're on

verdict watch in the trial of the former Trump campaign chairman what the jury's

decision will mean for the Muller investigation if anything at all stay

close

you

For more infomation >> OUT:NEW REACTION TO TRUMP REVOKING FORMER CIA DIRECTOR JOHN BRENNAN'S SECURITY CLEARANCE - Duration: 13:56.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump Revokes Ex-CIA Director John Brennan's Security Clearance - Duration: 0:22.

For more infomation >> President Trump Revokes Ex-CIA Director John Brennan's Security Clearance - Duration: 0:22.

-------------------------------------------

Diyarbakır'lı Mikrogirişimci Kadınlardan Trump'a Terlikli Tepki :) - Duration: 0:14.

For more infomation >> Diyarbakır'lı Mikrogirişimci Kadınlardan Trump'a Terlikli Tepki :) - Duration: 0:14.

-------------------------------------------

Últimas notícia de hoje : STEVE BANNON, MARQUETEIRO DE TRUMP, DARÁ PALPITES NA CAMPANHA DE BOLSONARO - Duration: 2:22.

For more infomation >> Últimas notícia de hoje : STEVE BANNON, MARQUETEIRO DE TRUMP, DARÁ PALPITES NA CAMPANHA DE BOLSONARO - Duration: 2:22.

-------------------------------------------

President Donald Trump - Reporter Gets Slammed For Trump Conspiracy - Duration: 4:47.

this went on for over 20 years we'll explain coming up and don't expect by

the way to hear any of this over at conspiracy TV MSNBC we're their top left

of Mao their words conspiracy theorist Rachel Maddow is pushing and busy

pushing more bizarre anti-trump conspiracy theories and lies this is

24/7 Tom Brokaw pay attention this is your NBC News and last night's show well

she broke another bombshell report because there's a secret recording from

the house Intel Committee Chairman Devin Nunez where he warned about the

consequences if Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats take back the house in

November the horror he told the truth and meanwhile over at fake news CNN

yes so-called reporter BS artist Jim Acosta is basking in the anti-trump

limelight and appeared on Stephen Colbert's show last night will show you

the worst of the worst buckle up time for a important breaking

news opening monologue levels of our government now that's not the case than

the rest of the news media let's take for example conspiracy TV MSNBC you're

gonna love this tape now this is not the case they're more interested in pushing

salacious rumors lies accusations Tom Brokaw you spent your entire career this

is your NBC News and nowhere is this more true than their chief conspiracy

theorists Rachel Maddow last night up to her old tricks literally making

something out of nothing whipping these left-wing viewers into a

frenzy over a secret recording of the house Intel Committee Chairman Devin

Nunez where he warned a roomful of donors that if Republicans lose all deep

state investigations will be halted and Democrats will try to impeach Trump

we've been saying this literally every night on this program they also by the

way want open borders to eliminate ice keep Obama care and they want the crumbs

back now of course making a big deal out of nothing

well that's kind of their mo over there at fake news MSNBC we can't forget about

their big scoop remember they got one page of Donald Trump's 2005 tax return

for 45 minutes we here it is it's here and what did we

discover he paid millions and millions and millions of dollars in taxes then of

course there's Rachel's favorite conspiracy that Trump is an agent if the

President did that today because he has some reason to serve that other country

rather than our own then well then a lot that has previously been inexplicable is

now explicable is our president subordinate to a foreign power yeah does

our president answer to a foreign government and a foreign leader the

worst case scenario that the president is a foreign agent suddenly feels very

palpable what would change the world is if you know Russia was interfering in

the election and they weren't doing it on their own and he was in on it I mean

this guy supposedly somebody who works at the Russians central bank

why did the FSB give him a medal for his work a medal of appreciation right after

Donald Trump clinched the Republican nomination for president he's a foreign

agent that's why he's being so tough on Putin like Obama wasn't and Clinton was

it now if you think her fake her overhype so-called scoops flat-out

conspiracy theories in there well think again take a look at this little wacky

trip down conspiracy lane I think you'll like it

of course Trump picked as his Secretary of State not Mitt Romney but out of

nowhere the Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson to whom

Vladimir Putin had personally awarded the Russian order of friendship tell her

soon as someone who Trump had never met before the presidential election he'd

never had any dealings with where did he come up with that as a choice for his

Secretary of State the perception that the president may

have ordered these strikes in part because of scandal will affect the

impact and the effectiveness of these military strikes unavoidably they pulled

their troops out starting Friday September 29th which would be the Friday

after the Trump administration made this baffling decision to insult and

harm our closest military ally in that region those troops from Chad got pulled

out the 29th well right after that that's when four US Army soldiers got

attacked by a large contingent of Isis fighters in the air Venezuelans are

enraged anew by this brand-new FEC filing from the White House okay if you

think

For more infomation >> President Donald Trump - Reporter Gets Slammed For Trump Conspiracy - Duration: 4:47.

-------------------------------------------

Omarosa Drops New Tape Of Trump Trying To Buy Her Silence - Duration: 2:19.

trump.

All of these characterized

towards the end of your book.

Take a listen.

>> Listen, obviously, with,

like, "The New York Times"

article and stuff, you know,

it's, it's --

>> What's the New York time

article?

>> The one that -- the one

that -- it was in "The New York

Times."

They wrote about you.

It sounds a little like,

obviously, that there are some

things you've got in the back

pocket to pull out.

Clearly, if you come on board

the campaign, like, we can't

have -- we got to --

>> Oh, god, no --

>> -- Everybody positive, right?

So the only thing that we have

to consider, where we're talking

salary, as far as the campaign

is concerned is that, as you

know, everything is public.

Um, and that all the money that

we raise and that pays salaries

is directly from donors.

Small donor dollars for the most

part.

So I know you were making 179 at

the white house.

And I think we can work

something out where we keep you

right along those lines.

Um, specifically, let me see, I

haven't even added up the

numbers.

But we were talking about, like,

15k a month.

Um, let me see what that adds up

to.

Times 12.

Yes, that's $180,000.

Does that sound like a fair deal

for you?

In terms of your position,

specifically, I really feel like

your position would require, you

know, you to be able to be

flexible in terms of where you

are.

Sometimes, you know, come to

New York for occasional

meetings.

But I would love, if you could,

you know, occasionally go do

speaking engagements and that

sort of thing for us.

I think you'd be awesome doing

that.

So it doesn't really matter

where you are.

If you're comfortable staying in

D.C., then, you know, you're,

we're more than happy to have

you --

>> We should point out here, no

response so far from Lara trump

or the trump campaign.

We have reached out for a

comment.

We'll talk about the content of

the tape in just a moment.

But first of all, why give us

those four?

>> Well, first of all, I played

the full entire conversation for

your producers because that was

important for them to verify,

but I really wanted to show

For more infomation >> Omarosa Drops New Tape Of Trump Trying To Buy Her Silence - Duration: 2:19.

-------------------------------------------

Michelle's Closest Allies Just Turned On Her Hard After Trump Exposes Her Huge Lie - Duration: 7:34.

For more infomation >> Michelle's Closest Allies Just Turned On Her Hard After Trump Exposes Her Huge Lie - Duration: 7:34.

-------------------------------------------

HKYTV ★Huh Kyung young and Donald Trump are similar(허경영과 트럼프는 닮은꼴) - Duration: 7:03.

Play what I once predicted about Trump.

Trump was last among 16 Republicans when he ran into presidential election.

But mbn called me. They said Trump is crazy and similar to me.

When Trump was last among 16 Republican candidates,

Then I told him that if Trump becomes president, America's economy will survive. Trump is the U.S. hope and icon.

I said this then.

I told you on September 24, 2015. .

If he becomes president of the United States, the U.S. economy will be activated.

Stop. Hang up. Change the screen.

What this means is that the Trump is America's icons.

If that person becomes president of the United States, the American economy lives. There are many jobs in the U.S. right now, so the economy is at its biggest boom in 45 years.

Although I, Huh Kyung young have an excellent prophecy for future, I'm sure I can see people exactly.

Those papers boasted a lot of Trump's.

'Trump 380 trillion won in investment in the U.S. So Apple...

Apple is investing so much.

So after Trump becomes president, America grows rapidly.

Am I right? So you have to know that what I say is absolutely correct.

My prediction was correct, but our country's economists downplayed Trump.

What kind of president would he be?

When I said that Trump would be president, the announcer of our country's broadcasting station laughed at me.

She laughed at me.

If I become president, Korea's economy will be number one in the world.

.

The three biggest indicators of the economy are growth, inflation and employment.

Trump has succeeded in all three of these. .

How many years ago was this? Before Trump became president, I told him in 2015.

This woman is from an announcer at KBS.

She is in the mbn.

This is that anchor.

This woman anchor looks smart, doesn't it? This woman anchor and I discussed.

I mean, there's a fight.

So she didn't believe what I said.

She's staring at me strangely.

Let's hear what she's saying. .

"Why do we send our precious soldiers overseas? "This is a loss," said Trump.

It may be a little inconvenient for you to hear, but the your commitment is way over the top.

They say

And there are some people who share common points between you and Trump in terms of showmanship.

We'd like to hear what the Trump you're evaluating is like.

.

As we prepare for it, you have become the star of the craze for every presidential election.

Right.

Whenever the presidential election hold, Huh Kyung young became a hotshot.

But then I looked at myself in a strange way. There was a craze and people thought I was crazy.

.

It's too bright for people to see.

But You'll see you later. .

He is the star of the craze for the presidential election. It's a good showmanship.

All I have to say is people stare at me.

When I sing, little kids and adults look at me.

What you should know is that the anti-fans are fans after all.

So if people call me crazy,

When I'm on TV, let's see what management is all about.

So they listen to me carefully.

So all who call me crazy in the next presidential election are changing.

.

Why? Because they felt like they wanted to cut off the fingers of the stamp on the politicians.

Therefore, people now think that we should listen to Huh's words.

.

Let's hear him say that he is 100 percent accurate in his predictions.

This is why they put aside all kinds of things and listen to me.

Am I right? So I have a good showmanship.

I'm just attacking established politics.

Trump and I are alike.

It is a hollow pledge.

Is this a hollow promise? It was an exact promise.

In the U.S. gentlers point of view, Trump's promises were vain,

When it comes to business people and common people, getting a lot of jobs is a priority.

So Obama did have a justification and Trump chose utilitarianism(realism).

utilitarianism

I don't need any justification. America is hungry, too. Now I'm going to turn to pragmatism.

Am I right?

Trump must have watched me for about 10 years.(Joke)

Okay. Now...

Thus, at that time, the U.S. economy changed and the U.S. economy lived because of Trump.

If Trump becomes president, there will be no war on the Korean Peninsula.

.

I told you that if Hillary becomes president, there will be a war on the Korean Peninsula.

That's why Hillary has the money the defense industry is funded.

Trump doesn't accept the money.

The arms dealers said Trump is a madman.

So if Trump become president, it won't be war in the Korea.

For more infomation >> HKYTV ★Huh Kyung young and Donald Trump are similar(허경영과 트럼프는 닮은꼴) - Duration: 7:03.

-------------------------------------------

The President Wishes Mad Max a Happy Birthday in the Most Trump Way Possible! - Duration: 1:45.

For more infomation >> The President Wishes Mad Max a Happy Birthday in the Most Trump Way Possible! - Duration: 1:45.

-------------------------------------------

Trump revokes security clearance of former CIA Director John Brennan - Duration: 3:06.

For more infomation >> Trump revokes security clearance of former CIA Director John Brennan - Duration: 3:06.

-------------------------------------------

Judge Jeanine: Brennan fires back at Trump after clearance revoked - Duration: 11:13.

stunning news out of Washington President Trump revokes the security

clearance of former CIA director John Brennan press secretary Sarah

Sanders reading a statement from the president explaining why any benefits

that senior officials might glean from consultations with mr. Brennan are now

outweighed by the risks posed by his erratic conduct and behavior mr.

Brennan's line and recent conduct characterized by increasingly frenzied

commentary is wholly inconsistent with access to the nation's most closely held

secrets and facilities the very aim of our adversaries which is to sow division

and chaos Brennan the now MSNBC contributor is a constant critic of

President Trump here he is just last night I think Donald Trump has badly

sullied the reputation of the office of the presidency with his invective with

his constant disregard I think for human decency as well as his befriended of

water crack leaders around the world and his continued pursuit of relationships

to benefit himself as opposed to country I do think that America's standing in

the world has also been tarnished but I think even more fundamentally what he is

doing here in the United States is very polarizing and he is I think the most

divisive president we've ever had in the Oval Office

fresh reaction from John Brennan on Twitter quote this action is part of a

broader effort by mr. Trump to suppress freedom of speech and punish critics it

should gravely worry all Americans including intelligence professionals

about the cost of speaking out my principles are worth far more than

clearances I will not relent the White House is

also now reviewing security clearances of top former intelligence officials and

FBI employees including James Comey Andrew McCabe Susan Rice Peter Strock

and James clapper all right judge anine oh I know you've been following first

this is Brett very closely they say these people

retain their clearances to consult with their successors I don't think he's

doing any consultation now and just as a professional courtesy do you believe he

has forfeited his professional courtesy by the frenzied rhetoric that he's been

exhibiting on cable TV and on Twitter well he certainly has been engaging in a

lot of frenzied behavior and criticism but here's the bottom line you're not

entitled to a security clearance you don't have a right to have it the

president it has the arbitrary right to take it away how many people do we know

whether or not they have it or don't have it

when does it sunset and here's the guy who's lied to Congress a million times

that's an exaggeration you know he he denied the CIA that he was running

improperly access computer files of the Senate it's all in my book which we'll

talk about later but he use it but here's the thing look the guy is he is

it this truth to power nonsense that you need to be able to have this it's really

for an institutional reference nobody in Pompeo ain't calling this guy right so

why does he need it and you know I have no problem with it they're not tied to

it all right so one judge Jeanine brought up one of the issues at stake

for the fact that he lied about spying on Senate staffers he also lied to

Congress when he says oh we don't listen to Americans phone calls in bulk and he

also lied about the use of the dossier said it wasn't really considered in the

intelligence assessment which it was so three things there alone the guy

preferring false information to Congress and to the American people he doesn't

have a great track record when it comes to honesty I think he has a great track

record and I think he's a patriot I tell you I'm to me I don't understand why

Michael Flynn's not on that list you have any idea why Michael ins not on

know I think we know on any Republican not on the list what you think of the

Pope is on the list is he's still a Republican have class so if that's not

it necessary this again you know you put call me puts McCabe they don't even have

clearance so did he but he puts them on the list because essentially and you

hear this now from the Democrats he's created an enemies list so he attacks

the press as the enemy of the American people he attacks his critics he makes

people who work for him signed non-disclosure agreements will host

transparency huh and then of course he's trying to now politicize intelligence

gathering he does not consult with Jim clapper his own Director of National

Intelligence about this move so to me this is like so sad and so authoritarian

and yet I've suppose all these supporters will guess they are a big

deal I think you meant cooks tina is this it's just rare i mean has this ever

happened before i think i think it's not an exaggeration

to say it's unprecedented but as the judge says the president does have the

right to make this decision what I look at as this way why today well solve a

problem like Omarosa by having something to lead with today this document is

actually dated July 26 they didn't change that today when they released it

so they've been holding on to it maybe because of Brennan's comments last night

on MSNBC they decided that was just the last straw and they decided to move

forward but it did provide the White House a way to pivot to the story that

they want to talk about of the day and that is this issue it's very clever the

use of the word erratic because it's that's not just a word that they pick

out of thin air erratic is one of the words that you're

asked about when you are going through a clearance or when your friends and

colleagues or your former work associates they'll be asked did you ever

see Jesse exhibit erratic behavior because that would be a tell that there

might be something wrong with them and they would not be able to deal with that

I do think it looks a little bit like political retaliation but the president

has the ability to do it so if he wants to do it fine I just don't think it

actually does anything beyond this new cycle because John Brennan's not gonna

stop talking is not even using a security clearance anyway alright Greg

welcome back thanks for having me back Jesse your hair is as big as ever you've

you've been missed on your book tour what do you think about this latest

clearance revoking well I think when when people say this is unprecedented

that doesn't matter anymore because everything

2016 is unprecedented and so we also when you have complaints about behavior

emotional behavior Brennan's criticisms of Trump are also pointless because

we've been through that he's still one you can still think he's a jerk he still

beat the pants off you so get over it so there are two big reasons here Brennan

is just another person who was broken by 2016

he's like the reverse version of the movie big instead of a child becoming a

man he is transformed from a man to a petulant child by some supernatural

surreal event that which was the 2016 election this has happened to a lot of

people he's fallen and he can't get off I think

this is trumped arrangements yo absolutely and also I the second reason

is and why his opinion means nothing to me

is back in the 80s at the height of the Cold War thank you Brennan voted for a

communist in the freest country we have ever seen he has no standing to be

critical about any Russian any Russian meddling or any kind of Russian policy

because he didn't just collude he cheerlead he cheerlead at a time when we

really needed people there to fight it to be an anti-communist so the fact that

he got this far is astounding I look forward to his books I know there will

be one and the other thing about this yeah I understand the idea of pivoting

but in in Trump world news is bocce ball yep so the ball comes the ball will be

al Moroso and the next fall will be Brennan but the fact is you can't tell

the difference between that being pivoting or just being another day

because every day I also think it's quite strategic yeah I think I think

they would do it every day I think they do this every day like you wake up every

day thinking you want to be proactive and yeah end up having to react to

things Brennan last night and the clip that we saw here he's reacting to Trump

calling Omarosa a dog and then so what Brennan says is that he's failed to live

up the president has failed to live up to minimum standards of decency it's

disheartening and dangerous for a president to behave in that way for our

nation how dangerous though how dangerous how ugly how disheartening but

you know what the problem is one the problem is that you've got Brennan

and clapper the people who lied to Congress who anyone else you know would

be in jail right now but these are the guys who are monetizing and politicizing

these are the guys who were actually going on television and if you don't

think that security clearance adds to their ability to be lobbyists and

consultants and advisers it's huge they're monetizing it but Michael Flynn

is not the guy is hiding somewhere rapid I think it's monetizing to say that he

was the CIA director he was how did he get on MSNBC got on CNN because he lied

and said he never leaked anything then we find out he leaks something to CNN

and then he's out getting a check from is that 1/4 million people judge who

have security clearance in the country I think it's a million-plus who have top

secret clearance million 3 right so these guys aren't monetizing these our

guys are build a wall we need to build a wall around the people with clearances

he's leveraging his clearance order to gain credibility when he goes on

television and makes these really outrageous statements some of these

statements he says the President of the United States is a danger to national

security he suggested Trump met one-on-one with Vladimir Putin because

he was hiding something from his own security team he says the president has

no credibility and he says he he is a Ponzi scheme artist comparing him to

Bernie Madoff and he said this is all gonna catch up with him kind of making

these veiled threats like oh your security clearance right so it's like it

doesn't necessarily matter he's now that he has the reputation he

has now that he's done he's done he will always be able to be on television he'll

always be able to write books that like that is not this doesn't change that for

him but I do think it is professionally embarrassing you know what most

Americans agree with what you said Brennan believes which is that Trump is

lying about his relations with Russia and that trumps not yeah that's what

surveys show that the Americans are not the least bit interested in the Russians

and you have to be very skeptical of somebody this emotional Brennan is

emotional wreck right now you can't there's something going on in

his head that's not right he's erratic he's

erratic

you

For more infomation >> Judge Jeanine: Brennan fires back at Trump after clearance revoked - Duration: 11:13.

-------------------------------------------

Lara Trump discusses Omarosa's new book and the First Family - Duration: 15:37.

For more infomation >> Lara Trump discusses Omarosa's new book and the First Family - Duration: 15:37.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Revokes Ex-Cia Director's Security Clearance - Duration: 1:40.

For more infomation >> Trump Revokes Ex-Cia Director's Security Clearance - Duration: 1:40.

-------------------------------------------

Randy Quaid reads Trump Tweets: No collusion! - Duration: 0:41.

The Rigged Russian Witch Hunt

goes on and on

as the "originators and founders" of this scam

continue to be fired and demoted

for their corrupt and illegal activity.

All credibility is gone

from this Hoax,

and much more will be lost

as it proceeds.

NO

COLLUSION!

For more infomation >> Randy Quaid reads Trump Tweets: No collusion! - Duration: 0:41.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump Criticizes Boston Globe After Coordinated Editorials - Duration: 0:58.

For more infomation >> President Trump Criticizes Boston Globe After Coordinated Editorials - Duration: 0:58.

-------------------------------------------

SON'S MEETING IN TRUMP TOWER ARE "COMPLETE FABRICATION" - Duration: 12:26.

stay in Trump Tower meeting with the Russians was meant to get dirt on

Hillary but you know is that actually illegal and what would that legal

standard mean for Hillary Clinton and that dirty dossier we're going to debate

that coming up next and we have a lot more to get to including that crazy

story of the radical Muslims in New Mexico holding children against their

will starving them depriving them of water

what is going on with this story and why is it being under covered we'll get to

all of that and debate the Clinton and the dirty dossier issue coming up next

now you can argue all you want about whether the June 2016 Trump Tower

meeting between C campaign officials and Russian Nationals offering dirt on a

Hillary was appropriate but was it illegal Trump critics are losing it

after the president acknowledged the true intention of the meeting on Twitter

yesterday and MSNBC's Joe Scarborough thinks he knows exactly what this means

it's illegal to get information to get anything of worth from a foreign

national speaker it doesn't have to be cash there doesn't have to be an

exchange of cash for something of value anything of value that's called an

in-kind contribution and the law has always looked at that just as seriously

as they've looked at you know as they've looked at money exchanging hands Oh ciao

joining me now to discuss this former deputy Trump campaign manager Dave bossy

opinion contributor for the hill John Solomon and attorney Leo Terrell all

right bossy take it away Joe was definitively putting his legal skills to

work definitively declaring it is illegal to meet with a foreign national

who promises Oppo research wouldn't that call Hilary's behavior

that's about to say that's what the Clinton campaign did it did if there's

any collusion it's their campaign with with the steal fake Russian dossier and

paying steal through the State Department through other through other

places through the FBI look they they are the only ones the Clinton

campaign er the only ones that colluded during the campaign Don jr. did nothing

wrong there's nothing wrong here why did they get the story a little mixed up

there in the early days like it was it wasn't about that listen I didn't help

with a statement like yes if I tell you as a lawyer who did criminal defense

work this is what I tell my clients do not talk about your case

Seattle años tiene la boca do not talk talk about academe talk about other

things leave the legal stuff to me you cannot

litigate this in the press because the press hates you and you got 17 lawyers

on the other side who don't care about what you tweet so if I again cousins

gonna do it he's gonna do it he's really smart but in the legal realm it's a

different ballgame it's a different ballgame and I think he's he's caused

himself a world of pain and just heart not heartache but a headache because of

talking to the press John well I'm never gonna fucking yeah I don't want to never

discourage anyone talk to the press they should always talk to the press yeah but

listen where was my profession on this very law when the whole Hillary dossier

think was coming out you didn't see any stories of reporters looking at that law

saying it must apply here suddenly someone says it applies to Donald Trump

and everybody goes with the pack over here no one really good goes and talks

to lawyers I've talked to lawyers prosecutors there's a great column by

Jonathan Turley on the hill site tonight there's no chance that that meeting

violates he says that will read from a said if the Russians had evidence of

criminal conduct by Hillary Clinton her campaign or Family Foundation the Trump

campaign had every reason to want to know about it that's precisely what

Clinton's campaign spent millions to do talking to Russians and other foreigners

investigating Trump indeed under this interpretation of federal election laws

Clinton and her surrogates would be equally guilty in using a former foreign

spy to gather info on Trump from foreign sources including the Russians period

Leo Terrell your reaction to that well I'm glad you're a lawyer Laura and

you know the dog you know as well Donald Trump jr. better lawyer up because he

along with Jared said that meeting and I Got News for you that is good Speer

see that is illicit hey what's that crime it's fierce into the fraud the

election to the fraud the election their involvement says - give me the code

what's this I want to tell you right now you can talk to your right over your

colleague Judge Napolitano and Leo Terrell agrees there Donald Trump jr. is

in trouble mark my words on this and the WD the

Clin d'oeil CA clinton never met with any foreign nationals likeness you paid

your what I lost this thing so Leo number one you can't sign it is statute

okay I'll give you that I'll let you off the hook for that number two you're

saying if you use intermediaries to gather information from foreign sources

then you obviate from having any responsibility in any conspiracy really

because I think that would use your GPS Hillary and anyone else in the Justice

Department I knew about this who facilitated that means for action of the

dustman let me respond to my favorite talk show host I'm saying to have a

conspiracy we have a meeting of mine Jarrod Donald Trump jr. conspiracy law

remember today's date there is no minimize what Hillary call he's not here

are the only lawyers on this panel unfortunately this is where no

fortunately I'm recovering but again we have a situation where I agree on this

point don't litigate this stuff in the press

because politically people say a lot of things politically and they kind of they

come close to the true they don't because in the legal matter it might be

unwise as it as a legal PR strategy but it doesn't mean a crime was committed

that is holy day also uncovered you know they also on you over the text messages

from Jared Kushner to his assistants saying get me out of this meeting

staffed in five minutes so that's called exculpatory evidence I would hope that

you would say there's no conspiracy when people are trying to not be in a meeting

I think it's funny though and John maybe you'll respond to this this is on CNN I

think I was on like the treadmill this morning I'm watching

I I was almost at the Fred Flintstone thing and like fell off the treadmill

because I'm listening to this going wait a second which one of these is a lawyer

coming to this conclusion let's watch you me there are two big important

things here first of all the law which says that's a big one it's illegal to

take anything of value from someone for yeah that's that I feel that's an

open-and-shut case so completely over John I I said this many times on the

show on the entity show I don't recognize the profession I practice and

say there are so many reporters that just say things in the moment without a

basis for fact you have to have a law to violate it's create a conspiracy there's

no law that prohibits people from taking information if you extended this out one

of the lawyers I talked to today said well then it would have been against the

law for Barack Obama to have arranged all those foreign trips in 2008 to could

make himself look good on the America on the world stage before he got elected

president it wasn't designed to prohibit those sort of things it was designed to

prohibit the sort of things that the Clintons were doing in the nitro and

they're taking my China Donald Donald Trump jr. knew he was talking to aegis

of the Russian government remember that text I love it I love it remember that

text Laura so are you making the Joe Scarborough

you know f you know Edward Bennett Williams argument that this is an

in-kind contribution because if you make that argument then as Jonathan Turley

said it's the same liability criminal liability on Hillary Clinton for an

in-kind contribution that that she received from a foreign source she paid

for it but it doesn't matter it's a conspiracy to get the information I'm

saying to you attorney Ingram that the meeting of the minds a conspiracy

between of having that meeting you don't need to act itself they've met to get

dirt from a government meeting and that's what I'm talking about okay

okay Don juniors on a radio show today in the morrow and I asked him about I

asked him about this meeting let's listen to what he said it's sort of the

cycles of the media narrative right you know that the other stuff isn't sticking

so they're back now tomorrow they'll be back on the 25th amendment literally

nothing changed you know they don't talk about

sort of the genesis of that meeting and that these people were dealing with

using GPS before I guess that is a 20 minute meeting it ended up being you

know about essentially nothing that was relevant to any of these things and you

know that's all it is and that's all they've got and that is I guess the

ultimate distraction from what's really going on in this country which is you

have a Republican president a very conservative president is getting stuff

done one last comment one last comment Donald Trump a junior said that meeting

was about Russian adoption his dad threw him under the bus a day by saying that's

not true and Donald Trump jr. has a problem with

the Senate in it on TV all day long and it's wrong here's what happened okay

this woman pledged to give dirt on Hillary yes she did it that's the

president said however she was trying to push for a removal or or you know to

rescind the Magnitsky Act Putin Putin when the Magnitsky Act was passed which

put all the sanctions on the billionaires he said oh really

we're gonna stop all adoptions of Russians into the United States I have

two Russian sons I followed this very closely that's why she brought up she

said we'll get will give you the adoption if you guys get rid of the

magnets he's oh he's right of course she talked about the adoption that was true

they all died she also met with fusion GPS I believe the day before the meeting

out and the day after the meeting so this is part of a conspiracy of what

Hillary Clinton is doing now inside the way John Solomon I want to find out

maybe you can do the reporting on this why hasn't Muller interviewed vasila

it's kaya why haven't they brought this illness

gaya in why well we don't know that he hasn't that's one of the things my I

think no I think she offered to testify I don't believe she's been brought in

unless something new has happened last week be surprised if there's a lot of

information flowing to her to the press investigation has been going on for two

years and cost over 25 million dollars of taxpayer money and this is where we

are today talking about let me say there's Donald Trump Donald Donald Trump

you guys need to go immediately I'm not trying to cut you out but we're gonna go

we're gonna go to black and I'm gonna get in trouble but thank you is a great

panel they are the woman we're shortchanging

the women trumpeted by the left is rapidly

into the year of the radical we'll explain next remember back in 1992 they

called that the year the woman the Democrats did in the election and then

it was 2016 with Hillary was the year of the woman and now here we are again 2018

let's try a third time around is being called the year the woman by some in the

media and of course on the left but if you listen to high-profile female

Democrats including 2020 presidential candidates you know this next person is

running you'd be forgiven for thinking it's the year the radical just take a

look I am a Democratic Socialist Republicans are going to call us

socialists no matter what we do

so we might as well give them the real thing I have a problem guys with that

phrase identity politics when people say that it's a pejorative that phrase is

used to divide and it is used to distract its purpose is to minimize and

marginalize issues that impact all of us

you

No comments:

Post a Comment