Trump news on Youtube Feb 9 2019

A Maryland woman faces charges that she assaulted White House counselor Kellyanne Conway in front of her teenage daughter during a confrontation last year at a restaurant in a Washington suburb

Mary Elizabeth Inabinett, 63, of Chevy Chase, was charged in November with second-degree assault and disorderly conduct and has a trial tentatively scheduled to start March 29, court records show

Conway told police she was attending a birthday party Oct. 14 at a Mexican restaurant in Bethesda when she felt somebody grab her shoulders from behind and shake her, according to a charging document prepared by Montgomery County police

 The woman who confronted Conway yelled, 'Shame on you,' and 'other comments believed to about Conway's political views,' the document says

Inabinett's attorney, William Alden McDaniel, Jr., said in a statement that his client exercised her First Amendment right 'to express her personal opinions' about a public figure in a public place

McDaniel said his client didn't assault Conway and will plead not guilty to the misdemeanor charges

'The facts at trial will show this to be true, and show Ms. Conway's account to be false,' the lawyer's statement says

'Her "First Amendment" right to scream like a lunatic does not include touching me or anyone else,' Conway told The Associated Press in an email

In a CNN interview broadcast Friday, Conway said she was standing next to her middle school-aged daughter and some of her daughter's friends when the woman began shaking her 'to the point where I thought maybe somebody was hugging me

' She said it felt 'weird' and 'a little aggressive,' so she turned around to face the woman

'She was just unhinged. She was out of control,' she said. 'Her whole face was terror and anger

She was right here, and my daughter was right there. And she ought to pay for that

She ought to pay for that because she has no right to touch anybody.'The restaurant's manager told police the woman who confronted Conway had to be forcibly removed from the premises

Conway told police the woman yelled and gestured at her for 8 to 10 minutes before she was escorted out of the restaurant

Share this article Share Conway wasn't injured, according to the charging document

The woman who confronted her was gone by the time police arrived, but restaurant staff helped police identify her as a suspect, and Conway's daughter provided officers with a short video clip and photograph of the encounter

Conway said she told President Donald Trump about the incident 'long after' it happened

She said Trump asked her, 'Are you OK? Is your daughter OK? Are the other girls OK?'

For more infomation >> Kellyanne: Trump-hating woman assaulted me in DC restaurant in October - Daily News - Duration: 4:05.

-------------------------------------------

BOLSONARO QUER DISCUTIR COM TRUMP DERRUBADA DE MADURO - Duration: 4:31.

For more infomation >> BOLSONARO QUER DISCUTIR COM TRUMP DERRUBADA DE MADURO - Duration: 4:31.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Shouldn't Be Allowed To Hide The Mueller Report From The Public - Duration: 3:40.

Here's the sad reality about being online, if you have used Facebook, if you have tried

to get a credit score or if you've had a yahoo email account anytime within the last three

years for any of those things, then the chances that your data has either been leaked out

to unsavory characters or just straight up sold by those corporations, the chances of

that are roughly 99 percent.

If you are a US citizen and you've done any of those three, uh, three things within the

last three years, that's pretty remarkable, right?

We're almost at almost 100 percent of us have either had our data leaked or stolen.

If we're in one of those online communities, some of us, depending on how many of those

years have had our data stolen and leaked multiple different times by multiple different

companies.

And here's the real kicker.

Nobody's gone to jail, no CEO, no executive running these companies that routinely lose

our data.

None of them have ever faced any kind of actual consequence for this except maybe a few class

action lawsuits.

Democratic Senator Ron Wyden for months now has been trying to change that.

And He seems to be fighting an uphill battle all by himself to get some kind of accountability

for these massive tech companies that continuously take our data.

Ron Wyden back in the fall, introduced legislation that would set a new standard.

It would create new rules that these tech companies would have to follow with regards

to our privacy and our data, and if they lied about it or didn't do everything properly,

they could face massive fines of up to four percent of their annual revenue, which would

result in billions upon billions of dollars for some of these companies and possibly even

jail time, jail sentences, prison for the CEOs and executives of these companies who

knowingly leak our data or sell our data and then lie to us about it.

They would go to jail under Ron Wyden's new bill that he is still pushing to this day.

And again, this is a piece of legislation that desperately needs to be enacted.

This is something that has to happen here in the United States.

The tech companies, whether knowingly or unwittingly are giving away our data and the worst part

of those who know that they're doing it right, it's one thing to just be bad at your job

and you leak a bunch of data and oops, you didn't notice that a hacker was in your system

like a Kofax for months.

Stealing people's data and social security numbers and addresses and drivers license

numbers.

Oops, we didn't notice, but it's another to be a company like Facebook that takes your

private messages and sells that data.

It takes your address, it takes your interest, it takes your browsing history and sells that

to people without your permission Wydens.

Bill would change that.

You could opt in to a do not share list and companies would no longer be able to sell

your data.

You might have to pay a small fee to be put on that list, but it would then protect your

data.

And if the company has lied about it in their annual reports to Congress, that would be

mandatory at this point.

Or reports to regulator, excuse me.

Um, if they lied about it, they would go to jail and they would lose a lot of their profits.

Isn't that the way this should work?

If a company lies about what they're doing to you, if they're putting your personal data

up there on the auction block without your knowledge, and then they not only lie to you

about it, but lie to regulators about it.

Shouldn't that person be in jail?

Shouldn't that person be made to be an example of what not to do?

And that's what's missing in this country right now.

It's been missing for decades.

The example of what not to do, white collar criminals are rampant on Wall Street in the

tech industry, in the oil industry, the fossil fuel industry, the chemical industry.

We have seen nothing but criminal behavior from a lot of these CEOs and shareholders

and executives, pharmaceutical companies too.

They're about the worst of the worst and the reason they continue engaging in this kind

of criminal behavior, putting out a medication that they know is going to kill people, but

also make them lots of money, dumping their toxins into a waterway, knowing they're going

to poison 40,000 people, but they don't want to spend the money to properly get rid of

it.

None of those CEOs or executives who made those decisions ever went to prison, and what

that does is it sends a message to everybody else that it'll be okay.

You can afford the fine.

You don't have to worry about jail time and everybody's going to be okay.

It except of course all those people you gave cancer too who are dying slow, horrible, painful

deaths.

They're not okay, but that's not used.

So what does it matter?

Wydens.

Bill seeks to change that.

At least for the tech industry.

There is no reason why any person on Capitol Hill should vote against this.

This is about our privacy.

This is about our data.

This is about our livelihoods and if you're one of those people who have had your data

stolen and then had the deal with the fallout of that, the phone calls to credit card companies,

getting them to cancel, change your numbers, you know, try and get your money back from

a bank after your debit card number was stolen.

I've been through that.

It is hell.

And anyone who's gone through any of that understands the same thing.

The companies that allowed this to happen, they need to see their CEO's pushed out of

their pit houses, pushed out of their mansions, pushed out of the board rooms and shoved in

the back of a police car.

Not to be seen again for the next 10 years.

For more infomation >> Trump Shouldn't Be Allowed To Hide The Mueller Report From The Public - Duration: 3:40.

-------------------------------------------

Republicans BEG Democrats To Not Look At Trump's Tax Returns - Duration: 3:01.

Here's the sad reality about being online, if you have used Facebook, if you have tried

to get a credit score or if you've had a yahoo email account anytime within the last three

years for any of those things, then the chances that your data has either been leaked out

to unsavory characters or just straight up sold by those corporations, the chances of

that are roughly 99 percent.

If you are a US citizen and you've done any of those three, uh, three things within the

last three years, that's pretty remarkable, right?

We're almost at almost 100 percent of us have either had our data leaked or stolen.

If we're in one of those online communities, some of us, depending on how many of those

years have had our data stolen and leaked multiple different times by multiple different

companies.

And here's the real kicker.

Nobody's gone to jail, no CEO, no executive running these companies that routinely lose

our data.

None of them have ever faced any kind of actual consequence for this except maybe a few class

action lawsuits.

Democratic Senator Ron Wyden for months now has been trying to change that.

And He seems to be fighting an uphill battle all by himself to get some kind of accountability

for these massive tech companies that continuously take our data.

Ron Wyden back in the fall, introduced legislation that would set a new standard.

It would create new rules that these tech companies would have to follow with regards

to our privacy and our data, and if they lied about it or didn't do everything properly,

they could face massive fines of up to four percent of their annual revenue, which would

result in billions upon billions of dollars for some of these companies and possibly even

jail time, jail sentences, prison for the CEOs and executives of these companies who

knowingly leak our data or sell our data and then lie to us about it.

They would go to jail under Ron Wyden's new bill that he is still pushing to this day.

And again, this is a piece of legislation that desperately needs to be enacted.

This is something that has to happen here in the United States.

The tech companies, whether knowingly or unwittingly are giving away our data and the worst part

of those who know that they're doing it right, it's one thing to just be bad at your job

and you leak a bunch of data and oops, you didn't notice that a hacker was in your system

like a Kofax for months.

Stealing people's data and social security numbers and addresses and drivers license

numbers.

Oops, we didn't notice, but it's another to be a company like Facebook that takes your

private messages and sells that data.

It takes your address, it takes your interest, it takes your browsing history and sells that

to people without your permission Wydens.

Bill would change that.

You could opt in to a do not share list and companies would no longer be able to sell

your data.

You might have to pay a small fee to be put on that list, but it would then protect your

data.

And if the company has lied about it in their annual reports to Congress, that would be

mandatory at this point.

Or reports to regulator, excuse me.

Um, if they lied about it, they would go to jail and they would lose a lot of their profits.

Isn't that the way this should work?

If a company lies about what they're doing to you, if they're putting your personal data

up there on the auction block without your knowledge, and then they not only lie to you

about it, but lie to regulators about it.

Shouldn't that person be in jail?

Shouldn't that person be made to be an example of what not to do?

And that's what's missing in this country right now.

It's been missing for decades.

The example of what not to do, white collar criminals are rampant on Wall Street in the

tech industry, in the oil industry, the fossil fuel industry, the chemical industry.

We have seen nothing but criminal behavior from a lot of these CEOs and shareholders

and executives, pharmaceutical companies too.

They're about the worst of the worst and the reason they continue engaging in this kind

of criminal behavior, putting out a medication that they know is going to kill people, but

also make them lots of money, dumping their toxins into a waterway, knowing they're going

to poison 40,000 people, but they don't want to spend the money to properly get rid of

it.

None of those CEOs or executives who made those decisions ever went to prison, and what

that does is it sends a message to everybody else that it'll be okay.

You can afford the fine.

You don't have to worry about jail time and everybody's going to be okay.

It except of course all those people you gave cancer too who are dying slow, horrible, painful

deaths.

They're not okay, but that's not used.

So what does it matter?

Wydens.

Bill seeks to change that.

At least for the tech industry.

There is no reason why any person on Capitol Hill should vote against this.

This is about our privacy.

This is about our data.

This is about our livelihoods and if you're one of those people who have had your data

stolen and then had the deal with the fallout of that, the phone calls to credit card companies,

getting them to cancel, change your numbers, you know, try and get your money back from

a bank after your debit card number was stolen.

I've been through that.

It is hell.

And anyone who's gone through any of that understands the same thing.

The companies that allowed this to happen, they need to see their CEO's pushed out of

their pit houses, pushed out of their mansions, pushed out of the board rooms and shoved in

the back of a police car.

Not to be seen again for the next 10 years.

For more infomation >> Republicans BEG Democrats To Not Look At Trump's Tax Returns - Duration: 3:01.

-------------------------------------------

Whitaker Makes A Fool Of Himself For Trump - Duration: 15:50.

For more infomation >> Whitaker Makes A Fool Of Himself For Trump - Duration: 15:50.

-------------------------------------------

Explosive Bezos Allegation Could Jeopardize Trump Ally Immunity | The Beat With Ari Melber | MSNBC - Duration: 8:15.

For more infomation >> Explosive Bezos Allegation Could Jeopardize Trump Ally Immunity | The Beat With Ari Melber | MSNBC - Duration: 8:15.

-------------------------------------------

Ivanka Trump Pleads Ignorance On Trump Tower Moscow Deal - Duration: 5:16.

Here's the sad reality about being online, if you have used Facebook, if you have tried

to get a credit score or if you've had a yahoo email account anytime within the last three

years for any of those things, then the chances that your data has either been leaked out

to unsavory characters or just straight up sold by those corporations, the chances of

that are roughly 99 percent.

If you are a US citizen and you've done any of those three, uh, three things within the

last three years, that's pretty remarkable, right?

We're almost at almost 100 percent of us have either had our data leaked or stolen.

If we're in one of those online communities, some of us, depending on how many of those

years have had our data stolen and leaked multiple different times by multiple different

companies.

And here's the real kicker.

Nobody's gone to jail, no CEO, no executive running these companies that routinely lose

our data.

None of them have ever faced any kind of actual consequence for this except maybe a few class

action lawsuits.

Democratic Senator Ron Wyden for months now has been trying to change that.

And He seems to be fighting an uphill battle all by himself to get some kind of accountability

for these massive tech companies that continuously take our data.

Ron Wyden back in the fall, introduced legislation that would set a new standard.

It would create new rules that these tech companies would have to follow with regards

to our privacy and our data, and if they lied about it or didn't do everything properly,

they could face massive fines of up to four percent of their annual revenue, which would

result in billions upon billions of dollars for some of these companies and possibly even

jail time, jail sentences, prison for the CEOs and executives of these companies who

knowingly leak our data or sell our data and then lie to us about it.

They would go to jail under Ron Wyden's new bill that he is still pushing to this day.

And again, this is a piece of legislation that desperately needs to be enacted.

This is something that has to happen here in the United States.

The tech companies, whether knowingly or unwittingly are giving away our data and the worst part

of those who know that they're doing it right, it's one thing to just be bad at your job

and you leak a bunch of data and oops, you didn't notice that a hacker was in your system

like a Kofax for months.

Stealing people's data and social security numbers and addresses and drivers license

numbers.

Oops, we didn't notice, but it's another to be a company like Facebook that takes your

private messages and sells that data.

It takes your address, it takes your interest, it takes your browsing history and sells that

to people without your permission Wydens.

Bill would change that.

You could opt in to a do not share list and companies would no longer be able to sell

your data.

You might have to pay a small fee to be put on that list, but it would then protect your

data.

And if the company has lied about it in their annual reports to Congress, that would be

mandatory at this point.

Or reports to regulator, excuse me.

Um, if they lied about it, they would go to jail and they would lose a lot of their profits.

Isn't that the way this should work?

If a company lies about what they're doing to you, if they're putting your personal data

up there on the auction block without your knowledge, and then they not only lie to you

about it, but lie to regulators about it.

Shouldn't that person be in jail?

Shouldn't that person be made to be an example of what not to do?

And that's what's missing in this country right now.

It's been missing for decades.

The example of what not to do, white collar criminals are rampant on Wall Street in the

tech industry, in the oil industry, the fossil fuel industry, the chemical industry.

We have seen nothing but criminal behavior from a lot of these CEOs and shareholders

and executives, pharmaceutical companies too.

They're about the worst of the worst and the reason they continue engaging in this kind

of criminal behavior, putting out a medication that they know is going to kill people, but

also make them lots of money, dumping their toxins into a waterway, knowing they're going

to poison 40,000 people, but they don't want to spend the money to properly get rid of

it.

None of those CEOs or executives who made those decisions ever went to prison, and what

that does is it sends a message to everybody else that it'll be okay.

You can afford the fine.

You don't have to worry about jail time and everybody's going to be okay.

It except of course all those people you gave cancer too who are dying slow, horrible, painful

deaths.

They're not okay, but that's not used.

So what does it matter?

Wydens.

Bill seeks to change that.

At least for the tech industry.

There is no reason why any person on Capitol Hill should vote against this.

This is about our privacy.

This is about our data.

This is about our livelihoods and if you're one of those people who have had your data

stolen and then had the deal with the fallout of that, the phone calls to credit card companies,

getting them to cancel, change your numbers, you know, try and get your money back from

a bank after your debit card number was stolen.

I've been through that.

It is hell.

And anyone who's gone through any of that understands the same thing.

The companies that allowed this to happen, they need to see their CEO's pushed out of

their pit houses, pushed out of their mansions, pushed out of the board rooms and shoved in

the back of a police car.

Not to be seen again for the next 10 years.

For more infomation >> Ivanka Trump Pleads Ignorance On Trump Tower Moscow Deal - Duration: 5:16.

-------------------------------------------

Will Trump Be '239 Pounds' At This Year's Physical? - Duration: 4:37.

WELCOME TO "THE LATE SHOW," EVERYBODY."

I'M YOUR HOST, STEPHEN COLBERT.

IT IS-- IT IS FRIDAY.

AND FOR MEMBERS OF TRUMP'S CABINET, THAT MEANS THEY'VE MADE

IT THROUGH A WHOLE OTHER WEEK WITHOUT BEING FIRED OR INDICTED.

AS YOU KNOW, THERE HAS BEEN A LOT OF TURNOVER IN THE TRUMP

WHITE HOUSE IN THE PAST YEAR.

IN THIS PHOTO FROM LAST YEAR'S STATE OF THE UNION, EIGHT

HIGH-RANKING STAFFERS ARE NO LONGER WORKING FOR TRUMP.

( LAUGHTER ) TRUMP SEEMS TO THINK--

( CHEERS AND APPLAUSE ) YEAH.

A LOT OF TURNOVER.

>> Jon: DROPPING LIKE FLIES.

>> Stephen: TRUMP SEEMS TO THINK BRINGING IN NEW PEOPLE IS

GOING TO HELP BRING HIS PRESIDENCY ON THE RIGHT TRACK.

BUT UNLIKE A STAINED HOTEL MATTRESS IN RUSSIA, THIS IS NOT

A PROBLEM THAT CAN BE SOLVED BY TURNOVER.

THANK YOU, THANK YOU.

>> Jon: THANK YOU, CITIZEN.

>> Stephen: AND THE LATEST WHITE HOUSE OFFICIAL ALLEGEDLY EYEING

THE EXITS IS ACTING CHIEF OF STAFF AND SIMON FROM "ALVIN AND

THE CHIPMUNKS," MICK MULVANEY.

( LAUGHTER ) ALVIN.

EVEN THOUGH MULVANEY HAS ONLY BEEN SERVING AS TRUMP'S CHIEF OF

STAFF FOR A FEW WEEKS, REPORTEDLY, HE'S ALREADY

PLANNING HIS ESCAPE.

THE ESCAPE PLAN IS TO CLIMB DOWN FROM A THIRD-FLOOR WUNDTO OF THE

WHITE HOUSE USING ONE OF TRUMP'S TIES.

NOW HERE'S THE-- CORE STRENGTH.

YOU NEED CORE STRENGTH FOR THAT.

>> Jon: YOU GOTTA HAVE IT.

>> Stephe: HOW WAS MICK TO KNOW THE JOB WOULD BE SO MISERABLE?

HIS PREDECESSOR, JOHN KELLY, ALWAYS LOOKED SO HAPPY TO BE

ALIVE.

HERE'S THE DEAL.

HE'S PLANNINGS HAD ESCAPE.

BUT TRUMP MIGHT BE PUSHING HIM OUT THE DOOR BECAUSE THE

PRESIDENT BLAMES MULVANEY FOR THE TERRIBLE PRESS INSPIRED BY

THE 35-DAY GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN.

(AS TRUMP ): "WHY'D YOU LET ME SAY I WOULD TAKE CREDIT FOR THE

SHUTDOWN, MICK?

IT'S YOUR JOB TO STOP ME.

WHEN YOU SEE ME START TO TALK, YOU DIVE IN AND FILL THE

WORD-HOLE WITH THE MOST BEAUTIFUL SLICE OF CHOCOLATE

CAKE!" ( LAUGHTER )

NOW, WHAT'S NEXT-- "WORD HOLE.

WORD HOLE."

( APPLAUSE ) WHAT'S NEXT FOR MULVANEY?

RUMOR HAS IT HE'S INTERESTED IN BECOMING THE COMMERCE SECRETARY.

WOW.

THAT'S A BALLSY MOVE TO WANT A JOB WORKING FOR THE SAME BOSS

WHO IS ABOUT TO FIRE YOU.

"YOU CAN'T FIRE ME.

I QUIT!

ALSO, HERE'S MY RESUME.

I AM PROFICIENT IN MICROSOFT XCEL."

BUT TRUMP WAS TOO BUSY TO FIRE ANYONE TODAY, BECAUSE THIS

AFTERNOON, HE GOT HIS ANNUAL PHYSICAL EXAM AT WALTER REED

HOSPITAL, HIS ANNUAL PHYSICAL, WHICH WILL BE FOLLOWED BY HIS

ANNUAL VEGETABLE.

( LAUGHTER ) NOW, I HOPE YOU ALL REMEMBER

LAST YEAR'S EXAM WHERE DOCTOR RONNY JACKSON CLAIMED TRUMP WAS

IN PERFECT HEALTH BECAUSE OF HIS EXCELLENT GENES AND WEIGHED 239

POUNDS.

THE PRESIDENT WAS SO IMPRESSED WITH HIS ABILITY TO LIE ON

QUEUE, HE DECIDED TO NOMINATE DR. RONNY TO LEAD VETERANS

AFFAIRS, DESPITE THE FACT THAT HE HAD HAD NO EXPERIENCE

MANAGING A LARGE BUREAUCRACY.

(AS TRUMP ): "LOOK, I CAN TEACH HIM EVERYTHING HE NEEDS TO KNOW

ABOUT MANAGING VETERANS AFFAIRS: $130,000, AND THE VETERAN SHUTS

UP, ALL RIGHT.

( CHEERS AND APPLAUSE ) I WILL TAKE IT.

I WILL 100% TAKE IT."

>> Jon: YEAH.

>> Stephe: AND IF BEING MASSIVELY UNQUALIFIED FOR THE

JOB WASN'T ENOUGH, DR. RONNY HAD TO WITHDRAW HIS NOMINATION AFTER

IT CAME OUT THAT WAS KNOWN FOR DRINKING ON THE JOB AND

OVER-PRESCRIBING DRUGS, SO MUCH SO THAT FORMER COLLEAGUES SAID

HE WAS NICKNAMED THE "CANDYMAN."

( LAUGHTER ) YES.

AND LEGEND IS, IF YOU SAY THE NAME "CANDYMAN" THREE TIMES IN A

WHITE HOUSE MIRROR, HE PRESCRIBES YOU A PRESCRIPTION

FOR ADDERALL TO CRUSH UP AND SNORT OFF THAT MIRROR.

( APPLAUSE ) BUT NOW, JUST IN TIME FOR

TRUMP'S PHYSICAL, DR. RONNY'S BACK!

BECAUSE TRUMP HAS CHOSEN HIM TO BE HIS TOP MEDICAL ADVISER,

DESPITE THE FACT THAT HE IS STILL UNDER INVESTIGATION.

OH, THE "HE" IN THAT SENTENCE, OF COURSE, REFERS TO EITHER ONE

OF THEM.

For more infomation >> Will Trump Be '239 Pounds' At This Year's Physical? - Duration: 4:37.

-------------------------------------------

President Donald Trump Campaign, GOP Donations Being Put To Dubious Use | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC - Duration: 3:41.

For more infomation >> President Donald Trump Campaign, GOP Donations Being Put To Dubious Use | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC - Duration: 3:41.

-------------------------------------------

Exposición usa a modelo que imita a Ivanka Trump | Al Rojo Vivo | Telemundo - Duration: 0:41.

For more infomation >> Exposición usa a modelo que imita a Ivanka Trump | Al Rojo Vivo | Telemundo - Duration: 0:41.

-------------------------------------------

A Scandal For The Ages, Even During President Donald Trump's Presidency | Deadline | MSNBC - Duration: 9:39.

For more infomation >> A Scandal For The Ages, Even During President Donald Trump's Presidency | Deadline | MSNBC - Duration: 9:39.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's acting Atty. Gen. says he hasn't interfered with Mueller probe | The 11th Hour | MSNBC - Duration: 13:05.

For more infomation >> Trump's acting Atty. Gen. says he hasn't interfered with Mueller probe | The 11th Hour | MSNBC - Duration: 13:05.

-------------------------------------------

Amid Dodges, Matt Whitaker Denies Discussing Mueller Probe With Donald Trump | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC - Duration: 6:03.

For more infomation >> Amid Dodges, Matt Whitaker Denies Discussing Mueller Probe With Donald Trump | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC - Duration: 6:03.

-------------------------------------------

Can Executive Privilege Apply To Matthew Whitaker's Talks With President Donald Trump? | MSNBC - Duration: 2:36.

For more infomation >> Can Executive Privilege Apply To Matthew Whitaker's Talks With President Donald Trump? | MSNBC - Duration: 2:36.

-------------------------------------------

Melania Trump MOCKED After She Wearing One Black Leather Glove At The State Of The Union - Duration: 3:26.

Melania Trump has left Twitter users scratching their heads, after she was seen wearing only

one black leather glove at the State of the Union address on Tuesday.

The 48-year-old first lady donned a $2,390 military-style coat with silver buttons by

Burberry, and a pair of black leather gloves to join her husband, President Donald Trump,

at the U.S. Capitol, but the demure outfit ended up causing quite a stir.

Melania removed one glove to shake hands with guests in her box, but her decision to not

take off the other left some viewers baffled.

People took to Twitter to ask why she was wearing only one leather glove, with some

joking that she must be impersonating Michael Jackson.

Another person used Melania's unusual styling to take a jab at Virginia Governor Ralph Northam,

who recently admitted to wearing blackface while dressing up like Michael Jackson at

a dance contest in 1984.

The young boy who was First Lady Melania Trump's guest at the State of the Union because he

was bullied for having the same last name, as the President is the new star of the 'resistance.'

Joshua Trump, 11, won over anti-Trump Twitter on Tuesday, after he was photographed sleeping

in the gallery during the President's speech.

The late hour appeared to take its toll on the sixth-grader from Delaware, who was seated

next to another guest, Grace Eline.

Eline is a young girl who was successfully treated for brain cancer.

To Eline's right is the First Lady, who is seen applauding her husband during his

speech.

But the speech appeared to arouse little interest in young Joshua, who became an instant meme-worthy

topic.

Melania Trump MOCKED after odd decision during State of the Union.

MELANIA Trump has left the world wondering why she only wore one solitary black glove

for most of her husband's State of the Union address on Tuesday.

The First Lady donned a pair of black gloves to go with her military style jacket but confused

some Twitter users as to why she made the decision.

While many were intently watching Trump's speech, some people on Twitter pointed out

that Melania had taken off one glove but not the other.

The 48-year-old had proceeded to remove one of the gloves in order to shake hands with

some of the guests.

Not only did she remove it but she also kept the glove off for a significant period of

time which set Twitter ablaze with potential theories.

Some had likened the First Lady to Michael Jackson or even Luke Skywalker as Twitter

began to churn out conspiracy theories.

Melania's odd decision seemed to continue to catch the eye of the US public with many

praising her tribute to Michael Jackson.

As the speech wore on some users began to really delve into Melania's decision with

some comparing her to Nicolas Cage as well as a film villain.

This isn't the first time that the First Lady been pictured wearing just one glove.

She replicated a similar motif when she went to watch Brett Kavanaugh formally take his

post as the 114th justice of the Supreme Court last year.

Unfortunately for the Twitter faithful, their conspiracy theories dried up when some eagle-eyed

viewers noticed that Melania had finally taken off the second glove.