Google photo QA: Trump news on Youtube May 20 2018

YUGE!!! Trump Just Unveiled A New Program That Will Turn Millions Of Democrats Into

Republicans

When President Trump was campaigning to the American people on why he would be the greatest

jobs president of all time, he meant what he said.

Millions of Americans are on food stamps thanks to the previously failed administrations.

Barack Obama will go down in history as the biggest welfare president of all time.

During Obama's reign of terror, food stamp claims rose 70 percent.

This means 47.6 MILLION Americans were on food stamps after either long miserable years

of the Obama presidency putting Barack Obama as the "Food Stamp President".

It's not racist when it's true.

Facts seem to slip the minds of liberals.

The Farm Bill known as Resolution 2, would actually make able-bodied adults ranging from

18-59 to work a minimum of twenty hours a week in order to keep receiving Food Stamps.

SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) provides food to people who can't afford

it, or are unable to work.

These new requirements would put Americans back to work, and get them off welfare for

good.

This would be another promise the President will keep.

1.2 MILLION Americans would discontinue using SNAP claims the CBO because they would be

able to work, and provide for their families.

This is a concept that Barack Obama and the rest of the liberal communists couldn't

seem to get inline with.

The constant push of welfare is what we call redistribution of wealth where we take from

the rich and give to the those who really don't need the money.

I'm not saying there aren't people out there that actually need the help, but many

are just lazy, and could actually get off their butts and go to work.

You will see millions of Democrats change their voter registration to vote Republican

after this happens.

The political shift will take place because people will finally start realizing that Republicans

are the only ones who offer REAL solutions to America's problems while Democrats inflate

ideas that only hurt America in the long run, and fits the bill to our next few generations.

An additional 400,000 could drop off the food stamp rolls over ten years because of a provision

in the bill that would close a loophole allowing individuals to qualify for food stamps without

meeting an "asset test," according to the CBO estimate.

But the number of people getting off food stamps could be more than what the CBO or

the House bill is projecting, according to House Agriculture Committee spokeswoman Rachel

Millard.

"They don't distinguish in their analysis who will come off due to the fact they have

found employment providing them enough money to no longer need SNAP, or those who have

chosen to remove themselves from the program due to the fact they haven't fulfilled the

work requirement, which can also be fulfilled through training," Millard told Breitbart

News Wednesday evening.

Millard added that the provision in the House bill causing 400,000 of the 1.6 million Americans

estimated to drop their SNAP benefits would close a loophole used under the Obama administration

called Broad Base Categorical Eligibility (BBCE).

Under BBCE, American households were eligible to receive SNAP benefits if they were authorized

to receive "a TANF-funded brochure" or "hotline number" without qualifying for

SNAP's income and asset thresholds.

However, the farm bill would still allow those who meet the "asset test" to receive benefits.

The idea of reforming the food stamp program has remained popular with the American public.

A Foundation for Government Accountability (FGA) survey published in April revealed that

more than 82 percent of Americans support the idea of food stamp recipients having to

meet work requirements.

The survey stated that 94 percent of Republicans and 71 percent of Democrats are in favor of

work requirements.

Some House Democrats, however, say the farm bill's cuts to SNAP are "unjust": –Breitbart.

"We should strengthen and #ProtectSNAP" screams socialism.

To "Strengthen" SNAP would actually mean raising taxes or taking away tax dollars from

one program to fund it.

That's unjust if you ask me.

This is the solution Democrats offer their voter base.

They promise them all these free programs in order to get their votes.

I've said in many articles before that Democrats known the only way they will be able to stay

in power is to pander to the people that want free stuff and keep promising more free stuff.

What they can't seem to understand is nothing is free.

Someone somewhere is paying for it.

That's not freedom, that's tyranny.

**Update**

The Farm Bill has been defeated.

A sweeping farm bill failed in the House on Friday in a blow to GOP leaders who were unable

to placate conservative lawmakers demanding commitments on immigration.

The House leadership put the bill on the floor gambling it would pass despite unanimous Democratic

opposition.

They negotiated with members of the conservative House Freedom Caucus up to the last minutes.

But their gamble failed.

The vote was 213 to 198, with 30 Republicans joined 183 Democrats in defeating the bill.

The outcome exposed what is becoming an all-out war within the House GOP over immigration.

The bill will come up again, though.

The current bill expires in September & the Senate is working on a new one.

Trump will eventually get his way & a new day will dawn in America.

For more infomation >> YUGE!!! Trump Just Unveiled A New Program That Will Turn Millions Of Democrats Into Republicans - Duration: 5:11.

-------------------------------------------

SUNDAY SMACKDOWN: Trump RIPS Mueller A New One As Witch Hunt Exceeds $20 Mil In Tax Dollars - Duration: 3:41.

For more infomation >> SUNDAY SMACKDOWN: Trump RIPS Mueller A New One As Witch Hunt Exceeds $20 Mil In Tax Dollars - Duration: 3:41.

-------------------------------------------

Kristin Gaspar Media take Trump's 'animals' comment out of context - Duration: 5:08.

all right the Homeland Security Secretary talking about comments alleged

come to the president referring to all illegal immigrants maybe all immigrants

period as animals when in fact he was talking about ms-13 members who are

violent ruthless and well animals the chairwoman of the San Diego County Board

of Supervisors Christian Gaspard was at that meeting with the president when he

made those comments and that was the group to which he was specifically

referring she joins me right now there's no mystery to this supervisor so are you

surprised so many media groups that pounced on this wrongly and generalized

about it wrongly that no matter what you'd think of the president he did not

say what they said he said the media owes us an apology in this case they

were in the very same room where I sat they knew the context of this and the

media was reckless using this to further a narrative that is absolutely false

everybody in that room including the media knew the president was referring

to ms-13 gang members the worst of the worst offenders out there that kill

people in public decapitate people murder for fun the to use the word

animals doesn't even begin to describe ms-13 gang members if anything the

president was soft using that term shame on the media for sharing this narrative

it didn't happen and by the way NBC's Chuck Todd you know

not one broom to give the president an easy time did agree with him on the

reference to ms-13 members for being just that but having said that I mean

III was hearing one discussion I don't even remember the network so if you'll

indulge me arisen where they were saying well that sounds like something Donald

Trump would say and not even thinking for a moment to to retract the comment

that was obviously wrong and and and misinterpreted and just say we botched

it people hear what they want to hear to the reality is watch the full tape you

will see exactly the context of this comment it's really

quite unfortunate you can see where the president feels the way he does calling

the media fake news if this is what he experiences on a daily basis I can

support what the president is feeling about the media you know I trained at

the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism Walter Cronkite was still alive he

shared stories about covering the war up in a plane a gun in one hand writing the

story in the other where half journalists like Walter Cronkite gone

well I mean I on this particularly show I mean they were clearly wrong I mean

not the president sometimes fake news is anything that's negative or nasty about

him so he wouldn't be the first president to get flummoxed by a media

that seems to go after him but this is the comment itself to which you refer

Crist and I think that's quite quite clear what he's talking about and we'll

talk about it right afterwards this from the president will be an ms-13 gang

member I know about if they don't we just passed certain threshold

I cannot tell ice about them we have people coming into the country of trying

to come in we're stopping a lot of them but we're taking people out of the

country you wouldn't believe how bad these people are these aren't people

these are animals and we're taking them out of the country at a level and at a

rate that's never happened before and because of the weak laws they come in

fast we get them we release them we get them again we bring them out it's crazy

you know of the reluctance to even identify ms-13 members any other way

is also kind of crazy isn't it Kristen absolutely it is and what the president

was referring to these weak sanctuary state laws that have been implemented by

the governor of California and across the country in other cities as well you

know they're placing back into our country 142 gang members California has

taken the brunt of it with nearly 90 gang members put right back into our

states you know in California we have a governor who has compromised the safety

of our residents it's put our sovereignty at as a nation

at risk we're fighting back against our own governor who's so soft on crime that

he's rolling out the welcome mat for ms-13 gang members it's entirely

unacceptable all right Kristen gasps well thank you for taking the time we

appreciate it

you

For more infomation >> Kristin Gaspar Media take Trump's 'animals' comment out of context - Duration: 5:08.

-------------------------------------------

BOMBSHELL Comey Had SECRET PROGRAM To Spy On Trump - Duration: 13:47.

BOMBSHELL Comey Had SECRET PROGRAM To Spy On Trump

After seeing a comprehensive report on the origins of the Russian investigation which

confirmed that a government informant met with Trump campaign advisors multiple times

President Donald Trump questioned if the Obama's FBI actually spied on his campaign back in

2016.

And the answer appears to be yes.

In an interview for "Fox & Friends" the head of the President's legal team, Rudy

Giuliani stated that if this is indeed true and Trump's campaign was indeed spied on

by the FBI then former FBI Director James Comey should be prosecuted to the fullest

extent of the law.

Guiliani's statements came on the one-year anniversary of the Special Counsel Robert

Mueller's Democrat-led the investigation which picked up right where the FBI left off.

The New York Times who was out to give an accounting Thursday of the original investigation

confirmed in the middle of their report that at least one government informant met several

times with Mr. Carter Page and George Papadopoulos.

Both of which were former Trump campaign advisers.

The NY Times report went on to detail how the probe, which was originally called "Crossfire

Hurricane" got started.

It also goes on to confirm that all this began during the final days of the FBI's investigation

into Hillary Clinton's private email server fiasco and that Comey's FBI used a secret

program to circumvent judicial approval in order to spy on the president.

Trending: South Korean President Drops a Bombshell on Trump!

Americans Can't Believe What He Said

Here is more on the program Comey used to spy on Candidate Trump via The Daily Wire:

"A report released by The New York Times on Wednesday revealed that the FBI, under

Director James Comey's leadership, used a secret program that does not require the

approval of a judge to gather phone records and "other documents" on Donald Trump's

presidential campaign.

The report also revealed that a government informant met several times with Trump campaign

officials, which validates a March 8, 2018 report from The Washington Post.

The New York Times reports:

The F.B.I. obtained phone records and other documents using national security letters

— a secret type of subpoena — officials said.

And at least one government informant met several times with Mr. Page and Mr. Papadopoulos,

current and former officials said.

That has become a politically contentious point, with Mr. Trump's allies questioning

whether the F.B.I. was spying on the Trump campaign or trying to entrap campaign officials.

National security letters (NSL) are secret orders that the FBI uses on a regular basis

to obtain sensitive electronic data and phone records.

The Intercept reports:

They are controversial in part because they carry the force of law but are created entirely

outside the judicial system: To issue one, an FBI official just needs to attest that

the information sought is relevant to a national security investigation.

The letters have also been criticized because they are shrouded in secrecy.

Companies that receive them are for the most part forbidden from notifying their customers

or the public.

The government has fought to keep even basic rules governing them secret.

Companies that receive NSLs might not be legally required to hand over the information demanded

by the FBI.

The Intercept continues:

The FBI's internal guidelines suggest that the bureau uses the letters to demand sensitive

information on email transactions — even though the Justice Department has specifically

advised the FBI that it does not have the authority to use the letters this way.

The documents also indicate that the FBI can use national security letters to surveil a

"community of interest" by obtaining information from a business about a customer and every

person that customer has contacted.

This is a controversial practice that the bureau once halted amid scrutiny.

But the documents reveal that a secretive unit that mines phone records can still initiate

such requests.

The most recent document on national security letter policy was made public on January 31,

2017, by The Intercept and reveals which FBI officials have the authority to sign NSLs.

The Director has delegated the authority to sign NSLs and to certify the nondisclosure

requirement to the following FBI officials:

Deputy Director Executive Assistant Director

Assistant EAD for the National Security Branch Assistant Directors and all DADs for CT, CI,

CyD, and the Weapons of Mass Destruction Directorate General Counsel

Deputy General Counsel for the National Security Law Branch

Assistant Directors in Charge in NY, LA, and D.C.

All Special Agents in Charge (SAC) The Electronic Communications Privacy Act

lists four types of information that the FBI is allowed to obtain using NSLs, as noted

by The Intercept:

Name of the owner of an account How long that person has owned it

The person's address Toll billing records, which reveal phone numbers

that are called and include the date, time, and length of each call

The Intercept further noted that lawyers with the Justice Department specifically stated

in 2008 that the FBI did not have the legal authority to demand that tech companies hand

over records beyond the four types listed, but "FBI agents may have expected that other

companies, especially small ones, would be too ignorant or weak to fight back."

This all came together as Fox News had previously reported that back in August 2017 at a Senate

testimony from Glenn Simpson who owns Fusion GPS had thought up the dossier.

At that time Simpson testified that former British spy and dossier author Christopher

Steele had confirmed to him that the FBI had intelligence from an "internal Trump campaign

source."

But it's not clear if the person Simpson referred to was the same person which has

been confirmed by

the

New York Times.

For more infomation >> BOMBSHELL Comey Had SECRET PROGRAM To Spy On Trump - Duration: 13:47.

-------------------------------------------

South Korean President Drops a Bombshell on Trump! Americans Can't Believe What He Said - Duration: 6:18.

South Korean President Drops a Bombshell on Trump!

Americans Can't Believe What He Said.

Over the past month, tensions with North Korea have drastically diminished.

Especially after North and South Korean leaders met with one another and broke bread over

dinner to celebrate the new era.

They both declared the end of the truce, the end of the Korean War.

Now the latest developments regarding this issue will be a little surprising.

While many people back home, specifically Democrats, would argue that President Trump

is a terrible President and that he is a danger to this country, the truth is the opposite.

Even the South Korean President said as much when he gave him credit for the recent de-escalation

in tensions between North and South Korea.

After meetings with North Korean leader Kim Jung Un, the South Korean President said the

following about President Trump,

"I give President Trump huge credit for bringing about the inter-Korean talks, and

I'd like to thank him for that."

The Conservative Post reported, "Moon insisted that it was precisely because

of Trump's willingness to commit the "full power" of American might to facing down

North Korea, and his propensity for sharing that commitment on Twitter, that these talks

were even possible.

Now, that's something to remember, because Democrats have been claiming for the past

year that Trump was nothing but a "warmonger" and that his threatening tweets would only

lead to disaster.

But, miracle of miracles, the very opposite has happened – Trump's threatening tweets

have brought PEACE to a region that has known only war (at least officially) for the past

50 YEARS."

This comes at the same time that a new United States Ambassador to South Korea has been

nominated.

Adm. Harry B. Harris Jr., who currently serves as the Commander of the U.S. Pacific Command

was officially nominated by the President.

He will be the Ambassador just in time for the President of South Korea's visit to

the United States in just a few short weeks.

Fox News reported,

"Harris, who currently resides in Hawaii with his wife, is "a highly decorated, combat

proven Naval officer with extensive knowledge, leadership, and geopolitical experiences in

the Indo-Pacific region," the statement said.

Over the course of 40 years, Harris has "served in every geographic combatant command region,"

it continued, and he has commanded the U.S. Pacific Fleet, the U.S. Sixth Fleet and VP-46,

among others.

Trump's announcement comes as he prepares to host the South Korean president on Tuesday,

marking the third summit for the leaders.

The schedule meeting "affirms the enduring strength" of the "alliance and deep friendship

between our two countries," the news release said.

Trump and Moon are expected to discuss the upcoming meeting between the U.S. and North

Korea, set to be held on June 12 in Singapore.

However, that meeting was recently called into question after North Korea threatened

to pull out of talks."

This is really good news.

It will be interesting to see how the new ambassador feels about the President's decision

to try and reduce the number of troops in South Korea.

Recent reports from high-level officials have indicated that President Trump wants this

done ahead of the high profile talks set forth with the South Korean and North Korean leaders.

"A statement released by the office of the South Korean President Friday also refuted

suggestions the US was considering a reduction in troop numbers.

According to the statement, an official at the US National Security Council told South

Korean National Security Adviser Chung Eui-yong the New York Times report was "not true

at all."

Chung had raised the issue Thursday night with Bolton in a phone call, an official familiar

with the conversation told CNN.

Bolton told Chung it was untrue that Trump is ordering plans to withdraw US troops, according

to the official.

The official also acknowledged that Trump has publicly expressed frustrations at the

cost and size of the US presence in South Korea and noted if the Korean War officially

comes to an end, there would have to be some sort of reduction.

The official said the troop withdrawal would not be on the table in talks with Kim, and

that Kim has not raised this as a possibility ahead of the summit.

When asked about the administration's current position on removing US troops from the Korean

Peninsula, a source close to the White House told CNN Thursday that it is viewed as something

that could possibly happen in the future but "not until long after the nukes are verifiably

gone."

"That is the position," the source said.

The source, who is familiar with the administration's internal discussions, added removing US troops

is not something currently being considered as a bargaining chip but as a possibility

should there be no need for them down the line.

According to the New York Times report, the officials would not say if Trump was seeking

options on a partial withdrawal or a full withdrawal, but said the latter was unlikely.

During a South Korean presidential briefing Wednesday, officials linked the presence of

US forces in South Korea to wider issues of peace and regional security.

"A peace treaty cannot be achieved between South Korea-North Korea or North Korea-United

States.

A peace treaty signifies an agreement to establish legal and systematic policies for the whole

Korean peninsula," the official said, referencing the pledge made by South Korean President

Moon Jae-in and Kim to bring a formal end to the Korean War, 65 years after hostilities

ceased.

"The status of the US forces was brought up from that relevance and I can reiterate

South Korean government's stance: we believe the US forces are needed to take a role of

a mediator in the region of tensions and military conflicts in other nations such as Japan and

China," they added."

Whatever the result may be it is clear that President Trump's policy with South Korea

and North Korea has been working.

He was able to achieve what no one else could prior to him in past administrations… the

end of the Korean War.

If the future is any indication of the past then it looks like negotiations with North

Korea will go well when they do sit down in the coming weeks.

what do you think about this?

Please Share this news and Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe

USA facts today.

For more infomation >> South Korean President Drops a Bombshell on Trump! Americans Can't Believe What He Said - Duration: 6:18.

-------------------------------------------

LOU DOBBS: GIULIANI-MUELLER WILL not indict the PRESIDENT TRUMP - Duration: 14:53.

special counsel robert muller will not seek an indictment against President

Trump presidential attorney Rudy Giuliani confirming to Fox News a

conversation that took place two weeks ago between the president's legal team

and Muller mower is bound by a Department of Justice guidance from 1999

that states a sitting president cannot be indicted end of story

well not quite joining us now Judicial Watch president tom Fitton Tom good to

have you with us this is a blockbuster statement from Rudy Giuliani even though

he told our White House chief correspondent John Roberts that he had

basically said that two weeks ago this is is it not a blockbuster well it is

because it suggests now the mauler operation is purely political with

respect to the president and looking at what the president did or did not do

because if he can't be indicted than what was is justice what's the Special

Counsel supposed to be doing other than writing a report for potential

impeachment well that's a political process as Justice Department shouldn't

be doing that and you know the president should stop cooperating with the special

counsel and should be shut down respect to the president in the least now the

only caveat there is he says if a president a sitting president can't be

indicted and my guess is there are anti-trump prosecutors on Muller's team

would like to see the president removed from office and then indicted so there's

still significant legal risk for the president from these anti-trump errs

targeting him through this out-of-control investigation these but

but preliminary what's there to do here if they're not going to indict them shut

it down yeah III think you're absolutely right in those anti-trump errs I had

best understand that no matter how vitriolic and how energized they are

there are millions tens of millions of pro-trump errs in this country who will

not stand for anymore political nonsense emanating from the center of the

the leftist minds in this country who just have been feasting on our judicial

system and the legal profession well and the other big news today is the New York

Times trying to get out ahead of the IG report Lou with confirmation that the

FBI and Justice Department were had taken the phone records of Trump

campaign officials through National Security Letters had a mole or spy close

to or in the campaign but despite all of that noise all that abuse it's 15 months

later however months later they still have no evidence of russia' collusion

again shut it down it's a well past time and the

congressional leadership needs to take ownership here Rosenstein needs to take

ownership and get this administration this justice warming back under control

you know it's embarrassing I have to tell you it's embarrassing I think to

this nation that the Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell this Speaker of

the House Paul Ryan the judiciary itself certainly the Supreme Court has a role

here just utter its voice the ABA left-wing as it is but Wall Street

corporate America all should be standing up for this president and standing

solidly against any further exploitation politically of what has been a just a

searing two years first almost a year investigation by the FBI of this

so-called Russian collusion then another year by the Special Counsel producing

nothing it is extraordinary the conflicts the nonsense that has been

produced it is it is nothing blessed than a farce you know Lou and I'm sure

you agree you know I was pretty darn critical of President Obama we sued that

administration hundreds of times we thought he exercised powers beyond his

constitutional role it just didn't occur to me that we'd have Criminal

Investigations targeting the president every time we didn't like what he did

what that's the approach now and it's like and it's and it's completely

outside the norms in terms of the rule of law

our constitutional republic the presidents got to be able to be

president here and if you don't like him in office and you think he's abused his

power then there's a political process for removing him either through

impeachment or through elections but the Justice Department investigating its own

president over things he did with respect to managing the Justice

Department is absurd and makes her as you point out makes our government look

like a joke yeah and it is the deep state is not a joke the left in this

country is not a joke nor is the business establishment the globalist

elites because they are arrayed with the National left-wing media against one

person one man the President of the United States and he has too few people

standing with him against the the onslaught and this serious just off

injustice that all of those forces represent arrayed against the

constitutionally elected leader of this nation I want to turn to the Senate

Judiciary Committee doing it again Senator Chuck Grassley releasing over

2,000 pages of documents on Donald Trump jr. following the the the lead of Dianne

Feinstein when she was vice chair of the committee releasing transcripts in it

all do you find anything surprising or compelling

they took a beating because they thought they might be some Clinton emails they

might want to let see get a hold of and the meeting was not about that and

nothing came of it there was no illegal collusion there was no evidence of

collusion there was no evidence anything went raw went on at that meeting other

than this Russian again associated with the Clinton DNC campaign vendor fusion

GPS wanted to lobby Don Trump jr. on this sanctions issue on behalf of her

Russian overlords what does that have to do with anything I and we've spent

millions and millions of dollars investigating this one meeting and while

they're still looking at it and there's evidence of no wrongdoing or criminality

at all and in very quickly we're out of time but

Senate Intel chair Richard Burr basically is turned over the

intelligence committee to Mark Warner I made a declaration today after huddling

with spy Chiefs former spy chiefs and without any any corroboration without

any statement of reason for their their claim that Vladimir Putin preferred

Donald Trump well that's straight out of the dossier that's straight out of the

Clinton DNC dossier anyone who thinks the deep State is just running the

executive branch it's well representative in the United States

Senate yeah unfortunately and we're well represented by Judicial Watch and your

time we appreciate it I'm fit good have you with us

up next Muller says he won't indict President Trump but that hasn't stopped

him from issuing another another round of subpoenas will tell you who he's

targeted next stay with us the Russia witch-hunt should have ended long ago

but guess what Robert Muller is expanding it even as the special counsel

is admitted that he cannot and will not indict President Trump

Robert Muller has issued two grand jury subpoenas those targeting Roger stones

Chiefs social media consultant the subpoenas request that Jason Sullivan

appear before a grand jury this Friday in DC where he will have to turn over

all documents and electronically stored information joining us now to assess all

of this legal analyst Greg Jarrod Fox legal analyst and author of the

brand-new book so brand new that it will not be published for a week or two you

can still little late can still put in your pre-order the Russia hoax the

illicit scheme to clear Hillary Clinton and frame Donald Trump available for a

pre-order and we are delighted to have you here good to be here let's start

with Rudy Giuliani's a blockbuster and not to overstate it but a blockbuster a

revelation that two weeks ago Muller told the president's legal team he will

not indict the president well you know Muller has finally grasped the obvious

it's been a long-standing rule at the Department of Justice you can't indict

the sitting president and she what a revelation he's actually gonna bide by a

rule you know that that's an important statement here because he has really not

abided by lots of rules oh yeah and the conflicts that he has just simply

ignored rather than react to it it's as if Republicans recused themselves when

there's a conflict or step back from a job or a post Democrats seem to go full

full on tilt I can teach an entire semester Law

School class on Professional Responsibility and just use Robert

Muller as an example he is saturated with conflicts of interest and for a man

who has such a reputation of integrity I seriously questioned his judgment or

lack thereof if you just look at the canons of ethics the rules of

Professional Responsibility seems to have violated a myriad of them in his

determination to stay on this case where he does not belong and at this point the

president is it too early for him to breathe a sigh of relief is it too early

for the legal team to start discussing with the Special Counsel the wind down

here yeah as long as there's a special counsel I'd be apprehensive just because

you never know what a guy like Muller will do and his team of hyper partisans

who appeared to be so rapidly anti-trump that I wouldn't trust them frankly there

are a couple of things here that give me pause about Giuliani's remarks about no

indictment of Trump one Nixon was an unindicted co-conspirator and Jerry Ford

pardoned who offered up Watergate yes who and Ford pardoned Nixon peremptorily

because he knew prosecutors were going to pretty soon indict Nixon as a

defendant so you worry about that aspect of the

other is when he read the special counsel regulations it calls for Muller

to issue a report I've always believed this was muck Mulder's goal issue a

report hedges and calls into question all he

has to do is one line say there may be some evidence that Trump might have

obstructed justice in his comments of Flynn and his firing have coming that

would be enough for Democrats to glom on to it and he final four articles of

impeachment not for Democrats Adam Schiff would if he found him absolutely

pure as the driven snow yeah uh Turley innocent in all regards Adam Schiff

would be out there screaming for his head but no these are louts Schiff is a

low-life ideologue who is just you know I mean he's he's bouncing along the

bottom of the swamp he's a bottom feeder for sure he's lost

all credibility by virtue of all of his vacuous claims that have come to nothing

he's he's proven nothing and you know Schiff is shift let's turn to if we may

they Senate Judiciary Committee dropping all of these pages from the top junior

yeah I you know if we look at all of this again there's nothing here right

there is nothing and yet they you know I think as big a problem as the Special

Counsel is and the deep state that is driving the Department of Justice and

the FBI obviously and beyond that in the intelligence community the the Craven

cowardice and opportunism of the leadership of the Republican Party in

the House and the Senate and I'm talking Ryan and I'm talking McConnell I the

absence of any voice in the legal profession standing up to say come to

your senses America this has got to end now yeah the longest time I felt like

The Lone Ranger I wrote article columns saying wait a minute what's wrong with a

meeting with a Russian in the Trump Tower the First Amendment protects it

and the Federal Campaign election act specifically permits it and I would

write where in the criminal codes does this constitute a crime call collusion

it doesn't and the pages released today prove it well

one thing the FBI the CIA the intelligence community wasn't they

weren't smart enough to stop Russian intervention they weren't smart enough

to detect it or to produce any evidence that would be helpful of collusion or in

any gate engagement and so that raises another question who are these so-called

spy masters I'm talking about clapper right and Brennan and call me why bother

why bother if you're in Congress even bring them forward because their

agencies failed altogether yeah - stop that intervention and to produce any

evidence of collusion or cooperation I mean it's just disgusting on that level

alone well like Adam Schiff clapper and Brennan have zero credibility they were

the instigators of the Russia hoax I think I think Senator Mark Warner really

thinks they're neat guys yeah place Warner there's another one there you go

Gregg Jarrett good to have you here really up next Congress turning to

President Trump to put an end to the Justice Department stonewalling we take

it up with congressman Ron De Santis here next they've got an idea and it's a

dog gun good one stay with us

you

For more infomation >> LOU DOBBS: GIULIANI-MUELLER WILL not indict the PRESIDENT TRUMP - Duration: 14:53.

-------------------------------------------

CONFIRMED: John Kerry Committed Treason… Should Trump Throw Him in Jail? - Duration: 4:49.

For more infomation >> CONFIRMED: John Kerry Committed Treason… Should Trump Throw Him in Jail? - Duration: 4:49.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump misspelled Melania Trump's name as 'Melanie' in a tweet on Saturday - Duration: 5:41.

For more infomation >> President Trump misspelled Melania Trump's name as 'Melanie' in a tweet on Saturday - Duration: 5:41.

-------------------------------------------

Feds Had Wiretap On Trump's Personal Lawyer - Duration: 11:51.

Feds Had Wiretap On Trump's Personal Lawyer

President Donald Trump's personal attorney Michael Cohen had a federal wiretap placed

on his phones weeks before his office was raided, MSNBC reports.

"What we know is federal investigators pursuant to a lawful court order warrant were able

to wiretap the phone lines of trump personal attorney Michael Cohen.

That this wiretap occurred several weeks before the now public search warrant that was executed

here in New York several weeks ago," NBCNews Tom Winter said Thursday.

Winter continued that at least one phone call between Cohen and the White House was recorded.

Trump railed against the raid after it was made public weeks earlier declaring "Attorney

client privilege is a dead."

Trump has been particularly incensed with the investigation into Cohen because the material

with which it began was found by special counsel Robert Mueller.

Trump and many of his allies note that any potential financial fraud by Cohen is far

outside the purview of Mueller's original mandate to investigate Russian interference

in the 2016 presidential election.

For more infomation >> Feds Had Wiretap On Trump's Personal Lawyer - Duration: 11:51.

-------------------------------------------

Trump is Gearing Up to Fulfill a HUGE - Duration: 17:43.

For more infomation >> Trump is Gearing Up to Fulfill a HUGE - Duration: 17:43.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Comes Forward, Exposes Obama's Treachery - Duration: 13:23.

Trump Comes Forward, Exposes Obama's Treachery

This is how you end a ridiculous witch hunt that has gone on too far: you expose the treachery

behind it for all to see.

Which is exactly what President Trump just did and Mueller and Obama and Comey and the

rest better hire lawyers.

Look, something stinks to high heaven here and the only ones really getting hurt are

the American people.

We voted against the establishment and for Trump because we wanted to shake things up

in DC.

The swamp was swallowing the entire country with its corruption and while we expected

the swamp to fight back, we never thought they would stoop this low.

From The Daily Mail:

President Donald Trump on Friday poured gasoline on an already roaring political bonfire, suggesting

he believes the FBI planted 'at least one' spy in his campaign in order to derail his

White Houe aspirations by ginning up a phony reason to criminally investigate him.

Giuliani said it 'would be the biggest scandal in the history of this town, at least involving

law enforcement,' if Trump's predecessor had weaponized federal law enforcement to

snoop on Trump's presidential campaign.

'I think we're going to have to look into whether we can challenge the legitimacy of

the entire investigation.

Maybe a special prosecutor, a special counsel, never should've been appointed,' he said.

'I'm shocked to hear that they put a spy in the campaign of a major party candidate

or maybe two spies.

And now I'm going through my brain, because you know I was a big part of that campaign

– I'm trying to figure out who was the spy.'

America needs to know right now what is really going on and we, not the creatures of the

swamp, will make the final decision on what really happened.

Release

the info, Mueller…

For more infomation >> Trump Comes Forward, Exposes Obama's Treachery - Duration: 13:23.

-------------------------------------------

How Trump and Melania Responded to - Duration: 13:42.

How Trump and Melania Responded to Royal Wedding Invite Snub is PURE CLASS

President Trump and First Lady Melania took the high road on not being invited to the

royal wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.

Instead of sending the traditional gift of a glass bowl, Trump and Melania will be making

a contribution to one of the 7 charities the royal couple has chosen.

From IJR

"President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump will be making a contribution to one

of the 7 charities the royal couple has designatedin lieu of gifts," White House deputy press

secretary Lindsay Walters shared with ABC reporter Meridith McGraw.

Traditionally, U.S. presidents have given members of the U.K.'s royal family bowls

as wedding presents, sparking rumors that the Trumps might send another gift in addition

to their charitable donation.

In fact, former President Ronald Reagan and former first lady Nancy Reagan gave Princess

Diana and Prince Charles a glass bowl for their wedding in 1981.

Meanwhile, former President Harry Truman gifted Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip a bowl

on their 1947 wedding day.

Although rumors had been swirling that former President Barack Obama and former first lady

Michelle Obama may get the royal inviteto Prince Harry's nuptials due to their recent

bonding, the prince and his bride decided against inviting political leaders.

"It has been decided that an official list of political leaders — both U.K. and international

— is not required for Prince Harry and Ms. Markle's wedding," Kensington Palace said

in a statement.

"Her Majesty's Government was consulted on this decision, which was taken by The Royal

Household."

"They are not commenting on individual guests being invited or not, but President and Mrs.

Obama will not be attending the wedding," a palace source added.

"But the couples look forward to seeing each other soon."

For more infomation >> How Trump and Melania Responded to - Duration: 13:42.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Secretly Slipped Away Alone While In - Duration: 18:13.

For more infomation >> Trump Secretly Slipped Away Alone While In - Duration: 18:13.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump Just Asked This Game-Changing Question That Could DESTROY the FBI and DOJ - Duration: 3:55.

For more infomation >> President Trump Just Asked This Game-Changing Question That Could DESTROY the FBI and DOJ - Duration: 3:55.

-------------------------------------------

Donald Trump nicht eingeladen: Das schenkt er Meghan & Harry - Duration: 2:38.

For more infomation >> Donald Trump nicht eingeladen: Das schenkt er Meghan & Harry - Duration: 2:38.

-------------------------------------------

Trump puts pressure on DOJ, FBI to release documents amid spying claims - Duration: 4:40.

For more infomation >> Trump puts pressure on DOJ, FBI to release documents amid spying claims - Duration: 4:40.

-------------------------------------------

Adam Schiff: Donald Trump Jr. Might Be A Mueller Target - Duration: 1:10.

stone's confederates are being

brought in, but someone needs to

do that investigation and

unfortunately we were not

permitted to.

>> I have to ask you about that,

I asked Mr. Stone if he was

preparing to be indicted and he

said he was prepared if that is

what came.

He wasn't saying whether he

expected it soon.

You're a former prosecutor.

It was interesting to us, there

were four people involved in

this investigation that have not

been interviewed by Bob Mueller.

Michael Cohen, Brad parscale,

the campaign manager for 2020,

by the way, Roger stone and the

president's son Donald Trump Jr.

As a former prosecutor why would

special counsel Bob Mueller,

someone who did not interview

somebody even though they appear

to be so important to an

investigation.

Explain why that would be the

case?

>> It could be one of two

reasons.

It could be that they're saving

the interviews, like the

interview with the president for

last after they've done the

groundwork.

It makes sense to find out all

you can before you bring in

certain key witnesses or it

could be that they're a target

of the investigation.

It is not something that you can

breathe easy about that you

haven't been called in.

Sometimes that might indicate

that you might be the target of

For more infomation >> Adam Schiff: Donald Trump Jr. Might Be A Mueller Target - Duration: 1:10.

-------------------------------------------

BOMBSHELL: Comey Had SECRET PROGRAM To Spy On Trump – They Found EVERYTHING! - Duration: 6:21.

BOMBSHELL: Comey Had SECRET PROGRAM To Spy On Trump – They Found EVERYTHING!

After seeing a comprehensive report on the origins of the Russian investigation which

confirmed that a government informant met with Trump campaign advisors multiple times

President Donald Trump questioned if the Obama's FBI actually spied on his campaign back in

2016.

And the answer appears to be yes.

In an interview for "Fox & Friends" the head of the President's legal team, Rudy

Giuliani stated that if this is indeed true and Trump's campaign was indeed spied on

by the FBI then former FBI Director James Comey should be prosecuted to the fullest

extent of the law.

Guiliani's statements came on the one-year anniversary of the Special Counsel Robert

Mueller's Democrat-led the investigation which picked up right where the FBI left off.

The New York Times who was out to give an accounting Thursday of the original investigation

confirmed in the middle of their report that at least one government informant met several

times with Mr. Carter Page and George Papadopoulos.

Both of which were former Trump campaign advisers.

The NY Times report went on to detail how the probe, which was originally called "Crossfire

Hurricane" got started.

It also goes on to confirm that all this began during the final days of the FBI's investigation

into Hillary Clinton's private email server fiasco and that Comey's FBI used a secret

program to circumvent judicial approval in order to spy on the president.

Here is more on the program Comey used to spy on Candidate Trump via The Daily Wire:

"A report released by The New York Times on Wednesday revealed that the FBI, under

Director James Comey's leadership, used a secret program that does not require the

approval of a judge to gather phone records and "other documents" on Donald Trump's

presidential campaign.

The report also revealed that a government informant met several times with Trump campaign

officials, which validates a March 8, 2018 report from The Washington Post.

The New York Times reports:

The F.B.I. obtained phone records and other documents using national security letters

— a secret type of subpoena — officials said.

And at least one government informant met several times with Mr. Page and Mr. Papadopoulos,

current and former officials said.

That has become a politically contentious point, with Mr. Trump's allies questioning

whether the F.B.I. was spying on the Trump campaign or trying to entrap campaign officials.

National security letters (NSL) are secret orders that the FBI uses on a regular basis

to obtain sensitive electronic data and phone records.

The Intercept reports:

They are controversial in part because they carry the force of law but are created entirely

outside the judicial system: To issue one, an FBI official just needs to attest that

the information sought is relevant to a national security investigation.

The letters have also been criticized because they are shrouded in secrecy.

Companies that receive them are for the most part forbidden from notifying their customers

or the public.

The government has fought to keep even basic rules governing them secret.

Companies that receive NSLs might not be legally required to hand over the information demanded

by the FBI.

The Intercept continues: The FBI's internal guidelines suggest that

the bureau uses the letters to demand sensitive information on email transactions — even

though the Justice Department has specifically advised the FBI that it does not have the

authority to use the letters this way.