Thursday, August 16, 2018

Trump news on Youtube Aug 17 2018

Trump Just Achieved Major Victory Days After Omarosa Started Slanderous Attack – CONGRATS

I have been involved with politics for a long time.

In all that time I have never seen a politician come out on top the way that President Trump

does time after time after time.

No matter what is thrown at him, Trump bounces back and Americans seem to love him more and

more for it.

He's a fighter and that is quintessentially American.

Trump has brought tons of jobs back to America and has dropped the unemployment number to

record lows.

There are literally more jobs than workers out there these days it seems.

I can't remember since Ronald Reagan when that happened.

Trump's approval rating among black voters has risen to 36 percent in a recent Rasmussen

poll.

The number seems totally unaffected by allegations of racism from former White House staffer

Omarosa Manigault Newman.

In fact, she seems to be helping Trump's numbers.

That's got to just enrage her and the left.

Teflon Don strikes again and is having the last laugh once more.

That's up from the 29 percent reported by Rasmussen two weeks ago.

A year ago, that number stood at 19 percent.

I detect a trend and it's a good one for 2020.

This daily tracking poll was released on Aug. 15th.

It seems to indicate that black Americans aren't fooled by Omarosa's slanderous

allegations of racism on the part of the president.

Congratulations are in order for the president as this is a major victory over efforts by

the left and the media to take President Trump down.

It's not working at all.

From The Epoch Times:

"Among other things, Manigault Newman accused Trump of using a racial slur during the production

of his reality television show "The Apprentice," on which she used to work with Trump.

The president, the White House, and multiple insiders have denied the claims.

"Trump's pitch to black Americans has centered around the promise of jobs.

Partly due to Trump cutting taxes and eliminating regulations, the economy has been on a roll,

with unemployment among blacks hovering around historical lows, a fact the administration

has repeatedly highlighted.

"'Since Election Day 2016, we have created 3.8 million new jobs.

Unemployment for African-Americans, Hispanic-Americans, and Asian-Americans has reached an all-time

low.

America is back!"

Vice President Mike Pence wrote on Twitter on Aug. 3

"A Yougov poll from Aug. 11-13 showed Trump's approval rating at 8 percent among blacks,

up from 3 percent on Aug. 9.

That result, however, wasn't filtered down to likely voters.

Among all registered voters, the approval was 45 percent in its latest poll.

"Overall approval of Trump among likely voters remained steady at 49 percent, marking

a slight increase from numbers around 46 percent in July."

Unemployment for Hispanic workers in the United States has fallen to a new record-low rate

of 4.5 percent in July, surpassing the record 4.6 percent set just a month earlier.

The overall unemployment rate dropped to 3.9 percent from 4 percent in June, the Bureau

of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported.

Asian unemployment dropped to 3.1 percent while black unemployment, still hovering around

historical lows, increased slightly to 6.6 percent.

All of this portends an even bigger landslide for President Trump in the next presidential

election if things keep heading in this direction.

And yet even with the statistics speaking for themselves, the media is twisting this

as the very opposite of what it is.

USA Today, for instance, a couple of days ago claimed that the Trump-Omarosa feud was

'deepening the wedge with black voters ahead of midterms'.

What the media is proclaiming and what is reality seem to be two very different things

here.

I contend this is the way it is for most Americans and President Trump.

They are watching what the president does and what his results are.

Voters are no longer listening to the mainstream media and they have long ago ceased to trust

them.

Omarosa notwithstanding, there is no evidence that President Trump is racist.

None at all.

Trump is known to be friends with countless people from many backgrounds, and even prominent

civil rights figures such as Jesse Jackson praised Trump before he announced that he

was running for president.

Perception is reality and Americans perceive that Trump is not a racist.

From the Conservative Tribune:

"Even a poll conducted by the NAACP — one of the most well-known black liberal groups

in America — revealed that while there's still a long way to go, Trump is faring much

better with the black community than many of his Republican predecessors.

"That poll put Trump's support among black Americans at 21 percent.

No, it doesn't seem very high … but when you consider how low past Republicans have

fared with minorities, it looks downright magnificent.

"It's also bad news for Democrats.

The left has long relied on black Americans voting blue at the polls, and if that demographic

continues to walk away from liberal politicians, the ability of Democrats to win future elections

is in serious jeopardy.

"'The Democrats heavily depend on 90-plus-percent turnout and 90-plus-percent support for Democrats

among African-Americans.

If that level of support falls to 71%, the game is more or less over," explained American

Thinker.

"If black voters begin to vote Republican in higher numbers or simply stay home on election

day, the numbers say that Democrats just can't win.

"The NAACP poll putting black opposition to Trump at 79 percent brings the left precariously

close to that tipping point — and other polls show the president doing even better

with blacks.

"'(Donald Trump's) approval ratings among black voters: 29%," stated Rasmussen Reports,

a respected polling group, a week ago.

"This time last year: 15%."

"That suggests that black opposition to Trump is right at 71 percent … yes, exactly

at the "tipping point" beyond which Democrats cannot win future presidential elections.

And Trump keeps doing better with blacks, not worse."

Looking at those numbers economically, I'd say Trump will get another four years and

the Democrats are basically doomed in the next election.

Victory will be very sweet while the left continues to scream "Racism!" in the background,

Trump will go on to serve yet another term and continue to help make America great again.

Good times.

For more infomation >> Trump Just Achieved Major Victory Days After Omarosa Started Slanderous Attack – CONGRATS - Duration: 6:16.

-------------------------------------------

Boston Globe Participates In Coordinated Editorial About Trump's Attacks On Media - Duration: 0:25.

For more infomation >> Boston Globe Participates In Coordinated Editorial About Trump's Attacks On Media - Duration: 0:25.

-------------------------------------------

Brennan hits back at Trump in NYT op-ed - Duration: 1:21.

Former CIA Director John Brennan fired back at President Donald

Trump for revoking his security clearance in an op-ed published

Thursday in The New York Times. In it, Brennan said the

president's decision was "politically motivated" and "an

attempt to scare into silence others who might dare to

challenge him." Brennan also wrote that Trump's repeated

claim about there being no collusion between his campaign

and Russia is "hogwash." The former head of the CIA has been

a very vocal critic of President Trump, often responding to the

president on Twitter. In a statement relayed by White House

press secretary Sarah Sanders on Wednesday, Trump said Brennan

had "leveraged" his security clearance to make "wild

outbursts" about the administration. Trump also said

Brennan — who served as CIA director from 2013 to 2017 —

"has a history that calls into question his objectivity and

credibility." However, in an interview with the Wall Street

Journal on Wednesday, the president said the ongoing

investigation into possible Russia collusion in the 2016

election was the reason behind his decision to revoke Brennan's

clearance. He said, "I call it the rigged witch hunt, it is a

sham. And these people led it. ... So I think it's something

that had to be done." The White House is still considering

revoking security clearances for a number of other former

intelligence officials, most of whom have also been critical of

President Trump.

For more infomation >> Brennan hits back at Trump in NYT op-ed - Duration: 1:21.

-------------------------------------------

Diyarbakır'lı Mikrogirişimci Kadınlardan Trump'a Terlikli Tepki :) - Duration: 0:14.

For more infomation >> Diyarbakır'lı Mikrogirişimci Kadınlardan Trump'a Terlikli Tepki :) - Duration: 0:14.

-------------------------------------------

HKYTV ★Huh Kyung young and Donald Trump are similar(허경영과 트럼프는 닮은꼴) - Duration: 7:03.

Play what I once predicted about Trump.

Trump was last among 16 Republicans when he ran into presidential election.

But mbn called me. They said Trump is crazy and similar to me.

When Trump was last among 16 Republican candidates,

Then I told him that if Trump becomes president, America's economy will survive. Trump is the U.S. hope and icon.

I said this then.

I told you on September 24, 2015. .

If he becomes president of the United States, the U.S. economy will be activated.

Stop. Hang up. Change the screen.

What this means is that the Trump is America's icons.

If that person becomes president of the United States, the American economy lives. There are many jobs in the U.S. right now, so the economy is at its biggest boom in 45 years.

Although I, Huh Kyung young have an excellent prophecy for future, I'm sure I can see people exactly.

Those papers boasted a lot of Trump's.

'Trump 380 trillion won in investment in the U.S. So Apple...

Apple is investing so much.

So after Trump becomes president, America grows rapidly.

Am I right? So you have to know that what I say is absolutely correct.

My prediction was correct, but our country's economists downplayed Trump.

What kind of president would he be?

When I said that Trump would be president, the announcer of our country's broadcasting station laughed at me.

She laughed at me.

If I become president, Korea's economy will be number one in the world.

.

The three biggest indicators of the economy are growth, inflation and employment.

Trump has succeeded in all three of these. .

How many years ago was this? Before Trump became president, I told him in 2015.

This woman is from an announcer at KBS.

She is in the mbn.

This is that anchor.

This woman anchor looks smart, doesn't it? This woman anchor and I discussed.

I mean, there's a fight.

So she didn't believe what I said.

She's staring at me strangely.

Let's hear what she's saying. .

"Why do we send our precious soldiers overseas? "This is a loss," said Trump.

It may be a little inconvenient for you to hear, but the your commitment is way over the top.

They say

And there are some people who share common points between you and Trump in terms of showmanship.

We'd like to hear what the Trump you're evaluating is like.

.

As we prepare for it, you have become the star of the craze for every presidential election.

Right.

Whenever the presidential election hold, Huh Kyung young became a hotshot.

But then I looked at myself in a strange way. There was a craze and people thought I was crazy.

.

It's too bright for people to see.

But You'll see you later. .

He is the star of the craze for the presidential election. It's a good showmanship.

All I have to say is people stare at me.

When I sing, little kids and adults look at me.

What you should know is that the anti-fans are fans after all.

So if people call me crazy,

When I'm on TV, let's see what management is all about.

So they listen to me carefully.

So all who call me crazy in the next presidential election are changing.

.

Why? Because they felt like they wanted to cut off the fingers of the stamp on the politicians.

Therefore, people now think that we should listen to Huh's words.

.

Let's hear him say that he is 100 percent accurate in his predictions.

This is why they put aside all kinds of things and listen to me.

Am I right? So I have a good showmanship.

I'm just attacking established politics.

Trump and I are alike.

It is a hollow pledge.

Is this a hollow promise? It was an exact promise.

In the U.S. gentlers point of view, Trump's promises were vain,

When it comes to business people and common people, getting a lot of jobs is a priority.

So Obama did have a justification and Trump chose utilitarianism(realism).

utilitarianism

I don't need any justification. America is hungry, too. Now I'm going to turn to pragmatism.

Am I right?

Trump must have watched me for about 10 years.(Joke)

Okay. Now...

Thus, at that time, the U.S. economy changed and the U.S. economy lived because of Trump.

If Trump becomes president, there will be no war on the Korean Peninsula.

.

I told you that if Hillary becomes president, there will be a war on the Korean Peninsula.

That's why Hillary has the money the defense industry is funded.

Trump doesn't accept the money.

The arms dealers said Trump is a madman.

So if Trump become president, it won't be war in the Korea.

For more infomation >> HKYTV ★Huh Kyung young and Donald Trump are similar(허경영과 트럼프는 닮은꼴) - Duration: 7:03.

-------------------------------------------

Omarosa releases new secret recording with Lara Trump - Duration: 2:36.

For more infomation >> Omarosa releases new secret recording with Lara Trump - Duration: 2:36.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Revokes Ex-Cia Director's Security Clearance - Duration: 1:40.

For more infomation >> Trump Revokes Ex-Cia Director's Security Clearance - Duration: 1:40.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump Criticizes Boston Globe After Coordinated Editorials - Duration: 0:58.

For more infomation >> President Trump Criticizes Boston Globe After Coordinated Editorials - Duration: 0:58.

-------------------------------------------

DOJ's Bruce Ohr is the 'lynchpin' in the Trump dossier: Chris Farrell - Duration: 7:03.

For more infomation >> DOJ's Bruce Ohr is the 'lynchpin' in the Trump dossier: Chris Farrell - Duration: 7:03.

-------------------------------------------

'She Was Given A Great Gift From God': President Trump Remembers Aretha Franklin - Duration: 0:51.

For more infomation >> 'She Was Given A Great Gift From God': President Trump Remembers Aretha Franklin - Duration: 0:51.

-------------------------------------------

SON'S MEETING IN TRUMP TOWER ARE "COMPLETE FABRICATION" - Duration: 12:26.

stay in Trump Tower meeting with the Russians was meant to get dirt on

Hillary but you know is that actually illegal and what would that legal

standard mean for Hillary Clinton and that dirty dossier we're going to debate

that coming up next and we have a lot more to get to including that crazy

story of the radical Muslims in New Mexico holding children against their

will starving them depriving them of water

what is going on with this story and why is it being under covered we'll get to

all of that and debate the Clinton and the dirty dossier issue coming up next

now you can argue all you want about whether the June 2016 Trump Tower

meeting between C campaign officials and Russian Nationals offering dirt on a

Hillary was appropriate but was it illegal Trump critics are losing it

after the president acknowledged the true intention of the meeting on Twitter

yesterday and MSNBC's Joe Scarborough thinks he knows exactly what this means

it's illegal to get information to get anything of worth from a foreign

national speaker it doesn't have to be cash there doesn't have to be an

exchange of cash for something of value anything of value that's called an

in-kind contribution and the law has always looked at that just as seriously

as they've looked at you know as they've looked at money exchanging hands Oh ciao

joining me now to discuss this former deputy Trump campaign manager Dave bossy

opinion contributor for the hill John Solomon and attorney Leo Terrell all

right bossy take it away Joe was definitively putting his legal skills to

work definitively declaring it is illegal to meet with a foreign national

who promises Oppo research wouldn't that call Hilary's behavior

that's about to say that's what the Clinton campaign did it did if there's

any collusion it's their campaign with with the steal fake Russian dossier and

paying steal through the State Department through other through other

places through the FBI look they they are the only ones the Clinton

campaign er the only ones that colluded during the campaign Don jr. did nothing

wrong there's nothing wrong here why did they get the story a little mixed up

there in the early days like it was it wasn't about that listen I didn't help

with a statement like yes if I tell you as a lawyer who did criminal defense

work this is what I tell my clients do not talk about your case

Seattle años tiene la boca do not talk talk about academe talk about other

things leave the legal stuff to me you cannot

litigate this in the press because the press hates you and you got 17 lawyers

on the other side who don't care about what you tweet so if I again cousins

gonna do it he's gonna do it he's really smart but in the legal realm it's a

different ballgame it's a different ballgame and I think he's he's caused

himself a world of pain and just heart not heartache but a headache because of

talking to the press John well I'm never gonna fucking yeah I don't want to never

discourage anyone talk to the press they should always talk to the press yeah but

listen where was my profession on this very law when the whole Hillary dossier

think was coming out you didn't see any stories of reporters looking at that law

saying it must apply here suddenly someone says it applies to Donald Trump

and everybody goes with the pack over here no one really good goes and talks

to lawyers I've talked to lawyers prosecutors there's a great column by

Jonathan Turley on the hill site tonight there's no chance that that meeting

violates he says that will read from a said if the Russians had evidence of

criminal conduct by Hillary Clinton her campaign or Family Foundation the Trump

campaign had every reason to want to know about it that's precisely what

Clinton's campaign spent millions to do talking to Russians and other foreigners

investigating Trump indeed under this interpretation of federal election laws

Clinton and her surrogates would be equally guilty in using a former foreign

spy to gather info on Trump from foreign sources including the Russians period

Leo Terrell your reaction to that well I'm glad you're a lawyer Laura and

you know the dog you know as well Donald Trump jr. better lawyer up because he

along with Jared said that meeting and I Got News for you that is good Speer

see that is illicit hey what's that crime it's fierce into the fraud the

election to the fraud the election their involvement says - give me the code

what's this I want to tell you right now you can talk to your right over your

colleague Judge Napolitano and Leo Terrell agrees there Donald Trump jr. is

in trouble mark my words on this and the WD the

Clin d'oeil CA clinton never met with any foreign nationals likeness you paid

your what I lost this thing so Leo number one you can't sign it is statute

okay I'll give you that I'll let you off the hook for that number two you're

saying if you use intermediaries to gather information from foreign sources

then you obviate from having any responsibility in any conspiracy really

because I think that would use your GPS Hillary and anyone else in the Justice

Department I knew about this who facilitated that means for action of the

dustman let me respond to my favorite talk show host I'm saying to have a

conspiracy we have a meeting of mine Jarrod Donald Trump jr. conspiracy law

remember today's date there is no minimize what Hillary call he's not here

are the only lawyers on this panel unfortunately this is where no

fortunately I'm recovering but again we have a situation where I agree on this

point don't litigate this stuff in the press

because politically people say a lot of things politically and they kind of they

come close to the true they don't because in the legal matter it might be

unwise as it as a legal PR strategy but it doesn't mean a crime was committed

that is holy day also uncovered you know they also on you over the text messages

from Jared Kushner to his assistants saying get me out of this meeting

staffed in five minutes so that's called exculpatory evidence I would hope that

you would say there's no conspiracy when people are trying to not be in a meeting

I think it's funny though and John maybe you'll respond to this this is on CNN I

think I was on like the treadmill this morning I'm watching

I I was almost at the Fred Flintstone thing and like fell off the treadmill

because I'm listening to this going wait a second which one of these is a lawyer

coming to this conclusion let's watch you me there are two big important

things here first of all the law which says that's a big one it's illegal to

take anything of value from someone for yeah that's that I feel that's an

open-and-shut case so completely over John I I said this many times on the

show on the entity show I don't recognize the profession I practice and

say there are so many reporters that just say things in the moment without a

basis for fact you have to have a law to violate it's create a conspiracy there's

no law that prohibits people from taking information if you extended this out one

of the lawyers I talked to today said well then it would have been against the

law for Barack Obama to have arranged all those foreign trips in 2008 to could

make himself look good on the America on the world stage before he got elected

president it wasn't designed to prohibit those sort of things it was designed to

prohibit the sort of things that the Clintons were doing in the nitro and

they're taking my China Donald Donald Trump jr. knew he was talking to aegis

of the Russian government remember that text I love it I love it remember that

text Laura so are you making the Joe Scarborough

you know f you know Edward Bennett Williams argument that this is an

in-kind contribution because if you make that argument then as Jonathan Turley

said it's the same liability criminal liability on Hillary Clinton for an

in-kind contribution that that she received from a foreign source she paid

for it but it doesn't matter it's a conspiracy to get the information I'm

saying to you attorney Ingram that the meeting of the minds a conspiracy

between of having that meeting you don't need to act itself they've met to get

dirt from a government meeting and that's what I'm talking about okay

okay Don juniors on a radio show today in the morrow and I asked him about I

asked him about this meeting let's listen to what he said it's sort of the

cycles of the media narrative right you know that the other stuff isn't sticking

so they're back now tomorrow they'll be back on the 25th amendment literally

nothing changed you know they don't talk about

sort of the genesis of that meeting and that these people were dealing with

using GPS before I guess that is a 20 minute meeting it ended up being you

know about essentially nothing that was relevant to any of these things and you

know that's all it is and that's all they've got and that is I guess the

ultimate distraction from what's really going on in this country which is you

have a Republican president a very conservative president is getting stuff

done one last comment one last comment Donald Trump a junior said that meeting

was about Russian adoption his dad threw him under the bus a day by saying that's

not true and Donald Trump jr. has a problem with

the Senate in it on TV all day long and it's wrong here's what happened okay

this woman pledged to give dirt on Hillary yes she did it that's the

president said however she was trying to push for a removal or or you know to

rescind the Magnitsky Act Putin Putin when the Magnitsky Act was passed which

put all the sanctions on the billionaires he said oh really

we're gonna stop all adoptions of Russians into the United States I have

two Russian sons I followed this very closely that's why she brought up she

said we'll get will give you the adoption if you guys get rid of the

magnets he's oh he's right of course she talked about the adoption that was true

they all died she also met with fusion GPS I believe the day before the meeting

out and the day after the meeting so this is part of a conspiracy of what

Hillary Clinton is doing now inside the way John Solomon I want to find out

maybe you can do the reporting on this why hasn't Muller interviewed vasila

it's kaya why haven't they brought this illness

gaya in why well we don't know that he hasn't that's one of the things my I

think no I think she offered to testify I don't believe she's been brought in

unless something new has happened last week be surprised if there's a lot of

information flowing to her to the press investigation has been going on for two

years and cost over 25 million dollars of taxpayer money and this is where we

are today talking about let me say there's Donald Trump Donald Donald Trump

you guys need to go immediately I'm not trying to cut you out but we're gonna go

we're gonna go to black and I'm gonna get in trouble but thank you is a great

panel they are the woman we're shortchanging

the women trumpeted by the left is rapidly

into the year of the radical we'll explain next remember back in 1992 they

called that the year the woman the Democrats did in the election and then

it was 2016 with Hillary was the year of the woman and now here we are again 2018

let's try a third time around is being called the year the woman by some in the

media and of course on the left but if you listen to high-profile female

Democrats including 2020 presidential candidates you know this next person is

running you'd be forgiven for thinking it's the year the radical just take a

look I am a Democratic Socialist Republicans are going to call us

socialists no matter what we do

so we might as well give them the real thing I have a problem guys with that

phrase identity politics when people say that it's a pejorative that phrase is

used to divide and it is used to distract its purpose is to minimize and

marginalize issues that impact all of us

you

For more infomation >> SON'S MEETING IN TRUMP TOWER ARE "COMPLETE FABRICATION" - Duration: 12:26.

-------------------------------------------

Donald Trump's Military Parade Could Feed Every Homeless Veteran for Almost 9 Months... - Duration: 4:10.

For more infomation >> Donald Trump's Military Parade Could Feed Every Homeless Veteran for Almost 9 Months... - Duration: 4:10.

-------------------------------------------

ALAN DERSHOWITZ "THE CASE AGAINST IMPEACHING TRUMP" AUTHOR - Duration: 18:14.

of the DNC it's a little bit of an awkward spot to be in because the DNC is

now reviewing these allegations of domestic abuse the committee's chairman

says he takes it very seriously that we downplayed the impact that this could

have heading into the midterms and you know Minnesota shaping up to be a

critical state in November and don't forget Sean Minnesota is still reeling

from the resignation of senator Al Franken just last year Sean Kristen

thank you for that report and joining us now with reaction to tonight's opening

monologue the author of another best-selling book the case against

impeaching Trump Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz by the way he has a

great book and criminal defense attorney David shone professor Dershowitz let me

begin with you I think that Sara's report tonight what are the firewalls

well I don't have any new information it sounds very nefarious and damning to

me well I have no idea that's why right from the beginning I've called for a

nonpartisan complete investigation by experts to all aspects of this whole

election we have to get to the bottom of this we have to have testimony that's

open to the public not behind closed doors of a grand jury

the American public is entitled to know what these things mean I have no idea

what these firewalls were referring to but it's certainly enough to open up

some kind of an investigation but can I comment just briefly on your opening

monologue you know I wrote a piece for the Boston Globe arguing that if the

president revokes the security clearance only of his critics that would raise a

serious First Amendment question it would be a close question because after

all he's not shutting them down these people can still say what they want and

criticize and they just don't have access to the material and if they don't

have access to the material if they're being in some way punished for their

expression of political views then I think you can have some First Amendment

issues that are raised I don't know how the case would come out it's similar in

some ways to a case that happened attorney of yet will do again I think

this way important yeah i CIA's rules in case of forward direction of directors

the agency holds their security clearance right

and renews it every five years for the rest of their lives however that

requires former CIA directors to behave like current CIA employees you cannot

make the case that mr. Brennan in any way is conducting himself like a current

CIA employee no I agree with that I agree with that the question is is this

being applied across the board to people and are they looking at everybody's

background piece went up to the Supreme Court it would be just like the case

involving the travel ban the court would ask the question are we allowed to look

at the motive of the president in doing this or do we just look at the action

the president clearly has the power to revoke security clearance but if he does

it for an impermissible purpose that couldn't be the basis for criminal

charges but it could be the basis for a constitutional violation I'm saying

argue that's probably a lot more to come under the First Amendment I think if we

apply the standard that I just read to you and you agree it's applicable yeah

um there's no ambiguity here he's not behaving like a currency a employee let

me go back to let me give you a just give you one quick hypothetical it's

quite hypothetical let's assume there was somebody who wasn't behaving like a

CIA director but was saying things positive about the president doesn't my

president didn't revoke his security clearance then we'd have a serious

question this is doing an immediate return to the information this is such

an egregious abuse you recognize it's not the common sense realizes no CIA

employee connect this way former director let me go to David David I want

to stay on this firewall issue and at firewalls plural I cannot imagine why

Christopher Steele is in contact 70 plus times at least that we know of would

Bruce or and that the things that they're talking about and the urgency

that he's he's expressing prior to commis testimony it's a shocking story

and as professor Dershowitz said from the start quite frankly on the special

counsel question the special counsel regulations provided and provide that

something short of a full investigation has spent the appointment of special

counsel is appropriate in the situation like this there has to be a full earring

it's not going to happen certainly from Mr Mol

on this question and the DOJ frankly right now has been missing in action so

I don't know who's gonna carefully look into this Sarah Carter has done a great

job reporting it but it has to be looked into I'm gonna jump back in to one other

question one other issue has professor Dershowitz recognized with all respect

as always with him the president certainly has the authority and the

exclusive authority on the question of Brennan's security clearance Brennan has

overstepped things here and by the way there's a history for this President

Obama isolated people whose views he didn't like or want to be associated

with like George Tenet like Paul Wolfowitz didn't include them in the

briefing it's true he stopped short of revoking their security clearance but

why does Brendan need the security clearance at this point he's misusing it

and he's abusing it I would argue that I think we're going to see probably more

people clapper should be next I believe Susan Rice with the whole list of people

Bruce or James Comey and on and I would argue that's all going to happen

professor I want to go the contacts though with Bruce or you don't find that

it's before the election well by the way one other thing

yeah House will have the former CIA director disseminating lies unverified

lies to the American people visa vie Harry Reid that's not the role of the

CIA professor that is a scary lightly and I think I know why he should be

criticized for it I know John Brennan I like him I thought he was a good

director of the CIA but I think he's gone overboard in his criticism and it

makes it sound when he makes criticism that he knows it because he was in the

CIA he has some special information and I think a former director of the CIA he

has to be much more discreet in his level of criticism having said that I do

think if the President and I security clearance only to his critics he will be

in court on the wrong side by the way I have a stand the ACLU will bring the

lawsuit because they will be awesome by the way against Donald Trump on the

security clearances has now said I'd put a Republican on the list that they were

incompetent or crazy well said we'll follow this in their argument

professor congratulations on the sex sick success of your book David Sean

always good to see you when we come we'll continue this discussion the great

one Mark Levin joins us that's next

and revoke of course the destroy Trump mainstream liberal media of course

extension of the Democratic Party at a complete meltdown let's take a look this

is without precedent in in modern American history I mean the security

clearances have never been used to punish people for speaking out this is

nothing short of extraordinary and we should all be scared about the state of

our democracy the president sent his White House press secretary out there

today to basically poop on the people from the press secretary podium and not

only threatened like they didn't just make a threat it was a promise they're

snatching John Brennan's national security clearance we begin tonight with

a chilling action taken by the presidents of the United States that

looks something like something you might see out of a dictate dictatorship or

authoritarian regime Trump is under fire for Nick Sounion enemies list tactics

those are the accusations of at least one former FBI official after the White

House is publicly admitting that it is retaliating against former CIA director

John Brennan joining us now is the host of CR TV's Levin TV the host of life

liberty Levin Sunday night right here on the Fox News Channel number one in a

slot I call on the great one Mark Levin mark we have never had a former

communist who literally we now know spread Russian

lies to this inform propagandize the American people to impact in a

presidential election either these are unprecedented times see if we can

unravel this from the fabulously stupid Omarosa media first of all apparently

the fact that Brennan voted for a Stalinist

who was funded by the Soviets the Communist Party USA was very attractive

to Barack Obama who made him CIA director think about that so how did

this man ever get a security clearance I'm curious about this now a couple of

things the president is looking at Brennan he revokes his security

clearance professor Dershowitz needs to know that's a privilege that's not a

right a secure privileged the fact of the matter is

nobody stopping Brennan from speaking fact nobody could stop he has a big

mouth he will never shut up he'll go on TV and be the kook that he is the idea

that he has a right to access to information because he served in the

Obama administration at the CIA is a preposterous argument but of course the

ACLU will take up the case because they take up a lot of stupid cases that's

number one number two who else is the president looking at Comey and people

who are keeping score Comey is a Republican how many times in the media

told us Mahler's a Republican comb is a Republican and even they questioned the

president okay you got a Republican and by the way for the media most of these

people that president are looking at are white I know that's very important to

you know Comey was fired at the recommendation of Rosenstein Comey was a

leaker and he absconded with government documents when he left his security

clearance should be pulled McCabe is under criminal investigation the number

two from the FBI never before in history media his security clearance should be

pulled Peter stroke was just fired the guy in

charge of counterintelligence investigations for misconduct his

security should be pulled James clapper committed perjury he lied to the

American people and Senator Wyden and that committee a long time ago his

security clearance should have been pulled Bruce or another one

pulled Yates another one not because the president has a problem with Democrats

or liberals here's a problem with these people and we haven't even gotten to the

unmasking issue yet so this is not a First Amendment issue meanwhile

meanwhile when these people had security clearances what the hell did they do

with them well let's take a look the russians interfered in our election

right well who was president who was head of the CIA who was national

security advisor who was the head of the FBI all these people with their security

clearances in positions of power did nothing effective to stop the Russians

from interfering in our election they did nothing to stop China from stealing

our technology they did nothing to stop North Korea's nuclear program and even

worse they awarded the aslam Oh hold it mark the tourist regime the

Tehran with a hundred and fifty billion dollars right with a hundred and fifty

billion dollars and provided them with a pathway to nuclear weapons good job boys

and girls in the Obama administration with your security clearances the fact

that Obama appointed these people and gave them security clearances is not the

obligation of this President to let them retain their security clearances there

is no constitutional issue that's just nonsense and again one of them's a

Republican so that makes this all okay mark I'd take away all their clearances

I'd take away all their clearances too but the fact of the matter is we really

need to focus in on the conduct of these individuals look at the phony media and

the arguments they're making this is like a dictatorship this is this is a

we've never seen anything like this before

all these blabbermouth who know nothing you're gonna see clapper on TV till you

throw up on your loafers you're gonna see Kony he had his book thing you're

gonna see Brennan all over the place all these phony victims and so forth and so

meanwhile when they were in office when they had their security clearances when

they had power they didn't stop the Russians they didn't stop the Red

Chinese they didn't stop the North Koreans they funded the Iranians and in

fact they are responsible for the greatest scandal in American history by

interfering with our election and trying to undermine the Trump campaign and the

Trump presidency they are gonna remember hold on mark and throw up what my

loafers but more importantly that's why we call you the great one great

commentary Mark Levin thank you don't forget Mark show Life Liberty Levin

every Sunday night 10:00 p.m. number one in its timeslot right here on

the Fox News Channel when we come back former CIA operative Daniel Hoffman well

he's been very outspoken in his criticism of John Brennan and Sebastian

korkut next hodgins officer Dan Hoffman and the

author of why we fight Fox News national security strategist sebastian cork up

both of you have been outspoken as it relates to brennan 35 years or so you

spend your life Dan Hoffman in in this type of business let's put it that way

yeah I always felt like John Brennan should take the Hippocratic oath of

respecting the privilege of holding security clearance and doing no harm to

our national security when he was enjoying his right to freedom of speech

and he did that tonight when he was speaking on MSNBC this isn't about

freedom of speech as as others have said on the show but let me tell you just

from my experience at CIA the concern that that I and I think others would

have is when foreign governments not to mention spies foreign spies stealing

secrets on our behalf here John Brennan making unsubstantiated claims that

Vladimir Putin could blackmail president Trump they think well John Brennan must

know something because after all he has a security clearance and that's why John

Brennan was causing a risking great collateral damage to our national

security well I think dr. korkor they want to

take all these people's security clearances call me strong spades the the

cave the whole bunch of them you know but this hack if you look at his he

tried to peddle lies to the American people in his role as director putting

aside with former directors must act as current CIA employees which he is not

doing so you know as a matter of protocol he's failed on every level how

did this guy even get a security clearance yeah you just stole my thunder

Sean issue number one John Brennan should never have had a security

clearance he admitted in 1980 when he joined the

CIA in a polygraph that he voted for the Communists at the height of the Cold War

when they wished to destroy us never should have had one i love alan

dershowitz but this is not a civil rights freedom of speech issue nobody

has the right to security clearance there's only one person who gets

peuta clearance automatically and guess who it is it's the president everybody

else it is a privilege of office Dan Hoffman

myself John Brennan we have all taken an oath of office I took it twice I took it

one I joined the Defense Department I took it when I joined the White House it

says you will protect the Constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic

and you will bear faith true faith and allegiance to the same

John Brennan has betrayed that oath of office and he has betrayed his

profession and the intelligence community every time he accuses the

president of treason with no evidence he is reprehensible and he has betrayed his

oath of office short it is that serious Daniel I and I agree dr. Gorka I why is

it to stick in my craw as CIA director that he literally perpetrated on the

American people spread misinformation firm ation by the way right out of

Pravda right at a you know former Soviet Union lies and propaganda misinforming

purposely the American people with unverified information that bothers me

as much as all that he's done after I mean I think that's a separate issue

frankly about the extent to which he politicized intelligence and involved

himself in politics I think he was the most political director in in my over my

career in the government of over 30 years but I guess that's to me it's it's

probably a separate issue this one is him abusing the privilege then he

enjoyed us for having a security clearance but also let's be clear the

clearance was designed so that he could go and help his successor I don't think

anyone's inviting him back and asking for his assistance at this time anyways

regardless I'm not sure yeah sorry good no that's go ahead dr. corker

John Brennan supported Moscow during the Cold War and he's still supporting the

Kremlin today that's who he is he's not the first person who should be stripped

of his clearance and there should be more to follow Sean I'd stripped the

whole bunch of them they're all corrupt they've all abused their power they've

all betrayed the American people with a political agenda and so many of them

tried to literally steal an election and influence an election in the United

States thank you both when we come back

Democrats continuing to embrace their far left radical socialism the right

back

you

For more infomation >> ALAN DERSHOWITZ "THE CASE AGAINST IMPEACHING TRUMP" AUTHOR - Duration: 18:14.

-------------------------------------------

Más de 350 periódicos se levantan contra Trump en EU 🔶| Narrame la Nota - Duration: 5:54.

For more infomation >> Más de 350 periódicos se levantan contra Trump en EU 🔶| Narrame la Nota - Duration: 5:54.

-------------------------------------------

Melania Trump « compte les minutes » jusqu'au divorce - Duration: 1:37.

For more infomation >> Melania Trump « compte les minutes » jusqu'au divorce - Duration: 1:37.

-------------------------------------------

After Omarosa Slanders Donald Trump, His Approval Rating Takes A Sharp Turn - Duration: 4:11.

For more infomation >> After Omarosa Slanders Donald Trump, His Approval Rating Takes A Sharp Turn - Duration: 4:11.

-------------------------------------------

JUST IN: SUPREME COURT BACKS TRUMP – HUGE CHANGE COMING FOR LIBERALS - Duration: 13:01.

JUST IN: SUPREME COURT BACKS TRUMP – HUGE CHANGE COMING FOR LIBERALS

They stole from the American people, but now swift justice is falling on the Supreme Court.

Most of the time, liberal judges have abused their power to oppose the President.

But in this recent, shocking story, an entire court is in deep water.

Seems like these judges had far too much power over how they spent their cash.

Perhaps you think he used taxpayer funds to rebuild a school.

Maybe help the underprivileged in the community.

No, he bought himself a $32,000 couch.

From Yahoo News:

A West Virginia Supreme Court justice facing a 23-count federal indictment was impeached

Monday for spending $363,000 on his office renovations — part of an extraordinary move

by lawmakers to consider putting the entire court on trial in the Senate…

But he was just the first.

Now all 4 justices have been impeached.

From The Hill:

The state lawmakers first voted to impeach Justice Allen Loughry on eight articles after

he spent $363,000 in renovations to his office, according to the network.

He was reportedly found to have lied to the House Finance Committee about having a $42,000

antique desk and computers, owned by the state, transferred to his home and used state vehicles

for his personal use.

Justice Robin Davis was impeached after using $500,000 for office renovations, the network

added.

It's rare that we hear about an entire court on the chopping block.

But that's just the kind of age we live in.

Once judges were held above reproach.

Sure, lawmakers might be corrupt, but not our judges!

Sadly, that's no longer the case.

This scandal was inevitable, given the West Virginia law.

The court was allowed to spend cash as they saw fit.

There were no rules or requirements.

Not even an approval process.

Gee, I wonder where they went wrong!

It's reasonable to think that a judge should renovate his office.

But $42k for a desk?

$32k for a couch?

Couldn't that money have gone to anything worthier?

We really can't be surprised to hear that the state wants to impeach the rest of the

court.

Imagine how long this abuse has been going on.

Probably years.

Thousands, maybe millions, of West Virginia tax dollars (and probably some federal) were

being wasted.

Perhaps this impeachment will go a long way in fixing the state's broken system.

And maybe a few more states—with wasteful practices–should follow suit.

Source: Yahoo News, The Hill

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends

and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> JUST IN: SUPREME COURT BACKS TRUMP – HUGE CHANGE COMING FOR LIBERALS - Duration: 13:01.

-------------------------------------------

HEADS ROLL DOJ OFFICIAL OUSTED, TRUMP EXPOSES DEEP STATE - Duration: 12:40.

HEADS ROLL DOJ OFFICIAL OUSTED, TRUMP EXPOSES DEEP STATE

The Deep State's war on Trump is heading toward a conclusion.

Anonymous leaks have fostered an environment where Americans believe the President himself

is under investigation.

But one new statement just crushed the Deep State's biggest lie about Trump and his

family.

America was rocked by a Washington Post report that special counsel Robert Mueller was investigating

Donald Trump for obstruction of justice.

The report was sourced to anonymous "officials" close to the investigation.

This was followed by a second Post story claiming Mueller was digging through the business dealings

of Trump's son-in-law and senior White House adviser Jared Kushner:

"Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III is investigating the finances and business dealings

of Jared Kushner, President Trump's son-in-law and adviser, as part of the investigation

into Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential election, according to U.S. officials familiar

with the matter…

… The Washington Post previously reported that investigators were scrutinizing meetings

that Kushner held with Russians in December — first with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak,

and then with Sergey Gorkov, the head of a state-owned Russian development bank.

At the time of that report, it was not clear that the FBI was investigating Kushner's

business dealings.

The officials who described the financial focus of the investigation spoke on the condition

of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly."

Leakers fed reporters stories that suggested Trump and his family were a collection of

corrupt criminals.

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein responded to these stories with a highly unusual statement

cautioning Americans not to believe stories based on anonymous officials.

Politico reports:

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein appeared to be taking issue with recent Washington

Post and New York Times stories that President Donald Trump himself is now the subject of

an obstruction of justice probe, as well as a separate new report from the Post that Mueller

is looking into White House senior adviser and Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner's finances.

Rosenstein's statement, though, mentioned none of the reports specifically.

Instead, he criticized articles that were attributed to unnamed officials.

"Americans should exercise caution before accepting as true any stories attributed to

anonymous 'officials,' particularly when they do not identify the country — let alone

the branch or agency of government — with which the alleged sources supposedly are affiliated,"

Rosenstein said.

"Americans should be skeptical about anonymous allegations.

The Department of Justice has a long-established policy to neither confirm nor deny such allegations."

This would not be the first time the Washington Post and other media outlets were caught running

fake news leaked to them by shadowy anti-Trump forces.

Previous reports about Comey asking for more resources for the Russia probe before being

fired, Rosenstein threatening to resign and Comey being prepared to contradict Trump's

claim he told him three times he was never under investigation were all proven to be

fake news.

The so-called "mainstream" media's poor track record of running stories that turn

out to be debunked, plus Rosenstein's statement, should caution every American not to believe

what they read in what Trump calls the "fake news media."

We will keep you up to date on any new developments in this story.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> HEADS ROLL DOJ OFFICIAL OUSTED, TRUMP EXPOSES DEEP STATE - Duration: 12:40.

-------------------------------------------

Robert Reich: Trump's Trade Wars - Duration: 3:14.

Trump has gotten America into a trade war with all our major trading partners.

He's put tariffs, which are essentially taxes, on what they sell to us.

And they've retaliated by putting tariffs on what we sell to them.

Trump's trade war is dumb and dangerous for 3 reasons:

First:

American companies make and sell things all around the world, employ people all over the

world, and are owned by investors all over the world.

At the same time, foreign companies are here, employing Americans, and exporting from the

United States.

BMW, a German company, is the biggest automobile exporter from the United States.

Second: Tariffs hurt American workers.

They drive up prices of inputs used by American workers to make all sorts of things – thereby

making our workers less competitive internationally.

Tariffs on steel hurt American workers who use steel in making cars, appliances, and

motorcycles.

Tariffs on chips, wires, and circuits hurt American workers who use them for making high-tech

products.

Tariffs also drive up the prices of goods bought by American consumers from all over

the world, reducing the purchasing power of American wages.

They're the equivalent of a wage cut.

And tariffs push foreign governments to raise tariffs on American exports, thereby making

American workers even less competitive.

Europe puts a retaliatory tariff on Harley-Davidson's motorcycle exports, and what happens?

Harley moved production to Europe.

The trade war that began in 1930 with the Smoot-Hawley tariff ended up worsening the

Great Depression.

Third: The best way to increase the competitiveness of American workers has nothing to do with

tariffs.

It's to invest in America.

Invest in the skills and know-how of our workers, starting with early-childhood education, through

better schools, access to world-class technical education, and access to college.

Also invest in future knowledge, through government support for basic research and development.

Invest in the infrastructure that links American workers to their jobs, to other American workers,

and to the global economy.

This means world-class roads, bridges, rapid transit, container ports, access to high-speed

Internet, and more.

Invest in the health of American workers through universal health care

But Trump and Republicans have been cutting all these investments.

Trade wars may make Trump feel tough, because he loves tests of his dominance.

But they hurt average working people.

[Trump's voice] "Absolutely totally rigged. It's rigged."

Hey friend! Thanks for watching. We do seem to get along.

Please subscribe to this channel so we can stay in touch.

No comments:

Post a Comment