Tuesday, September 18, 2018

Trump news on Youtube Sep 18 2018

President Donald Trump threatened that nations that don't make 'fair' deals withe U

S.with getting 'Tariffed' – as he prepared to slap trade rival China with $200 billion in trade tariffs

Trump issued the threat after reaching a new trade deal with Mexico, getting in a stand-off with Canada, and engaging in escalating rhetoric with China

'Tariffs have put the U.S.in a very strong bargaining position, with Billions of Dollars, and Jobs, flowing into our Country - and yet cost increases have thus far been almost unnoticeable

If countries will not make fair deals with us, they will be 'Tariffed!' China has been pushing back against the threat

'We have always maintained that the only correct means to resolve the trade dispute is through dialogue and consultation on an equal basis with mutual trust and respect,' responded China's foreign ministry spokesman Geng Shuang

The tough talk and fear of more tariffs and retaliation rattled investors and sent indexes dropping

The pan-European STOXX 600 index fell as much as 0.2percent, and Germany's DAX dropped half a percent, Reuters reported, while France's CAC 40 and Britain's FTSE 100 each fell 0

3percent.The drop came after a strong week for European stocks last week.Markets were also weak across Asia

Trump also proclaimed the U.S.steel industry the 'talk of the World.' 'Our Steel Industry is the talk of the World

It has been given new life, and is thriving.Billions of Dollars is being spent on new plants all around the country!' he wrote

U.S.steel production is over half what it was in the early and mid 1970s.The U.S.put out about 40 per cent of the world's steel after World War II, but the figures have steadily dropped in the years since

The tough talk follows reports China is deliberately reducing exports to the US by slowing down customs approvals and stepping up environmental and other inspections

So far in an ongoing trade war, China has matched new US tariffs on goods.An official Chinese newspaper called for more aggressive measures to 'make American pain worse' following tariff hikes by both sides on $50billion of each other's goods

Beijing is considering Washington's invitation last week to revive talks on their fight over Chinese technology policy and plans for state-led development of global champions in robotics and other fields

U.S.officials say those violate Beijing's market-opening commitments and worry they might erode US industrial leadership

Speaking Sunday at an economics forum, Lou Jiwei, a former finance minister and chairman of China's sovereign wealth fund, said Beijing should disrupt supply chains of American companies that rely on China's vast manufacturing industries, the website Sina

com reported.China's 'counterattack strategy needs to restrict exports to the United States as well as (imports of) U

S.goods,' Lou was paraphrased as saying.'Only knowing the pain of fighting will stop the war and cause (the United States) to negotiate seriously,' said Lou

Lou was finance minister through 2016 and serves as chairman of China's 1.9trillion yuan ($290 billion) National Social Security Fund, which manages assets of government pension plans

He is a former chairman of China's sovereign wealth fund, the China Investment Corp

The Chinese government said last week it welcomed Washington's proposal for more talks, though neither side has given any indication it is willing to compromise

Communist leaders see their industry plans as a path to prosperity and global influence

China wants talks based on 'mutual trust,' said a foreign ministry spokesman, Geng Shuang

He didn't answer directly when asked whether Beijing would back out if U.S.President Donald Trump goes ahead with a proposed tariff hike on $200 billion of Chinese goods

If an increase goes ahead, 'China will have to take necessary countermeasures,' said Geng at a regular daily briefing

Chinese authorities have yet to confirm what steps aside from retaliatory tariffs they might take

But they have threatened 'comprehensive measures' as Beijing runs out of imports for penalties due to its lopsided trade balance with the United States

For more infomation >> Trump says countries that don't make 'fair deal' will get 'tariffed' - Duration: 7:21.

-------------------------------------------

Donald Trump resalta acuerdo de comercio bilateral con México - Duration: 3:31.

 WASHINGTON (apro).- El presidente de Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, resaltó la importancia de la conclusión del acuerdo de comercio bilateral con México, e insistió en que el Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte (TLCAN) es un "horrible" compromiso para su país

 "Tenemos un gran acuerdo con México, creo que es grandioso para los dos países, un tratado que promueve empleos, y favorable para la apertura comercial", declaró el mandatario estadunidense en la Casa Blanca, durante una reunión del Consejo de Trabajadores Americanos

 Al minimizar las negociaciones de su gobierno con el de Canadá para finiquitar un compromiso que se pueda unir al logrado con México dentro del marco del TLCAN, Trump insistió en minimizar y denostar al tratado tripartita norteamericano

 "Tenemos un acuerdo muy injusto bajo el TLCAN, era un horrible, horrible tratado, perdimos miles de negocios y millones de empleos, pero ya no va a ocurrir", matizó el mandatario

 El pasado 31 de agosto, la representación comercial de la Casa Blanca (USTR, por sus siglas en inglés) envió al Congreso federal de Estados Unidos la notificación de la conclusión de las negociaciones comerciales con México, con la estructura de renegociación o actualización del TLCAN

 En la misiva al Capitolio, Trump acota a Canadá se le incluirá una vez que terminen las negociaciones, pero esto antes de que venza el plazo de 90 días que tiene el poder legislativo a partir del primero de este mes de septiembre; para ratificar o rechazar lo negociado con la USTR

 Por las leyes comerciales de Estados Unidos, Trump está impedido para pedirle al Congreso la aprobación de un acuerdo bilateral de comercio con México, como él lo presume

 Desde que asumió la presidencia, Trump no quita el dedo del renglón de querer anular al TLCAN sacando a Estados Unidos del TLCAN

Para hacerlo, Trump debe avisar al Capitolio con un plazo de 60 días antes del retiro de Estados Unidos, esto en medida legal por si los legisladores federales se opusieran a lo que pretende el presidente

 Trump insiste en querer dos acuerdos bilaterales, en lugar de mantener vigente al TLCAN

Sin embargo, por las leyes comerciales en vigencia el mandatario no puede hacerlo ahora, no por lo menos hasta el último día de noviembre que vence el plazo que inició el pasado 31 de agosto

 "Veamos que ocurre con Canadá, les hemos dicho que es lo que pretendemos tener; veamos cómo se da el proceso; estoy seguro de que saldrá bien; estamos trabajando en ello", añadió el presidente Trump

For more infomation >> Donald Trump resalta acuerdo de comercio bilateral con México - Duration: 3:31.

-------------------------------------------

Stormy Daniels offers grotesquely graphic description of Trump's genitals in salacious new book - Duration: 1:43.

For more infomation >> Stormy Daniels offers grotesquely graphic description of Trump's genitals in salacious new book - Duration: 1:43.

-------------------------------------------

Anderson Cooper just publicly scolded a Trump official for accusing CNN of lying - Duration: 2:13.

For more infomation >> Anderson Cooper just publicly scolded a Trump official for accusing CNN of lying - Duration: 2:13.

-------------------------------------------

The Art Of The Deal by Donald Trump | Trump Biography | Animated Book Summary - Duration: 5:15.

The art of the deal by Donald J Trump

The best-selling book the art of the deal written by a person who has great experience as an entrepreneur is an autobiography

And a guide for business as well

It's not only about real estate and construction

But a really interesting read about how to make successful business deals

don't forget to subscribe to our Channel and click on the bell below to make sure you learn every time we

Have a new video out

Trump starts the book with a diary of his typical business week which presents to us his work style

He claims you can't be imaginative or an entrepreneur if you have too much structure

He prefers to come to work each day and just see what develops

in

Chapter 2 he shares his rules in business the elements of the deal

Defining his style as simple and straightforward

I

Am very high and then I just keep pushing and pushing and pushing to get what I'm after

According to Trump there are 11 elements of the deal and they are one think big

One of the keys to thinking big is total focus. You can think of it almost as a controlled neurosis, which is a quality

Many highly successful entrepreneurs are obsessive driven

Single-minded and sometimes almost maniacal

But it's all channeled into their work

Number to protect the downside and the upside will take care of itself you

Should be very conservative in business and go into the deal

anticipating the worst

Number three

maximize your options

You should protect yourself by being flexible keeping a lot of balls in the air

Because most deals fall out no matter how promising they seem at first

Number four know your market

You should do your own surveys and draw your own conclusions

I'm a great believer in asking everyone for an opinion before I make a decision. I

Ask and ask and ask

Until I begin to get a gut feeling about something and that's when I make decision

Number five use your leverage

Leverage is something the other guy wants you have to convince the other guy. It's in his interest to make the deal

Number six enhance your location

You don't necessarily need the best location. What you need is the best deal

You can enhance a location through promotion and through psychology. What you should never do is pay too much

Number seven get the word out

You need to generate interest and you need to create excitement

The benefits of being written about have far outweighed the drawbacks

Number eight fight back

You should fight back very hard when people treat you badly or unfairly, or try to take advantage of you

Number nine deliver the goods

Creating excitement doing wonderful promotion getting all kinds of press throwing a little hyperbole is not enough

You should also have a great product to promote

Number ten contain the costs

You should be cost conscious. You should spend what you have to but not spend more than you should

Every penny counts because before chew on your pennies turned into dollars

Number 11. Have fun

You shouldn't work only for success and money. The real excitement is playing the game

Then in next chapters Trump continues persuading the reader how these rules work with examples from his business

The real stories make the book so vivid and enjoyable to read

Memorable quotes from the book

The final key to the way, I promote is bravado. I play to people's fantasies

People may not always think big themselves, but they can still get very excited by those. Who do

That's why a little hyperbole never hurts

people want to believe that something is the biggest and the greatest and the most spectacular in

The end we won by wearing everyone else down we never gave up and the opposition slowly began to melt away

The book is a must not only for entrepreneurs and businessman

But for everyone who wants to develop their social skills because daily life is full of deals

You

Tell us in the comments what's your favorite book face book read and grow Twitter twitter.com slash

For more infomation >> The Art Of The Deal by Donald Trump | Trump Biography | Animated Book Summary - Duration: 5:15.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump Breaks His Silence on the Allegations Against Kavanaugh - Duration: 3:52.

For more infomation >> President Trump Breaks His Silence on the Allegations Against Kavanaugh - Duration: 3:52.

-------------------------------------------

Anderson Cooper Just Publicly Scolded A Trump Official For Accusing CNN Of Lying About Florence - Duration: 2:12.

For more infomation >> Anderson Cooper Just Publicly Scolded A Trump Official For Accusing CNN Of Lying About Florence - Duration: 2:12.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's FEMA chief was just hit by a Congressional probe in new corruption scandal - Duration: 4:14.

For more infomation >> Trump's FEMA chief was just hit by a Congressional probe in new corruption scandal - Duration: 4:14.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's Supreme Court pick in doubt - Duration: 0:50.

Paul... this hasn't been delayed for five

months it's been delayed for 30 years.

The woman is saying that she was in fear

of her life. She said it only came out a

few years ago through some regression

the regressive psychotherapy. And the

psychotherapist report has her claiming

there were four people involved in

and now she's saying there's two. This is all about

political motive politically motivated.

And I've gotta tell you it's an

unhealthy side effect of politics in

America... that they can find anyone for

any cause to get a little bit of

celebrity - we'll cover your legal bills,

you can make any allegations you like,

and we'll pick it up... because it's all

about throwing mud. I think this is

entirely inappropriate and I hope it

goes away.

For more infomation >> Trump's Supreme Court pick in doubt - Duration: 0:50.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Expels Obama Swamp Slug And He's About To Get Rid Of EIGHT More - Duration: 5:43.

Trump Expels Obama Swamp Slug And He's About To Get Rid Of EIGHT More

One of President Trump's strongest promises, when he was campaigning, was that he would

drain the DC swamp.

I don't think the bureaucrats in the Beltway took him seriously, but they are beginning

to change their tune.

Trump is now focusing on them one at a time and a number of them are having their days

counted down in the government.

Just last month, Trump revoked the security clearance of former CIA Director John Brennan.

It was richly deserved as he was going on paid media networks and horribly disparaging

the president and his office, not to mention those that serve at Trump's pleasure.

And Trump has set his sights on eight or nine others who have also turned on his presidency

and in my opinion are national security threats.

You have a right to disagree with the president or anyone else… you do not have the right

to start name calling and disparaging the president and all that America stands for

just because you don't like the way someone's brand of politics is flowing these days.

That amounts to aiding and abetting the enemy.

"Mr. Brennan's lying and recent conduct characterized by increasingly frenzied commentary

is wholly inconsistent with access to the nation's most closely held secrets and facilities,

the very aim of our adversaries which is to sow division and chaos," White House Press

Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders stated.

"Mr. Brennan has recently leveraged his status as a former high-ranking official with

access to highly sensitive information to make a series of unfounded and outrageous

allegations — wild outbursts on the Internet and television — about this Administration,"

the president's statement continued.

"More broadly, the issue of Mr. Brennan's security clearance raises larger questions

about the practice of former officials maintaining access to our nation's most sensitive secrets

long after their time in government has ended," Sanders added.

Soon to be evaluated in a similar fashion are former FBI Director James Comey, former

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former National Security Agency Director Michael

Hayden, former national security adviser Susan Rice, former FBI attorney Lisa Page, former

Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, former FBI counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok,

former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, and Bruce Ohr.

The only one out of that bunch that isn't a total slug is Hayden and he says losing

his clearance will not affect him much.

The rest are definitely security risks.

Brennan was furious and responded via Twitter.

"This action is part of a broader effort by Mr. Trump to suppress freedom of speech

& punish critics," he wrote.

"It should gravely worry all Americans, including intelligence professionals, about

the cost of speaking out.

My principles are worth far more than clearances.

I will not relent," he wrote.

And yet, he threatened to sue over it.

Brennan even gave an interview to MSNBC where he blustered that if the president believed

that the action would lead the former CIA director "to just go away and be quiet,

he is very badly mistaken."

We should get so lucky.

"I've seen this type of behavior, and actions on the part of foreign tyrants and

despots and autocrats during my CIA and national security career," he said.

"I never thought I would see it here in the United States.

And so I do believe that all Americans really need to take stock of what is happening right

now in our government, and how abnormal and how irresponsible and how dangerous these

actions are."

Brennan whined that he was not informed by the government but instead, had to find out

about his security clearance being revoked from a friend who called when Sanders was

delivering the president's statement.

Cry me a river.

This is one Obama swamp slug that should have been stripped of his security clearances and

ejected long ago.

"Security clearances for those who still have them may be revoked, and those who have

already lost their security clearance may not be able to have it reinstated," Sanders

said.

From Politico:

"Susan Gordon, principal deputy director of national intelligence, told POLITICO on

Wednesday that she didn't know whether the White House consulted National Intelligence

Director Dan Coats before it announced the decision to revoke Brennan's clearance.

"But it is a presidential decision," she said.

"That authority is his; he can make the decisions.

I don't know whether we were consulted or not, but whether we were or not, it's an

executive decision for him to make."

"She pointed out that security clearances have traditionally been important tools for

the U.S. intelligence community, allowing agencies to rely the experiences of former

department chiefs.

"There's a whole range of people that we rely on, including our formers who have

those clearances to help us be better at what we do and know," she said on the sidelines

of a Defense Intelligence Agency conference in Omaha, Nebraska.

"Gordon said she didn't have any indication whether the removal of Brennan's clearances

was part of a "larger trend."

"She stressed, however, that former agency leaders — including those working for private

companies and those still in government — remain important parts of the intelligence community.

And, she said, former officials with clearances should maintain certain standards to keep

those clearances.

"Yes, that's important as well," she said."

Trump's actions here are widely supported by conservatives such as Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY),

Fox News' Tucker Carlson, and the Senate majority whip, John Cornyn (R-TX), who is

on the Intelligence Committee.

He said it was "entirely appropriate" for Trump to take action against Brennan.

Now, if we can just go even further and reboot the intelligence agencies with intense background

checks and severe vetting.

The swamp would start to drain even faster at that point I bet.

I'm glad to see Brennan get the boot by Trump… no big loss if you ask me, in fact…

it's a huge win.

When the others go it will also be worth celebrating.

For more infomation >> Trump Expels Obama Swamp Slug And He's About To Get Rid Of EIGHT More - Duration: 5:43.

-------------------------------------------

TRUMP INFURIATES ROBERT MUELLER WITH HUGE ANNOUNCEMENT - Duration: 11:28.

TRUMP INFURIATES ROBERT MUELLER WITH HUGE ANNOUNCEMENT

Sarah Huckabee Sanders held a White House press briefing today for the first time in

a few weeks and the media was ready to pounce.

The questions were rude as usual and Sarah answered each with elegance and grace.

And a little fire in the belly when she basically told Bob Mueller that the fight has just begun.

Not what he wanted to hear.

From The Hill:

White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said Wednesday that President Trump

was not issuing a formal directive to Jeff Sessions when he tweeted the attorney general

should bring the Russia probe to an end

"It's not an order.

It's the president's opinion," Sanders told reporters during a press briefing.

Sanders called the special counsel's probe into ties between the Trump campaign and Russian

interference in the 2016 "ridiculous" and said the president "wants to see it

come to an end."

"The president is not obstructing.

He is fighting back," she added.

Sessions has recused himself from the investigation into Moscow's election meddling, and Sanders

said she was unaware of Trump making similar comments to Deputy Attorney Rod Rosenstein,

who is overseeing the special counsel.

Her comments echo those make by Trump lawyers Rudy Giuliani and Jay Sekulow, who told The

Washington Post the president "uses tweets to express his opinion."

From CNN:

"It's not an order.

It's the President's opinion, and it's ridiculous that all of the corruption and

dishonesty that's gone on with the launching of the witch hunt, the President wants to

— has watched this process play out.

But he also wants to see it come to an end as he stated many times.

And we look forward to that happening."

Asked later whether Rudy Giuliani was advising the President on the matter, Sanders declined

to say, but reiterated, "The President is not obstructing, he's fighting back."

She said Trump was "stating his opinion" and "stating it clearly," noting that

Trump was "expressing frustration" with corruption from officials like James Comey,

Andrew McCabe, and Peter Strzok.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article

with your

friends

and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> TRUMP INFURIATES ROBERT MUELLER WITH HUGE ANNOUNCEMENT - Duration: 11:28.

-------------------------------------------

Is Trump Intentionally Trying To Tank The Economy? - Duration: 3:36.

Over the weekend, the Trump administration announced that the president is preparing

an additional package of 200 billion dollars' worth of new tariffs on goods coming over

from China.

Now, Donald Trump and the Republicans always keep telling us how great the economy is doing,

and on the surface, yeah, it looks like the economy is doing great.

But every credible economist has told us that not only is this a bubble, but that there

are many different things that could come along and pop that bubble.

One of them is a trade war, which is exactly what Donald Trump is engaging in right now.

We have already had to spend billions of dollars bailing out US farmers.

We've already seen stores around the country closing their doors because they can't afford

the products from overseas anymore, to bring them over here to the United States to finish

the manufacturing process or because they need those products in the manufacturing process.

So we've lost thousands of jobs, people are suffering, farmers are suffering, we can't

bail everyone out after all, and Trump wants to impose an additional 200 billion dollars'

worth of tariffs on Chinese goods, and this particular tariff package is going to hit

every single person in this country.

Here are just some of the items that will be taxed to hell and back under Trump's new

proposal here.

Refrigerators, air conditioners, furniture, televisions, toys, more than one thousand

different everyday consumer products.

One thousand.

Oh, and keep in mind, we're also coming up on the holiday shopping season, so pretty

much anything that you might be shopping for to get your loved ones or your children or

whoever it may be, yeah, the price on that is about to go through the roof because the

president seems to be intentionally trying to tank the economy.

Honestly, that's one of the only conclusions you can come to at this point.

Donald Trump knows the trade wars don't benefit anyone.

He knows that it's going to drive prices up for consumers, which means there's going to

be a spending shrink, or a spending freeze altogether, but he's doing it anyway because

he wants to prove a point to China, that he's the biggest, baddest guy there is to deal

with.

So what are they going to do?

They're going to do the same thing.

They've done it every single time.

Every time he imposes a new tariff on them, they put a new one on us, because they can.

Donald Trump has to understand that in some areas, especially economically speaking, because

of the way this country has gone to hell under capitalism in the last 30 years, we're not

the biggest, baddest, bestest economy in the world anymore.

Right?

We rely on all these other countries, not just for the goods they produce, but sometimes

they actually produce goods that are necessary for our manufacturing processes, and if we

can't get those, we can't even make some of the goods we make at home at home.

Trump doesn't seem to understand that.

There are some members of his administration who understand it and they've tried to talk

him out of it, but he doesn't want to listen because he thinks he's smarter than everyone

else.

He is the dumbest person in that White House today, and that is a White House that actually

includes Jared Kushner, but Trump by far is the dumbest.

And if I didn't know any better, I'd swear that he was trying to intentionally tank the

US economy just so that he could probably blame it on the Democrats in the future.

For more infomation >> Is Trump Intentionally Trying To Tank The Economy? - Duration: 3:36.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump FINALLY Breaks His Silence On The Allegations Against Brett Kavanaugh(VIDEO)!!! - Duration: 16:17.

President Trump FINALLY Breaks His Silence On The Allegations Against Brett Kavanaugh

is one of the finest people that I've

ever known he's an outstanding intellect

and outstanding judge respected by

everybody never had even a little

blemish on his record

the FBI has I think on through a process

six times with him over the years where

he went to higher and higher positions

he is somebody very special at the same

time we want to go through a process we

want to make sure everything is perfect

everything is just right

I wish the Democrats could have done

this a lot sooner because they had this

information for many months and they

shouldn't have waited too literally the

last days they should have done it a lot

sooner but with all of that being said

we want to go through the process one

thing I will say is that as I understand

it Judge Cavanaugh spent quite a bit of

time with senator Feinstein and it

wasn't even brought up at that meeting

and she had this information so you

would have thought certainly that she

would have brought it up at the meeting

not wait till everything's finished and

then have to start a process all over

again but with all of it being said we

want to go through a full process I have

great confidence in the US Senate and in

their procedures and what they're doing

and I think that's probably what they're

going to do they'll go through a process

and hear everybody out I think it's

important I believe they think it's

important but again he is one of the

great intellects and one of the finest

people that anybody is known you look at

his references I've never seen anything

quite like it

so they'll go through that process and

we'll get it done I don't know it

depends on the process I'd like to see a

complete process I'd like everybody to

be very happy most importantly I want

the American people to be happy because

they're getting somebody that is great I

want him to go in at the absolute

highest level and I think to do that you

have to go through this if it takes a

little delay it'll take a little delay

it shouldn't certainly be very much but

again this is something that should have

been brought up

long before this they had the

information in July as I understand it

that's a long time ago and nobody

mentioned it until the other day it's

very you know it's very unfortunate that

didn't mention it sooner but with all of

that being said it will I'm sure work

out very well you're talking about a an

individual who is as high a quality

individual as you'll ever see I have not

spoken to judge Cavanaugh next question

what a ridiculous question oh I think

he's on track yeah I mean I think he's

very much on track if they delayed a

little bit just to make sure everybody's

happy they want to be happy I can tell

you the Republican senators want to be a

hundred percent happy themselves they're

doing it very very professionally again

this should have been brought up a long

time ago

thank you thank you yeah you're gonna

see it on China today right after close

of business we'll be announcing

something and it will be a lot of money

coming into the coffers of the United

States of America a lot of money coming

in but you'll be seeing what we're doing

right after close of business today the

markets closing thank you

joining me now Mercedes slap white house

director of strategic communications'

Mercedes good evening to you a lots of

strategy and a lot of communicating on

the issue that cropped up over the

course of this weekend tell me what you

can about the meeting that Brett

Kavanaugh had at the White House today

well I can't get into any specifics of

the meeting but I will tell you that

Brett Kavanaugh as we know judge

Kavanaugh has made it very clear that he

believes that this is a completely false

allegation this is something that we

very much stand with Brett Kavanaugh as

a president has mentioned we do want a

thorough process we want to make sure

everything is right when it comes to

what the Senate Judiciary Committee has

agreed upon but with that being said of

course judge Kavanaugh is someone with

impeccable credentials someone who I

know personally Martha someone who I

spent many hours in an office working

through important judicial nominees back

in the day in the Bush administration

and it's someone who I respect greatly

and really is someone that as we know

has a very strong character and of

course should be able to defend his

integrity during this process can you

say that the White House is a hundred

percent committed to seeing the

Kavanaugh nomination through absolutely

we are a hundred percent committed to

standing with Judge Cavanaugh as we know

he is someone who is incredibly

respected in the legal circles someone

who has received bipartisan support from

the legal community someone who had

comes with incredibly strong credentials

is very well respected and let me mean

let me just ask you you know it did the

president speak with him personally

Mercedes know the president has not

spoken with judge Cavanaugh today as we

know judge Cavanaugh has been calling

several senators and the key is

obviously as judge Cavanaugh has said he

was not even aware of who this accuser

was before she had identified herself

this is a completely false allegation

and and it's incredibly disturbing that

senator Feinstein would have brought

this up at the at the last minute

which as we know we've gone through four

days of lengthy public hearings with

judge Cavanaugh they had a closed

session where they were able to talk

about the sensitive topics he had to

respond to over a thousand written

questions and now at the last minute

we're seeing senator Feinstein bringing

this up I just think it's an incredibly

disturbing it's incredibly unfortunate

that now we have to delay this yeah

there's a lot of questions about the

timing and the motivation for all of

this nonetheless in this me too

environment that we are all operating in

now is there concern at the White House

about what a potentially long drawn-out

process might mean politically as you

head into the midterms look the key here

is that we know that the president wants

to throw a process and we're going to

let the Senate Judiciary Committee

proceed with that her voice the accusers

voice should be heard with that being

said I can tell you I stand as someone

who knows Judge Cavanaugh someone who's

known him for over 17 years who've seen

him in a professional setting in a

social setting and he is someone with

utmost the utmost character someone who

is a friend and I just feel that he's

having to go about his character and and

that you've known him a long time we do

know now that the hearing is set for a

week from today from next Monday the

24th I believe of September and it will

be a public hearing so this is going to

turn into you know something we haven't

seen the likes of which since since the

Anita Hill hearings is that something

that this White House has the stomach

for look I think that at the end we know

that becoming the supreme next Supreme

Court justice is such an incredible

responsibility something that Judge

Cavanaugh is ready for the task he has

been open he has been transparent he's

been someone who has a be obviously

already served in administration has

gone through six FBI background checks

has been given over 32 hours of

testimony we know for a fact that the

Democrats from day one have been wanting

to stall this process from day one we

know that the vast majority is Democrats

if not all are saying they're not going

to support Breck yeah but in fact

is a last-minute political tactic by the

Democrats to stall this process we know

that judge Cavanaugh is qualified he's

someone who is incredibly respected he's

been and there's so many of these women

who have known him for a very long we're

about to speak to two of them judge in

just a moment I got to go quit but very

quickly has the White House discussed

any back-up plan if the Cavanaugh

nomination derails about who might know

as the president said he said it earlier

is like that's just or even a ridiculous

thought in terms of making sure that we

are we are very focused on getting judge

Cavanaugh confirmed of course we're

going to let this process go through but

at the end of the day we stand with

judge Cavanaugh we know he's a man of

great character and I'm very proud to

call him my friend

thank you very much Mercedes good to see

you tonight Mercedes shot down the White

House well this is moving forward to a

public hearing just receiving word

within the hour

from Senator Grassley the Committee

Chairman as I said earlier anyone who

comes forward as dr. Ford has done

deserves to be heard my staff has

reached out to dr. Ford to hear her

account and they held a follow-up call

with Judge Cavanaugh this afternoon

unfortunately committee Democrats have

refused to join us in this effort

however to provide ample transparency we

hold we will hold a public hearing

Monday to give these recent allegations

a full airing dr. Ford that he

references is Christine Blasi Ford she

is the accuser who has come out she is a

college professor and she is saying that

she will tell her story publicly up on

Capitol Hill and judge Kavanagh has

pushed back again saying it's all not

true let's bring in our panel Brit Hume

Fox News senior political analyst AV

Stoddard associate editor at

RealClearPolitics Molly Hemingway senior

editor at The Federalist and Christa our

wall politics editor here at Fox News

and author of the new book every man a

king a short colorful history of

American populace that's a great read

thank you sir

thoughts it's gonna be a real goat

roping this is going to be a a

contentious fraught space and the

Democrats have to be cognizant of

overreaching but the Republicans have to

be very cognizant about not

turning off offending people like Susan

Collins people like Lisa Murkowski whose

votes could be affected here and if

they're not seen as being fair and open

and even-handed with this woman with the

accuser that will go very poorly a B

this comes in the context of a midterm

election that is looming obviously

within just a matter of weeks right I

have no idea who to believe and we

without getting into any of that I think

the Democrats you know obviously there

are questions about the senator

Feinstein bringing this up before this

woman came forward and why is that

acceptable and then the Democrats there

was a hearing today that Brett Kavanaugh

was gonna meet with judiciary members or

top staff Democrats so they didn't want

to go why not that said and and the

White House responded I thought very

well today the president and I think

it's very smart that they're having

these open hearings few hours ago we

thought that the Senate majority leader

was resisting this idea and that would

have been a huge mistake that said there

is still time for the Republicans on

that committee or in leadership to mess

this up and if they do not handle I'm

gonna echo what Chris said if they do

not handle this well and give this woman

her due they will face a stampede on

November 6th and possibly a Democratic

Senate and it's just a mistake they

don't want to make it well it looks to

me from what we know now as if

somebody's gonna have to corroborate

their own version of events somehow or

we're gonna end up with it he said she

said and no one will be able to say the

others lying or telling the truth

and lastly - he says here there's

another person that's true that is true

mark judge was a alleged to have been in

the room and he said he didn't remember

anything like that happening so that

would be two against one of course he's

being attacked because he's you know had

alcohol issues through the years so you

can imagine how agree that will get but

if it comes down to that where it's you

know can't be proven or disproven the

last time that happened was the was was

Anita Hill and Clarence Thomas it was

never successfully established that she

was telling the truth or that he was in

denying her allegations of improper

sexual advances to her

and he got confirmed and he got

confirmed I might add by a Senate that

was 56 44 Democrat as opposed to this

one which was narrowly Republican but

they were back in those days Brett as

you know I'm sure there were a lot of

there were a lot of centrist Democrats

there aren't very many of those anymore

Republicans either the red Cavanaugh has

now put out a couple of really vigorous

defense and and denials here he said

this is a completely false allegation

I've never done anything like what the

accuser describes to her or to anyone

because this never happened I had no

idea who was making this accusation

until she identified herself yesterday I

am willing to talk to the Senate

Judiciary Committee in any way the

committee deems appropriate to refute

this allegation from 36 years ago and

defend my integrity now he says he

wasn't even at that party right this is

why in addition to the political

implications I think this is a really

interesting question of whether we want

to be the type of society that handles

disputes in this way this is an

allegation that was made it's at odds

with what a gajillion people have said

about Brett Kavanaugh including women he

dated at the time at the same time this

was alleged to have happened and in

college the way it went down as a be

noted is very curious Dianne Feinstein

chose not to bring it up at any of the

many times she could have done it behind

closed doors when she was talking to him

privately only orchestrating a big

public leak that makes it seem like

she's less interested in justice than

using this as a political cudgel and of

course Democrats began this whole

process by saying they would do

literally whatever it took to stop this

nomination and so I think that there's a

additional question about whether we

think it's appropriate that an

allegation that can be neither proven

nor disproven should be the basis for

determining who goes on the Supreme

Court or whether we should have a much

higher standard for rule of law and how

we handle important things like Supreme

Court nomination here is the Senate

Minority Leader Chuck Schumer on this

woman's credibility

I believe she's credible a lot of my

Republican friends don't what are they

afraid of they afraid that she might be

very persuasive well if she is it's a

whole different ballgame here isn't it

Chris I mentioned with Jonathan Turley

earlier that

it goes down this road and the

nominations pull the wheel Democrats

start impeachment on judge Brett

Kavanaugh because if he's not eligible

as a as they believe a sexual assault

perpetrator for the Supreme Court how is

he eligible for the second highest court

in the land I'm sure they would but

there is a serious consideration for

Democrats politically here that I don't

think they have wrapped their brains

around completely if they did succeed in

getting the cabin on nomination taken

down and there is a vacancy on the

Supreme Court on Election Day and Joe

Manchin and Claire McCaskill will say

come on Schumer like you're not helping

us here nobody more than those red state

Democrats wants this nomination complete

done and moved on from if this lingers

over it has political consequences for

them does this open up though the

possibility that they now have a free

vote to vote against Kavanagh and maybe

they were going to vote yes but now they

don't I've long believed that you'd get

some Democrats if no Republicans broke

I'd still think that's a distinct

possibility if if all the Republicans

stay together and the nominee is thereby

guaranteed to be confirmed

I'm sure Schumer will privately say to

the wavering Democrats that are tougher

reelection fights this year because of

the states they're in you go ahead and

catch the boat you need to take for your

purposes of your reelection but if a

Republican or two cracks I don't think

this nominations gonna be saved by

Democrats I don't think there's a

slightest chance of that thank you

god bless you and God bless america

No comments:

Post a Comment