Friday, July 20, 2018

Trump news on Youtube Jul 20 2018

Just now President Putin denied having anything to do with the election

interference of 2016. Every US intelligence agency has concluded that

Russia did. My first question for you sir is: who do you believe?

My people came to me... Dan Coats came to me

and some others, they said they think it's Russia.

I have President Putin. He just said it's not Russia.

I will say this, I don't see any reason why it would be.

Here's part of what he tweeted this morning:

While I had a great meeting with NATO raising vast amounts of money I had an even better

meeting with Vladimir Putin of Russia. Sadly it is not being reported that way.

The fake news is going crazy.

I accept our intelligence community's conclusion that Russia's meddling in the 2016 election took place.

Could be other people also.

There are a lot of people out there.

And a key sentence in my remarks

I said the word would instead of wouldn't. The sentence should have been:

"I don't see any reason why I wouldn't" or "why it wouldn't be Russian."

The president just tweeted a moment ago this, quote, "so many people at the higher

ends of intelligence loved my press conference performance in Helsinki.

Putin and I discussed many important subjects our earlier meeting. We got along well,

which truly bothered many haters who wanted to see a boxing match.

Big results will come.

Is Russia still targeting the U.S.?

Thank you very much. No.

You say you agree with US intelligence that's Russia meddled in

the election in 2016. Yeah and I've said that before Jeff I

have said that numerous times before and I would say that that is true yeah.

But you haven't condemned Putin specifically do you hold him personally responsible

Well I would because he's in charge of the country just like I consider myself

to be responsible for things that happen in this country.

The President, as both he and President Putin said

discussed election meddling. I think we've made

very clear what our position is on that front.

For more infomation >> Trump flip-flops on Russia meddling 5 times in 3 days - Duration: 2:31.

-------------------------------------------

James Comey Just Confirmed Trump's Worst Fears About The Deep State - Duration: 11:36.

James Comey Just Confirmed Trump's Worst Fears About The Deep State

Donald Trump has warned Americans that there is a Deep State within the federal government

actively working to sabotage his presidency.

Illegal leaks, biased FBI agents and covert spying campaigns were just the tip of the

iceberg.

Former FBI Director James Comey sent out a message that just confirmed President Trump's

worst fears about the Deep State.

For months, the so-called "mainstream" media has peddled fake news that there is

no such thing as the Deep State.

Journalists and pundits mocked President Trump for his assertions that shadowy forces embedded

in the bureaucracy were plotting in secret to sink his administration.

The fake news tried pushback on Trump claiming that top ranking FBI and intelligence community

officials – especially the Obama holdovers who remained in place while Trump's nominee

waited to be confirmed – were straight shooters who never let their hatred of Donald Trump

interfere with their ability to perform their jobs.

That laughable assertion began to collapse as the true story of James Comey's time

at the FBI became known.

Comey used spies against Trump's campaign and utilized the fake news Christopher Steele

dossier as the primary evidence to obtain a FISA warrant to wiretap Trump campaign aide

Carter Page.

Comey – as well as his defenders in the media – claimed that all of these actions

were legitimate and were not tainted by his hatred of Donald Trump.

The final blow to Comey's credibility was a recent tweet where Comey declared that every

American who didn't vote for the Democrats this fall was a traitor to America.

The disgraced former FBI Director tweeted:

This Republican Congress has proven incapable of fulfilling the Founders' design that

"Ambition must … counteract ambition."

All who believe in this country's values must vote for Democrats this fall.

Policy differences don't matter right now.

History has its eyes on us.

If Comey doesn't want to have his actions viewed through the prism of partisan politics

than he should never have revealed his true colors to the world.

This tweet is all the evidence Trump supporters need to prove that every decision Comey made

as FBI Director should be judged based on how they advanced his goals of destroying

Donald Trump.

Comey's social media posting also completely vindicates Trump's May 2017 decision to

fire Comey.

When Comey informed Trump that the FBI Director would give Trump "honest loyalty" he was

lying.

Comey's loyalty was to the Deep State and the plot to force Trump from office.

The FBI Director at any point in time could have stated that Donald Trump was not under

investigation.

But his public refusal to comment on the matter fed the media narrative that the FBI was actively

investigating President Trump for collusion with Russia.

Multiple lawmakers – including Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley – have implied that

Comey and other Department of Justice officials have made it clear behind closed doors that

Trump is not a target of the investigation.

Comey would never repeat in public what he was willing to say behind closed doors.

The argument that Comey made these comments in classified briefings does not hold water

since a)Comey was more than willing to leak confidential memos to his friends – a decision

which has landed him under investigation and b) Comey's tweet shows his decision to remain

silent and Trump's status and allow a cloud of suspicion to hover over his administration

was made out of partisan animus.

Comey's actions prove that not only is the Deep State real, but that the intelligence

community at the highest levels of the FBI were a cesspool of bias and Trump Derangement

Syndrome.

Do you agree?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments section.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream

media sources.

When

you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> James Comey Just Confirmed Trump's Worst Fears About The Deep State - Duration: 11:36.

-------------------------------------------

Notes on an Interpreters' Notes - The Trump-Putin Helsinki incident - Duration: 7:11.

Hello. Ewandro here. I wanted to add my two cents to the conversation

going on about the incident involving the interpreter to President Trump

regarding the Helsinki summit. There's now talk of that interpreter being

subpoenaed and asked to testify before Congress and at some point being

pressured to divulge information gained or content or information gained as a

result of her exposure to that high-level meeting which again goes and

runs contrary to a basic tenet of interpreting, which is of course

confidentiality. But I don't want to talk about the legal implications in this

case. Rather I want to take advantage of this incident for what it

gives us and for the opportunity it presents us to help people understand a

bit better how interpreters do their job. Because from the questions being asked

it is evident that there's a lot of ignorance out there. For example there's

now mention of the interpreter eventually being asked to submit her notes in the

hope that those notes are going to help clarify what the content of the meeting

was. There are many things wrong with this plan, and here's why. Number 1: Those

notes are no longer in existence, most likely. Any interpreter worth her salt at

the end of such a high caliber meeting would have disposed of those notes

appropriately. Number 2: Unlike stenographers, interpreters don't share a

common set of icons and symbols or a language that they use to take those

notes. The notes are not something that an interpreter

would look at and say 'oh yeah, she means this...

and that. This is what they're talking about.' It's not a language. It is

just a set of very random icons, abbreviations, upward and downward arrows

and so on that interpreters will use in a way that makes sense to them, and no-one

else. It's very cryptic and very economical even.

If you look at a page there's not much there, and it's because

they're just aids to memory. They're just there to trigger your thinking and

most likely just to help you understand what the logic of the conversation is,

where I'm coming from and where I'm going to, what came first in what came

second, if I'm reconstructing a speech from a long page of annotations.

Sometimes interpreters will take 5 to 8 minutes of non-stop speech before

they even are given a chance to start getting that back across in a different

language. So the notes are totally and utterly useless to anybody else looking

Even if they are produced they're not gonna help anybody.

Abbreviations, for example the letter E, could mean Empowerment. It could be Energy and

it could be elections. But in the course of one same conversation the same letter

will be used to mean different things to the same interpreter, because it's all

context driven. Even for that interpreter who took them those notes are not

gonna be valid and useful for much longer, because from that meeting she

went into another one and another one because she's on mission, following a

large team of aides and advisors and authorities around, and she doesn't have

the time to keep those notes and reflect on them. She's not keeping those notes to

write a report later. Once the meeting is over she shakes that all off, dusts it

all off, moves on to the next assignment where she's already busy preparing the

terminology, piling up information getting the specifics, and

that takes a lot of attention and a lot of bandwidth. So you don't have the

luxury of contemplating your notes a second time to actually make sense of

them. In a couple of hours if you look at the page you won't be able to even

make sense of what the notes were supposed to mean to you. Number 3,

most importantly, is that if that interpreter is ever

forced to come before Congress and divulge or share information,

confidential information gained in the course of that meeting, I wouldn't be

surprised if she claimed not to have any recollection. And I would totally believe

her, because I've been in that exact situation where you try your

best to get the message across and so on but you're not concentrating on content.

We're not hearing secrets or keeping them in retaining them for later

consumption, to convey them to someone else after the fact. We're too busy

with half of our mind just listening to a language, trying to

understand the units of meaning coming our way. Another third of your

mind going to reprocessing that in a different language. And the third that's

left of your mind is just checking on yourself and on your language and your

grammar and your style to make sure it all makes sense and comes across in an

elegant and an intelligible fashion. Interpreters are also very skilled at

remembering but also forgetting, because they need to void their mind

the minute the meeting ends, to actually get ready for what comes

next. So interpreters will not retain secrets

that's not what we do. Interpreters are not in for the message, you know,

content-wise. They are in for the logic and the units of meaning and making sure

that they work as a conduit that is actually making it possible for the

other two people or more in the room to communicate. That's number three.

Going back to the whole politics of it, if you want my opinion, I don't think an

interpreter should be put in that situation. I know there are legal

constraints in this case and again it's a matter of what takes precedence over

what. And not only because of what it means to the interpreter in question,

but because of what it means to the whole system. You don't want to undermine the

system of confidence that is in place to a point where next time a

high-level figure walks into a private room to have a high-level meeting he or

she might be doubtful as to whether s/he can trust the interpreter. So those

were my two cents and again I just wanted to go back to some technicalities

of interpreting to help you understand, those of you who are not interpreters,

how the whole thing happens and how it's done. I am Ewandro Magalhaes, a

conference interpreter - have been for 30 years, almost. Former chief interpreter

in the United Nations system in Geneva for seven years, and currently the VP

of Communications of KUDO, a company that is innovating the very way in which

interpretation is delivered. I hope you found this useful. Thank you very much.

I will see you next time.

For more infomation >> Notes on an Interpreters' Notes - The Trump-Putin Helsinki incident - Duration: 7:11.

-------------------------------------------

Michelle Obama Tried To Take Out Trump But Made The Worst Mistake Of Her Life - Duration: 10:17.

Michelle Obama Tried To Take Out Trump But Made The Worst Mistake Of Her Life

Michelle Obama has waged an unprecedented sabotage campaign against President Donald

Trump.

No other former First Lady has actively sought to undermine a sitting President.

Recently Obama launched a new plan to take out Trump, but it ended up being the biggest

mistake of her life.

Ever since Donald Trump took office, Michelle Obama has lobbed pot shots at his administration.

Obama roared when Trump rolled back her Soviet-style school lunch mandates.

And she has made racist comments about how people don't trust the GOP because it's

run by a bunch of old white men.

But Obama took her campaign to undermine the Trump administration to a new level ahead

of the 2018 midterms.

The former First Lady joined A-List Hollywood celebrities like Tom Hanks, Faith Hill and

Tim McGraw, Lin Manuel Miranda, Chris Paul and Janelle Monae to start up a new voter

registration organization called When We All Vote.

When We All Vote is billed as a "nonpartisan" group so they can obtain nonprofit status

with the IRS.

But don't let them fool you.

When We All Vote is a hardcore, left-wing activist group that will work hand-over-fist

to drag liberals to the polls in the midterm elections in order to create a blue wave to

wash the Democrats into power.

"Voting is the only way to ensure that our values and priorities are represented in the

halls of power," the former First Lady wrote in a press release.

"And it's not enough to just vote for president every four years.

We all have to vote in every single election: for mayor, governor, school board, state legislature

and Congress.

The leaders we elect to these offices help determine just about every aspect of our lives

and our democracy.

So the future of our families, our communities and our country belongs to those of us who

show up, cast our votes, and make our voices heard."

The Democrats are serious about winning back Congress so they can block Donald Trump's

agenda and ultimately impeach him.

And the left is leaving nothing to chance.

That's why liberals are bringing out the big guns.

Michelle Obama and a gang of A-list celebrities is as close to royalty as you can find in

the Democrat Party.

But there is one fatal flaw in this plan.

Americans are not registered to vote because they have no interest in participating in

the political process.

It takes candidates – Ronald Reagan, Barack Obama, Ron Paul or Donald Trump – to turn

Americans who didn't care about politics into voters.

And that only happens in Presidential election years.

If the left is counting on registering voters to win in November's midterms, then the

chances for a blue wave are even smaller than anyone thought.

Republicans should take heart that the left is deploying one of their biggest names on

a political mission with little upside.

We will keep you up to date on any new developments

in the 2018 midterm elections.

For more infomation >> Michelle Obama Tried To Take Out Trump But Made The Worst Mistake Of Her Life - Duration: 10:17.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Own Intelligence Chief Had No Idea That Putin Was Coming To The White House - Duration: 0:26.

moment ago with my colleague,

Andrea Mitchell.

>> We have some breaking news.

The white house has announced on

Twitter that Vladimir Putin is

coming to the white house in the

fall.

>> Say that again.

>> Vladimir Putin coming to the

white house --

>> Did I hear you?

>> Yeah, yeah.

>> Okay.

For more infomation >> Trump Own Intelligence Chief Had No Idea That Putin Was Coming To The White House - Duration: 0:26.

-------------------------------------------

NEWSROOM: POMPEO: TRUMP HAS BEEN "RELENTLESS" ON RUSSIA - Duration: 12:12.

picking news on two big stories that were following this morning the first

near Branson Missouri powerful waves capsizing a duck boat killing at least

13 people four others are still missing we're expecting a news conference at

10:00 a.m. we will take you there live when it begins also tornadoes touching

down in Iowa the sudden storms injuring 17 people and destroying many homes

yesterday but we begin with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo firmly defending

President Trump on his summit with Vladimir Putin as he heads to the UN for

high-level meetings on North Korea this morning good morning everyone I'm Sandra

Smith happy Friday everyone live inside America's newsroom good morning to you

I'm John Scott in for Bill Hemmer today Secretary of State Pompeo set to address

the media a few hours from now after meeting with members of the UN Security

Council including ambassador nikki Haley America's top diplomat saying last night

that as of right now kim jeong-hoon is holding up his end of the deal

no one's been closer than that than I have so everyone else is simply

speculating about what's taking place today I've been there the North Koreans

have consistently reaffirmed their commitment the commitment that chairman

Kim made to President Trump no one was under any illusion that this was going

to happen in hours or days or even weeks it's going to take time we have live Fox

team coverage Kevin cork is at the White House and we'll get reactions from

Washington Examiner editorial director Hugo Garden but we begin with Richardson

at UN headquarters this morning in new york city good morning rich hi good

morning Sandra and at the bottom of this hour Secretary of State Mike Pompeo

begins his meetings here at the United Nations in New York with the foreign

minister from South Korea UN Security Council officals Japanese officials and

UN leadership to update them on United States negotiations with North Korea to

relieve Kim jong-un of his nuclear weapons program secretary Pompeo just

returned from Pyongyang it was his third visit to that city it's unclear what

specific firm commitments Kim is made on dismantling that nuclear program

secretary Pompeo insists kim understands us demands and is committed to

surrendering his program the State Department refuses to offer a timeline

only acknowledging there's still a lot of work to do to accomplish this

analysts have also said that satellite images show continued North Korean work

on some of its weapons productions facilities secretary Pompeo says the US

has secured at least a commitment from North Korea for the return of the

remains of American service members that were killed during the Korean War that's

expected in the next couple of weeks he says now here at the Security Council

there are efforts from China and Russia to ease sanctions against North Korea to

reward it for already negotiating though South Korea's foreign minister has

rejected that idea the Trump administration has also said it is

pushing continued enforcement of existing sanctions against the Kim

regime and it has refused to enact additional sanctions against North Korea

now we asked the State Department while the Secretary of State is here at the

United Nations whether he would meet with any representatives from the North

Korean government the State Department would only say that that is not on the

schedule and they'll update us on any type of changes to that schedule if they

do occur the meetings begin here in less than 45 minutes for the secretary Sandra

right well look forward to all that Richardson thank you

meanwhile President Trump vowing to be very tough on Vladimir Putin if

diplomacy fails as the White House invites the Russian president to make an

official visit this fall getting along with President Putin and getting along

with Russia's a positive not a negative right now with that being said if that

doesn't work out I'll be the worst enemy he's ever had the worst he's ever had

Kevin cork who's one of our best friends is on the North Lawn with that part of

the story Kevin always great to be with you my friend co colorado by the way if

you missed all the news yesterday I'm sure you heard a great deal about it

speaking to the folks at home just know this when the White House's perspective

this is not a do-over or Redux as much as this is a continuation of an

important conversation the president making those commitments during the

summit in Helsinki and he'd like to see them play out actually right here in

Washington the this fall let me take it to Twitter show

you what Sarah Sanders had to say about it yesterday

that really sent us scrambling John in the afternoon she said in Helsinki the

president agreed to ongoing working-level dialogue between the two

Security Council staffs then she said this the president asked ambassador

Bolton to invite President Putin to Washington in the fall and those

discussions are already underway now that announcement underscores the

administration's push to engage Moscow in a way that could lead to better

relations but the President as you pointed out John said yesterday that

doesn't mean that this administration will be soft on Russia look at the

sanctions I've put on look at the diplomats I threw out look at all of the

things that I've done nobody else did what I've done Obama didn't do it

Obama was a patsy for Russia he was a total patsy look at the statement he

made when he thought the mics were turned off okay the stupid statement he

made nobody there's a big deal about that president once again being animated

about some things have happened in the recent past meanwhile Secretary of State

Mike Pompeo who clearly would take the lead on any new talks describe the

president's thinking this way he's trying to take opportunities places

where we find we can work together and put America in a position to do the

things he wants to do on behalf of the American people and that's the idea here

at the White House they want the president to continue to advance our

agenda by engaging Moscow when and where we can John so the Director of National

Intelligence had an interesting reaction to the news yesterday about this

Vladimir Putin invitation to Washington what is the White House saying about

that yeah interesting indeed he was actually over in Colorado and look at

the the White House will tell you they weren't exactly thrilled by the reaction

but they certainly understand because when you think about it Jon he's got a

portfolio ambassador Bolton has a portfolio he can't be expected to know

what everyone is doing across the senior leadership but I want to share for the

folks at home his reaction to being told about what Sarah Sanders had to say on

Twitter watch here the White House has announced on Twitter that Vladimir Putin

is coming to the White House in the fall

say that again

that's gonna be special okay a couple ways you can look at that little levity

at a conference or a damning indictment of the information flow within the

administration or maybe somewhere in between but White House officials tell

us don't make more out of this than we are back to you John even the nation's

top spy can't be plugged in every minute of it that's right all right Kevin cork

at the White House Kevin thank you and as we mentioned Secretary of State Mike

Pompeo repeatedly making it clear last night in that interview that the

president understands the threat from Russia

watch the noise these last few days the president's been very resolute he

understands precisely who it is we're dealing with in Russia he gets it

Hugo Gurdon is the editorial director at the Washington Examiner he joins me now

Hugo good morning to you good morning so should that interview calm the

president's critics well it should but I think you and I know Sandra that it's

not going to nothing has calmed them in the 18 months since he was inaugurated

so you know the truth is that the president's performance in Helsinki was

weak and it was disappointing through a lot of people and that you know the

thing however to remember is that the critics while they might be right on the

performance having been weak they're absolutely it's it is absurd as Mike

Pompeo said to say that somehow that performance proved that the President

Putin has some sort of dirt on President Trump that it is some sort of hold you

know president Trump is absolutely right when he talked about the things that he

has done to counter Russia the things that he didn't mention there

was just a few days before the Helsinki summit he was excoriating Germany for a

business deal on a gas pipeline which he said was enriching Russia

he's boosted American troop levels to counter Russia he sent deadly weapons to

the Ukrainians including sophisticated anti-tank weapons these are not the

actions of someone who seems to be a puppet of the Moscow you know DNI

director Dan coats and sort of what appeared to be a bit of a light moment

depending on how you look at it learned of this upcoming meeting with Putin in

Washington perhaps this fall on that stage there but nonetheless a meeting

with Putin in Washington is the White House perhaps giving everybody something

to look forward to - maybe distract from the Helsinki

summit I don't think that this is intended as a distraction I mean after

the last several days have been a certain amount of damage limitation

because of the way the Helsinki wants but I suspect that you know President

Trump is just not going to be deflected from his efforts to have a better

relationship with Russia he sometimes does that in a very clumsy way here but

you know there's also the fact that the his administration and the White House

spring surprises on its own administration so sure that information

presumably took mr. Coates by surprise and that is the kind of thing which

administration's should try not to have as big surprises what did she make it

the president really taking on Obama there he's made the point many times

that he's been tougher on Russia than Obama ever was but he said Obama was a

patsy for Russia yeah you know that's that's not it not a completely wrong

assessment you you he referred to the tape where President Obama was

reassuring the Russian Prime Minister that after the election and he had no

more elections to to run he could be kind of easier on Russia when it came to

the Ukraine President Obama refused to send the kind

of weaponry that President Trump has then he sent sort of pretty much useless

things like blankets you know if the truth is that President

Obama was in the way that in his actual policies softer on Russia than Trump has

been the the odd thing is that there's a big gulf between the rhetoric and the

actions with Obama the actions were softer and the rhetoric was a bit

tougher with the president Trump there's been plenty of tough actions but the

rhetoric looks ridiculously soft sometimes change quickly this morning

with Mike Pompeo attending those high-level meetings at the UN thank you

very much for your time this morning Hewitt thanks Sandra thanks we are

awaiting an update from authorities on the tourist boat that capsized in a

terrible storm near Branson Missouri killing at least 13 people as divers now

search for more survivors we will bring you that news conference as soon as it

begins plus president Trump slamming former CIA director John Brennan as a

new op-ed makes the case that Brennan's actions during the 2016 election were

even more troubling than James commis and by now you likely have heard the

incredible story of a young man determined to make it to his first day

of work and how a community came together to make it happen later this

hour we'll speak with one of the police officers who helped him along the way

officer pass by me and he looked around he was like I was halfway asleep when I

patted by you he said II know if it was the shadow rising

or was actually a person I told him I said I actually kind of my hair when you

would cut the lights on behind me because everybody else's just drive by

right past me

For more infomation >> NEWSROOM: POMPEO: TRUMP HAS BEEN "RELENTLESS" ON RUSSIA - Duration: 12:12.

-------------------------------------------

Pres. Trump Now Blames Putin For Russian Meddling In The Election - Duration: 1:54.

For more infomation >> Pres. Trump Now Blames Putin For Russian Meddling In The Election - Duration: 1:54.

-------------------------------------------

Live: President Trump Hosts the Pledge to America's Workers Event - Duration: 31:31.

thank you all it is wonderful to be joined by so many incredible men and

women who work in high demand industries across our nation thank you and I want

to thank the leaders in government in business and education who came together

for the launch of this landmark workforce initiative the president

pledged to fight for the Forgotten men and women of America and that is exactly

what he's done and that is what today is all about we want to open new pathways

for all Americans to secure better jobs and bigger paychecks I'm honored that

the president has asked me to lead the White House's effort to spur job

creation and economic opportunity through vocational education and

workforce development over the past year and a half our administration has taken

action to expand apprenticeships increase access to STEM education for

all K through 12 students and ensure that our workforce programs deliver real

results for our citizens we are also working with members of Congress many of

whom are here today to pass important legislation such as the Perkins Career

and Technical Education bill to modernize workforce development and

support over 11 million students and workers across the country in my travels

over the past 17 months it has been an amazing honor to meet with men and women

across our nation who helped build our cities pioneer new industries and start

businesses with a little more than their grit and imagination their talent is

unmatched their drive inspiring and their tenacity is truly what makes

America's workforce the best in the world last week in Syracuse New York I

met several recent high school graduates who join us today Lilly law William

DeJesus and Robert Felder Lily William Robert will you join us

through the pathways and Technology program they each graduated with more

than 20 college credits and experience interning in fields such as science

manufacturing and electrical engineering

last week robbers Roberts grandmother was with him

and Robert I hope you don't mind me sharing this story but I personally was

just blown away by the way she looked at you with such

pride and admiration and that's an admiration everyone in this room shares

Lily William Robert you are truly an inspiration to us all your ambition your

grit your perseverance it's really inspiring so thank you for being here

America's vocational education whether for high school students like Lily

William and Robert or for mid to late career workers should be as innovative

dynamic and successful as our people and that is why today the president is

launching a national workforce strategy we're calling upon government in the

private sector to equip our students and workers with the skills they need to

thrive in the modern economy I want to thank all of the companies and trade

associations who are here with us today and joining for the launch of this bold

initiative thank you for your partnership over the previous weeks and

months as we have prepared for this important day and this is really just

the beginning really thank you with that it is now my honor to introduce the 45th

President of the United States Donald J Trump to share today's announcement

that's a good group that is a very good group I will tell you I'm looking at

these people I see them on the cover of all the magazines every every week every

month my Fred that's great well thank you Ivanka very much and for your

incredible leadership of the White House workforce and they should have you

really have done an incredible job and you've worked so hard and I want to just

tell you we're all proud of you everyone here is proud of you especially these

folks back here because that's the future so I want to thank you honey

I'm thrilled

I'm thrilled and honored to be here today to launch the National Council for

the American worker joining us for the announcement is secretary Wilbur Ross

secretary good secretary Alex Acosta Betsy DeVos everybody knows

education Acting Secretary Peter O'Rourke Peter great job you doing

director Mulvaney who has worked so hard those budgets but they're coming along

right right make Linda McMahon administrator small business Thank You

Linda Jared fantastic job Chris incredible what a group this group

nobody knows Kelly and nobody knows all stand up fantastic job Andrew thank you

please stand up

really good thank you

I want to thank you also we have some very special people here House Education

and Workforce chairwoman say now we say chairwoman right we like it better

virginia foxx virginia and we have thanks virginia great job

representatives rip rick allen jamie herrera butler thank you

thank you Sean Duffy John John my friend Jim Renee C and Claudia Tenny we have

some very special other folks here in a very high administrative capacity we

have a favorite of mine Governor Scott Walker good job he's done thank you

Scott and Montana state auditor Matt Rosendale

Matt right here you doing good Matt I have big things for Matt we're really

especially grateful to be joined today by the top CEOs union leaders trade

associations and educators from all around the country these are the biggest

these are the best seasons of the most talented

among those and I'm going to be introducing him and going around the

table with them as they signed their pledge but we have a friend of mine for

a long time the really founder and creator and I heard he did a report at

his school and he got low marks because they said it couldn't work and he ended

up getting very high marks because it's a company called FedEx is that a correct

story pretty correct right that professor didn't know what happened Fred

Smith thank you for I think we'll have to give that

professor low mark stress cuz it worked out it worked out well for you home

depot CEO doing a fantastic job Craig Minear Craig thank you thank you

for Lockheed Martin CEO Marilyn Hewson and how's the f-35 doing right on time

right good job Raytheon CEO Tom Kennedy Tom thank you

thank you thank you Tom northrop grumman president kathy warden and we're going

to introduce everybody in a little while i also want to recognize dan england

chairman of the American Trucking Association along with Johnny Taylor

president of the Society for Human Resource Management they've been

fantastic and really worked hard with us everyone here today is united by the

same goal to train recruit hire American workers thanks to our tremendous

economic successes and we've had a lot of them and we've never had and I have

to tell you as a country we have never been more successful that we are exactly

right now today the numbers coming out are beyond what anyone ever thought

possible and so there's never been a better time to hire and grow in America

we've created 3.7 million jobs since the election in the month of June alone we

grew the workforce by more than 600,000 workers I say that if I ever mentioned

this if I ever mentioned this during the campaign they would have said there's no

way there's no way no way that could happen well it's happened and far more

than we ever thought we're in the longest positive job growth streak in

American history african-american unemployment has reached its lowest

level in American history Hispanic unemployment is at its lowest level in

American history Asian unemployment has reached its

lowest level in American history women's unemployment oh this is too bad Maryland

this is very sad has reached its lowest level in only 65 years but within about

two weeks I think we'll be able to say in American history because it's moving

quickly okay 65 years is not so bad right

consumer and business confidence has reached its all-time highs the highest

ever recorded and 95% of manufacturers are optimistic about the future that's

the highest number ever recorded so a lot of good things are happening out

there every day we are lifting our forgotten Americans off the sidelines

out of the margins and back into the workforce we are giving a second chance

at life to the six hundred and twenty thousand former inmates who reenter

society each year there's nothing like a great great jobs market to take care of

that situation it's incredible what's happened with people that were in prison

that previous to this could not get themselves a job and now they're being

hired and people are loving them it's been really incredible to see

but to keep this momentum going to continue this economic miracle and

that's what it is it's a miracle what's happened in the last year and a half we

must invest in job training and vocational education I mean the fact is

that companies are pouring back into our country companies that frankly left 10

and 20 years ago and they're coming back and we need people to work for those

companies we need talented people we need people with training that's why in

a few moments I will be signing an executive order to establish the

National Council for the American worker that's a first this council will be made

up of top officials across the government

we're also establishing an outside Advisory Board of industry leaders and

experts which we will announce in the coming weeks very shortly a lot of

people want to be on that board very badly have some great people going on

that board together their task will be to develop a national workforce and

strategy to equip Americans of all ages and at all stages of their career with

the skills they need to thrive in the modern economy whether it's a high

school student looking to land their first job first job ever and they've got

a lot of enthusiasm and they lose that enthusiasm when they don't land that job

but now they're all landing jobs or a late career worker who wants to learn a

new trade we want every American to have the chance to earn a great living doing

a great job that they love where they wake up in the morning and they can't

get to work fast enough a lot of these people know that feeling that's why

they're in the position they're in and that spirit I'm proud to announce an

exciting new challenge and the beginning of a new national movement we're asking

businesses and organizations across the country to sign our new pledge to

America's workers today 23 companies and associations are pledging to expand

apprenticeships that's an interesting word for me to be saying right the

apprentice I never actually put that together until

just now that was a good experience I will tell you that and that's range

Ivanka I never associated but here we are can't get away from that word it's a

great word for on-the-job training and vocational education they will sign the

pledge committing to train and retrain more than 3.8 million American students

and workers for new jobs and rewarding careers

this is only day one and we far exceeded our initial goal of 500,000 students and

workers we thought it was going to be 500,000 and disclose to 4 million and by

the time the day ends it'll probably be well over 4 million in the days and

months ahead we hope that hundreds of companies and organizations will join us

in this effort I want to thank all of the wonderful companies and associations

who are about to sign the pledge and we're about to introduce I applaud your

civic leadership it's incredible know so many of you I know how committed you are

you're great people and your commitment to training and recruiting American

workers also here with us today are American workers who know firsthand how

job training transforms their lives I'd like to invite a couple of them to speak

Brian Brianna where is Brianna Brianna come on

over here Brianna D'Angelo from Greenwood Indiana

is an apprentice for Gayler electric good company better say yes

please say a few words hi everyone so as a former college student turned mother

turned electrician I was given a great lifelong opportunity from Gayler

Electric and their partnership with The Associated Builders and Contractors I'm

standing here today for my daughter three-year-old he's got a long ways to

go but I'm standing here here for her and women that they can see that they

don't have to conform to what society says they have to you can do anything

I'm going to be an electrician in two years

very nice also here today is Janita mcnair from Orlando Florida who is

completing the American Hotel and Lodging Association apprenticeship for

managers and their really a lot of talented people coming out of that

program please chanita thank you so first I'd like to say thank you for

having me I think I fall under the column where the older workers I'm a

late bloomer but that's okay I'm here and in 31 years in the hospitality

industry has been good to me so my motivation is to be good to my

generation this following means my grandson came to me after his father was

murdered and he said I'm not gonna have a role model yes you will okay I can't

teach you how to be a man but I can

so for thank you for creating this BL insider so a lot of more people can have

this opportunity thank you that's great I'd also like to ask Carl green to come

up he's a truck driver and a military veteran and he's doing really well

Carl

this is my fourth career I started off as an army helicopter pilot in Vietnam

I went to the defense industries and then to banking and investments and

retired I was bored bored have found CR England thank you sir and found my last

and greatest career I enjoy driving my big rig across this great beautiful

country delivering food to hungry people

Thank You Carl and thank you to everybody or you've really been very

special we know every one of you and the great job you've done thank you all very

much great careers America is blessed with the greatest workers anywhere in

the world and today we are taking historic steps to ensure that every

American has the chance to realize their full-time potential by signing the

pledge to America's workers these great companies and they are great these are

the greatest in the world are affirming their commitment to train American

workers for American jobs because America's strength America's heart and

America's soul is found in our people more than anything else it's in our

people it is their love their pride and their patriotism that makes this

magnificent land our beloved home and together with the help of everyone in

this room we will truly make America greater than ever before that's what's

happening greater than ever before and I think it's happening faster than anyone

ever thought it's moving rapidly we have numbers coming out and past and present

and hopefully future that are far beyond anybody's wildest expectations and I

think frankly you haven't seen anything yet so I will now sign the Executive

Order and then I'm going to go around and say hello to these incredible people

and they're going to be giving the name their company and many of you know them

already and they're going to be signing taking on almost four million people

that's very exciting so thank you all very much I'm gonna sign the Executive

Order

go ahead mr. president ladies and gentlemen it's my distinct honor on

behalf of the aerospace and defense industry the voice of the world's

greatest aerospace and defense aerospace industry association is committed to

creating new opportunities to the tune of 48,000 for our students and workers

over the next five years thank you very much thank you

alright on behalf of the American Hotel and Lodging Association and our 26,000

members and in addition to our management track apprenticeship program

we are announcing a hundred and thirty thousand new opportunities with

scholarships certifications at a cost free college program further with great

women and men and hospitality that is a big number Thank You Katherine thank you

very much Thank You Patti thank you my name is Dan England CR

England trucky that's right and you're

representing the American Trucking associations and we're committing to

50,000 new opportunities over the next five years that's big stuff thank you

Dan thank you that's fantastic thank you do

mr. president we'll have an Associated Builders and Contractors and our 21,000

members we pledge to educate and re-educate 500,000 craft workers that is

fantastic and you'll do it you'll do it I know you well Gregg thank you thank

you absolutely on behalf of the associated

general contractor's of America we pledge to train or to upskill over 170

2,500 construction craft workers and professionals over the next five years

thank you Brian thank you that's beautiful hello Fred

this is some man right here I tell you

that's great thank you Fred thank you very much

mr. president sir good to see you again Scott Walker you know this is right he's

building the most incredible place you've ever seen in Wisconsin right

Scott I just left that's gonna be tell us

about that for a second go ahead yes sir were you know building a bringing an

industry back to America that hasn't been here and probably over at least 30

years which is advanced electronics manufacturing and we're going to bring

that into southeast Wisconsin as part of that I'd like to pledge today to provide

enhanced career opportunities for 13,000 Americans in Wisconsin that's great

fantastic thank you thank you very much

mr. president General Motors is proud to offer ten thousand nine hundred and

seventy five workforce training opportunities over the next five years

mr. president Home Depot is pleased to provide

enhanced training and opportunities for 50,000 associates at the Home Depot for

the next five years thank you well give my regards you know that say hello mr.

president gen Crozier and on behalf of IBM we are proud of programs like p-tech

apprenticeships and rescaling and committed to preparing 100,000 Wow

that's good and I heard your company is doing great

you're doing great Thank You mr. president Michael Beckerman representing

the internet industry today we're announcing over 30,000 opportunities and

this is just the tip of the iceberg from the internet industry to ensure the

American workers have the digital skills they need to compete in the economy of

today and tomorrow so thank you thank you very much

mr. president on behalf of Lockheed Martin I'm proud to say that today we

pledge to provide career opportunities new career opportunities for more than

8,000 employees over the next five years Thank You Marilyn you've done a

fantastic job Thank You Marilyn hey Fred she makes a plane you can't see it's

stealth f-35 I hope you can't see it at least right great job thank you very

much mr. president on behalf of Microsoft 10,000 opportunities and

really proud to be their representative

very good you're right they're great they're great thank you very much Thank

You mr. president my name is Randy Noel representing the National Association of

Homebuilders and through our Home Builders Institute

our educational arm we pledge to do prepare 50,000 new workers to work at

building an American dream thank you very much

mr. president my name is Rob gifford and on behalf of the National Restaurant

Association we pledge to Train three hundred and seventy thousand people over

the next five years mr. president naturally on behalf of the National

Retail Federation we're pleased to be here thank you for leadership we are

committing to train certify and upskill 250,000 workers at least over the next

five years Thank You mr. presidential mcGarvie North America's building trade

unions and on behalf of our unions and our contractor partners we commit to

invest six billion dollars and train and recruit and register 250,000 apprentices

over the next five years

mr. president I'm Kathy warden on behalf of Northrop Grumman we commit to 7500

new apprenticeships over the next five years

mr. president Tom Kennedy from Raytheon and we pledged

39,000 enhanced career opportunities over the next five years

mr. president I'm Tom Harkin with the signatory will on sealing alliance we

pledged through the Carpenters Union and regionally trusted funds 50,000 upgraded

trading opportunities mr. president Johnny Taylor good to see that's right

on behalf of the Society for Human Resource Management we have 300,000

members and more importantly we touched the lives of a hundred million workers

every day we're dedicated and committed to creating 127 thousand new

opportunities of the next five years for America Thank You mr. president my name

is Scott price I'm pleased to represent UPS where we are committing 250 1,750

new rolls through higher education and apprenticeships mr. president I'm Julie

Murphy from Walmart and and we commit to train and develop over 1 million

associates in the next five years thank you very much that is fantastic thank

you Tony so that's a big beginning that's a much bigger beginning evanka

than anyone thought possible

folks for so many years I've done so many of you but that is really a great

commitment so we appreciate it we're just getting started we need people to

be trained we need people that are going to go out and really love their job and

that's what you're going to do and those are great jobs Maryland those are great

jobs thank you all Fred thank you everybody

this is a big big day for our country there's never been anything done like

this before and you see the numbers so we're going to need all of these people

and most importantly in the room good luck to you good luck thank you good

luck

For more infomation >> Live: President Trump Hosts the Pledge to America's Workers Event - Duration: 31:31.

-------------------------------------------

Ari Melber Shreds Trump For Being A Coward Who Refuses To Fight Putin - Duration: 1:20.

double negative.

So you can put that in and I

think that probably clarifies

things pretty good by itself.

>> So here's where we are.

Donald Trump forged his entire

public brand on firing anyone,

fighting anyone and never

apologizing or backing down.

His whole aura was reality star

meets Tom petty, won't back

down, gonna stand my ground, and

I won't back down.

That was the narrative.

This week, of course, exposes

the giant exception.

When it comes to Putin and

Russia policy, trump won't

fight.

He looks like he's afraid Putin

will fire him.

He spent four consecutive days

backing down and explaining

himself.

And this quite blatant departure

from trump's normal brand has

many serious people asking

questions this week.

"The New York Times," front

page, with an article

questioning what happens when

treason may hit the oval office.

If Russia is the one topic that

terms trump from a relentless

Tom petty fighter to a kind of a

bumbling, flinching, flailing ca

pitlator, people are going to

ask why.

Like tonight, people are asking

why this widely contended week

of Donald Trump's foreign policy

towards Russia is being capped

at this hour with this

For more infomation >> Ari Melber Shreds Trump For Being A Coward Who Refuses To Fight Putin - Duration: 1:20.

-------------------------------------------

Seth Meyers Podcast:GOP Refuses to Hold Trump Accountable on Russia - Duration: 23:44.

welcome to listening late night with seth meyers podcast.

For more infomation >> Seth Meyers Podcast:GOP Refuses to Hold Trump Accountable on Russia - Duration: 23:44.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING Trump Signed His Latest Executive Order - Duration: 13:08.

BREAKING Trump Signed His Latest Executive Order

On April 10th of this year, the President officially signed an executive order that

will aid in reducing poverty in the United States by promoting financial opportunity

and economic mobility.

However, it has largely been under-reported on.

The White House press office did, however, release a statement on it saying,

"By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United

States of America, and to promote economic mobility, strong social networks, and accountability

to American taxpayers, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1.

Purpose.

The United States and its Constitution were founded on the principles of freedom and equal

opportunity for all.

To ensure that all Americans would be able to realize the benefits of those principles,

especially during hard times, the Government established programs to help families with

basic unmet needs.

Unfortunately, many of the programs designed to help families have instead delayed economic

independence, perpetuated poverty, and weakened family bonds.

While bipartisan welfare reform enacted in 1996 was a step toward eliminating the economic

stagnation and social harm that can result from long-term Government dependence, the

welfare system still traps many recipients, especially children, in poverty and is in

need of further reform and modernization in order to increase self-sufficiency, well-being,

and economic mobility.

Sec. 2.

Policy.

(a) In 2017, the Federal Government spent more than $700 billion on low-income assistance.

Since its inception, the welfare system has grown into a large bureaucracy that might

be susceptible to measuring success by how many people are enrolled in a program rather

than by how many have moved from poverty into financial independence.

This is not the type of system that was envisioned when welfare programs were instituted in this

country.

The Federal Government's role is to clear paths to self-sufficiency, reserving public

assistance programs for those who are truly in need.

The Federal Government should do everything within its authority to empower individuals

by providing opportunities for work, including by investing in Federal programs that are

effective at moving people into the workforce and out of poverty.

It must examine Federal policies and programs to ensure that they are consistent with principles

that are central to the American spirit — work, free enterprise, and safeguarding human and

economic resources.

For those policies or programs that are not succeeding in those respects, it is our duty

to either improve or eliminate them.

(b) It shall be the policy of the Federal Government to reform the welfare system of

the United States so that it empowers people in a manner that is consistent with applicable

law and the following principles, which shall be known as the Principles of Economic Mobility:

(i) Improve employment outcomes and economic independence (including by strengthening existing

work requirements for work-capable people and introducing new work requirements when

legally permissible);

(ii) Promote strong social networks as a way of sustainably escaping poverty (including

through work and marriage);

(iii) Address the challenges of populations that may particularly struggle to find and

maintain employment (including single parents, formerly incarcerated individuals, the homeless,

substance abusers, individuals with disabilities, and disconnected youth);

(iv) Balance flexibility and accountability both to ensure that State, local, and tribal

governments, and other institutions, may tailor their public assistance programs to the unique

needs of their communities and to ensure that welfare services and administering agencies

can be held accountable for achieving outcomes (including by designing and tracking measures

that assess whether programs help people escape poverty);

(v) Reduce the size of bureaucracy and streamline services to promote the effective use of resources;

(vi) Reserve benefits for people with low incomes and limited assets;

(vii) Reduce wasteful spending by consolidating or eliminating Federal programs that are duplicative

or ineffective;

(viii) Create a system by which the Federal Government remains updated on State, local,

and tribal successes and failures, and facilitates access to that information so that other States

and localities can benefit from it; and

(ix) Empower the private sector, as well as local communities, to develop and apply locally

based solutions to poverty.""

The executive order continues to describe in great detail and length how the administration

intends on curbing poverty.

But most importantly it focuses on several key factors in achieving this outcome,

improve employment outcomes and economic independence; promote marriage and family as a way of escaping

poverty; address the challenges of hard-to-employ populations;

provide more flexibility to States, while ensuring accountability for achieving outcomes;

streamline services to more effectively use taxpayer resources;

reserve benefits for those truly in need; consolidate duplicative programs;

facilitate greater sharing of information between States and localities; and

empower the private sector to find solutions to poverty

In the fine print of the executive order, the administration makes it clear they will

be increasing work requirements for those utilizing subsidized government benefits,

focusing on using taxpayer dollars for their intended purpose, as well as empowering state

and local authorities to provide services to those in need.

This executive order is going to be yet another notch under the belt of the administration

in curbing poverty and decreasing unemployment.

For the third straight month, the United States has maintained a 4.1 percent unemployment

rate which is the lowest it has been since 2000.

These are near record low numbers at a time when businesses are dealing with a shortage

of labor.

President Trump brought this order about because despite the labor shortage federal government

assistance benefits are being used at an all-time high.

In 2016 alone, a total of 16 million able-bodied individuals were enrolled in the Supplemental

Nutrition Assistant Program (SNAP).

While in January 2018 74 million were enrolled in Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance

Program (CHIP).

These numbers continue to increase and something must be done about it which is exactly why

the President introduced and signed this executive order.

By focusing on creating more opportunities for Americans to work it will lead to more

income in their pockets and less of a need for governmental assistance programs.

That means they'll be less likely to vote Democrat.

This is what provides people a pathway to financial freedom and the middle class and

that is what this administration is all about.

Especially given the fact the statistics from the U.S. Census Bureau indicate that 97 percent

of full-time workers eventually move out of poverty.

Share if you agree with this message of the President.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is

instead

promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends

and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> BREAKING Trump Signed His Latest Executive Order - Duration: 13:08.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING TRUMP CAPTURED HIM OVERNIGHT, HE'S IN CUSTODY – THIS IS HUGE! - Duration: 11:55.

BREAKING TRUMP CAPTURED HIM OVERNIGHT, HE'S IN CUSTODY – THIS IS HUGE!

President Donald Trump just scored a major victory when U.S. officials announced that

special operations forces have captured a key militant in the 2012 Benghazi attack on

a U.S. consulate that left four Americans dead.

CBS News reported that the suspect has been identified as Mustafa al-Imam, who was captured

in Libya and transported back to the U.S., where he is in the custody of the Department

of Justice.

President Trump released a statement saying that al-Imam will face justice for his alleged

role in the attack.

"To the families of these fallen heroes: I want you to know that your loved ones are

not forgotten, and they will never be forgotten," Trump said.

The Benghazi attack, which took place on September 11, 2012, killed Ambassador Chris Stevens,

U.S. State Department computer expert Sean Smith and CIA contractors Glen Doherty and

Tyrone Woods.

Stevens and Smith perished in the burning diplomatic outpost as American forces tried

to rescue them, while Doherty and Woods died eight hours later in a mortar attack on a

nearby CIA complex.

U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson released a statement saying that he was "deeply grateful"

to the U.S. military and the intelligence community for capturing the militant.

"Department of State family continues to mourn" the four Americans killed in the

attack and that officials "will spare no effort to ensure that justice is served,"

Tillerson said.

"I spoke with some of their family members to underscore the U.S. government's unwavering

support."

Hillary Clinton will undoubtedly be panicking about this, as she wants everyone to forget

that the Benghazi attack ever happened.

As Secretary of State, Clinton ignored Stevens' frequently pleas for help before the attack

took place.

She could have stopped the attack from taking place, yet she did nothing and let four Americans

die

on her watch.

For more infomation >> BREAKING TRUMP CAPTURED HIM OVERNIGHT, HE'S IN CUSTODY – THIS IS HUGE! - Duration: 11:55.

-------------------------------------------

Trump says he's 'unhappy' with U.S. Fed's interest rate hike - Duration: 0:47.

As the political firestorm over his summit with Putin continues, President Trump has

weighed in on his country's monetary policy.

In an interview with CNBC that was broadcast on Thursday, Trump said he was unhappy about

the Federal Reserve's interest rate hike amid his efforts to boost the economy.

"…..I'm not thrilled, because you know, we go up, and every time we go up, they want

to raise rates again, and I don't really, uh, I am not happy about it……"

His remarks break more than 20 years of White House tradition of steering clear of comments

on central bank policy and the value of the dollar.

The White House later issued a statement, saying Trump respects the Fed's independence

and is not interfering with its policy decisions.

For more infomation >> Trump says he's 'unhappy' with U.S. Fed's interest rate hike - Duration: 0:47.

-------------------------------------------

Trump, Brexit, World Cup - Duration: 4:53.

In a world where

society's tearing itself apart,

the very foundations of civilization are being questioned,

the rule of law is failing...

this summer, there's one team who seek the answers the world needs.

Welcome to British Rationals.

Why not go to North Korea? they said.

Write a puff piece for the Guardian they said.

It's been the worst summer holiday ever.

Welcome to British Rationals series four.

In a week when...

The controversial visit of controversial US president Donald Trump last week to the UK

proved so controversial I literally don't have time to talk about all the controversies that happened.

Then he went to Finland to meet Vladimir Putin.

I cannot believe he bad mouthed Theresa in the Sun newspaper!

Complete breach of protocol!

Only top Tories are allowed to backstab our Prime Minister.

I'm a teacher

so I have to separate children from their parents every single morning

but at least I know who to hand them back to at the end of the day.

See I quite like Donald Trump.

He's a man that does and says exactly what he wants.

He's a man that doesn't care if the world burns.

I quite respect that

even if he does look like one of my jobbies after a night on the Irn Bru.

You know the American establishment is outraged by Trump's performance and it's no surprise.

I mean if there's one thing that they hate more than racial equality,

women's reproductive rights, environmental standards and gun control

it's the Russians.

Trump and Putin they have much in common.

Trump he grabbed them by the pussy.

Putin, he grabbed them by the Pussy Riot

throw them in gulag.

Trump reckons Boris Johnson would make for a good PM.

Them two would resemble a grown-up Jedward running the world.

*bleep*

I'm not surprised Trump claimed his meeting with Putin would prove the easiest of the lot.

It's always a good idea to butter up your boss before your performance review.

In order to stave off a party revolt this week

Theresa May was forced to make a number of amendments to a Chequers white paper

which means we need to talk about Brexit.

Again.

Some say Brexit is not going to hurt

but Brexit hasn't happened yet.

It's like saying I have never broken my foot so I don't believe in pain.

All these snowflake Remainers are saying

"there's no plan!"

There is a plan!

No Deal.

I should be *bleep* happy

Boris Johnson has resigned.

You know what they say though

weebles wobble but they don't fall down

As an NHS nurse I'm glad they've at least come to an agreement on medicines.

I genuinely thought that we'd have to buy our supplies from this intimidating Scottish bloke

always hanging around the back of the hospital.

It's a load of pish.

I was due to make a killing!

Intimidating eh?

Not bad.

I tried teaching my students about Brexit

but none of its real.

Borders, tariffs it's all just man-made *bleep*

It's worse than teaching R.E.

Plus ca change,

plus c'est la meme chose

That's French.

Which will be banned after March.

Speaking of the French,

you may have noticed they won the World Cup on Sunday

and in typical football fans style,

they celebrated by smashing up Paris.

Just Fontaine would be proud.

Some people were concerned over Raheem Sterling having a tattoo of a gun.

If he ever gets a real one and goes on a shooting spree

just stand between two goal posts and you'll be fine.

I heard the England team got a new psychologist

to help them to not fear failure.

How's that working out for yer?

At least you don't have to lose in the Euros.

Brexit means Brexit no?

We had some parents invade the Year Four football match last year.

Mind you

they were protesting the price of the new school uniform

not the suppression of political freedom.

It's just as well England didn't win

there's not enough ambulances left in the country for the celebrations.

It's been an incredible summer of sport!

To be followed by an autumn of political drudgery.

If you've enjoyed this episode why not tell a friend?

Or subscribe to our YouTube channel or follow us everywhere @Britrationals

and join us next week for more British Rationals.

For more infomation >> Trump, Brexit, World Cup - Duration: 4:53.

-------------------------------------------

With A Flick Of His Pen, Trump Saves American Taxpayers $87 Billion - Duration: 9:54.

For more infomation >> With A Flick Of His Pen, Trump Saves American Taxpayers $87 Billion - Duration: 9:54.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Unloads During Fox Segment – Names The Trio That Betrayed America - Duration: 5:13.

For more infomation >> Trump Unloads During Fox Segment – Names The Trio That Betrayed America - Duration: 5:13.

-------------------------------------------

Pelosi: Who is Brett Kavanaugh, Trump's SCOTUS pick? - Duration: 21:48.

Democrats are absolutely desperate to stop the Senate from confirming

president Trump's extraordinarily well-qualified second nominee to the

Supreme Court judge Brett Kavanaugh who is currently serving with distinction on

the US Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Cavanaugh is a

brilliant jurist who successfully navigated the confirmation process

twelve years ago to get on the appellate court where he now serves and by all

accounts the judge is a dedicated father and husband respected and admired by

those he has worked for and fault with without even the slightest hint of

scandal in his background yet Democrats have declared war on president Trump's

nominee even though voters who elected Trump did so in part because he promised

to pick Supreme Court justices from a list of outstanding candidates that he

made public I'm going to fight this nomination with everything I've got

sending Minority Leader Chuck Schumer dn.y said recently flanked by ten

Democratic members of the Senate Judiciary Committee Schumer made it

clear that his party will do everything short of breaking the law to keep

Cavanaugh from taking the high court seat of retiring Justice Anthony Kennedy

but much to their frustration Democrats can't keep Kavanagh off the Supreme

Court with a frontal assault Republicans hold 51 seats in the 100 member Senate

and a handful of moderate Democrats up for re-election in November in states

that voted for Donald Trump in 2016 may vote with their GOP colleagues to

confirm Cavanaugh MBA pack chair Scott Bolden and former deputy independent

counsel Saleh Weissenberg debate video Democrats gear up for fight over

Kavanagh nomination fearing they don't have the votes to prevent Cavanaugh's

confirmation Democrats are developing a strategy of obstruction and delay this

strategy would block Cavanaugh his confirmation vote by making a patently

absurd demand for as many as several million pages of records from his

extensive government career as a Supreme Court Clerk an attorney on the

investigation that led to the impeachment of President Bill Clinton a

senior aide to President George W and an appeals court judge under this

plan Democrats would demand the release of every single record that might be

relevant to Cavanaugh including emails which could effectively push the

hearings and vote well past the November midterm elections when Democrats might

win majority control of the Senate and then be able to defeat Cavanaugh's

nomination Democrats may demand all documents relating to Cavanaugh's time

working on the Clinton whitewater investigation for Independent Counsel

Kenneth Starr but the nonpartisan National Archives has reported that

there are about 20,000 such documents in its possession and that it would take 22

months to five years to review and release them and responding to a lawsuit

by a public interest group under the Freedom of Information Act the George W

Bush Library and Museum has stated that fulfilling the group's demands for

documents about Cavanaugh's activities as a White House Counsel and staff

secretary would take 20 years and in any case would not include nearly 14,000

pages of materials exempted under law President Trump picks Brett Cavanaugh to

replace the retiring Justice Anthony Kennedy on the Supreme Court here's a

look at Trump's nominee video who is Brett Kavanaugh Trump's Coda's pick

delays of this magnitude are to use a legal term absolutely nuts before

yielding two demands for the review and release of hundreds of thousands or

perhaps millions of pages of documents Republican senators should demand that

their Democratic colleagues limit their demands to documents truly relevant to

judge in Cavanaugh's fitness if Democrats refuse Senate Majority Leader

Mitch McConnell r-ky would have grounds to schedule a timely vote before the

November midterm elections after all the object of the disclosure is not supposed

to be to delay and defeat a nomination but to permit the Senate to make a fully

informed judgment about the nominees merits if ten Democrats on the Judiciary

Committee tell the world that their minds are completely closed regarding a

nominee as they have done they are also saying that no amount of additional

information can change their minds Senate Democrats had plenty of time to

review this material in the three years yes three years

in which they held up Cavanaugh's nomination to the federal appeals court

in Washington another multi-year delay to review

Cavanaugh's nomination to the Supreme Court would be unjust and could set a

dangerous precedent that could leave seats on the High Court vacant for years

Democrats might also prompt a fight over executive privilege to further delay

matters as a White House aide Cavanaugh worked on matters of the highest

sensitivity as the Supreme Court recognized in the Watergate tapes case

the White House can claim an executive privilege the right to keep discussions

between the president and his advisors secret the Supreme Court said this right

of executive privilege would rise to its highest level if the subject involved

national security military and diplomatic affairs and law enforcement

but that other subjects might give way if the need of the other branches were

compelling enough Senate Democrats might try to delay a vote on Kavanagh so long

as the White House invokes executive privilege over Cavanaugh's work as an

aide the White House could extend a hand of cooperation by waiving its right of

executive privilege over all but the most sensitive national security and

military documents but the White House should also resist the temptation to

give up all of its rights because that could set a precedent that would tie the

hands of future presidents and would also discourage qualified candidates

with previous government service from becoming judges instead the White House

should stand firm that it will not produce the documents from Cavanaugh's

time as president george w bush's staff secretary when his job was essentially

to control the flow of memos and orders that require the president's personal

review and signature these documents would have little to do with Cavanaugh's

judicial views because he served as gatekeeper rather than author of the

documents he gave President Bush the Trump administration is not trying to

stonewall document production the Justice Department has told each of the

93 US attorneys nationwide to provide up to three staffers to review documents

relating to the Cavanagh nomination over the next few weeks this kind of effort

to speed up the release of documents requested by the soon at is

unprecedented senator Orrin Hatch Republican Utah a veteran of many

years on the Judiciary Committee hit exactly the right note yes hatch

acknowledged there is a lot a lot of documentation they are going to have to

disclose but at the same time hatch warned I think you can ask for too much

here is the bottom line whether Democrats like it not Donald Trump is

the duly elected president of the United States whether they like it or not

voters elected a Republican majority to the US Senate obstructing and paralyzing

the functioning of the u-s government including the supreme court is harmful

to our national interest and dangerous if democrats want to control who gets

seated on the Supreme Court they will need to get the American people to put

them back in charge of the Senate and elect a Democratic president joining me

now for reaction are two esteemed attorneys salt Weissenberg was the

deputy independent counsel during the investigations into Bill Clinton knows

Brett Kavanaugh and Scott Bolden is a Democrat and chair of the National Bar

Association political action committee great to see you um let's sit with you

Scott I think it's completely fair game for the Senate use their constitutional

responsibility seriously question Cavanaugh's judicial philosophy his

approach to the Constitution and ask him about past cases that's what you should

do in your process of reviewing these nominees but what you heard from Chuck

Schumer is something quite different he's now demanding contrary to what he

said one year ago one year and three months ago that nominees must say how

they're going to rule on certain hot-button cases or they're at all about

or their philosophies listen that's all about Obamacare this is all about

abortion or roe v-- wade and it's all about whether this justice this justice

nominee believes that the president can either be prosecuted or subpoenaed and

what-have-you these are not hot-button issues for the Democrats these are real

issues and when you take the gloves off and no Senate hearings if you look at

maybe the last five to ten that have been published or that we've seen you've

got non answers you've got questions that skirt the issue the Democrats

I think some Republicans are going to come out and say tell me what your

feelings or thoughts are on roe v-- wade when you went to the DC Circuit Cavan

justice Cavanaugh when he went to the DC Circuit he said he would follow a roe v

wade but that was a that was a mix because the problem that that is he was

going to the DC Circuit now he's going to be on a street forum' court why

shouldn't we be what I asked him his feelings on Rovio matter one Ruth Bader

Ginsburg got her confirmation hearing was very concerned about being asked

specific questions Chuck Schumer among many other Democrats when when we had a

Kagan up when we had Sotomayor up Democrat before he knew the place

okay just someplace shot and you're about to ship this court to the right

right I think you're wrong about that and a lot of conservatives are probably

not gonna be happy to hear this I think you guys ought to be really thinking

yourselves thank you thinking this president that he nominated someone like

Kevin who is who is he is to the right probably a little bit of Kennedy but the

idea that Brett Kavanaugh is going to like radically you know move to take the

first abortion case and overturn rose I don't see how undone violence and prior

opinions to all three of those areas the first thing but but here's the thing

when you use hysterics and what have you what about the justice crisis Network so

it's been ten million dollars to judicial million dollars thank you so

much and that's the best song why are the Democrats hysterical but the

justices network watching their flank that's why I made it makes sense maybe

you guys just want them to be you know unilateral disarmament yeah the left

wants Republicans to go into this confirmation fights all without offering

any defense of this candidate of this judicial nominee they have made this

about legislating from the bench because that's what they're that that's what

they want the court to do they want at the court to legislate new rights under

the Constitution that the framers never intended Richard Blumenthal I want to

share something with you saw that he said today I could not believe what I

was hearing in the snarly way that he said it let's watch judge Kavanagh

you don't belong in this building as a justice my colleagues should be a no on

this nominee unless judge Kavanaugh specifically commits that he will recuse

himself on any issues that involve president Trump's personal financial

dealings or this special counsel okay so explain that one for us please well

there's absolutely no basis for it there's no basis in ethics or history

for the concept that you can't rule on a case involving a president if he

happened to have appointed you now Rehnquist if you recall recused

himself from the Watergate tapes case but that's because he was a member of

the Nixon administration and a high official in the Justice Department but

it's just ridiculous and you're going to hear more of this kind of stuff and

you're right Laura really I've got no problem with people opposing a judicial

candidate because they oppose his constitutional philosophy or her

constitutional philosophy but the Democrats don't want to play that game

because then they would have to admit in public hearings that really they believe

the court should just enshrine their notion of progressivism

into the Constitution they really can't win an argument based on textualism and

originalism and so they have to come up with these phony issues and and that's

what you're gonna see and it's going to be very brutal and it's going to evolve

a lot of falsehoods and you know the Conservatives just have to Republicans

have to stay the course that's all else to it but so why shouldn't the Democrats

and the Republicans be even I asked about specific issues regarding his view

on roe v wade why shouldn't they be even asked about his views on immigration and

his prior cases that he's decided in the DC Circuit

that's not shenanigans that's doing real good cross-examination direct

examination to get a feel for what this next justice is going to be

that's not shenanigans at all that's real discussion to know what'll come

across Scott because Scott there's been a rule that's been followed for decades

that judicial candidates should not a pine on

something on a specific issue that may come before him or her and it's gone on

with both parties for at least the last 50 years and by the way I don't know a

lot of there's there's a lot of hypocrisy there's a lot of hypocrisy in

Washington but there's no area full of him more hypocrisy than judicial

selection as Laura pointed out when she quoted Schumer from judge Ginsburg

justice Ginsburg's nomination fight the party's totally changed positions

depending on whose ox is being gored about what you can ask now the fabulous

absolutely fair game it's absolutely fair game to get into questions of

judicial philosophy and you can find out a lot about a candidate when you do that

but it's not fair game to ask him how they're going to rule on what did judge

Cavanaugh say last night he said I will approach every case with an open mind an

independent view of the judiciary which i think is most people believe that's

what the court should be we don't want a court a Supreme Court that acts like

it's the super legislate legislature on these issues that Congress can't either

state state legislatures or the Congress can't get its act together on whether

it's immigration or any of these other social issues let those percolate up

through the states and be handled in due course you see after 45 years of Roe vs.

Wade the issue is not settled the country is still roiling over 50 million

babies being killed in the womb because of the sacrosanct right that was

emanating out of penumbra's in the Constitution that didn't work and I

think that's what the left wants to keep going didn't work I want to play one

more thing for you Scott though one more thing this was this was Feinstein on

Cavanaugh's view of the Second Amendment let's watch because the issue of gun

safety is so important to me I want to mention how extreme Cavanaugh's views

are in this area he argued in 2011 against Washington DC's ban because

weapons like AR 5th Dean's are in quote common use

Cavanaugh's views on the second amendment or straight out of the gun

lobby playbook again this is just this is the most why is the asshole way of

looking at case law do you know the case he's talking about the hello case yeah

okay do you know what Brett actually wrote in that case awareness my memory

but I've read the opinion several times okay he said our task is to apply the

Constitution we have the full screen and in precedence of the Supreme Court

regardless of whether the result is one we agree with as a matter of first

principles or policy that was the 2011 case following on from Heller he is

applying the Heller case he the fact that they're they don't like ar-15s

which are one of the most commonly owned guns in the United States long guns in

the United States that's fine California has rules against that but as a matter

of constitutional law Scott it's very different being than being a legislator

you conflate the issues no I think the branches of governor you I do too but

you conflate the issues in this regard if you're gonna be ruling on abortion

issues why should I not be able to ask you what are your professional feelings

or your thoughts on roe v wade what is your feelings don't matter as a judge

constitution matter okay his judicial philosophy so but already it's judicial

philosophy as well all I hear from those senators that they disagree with his

rulings why they disagree what his lower court rulings are writings of Ducks

that's all final word will he get confirmed yes or no do you think in the

end oh he'll definitely get confirmed but you know the real question about Roe

vs. Wade that he clearly can't be asked is I don't care what you thought about

Roe vs. Wade when it was decided in 1973 the question is whether or not it should

remain valid law if a case comes before the court and everyone would agree

that's just something you can't you can't ask somebody who's a judicial

nominee but I can't have to try to glean it from his writings right we got it we

can't prejudice future cases fantastic segment to both of you thank you so much

for thank you let's break this down with former law clerk to judge Cavanaugh and

also Justice Kennedy Justin Walker joins us that great to have you back with us

Justin thanks so much for having me all right so it's not just the abortion

issue I want to play a little bit more of what Minority Leader Nancy

Pelosi had to say today classes look some of the comments that justice

Kavanagh has made and others it is important to note that everything is at

risk roe v-- wade a woman's right to choose brown versus the Board of the

Education civil rights environmental issues gun safety the list goes on and

on all right so the positive there if you're supporting judge Cavanaugh she is

now referring to him as justice Cavanaugh but the downside there are all

of the things that are gonna go away including Brown v Board of Education

Justin oh my goodness you know I think it's important to put this mudslinging

in a little bit of perspective some of the very same groups that are

criticizing judge Cavanaugh right now they are out pro-choice America for

example criticized Ruth Bader Ginsburg when she was nominated to the court in

1993 they said she was insufficiently supportive of abortion rights number two

I think it's important to listen to people left right and center who were

open-minded and fair-minded about this just today President Obama's former

Solicitor General Don Verrilli called judge Cavanaugh a brilliant jurist and

the number three and finally I would point out for anyone who's wondering how

Judge Cavanaugh feels about precedents one of those presidents are Roe or any

other precedent just to read the book that he wrote along with twelve other

distinguished judges called the law of judicial precedents in which he says in

page after page and I'll tell you Shannon it's a thousand pages long he

says fidelity to precedent is important they should only be overturned in

extraordinary circumstances faithfulness to precedent encourages stability and

predictability and the rule of law yeah last time I looked around a thousand

page book it was law school and I don't think I'm gonna go back and read the

whole thing maybe some excerpts interesting though we've got a new Pew

poll out that talks about this idea of where people are with the Supreme Court

83% of people who responded said that they feel like it's the next person to

be chosen as either some what are very important to them they also said this

though about nominees being asked questions sixty-one percent of adults

overall said that if they're asked questions about hot-button issues like

issue like abortion they should have to answer those Justin what do you think

about that well that kind of answer by a just

judicial nominee would be somewhat unprecedented and I think many people

will consider to be unethical for a judge to prejudge a particular case or a

particular controversy until that judge has heard briefing from both sides and

argument and all those kinds of things so I expect that Judge Cavanaugh have

asked about specific cases will give the same response that Justice Ginsburg gave

Justice Breyer gave previous justices to the nominate and that is he can talk

about his approach to the law his general belief in the importance of

precedent his his desire to stick to the the text of a law and not impose his

personal ideology but I don't think it would be appropriate for him to say how

he would decide a certain case well there there's also a letter out today to

the Senate from more than 100 civil rights groups that have come together

and have said they are worried about his position on presidential power and

whether or not president should have to answer to criminal investigations while

they are in office they say that he lacks the requisite independence from

President Trump to serve as a much-needed check on his abuses of power

would he be an independent jurist judge Cavanaugh's 12-year record 300 opinions

demonstrate nothing but independence and fair-mindedness time and again he has

done what the law requires rather than imposing any kind of passion or

prejudice for a particular party and with response to that particular issue I

think it's important to look at what Judge Cavanaugh wrote he did not in any

way question the legality of an investigation very much like the kind of

investigation that Robert Moeller is conducting right now he wrote a law

review article about a legislative proposal but it was just that something

for Congress to consider not any kind of guidance about what courts should do and

those are two separate branches we should remind folks tonight all right

Justin Walker great to have you with us again

you

For more infomation >> Pelosi: Who is Brett Kavanaugh, Trump's SCOTUS pick? - Duration: 21:48.

-------------------------------------------

Lara Trump interviews Dinesh D'Souza on President Trump's Facebook Page - Duration: 1:09.

Trump: Dinesh, I'm so intrigued. This looks incredible.

Tell me about this film.

D'Souza: The movie is called "Death of a Nation." I'll have a book

of the same title coming out that week. It opens August 3 nationwide.

In a sense, the movie draws an analogy between Trump and Lincoln,

which may seem surprising, but I think the reason for it is that not since 1860

have the Democrats so fanatically refused to accept the result of a free election.

Also, the incivility of our environment today, the sheer savagery of it, I think Reagan,

had he lived now, would be really confused. Reagan lived in an era of gentleman's politics.

But one guy who would understand these roiled political waters is Lincoln,

because the political waters were even more roiled when he was running.

We draw, really, a lesson from Lincoln for President Trump, and show how

the Republican Party can live up to its own great tradition, the tradition of emancipation.

For more infomation >> Lara Trump interviews Dinesh D'Souza on President Trump's Facebook Page - Duration: 1:09.

-------------------------------------------

TRAITOR ALERT ,FIRST REPUBLICAN TO CALL FOR TRUMP IMPEACHMENT - Duration: 13:26.

TRAITOR ALERT ,FIRST REPUBLICAN TO CALL FOR TRUMP IMPEACHMENT

Why don't people see that the main reason why Hillary Clinton needed to win was to make

all of this stuff evaporate?

That is why she is fighting so hard to make President Donald J. Trump look bad.

By doing so, it provides a distraction from her crimes.

It is obvious that Russia became a concern to the left only because Hillary lost.

The Democrats along with some of the RINOs in Congress are afraid that they will get

exposed to what they did to hurt Trump and help Hillary win, so they blame Russia.

But, as we remember, Russia was given a "reset" button by Hillary and the Obama administration.

I wonder what changed so fast?

But even some treacherous Republicans jumped on that train and attacked President Trump!

Republican state representative Jason Villaballa (R-Dallas) published an op-ed in the Texas

Tribune this morning in which he became the first Republican lawmaker to publicly call

for Trump's impeachment.

You can read the full letter below.

In an open letter to Congress, State Rep. Jason Villalba wrote:

It's time to impeach the president

When I was ten years old, over a plate of rice, beans, and tortillas, I watched the

evening news in front of an old Emerson 19-inch tube TV.

On the screen was a man who looked like a grandpa, resembled the dad on "Father Knows

Best," and who spoke of a Shining City on the Hill — whatever that meant.

I didn't know who Ronald Reagan was at that time, but I knew he was an honorable man.

I knew that he cared for me and my family.

And I knew that even though I did not look like him, I wanted to be like him: fearless,

just, righteous — an American.

Ronald Reagan embodied for me what it meant to be a citizen of these great United States

of America.

We are a people who are strong yet compassionate, convicted yet tolerant, determined yet understanding.

I am a Republican today because of Ronald Reagan.

He instilled in me the principles that have guided my life, personally and politically.

I believe in fiscal conservatism, American exceptionalism, a moral rubric based on Judeo-Christian

values, and on a basic fealty to the essential standards set by our forefathers: truth, liberty,

self-sacrifice and basic goodness.

And yet, today, our own president of the United States mocks these basic tenets.

Since Donald J. Trump has been president, he alone has increased the national debt by

over $1 trillion.

Yes.

One trillion dollars.

The fastest any president in U.S. history has accrued that level of debt.

Our president has mocked and belittled our immigration laws, our intelligence agencies,

our foreign policy strategy and even the American people.

We have been called "stupid," "weak," "a joke" and "pathetic," all by our

own president.

Our president has reveled in sexually engaging with those actively trafficking in the pornography

industry and he has ridiculed those religious leaders who would deign to question him for

doing so.

He mocks and laughs at those Christians who would question him.

I was one of the only Republican elected officials in the country to plead with the American

voters to abandon this charlatan prior to his election.

For my transgressions, I was summarily unelected from the Texas Legislature.

I have no regrets.

I always do what I believe is right.

That is not politically expedient, but it helps me sleep at night.

But verily I say unto you today, if we do not stop this man now, today, over 500 days

into his presidency, we will be equally culpable in what he has planned for our great nation.

President Trump thinks you are a fool.

He believes you will never abandon him.

And he believes that there is almost nothing that he can do that would cause you to abandon

supporting him.

But what he doesn't know is that you are not a fool.

You, like me, are an American.

And no man will own your heart and mind like this president thinks he owns you.

Today is the day we take back our America.

Today is the day we say "NO" to anyone who revels in abusing those weaker than them

for political points.

Today is the day we stand up and fight for the American values that Reagan taught us:

truth, justice, peace, civility, comity and righteousness.

This is who we are.

Not the sordid, ugly, Trumpists who require anger and vitriol.

We have the clarity and focus to do what is right to make our communities better and stronger.

This is who we are — not the contorted caricature that the alt-right has created of us.

Today, we will stand with our better angels.

We will stand with those who seek to transcend the common detritus of the ordinary and become

citizens of that shining city on the hill that Reagan spoke of so long ago.

We are better than what this president suggests we are.

We eschew ugliness and divisiveness.

Donald J. Trump is no longer our leader.

It is time to push him into the ash bin of history.

Today, I ask you to impeach Trump.

A Republican lawmaker from Texas is calling for the impeachment of President Donald Trump

over his "treasonous" meeting with Russian leader Vladimir Putin, where Trump sided with

Russia over the U.S. intelligence community.

You can read his entire letter below.

In an open letter to Congress, State Rep. Jason Villalba wrote:

It's time to impeach the president

When I was ten years old, over a plate of rice, beans and tortillas, I watched the evening

news in front of an old Emerson 19-inch tube TV.

On the screen was a man who looked like a grandpa, resembled the dad on "Father Knows

Best," and who spoke of a Shining City on the Hill — whatever that meant.

I didn't know who Ronald Reagan was at that time, but I knew he was an honorable man.

I knew that he cared for me and my family.

And I knew that even though I did not look like him, I wanted to be like him: fearless,

just, righteous — an American.

Ronald Reagan embodied for me what it meant to be a citizen of these great United States

of America.

We are a people who are strong yet compassionate, convicted yet tolerant, determined yet understanding.

I am a Republican today because of Ronald Reagan.

He instilled in me the principles that have guided my life, personally and politically.

I believe in fiscal conservatism, American exceptionalism, a moral rubric based on Judeo-Christian

values, and on a basic fealty to the essential standards set by our forefathers: truth, liberty,

self-sacrifice and basic goodness.

And yet, today, our own president of the United States mocks these basic tenets.

Since Donald J. Trump has been president, he alone has increased the national debt by

over $1 trillion.

Yes.

One trillion dollars.

The fastest any president in U.S. history has accrued that level of debt.

Our president has mocked and belittled our immigration laws, our intelligence agencies,

our foreign policy strategy and even the American people.

We have been called "stupid," "weak," "a joke" and "pathetic," all by our

own president.

Our president has reveled in sexually engaging with those actively trafficking in the pornography

industry and he has ridiculed those religious leaders who would deign to question him for

doing so.

He mocks and laughs at those Christians who would question him.

I was one of the only Republican elected officials in the country to plead with the American

voters to abandon this charlatan prior to his election.

For my transgressions, I was summarily unelected from the Texas Legislature.

I have no regrets.

I always do what I believe is right.

That is not politically expedient, but it helps me sleep at night.

But verily I say unto you today, if we do not stop this man now, today, over 500 days

into his presidency, we will be equally culpable in what he has planned for our great nation.

President Trump thinks you are a fool.

He believes you will never abandon him.

And he believes that there is almost nothing that he can do that would cause you to abandon

supporting him.

But what he doesn't know is that you are not a fool.

You, like me, are an American.

And no man will own your heart and mind like this president thinks he owns you.

Today is the day we take back our America.

Today is the day we say "NO" to anyone who revels in abusing those weaker than them

for political points.

Today is the day we stand up and fight for the American values that Reagan taught us:

truth, justice, peace, civility, comity and righteousness.

This is who we are.

Not the sordid, ugly, Trumpists who require anger and vitriol.

We have the clarity and focus to do what is right to make our communities better and stronger.

This is who we are — not the contorted caricature that the alt-right has created of us.

Today, we will stand with our better angels.

We will stand with those who seek to transcend the common detritus of the ordinary and become

citizens of that shining city on the hill that Reagan spoke of so long ago.

We are better than what this president suggests we are.

We eschew ugliness and divisiveness.

Donald J. Trump is no longer our leader.

It is time to push him into the ash bin of history.

Today, I ask you to impeach Trump.

State Rep. Jason Villalba.

Trump and Putin is the beginning of the end of the deep state.

If you think the Democrats have behaved rabidly in the past, You ain't seen nothing yet.

Obama's entire presidency, especially the activities of his secretaries, are fixing

to get blown out of the water.

And this traitor is nothing more than a distraction!

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute

our content.

Please

take a

moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> TRAITOR ALERT ,FIRST REPUBLICAN TO CALL FOR TRUMP IMPEACHMENT - Duration: 13:26.

-------------------------------------------

Would a push to impeach Trump backfire against Democrats? - Duration: 15:37.

liberal lawmakers and pundits emboldened by bipartisan outrage over president

Trump's summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin have kicked up calls to

pursue impeachment indicating the issue quickly could become the next the missed

test for Democratic candidates the discussion follows the recent political

frenzy over calls to abolish immigration and customs enforcement i seee that

effort briefly served as a similar Loomis test in the wake of Trump's

zero-tolerance immigration policy that led to family separations at the

us-mexico border the gop-controlled house countered with a vote on a

resolution Wednesday expressing support Bryce effectively daring Democrats to go

on record opposing the agency the measure passed with a total of 133

Democratic representatives voted present amounting to a procedural refusal to

take a position despite weeks of heated anti-ice rhetoric from party leaders

abolish ice movement goes mainstream among top Democrats but we're abolishing

ice fizzled for now is a progressive cause the impeachment controversy could

have legs at the least it has forced Democratic leaders to confront and

carefully manage the pressure from the base Democrats abandon abolish ice

movement panel debates on the story House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer DMD on

Tuesday charged that President Trump's remarks inhale sinky were nothing short

of treason and marked the dark day in American history

Hoyer characterized impeachment though as a distraction while still keeping the

door open in the future there will be time enough to deal with other issues

and oversight of the president's performance when we take back control of

the House of Representatives he said Rep Eric sois well Democrat California a

member of the House Judiciary Committee toed the same line on Monday I think

that's premature at this point we should do all we can to make sure that he's

held accountable that we conduct the investigations the Republicans have been

unwilling to do sois well said in an interview with the

hill Walmart pulls impeach 45 clothing firm website aftermath

blowback if impeachment is the case he added it's because we found impenetrable

evidence that we take to the American people and will be accepted by both

Republicans and Democrats elsewhere the calls are getting louder Washington

Examiner editorial director Hugo Garden on president Trump's potential picks to

replace Justice Anthony Kennedy on the Supreme Court Trump taking on Democrats

and Democrats push for impeachment Obama's CIA director John Brennan Albert

endorsed impeachment when he tweeted Donald Trump's press conference

performance and hail sinky rises to and exceeds the threshold of high crimes and

misdemeanors and was nothing short of treasonous Ron fain with free speech for

people wrote in The Washington Post that while Trump's conduct might not try

stooge reason it might still be impeachment worthy regardless and

perhaps the most dramatic sign that the impeachment fight may go mainstream

Texas rep beta or Ark who is running to unseat GOP senator Ted Cruz in November

in the deep red pro Trump state has both advocated impeaching Trump and

downplayed the Democratic consequences of such an effort impeachment much like

an indictment shows that there is enough there for the case to proceed Roark said

this week and at this point there is certainly enough there for the case to

proceed Trump and his team have sought to manage and clean up after the rushes

summit controversy Trump sparked the biggest backlash for seeming to suggest

he accepts Vladimir Putin's denial of you s election meddling but he later

said he backs the US intelligence community conclusions and claimed he

must spoke during the joint press conference impeachment shows that there

is enough there for the case to proceed and there is certainly enough there for

the case to proceed rep beta or arc Democrat Texas for her part House

Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said that the Helsinki summit would increase calls

for impeachment perhaps in the country but said that in Congress we want to

stay focused on honoring our oath of office to protect and defend the

Constitution and our country dem fury over Trump's summit threatens to expose

party divisions the momentum in some quarters suggests though that trying to

remove from office is no longer an effort

relegated to the far left fringes of the party rep Maxine Waters Democrat

California for example has long advocated for Trump's impeachment

telling the California Democratic Party's annual convention in San Diego

in February that it's time to get ready for impeachment waters who came under

fire last month were openly advocating that anti-trump protesters comfort

administration officials in public had struggled to take the impeachment talk

mainstream however there are signs that the impeachment the missed test like the

ice wedge before it might ultimately falter as fractures in the party

prevents a unified and effective front from forming Rep Linda Sanchez Democrat

California the vice chair of the House Democratic caucus warned that discussing

impeachment is still premature we don't know all the facts yet Sanchez told

POLITICO this week and until the time that we do we can't make a decision on

whether or not impeachment is warranted freshman Rep Jackie Rosen who is seeking

Republican Dean Heller's seat in the Senate in November has treaded carefully

on the subject saying she wants to see her special counsel Robert Mueller's

investigation and ZUP Rosen issued a statement after the Helsinki summit

calling Trump's performance embarrassing but stopping short of calling for his

removal in what could be a replay of the abolish ice battle Republicans have

already shown a willingness to use that kind of measured wait-and-see approach

against Democrats who buck firebrands calls for more decisive action being

afraid of losing an election is no excuse for Jackie Rosen to hide where

she stands on impeachment Heller campaign spokesman Keith shiver said in

a statement last month pre-summit if she supports impeaching President Trump she

makes it President Trump at his New Jersey

Country Club this weekend where he will decide on his Supreme Court nominee with

the three finalists leading the pack the commander-in-chief giving a preview of

this monumental choice last night at a campaign style rally in Montana as you

know there's now a can see on the Supreme Court and if you

turn in Monday at nine o'clock I think you're going to be extremely happy here

now Hugo Garden Washington Examiner editorial director Hugo

there's much fanfare surrounding this nomination once we find out who the

nominee is and if you have any ideas among the three finalists please do

please tell us but how big of a fight is this gonna be with the Democrats over

this nominee it's an absolutely huge fight big and and it you know I can it's

going to be perhaps the biggest fight since the Clarence Thomas fight you know

really the the Democrats are in a reasonably strong position in that they

have the Republicans only have 51 votes in the Senate and if John McCain who is

obviously very ill it doesn't turn up to vote then the Democrats only have to

peel away one Republican vote in order to kill whoever is nominated

they were the Democrats want to inflict a defeat no matter which person the

president nominates but they have particular reasons for each and every

one of those I think the one that they most want to make sure does not get

nominated or gets defeated is Amy Barrett because she has become a

judicial star she would actually be the sort of brave choice because she would

undermine the Democrats suggestion and constant contention that the Republicans

and President Trump are sort of panty women and if she were on the court and a

case came up that allowed the restriction on Roe vs. Wade the abortion

law you know it would undermine the claim that it was just men who made this

decision so she'd be perhaps the brave choice I can't tell you which one of the

three however is is the most likely choice well with Amy Barrett during her

confirmation last year for the 7th US Circuit Court of Appeals she was

hammered on her stance on abortion because of her Catholic faith

and it just again that would be the the central line of attack from Democrats on

that but I will point out that Joe Donnelly Democrat Joe Donnelly a

Democrat up for reelection in the state of Indiana voted for as did joe Manchin

in West Virginia those being states that President Trump won during 2016 so there

is some political calculation in that there's a lot of political calculation

you're exactly right there are several Democrats who do not want to be seen to

be opposing a woman who have already voted for her and indeed some

Republicans like Susan Collins who is the particular target of a campaign by

Democratic organizations to kind of flip her against any nominee yeah you're

exactly right there's a lot of political calculation and the Democrats are also

weakened by the fact that their former majority leader basically got rid of the

filibuster and Mitch McConnell applied that to the Supreme Court so they they

have to the Republicans can get a nominee through on a majority vote

rather than having to face a filibuster so there's a lot of politics that goes

into this I it depends from now I think where the president Trump who generally

tries to make the dramatic and brave choice and which suggests to me that it

might be any bout if he feels that he has a better chance of getting say ray

Catholic through then perhaps but you know who is less well known less of a

star but nevertheless a solid conservative textualist then maybe you

know he would go for Catholic Hugo Steve Forbes is here hi Steve Forbes here in

terms of the politics you mentioned about the 51 Republicans but you alluded

to the fact there's several a lot of Democrats running in red states for

reelection this year how many of them are going to go against a popular choice

of President Trump one of the things about these three choices they've all

been through the fires of confirmation they know how to handle themselves

they're not going to embarrass themselves and so is it sounds like

McConnell thinks he can get this thing done before the next Supreme Court

session yes three or four Democrats they're going to have to vote for the

nominee presentable nominee with the tight reelection races coming up yeah I

think that's a pretty good best even the point you make is exactly right

you know it's going to be very difficult for people like Heidi Heitkamp Joe

Manchin and Donnelly - to go against somebody that they have voted for before

they also are also calculating okay if this nominee is going to get through why

do I want to be the person who votes in against her and that can be used against

me in my reelection campaign in a red state if there's a sense that someone's

going to get through you certainly don't want as the Democrats to stick your neck

out and get your head cut off at the next election if you go president Trump

moving on doing more from the president last night he was taken aim at Democrats

Maxine Waters and senator Elizabeth Warren in his speech last night listen

to this she is a low IQ individual Maxine Waters

I said it the other day hi I mean honestly she's somewhere in the mid 60s

I believe that Pocahontas I apologize to you - the fake Pocahontas I won't about

now even the Liberals are saying take a test take a test

how does Trump's branding of the Democratic Party or at least certain

members of that party help the GOP in November did the attacks help were heard

it's a difficult calculation they certainly helped President Trump he has

a very odd or unusual technique put it that way he both draws attention to the

people-to-people and belittles them at the same time diminishes me sort of you

know calling Elizabeth Warren Pocahontas is to make her looks more talking about

Maxine Waters and Elizabeth Warren's IQ you know in the 60s is to make them look

small it's meant to be very funny and a lot and obviously the audience there

finds it funny I don't know whether it helps or it hurts it's it's an

expression of contempt kind of humorous contempt and belittles his the Democrats

that worked for President Trump in 2016 whether that helps in 2018 for the

midterm elections it's a really difficult one to say do you do you think

Hyuga that the Democrats realized that people like Maxine Waters are perfect

for Donald Trump perfect foil puts the Democrats in a unfavorable position by

doing that kind of thing by the way if Pocahontas I don't know why

doesn't call her fake cojones but anyway maybe that will come next that'd be a

good line I'm perhaps he'll adopt that no Steve I think that yeah I think there

are some Democrats Nancy Pelosi being one of them who realized that Maxine

Waters in particular is an embarrassment you know she she makes ridiculous

suggestions and very extreme suggestions but frankly you know Elizabeth Warren

also talks in an extreme way but she that the base absolutely loves her so

there's this constant calculation about you know are these people who I think a

lot of sensible people a lot of people perhaps on this panel would regard as

somewhat ridiculous and embarrassing in what they say they do however gin up the

base and that's something the Democrats will fall under the trap of making

impeachment an issue if they do that's going to arouse the base of the GOP like

nothing if they think that's going to where this thing is going to be headed

is the extreme of the Democrat Party gonna fall into that trap it's going to

be a certainly want it I mean there's about a 70% support for impeachment in

in the base Nancy Pelosi was there when you know President Clinton was impeached

knows that there was a backlash in the 1998 in 1998 election against the

Republicans for that that the public in general does not like to see what is

clear sort of political move against a president that they elected so it would

backfire but it doesn't mean to say that with that kind of surge from the base

wanting it that it isn't going to happen I would if I had to bet I'd say it won't

happen and that the leadership will resist it but if they have gonna have to

push back very hard against base pressure here go great to see you very

much as well have a fantastic weekend and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi

has a warning for her fellow Democrats she says efforts to impeach President

Trump will hurt the party's chances to win in November impeachment is a very

serious matter that that happens it has to be a bipartisan initiative that could

discourage any discussion of impeachment on a political side I think it's a gift

to the Republicans about impeachment plus he also urging

Democrats to focus on the American people instead of the White House now

that actually is a good idea

you

No comments:

Post a Comment