Saturday, December 22, 2018

Trump news on Youtube Dec 22 2018

MUELLER'S COHEN REPORT JUST DEBUNKED A KEY CLAIM IN THE "TRUMP-RUSSIA DOSSIER"

Media reports from as far back as 2 years ago, stated special counsel Robert Mueller

obtained evidence of a Prague trip involving Michael Cohen and Kremlin officials, that

reportedly "confirmed" secret meetings proving collusion.

However, a flurry of court filings by Mueller last week suggests the story is fake.

Real Clear Politics reported last summer that Lanny Davis, attorney for Michael Cohen, trashed

the infamous Trump dossier, a document put together by former British spy Christopher

Steele, in an interview with NBC's Chuck Todd on Wednesday.

Davis said the part about Cohen visiting Prague to meet with Russians in 2016 "never"

happened."

He called it the "so-called dossier" and said it mentions his client in a "false"

manner.

On Tuesday, a superior court judge threw out a defamation lawsuit against Steele for failing

to provide evidence that information in the dossier was knowingly falsified.

"Can you say definitively whether you know if Michael Cohen was ever in Prague in 2016?"

Todd on Wednesday's edition of Meet the Press Daily on MSNBC.

"Never, never in Prague," Davis sternly said.

"Never ever?"

Todd pressed.

"Never ever in Prague," Davis answered.

View image on Twitter View image on Twitter

Rep. Steven Smith ???? @RepStevenSmith

Jim Comey relied on Hillary's bought and purchased Steele Dossier to get a FISA warrant and spy

on Trump, and then NEVER VERIFIED the contents.

Steele was so lazy that he didn't even get the CORRECT LOCATION of meetings, and was

wrong about Michael Cohen EVER being in Prague.

51 6:44 AM - Dec 9, 2018

30 people are talking about this Twitter Ads info and privacy

From Real Clear Investigations

It was one of the most incendiary allegations included in the Clinton-financed opposition

research known as the Steele dossier – that Donald Trump's fixer Michael Cohen met with

"Kremlin officials" in Prague in 2016 to arrange payments to operatives hacking

Hillary Clinton's campaign.

Despite strong denials from Cohen, the claim has shadowed the president, inspiring and

coloring the Russia investigation ever since.

McClatchy reported in April that Special Counsel Robert Mueller had obtained evidence of the

Prague trip and likely confirmed the secret meeting.

But a flurry of court filings by Mueller last week suggests that this story is false, a

damaging piece of disinformation that has roiled the nation for two years.

Officials familiar with the case said the proof is in the lack of evidence in the 25

pages of court papers Mueller has filed on Cohen over the past two weeks.

The alleged Prague visit is not evident in the plea agreement, the criminal information

statement or the sentencing memorandum, none of which contain redactions.

In fact, language in the filings strongly indicates prosecutors have not found evidence

to authenticate the Prague rumor, according to people familiar with the case, who spoke

on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive information.

They point to the sentencing memo filed Friday, for starters.

On page 5, Mueller stated that Cohen "has provided relevant and truthful information"

about "his own contacts with Russian interests during the campaign" to prosecutors in their

investigation of Russian election interference.

Though Mueller details contacts Cohen made with various Russians, he offers no evidence

he contacted Kremlin officials in Prague, as described in the dossier.

The Czech city, in fact, is not cited in any of his filings, though Moscow, St. Petersburg,

Davos and other cities are.

Prosecutors corroborated the information Cohen provided about his Russia contacts with evidence

— including travel records — they seized from him.

In addition, Cohen pleaded guilty last month to a single count of providing false testimony

to Congress related to a Moscow real estate venture – which suggests there was no reason

for him to correct his September 2017 statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee claiming,

"I have never in my life been to Prague or to anywhere in the Czech Republic."

In that same sworn testimony, Cohen also categorically denied plotting with Russian officials to

hack the election.

"I have never engaged with, been paid by, paid for, or conversed with any member of

the Russian Federation or anyone else to hack or interfere with the election," Cohen told

the Senate.

"I emphatically state that I had nothing to do with any Russian involvement in our

electoral process."

He added that he saw "not a hint of anything" that demonstrated Trump's involvement in

Russian interference in the election, either.

The Prague allegation is one of the most specific claims in the Steele dossier, a piece of opposition

research compiled by former British intelligence agent Christopher Steele and paid for by the

Clinton campaign.

Although former FBI Director James Comey has called the dossier "salacious and unverified,"

Mueller's team has relied on it as a road map in its investigation, and even traveled

to London to debrief its author.

The Prague claim was cited in three unconfirmed, hearsay reports written by Steele between

October and December 2016.

They alleged that Cohen visited the Czech capital to clandestinely meet with "Kremlin

officials" and hackers in August 2016 to arrange "deniable cash payments to hackers

who had worked in Europe under Kremlin direction against the Clinton campaign."

The reports further state that "three colleagues" accompanied Cohen to Prague.

Cohen has offered his passport to show he has never traveled to Prague – nor even

left

the country

during

the time alleged.

For more infomation >> MUELLER'S COHEN REPORT JUST DEBUNKED A KEY CLAIM IN THE "TRUMP RUSSIA DOSSIER" - Duration: 17:13.

-------------------------------------------

JAIL TIME COMING!! TRUMP JUST EXPOSED ONE THING MUELLER WANT TO HIDE MOST - Duration: 13:20.

JAIL TIME COMING!!

TRUMP JUST EXPOSED ONE THING MUELLER WANT TO HIDE MOST

President Trump's lawyers are preparing written responses to questions from Special

Counsel Robert Mueller regarding possible collusion with Russia.

The move, first reported by CNN, marks a major advance in negotiations between Trump's

attorneys and Mueller's team and could signal that the investigation is entering its final

phases.

The two sides have battled for months over whether Trump would appear for an interview

with Mueller's prosecutors or submit answers in writing.

Trump's legal team, led by Jay Sekulow and Rudy Giuliani, have also pushed for a narrow

set of questions to be posed to Trump.

Mueller, who was appointed special counsel on May 17, 2017, is investigating whether

the Trump campaign conspired with Russians to influence the 2016 election as well whether

Trump obstructed justice by firing James Comey as FBI director.

Comey's firing, on May 9, 2017, paved the way for Mueller's appointment.

Trump's lawyers have reportedly pushed to avoid dealing with questions about obstruction

of justice.

Giuliani, the public face of Trump's legal team, has argued that Trump was allowed to

fire Comey for any reason he saw fit.

In April, The New York Times published a list of nearly 50 questions that Mueller presented

the Trump team.

The questions covered a wide array of topics, including activities on the campaign as well

as the firing of Michael Flynn

as

national

security adviser.

For more infomation >> JAIL TIME COMING!! TRUMP JUST EXPOSED ONE THING MUELLER WANT TO HIDE MOST - Duration: 13:20.

-------------------------------------------

TRUMP DROPS MASSIVE NUKE ON MUELLER,ROBERT MUELLER IN FULL PANIC MODE - Duration: 15:13.

TRUMP DROPS MASSIVE NUKE ON MUELLER,ROBERT MUELLER IN FULL PANIC MODE

Has President Donald Trump been subpoenaed by special counsel Robert Mueller?

If you believe Politico the answer is yes.

A new report by Politico on Wednesday said that court documents have been filed that

makes it appear as if Mueller has subpoenaed the president to testify before the grand

jury.

The legal fight of the century may have already started, and almost no one noticed?

According to former federal prosecutor Nelson Cunningham, recent reporting — some of it

just by hanging around the clerk's office in Washington DC — reveals a very unusual

level of activity involving a grand jury, a subpoena, and bunch of expedited appeals.

Has Robert Mueller subpoenaed the president? Cunningham says "it all fits":

But now, thanks to Politico's reporting (backed up by the simple gumshoe move of sitting

in the clerk's office waiting to see who walks in and requests what file), we may know

what Mueller has been up to: Since mid-August, he may have been locked in proceedings with

Trump and his lawyers over a grand jury subpoena – in secret litigation that could tell us

by December whether the president will testify before Mueller's grand jury.

The evidence lies in obscure docket entries at the clerk's office for the D.C. Circuit.

Thanks to Politico's Josh Gerstein and Darren Samuelsohn, we know that on August 16th (the

day after Giuliani said he was almost finished with his memorandum, remember), a sealed grand

jury case was initiated in the D.C. federal district court before Chief Judge Beryl A.

Howell.

We know that on September 19, Chief Judge Howell issued a ruling and 5 days later one

of the parties appealed to the D.C. Circuit.

And thanks to Politico's reporting, we know that the special counsel's office is involved

(because the reporter overheard a conversation in the clerk's office).

We can further deduce that the special counsel prevailed in the district court below, and

that the presumptive grand jury witness has frantically appealed that order and sought

special treatment from the judges of the D.C. Circuit – often referred to as the "second-most

important court in the land."

How do we know this isn't Roger Stone, Carter Page, or some other fringe figure in the special

counsel investigation?

Presumably, any number of people would fight a grand-jury subpoena if one got delivered

to them, and might appeal a lower-court defeat.

That's true enough, Cunningham acknowledges, but few of them would get those appeals fast-tracked,

especially in the manner the court docket suggests.

After the first appeal was lodged, the court gave Mueller's team only three days to respond,

then dismissed the appeal two days after Mueller's team filed their response — apparently on

technical grounds, because the district court issued a favorable ruling to the witness,

who renewed the appeal.

Back before the D.C. Circuit, this case's very special handling continued.

On October 10, the day the case returned to the court, the parties filed a motion for

expedited handling, and within two days, the judges had granted their motion and set an

accelerated briefing schedule.

The witness was given just 11 days to file briefs; the special counsel (presumably) just

two weeks to respond; and reply papers one week later, on November 14 (for those paying

attention, that's 8 days after the midterm elections).

Oral arguments are set for December 14.

That's pretty fast for an ordinary witness' appeal of a subpoena, Cunningham argues, but

that's not the most compelling circumstance.

After losing the first appeal, the witness asked for an en banc review, which would require

all ten current judges on the DC Circuit Court of Appeal to rule on the case.

That itself is unusual, Cunningham argues, suggesting that the witness presents specific

and unique circumstances.

And at that point, a very curious thing happened — Judge Gregory Katsas recused himself before

the en banc petition was denied.

And who is Gregory Katsas?

He's the only current Trump appointee to the DC Circuit, Cunningham notes, as well

as a former deputy counsel to Trump.

The en banc petition wouldn't require a recusal if the witness were someone like Stone

or Page, as Katsas testified during his confirmation hearings that he never worked on anything

to do with the special counsel investigation.

However …

But if the witness were the president himself – if the matter involved an appeal from

a secret order requiring the president to testify before the grand jury – then Judge

Katsas would certainly feel obliged to recuse himself from any official role.

Not only was the president his former client (he was deputy counsel to the president, remember)

but he owes his judicial position to the president's nomination.

History provides a useful parallel: In 1974, in the unanimous Supreme Court decision US

v Nixon requiring another witness-president to comply with a subpoena, Justice William

Rehnquist recused himself for essentially the same reasons.

But, The New York Times Maggie Haberman reported, that the speculation is nothing more than

fake news according to President Trump's counsel Jay Sekulow.

"The report in Politico is completely false.

There has been no subpoena issued and there is no litigation," he

told her.

For more infomation >> TRUMP DROPS MASSIVE NUKE ON MUELLER,ROBERT MUELLER IN FULL PANIC MODE - Duration: 15:13.

-------------------------------------------

Wait Until You See the Brand New Prototype Trump Just Rolled Out for the Border Wall - Duration: 3:02.

For more infomation >> Wait Until You See the Brand New Prototype Trump Just Rolled Out for the Border Wall - Duration: 3:02.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Celebrates Border Wall Bill Passing the House by Trolling Nancy Pelosi - Duration: 3:11.

For more infomation >> Trump Celebrates Border Wall Bill Passing the House by Trolling Nancy Pelosi - Duration: 3:11.

-------------------------------------------

Donald Trump e la minaccia aliena - Zanc9 fa le voci #3 - Duration: 4:42.

Hi guys!

I am Donald Trump, and I want to become the president of the USA, yeah!

Yeees! Donald Trump! Donald Trump!

Oh, sorry, it's my assistant. It may be important…

Oh, this is some good news!

I actually AM the president of the USA!!

Yeees! Donald Trump! You are the best! Yeeeah!

Thank you guys

Anyway, I came here to tell you something really cool

We found aliens!

You know, the ones with green skin, who make whooo, whoooooooo!

Oh, again?

"Take it more seriously: they want to attack the Earth"

Oh, wow!

"They have black skin, huge teeth and three pairs of red eyes"

No matter how many eyes they've got, but their skin is BLACK!?

Where do they come from? South Africa!?

Mmm, let's ask him

"So, where do they come from?"

"They come from Vega"

Oh, they're Vegans!?

Don't worry dude: vegans are not dangerous

I know a couple of them. They only eat carrots, like rabbits

"They are planning an invasion"

Oh no! I don't want America to be full of rabbits!

Well, I'll put them on the blacklist

Now, let me call my dear friend from Russia

Hi, Vladi! How are you?

"Donald Trump, what are you doing calling me in the middle of the night??"

Are you kidding me? It's 6 p.m.

"Idiot!"

"The Earth is a sphere. There's the time zone: here in Moskow it's 4 o'clock"

Oh, I thought the Earth was flat

Anyway, did you hear about the vegans' invasion? We must do something!

"Ah, the aliens' invasion! Yes, the news leaked two weeks ago"

"Don't you worry, I have programmed a nuclear missiles system that will solve everything"

"The red button is ready. I just have to press it and everything blows up!"

Oh, ok. See you later then

Man, this is not good, not good at all

Atomic bombs? I don't like them. I don't like radiation: it ruins my hair!

Well, I've got a better idea

I'll build a wall, a great wall to separate the Earth from Vega

And I'll make vegans pay for that wall!!

Yeees! Donald Trump! Donald Trump! You are the best! Yeeeah!

As you can imagine, they both had their own minds

Putin sent missiles, while Donald Trump built the interstellar wall

However, Putin's missiles crashed into the wall and blew it up

So, aliens could reach the Earth unharmed, and the worst thing is...

THEY WEREN'T VEGANS

For more infomation >> Donald Trump e la minaccia aliena - Zanc9 fa le voci #3 - Duration: 4:42.

-------------------------------------------

Trump prepares to stay in Washington for holidays if demands for border wall are not met - Duration: 2:52.

For more infomation >> Trump prepares to stay in Washington for holidays if demands for border wall are not met - Duration: 2:52.

-------------------------------------------

James Mattis Handed Trump The Letter That No One Saw Coming - Duration: 3:46.

For more infomation >> James Mattis Handed Trump The Letter That No One Saw Coming - Duration: 3:46.

-------------------------------------------

TRUMP FINALLY DID IT TO SHUT DOWN THE ENTIRE BORDER!! DEMS NEVER SAW THIS COMING - Duration: 11:57.

TRUMP FINALLY DID IT TO SHUT DOWN THE ENTIRE BORDER!!

DEMS NEVER SAW THIS COMING

one of the people's favorite emojis thatNthere's the one that goes like this wellVthat's where

we are now with this whole funding battle after the president called

over leaders of Congress Republican side to a meeting at the

White House in which he basically told them that he needed to have something about border

security in the bill or he

certainly wasn't going to sign it the president in a statement from Sarah Sanders saying quote

President Trump just met with Republican members of the

House not surprisingly they all feel strongly about border security stopping the flow of

drugs stopping human trafficking and stopping terrorism we

protect nations all over the world the Democrats are unwilling to protect our nation we urgently

need funding for

border security and that includes a wall when the Speaker of the House his last day is supposed

to be today walked out of the White House it was clear that the president

dug in his heels and said I want something more than what the Senate

gave me last night listen here so what we're gonna do is go back to the house and work

with our members we want to keep the government open but we also

want to see an agreement that protects the border we have very serious concerns about

securing our border so the president said he will not sign this bill

so we're going to go back and work on adding border security to this also keeping the government

open because we do want to see an agreement just for the record

here are the 12 members of Congress on the Republican side who were in the meeting was

the Speaker Paul Ryan Kevin McCarthy the

incoming minority leader Steve Scalise Liz Cheney mo Brooks of Alabama Jim Jordan additionally

mark meadows Paul Mitchell Chris Gibson mark walker Barry ladder Milken and Wagner all

there as well but that the real question now Dana is I'm not

sure what they do because the Senate's left town and if they pass a measure that's got

funding for border

security in it there's nobody from the Senate to take a look at it the president will be

speaking at 2:30 we do know that so we he'll probably have

something to say about this it's also Ninteresting to note too that the president has kind of

stopped talking about a quote wall it is now talking

about a steel slat barrier which maybe Democrats may find more palatable I doubt it but he's

talking about it in

different terms well he's giving them some options on I did have one question for you

which is then why didn't the president say anything

before the Senate voted on the bill that now he doesn't like you know I was

talking to White House officials yesterday afternoon when this idea the CR was floating

around the Senate and I said so are you you're going to eat the CR and sign it and the consensus

seemed

to be yeah the president would you know reluctantly sign it but then the president woke up this

morning clearly was of a different mind than what his

aides told me yesterday so he wants this this funding for border security what he

can't get out of Congress he's going to try to get out of existing appropriation so this

tale has yet to be told in full and like many things around here at the

White House it's going to be a doozy IBwill not surrender this nation to the whims of

criminal organizations who prey on the vulnerable who hurt women and children

and has spread human misery and suffering human trafficking and massive drug inflow

must also be stopped it's at a tremendous level what we're doing and the

incredible job being done by border

security ice Border Patrol local police and the military the military has been incredible

and we're stopping them to process you wouldn't believe how tough

but we're stopping them in record numbers at this moment there is a debate over funding

border security in the wall also called so that I give them a little

bit of an out steel slats we don't use the word wall necessarily but it has to

be something special to do the job steel slots I've made my position very clear any measure

that= funds the government must include border security has to not for political purposes

but for for a country for the safety of our community this is not

merely my campaign promise this is the promise every lawmaker met that is the solemn promise

to protect and defend the

United States of America and it is our sacred obligation we have no choice for decades Washington

abandoned this commitment and millions and millions of people to enter our

country illegally and over the objections of the American people

no one voiced or voted for a policy no one endorsed this policy and no one ratified this

policy it was a total

assault on our democracy itself illegal immigration costs our nation two hundred and seventy five

billion dollars a year you hear many different numbers you can

say billions and billions but the number that I hear most accurate is two hundred and seventy

five billion dollars a year at least millions of jobs and thousands of

innocent lives more than 90% of

heroine comes across our southern border heroin deaths have tripled since 2002 every week

this illegal heroine kills at least 300 Americans and costs our nation

over 230 million to 289 billion dollars for nearly 5 billion dollars a week I spoke with

President Xi of China and he has agreed to make fentanyl another one of

the big big problems and probably I

think it's just gone to number one kills 80,000 people a year in our country he's going to

make that a major crime in China and if you get caught you pay a major penalty it's called

the death penalty and it wasn't listed as a crime until

I spoke to so I appreciate President Xi for doing that that's a

tremendous that's gonna have a tremendous impact every day 10 known or suspected terrorists

try to gain entry into our

country every day 2,000 illegal aliens try to cross our borders they try we get most

of them it's hard without a wall every year 50,000 illegal children are

smuggled by coyotes and criminals into our country in the last two years alone ice officers

arrested criminal aliens charged with or convicted of 100,000

assaults 30,000 sex crimes and 4,000 murders it's rough stuff yet the

Democrats continued to oppose border security no matter how many innocent people get hurt

or die ridiculously and dangerously certain people want open

borders which allow potentially massive crime our nation has spent trillions of dollars

and sacrificed thousands of brave young lives defending the borders

of foreign nations I am asking Congress to defend the border of our nation for tiny fraction

tiny fraction of the cost essential to border security is a

powerful physical barrier walls work whether we like it or not they work better than anything

in Israel 99.9 percent successful think of it I spoke to

Benjamin Netanyahu Prime Minister two

days ago we're talking about it he said it's 99.9 imeem he came up I didn't ask I said

99.9 percent successful we have proposed a steel slat barrier to halt the

deadly flow of these illegal traffickers smugglers and terrorists

every day that we deprive our Border Patrol and ice officers the resources

they need we put many innocent lives in harm's way it should be bipartisan I\ think it will

end up being bipartisan I really do illegal immigration also strains public services

that Americans depend on and illegal immigration drives down wages for the neediest Americans

no one who calls themselves a progressive should support illegal immigration open borders

hurts poor Americans more than anyone else

in our society in life there are certain principles worth fighting for principles that are more

important than politics party or personal convenience the safety and

security and sovereignty of the United States is the most important principle of all if

we don't stand strong for our national borders then we cease

to be a nation and we betray our

commitment to the loyal citizens of our great country I look forward to signing a bill that

fulfills our fundamental duty to the American people it is all about and I say this in any

way they want to hear it it's all about America first

we have to put our country first we have to put our people first and we have to put safety

first so thank you

all very much and we'll be working on that Mitch and Paul and Kevin and everybody and

we'll see what we can do but hopefully that all come together it

some additional perspective now in all these major stories from House Majority Leader Kevin

McCarthy Republican from California mr. leader thanks for joining

us first of all give us just an update

of how you think this gets solved from your point of view well first of all Brett think

about it you've already had 75% of the government funding we're

debating that last 25% this is about national security about border security so the Senate

sent over to us what is a continuing resolution that funds the government

as is with no border security

in there even though we've already been funding and building the wall it also had nothing

in there when it came to disasters remember the Hurricanes in North

Carolina in Florida in Georgia are the devastating fires in California so

what we will do and remember there are two separate bodies here it happens on

every bill we will take a continuing resolution we will add five billion dollars in that for

border security we'll also add the in there for disaster relief for those states

of devastation because they can't wait a lot of those individuals can't go

in plant can't rebuild entire cities are burnt in California and we'll send that over to

the Senate they can take action which we don't have a problem until Friday

tomorrow late I think there's some differences and we can find common

ground it's the way our government is designed to find common ground and come

to a solution right but you do you think you have the votes because you think you have

the votes in the house we will have the votes in the house we will pass it tonight

and we will send it to the Senate now the question is about the

Senate mr. leader yes because you have Chuck Schumer saying we're not doing it you have

senators over in the Senate who lost or they were stepping aside and they

may decide they're not gonna do this so where's your your optimism if you have any about getting

it past the Senate to avoid a partial shutdown well first

of all if I listen to Chuck

Schumer just a week ago he said he would fund the wall at 1.6 1.8 billion dollars is he

now saying he would not do that if I look at his what he voted on just a

few years back 2013 he funded and voted for a wall in that process as well so it's Chuck

Schumer changing his position

from the past and this is the real challenge here the American people have to understand

yes Republicans are in the majority we will pass it in the house

but the rules say you have to have 60 votes in the Senate so it really comes down to this

Chuck Schumer want to shut the government down

For more infomation >> TRUMP FINALLY DID IT TO SHUT DOWN THE ENTIRE BORDER!! DEMS NEVER SAW THIS COMING - Duration: 11:57.

-------------------------------------------

Stephen Miller's Defense of Trump's Syria Withdrawal in Epic - Duration: 4:26.

For more infomation >> Stephen Miller's Defense of Trump's Syria Withdrawal in Epic - Duration: 4:26.

-------------------------------------------

Florida Veteran Fundraises Millions To Help Trump's Efforts For Border Wall - Duration: 1:39.

For more infomation >> Florida Veteran Fundraises Millions To Help Trump's Efforts For Border Wall - Duration: 1:39.

-------------------------------------------

Trump defends toughness on ISIS after Fox & Friends host claims he 're-founded' the terror army - Duration: 6:04.

President Donald Trump defended his toughness against ISIS after 'Fox & Friends' host accused him of having 're-founded' the terror group with his sudden decision to pull troops out of Syria

'I've done more damage to ISIS than all recent presidents.not even close!' Trump wrote on Twitter Friday morning, just hours after the segment aired, throwing his press secretary onto the defensive on what is typically friendly terrain

Trump's pushback came after host Brian Kilmeade brough back Trump's own words – including his past claims that President Obama 'founded ISIS

'Both presidents have ordered airstrikes and kept troops in the field to combat the terror group in a multi-year campaign that pushed back it's self-proclaimed caliphate and seized what had effectively been its former capital

White House press secretary Sarah Sanders taunted ISIS not to 'pick a fight' with President Donald Trump Friday – after getting tough questions from Fox News host Brian Kilmeade slamming the president's sudden Syria pull-out

Kilmeade skewered Sanders Friday following Pentagon chief James Mattis' stunning resignation, saying Trump had 're-founded ISIS' by bucking Mattis and other military brass and announcing a troop withdrawal

Sanders appeared on the program Friday amid reverberations from Mattis' harsh resignation letter, which defended U

S.alliances and split with Trump following his sudden announcement of a pullout of U

S.troops from Syria.Kilmeade could be seen shifting in his chair in what started out as a softball interview with Sanders, who was out to defend the embattled Trump Whitehouse amid a looming government shutdown

'Sarah, he is giving Russia a big win.Vladimir Putin praised him.He also is doing exactly what he criticized president Obama for doing,' Kilmeade pounced on the president's favorite morning program

Referring to Trump, Kilmead said: 'He said president Obama is the founder of ISIS

He just re-founded ISIS because they got 30,000 men there and they are already striking back with our would-be evacuation,' Kilmeade continued

'The president is really on the griddle with this,' he added.'Brian, I have to respectfully and vehemently disagree with you,' Sanders pushed back

'The idea that the president has had anything to do with helping ISIS reemerge is absolutely outrageous,' she countered

Then Kilmeade, who wrote a book on Andrew Jackson and the battle of New Orleans, interjected: 'Leaving is helping

Leaving is helping,' echoing concerns inside the pentagon that the removal of 2,000 U

S.forces could provide relief to ISIS, while leaving Russia and Iran in power positions

Sanders responded that Trump 'has put so much emphasis on rebuilding the strongest military on the face of the planet

If ISIS wants to pick a fight with somebody, they sure as heck don't want to pick one with Donald Trump

Because  he will destroy them and defeat them,' she said.'And he's has made that extremely clear

We have wiped out 99% of ISIS in Syria.The president doesn't want to be in the middle of a civil war in the Middle East and continue to put American lives on the line

' Kilmeade interjected again,' saying 'The word on the ground is different from what you just said,' in a reference to the 30,000 ISIS fighters the Pentagon estimates remain in Iraq and Syria

'If we need to fight ISIS again the president is not afraid to do that,' Sanders countered

Co-host Ainsley Earhardt quickly cut off the interview.'All right, Sarah.Thank you so much

For more infomation >> Trump defends toughness on ISIS after Fox & Friends host claims he 're-founded' the terror army - Duration: 6:04.

-------------------------------------------

Libs Fundraise For Ladders To Jump Trump's Wall, Amputee Vet Shuts Them Down HARD - Duration: 4:35.

For more infomation >> Libs Fundraise For Ladders To Jump Trump's Wall, Amputee Vet Shuts Them Down HARD - Duration: 4:35.

-------------------------------------------

Trump threatens government shutdown will last for a very long time if Democrats oppose House bill th - Duration: 5:09.

Trump threatens government shutdown will last for a very long time if Democrats oppose House bill th

President Trump on Friday threatened that a partial government shutdown would last for a very long time if Congress does not meet his demand Friday for billions in funding for his long promised border wall in a stopgap spending measure.

In a spate of morning tweets, Trump sought to pin blame on Democrats for a potential shutdown even though he said last week that he would proudly own one if lawmakers did not provide at least dollar 5 billion toward his marquee campaign promise.

And he suggested that Senate rules should be changed if necessary so that Republicans could pass the bill without any Democratic support.

The Democrats, whose votes we need in the Senate, will probably vote against Border Security and the Wall even though they know it is DESPERATELY NEEDED, Trump wrote. If the Dems vote no, there will be a shutdown that will last for a very long time. People dont want Open Borders and Crime!

The Democrats, whose votes we need in the Senate, will probably vote against Border Security and the Wall even though they know it is DESPERATELY NEEDED. If the Dems vote no, there will be a shutdown that will last for a very long time. People dont want Open Borders and Crime!

Trumps warning came ahead of a midnight deadline for the president and Congress to come to terms on a spending bill to avert a partial government shutdown that would affect funding for roughly 25 percent of the federal agencies whose budgets rely on Congress.

After Trump threatened Thursday to veto a Senate measure that did not contain the border funding he sought, the House hurried to appease the president, pulling together a bill that would keep the government funded through Feb. 8 while also allocating dollar 5.7 billion for the border wall. The House bill also included nearly dollar 8 billion for disaster relief for hurricanes and wildfires.

Democrats, however, have enough votes in the Senate to keep that bill from advancing and have showed no signs of relenting.

The bottom line is simple: the Trump temper tantrum will shut down the government, but it will not get him his wall, Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer D N.Y. told reporters Thursday night.

In a contentious Oval Office meeting last week with House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi D Calif. and Schumer D N.Y. , Trump said he would be proud to shut down the government for border security.

So I will take the mantle, he said. I will be the one to shut it down. I wont blame you for it.

Senator Mitch McConnell should fight for the Wall and Border Security as hard as he fought for anything. He will need Democrat votes, but as shown in the House, good things happen. If enough Dems dont vote, it will be a Democrat Shutdown! House Republicans were great yesterday!

In other tweets Friday, Trump urged Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell R Ky. to fight hard to pass a bill with he border wall funding he is seeking.

Senator Mitch McConnell should fight for the Wall and Border Security as hard as he fought for anything, Trump wrote. He will need Democrat votes, but as shown in the House, good things happen. If enough Dems dont vote, it will be a Democrat Shutdown! House Republicans were great yesterday!

Trump also urged McConnell to use the Nuclear Option and get it done!

That is a reference a Senate rule that requires 60 votes to advance most legislation. Trump was advocating that McConnell change the rule so that only 50 votes are required. By doing that, Republicans would be able to pass a bill without Democratic cooperation in a chamber in which Republicans hold 51 seats.

For more than a year, Trump has tried to pressure McConnell to change Senate rules in a way that would allow the chamber to pass legislation with a simple majority.

During the Obama administration, when the Senate was controlled by Democrats, Democrats changed the rules to allow most presidential nominees to advance with a simple majority of votes. During the beginning of the Trump administration, McConnell extended this practice to the nomination of Supreme Court justices, which proved crucial because both of Trumps nominees to the nations highest court won approval by a narrow margin.

But McConnell has resisted such a change for legislation, as have a number of other Republicans, worried about the precedent it would set.

Last year, more than 60 senators from both parties signed a letter to McConnell and Schumer, saying they were opposed to changing the rules in the way Trump has demanded. The letter was signed, among others by Republican Sens. Susan Collins of Maine, Roy Blunt of Missouri, and John Thune of South Dakota.

Mitch, use the Nuclear Option and get it done! Our Country is counting on you!

In his tweets, Trump also sought to counter Democratic arguments that a border wall is an antiquated strategy for curbing illegal border crossings.

The Democrats are trying to belittle the concept of a Wall, calling it old fashioned, Trump wrote. The fact is there is nothing elses that will work, and that has been true for thousands of years. Its like the wheel, there is nothing better.

Properly designed and built Walls work, and the Democrats are lying when they say they dont, the president added.

The Democrats are trying to belittle the concept of a Wall, calling it old fashioned. The fact is there is nothing elses that will work, and that has been true for thousands of years. Its like the wheel, there is nothing better. I know tech better than anyone, technology.....

The Democrats are trying to belittle the concept of a Wall, calling it old fashioned. The fact is there is nothing elses that will work, and that has been true for thousands of years. Its like the wheel, there is nothing better. I know tech better than anyone, technology.....

Trumps attacks on Twitter came as a number of federal agencies were in the final stages of implementing their shutdown plans.

A number of federal parks and monuments are slated to close, some as soon as Saturday morning. The Securities and Exchange Commission posted a list of the services it will soon suspend, including the processing of certain business records. The Justice Department, Commerce Department and Internal Revenue Service are preparing to send thousands of people home without pay.

And Trumps prediction that a shutdown would last for a very long time means that more than 100,000 federal employees risk missing at least one paycheck, and possibly more. Even the Border Patrol agents and Transportation Security Agency officials who are directed to continue working during the shutdown will not be paid until Congress funds their agencies.

About 480,000 federal workers would be furloughed, according to a Washington Post projection.

For more infomation >> Trump threatens government shutdown will last for a very long time if Democrats oppose House bill th - Duration: 5:09.

-------------------------------------------

Mick Mulvaney Will Let Trump Be Trump - Duration: 4:54.

WELCOME TO "THE LATE SHOW."

OF THE I'M YOUR HOST, STEPHEN COLBERT.

( CHEERS AND APPLAUSE ) I FEEL THE SAME WAY.

I FEEL THE SAME WAY.

I'M IN A GOOD MOOD.

HAPPY FRIDAY AND MERRY CHRISTMAS TO EVERYBODY.

THE PRESIDENT-- ( CHEERS AND APPLAUSE )

WOOO!

COMING TO THE END OF THE YEAR, AND WE HAVE EARNED IT.

THE PRESIDENT REPORTEDLY "WILL SPEND 16 DAYS AT MAR-A-LAGO

DURING THE HOLIDAYS."

THIS IS FUN.

COINCIDENTALLY, RICHARD NIXON WENT TO MAR-A-LAGO A MONTH

BEFORE HE RESIGNED THE PRESIDENCY.

( CHEERS AND APPLAUSE ) OH, PLEASE.

OH, HISTORY, OH, HISTORY, PLEASE REPEAT YOURSELF.

WE DID OUR PART BY NOT LEARNING FROM YOU.

( LAUGHTER ) NOW, WHEN TRUMP GETS BACK, HE'LL

HAVE A NEW CHIEF OF STAFF: BUDGET DIRECTOR AND CHEF FROM

THE PIZZA BOX, MICK MULVANEY.

MULVANEY'S PREDECESSOR, GENERAL JOHN KELLY, TRIED TO REIN IN

TRUMP, BUT ACCORDING TO POLITICO, MULVANEY DOESN'T PLAN

TO TRY.

"I AM HONORED TO BE THE NEW ZOOKEEPER.

AS MY FIRST OFFICIAL ACT, UNLOCK ALL THE CAGES!

LET'S GET THE LIONS HIGH AND RUB STEAK SAUCE ON THE PENGUINS."

( CHEERS AND APPLAUSE ) SOURCES -- SOURCES -- I COULD GO

FOR SOME PENGUIN.

SOURCES CLOSE TO MULVANEY SAY HE INTENDS TO GIVE TRUMP MORE

LEEWAY TO ACT AS HE CHOOSES-- A RECOGNITION THAT TRYING TO

CONTROL TRUMP IS A FUTILE APPROACH.

SO, I'D LIKE TO POINT OUT THAT WHAT WE'VE SEEN IN THE LAST YEAR

AND HALF IS TRUMP BEING CONTROLLED.

( LAUGHTER ) WHAT'S HE GOING TO BE LIKE NOW?

(AS TRUMP) : "I WAS WRONG.

THERE ARE NOT FINE PEOPLE ON BOTH SIDES.

WHITE POWER!

I'M GOING TO TWEET OUT THE NUCLEAR LAUNCH CODES!

I LOVE PUTIN!

I'LL COLLUDE WITH ANYTHING THAT MOVES!

LET THE PEE PEE RAIN!" ( CHEERS AND APPLAUSE )

ONE OF THE KEY HEADACHES FOR KELLY WAS HIS RELATIONSHIP WITH

JARED AND IVANKA-- OR AS THEY'RE KNOWN BY THEIR CELEBRITY COUPLE

NAME, THE ACTUAL CHIEF OF STAFF.

( LAUGHTER ) KELLY REPORTEDLY DERIDED THEM AS

TWO NEW YORKERS "PLAYING GOVERNMENT."

(AS IVANKA) : "OKAY, JARED, I'L BE THE FIRST DAUGHTER, WHO'S

ALSO A FASHION MODEL AND SECRETARY OF STATE.

YOU GET TO COVER UP THE MURDER OF A SAUDI JOURNALIST.

GO!

ERIC, YOU CAN BE A TREE STUMP."

( LAUGHTER ) BUT SOURCES SAY THAT MULVANEY IS

NOT GOING TO GET IN JARED AND IVANKA'S WAY.

A FORMER ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL SCOFFED AT THAT PLAN, SAYING,

"EVERYONE GETS ALONG WITH THE KIDS IN THE BEGINNING."

( LAUGHTER ) WOW, THAT SOUNDS OMINOUS.

"WHY, YOU MUST BE THE NEW NANNY.

YOU LIKE THE CHILDREN?

OH, EVERYONE LIKES THE CHILDREN, UNTIL SUNDOWN.

( LAUGHTER ) I HOPE YOU HAVE A STRONG DOOR.

( MANIACAL LAUGHTER ) THEY'RE WATCHING US RIGHT NOW."

( LAUGHTER ) AND WITH THE HOLIDAY SEASON

COMING UPON US, A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE GOING TO BE TRAVELING.

AND THERE'S SOME GOOD NEWS FOR FOLKS WHO PLAN ON FLYING,

BECAUSE THE T.S.A. HAS SAID IT WILL DIAL BACK ITS CONTROVERSIAL

PASSENGER-MONITORING PROGRAM CALLED "QUIET SKIES"-- WHICH IS

ALSO WHAT I CALL IT WHEN I CRUSH TWO AMBIEN INTO THAT TINY

WHISKEY BOTTLE.

( LAUGHTER ) YOU MAY NEVER HAVE HEARD OF

QUIET SKIES, BECAUSE THE GOAL OF THE PROGRAM WAS TO MONITOR

AMERICAN TRAVELERS WHO WERE NOT ON ANY TERROR WATCH LISTS OR

SUSPECTED OF TERRORISM OR CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR.

THAT'S ENTRAPMENT.

NO ONE IS AT THEIR BEST AT THE AIRPORT.

I ONCE SAW AN INFANT EAT A ENTIRE CINNABON.

I SAW A GUY CARRYING AN IGUANA IN A FANNY PACK.

I ONCE SAW A GUY PAY $4.50 FOR MINTS, AND THAT GUY WAS ME!

(LAUGHTER) WHY DIDN'T THE AIR MARSHALS

SHOOT ME?

THIS PROGRAM USED ARMED, UNDERCOVER AIR MARSHALS TO

MONITOR WHETHER TRAVELERS USED A PHONE, WENT TO THE BATHROOM,

CHATTED WITH OTHERS, OR CHANGED CLOTHES.

BUT AFTER COMPLAINTS, THE T.S.A.

HAS AGREED TO SCALE THE PROGRAM BACK... SORT OF.

MARSHALS WILL STILL MONITOR PEOPLE THEY CONSIDER PERSONS OF

INTEREST, BUT THEY ARE CHANGING THE THRESHOLD FOR REPORTING

THEIR OBSERVATIONS TO INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES.

SO, MARSHALS WILL STILL WATCH WHAT YOU DO, BUT WON'T

NECESSARILY REPORT IT, WHICH MEANS NOW THERE ARE JUST ARMED

MEN STATIONED AROUND THE AIRPORT WRITING DOWN WHEN YOU PEE.

( LAUGHTER ) "UH, YOU GOING TO REPORT THAT TO

SOMEBODY?" NO.

NA, THIS IS JUST FOR ME."

For more infomation >> Mick Mulvaney Will Let Trump Be Trump - Duration: 4:54.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Has Animal Named After Him - Duration: 2:27.

For more infomation >> Trump Has Animal Named After Him - Duration: 2:27.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Pivots On Wall Funding - Duration: 8:47.

For more infomation >> Trump Pivots On Wall Funding - Duration: 8:47.

-------------------------------------------

Gift Ideas For Trump Fans - Duration: 5:15.

For more infomation >> Gift Ideas For Trump Fans - Duration: 5:15.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Admin Makes It Harder For People To Get Food Stamps - Duration: 4:06.

Well, Christmas is just a few days away now, and so the Trump administration decided to

give an early present to needy families all over this country, and that present is, we're

about to cut your food stamps and there's nothing you can do about it.

You see Donald Trump and the Republicans had actually been working on cutting food stamps.

They had been wanting to do that for quite some time now.

Uh, but they tried to put it in the farm bill.

Well, it did not survive in the farm bill farm bill gets signed anyway.

So the Trump administration got a little more clever with it.

How can we cut food stamps without having to go through Congress?

And the s da came up with a brilliant plan.

They just issued a new set of rules this week that increases the work requirements for people

receiving snap benefits.

Here's the way it currently works.

If you are receiving snap benefits, there are work requirements.

I think you'd get about three months without having a job before you get kicked off.

But if you're in a state where the unemployment rate is 10 percent or more, you can get an

extension on that because obviously you're in an area where work is hard to find.

The government took that into account.

The new rule lowers that unemployment rate from 10 percent to seven percent.

This is going to result in a few million people getting kicked off of the food stamp programs.

Now, these could be people who are just unable to find work.

They could be people on disability who are unable to work or have an exceptionally difficult

time finding work.

Whatever the reason is, the Trump administration doesn't care.

We don't want you to keep suckling off the government's teat.

We want you to get off your ass and go get a job.

Right?

And not what the Republicans always say, get a job.

You Bum.

A lot of these people can't.

They want to.

They don't want to sit there and just have to have the government take care of them.

They want to take responsibility, but due to circumstances, a lot of them not of their

own making, they're unable to.

Whether it's a faulty economy in the city or state where they live or an accident that

happened to them that prevents them from being able to properly work.

They didn't do this to themselves, but they're the ones being punished.

Meanwhile, the USDA also wants to cut the program by one point $6, billion dollars annually,

so not only are fewer people going to be receiving benefits now, but the benefits the people

do receive.

We're going to reduce those because, hey, we just gave the wealthy a big tax break last

year and we've got to pay for it somehow.

Right?

I, to me, this is Paul Ryan's dream child right here.

We get to screw over the working class poor and then screw them over a little more by

just reducing the total amount of benefits.

Anyway, after kicking so many people off of these benefits, and this is what this administration

prioritized, right in the days before Christmas.

I mean, I can't think of anything more heartless, deceitful and disgusting than what they have

done to these people.

Right in the heart of the holiday season.

Maybe if Trump gets visited by three ghosts on Christmas Eve, maybe they'll decide that

this is a bad idea, but I seriously doubt any of that's gonna happen.

Cutting aid for needy people in the United States has been the Republicans number one

agenda item for more than a decade.

They finally found a president heartless enough and clueless enough about what the public's

going to view this like a to actually go through with it.

Trump is their guy and they are his guys.

There is no distinction anymore between Donald Trump and regular republicans because they

are all one in the same with the same goal of screwing over as many poor people as possible.

No comments:

Post a Comment