Sunday, July 8, 2018

Trump news on Youtube Jul 8 2018

President Donald Trump's legal team has reportedly set new conditions for any potential interview

between the president and special counsel Robert Mueller's team.

Among other conditions, President Trump's lawyer Rudy Giuliani told The New York Times

there needed to be concrete evidence the president committed a crime before he'd agree to speak

with Mueller and his team.

The Times notes this is part of a shift to a more combative stance for the president's

legal team, which had been relatively cooperative with the investigation into Russian meddling

in the 2016 presidential election.

Giuliani has made a number of different statements about what Trump's lawyers would demand of

Mueller to secure an interview.

But Giuliani told the Times it was unlikely Mueller would accept the demands.

And back in January, the president himself said he'd like to talk to Mueller under oath.

For more infomation >> NYT: New demands for Trump-Mueller interview - Duration: 0:55.

-------------------------------------------

Dr Brown: "Prophetic Word About President Trump" - Duration: 56:12.

Dr Brown ➤ "Prophetic Word About President Trump"

For more infomation >> Dr Brown: "Prophetic Word About President Trump" - Duration: 56:12.

-------------------------------------------

HAPPENING NOW: Nunes Just Called on Trump to Expose the TRUTH on the FBI's FISA Abuse! - Duration: 2:26.

For more infomation >> HAPPENING NOW: Nunes Just Called on Trump to Expose the TRUTH on the FBI's FISA Abuse! - Duration: 2:26.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING TRUMP JUST FOUND THE FBI'S SECRET MOLE IN THE WHITE HOUSE – 'BIGGEST SCANDAL' - Duration: 17:14.

BREAKING TRUMP JUST FOUND THE FBI'S SECRET MOLE IN THE WHITE HOUSE – 'BIGGEST SCANDAL'

Democrats have a track record of doing whatever it takes when it comes to winning and keeping

their power.

The 2016 Presidental election was something to remember.

The Democrats put up the most corrupt candidate while the GOP eventually had their front-runner

Donald Trump.

Debbie Wasserman Shultz ( DNC Chair ) at the time handed Hillary Clinton the nomination

without hesitation.

America knew who Hillary Clinton was, and knew exactly what she was capable of.

The far left wing of the party didn't want Clinton they wanted Vermont Senator Bernie

"Socialist" Sanders who was cheated out of the nomination by Clinton, and the DNC.

Sanders conceded in defeat and encouraged his voter base to support Clinton.

That wasn't going to happen.

The Clinton camp knew they had to do something, and boy did they make a complete mess of it

all.

Russian meddling stories emerged, the media turned completely on Trump and gave Clinton

pass after pass.

It was set in stone that Hillary Clinton would be the 45th President of the United States.

The voters weren't stupid and elected Donald J. Trump.

News started to drip out that Hillary Clinton was cheating her way to the Presidency, and

the voters were the only ones that didn't want her in.

The media and every single special interest out there wanted Hillary Clinton because she

had power, and could give them everything they wanted.

Political influence was the biggest sponsor of the Clinton's.

Just recently it's been discovered that The FBI wanted Clinton to become President,

and sent a 73-year-old spy into the Trump campaign to report back anything that was

juicy.

The 73-year-old academic reportedly has deep ties to American and British intelligence,

having served in the Nixon, Ford and Reagan administrations, the New York Post reported.

Trending: BOOM!

Rush Limbaugh EXPOSES Michelle Obama's DISGUSTING Past After She Attacks Trumps

President Trump tweeted Friday that confirmation of an FBI plant in his campaign would become

the nation's "all time biggest political scandal."

"Reports are there was indeed at least one FBI representative implanted, for political

purposes, into my campaign for president," Trump wrote.

"It took place very early on, and long before the phony Russia Hoax became a "hot" Fake

News story.

If true – all time biggest political scandal!"

The New York Times and Washington Post reportedly have known of Stefan Halper's identity for

weeks, but chose not to reveal his name.

Then on Thursday, the Daily Caller named Halper in the opening paragraph of its report.

The Washington Post said it received warnings from U.S. officials that revealing Halper's

identity posed a security risk.

–Fox News

So who exactly is Stefan Halper?

According to Newsweek:

A U.S. citizen with doctorates from Oxford and Cambridge, Halper served in the Nixon,

Ford and Reagan administrations before becoming a fellow of Magdalene College, Cambridge,

where he is a Senior Fellow of the Centre of International Studies.

He was also a consultant on Russia and China policy issues to an internal Pentagon think

tank known as the Office of Net Assessment, according to public records cited by NBC News.

In the 1980s, he was reportedly involved in a spying operation for the Reagan campaign

that involved agents passing classified foreign policy documents from the Carter White House

to the Republican candidate's team.

Halper reportedly flew Trump foreign policy aide Papadopoulos to London and quizzed him

on alleged Russian efforts to boost the Trump campaign and undermine Democrat opponent Hillary

Clinton.

Page told NBC that he met with Halper and did not find his encounters with the academic

concerning.

Papadopoulos has not commented publicly on the reports, though sources close to him told

the network that Papadopoulos had met with Halper in 2016.

Liberal Outlets like "Mother Jones" recently put out a headline that reads "In Huge Disappointment,

the FBI's Super-Secret Trump Informant Looks to Be . . . Stefan Halper".

We call this "Trump Derangement Syndrome" where the media knows everything is a lie

and hopes they can lie their way into convincing the American people they made a huge mistake

choosing Donald Trump, and he's a horrible man despite his track record of being in office.

The economy is booming, Americans received a huge tax cut, Government is becoming more

transparent thanks to President Trump on Twitter, and his Press Secretary keeping the media

in check on a daily basis and making sure they know the facts.

Paul Krugman called it "Treason" to out Halper, but was completely trashed by Steve

Robinson on Twitter.

Others have noted that Halper, a longtime asset of MI6 and US Intelligence – is a

rabid Trump hater who openly supported Hillary Clinton during the 2016 US election.

"I believe [Hillary] Clinton would be best for US-UK relations and for relations with

the European Union," Clinton is well-known, deeply experienced and predictable.

US-UK relations will remain steady regardless of the winner although Clinton will be less

disruptive over time," Halper, who served as deputy assistant secretary of state for

political-military affairs and senior adviser to the Department of Defense and the Department

of Justice, said.

–Zero Hedge

Jack Posobiec brought Halper's hate for Trump out in the spotlight when he tweeted

a BBC article with Audio of Halper claiming how much he loved Hillary Clinton and Hated

Donald Trump.

When will the media realize the American people have caught on to their Fake News?

The constant Trump bashing has turned more viewers off than Rosie O'Donnelle's Twitter

Account.

President Trump has been fully vindicated several times, and yet we're still dripping

out more, and more lies and scandals brought on by the Deep State, and Hillary Clinton's

Campaign including the DNC, and The Clinton Foundation.

Let's hope AG Sessions has a plan, and knows exactly how to nail Hillary Clinton to the

wall and bring down the deep state!

For more infomation >> BREAKING TRUMP JUST FOUND THE FBI'S SECRET MOLE IN THE WHITE HOUSE – 'BIGGEST SCANDAL' - Duration: 17:14.

-------------------------------------------

This Trump Advisor Is About To Shut Down The Russia Investigation For Good - Duration: 14:43.

MUELLER DROPS CHARGES

A secret report is about to doom Barack Obama for good.

Obama was caught red-handed colluding with the radical Islamic government.

And now everyone is saying it's the smoking gun proving treason.

Senate Republicans released the results of an investigation into Obama's shady collusion

with the Iranian government to help the rogue nation avoid sanctions.

Republicans found that in 2016, the Obama administration granted a license to Iran to

take nearly $6 billion held in Oman and convert it into Euros by passing it through the United

States.

The license was necessary because of United States sanctions.

This scheme failed because banks in America were also wary of running afoul of the law

and would not go through with the transaction.

The episode is another reminder of the shady "side deals" the Obama administration

cut with Iran.

Obama was desperate to win a "legacy" second-term achievement and bent over backwards

to appease the terrorist supporting government.

These side deals also included releasing prisoners as part of a swap with Iran which the Justice

Department considered a national security threat to the United States.

In addition, the Obama administration dropped investigations and arrest warrants of 14 other

individuals, many of whom were believed to be connected to Hamas.

America paid a steep price for the Iran deal.

Now Americans are learning just what the deal cost.

And Texas Senator Ted Cruz reacted with horror to this news.

Cruz put out a statement blasting the administration for betraying America.

The Texas Senator declared, "The Obama Iran nuclear deal was a devil's bargain, but

one exclusively designed to help the devil.

The Obama administration covertly greased the nuclear deal with bribes and secret agreements

that made it even worse for America.

Over the years we've discovered some of them: There was the nuclear side deal to let

Iran inspect itself.

There was the ransom deal that gave Iran $1.7 billion in cash.

There were several wire transfers from America to Iran, ranging from roughly $1 million to

$10 million, including a purchase of excess nuclear-related material that Iran never should

have been producing and America did not need from them."

Cruz described how the newly unearthed scheme set about to turn the U.S.

economy into money launderers for Iran, stating, "They subordinated American law and the

U.S. financial system to the deal, hatching a scheme that would have put the U.S. dollar

and U.S. banks to work moving money for the Iranians."

Cruz also pledged to dig up the complete truth about the side agreements the Obama administration

entered into in order to secure Iran's signature on the disastrous Iran deal, as well as, "all

of the many unclassified documents outlining what Iran was actually promised…"

The Iran nuclear deal was a disaster.

Even before this report came out, the deal pumped hundreds of millions of dollars into

the Iranian economy – which could have been used to support terrorism – and set the

rogue nation on a glide path to developing a nuclear weapon.

Now the American people are learning that wasn't even the worst of it.

The Obama administration colluded with the Iranian government to elude U.S. sanctions

and turn American banks into money mules for a terrorist government.

We will keep you up to date on any new developments in this story.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends

and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> This Trump Advisor Is About To Shut Down The Russia Investigation For Good - Duration: 14:43.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's Border Patrol was just busted committing acts of unprecedented aggression against Canada - Duration: 3:07.

For more infomation >> Trump's Border Patrol was just busted committing acts of unprecedented aggression against Canada - Duration: 3:07.

-------------------------------------------

Trump administration comes out against breastfeeding worldwide to placate baby formula makers - Duration: 1:59.

For more infomation >> Trump administration comes out against breastfeeding worldwide to placate baby formula makers - Duration: 1:59.

-------------------------------------------

Romina Power Vs Donald Trump: "Bimbi strappati alle famiglie al confine Usa-Messico? ... - Duration: 3:42.

For more infomation >> Romina Power Vs Donald Trump: "Bimbi strappati alle famiglie al confine Usa-Messico? ... - Duration: 3:42.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's sister weighs in on his Supreme Court pick - 247 news - Duration: 8:06.

One finalist said to be on President Donald Trump's Supreme Court short-list has the family blessing - the endorsement of the president's sister Maryanne Trump Barry

U.S. Appeals Court Judge Thomas Hardiman served on the 3rd Circuit court of appeals with Trump's older sister

 Hardiman was also a finalist on the president's last Supreme Court short list when Trump ended up nominating Neil Gorsuch

Trump Barry, who advocated for Hardiman the last time around, has given him her strong endorsement again, The Hill newspaper reported

 The president has a fresh interest in Hardiman, The New York Times reported, having come close to picking him in 2007

 Trump reportedly likes Hardiman's personal story.  he was the first person in his family to finish college, graduating from Notre Dame

His father was a cab drive and Hardiman continued the family business while putting himself through Georgetown Law School

   He also speaks fluent Spanish, studied abroad in Mexico, and volunteered at a Ayuda, an immigration legal aid office in Washington D

C. Trump has said he'll name his pick to replace retiring Justice Anthony Kennedy on Monday evening at 9 p

m. His choice will likely shape the court for years to come and move the bench to right, replacing the swing vote Kennedy with a more conservative jurist

And the conservative base likes Hardiman. Conservatives like his stance on the second amendment, where he's ruled that two convicted felons should not be barred from access to guns because their crimes were not violent in nature

The judge also has a reputation as a reliable conservative on the federal appeals court in Philadelphia

 And there is one one hot-button issue that Hardiman has not weighed in on in a judicial setting: abortion

The lack of a paper trail on the controversial issue could help him in the confirmation process as there would not be a record for Democrats to pick through during questioning

 Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer took to twitter Sunday afternoon to slam Hardiman's credentials

 'Thomas Hardiman is a judge on the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals & on @realDonaldTrump's pre-approved list for SCOTUS noms, having passed his 'litmus tests' on overturning Roe v

Wade & striking down critical protections in our health care system,' he wrote.The other three names said to be on the president's short list are Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett, and Raymond Kethledge

Share this article Share The Republican leader in the Senate, Mitch McConnell, is said to be having doubts that Kavanaugh and Barrett could get confirmed

Kavanaugh has a long judicial history for both Republicans and Democrats to pick through during the confirmation process

He was also a lawyer on Ken Starr's team that investigated Bill Clinton and has close ties to the President George W

Bush, whom he serve as staff secretary. Bush appointed Kavanaugh to the federal bench

That long, controversial history could give Democrats an opportunity to deal the confirmation vote into October, when the Supreme Court's new term begins and when the midterm election is looming ahead

  Meanwhile, Coney Barrett's strict Catholic faith may work against her, especially on the abortion issue

 McConnell needs every Republican vote to a justice confirmed and moderate Republican Sens

Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski support abortion rights.  The Senate leader has told Trump that Kethledge and Hardiman have the fewest obstacles to confirmation, The New York Times reported

Kethledge's background appears to appeal to both Trump and the Senate.Although he lacks the Ivy League pedigree - he went to University of Michigan Law School - he's a hunter, a fisherman and an outdoorsman, traits not to be discounted as it would make it hard for Democrats in the Senate like Sen

Jon Tester or Heidi Heitkamp to oppose him.  And he is has one other thing going for him, Trump is said to love him

 A source familiar with the interviews the president conducted last week told Politico Trump 'loved' Kethledge and hit it off with him

'Simple math tells you if John McCain is absent it's a 50/49 Senate. One Republican senator can decide the fate of any Supreme Court nominee,' Democratic Sen

Dick Durbin said on NBC's 'Meet the Press' on Sunday morning.  McConnell has spoken to Trump or White House Counsel Don McGahn, or both, every day since Kennedy announced on June 27 that he was retiring from the court, according to the Times

 The senator has told the two men there is no margin of error on the pick because the timing of the Senate's court vote is so close to an election that could hand control of the chamber to Democrats

Three red-state Senate Democrats up for re-election this year voted to confirm Gorsuch and McConnell is hopeful they will support the next nominee

But he is prepared to go forward with only Republican votes, which is why he is sounding notes of caution about Kavanaugh and Barrett

Republican senators, in the meanwhile, took to the influential Sunday public affairs shows to argue any of the four contenders could get confirmed

 'Republicans are holding 4 lottery tickets, and all of them are winners,' Sen. Lindsay Graham said on 'Fox News Sunday

'And Republican Sen. Roy Blunt said on NBC's 'Meet the Press': 'I think we can confirm any of the four names being mentioned

' Additionally, Leonard Leo, who is on leave from the Federalist Society to aide Trump in selecting a jusitce, said on ABC's 'This Week' that he's confident the president and 'can get anybody confirmed

For more infomation >> Trump's sister weighs in on his Supreme Court pick - 247 news - Duration: 8:06.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's Pick For Supreme Court LEAKED! History Making Decision Changes Everything - Duration: 5:12.

For more infomation >> Trump's Pick For Supreme Court LEAKED! History Making Decision Changes Everything - Duration: 5:12.

-------------------------------------------

MoD Files Revealed Something HUGE! Trump's Space Force and Incredible UFO sightings 7/7/2018 - Duration: 17:55.

hey guys how's it going Richard here with Alien Bros and after two long

months I am back with a few incredible new UFO sightings to share with you guys

and a bit of Awesome UFO news first though let me just say to you guys happy

4th of July and yes I know I'm a day late and I also

want to say that I've deeply missed you guys while I've been away many of you

have probably been wondering where I've been at and the answer is that my

computer completely crashed on me and I was unable to get another one until just

a few days ago but I am back now and you can yet again expect constant quality

posting from this channel and I do apologize for the silence on my part

however it feels blissful to finally be back and to be able to share with you

guys yet again the unexplained occurrences happening both on Earth and

in space also the intro song if you guys like it was by They Fell in Glory a link

to that song will be down in the video description and after the UFO sightings

I have some news for you guys as well very intriguing stuff I think you guys

will really like it alright so the first UFO sighting that I have for you guys

was reported to MUFON and was captured over Rio de Janeiro Brazil on November

16th of 2017 as always the case number is down the video description the

footage is actually two separate videos which I will play back-to-back for you

guys so I'll go ahead and play you guys the footage and we'll talk more on

afterwards all right here it is

Paul has

so definitely not a bad sighting I just wish that this video was a bit longer

but this sighting is one of those highly observed triangle formations of lights

that have become more and more common but still just as unexplainable as ever

with a sighting like this usually the first thing that I attempt to do is to

try to verify if what we're looking at is drones or not because drones have

been mistaken for UFOs in these types of sightings a ridiculous number of times

however I found a pretty good method of determining if what we're looking at is

drones or something else in the case of this sighting the formation seems to

remain far too stationary in the sky for it to be drones with no movement that

seems atypical to a drone judging from the position of the person taking the

video I believe that these objects around 20,000 to 25,000 feet up in the

air you can see what appears to be a star up above the objects on the right

side of the formation and judging off of this and factoring in the depth

perception we can make a rough estimate of how high these objects are up in the

sky this of course cannot be confirmed as explicitly accurate but it is an

educated guess and in this case there is not very much else to go by so it is

more acceptable than no guess at all if you can think of a better way to gauge

the flight height and position in these objects then please feel free to let us

know down in the comments so we could factor it in with the facts of the

sighting now before I go any further the one who submitted this video did make a

statement on it although he was not the person that actually filmed the sighting

he does however include information from the actual witness so I've decided to

include it in his statement to give some more details on the sighting he is not a

native English speaker so I did have to make some grammatical Corrections for

the statement to make sense however I believe the corrections are accurate and

represent the message that he was trying to convey the statement reads and I

quote a video of a UFO fleet hovering in the sky a friend of mine made two videos

with an iPhone 7 showing a fleet of UFOs hovering at Engenho Novo, Rio de Janeiro

city Brazil he described the UFOs as pulsating lights changing colors from

blue to green to red to yellow mostly in formations of three they came from

nothing and disappeared to nothing in the sighting lasted approximately 5

minutes the videos are attached that is the end of the proxy sources statement

so the sources statement does claim a couple of things that the video actually

does not line up with which I am sure you guys noticed right off the bat

however there are certainly explanations as to why the main discretion being the

the lights changed colors although this isn't displayed in the video it is

likely that these lights did actually change colors there are two reasons why

I have not fully dismissed that statement with the first being that the

witness claimed that this sighting lasted for five minutes and only

recorded for a total of 41 seconds it is entirely possible that these lights

exhibited this behavior while the source was not yet filming I'm not sure why the

source did not film the entire sighting however there are always

possible reasons for that to be the case such as a lack of available memory on

his phone or his battery being low if these are not the reasons for the short

duration in the footage then I'm not too sure what the reason could be and I have

definitely taken that into account as well now the second reason why I have

not dismissed that statement is because it is entirely possible due to the

distance of the objects it was simply too far away to have been picked up by

the iPhone seven''s camera I do not own an iPhone 7 though so I have no experience

with how their cameras film lights from a distance so if any of you do and I am

incorrect then please let me know and correct me down in the comments the

reasons I listed are obviously not foolproof but they are plausible enough

explanations that I have not dismissed the statement now the next part many of

you will likely question is the part where he states that they were mostly

groups of three since the formation on the Left arguably contains six paired in

one group and it could be argued that the formation is simply a triangle but

likely only a section of one entire group containing more objects this is

somewhat subjective if we decide to group the four not three as the source

suggested in the triangle shape as their own separate sector we are simply

rationalizing the shape into a group since it is a shape we know of it does

not actually mean that the others which appear to be outliers are not part of

that group however the opposite could also be argued which makes again this

subjective without actually knowing if these objects were meant to all be part

of a single formation or not it is also arguable that the formation on the right

is not actually a triangle but instead is a rhombus due to the fourth light at

the top which is easily ignored when the eye decides to perceive it as a triangle

and labels the fourth as an outlier again the shape and grouping is

subjective but there is one agreeable aspect to these lights and that is that

their perfect synchrony in these formations their fading or pulsating

lights and their brightness which likely indicates they are large in size and

certainly all separate objects and not anything triangular such as a tr-3b

these types of lights have been common all around the world especially in the

Americas both south and north much like the sighting the objects tend to remain

stationary or have very little movement and lack any flashing aviation lights

making them illegal to fly in most airspace I will not say that these

objects are extraterrestrial government or anything of the sort however in my

opinion they're certainly unknown if you guys have an explanation for this

sighting similar UFO footage or saw the same object and know for sure what they

are then please send us over an email and we will get back to you as soon as

possible alright let's get to the next clip this UFO sighting was captured over

Houston Texas on April 29th of 2018 and this UFO sighting is far different from

the clips that we normally share on this channel but it is certainly one heck of

a sighting I actually found out about this sighting well over a month and a

half ago however I couldn't post on this UFO sighting since I didn't have a

computer the type of sighting that I'm about to share with you is one that has

been spotted for a very long time especially in Mexico and usually is

contributed to witchcraft however I personally don't believe in that sort of

thing and I think that these sightings have other explanations usually normal

and others like this one not so normal anyway I won't keep you guys waiting any

longer I'll go ahead and play the footage we could talk more on afterwards

alright here it is

so I'm sure that many of you guys have seen sighting similar to this one and

possibly even this exact sighting however I've wanted to share this for a

while now and felt that it certainly was worth showing you guys especially for

those of you that haven't seen it yet now more often than not these humanoid

UFO sightings are explainable for example in the case of la bruja in

Mexico which I'm sure most of you have seen before and for those that haven't I

highly recommend you search for it on YouTube once this video is over but the

main explanation for that sighting was that they were body shaped balloons now

this sighting was never actually proven to be a definite fact but it certainly

was the most widely accepted explanation this sighting on the other hand bares a

few different characteristics that give me a hard time believing that this is a

balloon to be more specific the object is clearly in control of its movements

rather than simply flying straight up into the sky it slowly flies left on the

screen rather than simply flying straight up like your typical helium

balloons would do instead this object is actually flying straight without

ascending much past the treeline and even descends a bit at one point in the

footage this object is very clearly under some form of intelligent control

however the question to then ask is who is controlling this unidentified flying

object I don't think that this could be a drone it looks far too large and would

be a very ineffective design for a drone I've never personally seen a humanoid

shape drone either and I think that it may be pretty safe to rule a drone out

as an explanation now could this possibly be someone using a jetpack I

would have to say that is highly unlikely maybe if this were military and

occurred near an active installation then I could see that possibly being the

case and maybe that is the case and if so then I honestly think it's pretty

cool that this person managed to film it but I still have my doubts members of

the public very rarely if ever have access to such technology and I don't

think the military will be out testing this type of technology where the entire

world could see now the witness also submitted a statement with the sighting

and it reads and I quote never thought I'd have something to add I just

observed this in Houston near Memorial Drive and Sheppard the object was moving

north-northwest was keeping the same elevation and didn't move like balloons

this was a much larger vertical structure like a floating Tower with a

pointed tip at the top don't know what the hell that was and I'm freaking out a

bit that is the end of the witnesses statement so yeah guys whatever this

thing is it is certainly not something that you see every day

let me know what you guys feel down in the comments and if you have any more

information on the signing or seeing something similar then please feel free

to send us an email alright now I want to get into a bit of news that was just

released and I found to be extremely intriguing I mentioned you guys earlier

as it turns out newly released secret files have released that British spies

planned to capture a flying saucer and use its alien technology to build super

weapons even after the Cold War there were fears that the Soviet Union or

China had impounded a UFO and we're harvesting it secrets to develop

super-fast warplanes that can hover in midair and be invisible to radar many of

you may have already been well aware of the coveted Kapustan Yar incident which

we have delved into thoroughly before in past videos on this channel and if you

haven't I definitely recommend going back and watching them and get yourself

up to speed this is an incident that supposedly happened exactly one year

after the Roswell crash in 1947 where Russia supposedly shot down a flying

saucer and harvested its technology it seems that Britain took this rumor quite

seriously and the more we learn about the involvement of major governments in

the UFO phenomenon the more the cover-up begins to unravel during this timeframe

the intelligence service Chiefs urged the British government to be on the

alert for sightings of strange foreign aircraft showing sinister signs of

extraterrestrial tinkering a dossier obtained by British X-files expert dr.

David Clarke reveals the government was running two UFO desks the public UFO desk

which was only set up to gather reports of sightings and the real work which was

being done by the experts from Defense Intelligence for half a century spy

bosses pored over reports convinced they represented as grave a threat to the

realm as the Soviet Union but by 1997 the word had come down from Whitehall that

the Security Services investigating x-files stuff such as alien abductions

have become a diversion from their main duties a review was ordered to confirm

that the desk should be shut down but also to determine whether anything

had been learned over the years which would be useful to the military the

dossier reveals that the RAF were particularly interested in any novel

technologies which might be useful to their programs the confidential memos

also added that propulsion stealth and any novel electromagnetic technologies

are a particular interest but the report by a senior Air Force Commander reached

the conclusion that an enemy power may have already obtained a UFO and had it

in its grasp monitor all reports in case of the

future to the hitherto unknown / not understood underlying phenomenon

is being exploited by another nation he wrote an actual or potential enemy could

develop a flying device with the characteristics that these phenomena

seem to have particular attention should be paid to any aircraft behaving like a

UFO with the tell-tale signs of high velocities sharp maneuvers stationary

flight and a few radar returns he added the report called you UAPs or

unidentified aerial phenomenon in the UK air defense region as part of three

files running more than 1,000 pages long they were held back from the UFO records

earmarked for transfer to the National Archives as part of the open government

project from 2008 to 2013 but earlier this year a complete set of the redacted

copies was sent to dr. Clarke ahead of their release to the National Archives

which is imminent dr. Clarke said the Ministry of Defence have been

desperately trying to delay the release of these formerly secret and highly

sensitive papers for more than a decade even though they have been partly

censored they can't conceal the fact that the UK military were interested in

capturing a UFO and obtaining UFO technology or what they coyly referred

to as novel weapon technology and the files reveal that they were desperate to

capture this technology wherever it came from before the Russians or the Chinese

got hold of it first although this was 1997 Russia was still regarded as an

undefeated enemy with a weapons program regarded as a threat to the west of

course we already knew that Russia was a perceived threat but why would Britain

worry about something that was back then considered to be a conspiracy theory

lunacy that only some lunatic would think is real unless of course there was

some truth to it it is well known that the US and British governments are

allies and it is common for close allies to share secrets with one another maybe

the United States which was also exposed as to have been having been involved in

researching this phenomena until this very day gave the British government a

heads-up out of fear that they would need help to spy on the Russians and

Chinese to prevent them from obtaining the same technologies that the u.s.

government obtained from Roswell and Maury island is this a confirmation that

we still haven't even scratched the surface of the United States involvement

with these UFOs and the technologies that the country possesses I think it's

likely but I definitely want to hear what you guys have to say about this

down the comments I it is fitting that as the information on

UFOs and our governments involvement with them seems to be leaking out we are also

seeing attention turned towards the US government's goal of obtaining a sixth

branch of the military which President Trump dubbed the space force of course

this has been a goal of the United States long before Trump ever brought it

up and was announced back in 2016 that we would have a space force ready by

2019 although it seems to have slipped a lot of people's minds the reality is

though that we have had the idea of a space force in mind since at least 1959

when project horizon was introduced with the goal of creating a lunar military

base this fixation of militarizing space has been in the forefront of the

government's mind for decades and in my opinion I think they have already made

their way out there and set everything up and are just now revealing it trying

to do it without giving any reason other than patriotism that may sit with some

people but I think there is a lot more to this than any of us know there must

be some sort of threat for us to want to invest trillions of dollars on a space

branch of the military if not then this could be a race to farm resources such

as the helium-3 on the moon which is in great abundance there and it's

considered to be extremely valuable at about forty thousand dollars an ounce

meaning that about 220 pounds of the stuff would be worth roughly $141 million

dollars and the moon has tons of it these are just my theories however I

think that they are the only ones that I've thought of that truly make any

sense so let me know what you guys think down in the comments it has been so long

since I've heard from most of you guys that I'm excited to get your inputs on

all this crazy stuff that's been happening and I'm so just glad to be

back anyway that's all I have for you guys today but stay tuned because there

is a lot more coming and we will have it posted very soon if you like the video

then please don't forget to smash that like button on your way out share it

comment and most importantly hit that subscribe button and tap that

notification bell it really helps us out and it'll let you guys stay up to date

by sending you a message straight to your inbox every time we upload a video

and you could stay on the up and up with all the latest alternative news also if

you want updates on when our videos will be coming out then please go follow our

Facebook page the link is down in the video description if you have some UFO

footage or evidence that you would like us to feature on the channel then please

email it over to us or email us down in the description as well and we will get

back to you as soon as possible also if you guys want to help keep this channel

going strong then donating even one dollar a month to

our patreon would be very very deeply appreciated

because YouTube isn't paying us so this is all out-of-pocket for us however we

love it and we won't be quitting anytime soon thanks for your support guys it

means a lot to us and don't forget to browse the channel if you're new and get

yourself up to speed as always i'm Richard with Alien Bros and i'll see you

guys again next video!

For more infomation >> MoD Files Revealed Something HUGE! Trump's Space Force and Incredible UFO sightings 7/7/2018 - Duration: 17:55.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Made A Big Change That Will Have Barack Obama Running For Cover - Duration: 11:36.

Trump Made A Big Change That Will Have Barack Obama Running For Cover

Donald Trump was elected to undo Barack Obama's socialist agenda.

Democrats have fought and obstructed his efforts every step of the way.

In response, Donald Trump announced one big change that left Barack Obama furious.

The media and career bureaucrats at the Environmental Protection Agency colluded in a political

assassination of EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt's career and character.

Liberals pushed a months-long smear campaign of exaggerated claims that eventually became

too much for Pruitt.

Pruitt fell on his sword and Donald Trump tweeted that he had accepted Pruitt's resignation

and that Deputy Director Andrew Wheeler would take over as Acting Administrator:

"I have accepted the resignation of Scott Pruitt as the Administrator of the Environmental

Protection Agency.

Within the Agency Scott has done an outstanding job, and I will always be thankful to him

for this.

The Senate confirmed Deputy at EPA, Andrew Wheeler, will…

…on Monday assume duties as the acting Administrator of the EPA.

I have no doubt that Andy will continue on with our great and lasting EPA agenda.

We have made tremendous progress and the future of the EPA is very bright!"

Pruitt's ruthless effectiveness in rolling back Obama's anti-American agenda made him

public enemy number one on the left and in the media.

So they coordinated a campaign to destroy him.

So-called "journalists" ditched the façade of nonpartisanship to dance on Pruitt's

grave and rub their victory in conservative's faces.

But the media's celebration was short lived.

Myron Ebell – who ran Trump's Environmental Protection Agency team during the transition

– told the Daily Caller in an exclusive interview that Wheeler would continue implementing

Donald Trump's pro-America agenda.

The Daily Caller reports:

"I think there will be a temporary setback, but it's the President's agenda, not Pruitt's,

and I think Andrew Wheeler is fully committed to implementing that agenda," Myron Ebell,

who headed Trump's EPA transition team, told TheDCNF.

"My guess is that it will be full speed ahead at EPA after the shock wears off,"

said Ebell, the director of energy and global warming policy at the free-market Competitive

Enterprise Institute.

The Environmental Protection Agency is the Holy Grail for the left.

Liberals use this agency to push junk science and fake news under the guise of "climate

change" to affect every aspect of Americans lives.

It's the beachhead from which leftists launched policies that turned America from a free market,

capitalist country into a socialist dystopia.

From day one, Scott Pruitt set about ending the EPA's assault on basic American values.

That's why Pruitt was targeted for destruction.

Other cabinet secretaries have continued on unscathed because they aren't seen as effective

or running an agency that the left believes belongs to them.

The kill mission against Pruitt was meant as a message by the media to any Trump official

– if you go against Barack Obama's agenda, we will chop your head off.

Do you believe new EPA Acting Administrator Andrew Wheeler will be as effective as Scott

Pruitt?

Let us know your thoughts in the comment section.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends

and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> Trump Made A Big Change That Will Have Barack Obama Running For Cover - Duration: 11:36.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Sets Record For Most Staff Turnover EVER - Duration: 4:18.

The Trump administration has set yet another record for this point in their presidency.

In addition to having the president who has lied more to the public during this amount

of time in office than anybody else before him, they have now had the highest staff turnover

rate of any administration within the first 18 months in office.

In fact, during the last 12-month period here, the turnover rate was 37%.

That number is actually very low, considering the fact that, when studied, the 37% turnover

rate only included people who were there at the beginning of the 12-month period and then

were not there at the end of it.

So, anybody who came during the 12-month period and left during the 12-month period weren't

actually counted, and that includes people like Anthony Scaramucci, who had the job for,

what, 10 days, maybe less than that; so, he wasn't even counted in the official count.

On top of that, Trump has had a 61% turnover rate amongst senior aides and officials within

his administration.

So, 37% on the lower end ... It's probably closer to 45 at this point ... of regular

staffers, the average in-and-out everyday folks, the one who were whining to Politico

recently that they can't find a date in D.C. because they work for Donald Trump, those

people are leaving in droves, and that doesn't mean too much.

No offense to these people.

I know you love your job, and you think you're doing well.

But these are people who are not out there making any decision that affects this country

at all.

Senior level staffers: the one who have Donald Trump's attention, the one who have his ear,

61% of them have already left.

That is remarkable, and that is unheard of.

That is almost 20 points higher than any previous president at this point in their administration,

which means Trump either is impossible to work with, or he is so bullish that he's driving

out people who may actually know what they're talking about.

Now, I'm not one to easily give credit to conservatives; but, when you're dealing with

a narcissistic moron like Donald Trump, it would at least be nice to know that there's

somebody in that administration that understands how both the world and the federal government

are supposed to work.

They could maybe talk him off the ledge every now and then before he does something stupid

like starting a war with North Korea or starting a massive trade war with all of our best buddies

across the planet.

Instead, these people are leaving.

New people are coming in, trying to get caught up-to-speed on the chaos that is the Trump

administration, and they're failing miserably.

If Trump doesn't have anyone around him who has any kind of staying power other than,

of course, Kellyanne Conway, and we know how dangerous that is ... If there's nobody there

that has been there long enough to gain his trust, then that means everything coming out

of this administration is 100% Trump.

There's nobody to pull him back.

There's nobody to talk him down.

There's nobody to tell him, "Wait.

That might not be a good idea," because they either haven't been there long enough to stand

up to him or know how to persuade him, or they haven't been there long enough to gain

his trust.

That's bad for this country.

This is not a humorous story about nobody wanting to work for Donald Trump.

This is a dangerous warning that every time somebody new comes into this administration

and somebody with a little bit experience leaves, Trump becomes a little more unhinged.

We're running out of decent people to send to the White House at this point.

Once we run out of people, it's either going to be the crazies coming in, more so than

they already have, or it's going to be Donald Trump left alone to his own devices to continue

to destroy this country.

Either way, nothing ends well for American citizens.

For more infomation >> Trump Sets Record For Most Staff Turnover EVER - Duration: 4:18.

-------------------------------------------

TRUMP STUNS DC WITH JEFF SESSIONS ANNOUNCEMENT – LIKELY REPLACEMENT IS FOX NEWS HOST - Duration: 10:52.

TRUMP STUNS DC WITH JEFF SESSIONS ANNOUNCEMENT – LIKELY REPLACEMENT IS FOX NEWS HOST

Over the past few weeks, the relationship between President Donald Trump and Attorney

General Jeff Sessions has been breaking down.

Now, rumors are swirling that Trump is close to firing Sessions and replacing him with

a popular Fox News host.

Mediaite reported that over the past 18 months, Judge Jeanine Pirro has been in contact with

Trump's staffers about the possibility of becoming his attorney general.

Trump is known to favor television personalities over political veterans in many cases, replacing

his former economic adviser, Gary Cohn, with CNBC's Larry Kudlow.

Pirro has made no secret of her disdain for Sessions, who she recently called "the most

dangerous man in America."

She also consistently bashes staffers and critics alike for being insufficiently loyal

to the president.

"The most of powerful prosecutor in the world, the man who holds the scales of justice

in his hands, hides behind the coat tails of a Rod Rosenstein," Pirro recently said.

"This man [Sessions] has done nothing to create confidence that wrongdoers will be

accountable.

He has done nothing to create confidence on the part of the American people of our system

of justice.

And with all the power and might of the Department of Justice behind him, he continues to do

nothing."

Trump took to Twitter earlier this week to slam Sessions once again.

"The Russian Witch Hunt Hoax continues, all because Jeff Sessions didn't tell me

he was going to recuse himself," Trump said in the tweet.

"I would have quickly picked someone else.

So much time and money wasted, so many lives ruined…and Sessions knew better than most

that there was No Collusion!"

For more infomation >> TRUMP STUNS DC WITH JEFF SESSIONS ANNOUNCEMENT – LIKELY REPLACEMENT IS FOX NEWS HOST - Duration: 10:52.

-------------------------------------------

Jeff Sessions Is DONE – After Another Betrayal of Trump, His Luck Ran Out - Duration: 14:44.

Jeff Sessions Is DONE – After Another Betrayal of Trump, His Luck Ran Out

Attorney General Jeff Sessions has been a figure of controversy in the Trump administration.

Sessions has drawn the ire of Trump supporters for his weakness in the Russia investigation.

But Jeff Sessions just stepped up and defended the President in one unbelievable way.

The media – and pro-amnesty Republicans – are furious over the administration's

zero tolerance policy that all illegal aliens caught sneaking into the country will be referred

for criminal prosecution.

The administration is using this as a deterrent to illegal aliens crossing the border.

And it is the common practice in the American judicial system.

But when a parent is arrested for a crime, their children don't go to jail with them.

They are placed with a guardian.

Sessions defended this policy by quoting Scripture.

The Attorney General cited Romans 13 during a speech to law enforcement officials in Fort

Wayne, Indiana.

Sessions stated:

"I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to

obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes.

Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves.

Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that

protects the weak and protects the lawful."

The media lost their minds.

CNN's Jim Acosta berated Press Secretary Sarah Sanders about Sessions remarks.

Sanders coolly responded to his badgering by stating he doesn't understand short sentences

and that she is very well-versed in Scripture and Sessions point is valid.

Sanders ignored his verbal abuse since he wasn't called on and just wanted to engage

in deranged histrionics for the TV cameras.

The media's bias is never more apparent than when immigration becomes a national topic.

Reporters – who don't have to compete with illegal aliens for jobs – rally to

the cause of open borders and amnesty.

These privileged elites live in cities where they reap the rewards of cheap labor without

experiencing any of the consequences.

Cosmopolitan liberals also wield their support for constant flows of illegal aliens as a

way to virtue signal about their support for "diversity and tolerance."

But out in real America, it's not so cut and dry.

Big businesses encourage hordes of illegal aliens to sneak in America because they can

be paid less than actual American citizens.

And massive flows of illegal border crossings are bringing in waves of dangerous MS-13 gang

members who are colonizing in American communities and turning them into warzones.

Communities in Long Island and around Washington, DC are being terrorized by an invasion of

MS-13 gang members who commit unspeakable acts of violence.

The Trump administration policy is justifiable on every level.

America cannot throw open her doors and take in everyone who wants to come.

There needs to be a legal and orderly process for people to immigrate.

Illegal immigration is an economic attack on American citizens and a public safety threat.

And the administration is correct to enforce the laws to the fullest extent in order to

beat back this invasion.

Do you agree with the Trump administration's policy to deter illegal immigration by referring

every illegal alien caught trying to enter the country for prosecution?

Let us know your thoughts in the comment section.

For more infomation >> Jeff Sessions Is DONE – After Another Betrayal of Trump, His Luck Ran Out - Duration: 14:44.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING TRUMP CALLS ON SESSIONS TO INVESTIGATE OBAMA - Duration: 14:44.

BREAKING TRUMP CALLS ON SESSIONS TO INVESTIGATE OBAMA

Donald Trump went rogue on Wednesday morning and called on his attorney general to investigate

Barack Hussein Obama.

President Trump took to Twitter on Wednesday morning to pressure Attorney General Jeff

Sessions to open an investigation into the Obama administration over Russian meddling

in the 2016 election.

Trump expressed frustration that Democrats are not under investigation, as special counsel

Robert Mueller's probe into allegations of collusion between the Trump campaign and

Russia heats up.

"Question: If all of the Russian meddling took place during the Obama Administration,

right up to January 20th, why aren't they the subject of the investigation?" Trump

wrote, according to The Hill.

"Why didn't Obama do something about the meddling?

Why aren't Dem crimes under investigation?

Ask Jeff Sessions!"

This comes one day after Trump took to Twitter to say that Obama and his Democrat minions

only became concerned about allegations of Russian interference into the 2016 election

after his upset victory.

Politico reported that Trump cited a quote from Obama himself as proof to back up this

assertion.

"'There is no serious person out there who would suggest somehow that you could even

rig America's elections, there's no evidence that that has happened in the past or that

it will happen this time, and so I'd invite Mr. Trump to stop whining and make his case

to get votes,'" Trump wrote on Twitter, quoting comments Obama made during an October,

2016 press conference.

"The President Obama quote just before election.

That's because he thought Crooked Hillary was going to win and he didn't want to 'rock

the boat,'" Trump continued in a second post.

"When I easily won the Electoral College, the whole game changed and the Russian excuse

became the narrative of the Dems."

"I have been much tougher on Russia than Obama, just look at the facts.

Total Fake News!" Trump later added.

For more infomation >> BREAKING TRUMP CALLS ON SESSIONS TO INVESTIGATE OBAMA - Duration: 14:44.

-------------------------------------------

Liberals Proven WRONG! Look What Just Happen to Wages After Trump's Metal Tariffs! - Duration: 3:22.

For more infomation >> Liberals Proven WRONG! Look What Just Happen to Wages After Trump's Metal Tariffs! - Duration: 3:22.

-------------------------------------------

Big Dem Just Arrested At Headquarters Attempting To Kill Trump Supporters - Duration: 5:33.

For more infomation >> Big Dem Just Arrested At Headquarters Attempting To Kill Trump Supporters - Duration: 5:33.

-------------------------------------------

Rudy Giuliani: MUELLER CAN INTERVIEW TRUMP - Duration: 14:23.

welcome back the embattled FBI agent Peter struck Hadding back to Capitol

Hill this week he will testify Thursday and do so in an open hearing at the

House Judiciary and oversight committees following his 11 hour closed-door

session with lawmakers last week joining me now is congressman Andy Biggs who

serves on the Judiciary Committee congressman thank you for joining us

this morning thanks for having me good to do with you

so Peter Strock testified behind closed doors did so for an incredible amount of

time 1011 hours I believe what do you hope to learn from him this time around

out in the opening out in the open considering you've already heard from

him behind closed doors well don't forget

that while he was sitting behind closed doors he had two attorneys kind of

filtering questions and answers so there's a lot left to get to and I think

we're gonna still go back and you know talk about this the biases how he

conducted the investigation don't forget he was the IG said he was the lead

investigator on the Hillary Clinton investigation he's the lead investigator

on the the Russian collusion and then somehow he ended up on Muller

investigation so there's still a lot of bone on that a lot of meat on that bone

regarding of bias and whether he actually was enacting some of that bias

in his investigations Peter Struck's attorney has said there

is a transcript before Peter Straub testifies release it out to the open so

everyone can see it what's wrong with that I don't really have a problem with

that but I think you're talking and and and his attorney knows this if you've

ever done a deposition or worked with with courts getting a transcript done

and getting it done right takes time because I mean he was there for 11 hours

so it's a lengthy transcript he gets to go through it and say well way to say

that wasn't quite right typically before he gets released publicly

there is another investigation speaking of documents the DOJ document requests

that yourself and others on the hill have been calling for saying you want

more documents they did produce more documents are you satisfied with where

things stand right now no I'm completely dissatisfied I'm glad they're finally

dribbling them through but I mean just think about this we have some requests

that have been out almost a year now that they haven't fully responded to but

you know they are getting some out but I think the public just like me are fed up

they want the documents let's let's get them quit dribbling them out let us see

them so I'm glad they're giving us some but I am fraction I mean if they're not

going to give them to us then then we need to take the next steps we can't we

can't just beg them anymore help me bridge the gap though if you

want those documents quickly but you say the transcript needs time I mean it

sounds like if you want everything quickly shouldn't the straw transcript

be out there - well the struck transcript will be out there in a timely

fashion I think but but don't forget like I say some of these requests that

we've made by subpoena to DOJ have been out there for almost a year now that's

that's a long time that's longer than a week all right so let me ask you about a

different investigation out there and that is the one in - the president the

president's one of his top attorneys Rudy Giuliani saying in an interview

with The New York Times over the weekend that there's basically two conditions

that he is setting forth for the president to sit down with Robert

Moeller one that there is evidence that the president committed a crime and two

that it would be essential to ending the investigation here's what Rudy Giuliani

told the New York Times he said quote if they can come to us and show us the

basis and that it's legitimate and that they have uncovered something we can go

from there and assess their objectivity do you think that's a smart a smart play

therefore mr. Giuliani and the president's legal team well maybe a good

PR move I think it's a bad legal move myself I mean the the authority that

that's out there is only if the president is you know if he's committed

a crime then the remedy is impeachment and then once out of office then you can

pursue proceed with the criminal investigation and conclusion of that I

don't think you should sit down I don't think that this is going to be objective

in any way I think it's been a skewed from the start I mean the fact just take

a look at the Muller investigative investigative team they won't even give

us all the names of those people but we know that the the people that are on

there have been revealed to be highly biased against this president which to

me indicates that maybe the investigation itself is tainted and I

wouldn't I would not subject the president to that interview congressman

sit right there if you can for I mean I want to get your thoughts on immigration

I know you've been to the southern border recently

and to your thoughts as well on one of your colleagues there and the house

freedom caucus so so stay there with us meantime we continue to watch what is

happening out in Thailand in the northern part of that country stay stay

with us and we'll be right back here on Sunday morning futures

hello and good Sunday morning to you we will get back to those breaking

developments out of Thailand in just a minute the first president Trump

preparing for his historic Supreme Court announcement tomorrow night as he also

gets ready for what could be a tense meeting with NATO leaders and a sit-down

next week with the Russian President Vladimir Putin plus the stage is set for

yet another explosive hearing on Capitol Hill with the embattled FBI agent Peter

struck who was set to testify publicly for the very first time hello and good

morning i'm blake berman info maria bartiromo and this is sunday morning'

futures it is just one day before President Trump announces his second

Supreme Court nominee and lawmakers are already raising concerns about some of

the candidates I'll sit down with John Malcolm who helped put together the

president's initial judicial list and the leaders of our NATO allies are

bracing for his arrival in Brussels later this week and the president's

upcoming summit with Vladimir Putin I'll get reaction to all that in an

exclusive interview this morning with the US ambassador to Germany Rick

Grinnell plus all eyes will be on Capitol Hill Thursday when Peter struck

testifies publicly before the House Judiciary Committee about his anti-trump

text messages and his role in both the Clinton and Trump investigations I'll

ask one committee member congressman Andy Biggs what he wants to hear from

struck as we look ahead on Sunday morning futures

but first right out of the gate this morning this is a Fox News Alert at

least four boys have now been recovered from that flooded cave in northern

Thailand Thai Navy SEALs backed by an international team of divers and experts

pulling off a remarkable feat here in just the last couple hours and this

dangerous rescue mission has just begun and could last for quite some time

President Trump tweeting out his support just moments ago writing on Twitter

quote the u.s. is working very closely with the government of Thailand to help

get all of the children out of the cave and to safety very brave and talented

people Jeff Paul is live on the ground in mae sai thailand this morning with

the breaking news Jeff where does everything stand right now well Blake

I'm just getting some new information into our hands that another operation to

free more boys will commence in 12 10 to 12 hours that's according to the

governor here in this province where we are 50 foreign divers 40 Thai divers are

currently involved in that rescue operation that has been confirmed now by

the governor has freed at least four of the boys obviously they're trying to get

them out as quickly as possible it's been very raining out here making those

rescue operations only more complicated yesterday while we were out near the

cave site lots of mud out there but certainly lots of resources lots of

people working around the clock to get these boys to safety now we do know that

those boys who have been rescued are being taken to the hospital to be

checked out we do not know their condition the governor said that he had

spoken with at least one of them and said that they are imperfect this is a

perfect situation he didn't go into much detail about their condition but it

sounds like they're getting the care they need right now and more boys could

be headed to safety very soon like Jeff great to hear this morning a story we

will follow all throughout the day here Jeff Paul from Thailand this morning

Jeff thanks meantime the countdown still on this morning to president Trump's

Supreme Court nomination as he prepares to name the second high court pic of his

presidency that'll come tomorrow night 9:00 p.m.

here on the East Coast six appellate court judges are believed to be on the

short list with three possibly maybe four candidates emerging as the top

contenders the president also bracing for

a confirmation fight no doubt about it that will come afterwards with a very

slim Republican majority in the Senate joining me now John Malcolm he is the

vice president of the Institute for constitutional government at the

Heritage Foundation and a former Deputy Assistant Attorney General he also

compiled the list of Supreme Court justice recommendations in 2016 seven of

the eight that you compiled ended up getting onto that list nowt about ratio

yeah no not that at all one of them was Brett Kavanaugh so let's start there he

is 53 years old Yale Law graduate DC Circuit Court of

Appeals so he's a local they're kind of on the farm team for the Supreme Court

but there are also concerns from some that he is not conservative enough and

that he has ties to the W 43 Bush administration we know what the

president thinks about the bushes in some cases are the the critiques that

he's not conservative enough accurate well I don't think so I think the world

of Brett Kavanaugh in addition to gonna yell he clerked for Anthony Kennedy on

the Supreme Court he then worked for under Ken Starr at the Office of the

Inspector General for five years he was a senior adviser to President Bush and

he's written over 300 opinions in his 12 years on the DC Circuit he is highly

regarded by judges across the country he's a committed textualism and and an

originalist cares a lot about separation of powers is not in favor of giving

undue deference to agencies there have been a couple of opinions in which he

actually ruled the way conservatives would want him to rule in terms of

reaching the right outcome but he didn't give the most pure conservative reasons

for reaching that outcome and that's caused some criticism but you know he

sits on a court with a majority of Democrats and he has to appeal to the

Supreme Court to Raymon Catholics 51 years old out of the Sixth Circuit he is

a University of Michigan law grad so not necessarily in the mold of the Ivy

League of which the other eight justices are there was a story in The New York

Times this morning that Mitch McConnell has pointed to kept ledge as one of two

that could possibly have the easiest nomination path do you see it that way

well he hasn't attracted the kind of criticism from a few conservatives that

Brett Kavanagh has and he certainly has a long judicial track record he's been

on the Sixth Circuit I think for ten years now possibly a little bit longer

also clerked for Justice Kennedy University of Michigan is a fine law

school he also wrote a book recently about leader

ship that I think was well done and attracted a lot of attention he'd also

do a fine job as an Associate Justice Amy Coney buried 46 years old Seventh

Circuit she's only been on the Federal Court of Appeals for since November I

believe right so you're talking only seven eight months there are some

questions about whether or not her resume is long enough a Notre Dame law

graduate is the resume there well she hasn't been a judge for very long but

she's been a very distinguished academic for a long time she was at GW and then

University of Virginia and since 2002 she was at Notre Dame

she has compiled an impressive body of scholarship was supported by scholars

across the political aisle around the country during her confirmation hearing

and of course held up as grace under fire during her confirmation hearing and

then there's also Thomas Hartman we were led to believe that he finished second

last go-around to Neil Gorsuch to help me out with this if you finished second

last time there's an opening this time why wouldn't hard Hindman be the pick if

you're the president well the calculus changes with each with each pick and

it's a whole new ballgame Tom Hartman has actually been the judge the longest

he was a district court judge in 2003 and he sat on the 3rd circuit since 2006

a very distinguished judge close of course to the president's sister has a

very solid opinions on religious liberty the Second Amendment so it doesn't

surprise me that he's in that final list whether you'll get that knot or not

remains to be seen Democrats are rallying around Roe vs. Wade there will

be if this nominee whoever it is goes through a fifth nominee that was put on

the High Court by a Republican president I want you to take a listen here real

quick - what then candidate Trump said on the tear on the trail during one of

the debates watch do you want to see the court overturn you just said you want to

see the court protect the Second Amendment

do you want to see the court overturn well if we put another two or perhaps

three justices on that's really what's going to be has that's will happen and

that'll happen automatically in my opinion because I am putting pro-life

and justices on the court I will say this it will go back to the states and

the states will then make a determination if it is one of those

three what happens to Roe do you think well I think that the concerns about Roe

versus Wade being overturned anytime in the near future are sort of overblown

there's only one justice on the court Clarence Thomas who has called to

revisit Roe the justices move very slowly and incrementally with

respect to any kind of precedent and of course with John Roberts on the court

you never know exactly which way he would go if row was squarely presented

to the Supreme Court and he's also the president has also said that he's not

going to have a litmus test as have other past presidents and I take him at

his word there are some who say I want to see a conservative woman on the court

that would be a me koni Barrett in this case is is that something for someone

like you who watches the court and who compiles a list is that something that

if not unnecessarily this instance something that you would like to see

happen at some point down the line well I I don't tend to think in terms of

genders and races I look for four qualities that having been said I had a

woman on my list Diane Sikes there are a number of highly qualified women on the

president's list Allison I'd Margaret Ryan

Amy Coney Barrett Joan Larson and if you picked any of them that would be great

all right prediction time who do you think the president will pick slight nod

to Brett Kavanaugh but it could experience dealt with a lot of second

that sits on the second most important court in the land deals with a lot of

issues that will be that the administration will care about but Amy

Barrett and Raymond Catholic are right up there this whisper came campaign

against Calvin all right now you know I think that everybody in Washington has

their favorites it's a little bit like cage match where only one person emerges

and so whisper campaigns happen to promote their candidate and to try to do

in these so you think it will be Cavanaugh if you had the selection who

would you choose if I had the selection it would be it would be Cavanaugh but

the others would also be outstanding thank you very much John Malcolm we

appreciate it you put the initial list together it might come to fruition with

the Cavanaugh pick we'll see we'll see

For more infomation >> Rudy Giuliani: MUELLER CAN INTERVIEW TRUMP - Duration: 14:23.

-------------------------------------------

TRUMP DROPS BOMBSHELL ON MUELLER - Duration: 13:16.

TRUMP DROPS BOMBSHELL ON MUELLER

Liberals have been fuming over the past few weeks as Donald Trump has attacked White House

Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into his alleged collusion with Russia during

the 2016 presidential campaign.

Instead of backing down, however, Trump just defended his attacks on the investigation

by saying he was merely "fight[ing] back."

"There's been no collusion whatsoever," Trump said on Wednesday, according to The

Hill.

"There's no obstruction whatsoever.

And I'm looking forward to it."

Trump went on to mock those who have accused him of obstructing the Russia probe by attacking

the investigations and referring to them as a "witch hunt."

"You fight back, oh, it's obstruction," Trump mockingly told reporters.

He added that he plans to speak with Mueller in two or three weeks, letting the special

counsel know that he is not afraid at all.

"I'm looking forward to it," Trump said about being questioned by Mueller.

"I would do it under oath."

Trump has previously called the Russia probe as a "hoax" and said in December that

the investigation "makes the country look very bad."

"It puts the country in a very bad position," Trump told The New York Times.

"So the sooner it's worked out, the better it is for the country."

Mueller's investigation has taken numerous hits in the past few weeks, as numerous members

of his team have been exposed as Democrat operatives with a strong bias against Trump.

On Tuesday, Trump took to Twitter to slam the FBI, bringing up the case of two FBI officials

who disparaged him in text messages during the election.

FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page were having an affair, and while some of their

text messages have been released, others have mysteriously gone missing.

"In one of the biggest stories in a long time, the FBI now says it is missing five

months worth of lovers Strzok-Page texts, perhaps 50,000, and all in prime time.

Wow!" Trump tweeted.

The text messages between Strzok and Page indicate that they knew that charges would

not be filed against Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton as a result of the

investigation into her email server, before Clinton was interviewed by the bureau.

One exchange between Strzok and Page that occurred on July 1, 2016, referenced then-Attorney

General Loretta Lynch's decision to accept the FBI's conclusion in the Clinton investigation.

Lynch announced this days after it was revealed that the attorney general and former President

Bill Clinton had an impromptu meeting aboard her plane in Phoenix.

"Timing looks like hell," Strzok texted Page.

"Yeah, that is awful timing," Page agreed, later adding, "It's a real profile in

couragw [sic], since she knows no charges will be brought."

Four days after this, then-FBI Director James Comey announced that no charges would be brought

against Clinton, even though he said her actions in regard to the private server were "extremely

careless."

No comments:

Post a Comment