Saturday, September 8, 2018

Trump news on Youtube Sep 8 2018

Let's start with the latest diplomacy between North Korea and the U.S.

And it's a case of "you've got mail" for U.S. President Donald Trump.

He says North Korean leader Kim Jong-un has sent him another letter... as the two sides

look to start engaging each other again... on the regime's denuclearization.

Park Ji-won reports.

Speaking to reporters on Air Force One on Friday,... as he traveled to a campaign event

in North Dakota,...

U.S. President Donald Trump said a letter from North Korean leader Kim Jong-un is being

delivered to him,... and he expects it to be a positive one.

He added the letter was handed over at the inter-Korean border a day earlier.

Watchers expect this might refer to Friday, Korea time,... when general-level military

talks between the North and the United Nations Command took place at the inter-Korean border

village of Panmunjom,... discussing the joint recovery of the war remains of U.S. service

members killed during the Korean War.

President Trump added that his Secretary of State Mike Pompeo will deliver Kim's letter

to him, when he returns to the U.S. from his visit to India.

It's Kim's fourth personal letter to President Trump,... since the first letter was sent

in June.

The first letter, which Trump evaluated as "very nice",.... salvaged the almost canceled

North Korea-U.S. summit in Singapore in mid-June.

Kim's previous letter to President Trump was sent early last month,... as North Korea repatriated

war remains of U.S. troops back to their homeland.

Late last month,.. Trump canceled Pompeo's fourth visit to North Korea, citing a lack

of sufficient progress on denuclearization.

Now the question is whether Kim's latest direct message to President Trump could reignite

the once-stalled denuclearization talks between the two sides.

Park Ji-won, Arirang News.

For more infomation >> Trump says personal letter from Kim Jong-un is on its way to him - Duration: 1:59.

-------------------------------------------

'I don't talk the way I am quoted': Trump says quotes in Bob Woodward's bombshell book sound fake - Duration: 16:56.

President Donald Trump leveled a new attack on Bob Woodward's bombshell book revealing chaos in the White House and senior aides scurrying to thwart the president's worst impulses – saying the quotes of himself don't ring true

Trump said the book isn't accurate because 'I don't talk the way I am quoted.' Trump, who is engaged in a two-front leak war following the release of a devastating anonymous op-ed from an anonymous senior administration official, Tweeted Friday that 'The Woodward book is a scam

' The president continued: 'I don't talk the way I am quoted.If I did I would not have been elected President

These quotes were made up.The author uses every trick in the book to demean and belittle

I wish the people could see the real facts - and our country is doing GREAT!' Trump's rebuttal of the Woodward book about the way he comes off in direct quotes cuts to the storied author's unique methods

In the book's forward, Woodward notes that he has done hundreds of hours of interviews, conducted on 'deep background

' Woodward writes in the forward to the book, which was obtained by DailyMail.com: 'When I have attributed exact quotations, thoughts or conclusions to the participants, that information comes from the person, a colleague with direct knowledge, or from meeting notes, personal diaries, files and government or personal documents

' The book contains numerous eye-catching quotes from the president  in private settings that show him in a different light from those who know his verbiage from public events

For example, Trump unleashes a slew of expletives when Jared Kushner and Steve Bannon ask him to cut a $50 million check to his campaign in one scene in the book

'No way,' Trump responded.'F*** that.I'm not doing it 'Where the f***'s the money? Where's all this money from these [donor] guys? Jared, you're supposed to be raising all this money

Not going to do it.' In a post-election scene in the book, Trump bashes a South Korea trade deal – but uses its technical acronym in a way that would be unfamiliar at any Trump rally

'I'm tired of these arguments!' Trump is quoted as saying at a meeting.'I don't want to hear about it anymore

We're getting out of KORUS.' Earlier in the week, Trump disputed the books claim that he called his attorney general, Jeff Sessions, 'mentally retarded,' and mocked his southern accent

'I said NEITHER, never used those terms on anyone, including Jeff, and being a southerner is a GREAT thing,' Trump wrote

However, Trump used the phrase 'mentally retarded' as an insult during radio interviews

He also has used the term 'dumb southerner' to mock in-laws, the New York Times reported

Trump went after the Woodward book as the furious hunt for the senior leaker who trashed President Trump in an anonymous op-ed heated up Friday, following reports Trump has a list of 12 suspects and still more denials from top officials who said they didn't do it

Kentucky Sen.Rand Paul has suggested lie detector tests for senior aides in just one of the aggressive options to try to identify the author from within his own administration who charged Trump with holding 'off the rails' meetings, filled with 'repetitive rants' that produce 'half-baked, ill-informed and occasionally reckless decisions

' Another tactic being floated is to force aides to sign sworn affidavits stating that they weren't behind the leaks

FBI Director Chris Wray is the latest top official to deny being behind the devastating op-ed, after Vice President Mike Pence and a raft of cabinet secretaries and senior aides said they didn't do it

Top aides have already been forced to sign non-disclosure agreements, so it is unclear what additional weight an affidavit might carry

An outside advisor said the White House has winnowed down the list of suspects to just a dozen, the New York Times reported

Trump said Thursday that an anonymous op-ed slamming him in The New York Times was an act of treason, asserting something he has only written with a question mark to date

The title used by the Times op-ed page, 'a senior official in the Trump administration,' could refer to hundreds of people

'The Times should never have done that because really what they've done is virtually, you know, it's treason

You could call it a lot of things,' the president said in Billings, Montana.Trump was being interviewed by Fox News Channel co-host Pete Hegseth in one corner of the Rimrock Auto Arena, with a live audience of more than 10,000 people

In his speech he blasted the 'anonymous gutless coward' behind the essay, verbally hiccuping on the word 'anonymous' and twice mangling the pronunciation

'Nobody knows who the hell he is, or she,' he finally declared.Trump repeated a challenge he had already issued to the Times on Twitter, demanding the paper's nameless author's head on a platter

'For the sake of our national security, The New York Times should publish his name at once

I think their reporters should go and investigate who it is.That would actually be a good scoop

That would be a good scoop!' he said.'At some point this whole thing is going to be exposed,' Trump predicted, as he warned about 'unelected deep-state operatives' who have tried to take his government into their own hands in a soft coup

'And it's really bad and it's really dangerous,' he said.'And it's really sad for the media

' Trump's stemwinder was met with unanimous cheers.No protesters raised their voices

During his pre-show interview with Fox, he speculated about who might have written the piece, focusing on people working 'at a fairly low level' who may want to give the public a false picture of what's going on at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue

'I don't mind when they write a book and they make lies, because it gets discredited,' he said

'We just discredited the last one.' But he admitted that he 'can't discredit' the Times turncoat 'because you don't know who they are

' The culprit could be a non-Republican lurking in his administration, he suggested, or 'it may be a deep-state person that's been there a long time

' The president had suggested ahalf-hour earlier that he would put muscle behind efforts to identify the official who broke ranks to claim in the Times that a 'resistance' of aides is trying to subvert the president's worst instincts for the good of the country

DailyMail.com asked him on the tarmac in Billings how he planned to uncover the disloyal official's identity

'We're going to try!' he yelled, over the noise of an idling Air Force One.As Air Force One was on approach for landing, Trump flexed his Twitter muscle in the Times' direction, while one of the paper's star photographers was sitting on the plane

'Are the investigative 'journalists' of the New York Times going to investigate themselves - who is the anonymous letter writer?' he wrote

Trump seemed content for most of the day while watching the drama of a Washington-wide molehunt play out on television and Twitter, and appreciatively consuming reports of Cabinet members denying any involvement in the journalistic bombshell

A White House official said in the afternoon that the president would 'probably go there in Montana' – anticipating a stem-winder about the op-ed

But the official wouldn't predict Trump's willingness to field direct questions from the press about who was and wasn't under suspicion

Trump boarded Marine One on the South Lawn without approaching a waiting gaggle of reporters

At Joint Base Andrews, he strode methodically up the Air Force One stairway, never coming near a traveling press corps that shouted questions about how he would unmask his deep-state Judas

And despite a nearly four-hour flight to the upper plains, he didn't stray to the aft press cabin to talk: He was saving his rhetorical bullets for Fox News

Non-Fox reporters were treated to a nonstop Fox feed on TV screens while the network was reporting on an ever-lengthening list of Cabinet officials and other Trump A-listers who denied having anything to do with the Times essay

At one point Fox filled its screen with a grid of 32 faces including Vice President Mike Pence, Ambassador to Russia Jon Huntsman, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Defense Secretary James Mattis

First lady Melania Trump said in a statement: 'To the writer of the oped - you are not protecting this country, you are sabotaging it with your cowardly actions

' Another White House official said Thursday that West Wing aides couldn't wait for the president to leave town, knowing it would 'lower the building's blood pressure and give him a reboot' in an atmosphere where he excels

Trump held his Montana rally in support of U.S.Senate candidate Matt Rosendale, who is challenging Democratic incumbent Jon Tester

He blames Tester for scuttling his White House physician's nomination to serve as Veterans Affairs secretary

Dr.Ronny Jackson, a respected Navy admiral, was forced to withdraw following Tester's accusations that he oversaw a 'toxic' work environment, drank on the job and overprescribed medication

The president, who insisted none of it was true, pledged that Tester would ultimately have a 'big price to pay in Montana

' Tester, he said Thursday, 'will never 'drain the swamp' because he happens to live in the swamp

' 'Jon Tester talks like he's from Montana, but he votes like he's Nancy Pelosi,' he said, lumping the Democrat in with one of the nation's most liberal lamakers

Trump needed the rally to publicly shake his Etch-a-Sketch following a week of revelations that hit his team like a series of kidney punches

First came excerpts from journalist Bob Woodward's forthcoming book 'Fear,' which paints the president as an ill-prepared and crude leader whose lack of impulse control drove senior aides to protect him from himself

In one vignette, Woodward describes then-chief economic adviser Gary Cohn literally swiping a draft memo from the Resolute Desk to derail Trump's goal of ending a crucial Korean trade agreement

Scuttling the longstanding deal would have introduced uncertainty into Washington's relationship with Seoul and could have jeopardized America's use of South Korean real estate for an ambitious missile-detection program

Internal fallout from the Cohn affair inside the West Wing had barely softened from panic to mere shock when The New York Times twisted the knife

The publication of Wednesday's unsigned op-ed, which the Times claims was penned by a 'senior' administration official, struck a variation on the same theme

Its central claim is that a winking, nudging cabal of aides considers its primary mission to save the republic from Trump's ham-fisted ways

'Many of the senior officials in his own administration are working diligently from within to frustrate parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations,' according to the still-unidentified writer

For more infomation >> 'I don't talk the way I am quoted': Trump says quotes in Bob Woodward's bombshell book sound fake - Duration: 16:56.

-------------------------------------------

Full President Trump interview with MTN News - Duration: 13:45.

mr. president thanks very much for

<font color="#E5E5E5">joining us</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> thank you very much John</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> it's</font>

very nice to<font color="#E5E5E5"> have</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> you here in Montana</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">obviously we'd like to</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> say welcome to</font>

Montana and<font color="#E5E5E5"> we start an interview but we</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">already had thousands of other people do</font>

that<font color="#E5E5E5"> for</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> you last night tell us</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> about</font>

the rally your<font color="#E5E5E5"> reactions well it was a</font>

beautiful<font color="#CCCCCC"> scene it was</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> a great evening</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">and</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> as you know Matt</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> Rosendale is a</font>

fantastic person that's why I'm<font color="#E5E5E5"> doing it</font>

I know how good<font color="#E5E5E5"> he</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> is he's got a great</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">heart</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> I hated to see what Jon Tester</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> did</font>

to the Admiral<font color="#CCCCCC"> we</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> have an admiral who's</font>

a<font color="#E5E5E5"> world-class human being and they lied</font>

about<font color="#E5E5E5"> him and they demeaned him and they</font>

defamed him and they were you<font color="#CCCCCC"> know a</font>

normal person<font color="#CCCCCC"> I would say</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> they ruined</font>

him and he'll he'll be fine

but what they did to him was horrible

what<font color="#E5E5E5"> they did to his family</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> I sort of</font>

call welcome<font color="#E5E5E5"> to</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> the</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> world of politics</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">but it shouldn't be</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> that way but what</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">tester did to him was a</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> terrible thing</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">terrible terrible thing so I I came here</font>

for<font color="#E5E5E5"> Matt and he's a terrific person</font>

really a terrific<font color="#E5E5E5"> person he'll be a</font>

great<font color="#CCCCCC"> Senator for Montana okay let's</font>

jump into the<font color="#E5E5E5"> news of the day good</font>

economic<font color="#CCCCCC"> numbers yesterday</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> we saw jobs</font>

report on wages<font color="#E5E5E5"> up first time in a long</font>

time<font color="#E5E5E5"> they said that couldn't be done</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">wages up full unemployment it's going to</font>

get better<font color="#E5E5E5"> we have tremendous potential</font>

we're opening<font color="#E5E5E5"> up our country</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> we're</font>

taking off regulations<font color="#E5E5E5"> that are horrible</font>

the<font color="#CCCCCC"> big tax cuts which the people</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> of</font>

Montana really<font color="#CCCCCC"> appreciate it I saw that</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">last</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> night</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> because as</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> soon as I</font>

mentioned the word tax cuts they were

going while that was a packed house that

was a beautiful place by the way but a

packed house and it's just<font color="#CCCCCC"> all happening</font>

but a very big<font color="#CCCCCC"> thing this morning that</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">is being covered that way actually were</font>

wages<font color="#E5E5E5"> because</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> wages have gone</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> down for</font>

years<font color="#E5E5E5"> you</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> know I used</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> to tell in the</font>

campaign<font color="#E5E5E5"> that</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> for</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> 18 19 years people</font>

were that worked three or four jobs that

go out<font color="#E5E5E5"> and just work all the time</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> and</font>

they were<font color="#E5E5E5"> making less than they were</font>

making<font color="#E5E5E5"> 18 and 20</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> years ago</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> and</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> now wages</font>

are<font color="#CCCCCC"> finally going</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> up which is what I</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">really wanted so to</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> me that was the</font>

biggest<font color="#E5E5E5"> news</font>

biggest economic<font color="#E5E5E5"> driver in the state</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> is</font>

our<font color="#CCCCCC"> farm and ranch economy and</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> we look</font>

at a an economic driver there's over two

billion dollars a year<font color="#CCCCCC"> and the farm and</font>

ranch economy relies<font color="#CCCCCC"> on exports</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> that's</font>

right

need to<font color="#E5E5E5"> have a good place for those</font>

goods<font color="#E5E5E5"> and services to be to be shipped</font>

out right there are some<font color="#E5E5E5"> farmers and</font>

ranchers who are<font color="#CCCCCC"> nervous with new trade</font>

agreements looming<font color="#E5E5E5"> but they're with me</font>

all the<font color="#E5E5E5"> way because they</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> know I'm doing</font>

the<font color="#E5E5E5"> right thing I mean I know exactly</font>

what<font color="#E5E5E5"> you</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> two and they are they're a</font>

little bit<font color="#E5E5E5"> nervous but they have</font>

confidence<font color="#E5E5E5"> in me they have trust</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> in me</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">we're opening up barriers</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> you see what</font>

I'm doing with Canada is an example

<font color="#E5E5E5">Canada has not treated as well and big</font>

barriers they pay you know there's a<font color="#CCCCCC"> 300</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">percent</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> think of it</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> three hundred</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">percent</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> tariff if you sell dairy</font>

products into Canada<font color="#E5E5E5"> we're saying we're</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">not playing this</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> game anymore</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> they have</font>

a tremendous you know<font color="#CCCCCC"> if we look at our</font>

surplus with Canada<font color="#E5E5E5"> it's not a surplus</font>

it's a huge deficit<font color="#E5E5E5"> so we're changing</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">and we're being tough and let them be</font>

tough but we're making<font color="#E5E5E5"> we're opening up</font>

countries we're opening up<font color="#CCCCCC"> the EU its</font>

Europe we're opening up probably<font color="#CCCCCC"> we're</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">gonna</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> be opening up China we're in a big</font>

big fight<font color="#E5E5E5"> with China</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> what I love</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> about</font>

the folks in Montana and they are

important<font color="#E5E5E5"> to you but what I like about</font>

the folks in Montana they know it's not

<font color="#E5E5E5">right what's been happening for many</font>

years<font color="#CCCCCC"> China's been taking out 500</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">billion a year from the United</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> States</font>

and they've been rebuilding China it's

been bad<font color="#CCCCCC"> for us so I'm in a very</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> tough</font>

battle<font color="#CCCCCC"> and we're gonna win the battle</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">we're gonna absolutely</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> win it and what I</font>

love<font color="#E5E5E5"> about the farmers and ranchers and</font>

and all of<font color="#CCCCCC"> the people in Montana</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> and</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">other states to be honest with you</font>

because they're all seeing<font color="#E5E5E5"> what's</font>

happening<font color="#CCCCCC"> we're winning</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> all these</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">battles we're gonna win against China</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">we're gonna win against Canada</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> we're</font>

gonna win against everybody and

ultimately it's<font color="#E5E5E5"> gonna be a win for</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> them</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">too I</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> assume because there's got to be a</font>

two-way street<font color="#CCCCCC"> but we have all the cards</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">our country is</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> all the cards we've never</font>

had<font color="#E5E5E5"> a</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> president that</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> wanted</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> to</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> play the</font>

cards they were willing<font color="#E5E5E5"> to accept a bad</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">NAFTA deal</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> if you look at farms over 15</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">years before</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> I got here</font>

15<font color="#E5E5E5"> years they've been going down if you</font>

look<font color="#E5E5E5"> at soybeans and I tell this often</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">five years</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> before my</font>

election it cut in half<font color="#E5E5E5"> okay so five</font>

years<font color="#CCCCCC"> before the</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> election before that</font>

great day in November<font color="#CCCCCC"> two years</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> ago</font>

soybeans went down like this<font color="#E5E5E5"> so</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> the day</font>

I got elected they had dropped<font color="#E5E5E5"> 50%</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> it</font>

wasn't good<font color="#CCCCCC"> you know that and we're</font>

opening<font color="#E5E5E5"> up markets because they</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> were</font>

closing markets and they were closing

<font color="#E5E5E5">them for their farmers and for other</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">reasons</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> but they were closing markets we</font>

say if you want to play the game and<font color="#E5E5E5"> if</font>

you want to be with the United<font color="#CCCCCC"> States</font>

you<font color="#CCCCCC"> have to</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> open up</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> your markets to our</font>

farmers<font color="#E5E5E5"> to</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> our</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> ranchers you have to open</font>

up<font color="#E5E5E5"> your markets and the people of</font>

Montana<font color="#CCCCCC"> they know that and you</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> know</font>

knows it better<font color="#E5E5E5"> than anybody</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> Matt</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">Rosendale</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> because he's pushing me make a</font>

great deal for<font color="#E5E5E5"> our farmers for for all</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">of our people and</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> for the country</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> but</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">Matt</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> Rosendale the first thing he said</font>

when<font color="#E5E5E5"> I</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> met him last night is please make</font>

a great<font color="#E5E5E5"> deal for the farmers and our</font>

ranch in community loves<font color="#E5E5E5"> Mexico and</font>

Canada well we already<font color="#E5E5E5"> have</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> a deal with</font>

Mexico which<font color="#E5E5E5"> is a much better deal</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> than</font>

we had we had a<font color="#E5E5E5"> horrible deal we were</font>

losing a fortune we were losing a

hundred<font color="#E5E5E5"> billion dollars</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> a year</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> on NAFTA</font>

with Mexico it's just what country wants

to do that<font color="#E5E5E5"> so now we have a fair deal</font>

with Mexico and<font color="#E5E5E5"> we very well could</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> have</font>

a fair deal<font color="#E5E5E5"> very soon with Canada or</font>

maybe not<font color="#E5E5E5"> and if we don't we're going to</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">do just</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> fine because we have another</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">alternative</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> that maybe is</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> better to be</font>

honest<font color="#E5E5E5"> but we'll see what happens</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">coal is another big dynamic driver in</font>

this state we rely on it right for state

tax income<font color="#E5E5E5"> you're still bullish on coal</font>

even though<font color="#E5E5E5"> a natural gas option</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> well</font>

natural gas is good<font color="#E5E5E5"> but we need coal</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">also you know what we need coal</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> too as a</font>

military alternative<font color="#E5E5E5"> because you know</font>

they blow up a pipeline<font color="#CCCCCC"> that's the end</font>

of your natural gas with coal you can

dump it over there you have two<font color="#E5E5E5"> years</font>

supply at your at<font color="#E5E5E5"> your big plants you</font>

can truck it<font color="#CCCCCC"> over the roads</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> that are no</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">longer</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> in existence you can do a lot of</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">things so no coal is</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> very close to my</font>

heart<font color="#E5E5E5"> clean coal I won your state by 20</font>

points<font color="#CCCCCC"> I won West Virginia by 42 points</font>

I won every coal state by a lot and we

just<font color="#CCCCCC"> had a rally in</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> West Virginia</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> it was</font>

unbelievable

same thing as<font color="#E5E5E5"> last night you</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> know it's</font>

really it's<font color="#E5E5E5"> really pretty much the same</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">everywhere they like what</font>

doing<font color="#E5E5E5"> and</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> coal</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> I just looked at the</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">window and there was a train the longest</font>

train I think I've ever<font color="#CCCCCC"> seen and every</font>

is that a<font color="#CCCCCC"> standard like 110 could it</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> be</font>

a<font color="#E5E5E5"> little bit longer if they want</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> it why</font>

is that<font color="#E5E5E5"> is that an actual standard</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> no</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">really okay well then it was a hundred</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">and ten cars and every one of</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> them was</font>

loaded up with call and they say two

<font color="#CCCCCC">years ago you wouldn't</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> have seen that</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">same so it's</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> pretty good</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> the coal people</font>

like me and<font color="#CCCCCC"> I like them the miners let's</font>

talk about a<font color="#CCCCCC"> couple of things and</font>

current<font color="#CCCCCC"> events sure right at this moment</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">I saw this morning on Twitter you</font>

mentioned Bob Woodward's book<font color="#CCCCCC"> yeah fear</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">and calling it a sham</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> what did you see</font>

in that that you didn't like and<font color="#E5E5E5"> yeah</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">well I it's</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> it's a scam and a sham</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> but</font>

I'll<font color="#E5E5E5"> tell you what I didn't like</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">I'm quoted as a fool</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> because if you look</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">at the way I don't speak that way I'm</font>

highly educated I went to the Wharton

School<font color="#E5E5E5"> of Finance</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> I don't speak that way</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">they're giving quotes</font>

now if these quotes even<font color="#E5E5E5"> exist</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> I don't</font>

know do they<font color="#E5E5E5"> make them up or what they</font>

say they<font color="#E5E5E5"> got them from a lot of people</font>

now general matters<font color="#CCCCCC"> whose</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> highly</font>

respected said he never<font color="#E5E5E5"> said that and</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> he</font>

gave the<font color="#E5E5E5"> most beautiful</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> renunciation of</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">the book</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> general Kelly the same thing he</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">said I never said that</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> and he</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> gave and</font>

if you look many of my<font color="#E5E5E5"> cabinet people</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">many of the people</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> that were quoted said</font>

they never<font color="#E5E5E5"> said that they never said</font>

that<font color="#CCCCCC"> and I actually said in the tweet</font>

this<font color="#E5E5E5"> morning</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> I said look if I spoke that</font>

way I'd never<font color="#E5E5E5"> be</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> President I did it last</font>

night<font color="#CCCCCC"> I</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> said if I</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> would act like</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> the way</font>

they say I'd never<font color="#E5E5E5"> be in front of you</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">then I'll speak for an hour to an hour</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">and a half in</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> front</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> of massive crowds</font>

usually<font color="#E5E5E5"> without even notes you don't do</font>

that<font color="#E5E5E5"> unless you're</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> very</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> capable very</font>

very competent<font color="#E5E5E5"> and capable</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> so</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> these</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">books are terrible where they can write</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">anything they want they can make up the</font>

most<font color="#E5E5E5"> horrible statements one person said</font>

he<font color="#E5E5E5"> was in a room and I was so good</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> so it</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">was this morning</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> he</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> was</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> in</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> two he</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> said I</font>

was at<font color="#E5E5E5"> that meeting he was so good it</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">was a military</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> meeting but the way they</font>

phrase it<font color="#E5E5E5"> it sounds like a fool I don't</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">talk that</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> way</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> and if I did you would</font>

have<font color="#CCCCCC"> found it out over the last two</font>

years<font color="#CCCCCC"> you would have found</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> that out</font>

during<font color="#CCCCCC"> the campaign where I took</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> down</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> 17</font>

Republicans<font color="#E5E5E5"> and Hillary Clinton</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> and I</font>

guess you could<font color="#E5E5E5"> say Bernie</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> too because</font>

in a certain<font color="#CCCCCC"> way I had to</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> take him down</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">but I beat everybody</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> and beat him badly</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">a foolish person</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> wouldn't be able</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> to do</font>

that they<font color="#E5E5E5"> would</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> have</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> been long gone so</font>

books are I've had some very<font color="#CCCCCC"> good books</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">written judge</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> Jeanine so many of them</font>

have<font color="#CCCCCC"> come out</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> Greg</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> I'll tell you the</font>

book on on the whole Muller

<font color="#E5E5E5">investigation that the scam</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> of Russia</font>

had this whole scam that's going<font color="#E5E5E5"> on</font>

there's no collusion<font color="#E5E5E5"> very interesting in</font>

the<font color="#CCCCCC"> book they</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> hardly talk about</font>

collusion<font color="#E5E5E5"> you know why and he would have</font>

loved<font color="#CCCCCC"> to that's his business right you</font>

know why they don't<font color="#E5E5E5"> talk about</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> it</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">because there was no collusion with</font>

Russia<font color="#CCCCCC"> so I'm over all I have to say</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> the</font>

publicity we've been getting has been

really good this letter<font color="#E5E5E5"> that was written</font>

to<font color="#CCCCCC"> the</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> New York Times with nobody knows</font>

who it is<font color="#CCCCCC"> I think it's really turned</font>

around<font color="#E5E5E5"> and hurt the New York Times it</font>

makes them look<font color="#CCCCCC"> so bad and I</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> think oh I</font>

think<font color="#E5E5E5"> it's but I think it's a disgrace</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">because normally if somebody</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> wants to</font>

write<font color="#CCCCCC"> something</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> bad that's okay because</font>

you<font color="#CCCCCC"> can go</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> back at them</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> and you debate</font>

the issue and somebody<font color="#E5E5E5"> comes out on top</font>

you<font color="#E5E5E5"> don't know who this person</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> is it may</font>

be<font color="#CCCCCC"> a low-level</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> person just writing</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> a</font>

letter<font color="#CCCCCC"> you know we have</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> thousands of</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">people working over there so I think it</font>

actually has<font color="#E5E5E5"> turned to a point where the</font>

New York Times is looking<font color="#CCCCCC"> very foolish</font>

all right<font color="#CCCCCC"> and very</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> bad one last one and</font>

that's<font color="#CCCCCC"> just to kind of give us a sense</font>

of<font color="#E5E5E5"> the</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> State</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> of the</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> Union</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> and people</font>

seem to<font color="#E5E5E5"> be divided in our country right</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">yeah and I'm sure that</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> that weighs heavy</font>

on<font color="#E5E5E5"> you yeah tell me</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> about how you look</font>

at trying<font color="#CCCCCC"> to bridge that well it's a</font>

very<font color="#E5E5E5"> interesting and good question</font>

because<font color="#E5E5E5"> in one way it's the strongest</font>

we've ever been<font color="#CCCCCC"> the economy is the best</font>

we've ever been<font color="#CCCCCC"> your coal miners are</font>

coming<font color="#E5E5E5"> back like never</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> before you know</font>

that<font color="#CCCCCC"> they were it</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> was that they were out</font>

of<font color="#E5E5E5"> business</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> if I didn't</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> when they were</font>

out of<font color="#CCCCCC"> business there would be no more</font>

coal taken out of the<font color="#CCCCCC"> ground I've taken</font>

regulations off by the hundreds and

hundreds and I've been thanked by

everybody<font color="#CCCCCC"> from the miners to the owners</font>

of<font color="#E5E5E5"> the mines that</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> were going</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> out</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">literally out of business</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> we're doing</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">Fenton</font>

Stickley financially<font color="#E5E5E5"> we're doing</font>

fantastically militarily<font color="#CCCCCC"> we're doing</font>

well in every single way other than

<font color="#E5E5E5">there</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> is a</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> tremendous hatred I watch</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">Judge</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> Cavanaugh</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> who's central casting a</font>

great intellect<font color="#E5E5E5"> top student at Yale</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> we</font>

just went through<font color="#E5E5E5"> justice now justice</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">Gorsuch</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> number one in this class</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> at</font>

Harvard<font color="#E5E5E5"> number one in his class at</font>

Oxford and<font color="#E5E5E5"> it was nasty</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> but not as nasty</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">as this one and we have a man who</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> is</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">just an extraordinary</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> man a great</font>

intellect<font color="#E5E5E5"> and I think frankly</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> the other</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">side's</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> making fools out of themselves</font>

but the level<font color="#E5E5E5"> of hatred the level of</font>

animosity<font color="#E5E5E5"> it's hard to believe so if I</font>

was going<font color="#CCCCCC"> to say there's any one problem</font>

in this<font color="#CCCCCC"> country it is</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> definitely that</font>

you have two sides<font color="#E5E5E5"> and there's great</font>

division and there shouldn't<font color="#CCCCCC"> be that</font>

division but<font color="#E5E5E5"> it seems no matter what you</font>

do<font color="#CCCCCC"> no matter</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> how good look wages are</font>

going up such a<font color="#E5E5E5"> big thing numbers are</font>

great the stock<font color="#E5E5E5"> markets at an all-time</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">high</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> there's more people working in the</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">United States</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> today</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> than ever before</font>

think of that ever before<font color="#CCCCCC"> we're</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> more</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">people working african-american</font>

employment you know<font color="#CCCCCC"> as you know</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> is is</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">doing great</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">Asian employment Hispanic employment</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">women's employment every single</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> every</font>

single stat is fantastic the only thing

you<font color="#E5E5E5"> hit it</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> the only</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> thing that troubles</font>

me<font color="#CCCCCC"> is when you</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> see an economy doing so</font>

well a<font color="#E5E5E5"> country doing so well and yet</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">this this level of division and hatred</font>

and that's a shame and maybe we can do

something<font color="#CCCCCC"> about</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> it</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> I hope so</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> one more</font>

shout out to<font color="#CCCCCC"> the people</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> of Montana well</font>

you're very<font color="#CCCCCC"> special people I want to</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">thank you for</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> that 20-point victory and</font>

I will say this<font color="#E5E5E5"> Matt</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> Rosendale is a</font>

winner<font color="#E5E5E5"> successful really loves you loves</font>

this state<font color="#CCCCCC"> he's going to be a</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> fantastic</font>

senator Jon Tester has done some very

<font color="#CCCCCC">bad things and things that</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> cannot be</font>

rewarded especially in hurting<font color="#E5E5E5"> a great</font>

human<font color="#E5E5E5"> being like the</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> Admiral he's a</font>

doctor and<font color="#E5E5E5"> he's an admiral and he was</font>

hurt really badly by<font color="#E5E5E5"> John tester and it</font>

all turned<font color="#CCCCCC"> out</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> to be false so</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> we</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> want</font>

Matt<font color="#CCCCCC"> Rosendale and it's very important</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">that he</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> wins and it's very important</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">because test</font>

we'll never vote for any<font color="#E5E5E5"> of our agenda</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">when we talk about</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> second</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> Amendment when</font>

we talk<font color="#CCCCCC"> about all of the things that we</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">talk</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> about</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> even when we talk</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> about coal</font>

and regulations

he will never<font color="#E5E5E5"> vote for</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> us he's</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> always</font>

going<font color="#E5E5E5"> to stay with Schumer and Pelosi</font>

<font color="#E5E5E5">always so I just say vote for</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> Matt</font>

<font color="#CCCCCC">Rosendale</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> all right thank you very very</font>

good<font color="#E5E5E5"> thank</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> you great</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> job</font>

For more infomation >> Full President Trump interview with MTN News - Duration: 13:45.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Policy Adviser Sentenced For Lying To FBI - Duration: 0:27.

For more infomation >> Trump Policy Adviser Sentenced For Lying To FBI - Duration: 0:27.

-------------------------------------------

Obama Tries Taking Credit For Booming Economy, Trump Responds With Hilarious Come Back - Duration: 1:56.

Obama Tries Taking Credit For Booming Economy, Trump Responds With Hilarious Come Back

On Friday during a speech in Fargo, North Dakota, President Trump responded to remarks

former President Obama made during a speech in Chicago, IL.

Obama tried to take credit for President Trump's booming economy.

On Friday morning, Obama gave a speech at the University of Illinois lying through his

teeth trying to take credit for President Trump's booming economy.

Jealous Obama said, "It did not start with Donald Trump.

He is a symptom, not the cause.

He is just capitalizing on resentments that politicians have been fanning for years."

The US GDP for the second quarter under President Trump boosted to 4.1% and is climbing.

President Trump took the stage in North Dakota and laughed at Obama's nonsense.President

Trump said Obama was trying to take credit for this incredible thing that's happening

in our country.

"Sorry I watched it but I fell asleep.

He's found he's very good, very good for sleeping.

I think he was trying to take credit.

He was trying to take credit for this incredible thing that's happening for our country…

I have to say this to President Obama, it wasn't him, but it would have been the same

thing."

"If the Democrats got in with their agenda almost two years ago, instead of having 4.2

up, I think honestly you'd have 4.2 down.

You'd be negative.

It'd be negative numbers."

President Trump declared.

For more infomation >> Obama Tries Taking Credit For Booming Economy, Trump Responds With Hilarious Come Back - Duration: 1:56.

-------------------------------------------

Tucker Carlson Tonight "Trump Derangement Syndrome" 9/7/18 - Duration: 39:37.

welcome to Tucker Carlson tonight

veteran members of both parties in

Washington suddenly seem pretty excited

about forcing the president from office

without bothering to call an election

well call that what you will it's not

democracy not that they care they just

want their power back but before that

happens we have some questions for the

permanent class in Washington about what

exactly it is they believe and what they

plan to do if they retake power that's

just ahead but first in case we're

starting to sour on Donald Trump after

all the drama of the last week Barack

Obama reappeared today to remind us why

America elected Trump in the first place

in a remarkable departure from tradition

and decorum Obama gave a bitterly

partisan campaign speech at the

University of Illinois at

champaign-urbana in which he urged

voters to support Democrats in the

midterm elections like virtually all

Obama speeches the subtext was mostly

about the omnipresence of white racism

which Obama needless to say blamed for

the rise of Trump but then he got

creative watch for example as Obama

blames the current administration for

pursuing almost exactly the same Russia

policy that he once did what happened to

the Republican Party its central

organizing principle in foreign policy

was the fight against communism and now

they're closing up to the former head of

the KGB how did a guy from Hawaii learn

to talk like that where do you get that

accent it's pretty funny but that was

just an aside soon Obama went back to

his favorite and endlessly recurring

theme Republican racism here's one quote

each time we painstakingly pull

ourselves closer to our founding ideals

that all of us are created equal endowed

by our creator with certain inalienable

rights that's why they elected Trump

they're just like slaveholders in the

antebellum South

watch Obama explain I understand this is

not just a matter of Democrats versus

Republicans or liberals versus

conservatives

at various times in our history this

kind of politics has infected both

parties Southern Democrats were the

bigger defenders of slavery slavery say

it simple

racism did it interestingly the one

thing Obama didn't mention was the death

of the American middle class and that's

odd because it was only in 2015 seven

years into Obama's presidency when the

middle class became a minority in this

country for the first time in living

memory that was the pivotal event of the

past several decades it changed this

country profoundly it is the cause of

nearly all of our current political

turmoil but to Obama it simply never

happened and of course seven years of

his policies had literally nothing to do

with it throughout Washington

establishment figures burst into

applause when they heard that they don't

want to talk about the dying middle

class either they're not interested and

they don't want to be implicated so much

easier just to blame racists under the

bed Kristen is a radio show host in New

York and a former staffer to Senator

Chuck Schumer and he joins us tonight so

Chris is it really that simple I mean

that the president said today if you if

you read the speech carefully as I did

what most Democrats have been saying for

the last years it's just racism all this

is racism people couldn't on Republicans

rural people these couldn't deal with

all the equality and so there's a

backlash and they elected Trump is that

really the explanation do you think yeah

I don't think that's really what he said

today and I think that's what he said

for anybody I think it's rich for

anybody to say that norms were not being

fouled today which is what you open with

today because norms have not been

followed for the last 20 months by this

president and I think it's time every

good American start pushing back and I

think President Obama speak today was a

rallying cry to the entire country okay

it was it was a campaign speech designed

to get Democrats elected he's a Democrat

I'm not begrudging yeah but I said we

just make two points one if you're

against overturning norms that surely it

must bother you that a recently retired

president is giving a campaign speech

have a norm that they don't do that he

just did and since you're a defender of

norms you're not bothered no I just

don't think that the the people who love

freedom and love our Constitution in

this country should universally disarm

to a president who has decided to push

every norm including holding on the

president including hold on Tucker

including calling on the press to turn

someone over to the government which you

know ok the Republican Party usually

think that Obamacare was tyranny don't

you think that's more tyrannical right

yeah you're talking okay whatever it's

it's also it's such a talking point so

yeah look that's fine then just don't

ever lecture me about normals again if

it's bad for Trump to overturn norms

which he's certainly done I'm not

denying that obviously he has completely

Obama's he has and Obama just did it

again today but that's cool and what

Trump is doing is bad because why stop

lecturing me about norms please but

let's get back to the race thing look

because I think it's real

Obama I read the speech I watched the

speech again and again he says this is

part of a long cycle in American history

says it out loud where we enfranchise

certain groups in the country and

certain reactionary elements hate that

and so they strike back that so Trump

code you just said that he blamed us on

racism and I'm asking you do you think

that's true is that really what the

Trump election was about racism I

watched the speech and then I read it

again in preparing for this show and

President Obama said that there are

genuinely people in this country that

fear change and it's not because of race

that's what he said today okay are there

people in this country are there people

in this country that have a racial

element to their politics of course

there are Tucker we both agree on that

yeah Obama is first on that list I would

say but let me ask you I don't honestly

don't you think if you're assessing

what's going on in America and Obama

fancies himself this intellectual as you

know and you guys pretend he is an

intellectual shouldn't you mention the

death of the middle class in your speech

during his presidency the middle class

for the first time in anyone's lifetime

became a minority in this country that

caused a ton of anxiety that in my view

resulted in from selection he doesn't

mention that no one ever mentions that

why I'm sure the president took over

President Obama took over an economy

that was bleeding jobs and he

resuscitated it including many

industries that would have just gone

away had it not been for the policies of

the Obama administration and you're

right the middle class did take a hit

during the Obama administration as it

had done by the in the Bush

administration as well yes I agree

look I'm not inspiring this because I'm

not a mindless partisan I'm not

defending george w not by the way let's

be clear i don't think it is and i'm not

here to tell republicans who i attack

regularly in the show i just want

someone to stop lying and concede that

all of this is not about racism it's

about the death of our middle class

which does stay in the country for a

hundred years can you admit that III

think that the the pressure on the

middle class is something that has

absolutely contributed to our politics

talker and it has also caused people who

are who are under stress to take it out

in ways that are not necessarily good

yeah that's from a b-26 the problem so

races yeah all right we're in should fix

the problem and I don't think that this

presidents capable doing it yeah maybe

screaming racist will fix the problem

maybe well Chris thank you during his

speech President Obama says that it's

time for women to hold more power

watch out of this political darkness I

am seeing

a Great Awakening it is a movement of

citizens who happened to be younger and

more diverse and more female than ever

before and that's really useful we need

more women in charge he could have done

his part by the way I think I mean I got

to check my notes but I think he ran

against a woman a woman who came closer

than any other woman in American history

to becoming president but he sabotage

her campaign in part by calling her does

it sound familiar a racist

her name was Hillary Clinton dan bond

Gina was a former Secret Service agent

and the author of the book spy gate the

attempted sabotage of Donald J Trump and

he joins us tonight I don't know why

this doesn't surprise me this is yet

another guy who flies in private planes

lecture

that's about carbon emissions another

guy who's lecturing us about how we need

more women to be empowered who brutally

savaged the woman who came closest to

becoming president like how much

hypocrisy are they capable of a lot yeah

he's also a guy giving a speech in

Denmark whose staff didn't want the

amount he was being paid to be disclosed

or they were gonna threaten to cancel

the speeches Barack Obama Tucker this is

a very deliberate strategy by the left

listen to me they live in a vacuum of

ignorance they don't have any ideas that

appeal on a popular scale mean what is

their campaign sign going to read you

know give us more of your money dramatic

tax hikes government's just too small we

need more of it they can't run on that

so their deliberate strategy is to fully

engage in identity and identity politics

hence the racism line coming out against

strategically and what it does Tucker is

it gets people to believe that the

Democrats don't vote for us vote against

those guys the Republicans because

they're the real bad guys and we're

gonna be the ones to save you this is a

cynical but very tactical strategy by

the Democrats and it's pretty disgusting

I hate it well I mean now what cost

though because if powerful people get up

and say anyone who opposes your ideas

hates you because of your skin color

people believe that and doesn't it make

all of us hate each other a little more

um it does Tucker but sadly this goes

back to you know critical theory which

has been taught in school forever you

know the the white patriarchal power

structure I'm that that bad that power

somehow is going to be necessary for

them to acquire back at any cost to

deconstruct this whole thing that led to

where we are now but again you can only

do that by divorcing people from facts

and data and getting them knee-deep in a

quagmire of emotion and the only way to

generate that emotion that hatred

towards your opponents is to say the

most awful things Tuckers or anything

worse you can call someone then a racist

or a bigot the answer is no that's why

they do it all the time it's the only

way to win I can't remember the last

time I heard someone make a

straightforward economic argument on

either side and by the way I'd be

grateful to hear it no matter what the

argument was I just want to hear someone

make a

serious argument that doesn't have to do

with motive or intent or your moral

character or racism like tell me what

the economics are no one does it's it's

actually I can't this is too stupid here

you're right they can't that's a great

point Dan but Gina I always wanted

something thank you thanks we've got

some news for you a former Trump

campaign adviser George papadopolis was

sentenced today to two weeks in jail 14

days the sentence though we want to be

clear on this was exclusively for lying

to federal agents in fact the judge in

the case Randy Moss said today that he

believed Papadopoulos showed no desire

to help Russia or hurt the United States

in other words clearly there was no

collusion Papadopoulos his offense was

getting caught up in an endless fishing

expedition that chewed aid has found not

one iota of evidence to support the

crime it was created to find just to be

clear Washington becoming more brazen in

its calls to end the current presidency

without bothering to hold a vote before

they stop democracy we'd like to ask a

few questions about what they believe

and what they intend to do when they

retake power that's next plus today was

the fourth straight day of hearings for

Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh

someone who spoke on the judges behalf

will join us just ahead

well just two days ago an anonymous

op-ed writer in The New York Times as

you well know revealed that he is part

of a resistance inside the executive

branch it's dedicated to sabotaging the

policies of the administration the left

was thrilled by this now they're calling

for the immediate removal of the

president we don't need an election or

even an impeachment trial they're

telling us the cabinet can just end

Trump's presidency right now it's that

simple

okay so Washington wants to remove a

democratically elected president because

they don't like his policies and they

want to do it without any election of

their own it sounds more like a coup

than a feature of a legitimate democracy

but that's what they're calling for

maybe they'll succeed in it but before

that happens the people hoping to regain

power should have to explain why their

ideas are better for America so far they

haven't done that they've talked a lot

about norms called a lot of people

racist and try to make anyone who

disagrees with them shut up and of

course they've lecture us endlessly

about something called diversity as if

that answers some relevant question our

diversity a patchwork heritage is not a

weakness it is still and always will be

one of our greatest strengths our

diversity is one of our greatest

strengths their great strength lies in

our diversity we know our diversity is a

strength not a weakness well they all

agree on that it's hard to know exactly

what it means though other than stop

talking or else we won't stop talking if

the president's going to be removed from

office without a single vote from

anybody outside Washington DC then we

deserve to have some simple questions

answered and we meet answered for real

not just with a sneer and a ticket to

the HR department for sensitivity

training so here goes first how is our

current immigration system made America

more stable and more prosperous in your

answer please explain what happened to

the state of California used to be

called the Golden State had a thriving

middle class had the country's best

schools now the schools in California

are a complete disaster the middle class

is vanishing and the nation's the

largest mass of in

poverty means behind to serve a tiny

pool of tech oligarchs how exactly did

that happen next how precisely is

diversity or strength since you've made

this our new national motto please be

specific as you explain it can you think

for example of other institutions such

as I don't know marriage or military

units in which the less people have in

common the more cohesive they are do you

get along better with your neighbors

your coworkers if you can't understand

each other or share no common values

please be honest as you answer this

question and if diversity is our

strength why is it okay for the rest of

us to surrender one of our central

rights freedom of speech to just a

handful of tech monopolies and by the

way if your ideas are so obviously true

why does anyone who question them need

to be shamed silenced and fired how

about this question after spending two

centuries overcoming our country's

painful history of racial discrimination

and hatred why is it once again

acceptable even encouraged to attack

people on the basis of their skin color

and by the way since we're asking if

it's now possible to change your sex is

it possible to change your race too if

not tell us why and be specific after

spending more than a trillion dollars in

thousands of lives attacking Afghanistan

Iraq and Libya and getting nothing for

it why does it now make sense to start

new wars in Syria and Iran and after 30

years after the Berlin Wall fell why

should we still treat Russia as our main

enemy while completely ignoring China

which actually is and how about this how

is it fair to use public resources to

bail out reckless financial institutions

that caused the last economic collapse

which other enterprises are eligible for

tax dollars once they go bankrupt

because of stupid decisions since we're

living by this principle does it apply

to my household budget for example and

this is San Francisco better off covered

in hypodermic needles and human waste is

Baltimore better off since the police

there decided to stop enforcing the law

how would you treat in Gary Indiana

doing weren't you in charge of those

cities we've got a lot more questions we

can go on but we're going to start

with those before canceling democracy

Washington should answer those questions

first and we're going to start by asking

them of Quentin James who's he found

reflective pack and he's nice enough to

join us night and thanks a lot for

coming on thank you for having shelter

so we hear a lot about Trump is bad

we're breaking norms a lot of that I'll

defend some of it I won't defend I don't

work for Trump

why would I defend it but what we never

hear about is the ideas of the people

who seek to take his place to regain

power and they're the people who came up

with all the ideas that the public

rejected to the extent that they elected

Donald Trump so my question is have they

reputed they aided those ideas the

public doesn't want unrestricted mass

low wage immigration are Democrats

against it now I mean have their views

changed what are they for I guess is my

question to you thank you so much for

again having me on Tucker I think first

we remember that that Hillary Clinton

got more votes than Donald Trump so I

don't know if the republic repudiated

the entire democratic platform there 61

million people it's a significant chunk

I would say no no of course right but

she still got three million more votes

but neither he nor their President Trump

is our president listen I think when it

comes to what Democrats believe in I'm

really excited about November when

Democrats will take over Congress and

we're gonna see a Democratic agenda move

forward one that's talking about raising

the minimum wage one is talking about

reforming our immigration system dealing

with our health care costs that are

rising right now I think what we've seen

over the past two years from Donald

Trump is a complete almost shutdown of

Congress moving forward and moving

anything substantial politically in

terms of policy way I thought that we're

mad because Congress has done always

evil things and wrecked the country I

don't you might want to recheck your

talking points in that but look I'm not

here talking about Trump or Congress we

spent all of our time talking about that

I want to know for example are Democrats

who backed the bailouts of the banks in

2008 are they committed to not doing

that again

Democrats who supported killing Qaddafi

and Libya's appear to support the

bombing of Syria talking about a war

with

Ron and Russia have they really thought

this at all are they still the war party

as look we are not here to I'm not here

to defend policy from the last

administration I think what we're all

challenged with right now is our current

administration and eighty again almost

complete standstill in terms of moving

legislation forward I think if you look

around the nation where we have

Democrats who are leading some of our

cities leading some of our states

they're really taking these issues to

the forefront and again moving things

forward but you make a fair point you're

right and I think they should fund the

wall immediately I'm sure you agree with

me he ran on it I wanna let's build that

no I think when you say Congress is

enacting that's what you're saying but

let me just ask you this so we have a

kind of case study here because the

state of California our biggest state is

a one-party state run entirely by

Democrats it was the richest state when

I grew up there it's now got more

poverty than any state it's billions in

debt it will never repay and its cities

are cesspools so would you say that

that's a model for the rest of the

country Tucker the last night's check I

think Governor Brown has a surplus for

the first time in years in California's

budget just to clarify California has

more debt obligations than this country

could pay so no there's no dumbing the

surplus that's just like it that's just

ridiculous

any asking other effects no but look

again I don't think we should look at

one state as a model to run our entire

nation well why not it's a democratic

state is the biggest state I mean no

again we're not here to confuse the

issues of California will become the

United States right now so named okay

okay then I'll just I'll make it easy

for you name a place the Democrats have

run for at least 20 years and tell me

reassure me that America will become

more like that place look I think if we

look at the past two democratic

presidencies of Bill Clinton and

President Barack Obama Nia cotton no

look at look at the economy look at the

jobs numbers right Donald Trump in here

amazing economy George Bush now an

amazing economy and now like if we look

at what's happening in the country the

the the the he's taking credit for what

we saw in the Barack Obama it's all

right the past presidency all right

Quentin thank you so much for joining us

I appreciate thank you so much Tucker

today was the fourth and final day of

the Brett Kavanaugh hearings a Hillary

supporter who testified on Cavanaugh's

behalf will join us next is the fourth

and final day of the marathon Brett

Kavanaugh hearings in Congress Cory

Booker and other Senate Democrats were

back at it looking for angles to derail

the nomination Akhil Reed amar is

professor at Yale Law School nose

Cavanaugh well and testified on his

behalf

excuse me during the hearings today

professor amar joins us tonight

professor thank you for coming on thanks

for having me so you are by your own

description a Hillary Clinton voter

probably vote differently from Brett

Kavanaugh why would you support his

confirmation because he's a student of

this document the Constitution he

studied it with intelligence and

diligence I believe he's the single best

Republican sitting federal judge under

age 60 he's the best person for the job

the best person on the horizon I'm not a

supporter of many of the things that the

Trump administration has done I've hear

they picked yes someone who's really

sane sober any Republican judge and any

Republican president Minh like Brett

kavanah at the top of his list as the

most important thing the Supreme Court

does is constitutional interpretation

and Brett Kavanaugh takes the

Constitution very seriously well that is

that is a great and so burns and honest

endorsement what do you make given the

criteria you use to make that decision

what do you make of the hearings in the

posture of some of his critics do you

think they're evaluating this correctly

well there's a lot of anger in the

on both left and right and some folks

may have made the decision that

riling up the bass worked for for the

Republicans maybe we should try to do

that for the Democrats I don't like that

strategy I thought that the temperature

in the room today metaphorically was

much lower than in previous days I've

been watching things on TV and was I'm

easy about going down into the snake pit

but but I thought today actually there

was a lot of sober conversation among

the witnesses with the Senators I I was

I was more impressed today than I have

been watching the thing on television

for the last three days yeah

well that's that's a low bar of course

and quickly professor are you worried

about going back to Yale or you have you

been criticized for what you did well

I'm back at Yale now and yeah you know i

professor czar supposed to profess we're

supposed to say what we actually believe

we don't run for election or re-election

and and we're gonna be judged in the

long run I'm a constitutional scholar

and I've read a lot of what Brett

Kavanaugh has written it and it

impresses me and I'm gonna call it as I

see it you're an honest man

good luck we're rooting for you thanks

for presser Thanks amazon has made Jeff

Bezos the single richest man in human

history but amazingly some of his

employees are so poor you're paying for

their food stamps is that fair our next

guest says Bezos is a hero and our

attacks on top tech companies are far

off base she'll explain

American Airlines plowing new ground

tonight taking a big step to improve the

flying experience of its passengers

that's good news what are they doing

well they're not adding more legroom

they're not bringing back free check

bags they're not increasing the size of

their peanut bags they definitely aren't

protecting you from the degrading

ineffective security theater of the TSA

but they are doing something all right

they are brace yourselves

banning plastic straws when you fly

United you can fly safe in the knowledge

that no hollow plastic cylinder will

imperil your well-being the feeling you

have right now deep in your gut it's

called liberty congratulations well

Amazon is a trillion dollar company but

despite that mammoth valuation some of

its workers are so poor they not only

have dropped out of the middle class

they are on food stamps which you are

paying for

we have criticized Amazon and by the way

other big tech companies and non tech

companies too like Walmart for this

arrangement where taxpayers subsidize

the wealth of the richest people in the

world we would have been willing in a

very limited way to praise some figures

we normally disagree with like Bernie

Sanders for agreeing Amy Peikoff is a

talk show host and blogs at don't let it

go calm she says their attacks on Amazon

are ridiculous

Amy Peikoff joins us tonight to explain

why Amy thanks up for coming on thanks

for having me on again Tucker how are

you oh I'm well but I'm confused so

you're a libertarian and I think a

pretty rigorous thinker I don't know why

it would be okay for the richest people

in our society in effect to rely on

corporate welfare to get even richer why

is that a good thing okay now to be

clear I'm against corporate welfare but

I've seen these attacks on big tech as

quite unfair and actually quiet on

American Tucker because me we're in

America we're gonna celebrate celebrate

innovation celebrates entrepreneurship

celebrates success celebrates wealth

creation why go after Amazon in

particular I mean he has improved

Jeff Bezos has improved our lives

tremendously and he's not using any

government benefits that anybody else

doesn't have access to it's about him

and his ingenious idea read this

business wait I'm not attacking Jeff

Bezos his innovation I'm not attacking

his business acumen I admire both of

those I think it's amazing what he built

he's the richest person in human history

and for that reason I find it disgusting

and wrong and actually incomprehensible

that he would have people working for

him that are so poor I'm patting for

their food stamps he's offloading some

of his labor costs okay it's not his

it's not his fault that the food stamp

program exists I mean people are working

for him for whatever productive value it

is that he is provided by the probe what

value they provide to him it that's

that's the you know the way drink no no

but I mean but I'm not I'm not woman I

just want to clear I'm not blaming him

for food stamps of course I'm blaming

him for paying his employees so little

that they qualify for food stamps you

can't get food stamps play here Tucker

right so the fact that they're the the

fact that he's able to have employees in

part because they are compensated by

food stamps that is sure a benefit that

he gets but it's a lot of other

businesses are getting it too so why go

after him it's because he's but I didn't

maybe because it's known as a liberal

and he's not the Washington Post going I

mean not is not true hold on target I'll

tell you why because he's the richest

man in the world and I believe that you

have an obligation to I don't know your

children your employees people who are

dependent upon you you have a moral

obligation to make sure that you do

something for them in exchange for a

moral obligation Tucker why does he have

why does he have a moral obligation to

them how more than they're worth to him

in terms of productive ability because

the powerful have an obligation to take

care of the less powerful I think I was

here to say

why well because I I think that's

inherent in our Christian code our

Judaic understanding our car but our

religious perspective is plenty of

people should clearly understand code is

based on really doesn't occur so you're

gonna need to provide a secular argument

I don't know where that moron I don't

know I think I think another another I'm

being honest about why I feel that way

and I realized by doing that I'm hoping

myself going to I'm actually gonna

finish Amy Amy I excuse me okay let me

finish my sentence which is to say it

would have been easier for me to say

what a secular person would say which is

decency requires it but even you don't

have to believe in decency or a moral

code to believe that it's wrong for

taxpayers to pay his labor costs which

is exactly there's labor cost than what

we need to do is we need to eliminate

the program that is paying for his labor

costs we don't blame an innovative

person like Jeff Bezos for doing

whatever he can within the semi freeing

of increase for himself use me

but his employees are so poor they're on

food stamps you don't see that as

grotesque

I mean Tucker listen I don't get paid

anything to come here and be on your

show and you I assume and I hope that

you make an excellent salary but I come

here because it is worth my while to be

able to say things to try to improve

they are choosing to voluntarily go and

work for whatever it is that Jeff Bezos

is on Monday we really the best

opportunity that's there do you want to

take it away from so dis guy it's so

disgusting yes we're interviewing Monday

and Amazon employee living in her car

we're gonna get our perspective on Amy

thank you very much thanks for all sides

the political spectrum by sneakers so

why is Nike targeting only one half

while innovating alienating the other

half of the country that discussion is

next

Steve

Nike is a huge company in their decision

to make colin kaepernick disturb their

ad campaign wasn't simply a political

statement it was a business decision is

it paying off well sale surged in the

days immediately after the announcement

of the campaign but Nike stock is still

down from from where it was at the

beginning of the week Jesse Kelly is a

Marine Corps combat veteran he also

hosted Jesse Kelly show on KPRC 950 in

Houston these are from a congressional

candidate and he joins us tonight so

Jesse do you think this was a leaving

aside your personal views on this do you

think was a wise decision for nike to do

this no it was idiotic and I understand

they're putting out these statements now

now that how they're focusing on the

urban environment on how they're

focusing on younger people but what

sense does it make to focus on left-wing

social justice warrior younger people

those are poor people you need to focus

on the entire country Nike was built on

the back of Michael Jordan who said

Republicans buy shoes too it makes no

sense to alienate anybody they could

have chose anybody for this thirtieth

anniversary of the just do it campaign

and they chose Colin Kaepernick and that

doesn't make them they act like that

means they're changing the world just

because you ride a jackass doesn't mean

you're Jesus Christ I'm so struck by the

term social justice warrior I mean I

really believe in social justice really

strongly but I don't hate America these

people hate America I mean the whole

point of this is you're kneeling during

our national anthem a bit you know the

basic symbol of our country is an attack

on the United States why do people who

say they identify with social justice

have to hate the country that's provided

more social justice in any country in

history well it's no different than the

people who love abortion that call it

women's reproductive rights Tucker the

level yet survives based on changing

language they've master language and

they try to shame other people when they

try to speak the truth and you're right

Colin Kapernick he's just the guys he's

an employee who violated the one rule of

every employee in the country and that's

make sure your talent outweighs your

baggage and he didn't he declared

America to be racist when you add in the

fact he reads defenses like Helen Keller

he's out of the NFL that's pretty funny

but wait I don't think you're giving him

his due I mean Nike told us that he's

the bravest person in human history

certainly American history I mean he's

sure if the United States Marine Corps

in combat

did you ever meet anyone as brave as

Kong Kaepernick I'll tell you all the

brothers in arms that I served with none

of them had the bravery to make 39

million dollars in the NFL and then move

on to get paid by one of the biggest

shoe brands in the world I have to tell

you I think he should get some sort of

medal of honor whatever civilians can

make Jesse thank you for coming on

tonight it's great to see you appreciate

you man

thank you Richard painter ran for office

in Minnesota recently he didn't win but

he did become famous for a phrase that

he uses a lot he put in a campaign ad

why does he love that phrase so much

dumpster fires the phrase we're gonna

ask him what is it about dumpster fire

that's so appealing that's next

dumpster fire and it's a dumpster fire

with nuclear weapons this is a dumpster

fire

if you followed the creator of former

bush ethics lawyer and vocal trump

critic richard painter you know that

there is a certain phrase that he loves

above above all other phrases here it is

some people see a dumpster fire and do

nothing but watch this is a dumpster

fire and it's a dumpster fire with

nuclear weapons this is a dumpster fire

it's a dangerous dumpster fire it is a

dumpster fire we need somebody to put it

out the dumpster fire in Washington

isn't just about Donald Trump although

he certainly contributed a lot to the

dunks are far Richard painter joins this

guy Richard thank you very much for

coming on thanks doc it has come to our

attention this obsession with fire

dumpster fires fire of this fire that

you could an ad about fire are you a

pyromaniac oh no I don't think so I we

could think of other analogies or

metaphors but most of the metaphors I

could think of describe what's going on

in Washington would be entirely

inappropriate on national television so

I think the dumpster fire is a good one

and we do notice we can you see I don't

if you can see the picture next to you

on the screen this is from your ad that

you had up a couple of months ago we

show this to our experts and they all

point out the same thing which is

there's a fire going on behind you and

you do nothing to put it out why is that

there's a dumpster fire but you take no

affirmative action to put it out to us

we add water go on that fire at the end

of that I am now this is what you played

no you seem to be basking in its warmth

and yet you didn't try and douse it I

mean it literally signals right to

suspect there's something going on here

but the real dose of fire is in

Washington I suggested a lot of ways to

clean that up get the money out of

politics and that's a problem in both

political parties and we have president

Trump sees go drain the swamp they

brought in a lot of conflicts of

interests we need to get people out of

Washington up financial conflicts of

interest that include the debt

pratik centaurs brought against - it

doesn't even make sense it's honestly

with respect I know you're an attorney

and a law professor yeah but there's a

fire going on but you want to drain the

swamp at the same time is that even safe

know what I'm talking about is we need

to settle for land here whether you want

to talk about the string on the swamp or

putting out the dumpster fire or some

other metaphor that would that be a pro

is to do both no but hold on I hear what

you're saying Richard take a step back

here okay fly like a drone above

yourself look down and assess you're

saying there's a fire in progress but we

must drain the swamp with any

responsible person drain a swamp in the

middle of a fire I didn't come up with

it dry in the swamp language that was

Donald Trump he hasn't drained anything

you just bought a bunch of backfilling

out of New York and Dick Jersey or

wherever he found everybody coming down

with financial conflicts of interest but

you know the Democrats have their bombs

true so let's let's focus on fixing this

around fires you financial conflicts of

interest say they've got the whole me to

thing yet they can't figure out what the

what's going on Keith Ellis it out in

Minnesota so the Democrats I want you to

drive I and I agree with that of course

my question is do their problems qualify

as a dumpster fire or merely maybe a

malfunctioning microwave I mean where

I'm in the kind of heat scale would you

put their problems I'd say that right in

there was a Republican boss Washington

DC is a dumpster fire and we aren't

gonna put it out until we got the money

out of politics get the politicians for

now basically you take the Republican

dumpster the Democratic dumpster put

them together and you've got a

conflagration there don't you oh of

course it everybody just accuses the

other party a big corrupt and as I say

they don't bother since the man who

stood in front of a burning dumpster and

did nothing to put it out I'm not oh

yeah we got to go unfortunate good luck

baby powers take control put out that

fire good to see you that is it for us

this week

to the show Monday we will be here an

exclusive story about big tech working

to change the 2016 election results

Monday night

For more infomation >> Tucker Carlson Tonight "Trump Derangement Syndrome" 9/7/18 - Duration: 39:37.

-------------------------------------------

Donald Trump Told Robert Mueller One Word That Sent Him Heading For The Hills - Duration: 12:06.

Donald Trump Told Robert Mueller One Word That Sent Him Heading For The Hills

Donald Trump and Robert Mueller are on a collision course.

Mueller is pushing for Trump to sit for an interview.

But Trump responded with this one word that sent Mueller heading for the hills.

Mueller Threatens the Trump Presidency Robert Mueller is the biggest threat to Trump's

Presidency.

He is leading the Deep State crusade to impeach Trump.

Mueller used the Russian collusion hoax to dig through every part of Trump's administration.

He has not charged any Trump people with colluding with the Russians.

However, Mueller did charge some Trump associates with crimes that had nothing to do with Russia.

He used these charges to pressure them to betray President Trump.

This led to Trump's lawyer, Michael Cohen, offering to work with prosecutors.

But it is unclear what Cohen knows.

Cohen claims Trump ordered him to make payments to women who said they had affairs with Trump.

Prosecutors charged Cohen with breaking FEC laws by making these payments.

They are working to frame Trump for a crime that does not exist.

Mueller had tipped prosecutors off in New York about these payments.

It shows Mueller is not working in good faith.

He is a prosecutor hell bent on bringing down Trump.

Trump Responds to Mueller Mueller used Cohen to increase the pressure

on Trump to sit for an interview.

The special counsel is trying to make the case that Trump obstructed justice by firing

former FBI Director James Comey.

But that isn't the real reason Mueller wants to interview Trump.

Mueller is setting a perjury trap.

Even if Trump tells the truth, Mueller can still say he lied.

If James Comey – or any other witness – gives one version of events and Trump tells another,

Mueller can choose to believe Comey.

That would allow Mueller to tell Congress Trump lied to prosecutors.

Congress would then have the smoking gun they need to impeach the President.

Trump's Lawyers Give Final Answer Trump's lawyers said he will not sit for

an interview about obstruction of justice.

"That's a no-go.

That is not going to happen," Giuliani said.

"There will be no questions at all on obstruction."

Giuliani said Mueller agreed to a written interview on Russian collusion.

However, Giuliani said he would not allow follow up questions.

"It would be in written form and if you want to follow up on our answers, justify

it.

Show us why you didn't get there the first time," Giuliani said.

Giuliani also said, "We aren't going to let them spring it on us."

Trump supporters were thrilled by this decision.

Mueller is not working with America's best interests in mind.

He is a snake.

Now the ball is in Mueller's court.

He must decide if he will subpoena the President.

However, he was willing to accept written answers on Russian collusion.

If he does not need to interview Trump in person on Russia, then why would he need to

interview Trump on obstruction?

We will keep you up to date on any new developments

in this story.

For more infomation >> Donald Trump Told Robert Mueller One Word That Sent Him Heading For The Hills - Duration: 12:06.

-------------------------------------------

Anti-Trump Book Spreads Dirty Lies, So Donald Asks Congress For A Big Favor - Duration: 1:49.

For more infomation >> Anti-Trump Book Spreads Dirty Lies, So Donald Asks Congress For A Big Favor - Duration: 1:49.

-------------------------------------------

Obama Scorches Trump In Return To Campaign Trail - Duration: 1:25.

For more infomation >> Obama Scorches Trump In Return To Campaign Trail - Duration: 1:25.

-------------------------------------------

After Years Of Silencing Conservatives, Trump's DOJ Drops The Hammer - Duration: 3:07.

For more infomation >> After Years Of Silencing Conservatives, Trump's DOJ Drops The Hammer - Duration: 3:07.

-------------------------------------------

WATCH: Trump Struggles to Pronounce 'Anonymous' at Rally | Heavy.com - Duration: 3:28.

WATCH: Trump Struggles to Pronounce 'Anonymous' at Rally | Heavy.com

Screenshot of Video Trump struggled to pronounce the word "anonymous" at a Montana rally.

President Donald Trump slid the word "excoriated" into his Montana rally speech twice with no issues, but struggled to pronounce the word "anonymous" when talking about an unnamed senior official in his administration who published an op-ed for the New York Times.

The president was in the process of once again explaining how his electoral victory and presidential accomplishments were driving his Democratic opponents and critics in the media crazy, when he turned the subject to the anonymous op-ed writer.

The unnamed source claimed officials in the Trump administration were undermining the president's agenda in order to protect the country from his "worst instincts.".

However, while the president was attempting to slam the anonymous author, he appeared to struggle with the actual word "anonymous.

" Trump let out what sounded like "analymous," before correcting himself to something more like "inomynous.

"The latest act of resistance is the op-ed published in the failing New York Times by an [insert attempt to say anonymous], really an [insert second attempt], gutless coward," he said.

Check out the video below.

"Nobody knows who the hell he is, or she, although they put he, but probably that's a little disguised.

That means it's she," he said, speculating that the author is a "she" rather than a "he." He also suggested that Times reporters should investigate the author of the op-ed.

  As expected, the internet didn't fail to pick up on the stumble and immediately immortalized the moment on social media.

Some poked fun at his inability to say the word, while others pointed out the irony of Trump's slurring on stage when he often comments on Hillary Clinton's "failing" health.

"It seems sexist that Trump and the media focused endlessly on Clinton's health but there is very little discussion of Trump's repeated instances of slurring and inability to pronounce a common word like anonymous.

These things are concerning," Walter Shaub wrote.

   .

For more infomation >> WATCH: Trump Struggles to Pronounce 'Anonymous' at Rally | Heavy.com - Duration: 3:28.

-------------------------------------------

Billings police chief praises town for security during Trump visit - Duration: 0:55.

For more infomation >> Billings police chief praises town for security during Trump visit - Duration: 0:55.

-------------------------------------------

Obama Criticizes Trump's Treatment of Press, Forgets That He PROSECUTED and SPIED on Reporters - Duration: 7:03.

Obama Criticizes Trump's Treatment of Press, Forgets That He PROSECUTED and SPIED on Reporters

Do liberals have any internal "checks and balances?"

If they did, they may be taken more seriously.

But as it stands now, we have a failed former president, who prosecuted and SPIED on reporters,

criticizing President Trump for saying "bad things" about the fake news.How can any

sane person take these ramblings seriously?

Washington Examiner

Former President Barack Obama is right when he says his administration's attacks on

the press can't be compared to President Trump's current crusade against the news

media.The Obama White House was far worse for press freedoms.

The former president spoke Friday afternoon at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,

urging students to get involved in the November midterm elections.

He dedicated a good deal of his address to drawing contrasts between his administration

and the administration of President Trump.

It was the regular sort of material from Obama.

There was a lot about optimism, hope, change The real whopper of a lie didn't come until

later in his address when he criticized Trump for routinely attacking the press.

"It shouldn't be Democratic or Republican to say that we don't threaten the freedom

of the press because they say things or publish stories we don't like," the former president

said.

"I complained plenty about Fox News, but you never heard me threaten to shut them down

or call them enemies of the people."This is some grade-A, primo historical revisionism.

When it comes to being anti-media, Trump only talks a big game.

And, boy, does he talk.

Obama, on the other hand, is a man of action.

As president, he did much more than complain about Fox News.

His administration spent eight long years curbing the press freedoms of journalists

of every stripe.

Obama was a pro at this.

Trump's war against the press is indeed ugly and often over-the-top.

But let that criticism come from someone who's not guilty of far worse.

In 2009, for example, the Obama White House intentionally excluded Fox News' Chris Wallace

from participating in a round of interviews pertaining to the president's push for healthcare

reform.

Later that same year, the administration officials tried to block Fox reporters from interviewing

"pay czar" Kenneth Feinberg.

The White House initially lied about this, and many in the press went along with it.

It wasn't until 2011 that the public learned the truth of the Feinberg episode.

An internal email dated Oct. 22, 2009, showed the White House director of broadcast media

told Treasury officials specifically, "We'd prefer if you skip Fox please."

The bigger point is that Feinberg was not the only administration official to have his

network appearances limited by the White House.

The Obama White House communications director, Anita Dunn, said at the time, "We're going

to treat them the way we would treat an opponent.

As they are undertaking a war against Barack Obama and the White House, we don't need

to pretend that this is the way that legitimate news organizations behave."

That language about "legitimate news organizations" and "opponents" is only different from

the things Trump says by degree, not by kind.

In 2010, the Obama administration renewed the bogus Bush-era subpoena against the New

York Times' James Risen in a prolonged attempt to determine whether the reporter was the

recipient of leaked CIA information.

In February 2011, federal investigators were revealed to have spied on Risen.

Federal investigators pored over Risen's credit reports and his personal bank records.

The feds even tracked his phone logs and movements.

Later, in 2012, Fox was mysteriously excluded from a White House conference call pertaining

to the terrorist attacks on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

Fox was also excluded from an all-network CIA briefing regarding the attacks.

In 2013, the Obama Justice Department labeled then-Fox News reporter James Rosen a "criminal

co-conspirator" under the Espionage Act of 1917.

And all because the reporter used a State Department contractor as a source for a story.

Rosen was also labeled a "flight risk."

The Justice Department seized the records of at least five phone lines connected to

Fox News.

The federal law enforcement agency even seized the phone records of Rosen's parents.

The FBI also got a warrant to search Rosen's emails from 2010.

In May 2013, the Associated Press revealed that the Justice Department had secretly collected

two months' worth of personal and work-related phone calls made by AP reporters and editors.

Federal officials secretly obtained records on incoming and outgoing calls made by specific

AP journalists, as well as general news staff, the news group reported, potentially compromising

many sources totally unrelated to the investigation.

Federal investigators even collected data on calls made by AP reporters in the House

of Representatives press gallery.

In 2014, the Obama administration set the record for denying the most Freedom of Information

Act requests of any administration.

It topped this feat in 2015.

There are only two actions that the Trump administration has taken that can be compared

to the Obama-era war on the press.

First, the Trump White House barred a CNN reporter in July from a Rose Garden event.

Second, the Trump Justice Department seized electronic correspondences between New York

Times reporter Ali Watkins and her ex-lover, former Senate Intelligence Committee aide

James Wolfe.

Other than the fact that Obama has an extraordinarily ugly legacy of anti-press behavior, he made

some great points Friday.

He never actually called the news media the "enemy of the people."

He and his lieutenants simply prosecuted and spied on reporters, all while claiming Fox

is "an opponent" and not " really a news station."

Obama is right to draw a contrast between himself and Trump.

One of them has been an actual clear and grave threat to the press, and the other one has

an orange tan.

For more infomation >> Obama Criticizes Trump's Treatment of Press, Forgets That He PROSECUTED and SPIED on Reporters - Duration: 7:03.

-------------------------------------------

People Protest President Trump's Visit - Duration: 1:02.

For more infomation >> People Protest President Trump's Visit - Duration: 1:02.

-------------------------------------------

Rudy Giuliani Says Trump Won't Even Answer Mueller's Written Questions - Duration: 4:13.

Donald Trump has the absolute worst lawyers in the United States.

And Rudy Giuliani, his lead attorney who is working for free, allegedly, is without a

doubt the dumbest and worst attorney ever to pass the bar here in the United States.

Giuliani announced on Thursday afternoon that under no circumstances would Donald Trump

be answer Robert Mueller's questions, even if they were in writing, because Trump and

Giuliani don't want to answer any questions about obstruction of justice.

Now rewind the clock a couple months ago, when Giuliani was begging Mueller to let Trump

submit written answers to questions.

And Mueller said no.

Well, this week Mueller caved and he said, okay, fine.

We'll let you submit written answers to questions.

And now Giuliani says, no, we're not even gonna do that.

No, sorry.

Not gonna happen.

Because my client's such a blistering, blubbering buffoon, that he's gonna perjure himself or

commit even further obstruction of justice somehow.

So we're just not gonna do anything.

What Giuliani is doing right now is actually a calculated move, because he's trying to

trigger a Constitutional crisis, wherein Robert Mueller has to subpoena Donald Trump, something

Trump and Giuliani swear can't happen, although it 100 percent can.

Therefore it's gonna go to the courts.

The courts are gonna have to appeal it.

It's gonna go to the U.S. Supreme Court, and Giuliani is counting on the fact that by that

time happens, Kavanaugh's gonna be on the court, gonna have the conservative majority,

and they're gonna rule in Trump's favor, and end this entire thing.

Giuliani's playing a long game that's not going to work.

Why?

Because you see, these justices on the Supreme Court, even some as conservative as they are,

like Gorsuch or Kavanaugh could be, you still have a couple others who, when it comes right

down to the U.S. Constitution, they've surprised us a couple times.

So if you're thinking that making Mueller go to the Supreme Court in order to issue

the President a subpoena's a good idea, I can go ahead and tell you that you're going

to be shocked when you find out what actually happens.

Yeah, Trump can definitely count on Gorsuch and Kavanaugh if he gets appointed, and Thomas.

Beyond that, it's a little bit trickier.

But again, we may not even get to that point.

We may have lower courts that all say, hell yeah, you can subpoena the President, and

he must comply right now.

And, if Kavanaugh doesn't get confirmed, and there is a vacancy on that court, then a deadlocked

Supreme Court gonna rule with the lower courts.

And the lower courts in that area tend to be decent.

So Giuliani is playing a very bad long game at this point.

But that also misses the point.

The point is that Donald Trump can't talk to Robert Mueller without perjuring himself.

That's not the fault of Mueller.

That's Donald Trump is a horrible human being who is incapable of telling the truth.

And I know FOX News Republicans have all talked about, no, if he testifies, it's a perjury

trap.

He can't do that.

Why are you worried about a trap being set instead of being worried about the fact that

the guy you're cheerleading for every single day can't seem to tell the truth.

One of those is an actual problem.

The other is not.

And I'll go ahead and give it to you, since you're not that smart.

The trap is not the problem.

The problem is that your guy is so dumb and incompetent, that he would absolutely perjure

himself because he's such an idiot.

That's the bigger issue here.

Not just that Giuliani says, no, we can't do that.

He's not gonna answer these questions.

Not that he's trying to basically gamble on Trump's entire Administration, by hoping that

this goes to the Supreme Court, but that the fact is we have a President who cannot even

be trusted to tell the truth to federal investigators.

That should tell you everything you need to know about what this investigation is truly

about, and which side is telling the truth.

For more infomation >> Rudy Giuliani Says Trump Won't Even Answer Mueller's Written Questions - Duration: 4:13.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Administration Takes Steps To Stop Independent Oversight Of Nuclear Facilities - Duration: 4:30.

The Trump administration is defending an order that could be used to withhold information

about nuclear facilities and hide that information fro the nuclear safety board.

Some law makers are calling the move a step to weaken oversight on the nuclear industry.

Joining me to talk about this is Brigida Santos.

Brigida, the Trump administration is quietly taking steps that are going to inhibit independent

oversight.

Really, to me, I don't how you can get around it.

It's a high risk problem, because we're talking about nuclear facilities.

What your take on this story?

These new rules will significantly reduce the authority of the Defense Nuclear Facility

Safety Board, which has acted as an independent watch dog on the industry since the late 1980s.

The board's role is to assess the safety of US nuclear weapons facilities and make recommendations

for improvements based on near accidents and confirmed incidents.

These new rules aim to limit the board's access to information, cut the number of nuclear

weapons related facilities that can make recommendations on by 71%, take away it's authority to oversee

protections for 39,000 nuclear workers, and prevent board members from speaking to laboratory

staff without direct permission from the Department of Energy.

Now, these orders were first published in May, but the first of three hearings was held

on August 28th, last week.

Now, until now, Congress and the public have not been given a chance to comment on this,

and they were not made aware that these changes were coming down the pipeline.

In fact, the only people that were alerted to these changes were the contractors, the

private contractors, that are overseeing and operating these nuclear facilities.

Brigida, member of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, both Democrats and Republicans,

have been united in their criticism of the Energy Department's order, understandably.

All you have to do is look at the meltdowns that have taken place across the world.

Chernobyl, now we're feeling the affect of Chernobyl in the US.

The truth is, you can't safely do this if there's anybody that's kept in the dark.

This has to be something where people, at every level, know about potential problems.

Here, this is just the opposite of that.

What is your take on that?

This is absolutely the opposite of that, and it is a bipartisan effort.

Board members on both sides of the aisle, Democrat and Republican, are saying that getting

rid of oversight is incredibly dangerous for public safety, for the environment, and for

the safety of the workers in those nuclear facilities.

They want to suspend this rule and at least give the public and Congress the appropriate

time to comment and weigh-in on whether this should move forward or not.

This has really been the MO of this administration and, to some degree, last administration,

where we don't really have public meetings anymore.

We don't really tell everybody what's going one.

We kind of do it on Friday night when nobody's paying attention.

This is one of those situations.

Fortunately, with bipartisan support, we may not have that problem.

The industry, though, is calling the Nuclear Safety Board is an excessive regulation, that

it's somehow inhibiting innovation.

It's inhibiting progress in the nuclear industry.

We hear this every time.

Every time we want to shortcut regulations, there is, "Ah gee, we're losing money.

We're not progressing.

It's because of these bureaucrats are making us follow some rules."

When was this five member board formed, and what reasons was the board formed to begin

with?

This board was formed in 1988, toward the end of Cold War.

The reason it was formed was to oversee the Department of Energy's nuclear complexes,

which lacked accountability, and were riddled with problems, including poor safety conditions

and radiological contamination.

Prior to the board's existence, the Department of Energy regulated these facilities by itself.

It was doing its own oversight, which is clearly problematic.

While the board does not have regulatory power, all its recommendations were adopted by the

Department of Energy until about 2008.

Is the order consistent with the Atomic Energy Act?

I've got about a little less than a minute.

What is your take?

Is there consistency here?

The board members say that it is not consistent at all with the act.

Thank you for joining me, Brigida.

For more infomation >> Trump Administration Takes Steps To Stop Independent Oversight Of Nuclear Facilities - Duration: 4:30.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Claims Abraham Lincoln Had to Deal with Fake News - Duration: 6:37.

Let's get to some news here.

Last night, President Trump held a big rally in Montana.

When he first got there, Trump said,

"Take me to your leader -- Hannah Montana."

During his speech, Trump talked about the anonymous op-ed

one of his staffers wrote about him.

But he had a little trouble saying the word "anonymous."

In fact, he had a little trouble twice.

Listen to this.

-The latest act of resistance is the op-ed

published in the failing "New York Times"

by an anominiss...

Really, an anominuss, gutless coward.

[ Laughter ]

"Anuhmiss. Anuhmiss.

Anuhmiss. Anuh-manah."

-♪ Do, do, do-do-do ♪

-♪ Anominosh ♪ -♪ Do, do, do-do-do ♪

-♪ Anominosh ♪ -♪ Do, do, do-do-do ♪

♪ Do-do-do, do-do-do, do-do-do ♪

♪ Do-do-do-do-do ♪

-In the same speech, Trump claimed that

Abraham Lincoln also had to deal with a lot of fake news.

[ Laughter ]

Watch this. This is real.

-You know, when Abraham Lincoln

made the Gettysburg Address speech,

the great speech,

do you know he was ridiculed?

He was ridiculed.

He was excoriated...

by the fake news.

They had fake news.

-Hang on. Trump knows how to say "excoriated,"

but he can't say "anonymous"?

I mean, that's not bad. "Excoriated."

-Come on! -Anomoniss.

-♪ Do, do, do-do-do ♪

-♪ Anomoniss ♪ -♪ Do, do, do-do ♪

Manah-munuh-manah.

[ Mumbling as Animal ]

♪ Anomoniss ♪ -♪ Do, do, do-do ♪

-♪ Anomunah ♪ -♪ Do, do, do-do ♪

-Later on, Trump told the crowd

that he has the mental fitness to be president.

Then, to prove it, he tried to strap a Fitbit

around his head.

[ Laughter ]

"4,000 steps."

Well, the White House announced that, next week,

Trump's holding a rally in Mississippi,

but after how he said "anonymous,"

they might want to pick a different state

than Mississippi.

He's like, "Mitsubishi.

Mitsussippi.

Mushy pee pee."

After Trump mispronounced "anonymous,"

we noticed that he has trouble saying a lot of words.

And with that in mind, it's time to play "Talk Like Trump."

♪♪

-♪ Talk Like Trump ♪

♪ Collusion ♪

-So, here's how this works.

I'm going to see if anyone can guess

how the President is going to mispronounce a simple word.

If you get it right, you get a prize.

If you get it wrong, you still get a prize.

All right, raise your hand

if you want to play "Talk Like Trump."

Yeah, right here. Hey, come on, stand up.

What's your name? -Rheema.

-Rheema. Hey. Where you from?

-I'm from D.C. -Hey, you're from D.C.?

-Yeah. -Hey, welcome.

-Now here you go. Our first clip --

President Trump is going to try to say and word "congratulate."

Okay? How do you think he's going to mispronounce it?

-Um -- [Mumbles incoherently]

[ Laughter ]

-If you're -- If you're right,

I'm going to give you a vacation.

I mean, that is -- Let's see what happened.

[ Cheers and applause ]

-And I want to crugradulate.

-Ah! Incorrect. [ Buzzer ]

Sorry. The correct answer was "crugradulate."

There's your "crugradulate" T-shirt right there.

That's for you. Hey. Thank you so much for being here.

Nice to meet you.

Yeah! Get up! Come on.

Hi, pal. What's your name? -Hi! Hannah.

-Hannah, where you from? -West Virginia!

-Yay! West Virginia!

All right. This next clip is very simple.

Trump tries to say the word "capsule."

Capsule. -"Cash-uhl."

-Oh, what do you think? -"Cash-uhl."

-Oh. Ca--

I like the way you say it. "Cash-uhl."

All right. Is that -- It's "capsule."

Let's see what happened.

-...from the Wright brothers

to that beautiful Orion space capsicle.

-Ah! [ Buzzer ]

[ Laughs ]

Capsicle. Capsicle. I'm sorry.

Here's your --

Here's your "capsicle" T-shirt custom for you.

That is for you. Thank you for playing, pal.

Hey, buddy. Yeah. -Hey.

-How you doing? -Good, Jimmy. How you doing?

-Nice to see you. Thank you for being at the show.

What's your name? -Alan.

-Alan? Very, good, Alan. This is our final clip here.

It's our favorite. Trump tries to say "United States."

How does he mispronounce "United States"?

-"United States."

[ Laughter ]

[ Tuba plays sad notes ]

[ Laughter ]

-See, the whole thing is that

he's mispronouncing the words, you know?

-He gets them right now and again.

-Yeah, he does. Yeah, that was a curveball answer.

That's kind of interesting. All right.

He thinks that he's going to mispronounce "United States"

by saying "United States."

Let's see what happened.

-And God bless the United Schtates.

Very close! United Schtates. United Schtates.

Here's your "United Schtates" T-shirt.

Thank you. Thank you for playing, pal. Good to see you.

Thanks for all the great -- That was "Talk Like Trump."

Thanks to all our players.

-♪ Talk Like Trump, Talk Like Trump ♪

♪ Talk Like Trump ♪ -Yeah!

Clearly, it's been a long week for Trump,

and after the op-ed and Bob Woodward's new book,

he now says the number of people he can trust

is getting smaller and smaller.

In fact, Trump just released a video

to describe exactly how isolated he feels.

Check this out.

-♪ I think I'm alone now ♪

♪ There doesn't seem to be anyone around ♪

♪ And I think I'm alone now ♪

♪ The beating of our hearts is the only sound ♪

-There you go. Yeah.

[ Cheers and applause ]

Did you guys hear about this last night?

SpaceX founder Elon Musk smoked pot on a podcast.

You can tell he really liked it 'cause now he's building

a rocket that goes from Taco Bell to White Castle.

[ Laughter ]

Elon Musk smoked on a podcast

but said, "I'm not a regular smoker of weed."

People had a feeling he wasn't a regular smoker of weed

when he used the phrase "regular smoker of weed."

"I'm not a regular smoker of weed."

A new study found that olive oil

may be more effective for men than Viagra.

At first, men were like, "It's not working,"

and doctors were like, "You're supposed to drink it, you creeps."

[ Laughter ]

"Oh, my bad."

No comments:

Post a Comment