Trump news on Youtube Feb 14 2019

now staying where the US and China trade relations president Donald Trump says

he's open to extending a march 1st deadline to raise tariffs and Chinese

products if the two sides are near an agreement his remarks came as the

world's two biggest economies are holding talks to resolve their trade war

the 10 percent or two hundred million goes up to 25 percent on March 1st

and so far I've said don't do that now if we're close to a deal where we think

we can make a real deal and it's going to get done I could see myself letting

that slide for a little while but generally speaking I'm not inclined to

do that US Trade Representative Robert light Iser and Treasury Secretary

Stephen Lucien are now in Beijing two stays ahead of high-level talks with

their Chinese counterparts a possible shift in the Montford deadline it will

likely come after those talks

For more infomation >> Trump open to extending March 1 deadline on China tariffs - Duration: 0:56.

-------------------------------------------

Poll: Strong approval for Trump among Republicans, disapproval among Democrats - Duration: 1:15.

For more infomation >> Poll: Strong approval for Trump among Republicans, disapproval among Democrats - Duration: 1:15.

-------------------------------------------

Trump not 'thrilled' by deal to end shutdown but may back it - Duration: 1:41.

Partisan politics have long ruled Capitol Hill and they still do

but with a compromise agreed-upon to avoid another government shutdown both Democratic

and Republican leaders have been putting pressure on Donald Trump to greenlight

their tentative spending deal.

'Please Mr.President, no one got everything they wanted

in this bill but sign it and don't cause a shutdown'

'I think, I think he's got a pretty good deal here you know. I think,

I think he's done just fine I hope he'll conclude that because he's got to sign the bill.

The President received the news of the bipartisan compromise before

going on the stage at a rally Monday in Texas, but he's yet to publicly say he'll

sign it, for it would a lot just under 1.4 billion dollars in spending for

border fences and not the 5.7 billion Trump sought for a concrete or steel

wall along the US' southern border. The offer is less than a previous compromise

one that Trump rejected leading to last month's record-breaking 35 day

government shutdown, the president now says he might reconsider.

"I can't say I'm happy, I can't say I'm thrilled but the walls getting built

regardless, doesn't matter because we're doing other things beyond what we're

talking about here so we'll see what happens we're having a meeting on it later."

What's changed this time around is both pressure from Republican senators

and the fallout from the previous shutdown, which many blamed Trump and the GOP for.

Yet the US president remains adamant, he says that if he signs the

deal he'll still find a way. Through declaring a national emergency or

reappropriation funds to finance his long-promised wall.

For more infomation >> Trump not 'thrilled' by deal to end shutdown but may back it - Duration: 1:41.

-------------------------------------------

The members of Trump's inner circle are taking turns selling him out - Duration: 3:22.

For more infomation >> The members of Trump's inner circle are taking turns selling him out - Duration: 3:22.

-------------------------------------------

There are two good reasons Trump should accept a no wall deal Los Angeles Times - Duration: 2:51.

There are two good reasons Trump should accept a no wall deal Los Angeles Times

True to form, top congressional appropriators found a way to cut a deal on border security issues Monday night, opening a path to a fully funded, functioning federal government for the remaining seven months of the fiscal year.

Now, if only President Trump will take it. He may be tempted to say no, but he has better reasons to say yes.

By including no money for a new border wall, and even less money for border fencing than the Senate had proposed in December, the negotiators sent an obvious but still somehow necessary message to Trump: Elections matter. The president had made the midterm elections a referendum on border security, and the GOP lost the House. So Republicans dont have nearly as much leverage over the issue as they used to.

Trump told reporters Tuesday morning that he was not happy about the deal, adding that he would meet with other administration officials later in the day to decide how to respond. He could obviously reject it, which would almost certainly force another partial government shutdown.

The last shutdown clearly damaged Trumps standing with most Americans, his already weak approval ratings. But Trump may be tempted to take another run at forcing Democrats to cough up some money for his wall because he may finally have found a message on border security that works, at least in the context of his bid for reelection next year, and another shutdown would give him the opportunity to keep beating that drum.

A Trump theme for 2020 is that the Democratic Party has been taken over by extremists who want to open the border, disband Immigration and Customs Enforcement and unleash dangerous criminals on unsuspecting Americans. And yes, there are some on the left who have called for disbanding ICE and who oppose almost all deportations. But thats cherry picking, not unlike calling the GOP the party of zero reproductive rights because there are some Republican lawmakers who oppose abortion in any and all circumstances.

Unfortunately for Democrats, their negotiators from the House Appropriations Committee made a demand that was easy for Trump to caricature as an attack on border security.

The House conferees proposed a tough cap on ICE detentions in the interior of the United States that is, away from the border. The point, as Rep. Lucille Roybal Allard D Downey explained in an interview, is to force ICE to shift its focus back to violent criminals in the country illegally. Right now, ICE is just indiscriminately going out and rounding up not just criminals, but mom and dads heading to church, taking their kids to school, she said.

The detainees Roybal Allard characterizes as moms and dads, however, the administration paints as MS 13 gang bangers. In a briefing Monday, ICE Deputy Director Matt Albence said, If we are forced to live within a cap based on interior arrests, we will immediately be forced to release criminal aliens that are currently sitting in our custody. Well be releasing gang members. Well be releasing individuals convicted of ... domestic violence and drug crimes.

Thats a powerful image, even though it seems to be anchored in a mischaracterization of who detainees are. ICEs statistics show that the agency removed in fiscal 2018 who had been ordered deported, 57 percent of whom were convicted criminals. But it did not break down what those convictions represented. Customs and Border Patrol did offer obtained for the nearly 6,300 people it arrested in the first 11 months of fiscal 2018, and more than half of them were convicted simply of entering or reentering the country illegally. Less than one sixth of the arrests were for violent crimes or weapons related charges.

Only ICE knows for sure the sort of folks who would be released if detentions were capped, and ICE is insisting that the results would be a horror show. That assertion fits into Trumps Democrats as extremists meme.

On the other hand, here are two reasons Trump would be better off taking the deal.

For starters, he simply doesnt have the votes to get more money for his wall. Since Democrats won the House, the offers from Congress have been getting worse, not better; a bipartisan proposal in December would have provided dollar 1.6 billion for 65 miles of new fencing, compared with less than dollar 1.4 billion for 55 miles of fencing in the current proposal.

Second, given that , the president is mainly interested in scoring points with his base the group that may be hard pressed to accept anything less. The surest way to deliver that prize is for Trump to circumvent Congress by declaring a national emergency and shifting funds to the wall from some other project that was previously funded.

That may very well prove to be illegal, and even if it isnt, it would set a horrible precedent. But its a safer bet for Trump than forcing another shutdown that would hurt his standing even more, with little or no likelihood of congressional Democrats caving on the wall.

For more infomation >> There are two good reasons Trump should accept a no wall deal Los Angeles Times - Duration: 2:51.

-------------------------------------------

Why Trump wants to build a wall on the border with Mexico? (Valeriy Pyakin 2019.01.05) - Duration: 4:14.

Presenter: We have been working for more than an hour. It's 13 h. and 2 m. MSK.

And a couple more questions from Timofey:

"Why does Trump talk about the state of emergency regarding the building of the wall on the US-Mexican border? What's going on at the Mexican border?"

Valeriy Pyakin: The border with Mexico and the migration are used in the domestic political struggle.

The fact is that the American state "elites" are ready to resist Trump.

We were constantly told about American democracy.

We were told that the presidents changed, but the US policy didn't change, that the presidents are working for unaltered American Interests.

And now we see that there are various American interests and different parts of the American "elites" represent different segments of these interests.

So, the American state "elites" are cutting their own throats.

They don't understand it.

They want to preserve the American domination in the world, in order to use its resources without understanding

that such a situation will crash the US with fatal consequences.

The US will be plunged into civil war so crazy that the movie "Mad Max" (and other movies they have made) will seem like a child's play to them.

The American pro-GP "elites" understand it and they want to rearrange the American global dominance within the US will US gradually, with minimal harm.

But to do this they have to separate relations with the whole world.

And the state "elites" having a significant percentage in the government system resist because otherwise they will lose their job.

If there is no American domination, then everyone who is working abroad should look for a new job.

And those in the USA who work to ensure the governance of the US should be closed by whole departments, they become useless.

So they resist. How to move them, how to take them away?

Here you are, the shutdown, and the incident with the wall.

Look, the US had Congress elections recently. Democrats won in 15 "Republican" states.

But these Democrats opposed 'the Democrats', that is they sided with the global "elites", but not with the American state "elites".

I've told many times that there is no vertical division into Democrats and Republicans.

There is a horizontal division with the state "elites" who understand nothing in the bottom,

and global "elites" who are brought to the supranational governance, including the US, in the top.es that there is no vertical division into Democrats and Republicans.

That's why Trump can consider the elections successful because the global "elites" have won.

And it doesn't matter if they are Republicans or Democrats.

For more infomation >> Why Trump wants to build a wall on the border with Mexico? (Valeriy Pyakin 2019.01.05) - Duration: 4:14.

-------------------------------------------

Donald Trump's remaining supporters reach a whole new low - Duration: 2:37.

For more infomation >> Donald Trump's remaining supporters reach a whole new low - Duration: 2:37.

-------------------------------------------

Trump crows no 'collusion' after Senate Intel chair's comment - Daily News - Duration: 3:55.

President Donald Trump crowed Wednesday about statements by the chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee that the panel's two-year probe has not found evidence of collusion between his campaign and Russia

The president trumpeted a fresh comment by panel chair Sen. Richard Burr, who has gone on record twice about what his panel has not found following a two-year investigation

 'The Senate Intelligence Committee: THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION BETWEEN THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN AND RUSSIA!' Trump tweeted Wednesday morning, using all capital letters to reiterate something he has himself proclaimed throughout his presidency

Burr told reporters Tuesday: 'There is no factual evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia

' And NBC News confirmed the panel had found no 'direct evidence' of a conspiracy between the campaign and Russians, even as the Mueller probe has achieved convictions of top Trump campaign advisors and associates for lying about their Russia contacts during the campaign

     Burr, a Republican senator from North Carolina, gave a lengthy interview to CBS News last week where he said his committee staff has worked for two years, interviewed more than 200 witnesses from multiple countries and reviewed over 300,000 pages

 'Based on the evidence to date,' Burr said his panel could not definitively say there was collusion between Trump and the Russians

'If we write a report based upon the facts that we have, then we don't have anything that would suggest there was collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia,' Burr told the network

However, panel Democrats are disputing Burr's statement.  'I'm not going to get into any conclusions I have,' said top Democrat Sen

Mark Warner of Virginia, adding: 'there's never been a campaign in American history

that people affiliated with the campaign had as many ties with Russia as the Trump campaign did

'Warner told Mother Jones the probe is far from completed. 'We've still got many of the most major figures to either come or come back,' he said

Special Counsel Robert Mueller's probe is also continuing, despite repeated claims by President Trump's legal team that it is wrapping up

Weeks ago federal prosecutors indicted longtime Trump lawyer Roger Stone with witness tampering and obstruction, and obtained electronic communications through an FBI raid on his Florida home

Prosecutors have revealed in court filings that Trump campaign chair Paul Manafort passed campaign polling to former Ukrainian partner Konstantin Kilimnik, who has ties to Russian intelligence

 'The notion that the president's campaign manager was sharing internal campaign documents with the Russians in advance of the release of information that came from Russia and that interfered massively with the campaign is mind-boggling,' Warner told Mother Jones

 

For more infomation >> Trump crows no 'collusion' after Senate Intel chair's comment - Daily News - Duration: 3:55.

-------------------------------------------

Donald Trump's White House golf scam exposed - Duration: 1:40.

For more infomation >> Donald Trump's White House golf scam exposed - Duration: 1:40.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump Not Happy With Border Security Deal - Duration: 1:49.

For more infomation >> President Trump Not Happy With Border Security Deal - Duration: 1:49.

-------------------------------------------

Hillary Clinton just took a blowtorch to Donald Trump - Duration: 1:28.

For more infomation >> Hillary Clinton just took a blowtorch to Donald Trump - Duration: 1:28.

-------------------------------------------

Hillary Clinton zings Republicans after Trump uses her 'Stronger Together' slogan - Duration: 3:46.

Hillary Clinton needled the Republican National Committee on Tuesday after Donald Trump slipped her 2016 campaign slogan 'Stronger Together' into his El Paso, Texas rally speech

The president, who defeated Clinton in the 2016 White House contest, told a capacity crowd Monday night that he has had 'a great romance' with Texas, 'and we're only getting stronger together

' The RNC drove the slogan pilfering home on Tuesday, tweeting an image of Trump with the slogan overlaid

'Now copy my plan on health care, a fairer tax system, and voting rights,' Clinton replied in a tweet, adding a link to her 2016 campaign platform

'Stronger Together' was Clinton's counter to 'Make America Great Again' as the two presidential hopefuls held dueling campaign events

The words appeared in powder blue and white at nearly every Clinton speech, starting in late 2015

The phrase was the title of the election-year book she co-authored with Virginia Sen

Tim Kaine, her vice presidential running mate.Their campaign also made ads based on the theme

The GOP fired back at Clinton on Tuesday, jabbing on Twitter: 'How about this: We'll give you your slogan back if you run again

' Clinton has reportedly not ruled out a third run for the White House.She lost the 2008 Democratic nomination to Barack Obama eight years before falling to Trump in the general election

But an RNC spokesman told Fox News that her old tagline is fair game.'When you lose your campaign, you lose your monopoly on any slogans,' Steve Guest said

'As we saw at his packed rally, President Trump continues to unite the American people behind his pro-border security agenda

' Trump spoke to 6,500 people in El Paso on Monday night, with a throng estimated at 10,000 watching outside the El Paso County Coliseum on giant video screens

Former Texas Democratic congressman Beto O'Rourke held a counter-rally acros town attended by an estimated 7,000 people, blasting Trump for using the Texas border region as a prop to argue for his long-promised wall

For more infomation >> Hillary Clinton zings Republicans after Trump uses her 'Stronger Together' slogan - Duration: 3:46.

-------------------------------------------

Trump could win 2020, Green new deal, abortion, crazy democrats - Duration: 12:51.

For more infomation >> Trump could win 2020, Green new deal, abortion, crazy democrats - Duration: 12:51.

-------------------------------------------

Trump discusses Venezuela with Colombian president at White House - Duration: 2:25.

For more infomation >> Trump discusses Venezuela with Colombian president at White House - Duration: 2:25.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump Enraged After Details Leaked To Media Out Of Spite - Duration: 2:06.

For more infomation >> President Trump Enraged After Details Leaked To Media Out Of Spite - Duration: 2:06.

-------------------------------------------

Macron : un pantin selon Bannon, l'ancien conseiller de Trump - Duration: 3:16.

For more infomation >> Macron : un pantin selon Bannon, l'ancien conseiller de Trump - Duration: 3:16.

-------------------------------------------

Donald Trump Is Being Sued AGAIN - Duration: 4:26.

Donald Trump is being sued.

Once again, the man who just seems to be sued by everyone for everything, whether it's not

paying as contractors or you know, all of the horrible policies he's put in place.

All the emoluments that he is accepted, the guy just constantly gets sued.

Well, this new lawsuit is actually similar to other law suits that have been filed against

him and his administration.

This one is being brought by six migrant families who the Trump administration's separated from

their children at the border and they're now suing Trump and the administration for the

unnecessary pain, suffering and trauma that they caused to these families.

Right now there's only six in the lawsuit.

It's very likely that that number is going to increase dramatically.

Assuming this case has given permission to move forward and it should be able to move

forward.

I don't think that's going to be a question, but there probably will be a hearing to determine

whether or not these people have standing and here's the thing though, they absolutely

do have standing.

They were in here in the United States on American soil.

At which point they are protected by the laws of the United States of America citizen or

not.

So yes, that argument's pretty easy to settle.

Do they have standing?

Hell yeah, they do, but here's why they're suing.

Again, these are mothers who had their children in some cases actually literally ripped out

of their arms and taken away.

The parents were not told where their kids were going there.

We're not told how long they would be separated.

They were not allowed to contact them.

They didn't know a thing.

They were taken to a separate cage and locked up.

Their kid was taken to a different facility, sometimes a different city, sometimes a different

state, and they had no idea.

The kids didn't know where the parents were.

The parents didn't know where the kids, where they couldn't communicate with each other.

They were abused while in custody and according to the filing of this lawsuit that has caused

insurmountable damage psychologically to both the parents and the kids leaving them with

this PTSD and they want something done.

They want something someone held accountable.

Now, each of the families, the six families involved or seeking $2 million a piece for

the suffering and the pain and the trauma that was caused to them by the administration.

But it's not necessarily about the money.

What they want to do is send the administration a message, which is actually what most lawsuits

are about.

It's not just about getting money, it's not a cash grab.

What it is is to highlight a policy or a problem, bring it to the public's attention and then

force a change.

We have seen that with lawsuits since the beginning of this country.

You know, the last century alone has shown us how powerful lawsuits can be in changing

the laws in this country.

Tobacco laws, seat belt laws, uh, you know, pharmaceutical testing requirements, all kinds

of things that only came about because of lawsuits as best as agent orange.

That's what they're trying to do with this policy here.

They're trying to show that there is very real damage being caused by the Trump administration's

family separation policy, and that the policy was only enacted so that the president could

prove to the rest of the world how cruel he truly is.

This was not a safety issue.

This was not a security issue, and it did nothing to deter people from coming into this

country.

This entire family separation policy was built on one thing and one thing alone, and that

was to show everybody how horrible and heartless the United States government can truly be.

And that is what these lawyers representing these families are about to go argue in court.

For more infomation >> Donald Trump Is Being Sued AGAIN - Duration: 4:26.

-------------------------------------------

'(Trump's Rally In) El Paso' By Marty Robbins - Duration: 1:22.

For more infomation >> '(Trump's Rally In) El Paso' By Marty Robbins - Duration: 1:22.

-------------------------------------------

Photographer Shows Trump Without Fake Tan And Fake Hair And It's Hilarious - Duration: 3:42.

Recently a Photoshop image of Donald Trump went viral on social media because this image

was not mocking Trump.

It wasn't making fun of Donald Trump.

It was showing what Donald Trump would actually look like if he wasn't such a vain and vacuous

individual.

This image was created by a New Zealand photographer named Jordan Rivers.

He posted on Facebook and what he did was he took a regular picture of Donald Trump,

put it into Photoshop, did the color match tool, and he took the color around Donald

Trump's eyes.

You know, where the fake Orange Tan has not been able to penetrate.

So he then used that color from under the eyes and matched the rest of his face to it.

He also removed the ridiculous comb-over and showed what Donald Trump would look like if

he was just a normal human being that wasn't trying to alter his appearance to make himself,

I don't know, appear younger, appear more virile, whatever it is, he wants to look a

different way than he does.

And this new, uh, New Zealand photographers showed us the real Donald Trump.

And this is it.

This is the picture here.

This is what Donald Trump would look like without the fake orange spray tan or tanning

beds or whatever the hell it is.

And if he had the courage to admit, you know what?

I'm going bald.

It happens.

It happens to men all over the world and there's nothing to be ashamed about with it.

Trust me bud.

But you can't do that.

And to me, that's why this little project that this photographer put out there is so

important.

We have a president who we're supposed to trust.

We're supposed to trust this person to handle our foreign policy, to make the right decisions

for our military, to protect us as American citizens and enact policies that are going

to benefit every one of us.

And yet we can't even trust him to show us who he really is.

He is fake.

The Harris fake, the Tan is fake.

Everything about this man is fake.

And that's what this photographer's project was trying to show us because when you take

away the comb over, you take away the fake Tan.

What do you have left?

You have a feeble, frightened white guy who's so terrified that people might eventually

peek behind the curtain and see how horrible he truly is.

Or at least that's what's happening in his mind.

There's nothing wrong with being yourself with looking like yourself.

You know, this guy could seriously pin a fit from some body positive, uh, advertisements

here yet instead, he would rather spend more time hiding his true appearance than actually

doing the job of being the president of the United States.

And that's just another reason why nobody in this country should ever trust this man.

He's more concerned about the Face he sees looking back at him in the mirror than he

is about taking care of American citizens.