SUBSCRIBE NOW TO WATCH MORE VIDEOS
-------------------------------------------
Meghan McCain Crushes ESPN's Anti-Trump Jemele Hill: Is Ben Carson A White Supremacist?(VIDEO)!!! - Duration: 6:55.Meghan McCain Crushes ESPN's Anti-Trump Jemele Hill: Is Ben Carson A White Supremacist?
please welcome ESPN's Jamel help here
for calling calling out the new guy in the White House over his response to the
rally in Charlottesville back in August since you're here tell us
what happened well like a lot of people I was feeling very emotional because
Charlotte feel that happened and I probably did what you shouldn't do when
you feel emotional a little angry is go to Twitter and I got into a dialogue
with a Twitter user and obviously everybody seen the tweets you know what
I've said and I did not expect in that moment that it was going to become what
it became I didn't expect everyone to be a hot topic and it just kind of
escalated from there so then it leads to I would see the president personally
calling me out in a tweet the White House calling or saying what I did was a
fireable offense so it was just it was a lot going on but were you just to clear
it up because there are some people that don't know what you tweeted you tweeted
well let the explanation finish what happened and then I can explain yeah no
I mean it that was really just the gist of it it's just being emotional going to
Twitter getting into back-and-forth and suddenly I became a walking thing peace
okay so you said Donald Trump is a Whites you tweet it Donald Trump is a
white supremacist who has largely surrounded himself with other white
supremacists yep and that was Charlotte's me right after Charlotte Wow
yes so that's what I said I was reacting responding in that moment so we've all
tweeted things and then myself included I've tweeted things in the heat of the
moment when I've been emotional it's something I've had to learn the hard way
not to do as I've grown in my career do you still stand by what you said and do
you think that President Trump supporters are white supremacists
I still stand by what I said I don't think that his supporters are white
supremacist what I would say though is that they have the privilege the benefit
of privilege to be able to distance and disassociate themselves from certain
issues me as a woman of color I feel vulnerable to certain behaviors certain
policies certain things that he said done and so all of that was part of that
response of feeling that vulnerability if it doesn't impact you directly or if
you don't feel that it's probably harder for you to understand it and so I just
asked those who do support him to understand that that perspective is
coming from that place it's not about calling you out necessarily it's about
the fact that in this time and in this moment it feels like people of color are
under attack
what would you say to a Ben Carson who's working in the administration is
obviously not white would you consider him a white supremacist no I mean I
wouldn't as I said I don't consider his supporters or every also just said you
stand by what you tweeted which is that he's surrounded by white supremacist but
I wasn't talking about Ben Carson I think we know the names that the
administration he does I didn't say he was surrounded by all everybody he was
surrounded by their whites or problem obviously Steve Ben and I can go down
the list of people who who have at very least played footsie with white
supremacist which would you do it again cuz I know
there was a second tweet that and we're friends yes you know there's second
tweet and you tweeted in October about the Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones who
indicated that players who protest during the national anthem would be told
not to play and you tweeted if you strongly reject what Jerry Jones said
the key is his advertisers don't place the burden squarely on the players and
you were suspended for that in two weeks would you do that again no I probably
wouldn't do that again I think and this is the problem with Twitter as we all
know Twitter is not a great place for nuance you know I wasn't specifically
calling for a boycott of the NFL or of Jerry Jones but I understand well how it
could be interpreted that way and no let's just be keep it 100 the my
employers in business with the NFL and some of those same advertises that Jerry
Jones has they also are advertisers of ESPN so I very much understood why I was
suspended it was not related to the Trump tweets it was more or less related
to that and and putting the company in a tough position you asked me you know
would I do it again and I would just do it a different way I wouldn't
to Twitter what I should have done especially because we were having all
these national conversations is gone to ESPN and asked if I could write a column
about it instead to kind of at least in a more widely you know with more breadth
and more depth explain my position yeah because what are you hundred forty
characters on what is the good thing about Twitter pray tell I think the
president tweets constantly and gets into trouble and then does crazy stuff
on Twitter you're getting in trouble people say crazy stuff you say you did
too oh I was younger what is the variance on that people continue to use
so because it seems like it's a destructive force rather than than a
constructive force so I I completely understand that viewpoint and there are
days where I wake up and I go to Twitter and I say oh my god the stupid people
have won you know however there are other times and other moments where
really amazing things happen like the Black Panther challenge that's an
amazing thing that started off as a social media engine and while I realize
it may not happen enough for your liking but there are positive interactions that
take place and I will say I reached out to you and all this going on personally
that by the way welcome because I also saw the stuff that you were on the
receiving end of I mean people were calling you the n-word they were calling
you the c-word it was started to think it was my middle
name yeah it was it was unbelievable to me the vitriol that you got for
basically giving your opinion much like we get how did you feel about that you
know unfortunately it's something I had to grow used to I'm sure you guys have
had to as well and I hate saying that we don't read it well but even still you
know it's out there you know it's out there right and so I hate to empower the
idiots that do it but you have to in this business to survive kind of have a
thick skin yeah you gotta have a very strict skin and you know you shouldn't
really read a lot of the tweets because what happens is people actually take
them to heart and start believing not yes and my question always is why would
you let somebody who doesn't know you affect you right that way because
they're they're they're mean and nasty so but you know you're here today we'll
be right back thank you god bless you and God bless america
-------------------------------------------
Breaking News 8PM | Donald Trump News 2/22/2018 - Duration: 43:35.-------------------------------------------
Before Meeting With Students About Guns, Trump Stops Everything & Gives 1 Man The Floor - Duration: 3:55.Before Meeting With Students About Guns, Trump Stops Everything & Gives 1 Man The Floor
President Donald Trump hosted high school students at the White House on Wednesday to
discuss guns and violence in American schools.
But before starting the meeting, he stopped everything in order to give one man the floor.
It was an absolutely breath-taking moment and a great example of why Trump is the perfect
leader to get us through this difficult time.
Throughout the day on Wednesday, students marched on the Florida state Capitol, calling
for tougher gun laws.
Hundreds of students from suburban Maryland also ditched school to attend a rally on Capitol
Hill before marching to the White House.
Meanwhile, President Donald Trump held a "listening session" for survivors of the mass shooting
at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, last week.
On Valentine's Day, 19-year-old gunman Nikolas Cruz stormed his former high school armed
with an AR-15, intent on murdering as many innocent people as possible.
He succeeded in killing seventeen, and he injured fourteen others, accomplishing his
goal of becoming a "professional school shooter."
In the wake of this tragic massacre, the nation has cried out for lawmakers to "do something"
to prevent more innocent lives from being lost at U.S. schools in the future.
The people need a leader to give them hope in these dire circumstances, and luckily,
Donald Trump has delivered.
President Trump held a listening session on Wednesday for some of the people affected
by last week's shooting in Parkland.
It was an emotional meeting, as students and parents alike aired their grievances.
As Trump entered the room, he made sure to shake each and every person's hand.
Then, he made sure the meeting started on the right foot by asking a pastor to lead
the entire group in prayer.
"I thought we would start off, pastor, if you could possibly say a prayer it would be
appreciated," said the president.
The entire room then fell silent as the pastor led everyone in a heartfelt prayer for the
seventeen victims of the shooting at Stoneman Douglas High School and others who have perished
due to gun violence.
Spilling out wrenching tales of lost lives and stolen security, students and parents
appealed to President Donald Trump on Wednesday to set politics aside and protect America's
school children from the scourge of gun violence.
Trump listened intently to the raw emotion and pledged action, including the possibility
of arming teachers.
What was dubbed a "listening session" turned into an expression of anguish and emotion.
[Source: CBS New York] Thankfully, President Donald Trump understands
what most on the left do not.
Now, more than ever, we need prayer.
As a nation, we need to turn back to the Christian roots our country was founded upon and reclaim
our moral compass.
We've tried taking God out of the equation and that hasn't worked.
Our society is more violent now than ever.
Indeed, we have removed God and guns from our schools, but are they any safer for it?
Certainly not.
In fact, at the rate school shootings are unfolding, you are quite literally gambling
with your child's life if you send them to school, where they essentially become a
sitting duck as soon as they walk through the doors.
President Donald Trump's idea to arm teachers is a good one.
Any would-be gunman would certainly think twice before storming a school if they knew
they were likely to be met with a barrage of bullets on the other side.
After all, a "gun-free zone" is like a neon welcome sign to a potential maniac.
Despite what those on the left would have you believe, these are the least safe places
around.
-------------------------------------------
Will Trump's Latest Attack on Obamacare Strike a Death Blow? - Duration: 7:15.GREG WILPERT: Welcome to The Real News Network.
I'm Greg Wilpert coming to you from Quito, Ecuador.
On Tuesday, the Trump administration took another step toward dismantling the Affordable
Care Act, or Obamacare as it is also known.
Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar announced that short-term insurance plans
would be expanded from three to 12 months.
Short-term plans do not need to follow all of the Obamacare requirements, such as covering
pre-existing conditions, mental health problems, maternity care, and addiction, for example.
Democratic lawmakers immediately rejected the new rule.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, for example, tweeted: "Since day one, the Trump
administration's playbook on healthcare has been to sabotage marketplaces, jack up costs
and premiums, and then offer junk insurance that fails to offer protections for those
with pre-existing conditions, coverage of essential health benefits, and more."
Trump administration officials, though, say that expanding short-term care will give consumers
more lower priced options for health insurance.
Joining me to discuss the latest change to Obamacare is Dean Baker.
Dean is senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research and is the author
of <i>Rigged: How Globalization and the Rules of the Modern Economy Were Structured to Make
the Rich Richer.</i> Welcome back, Dean.
DEAN BAKER: Thanks for having me on.
GREG WILPERT: So, first of all, what is the most important consequence, would you say,
of expanding short-term insurance coverage from three to 12 months?
DEAN BAKER: Well, these were less highly regulated policies and they're proposing to regulate
them even less than have previously been the case.
The original idea in the Obamacare plan as it was set up is that okay, people change
jobs, they move into a state, there are a lot of reasons why you might wanna be in a
plan for a short period of time and you need to be less concerned about that plan meeting
all the requirements of a longer term plan.
If it's three months, it may not be that big a deal.
This makes it 12 months and totally throws out ... or I shouldn't say totally ... throws
out many of the regulations put in the Obamacare, most importantly the one on pre-existing conditions.
So they could say, "Okay, we're only giving insurance to healthy people."
Or alternatively they could say, "Okay, if you have a health issue we'll give you insurance.
We're just gonna charge you $20,000 a year for it."
And the big issue here is that that fragments the market.
If I'm a healthy person, I have relatively few health needs, I could go ahead and get
a high deductible policy.
They'll sell that to me 'cause I'm a healthy person.
And what that means is the rest of the market is less healthy.
Those plans become more expensive.
That's exactly the world we were in pre-Obamacare when we had another 25 million people without
insurance.
GREG WILPERT: So what is the purpose though of short-term coverage anyway?
Shouldn't all people be covered as long as possible?
DEAN BAKER: Well, ideally they would be.
But again, someone may not wanna pay for a full year policy if they're only gonna be
in the state for three months, they're about to get a job that will give them insurance
through their employer.
There's all sorts of reasons why you might not want to sign up for a full year plan.
So the idea was that you could have plans that just fill the gap, a short-term gap.
GREG WILPERT: So the Trump administration though is saying that this policy change would
only affect between 100 and 200 thousand people and that this wouldn't be enough to impact
the premiums for those who have long-term health insurance plans.
What do you make of this argument that it's really not going to impact the market as you
said?
DEAN BAKER: Well, a couple points.
First off, if we're just looking at the market and the exchanges, that's only around 10 or
12 million people.
So even their 100-200,000 number, that's about 2% of that market.
But the other point is that that will grow through time.
So if we just say right now how many people that affects given the market today that number
may well be right.
But over time a lot of people will say, "Well, I'm relatively healthy.
I could get one of these short-term plans.
They'll give me a good rate because I'm in good health."
So telling me that this year will only affect 100-200,000, again that's probably a plausible
number.
But if we look out three, four, five years you're probably talking about a very, very
different world where you have a lot of relatively healthy people signing up for these plans.
They'll save money.
No doubt about it.
That's exactly the point.
GREG WILPERT: So, Republicans actually also eliminated the individual mandate which required
all U.S. citizens to have health insurance, and this was back in December, I believe.
Now, according to some reports, the Trump administration's even considering to expand
the short-term insurance beyond one year.
Now, what would you say is the cumulative effect of all of this?
Is this a death blow to Obamacare?
DEAN BAKER: Pretty much, yeah.
I mean, the key ... To my view, the key part of Obamacare was creating a unified insurance
market where anyone can get insurance regardless of their heath and this is destroying that.
So what this means is we'll be back to the world pre-Obamacare where, suppose you have
a heart condition, suppose you're a cancer survivor, you either won't be able to get
insurance at all or if you do have a company that's offering to sell you insurance, they're
gonna want 50, 60, 70,000 dollars a year.
That's what people paid or faced.
I mean not many people could afford to pay that.
But those were the sorts of premiums a person with a serious health condition would have
faced pre-Obamacare.
We're going to be back in that world.
And it's incredibly cynical, 'cause people in good health can get insurance.
That's nice.
But, of course, they aren't the people who really need it.
So as long as you don't really need insurance you'll be able to get it.
Great.
GREG WILPERT: So looking ahead, what do you think might be the longer term consequence
in terms of the possibilities of getting some kind of Medicare-for-All or a single-payer
system, considering that so many people are going to be negatively impacted by higher
premiums and lack of coverage?
DEAN BAKER: Well, I think the Democrats are already more involved and we saw that 17 Senate
Democrats were co-sponsoring the single-payer type plan or Medicare-for-All type plan that
Bernie Sanders was the lead sponsor of.
And I think this is just gonna lead to more support 'cause basically if you destroy Obamacare,
if you talk about saving it and preserving it and making it better, if you've destroyed
it well then that's no longer the starting point.
The question is where do you move from and I think we can talk about moving towards a
universal Medicare system.
I think it's very likely we'll have things like, say, lowering the Medicare age to maybe
60.
I don't know if we'll do that in a single year but we'll do that.
And having some sort of buy-in, a universal public option.
And other reforms like that that could hugely extend coverage even though, as I said, we're
not gonna get to universal Medicare all at one leap but we could certainly make a lot
of good progress.
And I think the Democrats will be emboldened to push that way given, really pretty outrageous
plan proposals on the Republican part.
GREG WILPERT: Okay.
Well, we'll leave it there for now as we continue to follow the development.
I was speaking to Dean Baker, senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research.
Thanks for having joined us again today, Dean.
DEAN BAKER: Thanks for having me on.
GREG WILPERT: And I'm Greg Wilpert for The Real News Network.
-------------------------------------------
Thời sự trong ngày 23/2/2018 - SÉT ĐÁNH NGANG TAI Donald Trump khi Bộ TƯ PHÁP KẾT TỘI hàng loạt E4U - Duration: 31:22.-------------------------------------------
Trump rectifica en Twitter su propuesta sobre armas | Noticiero | Telemundo - Duration: 3:32.-------------------------------------------
THỜI SỰ THẾ GIỚI mới nhất 23/2/2018 | DẤU HỎI LỚN về DONALD TRUMP | TIN TỨC THẾ GIỚI mới nhất LS. - Duration: 1:04:44.-------------------------------------------
Grieving Father To Trump: 'We As A Country Failed Our Children' - Duration: 2:22.-------------------------------------------
Trump Holds Listening Session With School Shooting Victims - Duration: 2:54.-------------------------------------------
Trump Announces New NRA Approved Gun Policy - Duration: 0:52.Now we know a lot of people are demanding action on gun control
But your president has
an amazing, brilliant counter proposal, okay?
How about instead we have...
A parade for guns!!!
In America we have the biggest guns!
The best guns! The most beautiful guns!
We all know the right to own an AR-15 trumps the right
for children NOT to be shot in schools, ok?
So why not have a parade
for the thing that we value more than human life?
Now if you excuse me
Instead I'm going to gun victims funerals
I'm gonna go play golf!
Pew! Pew!
-------------------------------------------
Trump's 'America First' effect behind GM's decision to shut local plant? - Duration: 3:52.We start our newscast with the current crisis unfolding in South Korea over General Motors'
decision to shut one of its production lines in the country.
With thousands of local jobs on the line,... top economic officials from the Korean government
are to meet behind closed doors this afternoon with GM representatives.
So we are going to take a closer look at the situation,... which some in Korea are warning
could be the start of a trend of big American companies moving back to the U.S. to stay
on the Trump administration's good side.
Shin Se-min reports.
It's known as the birthplace of the compact Chevy Cruze and the Orlando SUV.
GM arrived in Gunsan, a small seaside town on Korea's western coast, more than 20 years
ago,… bringing with it jobs and a fresh lease of life.
But today,...
General Motor's Gunsan plant is at the brink of closure,... following the U.S. automaker's
bombshell announcement that eye-watering losses were forcing it to turn the lights off.
Just how bad is it?
In the last three years since 2014,...
GM Korea posted net losses of one-point-eight billion U.S. dollars,... while only operating
at 20 percent of capacity.
Explaining its decision, GM pointed to mushrooming manufacturing costs linked to rising wages,
aggressive labor union activity and the depressed local sales.
"GM's decision to shut its loss-making unit in Gunsan, which employs some 2,000 workers,
could just be the first taste of what's to come.
The president of GM International has given another ominous deadline,.. saying the company
will make "some important decisions on next steps" by the end of February."
One of those steps,... offering a two-point-two billion dollar debt-for-equity swap,.. in
return for financial support from the Korean government.
Close consultations between the government and the automaker are taking place,.. with
officials from the finance ministry also scheduled for a session on Thursday with GM representatives.
The emergence of the GM crisis comes at a crunch time for South Korea and the U.S.,…
long-time allies both economically and diplomatically.
Trade friction between the two is clear to see following the Trump administration's imposition
of hefty safeguard duties on Korean products and Washington's desire to overhaul the South
Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement.
"This clearly reflects the Trump administration's policy of bringing jobs back to America.
I think this case could influence the trade policies of the two countries,... and even
be a model for other global firms doing business in Korea."
The expert says Trump, who is targeting blue-collar workers in the mid-terms, may highlight the
situation as an example of his efforts to bring jobs back to America, jobs that he says
have been lost over years of allowing American firms to up sticks to relocate overseas.
Looking to avoid this kind of situation happening again,... experts say South Korea must get
serious about creating favorable business conditions for foreign firms.
These could include stripping back regulations and loosening the grip of the country's powerful
trade unions.
However, such moves would likely meet resistance and even if they are passed, such reforms
are unlikely to bear fruit for a number of months -- too late to help the GM workers
in Gunsan who wonder what their future holds.
Shin Se-min, Arirang News.
-------------------------------------------
Trump's solution to prevent US school shootings: 'Arm teachers' - Duration: 0:31.The coach was very brave,
He saved a lot of lives, I suspect,
but if he had a firearm
he wouldn't had a run,
he would have shot and that would have been the end of it.
And this would only be obviously for people that are very adept at handling a gun,
and it would be it's called "concealed carry",
where a teacher would have a concealed gun on them,
they'd go for special training,
and they would be there
and you would no longer have a gun-free zone.
-------------------------------------------
Trump Fires All Of His Motorcade Van Drivers After Secret Service Makes Shocking Discovery - Duration: 22:49.-------------------------------------------
Trump Endorses Raising Age On Buying Certain Weapons - Duration: 1:18.-------------------------------------------
Stephen Points Out Obama's Parting Gift To Trump - Duration: 4:14.-------------------------------------------
First Lady Melania Trump Visits Children at The Children's Inn at NIH - Duration: 0:45.(music playing)
-------------------------------------------
TRUMP TWEET STORM President Trump Takes on Obama for Not Taking - Duration: 2:02.TRUMP
TWEET STORM: President Trump Takes on Obama for Not Taking Action Against Russian Election
Interference
President Trump cut loose on Twitter again on Tuesday morning.
The Republican president went off on Barack Obama again, the Democrat Party and the far
left�s Russia collusion hoax.
Trump hit Barack Obama on his Russia policy.
President Trump thanked FOX and Friends for their coverage on Obama�s failures with
Russia.
President Trump then hit former President Obama for his famous quote on election integrity
before the election when Barack thought Hillary Clinton would win.
Hah!
President Trump: �There is no serious person out there who would suggest somehow that you
could even rig America�s elections, there�s no evidence that that has happened in the
past or that it will happen this time, and so I�d invite Mr. Trump to stop whining
and make his case to get votes.� The President Obama quote just before election.
That�s because he thought Crooked Hillary was going to win and he didn�t want to �rock
the boat.� When I easily won the Electoral College, the whole game changed and the Russian
excuse became the narrative of the Dems.
It�s so refreshing having a Republican leader who is not afraid of his own shadow.
No comments:
Post a Comment