Sunday, May 13, 2018

Trump news on Youtube May 13 2018

it's official President Trump will meet face to face with North Korean leader

Kim jong-un one month from today June 12th in Singapore I'll be meeting

with Kim jong-un to pursue a future of peace and security for the world for the

whole world so is the president making the right moves toward peace with North

Korea here to weigh in is senior member of the House Armed Services Committee

Democratic Congressman John Garamendi congressman thank you very much for

being here this morning so you've seen these developments as that you're on

that Armed Services Committee you've seen the developments on the Korean

Peninsula our Democrats willing to at least

concede the the approach of this administration has brought us to a

moment where we could see a denuclearized enca low without war let's

be hopeful this would be a wonderful thing for the

entire world certainly for the United States for Korea and for that region so

listen let's be very very hopeful and be supportive of this important effort at

the same time let's not get too starry-eyed here this is a very very

difficult situation the president has set a very very high bar by moving away

from the Iran nuclear deal he will have to at least get that much from North

Korea probably over a significant period of time but nonetheless I'm going to be

very hopeful and encouraged by this move that the that will take place one month

from today Carson I think that's very fair I think hopeful is a fair approach

to look at something like this some of your fellow Democrats have looked at it

a little bit differently we've seen John Kerry former Secretary of State

literally meeting with foreign officials trying to and this is on the Iran deal

trying to stop the president from scrapping the Iran deal you've also got

Hillary Clinton on her book tour in Australia talking about how you know

it's eroding our credibility what happens with Iran we have one

commander-in-chief at a time would you counsel that those previous leaders let

this president advance the foreign policy he thinks is in the best interest

of our country well one thing you can count on in America and that is debate

you can count on controversy and debate obviously the Iran nuclear deal was a

very very controversial issue when it was put in place I happen to think it

was a good program and did prevent Iran from having a nuclear weapon for some

time and very intrusive and very comprehensive observations for debate

all of that is now on the site I'm the Secretary of State during negotiations

John Kerry is literally meeting with foreign governments trying to undermine

our commander-in-chief that's not debate that's backstabber well I don't know if

that's exactly the case think about the timing for a moment the American policy

until the moment that the president signed his retreat from the Iran nuclear

deal the American policy was the Iran nuclear a deal that was in place the

jcpoa that was the American policy the Obama policy because it was never a

ratified treaty which would make it US policy in certain the policy of the

Obama administration but that gives this administration the pathway to pursue

their own policy correct well absolutely correct and that's

exactly what happened now was the decision by the president the right

decision that's going to play out in a very short period of time obviously the

allies that put this together United Kingdom Germany France the European

Union and two countries that are not allies but were deeply involved in the

program a China and Russia they are now on the other side of the United States

with regard to the to the Iran nuclear deal how that plays out what do the

sanctions that are going to be reimpose mean to those countries we do know that

Germany and France are already very very concerned that the imposition of the

American sanctions will have a very significant impact on their economy and

I'm sure right now that Iran is trying to figure out how best it will proceed

the United States also has to figure out how to proceed course we're not going to

be successful if we go alone so the interest is not the German or French

economy it's it's our security and the security of our allies in Israel if

President Trump believes as he has stated that the Iran deal was based

a lie that giving 1.7 billion dollars up front is not a good incentive that not

being able to inspect military sites is not a good idea that a 10-year window

where it stops isn't effective where they can still test their ballistic

missiles where they could put a nuke on it is bad policy

it hasn't he learned all of those lessons and then said hey we're going to

start over and then B we're going to apply a different approach in North

Korea we're not going to give them anything upfront there gave us our

hostages without without having to pay for them would you not acknowledge that

a hard-nosed approach has brought our enemies to the table and as a result

likely made us more safe well you may be able to draw a line between these two

but I think it's best to consider that where we were with Iran was a agreement

in which they poured concrete into their nuclear reactor that was designed to

produce plutonium that they did set aside and destroy many of their

centrifuges that they did a it's not all of them get to see all their sites I

mean we can litigate the ins and outs of the deal but a lot of people who look at

a deal realize there's a lot of things we can't see and a lot of things they

didn't stop and the deal ends after 10 years so Iran has a long view of the

world they still want to do you know what you're not you're not quite correct

about the deal ending after 10 years it actually goes on in perpetuity because

Iran is a signatory to the non-proliferation treaty which provided

there's no safeguards they were reveal we got the Intel that they're actually

building a new I mean they'd been lying to us for a long time no doubt about it

but also do keep in mind that the Secretary of State former CIA director

and the Secretary of Defense said that Iran was abiding by that agreement in in

it full with regard to the military sites the inspectors did have access to

the military sites after some 21 days of the request for such access or else the

sanctions would automatically snapback all of that is off the table now where

do we go forward from here I'm going to be very very hopeful about what takes

place in the Korean negotiations it's an extraordinarily dangerous place if that

has been at work for more than 60 years we do know that the South Korean

the new president there has made a very courageous move to recognize that the

reality on the ground is that there are two countries we're gonna see what

happens I wish the president good success well

Democratic congressman John Garamendi I think that's as I said hopeful is fair

and I hope you'll talk to more of your Democratic colleagues that they give

this commander-in-chief that chance thank you for the time this morning

really if you got it thank you

you

For more infomation >> Rep. Garamendi on Trump's North Korea negotiations - Duration: 7:38.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's ICE Storms Nation's Largest Sanctuary City, Arresting Hundreds - Duration: 13:21.

Trump's ICE Storms Nation's Largest Sanctuary City, Arresting Hundreds

Cities across America are breaking federal law, challenging immigration agents by protecting

illegal immigrants.

Under President Trump, ICE is no longer putting up with that.

It doesn't matter how big the city is, or how many illegals they're trying to shelter.

Bleeding heart liberal governors and mayors have been welcoming illegals with open arms

at the expense of American citizens.

They were under the illusion they could hide behind their big city budgets and their establishment

power.

Well, Donald just sent a signal that law-abiding American citizens are far more important to

their government than foreign lawbreakers.

If only we could deport liberals for their illegal actions.

For now, we'll have to settle for deporting criminal illegals.

And ICE just found a whole bunch in America's largest sanctuary city.

From Breitbart:

Immigration enforcement agents tracked and arrested 225 illegal migrants in New York's

"sanctuary city" where Democratic politicians are protecting illegals in the huge cheap-labor

workforce which supports the city's elite finance sector.

A statement from U.S Immigration and Customs Enforcement stated the six-day operation picked

up 60 migrants who had been arrested and then released by the city's police forces, despite

federal requests to detain them for repatriation:

"More than 60 individuals arrested during this operation were previously released from

local law enforcement on an active detainer.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) places detainers on individuals who have been

arrested on local criminal charges and who are suspected of being deportable."

The fact that liberals are trying to shield these people from being deported, when over

180 of those rounded up were convicted criminals, should tell you everything you need to know

about the Democratic Party.

And it's not as if these raids are a total surprise.

Over 80 of the people detained had been issued final warnings to leave the US in recent weeks,

or had already been removed and had snuck back in, counting on the city's weak stance

on immigration to protect them.

NYC's constant pandering to these people have emboldened them to think they can get

away with anything they want, and many of them try.

The DHS statement said the arrestees included criminals convicted of manslaughter, DUIs,

registered sex offenders, rapists, murder, burglary, forgery and fraud.

ICE is definitely doing its job well by keeping these monsters off our streets, but calling

ICE on illegal immigrants is merely reactive.

Building the wall will be proactive, and the sooner it goes up, the safer America will

be.

For more infomation >> Trump's ICE Storms Nation's Largest Sanctuary City, Arresting Hundreds - Duration: 13:21.

-------------------------------------------

ALERT FBI Mole Was Placed In Trump Campaign – Identity Rocks DC - Duration: 13:06.

ALERT FBI Mole Was Placed In Trump Campaign – Identity Rocks DC

It's no secret that the FBI kept a close eye on Donald Trump's presidential campaign,

but new reports indicate that the bureau may have gone far deeper in monitoring the current

president than any of us ever thought.

In a Wall Street Journal piece called "About That FBI 'Source,'" reporter Kimberley

Strassel wrote that information on an FBI source that the Department of Justice was

just forced to reveal to the House Intelligence Committee may be evidence of an FBI mole inside

the 2016 Trump presidential campaign.

"The Department of Justice lost its latest battle with Congress Thursday when it allowed

House Intelligence Committee members to view classified documents about a top-secret intelligence

source that was part of the FBI's investigation of the Trump campaign," Strassel wrote,

according to Western Journal.

"Even without official confirmation of that source's name, the news so far holds some

stunning implications."

She went on to point out that the DOJ and FBI "outright hid critical information from

a congressional investigation."

Strassel then cited Speaker Paul Ryan's press conference after the material was released

Thursday, in which he "bluntly noted that Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes's request

for details on this secret source was 'wholly appropriate,' 'completely within the scope'

of the committee's long-running FBI investigation, and 'something that probably should have

been answered a while ago.'"

"Translation: The department knew full well it should have turned this material over to

congressional investigators last year, but instead deliberately concealed it," she

wrote.

"The bureau already has some explaining to do.

Thanks to the Washington Post's unnamed law-enforcement leakers, we know Mr. Nunes's

request deals with a 'top secret intelligence source' of the FBI and CIA, who is a U.S.

citizen and who was involved in the Russia collusion probe."

"When government agencies refer to sources, they mean people who appear to be average

citizens but use their profession or contacts to spy for the agency.

Ergo, we might take this to mean that the FBI secretly had a person on the payroll who

used his or her non-FBI credentials to interact in some capacity with the Trump campaign,"

Strassel continued.

"This would amount to spying, and it is hugely disconcerting.

It would also be a major escalation from the electronic surveillance we already knew about,

which was bad enough."

"I believe I know the name of the informant, but my intelligence sources did not provide

it to me and refuse to confirm it," Strassel concluded.

"It would therefore be irresponsible to publish it.

But what is clear is that we've barely scratched the surface of the FBI's 2016 behavior,

and the country will never get the straight story until President Trump moves to declassify

everything possible.

It's time to rip off the Band-Aid."

It's truly disturbing how little we know about the FBI's surveillance of Trump and

those around him.

Who do you think the informant could be?

Let us know your thoughts

in

the comments section.

For more infomation >> ALERT FBI Mole Was Placed In Trump Campaign – Identity Rocks DC - Duration: 13:06.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Ready To Slap Smuggling Charges on Sanctuary City Leaders After DHS Raid Uncovers Everything - Duration: 5:51.

Trump Getting Ready To Slap Smuggling Charges on Sanctuary City Leaders After DHS Raid Uncovers

Everything The debate over illegal immigration is never

over.

Especially under this current administration.

Now the administration's top immigration enforcement organization is saying they will

charge sanctuary city leaders with breaking federal anti-smuggling laws.

This could mean some serious time behind bars if they are not careful.

The Washington Times reported,

"Thomas Homan, the acting director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, also

told Americans to expect more work site enforcement targeting unscrupulous employers and more

287(g) agreements with willing police and sheriff's departments that want to help

get illegal immigrants off their streets.

Eventually, he said, ICE will break the deportation records of 409,849 migrants set in 2012 under

President Obama.

"I think 409,000 is a stretch this year, but if [the Justice Department] keeps going

in the direction they're going in, if we continue to expand our operational footprint,

I think we're going to get there," he told The Washington Times.

"Our interior arrests will go up.

They're going to top last year's for sure."Mr. Homan is the spear tip of President Trump's

effort to step up immigration enforcement — perhaps the largest swing in attitude

for any agency in government from the last administration to the current one.Agents and

officers have been unshackled from the limits imposed by Mr. Obama, whose rules restricted

arrests to less than 20 percent of the estimated illegal immigrant population.

Now, most illegal immigrants are eligible for deportation, though Mr. Homansaid serious

criminals, recent border crossers and people who are actively defying deportation orders

are still the agency's priorities."

While it may seem like mere conjecture, this is not the case.

Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielson confirmed the reports indicating she is encouraging

personnel to lodge criminal charges against sanctuary cities who refuse to abide by the

national law.

The Washington Times reported,

"Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen confirmed Tuesday that her department has

asked federal prosecutors to see if they can lodge criminal charges against sanctuary cities

that refuse to cooperate with federal deportation efforts.

"The Department of Justice is reviewing what avenues may be available," Ms. Nielsen

told the Senate Judiciary Committee.Her confirmation came after California's new sanctuary law

went into effect Jan. 1, severely restricting cooperation the state or any of its localities

could offer.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director Tom Homan says those policies put his officers

and local communities at more risk because they have to arrest illegal immigrants out

in the community.

Mr. Homan told The Washington Times last July that he wanted to see local officials charged

as complicit in human smuggling if they shielded illegal immigrants through sanctuary policies.

Mr. Homan repeated that demand in an interview with Fox News earlier this year, setting off

a firestorm of criticism."

While Democrats try and pitch the narrative that Republicans are anti-immigrant what it

is really about is what is best for America.

It has nothing to do with being anti-immigrant.

It is about making America great again.

Which means making sure people abide by the law and protecting the law.

Chief of Staff to the President, John Kelly recently told NPR exactly what the problem

is,

"Let me step back and tell you that the vast majority of the people that move illegally

into the United States are not bad people.

They're not criminals.

They're not MS-13.

. . . But they're also not people that would easily assimilate into the United States,

into our modern society.

They're overwhelmingly rural people.

In the countries they come from, fourth-, fifth-, sixth-grade educations are kind of

the norm.

They don't speak English; obviously that's a big thing.

. . . They don't integrate well; they don't have skills.

They're not bad people.

They're coming here for a reason.

And I sympathize with the reason.

But the laws are the laws.

. . . The big point is they elected to come illegally into the United States, and this

is a technique that no one hopes will be used extensively or for very long."

What Kelly had to say was not incorrect but the Democratic party doesn't want to say

that because they rely on their base, which is in large part made up of immigrants, to

vote for them.

So they continue these failed policies in order to remain in power.

However, it will not be staying around for much longer.

The times of catch and release are gone.

This new administration has made it clear they will not be doing things as usual and

they will be conducting a complete restoration of the immigration system.

Long gone are the days where immigration authorities and cities can get away with allowing illegal

aliens to remain in the United States without having come here properly and legally.

For more infomation >> Trump Ready To Slap Smuggling Charges on Sanctuary City Leaders After DHS Raid Uncovers Everything - Duration: 5:51.

-------------------------------------------

Obama thinks he can run the government behind Trump's back—well Donald's not going to let him... - Duration: 3:52.

For more infomation >> Obama thinks he can run the government behind Trump's back—well Donald's not going to let him... - Duration: 3:52.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING: FBI Planted Mole In Trump Administration… Spread This Like WILDFIRE - Duration: 4:01.

For more infomation >> BREAKING: FBI Planted Mole In Trump Administration… Spread This Like WILDFIRE - Duration: 4:01.

-------------------------------------------

11 Septembre et la montée au pouvoir de Trump prévoit des événements majeurs pour 2018 ! - Duration: 5:56.

For more infomation >> 11 Septembre et la montée au pouvoir de Trump prévoit des événements majeurs pour 2018 ! - Duration: 5:56.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING: President Trump FURIOUS Over DHS Major Failures At Mexico Border - Duration: 2:03.

For more infomation >> BREAKING: President Trump FURIOUS Over DHS Major Failures At Mexico Border - Duration: 2:03.

-------------------------------------------

trump about the Jerusalem embessy - טראמפ על העברת שגרירות לי-ם - Duration: 7:50.

For more infomation >> trump about the Jerusalem embessy - טראמפ על העברת שגרירות לי-ם - Duration: 7:50.

-------------------------------------------

Trump legal team weighs sit-down with Mueller-the president's legal team should proceed. - Duration: 10:38.

president Trump's picked to lead the CIA facing a grilling this week on Capitol

Hill Gina Haspel a 33 year veteran of the spy agency testified Wednesday

before the Senate Intelligence Committee ahead of a confirmation vote there next

week Haspel facing combative questions over her role in the CIA's post 9-11

interrogation program do you believe that the previous interrogation

techniques were immoral senator I believe that CIA officers to whom you

referred it's a yes or no answer senator I believe that CIA extraordinary work to

prevent another attack on this country given the legal tools that we were

authorizing answer yes or no we're back Afghan Henninger Mary Kissel and Wall

Street Journal editorial page writer Kate bachelder Odelle all right Mary so

what did you make of that exchange with with Senator Harris I think it's a red

herring frankly Paul I cannot believe that Democratic senators are relitigated

a debate that the American people had more than a decade ago Gina Haspel did

not put that interrogation program into place it was legal when it was carried

out by her and then we had a great debate about it and we decided to roll

back some of those interrogation techniques and I think she was right to

defend the CIA officers who were carrying out their duty in a

constitutional and legal fashion kit you saw the hearing and there was some

suggestion beforehand that it was gonna be really worse than it went pretty well

for a spell did that I think it did I mean she addressed these allegations on

enhanced her interrogation in her opening statement and did so clearly and

articulately and said I don't support bringing back such a program it is

against the law if Congress were to try to change the law I wouldn't support

that either and she was very direct and clear and Kamala Harris is asking her to

go back in time and be clairvoyant that the law and public a chin yin opinion

would shift in such a way yeah and well and she and Haspel in particular ran and

interrogated in Thailand which dealt with some some

al-qaeda detainees and got some pretty useful information she did I also would

add just what a partisan farce all of this is there are 36 Democrats who are

still in the Senate who voted for John Brennan in 2013 to PCI to be CIA

director and John Brennan oversaw this program more closely than Gina Haspel

did at the time and and for some reason now Gina Haskell is being declared

unqualified but last-minute entry here in the debate john mccain obviously has

a unique personal history having been tortured himself in a prison and vietnam

speaks with i think unique amoral authority on this and he said he's going

to vote against Haspel how is that going to influence the the vote well it is

worth noting that he and rand paul are on the same side of this question rand

paul also said that he is not going to vote for Gina Haskell but so far we do

have a couple Democrats who are willing to support her so I do think that she's

going to get through and John McCain unfortunately is ill and will not be

there to physically vote against her so we think but so I don't think I don't

think ultimately it holds up her nomination and Lindsey Graham who is

often John McCain's comrade on these questions of interrogation he's broken

with John McCain on the city he's going to vote for for Haspel yes and I think

Lindsey Graham has the better of the argument on her qualifications right Dan

tell you anything about the Democrats here all of this this debate because I

assume she's going to get through yeah Paul tells me a lot about the Democrats

it tells me on the one hand they're going to pose any nominee that Donald

Trump puts up there and I think that's beginning to energize Republicans out

there in the country probably showed up in the primaries the second thing that

occurs to me though Paul is Kamala Harris wasn't the only one raising that

question senator Martin Heinrich Democrat of New Mexico said to her where

is your moral compass on what basis do the Democrats irrigate this kind of

moral condescension to themselves over a woman who was fighting a war against Al

Qaeda after they killed 3,000 Americans in hindsight it does make you

wonder where the Democrats the current Democratic Party stands on the issue of

national security and it's a political issue do you want to turn national

security over to the sorts of people who are interrogating Gina Haskell or to

Gina Hass well I think I would go with Miss has bolts all right thank you all

still ahead Tuesday's primaries in Ohio Indiana and West Virginia seen as a

boost to the Republicans as they battled to maintain control of the Senate this

November what the GOP learned from this week's contest when we come back

this Indiana will face an important choice you can send a really incredible

swamp person back to the Senate like Joe Donnelly or you can send us Republicans

like micron to drain the swamp that was President Trump Thursday and I had a

rally in Elkhart Indiana giving a plugged a businessman and GOP Senate

candidate Mike Brown who won the primary there on Tuesday primary results in the

Hoosier State as well as in Ohio and West Virginia seen as maybe boosting

Republican chances of holding the Senate this November we're back with Dan

Henninger Kim Strasse and Wall Street Journal editorial board member Alicia

Finley so what's the lesson for the Senate here they did they improve their

chances well I think they definitely did by nominating cannons they're more

viable that can actually be Democrats in West Virginia you had the AG Morsi beat

Democratic congressman and he's a state attorney Attorney General beat the coal

Baron or who was in prison for a year blakenship and he probably stood no

chance Blankenship had he woman yeah how do you want he stood no chance of being

Jang man ok and in Indiana Mike brought outsider he'd be two congressmen so

they're voters in Indiana Republican voters are still looking for somebody to

change things in Washington what about bran though he's a rookie he

hasn't done this before I assume his record as a businessman CEO is going to

be exhumed in every detail by the Democrats right I mean he's probably

gonna get the Mitt Romney treatment here though he runs an automotive parts

business I think people in Indiana especially

with the tariffs are starting to realize how important trade actually is and

supply chains are so I don't think that is going to be used against him as

Democrats are hoping and I think he's does stand a strong chance against Joe

Donnelly what about the anti McConnell which makalah the majority leader

strategy some people have been trying like Blankenship it worked in Alabama

rollin Roy Moore you stick but is it it is it as a fading as a strategy well it

seems so in West Virginia and I don't think it's really being played in a lot

of the other primaries I think or I would hope the Republican voters are

realizing maybe after the passage of tax reform that McConnell and president

rumpus share a lot of the same policy goals

all right Kim but the word in the house is not so good I think the Republicans

may have set themselves up for a go for losing a seat in North Carolina when

they out stood a sitting congressman in favor of a challenger why don't you

explain what happened there yeah so down in North Carolina this district you had

Robert Pittenger who was the incumbent he was beaten by a somewhat fiery pastor

they'd run and matched up against each other before this time this guy won and

and this is very much a seat that would have been safe likely if it was in the

incumbent but now the new Republican is going to face Dan McReady who's a

Democrat who's a moderate much more down the middle and this is the kind of

strategy Democrats have been exercising across the country we saw it in

Pennsylvania with their candidate in Connor Lam they're trying to pick

candidates that fit the district and this guy has a very good shot of winning

over this middle-of-the-road district in North Carolina dan interesting result

too in Ohio you have Mike DeWine winning the governor's race there

to be the Republican nominee former two-term senator I think or at least one

term senator and he's gonna run against Richard Cordray the former head of the

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau who Alisha has been torturing for about four

or five years with her FairPoint we've been giving it back

what do you but it looks like that mean turnout there in Ohio Republicans had

better turnout than Democrats in the primaries which raises some questions

about just how big Democratic enthusiasm is going to be this year well we assume

Democratic enthusiasm is going to be very big it's been big that's one thing

they've had going for themselves progressives are so animated against

Donald Trump and that may serve mr. DeWine well I hope oh hi Owens don't

fall asleep during that campaign because Mike DeWine and Richard Cordray are two

of the least inspiring public figures you could encounter but be that as it

may the big thing that I think we saw here is Republicans are beginning to get

interested in this race the polling suggests their enthusiasm is growing and

I believe that's what Donald Trump is recognized that's why he's going out and

doing these rallies like he did in Elkhart he knows that he needs more

turnout from Republicans and we have seen just in this past week at least two

polls show that the generic ballot Republican versus conservative has

really really tightened it's below six three in one poll one in the Reuters

poll and that means it's going to be very competitive all right Dan we have

to take one more break when we come back hits and misses of the week

you

For more infomation >> Trump legal team weighs sit-down with Mueller-the president's legal team should proceed. - Duration: 10:38.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Exit Iran Nuclear Accord - Duration: 13:13.

welcome to the journal editorial report I'm Paul Gigot

president Trump up ending the foreign policy status quo again this week with

an announcement Tuesday that the United States would exit President Obama's 2015

around nuclear accord and reinstate sanctions on the rogue regime this as

three Americans detained in North Korea arrived home early Thursday ahead of a

summit now set for June 12th in Singapore between President Trump and

Kim Jong the president voicing optimism that the meeting would be a success

bring country into the real believe that have a success

joining the panel this week Wall Street Journal columnist and deputy of their

dad henagar columnist bill McGurn and in London editorial board member Mary

Kissel so Dan let's start with you you agreed first with the decision to

withdraw oh I absolutely agree with that decision Paul I think it had to be done

to drive negotiations with the Europeans were basically dragging their heels on I

mean there was a kind of basic agreement that the deal that Obama and John Kerry

did had imperfections it did nothing to limit the Iran's missile program it did

nothing to limit Iran's hegemonic activities in the Middle East and there

was a problem with the sunset provision at the end that it was going to expire

in 2025 now the European said they were willing to talk about that but we were

making no progress on those talks okay so this is something that this decision

Mary is likely to drive the Europeans they're gonna have to do something but

they should very cautious statement they said they were disappointed by it but

what options do they have now moving forward well the Europeans have a very

clear choice to make Paul they can either trade with Iran a very small

economy in a state sponsor of terrorism or they can decide the trade with the

United States and US financial institutions I think you see saw two

very different responses from Brussels where the chief diplomat said that the

Iran deal was the greatest diplomatic achievement of all time ever and the

response that you saw from Britain Germany and France it's also important

to remember that Britain has very strong links to the US financial system so I

think they're much more inclined to do a deal with the United States and trying

to close some of these loopholes that Dan talked about I think France and

Germany will protest a little more they have many more business ties to Iran but

I think ultimately all the Europeans will have to come around because the

economics are on the side of the United States not Iran do you think that

explains Mary the the relatively mild response to the Europeans and one thing

I don't know if you saw it but there was an op-ed and

petter is paper by a couple of former obama officials on friday saying what

the Europeans should do is they should house I mean just should call back their

ambassadors from the United States and maybe if it escalates even get rid

basically sever immediate diplomatic ties normal diplomatic relations with

the United States to try to rebuke America for this for this decision now

what a remarkable thing to read Paul and you know I called Iran a state sponsor

of terror but of course there's so much more than that

they're fomenting unrest across the Middle East and to see former White

House officials side with them instead of on the side of the free and liberal

Western world is really something to behold but again I think it's incumbent

also on the Trump administration to explain continually why it was important

to get out of this deal you saw the Europeans talk a lot for example about

the UN nuclear watchdog and how that watchdog has given its stamp of approval

to the Iran deal multiple times well the Trump administration needs to

explain that that watchdog does not have access to all of Iran's and nuclear

sites and that Iran is repeatedly lied to that watchdog called the

International Atomic Energy Agency the IAEA Trump administration officials

should keep making an issue of that and talk a lot about it and often bill what

impact do you think this is going to have on the North Koreans and the

message going into that summit well in one sense it's it's a little different

because Iran the bed in Iran is that the world will want to be in the US

financial system right that's the bed that's the less there's probably some

guy in Tehran calling his you know would be partner in Paris thing you know we're

waiting for that why it's perfect it's not coming like last night in in Elkhart

is for North Korea President Trump said I'm not gonna go to Singapore with kim

jeong-hoon and come out with the deal like John Kerry made so look it's good

to show strength I think we should be encouraged by what we see in North Korea

but again the goal isn't to sit down with Kim the goal isn't even to to

release prisoners the goal is to prevent them from having the capacity to strike

America with the nuclear arm and we're you know we still haven't got there yet

and Dan on Iran the Iran the Iranian have said they're not going to withdraw

immediately those are a lot of debate back and forth in the media and in in

Iran do you think that their incentives are to stay in or you know some because

some people predicted they would now get out and sprint to get a bomb what do you

think is gonna happen there I think the Iranian isn't incentive mmm

as Mary was suggesting earlier excuse me the Iranian incentive is at this point

primarily economic they got into this deal because they needed to get revenue

flows from Europe to help their economy just last weekend there were riots and

protests across Iran by lower middle-class Iranians who were saying

explicitly they had not benefited from the revenue resulting from the end of

the sanctions so the mullahs have a problem internally and I think their

primary goal here is going to try to do whatever they need to do to preserve

those economic relationships and if the sanctions start tightening on those

European companies Europeans in the Iranians as they are going to have to do

something to adjust to make the economy and Iran survive all right thank you all

still ahead a look at what's next following president Trump's decision to

exit the Iran Accord can the president reach an agreement with European allies

to fix the deals flaws and will Congress have a role well as Senator Ron Johnson

next

it is clear to me that we cannot prevent an Iranian nuclear bomb under the

decaying and rotten structure of the current agreement the Iran deal is

defective at its core president Trump's decision

this week to leave the Iran nuclear accord drawing a mixed reaction on

Capitol Hill with Democrats largely condemning the president's decision

claiming it would trigger a nuclear crisis or could and lead to even greater

tensions in the Middle East Republican Ron Johnson of Wisconsin is a member of

the Senate Foreign Relations Committee he joins me now from beautiful Milwaukee

Wisconsin senator good to have you with us thanks for coming in do you do you

agree with the president's decision on on Iran I do the world is less safe

because of the Iranian agreement that funneled about a hundred billion dollars

plus into not only the economy but even worse the military of the largest

state-sponsored terror terror and we've seen how they use that money to

destabilize Yemen to destabilize Syria provide Hezbollah more support they're

starting to lob rockets into Israel right and the deal did nothing to stop

their ballistic missile technology advancement either so I would say the

Iranian agreement made the world less safe so getting out of it will give us

the opportunity to ratchet up sanctions and hopefully come up with a better deal

are you worried at all though about the the rift with Europe because they're

disappointed obviously with with the president's decision they said so in a

statement and you know you could have some more transatlantic tensions

particularly you've got already fighting over tariffs on steel and aluminum does

that concern you at all sure I'm concerned we want to have a strong

relationship with our NATO allies and our European friends as well means the

Western democracies has kept a peace and security throughout the world we need to

hang together but the fact the matter is those same countries Britain France

Germany knew full well when President Obama entered this unilaterally did not

consult with Congress didn't ratify this through treaty process that that

agreement was really worth you know no more than the paper was

written on and they're recognized that right now so hopefully French president

McCrone is certainly talking about the working out a better deal that's the

better attitude to take so if such a deal did come to fruition you know

adding couple of the provisions that you mentioned before like the sunset

provision and intrusive inspections do you think that you guys in the in the

Senate would be able and willing to put those provisions into your legislation

that's that monitors and cause a review of the Irani clear core that's corker

car do you think you could get bipartisan support to do that I guess

what I'd rather do is come up with a new deal and send it through application of

the Senate that President Obama had done that first of all the the Iranian

agreement would have been far better and might have stood the test of time it

certainly would have had bipartisan support so that that's the danger in any

president acting unilaterally doing these executive agreements that are

clearly rise the level of treaties and not really going through the

ratification process all right I'd much rather see president Trump come up with

a new deal and have it ratified by the Senate all right that's very interesting

and because of obviously the Senate treaty you got to have 67 votes with

quarter Cardin you'd only have to have 60 votes harder to so you'd have to get

President Trump would have to get an enormous number of Democrats to sign on

to that kind of a deal well you know during the corker Cardin debate the

Iranian agreement act I think it was called the first event we voted on was

mine which would have deemed that a treaty I remember Paul from my

standpoint but from my standpoint if if Sanders really were upholding their oath

of office and defending the Constitution that amendment should have passed 100 to

zero but it didn't we actually had Republicans lobbying

against it unfortunately but again from so from my standpoint something so

significant certainly is a treaty and it should be ratified and we would be in a

far better place today have you done that is there is there what what's the

mood generally speaking in the Senate about this withdrawal decision I mean

the Democrats I remember when you had this debate there was bipartisan

opposition even among Democrats some opposed I think Chuck Schumer voted

against it or he was opposed to it in in some of the crucial votes on

Capitol Hill but now Democrats say well we should stay in anyway what's what's

changed well they circle the right wagons even

back then to end up passing the corker Cardin agreement act but from my

standpoint I think a lot of people are in Berlin I could have actually argued

this both ways state stay in the agreement try and strengthen it we've

already given up all of our leverage there's you know the fiction of snapback

sanctions was just that it was a fiction there's no way you're gonna get the 100

billion dollars plus back right and there's no way to put the Iran's

behavior back in the bottle so you know you could argue this both ways but I

have no problem with what President Trump has done you'll particularly start

ratcheting up sanctions at this point in time yep Prime Minister Netanyahu made a

very strong case that when you see these spontaneous demonstrations in Iran you

know obviously that money's not floating there economy for the benefit of the

Iranian people and this is probably a pretty good point in time to start

really ratcheting up pressure on the Iranian regime alright just another

quick subject Jena Haspel are you gonna vote to confirm her as CIA director and

you think she's going to be confirmed I'm absolutely gonna support her and

hopefully she will be confirmed you think she's going to be confirmed well

yeah there they are there's toxin even our conference it was

not helpful Senator McCain came out against her again I've got a great deal

respect for Senator McCain but that was not helpful in terms of her confirmation

okay all right Thank You senator appreciate your being here have a great

day when we come back a showdown between

House Republicans and the Justice Department taking a new turn this week

what the documents saw it by Devon Nunez

For more infomation >> Trump Exit Iran Nuclear Accord - Duration: 13:13.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING: President Trump FURIOUS Over DHS Major Failures At Mexico Border - Duration: 2:22.

For more infomation >> BREAKING: President Trump FURIOUS Over DHS Major Failures At Mexico Border - Duration: 2:22.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Just Published Comey's Crimes For The World To See, Suggests Big Jim May Be Headed To Prison - Duration: 12:45.

For more infomation >> Trump Just Published Comey's Crimes For The World To See, Suggests Big Jim May Be Headed To Prison - Duration: 12:45.

-------------------------------------------

Trump-Kim Jong Un summit Nauert: US expectations are clear to North Korea - Duration: 10:29.

let's bring in Heather now are the acting Undersecretary of State for

public diplomacy and public affairs and she used to work with us here on Fox and

Friends hey Heather it's so good to see you

good morning Ainsley great to see all of you thank you all right so let's set the

stage for Singapore what can we expect well this administration has made more

progress in the past eight weeks then we have then the government has in the past

eight years in getting North Korea to denuclearize so this is a tremendous

step in the right direction under president Trump's leadership and now

secretary Pompeo is as well so as we look ahead to the next to the the summit

meeting that's set to take place in Singapore you can expect a lot of

planning there a lot of logistics that are involved in planning that we

secretary Pompeo set sort of the expectations that we have for North

Korea to denuclearize he made our expectations very well-known in his

talks with Kim jong-un and so between now and then just a lot of conversations

about how those meetings will go down so there's a story out today that says that

apparently it sounds like the North Koreans are removing some of the extra

buildings at some of their testing sites over there and it's you know it's

unclear to the the person who wrote this story why they're doing it I bet you

know more about that than whoever wrote the news story

well it's something I actually can't confirm at this time we watched those

situations very carefully the overall United States government does we think

that they are they've certainly Kim jong-un has pledged to do the right

thing others have said that they would

denuclearize that's what we are pushing for we are going for that our

expectations are clear in the administration policy is well known by

the North Koreans well the former CIA director John

Brennan thinks your chance or the president's chance or secretary pompeius

chance of actually getting North Korea to denuclearize is very very low listen

to what he had to say okay I hope that a summit meeting is going to result in a

deal equation of the Korean Peninsula what are the odds I think they're

probably you know less than 0.1% than 0.1% so he's predicting 99.9% failure in

this outcome yeah look here's what I can say we are committed

to doing this the North Koreans have made some good faith calls it was

certainly a good faith effort in letting are releasing our American prisoners

earlier this week we were tremendously proud to bring those folks home look we

are realistic and clear-eyed about this but it doesn't mean that we aren't going

to make every effort and every attempt to fulfill president Trump's policy of

denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula we're a long way from that but we're

certainly going to make all of our efforts and the sanctions are not going

to come off until they do that right absolutely not this administration came

in very early on and designed the maximum pressure campaign on North Korea

we were joined by many other countries around the world to put sanctions on

North Korea and also other entities to try to get them to force them to

denuclearize we have seen those sanctions working we believe that that

is what has brought them to the table our allies back us on that and are in

agreement with us on that so we're pushing it in the right direction but

those sanctions will not come off until denuclearization happens well a couple

of days ago you were with Mike Pompeo and I know we're kind of kidding you

know we saw the the still images but what was it like on the ground with Kim

jong-un yeah so so first let me start off by telling you a little bit about

what it was like when our American prisoners came on the plane and try to

picture this guys in North Korea we're at the Pyongyang Airport and these three

men are walking onto a plane that says United States of America across that

plane how incredible just that taste of freedom they walked on board we each got

an opportunity to take a look at them to shake their hands and say welcome home

even though we were still on North Korean soil they were then under the

appropriate the protection of the United States of America they said to us there

they looked us right in the eyes and said god Bless America and we are so

proud to be Americans we all cheered up we all choked up it was an incredible

moment so I mean that really for me as an American and for someone who

represents the State Department in this administration was the highlight of the

week the entire reason we did go there though was to set the table for

president Trump's meeting with Kim jong-un later next month and

so the secretary secretary Pompeo made a tremendous amount of progress in

planning for that meeting I was not in the meeting with him along with Kim

jong-un there was just one other u.s. official but we believe we made some

progress on that front Heather are there any demands we've made

up front that the North Koreans have not agreed to yet or haven't haven't said is

it possible you know we're still in the planning stages here but we've made it

very clear complete irreversible verifiable denuclearization we've made

that clear all along that that is our goal and many other countries around the

world completely back us up in that way Heather as far as those hostages are

concerned what are they what were they like do they have family members here do

they have kids and did you find out what was in that note that one of them handed

to Mike Pompeo yes so I read that I understand that a psalm was handed to to

vice president pence I've not seen it myself so I'm not familiar with what

exactly is in that but these are men of faith and that was very important to

them they do have families here in the United States the United States citizens

I know my consular affairs colleagues have the opportunity to give those

family members a call and let them know that they're American prisoners their

family members now the freed Americans as I like to call them we're on their

way home can you imagine getting that phone call from the United States

government saying hey we have your dad we have your husband we have your

brother so we reached out to them I know that some of those families were on

their way to Washington DC to be reunited there now private citizens so

I'm not going to be able to talk about what's ahead for them but I know they're

certainly glad to be reunited with their families and back home on safe ground

did they mention to you about their treatment I did not ask them personally

about that as you have to imagine it's an extremely sensitive situation when

they're coming on board the plane a sunlight was something that some of them

had not even had exposure to so our goal was to just give them their space give

them their space and they spent time with our State Department and White

House doctors also psychiatrists so they were the main points of contact with

these men on the flights home so that they could take care of them we didn't

want to pro but I'm sure some of those conversations will be had in the coming

days their treatment what they experienced and what their goals are for

the future what a week I mean between the hostages

and then a couple days earlier it was pulling the plug on the Iran deal of

course now the sanctions kick back they snap back but we really need the help of

our European allies because if they just pretend yeah it's business as usual then

this thing is not going to work well and that's the entire reason that President

Trump made the decision to pull out of the Iranian nuclear deal the Iranian

nuclear deal only dealt with one small part some would call it significant but

one part of Iran's bad behavior and that is its interest in a nuclear program

forgetting about all the bad activities that Iran is involved with all around

the world we see the news we watch the news carefully out of Syria where Iran

it's Revolutionary Guard Corp and also Hezbollah are attacking our ally Israel

they are doing lots of bad things around the world we see Iran backing the Houthi

rebels in Yemen shooting missiles and rockets into into Saudi Arabia are close

strategic partner they're doing lots of bad things around the world that the

United States intends to hold them to account for now our next step is to talk

with our European allies and others to say let's look at Iran through the

totality of his bad acts and not just through a one narrow slice the nuclear

deal well Heather Nancy Pelosi not surprisingly does not agree listen to

what she says okay deal without the agreement Iran was on the path to have a

nuclear weapon in one or two years so to those who keep saying this is important

for us to stop them from getting a weapon way down the road you have just

given them license to go forward in a year or two we take an oath to protect

and defend that is our first responsibility I do not think the

president is honoring that oath by what he did

so she says the bomb is more likely now well look we have seen Iran lie and lie

again they have not been good actors and all of this you just saw the documents

that Israel was able to obtain out of Iran the United States has taken a look

at those documents we believe those to be authentic we've seen that regime lie

in the past so we certainly would have questions

about its commitment to the nuclear deal all right then on Monday another another

historic thing is happening checking off all these boxes the US Embassy in

Jerusalem is set to open what are your comments on that yes so this is

something that the president president Trump talked about on the campaign trail

the importance of opening an embassy in Jerusalem we are pleased that our Deputy

Secretary of State John Sullivan will be leading the delegation secretary

minuchin will be there as well as Jared and Ivanka Trump are joining there as

well so we're very proud and pleased a president Trump's accomplishment in

doing this it's something he promised and now something that he is fulfilling

well it's something a lot of presidents have promised but this is the first time

it's actually happened heather Nauert who once upon a time was our news anchor

and she'd get up at 2 o'clock in the morning and now she's a big shot at the

State Department and she never goes to sleep that's right thank you so much and

it's just I just have to tell you it is such an honor to be a part of this State

Department and this administration and it makes it all worthwhile when you can

be oh and I could be just a small part of helping to bring these Americans home

I can't tell you guys I mean this has made this career change for me entirely

worth it what a meaningful experience very cool and happy Mother's Day I thank

you thank you look forward to seeing my family all

right take care all right you

For more infomation >> Trump-Kim Jong Un summit Nauert: US expectations are clear to North Korea - Duration: 10:29.

-------------------------------------------

Japanese Prime Minister to meet Trump and Putin in the coming weeks - Duration: 0:51.

U.S. President Donald Trump and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe will meet on the sidelines

of the G7 summit to be held in Canada for two days from June 8th.

This,... according to Japan's Kyodo News Agency on Saturday.

The timing of the meeting is significant as it will come just a few days before the North

Korea-U.S. summit in Singapore.

The two leaders are expected to discuss Pyongyang's nuclear program,... and Abe is expected to,

once again, ask Trump to resolve the issue of Japanese abductees in the North.

It was also reported Saturday that Abe will meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin

in Moscow on May 26th.

The two will likely discuss ways to boost their economic ties, as well as share views

on the Iran nuclear deal and the situation in Syria.

For more infomation >> Japanese Prime Minister to meet Trump and Putin in the coming weeks - Duration: 0:51.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Touts Unemployment Numbers - Duration: 6:41.

welcome back president Trump touting the newest unemployment numbers as the

nation celebrates that nearly 45 year low of jobless claims and a record 6.6

million job openings in the month of March has reached the lowest level in

the history of our country Hispanic unemployment likewise is the

lowest think of it in the history in the history of our countries the lowest here

to bring all the business networks Christina por snivel as' did I get that

right yeah you did I've been practicing I knew be fans they really get it right

parts novelist there was a little bit of a hesitation but I was there there's no

hesitation with the economy right now no no definitely not with the latest

numbers we saw unemployment at three point nine percent we haven't seen it

that low since 2000 which sounds like great news you have almost literally a

job for every single American in the country because you have the March

hitting a record number of 211 thousand which you mentioned just early on but

the problem is is the fact that the labor market is actually shrinking

you're seeing fewer people joining the labor force and more leaving you've got

the aging baby boomers fewer births in you know the Millennials of the younger

generations and so that's making it more difficult for businesses to try to find

good quality people what's the long-term plan here people are excited about tax

cuts they feel like things are doing well businesses small businesses are

doing well how far can it go in regards to tax cuts

is we're not seeing the games right away when it comes to companies companies are

bringing back money from overseas Apple it's a great example he loves to use

Apple so they're bringing the money back into the United States but they're not

necessarily taking that money and reinvesting in employees instead they're

taking that money and they're buying back shares Apple being the example

buying back 100 billion dollars worth of shares they are doing ma mergers and

acquisitions instead of saying let me increase the salary of my employees so

that they can continue to buy products that have increased because of inflation

or because of oil prices well hopefully over time when you don't have enough

when have low unemployment that demand forces

wages up but we'll see where that goes and salaries Nancy Pelosi says though

the best way to fix it is to undo the tax cuts what do you make of her sort of

what she said on the campaign trail saying increase which would effectively

be an increase on the middle class how's it affect this so she I watch us a few

times and I've tried to read almost every single media outlet to see their

perspective and I know that she said she agreed to the second part of the

statement and maybe we can play that clip or not but she agreed to saying

that she would unroll the tax plan right so we can assume that that means either

increasing taxes or changing the the breakdown because she according to her

statistics 83% of the 1% is benefiting from this tax cut so she feels like it's

unfairly given towards the wealthier however if we're talking about the

actual tax cuts she used the term crumbs and that's inaccurate and I'm trying to

use bipartisan Rhian accurate and also quite insulting to many of the people

who write that is a big deal for them and that's change their life but there's

a cat the the inaccuracy is only up until 2025 when those individual filers

that expires so before within that period let's say you make between 38,000

to $70,000 you will see your federal tax rate go from 25 percent to 22 percent so

you're gaining Christina porch nebulous yes no hesitation well it was a meltdown

on the House floor listen this business about making America great again it is

your president that's dividing this country no I do not yield not one second

not one second not one second what led to the Maxine Waters blow up against a

Republican congressman will bring it to you and Georgia's gun King gubernatorial

candidate is growing political correctness out the window in its latest

campaign ad here he is he's like my chainsaw is ready to rip up some

regulations I got a big truck just in case I need to round up criminal

illegals and take them home myself yeah I just said that sick truck just in

case I need to round up criminal illegals and take him home myself yeah I

just said that yeah he just said that and he's joining us now the candidate

calls himself a politically incorrect conservative current Georgia Secretary

of State Brian cap good morning sir morning guys

great to be on with you we should note there are about I think six candidates

maybe in the primary and you're maybe about second in the polls trying to

climb a little bit higher how are those ads working they're working great people

are really resonating to it that's driving the left crazy and the good

hard-working people of Georgia just love them they've really taken to the ads not

only the humor in them but really drawing attention to our conservative

message our four-point plan my strong support for the second amendment you

know two plans that we have to take on public safety reform with tracking

deport criminal aliens and stop illan stopping and dismantling gangs and has

really been interesting how many people will come up to me and and give me one

of the lines in our last commercial or two hey bright so I love the political

incorrectness I love some good humor I get that it ad like that is meant to get

you to stand out with a lot of candidates but you would acknowledge

that it's not upon a private citizen to round up illegals and take them home

myself in your truck right so you that's tongue-in-cheek that's not something a

private person should do well I'm sure I'm sure that we shouldn't have any

tongue-in-cheek in politics anymore I tell you people just take a lot of this

too seriously we're trying to draw attention to a really detailed policy

message we have with tracking into clean criminal illegals which I'm sure

everyone supports and also stopping dismantling gangs I mean we've become a

distribution hub for the Mexican drug cartel here in this state and that's not

me saying that that's federal prosecutors I've worked on these plans

with local prosecutors local law enforcement and it's drawing attention

to my commitment to keeping our families safe I have three teenage daughters a

great wife our first dad Jake was about my protection for them

and keeping them safe and I want people to know as governor I'm going to keep

our state safe so we can continue to have a great business climate here well

certainly as people talk and Brian camp great to have you on this morning good

luck Brian appreciate it all right what's up friends right after this

For more infomation >> Trump Touts Unemployment Numbers - Duration: 6:41.

-------------------------------------------

James Mattis Made A Big Announcement Every Trump Supporter Was Waiting For - Duration: 13:31.

James Mattis Made A Big Announcement Every Trump Supporter Was Waiting For

Donald Trump stunned Washington when he declared his support for militarizing the border.

Pundits immediately began speculating how the military would follow through.

But that all came to an end when James Mattis made the big announcement every Trump supporter

was waiting for.

When Trump pronounced that he was ordering the National Guard to assist in securing the

border, Washington insiders speculated as to how he would fulfill this promise.

That answer arrived swiftly when the Pentagon announced the creation of a special cell to

carry out this mission.

Breitbart reports:

"THE PENTAGON ANNOUNCED ON THURSDAY IT WAS STANDING UP A NEW CELL TO SUPPORT PRESIDENT

TRUMP'S ACTIVATION OF NATIONAL GUARD TROOPS ALONG THE U.S. BORDER WITH MEXICO.

"THIS IS NOT BUSINESS AS USUAL.

THE CELL WILL LAST FOR THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE TO MAKE SURE WE SURGE OUR CAPACITY TO MEET

THE PRESIDENT'S ENHANCED BORDER SECURITY GOALS," SAID PENTAGON CHIEF SPOKESPERSON

DANA WHITE.

THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE CELL COMES AFTER PRESIDENT TRUMP ANNOUNCED ON THURSDAY HE WAS

ACTIVATING THE NATIONAL GUARD TO SUPPORT BORDER SECURITY ALONG THE U.S. BORDER WITH MEXICO.

WHITE SAID THE CELL WOULD BE LED BY KEN RAPUANO, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR HOMELAND

DEFENSE AND GLOBAL SECURITY, AND BE STAFFED WITH DEFENSE DEPARTMENT POLICY STAFF AND MILITARY

OFFICIALS FROM THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF.

SHE SAID THE CELL WILL BE "24/7" AND WILL BE THE CONDUIT BETWEEN THE PENTAGON AND THE

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY AS THE TWO DEPARTMENTS WORK TOGETHER ON BORDER SECURITY."

Trump flashed out this policy a bit more when he told reporters he believed 2,000 to 4,000

Guardsmen would be sent to the border.

CNN reports:

"PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP SAID THURSDAY HE WAS CONSIDERING SENDING "ANYWHERE FROM 2,000

TO 4,000" NATIONAL GUARD TROOPS TO THE SOUTHERN BORDER, APPLYING THE FIRST FIGURES TO HIS

SURPRISE ANNOUNCEMENT THIS WEEK THAT MILITARY FORCES WILL BE DEPLOYED TO BOLSTER SECURITY.

TRUMP SAID THE ADMINISTRATION IS STILL LOOKING AT HOW MUCH THE DEPLOYMENT MIGHT COST, BUT

THAT HE HAS A "PRETTY GOOD IDEA."

AND HE INSISTED THE TROOPS WOULD REMAIN THERE UNTIL HIS PROPOSED BORDER WALL IS COMPLETE.

THE REMARKS ANSWERED, AT LEAST IN PART, SEVERAL OUTSTANDING QUESTIONS ABOUT THE DEPLOYMENT

PLAN, WHICH TRUMP FIRST ANNOUNCED ON TUESDAY."

Trump has maintained his base because he continues to follow through on his campaign trail promises.

And sending troops to the border until the wall is built will signal to his supporters

that he is serious about his pledge to crackdown on illegal immigration.

We will keep you updated on any new developments in this story.

For more infomation >> James Mattis Made A Big Announcement Every Trump Supporter Was Waiting For - Duration: 13:31.

-------------------------------------------

Foreign Policy Wins: Trump Vs Obama - Duration: 10:48.

after freeing three American hostages in engineering a meeting with the North

Korean leader President Trump being floated for the Nobel Peace Prize even

the New York Times is acknowledging Trump's effort but his critics called

the award unjustified they forget president obama was given the prize

after only nine months in office here debate chairman of the American

Conservative Union match slap at radio talk show host Jamila Bey

good morning both of you beer so what do you think Matt is it time for this

president to get the Nobel Peace Prize well I would say this there's still a

lot of progress to be made both in Iran and in North Korea but I think it's a

very fair case to make for Donald Trump because he has actually gone against the

consensus the international consensus in these two important we these two

important issues and and everybody has been rooting against him it seems like

oh he's gonna cause war oh this is gonna result in irresponsible risk and what

it's actually done is he's gone back to what Reagan knew you get peace when you

project strength and I think he's got a good case to make

jameelah what was the case for Barack Obama just nine months in quite frankly

you know the the Nobel Committee I would argue gave that prize on a number of

factors and few had to do with what the president at the time actually had

accomplished I think that there was a symbolic a symbolic component of the

Nobel Peace Prize that went to Barack Obama and nine months and whether you

like the guy whether you didn't like the guy that's really no time to judge

presidency on its merits he had you know what for seven years and three months

longer ago and that in the terms he served as president sure but really

partner you're saying that you're acknowledging that it was symbolism for

Barack Obama it's the first african-american president it wasn't

really based on his accomplishments well I am saying I am saying that I'm also

saying that the Nobel Committee who select who wins the Peace Prize do have

a number of factors that they can choose from many of them are subjective and to

be blunt you know nine months in you you don't even get a baby after nine

months you need another few weeks before you get your little strapping boy or

girl to take home with you so yeah so Matt what's your sense of because the

Iran nuclear deal was a hot issue this week and the fact is that this president

president Trump says that it was a disaster yeah that's right let me go

back on this question about why Barack Obama got the Peace Prize Barack Obama

got the Nobel Peace Prize because he read went around this country and ran

for president and actually went around Europe and apologized for Gitmo and our

forces being in Iraq and he said he was gonna close Gitmo and pull out our

forces he did need four of those things and that's why a lot of people who voted

for him to get the prize have second thoughts so jamelia that's correct

and when we consider the fact that a lot of this warning of this prize which you

know has real really no consequence in the long run it's a it's a prize not not

a an idea about here's what you've actually done when we consider that

abroad right now Trump's approval rating is is not

particularly strong that you've got a number of European nations and folks who

are are in the ear of the no-go people saying oh well we don't know what he's

done I think I think it's it's a it's a hard road to hoe I don't think that this

is something this award is something that the president should really be

banking on that point you're basically saying that because European leaders

don't like this president they're whispering in the ear of Nobel Prize

Committee he shouldn't get it and that his approval ratings of

freeing hostages and eradicating Isis aren't those accomplishments around the

world that might merit a prize like this of course they are but the thing is this

is this is really a popularity award sorry I wish it had more substance to it

than that if he gets it great if he doesn't we're still going to be trying

to do the best for American people we're still going to do the best

I'm not worried about any European leaders who are whispering to each other

I think that's one of the reasons why Donald Trump is the president is that

we're saying to Europe in to the consensus in Europe hey guys we're gonna

lead America is gonna lead by doing what's in America's interest if you want

to come along with us great all right and what we're seeing around the globe

is Donald Trump is leading and it's actually better and safer for America

all right Matt Jamila we're gonna have to leave it there good debate appreciate

come on back then all right meanwhile Whoopi Goldberg wants our

president waterboarded really remember how the gentleman in the White House

talked about torture on the campaign trail well what I'd like to say is I

would like you to try it oh my dr. James Mitchell help develop

the CIA's enhanced interrogation program he's here to respond live next and fire

and fury apparently a big hit at the tehran book fair why Iran's supreme

leader is sharing a picture of himself reading it coming up

so quick headlines Iraqis are now at the polls in the first parliamentary

election since defeating Isis few people expect its new leaders to stabilize the

country plagued by conflicts he cannot hardship and corruption for

the first time the vote is done electronically to try and reduce fraud

and a pair of u.s. stealth fighter jets intercept two Russian bombers off the

coast of Alaska the planes capable of dropping nuclear bombs we're closely

monitored before leaving the area military officials say they never

entered US airspace but came within 55 miles

beep data like you did with that stairway walk alright talk show host

Whoopi Goldberg challenging President Trump to be waterboarded watch this

remember how the gentlemen and the White House talk about torture on the campaign

trail what I'd like to say is I would like you to try it I think people who

have actually been tortured of course saying this is not a good

thing you should listen to that because you have never been tortured and neither

has dictated that was Whoopie let's bring in the author of intense enhanced

interrogation dr. James Mitchell helped to develop the CIA's enhanced

interrogation program and interrogated 9/11 planner Khalid Sheikh Mohammed dr.

thanks for being here this morning so what do you make of Whoopi's comments

and how they reflect the media's view of what you had to do to keep our country

safe well honestly who cares what Whoopi Goldberg thanks you know I'm tempted to

just completely dismiss it but on second thought maybe she could show us how it's

done the next time there was credible intelligence of another catastrophic

attack with the potential to kill thousands of people in the United States

maybe she can go to some unsafe place in the world and interrogate the terrorists

and I'll stay back home I'll stay safe with my family and I'll criticize her

like she criticized us you know the I think what she's doing really is value

signaling I think she's preening in front of an

audience that likes her to show how much more morally superior she is to us but I

would say it's a psychologist that she needs to be careful and the reason for

that is because a strong-willed man like Donald Trump

he's exposed to the water would he's not gonna think like Whoopi Goldberg thanks

he may see its harshness and think that's exactly what we need we need to

be do more of that remember when they were trying to decide whether or not

waterboarding was legal I waterboarded an Assistant Attorney General of the

United States he got up off the waterboard and decided that not only was

it legal not only was it not torture but it didn't violate our treaties with

other countries so I think she just needs to be cautious so the idea when

you waterboarded that assistant AG the idea was I want you to see what this

feels like and he or she stood up and said it brought me to the precipice I

probably would give up information but ultimately I'm safe and just fine

afterwards actually it was the other way around he demanded that we waterboarded

him so he could decide whether or not it was Tory and in the run-up to doing that

I waterboarded a CIA attorney a woman who would not allow us allow us to

waterboard the Attorney General this just an attorney general until she was

waterboarded and both of them said essentially the same thing it sucked

I wouldn't want to do it again but I don't think it's torture now the laws

have changed and that's the other thing that I think your viewers probably

should be aware of this is a tempest in a teapot the laws have changed the moral

landscape has changed waterboarding is off the table now

so fussing and getting hysterical about waterboarding is an irrelevant waste of

time it's simply value signaling dr. Mitchell

briefly is that could there be a world again where waterboarding is off the

table have we forgotten what our enemies will do to us well I don't think I

actually don't think it's necessary right now given our current threat

situation and and the capabilities our organization but if the bad guys ever

get a nuclear weapon you can bet your ass that it's gonna be on the table

again because no president in the United States is gonna allow a terrorist

to set off a nuclear bomb in New York City or Los Angeles or Chicago or

Seattle or Portland because they want to maintain a high moral high ground and if

they do they ought to be ran out town on a rail because that's just

despicable dr. James Mitchell author of enhanced interrogation you know of which

you speak sir thank you very much for joining us this morning we appreciate it

thank you all right well did the FBI spy on Trump

that's the question as the investigators become the investigated if for any

reason we find out that this person this asset of theirs was in fact surveilling

or spying on the Trump campaign prior to that time then they've got an issue hmm

dan bond Geno here to weigh in live on that next and Georgia's gun-toting

gubernatorial candidate is throwing political correctness out the window in

his latest campaign ad he's here live coming up I got a big truck just in case

I need to round up criminal illegals and take them home myself yeah I just said

that

For more infomation >> Foreign Policy Wins: Trump Vs Obama - Duration: 10:48.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Just Blew the Lid Off BIGGEST SCANDAL in US History - Duration: 11:21.

Trump Just Blew the Lid Off BIGGEST SCANDAL in US History

Trump's administration has uncovered a frightening, and deadly, fact: the Department of Veterans

Affairs has been letting its hospitals hire doctors and nurses with revoked medical licenses!

Apparently this has been happening for the past 15 years.

Clearly, and for good reason, it violates federal laws.

In direct contradiction to a 1999 law that bars any VA from hiring a healthcare worker

whose licenses had been revoked in any state, in 2002 the VA distributed guidelines that

allowed its hospitals to hire doctors and nurses that had a license in one of the 50

states, even if they had, previously, been subject to a license revocation.

A report by USA Today starts out, "Veteran patients in imminent danger at VA hospital

in D.C., investigation finds."

That report goes on to explain that the conditions at the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical

Center in Washington, D.C., are so dangerous that the agency's chief watchdog group actually

put out a report alerting patients about the issues at that organization.

Apparently multiple issues were found at that location, such as lack of critical supplies,

including bone material needed for knee replacement surgeries and tubes needed for kidney dialysis,

due to an ineffective inventory system.

Worse, perhaps, than the lack of an effective system was the fact that the inspector general

found that senior VA leaders knew about the problems for months but did nothing to rectify

it.

In addition to this finding, the investigators reviewed 25 sterile storage areas and found

that 18 of them were dirty.

These types of reports from the inspector general are, in fact, not commonly made, with

the last one having occurred in January 2015.

The Washington V.A.'s medical director, Brian Hawkins, has since been relieved of

his position and placed on administrative leave.

In addition to the immediate danger posed by these issues, there is the larger issue

of whether or not a government-run healthcare system, as promoted by many liberals, would

be able to provide quality healthcare to U.S. citizens.

If this V.A. debacle is any indication, it most certainly would not.

For more infomation >> Trump Just Blew the Lid Off BIGGEST SCANDAL in US History - Duration: 11:21.

-------------------------------------------

There's an Interesting Reason Why Trump Hasn't Destroyed This SLEAZEBALL on Twitter - Duration: 2:36.

There's an Interesting Reason Why Trump Hasn't Destroyed This SLEAZEBALL on Twitter.

Aging porn star Stormy Daniels has one of the sleaziest lawyers we've ever seen.

Michael Avenatti makes carnival barkers look credible and serious.

But, why hasn't President Trump sliced and diced the legal buffoon on Twitter?

There's a very good reason why, and it's the "strategy of non-engagement" which

is working; as Avenatti keeps making blunder after blunder trying to catch President Trump's

attention.

From Daily Caller While President Trump typically doesn't

hesitate to use social media to blast his opponents, Stormy Daniels' lawyer Michael

Avenatti's name has been noticeably missing from Trump's Twitter feed.

However, it's not that Trump doesn't have an opinion on Avenatti, but rather could be,

as the Daily Beast puts it, a strategy of "strategic non-engagement."

Add that to the fact that Trump reportedly thinks Avenatti is a "loser" unworthy

of his time.

The Daily Beast reports: According to two sources close to the president,

Trump has privately branded Avenatti a wannabe bigshot and a "loser."

A White House official noted that Trump has explained his decision to not go after Avenatti

publicly because he deems him a "total loser" not worthy of Trump's acknowledgement, whether

on Twitter, in public statements, or in response to shouted questions from the White House

press corps.

While Trump himself may be silent on Avenatti for that reason, it's unclear why more GOP

groups aren't picking up the slack when it comes to the Stormy Daniels lawyer.

"No one seems to understand why the RNC, America Rising and other GOP groups aren't

doing even basic political blocking and tackling with Avenatti," said a GOP operative to

The Daily Beast.

"He's essentially gotten a free pass from them."

Notable exceptions including a recent Fox News report on Avenatti's business dealings,

and criticism from Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani.

Former Bush press secretary Ari Fleischer called the entire Stormy Daniels situation

a "sideshow," citing the fact that it's "being investigated in the Southern District

of New York and not by Mueller."

"I can see why the Trump White House wants to concentrate its fire where the fire matters

most," said Fleischer.

"And that's with Mueller."

what do you think about this?

Please Share this news and Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe

USA facts today.

No comments:

Post a Comment