Sunday, December 17, 2017

Trump news on Youtube Dec 17 2017

Did Donald Trump robbed the bank?

Not really :P

Lafore brothers did.

The brother Vittorio and Ivan Lafore four age 26 and 30

from the land of famous structures

Italy!

what they've done was...

They robbed dozens of ATMs in the city of Turin

by performing cinematic stunts

using the masks of

President Donald John Trump

the 45th and current president of USA

whatsoever -_-

In closed circuit footage of

One of the robberies one of the brothers in the Trump mask

is seen covering the surveillance cameras

in the lobby of a bank in planting an explosive in the cash dispenser

Ducks around the corner after lighting the fuse

just before a violent blast!

the stunt evokes the film Point Break filmed in 1991

starring Keanu Reeves and Patrick Swayze

in which a gang of surfers wore masks of

former US Presidents while robbing banks,

but in a statement the policemen clearly said

the brothers had been inspired by a different film

Yep, you guessed right.

Maybe not

"The Jackal"

filmed in 1997

played by the die-hard Protagonist

Bruce Willis

in that particular movie Bruce will change

the color of the car to avoid the police in pursuit

Likewise Lafore brothers painted their

White "Mercedes" into a

"Black Beauty" [Black Audi]

BABY;)

For more infomation >> Donald Trump Robbed a bank! - Duration: 1:39.

-------------------------------------------

Donald and Melania Trump Share Elegant Christmas Photo Twitter Reacts! - Duration: 1:31.

Donald and Melania Trump Share Elegant Christmas Photo: Twitter Reacts!

Happy holidays from The White House!

President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump released their elegant Christmas photo

on Wednesday, December 13, just in time for the holiday season.

The glamorous snapshot features the first couple dressed in black-tie attire and holding

hands while posing alongside two snow-dusted Christmas trees adorned with gold lights.

Fans took to Twitter to react to the picture and wish the real estate magnate, 71, and

the former model, 47, well.

However, several users on the microblogging site inquired about the couple�s 11-year-old

son Barron�s notable absence from the festive photograph.

�This Christmas Barron Trump is HOME ALONE!� added another in reference to President Trump�s

cameo in the classic Christmas flick of the same name.

The White House shared a video of Melania decorating the property and preparing for

the season back in November.

In the cozy clip, the Slovenia native bundles up in an oversized turtle neck sweater and

ankle boots as she oversees cookie decorating, organizes classic wreaths and gets everything

in order for the most wonderful time of the year.

The FLOTUS has also been getting in the holiday spirit by rocking seasonal outfits.

While stepping out at an event supporting military families in Washington, D.C. on Thursday,

December 14, Melania stunned in an emerald green Prada peacoat.

She also turned heads she sported a fashionable Chanel number while attending the National

Tree Lighting in November.

For more infomation >> Donald and Melania Trump Share Elegant Christmas Photo Twitter Reacts! - Duration: 1:31.

-------------------------------------------

Trump praises police, slams immigration lottery at FBI Academy - Duration: 3:30.

Trump praises police, slams immigration lottery at FBI Academy

President Trump vowed to defend police against "dangerous" and "malicious" attacks and to

push for an immigration system that focuses on the merits of applicants during a wide-ranging

speech at the FBI Academy on Friday.

"America's police will have a true friend and loyal champion in the White House � more

loyal than anyone else can be," Trump said at the academy's graduation ceremony, at which

state and local police officers celebrated the completion of a 10-week law enforcement

course.

"You very rarely get the recognition you deserve," Trump said.

"Being a police officer is not just a career, it's a calling," he added.

"They have been subjected to malicious attacks on their character, on their integrity."

Trump pointed to the rise in violence in cities around the country while calling on society

to stop its demonization of police officers, which has arisen in part from what critics

say is a rise in violence against unarmed blacks.

"What the hell is going on in Chicago?

What the hell is happening there?"

Trump said of the violence in Chicago that kills hundreds every year.

"We believe criminals who kill police officers should get the death penalty," Trump added.

The president also called for reforming an immigration program that randomly selects

applicants to enter the U.S. every year.

"They give us their worst people, they put them in a bin," Trump said of the diversity

visa lottery program.

"What kind of a system is that?

They come in by lottery," he added.

Administration officials have taken aim at the visa lottery since a beneficiary of the

program drove a van into a crowd of people on a New York City sidewalk on Halloween,

killing eight people.

The suspect in an attempted bombing of the New York City subway system earlier this week

reportedly entered the country through "chain migration," a process by which immigrants

already in the U.S. can sponsor family members to enter the country, who can then in turn

sponsor more family members, creating a chain of immigrants.

Trump also used his speech to highlight efforts to crack down on MS-13, a criminal gang with

some members who traveled to the U.S. illegally and who have committed a number of violent

and occasionally brutal crimes around the country.

"To any member of MS-13 listening, I have a message for you: We will find you, we will

arrest you, we will jail you, we will throw you the hell out of the country," Trump said.

"Somehow, I like it better than jail.

Jail, we have to take care of them.

Who the hell wants to take care of them?

You know, the jail stuff is wonderful, but we have to pay for it, right?"

For more infomation >> Trump praises police, slams immigration lottery at FBI Academy - Duration: 3:30.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump It's a Shame What Happened to the FBI — Hillary - Duration: 2:13.

President Trump: It�s a Shame What Happened to the FBI � Hillary Clinton Investigation

Was a Rigged System

President Trump slammed the FBI corruption and collusion that is now evident at the bureau.

President Trump said it was �a shame� what has happened to the FBI in the past few

years. FBI brass altered their findings of Hillary Clinton�s criminal actions to ensure

she was able to run for president in 2016. There is now plenty of proof that this happened

during the 2016 presidential campaign.

President Trump: We�re going to rebuild the FBI. It will be bigger and better than

ever. But it�s very sad when you look at those documents. And how they�ve done that

is really, really disgraceful� It�s a very sad thing to watch. The level of anger

with what they are witnessing at the FBI is certainly very sad� Russia was a Democrat

hoax. I had nothing to do with Russia. I did not even make a call to Russia. Even the Democrats

admit there was no collusion� When you look at the Hillary Clinton investigation. I �ve

been saying it for a long time. That was a rigged system folks. That was a rigged system.

When you look at what they did in respect to the Hillary Clinton investigation it was

rigged.

See the video: Trump It's a Shame What Happened to the FBI - Hillary Clinton Investigation

Was a Rigged System. The video link is in the article source link in our description.

For more infomation >> President Trump It's a Shame What Happened to the FBI — Hillary - Duration: 2:13.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING: Government Official Who Plotted For Months To Bring Trump Down Just Caught Committing - Duration: 3:41.

For more infomation >> BREAKING: Government Official Who Plotted For Months To Bring Trump Down Just Caught Committing - Duration: 3:41.

-------------------------------------------

Melania Trump and 10 jarring news photos that sum up 2017 - Duration: 3:22.

For more infomation >> Melania Trump and 10 jarring news photos that sum up 2017 - Duration: 3:22.

-------------------------------------------

DONALD TRUMP BANS THE CDC FROM USING THESE SEVEN WORDS l HMONG MUSIC - Duration: 2:01.

Donald Trump's administration has reportedly banned the Center for Disease Control from using seven words and phrases,

including "science-based" and "transgender," in documents it is working on for next year's budget

In an astounding move, officials at the CDC were told in a Thursday meeting they were not to use certain words, a policy analyst told The Washington Post.

The other banned words were diversity, entitlement, vulnerable, fetus, and evidence-based, with the CDC staff in the meeting reportedly told that rather than using the phrases evidence-based or science-based, they should instead say:

"The "CDC bases its recommendations on science in consideration with community standards and wishes."

Following the news of the banned words, Twitter was awash with comments from people concerned about a ban on the phrases science-based and evidence-based,

while others highlighted fears over the words transgender and diversity being banned – with a board member of the World Professional Association for Transgender Health describing the move as "quite shocking."

"I'm not sure what the ultimate rationale is for doing this aside from trying to erase certain types of people off the map,"

Dr. Loren Schechter, who is also the director of the Center for Gender Confirmation surgery at Weiss Memorial Hospital in Chicago, told The Huffington Post.

"I think walking back hard-earned civil rights is something that is, number one, quite shocking to me and, number two, quite concerning.

Simply choosing to ignore reality, science, medicine, will not make these things go away and will not really advance anyone's cause or lead to improved health outcomes," he added.

The move also prompted questions about why Trump's administration would want to see fewer uses of science or evidence-based facts in reports.

Sharing the news about the banned words, Planned Parenthood tweeted: "It's clearer than ever: this administration has disdained women's health, LGBTQ people, and science since day one."

For more infomation >> DONALD TRUMP BANS THE CDC FROM USING THESE SEVEN WORDS l HMONG MUSIC - Duration: 2:01.

-------------------------------------------

As Obama Runs Around Acting Like President, Trump Finds 'Smoking Gun' Left In Oval Office - Duration: 4:48.

For more infomation >> As Obama Runs Around Acting Like President, Trump Finds 'Smoking Gun' Left In Oval Office - Duration: 4:48.

-------------------------------------------

Trump will spend $5 billion on anti-Russian psychotherapy (Ruslan Ostashko) - Duration: 6:21.

Trump will spend $5 billion on anti-Russian psychotherapy.

My dear fellow citizens, congratulations!

The President of the United States Donald Trump has signed into law the 2018 defense policy bill authorizing a large Pentagon budget.

A significant portion of this important document is dedicated to the containment of us, i.e. Russia.

It seems that there is no cause to rejoice. They consider us the enemy;

they will be trying to hurt us as much as possible and to thwart us anywhere they can. Furthermore, it has been announced to the whole world

that we – i.e. Russia – is the source of evil, meldonium, hackers and military threat for the freedom-loving European countries.

The Americans and we happen to inhabit the same planet.

They are not planning on flying off anywhere. We also are not in a hurry to move some place else.

We will have to live together on this globe.

In order for us to live well, we will have to understand how our transatlantic partners perceive the surrounding reality.

They perceive the reality pretty much in this way: anyone they set their eyes upon

is either a source of profit or a threat, which needs to be bludgeoned on the head until his dead corpse turns into a source of profit.

Some countries such as Great Britain were fortunate enough to get appointed to the position of a small jackal,

whose function is to bite those Washington considers a threat hoping later to get a piece of the corpse.

Unfortunately, or, as I look at it, fortunately, we do not have an option to turn into an American jackal.

They dislike us too much: we are too distinct,

and Washington establishment considers us too dangerous even when we are at our most peaceful and domesticated behavior.

This means that under any circumstances they would prefer to see us not just in the coffin but, rather, on the chopping block.

They have already chopped us with the butcher knife in 1990s – the whole country is still covered with scars.

That is why when I am reading the American documents I do not want to find that Russia is considered a source of profit;

I want to see everything related to Russia marked in red and minus signs.

And the bigger the expenses associated with those minus signs, the more confident we should feel.

The desire of the Washington administration to spend a lot of money to contain Russia

is equivalent to an independent audit of the effectiveness of our foreign and defense policy.

If Washington has such a desire, this means we passed the test.

It is impossible to calculate how many billions of dollars out of the US military budget will be spend directly on Russia.

The budget does not specify that a particular aircraft carrier would be built to counter a specific country.

However, appropriation categories could be evaluated to understand how much money is earmarked for specific programs.

And here there is a lot about the Russian threat.

The Pentagon 2018 budget allocates $4.6 billion to contain threats in Europe.

I believe everyone understand that in Europe we are the ones that are meant to be contained.

Fighting the Middle Eastern terrorism that threatens Europe is, of course, not a task for the American military.

Particularly keeping in mind that financing the aforementioned terrorists is likely listed in the budget of their colleagues from the CIA.

Therefore, the American military in Europe will be containing specifically the Russian threat.

Special attention will be paid to the Baltic countries.

Every time I see the Americans allocating money to the Baltic countries I feel a gnawing suspicion:

Could the Americans know something about Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia we do not know?

I do not understand why would we be annexing the Baltic countries?

I do not know anybody who thinks that we absolutely need to conquer the Baltic states.

I do not see any political or economic sense in such an action.

We don't have enough of sardines or what? Or we have no ports?

However, the American politicians and generals want to spend money specifically on the defense of these countries.

Hard to understand but big empires might have their own big idiosyncrasies.

But on the other hand, considering how inefficiently the American Army spends the money,

those $100 million allocated to the Baltics would be enough, to support, perhaps, two or three battalions.

A trifle, but still might give pleasure to the leaders of the Baltic countries, and they will have something to brag about before their voters.

If we look at all anti-Russian expenses as a unit and at their justification, we come to an astonishing discovery:

the American experts and military openly state that the aim of this program is to build confidence of the NATO allies that the Americans would defend them when necessary.

I have a bad news for the American NATO allies in Europe:

the Americans will double-cross them at the first opportunity,

the same way they double-crossed their Syrian allies exposing them to the bombs of the Russian Air Force;

the same way they betrayed their Kurd allies to Erdogan and the Iraqi Army.

The Europeans having watched the events in Syria

are beginning to suspect that the military roof they are paying the US for is in reality leaking.

So, now the Trump administration has to conduct psychotherapy sessions, wipe their noses,

change pumpers, dispense sedatives and beg to stop the hysterics.

That won't help. The Europeans are already signing agreements among themselves about mutual defense without the US;

Juncker and Merkel are making statements that the safety of Europe is the responsibility of Europe itself.

Translating this from the diplomatic to the human language, it means that the Americans are no longer trusted or believed.

The moral authority is completely and irrevocably lost; it cannot be recovered for the price of $5 billion but Trump will try.

NATO is slowly breaking up, and so in the future the US will have more than one reason to fear us.

For more infomation >> Trump will spend $5 billion on anti-Russian psychotherapy (Ruslan Ostashko) - Duration: 6:21.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING NEWS From White House… Trump Family Just Got The BEST NEWS EVER!!!! - Duration: 5:30.

BREAKING NEWS From White House… Trump Family Just Got

The BEST NEWS EVER!!!!

While some have criticized the First Lady her approval rating has climbed close to 17

points since her husband Donald Trump took office in January of this year.

Now close to 54 percent of those who were polled say they have a favorable view of the

First Lady.

However, those same people say they view the President unfavorably.

Interesting correlation.

Gallup has now indicated the president has a 41 percent approval rating.

Only a one percent increase since January.

The Daily Mail reported,

"The percentage of people who view him unfavorably has also risen by one percent from 55 to 56.

It is an increase from last week when, in a separate study by The Pew Research Center,

31 percent said they liked him.

Melania's boosted popularity is evidence of an encouraging increase since the start

of the year when, not long before accompanying her husband to his Inauguration ceremony,

her approval rating sat at 37 percent.

The same number viewed her unfavorably.

Now, 33 percent have that view.

She has proved less polarizing than her husband – while 13 percent said they had no opinion

of Melania, only 3 percent said the same of the president.

In January, 26 percent said they had no view of the incoming First Lady, demonstrating

that her efforts over the last year have led most to form an opinion of her."

Melania spent the first half of the year quietly, residing in New York City with her son Barron

to ensure he saw out his school year without disruption.

Her public engagements were few and she rarely spoke in public.

But since relocating to The White House in the summer, Mrs Trump has embraced a more

proactive stance.

She has proved a hit with foreign leaders and their partners and has consistently dazzled

sartorially.

Indeed, so unwavering is her commitment to fashion that she chose to fly to disaster-struck

Houston to offer hurricane relief in a pair of $500 Manolo Blahnik stilettos.

Countless photo-ops with children in hospitals and at festive White House events have seasoned

her first year as First Lady."

The First Lady during her time in the White House has focused on anti-bullying initiatives,

Children's Hospitals and their patients, as well as spending time with veterans, their

children, and their families.

While every First Lady has their own pet projects they work on she has certainly carved her

own space in history for what she wants to work on.

Many view the First Lady and the Trump family as an asset to the President.

While President Trump has always been more crass and rough around the edges his family

has been the exact opposite.

Well educated, kind, cultured, generous, and by all accounts lovely to be around.

Ivanka Trump, Barron Trump, the Trump grandchildren, and Melania Trump are perfect examples.

Newsweek reported,

"Just before the Trumps became the first couple on January 20, the first lady-elect

had the country split in opinion: About 37 percent viewed her favorably and 37 percent

unfavorably, with 26 percent undecided.

About a year later, only 13 percent of Americans still have no opinion of the Slovenia-born

former model, and her unfavorables have dropped a bit, to 33 percent.

"Melania Trump's favorability advantage … is consistent with Gallup's findings

that recent first ladies are, on average, more popular than their husbands," pollsters

said in a statement about their December 4-11 questioning.

"This is likely because a first lady's role is more ceremonial and generally much

less divisive than that of the president."

Trump is indeed a notably unpopular president.

A Gallup spokeswoman told Newsweek that Trump's current approval ratings, now in the mid-30s,

are the lowest among the modern presidents, including Eisenhower, Kennedy, Nixon, Carter,

Reagan, the Bushes, Clinton and Obama, in the first year of a first term.

That said, even the best-liked presidents have trouble keeping up with their spouses

in the popularity contest of U.S. politics.

"Michelle Obama and Laura Bush outpaced their husbands, holding an average 12-point

and 17-point edge in favorability, respectively, over their spouses," Gallup noted.

Melania Trump is currently about on par with those predecessors; Hillary Clinton averaged

one point lower favorability than her husband during their White House years.

Melania Trump has taken some heat during the course of her first year as first lady, including

for delaying her move from Manhattan to the White House and even some of her fashion choices,

but the nation is clearly warming to her."

Sometimes transitions are difficult so it is not surprising that the First Lady had

a drastic spike in her approval rating.

She is almost a year into her duties and she is getting used to them and carving a space

for herself.

Perhaps she just needed some time to transition into her role in order to fully feel comfortable.

Now she is killing it and doing her roles as First Lady extraordinarily well.

For more infomation >> BREAKING NEWS From White House… Trump Family Just Got The BEST NEWS EVER!!!! - Duration: 5:30.

-------------------------------------------

Easy to Use Calculator Tells How Much Trump's Tax Plan Will Save Your Family - Duration: 2:48.

For more infomation >> Easy to Use Calculator Tells How Much Trump's Tax Plan Will Save Your Family - Duration: 2:48.

-------------------------------------------

Senator Gives Away Trump Game Plan if North Korea Tests Another Missile - Duration: 3:01.

For more infomation >> Senator Gives Away Trump Game Plan if North Korea Tests Another Missile - Duration: 3:01.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING NEWS About Obamacare…Trump Finally Did IT!!! Cities Are Going To BURN! - Duration: 10:13.

For more infomation >> BREAKING NEWS About Obamacare…Trump Finally Did IT!!! Cities Are Going To BURN! - Duration: 10:13.

-------------------------------------------

REPORT: Feminist Lawyer Lisa Bloom Offered Money To Trump Accusers - Duration: 4:21.

For more infomation >> REPORT: Feminist Lawyer Lisa Bloom Offered Money To Trump Accusers - Duration: 4:21.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Saves Taxpayers $3,000,000 by Nuking Obama Designed Websit - Duration: 3:21.

Trump Saves Taxpayers $3,000,000 by Nuking Obama-Designed Website

When it comes to website design, the Obama White House was not known for doing so efficiently

or cheaply. Those with long memories of insurance exchanges can attest to this.

Apparently, this kind of profligacy extends to other web portals as well. And President

Trump�s administration is going to save $3,000,000 by nuking the current design of

Whitehouse.gov and unveiling a new one.

According to the Washington Examiner, the new White House website will debut this Friday.

The redesign was part of a �a months-long reconstruction process that aimed to bring

the Trump administration�s digital presence up to current standards,� an official told

the Examiner.

�The old site was a good temporary measure that allowed us to use what the previous administration

had built, but it wasn�t where it needed to be in terms of providing people with content

they can easily access,� the official is quoted as saying.

�It adapts the U.S. web design standards and uses a style that is clean, simple and

presidential,� the official said.

Among the improvements: �in-depth policy updates,� search tools that can help users

filter content better, and a look that�s �much cleaner.�

And all of that costs 60 percent less than what it used to.

�We will save taxpayers almost $3 million per year as a result of the redesigned site,�

the official said.

�The president is focused on making smart use of taxpayer dollars and we thought that

the previous site was, frankly, costing far too much.�

As for the savings? Well, security and maintenance were a major part of the cost of the old website,

which the source said cost $6 million per year,

�We are now saving more than 60 percent of that number per year,� they added.

Three million dollars doesn�t exactly sound like a lot, at least not for the federal government

and/or a real housewife of New Jersey.

However, when it comes to taxpayer-funded websites, saving 60 percent is a pretty big

deal.

It�s certainly more than the 15 percent Geico keeps promising you. However, it seems

like it took the Trump administration a bit longer than 15 minutes � and that�s a

very good thing.

Please like and share on Facebook and Twitter if you agree saving money on government websites

is a pretty worthwhile thing.

What are your thoughts on Obama's old website being replaced? Scroll down to comment below!

For more infomation >> Trump Saves Taxpayers $3,000,000 by Nuking Obama Designed Websit - Duration: 3:21.

-------------------------------------------

BOMBSHELL Out Of San Francisco… Anti-Trump Judge Going To PRISON!!! - Duration: 6:00.

BOMBSHELL Out Of San Francisco…

Anti-Trump Judge Going To PRISON!!!

Another one bites the dust… this time in the 9th circus….err I mean 9th circuit.

A prominent judge in the US appeals court has now been accused inappropriate sexual

conduct or comments by a total of nine women.

The latest allegations against Judge Alex Kozinski of the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals

go back decades and include women who met him at events, according to the Washington

Post.

The 67-year-old judge based out of Pasadena, California was appointed to the bench by former

President Ronald Reagan in 1985 serving the 9th Circuit for 32 years.

Seven of those years were served as chief judge from 2007-2014.

A child of Romania immigrants that survived the Holocaust fleeing to America, Kozinski

is an essayist and judicial commentator in addition to sitting the bench on the 9th US

Circuit Court of Appeals with essays in publications such as Slate, The New Yorker, The New Republic,

and National Review.

He is known for his irreverent opinions and his clerks often win prestigious clerkships

at the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Post reported that six former clerks and externs on the appeals court had accused Kozinski

of subjecting them to inappropriate comments or exposing them to pornography, as well as

four women who say he touched or kissed them against their will.

Retired US Court of Federal Claims judge, Christine Miller has accused Kozinski of grabbing

her breasts during a car ride in 1986 after a legal community function in the Baltimore

area.

According to Miller, Kozinski got grabby hands after she refused to go to a motel with him

and have sex.

Miller states –

"'He said if you won't sleep with me, I want to touch you, and then he reached over,

and — this was the most antiseptic — he grabbed each of my breasts and squeezed them."

Emily Murphy states Kozinski once tried to convince her and other clerks to work out

while naked after she mentioned that the court's gym appeared to regularly be used by employees.

Another accuser is Leah Litman, a law professor at Univerity of California, Irvine.

Litman claims the judge spoke of just having had sex, then pinching her side as well as

her leg while they were in a restaurant together the evening before they were to appear together

on a judicial panel at her school in July.Yet a third lawyer not identified by name claims

Kozinski approached her at a 2008 legal event held in Los Angeles while she stood alone.

He then proceeded to kiss her on the mouth and give her a tight bear hug with no warning

or invitation.

According to the Post, the woman's husband did confirm the incident in question, however,

they said nothing due to Kozinski's powerful position and a belief that nothing would be

done because of it.

Another accuser by the name of Heidi Bond a former law clerk from 2006-2007, said the

judge showed her porn on multiple occasions, including pictures of naked college-aged students

at a party and a flipbook which a woman's naked body parts had to be matched up to the

corresponding bodies.

When asked why nothing was said at the time, she responded with "I mean, who would I

tell?

Who do you even tell?

Who do you go to?"

Kosinski vehemently denies the allegations, issuing a statement through his attorney indicating

he believed all of this was a misunderstanding based on his "unusual sense of humor"

and he deeply regretted that his 'unusual sense of humor caused offense or made anyone

uncomfortable.'

"I have been a judge for 35 years and during that time have had over 500 employees in my

chambers.

I treat all of my employees as family and work very closely with most of them.

I would never intentionally do anything to offend anyone and it is regrettable that a

handful have been offended by something I may have said or done."

Now as a result of these allegations the 9th Circuit has opened a misconduct inquiry.

In a letter to Chief Justice Roberts, 9th Circuit Chief Judge Sidney Thomas said it

is the practice of the appeals court to investigate published allegations of misconduct.

As a result, the circuit initiated a formal inquiry.

In an effort to ensure impartiality inasmuch as it can do so, Thomas asked the chief justice

to transfer the complaint to another circuit so judges that do not sit with Kozinski would

conduct the inquiry.

On Friday, Roberts did just that by letter routing the misconduct inquiring to the Judicial

Council of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York.

According to NPR –

Since the Post's report last week, two other former clerks on the 9th Circuit who did not

work for Kozinski, including Slate columnist Dahlia Lithwick, have published accounts of

their own encounters with the judge.

The Washington Post reported Friday night that nine more women say he "subjected them

to sexual comments or other conduct, including four who say he touched them inappropriately."

One of Kozinski's current clerks has resigned, a spokesman for the court told The Associated

Press.

This is not Kozinski's first time facing misconduct charges either.

In 2008, the Los Angeles Times reported on a publicly accessible website the judge maintained

full of sexually explicit photos and videos.

Like this current misconduct inquiry, this one was also transferred to another court

where Kozinski was subsequently admonished for exhibiting poor judgment in maintaining

material that could prove "an embarrassment to the federal judiciary."

This existence of this inquiry tends to lend credence to the women's claims of sexual

impropriety on the part of Kozinski.

For more infomation >> BOMBSHELL Out Of San Francisco… Anti-Trump Judge Going To PRISON!!! - Duration: 6:00.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Foundation Gave $20k To Conservative Fraud James O'Keefe - Duration: 3:27.

Most people in this country view James O'Keefe, the founder of Project Veritas, as the convicted

fraudster that he is.

We don't take him seriously.

We don't think that he has any journalistic credibility to speak of, but believe it or

not, there's some people in this country who think that this kid is doing great work and

helping expose some kind of liberal agenda in the United States.

And one of those people who thinks he's doing such a great job happens to be President Donald

Trump.

According to tax filings that Think Progress has gotten a hold of from the Trump Foundation,

in the year 2015, the Trump Foundation gave James O'Keefe's Project Veritas $20,000 in

donations.

Originally, back in October of this year, it was reported that the organization, the

Trump Foundation, had given $10,000 to Project Veritas in 2015, but after the folks at Think

Progress got their hands on the documents, went through them with a fine tooth comb,

they found out that no, they actually gave two $10,000 donations to Project Veritas,

meaning that the total amount was twice as high as it'd been previously reported two

months ago in this country.

James O'Keefe is the idiot responsible for the overall attack on Planned Parenthood that

Republicans have been running with for several years now.

They wanna take healthcare away from millions of American women, some of them, this is the

only place they can go to get care, because of James O'Keefe.

Republicans believe that some of the accusers, or all of the accusers, against Roy Moore

are lying because of James O'Keefe.

People believe that Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama paid people to go to Donald Trump rallies

and start fist fights because of James O'Keefe.

Donald Trump actually pushed that conspiracy from O'Keefe as well.

And yet, here we have a president who bitches and moans about fake news all day long on

Twitter, who is literally funding fake news.

Everything that that James O'Keefe has done has turned out to be a fraud.

Those Planned Parenthood videos were faked.

He hired somebody to pretend to be a Roy Moore sexual assault victim in order to fool the

Washington Post, and try to destroy their credibility.

He pushes these conspiracy theories, or pushed them during the 2016 campaign, about Hillary

Clinton and Barack Obama, in spite of the fact there was absolutely no evidence to back

them up.

James O'Keefe is cancer on the American citizenry.

He is horrible.

He is no good at anything.

He is just a pathetic little right wing troll that wants nothing more than to sow discord,

and for some reason, destroy the Democratic Party, as if he's gonna personally gain from

it.

Nobody takes this guy seriously, and they shouldn't.

The only time when somebody has taken what he's done seriously is that time when he was

convicted for fraud.

For more infomation >> Trump Foundation Gave $20k To Conservative Fraud James O'Keefe - Duration: 3:27.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Administration Brags About Repealing Laws That Don't Even Exist - Duration: 3:19.

Well as we approach the end of this year, and basically come to Donald Trump's full

11th month in office in the coming days, let's look back at what Donald Trump has accomplished

in his first year as president.

Well, that was easy, it's pretty much nothing.

But according to the Trump administration he has repealed nearly 1,000 different job

killing regulations and rules that were put in place by previous administrations.

Donald Trump, he may not have any legislative accomplishments to his name as of right now,

but he's been repealing regulations, undoing the work of past presidents non stop since

he came into office.

According to the White House, almost 1,000 regulations gone.

Not exactly though.

According to new reports, all of these regulations that the Trump administration is bragging

about destroying, most of them, more than 800 of the alleged 1,000 never existed to

begin with.

See, here's what Donald Trump is actually taking credit for.

A lot of regulations that get put in place by agencies here in the United States have

an expiration date.

At that point the regulation can then be re-looked at, re-vamped, re-tooled, or just simply re-instated.

Or nothing can be done and it goes away because time's expired.

That's what happened with most of them.

Some of the others, a good third of them I think, actually never got put in place to

begin with.

They were simply proposed rules that everyone already admitted had absolutely no chance

of passing.

According to the Brookings Institute, only 12 active regulations had been killed by Donald

Trump this year.

The White House wants you to think that they've repealed 1,000 regulations, but the real number,

according to reports, is closer to a dozen.

Now even just repealing one of these regulations is going to be bad for the American people,

because some of the ones that they're going after are environmental regulations that protect

our air and our water and our earth.

Our quality of life, our ability to go outside and take a deep breath and not inhale a bunch

of pollutants.

Those are the things that the administration's getting rid of.

Not off benefits to the middle class, not because it's going to create jobs, not because

it's going to help the economy, it's going to actually do the opposite, it's going to

harm the economy.

They're doing it because it helps their corporate interest.

It helps businesses.

They're not going to parlay that savings from not having to comply with regulations into

hiring more people, they're going to distribute it amongst shareholders, because that's what

corporations always do.

But the bottom line is this, as 2017 draws to a close, Donald Trump has done virtually

nothing as president of the United States.

And the few things that he has actually accomplished are among the most horrible we've ever seen

from a president during their first year.

For more infomation >> Trump Administration Brags About Repealing Laws That Don't Even Exist - Duration: 3:19.

-------------------------------------------

Trey Gowdy Predicts New Trump Shakeup in One Week: I'll Be Surprised If He's Still an Employee - Duration: 4:27.

For more infomation >> Trey Gowdy Predicts New Trump Shakeup in One Week: I'll Be Surprised If He's Still an Employee - Duration: 4:27.

-------------------------------------------

Smackdown! President Trump Just Smashed Hundreds Of Deep Staters, Obama Is Totally Incensed - Duration: 3:28.

Smackdown!

President Trump Just Smashed Hundreds Of Deep Staters, Obama Is Totally Incensed

Remember the vile abuse of conservative Tea Party groups by the IRS as led by the Obama

administration.

Almost certainly there were those inside that organization who protested what was occurring.

However a fish rots starting from the head, and with Lois Lerner as leader of the Exempt

Organizations unit, much rottenness was released on those conservative groups.

The politicization of government organizations, particularly those with prosecutorial or enforcement

powers, is a steady peril.

It's quite recently too simple for corrupt government officials to take an alternate

way to fulfilling their motivations by trading off such organizations and inspiring them

to chip away at their sake.

Consequently, forceful oversight is basic.

President Trump's Department of Justice has settled lawsuits by conservative groups

whose applications for tax-exempt absolved status were postponed exclusively in light

of their conservative perspective.

This is decisively the corruption that must be kept away from, and be found and punished

when found.

It is empowering that these conservative groups have gotten both compensations for the wrongs

done to them and add an apology from the IRS.

"The Trump administration, after years of litigation, has settled lawsuits with Tea

Party and other conservative groups who say they were unfairly targeted by the IRS under

the Obama administration.

"Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced early Thursday that the Justice Department

had entered into settlements with Tea Party groups whose tax-exempt status was significantly

delayed by the IRS dating back to 2013, "based solely on their viewpoint or ideology."

"THE SETTLEMENTS INVOLVE PAYMENTS TO THE PLAINTIFFS AND AN APOLOGY FROM THE IRS."

Here's the announcement by the IRS.

Mr. Obama and Mrs. Lerner must be incensed.

"'The IRS admits that its treatment of Plaintiffs during the tax-exempt determination

process, including screening their applications based on their names or policy positions,

subjecting those applications to heightened scrutiny and inordinate delays, and demanding

some Plaintiffs' information that TIGTA determined was unnecessary to the agency's

determination of their tax-exempt status, was wrong,' the IRS said in court documents.

'For such treatment, the IRS expresses its sincere apology.'"

Apologies are pleasant, and settlements are significantly more welcome.

However, is upsetting this was likely not a confined example of corruption by the Obama

administration.

The impacts of mentality that considers and empowers such detestable conduct were likely

not isolated inside the IRS.

Mr. Obama, similar to his countryman Mrs. Clinton, was unmistakably exceptionally eager

to utilize the forces of authority Washington to manage political adversaries and to make

points of interest for political partners.

It is a risk that is ever present, and one that requests forceful endeavors to forestall

and to punish such abuses.

What do you think about this?

Do not hesitate and write your thoughts in the comment section below.

No comments:

Post a Comment