Trump news on Youtube Feb 13 2019

now staying where the US and China trade relations president Donald Trump says

he's open to extending a march 1st deadline to raise tariffs and Chinese

products if the two sides are near an agreement his remarks came as the

world's two biggest economies are holding talks to resolve their trade war

the 10 percent or two hundred million goes up to 25 percent on March 1st

and so far I've said don't do that now if we're close to a deal where we think

we can make a real deal and it's going to get done I could see myself letting

that slide for a little while but generally speaking I'm not inclined to

do that US Trade Representative Robert light Iser and Treasury Secretary

Stephen Lucien are now in Beijing two stays ahead of high-level talks with

their Chinese counterparts a possible shift in the Montford deadline it will

likely come after those talks

For more infomation >> Trump open to extending March 1 deadline on China tariffs - Duration: 0:56.

-------------------------------------------

Trump not 'thrilled' by deal to end shutdown but may back it - Duration: 1:41.

Partisan politics have long ruled Capitol Hill and they still do

but with a compromise agreed-upon to avoid another government shutdown both Democratic

and Republican leaders have been putting pressure on Donald Trump to greenlight

their tentative spending deal.

'Please Mr.President, no one got everything they wanted

in this bill but sign it and don't cause a shutdown'

'I think, I think he's got a pretty good deal here you know. I think,

I think he's done just fine I hope he'll conclude that because he's got to sign the bill.

The President received the news of the bipartisan compromise before

going on the stage at a rally Monday in Texas, but he's yet to publicly say he'll

sign it, for it would a lot just under 1.4 billion dollars in spending for

border fences and not the 5.7 billion Trump sought for a concrete or steel

wall along the US' southern border. The offer is less than a previous compromise

one that Trump rejected leading to last month's record-breaking 35 day

government shutdown, the president now says he might reconsider.

"I can't say I'm happy, I can't say I'm thrilled but the walls getting built

regardless, doesn't matter because we're doing other things beyond what we're

talking about here so we'll see what happens we're having a meeting on it later."

What's changed this time around is both pressure from Republican senators

and the fallout from the previous shutdown, which many blamed Trump and the GOP for.

Yet the US president remains adamant, he says that if he signs the

deal he'll still find a way. Through declaring a national emergency or

reappropriation funds to finance his long-promised wall.

For more infomation >> Trump not 'thrilled' by deal to end shutdown but may back it - Duration: 1:41.

-------------------------------------------

The members of Trump's inner circle are taking turns selling him out - Duration: 3:22.

For more infomation >> The members of Trump's inner circle are taking turns selling him out - Duration: 3:22.

-------------------------------------------

There are two good reasons Trump should accept a no wall deal Los Angeles Times - Duration: 2:51.

There are two good reasons Trump should accept a no wall deal Los Angeles Times

True to form, top congressional appropriators found a way to cut a deal on border security issues Monday night, opening a path to a fully funded, functioning federal government for the remaining seven months of the fiscal year.

Now, if only President Trump will take it. He may be tempted to say no, but he has better reasons to say yes.

By including no money for a new border wall, and even less money for border fencing than the Senate had proposed in December, the negotiators sent an obvious but still somehow necessary message to Trump: Elections matter. The president had made the midterm elections a referendum on border security, and the GOP lost the House. So Republicans dont have nearly as much leverage over the issue as they used to.

Trump told reporters Tuesday morning that he was not happy about the deal, adding that he would meet with other administration officials later in the day to decide how to respond. He could obviously reject it, which would almost certainly force another partial government shutdown.

The last shutdown clearly damaged Trumps standing with most Americans, his already weak approval ratings. But Trump may be tempted to take another run at forcing Democrats to cough up some money for his wall because he may finally have found a message on border security that works, at least in the context of his bid for reelection next year, and another shutdown would give him the opportunity to keep beating that drum.

A Trump theme for 2020 is that the Democratic Party has been taken over by extremists who want to open the border, disband Immigration and Customs Enforcement and unleash dangerous criminals on unsuspecting Americans. And yes, there are some on the left who have called for disbanding ICE and who oppose almost all deportations. But thats cherry picking, not unlike calling the GOP the party of zero reproductive rights because there are some Republican lawmakers who oppose abortion in any and all circumstances.

Unfortunately for Democrats, their negotiators from the House Appropriations Committee made a demand that was easy for Trump to caricature as an attack on border security.

The House conferees proposed a tough cap on ICE detentions in the interior of the United States that is, away from the border. The point, as Rep. Lucille Roybal Allard D Downey explained in an interview, is to force ICE to shift its focus back to violent criminals in the country illegally. Right now, ICE is just indiscriminately going out and rounding up not just criminals, but mom and dads heading to church, taking their kids to school, she said.

The detainees Roybal Allard characterizes as moms and dads, however, the administration paints as MS 13 gang bangers. In a briefing Monday, ICE Deputy Director Matt Albence said, If we are forced to live within a cap based on interior arrests, we will immediately be forced to release criminal aliens that are currently sitting in our custody. Well be releasing gang members. Well be releasing individuals convicted of ... domestic violence and drug crimes.

Thats a powerful image, even though it seems to be anchored in a mischaracterization of who detainees are. ICEs statistics show that the agency removed in fiscal 2018 who had been ordered deported, 57 percent of whom were convicted criminals. But it did not break down what those convictions represented. Customs and Border Patrol did offer obtained for the nearly 6,300 people it arrested in the first 11 months of fiscal 2018, and more than half of them were convicted simply of entering or reentering the country illegally. Less than one sixth of the arrests were for violent crimes or weapons related charges.

Only ICE knows for sure the sort of folks who would be released if detentions were capped, and ICE is insisting that the results would be a horror show. That assertion fits into Trumps Democrats as extremists meme.

On the other hand, here are two reasons Trump would be better off taking the deal.

For starters, he simply doesnt have the votes to get more money for his wall. Since Democrats won the House, the offers from Congress have been getting worse, not better; a bipartisan proposal in December would have provided dollar 1.6 billion for 65 miles of new fencing, compared with less than dollar 1.4 billion for 55 miles of fencing in the current proposal.

Second, given that , the president is mainly interested in scoring points with his base the group that may be hard pressed to accept anything less. The surest way to deliver that prize is for Trump to circumvent Congress by declaring a national emergency and shifting funds to the wall from some other project that was previously funded.

That may very well prove to be illegal, and even if it isnt, it would set a horrible precedent. But its a safer bet for Trump than forcing another shutdown that would hurt his standing even more, with little or no likelihood of congressional Democrats caving on the wall.

For more infomation >> There are two good reasons Trump should accept a no wall deal Los Angeles Times - Duration: 2:51.

-------------------------------------------

Why Trump wants to build a wall on the border with Mexico? (Valeriy Pyakin 2019.01.05) - Duration: 4:14.

Presenter: We have been working for more than an hour. It's 13 h. and 2 m. MSK.

And a couple more questions from Timofey:

"Why does Trump talk about the state of emergency regarding the building of the wall on the US-Mexican border? What's going on at the Mexican border?"

Valeriy Pyakin: The border with Mexico and the migration are used in the domestic political struggle.

The fact is that the American state "elites" are ready to resist Trump.

We were constantly told about American democracy.

We were told that the presidents changed, but the US policy didn't change, that the presidents are working for unaltered American Interests.

And now we see that there are various American interests and different parts of the American "elites" represent different segments of these interests.

So, the American state "elites" are cutting their own throats.

They don't understand it.

They want to preserve the American domination in the world, in order to use its resources without understanding

that such a situation will crash the US with fatal consequences.

The US will be plunged into civil war so crazy that the movie "Mad Max" (and other movies they have made) will seem like a child's play to them.

The American pro-GP "elites" understand it and they want to rearrange the American global dominance within the US will US gradually, with minimal harm.

But to do this they have to separate relations with the whole world.

And the state "elites" having a significant percentage in the government system resist because otherwise they will lose their job.

If there is no American domination, then everyone who is working abroad should look for a new job.

And those in the USA who work to ensure the governance of the US should be closed by whole departments, they become useless.

So they resist. How to move them, how to take them away?

Here you are, the shutdown, and the incident with the wall.

Look, the US had Congress elections recently. Democrats won in 15 "Republican" states.

But these Democrats opposed 'the Democrats', that is they sided with the global "elites", but not with the American state "elites".

I've told many times that there is no vertical division into Democrats and Republicans.

There is a horizontal division with the state "elites" who understand nothing in the bottom,

and global "elites" who are brought to the supranational governance, including the US, in the top.es that there is no vertical division into Democrats and Republicans.

That's why Trump can consider the elections successful because the global "elites" have won.

And it doesn't matter if they are Republicans or Democrats.

For more infomation >> Why Trump wants to build a wall on the border with Mexico? (Valeriy Pyakin 2019.01.05) - Duration: 4:14.

-------------------------------------------

Trump no está contento con la propuesta para evitar cierre de gobierno - Duration: 1:41.

For more infomation >> Trump no está contento con la propuesta para evitar cierre de gobierno - Duration: 1:41.

-------------------------------------------

Trump 'not happy' about congressional border deal to keep government open - Duration: 3:02.

For more infomation >> Trump 'not happy' about congressional border deal to keep government open - Duration: 3:02.

-------------------------------------------

Donald Trump isn't going to like what this Senate Intel Committee leader just said about the Trump-R - Duration: 1:44.

For more infomation >> Donald Trump isn't going to like what this Senate Intel Committee leader just said about the Trump-R - Duration: 1:44.

-------------------------------------------

Will President Trump Sign Off On Spending Deal? - Duration: 1:43.

For more infomation >> Will President Trump Sign Off On Spending Deal? - Duration: 1:43.

-------------------------------------------

GOP Senator Richard Burr, but Donald Trump is going down - Duration: 2:17.

For more infomation >> GOP Senator Richard Burr, but Donald Trump is going down - Duration: 2:17.

-------------------------------------------

Donald Trump Money Laundering Investigation Announcement Stuns Fragile. W.H. - Duration: 3:55.

For more infomation >> Donald Trump Money Laundering Investigation Announcement Stuns Fragile. W.H. - Duration: 3:55.

-------------------------------------------

Trump crows no 'collusion' after Senate Intel chair's comment - Daily News - Duration: 3:55.

President Donald Trump crowed Wednesday about statements by the chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee that the panel's two-year probe has not found evidence of collusion between his campaign and Russia

The president trumpeted a fresh comment by panel chair Sen. Richard Burr, who has gone on record twice about what his panel has not found following a two-year investigation

 'The Senate Intelligence Committee: THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION BETWEEN THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN AND RUSSIA!' Trump tweeted Wednesday morning, using all capital letters to reiterate something he has himself proclaimed throughout his presidency

Burr told reporters Tuesday: 'There is no factual evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia

' And NBC News confirmed the panel had found no 'direct evidence' of a conspiracy between the campaign and Russians, even as the Mueller probe has achieved convictions of top Trump campaign advisors and associates for lying about their Russia contacts during the campaign

     Burr, a Republican senator from North Carolina, gave a lengthy interview to CBS News last week where he said his committee staff has worked for two years, interviewed more than 200 witnesses from multiple countries and reviewed over 300,000 pages

 'Based on the evidence to date,' Burr said his panel could not definitively say there was collusion between Trump and the Russians

'If we write a report based upon the facts that we have, then we don't have anything that would suggest there was collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia,' Burr told the network

However, panel Democrats are disputing Burr's statement.  'I'm not going to get into any conclusions I have,' said top Democrat Sen

Mark Warner of Virginia, adding: 'there's never been a campaign in American history

that people affiliated with the campaign had as many ties with Russia as the Trump campaign did

'Warner told Mother Jones the probe is far from completed. 'We've still got many of the most major figures to either come or come back,' he said

Special Counsel Robert Mueller's probe is also continuing, despite repeated claims by President Trump's legal team that it is wrapping up

Weeks ago federal prosecutors indicted longtime Trump lawyer Roger Stone with witness tampering and obstruction, and obtained electronic communications through an FBI raid on his Florida home

Prosecutors have revealed in court filings that Trump campaign chair Paul Manafort passed campaign polling to former Ukrainian partner Konstantin Kilimnik, who has ties to Russian intelligence

 'The notion that the president's campaign manager was sharing internal campaign documents with the Russians in advance of the release of information that came from Russia and that interfered massively with the campaign is mind-boggling,' Warner told Mother Jones

 

For more infomation >> Trump crows no 'collusion' after Senate Intel chair's comment - Daily News - Duration: 3:55.

-------------------------------------------

Donald Trump's White House golf scam exposed - Duration: 1:40.

For more infomation >> Donald Trump's White House golf scam exposed - Duration: 1:40.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump Not Happy With Border Security Deal - Duration: 1:49.

For more infomation >> President Trump Not Happy With Border Security Deal - Duration: 1:49.

-------------------------------------------

Hillary Clinton zings Republicans after Trump uses her 'Stronger Together' slogan - Duration: 3:46.

Hillary Clinton needled the Republican National Committee on Tuesday after Donald Trump slipped her 2016 campaign slogan 'Stronger Together' into his El Paso, Texas rally speech

The president, who defeated Clinton in the 2016 White House contest, told a capacity crowd Monday night that he has had 'a great romance' with Texas, 'and we're only getting stronger together

' The RNC drove the slogan pilfering home on Tuesday, tweeting an image of Trump with the slogan overlaid

'Now copy my plan on health care, a fairer tax system, and voting rights,' Clinton replied in a tweet, adding a link to her 2016 campaign platform

'Stronger Together' was Clinton's counter to 'Make America Great Again' as the two presidential hopefuls held dueling campaign events

The words appeared in powder blue and white at nearly every Clinton speech, starting in late 2015

The phrase was the title of the election-year book she co-authored with Virginia Sen

Tim Kaine, her vice presidential running mate.Their campaign also made ads based on the theme

The GOP fired back at Clinton on Tuesday, jabbing on Twitter: 'How about this: We'll give you your slogan back if you run again

' Clinton has reportedly not ruled out a third run for the White House.She lost the 2008 Democratic nomination to Barack Obama eight years before falling to Trump in the general election

But an RNC spokesman told Fox News that her old tagline is fair game.'When you lose your campaign, you lose your monopoly on any slogans,' Steve Guest said

'As we saw at his packed rally, President Trump continues to unite the American people behind his pro-border security agenda

' Trump spoke to 6,500 people in El Paso on Monday night, with a throng estimated at 10,000 watching outside the El Paso County Coliseum on giant video screens

Former Texas Democratic congressman Beto O'Rourke held a counter-rally acros town attended by an estimated 7,000 people, blasting Trump for using the Texas border region as a prop to argue for his long-promised wall

For more infomation >> Hillary Clinton zings Republicans after Trump uses her 'Stronger Together' slogan - Duration: 3:46.

-------------------------------------------

Trump could win 2020, Green new deal, abortion, crazy democrats - Duration: 12:51.

For more infomation >> Trump could win 2020, Green new deal, abortion, crazy democrats - Duration: 12:51.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Likely To Sign Deal On 'Physical Barrier' - Duration: 1:52.

For more infomation >> Trump Likely To Sign Deal On 'Physical Barrier' - Duration: 1:52.

-------------------------------------------

Top Trump Challenger Made A Huge Mistake That Just Ruined Their Career - Duration: 8:08.

Top Trump Challenger Made A Huge Mistake That Just Ruined Their Career

One Democrat made a name for themselves in the 2018 campaign as the biggest threat to

Donald Trump.

And they tried to seize on that momentum by issuing another big threat to the President.

But the top Trump challenger ended up making a huge mistake that just ruined their career.

Every Democrat thinking about running for President is jockeying for a position in the

ever growing field of contenders.

That is leading some to take risks in order to gain attention from the voters.

Former Texas Congressman Beto O'Rourke staged just such a publicity stunt to get back into

the national conversation, since it had been dominated by Democrats declaring their intentions

to run for President.

O'Rourke was not ready to make that move, so instead he staged a counter-rally to Donald

Trump's event in Texas to promote his proposed border wall.

And as Trump pointed out in his speech, this faceoff did not go well for O'Rourke.

"If you really want to see something, go outside.

Tens of thousands of people are watching screens outside," Trump noted.

"We were all challenged by a young man who lost an election to Ted Cruz," Trump told

the crowd.

Trump mocked O'Rourke for thinking about running for President after suffering an election

loss.

Normally, electoral victories are what catapults a politician to the top tier of Presidential

contenders.

"And then they said, you know what, hey, you're supposed to win in order to run,"

the President continued.

Trump compared O'Rourke's failed electoral record to his own, where Trump won the only

election he ever participated in.

"We, I, we.

I'm one and one.

I'm one for one.

Think of it.

We had one election.

We won.

Now we're going to be two for 0 and everything's gonna be perfect," said Trump.

Heading into Trump's rally, the fake news media promoted O'Rourke's counter-protest

as a split-screen preview of 2020.

But if that was the case, then O'Rourke's campaign imploded before it even launched.

His rally drew a measly few hundred leftists.

Trump, on the other hand, had 69,000 people send an RSVP, and 35,000 Americans showed

up.

The crowd was so massive that they had to set up an overflow area for thousands of people

to listen to the speech on speakers.

"A young man who has very little going for himself except he's got a great first name,"

the President explained to the crowd.

"He challenged us.

So we have, let's say, 35,000 people tonight and he has 200 people, 300 people, not too

good."

"What I would say is that may be the end of his presidential bid, but he did challenge

us," President Trump concluded.

If O'Rourke's pitiful crowd didn't send a signal that he was on the wrong side of

the issue, then his rhetoric of putting the interests of illegal aliens ahead of American

citizens sure did.

O'Rourke railed against the border wall that protects El Paso from Juarez, Mexico

– which is one of the most dangerous cities in the world.

There is no questioning that the wall helped cut down on illegal border crossings.

But O'Rourke inexplicably claimed that walls don't work.

O'Rourke ranted that El Paso was "one of the safest cities in the United States

of America.

Safe not because of walls, but in spite of walls."

The Texas Democrat then claimed – without citing evidence – that border walls kill

people.

"Walls do not save lives, walls end lives," O'Rourke hysterically stated.

All in all, the event was a disaster for O'Rourke on every level.

Do you think the pitiful showing for Beto O'Rourke's anti-wall rally damaged his

Presidential campaign?

Let us know your

thoughts

in the comment section.