Friday, December 14, 2018

Trump news on Youtube Dec 14 2018

Well, the war on Christmas is well underway at this point, but it turns out the people

actually waging the war on Christmas might be the current occupants of the White House.

Donald trump has decided that he is not going to throw the annual Christmas party for members

of the media this year.

It had been a long standing tradition at the White House throwing a Christmas party for

members of the press showing a little bit of goodwill and then moving on.

Donald trump can't even muster enough goodwill to be in the same room as these people or

God forbid, let them enjoy themselves for a little bit and he decided to cancel Christmas

for the White House press corps.

Well, I can't even say he canceled Christmas for the White House press corps because apparently

he is still going to do a Christmas party for certain members of the press.

Just it's only going to include the ones that are favorable to him, which includes most

of the people on Fox News and Fox.

Fox News are the folks who reported that there is going to be a separate little smaller Christmas

party.

Some of us are going to it, so that's actually what's happening right now.

Donald trump didn't do this because they didn't have the resources or because he hates all

the media.

He did it because he is a petty and spiteful human being that did not want to give that

kind of honor or pleasure to members of the press who go out there and accurately report

on his administration every single day.

Never in my lifetime have I seen a president this hostile towards the media.

I mean George W dot Bush got ripped by these people all the time, but he is still had enough

courage to go to the White House correspondence dinner to sit there and be mocked and ridiculed

and roasted and he laughed about it.

Same thing with Obama.

He even did interviews on Fox News who hated him, but Donald Trump can't even muster the

courage to throw these people a holiday party.

Now tell me, does that sound like the people who are trying to preserve Christmas or do

they just want to make it about themselves and all their little buddies over at Fox News?

So maybe this year there actually is a war on Christmas.

It's just that in an m night Shyamalan kind of twist.

It's coming from the Republicans themselves.

For more infomation >> Trump Has TOTAL Meltdown, Cancels Christmas Party For Reporters - Duration: 3:47.

-------------------------------------------

Incoming NY AG Boasts She'll Investigate Everyone Around Trump - Duration: 2:19.

For more infomation >> Incoming NY AG Boasts She'll Investigate Everyone Around Trump - Duration: 2:19.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Suddenly Canceled White House Christmas Bash – Has Better Plans Instead - Duration: 3:10.

For more infomation >> Trump Suddenly Canceled White House Christmas Bash – Has Better Plans Instead - Duration: 3:10.

-------------------------------------------

Democrats Try To Nail Trump For Hush Money, But Obama Is The One Panicking - Duration: 6:37.

For more infomation >> Democrats Try To Nail Trump For Hush Money, But Obama Is The One Panicking - Duration: 6:37.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Ruins Spoiled Reporters' Holidays by Nixing WH Christmas Party They Love So Much - Duration: 2:15.

For more infomation >> Trump Ruins Spoiled Reporters' Holidays by Nixing WH Christmas Party They Love So Much - Duration: 2:15.

-------------------------------------------

El presidente de México se comunicó con el Donald Trump | Un Nuevo Día | Telemundo - Duration: 3:36.

For more infomation >> El presidente de México se comunicó con el Donald Trump | Un Nuevo Día | Telemundo - Duration: 3:36.

-------------------------------------------

The Migrant Caravan Issued This Threat To Trump That Will Leave You Speechless - Duration: 3:31.

For more infomation >> The Migrant Caravan Issued This Threat To Trump That Will Leave You Speechless - Duration: 3:31.

-------------------------------------------

OMG!! UNBELIEVABLE!! TRUMP ABOUT TO PROSECUTE MUELLER & COMEY! - Duration: 10:06.

OMG!!

UNBELIEVABLE!!

TRUMP ABOUT TO PROSECUTE MUELLER & COMEY!

president of Judicial Watch tom Fitton joins me now so tom this is a victory for you and

some critics of the former attorney general jeff sessions might even say it's a victory

for the Justice Department to force them to do something that maybe they should have done

before

what's your thought you know one aspect of this ruling is the court didn't just criticize

the Obama State Department in Justice Department but highlighted the problem of this Justice

Department continuing to defend the indefensible he specifically talked about the chicane

eree of this justice department's continued defense and excuse making for the misconduct

of Hillary Clinton in the State Department of Justice Department previously so and he

also talked about not being terribly convinced about mr. commis testimony about the thoroughness

of his Clinton email investigation and

it shows you the value frankly Harris if we could promote you to watch a little bit of

having an independent group like Judicial Watch focused on this because Congress has

dropped the ball here the Justice Department frankly is on the other side of this even

during this

administration and you know the courts have been hoodwinked here to use a phrase that

the court highlighted in his decision and so they're not going to back down and now

some some people like mrs.

Clinton potentially are going to have to answer additional questions you know I am curious

about one point

because we have found out recently that Ivanka Trump also had her own personal email server

with some emails on it and she has talked substantively about how all of that sits on

the White House server or and and that nothing had been

deleted if critics of the Trump administration question about that comparatively to Hillary

Clinton and what you're seeking what is your answer well it frankly just highlights the

egregious nature of what mrs.

Clinton

did when you compare what happened with Ivanka Trump where you had some emails about government

business being sent on her private account before and after her work at the White House

emails by all accounts that were captured

and preserved which is in fact what they probably need to be but there's no legal prohibition

on using personal emails for government business now and again the prop the difference here

is Hillary Clinton specifically set up an email system to make sure no emails would

be

captured by the government and provided to investigators as long as she had anything

to do with it until as the court highlighted Judicial Watch caught him you know there is

another another difference to that I see that I wonder it could your FOIA or could this

investigation get to the bottom of will we ever know exactly how many and how the emails

were destroyed I mean we've heard all sorts of stories about this was taken out into the

woods and they attacked it and that server was destroyed I mean what are the facts that

you know so far about that that's important it's the deletions it's that it's that sort

of subterfuge accusation well at least half of the emails Hillary Clinton improperly took

from the White House were destroyed about 33,000 of them as best we can tell because

we've

been getting the emails that the FBI has been able even either either to recover or otherwise

find the FBI's only been able to find five thousand of them so there are what 27,000

emails still missing and highlights the egregious nature again of what mrs.

Clinton did

this massive destruction of government records she had no business taking any of these emails

out of the State Department and she did and the American people deserve full answers and

frankly the court I think is speaking for millions of Americans and demanding accountability

here and and I hope the

new Attorney General is paying attention the decisions like this because this is what's

going on in the Justice Department they're defending Hillary Clinton while attacking

president Trump on specious charges all right Judicial Watch as you said important work

that you were doing FOIA is something that journalists use all the time we'll be

watching very closely thank you for coming on the program you're welcome Maris thank

you House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin newness is with us first do you have

any reaction to what you just heard from John Solomon and I don't want to go to his big

breaking report from yesterday

yeah it doesn't surprise me Shawn and we have actively been looking into the Clinton Foundation

in uranium one if you may remember that we assigned a task force leader Peter King from

New York to look into this so we have seen some troubling information on this and you

know I can't verify John's reporting he

always does a good job he has great sources and I'm sure there's much more to be learned

on it let me go back to his breaking news yesterday what we discovered apparently and

I don't know how this was not known when we go back two years now pretty much investigating

this whole issue the the Clinton bought

and paid for phony dossier etc what we now found out there is an email chain or a chain

of emails James Comey is on it top DOJ officials are on it and they knew and the Intel committee

had Intel community had massive questions about

the veracity the truthfulness the validity of the dossier which your memo and the Grassley

Graham memo point to as the bulk of the applications for the FISA warrant against quarter-page

when did you first find out about this email chain well I don't know that the email

chain and John's reporting is the same stuff that we're looking at although it sounds very

similar what we have been saying and this is when as high as the speaker of the house

we have been requesting for many months now and actually talked about on your show a

couple weeks ago that there are there are emails where there are read actions that we

are quite convinced that if that is unredacted and provided to the House of Representatives

to the to the Intelligence Committee it will be very clear that there is very much it was

very well known that there was a lot of

information that was not provided to the FISA Court leading up to the war the warrant on

Carter page so I don't know exactly who Jon sources are but I do know that we have been

trying to get these read actions from emails without look it's possible that we are we

are

talking about the same types of emails it's also possible Shawn that there's even more

emails that we don't even know about but but what we are aware of what I call the fourth

bucket of information it would be very clear that there were people within the FBI India

that knew well and good before they went

to the FISA Court that Christopher steel and others were up to some so your Sayle bad and

nefarious activity you say that these emails will be the fourth bucket the 302s would be

a second bucket the FISA application themselves especially the last one pages 10 through12

17 to 34 then the gang of eight information those would be the four

buckets what John is saying here that's correct and and those worst three remember Sean in

those first three that the president has actually called to have Declassified but he's holding

we're talking now recently said is this fourth bucket okay so what I want to ask you is if

they knew and if the Intelligence Committee knew that they were questionable that

the whole dossier was questionable and it was the bulk of the FISA applications and

they used it anyway we know that they omitted that Hilary bought and paid for it with a

footnote that said it might be have a political taint to it but they didn't say it was the

opposition party candidate is it possible that they knew it was not true

that they gave it to the FISA Court anyway that they didn't do their due diligence verify

and corroborated and that they totally and completely committed fraud on the FISA Court

not once before separate times meaning anybody that signed off on it was

signing off on an application to spy on an American with evidence that they at best thought

could very likely not be true yeah so remember what we've been looking at criminally has

been abuse of power whether or not there was a conspiracy to abuse power you know about

that you've talked about that for a long time what this gets into is this would

be the first clear evidence that we have on another major crime which would be called

lying to a federal judge which is a crime in a major crime so that is what the people

are talking about with exists it is the evidence that we have this would be called me signing

off on it

rod Rosenstein signing off on the last one though we have Sally Yates signing off on

it right well they're the ones that signed off on it but they're not necessarily the

ones who would have provided and doctored the information so really the people that

are cold here are the ones who were were in these

discussions that knew about the information that was not provided to the court even though

Adam Schiff will have a lot of issues with will be the chairman of the committee come

January will you still have the authority and the ability to get this information to

the American people yeah I mean the only difference is is that I will be the

Republican leader on the committee the question is is that the subpoena power will lay in

the hands of the Democrats the Senate would have the power to weaken that that's true

but we have also for many months here Sean been willing to we've said that look our investigations

over with the White House is going to be able to declassify a lot of this information to

help us out to

get to the bottom of this all right it's the congressman earnest you've done great work

so is John Solomon if so that basically what I said is true that is there is no equal justice

equal application of our laws that would be shredding literally shredding if you're giving

false information to a court to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on an American and not even

verifying it Wow

For more infomation >> OMG!! UNBELIEVABLE!! TRUMP ABOUT TO PROSECUTE MUELLER & COMEY! - Duration: 10:06.

-------------------------------------------

Federal prosecutors investigating Trump inaugural committee - Duration: 0:25.

For more infomation >> Federal prosecutors investigating Trump inaugural committee - Duration: 0:25.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump reacts to Michael Cohen's prison sentence - Duration: 6:57.

For more infomation >> President Trump reacts to Michael Cohen's prison sentence - Duration: 6:57.

-------------------------------------------

After Congress Refuses Trump's Border Wall, He Responds With Military Order - Duration: 3:03.

For more infomation >> After Congress Refuses Trump's Border Wall, He Responds With Military Order - Duration: 3:03.

-------------------------------------------

Hardline Trump on full display: Varney - Duration: 1:43.

For more infomation >> Hardline Trump on full display: Varney - Duration: 1:43.

-------------------------------------------

Trump To Destroy National Butterfly Center - Duration: 6:09.

For more infomation >> Trump To Destroy National Butterfly Center - Duration: 6:09.

-------------------------------------------

DONALD TRUMP BLEW THE WHISTLE ON ROBERT MUELLER'S WORST CRIME - Duration: 13:10.

DONALD TRUMP BLEW THE WHISTLE ON ROBERT MUELLER'S WORST CRIME

Robert Mueller was appointed as the special counsel in the Russia investigation for one

reason only.

And that was to dig up something – anything – the swamp could use to impeach the President.

But Trump is fighting back and blew the whistle on Mueller's worst crime with two tweets.

Bloomberg politics recently broke a story that a source familiar with the investigation

revealed Mueller was going to speed up his investigation into Russian collusion and could

produce indictments by the fall.

Bloomberg reported:

"Special Counsel Robert Mueller is preparing to accelerate his probe into possible collusion

between Donald Trump's presidential campaign and Russians who sought to interfere in the

2016 election, according to a person familiar with the investigation."

The article listed 13 former and current Trump officials that Mueller may haul in on charges.

Currently, Mueller is preparing for trials in Virginia and Washington, D.C. against former

Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort for financial crimes that predated his work for

President Trump.

But President Trump threw a flag on Mueller's investigation when he tweeted:

"When is Bob Mueller going to list his Conflicts of Interest?

Why has it taken so long?

Will they be listed at the top of his $22,000,000 Report…And what about the 13 Angry Democrats,

will they list their conflicts with Crooked H?

How many people will be sent to jail and……

….persecuted on old and/or totally unrelated charges (there was no collusion and there

was no obstruction of the no collusion)…And what is going on in the FBI & DOJ with Crooked

Hillary, the DNC and all of the lies?

A disgraceful situation!"

The number of conflict of interests on Mueller's team is outrageous.

One of the prosecutors – Andrew Weissman – attended Hillary Clinton's 2016 Election

Night victory party.

Another Mueller investigator – Jeannie Rhee – did legal work for the Clinton Foundation.

Rhee also has forked over $16,000 in campaign contributions since 2008, including $5,400

– the legal maximum allowed – to Hillary Clinton's Presidential campaign.

James Quarles has donated $33,000 to political candidates, with the overwhelming majority

being lavished on Democrats.

Mueller team member Kyle Freeny is a former Justice Department official who defended Obama's

illegal executive amnesty in court.

And Mueller himself is a walking conflict of interest.

When James Comey was Deputy Attorney General, he formed a bond with Mueller who was then

the FBI Director.

The two were described as "brothers in arms."

Now Mueller is tasked with making a criminal case out of his friend being fired.

It's an outrageous conflict of interest and an abuse of prosecutorial power.

Trump is correct to blow the whistle on this nonsense investigation.

Critics are wondering what Mueller has been doing for the last year.

Investigating Russian election interference was his mandate.

If his investigation has not produced any results for over a year, why is it still going

on?

And given the rampant conflicts of interest on the Mueller team, fair-minded Americans

would just dismiss his findings as nothing more than partisan hackery.

Do you agree?

Let us know

your

thoughts

in the comment section.

No comments:

Post a Comment