Sunday, May 13, 2018

Trump news on Youtube May 13 2018

BREAKING: President Trump FURIOUS Over DHS Major Failures At Mexico Border

President Trump allegedly laid into Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kirstjen

Nielsen during a White House meeting, as border crossings at the U.S.-Mexico border continue

to skyrocket, according to a new report, Breitbart reports.

"Why don't you have solutions?

How is this still happening?

We need to shut it down.

We're closed."

~ President Trump

While Trump and Attorney General Jeff Sessions have taken tough approaches to illegal immigration

and the caravan, Nielsen in her most recent testimony before Congress begged asylum-seekers

to use the ports of entry to enter the U.S. legally, a move that experts say was a "colossal

mistake."

"If you are fleeing and you have a need to come to the United States, please come

to the ports of entry.

You — you — you know, we will process your claim there.

But if you come across the border illegally, you've — you've broken the law and we

have to prosecute.

It's the only way to keep our border — to have a border."

~ Nielsen President Trump, continues to grow even more

frustrated by a spike in apprehensions at the border and other legal setbacks, blamed

Nielsen Wednesday for failing to do enough to stop them, according to people familiar

with the exchange.

Nielsen did not deny the meeting had grown heated in a statement Thursday evening, but

said she shared the president's frustrations.

"The President is rightly frustrated that existing loopholes and the lack of Congressional

action have prevented this administration from fully securing the border and protecting

the American people.

I share his frustration.

Border security is the most basic and necessary responsibility of a sovereign nation" and

said she would "continue to direct the Department to do all we can to implement the President's

security-focused agenda."

If she cannot control DHS and enforce National Security at our borders, then get her out

of DHS and put a pitbull in charge!

SECURE OUR BORDERS!

what do you think about this?

Please Share this news and Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe

USA facts today.

For more infomation >> BREAKING: President Trump FURIOUS Over DHS Major Failures At Mexico Border - Duration: 2:22.

-------------------------------------------

Breaking News ALERT . President Donald Trump Weekly Address to the Nation Today 5-13-18 - Duration: 1:20.

For more infomation >> Breaking News ALERT . President Donald Trump Weekly Address to the Nation Today 5-13-18 - Duration: 1:20.

-------------------------------------------

LGBTQ community reacts after Trump rolls back Obama rules that helped transgender prisoners - Duration: 2:09.

For more infomation >> LGBTQ community reacts after Trump rolls back Obama rules that helped transgender prisoners - Duration: 2:09.

-------------------------------------------

Mueller just opened investigation into Trump's foreign inauguration donors - Duration: 5:16.

For more infomation >> Mueller just opened investigation into Trump's foreign inauguration donors - Duration: 5:16.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's ICE Storms Nation's Largest Sanctuary City, Arresting Hundreds - Duration: 13:21.

Trump's ICE Storms Nation's Largest Sanctuary City, Arresting Hundreds

Cities across America are breaking federal law, challenging immigration agents by protecting

illegal immigrants.

Under President Trump, ICE is no longer putting up with that.

It doesn't matter how big the city is, or how many illegals they're trying to shelter.

Bleeding heart liberal governors and mayors have been welcoming illegals with open arms

at the expense of American citizens.

They were under the illusion they could hide behind their big city budgets and their establishment

power.

Well, Donald just sent a signal that law-abiding American citizens are far more important to

their government than foreign lawbreakers.

If only we could deport liberals for their illegal actions.

For now, we'll have to settle for deporting criminal illegals.

And ICE just found a whole bunch in America's largest sanctuary city.

From Breitbart:

Immigration enforcement agents tracked and arrested 225 illegal migrants in New York's

"sanctuary city" where Democratic politicians are protecting illegals in the huge cheap-labor

workforce which supports the city's elite finance sector.

A statement from U.S Immigration and Customs Enforcement stated the six-day operation picked

up 60 migrants who had been arrested and then released by the city's police forces, despite

federal requests to detain them for repatriation:

"More than 60 individuals arrested during this operation were previously released from

local law enforcement on an active detainer.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) places detainers on individuals who have been

arrested on local criminal charges and who are suspected of being deportable."

The fact that liberals are trying to shield these people from being deported, when over

180 of those rounded up were convicted criminals, should tell you everything you need to know

about the Democratic Party.

And it's not as if these raids are a total surprise.

Over 80 of the people detained had been issued final warnings to leave the US in recent weeks,

or had already been removed and had snuck back in, counting on the city's weak stance

on immigration to protect them.

NYC's constant pandering to these people have emboldened them to think they can get

away with anything they want, and many of them try.

The DHS statement said the arrestees included criminals convicted of manslaughter, DUIs,

registered sex offenders, rapists, murder, burglary, forgery and fraud.

ICE is definitely doing its job well by keeping these monsters off our streets, but calling

ICE on illegal immigrants is merely reactive.

Building the wall will be proactive, and the sooner it goes up, the safer America will

be.

For more infomation >> Trump's ICE Storms Nation's Largest Sanctuary City, Arresting Hundreds - Duration: 13:21.

-------------------------------------------

Donald Trump Drops NUKE on Kathy Griffin After She Threatens Barron - Duration: 10:53.

Donald Trump Drops NUKE on Kathy Griffin After She Threatens Barron

Loudmouth comedian Kathy Griffin just reemerged to launch a vile attack on Donald Trump's

12 year-old son Barron, but it didn't end well for her.

Right Wing News reported that Griffin sank to a new low when she attacked Barron, threatening

to "deliver a beat down" to a boy who is still in grade school.

"It's not about trying to be an equal-opportunity offender anymore because Hillary got such

a beat down.

It's his turn.

So I'm happy to deliver beat down to Donald Trump — and also to Barron," Griffin said

after the election.

"You know a lot of comics are going to go hard for Donald, my edge is that I'll go

direct for Barron.

I'm going to get in ahead of the game."

Griffin's lawyer Lisa Bloom recently claimed that this comment was made "years ago"

and that it was just part of her act, but this is a blatant lie, as the comedian said

it in an interview.

"You're talking about something from a comedy act years ago, I think," Bloom said.

"We can have edgy comics in America.

Comics can say things that are not appropriate for children.

Comics can create images that are not appropriate for children… it is not the job of a comic

to filter everything down to the level of an 11-year-old."

It's absolutely disgusting that Griffin would resort to attacking a 12 year-old child.

During Barack Obama's presidency, his daughters Malia and Sasha were seen as off-limits to

attacks from the public, yet liberals seem to have no problem with Barron being targeted.

Once again, the hypocrisy of liberals is rearing it's ugly head, and Barron is being victimized

by it.

We think it's time for Griffin to return to exile and stop attacking the Trump family.

SHARE this story if you think Kathy Griffin should go away!

For more infomation >> Donald Trump Drops NUKE on Kathy Griffin After She Threatens Barron - Duration: 10:53.

-------------------------------------------

CIA Interrogator Sends Whoopi Goldberg a Warning After She Suggests Trump Be Waterboarded - Duration: 3:39.

For more infomation >> CIA Interrogator Sends Whoopi Goldberg a Warning After She Suggests Trump Be Waterboarded - Duration: 3:39.

-------------------------------------------

Saída de Trump do acordo nuclear com o Irã beneficia Rússia e China - Duration: 8:02.

For more infomation >> Saída de Trump do acordo nuclear com o Irã beneficia Rússia e China - Duration: 8:02.

-------------------------------------------

Ann Coulter Reveals The Way Trump Can Bypass Congress To - Duration: 11:34.

ANN COULTER REVEALS THE WAY TRUMP CAN BYPASS CONGRESS TO BUILD THE WALL

Conservative firebrand Ann Coulter has never been known to back down from a fight.

Probably because she's almost always right.

During the 2012 election cycle, she stated that if the GOP nominated Mitt Romney, they

would lose the general election.

Well, we all know how that turned out.

Another example: When she appeared on the liberal talkshow Real Time with Bill Maher

back in 2015, she boldly stated that Donald Trump would not only be the Republican nominee,

but that he would win the general election.

The audience and panel laughed in her face at the time, but on election night they definitely

weren't laughing!

Now Ann is taking on the latest spending bill, and vented her frustrations with it on Justice

with Judge Jeanine.

While lamenting the bill's complete lack of funding to build the border wall, Ann came

up with the perfect solution.

From Breitbart:

Coulter, frustrated by Trump's decision to sign last week's omnibus spending bill,

said construction of such a wall was within his power as president given under the Constitution

he was responsible for the country's national defense.

"On the day after his inauguration, it's his authority under the Constitution that

cannot be taken away from him by any legislature, by any court — I'm quite confident the

Supreme Court would uphold this — to defend our borders.

I mean, he has — last war that had a declaration of war from Congress in it was World War II.

And we engage in a lot of military actions around the world.

I think it can be done right on our border for defense.

Have the Seabees do it."

Using the Seabees (The United States Naval Construction Battalions) would be an incredibly

effective use of our military.

Instead of 'helping' people in some far away country who may not really want our help,

we can help ourselves by working to stem the invasion of criminal illegal aliens.

President Trump must have watched the show that night, because he tweeted this point

the following morning.

It seems President Trump is planning to take the money allocated to rebuilding our military

and will use it to finally build our big beautiful wall, all in the name of providing for the

common defense.

If Ann's past is any indication, her prediction that the military will build the border wall

is all but

a certainty.

Checkmate, liberals!

For more infomation >> Ann Coulter Reveals The Way Trump Can Bypass Congress To - Duration: 11:34.

-------------------------------------------

Donald Trump Praises His "Warm Mom" In Heartfelt Mothers' Day BUT Makes NO Mention Of Melania - Duration: 2:23.

Donald Trump praised his 'incredible' mom in a heartfelt Mother's Day, but the president

made no mention of the First Lady and mother-of-one, Melania Trump.

'This Sunday is one of the most important days of the year.

It's a special opportunity to thank all of the mothers and grandmothers in our lives,'.

Trump's mother, Mary Anne MacLeod, was Scottish-born and emigrated to New York in 1930.

She found work as a domestic worker before marrying Trump's father, Fred Trump Sr, in

1936.

MacLeod passed away in August 2000.

'My mother was a great person,' the president said, adding that she met his father, Fred,

when she was very young.

Trump's parents were married for more than 60 years until Fred Trump's death in 1999.

They had five children.

'I learned so much from my mother.

She was just incredible, warm, loving, really smart, could be tough if she had to be, but

basically she was a really nice person.

'So much of what I've done and so much of what I've become is because of my mother.

I miss her a lot,' Trump added.

Trump also said in the video that 'America's strength has come from the love, courage and

devotion of our mothers'.

'They helped us gain our independence.

Through their grit, determination and incredible spirit, they pioneered the West and settled

the frontier.

'During WWII America's mothers helped build the greatest arsenal for Democracy,' he added.

In the past, Trump has been more reluctant to talk about his mother, but he has made

several references to his father and the role he played in his life.

MacLeod was reportedly displeased with her son when in the 1990s when his failing marriage

to Ivana Trump made headlines.

'What kind of son have I created?'

Trump's mother, Mary, is said to have asked Ivana, at the time, according to a 1990 Vanity

Fair article.

In the past, Trump has described his mother as a 'fantastic' woman with a 'great sense

of pageantry'.

For more infomation >> Donald Trump Praises His "Warm Mom" In Heartfelt Mothers' Day BUT Makes NO Mention Of Melania - Duration: 2:23.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING: President Trump FURIOUS Over DHS Major Failures At Mexico Border - Duration: 2:03.

For more infomation >> BREAKING: President Trump FURIOUS Over DHS Major Failures At Mexico Border - Duration: 2:03.

-------------------------------------------

Dems Hit the PANIC SWITCH as Black Support For Trump Enters the 'Danger Zone' - Duration: 7:11.

For more infomation >> Dems Hit the PANIC SWITCH as Black Support For Trump Enters the 'Danger Zone' - Duration: 7:11.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Just Blindsided Congress In Genius Move, Sends Paul Ryan Scrambling - Duration: 5:28.

For more infomation >> Trump Just Blindsided Congress In Genius Move, Sends Paul Ryan Scrambling - Duration: 5:28.

-------------------------------------------

Trump legal team weighs sit-down with Mueller-the president's legal team should proceed. - Duration: 10:38.

president Trump's picked to lead the CIA facing a grilling this week on Capitol

Hill Gina Haspel a 33 year veteran of the spy agency testified Wednesday

before the Senate Intelligence Committee ahead of a confirmation vote there next

week Haspel facing combative questions over her role in the CIA's post 9-11

interrogation program do you believe that the previous interrogation

techniques were immoral senator I believe that CIA officers to whom you

referred it's a yes or no answer senator I believe that CIA extraordinary work to

prevent another attack on this country given the legal tools that we were

authorizing answer yes or no we're back Afghan Henninger Mary Kissel and Wall

Street Journal editorial page writer Kate bachelder Odelle all right Mary so

what did you make of that exchange with with Senator Harris I think it's a red

herring frankly Paul I cannot believe that Democratic senators are relitigated

a debate that the American people had more than a decade ago Gina Haspel did

not put that interrogation program into place it was legal when it was carried

out by her and then we had a great debate about it and we decided to roll

back some of those interrogation techniques and I think she was right to

defend the CIA officers who were carrying out their duty in a

constitutional and legal fashion kit you saw the hearing and there was some

suggestion beforehand that it was gonna be really worse than it went pretty well

for a spell did that I think it did I mean she addressed these allegations on

enhanced her interrogation in her opening statement and did so clearly and

articulately and said I don't support bringing back such a program it is

against the law if Congress were to try to change the law I wouldn't support

that either and she was very direct and clear and Kamala Harris is asking her to

go back in time and be clairvoyant that the law and public a chin yin opinion

would shift in such a way yeah and well and she and Haspel in particular ran and

interrogated in Thailand which dealt with some some

al-qaeda detainees and got some pretty useful information she did I also would

add just what a partisan farce all of this is there are 36 Democrats who are

still in the Senate who voted for John Brennan in 2013 to PCI to be CIA

director and John Brennan oversaw this program more closely than Gina Haspel

did at the time and and for some reason now Gina Haskell is being declared

unqualified but last-minute entry here in the debate john mccain obviously has

a unique personal history having been tortured himself in a prison and vietnam

speaks with i think unique amoral authority on this and he said he's going

to vote against Haspel how is that going to influence the the vote well it is

worth noting that he and rand paul are on the same side of this question rand

paul also said that he is not going to vote for Gina Haskell but so far we do

have a couple Democrats who are willing to support her so I do think that she's

going to get through and John McCain unfortunately is ill and will not be

there to physically vote against her so we think but so I don't think I don't

think ultimately it holds up her nomination and Lindsey Graham who is

often John McCain's comrade on these questions of interrogation he's broken

with John McCain on the city he's going to vote for for Haspel yes and I think

Lindsey Graham has the better of the argument on her qualifications right Dan

tell you anything about the Democrats here all of this this debate because I

assume she's going to get through yeah Paul tells me a lot about the Democrats

it tells me on the one hand they're going to pose any nominee that Donald

Trump puts up there and I think that's beginning to energize Republicans out

there in the country probably showed up in the primaries the second thing that

occurs to me though Paul is Kamala Harris wasn't the only one raising that

question senator Martin Heinrich Democrat of New Mexico said to her where

is your moral compass on what basis do the Democrats irrigate this kind of

moral condescension to themselves over a woman who was fighting a war against Al

Qaeda after they killed 3,000 Americans in hindsight it does make you

wonder where the Democrats the current Democratic Party stands on the issue of

national security and it's a political issue do you want to turn national

security over to the sorts of people who are interrogating Gina Haskell or to

Gina Hass well I think I would go with Miss has bolts all right thank you all

still ahead Tuesday's primaries in Ohio Indiana and West Virginia seen as a

boost to the Republicans as they battled to maintain control of the Senate this

November what the GOP learned from this week's contest when we come back

this Indiana will face an important choice you can send a really incredible

swamp person back to the Senate like Joe Donnelly or you can send us Republicans

like micron to drain the swamp that was President Trump Thursday and I had a

rally in Elkhart Indiana giving a plugged a businessman and GOP Senate

candidate Mike Brown who won the primary there on Tuesday primary results in the

Hoosier State as well as in Ohio and West Virginia seen as maybe boosting

Republican chances of holding the Senate this November we're back with Dan

Henninger Kim Strasse and Wall Street Journal editorial board member Alicia

Finley so what's the lesson for the Senate here they did they improve their

chances well I think they definitely did by nominating cannons they're more

viable that can actually be Democrats in West Virginia you had the AG Morsi beat

Democratic congressman and he's a state attorney Attorney General beat the coal

Baron or who was in prison for a year blakenship and he probably stood no

chance Blankenship had he woman yeah how do you want he stood no chance of being

Jang man ok and in Indiana Mike brought outsider he'd be two congressmen so

they're voters in Indiana Republican voters are still looking for somebody to

change things in Washington what about bran though he's a rookie he

hasn't done this before I assume his record as a businessman CEO is going to

be exhumed in every detail by the Democrats right I mean he's probably

gonna get the Mitt Romney treatment here though he runs an automotive parts

business I think people in Indiana especially

with the tariffs are starting to realize how important trade actually is and

supply chains are so I don't think that is going to be used against him as

Democrats are hoping and I think he's does stand a strong chance against Joe

Donnelly what about the anti McConnell which makalah the majority leader

strategy some people have been trying like Blankenship it worked in Alabama

rollin Roy Moore you stick but is it it is it as a fading as a strategy well it

seems so in West Virginia and I don't think it's really being played in a lot

of the other primaries I think or I would hope the Republican voters are

realizing maybe after the passage of tax reform that McConnell and president

rumpus share a lot of the same policy goals

all right Kim but the word in the house is not so good I think the Republicans

may have set themselves up for a go for losing a seat in North Carolina when

they out stood a sitting congressman in favor of a challenger why don't you

explain what happened there yeah so down in North Carolina this district you had

Robert Pittenger who was the incumbent he was beaten by a somewhat fiery pastor

they'd run and matched up against each other before this time this guy won and

and this is very much a seat that would have been safe likely if it was in the

incumbent but now the new Republican is going to face Dan McReady who's a

Democrat who's a moderate much more down the middle and this is the kind of

strategy Democrats have been exercising across the country we saw it in

Pennsylvania with their candidate in Connor Lam they're trying to pick

candidates that fit the district and this guy has a very good shot of winning

over this middle-of-the-road district in North Carolina dan interesting result

too in Ohio you have Mike DeWine winning the governor's race there

to be the Republican nominee former two-term senator I think or at least one

term senator and he's gonna run against Richard Cordray the former head of the

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau who Alisha has been torturing for about four

or five years with her FairPoint we've been giving it back

what do you but it looks like that mean turnout there in Ohio Republicans had

better turnout than Democrats in the primaries which raises some questions

about just how big Democratic enthusiasm is going to be this year well we assume

Democratic enthusiasm is going to be very big it's been big that's one thing

they've had going for themselves progressives are so animated against

Donald Trump and that may serve mr. DeWine well I hope oh hi Owens don't

fall asleep during that campaign because Mike DeWine and Richard Cordray are two

of the least inspiring public figures you could encounter but be that as it

may the big thing that I think we saw here is Republicans are beginning to get

interested in this race the polling suggests their enthusiasm is growing and

I believe that's what Donald Trump is recognized that's why he's going out and

doing these rallies like he did in Elkhart he knows that he needs more

turnout from Republicans and we have seen just in this past week at least two

polls show that the generic ballot Republican versus conservative has

really really tightened it's below six three in one poll one in the Reuters

poll and that means it's going to be very competitive all right Dan we have

to take one more break when we come back hits and misses of the week

you

For more infomation >> Trump legal team weighs sit-down with Mueller-the president's legal team should proceed. - Duration: 10:38.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING: President Trump FURIOUS Over DHS Major Failures At Mexico Border - Duration: 2:22.

For more infomation >> BREAKING: President Trump FURIOUS Over DHS Major Failures At Mexico Border - Duration: 2:22.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Declares Major Disaster In Hawaii - Duration: 7:06.

Senator Chuck Grassley has a message for Supreme Court justices who are

considering retirement do it now the Republican chair of the Judiciary

Committee says that if any justices are thinking of retiring in the near future

they should do it do so before this year's midterm elections we've got to

get this done before the election and there's generally about 50 60 70 days

between the time a president nominates somebody and we get a hearing in

committee and then another two weeks before it gets to the floor and this has

to be done before the November election so my message to any one of the nine

Supreme Court justices if you're thinking about quitting this year do it

yesterday Hans von Spakovsky is a senior legal fellow at Heritage Foundation and

former counsel to the Assistant Attorney General at the Justice Department so

Hans let's talk about the Senators calculus behind his plea is it just to

avoid being in the middle of the nomination and confirmation process come

November or is there more behind it well I think what's going on here is that he

may have said he was talking about the nine justices but this is aimed clearly

at Justice Kennedy look for two years now rumors have been swirling the

Justice Kennedy is thinking about resigning not any of the liberal

justices and so what he's basically telling Kennedy is look if you want to

resign you need to do it now the reason being that Democrats in the Senate have

been doing everything they can to slow down the confirmation process to try to

delay it as much as possible and if we want to get a new justice in before the

next term of the court starts in October it would have to happen very quickly and

of course those on the other side of this political aisle would say you know

what the Conservatives are known to have in the past block nomination process so

Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy as you mentioned he's gonna be 82 in July he

you know look we know that he's considering retiring when his current

term expires next might the midterms be front of his mind

in his decision-making well sure because you know there's a chance that the

Senate might change hands and if Republicans and president Trump think

they are having a hard time now getting nominees through if the Democrats take

over the the Senate then the nomination process is going to probably come to an

almost complete standstill does the president have anyone on deck do you

know well he's he's still got his long list of judges and potential nominees

that he's put out before so I think the White House would move very very quickly

if one of the seats opened up on the Supreme Court so if the Supreme Court

remains intact by November how might the current makeup of the Supreme Court

affect the midterm elections well remember there were a lot of people and

this was something that not not really happened for a lot of voters said that

who was on the court and who would be able to choose who would be on the court

to fill Justice Scalia see that they considered that in the election and if

there were a resignation any time before should say shortly before the November

election of one of the justices on the Supreme Court I think that something

voters would look at because you know we're at a delicate balance on the court

between conservatives and liberals and I think people most voters especially

Trump supporters would not want another liberal getting on the court in Haun's

finally what what about the notion of not filling an empty Supreme Court seat

during an election year well that was something that Joe Biden came up in with

in 1992 when he was the chairman of the Judiciary Committee but the reason he

said that was because George HW Bush was the president and he didn't want a

Republican naming another seat of the Supreme Court the Democrats clearly

don't believe in that principle because remember in 2016 when the Scalia seat

was empty and President Obama put forward a nominee Merrick garland the

Democrats did everything they could to try to get him confirmed although they

weren't successful so it all boils down to politics yes exactly

Vaughn Vaughn's Bukowski thank you very much thanks for having me Oh Hans I got

the part right icing on this book outside party so much thanks Hans

well good about this scientist now warning of a possible explosion at that

erupting volcano and how ye will have a live report on those news concerns and

why a bad situation could get they say even worse President Trump is declaring

a major disaster area in Hawaii that after that volcano in the Big Island

butter released more dangerous lava and toxic gas scientists are now saying

there actually could be a massive explosion at the summit crater the

eruption so far has destroyed about two dozen homes and forced roughly 2,000

people to evacuate Anita Vogel is live in Los Angeles tonight with the very

latest on this continuing and dangerous situation I need it why there Eric you

know what they've described sounds pretty frightening for folks near the

volcano geologists are warning of even more intense explosions that could send

huge six foot wide boulders the size of refrigerators over a small car shooting

into the air up to half a mile away as well as ash plumes that could go as high

as 20,000 feet in the air so they're keeping their eye on the

lowering of the lava lake in the middle of the crater raising the potential for

those explosions if a larger explosion occurs it's because big blocks will fall

into the vent and will block the steam from escaping so essentially the steam

is just going to get trapped and it will just explosively evacuate that crater in

large blocks and smaller particles of ash will come streaming out of the vents

and keep in mind this very thing did happen back in 1924 now you can take a

look at this map this morning in Hawaii the 16th of vent or fissure opened up

that's where the lava comes bubbling out of the ground you can see right there on

the map that red spot that indicates the fissures the newest one is just to the

east or to the right of there close to a geothermal energy plant and a

residential subdivision it's from these vents in the

and where that molten rock lava comes up just like I said right now there are

2,000 people who have been evacuated hundreds are without power and officials

say Eric there's no end in sight this could go on for months Anita we can only

pray for those people and hope for the best

thank you that is it for us Molly lined up next with the Fox reporter C tomorrow

thank you since my stroke he hasn't left my side with the right steps 80%

For more infomation >> Trump Declares Major Disaster In Hawaii - Duration: 7:06.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Just Published Comey's Crimes For The World To See, Suggests Big Jim May Be Headed To Prison - Duration: 12:45.

Trump Just Published Comey's Crimes For The World To See, Suggests Big Jim May Be

Headed To Prison

Elder Patriot – The mainstream media would like you to think that President Trump's

tweets are the product of an unhinged executive in the throes of a psychological meltdown.

Most of us aren't buying it because after fifteen months we've learned that Trump

is always proven right in the end.

It appears that the "Destroy Trump Media" will never learn, though.

Or, more precisely, they will never relent because their job is to defend the Washington

establishment and Deep State until the bitter end.

No matter what Trump has been on a Twitter rampage against

Deep State protectors Robert Mueller and James Comey both of who have been trying to frame

him for things that never happened for the past two years.

With Mueller raiding his attorney's office and Comey launching a book tour all within

the last couple of days, President Trump decided to let his supporters know that he's still

in charge and that his tormentors are facing an uncertain future… at best.

When we consider the timing of Comey's decision to re-open the Hillary Clinton email investigation

we have to consider that the mainstream media was reporting the likelihood of a Clinton

landslide and a Dem takeover of the House and Senate at the same time.

Was Comey counting on Hillary winning and then being rewarded by her for presenting

her a clean slate on the email scandal in a similar manner that he ignored or buried

all of her other misdeeds?

What does Trump know about the meeting?

We all know that Lynch has no grandchildren and Wild Bill has one so that discussion wouldn't

last more than a few minutes.

Golf?

Seriously, take a look at Loretta Lynch and try selling that again.

Whether the plane's comms system was compromised or not might have left a trail at one government

spy agency or another Loyalty? Trump: "Are you as committed as

I am to ferreting out corruption at every level of government as I am?"

Obviously that was a level of "loyalty" Comey wasn't prepared to give to the new

president.

Comey: "Who the f*ck do you think you are?

I answer to no one and certainly not to you.

You're an outsider looking to upset our applecart."

Comey knows he's screwed because his pals, Mueller and Rosenstein, just destroyed the

privileged relationship that has been the hallmark of the lawyer-client relationship

that makes America, America.

With this tweet, Trump has signaled Comey that his granting of immunity and lawyer-client

privilege to Cheryl Mills is going to come back to haunt him.

President Trump did not come from the political class.

And he didn't give up his plush lifestyle to maintain the D.C. status quo that has been

screwing hardworking Americans for decades.

He identified Washington as a swamp and he made clear his intent to drain it.

For more infomation >> Trump Just Published Comey's Crimes For The World To See, Suggests Big Jim May Be Headed To Prison - Duration: 12:45.

-------------------------------------------

HUGE DACA ANNOUNCEMENT ROCKS NATION – Trump Supporters Stunned - Duration: 11:34.

HUGE DACA ANNOUNCEMENT ROCKS NATION – Trump Supporters Stunned

Dreamers in one major U.S. state are in full panic mode after the state's Supreme Court

issued a major ruling about them.

Fox News reported that Barack Obama's precious Deferred Action of Childhood Arrivals (DACA)

recipients are no longer eligible for cheaper "in-state" tuition in Arizona.

This ruling will impact Dreamers who attend Arizona's three state universities and its

largest community college.

The Arizona Supreme Court said that it will release an opinion explaining the ruling on

May 14 and that it was announcing the decision now to give the district and its students,

as well as the state, as much time as possible for planning.

"While people can disagree what the law should be, I hope we all can agree that the

attorney general must enforce the law as it is, not as we want it to be," Arizona Attorney

General Mark Brnovich said in a statement.

Liberals are of course fuming over this decision, with Matt Hasson, spokesman for the Maricopa

County Community Colleges District, saying his district was disappointed by it.

"This ruling is troubling for the 2,000 DACA students currently enrolled in Maricopa

Community Colleges," he said in a statement.

"During the past five years, more than 600 DACA students earned an associate's degree

or a certificate from one of our colleges and are making valuable contributions to the

health of our economy."

This comes weeks after President Donald Trump called out Democrats for abandoning Dreamers.

"Much can be done with the $1.6 Billion given to building and fixing the border wall.

It is just a down payment.

Work will start immediately.

The rest of the money will come – and remember DACA, the Democrats abandoned you (but we

will not)!" Trump wrote on Twitter.

What do you think about this?

Let us know your thoughts

in the

comments section.

For more infomation >> HUGE DACA ANNOUNCEMENT ROCKS NATION – Trump Supporters Stunned - Duration: 11:34.

-------------------------------------------

Media's Michael Cohen frenzy | Overshadows Trump foreign policy moves. - Duration: 10:52.

and president Trump pulled out of the Iran nuclear deal it was huge global

news front-page headlines everywhere but on CNN and MSNBC that night the story

got bumped down the lineup for the latest on Michael calling The New York

Times and other outlets confirming that an American company with strong ties to

a Russian oligarch who's been banned from the US had paid the president's

personal lawyer five hundred thousand dollars Cohen also took in millions of

dollars from such major corporations as AT&T Novartis and Korean aerospace

industries so just how much media attention does this deserve joining us

now to analyze the coverage Gillian Turner a Fox News correspondent here in

Washington Molly Hemingway he's senior editor at the Federalist and a Fox News

contributor and Capri Cafaro a Washington Examiner contributor and

former Democratic Senate leader in Ohio Gillian

these disclosures about Michael calling our news period but are they more

important than the global impact of the president walking away from the Iran

nuclear agreement is that a rhetorical question and I asked because I think the

answer is so obvious which is no they are not more important than US nuclear

threat the nucleus the nuclear threat against the United States from Iran and

North Korea and the fact that the administration saved three American

hostages this week I think that when it comes to the president pulling out of

the Iran deal in particular though the widespread panning from the media was

really a reflection of what the policy community was saying in this instance

and by that I mean analysts across the board even folks who were initially

critical of the deal the negotiations as they unfolded said now that we're in the

deal it's important we stay in the deal so that the US has perceived is living

up to its word so I think the media was reflecting that sentiment as expressed

by punctuate that point CNN International correspondent Christiane

Amanpour I'm just going to read this possibly the greatest deliberate act of

self harm and self sabotage in the geostrategic politics in the modern era

but let's come back to Cohn as other channels seems to do a lot so what does

it tell you about the focus of CNN and MSNBC at least in primetime going

wall-to-wall with the news that the confirmation of the original

charges thrown out by Michael avenatti about Cohen getting five hundred

thousand from this American company we very close ties to this Russian

billionaire Viktor Vekselberg who as it turns out has been questioned by Robert

mullahs office yeah it was interesting that this was one of the things that was

highlighted I think it's actually important to point out right away that

we know this information because there was a criminal leak from some government

agency now whether that was the Special Counsel or the Treasury Department this

is just the latest in a tremendous series of criminal leaks this one they

claim they're going to be investigating we've had a lot of leaks that haven't

been investigated but it's designed to create a narrative and obviously the

Russia thing was pulled out it was an American company actually who paid the

essential consulting and they do have Russian ties and and that name that we

that you mentioned has been heard before because that was also a big donor to the

Clinton Foundation and whatnot but there is clearly an attempt to tie this to the

Russia conspiracy theory and I thought what was much more interesting this week

was the Department of Justice or some other Intelligence Agency leaking to the

Washington Post what they were suggesting was that they had a mole on

the Trump campaign that's a massive change in a really big important story

that has not been getting a lot of coverage on the other hand on the comb

business Fox primetime shows barely mentioned payments to Michael Cohen and

generally it's gotten far less coverage on this network does it deserve more

well I think that it deserves coverage but I think the question becomes what do

journalists focus on it seems that a you know the cnn's and the MSNBC's of the

world and other mainstream media focused more on the salacious side the building

the narrative as Molly mentioned there are some very serious issues here that I

think warrant more scrutiny one being wouldn't have been necessary for Michael

Cohen to for example be a registered lobbyist with the federal government if

he's going to represent companies like AT&T although although just briefly

there's no nobody's produced any evidence that he actually went to

government officials does it change your policy agreed maybe yeah but he was you

know there was this entire memo on what they what 18 T for example expected

opinion so you know if you think you're going to engage in that kind of activity

should you not be you know that's a question a registered

lobbyist I think the other the you know aspect is this you know quote-unquote

Russian oligarch you know this man is actually being sanctioned by the United

States government and I think that you know if you're going to talk about the

issue of Russia in this context I think it's it's more about you know why is

someone doing business with somebody who now ultimately has been sanctioned

that's why it's important to note that it was an American company actually who

paid the money their leaves with this guy but that doesn't mean that they're

sanctioned but let me take a broader view Gillian and that is the media just

shocked shocked to discover that there's gambling in Casablanca talking here

about these big companies you know so it's not I mean I'm not defending this

practice but DC is a swampy place this has gone on for many many

administrations where you hire someone who is a friend of somebody who's high

up in the White House or the president because you're looking for access and

somebody who can carry your message there is nobody Howie that the press

loathes and is more suspicious of than lobbying firms in Washington DC and I

think to a certain extent the national media is even more critical of lobbying

in Washington than it is of the Trump administration writ large so there is no

surprise that the press has zeroed in on Michael Kahn just you know revelations

about Michael Cohen's lobbying firm called essential consultants a strange

name but essential consultants and their mega hundred mega million-dollar deals

with me I'm sorry but that would be huge news to the American public if the media

actually had a problem with this industry I think the American people

have a huge problem with the industry but I don't think it's well covered it

is really gross like the Michael Cohen story is gross people do trade access

for money and that is something that happens all over the place have you

heard the name have you heard the name Tony Podesta or think about Rahm Emanuel

who made eight five million dollars after that firm for example Podesta

group shuttered after speculation from the media in the late in the wake of

disclosures about what they were doing in the canon let's not forget I disagree

I think the media is no zero not lobbying closing

every I was just saying I disagree I think the media keeps a really good

watchdog eye and a lot of lobbying you know there's a certain acceptance of it

if you live what do people think all of these K Street law firms and lobbying

firms do this I are former White House officials and former congressman it's

all about accents it's all about influence I'm not just to find what

Michael Cawley be regulated because they are lobbying firms that have to disclose

but remember people the American public outside of the swamp voted for President

Trump to drain the swamps so someone so close to him you know being embroiled in

taking this kind of money in a group all the millions of dollars of consulting

and lobbying firms combined have received less coverage than Michael

Cohen has this week I mean in history I think you see how much coverage this

story got compared to the fact that this is a daily industry lobbying and

consulting this is what this entire town is made out of

I did see Axios make a point like obviously this is what this whole town

is about but that has not been the tenor of a lot of become I agree with that and

you know AT&T the CEO now said it was a big mistake to hire Michael Kahn he was

hired in part to help with the proposed merger with Time Warner which the Trump

Justice Department has opposed and again this happens all the time it doesn't

make it right not excusing it at all but it some people are actually just so

shocked over let's come back to Michael avenatti we've played it at the top him

and this is a guy let's hear from him first and last question on the other

side there's been some criticism about how our media strategy and how often I'm

on CNN and how often I've been on your show and other networks etc okay it's

all a bunch of nonsense because here's the bottom line Anderson it's working

okay it's working in spades this is a guy who's been on CNN or MSNBC

more than a hundred times in a couple of months he's representing his client but

how much is he driving the media narrative on all of this well he is the

frontman for what is obviously a well-funded and well coordinated

operation that has received next to no criticism or reflection by many people

in the media I saw something that showed that he had a hundred and seventy-five

million dollars in free coverage on on the various networks and I think it is

worth asking like who is this guy how does he have access to special counsel

or Treasury Department documents who are his connections who's paying for this we

know that he ostensibly represents store Daniel she has said she's not paying him

I think it's worth finding out just a little bit more about this thing that is

driving so much of the coverage right and some of the information that he got

that came from these leaked records and there's now a Treasury IG investigation

of this were wrong you had a different Michael Cohen who lives in Canada and he

says well 99% of it was right I mean don't you think that television anchors

and reporters need to question him more aggressively rather than just putting

him on show after show if the show say okay what do you got come on what do you

got it what do you got on Trump what do you got on stormy yeah I mean look I

mean I think that that the network's have really most of the network's at

least have really taken the bait you know Michael avenatti is absolutely a

self-promoter and I think that they really just want to continue to again

focus on the more salacious aspects of it and there has not been a counterpoint

to you know what what Molly and others have said there's no questioning of

Michael avenatti it's just tell us more dirt and there's no checks and balance

and that's not journalism and I want to make one other interesting point about

avenatti I just saw today in Politico they just reported that Michael avenatti

had dinner just this weekend in New York with Ronan Farrow who you know famously

just you know took down the New York Attorney General so I'm sure that wasn't

just a friendly visit well there's been a little question Michael avenatti in my

view not enough and not aggressively enough and it is kind of an imbalance

because if Michael Cohen is basically not talking to some reporters chasing

him into a taxi and he said that says was inaccurate his attorney is not out

there very much and then you have another lawyer who

seems to and let's just say enjoy being on television is speculated by getting

his own show one day and I understand why the media cover him and he's a

camera already guest but that seemed a little imbalanced to you it seems in

balance Laura Ingraham made the point in the open of the show that he's avenatti

has treated sort of like an analyst or a commentator on these programs when in

fact he's the representative representing one specific interest in

the case I would just say then isn't it incumbent upon the Trump team to provide

a counterpoint to that narrative if he's the lawyer representing stormy Daniels

mr. Trump's the president the president's representative should be

speaking out more as well oh it is Michael Cohen whose honor

only on these particular points a lot more to learn about this

For more infomation >> Media's Michael Cohen frenzy | Overshadows Trump foreign policy moves. - Duration: 10:52.

-------------------------------------------

Fox News Sunday:Pompeo backs Trump's vow on Europe helping Iran pursue nuclear weapon - Duration: 15:08.

and joining us now the new and very busy Secretary of State Mike Pompeo mr.

secretary welcome back to Fox News Sunday come on Oh Chris it's great to be

with you let's start with breaking news first of all that savage attack last

night in Paris a Chechen knifing killing one person wounding 4 others what can

you tell us about a possible link to terror we don't know much more we know

that the Caliphate Isis has claimed responsibility they said he was one of

their soldiers we can't verify that yet the French authorities with all the

intelligence help the United States can provide we'll do our best to unpack this

in the coming hours okay let's talk about some other breaking news and North

Koreans announced yesterday that they are going to blow up their nuclear site

in ten to twelve days how big a development is this and is that do we

believe their only nuclear test site Chris it's good news

every single site that the North Koreans have that can inflict risk upon the

American people that is destroyed eliminated dismantled as good news for

the American people and for the world and so this is one step along the way

had a good set of meetings this past week aimed at heading in exactly this

direction I want to go back to the combat and Kevin just played it your

comment on Friday that if Kim chooses the quote right path the u.s. is

prepared to work with North Korea to quote achieve prosperity what does that

mean in terms of direct US investment in North Korea and are we as part of this

willing in effect to guarantee Kim's security that that regime change will be

off the table Kris here's what this will look like this will be Americans coming

in private-sector America's not the US taxpayer private sector Americans coming

in to help build out the energy grid they need enormous amounts of

electricity in North Korea to work with them to develop infrastructure all the

things that the North Korean people need the capacity for American agriculture to

support North Korea so they can eat meat and have healthy lives those are the

kind of things that if we get what it is the president has demanded the complete

verifiable irreversible denuclearization of North Korea

that the American people will offer in spades and as part of that are we in

effect saying to Kim if you give us what we want you can stay on in power we will

have to provide security assurances to to be sure this has been the trade-off

that has been pending for 25 years no president has ever put America in a

position where the North Korean leadership thought that this was truly

possible that the Americans would actually do this would lead to the place

where America was no longer held at risk by the North Korean regime that's the

objectives when I said earlier this week that I think chairman Kim shares the

objectives of the American people I'm convinced of that now the task is for

President Trump and he to meet to validate the process by which this would

go forward to set out those markers so that we can negotiate this outcome do

you have any problem given Kim's history and the history of his family as an

oppressive regime any problems with the idea of the US even if we get our deal

in effect giving a security guarantee to the Kim regime look we'll have to see

how the negotiations proceed but make no mistake about it America's interest here

is preventing the risk that North Korea will launch a nuclear weapon into LA or

Denver into the very place we're sitting here at this morning Chris that's our

objective that's the end state the president has laid out and that's the

mission that he sent me on this past week to put us on the trajectory to go

achieve that let's talk about denuclearization the objective two weeks

ago National Security Advisor John Bolton sat in this very seat and he told

me that the u.s. negotiating position going in is that Kim has to ship out has

to dismantle and and take out of the country all of this nuclear weapons all

of his nuclear infrastructure all of his long-range missiles before the US will

grant any concessions on the other hand this week Kim met with Chinese President

Xi and he called for quote phased and synchronous measures in other words

action for action have you and Kim agreed what the sequencing is is it all

of the actions by him first or is it step by step and is that

something as I say that you've agreed with or is it something that

and the president will have to work out of the summit Chris we've had

discussions on how this would proceed there's still a great deal of detail to

be worked on and in the coming weeks we will continue to work on that so that we

can be in a good spot on June 12th to Singapore for a president Trump but make

no mistake about it we've done this before right we've done trade for trade

moment for a moment you give me X I give you Y and it has failed repeatedly I

think chairman Kim understands that I think he appreciates the fact that this

is gonna have to be different and big and special and something that has never

been undertaken before if we're going to get to this historic outcome both sides

have to be prepared to take truly historic measures to achieve it and how

confident are you because you're gonna be putting the President of the United

States in a room with Kim in Singapore with the whole world watching how

confident are you that not only he understands it but that he's going to

have to that he's going to deliver on our expectations

well the quote president Trump will see right we we are not to the place yet

where we should be remotely close to declaring that we've achieved what it is

we want there's a great deal of work that remains our eyes are wide open with

respect to the risks but it is it is our fervent hope that chairman Kim wants to

make a strategic change a strategic change in the direction for his country

and his people and if he's prepared to do that President Trump is prepared to

assure that this could be a successful transition all right I want to talk

about that is that you you you've said that we we understand and john bolton

talked about that nobody in the administration is starry-eyed the

president has been raising expectations for this summit saying he thinks that

they're gonna make a great deal that his phrase your predecessor at the CIA John

Brennan says he thinks that's playing into Kim's

hands take a look I think that we're gonna have a success I think this will

be a very big success I think he has been masterful and how he has

manipulated perceptions and how he's manipulated and quite frankly duped mr.

Trump is it a mistake for the president to predict a quote great success

I think former director Brad's remarks are silly on their face

we're going to enter into a set of discussions with two nations doing their

best to achieve outcomes for their own people that are consistent with their

objectives and goals I think we now understand that there is the potential

that there are shared objectives and our mission is to prepare the groundwork and

we're pretty far along the way of doing so and we'll continue to work in the

days that had 30 left to prepare for June 12th so the president can have a

successful outcome that the two of them can meet and see if there is a

sufficient overlap so that we can achieve the ultimate objective for the

American people after you brought the American hostages home and the whole

world celebrated that President Trump raised Kim for releasing them and that

prey is not the release of the hostages but that phrase upset

some critics take a look at this Kim Jong I did a great service to himself to

his country by doing this we can't be fooled into giving the North Korean

regime credit for returning Americans that never should have been be been

detained in the first place according to your State Department's

latest report at North Korea still holds at least 80,000 political prisoners in

its labor camps and other facilities is human rights an issue in this summit or

is it's just going to be about the nuclear issue yeah Chris this

administration is always concerned about human rights it's the case not only are

there political prisoners that remain in North Korea there are Americans held

around the world by other rogue regimes too I can assure you this administration

I saw it in my role as director of the CIA and I've seen it now in my first two

and a half weeks the Secretary of State is intently focused on achieving the

return of each of those as well we had a success this week we're happy for those

families and for America that those three Americans returned home but we

recognize there's much work to do we still have Americans held and we're

working diligently on behalf of each and every one of them when I people found

out that you were going to be on the program today that but they all have the

same question I must say I did what is Kim like with the possible exception of

Dennis Rodman you as more time with them than any other

Westerner at least two and a half hours the way I figure it what does he like

give us any kind of personal insight how aware is he of what President Trump has

been saying was there any mention of little Rocket Man well I've got a lot

fewer of rebounds than Dennis Rodman but I did get to spend a great deal time

with chairman Kim the conversations are professional he knows he knows his brief

he knows what the what he is trying to achieve for the North Korean people he's

able to deal with complexity when the conversation requires it he does follow

the Western press he'll he'll probably watch this show at some point he's

paying attention to things that the world is saying he too is preparing for

June 12th he and his team will be working with them to put our two leaders

in a position where it's just possible we might pull off a historic under was

there any mention of the exchange of insults back and forth no we didn't

cover that Chris that's probably wise I want to turn there's a lot on your brief

Iran and Israel got into an armed conflict across the Syrian border this

week after President Trump pulled out of the nuclear deal with Tehran do you

think that there's any connection that Iran feels less constrained now that the

u.s. no longer is part of this this deal about Iran nukes that's ludicrous it's

ludicrous to suggest that Iran feels less constrained when during the jcpoa

they have now fired missiles into an airport where Americans travel each day

in Riyadh they've now fired it missiles into Israel suggests that somehow the

withdrawal from the JCP is driving the Iranian conduct that's taken place

during the jcpoa in Yemen the rise of Hezbollah all of those things took place

during the jcpoa indeed I would argue that they felt they could act with

impunity they watched they watched Europe put exactly zero sanctions on

their missile program during the jcpoa I think rouhani and Zarif need to

explain why it's the case that while this agreement was in place Iran

continued its mark across the Middle East president hunt

made it clear that he's not only going after Ron but he's also prepared to

sanction European companies that continue to do business in Tehran here

is the president we will be instituting the highest level of economic sanction

any nation that helps Iran in its quest for nuclear weapons could also be

strongly sanctioned by the United States but the leaders of France of Germany of

Britain all say that they're going to stay in the deal and they're going to

look for a way to protect European companies that continue to do business

the question is how hard is the Trump administration prepared to go after

European companies that that ignore the u.s. pulling out two things

Chris first the wealth that was created in Iran as a result of the JCAP jcpoa

drove Iranian Millian activity in fuelled Qasem Soleimani it fueled the

IRGC provided resources for their work in Syria and Iraq president Trump's

withdrawal is aimed at denying them that wealth denying them the resources to

continue their bad behavior to take the money away from them the withdrawal

wasn't aimed at the Europeans I worked hard over the short time I've been the

Secretary of State to try and fix the deal we couldn't reach agreement with

our e3 partners I am hopeful in the days and weeks ahead we can come up with a

deal that really works that really protects the world from Iranian bad

behavior not just their nuclear program but their missiles and their maligned

behavior as well and I'll be working closely with the Europeans to try and

achieve that what about if the European companies and the European countries say

look there's not gonna be a renegotiation any more than there's

going to be a renegotiation of the Paris climate Accord is the u.s. prepared to

go after companies in our allies like Britain

France and Germany if they try to continue to do business the sanctions

regime that is now in place is very clear about what the requirements are my

mission that I've been given by President Trump is to work to strike a

deal that achieves the outcome that protect America that's what we're

going to do and I'll be hard at it with the Europeans in the next several days a

couple of final questions Israel the u.s. opens its embassy in Jerusalem

tomorrow the Palestinians are talking about a Day of Rage violent mass

protests and the PLO won't even talk to the US anymore as an interlocutor in

terms of the Middle East is the peace process dead and given the threat of

violence what are you as the Secretary of State

saying to Americans in the Middle East in those parts of the world over the

next few days so the peace process is most decidedly

not dead we're hard at work on it we we hope we can achieve a successful outcome

there as well with respect to security we were aware of the situation on the

ground the Unites States governor has taken a number of actions to ensure that

not only our governmental interests but the American people in that region are

secure as well and we're comfortable we've taken action that reduces that

risk finally and it's pretty remarkable given

all that's happened all that's on your brief you have been Secretary of State

for barely two weeks now what's your vision for the State Department

well first Chris I hope having peaked in my purse but but it's pretty clear we've

got to go put the diplomatic team on the playing field it should be the United

States State Department that is at the front of American foreign policy

delivering solutions to solve America's problems without resort to military

force and so I'm gonna build the team we're gonna get our swagger back and the

State Department will be out in front in every corner of the world leading

America's diplomatic policy achieving great outcomes on behalf of President

Trump and America secretary Pompeo thank you thanks for your time and a very busy

schedule they always good to talk with you service

No comments:

Post a Comment