He's here
Now who's broadcasting from the underground Samantha's in the bowels of a hidden pocket?
Somewhere under the brick and steel of a nondescript building. We've once again made contact with our leader
Everybody mark levin here are number eight seven seven three eight one three eight
One one eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one tons to cover with you today
Much of it fascinating over 300 newspaper editorials condemning the president
For calling the press the enemy of the people
but he didn't call the press the enemy the people he called the fake news the enemy of the people and
of course the self-serving leftists on these editorial boards the overwhelming majority of which endorsed
president trumps opponent Hillary Clinton for president the United States
Continues this this facade this fabrication
That there's an attack on the Free Press in this country
There's not an attack on the Free Press in this country
The most powerful man in the country the most powerful man in the government hasn't lifted a finger to do anything
Against a free press or freedom of the press
What many in the press are doing is unamerican and they know it
There are Liars
by omission and Commission
They're propagandists by omission and Commission
And they know it and
They're in many respects an ideological
cabal
Now how do we know that? They just revealed themselves over 300 of them and there's more oh
But those are the editorial pages. They're not the news pages. I know it's worse on the news pages
because they're even less transparent than the editorial pages as
I've been saying over and over again in the course of the last few months
This president hasn't sought legislation
Like John Adams did in his party the Federalists
to curb the press
To criminalize differences of opinion
This president unlike Lincoln who of whom I am an enormous admirer and I understand what he did at the time
As it director that any member of the media be thrown in the prison without habeas corpus
This president, unlike Barack Obama who was a disgrace has not unleashed the FBI and
our surveillance tools
against the media certainly not to the extent Obama did as a matter of fact Obama's use of federal law enforcement and
eavesdropping on the media
surpassed virtually every president before him combined
But there wasn't a cabal of editorial page articles and opinions
Accusing Obama of threatening America was there
so you see the problem is not an
Attack on freedom of the press or a free press the problem is the people
In the media not all but too many who are frauds
her ideologue on the news pages and on the editorial pages and
It is the American people who've taken notice
That's why multi billionaires have had to sweep in and save
them like the New York Post say by the richest man on earth V Zoe's
Like the New York Times seventeen percent of it is owned by
a Mexican billionaire a
telecommunications giant
Bloomberg News owned by a billionaire and all the rest of them
All the rest of them NBC MSNBC unless there's been a change of ownership comcast
CBS part of a conglomeration
Nobody's taking down these companies
Nobody's putting them out of business
They put themselves out of business to the extent they lose ratings and they loop subscribers
Because their product sucks. That's why CNN's rating continued to tank
That's why MSNBC will never catch Fox
That's why Network News is at its lowest ebb in modern times
That's why people go to the Internet not even necessarily to get news quote-unquote
But to get different opinions and to pull different information from all over the world
Complete joke
complete joke
It's not about freedom of the press or a free press and
Who is it? And we've talked about this? I'm not gonna spend all day
Who is it that tries to shut down conservative talk radio every 5 or 10 years?
The Democrats the left with the media support
Who is it day in and day out that attacks Fox News
Because there's one little cable channel the biggest I might add but one
Little voice. It's not even a uniform voice
That does not march in lockstep with all the rest of them and they insist on it they insist on groupthink
They insist on
So often the news on these other networks is about other news people who don't tow the line
So freedom of the press as a constitutional matter is as safe as it's ever been
The press itself is as sick as it's ever been is as unprofessional as it's ever been is as
ideologically driven as it's ever been is
filled with
propagandists as it's ever been
The press is very sick
Freedom of the press is as strong as ever now. That is a distinction that the low IQ left
Particularly hosts and so-called reporters in the very media. I'm talking about will not understand so I'm not talking to them. I'm talking to you
Now we have this guy Brennan
Former CIA director now is a victim. You see he's a victim
Donald Trump they say is acting like a dictator
Nobody's ever seen this before some of the generals and admirals some of the Obama generals and admirals are standing up for Brennan
One of them is said that why don't you revoke my security Clinton? Well, why don't you surrender it pal?
What's with the drama queen stuff?
Even see a
Spattering they're splattering of little pieces about how this raises a constitutional issue. Really?
Brenna the private citizen. He has a constitutional right a statutory right regulatory rights some kind of vested right to
Retain a security clearance
No, no, you don't understand mark. That's not it
The issue is what basis can you revoke it? Well, the commander-in-chief can revoke it on any basis. He chooses to revoke it
You don't have a constitutional right in all things
Another constitutional right to have access to security information
It's on a need-to-know basis and the president gets to decide who needs to know
Mr. Brennan has abused
whatever authority
Whatever tradition he was operating under before
Is a vile poisonous mouthpiece of the left?
Who makes himself available to media and who's paid by media?
There's no constitutional issue that's not to say some judge wouldn't rule that way we have a lot of knucklehead judges out there
They're taking over environmental issues. They're taking over immigration issues worse than I've ever seen
And over a conservative review my buddy. Daniel Horowitz is working on a piece related to this but
Lawlessness is not the standard by which the present the United States should comply is it
Now I dressed this brennon matter on the radio last evening
But I also addressed it on Hannity last night
And we'll play some of this then we're gonna move on to a number of other things including the manor furred
jury
First day no decision, but they asked some very interesting questions. You know, you try to read the tea leaves
I'm not making predictions, of course
But let's take a listen
This is Hannity last night cut one go. We have never had a former communist
Who literally we now know spread?
Russian lies
To this inform propagandize the American people to impact in a presidential election either
these are unprecedented times see if we can unravel this from the
Fabulously stupid Omarosa media. First of all, apparently the fact that Brennan voted for a
Stalinist who was funded by the Soviets the Communist Party USA
Was very attractive to Barack Obama who made him CIA director think about that. So how did this man ever get a security clearance?
I'm curious about this
Now a couple of things the president is looking at Brennan. He revokes his security clearance
Professor Dershowitz needs to know that's a privilege. That's not a right of security
Privilege the fact of the matter is nobody stopping
Brennan from speaking. In fact, nobody could stop. He is a big mouth. He will never shut up
he'll go on TV and be the kook that he is the idea that he has a right to access the
Information because he served in the Obama administration at the CIA is a preposterous argument
But of course the ACLU will take up the case because they take up a lot of stupid cases
That's number one. Number two. Who else is the president looking at Comey and people who are keeping score Comey is a
Republican how many times in the media told us Mahler's a Republican calm is a Republican and even they questioned the president
Okay, you got a Republican. And by the way for the media most of these people the president are looking at are white
I know that's very important to you know, call me was fired at the recommendation of Rosenstein
Comey was a leaker
And he absconded with government documents when he left his security clearance should be pulled mchavez under criminal investigation
The number two from the FBI never before and he three media his security clearance
Should be pulled tear stroke was just fired the guy in charge of counterintelligence
Investigations for misconduct his security should be pulled James clapper committed perjury
He lied to the American people and Senator Wyden and that committee a long time ago
his security clearance should have been pull Bruce or
Another one pool Yates another one not because the president has a problem with Democrats or liberals
Here's a problem with these people and we haven't even gotten to the unmasking issue yet. So this is not a First Amendment issue
Meanwhile, meanwhile when these people had security clearances. What the hell did they do with them?
Well, let's take a look the russians interfered in our election, right?
Well who was president who was head of the CIA?
Who was national security adviser who was the head of the FBI all these people with their security clearances in positions of power?
Did nothing effective to stop the Russians from interfering in our election. They did nothing to stop China from stealing our technology
They did nothing to stop North Korea's nuclear program and even worse they awarded the aslam. Oh
Hold it mark the terrorist regime that's a rod
with a hundred and fifty billion dollars right with a hundred fifty billion dollars and
Provided them with a pathway to nuclear weapons good job boys and girls in the Obama administration with your security
clearances the fact that Obama
Appointed these people and gave them
Security clearances is not the obligation of this President to let them retain their security clearances
There is no constitutional issue. That's just nonsense
And again, one of them's a Republican so that makes this all okay
All right
Briefly one more cut and then we'll move along cut to go mark I take away all their clearances
I take away all their clearances, too
But the fact of the matter is we really need to focus in on the conduct of these individuals
Look at the phony media and the arguments they're making this is like a dictatorship
This is this is a we've never seen anything like this before
All these blabbermouth who know nothing. You're gonna seek on TV till you throw up on your loafers
You're gonna see call me. He had his book thing
You're gonna see Brennan all over the place all these phony victims and so forth and so meanwhile
When they were in office when they had their security clearances when they had power they didn't stop the Russians
They didn't stop the Red Chinese. They didn't stop the North Koreans. They funded the Iranians. And in fact, they are
Responsible for the greatest scandal in American history by interfering with our election and trying to undermine the Trump campaign
Now ladies and gentlemen, I'm back alive now after the break
After the break they throw around this word dictatorship
third-world
President's enemies in the media
President's enemies in Congress including the likes of bob corker and his ilk as well as of course the democrats
mark, Tourette's Warner among others
The president you see is acting like a dictator by firing people or by withdrawing their security clearances. I
Will demonstrate to you very briefly after the break how mr. Brennan mr. CIA director
Learned a lot, I guess from his old Soviet buddies
Gus Hall and the crowd learn a lot about espionage
Including spying on a Senate Intelligence Committee staff. Oh, you're gonna want to hear this one. I'll be right back
March 1124
Franken Feinstein is the
Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee and she is furious at the CIA being run by Brennan goat
without prior notification or approval
CIA personnel
Had conducted a search
That was John Brennan's word of the committee computers at the off-site
Facility this search
Involved not only a search of documents provided by the committee by the CIA
But also a search of the stand alone and walled off
committee network drive
containing the committee's own internal work product and
Communications based on what director Brennan has informed us
I have grave concerns that the CIA search may well have violated the separation of powers
principles embodied in the United States Constitution
Our staff involved in this matter have the appropriate clearances
Handled this sensitive material according to establish procedures and practice to protect classified information
And were provided access to the Panetta review by the CIA
itself as
A result. There is no legitimate reason
to allege to the Justice Department that Senate staff may have committed a crime I
View the acting consul generals referral as a potential effort to intimidate
This staff and I am not taking it lightly you got that media
Mr. Brennan and his CIA was spying on
Senate Intelligence Committee staff at the time Feinstein
Chairman of that committee was furious
Brennan
Repeatedly covered up repeatedly lied about it came up with excuses eventually at a spill the beans
But you had the CIA
the CIA director
spying on senate intelligence committee staffers
Going into there records in their computers that were off-site
now there's
fascism now there is dictatorship and
They defend this man and his security clearance
Can be all of them. I'll be back
America's passionately
Cerebral voice talk with that voice now eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one
The audio I played for you is actually a video it's on the Internet any news
department in America
Could have pulled it and played it any time during the last 24 hours
But they didn't and they won't
Because they don't want you to know about the real John Brennan
This man ran an agency that
spied on a Senate staff the Senate Intelligence Committee staff Mark Warner runs to the microphone is
Mentally challenged as he is
Accuses the president the united states of being nick Sounion
with an enemies list
he sat on that committee, and he knew full well what brennan and the CI a-- had done to staffers and
Yet look how he talks
All the media have access to what I've played free, I'm gonna play one more time
This is Dianne Feinstein going to the Senate floor, March 11 2014 just a few years ago furious
That the CIA
Broke into Senate Intelligence Committee computers
To see what the staffers were working on
Brennan covered it up for a period of time
They even gave the phony argument that they wanted to make sure that these Senate staffers were properly handling
Sensitive and secure information even though they all had clearances
And
Brennan is on TV hired by one of the media outlets
Trashing the President of the United States day in and day out making the most outrageous allegations Brennan whose fingerprints are all over
The Russia dossier and the pushing it into law enforcement and into the media as he operated in the shadows as CIA director
Brennan
Who had closer ties to the Russians than anybody he accuses?
He voted for
their communist apparatchik
Gus Hall a Stalinist who received funds from the Soviets as the Communist Party USA received funds from the Soviets and
Their purpose was to overthrow our government in the middle of the Cold War and Brennan voted for him
One more time March 11 2014. This is the man the media are defending
Their surrogates are defending in this Admiral
Who said - they McLaren or whatever his name is? Mr. President yanked my security clearance. Let me tell you something pal
You may be a great Patriot, but you're an ignoramus that you are
Go ahead without prior notification or approval
CIA personnel
Had conducted a search
That was John Brennan's word of the committee computers at the off-site
Facility this search
Involved not only a search of documents provided by the committee by the CIA
But also a search of the standalone and walled off
committee Network drive
containing the committee's own internal work product and
Communications based on what director Brennan has informed us now
Let's not if this had been a Republican administration where the Republican CIA director who did that?
You know damn well where the media would fall on this
We wouldn't be debating security clearances. We lit to be we'd be debating. Why aren't these people prosecuted and sent prison?
Go ahead
That the CIA search may well have violated the separation of powers principles
Embodied in the United States Constitution meaning the executive branch under Barack Obama
Spying on the legislative branch. This is a problem in the Obama administration from day one
Whether its unleashing the FBI against the media whether it's putting a spy in the Trump campaign
Whether it is the dossier and Christopher Steele, whether it's mr. Stroke and MS page and McCabe and Comey
Whether it's the phony vice a warrant
And the unmasking of American citizens including Lieutenant General Michael Flynn
Go ahead our staff involved in this matter have the appropriate clearances
Handled this sensitive material according to establish procedures and practice to protect classified information
And we're provided access to the Panetta review by the CIA
itself as
a result
There is no legitimate reason to allege to the Justice Department that Senate staff
may have committed a crime I
View the acting consul generals referral as a potential effort to intimidate
This staff and I am NOT taking it lightly
Mm-hmm
Sayed is we who stand for civil liberties? Not them folks it is we who stand for civil liberties?
It is we who stand for the rule of law?
Privacy and the Constitution not them it is we who stand for freedom of the press?
and freedom of speech
not them it is we who stand against an all-powerful centralized government not them and
This is what we're battling
constitutionalism
Versus progressivism. It's exactly what's going on a progressivism reaches a point where?
It becomes openly tyrannical and you're seeing it with your own two eyes right now
Now I'm not gonna play all the audio we have of these Democrats
Joaquin Castro Democrat, Texas, Eric's wall. Well, Democrat, California and on and on and on on
And on and on
defending Brennan
But I will play you Jim Sciuto who used to serve in the Obama administration and worked with
CIA director Brennan as a national security adviser to then President Obama and
he's reporting on CNN today on this issue as
If he's an objective journalist
Which of course he's not
He asks this Putin is cheering Brennan losing his security clearance
Well, of course he is maybe Brennan was a source to him. Anyway cut five go Julie you cover Russia
Well that you had the president in Helsinki a handful of weeks ago stand next for the Russian president in question. The intelligence community's assessment
dismiss it really now you have a president firing a
Former leader of the intelligence community and citing the Russia investigation does Putin cheer?
Stop now. This is you. See this is what they call news
there's nothing newsworthy about a man who served in the
opposite administration in the opposite party who embraced opposite policies who work with the individual who is being
reported about
Not asking questions but making statements like this
For a correspondent from GQ magazine GQ magazine has a correspondent. I'm afraid it does
Gentlemen quarterly and of course, she's a leftist. It's Putin cheering about this. Go ahead
Of course it goes it's just more chaos more kind of dismantling of the u.s
System of the transatlantic alliance. All right an idiot
That's why she stuck at gentlemen quarterly magazine
Next thing, you know, she'll be writing for nature or whatever
So I just wanted to put a fine point on this now
Related to this in some context. There's a writer by the name of JM
Rieger who used to write for the Huffington Post which is obviously a left-wing crap website now he writes for the washington compost
You see they have a farm team and they move up to the pros
So-called over there at the washington compost listen to this on
Fox news robert muller is often a bigger boogeyman than Vladimir Putin
some Fox pundits
Now say special counsel Robert as small of the third represents a bigger threat to the United States than Russian President Vladimir Putin
when conservative radio host Mark Levin appeared on Fox News's Hannity last week by though it takes him a week to catch up to
Discuss the latest in the Russia investigation he ended up baffling even some of his most conservative allies
Some nitwit woman who writes for a red state I never heard of her before. It's not a conservative ally of mine
Only we know the hell she is. Anyway, that's his link
Quote Robert Muller is a greater threat to this Republican the Constitution than anything Vladimir Putin did join the campaign
Levin said and I'm no fan of Vladimir Putin now I've discussed this at length many times
Muller is a threat to our constitutional system
Because he's being used wittingly
to reverse the last election and
He's prepared to create a constitutional confrontation
Which will distract the president and his administration
Which will
Make our enemies
Actually laugh as CNN would say and they'll possibly get on the move make a move
While the president is having to deal with a subpoena or something of that sort. This is a
terrible violation potentially of separation of powers among
Other things the appointments clause
Vladimir Putin, you can't do anything to cause a problem with our separation of powers or undermine our
Constitution or even our notion of republicanism he's a national security threat. That's exactly the point
I'm making over and over again, but this guy JM riggers such an idiot such an ideologue
Well, he likes to play the typical liberal game
While bringing up a basket of all claims about the Muller investigation Levin did not say specifically what made Muller a larger threat than Putin
I've missed a producer
World
We have another propagandist this clown he purposely puts that sentence in there because he knows that I do
But he can't help himself
Still the following night Hannity guest host Jeanine Pirro made the same comparison is Muller a greater threat than Putin to this country
No notice. That's not what I said
Three sentences above quote Robert Muller is a greater threat to this Republic and the
Constitution than anything Vladimir Putin did during the campaign
Is that what I said? He quotes me
But he says the same comparison was made by Judge Jeanine. No, it wasn't
Was it the same at all then he talks about the coup
No fewer than nine Fox hosts and this guy is very busy sitting there he hey. Hey, let's run the vid
Let me count how many of them talking about trying to overthrow Trump. Well, what are they trying to do?
The unleashing of a prosecutor the constant incessant talk about impeachment the day after the man's elected
What do you call that? What do you call that?
You idiot?
No fewer than nine Fox hosts and pundits have suggested as much since February 2017. That's the whole article
The Washington Post is trying to force Trump out of office CNN MSNBC
Near to all it a thousand so-called reporters
like cockroaches all over the place trying to reverse the action results and then when you call them at wait, what do you
Well, they this is the fringe here the conservative fringe
Stupid people who don't want to get any smarter. I'll be right back
You know
I've had my
Share of mechanics calling me saying they found something wrong that needs replacing when I've taken my car in for an oil change
Those so-called surprise high repair bills are terrible
Especially when you're not covered by manufacturer's warranty and you're paying out of your own pocket to fix them. That's why I recommend
Extended vehicle protection from Car Show like we have on our 2010 Camaro
If your car has five thousand a one hundred and fifty thousand miles car shield can save you from paying for high repair costs
Replacing your engine or even a simple sensor can cost thousands
Now when you're protected by car shield, you're gonna have your favorite mechanic or dealership fix your car and they're paid directly
It's that simple and it's your choice
Car shield also provides 24/7 roadside assistance and a rental car while yours is being fixed for free
Get covered by the ultimate an extended vehicle protection you get car shield
Here's what you do do it right now call 800 car
6100 and mention code Levin
800 car
6100 code Levin or visit car shield calm and use code Levin that's car shield
Calm code le VI n either way you save 10% That's car shield calm or 800 car
6100 code Levin save 10% a
Deductible may apply
Alright
Are you as sick as I am talking about John Brennan's security clearance?
Like it affects the nation one way or another I have to push back
it's the only reason I raise these things and
I'm hopeful the president will yank the security clearances from at least a half a dozen or a dozen more of these people and
so though of course run the news and tell us how great James Comey is because John commis a leaker, of course and he stole
Government documents on the way out the door. Oh, they're my private property. What an idiot?
Where mccabe is under criminal investigation?
Or a stroke who was just fired
or this fella or Bruce or
Who was in the shadows?
working with his wife
Opposition research against the president and at the same time feeding information, mr. Stroke over there at the FBI. Oh
What a public servant
Then we have an admiral today
and says
Writes a piece in The Washington Post. It's amazing how quickly they get these things written in and in these major newspapers
Isn't it have you ever tried to write a piece and get it in a major newspaper? It's not so simple
Particulars you disagree with them
And he says that mr. Trump is a disgrace. He's humiliated us. He's an embarrassment and that mr
Trump should pull his security clearance, too
These are these obama admirals and generals
Why don't you just surrender your security clearance pow what do you need it for? You're done you retard?
Just surrender it
but he want he wants to make a spectacle and
So the left has succeeded in politicizing our intelligence agencies
They were involved in the last election. They've succeeded in politicizing the FBI
They were involved in the last election and now they've succeeded in politicizing the military
Because this is what they do they destroy institutions and traditions and customs
While claiming you're doing it
While claiming you're doing it
Now there's a lot more to get to this subpoena issue
May be coming to a head
Should mr. Muller foolishly stupidly
arrogantly
Issue a subpoena for the president the United States to appear before a federal grand jury
or some other form of physical appearance of a president
A president has never appeared in front of a grand jury
So this issue should be quite interesting
But more than interesting this is exactly what I was talking about when the idiot over the Washington Post couldn't comprehend
Well, he probably comprehended what I was talking about, but he didn't want to
it's better to paint somebody as a kook or
To attack people as racists and so forth
It is amazing
We have the greatest scandal and put in the in the history this country from a political perspective greatest
And the vast majority the media are either involved in it by feeling leaks by the perpetrators
or ignoring it or
Trying to deflect on behalf of Obama
His officials in the Democrat Party, that's how much they hate Trump
Notice they didn't write
Editorials three or four hundred newspapers. They didn't write editorials when Barack Obama SiC the FBI
on their colleagues no
Why would they do that?
They didn't write editorials when talk news came under attack now that is talk radio
Or when Fox comes under attack, no
Or when we all come under attack and the Democrats try to nationalize the unit. No, no, that's not a problem
You see there what Freight of the president's words?
fake news
enemy of the people
Little self-serving don't you think I'll be right back
He's here now
Broadcasting come from the underground command post deep in the bowels of a hidden pocket somewhere under the brick and steel of a
Nondescript building we've once again made contact with their leader
Everybody mark levin here are number eight seven seven three eight one three eight
One one eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one in a few minutes. I
Want to walk you through what?
Might be occurring
any time now or maybe not so
You are more informed
About the constitution of the consequences of
What may take place maybe not with mr. Muller and a subpoena I
Think it's very important than the millions of you who listened to this program know about it because you're gonna be fed more
Propaganda than you can imagine should that subpoena take place?
So I consider that
Enormous ly important that just stick with me, but before we do
I've always been a great fan of Aretha Franklin. I
Don't know where politics and all that. I'm not talking about that, but her unbelievable voice
There will never ever be another voice like that just never be another voice like that Aretha Franklin and
Rest in peace, you know, we're all gonna leave this earth. I
Hate to tell you we're all gonna leave this earth
And when you leave this earth if you could make as many people happy
Peaceful as possible man, you've accomplished more than most other people
And that's what she did her songs that voice will live in perpetuity
In perpetuity
You could feel that song in your bones in your soul
Absolutely, unbelievable that voice that range nothing like it nobody
So may she rest in peace
Alright
Then we get down to brass tacks here
The Moloch team has to make a decision now I
Don't know what the president's lawyers have proposed to mr. Muller
But they're good lawyers Sekulow Giuliani flood. There may be others. They're good lawyers
And based on what Giuliani said and reading the tea leaves
they have very
narrow parameters for this prosecutor
No, you can't question the president about his presidential prerogatives
like firing Comey
You have a public record, you know why he fired Comey this president
Explains more about his actions than any president. I can think of he uses Twitter. He goes to rallies he speaks on other
forums and so forth but
It's none of mr. Mullahs business period
And
Questions cannot be asked for the purpose of trying to catch the President and some kind of a trick and
Then claim that he made a false statement or he contradicted somebody and therefore he perjured himself
And there are other issues that
Should have been and may have been raised by the president's lawyers
Let me go over some of them now, I don't know this but this is what I would do
Mr. Muller
What is your authority the question in the President of the United States under our Constitution
Not any public official not any citizen but the President of the United States what is your authority
If you agree that you must comply with the Department of Justice's
policies in the Department of Justice's policies
include two memos that
stretch almost half a century by two different administration's
From two different parties that have never been altered
That state unequivocally that it is the position of the United States Department of Justice
your boss
Your boss that you cannot indict a sitting president then what exactly?
Is it that?
You want to glean from this president in terms of a criminal prosecution
It's not the target
He hasn't committed any crime there's nothing in the federal code
You better have a damn good reason
Now we're not talking about turning over documents we have
You know the Nixon case where they were
Nixon was forced to give over the tapes. We're not talking about giving over tapes we're talking about
Physical access to the President of the United States that's quite different
Quite different
We're not talking about a civil case
We're talking about a criminal case president the United States
Has never been subpoenaed
Successfully to appear in front of a federal grand jury, so mr. Muller exactly. What are you up to now?
Mr. Muller
You're either one or another kind of
federal official
Are you an inferior official under the appointments clause of the Constitution?
Three judges federal judges in Washington DC have ruled that that's what you are
You're an ethereal official an employee of the Department of Justice who reports to the Deputy Attorney General the United States
Do you agree with those decisions or
Are you a principal officer under?
the appointments clause of the Constitution with me under the appointments clause of the Constitution and
Therefore you should have been nominated by the president confirmed by the Senate. Otherwise everything you've done is null and void, which is it
Well, he would obviously argue I would think that he is an inferior employee
That he reports to the Deputy Attorney General the United States. Who is the acting Attorney General for these purposes fine
You're an inferior employee inferior to who
Well, the Deputy Attorney General to whom else the Attorney General who else the president of the United States
So you can subpoena your boss even though your boss argues
That for the purposes in which you seek to subpoena you do not have the power
Now if that's the case
You're not an inferior employee
Are you but if you are and
I as your superior your ultimate superior. I'm the executive branch. I'm president of the United States. How can you subpoena me?
To physically appear in front of a grand jury or physically appear for your questioning
This would completely turn upside down
separation of powers
The appointments clause of the Constitution and the structure of the executive branch
This is what I mean that this man is more dangerous to our constitutional system than Vladimir Putin
Putin is without question a danger to this nation. There's nothing to do with national security
So the dense Washington Post reporter, this is way above his high Q level, but all of you understand what I'm saying
These are important points stay with me. These are the kinds of points that will be argued in a constitutional confrontation
Now mr. Muller and his lawyers are not constitutional experts
Some have argued in
appeals courts some of argued in front of the Supreme Court
But they're not experts per se in this area
In any respect
Moreover mr. Muller will be opening the door
To allow the president's attorneys to bring up any and all related matters
Involving the nature and course of this investigation
Now that doesn't mean some liberal judge or justice
Or court won't knock them down, but the door will be open
Where they can challenge
So much of what mr. Muller has done in the nature and with this investigation was launched
And so, mr. Muller has quite a high hill to climb
Assuming he doesn't have a bunch of liberal judges who want to help him out
Why do you want to subpoena the president the United States what is it that you need to know?
I need to know why he fired Co me excuse me, two points. You don't get to know that but moreover
There's a public record. He said while he fired call me
Well, he gave three different answers Wow now you have three answers
But you're an inferior employee you report to the Justice now, why is this important folks
You cannot have any assistant US attorney
Issuing subpoenas for a president to appear in front of a federal grand jury
To ask a bunch of questions which they claim they cannot get answered without
Forcing the president in front of a grand jury or demanding an interview of the president in a criminal matter
The courts would be unleashing things they don't even know that they're unleashing
It would completely undermine the power of the president's on the other hand the President must defend his prerogatives
He must defend the right of a president any president to fire
coordinate
To fire a support, he must defend the rights of presidents not to be forced to appear in front of federal grand juries
At the demand effectively of an inferior employee
Now mark judge Starr
He issued a subpoena for the president to appear before a federal grand jury. That is Clinton
While Clinton should have fought it
But they are two completely different cases
Clinton in conducting himself the way he did wasn't protecting a presidential prerogative
Clinton's actions involved Clinton's actions
You see the issue of whether Clinton committed perjury in a civil trial
Has nothing to do with our very President of the United States
He's able to fire the FBI director. Also think of it this way
If a prosecutor is free to question a president about his prerogative the fire a subordinate
Look at the opportunities for political blackmail from future FBI director
Future CIA director future national security intelligent all of them. I'll be right back
Mr. Mauler issues a subpoena
It is mr. Muller who's going to have a lot of questions that are going to have to be answered but I
Believe it's quite possible. He will I don't know. I'm not predicting. I'm just saying he's I find him to be extremely irresponsible
You know
We're gonna talk a little later and quite soon actually about the Manafort case and the jury coming back and asking a number of questions
And they asked questions that were really quite astounding and yet very rational
What's a shelf company?
You're the prosecutor you just spent two weeks laying out your case, you didn't even define the terms
Of the various entities that you're talking about
They asked the judge to clarify judges look I can't do that, you know the case the case has been argued that
Both sides arrested you need to figure these things out
and they asked other other technical terms the
Prosecution's thrown all this stuff out there. They may still get their convictions here and there they're
on a on a charge here and they're
Their star witness as a disaster. They're telling the jury no, no forget about him focus on the document
I don't think these guys are particularly good
Parents
Hillsdale College baby, I
Know you love freedom. Now, how do I know?
Because you listen to this show that's how I know
And my show and everything I do is all about preserving liberty in the form of government that secures it for us
It's the same with Hillsdale College one of the very best truly liberal arts colleges in the nation
That's why I talk about them so often
Now because Hillsdale is committed to pursuing truth and defending Liberty they teach their stellar students to defend freedom
No matter what, they major in whether it's science music economics business, whatever
Hillsdale teaches them how to defend liberty and they do that for you, too
You know through their free monthly digest of conservative thought it's called in Primus
3.8 million Americans receive it for free every month and
You my friend and fellow freedom lover should be reading it, too
You can subscribe for free at Levin from Hillsdale. Com le VI and for Hillsdale com
There's no strings attached
Generous donors who want to preserve freedom for future generations make it possible for, Hillsdale
To send in Primus to you for no cost every single month
Start receiving and reading in Prime ISM so you can know how to defend the freedom you love
Go to live in for Hillsdale. Com le VI in for Hillsdale com now. Let me tell you a little secret
Because I'm in constant touch with all of our wonderful sponsors. I
Don't believe this is gonna be free
forever
Maybe not even in the near future. So I want to strongly encourage you to get the empress'
Now so you're grandfathered in so you can lock it in
That's Levin for Hillsdale. Com le VI in for Hillsdale comm
Did you get your copy of the second coming in by my buddy John hi Bush
Well, he reported back that they have sold thousands of copies of their first edition at the Reagan Library because
many of you
Went online immediately and copies and got them signed
I told you the first editions run out that's with any book
Then a publisher publishes a second edition third edition fourth edition silver. So the goal is to get your first edition of a book
And if you can get it signed on top of that for free
That's a big deal to
John highbush is a big-time thriller writer
He's about to have his second best-selling book the second coming
He's one of the few conservatives who have been incredibly successful in
novel writing
Just because that's the nature of the publishing business
It's a great book. He was on the program last night. I want to encourage you quickly right now. Go back if you haven't
Go back if you have but go there if you haven't
- Reagan Library comm isn't that right? Mr. Producer?
Reagan Library com go to the store
Get a copy of the Second Coming. It's the first edition and ask for it to be signed and then they'll send it to you
Now if you just want to get a copy and you don't care if it's sign or not
You can go to amazon.com and any Barnes & Noble in any
Serious bookstore a significant bookstore even small bookstores. The second coming is the name of the book by John highbush
But I'm just giving you inside information cuz I asked him a few hours ago
I said, how's it going? He said mark, we've sold a whole bunch of them at the Reagan Library
I'm signing them as fast as I can
We're running low on the first edition. So jump in. I'm not hawking it. I'm not hyping it you're my brothers and sisters
I'm telling you what's going on? Like I always do
Reagan Library comm go to the store and get it and ask for them to sign it. All right
I want to get back to the subpoena issue
There's a piece at ABC News what happens if Mahler decides to subpoena President Trump and
they asked a bunch of
Law professors or former prosecutors and that sort of thing
Peter Shayne professor, Ohio State University
Is it smart strategy for Muller to issue a subpoena on the president?
He says that Moritz College of Law, I would say yes
because the evidence that the president could give would be in my judgment directly relevant to the plausibility of charges that
Involved not only the president but other people involved in his campaign
including family members and I think that as a prosecutor and former FBI director that Muller believes in
Dhading as many eyes and crossing as many t's as possible
I don't think he would want to leave this particular stone unturned. I have no idea what that means
None
Question the president about what involving family members
You question the family members
All right, somebody by the name of whiting
Their answer there are risks for Muller in terms of whether to seek a subpoena. The first is delay
It would be litigated and that is a fact by the way, and it would take several months to be litigated
So he'd have to decide whether and how the delay would affect his investigation and the second thing is he could lose in court
I don't think he'd lose in court but there's always a risk of losing in court and so we would have to calculate how important
It was for him to get the interview versus the risks. That's why this has dragged on for so long
Both sides are negotiating in the shadow of these risks and trying to press their positions and see who will blink first
Steven Saltzburg George Washington University professor of law former associate independent counsel
Better not the subpoena the president because it could be litigated for 18 months or more
Muller has sufficient statements by the President to know why he did what he did that is a fact right there
There's no reason for any of this
So in my view the professor and former associate independent counsel probably knows better than the rest somebody named welly
I'm confident that what's going on inside? The Muller investigation is only remotely related to what we know about at this point
So it's a possibly he has what he needs and doesn't absolutely
Need the president's testimony so he could walk away from it or he could issue a subpoena. Well, thanks for nothing there pal
What would prompt Muller to issue a subpoena to the president is the question posed by ABC
They go to Professor Prakash of the University of Virginia
Giuliani's been all over the press about how the president wants to testify but not with the respect to all of these questions about obstruction
of justice
This has been going on for months. Perhaps Muller believes
That he just has to ask these questions and play this out to see what the president's responses
Well, that's a foolish answer back to this guy whiting Muller would have to decide either that Trump's team is not serious about sitting down
For an interview or that the conditions they are seeking to impose are so restrictive as to make the interview not worthwhile
And if Muller decides that one of those two things has happened
Then that's when he would have to make a decision about whether or not to seek a subpoena
Wylie
This is all really just a game of chicken
we can go round and round and round and what all this comes down to is the president is saying make me
I'm gonna comment on this in a second Paul rosensweig senior fellow R Street Institute
professorial lecturer in law at George Washington University
I'm quite familiar with this gentleman quote one of the best arguments against wasting time on subpoenaing the president is that since there is a
Justice Department
Policy that says the president can't be indicted and Muller has probably decided in his mind that he's going to follow that policy
It doesn't really make that much difference
What the president says if you're not going to charge him with a crime who cares what he has to say, right?
I think that I care what he has to say
Even if it's not capable of being criminally prosecuted because I think that the truth value of knowing what happened is greater
Well, that's a stupid answer
If and when Muller decides to subpoena President Trump what happens next
Wylie that's the federal government basically saying you do this or else that's what a subpoena is
it is saying to the President of the United States if you don't comply we
The government are going to make you comply now. Listen to that. The president is the executive branch
This is an inferior employee if you listen to the so-called experts
So this inferior employee can say we can make my boss comply with this
This is what I mean the courts are playing with fire if they go along with this
Salzburg the former associate independent counsel quote the president could comply or he could file a motion to quash the subpoena on the ground that
it is a burden on the presidency and
That's true because he's obviously read the memos out of the Department of Justice
Somebody been a name is Shane
The reasons for objecting to the subpoena have to do with whether a president may subpoena for testimony at all
What the president's lawyers are going to say
I'm virtually certain is that the court has no authority to demand that the president give personal testimony
Professor Prakash
I think the president would then invoke executive privilege and I think the special counsel at that point would try to contest the invocation
saying it doesn't apply and therefore the president has to testify and so that would be
litigated and the court would have to decide whether the special counsel could actually contest the president's claim if they decide that he couldn't
That would be the end of the subpoena. He wouldn't be able to enforce it
Rosensweig
If they are at an impasse and mother issues a subpoena
The president has a decision to make he can comply with the subpoena that means showing up in the grand jury and answering questions
Like any other human being who subpoenaed to testify?
Option two is the one that President Clinton chose in the 1990s, which was when he was subpoena by Ken Starr
That was when Clinton's team finally sat down and negotiated third thing
The president could do is fight you go to the court and say look, I'm the president. You can't subpoena me
I refuse to come
That fight would start in the District of Columbia with a grand jury's meeting and pretty obviously it would go all the way up to
the Supreme Court
I
Predict. That's what would happen
Whiting the other thing that could happen is mother could issue the subpoena and then that could start negotiations again if they see that Muller
Is willing to issue a subpoena
Then they might the risks
Then they asked how long might a court battle over subpoena take practice
President try not to comply with any order until he gets a decision from the appellate court or from the Supreme Court
The district court ordered him to testify I suspect he'd say I'm going to peel this and try to prevent the testimony from being given
Whiting certainly be expedited because this is an ongoing investigation
So there's a pressing need to resolve it
And also I think the judge would know that both sides have fully thought through their arguments and so forth rosensweig
I would expect everybody would work very hard to expedite it
Shane
There's an interesting question as the strategy because there are two elements of strategy two objectives one is winning. The other is delaying
Let me just say this folks. You can delay and win
If the subpoena fight reaches the Supreme Court who is likely to prevail and then when we're done I have a question for you
What haven't they asked over there at ABC News?
Practice unlike the Nixon case they are not asking for evidence for documents or tapes. They're asking for the president's testimony
I don't know what the court would say about trying to get the president to testify as the whether he had the requisite
state of mind for obstruction of justice
or whatever else the special prosecutors investigating and I don't know what the court would say about the applicability of
Executive privilege in that context as far as I can tell the special counsel doesn't have any explicit litigating authority to contest
presidential assertions of executive privilege
That was a feature of the regulations in place in Watergate era
It wasn't reiative for whatever reason when the Clinton administration put out these special counsel regulations
Shane I would be a little surprised if the Supreme Court were to take the position that executive privilege with regard to testimony was absolute
The accountability of any one branch of government to any other branch stop
It's not the accountability of one branch to another branch it's the same branch that's the point professor
It's the same branch. It's an executive branch
He's an inferior employee if you buy that argument if he's not an inferior employee if he's a principal employee
He's out because it violate the appointments clause
That's why he's kind of boxed in Molly
What else does he say here?
I think what's going to happen is the decision is not going to be you can never subpoena the president and it's not going to
Be you can subpoena the president just like any other citizen. It's going to be somewhere in the middle
Rosensweig in the end. My prediction is seventy five to twenty five percent that Muller wins are at this guy
I don't even know why this rosensweig is involved
then they asked if Trump could defy a court order and
That's all speculate what didn't they ask mr. Petitioner
If mr. Muller issues a subpoena
To try and force the president to testify in front of a federal grand jury
What potential damage might he do to the constitutional
You see ladies and gentlemen
The framers hoped that men of high virtue would serve in high office
But they felt that it was unlikely in many cases
So they created the appointments process and certain some certain people are elected and checks and balances and all the rest
The problem is this prosecutor has not checked or balanced
He's a cowboy
He's rogue, he doesn't have a function within our constitutional order
The supreme court was wrong in marzin and there be wrong now to intervene on the behalf of a special counsel
Against another branch of government the presidency. I'll be right back
Every time you go online
Your internet provider and advertising companies
Contract what you do and sell your personal information. Please listen to this
it's very very important because I've got a solution for you and
You know the NSA is gobbling up information everywhere
So how do you actually protect yourself?
Now computer experts recommend using a VPN. Well, that's nice. What does that mean?
Well the software I use is called Express VPN
Which makes it super easy for anyone to stay private on line
protect your privacy from all comers
They're rated the number one VPN server by TechRadar. Now these days I don't use the internet without
Express
VPN expressvpn
apps take just minutes to set up and
Afterwards they run seamlessly in the background of my computer and smartphone
You install the program then turn on expressvpn
Protection with a single click folks it couldn't be easier and it couldn't be more important
expressvpn
secures and
Make sure your anonymous
Through the internet through data encryption and hiding your IP address. That means nobody. Hello
Nobody can record our access your online activity. So if you want to protect yourself from hackers
spy agencies and your ISP
visit
expressvpn
Comm slash mark, that's expressvpn
Comm slash mark, and by the way
Get their special offer right now three months free with a one-year package
now when I get a new sponsor
They get offer discounts like this and it's important to jump in right away plus look at the service. It's a great product
don't risk your online data any longer visit Xpress e XP are
ESS expressvpn
Comm slash mark right away
When when I talk to this sponsor I spoke to this the folks who founded this company. It was very very exciting names, dan
and
I said this is the perfect product and
Service for me and my audience it really is
expressvpn
Dot-com
mark
alright now when we return
For our third hour. I hope you'll stay with us. I want to talk a little bit about what happened
in the manor free courtroom today
The juries had a number of questions not a ton but a number
That I thought were fascinating not to predict an outcome. I'd be foolish to do that anybody would
But they weren't really clear about a few terms
Especially one that grabbed my attention
I'll be right back
He's here now
Broadcasting come from the underground command post deep in the bowels of a hidden bunker somewhere under the brick and steel of a
Nondescript building we once again made contact with our leader
Hello everybody mark Levin here are number eight
77381 three eight one one eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one during the
First day of jury proceedings that lasted six or seven hours or so
The jury asked a couple of questions of the court
Including what is a shelf company and a few other technical terms now?
This isn't the question that
Particularly drew my attention, but still they're asking questions like that
That means the prosecution didn't explain these technical terms or some of them
And apparently that phrase was used repeatedly
again, I I'm just giving you a sense you're sitting in a jury room and these you're asking these things and the
Prosecution has to prove its case
Beyond a reasonable doubt and each one of the charges now. They threw a zillion charges at Manafort
So they're hoping they get one two three something
or all of them
They asked other questions
They said to the court
Can you help us organize the evidence as the evidence the documentary evidence applies to each one of the charges?
Can you help us put it in order court said no, you have to do that. We don't do that. We can't do that
That's interesting
Maybe they're overwhelmed
Maybe there was too much thrown at them
Then they asked the judge and here's the one that got my attention
To define reasonable doubt
What's meant by reasonable doubt
And the prosecution and the defense counsel apparently agreed and the judge said
Well, it doesn't mean there's no possibility whatsoever
It's something less than that
What's reasonable doubt
So they're not I
Guess the defense counsel was rather pleased today because they didn't just say, okay. Let's sit down guilty guilty guilty of those
What's this phrase mean? And what's this phrase mean? And
what does reasonable doubt mean and
You know, can you help us take whatever information we're supposed to take and apply to a particular charge
You know, these are really straightforward charges, but it can get complicated
Bank fraud and tax fraud
Now here's the truth what usually happens in a case like this
Is there isn't a case like this
Because the first thing that usually occurs in this process is there is an extensive IRS audit
It could go on for years
The IRS sits down with your accountants your accountants go through everything the IRS
issues their own
investigative subpoenas, they gather information
whether it's on wires or whatever it is, why are moving of money and so forth and so on and
And it can go in various directions
But typically it doesn't go straight in to a criminal prosecution
Like this
I'm just telling you the truth
There are criminal prosecutions in tax cases a bank fraud cases. That's quite obvious
But typically it's not the first shoe to drop
And I'll give you further evidence of that remember
The FBI was aware of a number of these foreign bank accounts
In 2015 and 2016. That's just two and three years ago
During the course of another investigation they aware them they asked about them and they moved on
They moved on
Now that's pretty remarkable, isn't it?
If in fact you're talking about these massive sums of money
ripping off the American
Government and the federal treasury and so far. Why would they just move on?
Why would they slow down and say you know what let's really dig into that but they didn't really dig into that
It's almost as if they dusted off this old matter
They decided to make a
bigger push on it
Because of who Manafort us again, I'm no special Pleader ladies and gentlemen, these Gilley's guilty, but that's not my point
And you could tell the judge from day one wasn't really happy about this case like why you're focused on this guy
You're the special counsel
obviously you wanna you want to beat him down and and keep something else in mind if they get a conviction on one count to
Count 10 count whatever it is
They're still gonna go back the prosecutor and say I give us something
It maybe will we'll fight to reduce the sentence you can still plea you know
That is in terms of your sentence you can still cut a deal
And then you have the other trial hanging over man afraid in Washington DC
in front of a liberal Obama judge, so they're thrilled about that the prosecutors but what I said earlier was this
Again maybe they'll get a conviction on all counts. That's not my point. What I said was this
this was a sloppy prosecution a
Very sloppy prosecution if in fact the documents are enough to convict as
The prosecution said in its closing argument yesterday
Plus if you have witnesses accountants
Bank officials bank employees and so forth. Why would you put gates on the stand?
You knew Gates was gonna be filleted you knew he was gonna be hammered
You know, he's a serial liar and he's a crook even cheated Manafort his friend and his boss
You know, he's a reprobate who has no character
And my buddy Andy McCarthy points out another thing with respect to this guy what he says
They were charging
gates with counts that added up to over a hundred years in prison and
the deal they cut with Gates's effective to relatively minor counts a
Maximum potential of ten years in prison with a likelihood of serving no time
You go from a hundred years to zero. Well, that should raise eyebrows. You're that desperate to have this witness is
That equal justice ladies and gentlemen, no
And
Yet defense counsel
Shoot him up pretty well. Really I
think I
Wasn't there every day? I didn't hear every argument wasn't there any day?
so again, I'm reading the the news accounts some of which are better than others and
You don't get a sense of how the jury reacted, you know not being in the courthouse
But it's very interesting to me that the jury comes back with a number of technical questions, well, what does this mean
What does this mean? Well these shelf corporations. I
Won't say that was the heart of the case
But it was certainly significant
You're setting up these companies in order to they argue launder money through them overseas
What's a shelf corporation
And what's
reasonable doubt and
How do we match up all this evidence with?
With the various charter, how do we make sure this evidence applies to this charge in this charge and so forth and so on?
So, I don't know what to make of this other than
and
Again, we don't know but if you're the prosecution you have to be a little nervous of your defense counsel
You have to be not happy, but you have to be somewhat
pleased
Because it's up to the government to make the case the government has to make the case
It's not up to the defense to make the case
The government has to make the case that this guy committed these serial crimes. He did it with intent and
the test is
Reasonable doubt
Reasonable doubt that's the test. I'll be right back
40 minutes or so left in the program. I want to get to Elizabeth Warren's proposal
among other things
Before we leave the show, but again Aretha Franklin passed away today
one of my favorites
But there will never be another Aretha Franklin. You can't say that about a lot of people but that is true
and
That voice can never be matched can never be matched by anybody just can't
Alright I must forget where I was here what my place is
Elizabeth Warren, she's gonna introduce the accountable capitalism act
Now on a radical
socialist
wants to introduce the accountable capitalism Act
You better worry and worry a lot. Whatever happened to the accountable government Act
This is from the Washington Examiner
Senator Elizabeth Warren will introduce legislation aimed at making the nation's largest companies accountable to employees and their local communities
Not just shareholders
Excuse me
You're not a company is folks it is a legal
Creation
That is run by individuals
Where individuals work and under individuals invest in the company
It's about property rights. It's about entrepreneurship
It's about wealth creation. It's about commerce and trade
Government has no role whatsoever
Accountability
to your community
Tell me when's the last time the IRS was held to account to your community
When's the last time the Department of Agriculture was held to account to your community?
When's the last time the Department of Housing and Urban Development was held to account?
To your community and go through all the departments and agencies
So we're now going to through the back door
through populist propaganda nationalize big chunks of the private sector
That shift she wrote at The Wall Street Journal had a tremendous effect on the economy
Because she says companies in the late twentieth century started operating away that made them slaves to shareholders
now do any of you have a private pension any of you have
Mutual funds of 401k and IRA, mr. Producer you have anything
You have a 401 are you a multi millionaire billionaire
No
You got a wife and two kids and you have to break your back to earn a living in New York, don't you?
And so does your wife then you put a little bit of money away in a in a private pension plan, right?
And those private pension plans invest in companies
So when you retire you'll have more money
Capitalism already redistribute wealth capitalism already attracts investment
Capitalism is for all the people
Rich poor middle class we can use all the Marxist
propaganda
But your rights the shift has had a tremendous effect on the economy in the early
1980s large American companies sent less than half their earnings to shareholders spending the rest on their employees and other priorities
Employees and other priorities
Companies need to hire people
in order to make profits that's a priority and
You want to make a profit in order to attract?
voluntary
capital investment but between
2007 and 2016 large American companies dedicated
93% of their earnings to shareholders. Where does that come from?
But even if they do you're a shareholder if you have a 401k or an IRA
If you have any kind of pension whatsoever, you're a shareholder you the American people who the hell else is a shareholder
I'll be right back
Americus mentor of
Conservatism call now at eight seven seven three eight one three eight watt one now. Let's not
Speed by this Elizabeth Warren says to give employees communities and other stakeholders a leg up
Her bill would require companies with more than 1 billion dollars in annual revenue to obtain a federal corporate charter
So now
in order to function you
Would need a federal corporate charter
That charter would require corporate directors to quote consider the interests of all major corporate stakeholders
Not only shareholders and company decisions
Shareholders could sue if they believe directors weren't fulfilling those obligations
her bill would also let employees elect at least 40% of the company's directors and at least
75% of the rector's and shareholders would have to sign off on decisions to spend money on politics. I
Thought we lived in America I thought if you start a business and you start a company
It becomes wildly successful and you ploy all kinds of people and provide products and services that people want that's a good thing
But apparently it's not good enough for
The past 30 years she wrote we've put the American stamp of approval on giant corporation. No, no. No we haven't
We've put the American stamp of approval on massive government
She writes even as they have ignored the interests of all but a tiny slice of Americans
We should insist on a new deal
This of course would be a pickaxe at the heart of capitalism
We're now the federal government
Politicians and bureaucrats would substitute their priorities their personal policy
decisions
for that of a private institution
And the funny thing about these big companies any of us can own a piece of them any of us can invest in them
Any of us?
That's why a mutual funds that's why you have your 401k or your IRA or whatever it is
The government can't even keep track of its own money waste over 125 billion dollars a year the government
Stall all the money out of the Social Security and Medicare trust funds stall all the money out of the Highway Trust Fund
the government lies on its books
about the actual state of the government's finances all unfunded liabilities are not shown on the government's
in the government's documents
And
Now it's not enough to tax the companies. It's not enough to regulate the companies
It's not enough to have IRS agents in these companies and they are full-time
It's not enough to have the EEOC and OSHA and you name it and that's just the feds. He got the states to
Warren who has absolutely no experience running anything
Has had an abstract idea
This is
redistribution of wealth
She would take the assets and resources of a corporation and say okay
You got to give to the community. Well, what does that mean?
it means whenever the Democrats control Congress and the presidency they will have a
Say in how these companies run themselves
This is absolutely frightening and every day and every night they come up with one cockamamie idea after another
One cockamamie idea after another
We've created the wealthiest nation on the face of the earth not just for the richest among us but for all of us
And look what they caught the accountable capitalism act
Capitalism is nothing more
Than individuals making decisions
About how they want to live that's it
What you want to become how much you hope to make what you want to do with your money whether you want to save it
Or spend it. What do you want to spend it on? How do you want to save it?
What do you want to do with your resources? That's your money. That's capitalism. The individuals make the choice
She would substitute individual decision-making for her decision making because that's the bottom line
It's all centralized and they always do it in the populous name for the people for the people
I want to make sure the communities taken care of in the unions are dating given the employees are taking you and theirs
taken care of
All about government it's always about government
the accountable capitalism act
the very reprobates
Who run for office and get elected the politicians?
The bureaucrats don't have enough power
but they get more and then when you have a
An issue that has to be decided all of a sudden you gotta go into federal court
They want to drag the private sector into their hell
and
where is the constitutional basis for this can anybody tell us where is the
Constitutional basis for this is it anywhere?
Where is the authority for this?
Well, it doesn't exist, but they don't care they don't care
You know, I enjoy helping my listeners like Nathaniel who owe the IRS tens of thousands in back taxes
He told the IRS. He didn't have the money to pay. It didn't matter
They put a lien on his home anyway and Nathaniel heard how much I respect Optima tax relief. So we engage them
Optima got the IRS to designate Nathaniel's case as
Cnc. That is currently not collectible
It's a big win because it basically says no use pursuing our client. There's nothing to be gained here
Optima kept fighting on the Thanos behalf until the IRS agreed to a deal that saved in thousands and resolved this tax debt for good
Optoma knows that behind every tax problem are honest hardworking Americans with families home savings and paychecks that need protection
They've resolved over a half a billion dollars in tax for their clients
If you owe back taxes to the IRS call my friends at Optima tax relief eight hundred four nine nine
sixty three hundred eight hundred four nine nine sixty three hundred
That's eight hundred four. Ninety. Nine sixty three hundred now
There's one other issue I wanted to get to it doesn't it
Doesn't arise seamlessly into these other issues. I've been discussing but it doesn't matter I
Want you to listen to this?
This is from AFP the French press agency
Chinese bombers likely training for US strikes according to the Pentagon
Nobody is focused on what China is doing
More than I whether it's on life liberty and Levin on Fox
Levin TV on CR TV or behind this microphone on Westwood One
Chinese bombers are likely training for strikes against American and allied targets in the Pacific
According to a new Pentagon report that also details how Beijing is transforming its ground forces to fight and win
The annual report to Congress released today highlights. China's growing military economic and diplomatic clout and
how Beijing is leveraging this to rapidly build its international footprint and
Establish regional dominance in the case of China's air, by the way
Was this covered on CNN or anywhere else on MSNBC?
John Brennan and his security egg and shovels dam security clearance. How about they face a focus on real news?
The annual report that Congress released today highlights China's growing military
economic and diplomatic cloud and how Beijing is leveraging this to rapidly bill its
International footprint and established regional dominance in the case of China's air power the report states that Chinese bombers are developing
Capabilities to hit targets as far from China as possible
Over the last three years the People's Liberation Army the PLA. Yeah, right
The People's raishin army has rapidly expanded its overwater bomber
Operating areas gaining experience in critical maritime regions and likely training for strikes against u.s
And allied targets the document states noting how China is pushing its operations out into the Pacific
In August 2017. That's a year ago six Chinese
h6k bombers
Flew through them Miyoko straight in the southwest of the Japanese islands
and then for the first time turned north to fly east of Okinawa where
47,000 US troops are based
the PLA may demonstrate the capability to strike us and allied forces and military bases in the western Pacific Ocean including
Guam which is an American territory. Those are American citizens
And my great-uncle fought there during World War two
The report says
largest ground force China is engaged in a decades-long build-up and
modernization of its once backward Armed Forces and military leaders have set a goal of filling a world-class military by
2050
President Gigi ping last year ordered the PLA to step up efforts saying China needed a military ready to fight and win wars
The call has alarmed China's neighbors
Several of whom are embroiled in tense border disputes with the superpower
See now China's a superpower wasn't a superpower five years ago
According to the Pentagon the PLA in April 2017 undertook a massive transformation of
Operational tactical units as part of its structural reforms with nearly 1 million troops
The PLA is the largest standing Ground Force in the world
The report notes that the purpose of these reforms is to create a more mobile
Modular lethal ground force capable of being the core of joint operations
And able to meet GG pings directive to fight and win wars
China's military budget for 2017 was about
190 billion dollars according to the report far behind the Pentagon's annual budget of about
$700 now, that is an absurd comparison
Their soldiers are conscripts. They're not volunteers for the most part. They pay them nothing
They pay their families nothing they have minimal health care
That I'll go on when the Pentagon released its annual report last year Beijing dismissed it as irresponsible and
predicting that China would expand its global military presence by building overseas bases in countries, like
Pakistan
This year's report reiterates that China will seek to establish new bases in countries such as Pakistan
key to this expanding footprint is
China's belt and road initiative that seeks the bolster ties with other nations through LEED lending and
infrastructure deals
The document also shines a light on China's ongoing military preparations for a contingency in the Taiwan Strait. You know what that means?
They intend to invade Taiwan
Officially China advocates for a peaceful reunification with Taiwan, but it has never repudiated the use of military force the document notes
the PLA also is likely preparing for a contingency to unify Taiwan with China by force by
simultaneously deterring delaying and denying any third party intervention on Taiwan's behalf at States and
should the United States intervene China would try to delay effective intervention and seek victory and a
high-intensity limited war of short duration
In other words quick and hard everything they have fast
To the ire of regional neighbors China has built a series of eyelets as you know
And ocean features in the military facilities in the South China Sea
Beijing has now stopped substantial land reclamation doesn't have to it's built the basis
However, it continued to build infrastructure at these
outposts the report says
CNN reporting on this MSNBC reporting on this
Anybody really covering this on a regular basis
You know what this is
World War three
World War three
one day
And I want to remember what I'm saying
our media focused on stormy Daniels
stormy Daniels lawyer Omarosa
The pulled security clearance from the miscreant Brennan
focused on trying to take down a
Commander-in-chief who's knows about this who's put men around him and women around him who are concerned about this Pompeo
bolton nikki Haley mattes
I'm trying to distract him and burden him and make his job impossible
This clown over there at the Washington Post is exactly what I mean
When I say that Muller
Has done more damage and will do more damage to our republic in our Constitution than Russia
That's exactly what Abraham Lincoln meant Thomas Jefferson met Joseph's story men and so many more
that if we are to be defeated we will be defeated from within and
The propaganda wing of those who will defeat us will be the Washington Post among others. I'll be right back
Here we go again this time turns out that an identity protection company whose name you're mighty familiar with
Hasn't been so careful of protecting the email addresses of their customers and many were compromised
Please hear me
The only only identity company that I trust to protect my family and me is my ID care
You really need to take this stuff. Seriously. If you have credit cards to online banking banking or even use email you're vulnerable
I don't worry anymore because I switched my identity protection to the guys who've been protecting fortune 500 companies for years
my ID care
You can get their stellar protection - at my ID care.com slash mark my ID
Care.com slash mark, if you do that, you'll also get 15% off just enter promo code mark, that's a promo code mark
So that's my ID care.com slash mark promo code mark now I'm proud to partner with my ID care
They're the best
They take great care of their customers and our data and they take it very very seriously and they cover us for the nine types
Of identity theft for less than ten bucks a month
My ID care can even help if you're already a victim if you're already a victim
So learn more and then let my ID care take care of you and your family
The way they take care of me and my family
My ID
care.com
mark promo code mark my ID care.com
mark promo code mark for
15% off
Alright
Let's go - there was one here Paul, San Antonio, Texas Sirius satellite go. I
Just wanted to great. I think you for taking my call great show on Sunday. I found it hard to believe that dr. Pillsbury
Said that they didn't know anything about China didn't realize that they were trying to take us over
militarily because
Back in the late 90s when I was in school. I went to military school and we were learning
That's let's let's slow down a second. They knew that they just had a different approach a different doctrine
they were trying to engage them trying to get them hooked on the
Capitalism and things of that sort and then they realized there was a terrible mistake. All right, go ahead
and
The things they said we had a Chinese teacher that taught us that China was trying to take us over
Militarily that they had a plan to build, you know
its plans for aircraft carrier
Starting then that would be ready in 10 to 15 years and lo and behold they have an aircraft carrier 2 now
So that was interesting what he said that they weren't really
Sixteen to me that he said that they were concerned as much with China and they know you want you want to read his book
Because as I say he lays it out
But they were trying they taught they were trying to engage with China
They started it with Nixon and so forth and so on. Anyway, what else do you have?
Interesting, all right buddy, appreciate your call. Thank you
Vinnie
Charleston South Carolina on the mark live a nap go
Hey, Mark, how are ya? Okay, how are you? Good good appreciate you so much. Hey
Listen, I was just early on when the notion was floated about a subpoena being issued by Muller to president Trump
Fox had someone on a guest attorney who recommended that he do nothing more than absolutely ignore it
There's nothing they could do. They can't hold them in contempt like oh no, no. No, that's not true
they can go to a federal judge and
seek contempt
But he can't be prosecuted right because he's the president so I think that's what that was
The this has been my position from day one
Don't even I mean they'll need to decide for themselves
They can claim executive privilege or just say no we're not going to do that and a judge can issue a contempt order
But they have to play it out. The lawyers have to play it out
Look at the different options that are available to consider how it'll play out
We'll be back tomorrow more this and more of that
We salute all you heroes out there and I'll see you tomorrow and enjoy Levin TV tonight
You
For more infomation >> Trump To Make The 'Biggest Change To The Legal Immigration System In Decades' 20 MILLION AFFECTED - Duration: 5:26. 
For more infomation >> Trump Administration Unveils New Plan To Reduce Risk Of Forest Fires - Duration: 1:25. 
For more infomation >> Cuomo Brothers Get Wiped Out After Trump Puts Them On FULL BLAST - Duration: 2:36. 
For more infomation >> Trump Expels Obama Swamp Slug, And He's About Get Rid Of 8 More - Duration: 3:35. 
For more infomation >> John Brennan just threatened Trump with bold response to his security clearance revocation - Duration: 2:05. 
For more infomation >> Trump Expels Obama Swamp Slug, And He's About Get Rid Of 8 More - Duration: 3:46. 
For more infomation >> Pres Trump Launches A Full-Scale Attack On Brennan & His Fellow Swamp Minions - Duration: 3:21. 
No comments:
Post a Comment