Trump news on Youtube Jan 7 2019

Donald Trump attacked Venom - Donald Trump Sniper Episode 3

For more infomation >> Donald Trump attacked Venom - Donald Trump Sniper Episode 3 - Duration: 4:21.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Kills Al Qaeda Operative Behind USS Cole Attack, Vows To Do What Obama Didn't - Duration: 5:07.

For more infomation >> Trump Kills Al Qaeda Operative Behind USS Cole Attack, Vows To Do What Obama Didn't - Duration: 5:07.

-------------------------------------------

Angel Mom Sabine Urges Dems "Love Americans More Than You Hate Trump!" - Duration: 2:20.

For more infomation >> Angel Mom Sabine Urges Dems "Love Americans More Than You Hate Trump!" - Duration: 2:20.

-------------------------------------------

Trump: 'Not Much Headway' Made As Shutdown Enters Day 16 | Sunday TODAY - Duration: 3:04.

For more infomation >> Trump: 'Not Much Headway' Made As Shutdown Enters Day 16 | Sunday TODAY - Duration: 3:04.

-------------------------------------------

Details of second N. Korea-U.S. summit to be announced in not too distant future: Trump - Duration: 1:28.

top story this morning US President Donald Trump has revealed that

negotiations are underway on the venue for his second summit with North Korean

leader Kim jong-un Trump explained he's been in indirect communication with Kim

but didn't elaborate on when the summit might actually take place kim hyusun

starts us off

president Trump has been speaking optimistically about a second summit

with North Korean leader Kim jong-un speaking to reporters outside the White

House on Sunday he said the venue is already being

discussed we're negotiating a location it will be announced probably not in the

not-too-distant future they have made it very clear in fact they've actually said

to the media that they would like to meet and they do want to meet and we

want to meet and we'll see what happens he also revealed that he has spoken

indirectly with the North Korean leader adding that the situation with Pyongyang

is much better now compared to when he first took office

president Trump however added the sanctions against the regime remain in

effect as for the location of a second summit CNN reported last week that the

Trump administration is reviewing a number of places citing diplomatic

sources the report said Vietnam Hawaii and even the Demilitarized Zone that

separates the two Koreas have been mentioned as possible summit venues

Huson arirang news

For more infomation >> Details of second N. Korea-U.S. summit to be announced in not too distant future: Trump - Duration: 1:28.

-------------------------------------------

URGENT,Trump stands of budging on his demand for $5.6 billion for a wall along the U.S Mexico border - Duration: 11:15.

Welcome to USA news today

Please subscribe and check

notification box

To get all breaking news alerts and latest updates on hot cases

So we've been in touch with a lot of people and I informed my folks to say

That we'll build a steel barrier steel and we made out of steel

It'll be less obtrusive and it'll be stronger

But it'll be less obtrusive

Stronger and we're able to use our great companies to make it by using steel

So we're going to be doing a steel barrier and that

Gives us great strength

at the border

I

Would consider doctor, but I think we complicated

I'd rather have the Supreme Court Rule and then you work with the Democrats on doctor

I want to help with daca, but I'd rather have this, you know going to these important Supreme Court very soon and

Rogers and Julie something was backing out Bregman rather work with the Democrats. Let's be Supreme Court

Now we're looking at a national emergency because we have a national emergency just read the papers

we have a crisis at the border of drugs of

Human being see traffic all over the world. They're coming through and we have a

Absolute crisis and of criminals and gang members coming through it is national security. It's a national emergency

Well, we'll be letting you know fairly soon

Well, we have a lot of different ways, I'm not going to get into that

I'm just saying we are looking at it very strongly, but hopefully we can do it this way

And as I told you it's going to be a steel

Border and that's going to give us great strength

They don't like concrete so we'll give them steel steel is fine steel is actually

Steel is actually more expensive than concrete, but it'll look beautiful. And it's very strong. It's actually stronger. I

Think they will make an adjustment because they want to see the butters

They've been give you know government workers want to see the border taking care if it affects them very dearly

They love our country and they want to make sure that we have a strong water

I don't know Democrats are not probably in this case. A lot of them are Democrats

You have a lot of Republicans too, but regardless, I mean that's the way it is

Those people are great Americans that great Patriots. They want to make sure we have a strong border very important

Welcome back president Trump doubling down on his calls for a border wall with Mexico before heading to off to Camp David

To meet with senior advisors. Let me bring in California Democratic congressman roe Connor right now

He is the vice chairman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus

He sits on both the House Budget and Armed Services committees and Congressman. It is good to have you on the program this morning

Thanks Maria for having me on we just heard from Senator Shelby and he could not identify

What the Democrats want?

Why will you not vote for a wall?

Well, two things first of all, we should have the functioning of government

Taking place and not hold that hostage to any president's personal cause look I represent Silicon Valley

We can't have companies IP owing which is hurting the markets or making things more volatile

So let's fund government and then separately let's have the debate on immigration. But Senator Shelby said, what are the Democrats won?

I said we want very simply three things first. The president should level with the American people that he was wrong

Mexico isn't going to pay for border security. He wants Congress to pay for border security

secondly, he should have a path for the dreamers to have some legal way of staying in the United States and third you should

Recognize that this is the 21st century

Most people who are here in an undocumented way have overstayed their visas where we need

The investment is on better technology better sensors better

Enforcement not on a wall which is a 15th century idea, but what's wrong with the wall?

I mean, you're not going to leave your doors unlocked and let anybody come in. You have a wall and have a concrete

Stopping from from strangers coming in. Can you really say a wall doesn't work? Well, I think we have more technology, right?

I mean, I'm in my house. I don't have a wall around it, but I have an alarm system

So I think that if you're gonna look at what the marginal benefit of investments are you would get more from funding some of these

technology solutions and secondly a lot of the people who are here in an

Undocumented way they came here legally, but they've overstayed their visas in a wall does nothing to fix that

So the Democrats are for securing our borders

no one believes that we shouldn't secure our borders we want to do so in a thoughtful way and by the way, the

Immigration deal in 2013 that was reached had funding for border security

But first let's get government back up and running. Let's pay the people at TSA. Let's pay border agents

Let's allow Silicon Valley companies to IPO to help the market. No congressman

honestly

I mean a lot of people believe this is all about

politics the fact that the Democrats do not want this president to have one more thing to be able to say I

Had a promise during the campaign. I kept that promise because you mentioned daca

There was a deal from the President on daca a year and a half ago. And the DEM said no

He actually didn't take the deal the Senate had a bipartisan bill that the president rejected and the president wanted a far more

Conservative version but the reality is the president's campaign promise. Was that Mexico was going to pay for it, and he still hasn't explained

Why Mexico isn't paying for it. And so I think that that is important for him to level but put the politics aside

let's talk about

funding for border security

and the best way to do it and a lot of the experts will tell you that the president's idea of a wall isn't

Actually, what's going to secure our borders?

It's not what's going to help

against drug trafficking and sex trafficking and all the problems that he's

Identified and I want to be clear because you have not been afraid to stand up to leadership in your party when you feel it

Doesn't make sense and when you disagree

You've said that you are opposing the House Democratic rules leadership package

I want to know why you're doing that

Explain the rules package and what you don't like about it and also this broader divide within the demo party

I mean you are the vice chairman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus

We know that you've got lots of members who are pulling the overall party all the way to the left and that goes against what?

Many moderate Democrats want to do in terms of leadership. So, how are you going to correct that?

Well, let me answer both questions

First on Pago which I opposed what that requires is that the government has to have an offset

Congress has to have an offset for any single piece of legislation. I opposed it is because it's bad economics. I mean in a

recession you need the government to spend and in a

Economy that's doing well. You don't need the government to spend as much that's just basic economics

Anyone who has studied economics 101 knows that?

Right, you know so I oppose that on that principle

Your broader question is a good one and look I have not been partisan

For example, even though I disagreed with the way the president has pulled out of Syria. I actually support his decision

to start pulling out of Syria in Afghanistan and there were many congressional progressives who worked with people on

the right on a policy of more foreign policy restraint

So I don't think that the lines in Congress are always just left, right?

I think the question is who's going to have more restraint and foreign policy and how are we going to have an economic policy?

that helps working-class and middle-class Americans and you may actually see some

strange or interesting coalition's to get those policies through

But one of your colleagues Alexander Ocasio portes wants to raise

Taxes on the on the top earners and we know that the top 10 percent of all earners

Already pay 70% of the tax in this country, sir

Why are you for what ALC is saying I?

I'm not for her exact plan. I my view is we can get the revenue by getting us out of bad wars

By repealing a large part of the bush and trump tax cuts and by taxing companies who are making a lot of their money overseas

I mean right now we are not taxing companies overseas

So there are disagreements that within the Democratic caucus the exact way to get something done

But I think at the end of the day the basic party will be unified on a few goals

We want an infrastructure bill. We want to lower the cost of prescription drugs

We should try to get out of these bad Wars. We need to bring jobs to places left behind and frankly

I some of these ideas aren't even partisan. Look I was at the White House two weeks ago

The President signed a bill working with the White House innovation office to modernize our federal websites

We have to find common ground in this country we can disagree

But what are we doing to make sure the country is moving forward?

so we leave the 21st century and not China so so many of your colleagues and you included sign this form bill 867

Billion dollars and it really is

Questionable that you can't find five billion dollars to secure the borders. This is an ongoing

Conversation and will continue to have at conferen. I hope you'll join us again soon. Thanks very much for joining us. I appreciate it

Appreciate your having me on

You

For more infomation >> URGENT,Trump stands of budging on his demand for $5.6 billion for a wall along the U.S Mexico border - Duration: 11:15.

-------------------------------------------

Whistleblowers Reveal Comey's Central Role in Trump Spying Cover-Up - Duration: 5:43.

For more infomation >> Whistleblowers Reveal Comey's Central Role in Trump Spying Cover-Up - Duration: 5:43.

-------------------------------------------

TRUMP ÖLDÜRME OYUNU !?! - Whack The Trump - Duration: 5:59.

For more infomation >> TRUMP ÖLDÜRME OYUNU !?! - Whack The Trump - Duration: 5:59.

-------------------------------------------

First 2 Years of Trump vs Obama in Job Creation a BLOWOUT! - Duration: 3:16.

For more infomation >> First 2 Years of Trump vs Obama in Job Creation a BLOWOUT! - Duration: 3:16.

-------------------------------------------

Opinion The People vs. Donald J. Trump The New York Times - Duration: 6:55.

Opinion The People vs. Donald J. Trump The New York Times

He is demonstrably unfit for office. What are we waiting for?

Opinion Columnist

The presidential oath of office contains 35 words and one core promise: to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. Since virtually the moment Donald J. Trump took that oath two years ago, he has been violating it.

He has repeatedly put above those of the country. He has used the presidency to promote his businesses. He has accepted financial gifts from foreign countries. He has lied to the American people about his relationship with a hostile foreign government. He has tolerated cabinet officials who use their position to enrich themselves.

To shield himself from accountability for all of this — and for his unscrupulous presidential campaign — he has set out to undermine the American system of . He has called for the prosecution of his political enemies and the protection of his allies. He has attempted to . He has tried to shake the publics confidence in one democratic institution after another, including the press, federal law enforcement and the federal judiciary.

The unrelenting chaos that Trump creates can sometimes obscure the big picture. But the big picture is simple: The United States has never had a president as demonstrably unfit for the office as Trump. And its becoming clear that 2019 is likely to be dominated by a single question: What are we going to do about it?

The easy answer is to wait — to allow the various investigations of Trump to run their course and ask voters to deliver a verdict in 2020. That answer has one great advantage. It would avoid the national trauma of overturning an election result. Ultimately, however, waiting is too dangerous. The cost of removing a president from office is smaller than the cost of allowing this president to remain.

He has already shown, repeatedly, that he will hurt the country in order to help himself. He will damage American interests around the world and damage vital parts of our constitutional system at home. The risks that he will cause much more harm are growing.

Some of the biggest moderating influences the administration. The defense secretary who defended our alliances with NATO and South Korea is gone. So is the attorney general who refused to let Trump subvert a federal investigation into himself. The administration is increasingly filled with lackeys and enablers. Trump has become freer to turn his whims into policy — like, say, shutting down the government on the advice of Fox News hosts or pulling troops from Syria on the advice of a Turkish autocrat.

The biggest risk may be that an external emergency — a war, a terrorist attack, a financial crisis, an immense natural disaster — will arise. By then, it will be too late to pretend that he is anything other than manifestly unfit to lead.

For the countrys sake, there is only one acceptable outcome, just as there was after Americans realized in 1974 that a criminal was occupying the Oval Office. The president must go.

Achieving this outcome wont be easy. It will require honorable people who have served in the Trump administration to share, publicly, what they have seen and what they believe. At this point, anonymous leaks are not sufficient. It will require congressional Republicans to acknowledge that they let a con man take over their party and then defended that con man. It will require Democrats and progressive activists to understand that a rushed impeachment may actually help Trump remain in office.

But if removing him will not be easy, its not as unlikely as it may sometimes seem. From the beginning, Trump has been an unusually weak president, as have pointed out. Although members of Congress have not done nearly enough to constrain him, no other recent president has faced nearly so much public criticism or private disdain from his own party.

Since the midterm election showed the political costs that Trump inflicts on Republicans, this criticism . They have broken with him on foreign policy in Saudi Arabia, Yemen and Syria and are anxious about the government shutdown. Trump is vulnerable to any erosion in his already weak approval rating, be it from an economic downturn, more Russia revelations or simply the defection of a few key allies. When support for an unpopular leader starts to crack, it can .

Before we get to the how of Trumps removal, though, I want to spend a little more time on the why — because even talking about the ouster of an elected president should happen only under extreme circumstances. Unfortunately, the country is now so polarized that such talk instead occurs with every president. Both George W. Bush and Barack Obama were subjected to reckless calls for their impeachment, from of no less.

So lets be clear. Trumps ideology is not an impeachable offense. However much you may disagree with Trumps tax policy — — it is not a reason to remove him from office. Nor are his efforts to cut government health insurance or to deport undocumented immigrants. Such issues, among others, are legitimate matters of democratic struggle, to be decided by elections, legislative debates, protests and the other normal tools of democracy. These issues are not the treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors that the founders .

Yet the founders also did not intend for the removal of a president to be impossible. They insisted on including an impeachment clause in the Constitution because they understood that an incompetent or corrupt person was nonetheless likely to attain high office every so often. And they understood how much harm such a person could do. The country needed a way to address what called the abuse or violation of some public trust and called the incapacity, negligence or perfidy of a president.

The negligence and perfidy of President Trump — his high crimes and misdemeanors — can be separated into four categories. This list is conservative. It does not include the possibility that his campaign coordinated strategy with Russia, which remains uncertain. It also does not include to the job, like his refusal to read briefing books or the many empty hours on his schedule. It instead focuses on demonstrable ways that he has broken the law or violated .

Regardless of party, Trumps predecessors took elaborate steps to separate their personal financial interests from their governing responsibilities. They released their tax returns, so that any potential conflicts would be public. They placed their assets in a blind trust, to avoid knowing how their policies might affect their own investments.

Trump has instead treated the presidency as a branding opportunity. He has continued to own and promote the Trump Organization. He has spent at one of his properties and for hundreds of thousands of dollars.

If this pattern were merely petty corruption, without damage to the national interest, it might not warrant removal from office. But Trumps focus on personal profit certainly appears to be affecting policy. Most worrisome, foreign officials and others have realized they can curry favor with the president by spending money at one of his properties.

Saudi Arabia has showered the Trump Organization , and Trump has stood by the Saudis despite their brutal war in Yemen and their assassination of a prominent critic. A Chinese government owned company reportedly gave to a Trump backed project in Indonesia; two days later, Trump announced that he was lifting sanctions on another well connected Chinese company.

These examples, and many more, flout of the Constitution, which bans federal officeholders from accepting emoluments from any foreign country unless Congress approves the arrangement. Madison, when making the case for an impeachment clause, spoke of a president who might betray his trust to foreign powers.

Then, of course, there is Russia. Even before Robert Mueller, the special counsel, completes his investigation, the known facts are damning enough in at least one way. Trump lied to the American people during the 2016 campaign about between his company and Vladimir Putins government. As president, Trump has taken steps — in Europe and Syria — that benefit Putin. To put it succinctly: The president of the United States lied to the country about his commercial relationship with a hostile foreign government toward which he has a strangely accommodating policy.

Combine Trumps actions with his tolerance — including ones who have made shady stock trades, accepted lavish perks or used government to promote their own companies or those of their friends — and the Trump administration is almost certainly the most corrupt in American history. It makes Warren G. Hardings Teapot Dome scandal look like, well, a tempest in a teapot.

A Watergate grand jury famously described Richard Nixon as Trump now has his own indictment tag: Individual 1.

Federal prosecutors in New York last month alleging that Trump — identified as Individual 1 — directed a criminal plan to evade campaign finance laws. It happened during the final weeks of the 2016 campaign, when he instructed his lawyer, Michael Cohen, to pay a combined dollar 280,000 in hush money to two women with whom Trump evidently had affairs. Trump and his campaign did not disclose these payments, as required by law. In the two years since, Trump has lied publicly about them — initially saying he did not know about the payments, only to change his story later.

Its worth acknowledging that most campaign finance violations do not warrant removal from office. But these payments were not most campaign finance violations. They involved large, secret payoffs in the final weeks of a presidential campaign that, prosecutors said, deceived the voting public. The seriousness of the deception is that the prosecutors filed criminal charges against Cohen, rather than the more common penalty of civil fines for campaign finance violations.

What should happen to a president who won office with help from criminal behavior? The founders specifically considered this possibility during their debates at the Constitutional Convention. The most direct answer : A president who practiced corruption and by that means procured his appointment in the first instance should be subject to impeachment.

Whatever Mueller ultimately reveals about the relationship between the Trump campaign and Russia, Trump has to keep Mueller — and others — from getting to the truth.

Again and again, Trump has interfered with the investigation in ways that may violate the law and clearly do violate decades old standards of presidential conduct. He James Comey, then the F.B.I. director, to let up on the Russia investigation, as a political favor. When Comey refused, Trump fired him. Trump also repeatedly pressured Jeff Sessions, the attorney general, the investigation and ultimately forced Sessions to resign for not doing so. Trump has also several of the governments top experts on Russian organized crime, including Andrew McCabe and Bruce Ohr.

And Trump has repeatedly lied to the American people. He has , outrageously, that the Justice Department tells witnesses to lie in exchange for leniency. He has rejected, with no factual basis, the findings of multiple intelligence agencies about Russias role in the 2016 campaign. He reportedly helped his son Donald Trump Jr. a false statement about a 2016 meeting with a Russian lawyer.

Obstruction of justice is certainly grounds for the removal of a president. It was of the first Nixon article of impeachment passed by the House Judiciary Committee. Among other things, that article accused him of making false or misleading public statements for the purpose of deceiving the people of the United States.

The Constitution that Trump swore to uphold revolves around checks and balances. It depends on the idea that the president is not a monarch. He is a citizen to whom, like all other citizens, the countrys laws apply. Trump rejects this principle. He has instead tried to undermine the credibility of any independent source of power or information that does not serve his interests.

Its much more than just the Russia investigation. He has tried to delegitimize federal judges based on their ethnicity or on the president who appointed them, drawing a rare from Chief Justice John Roberts. Trump has the Justice Department for indicting Republican politicians during an election year. He has called for Comey, Hillary Clinton and other political opponents of his to be jailed.

Trump has described journalists as the enemy of the people — an insult usually leveled by autocrats. He has rejected basic factual findings from the C.I.A., the Congressional Budget Office, research scientists and others. He bald lies about election fraud.

Individually, these sins may not seem to deserve removal from office. Collectively, though, they exact a terrible toll on American society. They cause people to lose the faith on which a democracy depends — faith in elections, in the justice system, in .

No other president since Nixon has engaged in behavior remotely like Trumps. To accept it without sanction is ultimately to endorse it. Unpleasant though it is to remove a president, the costs and the risks of a continued Trump presidency are worse.

The most relevant precedent for the removal of Trump is Nixon, the only American president to be forced from office because of his conduct. And two aspects of Nixons departure tend to get overlooked today. One, he was never impeached. Two, most Republicans — both voters and elites — until almost the very end. His approval rating among Republicans was still about 50 percent when, realizing in the summer of 1974 that he was doomed, he resigned.

The current political dynamics have some similarities. Whether the House of Representatives, under Democratic control, impeaches Trump is not the big question. The question is whether he loses the support of a meaningful slice of Republicans.

I know that many of Trumps critics have given up hoping that he ever will. They assume that Republican senators will go on occasionally criticizing him without confronting him. But it is a mistake to give up. The stakes are too large — and the chances of success are too real.

Consider the following descriptions of Trump: ; ; reckless; impetuous; unstable; a pathological liar; ; a concern to . Every one of these descriptions comes from a Republican member of Congress or of Trumps own administration.

They know. They know he is unfit for office. They do not need to be persuaded of the truth. They need to be persuaded to act on it.

Democrats wont persuade them by impeaching Trump. Doing so would probably rally the presidents supporters. It would shift the focus from Trumps behavior toward a group of Democratic leaders whom Republicans are never going to like. A smarter approach is a series of sober minded hearings to highlight Trumps misconduct. Democrats should focus on easily understandable issues most likely to bother Trumps supporters, like corruption.

If this approach works at all — or if Muellers findings shift opinion, or if a separate problem arises, like the economy — Trumps Republican allies will find themselves in a very difficult spot. At his current approval rating of , Republicans were thumped in the midterms. Were his rating to fall further, a significant number of congressional Republicans would be facing long re election odds in 2020.

Two examples are Cory Gardner of Colorado and Susan Collins of Maine, senators who, not coincidentally, have shown tentative signs of breaking with Trump on the government shutdown. The recent criticism — who between critical and sycophantic, depending on his own political interests — is another sign of Trumps weakness.

For now, most Republicans worry that a full break with Trump will cause them to lose a primary, and it might. But sticking by him is no free lunch. Just ask the 27 Republican incumbents who were last year and are now former members of Congress. By wide margins, suburban voters and younger voters find Trump abhorrent. The Republican Party needs to hold its own among these voters, starting in 2020.

Its not only that Trump is unfit to be president and that Republicans know it. It also may be the case that they will soon have a political self interest in abandoning him. If they did, the end could come swiftly. The House could then impeach Trump, knowing the Senate might act to convict. Or negotiations could begin over whether Trump deserves to trade resignation for some version of immunity.

Finally, there is the hope — naïve though it may seem — that some Republicans will choose to act on principle. There now exists a small club of former Trump administration officials who were widely respected before joining the administration and whom Trump has sullied, to greater or lesser degrees. It includes Rex Tillerson, Gary Cohn, H.R. McMaster and Jim Mattis. Imagine if one of them gave a television interview and told the truth about Trump. Doing so would be a service to their country at a time of national need. It would be an illustration of duty.

Throughout his career, Trump has worked hard to invent his own reality, and largely succeeded. It has made him very rich and, against all odds, elected him president. But whatever happens in 2019, his false version of reality will not survive history, just as Nixons did not. Which side of that history do todays Republicans want to be on?

with commentary on the news and reading suggestions from around the web.

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on and and .

For more infomation >> Opinion The People vs. Donald J. Trump The New York Times - Duration: 6:55.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Unloads On CNN Reporter On White House Lawn For Claiming He Failed Campaign Promise(VIDEO)!!! - Duration: 13:32.

Trump Unloads On CNN Reporter On White House Lawn For Claiming He Failed Campaign Promise

yes yes ma'am you ran your campaign promising supporters that Mexico is

going to pay for the war always going to be made of concrete

you just said earlier that the wall could be made of steel and right now our

government is shut down over a demand from your administration that the

American taxpayer pay for the wall so how can you say you're not failing on

that promise to your supporters a very nice question so beautifully asked even

though I just answered look let me just excuse me excuse me you ready are you

ready I just told you that we just made a trade deal and we will take in

billions and billions of dollars far more than the cost of the wall the wall

as peanuts compared to what the value of this trade deal is to the United States

as far as concrete I said I was going to build a wall I never said I'm gonna

build a concrete I said I'm gonna build a wall just so you know cuz I know

you're not into the construction business you don't understand something

we now have a great steel business that's rebuilt in the United States

Steel is stronger than concrete if I build this wall or fence or anything

that Democrats need to call it because I'm not into names I'm into production

I'm into something that works if I build a steel wall rather than a concrete wall

it will actually be stronger than a conquerer steel is stronger than

concrete okay in case you could check it out listen if

I build a wall and the wall is made out of steel instead of concrete I think

people will like that and here's the other good thing I'll have it done by

the United States Steel Corporation by companies in our country that are now

powerful great companies again and they become powerful over the last two years

because of me and because of our trade policies so if I have a steel wall or

you could call it a steel fence but it'll be more powerful than any of the

concrete walls that we're talking about it's possible that it will look better

and one of the things I think you have seen this that's very important for us

very very important in speaking of Border

Patrol ice and actually local law enforcement and even military they want

to be able to see through it you can't really see through a concrete well they

want to be able to see who's on the other side of the wall because if

they're here and you have about a 12 inch concrete wall and you have people

on the other side but you can't see what's over there it's very dangerous

they want to be able to see through the wall a see-through wall made out of

steel is far stronger than a concrete wall so I'm very happy with it I think I

think I'm not sure but I think that's what the Democrats prefer and if it can

get them there I'm okay it actually will be a more powerful wall and it will be a

more beautiful wall than having a concrete wall so we can do trade deal

mr. president Jeff Jeff thank you miss go ahead Thank You mr. president I want

to ask you two questions one as you talked about the wall eminent domain

many of those who own property on the southern border will lose their property

because of this and once this happens they say that they could go to court

with you for years it could take years then also what is the safety net for

federal workers you're saying months and possibly a year for this shutdown do you

have in mind a safety net for those who need their checks those who need s-s-i

those who need Medicaid what have you well the safety net is going to be

having a strong border because we're gonna be safe I'm not talking about

economically but ultimately economically I really believe that these people many

of the people that we're talking about many of the people you're discussing I

really believe that they agree with what we're doing and we could have this April

we can have this fixed very quickly we can this can happen by early next week

we're gonna be working over the weekend we can have a solution to this but I

wanted to keep it all at one point and I think a lot of the people that you're

referring to April Argo are really wanting that to happen - I really

believe a lot of them want to see border security and they're willing to give it

up I had when I had the people in yesterday they represent most of the

Border Patrol people that you had yes that were at the news conference they

represent most of water patrol every one of them said don't even think about us

get this fixed that is doing the great thing for a country as far as eminent

domain you're right a hundred percent eminent domain is very interesting but

without eminent domain you wouldn't have any highways you wouldn't have any

schools you wouldn't have any roadways what we're doing with eminent domain is

in many cases we'll make a deal upfront that we've already done that the

Secretary has done a lot of that and if we can't make a deal we take the land

and we pay them through a court process which goes actually fairly quickly and

we're generous but we take the land otherwise you could never build anything

if you didn't use them in a domain you wouldn't have one highway in this

country you have to use eminent domain it's actually something you don't want

to use it but if you're going to do a stretch as an example of pipelines and

other things that go you have to use eminent domain otherwise you'd never be

able to buy the land if we had one person that wouldn't sell us out of

hundreds just one it only takes one that we wouldn't be able to build proper

border security because we'd have that big opening that I was talking about so

what happens is some are paid upfront you make a deal upfront and we're

willing to do that in all cases and when they're unwilling to make a deal which

also happens then you go to court but in the meantime we're able to build the

border security so I think it's a fair process I think it's a process that's

very necessary but I think it's fair couldn't that hold up your wall no it's

not gonna hold it up because under the military version of eminent domain and

under actually homeland security we can do it before we even start now a lot of

times we'll make a deal and I would say a good percentage of the time we're

making deals we have already purchased a lot of it you know a lot of the money

that we've been given has already been spent on purchasing the land the

right-of-way it's essentially a right-of-way so we are very very far

along on that but eminent domain is something that has to be used usually

you would say for anything that's long like a road like a pipeline or like a

wall or a fence okay thank you good question it's a good question

please please go ahead thank you two questions first mr. president have you

considered using emergency powers did we keep this going or not folks sure I just

don't want to say always stood out there you know you have so many questions I'm

just looking at Mike and Steve and Kevin I'm saying should we and most

importantly Madam Secretary I'm just oh you are you called yeah take take mine

you are mine now I'm just saying you want sure we keep this going Elise yes I

did go ahead so first let me know when you

get tired I'm not have you considered using emergency powers to grant yourself

authorities to build this wall without congressional approval and second I have

to go you have yes I have and I can do it if I want so you don't need

congressional approval to build no we can use them absolutely we can call a

national emergency because of the security of our country absolutely no we

can do it I haven't done it I may do it I may do it but we could call a national

emergency and build it very quickly and it's another way of doing it but if we

can do it through a negotiated process we're giving that a shot so is that a

threat hanging over the Democrats I never threatened anybody but I am

allowed to do that yes second question called a national

emergency on Mexico the benefits from that trade deal are going to go to

private companies private citizens so you're talking about tax revenues

they're gonna pay tremendous tax so it's American taxpayers I'll give you an

example when a company was going to leave for Mexico or Canada but for

Mexico because we lost tremendous amounts of our car business like 25

percent to Mexico if they stay all of those taxes that they have been paying

real estate taxes sales taxes employee employer taxes tremendous taxes that

nobody even understands they pay the tremendous income taxes federal income

taxes state income taxes in some cases all of those taxes stay with us the wall

is you know it's it's great but the USMC a which gives a

disincentive for companies to leave it's a tremendous disincentive anybody that

leaves after this deal is done look it's one of the primary reasons

that I like it because I can live pre NAFTA - the only thing I can't live with

is NAFTA I can live pre NAFTA before NAFTA before everybody left New England

and left all of the different places Ohio Pennsylvania I mean you still have

empty steel factories all over the place and other factories I can live pre NAFTA

very easily but the only thing I'm not living with is NAFTA that was one of the

worst trade deals ever made so those are American taxpayer dollars which you

consider essentially Mexico paying for the wall well many many times over look

the u.s. MCA will make in the form that we right now are losing approximately a

hundred hard to believe and this doesn't include the drugs pouring in which is

probably a much higher number than anybody would even know in addition to

destroying lives and families so horribly we are losing close to a

hundred billion dollars a year on trade with Mexico for many years

not only that they have a tax of seventeen percent we don't have a tax so

they have a value-added tax of seventeen percent we don't have a tax of seventeen

percent that deal was bad today it was made because they charged the tax before

the deal was made it we didn't it was an obsolete deal when it was made like

thirty years ago whatever it was no no all of this stuff is changing now this

is a fair deal this is a good deal for Mexico frankly oil companies and other

companies have an incentive now to go to Mexico and take oil out and that's why

we're keeping gasoline prices so low you look at what's going on with gasoline

prices I mean it's rather incredible if you

look back four months ago oil hit eighty three dollars a barrel

eighty three it was heading to a hundred and then it could have gone to a hundred

and twenty five you want to see problems let that happen after I made some phone

calls to OPEC and the OPEC nations which is essentially a monopoly all of a

sudden it started coming down I'm very happy with what's happened and I'm very

happy that people are paying a lot less in many cases than $2 a gallon for

gasoline you look at what's happening everyone's talking about didn't happen

by luck it happened through Talent hold it one at a time please good mr.

president why not reopen the government to create more space to have that

broader conversation well we think it could go very quickly no we won't be

opening until it's solved we think this is a much bigger problem the border is a

much more dangerous problem it's a much bigger problem it's a problem of

national security it's a problem of terrorists you know I talked about human

traffickers I talk about drugs I talk about gangs but a lot of people don't

say we have terrorists coming through the southern border because they find

that's probably the easiest place to come through they drive right in and

they make a left not gonna happen he's not gonna happen so so we're not

going to do that we won't be doing pieces we won't be doing it in drips and

drabs and I'll tell you what I've seen a lot of people over the last week and a

half I've been right in this magnificent structure right behind you it's called

the White House and I was here on Christmas and I was here my family was

in Florida I said go to Florida and I didn't even find it to be a lonely place

there's something very special about the white house but I was here Christmas I

was here on New Year's Eve and I will tell you the people that I've spoken

with and I've gotten to meet a lot of people that I wouldn't have met a lot of

people have been coming through the White House and explaining different

things and different attitudes a lot of people that you think are upset and

certainly they're not thrilled but they say sir do the right thing we need

border security and these are people that won't be getting paid Border Patrol

yesterday we're saying sir we're affected by it do what's right it's time

this is after many many decades many many decades this should have taken

place a long time ago we're gonna get it done you thank you god bless you and God

bless america

For more infomation >> Trump Unloads On CNN Reporter On White House Lawn For Claiming He Failed Campaign Promise(VIDEO)!!! - Duration: 13:32.

-------------------------------------------

MIGRANT CARAVAN BREAKING 🔴 President Trump gives UPDATE on Border Wall and Government Shutdown - Duration: 26:17.

For more infomation >> MIGRANT CARAVAN BREAKING 🔴 President Trump gives UPDATE on Border Wall and Government Shutdown - Duration: 26:17.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Worried That Former Aides Will Expose His Incompetency Before 2020 Election - Duration: 3:29.

One of my favorite stories to read about Donald Trump is when he's terrified of something,

and I know that's not necessarily substantive, but it is interesting to see how fearful the

president of the United States truly is because we get stories like this all the time.

Know you see the headlines.

Donald Trump afraid that X, Y, or Z terrified of person A, B, or C, well, we've got another

one of these folks except in this case, it turns out Donald Trump is actually a terrified

of every person that has ever worked for him in the Oval Office.

See, according to a new report by the daily beast, Donald Trump is terrified.

It's actually the word that some of the White House insiders use, terrified of former aides

and staffers and cabinet members coming forward and airing all of the presidents dirty laundry

prior to the 2020 presidential election.

Now, here's the thing, before you get too excited, let me go ahead and call me down

a bit because it's not like any of these people are going to come forward and say, oh my God.

I saw Donald Trump committing collusion.

I saw Donald Trump committing campaign.

No, no, no, no.

They didn't witness any crimes being committed by the president of the United States.

They could have.

They absolutely could have, but that's not what the president's even afraid of.

What he is afraid of is any of these aides coming forward and talking about how dysfunctional

and incompetent Donald Trump is as the president of the United States.

That's what he fears the most is people not respecting him.

People not looking up to him, people not admiring him, and those people who worked in the west

wing with him.

They understand just how incompetent and delusional he truly is so they can go out there and they

can tell their stories.

It's not going to put Donald Trump in jail, but what it's going to do is hurt his ego

and it might even hurt the perception that his base has of Donald Trump as this super

strong alpha male type who can do no wrong.

That's not what reality is.

Reality is what those aides and staffers got to see every single day.

They saw an overweight out of shape man sitting his ass on the couch watching Fox News and

angrily tweeting about what he saw on the network.

I mean, he's everybody's Grandpa at this point, except he uses twitter and most other grandparents

don't.

Typically, that's what this is.

He should be sitting in his condo in New York City, in his underwear, eating popcorn, watching

Fox News, not sitting in the Oval Office, angrily tweeting about Fox News while also

bombing other countries.

That's the danger here, but he understands that every perception he gave, every person

he belittled and every staffer that he yelled at, all of them have a story to tell about

him, and those stories are going to absolutely destroy his ego as well as the image that

he has been projecting to his base since day one, and nothing is more damaging to Donald

Trump than hurting his ego.

For more infomation >> Trump Worried That Former Aides Will Expose His Incompetency Before 2020 Election - Duration: 3:29.

-------------------------------------------

No incentives for Trump, Democrats to compromise on border wall? - Duration: 4:57.

For more infomation >> No incentives for Trump, Democrats to compromise on border wall? - Duration: 4:57.

-------------------------------------------

Reporter Asks Sarah Sanders THIS QUESTION Over Trump's BORDER Then All Hell Broke Loose On Schumer!! - Duration: 11:10.

Reporter Asks Sarah Sanders THIS QUESTION Over Trump's BORDER Then All Hell Broke Loose On Schumer

joining me now here in the studio White House press secretary Sarah Sanders

Sarah welcome back to Fox News Sunday great to be with you so what is the

latest on the negotiations did they make any progress yesterday well they made

some progress yesterday the fact that they're sitting down at the table is

some progress in and of itself but they've got a long way to go I mean

Democrats set down the first thing that one of the individuals from the Democrat

side said in the in the meeting was we're not here to make an agreement so

this was the beginning of a conversation that still has I think a lot left to be

worked out they're gonna meet again later this afternoon and hopefully

they'll continue to make progress and continue to move the ball down the field

at the end of the day though Democrats have said over and over again that they

support border security that they support protecting American citizens now

it's time to fulfill some of those statements that they've made work with

the president let's get this done let's open the government of course the

question is is the wall the best way to do it I'm going to ask you about that in

a minute but again going back to Friday the president met what he said that he

is prepared to confide for the wall to continue the shutdown for months or even

years well I think that's one of the things that people misunderstand the

president's not fighting for the wall he's fighting for the protection of

American citizens absolutely he wants the wallet he wants a number of other

things we have a completely broken immigration system we have a national

crisis it's not just of safety and security but a humanitarian crisis we

have drugs we have human traffickers we have terrorists that come across our

border and there has to be a stop to that and we want to do not just the wall

certainly that's one of the most important factors we know that it works

we know that in the places that it's been it's 95 percent effective we want

to be effective across the board and that includes the wall and other

technology but you're not answer my question he meant what he said he's

prepared to continue this fight this shutdown for months or even years

absolutely the president means what he says when he says that but it would be

outrageous for Democrats who agree with the president that's

what's the most outrageous thing to me and something that frankly is so just

incomprehensible they agree with the president they agree that we need border

security they just are unwilling to let this president win and I think at some

point they have to decide that they care more about Americans than fighting the

president and so far we haven't seen a willingness on their side to fully do

that let's let's talk about caring about Americans because House Democrats this

week passed six bills that would fund eight agencies unrelated to Homeland

Security unrelated to the wall that would get them back going right now and

the question is why not sign that bill fund those agencies that have nothing to

do with the border wall and not hold those hundreds of thousands of federal

workers and the services they provide hostage anybody hostage the president

wants to fund the government he wants to open the government you could open those

eight other agencies we've been having this debate for years at some point we

have to say enough is enough until we can come together we can be reasonable

which we have put forth in good faith multiple offers to Democrats to say

let's make a deal let's let's have a discussion let's get to a place where we

agree we have to stop kicking the can down the road and just continuing okay

let's do it again in 30 days let's do it in 45 days talk about security that dot

but you can continue to fight about that if you want and shut it down but why

hold agriculture hostage why hold justice hostage why hold the the

Treasury Department hostage why not fund them they have nothing to do with a

border wall the president wants to do this all at once he knows it's better if

they can focus on getting all of these packages done at one day the real reason

is because we want the leverage from all these it's not that but you also have to

look at the six the six bills those aren't the budget that we submitted

either there are a lot of discrepancies I'm not saying we oppose those six I'm

just saying to make it like this is an easy deal we want to be able to

negotiate but at the same time you can't just keep passing the buck this is a

major point of contention and let's just sit down and work it out okay but if

this shutdown drags on not months or years but even into Feb you

it's going to start to hurt real people take a look at this Sarah federal tax

refunds will be delayed food stamps for 38 million Americans will be cut

millions of people will lose rental assistance payments and union leaders

say hundreds of TSA workers are already off the job because they can't afford to

get to work president from fins the border wall is

worth all of that look the president certainly doesn't want any of those

things to happen but you know what else he doesn't want to see happen he never

wants to make a phone call like the one he made earlier this week where he spoke

to officer Singh of California's widow because an illegal immigrant came across

our border and killed him in cold blood that shouldn't happen in this country

particularly when we have things that we know can help prevent it every life

that's what sets America apart from every other country we value life it's

what makes us unique and the day that we stopped doing that even if it's 110 or a

hundred thousand that's when we stop being the greatest country on the face

of this earth not only people like that but we also have a massive influx of

drugs that come across the southern border ninety percent of the heroin that

comes into this country comes across through the southern border and three

hundred Americans are killed from that every single let's talk about the wall

because there is no question that there has been a big spike in the number of

family units coming across the border the president talks about terrorists

potentially coming across the border and here is Secretary of Homeland Security

Niels that take a look CBP has stopped over 3,000 what we call special interest

aliens trying to come into the country and the southern border those are aliens

who the Intel community has identified are of concern but special interest

aliens are just people who come from countries that have ever produced a

terrorist are not terrorists themselves and the State Department says that there

is quote their words no credible evidence of any terrorists coming across

the border from Mexico we know that roughly nearly 4,000 known or suspected

terrorists come into our country illegally and

know that our most vulnerable point of entry is I know this statistic I didn't

know if you're gonna use it but I studied up on this do you know where

those four thousand people come or where they're captured airports not always

land and it's by sea it's all of the above but one thing that you're

forgetting is that the most vulnerable point of entry that we have into this

country is our southern border and we have to protect it and the more in the

southern borders Sarah they're coming and they're being stopped in every way

so they're certainly I'm not disagreeing with you that they're coming through

airports I'm saying that they come by air by land and by sea and the more and

more that our border becomes vulnerable and the less and less that we spend time

and money protecting it the more that we're gonna have an influx not just of

terrorists but of human traffickers drug in flow and people that are coming here

to do American citizens harm okay the president now says and this was a

revelation on Friday that he can go around Congress and build this wall on

his own take a look we can call a national emergency because of the

security of our country absolutely no we can do it I haven't done it I may do it

I may do it but we could call a national emergency and build it very quickly how

serious is he about that has the White House drafted an emergency order a

resolution that he could that he could announce tomorrow we're clearing a

national emergency we're going to build the wall has he set a deadline for when

he's gonna end talks and simply say I'm gonna go off on my own and do it and is

he really prepared it's a lot of questions well three is he really

prepared it's all the same question which is how serious is he is he really

prepared to go off on his own and use money that was authorized for military

construction and build a wall instead the president's prepared to do what it

takes to protect our borders to protect the people of this country he knows that

the number one job he has as president and commander-in-chief is to protect its

citizens and if he doesn't take that seriously whether it's at our southern

border or whether it's from terrorists coming

from whatever way they come or any other places I really think he has do harm to

Americans then he is not going to be the president that he knows himself to be in

layers that that he has the authority to build the wall with funds that were

appropriated for the military construction without congressional

approval as we've said for the last several weeks we're looking and

exploring every option available that the president has and it's not a viable

option whatever action he takes will certainly be lawful and we're looking at

every option we can this is something the president takes incredibly seriously

it's very passionate about and it's not gonna stop until he figures out the best

way to make sure we're doing everything we can to make America safer and more

secure I got less than a minute left president Trump is at Camp David today

to meet with White House senior officials about his priorities for 2019

what can you tell us about the meeting and about what his agenda is we've had

an incredible first two years under the president Trump the economy is strong

Isis has been on the run the judiciary is being made we have just a number of

successes over these first two years we want to look at how we're going to

continue to build on those as we move into 2020 top priority I think the

president's got a lot immigration certainly has to be at the forefront

right now that's one of the biggest things that we have to get done is

securing our border but not just securing the border but fixing the

immigration system as a whole it's completely broken the president wants to

make sure we look at all of the different things loopholes we can close

to make that better infrastructure fighting the opioid crisis those are

gonna be things that also not only are the president's big priorities but

things we think we might be able to get Democrats to actually work with us the

American people elected them to come here and do more than just fight the

president and we hope that they'll fulfill their constituents hopes for

them and do exactly that Sarah thank you thank you thanks for coming in today

always good to talk always great to be here thank you

god bless you and God bless america

For more infomation >> Reporter Asks Sarah Sanders THIS QUESTION Over Trump's BORDER Then All Hell Broke Loose On Schumer!! - Duration: 11:10.

-------------------------------------------

Joe: President Donald Trump Has Undercut Main Principles Of The GOP | Morning Joe | MSNBC - Duration: 13:50.

For more infomation >> Joe: President Donald Trump Has Undercut Main Principles Of The GOP | Morning Joe | MSNBC - Duration: 13:50.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Averaged 15 Lies PER DAY In 2018 - Duration: 3:33.

Well, now that the year 2018 is officially over, we are several days at this point.

End of the year, 2019.

We have to look back at all of the lies that President Donald j Trump told during the year

2018.

Luckily The Washington Post fact checker has been keeping track of these since day one

as they do with presidents and they found out that Donald Trump averaged 15 lies per

day in the year 2018 5,600 total lies told by the president from January first of last

year to December 31st 5,600 lines, 15 averaged per day.

That is triple.

Actually a little more than triple the total number of lies that he told the year before.

Here's what's interesting, this is a from the article here says Trump spent the first

half of the year and most of December at his 2017 average of $200 to $250 per month.

Not Bad, right?

Uh, but that increased to 500 lies in June, July and August.

Then 600 and September, more than 1200 in October.

And nearly 900 in November, according to the Washington Post Fact Checker, 25% of these

lies, which is why the number went up so high in October.

We're actually told at his rallies, in fact, there were several rallies that the post fact

checker analyzed where he told over 90, sometimes over 100 lies just in his 55 minute speeches.

So 25% of the total lies for the year.

We're told at rallies, 17% came from twitter.

17% of his total lie total came from his twitter feed.

Now here's the depressing part of this story, and that is that his base doesn't care.

The people at the rallies did not care that they were being lied to accept.

Obviously that one guy who was standing behind the president making that face, that guy got

it.

He understood he was being lied to, which is why they switched him out shortly thereafter

with other people.

But nonetheless, the people at those rallies don't care that they're being lied to.

Some of them know they're being lied to and don't care about it.

The rest of them don't even understand that that is the power of Donald Trump.

That is the only a manner in which the man actually has power.

It's his power to manipulate people.

The power to tell them quite literally what you see with your eyes isn't real.

What you're hearing with your ears isn't real.

He told them that and they believed it.

We can't trust our own eyes.

We can't trust our own ears.

We can't trust facts and figures and statistics.

Instead, we have to only believe what you say because you wouldn't lie to us.

Well, in fact, he did.

He did it 15 times every single day last year.

On average.

He did it close to 6,000 times throughout the entirety of the year, 2018 because that

is all the man knows how to do.

He is a serial liar.

He is immune to reality and he only appeals to people who share those same traits that

he has.