Saturday, October 28, 2017

Trump news on Youtube Oct 28 2017

I was draft age during the Vietnam War, and as far as I was concerned, LBJ was the enemy.

I hated him, because I didn't agree with the war, and he could send me to my death.

It wasn't until I got older, and I matured, and I spent a ton of time in politics that

I really started to appreciate and understand what he was able to accomplish.

Had it not been for the Vietnam War, he would've been one of the, gone down as one of the great

presidents of all time.

Now, you can't take the Vietnam War away. It was there.

So it's like the tale of two presidencies.

I don't think he can learn anything, because he doesn't seem to want to learn.

To have the House and the Senate and the courts and the presidency, and not be able to move

your agenda forward is, it's like criminal.

Lyndon Johnson had to buck his own party to get the civil rights bill moved into law.

He did it.

He did what he needed to do to get things done, because more important than his presidency,

more important than his party, was the country, and doing something for the country.

I think many people in the country were lulled into a sense of complacency, that we felt

we were on a glide path.

I mean, you looked at Brown v. the Board of Education in '54, the Civil Rights Act in

'64, the Voting Rights Act in '65, Loving v. Virginia in '67.

And then we have the president of the United States, an African American, Barack Obama.

And so, there's a sense that we were on this kind of glide path.

And then along comes a guy who starts stoking this lie, this propaganda about delegitimizing

the president of the United States, saying he's not a real president because he wasn't

born here.

And all of a sudden, this undercurrent of racism starts bubbling up to the surface.

You know, the positive spin on Donald Trump is that he's unearthed all of this hatred

and bigotry, and it says to us we need to do a lot more work.

And I think we are moving towards that.

We are seeing the browning of America, and that's a good thing.

That's a good thing, because that means we'll become one.

But a lot of people are frightened of that, and they don't like that.

And that's one of the ways you can move an electorate.

You make them fearful of the other, and you exploit it.

And that's what happened in this last election.

For more infomation >> Rob Reiner on Trump: 'I don't think he can learn anything' - Duration: 3:03.

-------------------------------------------

Top Trump general swoops on North Korea border to STOP Kim Jong-un firing nukes - Duration: 4:35.

Top Trump general swoops on North Korea border to STOP Kim Jong-un firing nukes

Former US general James Mattis, secretary of defence, visited the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) today to demand Kim stands down from the brink of nuclear war.

In a rare and provocative move, Mattis, a retired US Marine Corps general, condemned the "threats posed" by Kim and his "oppressive regime".

North Korean provocations continue to threaten regional and world peace and despite unanimous condemnation by the United Nations Security Council they still proceed, Mattis said.

He accused the tyrant of depriving his citizens of "freedom", "welfare" and " human dignity" in the pursuit of nuclear weapons that could cause "catastrophe".

Standing beside his counterpart, South Korean defence minister Song Young-moo, he vowed to preside over the "denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula".

"We stand shoulder to shoulder with you and the Korean people in confronting the threats posed by the Kim Jong-un regime," he said as Young-moo watched on.

He noted the "stark difference" between North and South Korea, whose vibrant democracy and free society has allowed the country to thrive.

His highly unusual speech came after Pyongyang warned the world its threats to test a hydrogen bomb above ground should be taken "literally".

Speaking after Mattis, Young-moo described North Korea's missiles and nuclear bombs as "weapons that can't be used". If it does, it will face retaliation by the strong combined force of South Korea and the US, he said.

But striking a softer tone, Mattis said the Trump administration does not want conflict, saying: "Our goal is not war." Instead, Mattis said the aim is to carry out the "verifiable and irreversible" removal of nuclear weapons from the Korean peninsula.

North Korea has repeatedly frustrated the Trump presidency by testing nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles in defiance of international condemnation. Trump is due to make a highly anticipated visit to South Korea next month in a symbolic show of support.

The US President was also scheduled to tour the DMZ, but is now expected to abandon those plans, a White House official said this week.

Trump has previously threatened to "totally destroy" North Korea, whose sixth and largest nuclear test provoked fury across the globe.

But when asked about the trip at a press conference on Wednesday, Trump was coy, replying: "I'd rather not say, but you'll be surprised.".

Speaking to US and South Korea troops today, Mattis said the US is "doing everything" to find a diplomatic solution to the North Korea crisis.

However, he said "our diplomats have to be backed up by strong soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines". Meanwhile, the US has dispatched three nuclear-powered aircraft carriers to the region ahead of Trump's visit on November 7.

Warships USS Nimitz, USS Theodore Roosevelt and USS Ronald will take part in rare war drills planned to coincide with Trump's visit next month.

For more infomation >> Top Trump general swoops on North Korea border to STOP Kim Jong-un firing nukes - Duration: 4:35.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING: Trump 'unhappy' with government redactions to JFK files - Duration: 3:16.

For more infomation >> BREAKING: Trump 'unhappy' with government redactions to JFK files - Duration: 3:16.

-------------------------------------------

Sarah Huckabee Sanders says Trump's accusers are lying - Duration: 0:21.

release more details at that

point.

If not, before, he also spoke

with some senators during the

course of that meeting.

>> Obviously, sexual harassment

has been in the news, and some

women have accused the president

of sexually harassing them, the

For more infomation >> Sarah Huckabee Sanders says Trump's accusers are lying - Duration: 0:21.

-------------------------------------------

Some JFK Assassination Files Released; Trump Holds Back Others - Duration: 1:26.

For more infomation >> Some JFK Assassination Files Released; Trump Holds Back Others - Duration: 1:26.

-------------------------------------------

What does Trump KNOW? US President 'FURIOUS' about CIA and FBI changes to JFK files - Duration: 4:17.

What does Trump KNOW? US President 'FURIOUS' about CIA and FBI changes to JFK files

Researchers, journalists and conspiracy theorists were left fuming yesterday as the US withheld 300 files from the highly classified documents about the killing of John F. Kennedy.

The US President had assured all of nearly 3,000 documents would be opened to the public after 54-years. But around 10% of the files were held back as Trump caved to pressure from the the CIA and FBI.

The spy agencies have to be allowed to redact the files to protect spies and codenames – and requested more time to make the changes.

Trump has now reassured JFK conspiracists that "everything" will be opened – assuring they are being released "very carefully". However, he is reportedly unhappy with the level redactions according to a White House source.

"It really stinks to high heaven." Seb Gorka The US President has taken an interest in the files being released, and had said he would not block them being opened.

Conspiracy theorists believe the withheld documents may hold the juiciest information about the killing of JFK. Today, Trump tweeted: "JFK Files are being carefully released. In the end there will be great transparency.

"It is my hope to get just about everything to public. A source told CNN the US President was believes the agencies are "not meeting the spirit of the law and is fuming with the level of redactions.

Already revelations about the JFK killing have emerged as people around the world trawl through the once-classified documents. KGB sources claimed Vice President Lyndon Johnson was responsible for the killing, and the Russians suspected the shooting an attempt a coup.

Meanwhile, a British reporter was tipped off about big news"just 29 minutes before the assassination on November 22, 1963.

Former top Trump aide Seb Gorka said: There's only two reasons you would do that redaction right now, the reasons are you protect active operations or you protect sources and methods – neither of those can be true 50 years later – so what is it? "Something embarrassing.

It really stinks to high heaven.". Theories have long persisted there may be more to the story, including internal plots by the FBI and CIA, the Soviet Union and Cuba.

Officially, JFK was shot while riding in his open-topped motorcade in Dallas, Texas, by lone gunman Lee Harvey Oswald. Oswald is believed by some conspiracy theorists to be just a fall-guy for a wider plot to kill off the US President.

The gunman was killed himself by Jack Ruby while leaving a police station following his arrest in Dallas.

Other theories suggest there was a second shooter – with even a surgeon who treated JFK saying he believed there was another gunman. It likely even after the full release of the files, conspiracy theories will persist.

For more infomation >> What does Trump KNOW? US President 'FURIOUS' about CIA and FBI changes to JFK files - Duration: 4:17.

-------------------------------------------

Seth's Favorite Jokes of the Week: The President's Memory, Lou Dobb's Trump Interview - Duration: 1:38.

♪♪

-I'm Seth.

These are our favorite jokes of the week.

Fox News host, Lou Dobbs, interviewed President Trump

last night and told Trump he is "one of the most loved

and respected Presidents in history."

I don't know about that,

but he's definitely in the top 45.

President Trump today claimed he has a better recollection

of his condolence call to the widow of the soldier

than she does, pointing to his head and saying,

"One of the great memories of all time."

Trump then added, "If you don't believe me,

ask my wife, Melatonin."

A new poll has found that 51% of Democrats

now have a favorable view

of former President George W. Bush.

And that makes sense. I'd also have a favorable view

of the flu if I suddenly found myself with the plague.

A protestor posing as a journalist threw Russian flags

at President Trump as he arrived at the Capitol today.

And this is weird -- Trump signed them and threw them back.

Red Lobster announced today that it will start delivering

its food in New York City through a partnership

with Grubhub, because if there's one thing

that will make discount seafood even better,

it's 20 minutes on the back of a bike.

[ Laughter ]

[ Cheers and applause ]

For more infomation >> Seth's Favorite Jokes of the Week: The President's Memory, Lou Dobb's Trump Interview - Duration: 1:38.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's Opioid Announcement Will Do Literally Nothing To Solve The Crisis - Duration: 4:26.

On Thursday, after months of saying he was going to do this, this is actually something

he was supposed to do about six months ago, Donald Trump finally decided to declare a

national health emergency over the opioid crisis here in the United States.

That's great that he decided to finally do that.

After all, 175 people are dying every single day in the United States as a result of overdoses

on prescription opioids.

However, his declaration of a national emergency literally does nothing to solve the problem.

Currently, the fund that is set up to help deal with this crisis, the amount of money

in that fund stands at $57,000, which is about $7,000 short of being able to give everyone

in this country, their families, who have died of opioid overdose, $1,000 each.

We're not even to the point of funding where we could pay the victim's family $1,000 because

there's no money in the fund.

Trump's declaration of a national health emergency does nothing to increase that funding.

States can ask for more money, but they could literally do that anyway.

Donald Trump's announcement on Thursday was nothing but fluff, nothing but "Look at me,

look how great I am, look how serious I'm taking this issue that I told you I was going

to act on six months ago."

It was a pathetic attempt by a failing president to act for a moment like he was some kind

of decent leader here in the United States.

Meanwhile, an opioid executive actually got hauled off to jail yesterday for the role

that he played in pushing doctors to prescribe more opioids.

That's how we solve this problem.

It's not just the manufacturers, it's the distributors, the people out there pushing

these pills on American citizens.

Declaring a national health emergency is great.

It raises awareness about it, but if you're not going to fund the program, if you're not

going to hold those responsible liable, then don't bother.

There are people, there are attorneys, there are lawyers, judges, law enforcement officers

and even doctors coming forward who are trying to hold the actual responsible parties responsible

for it.

That's why yesterday, in the midst of this grand announcement, nobody talked about the

fact that one of the distributing company owners went to jail, has been arrested, and

is now going to face a criminal trial for his role in pushing this.

This is as big, if not potentially bigger, than what happened with the tobacco lawsuits

in the 1990s.

Donald Trump is not taking this seriously enough.

The American public doesn't seem to understand how serious this crisis truly is.

Go look at some of the hardest-hit areas with this, Kentucky, West Virginia, Ohio, Illinois.

They understand what's going on and they know that President Trump's declaration is not

going to do anything to solve the problem.

We need real leaders with real ideas taking real action on this issue.

Right now, the only people who have that kind of persona, that kind of power, are the trial

lawyers that are trying to recover for the victims here and stop making states and cities

pay for the fact that drug company CEO's and distributor CEO's are pushing these pills,

killings hundreds of people a day, and sticking the cities and states with the cost of having

to care for those victims.

It's the lawyers out there that are working on that, not the Trump Administration, not

the Republicans in Congress and not Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price.

We have some real heroes out there in this story, but it's certainly not anyone within

the Trump Administration.

For more infomation >> Trump's Opioid Announcement Will Do Literally Nothing To Solve The Crisis - Duration: 4:26.

-------------------------------------------

What You Need To Know About The Trump JFK Release - Duration: 9:19.

Welcome back beautiful amazing human beings and ...

yeah let's talk about the secret government files ...

related to the assassination of former US President John F ...

Kennedy was going to be a very poor video that is going ...

to show you exactly how government works now before ...

we start I hate to say this well not really but I told you so I ...

told you this was going to happen right after US ...

president Donald Trump said he's going to release the long ...

blocked and classified JFK files will actually I'm partly ...

right because some documents were released last ...

night and in this video we are going to go over some of the ...

bigger Bombshells that were released in the documents ...

and of course we're going to the bigger story here which is ...

the cover-up which suggests to the American people that ...

the same shadowy figures deep State and intelligence ...

agencies that had a lot of power when JFK was in ...

charge are pretty much still running the show right now ...

now 6 days ago Donald Trump tweeted that he would ...

approve the release of all the JFK files which spurred a lot ...

of people to contact me personally and say hey.

Donald Trump is going against the Deep State and ...

intelligence agencies and then yesterday many people ...

including myself or on the computer refreshing the ...

government website waiting impatiently for these ...

documents to finally come out and then we found out he only ...

released some of them while keeping my portion still on ...

released to the public pending review ultimately blocking the ...

full release of these JFK documents after a last-minute ...

Push by the CIA Donald Trump been said quote I have ...

no choice then he said that there would be potentially ...

irreversible harm to National Security if all the records were ...

to come out now let me translate that for you when ...

Donald Trump says threat to National Security he ultimately ...

means we're covering up and lying to you than American ...

people so you don't find out how horrible the US ...

government is capable be he also tweeted today that the ...

JFK files are being carefully released and that in the end ...

there will be great transparency and then cool it ...

is my home. Just about everything to ...

public over 50 years with these documents in hand had ...

enough time to redact all the information that was quote a ...

threat to National Security but no they need more time so ...

we're definitely seeing an internal struggle here between ...

Donald Trump and the CIA with the CIA ultimately ...

deciding what the US president could release to the ...

American public even CNN anchor Jim Acosta said that ...

he asked the officials whether there were any signs of a ...

conspiracy in the secret JFK files and he said officials are ...

on call with reporters would not even comment so it is ...

very interesting that the intelligence agencies are ...

petrified that you will find out what they were up to 50 years ...

ago but some of the files were released last night they're ...

available on this website which will be available in the ...

description below so you could fact check everything ...

we're going to say moving forward in this video and then ...

to add a cherry on top of WikiLeaks has issued a hug.

$2,000 reward from the wits held at JFK documents.

Of course Donald Trump just block from the American ...

public know what these new documents coming out I think ...

it's clear that there is a massive cover-up happening ...

right now and we have to understand that these are ...

thousands of files that people are going through which will ...

take weeks to vet in order to get you all the information ...

from this latest data. But so far on the internet ...

these are the latest Bombshells that people found ...

out from these documents from these files we found out ...

that the former FBI director J Edgar Hoover said that the ...

public must believe that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone ...

and was the lone gunman that assassinated John F Kennedy ...

these documents show how the American government was ...

working to make sure that the American public was ...

convinced that Oswald was the lone gunman There's an ...

actual document that ends prematurely and is cut off and ...

censored right before a deposition that talks about ...

the. CIA being involved in the ...

assassination there's a document and closed talking ...

about how the Soviet Union was convinced that the JFK ...

assassination was a coup d'etat and that it was not a ...

single lone gunman that assassinated JFK the Russian ...

intelligence agency at the time was in possession of data ...

reporting to indict President Johnson vice president of JFK ...

who was reportedly responsible for the ...

assassination of John F Kennedy another major ...

bombshell which I think should be big news for everyone is ...

the fact that in these JFK files they have the lone gunman ...

Lee Harvey Oswald and his assassin that killed him Jack ...

Ruby meeting each other weeks before the ...

assassination of John F Kennedy detail and how they ...

went to Cuba together to supposedly cut sugar cane ...

and that they were discussing Big Bird saying that they were ...

overheard speaking in code right before the JFK ...

assassination and of course right before Jack Ruby.

Assassinated Lee Harvey Oswald the same Lee Harvey ...

Oswald who was speaking out and saying he was a patsy ...

and was saying that the government wasn't lying about ...

the assassination of JFK of course couldn't speak out any ...

longer because he was assassinated it went as well ...

by who were finding out was known to him before ...

everything and that was Jack Ruby the same Jack Ruby ...

who during his court proceedings for a fascinating ...

the quote lone gunman came out publicly and said worker ...

my motive. Manhattan.

Jack Ruby said he would testify if he was transfer.

And had protection in Washington DC which never ...

happened by the way better record also said.

Glass Broken anabaptist pointing the finger directly at ...

the person who took over the presidency Lyndon B Johnson ...

also in the documents we have a Surgeon General ...

report that talks about a second shooter being involved ...

during the assassination and even would older documents ...

we have evidence suggesting that Oswald the lone gunman ...

was actually trained by the CIA previously beforehand ...

which of course Jason bermas made a very important video ...

on this YouTube channel about specifically what the ...

exact a document that he wanted to come out from this ...

entire case which of course I did it you'll be able to click on ...

this video right after this one and I definitely recommend ...

you watch it and even outside of JFK's assassination we are ...

finding out even bigger Bombshells when it comes to ...

the cia's involvement with the US mainstream media as the ...

documents confirmed and talked about how there were ...

over 40 journalists who worked in the mainstream ...

media who are really undercover CIA.

Of course weren't working as journalists but really ...

propaganda outlets for this intelligence agency which ...

practice is information Warfare and this information ...

to guarantee that the American people will never ...

find out the truth of what the government is doing the ...

documents also talked about introducing a biological agent ...

to cause crop failure in Cuba and the importance of ...

covering it up and most importantly what you have to ...

note here is that this is the stuff that they are okay with ...

telling you now imagine the stuff that they're still keeping ...

secret from you it's still going to take weeks to find out the ...

whole truth behind all these documents and some of them ...

will never be released which of course adds more mystery ...

conspiracy theories and the rightful mistrust of government ...

clearly the government is still lying to you about the ...

assassination of John F Kennedy which means ...

essentially the same powers and institutions that covered ...

up this crime or still in charge today and this is why most ...

Americans don't be. The JFK official story and ...

they don't trust the government and now we're ...

just being Vindicated because we have every right to John F ...

Kennedy was a very powerful leader against the Federal ...

Reserve and the CIA and ultimately what happened to ...

him will never be Vindicated by the US government but it ...

can be in the hearts and minds of Americans if you ...

disagree with me let me know in the comments section ...

below I look forward to your comments and responding to a.

If you agree with me share this video and get it out there ...

to your friends and family members and most ...

importantly thank you for all you amazing human beings ...

who make this broadcast possible by going to we are ...

change.org ports donate and donating to us to keep us a ...

fully free Independent Media Outlet which unlike the CIA ...

controlled mainstream media we're willing to tell you things ...

that they of course want covered up against watching I love you.

For more infomation >> What You Need To Know About The Trump JFK Release - Duration: 9:19.

-------------------------------------------

I've Got Good News and Good News: Trump Forgets Twitter Password - Duration: 2:07.

For more infomation >> I've Got Good News and Good News: Trump Forgets Twitter Password - Duration: 2:07.

-------------------------------------------

Schoolhouse Trump, This Week in Words - Monologue - Duration: 4:58.

For more infomation >> Schoolhouse Trump, This Week in Words - Monologue - Duration: 4:58.

-------------------------------------------

Impeachment Ad Triggers Fox News Fans - Duration: 11:24.

>> BILLIONAIRE PHILANTHROPIST AND ACTIVIST TOM STEYER IS BACK WITH AN

AD CALLING FOR DONALD TRUMP'S IMPEACHMENT AND HE WANTED TO PUT ON

A PLACE WHERE HE KNEW THAT TRUMP WOULD SEE IT, AND SO OF COURSE HE

CHOSE FOX AND FRIENDS.

LET'S SEE WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE.

>> HE HAS BROUGHT US TO THE BRINK OF NUCLEUS WERE, OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE TO

THE FBI, AND IN DIRECT VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION HAS TAKEN MONEY

FROM FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS AND THREATENED TO SHUT DOWN NEWS

ORGANIZATIONS THAT REPORT THE TRUTH.

IF THAT ISN'T A CASE FOR IMPEACHMENT

AND REMOVING A DANGEROUS PRECEDENT,

THEN WHAT HAS OUR GOVERNMENT BECOME?

I AM TOM STEYER AND LIKE YOU I AM A

CITIZEN THAT WANTS TO DO SOMETHING.

IT IS WHY AM FINDING THIS EFFORT TO

RAISE OUR VOICES TOGETHER AND DEMAND

THAT ELECTED OFFICIALS TAKE A STAND ON IMPEACHMENT.

A REPUBLICAN

CONGRESS ONCE IMPEACHED A PRESIDENT

FOR FAR LESS AND TODAY PEOPLE IN CONGRESS AND HIS OWN ADMINISTRATION

KNOW THAT THIS PRESIDENT IS A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER WHO WAS MENTALLY

UNSTABLE AND ARMED WITH NUCLEAR WEAPONS.

AND THEY DO NOTHING.

JOIN

US AND TELL YOUR MEMBER OF CONGRESS THAT THEY HAVE A MORAL RESPONSE

ABILITY TO STOP DOING WHAT IS POLITICAL AND START DOING WHAT IS

RIGHT.

OUR COUNTRY DEPENDS ON IT.

>> IF YOU THOUGHT THE PRESIDENT MIGHT NOT HAVE SEEN THAT BECAUSE HE

WAS DOING SOME IMPORTANT GOVERNMENT STUFF, YOU HAVE NOT BEEN PAYING

ATTENTION THIS YEAR.

HE IMMEDIATELY TWEETED ABOUT IT.

IT IS A DIRECT

RESPONSE TO THE CHARGES ñ HE IS PUSHING FOR THAT AND IS I GUESS ABLE

TO.

I AM SURPRISED THAT FOX RAN THE AD IN THE FIRST PLACE.

I HAVE

RECENTLY READ THAT THERE AD REVENUE IS DOWN 17% SO IT IS POSSIBLE THAT

THEY CAN BE LESS CHOOSY ABOUT THE

ADS, BUT FOX AND FRIENDS IS A POPULAR SHOW I THINK.

SO THEY

DECIDED TO RUN THAT NOW FOX AND

FRIENDS, THEIR AUDIENCE WAS NOT HAPPY.

THERE WERE TWEETS AND

COMMENTS ON THE ARTICLE SAYING THAT THEY HAD BEEN TAKEN OVER BY COMMIES

AND JEWS.

AND THAT THEY WERE JUST IN IT FOR

THE MONEY.

IF THERE IS ANYONE

WHO HAS EARNED FOR BETTER OR WORSE PROTECTION FROM THE CHARGE THAT THEY

ARE NOT SUFFICIENTLY PRO-TRUMP, ISN'T IT FOX AND FRIENDS AT THIS

POINT?

THEY HAVEN'T DONE NOTHING BUT HELP AND PRAISE HIM FOR A YEAR BUT

THEY RUN THIS ONE AD AND PEOPLE ñ

>> I DON'T BELIEVE THEM ANYWAY.

THAT IS WHY THEY WERE ANGRY.

THEY WERE

PROBABLY LIKE THIS IS A BUBBLE, YOU

ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO ALLOW DIFFERENT VIEWPOINTS INTO THIS BUBBLE.

>> THERE ARE A LOT OF NEW RIGHT WING

CHANNELS.

NEWSMAX IS A 24 HOUR

CHANNEL, ALSO ONE AMERICA.

I WAS WATCHING IT YESTERDAY.

MAYBE THEY

ARE THE FRIENDS OF FOX AND FRIENDS?

IT MIGHT BE COOL IF THERE WAS A

CROSSOVER WITH THE ACTUAL SHOW

FRIENDS.

SOMEONE CAN WEB THAT TOGETHER.

LET'S HAVE STEVE DO SEE

DATING SOMEONE.

IF THEY ARE GOING TO KEEP PAYING OUT HOSTS OF SEXUAL

ASSAULTS AND HAVE TO SILENCE THEM.

YOU NEED THE MONEY, I GET IT.

BUT I

ACTUALLY THOUGHT THIS WAS A PRETTY

EFFECTIVE AD.

HE IS CALM, THOSE BLUE EYES, THOSE STEEL BLUE EYES STARING

AT YOU AS THE CAMERA JUST SLOWLY PANS IN.

I JUST THOUGHT THE

MESSAGING COULD HAVE BEEN DIFFERENT.

I THINK IT COULD HAVE BEEN JUST LIKE DONALD, SEEK THERAPY.

WE KNOW YOU

NEED HELP, WE WANT TO HELP YOU.

STEP DOWN BUDDY.

YOU CAN GOLF EVERY DAY.

>> I WANT TO GET TO TOM STEYER'S MESSAGE AS WELL.

I ASSUME HE MEANS

THE MONEY THAT HE PUTS INTO

ELECTIONS WHICH IS NOT TRUE EITHER.

ANYWAYS SO I THINK THE STEYER AD IS

SMART IN A LOT OF DIFFERENT WAYS.

IT WAS SMART TO RUN IT ON FOX AND

FRIENDS TO GET IT UNDER TRUMP'S SKIN

WHO THEY KNOW CANNOT HELP HIMSELF.

>>WHICH IS A TACTIC JOHN OLIVER HAS USED A COUPLE OF TIMES.

REALLY WELL

PLAYED, I THINK IT WAS SUPERSMART.

AND STEYER IS VERY WEALTHY, HE IS A

PROGRESSIVE AND IS NOT LOOKING TO

TAKE THE MONEY HE USES AND CREATE BENEFITS FOR HIMSELF LIKE TAX CUTS.

HE IS NOT ARGUING FOR THAT.

SO IT IS NOT OUT OF SELF INTEREST.

EXCEPT FOR

THE FACT THAT THE MAIN MONEY HE

SPENDS IS TO HELP THE FIGHT AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE.

I GUESS HE HAS A

CONFLICT OF INTEREST BECAUSE HE WANTS TO STAY ALIVE AND WANTS TO

HAVE GRANDKIDS ON HIS PLANET.

>> AND I PLAY DEVILS ADVOCATE?

I AGREE AND CERTAINLY HE IS FREE IF HE

WANTS TO PAY FOR AN AD.

CORPORATIONS DO IT ALL THE TIME.

BUT IT DOES MAKE

ME A LITTLE UNCOMFORTABLE THAT WE HAVE THIS CLASS OF PEOPLE, SOME OF

THEM ARE PROGRESSIVES WHO ARE SO WEALTHY THAT THEY CAN UNILATERALLY

JUST PRODUCE THESE POLITICAL ADS.

I DON'T KNOW IF IT IS EVEN ACCURATE,

BUT IT IS JUST MORE ADVERTISING COMING FROM THE DIRECT POINT OF VIEW

OF A BILLIONAIRE.

I AGREE WITH THIS

ONE, BUT THEY COULD BUY OUT ALL THE ADS.

>> YEAH, BILLIONAIRE VERSUS BILLIONAIRE.

BECAUSE OF THAT

SUBTITLE IN THE COMMERCIAL WE KNOW

HE IS AN AMERICAN CITIZEN SO ñ THAT WAS MY FAVORITE PART.

I JUST LOVE

THAT.

>> LETS BE BALANCED HERE AND JOIN THE FRAY OF SLIGHT CRITICISMS HERE.

ONE IS AMERICAN CITIZEN LOOKED REALLY GOOFY.

TOTALLY AGREE.

HE

COULD'VE WRITTEN HOMO SAPIENS, HUMAN

BEING ñ WE KNOW.

IT'S A WAY OF SAYING NOT BILLIONAIRE, NOT RUNNING

FOR

OFFICE.

BUT LET'S KEEP IT REAL ONE DAY STEYER MIGHT RUN FOR OFFICE

BECAUSE HE IS A BILLIONAIRE.

IF HE'S GOING TO SIGN IT

RUN FOR OFFICE AND

A LOT OF PEOPLE SIGN THE PETITION

THEN GOOD.

OVERALL THERE IS NOT MANY PEOPLE DOING THE RIGHT THING.

IT IS

OKAY TO PUT HIS MESSAGE OUT.

IF HE WANTS TO SPEND ALL OF WHAT HE HAS ON

DOING GREAT THINGS INCLUDING THE MEDIA AND THE RIGHT ADS, I JUST WANT

TO PREVENT BILLIONAIRES FROM BEING ABLE TO BUY ELECTIONS.

BUT HERE

THERE IS NO ELECTION, HE IS NOT

TRYING TO INFLUENCE.

>>IT IS ISSUE ADVOCACY.

>> YES, AS OPPOSED TO VOTE FOR X NOT Y.

MY ONLY LAST TINY CRITICISM IS

SPEAK UP A LITTLE BIT.

>>I'M GLAD HE BROUGHT UP THE CRITICISM OF TRUMP'S

IRRESPONSIBILITY IN DEALING WITH

NORTH KOREA AND THE THREAT OF NUCLEAR WAR.

IT IS LIKE ñ TO ME IT

SEEMS LIKE THERE IS ALMOST NO ANTIWAR MOVEMENT GOING ON.

WHEN IT

COMES TO WAR IT IS LIKE THERE IS

ALMOST NOTHING GOING ON.

JUST SAYING NORTH KOREA IS EVIL ñ NOW THEY ARE

ALREADY TALKING ABOUT TACTICAL MOVES.

IT IS TERRIFYING.

I'M GLAD HE

THREW THAT IN THERE.

IT SEEMS LIKE THAT IS NOT EVEN A CONVERSATION

THESE DAYS.

>>HOPEFULLY HE SCARED PEOPLE ABOUT THE THREAT OF NUCLEAR WAR.

>> EVEN IF DONALD TRUMP IS NOT THERE AND IT IS BARACK OBAMA OR SOMEONE

WHO IS SEEN AS SAYING, MAYBE THEY SHOULD HAVE THE CAPACITY TO KILL

EVERY HUMAN THAT EXISTS.

>> WHAT I AM MOST CONCERNED ABOUT WHEN IT COMES TO TRUMP IS HIS MENTAL

STABILITY IN REGARDS TO NORTH KOREA PARTICULARLY.

IMPEACHMENT, THAT IS

FINE AND A GOOD STRATEGY.

I THINK THE 25TH AMENDMENT SHOULD BE

INCREDIBLY RARE BUT THIS MIGHT BE AN INSTANCE WHERE WE SHOULD CONSIDER

USING IT.

WE EVEN HAVE A PETITION ON THAT.

BECAUSE HE MIGHT NOT BE STABLE

ENOUGH TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

AND I THINK HE IS A LITTLE

DANGER TO THE WORLD.

AND I AM NOT THE ONLY ONE SAYING THAT NOW.

NOW WE

HAVE REPUBLICAN SENATORS LIKE BOB

CORKER, JEFF FLAKE ñ ALSO GEORGE W. BUSH MAKING SPEECHES ABOUT HOW HE IS

NOT STABLE.

>> AND THAT IS COMING FROM GEORGE W. BUSH.

ONE FINAL POINTS IN TERMS OF WHETHER THE PUBLIC MIGHT ACTUALLY TAKE TO

THIS MESSAGE-

For more infomation >> Impeachment Ad Triggers Fox News Fans - Duration: 11:24.

-------------------------------------------

This Week's Russia Round-Up - Duration: 5:04.

WELCOME TO "THE LATE SHOW."

I'M YOUR HOST, STEPHEN COLBERT.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH, CITIZEN.

WELL, AS YOU CAN TELL BY THE ENERGY IN THE ROOM, IT'S FRIDAY.

AND YOU KNOW WHAT WE SAY ON FRIDAY: "LIGHT FUSE AND GET AWAY

QUICKLY."

ONE THING WE LEARNED THIS WEEK IS THAT THERE IS NO MORE

REPUBLICAN PARTY.

IT BELONGS TO DONALD TRUMP.

THE G.O.P. IS NOW THE GROSS ORANGE PILE.

( APPLAUSE ) BECAUSE HE'S GOT THEM, RIGHT?

HE'S GOT THE BALLS IN A LITTLE FELT SACK IN HIS POCKET.

TRUMP HAS FORCED OUT ANY MEANINGFUL OPPOSITION, AND

EVERYBODY ELSE IS FALLING IN LINE LIKE FRIGHTENED DUCKLINGS.

AS TRUMP TWEETED YESTERDAY, "DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE UNITY

WITHIN THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!" AND I BELIEVE WE ACTUALLY HAVING

HIM SAYING IT ON FOOTAGE.

>> YOU UNDERESTIMATE THE.

>> UNITY.

>> OF THE DARK SIDE.

>> Stephen: BUT AMONG HIS ALLIES ARE OUR ENEMIES.

IT'S TIME FOR THIS WEEK'S RUSSIA ROUNDUP.

( APPLAUSE ) ♪ ♪ ♪

REMEMBER THE DOSSIER?

YOU GUYS REMEMBER THAT?

YEAH?

THE COLLECTION OF DIRT ON TRUMP'S RUSSIA CONNECTIONS?

WELL, IT'S IN THE NEWS AGAIN.

AND BEFORE YOU ASK-- NO, WE DON'T HAVE THE PEE-PEE TAPE.

YOU'LL KNOW WHEN WE DO.

( LAUGHTER ) IT WILL BE ON A LOOP.

BUT WE DID LEARN THIS WEEK THAT "THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN AND THE

D.N.C. PAID FOR THE RESEARCH THAT LED TO THE DOSSIER."

THAT IS A HUGE SCANDAL FOR OUR SITTING "NOT PRESIDENT."

SHE MIGHT BE UNPEACHED.

( LAUGHTER ) OF COURSE, DONALD TRUMP MADE A

BIG DEAL OF IT, RETWEETING A "FOX & FRIENDS" BULLETIN,

"CLINTON CAMPAIGN AND D.N.C.

PAID FOR RESEARCH THAT LED TO THE ANTI-TRUMP FAKE NEWS

DOSSIER.

THE VICTIM HERE IS THE PRESIDENT."

NO, NO, NO, SIR.

SIR, THE VICTIM, AS ALWAYS, IS THAT RUSSIAN MATTRESS.

YOU'RE FINE.

OKAY, SO THE DEMOCRATS PAID TO FIND DIRT ON THEIR OPPONENT,

AND THEY FOUND SOME.

AND HERE'S THE SCANDAL: THEY DIDN'T USE IT.

SHE LOST.

WHY DIDN'T YOU USE IT?

FORGET "STRONGER TOGETHER."

WHY WASN'T IT "STRONGER WITHOUT A RUSSIAN STOOGE WHO LOVES THE

PEE-PEE?" ( LAUGHTER )

( APPLAUSE ) AND-- IT'S GOT A RING TO IT.

IT'S GOT A "I LIKE IKE."

AND BEFORE THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN PAID A DIME, THIS OPPO RESEARCH

WAS ACTUALLY FUNDED BY AN UNKNOWN REPUBLICAN CLIENT DURING

THE G.O.P. PRIMARY.

NOW, WITH 17 REPUBLICANS RUNNING IN LAST YEAR'S PRIMARIES, IT

COULD HAVE BEEN ANYBODY-- JEB BUSH.

IT'S JEB BUSH.

( LAUGHTER ) NOW, TRUMP SUPPORTERS ARE NOW

TRYING TO CLAIM THAT CLINTON FUNDING THE DOSSIER PROVES

TRUMP'S INNOCENCE SOMEHOW.

FOX NEWS EVEN WROTE THIS HEADLINE: "TRUMP RIPS CLINTON,

D.N.C.-RUSSIA COLLUSION REPORTS."

NO!

NO, THEY DID NOT COLLUDE WITH RUSSIA.

IF THEY PAID TO FIND OUT THAT TRUMP CLIEWLDED WITH RUSSIA,

THAT'S NOT COLLUSION.

THAT'S LIKE RUNNING A HEADLINE THAT SAYS, "TRUMP RIPS AL ROKER

FOR COLLUDING WITH HUMIDITY."

( LAUGHTER ) ( APPLAUSE )

NOW-- HE SEEMED ANGRY.

HE SEEMED REALLY ANGRY RIGHT THERE.

NOW, ONE OF THE WAYS THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN IS ACCUSED OF COLLUDING

WITH THE RUSSIANS IS THAT THEY WANTED TO RELEASE DAMAGING

EMAILS WHICH WERE HACKED BY THE RUSSIANS AND GIVEN TO WIKILEAKS.

BUT THERE WAS NO INDICATION OF ANY OF THAT DURING THE CAMPAIGN,

RIGHT?

>> RUSSIA, IF YOU'RE LISTENING, I HOPE YOU'RE ABLE TO FIND THE

30,000 EMAILS THAT ARE MISSING.

>> Stephen: OKAY, THAT'S RUSSIA, BUT TRUMP NEVER SAID ANYTHING

ABOUT WIKILEAKS.

>> WIKILEAKS!

I LOVE WIKILEAKS.

OH, WE LOVE WIKILEAKS.

BOY, THEY HAVE REALLY WIKILEAKS!

BOY, I LOVE READING THOSE WIKILEAKS.

>> Stephen: OKAY, BUT THAT'S JUST LOCKER ROOM TALK.

THERE'S NO PROOF-- THERE'S ZERO PROOF THAT THEY TRIED TO TEAM UP

WITH JULIAN ASSANGE, OTHER THAN THIS:

"TRUMP DATA GURU: I TRIED TO TEAM UP WITH JULIAN ASSANGE."

BUT WHEN HE WAS ASKED ABOUT IT, WIKILEAKS FOUNDER AND MIKE PENCE

IN WITNESS PROTECTION, JULIAN ASSANGE, TWEETED, "I CAN CONFIRM

AN APPROACH-- PRIOR TO NOVEMBER LAST YEAR-- I CAN CONFIRM THAT

IT WAS REJECTED BY WIKILEAKS."

THAT'S RIGHT-- A FUGITIVE, WANTED BY THE C.I.A., TRAPPED IN

THE ECUADORIAN EMBASSY FOR FIVE YEARS, REJECTED AN OVERTURE FROM

WHAT COULD BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

"WHO'S THAT ON THE PHONE, DONALD TRUMP?

I'D RATHER GO TO GITMO."

For more infomation >> This Week's Russia Round-Up - Duration: 5:04.

-------------------------------------------

Shields and Brooks on Flake's Trump diatribe, confronting powerful men on sexual harassment - Duration: 14:01.

JUDY WOODRUFF: The rift in the Republican Party widened this week, as outgoing Senator

Jeff Flake of Arizona called on his party to stand up to President Trump, and House

Republicans aired their disagreements over a plan to overhaul the tax code.

That brings us to the analysis of Shields and Brooks.

That's syndicated columnist Mark Shields and New York Times columnist David Brooks.

And, gentlemen, welcome to both of you.

So, we have spent much of this week examining, talking about that stunning speech, David,

that Senator Jeff Flake of Arizona gave on the Senate floor this week, where he essentially

took on the president and challenged his colleagues.

Let's first just listen to a short excerpt of that.

SEN.

JEFF FLAKE (R), Arizona: We must never regard as normal the regular and casual undermining

of our democratic norms and ideals.

We must never meekly accept the daily sundering of our country, the personal attacks, the

threats against principles, freedoms and institution, the flagrant disregard for truth and decency,

the reckless provocations most often for the pettiest and most personal reasons, reasons

having nothing whatsoever to do with the fortunes of the people that we have been elected to

serve.

JUDY WOODRUFF: That was Jeff Flake on the Senate floor.

David, what change -- what effect has that speech had?

DAVID BROOKS: Well, it sounded like a call to arms at the moment, but it's pretty clear

it was Appomattox in reality.

What Flake made clear is that you can't survive a Republican primary if you don't sound like

Donald Trump.

And whether with Flake leaving, Corker leaving, McCain sort of in the end -- toward the end

of his career, the Republicans who want have a political viability have to be Trumpian.

And so what you have is most of the Republicans saying, I may not like this guy privately,

I may worry about this guy, but this is my guy, I am going to support him.

And so this was really the week, I thought, something atmospheric shifted and Donald Trump,

and Steve Bannon really took control of the Republican Party.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Mark?

MARK SHIELDS: Yes, I think David is absolutely right, Judy, that the Republican Party is

the wholly owned subsidiary of Donald Trump at this point.

And the polls show it that Republican voters rate Donald Trump off the boards in high marks

and actually give negative marks to Republicans in Congress.

So, the choice has been made, it would seem.

And I thought that when Jeff Flake said the fragrant disregard for truth and decency,

and then Bob Corker, senator from Tennessee's indictment as well, they aren't philosophical

difference.

I mean, Bob Corker obviously talked about the danger of World War �MDNM�III and

Donald Trump's not coherent leadership, but they're an indictment of character.

And that's -- but for the other Republicans to remain silent on that, if that's the question,

if character is the question, then they just say, oh, we just want to worry about our own

reelection.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Well, let me ask you about that, David, because Jeff Flake went on to

say to his fellow Republicans, our children are watching, and he asked -- he said, what

are we going to do about that?

What are we going to do when the next generation asks us, how did we respond at this time,

in other words, saying they are complicit.

DAVID BROOKS: You know, I had some conversations with some Republican senators who support

Donald Trump, by and large, and I guess their argument is, well, you know, I really believe

in this tax cut, he's for that, we can get some economic policy passed.

When his administration calls my office to say who they want to be deputy secretary and

this and that, and I give them a name, they hire the person, so I have been able to have

some influence on the administration in that way.

And I grant, for some conservatives, Trump offers something, and maybe the administration

is hiring a lot of their former staffers in a way they think is good and influential.

But I guess I would say, your priorities are messed up, that if you are supporting Donald

Trump because he will get you a tax bill you like, you're putting money above morals.

And the character and the morals of the country and the social fabric of the country are more

important than whether the tax rate is 39.6 or 35.4.

And so -- and I would ask them to think about that.

I guess when I do make that point, a lot of the things I find outrageous about Donald

Trump's behavior, they seem kind of distant and they treat those things as unimportant.

They put sort of a vast distance between them and some of the daily fights and dishonesties

that I think characterize a lot of this president's behavior.

JUDY WOODRUFF: So, Mark, are we talking about values here?

What does it come down to?

MARK SHIELDS: Well, I certainly think that's the way that Jeff Flake framed it.

It is a question of character.

It's destiny.

And I think the fact is, Judy, David mentioned tax cuts, and that's it.

That's the last stage out of Dodge for the Republicans.

They have failed at every turn in this Congress and in the Trump administration.

They have nothing to show.

They talk about Justice Gorsuch.

Fine.

But they really have nothing to show, no accomplishments with total Republican dominance of both the

Congress and the presidency.

So, this is it.

And this is the one thing that ties them together.

You know, it's shameless.

A party that talks so movingly about balancing the budget and not putting the burden on our

children and grandchildren, and adding $1.5 trillion, they voted to this week -- the president

pushed to do it -- and to the new debt over the next 10 years.

And, you know -- but this is it.

This is their last chance to say, we did something in this election.

And the key, the problem that Republicans are facing and a real confrontation is, the

FOX News poll showed that Republicans, if you could vote for -- had to vote for Congress

today, would you vote for a Democrat or Republican?

And by 50 to 35, people say they would vote for a Democrat.

And even in 19 -- yes, go ahead.

JUDY WOODRUFF: No, I was just going to say, so you're saying the Republicans have that

to worry about?

MARK SHIELDS: They have a general election in November of 2018 that they have to be scared

silly about, given those numbers in the FOX News poll.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Well, given that, David, and the fact so many Republicans are saying, we

need to work together to get something done, what are the prospects for tax reform, tax

cuts?

DAVID BROOKS: Well, I think they're pretty grim.

You know, they might be able to fall back to some sort of tax cut of something, maybe

the corporate tax rate or something like that, but getting some sort of big bill, where they

take on some of the deduction for local taxes, for the 401(k)s, there are pretty entrenched

interests.

And it takes a lot of political skill to get that kind of more comprehensive reform passed.

So I'm not particularly optimistic about that.

If I could just take one point that Mark made, and maybe go a little deeper, what's been

interesting to me -- and my colleague Tom Edsall has written about this -- is that the

nature of the party affiliation has changed in the last few years.

It's no longer really about ideology.

It's no longer about belief system.

It's about identity.

It's as if being, say, Pennsylvanian or an Italian American or a Jewish American, all

the things that people who used to form their identity about, those have all fallen away.

And now it's just, are you a Republican or a Democrat?

And that's become the primary identity marker for a lot of people.

And when you're like that, you will follow your president or your party leader absolutely

anywhere they're willing to go.

JUDY WOODRUFF: And where does that lead us, Mark?

MARK SHIELDS: Well, it leads us to, Judy, to -- there are 192 safe Republican House

seats right now.

They're considered safe by Nathan Gonzales, who is a great analyst and appeared on our

broadcast.

And in there, your election is not -- your concern is not nearly so much about November

2018, although it should be, because, right now, the outcome or the signs are dire, but

you're worried about the primary, and that's what you don't want.

Bob Corker in Tennessee was at 61 percent/21 percent favorable, 3-1 favorable in February

this year among Republican voters.

Criticized Donald Trump, and he's now at 37 percent/48 percent favorable among Republicans.

JUDY WOODRUFF: So, a drop.

MARK SHIELDS: A drop of, what, 60 -- or 50 votes -- 50 percent.

So, that is what you're scared of if you're a Republican.

But you're terrified if you're going into the general election, because Donald Trump

is toxic, and he excites -- the excitement and intensity right now is on the part of

Democrats, rather than Republicans, heading into the next election.

JUDY WOODRUFF: But, David, to pick up on the point that -- where you stopped and I asked

Mark, where does it lead Republicans, if they are simply defining themselves by their party?

DAVID BROOKS: Well, it probably leads them in a 38 percent position, which is pretty

bad.

The only thing I would say is, I wouldn't underestimate the Democrats' ability to mess

this up.

One of the things we have seen across Western Europe is the complete collapse of center-left

parties.

People who were in the center-left are now going to green parties.

They're going to socialist parties.

They're going left.

And I think that's happening here, too.

And one of the things -- I assume that's going to happen.

And what you see is, it looks like the Republican Party is in crisis, but they're reasonably

strong on the state and local level.

But it could be that both parties are in crisis, which is what you do see in Britain and a

lot of countries around the world, just a decay of the party system as we know it.

MARK SHIELDS: Yes.

I think...

JUDY WOODRUFF: So, what are we going to end up with?

MARK SHIELDS: Well, in our country, where I guess I disagree with David is, a national

party is defined by its leader, the face of the leader.

You don't have a coherent national philosophy for a party until you nominate a presidential

nominee and probably elect a president.

So until the Democrats do that, they will not have an overarching message.

But, in 2018, all you have to be is the other guy, if there's great dissatisfaction.

Just to put the numbers in perspective, Judy, in 2010, when the Republicans picked up 63

House seats from the Democrats, won away 63 House seats, did the Republicans, the difference

in that generic of who would you rather have, a Democrat or Republican, was nine points.

It was nine points more Republican.

Today, it's 15 percent more Democrat.

So, that really is unsettling.

(CROSSTALK)

JUDY WOODRUFF: For Democrats.

MARK SHIELDS: That's right.

Yes.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Complete change -- go ahead.

DAVID BROOKS: It means they can't move because of the partisan alignment, so they're stuck

losing, but they can't be anything other than they are.

JUDY WOODRUFF: We're going to keep on talking about this into 2018.

I do want to change the subject, though, David, with what we -- the interview that I did a

few segments ago with Sheila Nevins, who's probably the most powerful woman in television

filmmaking, about her own experience with sexual harassment.

She said in that interview that she thinks the country has now -- is now going to change,

that men are not going to be able to get away anymore with what they have gotten away with

before now.

What do you think?

DAVID BROOKS: Well, I do think the norms have been steadily shifting over the decades.

But I thought the key point that she made is there's -- you can now, if you're a woman

and you have been harassed and oppressed, you can now join as a group.

The technology makes this a lot easier, and that you can come out -- because guys who

are harassing, it's not just one case.

It tends to be a lot of cases.

And so people can come out as a group.

They can find each other online.

And they can say, yes, this happened to all of us, and it's a lot more effective.

So, I don't think the norms have shifted.

The stuff that people are being accused, everybody knew that was awful.

But what is happening this week is, the punishments are coming down in a way that we have never

seen before.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Are things changing, Mark?

MARK SHIELDS: Oh, I think have changing dramatically and are changing dramatically.

Just imagine, 1991, Judy, when the Clarence Thomas hearings and Anita Hill case appeared.

That male Judiciary Committee was just -- shamed her, and were adversarial.

Just think if that testimony were given today by somebody of Anita Hill's credentials and

believability.

You would have to take it seriously.

I think women in position of power -- this is about abuse in these actions we hear.

It's cruelty, but, most of all, it's about power.

It's somehow that I can exercise power and that you're not another human being.

And until every man acknowledges that every woman is either his sister, his mother, his

daughter, his niece, his favorite child, then I'm afraid that this is considered a perk

by a number of powerful men.

JUDY WOODRUFF: And, David, that's my question.

As long as men hold the vast majority of the powerful jobs in this country, powerful roles,

is anything really going to change?

I understand you're saying women can now speak up as a group, but they are still going to

be facing this.

DAVID BROOKS: Yes, the power dynamics will be what they are.

But this is not going to go away.

Abuse of women in -- around society is as old as time, because some men have some power

addiction.

They have a masochism.

Some men have an addiction to seduction, where they're always crudely coming on and sort

of driven by some sort of pathetic hole.

And so the idea that it's going to stop happening is not going to -- it's not going to stop.

It's just woven into some people's distorted natures.

But at least they can stop getting away with it.

And I do think that is becoming much and much more likely, that they will get caught.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Well, we certainly hope that some things are changing for the better.

David Brooks, Mark Shields, thank you both.

MARK SHIELDS: Thank you, Judy.

No comments:

Post a Comment