Trump news on Youtube Aug 14 2018

BREAKING: Trump About To Drop Presidential Hammer On Obama

More and more is coming out about Spygate.

The Obama administration tried to take over the FBI's investigation of the Trump campaign,

according to The Hill's John Solomon.

He covered it last night on Hannity's show and then wrote on it extensively at The Hill.

Solomon claims that the FBI began spying on members of the Trump campaign to gather the

intelligence that ultimately justified the collusion investigation, weeks or even months

before the FBI had a formal predicate.

If true, the whole thing was cooked up and premeditated.

It was indeed a pre-planned coup and President Trump is about to drop the presidential hammer

on all of them.

"That's very important.

The rules say you can't use sources until you have a predicated investigation.

The predication is July 31, 2016," Solomon told Hannity.

The investigative reporter said he had sources and documents backing up his claim that he

would be making public in his report in The Hill on Friday and he did just that.

Solomon started off his well-researched piece with this:

"The bridge to the Russia investigation wasn't erected in Moscow during the summer

of the 2016 election."

"It originated earlier, 1,700 miles away in London, where foreign figures contacted

Trump campaign advisers and provided the FBI with hearsay allegations of Trump-Russia collusion,

bureau documents and interviews of government insiders reveal.

These contacts in spring 2016 — some from trusted intelligence sources, others from

Hillary Clinton supporters — occurred well before FBI headquarters authorized an official

counterintelligence investigation on July 31, 2016."

"The new timeline makes one wonder: Did the FBI follow its rules governing informants?"

A very good question and of course the answer is a resounding "no."

Solomon stressed that informants were making contacts with the Trump officials and providing

information to the FBI "much, much earlier than July 31."

Then he drops the bombshell that according to the FBI, the White House and Obama wanted

to take over the whole investigation.

Here is where that led on Sean Hannity's show last night:

John Solomon: I'm putting finishing touches on a column that I think will come out tomorrow.

And it will reveal two really important things.

The efforts to begin targeting and reaching out to Trump campaign officials to gain intelligence

on Russia that would ultimately justify the investigation began weeks and maybe months

before the FBI had a formal predicate.

And that's very important the rules say you can't use sources until you have a predicated

investigation.

The investigation is July 31, 2016.

My sources and documents that I will be able to make public tomorrow will show that there

were contacts going on by people identified as informers, informants, people who provided

information began much, much earlier than July 31st.

That's the first part.

The second part is as the investigation was just starting to ramp up there are internal

FBI documents showing FBI agents talking about the White House trying to take over the investigation.

Fears that the Justice Department were going to leak for political reasons and their own

personal fear.

Sean Hannity: Slow down.

When you say the White House you mean the Obama White House- they were attempting to

take over the investigation.

John Solomon: That's what these messages say.

Sean Hannity: These are FBI messages and this is the Obama White House.

How high up are we talking about here?

John Solomon: We don't know the messages are just what they are.

Solomon covers in the second part of his report the internal FBI communications between former

counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok, his mistress Lisa Page and others discussing how

the Obama White House was trying to take over the investigation.

"The words 'the White House is running this' are clear in the text message,"

Solomon told Hannity, adding that "the FBI agents who opened this case feared that Barack

Obama was weak on national security and wouldn't do what they needed for Russia."

Wowzers.

He went on to say, "The political elements of the administration were trying to intrude

on the FBI investigation."

Solomon's report does not sync with what former Obama deputy national security adviser

Ben Rhodes wrote about the investigation in his new book "The World as It Is," which

is set to be published next week by Random House.

Well, duh.

Rhodes is lying.

That's what he is good at and has done from the beginning.

In his book, Rhodes claims that Obama didn't know there was an FBI investigation into the

Trump campaign's possible contacts with Russia until he left office.

That's just laughable.

Rhodes said that "neither he nor Mr. Obama knew at that time that there was an F.B.I.

investigation," according to the New York Times, which obtained an advance copy of the

book.

Way to cover your collective backsides.

No one believes that.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends

and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> BREAKING: Trump About To Drop Presidential Hammer On Obama - Duration: 16:10.

-------------------------------------------

Omarosa Claims Melania Trump's 'I Don't Care' Jacket Was a 'Style Rebellion' to 'Hurt' Her Husband - - Duration: 5:04.

 First Lady Melania Trump's controversial fashion choices — from her pussy-bow blouse to her "I really don't care" jacket — were actually "style rebellions" intended to "punish her husband," former White House aide Omarosa Manigault Newman alleges in her new book

 In Unhinged, due out Tuesday, Manigault Newman specifically claims that the first lady was trying to make President Trump "look foolish" when she wore a Zara jacket emblazoned with the words "I REALLY DON'T CARE, DO U?" on her way to visit separated children at an immigration facility in Texas

 "It's my opinion that Melania was forced to go to the border that day in June, essentially, to mop up her husband's mess," Manigault Newman writes in an excerpt obtained exclusively by the Daily Mail

 "She wore that jacket to hurt Trump, setting off a controversy that he would have to fix, prolonging the conversation about the administration's insensitivity, ruining the trip itself, and trying to make sure that no one asked her to do something like that again

 "Not that Melania doesn't have compassion for immigrant children; I'm sure she does," Manigault Newman adds

"But she gladly, spitefully, wrecked her husband's directives to make him look foolish

"  Manigault Newman did not present any proof of her theories about Mrs. Trump.  The first lady's spokesperson did not immediately respond to PEOPLE's request for comment on Monday

 The first lady faced heavy criticism in June when she donned a jacket that read "I REALLY DON'T CARE, DO U?" as she departed to visit migrant children separated from their parents at the U

S.-Mexico border as a result of her husband's "zero-tolerance" immigration policy

 Despite the instant backlash, Mrs. Trump put the jacket back on for her return flight to Washington, D

C.  In the aftermath of Mrs. Trump's "jacketgate" moment, the president claimed that his wife's fashion choice was a message to the "Fake News Media

" He tweeted at the time, "Melania has learned how dishonest they are, and she truly no longer cares!"  However, Melania's communications director, Stephanie Grisham, contradicted the president's explanation

 "It's a jacket. There was no hidden message," Grisham said in a statement in June

"After today's important visit to Texas, I hope the media isn't going to choose to focus on her wardrobe

" Grisham also said at the time that the trip was "100 percent" Mrs. Trump's idea and that her husband was "supportive

"  In Unhinged, Manigault Newman goes on to claim that the first lady has been making such "style rebellions" since her husband's campaign days

 "As a student of fashion and keenly image-conscious woman, she knows that everyone of her style choices will be scrutinized and debated," Manigault Newman writes

 "Why did she wear a Gucci 'pussy bow' pink blouse to the presidential debate immediately after the Access Hollywood bombshell? Did she purposefully wear a Hillary Clinton-esque white pantsuit to Trump's first State of the Union address? Did she mean to come off as out of touch and tone-dead by wearing snakeskin stiletto heels to hurricane-ravaged Texas? The messages behind her style choices aren't always clear, but they are never accidental

 "Taken as a whole, all of her style rebellions have served the same purpose, and not only misdirection and distraction — strategies her husband knows all too well," Manigault Newman added

"I believe Melania uses style to punish her husband."

For more infomation >> Omarosa Claims Melania Trump's 'I Don't Care' Jacket Was a 'Style Rebellion' to 'Hurt' Her Husband - - Duration: 5:04.

-------------------------------------------

DOLAR 7 TL ERDOĞAN'DAN TRUMP'A SERT CEVAP / KÜRESEL DÜNYA'NIN KABADAYI'SI - Duration: 3:39.

For more infomation >> DOLAR 7 TL ERDOĞAN'DAN TRUMP'A SERT CEVAP / KÜRESEL DÜNYA'NIN KABADAYI'SI - Duration: 3:39.

-------------------------------------------

Trump signs defense bill restricting drawdown of U.S. troops in Korea - Duration: 1:53.

U.S. President Donald Trump put pen to paper on a defense-spending bill that aims to counter

Chinese aggression.

But what it also restricts is any drawdown of American troops here in South Korea.

Lee Seung-jae reports.

The John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act,... which approves 716-billion U.S. dollars

for defense in fiscal year 2019,... was recently passed by both chambers of Congress,... and

was sent to President Trump on Monday to sign into law.

At a ceremony at the U.S. Army's Fort Drum base in New York,...

President Trump called the bill "the most significant investment" in the nation's military

in modern history.

The legislation notes that over 28-thousand American troops are currently stationed in

South Korea as a demonstration of the U.S. commitment to the bilateral alliance.

And under a section describing the Sense of Senate on U.S. military forces on the Korean

Peninsula,... it says their "significant removal" is "a non-negotiable item as it relates to

the complete, verifiable, and irreversible denuclearization" of North Korea.

In short, the defense bill restricts any drawdown of American troops in South Korea.

A conference report accompanying the legislation notes that Congress also prohibits the use

of the funds to reduce the troops' number below 22-thousand,... without certification

from the Secretary of Defense.

The defense chief would also be required to certify that he has "appropriately consulted

with allies of the U.S.,... including South Korea and Japan,.. regarding such a reduction."

The restriction comes as President Trump has repeatedly indicated his willingness to eventually

pull American forces out of South Korea.

Critics say such a move would play into the hands of North Korea and China,... which wish

to see U.S. troops removed from near their border.

Lee Seung-jae, Arirang News.

For more infomation >> Trump signs defense bill restricting drawdown of U.S. troops in Korea - Duration: 1:53.

-------------------------------------------

ANTI-TRUMP AGENT PETER STRZOK HAS BEEN FIRED - Duration: 10:02.

some breaking news for you into our newsroom right now the FBI has fired

embattled agent Peter Strahm anti-trump texts he exchanged with former FBI

lawyer Lisa Paige as you know the two were having an affair and the

controversy continues struck of course helped leave the FBI's probe into the

Russian interference ahead of the 2016 election strux attorney literally

moments ago issuing a statement and it reads in part the decision to fire

special agent struck is not only a departure from typical bureau practice

but also contradicts director ray's testimony to Congress and his assurances

that the FBI intended to follow its regular process in this and all

personnel matters joining me now to comment on this breaking news

congressman darrell Issa member of both the House Judiciary and Foreign Affairs

Committee what's your take on his firing this is pretty big news it is an hurray

for an agency that finally did something right which is recognized there's no

place in the FBI for somebody whose bias whose conduct whose statements show that

they were not willing to be fair and that in fact they compromise the very

integrity or bring into question the integrity FBI so hooray that they didn't

wait any longer they waited a long time yeah this is a 22 year veteran who

displayed clear bias against Trump in those text messages what took so long

well the process of getting rid of anyone in in federal government other

than political appointees is long and laborious they're usually covered by one

or even two different protections the Civil Service Act and unions and the

process goes on forever you might have noticed that at the IRS people fired in

the sort of Lois Lerner era were typically rehired over 200 of them so

the process of firing em is long the bars from rehiring generally aren't

affirmative and this is one of the problems in government you know the

acted specifically for the Veterans Administration to make it easier to fire

people because our veterans were dying for lack of quality care so it is a

problem it continues to be but this is one of those cases in which the goods

were on this individual in no uncertain way and he had really brought shame on

the FBI an agency in which most agents keep their politics and themselves and

keep their biases literally out of their con well with the exception of James

Comey of course yeah exactly and I knew exactly what you meant

he was integral to the bureau for several reasons but two major

investigations obviously the Russia investigation which again there was bias

there and then also the Hillary Clinton email investigation you know Lindsey

Graham has obviously come out and he says that there should be a second

Special Counsel to oversee this because of the concern of the few bad eggs that

you refer to in the FBI that they feel maybe there is a bias here by firing

strucked is that perhaps qualm the concerns of the Muller investigation

being partisan no you really can't do it that way Michael Horowitz the Inspector

General did what he could do under the IG Act but you do need somebody with

subpoena Authority somebody that demands documents many of them outside the

Department of Justice and and from former employees to get to the bottom of

it you can't have an agency put in investigate itself effectively but

particularly when it's the agency that has all the power you might remember

that one of the things that struck did was he held on to his ability to

personally declassify information which meant he could leak information by

declassifying it making it public he held on to a lot of those capabilities

that helped him essentially create a legal way to spy on a candidacy of

President Trump does this further boost then Lindsey Graham's

claim that he believes that a special counsel a second Special Counsel should

be appointed because let's remember you need to have prosecutorial power in

order to continue to you know hold these people accountable and there needs to be

accountability here and sadly within the FBI itself well the

Attorney General oversees all of these and he has not recused himself from

corruption and misconduct within his his agency Department of Justice so it is

completely within the ability of the Attorney General to name an individual

perhaps a US Attorney or some or even a retired US Attorney to investigate this

agency to have full access to have subpoena Authority and to get to the

bottom and the top of all of this past misconduct without it where we the

American people are and even the president can't have confidence in the

Department of Justice and we need that all right congressman darrell Issa thank

you very much and if you're just joining us once again breaking news Peter strike

fired who once led the Russia investigation into the interference of

the 2016 election developer there huh huge 20 minutes past the hour get more

on that we'll give it to you in the meantime this morning how did an airline

workers steal a passenger plane and fly it around for more than an hour before

crashing how was he able to do that in a post-911 world yeah that's a question

you need answered an incredible video to show you this morning details on where

this happened next

there was the breaking news now the Washington Post broke at Fox News now

confirming Peters truck has been fired from the FBI Peter struck was the heart

at the heart rather in 2016 of all the investigations led by the FBI under the

Department of Justice that includes Hillary Clinton's use of a private email

server he also served as really the nexus for Bob Muller Special Counsel

investigation that was looking at Donald Trump's presidential campaign and

connections to the Russian government that were alleged and have been alleged

by many thus far part of the reason why this timing is so interesting is because

in about two weeks Bruce or is set to testify before a

House committee now Bruce or works for the Department of Justice as well former

associate deputy AG will testify on the hill that's going to happen at the end

of August August 28th three days later is the deadline September 1 that Rudy

Giuliani gave over the weekend saying Bob mother's got to cut a deal by

September 1 or they will not do any sort of deal during the months that follow

because of the midterm elections that will happen two months in a week after

that point so the FBI declining to comment on this breaking news but Peter

struck hood had been employed by the FBI was moved about a year ago I believe the

Department of Human Resources but still a paid employee of the FBI testified in

front of the hill about a month ago is now no longer employed by the Federal

Bureau of Investigation so we're just putting all this together we're trying

to figure out what the timeline means or perhaps does not mean but that's the

headline of the hour Peter struck fired by the FBI now

Peter struck fired over anti-trump text messages he exchanged with his lover

ELISA page during the 2016 presidential campaign chief intelligence

correspondent Catherine Herridge is live in Alexandria Virginia where she's been

covering the Paul Manafort trial and now another twist Catherine what are you

hearing well thanks Julie in the last few

minutes Fox News has obtained a statement from the lawyer for FBI agent

Peter struck and the lawyer confirmed that he was fired by the FBI's deputy

director Friday afternoon and the statement alleges that the deputy

director overruled the findings of the FBI's internal disciplinary office known

as the Office of Professional Responsibility that had recommended a

suspension as well as a demotion for Peter struck because of the

antitrump text messages I want to draw your attention to a key section of the

statement from Struck's lawyer and it reads

the decision to fire Special Agents truck is not only a departure from

typical Bureau practice but contradicts director Ray's testimony to Congress and

his assurances that the FBI intended to follow this regular process in this and

all personnel matters the decision should be deeply troubling to all

Americans that's a key section because it is

absolutely accurate that publicly and privately the FBI director has said that

the bureau got into trouble during the 2016 campaign because director Comey

failed to follow proper procedures and practices and he said on his watch they

would do so under all circumstances I think it's also important to note that

struck was at the center of not only the email kids kind of in the driver's seat

but also in the driver's seat of the FBI's opening of the Russia collusion

case and also kind of in the driver's seat with struck was deputy director

Andrew McCabe and Andrew McCabe was fired earlier this year for lying to

federal agents about his contacts with the media so basically at this point we

have today two key figures very senior figures within the FBI who have been

both fired for cause in the case of deputy director Andrew McCabe it was for

lying to federal investigators that is a crime that could be prosecuted and in

the case of FBI agent Peter struck it was at the decision of the deputy

director who overruled the finding of the bureau's internal disciplinary

office Julie catherine herridge thing

you

For more infomation >> ANTI-TRUMP AGENT PETER STRZOK HAS BEEN FIRED - Duration: 10:02.

-------------------------------------------

Trump in New York: Will speak at John McCain defense bill signing at Fort Drum base... - Duration: 1:43.

For more infomation >> Trump in New York: Will speak at John McCain defense bill signing at Fort Drum base... - Duration: 1:43.

-------------------------------------------

Trump demands Mueller end the Russia probe after Strzok firing - Duration: 9:25.

President Donald Trump renewed his demand that special counsel Robert Mueller end the Russia probe Monday after the FBI fired former senior FBI official Peter Strzok, who had a senior role in the Russia and Clinton email probes

Stzrok's lawyer confirmed the firing of Strzok, who was revealed to have exchanged anti-Trump texts during the campaign, on Monday morning

Trump responded on Twitter by once again blasting the Russia probe that has already gone after several former Trump campaign officials

He also called for a re-do of the FBI's Clinton email investigation, which never charged his political rival with a crime

'Agent Peter Strzok was just fired from the FBI - finally,' Trump wrote around noon on Monday, after news broke publicly about Strzok's firing

Strzok's lawyer Aitan Goelman slammed the firing in a Monday statement, saying the FBI overruled its own Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) and 'departed from established precedent by firing 21-year FBI veteran

''This decision should be deeply troubling to all Americans,' Goelman said.'The list of bad players in the FBI & DOJ gets longer & longer,' the president continued

'Based on the fact that Strzok was in charge of the Witch Hunt, will it be dropped?' Trump said, using his terminology for the Mueller probe

'It is a total Hoax. No Collusion, No Obstruction - I just fight back!' he said.In a follow-up Tweet, Trump targeted the FBI's Hillary Clinton email investigation – which Strzok also took part in

   'Just fired Agent Strzok, formerly of the FBI, was in charge of the Crooked Hillary Clinton sham investigation

It was a total fraud on the American public and should be properly redone!' Trump wrote

  In July of 2016, former FBI Director James Comey, announced the decision not to charge Clinton, even as he chided her for carelessness in her use of a private email server

 The Strzok firing happened two months after the longtime agent was escorted out of the FBI building after he became a focus of an Inspector General's report that found the senior counterintelligence official was biased

The IG investigators uncovered a series of anti-Trump texts between Strzok and fellow FBI agent Lisa Page, with whom he was having an affair

The FBI had no comment on Trump's latest tweets about the Mueller probe and the Clinton investigation

 Strzok tweeted to Page during the campaign 'F Trump' and called Trump in another tweet a 'f***ing idiot

'President Trump has regularly railed against the 'FBI lovers' on Twitter while bashing the Russia probe, which he brands a 'witch hunt

' Trump wrote while on vacation at his New Jersey golf club days ago: 'This is an illegally brought Rigged Witch Hunt run by people who are totally corrupt and/or conflicted

It was started and paid for by Crooked Hillary and the Democrats. Phony Dossier, FISA disgrace and so many lying and dishonest people already fired

17 Angry Dems? Stay tuned!'Strzok's firing was confirmed by lawyer Aitan Goelman, the Washington Post reported

Goelman slammed the firing in a statement saying the 'Deputy Director of the FBI overruled the FBI's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) and departed from established precedent by firing 21-year FBI veteran Peter Strzok

'He continued: "The decision to fire Special Agent Strzok is not only a departure from typical Bureau practice, but also contradicts Director Wray's testimony to Congress and his assurances that the FBI intended to follow its regular process in this and all personnel matters

'Goelman concluded: 'It is a decision that produces only one winner - those who seek to harm our country and weaken our democracy

'The Justice Department IG found Strzok had 'bias' but found Strzok and Page hadn't let their views impact their decisions on cases

In one text to Strzok before the election, Page asks: Trump is 'not ever going to become president, right? Right?!'  RELATED ARTICLES Previous 1 Next 'I was not against a Space Force': Jim Mattis claims he

'You have to respect them': Former Trump campaign manager. 'Nobody even told me about it!' Rogue former Trump staffer

Trump finally slaps back at 'vicious but not smart' Omarosa. Share this article Share 1

2k shares Strzok responded: 'No. No he won't. We'll stop it.'The IG had recommended administrative action against Strzok

'The damage caused by [Strzok and Page's] actions extends far beyond the scope of the [Clinton email] investigation and goes to the heart of the FBI's reputation for neutral fact finding and political independence," Inspector General Michael Horowitz wrote

Horowitz testified that the texts 'clearly shows a biased state of mind.'Strzok's lawyer, Goelman, said the firing was abnormal since the director of an FBI disciplinary office had recommended a 60-day suspension

"This isn't the normal process in any way more than name,' he told the Post. After his texts were uncovered, Strzok was removed from special counsel Robert Mueller's staff and given a human resources position

 Trump also blasted Strzok on Twitter in June. 'FBI Agent Peter Strzok, who headed the Clinton & Russia investigations, texted to his lover Lisa Page, in the IG Report, that "we'll stop" candidate Trump from becoming President

Doesn't get any lower than that!' the president wrote.The News of Strzok's firing comes after Trump has been turning up the heat on Mueller and his Russia probe online

Prosecutors have been questioning and subpoenaing associates of informal Trump advisor Roger Stone, who had campaign communications with WikiLeaks