Trump news on Youtube May 17 2018

president Trump facing big foreign policy challenges including North Korea

Russia the Middle East and just in time for all these developments our friend

anchor of special report Bret Baier has a new book out that parallels today's

headlines it's called three days in Moscow Ronald Reagan and the fall of the

Soviet empire lucky for us Brett is right here in New

York with us Brett welcome thank you so tell tell us about the parallels well

there's a lot of parallels in the moments the challenges there are

obviously very different personalities but Reagan used a lot of bold language

that Washington foreign policy establishment kind of really had a

problem with back in the day I thought it was too aggressive and in that case

you know Donald Trump's tweets are similar in that way we'll see if Donald

Trump follows the the guidelines of these summits and how he got up from the

table if it didn't work I do want to bring in the book you know the book is

here and it came out this week and I saw you while talking about the books and

how Jesse is so prolific in his reading so I brought the young readers which

also comes a big print at the same time

you can color in the back doors by Brett Baier the monologue shushing that is

creepy is this the creepiest thing it's a hard

candy Valley it almost looks like you but because it's not like you it's just

freaky I keep it you know I take this everywhere that's really I travel on the

subway with it I've had three companies say they really want to they really want

to do this yeah but I think you should do it for the Children's Hospital

charity you know what you should do is do a promotion with your book on Twitter

that if somebody shows a receipt of buying your book they are part of the

auction for the bear

what is going through your mind when you get the five tossing to you at 5:59

essentially it is one of the most scary parts of the day especially if it's gray

yes just assume it's gonna rhyme Dana ponch she just says I don't have any was

there instances and not just with this summit that Ronald Reagan had the one

that you write about here yeah but were there instances where one of the parties

threatened to call it off yes Reykjavik they got up and left so it goes Geneva

Reykjavik and then Washington DC and Moscow and the reason this one is

important in Moscow is the final one and he speaks to Moscow State University

students about freedom and democracy and not like hitting them over the head that

we're better than you but sort of like a Pied Piper like come and see why the

West is the way to go you know what's interesting on that point I mean

obviously I think back I was covering the Reagan White House this is

perestroika and he makes tremendous inroads with Gorbachev but now we're

dealing with Putin and Putin has rejected the West and all of our offers

and help in terms of coming in to the Western world capitalist yeah it's a

totally different he's trying to recreate the Soviet Union expansionism

and Mikhail Gorbachev was a different leader and Reagan saw that and that's

why I negotiated with them a little fact in here Reagan and Gorbachev in Red

Square when they're walking around Marlin Fitzwater whispers in his ear and

says all these people around you they're not civilians they're KGB officers yeah

and one of them was believed to be Vladimir Putin knew you're killing three

days

so the title three days in Moscow I thought it was about Trump's visit for

the pageant is really thrilled with some news of the day just with you we just

did a block on the Trump Tower meetings on jr. and the transcripts that came out

and I'm just curious if you know some people are saying oh there's tons of

stuff in here that could really change the tide others saying it's a big

nothing burger I think that was Jessie what do you think is there anything new

here I do think that's what Dana pointed out I'm at the Penn afford notes is

actually really interesting the the notes in the meeting I also think that

Don jr. there's a lot of calls for him to come back up and testify because

there's some hazy memory there at the same time you look at this New York

Times piece about operation what does it crossfire hurricane and in deep in there

it says a year later there's still no evidence of you know any the Trump

officials colluding with Russia and I think both sides of this investigation

we have a lot to learn and we're probably months away can I just be on

behalf of America say no one cares okay no one cares

the bear doesn't even care tab so Senate Intel comes out and says much

differently than house Intel oh yeah Russia interfered and they favored Trump

does that matter what matters that they put it out and they were backing up the

intelligence community in in what they were put on a bipartisan report in a

bipartisan report and we're gonna have senator Lankford on special report

tonight to talk about that's a good guest yep Jesse you know I realize that

you love books so I want you to ask your toughest question now that we have bret

baier right here how will you handle the fact that Gutfeld might outsell you with

the monologues I like that he plugs my book

you got to kill me book out there you got the Gutfeld thing coming up yeah

Ainsley's got a book out we have a lot of books how will you feel if you don't

outsell all I'll feel like that bear those bears feeling pretty good right

now it's in the best seat my house my lap

right there before we go just on a personal note what do you hear from

Charles Krauthammer office so I had this email the other day he's doing better

his doctors say he's turned the corner and he hopes to be back in you know in

the panel and on the panel great good here's wishing you all the best Charles

I know you watch and does he watched as he watches watch and he watches the fine

I hope you merit ourselves Charles it's a little late for that I'm only a bear

with a human face huh that's true yeah this is where I am again yeah do you get

aggravated no I think it's good you know I can always hear you laughing because I

think you're trying to do a serious show

you

For more infomation >> Bret Baier talks Reagan-Trump parallels, new book - Duration: 7:41.

-------------------------------------------

Robert Mueller Discovered One Phone Call That Is Devastating News For Trump - Duration: 11:36.

Robert Mueller Discovered One Phone Call That Is Devastating News For Trump

Robert Mueller is desperate.

His collusion investigation is a hoax and he's scrounging around for anything he can

use to make the case that Congress should impeach Donald Trump.

He's discovered one phone call that could be bad news for the President.

Mueller is zeroing in on the Trump administration's response to the story that a Russian lawyer

promised Donald Trump, Jr. dirt on Hillary Clinton in exchange for a meeting.

The lawyer lied.

There was no dirt—the lawyer wanted to lobby the campaign about lifting sanctions on Russia

adoption.

It was another supposed bombshell that fizzled within hours of its publication.

So Mueller – in his zeal to destroy the President – is focusing on a phone call

between Trump, top aide Hope Hicks, and former legal team spokesmen Mark Corallo, where they

discussed the administration's response to the story.

Corallo alleges that Hicks claimed the emails that Trump, Jr. eventually made public would

"never get out" and alleges that this meant she was trying to obstruct justice with

the President on the phone.

The New York Times reports:

"THE CONFERENCE CALL WITH THE PRESIDENT, MR.

CORALLO AND MS.

HICKS TOOK PLACE THE NEXT MORNING, AND WHAT TRANSPIRED ON THE CALL IS A MATTER OF DISPUTE.

IN MR.

CORALLO'S ACCOUNT — WHICH HE PROVIDED CONTEMPORANEOUSLY TO THREE COLLEAGUES WHO

LATER GAVE IT TO THE TIMES — HE TOLD BOTH MR.

TRUMP AND MS.

HICKS THAT THE STATEMENT DRAFTED ABOARD AIR FORCE ONE WOULD BACKFIRE BECAUSE DOCUMENTS

WOULD EVENTUALLY SURFACE SHOWING THAT THE MEETING HAD BEEN SET UP FOR THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN

TO GET POLITICAL DIRT ABOUT MRS.

CLINTON FROM THE RUSSIANS.

ACCORDING TO HIS ACCOUNT, MS.

HICKS RESPONDED THAT THE EMAILS "WILL NEVER GET OUT" BECAUSE ONLY A FEW PEOPLE HAD ACCESS

TO THEM.

MR.

CORALLO, WHO WORKED AS A JUSTICE DEPARTMENT SPOKESMAN DURING THE GEORGE W. BUSH ADMINISTRATION,

TOLD COLLEAGUES HE WAS ALARMED NOT ONLY BY WHAT MS.

HICKS HAD SAID — EITHER SHE WAS BEING NAÏVE OR WAS SUGGESTING THAT THE EMAILS COULD BE

WITHHELD FROM INVESTIGATORS — BUT ALSO THAT SHE HAD SAID IT IN FRONT OF THE PRESIDENT

WITHOUT A LAWYER ON THE PHONE AND THAT THE CONVERSATION COULD NOT BE PROTECTED BY ATTORNEY-CLIENT

PRIVILEGE."

Hicks' lawyer strongly denied this allegation and labeled it as false.

The Times also reports:

IN A STATEMENT ON WEDNESDAY, A LAWYER FOR MS.

HICKS STRONGLY DENIED MR.

CORALLO'S ALLEGATIONS.

"AS MOST REPORTERS KNOW, IT'S NOT MY PRACTICE TO COMMENT IN RESPONSE TO QUESTIONS FROM THE

MEDIA.

BUT THIS WARRANTS A RESPONSE," SAID THE LAWYER, ROBERT P. TROUT.

"SHE NEVER SAID THAT.

AND THE IDEA THAT HOPE HICKS EVER SUGGESTED THAT EMAILS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS WOULD BE CONCEALED

OR DESTROYED IS COMPLETELY FALSE."

Mueller's interest in this episode shows how desperate he is to destroy Trump.

Even if the initial statement to the media was misleading, that is not a crime.

If a special counsel was appointed every time a politician shaded the truth to the media

there would be 535 special counsels investigating every member of Congress.

Mueller digging into this meeting exposes that he is holding no cards.

If he really had any evidence of collusion or obstruction he would be pursuing that instead.

Investigations are supposed to be conducted in pursuit of evidence to prove a crime was

committed.

The Mueller probe is an investigation in pursuit of a crime.

Trump is being investigated because his real "crime" was winning the election against

the wishes of the political establishment.

So they are using this fake news Russia probe to try and tear him down.

It's an illegitimate assault on Democracy and it should be shut

down immediately.

Do you agree?

Let us know your

thoughts in the comment section.

For more infomation >> Robert Mueller Discovered One Phone Call That Is Devastating News For Trump - Duration: 11:36.

-------------------------------------------

Fed Up Trump Goes Rogue – DROPS NUKE On Robert Mueller - Duration: 13:24.

For more infomation >> Fed Up Trump Goes Rogue – DROPS NUKE On Robert Mueller - Duration: 13:24.

-------------------------------------------

The FBI Director Threatened Trump In This Awful Way - Duration: 12:15.

The FBI Director Threatened Trump In This Awful Way

The controversy over the FBI's bias against Donald Trump is not going away.

The President is on the verge of releasing a memo that details how the Bureau abused

the FISA process to spy on members of his Presidential campaign.

And the FBI Director may have threatened the President in this awful way.

The Deep State is terrified of the Nunes memo.

It outlines the Obama administration and the FBI's abuses of power in spying on Donald

Trump's Presidential campaign.

After the House voted to make the memo public, Donald Trump had five days to declassify it.

The FBI strongly objected to the American people being able to judge for themselves

if the Bureau crossed the line in using the fake news Christopher Steele dossier to obtain

warrants allowing them to spy on the Trump campaign.

And CNN reported that new FBI Director Christopher Wray may resign if the memo was made public.

CNN reports:

"TOP WHITE HOUSE AIDES ARE WORRIED FBI DIRECTOR CHRISTOPHER WRAY COULD QUIT IF THE HIGHLY

CONTROVERSIAL REPUBLICAN MEMO ALLEGING THE FBI ABUSED ITS SURVEILLANCE TOOLS IS RELEASED,

MULTIPLE SOURCES WITH KNOWLEDGE OF THE SITUATION TELL CNN.

WRAY HAS MADE CLEAR HE IS FRUSTRATED THAT PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP PICKED HIM TO LEAD

THE FBI AFTER HE FIRED FBI DIRECTOR JAMES COMEY IN MAY, YET HIS ADVICE ON THE NUNES

MEMO IS BEING DISREGARDED AND CAST AS PART OF THE PURPORTED PARTISAN LEADERSHIP OF THE

FBI, ACCORDING TO A SENIOR LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL.

WRAY'S STANCE IS "RAISING HELL," ONE SOURCE FAMILIAR WITH THE MATTER SAID."

But once it became clear Trump was intent on releasing the memo, the sources who spread

these rumors began to walk them back.

It's clear the report of Wray wanting out was nothing more than a desperate attempt

by some to try and block Trump from releasing the memo.

It's understandable that Wray – and those who are sympathetic to the FBI – don't

want the American people to read the Nunes memo.

The FBI was once was a trusted institution.

But the memo will make clear that the Obama administration corrupted the FBI and weaponized

its leadership against Donald Trump.

We will keep you to date on any new developments

in

this story.

For more infomation >> The FBI Director Threatened Trump In This Awful Way - Duration: 12:15.

-------------------------------------------

Breaking: President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin - Duration: 11:05.

BREAKING: PRESIDENT TRUMP AND RUSSIAN PRESIDENT VLADIMIR PUTIN ISSUE MAJOR ANNOUNCEMENT

Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump, in a joint statement

on Syria, agreed to continue joint efforts on fighting Islamic State until it is defeated,

the Kremlin said on Saturday.

According to Fox News, they issued the statement after a brief meeting at the Asia Pacific

Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit.

Via Christian News Alert:

In the statement, the two leaders stated that there is no military solution to the conflict.

Both parties also stated that they were committed to Damascus' sovereignty.

Originally, it was expected that the two leaders would speak on Friday, however, they had their

conversation on Saturday as they walked to a "family photograph" at the conference.

It was the first time Putin and Trump had met since the G20 conference earlier this

year.

The relationship between the United States and Russia has been strained since Congress

passed a law imposing more aggressive sanctions against the Kremlin for their meddling in

the 2016 election.

President Trump reluctantly signed the bill into law.

In response, Russia expelled half of the United States' diplomatic staff from the US embassy

in Moscow.

In the days leading up to the meeting, there was speculation about the subjects the two

leaders would discuss.

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson told reporters in China that there wasn't a reason to have

a formal meeting between Trump and Putin if they could not take more steps towards resolving

issues like Syria and the Ukraine.

"The view has been if the two leaders are going to meet, is there something sufficiently

substantive to talk about that would warrant a formal meeting," Tillerson said.

On Thursday, it was reported that the United States and Russia were close to finalizing

an agreement regarding the Syrian civil war after ISIS is defeated.

The agreement in discussion contains three components, confliction between U.S. and Russian

military, decreasing violence in the region, and restarting peace talks led by the United

Nations.

According to The New York Times, Syria was not the only topic at hand during the conversation.

President Trump again asked Putin whether or not the Kremlin attempted to meddle in

the 2016 election.

This has been a serious point of contention ever since Trump won the presidency.

President Trump told reporters that Putin denied the allegations.

"He said he didn't meddle — I asked him again," Trump said.

"You can only ask so many times.

I just asked him again.

He said he absolutely did not meddle in our election.

He did not do what they are saying he did."

The president did not directly state whether or not he believes Putin's claims.

However, he did state that the issue is harming relations between the United States and the

Kremlin.

"Every time he sees me he says, 'I didn't do that,' and I really believe that when

he tells me that, he means it," he said.

"I think he is very insulted by it, which is not a good thing for our country."

It appears that Trump wishes to put the 2016 election interference behind him.

To people on the left, it might appear that Trump's desire to move past the issue is

because he was colluding with the Russian government to swing the results of the election.

Since nobody has been able to find evidence proving that the Trump campaign worked with

the Kremlin, it's more likely that Trump wants to have a more productive relationship

with Russia — especially when it comes to Syria and the North Korea issue.

(Source: www.christiannewsalert.com)

It was reported on Thursday that Washington and Moscow were nearing an agreement on Syria

for how they hope to resolve the Arab country's civil war once ISIS is defeated.

The U.S.-Russian agreement that was being discussed focused on three elements, officials

told The Associated Press: "deconfliction" between the U.S. and Russian militaries, reducing

violence in the civil war and reinvigorating U.N.-led peace talks.

The officials weren't authorized to discuss the deliberations and requested anonymity.

Mr. Putin said that Mr. Trump behaved at meetings "with the highest level of good will and

correctness," adding, "He is a cultured person, and comfortable discussing matters

related

to work."

For more infomation >> Breaking: President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin - Duration: 11:05.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump responds to letters from local students - Duration: 1:36.

For more infomation >> President Trump responds to letters from local students - Duration: 1:36.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Goes Rogue And Ditches Everyone To Make Important Secret Stop - Duration: 4:16.

For more infomation >> Trump Goes Rogue And Ditches Everyone To Make Important Secret Stop - Duration: 4:16.

-------------------------------------------

Liberals Criticize One Thing About Trump's New Embassy - Duration: 11:07.

Liberals Criticize One Thing About Trump's New Embassy.

You Won't Believe This.

Once again, liberals are complaining about President Donald Trump.

As he fulfills another big promise from his campaign, they try to distract the public.

This latest attack reveals how desperate and pathetic they've become, and patriots everywhere

are laughing at them.

We know the left-wing media is stupid.

Their unending hatred of President Trump has made them all but irrelevant.

Why should anyone take their "coverage" seriously, anymore?

They've spent the good part of a year and a half reporting on things like Trump's

ice cream preferences and White House rumors.

When they do try to report on "real" issues, all we get is made up controversies about

Russia or an old porn star.

The mainstream media still can't get over Trump's victory.

They have made it their goal to undermine his presidency at every step.

Every time Trump wins something for the American people, they downplay it, distract from it,

or outright ignore it.

Some estimate the media's coverage of the President to be 90% negative.

So much for journalistic integrity.

Despite all of that, the President continues to make good on his promises.

One really big one was achieved this week.

During his campaign, Trump promised to move the U.S. embassy in Israel to Jerusalem.

It would be a clear sign that America acknowledges Jerusalem as the true capital of Israel.

Even though Congress voted to do so years ago, no President was willing to actually

do it — except for Trump.

When President @realDonaldTrump announced that it is time to officially recognize Jerusalem

as the capital of Israel, he fulfilled another campaign promise, in addition to those that

go back 25 years….

pic.twitter.com/P7M2dEx2qT

— Dan Scavino Jr. (@DanScavino) December 7, 2017

Yesterday was the ceremony that officially unveiled the U.S. embassy's new home in

the ancient city.

It was another important promise kept by President Donald Trump.

Every America who respects and supports our ally in the Middle East celebrated the achievement.

Except, of course, liberals.

Even though they claim to support the Jewish people, they had little good to say about

the historic event.

Instead, much of the media focused on a 30,000+ riot of Palestinians outside the border.

They focused on the backlash by Israel's enemies, in order to discredit Trump and Israel

itself.

But that's not even the end of it.

Numerous liberals took to Twitter to complain about the embassy.

What do you think they were upset about?

The cost of the building?

Security?

Maybe they are upset with our ambassador, David Friedman?

It was none of that.

They didn't like the size of Trump's name on the plaque outside.

Seriously.

Now they're criticizing the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem because "'Donald J. Trump'

is in a larger font than 'Jerusalem, Israel'" on the ceremonial plaque [Source: Twitchy]

On the new U.S. embassy plaque, "Donald J. Trump" is in a larger font size than "Jerusalem,

Israel" pic.twitter.com/OIkW2NJF9x

— Josh Rogin (@joshrogin) May 15, 2018

I mean, seriously Josh?

This man is a columnist for the Washington Post and a political analyst.

But he's so petty he complains about the font of Trump's name.

Pathetic.

But don't think it was just this fake news peddler.

Many more liberal idiots joined the chorus.

This happened https://t.co/00tPSP0lBQ

— Chris Cillizza (@CillizzaCNN) May 15, 2018

To you, it's public service.

To him, it's a branding opportunity.

https://t.co/YcXdXJY1mU

— Will Saletan (@saletan) May 15, 2018

Says it all.

This wasn't about support for Israel, it was about Trump's ego.

And it was a bad decision.

And innocent people died.

Were killed.

It's an embarrassing and shameful day for both US and Israeli leadership.

https://t.co/r2kuNE8v5y

— Michael Simon (@mbsimon) May 15, 2018

Yeah, it was about Trump's ego.

Because all of the hate he got from the America media was really worth it, to see his name

displayed on a tiny plaque outside a government building.

I guess Michael Simon has never seen this:

I don't think Donald Trump needs his ego to be stroked by something much smaller in

comparison.

(Don't buy what he said about "innocent people" dying.

The 50 people who died were terrorists who attacked Israel's border.

They flung Molotov cocktails and fired guns at Israeli soldiers.

These are the people Michael Simon calls innocent.)

Of course, there were stupid responses, like this:

This physically pains me.

@realDonaldTrump YOU DO NOT OWN THE UNITED STATES.

This is not a Trump Hotel.

It belongs to the people.

#gross https://t.co/UE03VjkxoD

— teri weinberg (@TeriWeinberg) May 15, 2018

This physically pains you?

Kid, you should see a doctor, because something ain't right.

Oh, and the embassy belongs to the people?

Then I guess it shouldn't display the name of the President, like every other government

building.

Naturally, as liberals complained about fonts, patriots were laughing.

That's all they got left, friends.

Font sizes.

https://t.co/8b0YLSYOnD

— Mike Cernovich 🇺🇸 (@Cernovich) May 15, 2018

Also, two scoops of ice cream.

https://t.co/3Qt11fIMvl

— Arthur Schwartz (@ArthurSchwartz) May 15, 2018

It's clear the liberal media has no credibility left.

They can't even honestly report on something so significant.

The U.S. embassy move is a major win for our ally in the Middle East.

It is a sign that America means business in supporting Israel.

Every American should be celebrating.

But the bitter, enraged left, so petty and childish, cannot.

The worst they can do is bicker about the size of Trump's name on the wall.

Just imagine how big it'll be on the border wall.

For more infomation >> Liberals Criticize One Thing About Trump's New Embassy - Duration: 11:07.

-------------------------------------------

Giuliani: Mueller Can't Indict Trump - Duration: 12:57.

it is America's number one cable morning news show and you are watching her right

now welcome aboard the 7 o'clock hour of Fox and Friends Ainsley's in England and

Abbey's in her place she's living at a drink tea the proper way right give me

all our tips when she gets home and we'll find out once a parole if she

likes warm beer because that's how they they don't really refrigerate things

over there and it started refrigerated more on that later

England discovered free on we're gonna discuss that next hour good point all of

you thanks for joining us Mayor Rudy Giuliani scrambled early changed outfits

right up to Laura Ingraham show to help us out through the wingull tagamet

tangle mince which are the Muller investigation thanks so much for joining

us for the quick turnaround mr. mayor nice to be with you always

all right first off on some of the things you revealed last night when you

were sitting down with Robert Muller and others he made it clear to you there was

Robert Muller when he said I can we don't believe we can indict a sitting

president was he trying to get your guard down as if what are you afraid of

guys just bring him in no I don't think that I came up this way we we I asked

him specifically if they if they realized or acknowledged they didn't

have the power to indict both under the Justice Department memo which gives them

their power in essence confined state power and under the Constitution and he

said well he did he he would answer and one of the assistants said they

acknowledge they had to be bound by Justice Department policies and then the

next day or the day after they clarified it for Jay Sekulow who was with me at

the meeting that they didn't have the power to indict that what they would

eventually do is write a memorandum and give it to the Deputy Attorney General

Rosen Steve and we never got to the issue with subpoena he I think he had

raised that earlier with with John Dowd but it didn't come up with me but we're

pretty comfortable that in the circumstances of this case they wouldn't

be able to subpoena him personally really well there's no Supreme Court

decision that really is right on on point

there are several decisions around for example they could probably require

documents to be produced that's what was required of Nixon and we've produced 1.4

million dot they could probably require you to

testify in a civil case possibly even as a witness in a criminal case but they

can't let they can't require you to testify and what would be your own case

because they have to roll it's it's all about a possible impeachment impeachment

has to come before indictment and that's what that's a law not just in the United

States that's the law the governs for most heads of state in the world

so so essentially your team is saying hey mr. Maule you you cannot subpoena

him to get him to come and talk to you because that would violate article 2 of

the Constitution and executive privilege so it's a no right well also it would

violate the just Department policies and he is specifically appointed under those

policies so he has to follow those so we could go to court and challenge anything

that he did that was violative that those apologies what he's being

challenged by Manafort looks like successfully to produce his

authorization to indict Manafort that's not clear that he has it so I don't

think he wants to battle with us other than that yeah there is a narrow set of

circumstances you kind understand the president wants to testify

I want it wants to give out give his side of the case that she believes is

the truthful one he keeps saying to me I never talked to any Russians I had

nothing to do with any Russians what is this nonsense about Russians and about

obstruction to justice what he says very simply is I'm just expressing my opinion

mm-hmm I can't say that Comey is doing a bad

job I'm obstructing justice if I decide that

the director of the FBI is doing a bad job that's ridiculous so he wants to

express that now on most side everything he says they believe they can examine

his motives so if they had an open mind we would be inclined maybe to let our

client do what he wants to do yeah what do you think happens to James coming

you've been critical of him about leaking his memos you say he needs to be

personally investigated where do you think that goes well I don't know how

you can fire FBI agents for leaking less sensitive things and not fire him for

leaking a memo that he is variously classified as an FBI document his own

personal document first of all nothing is his personal document when he's

director of the FBI and he's sitting down and trying to memorialize a meeting

with the president the United States give me a break call me I mean even you

can't stretch the truth that far you you go pretty far but I can't stretch it

that for so I mean this whole I mean I think the investigation should be thrown

out because it all began with an illegal act commis leaking of the memo to the

professor who the house now wants to find out all the circumstance of that

it's gonna be a pretty slimy situation right I'd like to know how often call me

leaked at other surfaces - yeah I mean you just think you'd be so comfortable

doing it and so easily he said it and then we find out the guy had special FBI

clearance mr. mayor we had Judge Napolitano here and you guys go away

back to old Italy in your rivalries with your families I'm only kidding

but he came out and says listen I love Rudy but he's making a mistake poking

the bear by telling mo to wrap it up you don't want to poke the poke to grab the

tiger you don't want to aggravate him because they make your life miserable

have you examined your tactics and thought about the baby the backlash

somebody has to defend the president and that's my job and if he wanted to get

angry get angry at me not the president I'm the one doing it and the reality is

that's my job my job is not to you know lean over and let him beat the hell out

of us that's what was going on before I got here it's my job to make the case

for the President of the United States I'm very proud of that and I think it's

very different now than it was a couple weeks ago you know since I got involved

in the raskins and Ryan and Jay we're one team now what we're doing what the

president wants and we're fighting back you know I look they're professionals

and if they're not there's a remedy can be in court I mean oh all they can do is

write a report right so how bad that is sure can you deal with that we can write

- can you see any scenario mayor where the president would sit down with Muller

yeah sure absolutely I think you know it depends on if if they're willing to be

reasonable we've written them five letters three when John Dowd was in

charge - since I came aboard asking for things that we would need in order to

decide whether to submit him to questioning which every lawyer in

America I think even Judge Napolitano would tell

you he shouldn't do sure I mean we're gonna be the laughingstock of warriors

and we let him testify guys but you can be sure we're only going to do that if

we feel there's a way to shorten this thing if we're in for a long

investigation we'll fight every single thing whether people think it's nice or

not nice or if you're innocent you've got to fight back and the president is

innocent and he is absolutely right because when I get insulted you get

insulted but it's a damn witch hunt well I tell you what the Moller investigation

officially started a year ago and today the New York Times had a great big

article about the operation that led to it it was called Operation crossfire

hurricane and it sounds like the New York Times is confirming that the FBI

essentially spied on the Trump campaign in the summer before the election which

would suggest they were out to frame it here's the exact quote at least one

government informant met several times with Paige and Papadopoulos current and

former officials said that has become politically contentious point with

Trump's allies questioning whether the FBI was spying on the Trump campaign or

not this was buried in a 4,000 page story but what I just read to you what

is your stand on that what is that does that change anything what would changed

a lot of things I mean first of all we're gonna have to look into as a

result of the times the article Thank You New York Times they usually don't

help us in in this case I think we're gonna have to look into whether we can

challenge the legitimacy of the entire investigation maybe a special process

prosecutor special counsel never should have been appointed not based on an

illegal leak not based on a set of facts that go back to I mean I'm shocked to

hear that they put a spy in the campaign of a major party candidate or maybe two

spies and now I'm going through my brain since you know I was a big part of that

campaign trying to figure out who was the spy now I'm wonder is is this person

or that person or this person now if it's fine they got nothing from it look

they'd be able to bring their case right now is the spy had any incriminating

information that spy should have been enough to tell them these people would

not talking to the Russians there's no collusion we need enough

evidence to put a spy on someone to subpoena someone I mean there are still

a lot of questions as to the evidence that ultimately led to this

investigation well it's kind of like the Big Bang Theory right Abbi I mean

obviously they didn't have enough evidence to put a spy in I mean you

don't know you don't need enough evidence that put a spy in to put one in

on the president United States that would seem to me you darn well better

have it they didn't have it because they don't have it now yeah it wouldn't be

look if they had if they had had a spy mr. spy got incriminating evidence

they'd be able to wrap this investigation up I wouldn't be sitting

here we've been dealing with whatever the aftermath of the investigation is so

all we know is they may have had somebody inside close to the campaign

but so far that would be the biggest scandal in the history of this town at

least involving law enforcement and I have there's no one that has more

respect for the FBI agents the minim of the FBI than I do and I would I mean

Comey has put them through hell he put him through through this as well really

to clear the name of the FBI he should be proud he should be prosecuted and his

friend McCabe who who one of them is one of them's lying I mean they're now going

at each other one of them is lying I mean he can toss a coin to figure out

here's one well let's see the president should've fired him I know well let's

see if any of this is addressed in the inspector general's report which should

be out very shortly Rudy well looking forward to that guys I'll see you back

in New York all right good day he was on late last night to Julian for some other

headlines lot going on that's right we are following a lot of stories starting

with this president Trump meeting with politicians opposed to California's

sanctuary laws the commander in chief praising the leaders for fighting

against it we cannot let this virtually happen in America the State of

California's attempts to nullify federal law have sparked a rebellion by

patriotic citizens who want their families protected and their borders

secure this comes as the city of Hanford voted unanimously to break away from the

state sanctuary laws nearly two dozen cities and six counties have joined the

anti sanctuary fight a hero school resource officer stops a gunman and

saves lives that's officer Mark Dallas shooting and

injuring a former student who opened fire at a high school in Dixon Illinois

he charged towards suspect and confronted him head-on because of

historic actions countless lives were saved the Vice President tweeting his

thanks saying quote another example of the brave work performed by law

enforcement each and every day suspect Matt Milby is hot alized

and under arrest brand new video showing the road cracked in half as earthquakes

shake ye the tremors rattling the Big Island as the threat of an explosive

eruption grows the Kilauea Volcano blasting plumes of smoke and ash into

the air as lava fissures destroy homes and burned land but the volcano can't

stop these golfers look at this incredible photo showing a group teeing

off with ash spewing in the background it's just amazing termination I am

through it's insane are in this story's incredible newborn twins not quite ready

to be a part in moments after birth crying as doctors try to separate them

but what happens next is amazing look at that the newborns Weston and Caleb

immediately stopped crying when their cheeks touched the video posted by their

dad on YouTube has over 5 million views oh good or well there really is

something to the power of touch yep beautiful thank you I remember them

alright alright now I got 15 seconds believe in me she called the president a

dictator then questioned if the 9/11 attacks were real but this city

councilman's latest comment may be her most outrageous yet and Ainsley in

England for the world wedding we're gonna catch up with her that is ugly

that's your waving hainsley Prudential eyes

For more infomation >> Giuliani: Mueller Can't Indict Trump - Duration: 12:57.

-------------------------------------------

North Korea Threatens To Abandon Trump Summit, Furious Over Bolton Comments - Duration: 5:33.

North Korea Threatens To Abandon Trump Summit, Furious Over Bolton Comments

by Tyler Durden

Update II: The Pentagon has denied reports that it had considered pulling B-52 bombers

from military drills between the US and South Korea.

According to the Pentagon, the bombers were never supposed to take part in the drills,

the Washington Examiner reported.

The US and South Korea recently started their springtime "Max Thunder" drills which are

meant to "enhance interoperability and readiness."

The scope of Max Thunder has not changed," Pentagon spokesman Lt. Col. Chris Logan said

Wednesday.

* * *

Update: The White House says it's hopeful that its planned meeting with North Korean

leader Kim Jong Un will move forward, though it's prepared for tough negotiations, Press

Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders told Fox News.

�He�ll be there, and he�ll be ready" White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee

Sanders said of Trump in a Fox News interview Wednesday, adding that North Korea�s threat

to back out of a denuclearization summit isn�t out of the ordinary.

"We�re ready to meet, and if it happens that�s great, but if doesn�t well see

what happens," she said.

"If it doesn�t we�ll continue the maximum pressure campaign that has been ongoing"

The summit is set to take place June 12 in Singapore.

North Korea has threatened to pull out of next month's peace summit with Washington

if the US insists on the peninsula hurriedly giving up its nuclear weapons without offering

immediate sanctions relief.

After blaming joint South Korean-US military exercises for the country's decision yesterday

to cancel a planned summit with the South and to suspend talks, the North revealed another

source of anger: National Security Advisor John Bolton's comments from his appearance

Sunday on CNN's State of the Union, where he suggested that North Korea must "commit

to denuclearization" to help it "become a normal nation."

Kim Kye Gwan, a vice foreign minister and a top North Korea disarmament negotiator,

said the regime was disappointed by the US's articulation of its goals for the summit,

according to a statement published Wednesday by the state-run Korean Central News Agency

via Bloomberg.

Kim expressed anger toward Bolton and other US officials, adding that the North rejects

the "Libya model" where a state surrenders its weapons first then receives incentives

like sanctions relief.

"If the U.S. is trying to drive us into a corner to force our unilateral nuclear abandonment,

we will no longer be interested in such dialogue and cannot but reconsider our proceeding to

the DPRK-U.S. summit," Kim said.

He added that Trump risked becoming a "more tragic and unsuccessful president than his

predecessors" if he didn�t accept North Korea as a nuclear power.

Kim Kye Gwan said the North had already declared its willingness to denuclearize the peninsula

- but that it must not be counted on to act first.

"If the Trump administration corners us and tries to force us to give up nuclear [weapons]

unfairly," it says, "we will not be interested in such talks anymore and cannot help but

reconsider having the upcoming DPRK-U.S. summit."

North Korea added that it wouldn't be satisfied with "complete, verifiable and irreversible"

denuclearization as well as the dismantling of nuclear and chemical arms, per Nikkei.

One North Korea expert said observers shouldn't panic: The sharp rhetoric is more likely a

negotiating tactic than a legitimate threat to scrap the talks.

Jin Chang-soo, president at the Sejong Institute, said North Korea's remarks are more like jockeying

ahead of the summit with the U.S., and not a serious threat to pull out of the meeting.

"North Korea and the U.S. agreed on the big picture, but they still have different ideas

on a detailed process.

Pyongyang is trying to boost its negotiation power with such actions," Jin said.

In a statement, the South Korean government said North Korea's decision to suspend talks

was "regrettable."

"It is regrettable that the North has suspended inter-Korean high-level talks with no consultation

with us," said Baik Tae-hyun, a spokesman for South Korea's Unification Ministry.

"The government has a firm will to carry out the Panmunjom Declaration faithfully, and

urges the North side to come to the table quickly for the peace and prosperity of the

Korean Peninsula."

China, meanwhile, called on both sides to "avoid further provocation."

"The amelioration of the situation on the Korean Peninsula is hard won and should be

cherished," foreign ministry spokesman Lu Kang told reporters in Beijing.

For now Kim's gambit appears to be working: on Tuesday night, the US said that it would

consider withholding B-52 bombers from its joint military drills with South Korea in

a bid to appease the North.

Should Pyongyang say it demands more, will Trump - visions of a Nobel Peace Prize dancing

in his head - appease Kim again, and if so, how?

For more infomation >> North Korea Threatens To Abandon Trump Summit, Furious Over Bolton Comments - Duration: 5:33.

-------------------------------------------

ABC Execs Demand Roseanne Stop Talking About Trump - Duration: 10:54.

ABC Execs Demand Roseanne Stop Talking About Trump, Her Response Sent SHOCKWAVES Through

Studio!

American TV fans were ecstatic when they found out Roseanne would return to regular programming

with a new season.

Her show was well received, gathering millions of viewers, and hitting hard on political

humor while hammering home a few good points in each episode.

It didn't take that long for ABC to come after Roseanne Barr and give her a scathing

message about her pro-Trump character.

However, the president of ABC, Channing Dungey, didn't expect to hear the response Roseanne

had for him after he demanded that she slow her roll on the political commentary and pro-Trump

agenda.

Dungey seems to want Roseanne to stop with the political aspect and resort to strictly

comedy – even though political humor is extremely funny and worked very well for her

show up until now.

Dungey wants the show to lean away from politics for now on.

Conservative fans might not like that as much because the millions of fans who were happily

watching the show could see their new show faced with a forced agenda to change Roseanne's

show.

John Goodman would likely agree that he and Roseanne need to continue doing what worked

best to get excellent viewership in the millions.

Don't let ABC get you down.

Roseanne shocked them with a stunning reply that put her fans at ease when she posted

this on Twitter.

Fox News provided more details on the demand from ABC: "ABC entertainment president Channing

Dungey put the kibosh on "Roseanne" remaining political in the second season – apparently

ditching the strategy the network touted only two months ago.

Dungey said that the show will lean away from politics next season during a conference call

with reporters as part of the network's upfront presentation.

Upon learning the news, conservative media icon Matt Drudge tweeted, "Corporate cannibals

stripping Roseanne of her fun."

The return of "Roseanne" featured a debut episode in which characters argued about the

2016 election, with the show's namesake representing the conservative viewpoint.

As the season concluded, politics appeared less frequently on the sitcom.

"I think that they're going to stay on the path that they were on toward the end

of last season, which is away from politics and toward family," Dungey said during the

network's upfront presentation after the call, according to TheWrap.

The site added that Dungey said ABC's goal is to be "as diverse and as inclusive as

possible … across all metrics."

"I think that one of the things that was fresh for us with 'Roseanne' on the air

is that it is focusing (on) a family that is in a different economic status than some

of the other family comedies that are on the air," Dungey reportedly said.

The show, starring Roseanne Barr the pro-Trump title character, drew plenty of eyeballs when

it premiered on March 27, shocking the industry with over 27 million viewers in Live+7 in

delayed ratings.

Shortly afterwards, ABC President Ben Sherwood eagerly rolled himself out to The New York

Times after the successful return.

At the time, Sherwood claimed that ABC executives had a meeting the morning after the 2016 election

about how they could better reach Middle America.

"We looked at each other and said, 'There's a lot about this country we need to learn

a lot more about, here on the coasts,'" Sherwood told the Times in a feature headline,

"'Roseanne' Reboot Sprang From ABC's Heartland Strategy After Trump's Victory."

An ABC spokesperson said the network is "definitely not" ditching the heartland strategy when

reached by Fox News."

ABC might want to remember that Roseanne's show brought millions of viewers to their

network and likely increased their ratings on the days that her show aired.

Her statistics to open the series this year was stunning, but slowed slightly, although

it seemed like her show continued to perform as her fans became loyal viewers as her season

went on.

The next season might have the hands of the ABC president grappling their show like a

wrestling move, but Roseanne wants her fans to know that she's not backing down and

she will continue to provide as best of a show as possible.

Do you think Roseanne will continue with her political jabs and humor or will she be forced

to dial back towards a strictly family based show?

What's wrong with having a little bit of political humor if the ratings continue to

do well?

Should Roseanne demand control of her show as long as the ratings are up?

Share this with a friend who likes the Roseanne

show

and write

your

comments below!

For more infomation >> ABC Execs Demand Roseanne Stop Talking About Trump - Duration: 10:54.

-------------------------------------------

President Mirziyoyev of Uzbekistan SHOCKS President Trump - Duration: 7:02.

thank you very much it's a great honor to have the president of Uzbekistan with

us he's a highly respected man in his country and throughout we've been

working very closely together on different things including trade they've

actually made investments here we make investments there we're working together

from the standpoint of the military including his purchase of equipment and

military equipment from the United States mr. president

KeSPA da president yeah Malaka darienne WOM honest I'm Amelia she would near a

table stretch a starry sky America's fear of nationalism with cigarette pack

dear Josh nationalisms massive territorial initialisms when you blog

about me say Tammy mr. president thank you very much indeed indeed today we are

having a very historical meeting and we know that the United States of America

so their early days the Independence of the Republic of Uzbekistan has always

supported the independence sovereignty as well as the territorial integrity of

Uzbekistan and we do highly appreciate this fact mashup misciagna push the

river president America speed Astana panellist a solution on Norwood our

relations since the elections of the presidents of the United States of

America as well as news magazine have taken have rising to a new level

yeah pastrami Iowa's postilla borough president America - dignity

ocean party result of economic primitive army yummy starry sky and aloe vera

former SAS diamond or a botanist at a diode the result of washy leech may

report a rowdy American school Marauder mr. president I congratulate there since

the latest elections of the president of the u.s. here in your country you have

been achieving in a very outstanding results and the economic sphere as was

that you can graduate on the adoption of the historical tax refers in terms of

the creation of the new jobs in here in America as well so this is the result

has those outcomes of your personal work in the MS appraiser

for the welfare and the prosperity of the American people not sure I agree 100

massive street Eliade in New York Masha telephone as Gavroche Esther

escaped as Lonnie Business Forum New York a dolly watching a shitty marital

Tata Sumo a Thomas dr. Mason Islamist regimes son is near pronita Sal Messner

was a linear who's which is a lineage that America was purchased an era

strategies know where a strategic partners at the Samanas vana Garrett a

severe and a tumor suppressor and sensory awareness meetings with you

which take place in regard as also the neighbor city well at the same time the

telephone conversation that we have Alaska this is a today the his work the

historical meeting as well as the historical message that you have sent to

the peasants forum that we have held with the American side in the near city

have yielded very tangible results and hazard the meeting that we are T today

having with you mr. president and today Roy who knows for once again where the

joint statement as between the United States of America and Pakistan and

reliant as the new era for strategic partnership between us Pakistan and the

United States of America the naming itself of this joint statement speaks

for itself asalaam delicate whiskas algunas

watching terra cotta is minnows mrs. Onassis table uhm naga technology

borrowed an occupying yeh mera ki seditionist a risky visit me

missile solution is reducing accompany me america ocular pity million dollar

attack every atoms touched or nasha strategies partner straw at Nova era

naturalist rallies partners serious Nene marina the local perspective yeah he

sure a swampland blog a during data culture

but I want spasiba master president indeed for another fast one only half

years we have been closely engaging with the United States of America insurance

investments and layaway and lately we have been procuring from the US a lot of

technology as well as the equipment as I have already animal square this is a

t-table historical meeting mr. president the party of this historical visit to

the US we have been able to sign the contracts and agreements with the

leading US companies worth five billion dollars as I have told you away do their

duty to partnership this is the new era the strategic partnership between

Pakistan and the US and in this very regard outlier to say that we've got

very serious intentions for the heuristic Emma for the perspectives mr.

president objection please fine opportunity to thank you indeed for the

world welcome here again in the West

Bathsheba that's possible thank you very much thank you very much

we will see what happens whatever

today's meeting is a wrong impression for a news batch all around the world as

well we'll see what happens

For more infomation >> President Mirziyoyev of Uzbekistan SHOCKS President Trump - Duration: 7:02.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING News Out Of Trump's DOJ! - Duration: 13:44.

BREAKING News Out Of Trump's DOJ!

Sentenced To LIFE IN PRISON!!!

Earlier today, a Guatemalan national was sentenced to life in prison following a March 2016 trial

that resulted in a conviction for his participation in an international drug trafficking conspiracy.

He was responsible for the distribution of multi-ton quantities of cocaine for illegal

importation into the United States.

Acting Assistant Attorney General John P. Cronan of the Justice Department's Criminal

Division and Special Agent in Charge Raymond Donovan of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration

(DEA) Special Operations Division made the announcement.

Waldemar Lorenzana-Cordon, 53, was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly

of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

"Waldemar Lorenzana-Cordon was a drug kingpin whose criminal organization had close ties

to the violent Sinaloa Cartel and was responsible for transporting massive amounts of cocaine

to be sold on our streets," said Acting Assistant Attorney General Cronan.

"Lorenzana-Cordon's life sentence sends a powerful message to leaders of drug trafficking

organizations that, if they send their poison to our country, the United States and our

international partners will work tirelessly to bring them to justice, no matter where

in the world they may reside.

I thank the dedicated prosecutors of the Criminal Division's Narcotic and Dangerous Drug Section

and law enforcement officers with the Drug Enforcement Administration's Bilateral Investigations

Group for their outstanding work on this important case."

"One of the world's most influential drug traffickers now faces American justice and

DEA is pleased he will never be in business again," said DEA Special Agent in Charge

Donovan.

"Lorenzana-Cordon imported huge amounts of cocaine to the United States for over a

decade, helping fuel our nation's drug epidemic.

He conspired with some of the most brutal and destructive drug networks in history,

facilitating and coordinating huge shipments for the Sinaloa Cartel, among others.

DEA's work will always focus on these types of investigations: attacking the most powerful,

influential global criminal networks and their many facilitators and associates."

The defendant was convicted on one count of conspiring to unlawfully distribute cocaine

for illegal importation into the United States.

As proven at trial, the defendant along with his brother, co-defendant Eliu Lorenzana-Cordon,

led an international drug trafficking organization with close ties to the Sinaloa Cartel.

Between 1996 and 2009, the defendant and his co-conspirators received, stored, and distributed

multi-ton quantities of cocaine from Colombia at their properties in Zacapa, Guatemala,

for importation into Mexico and then ultimately into the United States.

In February, Eliu Lorenzana-Cordon was sentenced to life in prison following a March 2016 trial

resulting in a conviction.

On April 27, 2010, the Department of Treasury's Office of Foreign Asset Control designated

the defendant and his brother, Eliu Lorenzana-Cordon, as Specially Designated Narcotics Traffickers

pursuant to the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act due to their significant roles

in international narcotics trafficking and their ties to the Sinaloa Cartel.

The DEA's Special Operations Division's Bilateral Investigations Unit and Guatemala

City Country Office led the investigation, which was supported by the Organized Crime

Drug Enforcement Task Force program, the Criminal Division's Office of International Affairs,

the Chicago Police Department and the governments of El Salvador and Panama provided support

and assistance.

Finally, and in particular, the Justice Department wishes to convey its gratitude to the government

of Guatemala for its steadfast commitment, collaboration and assistance in the investigation,

extradition, and prosecution of this case.

Assistant Deputy Chief Michael Lang and Trial Attorney Emily Cohen of the Criminal Division's

Narcotic and Dangerous Drug Section are prosecuting

the case.

GOD BLESS.

For more infomation >> BREAKING News Out Of Trump's DOJ! - Duration: 13:44.

-------------------------------------------

Huge Trump Signs Just Went Up - Duration: 16:10.

Huge Trump Signs Just Went Up Everywhere And Cover Buses, Sending Major Message About What's

Coming

President Trump has done what every prior president in my lifetime has promised but

none had the strength, or guts, to follow through.

"I have determined that it is time to officially recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel,"

said President Trump a few months ago.

He then added, "While previous presidents have made this a major campaign promise, they

failed to deliver.

Today, I am delivering."

And in doing so, President Trump and the world will finally see the promise become a reality

by having the United States Embassy moved from its current location in Tel Aviv, to

the capital of Israel, Jerusalem.

Previous administrations have promised this during campaigns but once in office, they

have completely avoided the move because they did not want to inflame the tensions between

the Palestinians and Israelis because most erroneously believed that appeasing Muslim

terrorists is the way to peace.

Trending: CNN Reporter Nearly Gets Into 'Physical Fight' In White House, Gets Smacked Back

To Reality By Sarah

Although no other nation has their embassy in Jerusalem someone has to be the first to

make the move, and that someone in the United States under the leadership of President Donald

Trump.

And because tomorrow this move becomes a reality some very interesting displays have come up

in Jerusalem.

As you can see above, in response to Trump's announcement, "God Bless Donald Trump"

signs are popping up all over the city of Jerusalem.

A recent poll found that 77% of Israelis believe that President Trump is more pro-Israel than

pro-Palestinian.

This is a huge contrast to the prior administration where only 4% thought President Obama was

more pro-Israel.

When President Trump made the decision the anti-Semitic United Nations was quick to condemn

the decision even though UN Ambassador Nikki Haley warned the US would think long and hard

before funding the UN if the vote went this way.

Haley certainly reminded the rest of the world that the U.S. is a sovereign nation and we

do not answer to anyone.

Trump himself later weighed in by saying "We're watching those votes, let them vote against

us, we'll save a lot.

We don't care."

More on this via WND:

"Ben Shapiro listed seven reasons Trump's decision to move our embassy to Jerusalem

is right, calling it "an act of not only political bravery but moral courage."

But is it an act that God Himself will bless?

Is there spiritual significance to this decision as well?

Earlier this year, a pastor asked me if there was any way to get a message to the president.

With great passion, he said to me, "During the campaign, Donald Trump promised to move

the embassy his first day in office, but he didn't do it.

And when did the protest marches against him begin?

His second day in office!

He will never see the full blessing of God until he makes good on his promise."

Others believe that Trump's decision will prove disastrous.

As a headline on the Daily Mail proclaims, "'He's declaring war on 1.5 billion

Muslims': Trump will recognise Jerusalem as Israel's capital TODAY despite international

fury from the Pope, Britain, Russia, China and Palestinians."

In the words of the Palestinian Authority's Manuel Hassassian, "He is declaring war

in the Middle East, he is declaring war against 1.5 billion Muslims [and] hundreds of millions

of Christians that are not going to accept the holy shrines to be totally under the hegemony

of Israel."

In reality, Trump is not declaring war in the Middle East, not declaring war against

1.5 billion Muslims and in no way, shape, size or form declaring war on hundreds of

millions of Christians.

In fact, the very notion that Christians will not accept "the holy shrines" being "totally

under the hegemony of Israel" is absolute nonsense.

First, America's recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital changes nothing on the

ground at all, especially when it comes to the Christian holy sites, which have been

under Israeli hegemony for decades.

Second, it is under Jewish hegemony that Middle Eastern Christians have access to these holy

sites and freedom to practice their faith.

The restrictions generally come under Islamic, not Israeli rule.

Still, the question must be asked: Why the uproar over Jerusalem?

Why does the whole world care?

Why does the pope weigh in?

Why are Muslim nations in such upheaval?

Why are Russia and China concerned?

What makes Jerusalem so important?

Jerusalem was never the capital of a Palestinian or Arab state.

(For that matter, there was not even a concept of a Palestinian state until the middle of

the 20th century and no such thing as a Palestinian people until after the Six Day War in 1967.)

Every other nation on the planet chooses its capital city, and the other nations recognize

that city and put their embassies there.

Why won't the rest of the world recognize Jerusalem as Israel's capital?

Why are the embassies located in Tel Aviv rather than Jerusalem?

Jerusalem is the historic capital of the Jewish people, going back to roughly 1000 B.C. Jews

face Jerusalem when they pray, and synagogues in the West face east, while every year at

Passover, the hopeful prayer is recited, "Next year in Jerusalem!"

And in terms of functional reality, Jerusalem is the capital of the nation.

There's nothing to discuss or debate.

That's reality, plain and simple.

When it comes to the peace process, more than two decades of negotiations have yielded precious

little progress, so the idea that recognizing Jerusalem would hurt this process is ludicrous.

Instead, if the Palestinians want peace with Israel, they can have wonderful, lasting,

prosperous peace – without dividing Jerusalem.

But all these are political questions and issues.

My question is spiritual in nature: Will God bless President Trump and the United States

for making this bold and courageous move?

I believe He will, since: 1) in doing so the president is blessing Israel, and God still

blesses those who bless His covenant nation, despite that nation's sins; 2) out of all

the cities on the earth, the Bible only calls us to pray for the welfare of Jerusalem (see

Psalm 122; Isaiah 62:1-8); 3) the tremendous resistance to the president's decision gives

evidence to the intensity of the spiritual battle over this city; and 4) there are prophetic

scriptures that speak of a Jewish Jerusalem welcoming back the Messiah, and so the decision

to fortify the unity of the city is in explicit harmony with those Scriptures (see especially

Zechariah 12 and 14).

And what about God's love for the Muslim world?

What about justice for the Palestinians?

The answer is simple: If they want to be blessed, they, too, must recognize the Jewish claim

to Jerusalem, a city that they do not need to possess or divide.

They don't need to call for violence and war.

Instead, they need to accept that East Jerusalem will not be the capital of a Palestinian state,

that working with the Jewish people rather than against them will be in their best interests

too, and that the Jewish people have a massively greater claim to Jerusalem than the Muslims

do.

As for President Trump, he is convinced that this formal recognition of Jerusalem will

aid and abet the peace process.

But even if that is not the case, I truly believe that God will bless him and bless

America for making this courageous and righteous decision.

Let's watch and see in the coming days."

H/T The Mirror

For more infomation >> Huge Trump Signs Just Went Up - Duration: 16:10.

-------------------------------------------

BAIER: Giuliani says Mueller acknowledged he can't indict Trump - Duration: 10:24.

the investigation was not about the president Jim Comey told the president

that three times in their meetings because that never has been the center

of the investigation nor is the role the special counsel to go try to get an

indictment of the president it is his role was very clear to see if there's

any criminal activity among the campaign I want to know what the basis is for

that statement by Rudy Giuliani and whether it was just a fan view by one of

the attorneys with the special counsel or whether it was a pronouncement by the

special counsel himself well the break news today Rudy Giuliani

telling our own Fox News John Roberts that that the special counsel will

follow DOJ guidance that the president cannot be indicted

according to Giuliani Muller has no choice and they're obviously pushing for

this to come to a conclusion what does this all mean and let's look at what the

Senate put out the Senate Intelligence Committee and Judiciary Committee today

let's bring in our panel here in New York former White House press secretary

Ari Fleischer Caitlyn Huy Byrnes national political reporter for Real

Clear Politics and Bill McGurn mainstream columnist for The Wall Street

Journal okay Ari your take on the news about Giuliani and what was said today

well it's significant but I wanted to say the president's home free so long as

there is a special counsel investigating no president is home free and neither is

the staffer the people who worked on the campaign we have to wait for Bob Muller

and only then our people home free so it is significant because of Rudy Giuliani

is right and I think I'd like to hear this also from the Department of Justice

and reinforcing what Giuliani said then it's a significant sigh of relief in the

legal sense but as we all know from what Bill Clinton went through this is a

political exercise in addition to a legal exercise the real jeopardy also

becomes Congress and the American people if the American people think crimes were

committed it will hurt Republicans and elections that hurt the president in a

real act so a lot more needs to be said and having said all that I still see no

evidence of collusion I don't think there's been collusion from the start

and particularly the most pernicious which would have been any involvement

from the Trump people and hacking Hillary it Podesta's emails and

disseminating them which is what this was all about I mean

development was at the Bob Mahler a team subpoenaed the social media director for

Roger stone today and we also had the release of some Senate documents put it

in perspective for scale right well the Senate documents really confirmed what

the intelligence community said which is that Russia meddled in the election to

help Donald Trump and now that's different from the house assessment the

house assessment of course the president was cheering on but we've seen how

different those committees have operated rather like we're trying to straighten

that out about you know the difference in the committee's saying that they were

looking at a specific area but go ahead sure so I think the bigger point here

though is that the Muller investigation continues the president it's it is

hanging over his administration certainly and he has expressed

frustrations with that I am interested to see though how the public starts to

react the longer that this goes on you have seen in polling a slight dip in

people's perceptions of the investigation you've seen Republicans by

a large margin really opposed that and you've seen candidates running for

office on the Republican ticket evoking the president's language that this is a

witch-hunt so you know the president reshuffled his

legal team because he didn't think that he was getting the the best advice and

he wanted to have a more combative nature with the special counsel and so

we'll see kind of how Giuliani handles this in this new space bill mutant yeah

I I think it was a good day for two reasons one is I think it's good that

the committee's release their findings because I think at the root of our

system is political accountability not criminal liability but political

accountability and what the American people need is to know what happened and

the longer we go on the more questions we have about our intelligence community

and so forth and it seems the less evidence there is about Donald Trump so

that's that's one side the other thing I think mr. Giuliani's the comments could

think about what that says the special prosecutor who ostensibly

works for the Justice Department is going to follow Justice Department

guidelines and that's a news story I find it incredible I mean I think the

proper venue for most of this is Congress

it's amazing to me that Congress has been stonewalled in men in its pursuit

of many of the documents and it's taken a backseat we've kind of you know we've

kind of looked to criminalize political behavior when the first accountability

to should be to the American people through their elected representatives

there's a lot we don't know about the start of the investigation and there's a

lot that just does not add up with that I mean there's a lot of people looking

at it but Capitol Hill hasn't come to that conclusion either no and you know

to quote Charles Krauthammer this has been one of the greatest issues we've

ever seen where it's all smoke and no fire and this is what we keep chasing

and this is why I keep coming back to the core issue did anybody and the Trump

campaign work with Russia to hack Hillary or Podesta's emails or work with

WikiLeaks to disseminate them the answer is no and nobody yet in two years almost

three years it's gonna with any evidence to support either of those if the answer

is no what are we doing where is this going

we're in dining people for financial fraud and other things having nothing to

do with the president fine it has nothing to do with the president

anything come from in your assessment of that transcript at 2500 pages from the

Trump Tower struck you that Donald Trump jr. didn't know whether his dad knew or

not what well the interest in this meeting of course is because of the

question of collusion right whether Trump associates were amenable or open

receptive to any help from Russian agents and what we don't know is what

Donald Trump jr. knew or didn't know I thought it was interesting how he said

that he didn't really talk to his father about it but he also said in very and in

various exchanges that he didn't know or couldn't recall and so I think this

provides a more detailed assessment of that meeting but still I think there are

a lot of questions I think the broader question of course is when when will

this wrap up and what will come of it you've had lots of indictments on

Russian meddling of course that the administration has acted on but on the

issue of collusion you do have a lot of people asking when

is this going to be answer final word on this and I want to do around on North

Korea yeah well you know my saying is special

councils corrupt independent councils corrupt absolutely there's a reason

we're at this stage and we're finding no evidence and we're going on so to be

nice if we do get to a conclusion I agree with Caitlin I think also a lot of

people are getting tired but they're not getting tired because of the search

they're getting tired that they're not seeing as Ari says any hard evidence we

keep sort of spinning our wheels the pages today are sort of interesting they

give a lot more detail and granularity but we knew from Donald Trump juniors

email what he went to this meeting to see and so forth so I'm not sure

materially it adds and what we don't know what we really don't know is why

and when the FBI launched the investigation we know what they say but

we're not yet clear on why they in the vacuum of all this as Kaylin mentioned

the president's poll numbers are going up right well they haven't found a

fitness on the main the main attack against him so you know you would expect

that plus if the economy is getting better why wouldn't it go up okay North

Korea it looks like it's you know touch and go whether this summits happening or

not your thoughts you've been around the block with the North Koreans they don't

really you know keep up with promises all the time I've been a cynic all along

on this day taunt with North Korea because I've lived through it before

I've seen North Korea lie deceive say that they'll stop enrichment of uranium

only to start enrich and start development plutonium to pursue a

nuclear weapon they say we got rid of our nuclear weapons but then they have

50 more they got rid of 10 they kept 50 this is North Korea so I think President

Trump should proceed with a military drill with South Korea do not back down

you back down one inch to the North Koreans they will roll all over you be

tough be firm and I expect if the summit goes on be tough be firm there but the

real issue is going to be the months in the years after an agreement if there is

one that's reached because the history is North Korea they'll deceive us so the

pageantry of an agreement is not as important as North Korea actually doing

what they say does it happen well it's interesting because the

president it's very clear he wants to make some kind of deal here right he has

driven in large part by being able to do things his predecessors weren't able to

do he says that himself he's also you know

invited conversations about the Nobel Peace Prize so I think I'm wondering

kind of how that plays into how North Korea is thinking about this whether

they can exert leverage knowing that the president wants this so badly percentage

Singapore June 12th yeah well I think there will by I'd say 90 percent I think

that they'll meet because it's always in this North Koreans interest to meet they

make an agreement that they don't frequently abide by look I think Aries

right we have to keep our eye on the ball all right the ball here is not

letting them to get the capacity to strike the United States with the

nuclear missile in the way it's Donald Trump's redline and we're to where we

are because he's been tough and I think you should be tough and I'm glad that

John Bolton's there and I'm I'm with John Bolton if we're gonna have a deal

I'd rather a Libya type deal than in Iran type deal all right

panel thank you very much what is your optimal timeline for this to wrap up

they should do it today I mean as soon as possible I think that they have the

facts from which they can write their report if you're going to write a fair

report fine write it if you're going to write an unfair report write it and we

will combat it we're ready to rip it apart

you

For more infomation >> BAIER: Giuliani says Mueller acknowledged he can't indict Trump - Duration: 10:24.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Has HAD IT! Sarah Sanders Announces They're ALL Banned From White House Effective NOW! - Duration: 12:19.

Trump Has HAD IT!

Sarah Sanders Announces They're ALL Banned From White House Effective NOW!

The White House has now decided that staffers and guests will no longer be able to use personal

cell phones in the West Wing.

The announcement came right after a book came out against the Trump Administration in January

which was rumored to be a tell-all book of the inner-workings of the Trump Administration.

One that prompted President Donald Trump to threaten Steve Bannon with legal action since

the book is full of quotes from him.

NBC News reported the White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders as saying:

"The security and integrity of the technology systems at the White House is a top priority

for the Trump administration.

Therefore, starting next week the use of all personal devices for both guests and staff

will no longer be allowed in the West Wing," she said.

"Staff will be able to conduct business on their government-issued devices and continue

working hard on behalf of the American people."

Trending: CNN Reporter Nearly Gets Into 'Physical Fight' In White House, Gets Smacked Back

To Reality By Sarah

But what Press Secretary Sanders declined to answer was whether the White House personal

cell phone ban will also apply to the President's devices.

Instead, she answered "As always we do not discuss specific security measures around

the president,"

This is a measure which has been in talks since early November of last year when the

media started to suffer from leaks which no one other than White House staff could have

been responsible for.

This ban announcement followed the release of the now mostly discredited book "Fire

and Fury: Inside the Trump White House," by Michael Wolff, which went on to reveal

widespread dysfunction and infighting inside the administration.

Perhaps one of the most damaging parts in the book is where Steve Bannon referred to

a meeting of Trump campaign officials with a Russian lawyer in Trump Tower during the

presidential campaign "treasonous" and "unpatriotic."

Which prompted an attorney for the President to threaten him with legal action since he

violated a written confidentiality and nondisparagement agreement the moment he spoke to Wolff.

Funny how after Bannon was fired the leaks from the White House stopped cold.

Never again did we hear about any other problem within the White House, either with the president

or-or staff.

Here is more on this mess via Bloomberg:

"The White House may ban its employees from using personal mobile phones while at work,

raising concerns among some staffers including that they'll be cut off from family and

friends, according to seven administration officials.

President Donald Trump has repeatedly complained about press leaks since taking office, but

one official said the potential change isn't connected to concerns about unauthorized disclosures

to news organizations.

The proposed ban is instead driven by cybersecurity concerns, the officials said.

One official said that there are too many devices connected to the campus wireless network

and that personal phones aren't as secure as those issued by the federal government.

White House Chief of Staff John Kelly — whose personal phone was found to be compromised

by hackers earlier this year — is leading the push for a ban, another official said.

The officials requested anonymity to discuss the proposal because it's not final.

The White House already takes precautions with personal wireless devices, including

by requiring officials to leave phones in cubbies outside of meeting rooms where sensitive

or classified information is discussed.

Top officials haven't yet decided whether or when to impose the ban, and if it would

apply to all staff in the executive office of the president.

While some lower-level officials support a ban, others worry it could result in a series

of disruptive unintended consequences.

Mobile devices issued by the White House aren't able to send text messages, creating a hardship

for staff who say texting is often the easiest way for their families to reach them in the

middle of a busy day of meetings.

Other staff are concerned that they could be accused of wasting government resources

if they use White House-issued phones to place personal calls.

The White House computer network already blocks employees from accessing certain websites,

including Gmail and Google Hangouts, meaning that without personal devices officials could

be cut off from their personal email accounts throughout the work day.

People opposed to the idea also note that government record-keeping requirements mean

that records of personal calls placed to and from a government mobile phone would be archived

and eventually made public.

Security priorities may override those concerns.

Mobile phone security has been a persistent issue for the White House, and at times some

top officials have also worried about staff using their personal devices to communicate

with news reporters.

In October, Politico reported that White House officials believed Kelly's personal mobile

phone had been compromised for months, raising the prospect that foreign adversaries may

have gained access to data on the device.

Staffers were also instructed not to use their personal or regular work mobile phones during

Trump's trip to China earlier this month.

Instead, they were assigned "burner" phones in case they became compromised by a cyber

attack.

In the early months of the administration, former White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer

demanded members of his staff turn over their mobile phones for random checks to see if

they had leaked damaging information to the media.

Spicer warned his staff that using encrypted messaging apps like Signal and Confide were

violations of the Presidential Records Act.

Former White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus proposed a ban on personal mobile phones before

he left his post in July, a person familiar with the matter said.

His aim was to crack down on use of personal phones to conduct official business, the person

said."

For more infomation >> Trump Has HAD IT! Sarah Sanders Announces They're ALL Banned From White House Effective NOW! - Duration: 12:19.

-------------------------------------------

Mueller Just Admitted Something to Trump's Legal Team That CRUSHES Dems Impeachment Dreams - Duration: 6:57.

For more infomation >> Mueller Just Admitted Something to Trump's Legal Team That CRUSHES Dems Impeachment Dreams - Duration: 6:57.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump's Newly Released Financials Just Destroyed Stormy's Case - Duration: 2:08.

For more infomation >> President Trump's Newly Released Financials Just Destroyed Stormy's Case - Duration: 2:08.

-------------------------------------------

Top Democrat Surrenders To Trump, Delivers Long Awaited CIA Victory - Duration: 12:43.

Top Democrat Surrenders To Trump, Delivers Long-Awaited CIA Victory

We've seen this happen since day one of Trump's White House.

The President has selected some of the best and brightest to serve in his administration.

But every time, and I mean every time, the Democrats dragged their feet through the approval

process.

It's obvious they can't prevent Trump from picking the people he wants.

He has the power to select his cabinet and leaders of key agencies.

All they can do is either vote yes or no.

If they reject someone, he'll just pick someone else they'll hate.

The Democrats know this.

So, they deliberately drag out the approval process.

Like petty children, they delay voting so that Trump doesn't get his people in place.

There are still hundreds of appointments waiting to be confirmed.

Senate Democrats have the audacity to go on vacation before voting.

Perhaps one of the most important votes is on Gina Haspel, Trump's pick for CIA director.

You'd think this would be a slam dunk.

Haspel has served in the agency for years.

She has ample experience and leadership skills.

Also, she'll be the first female head of the CIA.

Why wouldn't democrats—who claim to be feminists—support her?

Instead, the left made it clear they weren't happy with Haspel.

Until today.

A top obstructionist just announced he's changing his vote.

Which gives Trump another win.

From IJR:

President Donald Trump's CIA director nominee, Gina Haspel, received a major boost on Tuesday

after securing the vote of the Democratic vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee,

paving the way for her to become the first female director of the CIA.

"I'm going to support Gina Haspel's nomination to be Director of the CIA.

I also respect my colleagues who have made a different decision," Sen. Mark Warner

(D-Va.) wrote in a statement on Tuesday…

Last week, Warner expressed concern over Haspel's nomination, urging her to fix her "unacceptable"

lack of transparency during the confirmation process…

However, Warner's backing of Haspel on Tuesday, along with Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.), means

the acting director is all but certain to be confirmed following a Senate vote next

week.

Democrats just don't want Trump to succeed.

They will fight him, tooth and nail, even if that means America suffers as a consequence.

The CIA needs a strong, uncompromising leader.

President Trump picked the right person for the job.

But the Democrats don't care.

They'd rather delay her appointment, forcing the agency to suffer.

Many Democrats used Haspel's stance on interrogation methods as an excuse to reject her.

It's a flimsy pretense.

What the CIA does to acquire information is never pretty.

The starched shirts in D.C. have no business questioning what they are up to overseas.

They work they do keeps American lives safe.

That should be enough.

Yet Democrats put on a dog and pony show, just to delay a vote confirming Haspel.

They used her support of waterboarding as a big issue.

It's not.

They are just pathetic children.

Warner's support for Haspel is great.

But it's no surprise.

He must be getting pressure from voters over the delays.

As more time goes on, the American people will be asking questions.

Why can't the Senate approve Trump's picks?

Why are they taking so long?

Maybe we need to elect new people who can do their job.

The rest of Congress needs to wake up and learn from Warner.

Obstructing

the President's agenda is

only going

to hurt you.

Source: IJR