Wednesday, September 12, 2018

Trump news on Youtube Sep 13 2018

One campaign did collude in the 2016 election.

But it was not Donald Trump's campaign.

And Hillary Clinton is panicking now that Trump revealed a crime she's tried to keep

secret Hillary Clinton Hid Secret About The 2016

Election The media's focus on Russia meddling during

the 2016 election missed the real story.

The Russians buying a few social media ads played zero role in the outcome of the election.

It's fake news.

Journalists harp on Russia because they want people to think Trump's win did not count.

But Trump just revealed that it was the social media companies that did the real election

meddling.

The Daily Caller reports: "I think they already have," Trump said

of social media companies interference in the 2018 presidential election.

The president pivoted to 2016 saying "I mean the true interference in the last election

was that — if you look at all, virtually all of those companies are super liberal companies

in favor of Hillary Clinton."

"Maybe I did a better job because I'm good with the Twitter and I'm good at social

media, but the truth is they were all on Hillary Clinton's side, and if you look at what

was going on with Facebook and with Google and all of it, they were very much on her

side," Trump continued.

The Daily Caller also reports: Trump has railed against social media and

tech companies in recent days, particularly Google.

He has accused the company of censoring conservative news but has brushed off regulation, saying

he just wants fairness.

"I think that Google and Facebook and Twitter, I think they treat conservatives and Republicans

very unfairly.

I could tell you that I have personal experience," he recently said publicly.

It makes sense that the social media companies colluded to try and rig the election.

Big tech leans left.

Employees at all the major companies overwhelmingly supported Hillary Clinton.

And they put policies in place to favor her campaign.

Social Media Censors Conservatives CNN tried to claim Trump was lying.

However, this was typical CNN fake news.

Back in 2016, Facebook was caught leaving out right-leaning media sites in the trending

news section.

In 2017, Facebook changed its algorithm to suppress the reach of alternative news sites.

This affected all news sites, but the change was only made because liberals believed Trump

won the election because of "misinformation" on social media.

Because Trump won, Facebook killed off all news site traffic.

Only legacy media outlets survived.

This month, Apple, Google and Facebook banned pro-Trump radio host Alex Jones.

They claimed they banned him for "hate speech."

Liberals believe all conservative speech is "hate speech."

This opened the door for tech giants to start banning all conservatives just before the

midterm elections.

In fact, the purge has already begun.

Twitter banned CRTV host Gavin McInnes.

They also banned several aides of former Congressman Ron Paul.

In addition, Twitter got caught "shadow banning" conservatives.

Vice reported famous Republicans like RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel and Congressmen

Matt Gaetz did not appear in the site's search menu.

Even if you typed out their full name, their account did not appear.

Twitter put out a statement trying to deny the charge.

However, they admitted they did shadow ban.

Twitter wrote: You are always able to see the tweets from

accounts you follow (although you may have to do more work to find them, like go directly

to their profile.

Twitter saying users had to do more work to find certain accounts is the definition of

shadow banning.

We will keep you up to date on any new developments in this story.

We report the daily's breaking news, President Donald trump news, news headlines, white house

news and the Most Interesting News.

We report the genuine news and circumstances occurring the world over.

Genuine Reports that the predominant press doesn't need you to think about!

We are your ONE source for the most vital world event and stories happening every day!

We always want to know what YOU think!

Stay tuned for updates.

------------------------------------------------------------------------ ► President Trump Latest News : https://bit.ly/2N3r42C

► Latest news videos: https://bit.ly/2NvSnSI ------------------------------------------------------------------------

Copyright Disclaimer: Citation of articles and authors in this report does not imply

ownership.

Works and images presented here fall under Fair Use Section 107 and are used for commentary

on globally significant newsworthy events.

Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes

such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

nbc briefing english news fox news.

For more infomation >> Donald Trump Revealed A Crime Hillary Clinton Tried To Keep Secret - Duration: 3:37.

-------------------------------------------

Cavuto: CHUCK GRASSLEY - TRUMP IS DOING WHAT SHOULD BE DONE ON ELECTION SECURITY - Duration: 4:41.

you metal will be trouble president

Trump's signing today an executive order

that greenlight sanctions against

countries that mess with our electoral

process and worse the White House saying

it really had nothing to do with

criticism over the president so-called

Helsinki moment I had a chance to catch

up with Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck

Grassley whether this measure which he

supports goes far enough I think it's

absolutely necessary that the president

and any of us in public office do all we

can to reduce the skepticism of our

election process being fair and honest

and thorough and I think the president

doing this is doing what should be done

at this time in addition to what

Congress has already done appropriating

some money to help the states to make

sure that their system is not

infiltrated by this sort of hacking but

also it follows on what Congress has had

a strong position on for a long period

of time not only dealing with the

election interference but in areas other

areas where China or where Russia has

violated like Crimea in Ukraine and

threatening the Baltics Congress wants

the president to be very forceful in

that and I believe this is an example of

that force that Congress would expect

from the president but this addresses

any future interruptions right it

doesn't go back to what might or might

not have happened I guess pretty much

safely let's assume did happen in the

2016 camp

no but then don't forget there's already

some sanctions put on for that reason

and other reasons already on

particularly individuals close to Putin

but not the government of russia per se

that's right as far as I can tell okay

officer I want to move on to Brett

Kavanaugh right now and the your

timeline for a vote in committee to get

it out of committee what do you think

okay tomorrow he is on the agenda but

under our rules that are very frequently

used and filled seldom not used is to

hold over for one week something that's

for the first time on the agenda so

tomorrow it will be helped Kavanaugh

will be held over according to that rule

and then that puts it on Thursday

September the 20th to have the debate

and I presume there's going to be five

or six hours of debate within our

committee and then based upon the

questioning of last week I would expect

that he'll be approved by our committee

on 11 to 10 volt all right and then when

it gets to the full Senate do you expect

all all Republicans to vote yay as of

now I do and I think that that we it's

very necessary for all Republicans to

stick together on this first vote

because I don't think that if we got a

possibility given four or five Democrat

votes I don't think any one of those

Democrats would give us the fiftieth

vote but if we get 50 or 51 Republican

votes then I think we're going to end up

with 54 or 55 in a bipartisan way

sending Cavanaugh to the Supreme Court

what

make between the protests and a number

Democrats including Senator Cory Booker

who had that great Spartacus moment as

he called it where he would risk

expulsion from the Senate for releasing

classified emails do you think because

he followed up with the release of still

additional emails that that's something

the Senate should consider that he

should be more exposed well I'm not a

member of the Ethics Committee and if I

was I couldn't talk about it but I'll

leave that up to the ethics committee or

anybody on the outside that wants to

push that at this point I would not push

it because I think that he in some of

those approaches like when he read from

something that at 4:00 a.m. in the

morning had already been said it was

legal for him to have that document and

to use it I think he he looked a little

silly in pursuing it by the way that

full interview is on the Fox Business

website there in fact his own thoughts

on the likelihood of the Kavanagh

nomination and Republicans who might or

might not support I'll give you a hint

here he thinks all Republicans will when

push comes to shop

For more infomation >> Cavuto: CHUCK GRASSLEY - TRUMP IS DOING WHAT SHOULD BE DONE ON ELECTION SECURITY - Duration: 4:41.

-------------------------------------------

PLOT THICKENS: More Disturbing Details Emerge on 2016 Trump Tower Meeting - Duration: 12:51.

It turns out that the Don Jr. Trump Tower/Russia meeting was indeed one gigantic setup, put

in motion by Hillary Clinton.

We have heard this before, however, now, we are learning of even deeper ties to Hillary.

NEW YORK — Multiple recent Breitbart News investigations into the infamous brief meeting

at Trump Tower on June 9, 2016 between individuals tied to Russia, Donald Trump Jr. and other

campaign officials point to the increasing likelihood of the confab being set up as a

dirty trick against Donald Trump's presidential campaign.

Three Russian participants at the meeting have ties to the controversial Fusion GPS

outfit, and two have confirmed ties to Hillary Clinton.

The Russia collusion conspiracy was sparked by the dossier produced by Fusion GPS, which

was paid for its anti-Trump work by Trump's primary political opponents, namely Clinton's

2016 presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) via the Perkins Coie

law firm.

Also, email logs brought to light show numerous emails were exchanged between a Clinton associate,

Fusion GPS and Trump Tower participants, with the subjects of some of those emails listing

the Magnitsky Act, which sanctions Russian officials and was by all accounts the very

topic of the Trump Tower meeting.

One Russian participant in the Trump Tower presentation admits to personally knowing

Hillary Clinton since the late 1990s and says he "knew" some of the people who worked

on Clinton's 2016 campaign.

Another Russian attendee, a translator, testified that he was previously an interpreter for

Hillary herself as well as for John Kerry and Barack Obama.

Questions are also raised by a timeline showing numerous personal meetings between Fusion

GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson and Trump Tower participants.

A Clinton associate, Ed Lieberman, was listed as being present at one and possibly two of

those meetings.

Separately, Lieberman met with one Russian participant the same day of the Trump Tower

meeting, according to separate testimony.

There are also questions about the initial setup of the Trump Tower meeting, with the

publicist who sent the infamous email to Donald Trump Jr. promising "information that would

incriminate" Clinton later admitting that he used deliberately hyperbolic language to

ensure that the meeting took place.

No such incriminating information on Hillary was provided, according to all meeting participants.

In testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee, Robert Goldstone, the publicist, further said

that he believes the meeting was a "bait and switch" by a Russian lobbyist seeking

a meeting on another matter by misleadingly claiming to be bringing the Trump campaign

dirt on Clinton.

Dinners with Fusion GPS Russian-born Washington lobbyist Rinat Akhmetshin,

who was present at the meeting, and Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya, who led the

Trump Tower meeting along with Akhmetshin, both worked with Fusion GPS on a case involving

the Magnitsky Act, which was the central topic of the Trump Tower meeting.

The work included the period of the Trump Tower gathering.

Anatoli Samochornov, the Russian translator who was present at the Trump Tower meeting,

also did translation work associated with that case and was present for the meetings

with Fusion GPS.

According to testimony, Akhmetshin, Veselnitskaya and Samochornov held several dinner meetings,

including during the time of the June 9, 2016 Trump Tower confab.

We are your ONE source for the most vital

world event and stories happening every day!

We always want to know what YOU think!

Stay

tuned

for updates.

------------------------------------------------------------------------ ► President Trump Latest News : https://bit.ly/2N3r42C

► Latest news videos: https://bit.ly/2NvSnSI ------------------------------------------------------------------------

Copyright Disclaimer: Citation

of articles and authors in this report does not imply ownership.

Works and images presented here fall under Fair Use Section 107 and are used for commentary

on globally significant newsworthy events.

Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made

for fair use

for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

nbc briefing english news fox news.

For more infomation >> PLOT THICKENS: More Disturbing Details Emerge on 2016 Trump Tower Meeting - Duration: 12:51.

-------------------------------------------

Dem Disaster: Trump 5 Points Ahead of Obama at Same Point in Presidency - Duration: 4:53.

For more infomation >> Dem Disaster: Trump 5 Points Ahead of Obama at Same Point in Presidency - Duration: 4:53.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING NEWS TRUMP CAPTURED HIM OVERNIGHT, HE'S IN CUSTODY – This Is HUGE! - Duration: 10:12.

BREAKING NEWS TRUMP CAPTURED HIM OVERNIGHT, HE'S IN CUSTODY – This Is HUGE!

President Donald Trump just scored a major victory when U.S. officialс announced that

special operations forces have captured a key militant in the 2012 Benghazi attack on

a U.S. consulate that left four Americans dead.

loading...

CBS News reported that the suspect has been identified as Mustafa al-Imаm, who was captured

in Libya and transported back to the U.S., where he is in the custody of the Department

of Justice.

President Trump released a statement saying that al-Imam will face justice for his alleged

role in the attack.

The Benghazi attack, which took place on September 11, 2012, killed Ambassador Chris Stevens,

U.S. State Department computer expert Sean Smith and CIA contractors Glen Doherty and

Tyrone Woods.

Stevens and Smith perished in the burning diplomatic outpost as American forces tried

to rescue them.

While Doherty and Woods died eight hours later in a mortar attack on a nearby CIA complex.

U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson discharged an articulation saying that he was "deeply

grateful" to the U.S. military and the insights community for capturing the militant.

"Department of State family continues to mourn"

The four Americans killed in the attack and those officials

"will spare no effort to ensure that justice is served," Tillerson said.

"I spoke with some of their family members to underscore the U.S. government's unwavering

support."

Hillary Clinton will without a doubt be freezing approximately this, as she needs everybody

to disregard that the Benghazi assault ever happened.

As Secretary of State, Clinton overlooked Stevens' as often as possible supplications

for offer assistance sometime recently the assault took put.

She may have ceased the assault from taking put, however, she did nothing and let four

Americans pass on on her watch.

What do you think about this?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments section.

For more infomation >> BREAKING NEWS TRUMP CAPTURED HIM OVERNIGHT, HE'S IN CUSTODY – This Is HUGE! - Duration: 10:12.

-------------------------------------------

WASHINGTON POST CLAIMS TRUMP ."fOMPUCIT" WITH EXTREME WEATHER AND OTHER NEWS NEXT - Duration: 15:37.

the ladies romance I care hello

everybody and welcome to the five

massive hurricane Florence is set to

slam into the Carolinas potentially

causing catastrophic damage and somehow

it's now president Trump's fault the

washington post out with an op-ed titled

another hurricane is about to batter our

coasts trump is complicit according to

the post because President Trump doesn't

bend over backwards to support climate

change

he's now to blame and I go to our

resident climate change expert Greg

Gutfeld it always drives me crazy okay

I'll start with two facts and then have

an overall assessment of this situation

okay okay so from that enclosure ears

he's gonna talk okay so from 1915 to

1965 that's 51 years that there were 19

major hurricanes now if you go fifty-one

years from their 1966 to 2016 you've

only had seven so that's 37% is frequent

- if there's rising climate change and

fewer of these major hurricanes there

goes your theory but there is something

you know there's an increase in damage

over time with these hurricanes but

that's not due to the storm intensity

it's because we're increasing

infrastructure in coastal areas so you

can blame not a global warming but you

could blame the builders for building in

areas where their storms but I will say

this to be fair because I no want

disagree sympathy the jury's probably

still out on this stuff who's gonna take

time to look at everything the big

problem is is what I call the Trump

floater you know when you go to a bar

and you order like a whiskey with a

Bailey's floater or a Meyers floater now

every story every story is now a drink

every story's a drink with a Trump

floater so it's like whether you're

whether it's about like yesterday 9/11

or hurricanes or or any kind of any kind

of event psychological disorders

depression can't sleep can't sleep it's

Trump so everything now has a Trump

angle it's a it's everything is a drink

with the Trump floater and it's because

people people in the media have Trump on

the brain and they're using that instead

of their brain why are all your

about bars and bathrooms one always

leads to the other that's true I came

prepared and I'm gonna dress you as mr.

Williams because I found out how old you

are was gonna be a very statistical

segment

I brought a chart can we see the chart

please in the controller I'll look at

this chart woo America the largest

decline in co2 emissions in the world

look at us all the way up at the top

we're reducing our co2 and vaginas like

we are Shina the European Union Canada

they're increasing their co2 so first

year the Trump prison's presidency co2

is down now on explain that one maybe

maybe you kept your mouth shut in the

hot air you know did you have us as the

number one emitter of these gases and

you say we make some steps to pull back

and therefore everybody else is to blame

I don't get it we're not we're

decreasing and when China and India EU

are increasing because they have an

increasing base of middle-class people

factories and the like they're still

gaining a middle class we're W is

gaining a middle class they are they're

soaking up the EU but China a lot of

what they call the BRIC nations you know

Brazil India they're building up Jessie

so the idea is that the United States as

a successful economy with a large middle

class would set an example about the

need for reducing co2 let me know where

that's why things are what they are what

the Washington Post editorial board said

guess who has just signed legislation to

allow the you know the expansion of

methane gas in our release in our

country Donald Trump Donald Trump and

Republican orthodoxy has become aware

the contrarians we don't believe these

scientists we don't believe any of this

about increasing temperatures and Greg

there's been increasing temperatures

over the last dozen years in the world

while it's increasing temperatures under

my collar because you're making me very

angry

mr. Williams the application is then

that the United States should take

measures which often frankly are

job-killing measures hundreds of

thousands of people in this country lose

their jobs because it hurts energy

production and these other sources of

energy for energy production are not yet

ready to roll and compete with coal and

otherwise and other countries just get

to do nothing and what we as as we pay

what you're thinking a little that's

what the Paris Accord was no no it

wasn't and I think you know Ryan is a

little off there because the reality is

that now alternative energy development

has produced more jobs than let's say

coal mining oh yeah there's tons of

windmill jobs out there Walter all which

are backed by a power station right Dana

let's get some facts here this was about

Donald Trump and pre blaming him for the

hurricane I mean it used to be the

hurricane comes and they attack another

ocean Obama's administration Hurricane

sandy was blamed on Republicans as well

they always are always playing for

hurricanes I talked to Charlie hurt

yesterday one of our foxnews

contributors he lives in the path of the

hurricane and he said that people they

are still talking about Hurricane

Camille from 1969 when they had it was a

terrible hurricane and that was before

these Rises I do think that America

plays an important role here and that is

because we are innovative and we have a

growing economy right now that means you

can invest in new technology so that you

can get to the point that your dad is

making which is can we continue to

figure out a way to decrease them I

would say from a political standpoint

the Republican Party could stand to talk

about this a little bit more they have a

good position that they you know you're

gonna lose an entire younger generation

if you don't try to talk to them about

this it's what you can't win you can't

win you could you can well it's you

could just not try like what the thing

is right now what's happening is the

Liberals the left of the Liberals they

have replaced global warming with Trump

you should be the global warming cause

war shark attacks and depression but now

they've just said no Trump causes

everything bad and so now we have to do

our best to somehow reduce the amount of

Trump in the atmosphere you can support

innovation I think that's a great idea

innovation Robin

but the problem is that they that they

want first of all United States can't do

this by ourselves if we if we do great

things when it comes to two other energy

sources and the rest of the world

doesn't follow suit it's not going to

accomplish anything and also if these

other areas are not ready to compete

with coal I'm all for it I'm all for

those innovations but if they're not

ready

you can't kill one industry then also

take coal away from have nowhere to go

nowhere to work so it has to that's why

the framers remember it when Hillary

Clinton said to the coal miners you know

we can help you move on find new kinds

of jobs retrain it was do is help people

move on but to your point yes I'd like

you're making the case for the Paris

climate deal because I know that that

locks in other countries to make

commensurate and the methane piece is a

little bit more complicated than how

Juan described it we have two T's so I

would just tell me about it thing is

whatever shoes Melania wears to the

hurricane ravaged states they better not

be too expensive because she's going to

get attacked Democrats completely silent

after yet another left-wing political

attack Greg's on it next

as we hear the media complain about

Trump's blunt rhetoric it pays to see

their response when violence follows

their rhetoric one man just tried to

stab a Republican candidate as the fiend

allegedly cursed Trump

this comes as yet another Broadway star

pleads for the president's death where

is John Wilkes Booth when you need right

would I be on the animated Johnny Depp

looks terrible to cut back on the rum

now this comes as the cheerleader of

confrontation brags about threatening

Trump supporters all the time you saw it

I did not read his constituents his

supporters I do that all the time that I

didn't do at that time now the media

would call this cause and effect but

since it's a liberal it's just a

coincidence you have all this violent

anti Trump rhetoric that's absolutely

nothing to do with actual harm that

follows how stupid of us to think of

that if only we had an actual expert

someone who knows firsthand what

left-wing political violence looks like

they need to be denouncing that kind of

activity there's no place for it if

somebody on the right was doing it we'd

be vocally denouncing it they need to be

denouncing that on the left remember him

now his words probably won't matter as

much these days because most victims now

are just those with wounded feelings

because that's what we care about we

hear a lot about Trump's rhetoric as

though it's worse than violent deeds

this after four decades of incendiary

words and deeds churning from the left

guys like Bill Eyre is a left-wing

bomber who just retired from the

university university that you paid for

on 9/11 he was quoted in the New York

Times saying I don't regret setting

bombs I feel we didn't do enough why do

I get the sense there are more and more

people 17 years later who might agree

with them it's the business of

demonization and it seems to be booming

just ask Scalise indeed Dana always like

the kicker yes you like the kicker the

thing is there's never a follow-up on

these things if it's a right if it's not

a righty it's a one-off it's an isolated

incident

yes something unless if it's on the

right it tends to be a trend yeah

that is extremely frustrating it is

frustrating it seems wad that the media

and Democrats denounce violence when it

suits them no I said I please from that

camp I think it's Trump by the way when

they important the right-wing was all

about beating up people at Trump rallies

like what did Trump say he said you know

what I don't endorse it but these people

have tremendous passion nothing's ever

happened

nothing's ever happen how about I'd like

to punch him in the face says Trump how

about that's in a good quantity we've

knocked the crap words from oh so these

words I'm talking Oh what about

Charlotte slow you want some bad deeds

they know there's enough of that to go

around can play that game I'm not

playing any game on thanks police

deserves all our sympathies and he has

grounds to speak on this with great

authority given us the suffering that he

went through but I'm just saying it

strikes me that when Maxine Waters and

we've seen this tape a hundred times now

on Fox I guess we like it but when

Maxine Waters says it's okay to confront

people people say oh that's violence

that's not the kind of violence that

we're seeing at Trump rallies it's funny

because she just admitted she actually

does threaten people is not talking

about like what happened with Sarah

Huckabee Sanders it's okay to harass

people right people say hey I don't like

what you're doing we're Americans we

have a right to say that in a world

where feelings matter unless you're a

Republican are you know I think Maxine's

sin Jedidiah is that she's promoting

everything but democracy she's not

saying vote like go out and vote she's

saying impeach which is essentially

saying overthrow yeah she's saying

basically bully and used the media and

use everything to when the democratic

process that he got elected he's

everybody's president I keep hearing

liberals say oh he's not my president

he's everybody's president and the media

selective coverage I always think back

to the Tea Party rallies that I went to

all the time and how the media was

scouring those crowds looking for

violence looking for a sign that they

could say was inciting violence and then

that same media ignored actual violence

that was going on at Occupy Wall Street

where people were getting raped and

there were accusations of rape in these

tents in New York City and beyond and

that and the media's refusal they'll

hold Trump

two tasks for a language that I'll agree

in some cases is not good but they won't

hold people accountable for actual

violence against people on the right

somehow the rhetoric matters to them

more than the actual acts of violence

because it depends on where it comes

from I understand I understand why

people act violent because if you have

been taught for years that the other

side is the oppressor and that you are

the oppressed it's not about being wrong

or right it's about being moral and

immoral or evil so the red so the

Republicans and conservatives will be

always be the target of violence because

they are seen as immoral or evil but

because the ends justify the means yes

that's how they've been raised and

that's what they believe and they're

like infants if they don't get their way

they will scream and they will punch and

I understand the frustration because

Trump's winning and he rubs it in their

face and he pushes their buttons and

they're completely shut out of power on

every level of the doctor waters doctor

you were raised by liberal parents were

you raised to be violent I'm saying

they've been conditioned because like

we've discussed Hollywood has done a lot

of disgusting things and Maxine Waters

as you know they traffic in this type of

violent rhetoric and I'm not blaming

these people for the actions of one

deranged individual I'm saying they're

not condemning these people when it

comes out this man who has Trump

derangement syndrome just tried to stab

a Republican congressional candidate and

I haven't heard this once on the network

news anywhere outside of Fox News or the

Internet where is the condemnation

coming in from leadership and the

Democratic Party says we don't condone

this type of stuff well I don't hear it

at all I'm here at crickets the guy's

nuts but you're not he's not seen you're

not playing I agree you're not blaming

all those people but they need to stand

and condemn this stuff don't do that

they will one person will come out who

happens to have a comment on their

Facebook page that's pro Trump and now

it's all Trump supporters all

Republicans are violent they don't give

that same goodness there's one practical

thing that could be done the Federal

Election Commission could change the law

to allow campaign contributions to be

used

for personal security and if you are a

member or you are a candidate and you

are concerned you should be allowed to

do that it would be fully disclosed and

I know that that is a proposal in front

of them right now I think they should

just go ahead and do it yes tchen a good

suggestion Journal smoke and smoke it oh

my goodness Dana it happened to work

ever since they legalized this a you

you're a bad employee

I can't even keep up coming up we're

expecting an update on Hurricane

Florence from President Trump we'll

bring it to you live plus Nancy Pelosi

bragging that Democrats have the

midterms in the bag straight ahead

and Old Dominion we have a value

proposition for our customers we have

on-time delivery

For more infomation >> WASHINGTON POST CLAIMS TRUMP ."fOMPUCIT" WITH EXTREME WEATHER AND OTHER NEWS NEXT - Duration: 15:37.

-------------------------------------------

Woman who flipped off Trump runs for office - Duration: 2:07.

For more infomation >> Woman who flipped off Trump runs for office - Duration: 2:07.

-------------------------------------------

Joy's Shocked, Show Cuts Off After Mueller's Witness Drops Bombshell Clearing Trump - Duration: 5:58.

George Papadopoulos is the campaign worker who became Special Counsel Robert Mueller's

big witness in his case to prove President Donald Trump colluded with the Russians.

Papadopoulos appeared on The View, and Joy Behar was jumping with excitement, thinking

he would shed light on how Mueller will get Trump impeached.

Then, it all went wrong as Papadopoulos cleared Trump with bombshell evidence, and a shocked

Behar lost it as the show was cut off.

You'll love this.

The View is having a tough start to their new season.

Yesterday, it was Omarosa playing her "secret Trump tape" which proved Hillary Clinton

was guilty of paying for the bogus "Trump-Russia" dossier and setting up a go-between using

the law firm "Perkins-Coie" to pay for it thinking it could never be traced back

to her.

That segment caused Whoopi to freak out.

Mad World News previously reported, "What did Whoopi do immediately after the [secret

Trump] tape was done playing?

She panicked, cutting the show and went to commercial.

Then, they never mentioned this tape again during the entire show!"

That was on Monday.

The next day, Robert Mueller's so-called key witness against Trump, George Papadopoulos,

shows up as The View's main guest.

The shrews of The View were no doubt sure this key witness would spill the beans about

how the Special Counsel was so close to proving the president is guilty and needs to be impeached.

Except, once again, no one over at ABC did their homework.

And it was almost like déjà vu with Omarosa.

But before we get to Behar's histrionics, you have to understand who Papadopolous was

to the Trump campaign,

In reality, George Papadopoulos was a minor player living in London.

He was only 28 years old and had been soliciting the Trump campaign for a position.

He was an unofficial volunteer "foreign advisor" to the campaign in spring of 2016.

He was targeted by the cabal at the DOJ and FBI as someone they could set up, hoping he

would take the bait they fed him through a now outed British CIA asset named Alexander

Downer.

Downer "ran into" George at a bar in London and told him, "I have a ton of Hillary's

emails.

Don't you think the Trump campaign would love to get a hold of them?"

So, here's the kicker and why Joy was so shocked and was rendered utterly speechless.

On The View, Joy asked George, "You never told anyone at the Trump campaign about the

emails?

Is that what you are saying?!"

Papadopoulos answered, "Yeah, I have no recollection of doing it…"

Which at that point, snarky Sunny Hostin rudely cuts him off saying, "Not having any recollection

of not doing it and not doing it are two different things."

The leftist audience burst into applause, and Joy can be heard chuckling, all of them

totally clueless of what is to come.

George says, "Let's not forget I was living in London at the time.

I wasn't in some sort of headquarters…"

Again rude Sunny Hostin cuts him off sarcastically saying, "But that doesn't affect your

memory."

Now, Joy's excited to get the Trump dirt that she is positive is coming.

She tells George, "Quickly, we are running out of time."

The truth is they had an entire second segment coming up with George and his wife.

Remember, the topic is Hillary's emails and the shrews on The View are sure Papadopolous

somehow is the link who got those emails to the Trump campaign.

They think the emails are the smoking gun proving Trump colluded with Russia.

Papadolopolous says, "Ok, but here's how I was transmitting information to the campaign

and it was 99% over email.

And so if it would have been sent it would have been over email and obviously that email

has never been discovered because I don't remember sending it."

Boom!

Pure silence.

A pin could have dropped in that studio and we could have heard it.

Since Joy was rendered speechless, quickly Whoopi says dejected, "Well, OK, your wife

is coming out…she'll join us when we come back," and they go to commercial.

Of course, if an email like that existed, Mueller would have found it and George Papadopolous

wouldn't be giving interviews.

Also, isn't it obvious Papadopolous was being set-up to send those emails to the Trump

campaign?

This was a very rough day over at The View for the Trump-haters:

When they come back from commercial with Papadolopous' wife joining them, you'd think the shrews

would be excited continue their inquiry into the damning Hillary emails, right?

Wrong.

They know they have struck out once again.

Instead, they talk about fluff with his wife and never re-visit the hardcore questioning

to get the Trump dirt.

When will these idiots figure out evidence against Trump doesn't exist?

Not one of them asks the right questions like who is this guy Downer working for who fed

you this information about Hillary's emails?

Well, all over, even in the mainstream media, Downer has been identified as a CIA asset.

It's the Obama administration setting up Trump.

But the shrews on The View are now 0-2.

Omarosa's tape proved Hillary's guilty and Pappadolpolous proved Trump's campaign

was being infiltrated by foreign spies working for the CIA.

When the entire truth comes out, they better have rubber rooms ready for those leftist

nitwits hosting The View.

For more infomation >> Joy's Shocked, Show Cuts Off After Mueller's Witness Drops Bombshell Clearing Trump - Duration: 5:58.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING NOW: Trump Just Had All 130 Arrested In Just Over 24Hrs – Justice Served! - Duration: 7:27.

For more infomation >> BREAKING NOW: Trump Just Had All 130 Arrested In Just Over 24Hrs – Justice Served! - Duration: 7:27.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING NOW: Trump Just Had All 130 Arrested In Just Over 24Hrs – Justice Served! - Duration: 12:23.

Illegal immigration is a "major problem" of some significance according to 68% of American

voters.

That is according to a recent Rasmussen Reports poll that shows many Americans are increasingly

concerned in spite of the attempts of mainstream media propagandists attempting to convince

much of America otherwise.

A mere 32% of the respondents to the telephone and online surveys stated illegal immigration

is "not a serious problem," and a paltry 9% stated the issue is "not at all serious."

The Trump administration continues to crack down on the illegal alien invasion as U.S.

Border Patrol agents arrest two massive groups of illegal aliens including unaccompanied

minors in just over 24 hours in Texas.

"U.S. Border Patrol agents scooped up 131 illegal immigrants, including 22 unaccompanied

minors, in just a little over a day in the Rio Grande Valley, officials said Tuesday.

"The arrests stem from two separate incidents in a span of just over 24 hours.

"Weslaco agents first arrested 66 illegals from El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras

on Monday.

The group comprised 20 families and 11 unaccompanied minors.

"Then on Tuesday, Weslaco agents arrested an additional 65 illegal immigrants from Guatemala

and El Salvador.

That group was made up of 25 families and 11 unaccompanied children.

"Officials said in a press release that all 131 illegal immigrants were being processed

by the Border Patrol."

All in all a total of 45 family units and 22 unaccompanied minors were included among

those illegal aliens arrested.

There are approximately 1,857,000 illegal aliens residing in the state of Texas, making

it the state with the second-highest number of illegal alien invaders living within its

borders, surpassed only by the state of California.

The total illegal alien population for the entire United States is just north of 12 million,

according to the Federation for Immigration Reform (FAIR).

Around 62% of illegal aliens are from Mexico, which translates to more than six million

illegal Mexican aliens within American borders without consent or permission.

The number two country is El Salvador and accounts for only about half a million or

so and the numbers go down from there from places such as Guatemala, Honduras, the Philippines,

Korea, Ecuador, Brazil, and China.

Just how much does that cost the American taxpaying citizenry of the United States?

According to FAIR:

"At the federal, state, and local levels, taxpayers shell out approximately $134.9 billion

to cover the costs incurred by the presence of more than 12.5 million illegal aliens,

and about 4.2 million citizen children of illegal aliens.

That amounts to a tax burden of approximately $8,075 per illegal alien family member and

a total of $115,894,597,664.

The total cost of illegal immigration to U.S. taxpayers is both staggering and crippling.

In 2013, FAIR estimated the total cost to be approximately $113 billion.

So, in under four years, the cost has risen nearly $3 billion.

This is a disturbing and unsustainable trend.

The sections below will break down and further explain these numbers at the federal, state,

and local levels.

"The Federal government spends a net amount of $45.8 billion on illegal aliens and their

U.S.-born children.

This amount includes expenditures for public education, medical care, justice enforcement

initiatives, welfare programs, and other miscellaneous costs.

It also factors in the meager amount illegal aliens pay to the federal government in income,

social security, Medicare and excise taxes.

ShareTweetFlipPlusEmail

Illegal immigration is a "major problem" of some significance according to 68% of American

voters.

That is according to a recent Rasmussen Reports poll that shows many Americans are increasingly

concerned in spite of the attempts of mainstream media propagandists attempting to convince

much of America otherwise.

A mere 32% of the respondents to the telephone and online surveys stated illegal immigration

is "not a serious problem," and a paltry 9% stated the issue is "not at all serious."

The Trump administration continues to crack down on the illegal alien invasion as U.S.

Border Patrol agents arrest two massive groups of illegal aliens including unaccompanied

minors in just over 24 hours in Texas.

Fox News reports:

Trending: It Has Officially Been Confirmed About Sarah Huckabee Sanders – Congratulations!

"U.S. Border Patrol agents scooped up 131 illegal immigrants, including 22 unaccompanied

minors, in just a little over a day in the Rio Grande Valley, officials said Tuesday.

"The arrests stem from two separate incidents in a span of just over 24 hours.

"Weslaco agents first arrested 66 illegals from El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras

on Monday.

The group comprised 20 families and 11 unaccompanied minors.

"Then on Tuesday, Weslaco agents arrested an additional 65 illegal immigrants from Guatemala

and El Salvador.

That group was made up of 25 families and 11 unaccompanied children.

"Officials said in a press release that all 131 illegal immigrants were being processed

by the Border Patrol."

All in all a total of 45 family units and 22 unaccompanied minors were included among

those illegal aliens arrested.

There are approximately 1,857,000 illegal aliens residing in the state of Texas, making

it the state with the second-highest number of illegal alien invaders living within its

borders, surpassed only by the state of California.

The total illegal alien population for the entire United States is just north of 12 million,

according to the Federation for Immigration Reform (FAIR).

Around 62% of illegal aliens are from Mexico, which translates to more than six million

illegal Mexican aliens within American borders without consent or permission.

The number two country is El Salvador and accounts for only about half a million or

so and the numbers go down from there from places such as Guatemala, Honduras, the Philippines,

Korea, Ecuador, Brazil, and China.

Just how much does that cost the American taxpaying citizenry of the United States?

According to FAIR:

"At the federal, state, and local levels, taxpayers shell out approximately $134.9 billion

to cover the costs incurred by the presence of more than 12.5 million illegal aliens,

and about 4.2 million citizen children of illegal aliens.

That amounts to a tax burden of approximately $8,075 per illegal alien family member and

a total of $115,894,597,664.

The total cost of illegal immigration to U.S. taxpayers is both staggering and crippling.

In 2013, FAIR estimated the total cost to be approximately $113 billion.

So, in under four years, the cost has risen nearly $3 billion.

This is a disturbing and unsustainable trend.

The sections below will break down and further explain these numbers at the federal, state,

and local levels.

"The Federal government spends a net amount of $45.8 billion on illegal aliens and their

U.S.-born children.

This amount includes expenditures for public education, medical care, justice enforcement

initiatives, welfare programs, and other miscellaneous costs.

It also factors in the meager amount illegal aliens pay to the federal government in income,

social security, Medicare and excise taxes.

A young Mexican helps a compatriot to climb the metal wall that divides the border between

Mexico and the United States to cross illegally to Sunland Park, from Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua

state, Mexico on April 6, 2018.

US President Donald Trump on April 5, 2018, said he would send thousands …

"The approximately $46 billion in federal expenditures attributable to illegal aliens

is staggering.

Assuming an illegal alien population of approximately 12.5 million illegal aliens and 4.2 million

U.S.-born children of illegal aliens, that amounts to roughly $2,746 per illegal alien,

per year.

For the sake of comparison, the average American college student receives only $4,800 in federal

student loans each year."

Leftists and open borders proponents alike frequently cite allegedly large tax contributions

made by illegal aliens as some level of justification for their continued illegal presence within

American borders, as well as a basis for offering them amnesty, similar to what was previously

enacted in 1986 under the Reagan administration.

As FAIR notes, this is little more than a red herring as these "studies" use some

seriously funny math.

Most of them grossly overestimate both taxes actually collected from illegal aliens, as

well as the amounts actually paid by illegal aliens (i.e. the money actually collected

FROM illegals and actually KEPT by federal and state governments).

Since the 1990s, illegal aliens have had little to no fear of deportation for their immigration

status creating an environment where not only are illegal aliens both willing and able to

file tax returns, they are actually incentivized to do so.

Because the vast majority of illegal aliens hold lower-income jobs, many of those that

are subject to wage deductions end up receiving a complete refund of all taxes paid, PLUS

net payments made on the basis of any tax credits.

As a result of this practice, illegal aliens actually PROFIT off the backs of the American

taxpayers by filing a tax return themselves and therefore have a strong self-interest

in doing so.

By FAIR's estimation even though the costs of illegal immigration borne by taxpayers

at the federal level are staggering, they only pale in comparison to the fiscal burden

shouldered by taxpayers at the state level.

As a state, the taxpaying citizens of Texas were forced to shoulder the staggering total

burden of $10,994,614,550 which breaks down to approximately $4,429.00.

The combined total of state and local government general expenditures on illegal aliens is

$18,571,428,571 billion.

Perhaps the leftists and the open borders proponents should just write a check.

For more infomation >> BREAKING NOW: Trump Just Had All 130 Arrested In Just Over 24Hrs – Justice Served! - Duration: 12:23.

-------------------------------------------

GOWDY GOES NUCLEAR – EXPOSES ANTI TRUMP FBI OFFICIAL, RAINS DOWN HELL - Duration: 11:14.

GOWDY GOES NUCLEAR – EXPOSES ANTI-TRUMP FBI OFFICIAL, RAINS DOWN HELL

Last week, the Justice Department gave Congress less than 15 percent of the texts between

FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page.

Now, Rep. Trey Gowdy has had enough of this nonsense and is saying that both FBI officials

Peter Strzok and Lisa Page should testify before Congress.

Western Journalism reported that Gowdy explained that this move for accountability would help

lawmakers deem whether or not the two FBI officials actually held enough power to take

down President Donald Trump or even protect Hillary Clinton from criminal charges over

email allegations.

"I can't prove that they were the final decision makers, nor do I have to," Gowdy

admitted.

"What I have to prove to you is two really important people hated (Trump); would have

done anything to protect (Clinton)."

He went on to suggest that the texts were evidence that the two "hated" then-presidential

candidate Trump, alluding to their bias against the current administration and alleged efforts

to assist those within Democratic National Committee.

One example of the FBI helping Clinton came when Strzok interviewed Clinton about her

use of private email servers during her time as secretary of state, soon after which the

classified information was discovered.

Gowdy explained that Strzok allegedly "scrubbed" the language about Clinton's "grossly

negligent" behavior from the final FBI report.

"Did they have the power to protect her?"

Gowdy asked.

"The decision not to charge (Clinton) was made even before they interviewed her.

How would you like that deal?"

He then pointed to the two FBI officials and how they had been removed from the Special

Counsel Robert Mueller's Russia-collusion investigation after Mueller learned of the

"insidious" political bias against Trump.

"These are the same two people, whose bias was so insidious, that Bob Mueller fired them

the second he found out about it," Gowdy said.

"These witnesses need to come in and tell us what they meant [by these texts] and everything

else they said over the course of eighteen months."

However, Gowdy refused to comment on whether he thinks the text which referred to a "secret

society" of FBI agents was a joke or real.

"Republicans are better served by letting the texts speak for themselves," Gowdy admitted.

"These witnesses need to come in and tell us what they meant by it."

What do you think about this?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments section.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with

your

friends

and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> GOWDY GOES NUCLEAR – EXPOSES ANTI TRUMP FBI OFFICIAL, RAINS DOWN HELL - Duration: 11:14.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Close To Declassifying Docs Proving Big-Time Corruption – He Waited For The Right Time! - Duration: 4:44.

For more infomation >> Trump Close To Declassifying Docs Proving Big-Time Corruption – He Waited For The Right Time! - Duration: 4:44.

-------------------------------------------

The Latest Trump Impeachment Odds [September 11] | Heavy.com - Duration: 4:47.

The Latest Trump Impeachment Odds [September 11] | Heavy.com

Trump's impeachment odds have hovered in the forty-percent range for several months, and might increase in the coming months leading up to the midterms.

In the wake of the shocking op-ed published by The New York Times by an anonymous senior Trump official who detailed a "secret resistance" inside the administration, Trump's approval rating has dropped into the thirties in several recent polls.

A recent ABC News/Washington Post poll revealed that Trump's approval rating was just around 36%, while an IBD/TIPP poll reflected the same.

Trump's marked drop in approval is not good news for Republicans as the 2018 midterms loom.

If the Democratic party is able to win a majority of seats in the house, then impeachment for the president would start to look like a real possibility.

Here's what you need to know about Trump's latest odds of impeachment.

Trump Impeachment Odds Over the Last 90 Days.

PredictIt odds reflect a 6% likelihood of Trump being impeached by 2018, but a current 46% likelihood of Trump being impeached within his first term, which reflects a 2% increase since September 7.

MyBookie reflects a slightly different story, predicting Trump to be at -500/+300 odds for making it through his first term.

Of course, prediction markets are not polls, and do not reflect an accurate representation of the American demographic.

But they do serve as a barometer for at least one audience's perspective of the administration, which is a valuable angle to add for consideration.

Likelihood That Democrats Take the House in the 2018 Midterms.

FiveThirtyEightThe Democratic party currently has an estimated 78% likelihood of taking the house in the 2018 midterms.One thing to watch for in the coming weeks won't just be the unfolding drama around the source of the op-ed, but the increasing or decreasing likelihood that Democrats take over the house after the 2018 midterms.

Should Democrats take the house, the likelihood of Trump's impeachment should skyrocket past 50%.

Currently, FiveThirtyEight predicts there to be a seven in nine chance, or 78% chance, that Democrats will take the house.

Trump Tells Montana Crowd That Impeachment Will Be Their Fault If it Occurs.

At a Montana rally on September 6, Trump told the crowd, "If it does happen, it's your fault because you did not go out and vote.

You didn't go out to vote — that's the only way it could happen.

I'll be the only president in history they'll say: 'What a job he's done! By the way, we're impeaching him.'".

Trump continued, "This election you aren't just voting for a candidate.

You're voting for which party controls Congress.".

A recent ABC News/Washington Post poll revealed that 49% of people polled would support Congress if it initiated impeachment proceedings.

For more infomation >> The Latest Trump Impeachment Odds [September 11] | Heavy.com - Duration: 4:47.

-------------------------------------------

Native American Tribes Sue Trump Administration To Stop The Keystone XL Pipeline - Duration: 4:26.

It's been quite some time since most Americans have heard the phrase "Keystone XL Pipeline"

but believe it or not, that pipeline is actually currently under construction here in the United

States.

Towards the end of the Obama administration after actually looking into the issue for

almost eight years, they finally decided, "You know what?

We're not going to give you the permit to build this."

The only reason they did that is because the public pressure against the pipeline became

too much for them to continue to ignore, so they finally said, "All right.

Fine.

We give up.

We'll pull the permit.

Are you happy now?"

Well, shortly after Donald Trump came into office, he gave the permit back to them and

said, "Go ahead.

Start building your disgusting pipeline," because, according to Trump, this is going

to be "part of a new era of American energy policy that will lower cost for American families

and very significantly reduce our dependence on foreign oil and create thousands of jobs

right here in America."

Now I want to address those claims by Donald Trump in just a moment, but I want to start

by saying this, right now because this pipeline is being built, two Native American tribes

have banded together to sew the Trump administration to force them to pull the permit from TransCanada,

the company that owns the pipeline, in order to stop it.

According to the legal arguments being made by these two tribes, there was no ... Actually

I'll read it.

I'll read it right here.

This is amazing.

There was no analysis of trust obligations, no analysis of treaty rights for these native

tribes, no analysis of the potential impact on hunting and fishing rights, no analysis

of potential impacts on the Rosebud Sioux Tribe's unique water system, no analysis of

the potential impact of spills on tribal citizens, and no analysis of the potential impact on

cultural sites in the path of the pipeline, which is in violation of the National Environmental

Policy Act and the National Historic Preservation Act.

Basically to put it in legal terms for you, they're screwing over Native Americans here

in the United States in every single possible way.

They don't care about the treaties that we've signed.

They don't care about the environmental laws that we have.

They just want to get this pipeline in because TransCanada wants them to.

Now back to those claims from Donald Trump, this is going to reduce our dependence on

foreign oil.

Well, first and foremost, what's going to be going through the Keystone XL Pipeline

is foreign fossil fuel.

That's not coming from the United States.

It's not.

It's coming from Canada.

Hence, the company doing it is TransCanada.

Second of all, it's not even coming to the US.

That pipeline is going right down to the Gulf of Mexico so they can load it onto tanker

ships and ship it overseas.

That's not ours.

It's not going to do anything to reduce our cost, so there's lie number two busted.

As for that thousands of jobs, I think the actual job number of permanent jobs that the

pipeline's going to create is 36.

It's been a few years since I've had to pull that number out of memory, so it's somewhere

around 36.

I know it's less than 40 total permanent new American jobs.

That's actually according to the State Department itself.

36 jobs.

You get more jobs than that opening up a new McDonald's somewhere.

We're putting our entire environment at risk, basically trampling the rights of these Native

American tribes for 36 jobs, no additional energy independence, and sure as hell no reduced

energy cost for those of us here at the United States.

Wow.

All of us are getting screwed, but at least these Native American tribes have a full proof

legal argument.

If they are able to bring this argument in front of a fair and impartial judge here in

the United States, there is virtually no way that any fair and impartial judge could rule

in TransCanada's favor.

Unfortunately here in the United States, we're running out of fair and impartial judges and

instead they're being replaced by pro-corporate anti-consumer hacks, which doesn't leave me

very hopeful for the future of this lawsuit that's been filed.

For more infomation >> Native American Tribes Sue Trump Administration To Stop The Keystone XL Pipeline - Duration: 4:26.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Blames San Juan Mayor And Geography For Nearly 3,000 Puerto Rico Deaths - Duration: 4:02.

Since becoming President of the United States, Donald Trump has been the Commander in Chief

for the United States throughout several different major natural disasters.

One of the biggest ones obviously was Hurricane Maria that devastated Puerto Rico.

Yesterday, as this administration was gearing up for Hurricane Florence to come batter the

Eastern seaboard of the United States, Donald Trump took the time to remind us of how great

his disaster response was last year during hurricane season.

He tweeted the following out: He said, "We got A pluses for our recent hurricane work

in Texas and Florida, and did an unappreciated great job in Puerto Rico, even though an inaccessible

island with very poor electricity and a totally incompetent Mayor of San Juan.

We are ready for the big one that is coming!"

So rather than take the fault for the fact that on his watch, on an island that is a

United States territory filled with U.S. citizens, the fact that 2,975 Americans died in that

storm, totally not his fault.

"The island is inaccessible," he says.

I guess there's no way to get to it because that is what inaccessible means.

It means that there is literally no way to get to something.

So it's curious to know how FEMA did end up down there or the National Guard or hell,

even all the people on the island.

How do you get to and from Puerto Rico if it's inaccessible?

Second, this man will not miss an opportunity to attack a strong woman, and that is the

Mayor of San Juan, who he's attacking in this tweet, who he attacked relentlessly after

the storm hit the island.

And again, it is 100% because she's a very strong woman, dealing with a very intense

circumstance down there on the island, and island, by the way, yeah poor electricity.

You can go ahead and blame that on the big banks who help decimate the island's economy

by robbing them blind.

That is not the fault of the citizens of Puerto Rico, that is the fault of the major bankers

here in the United States.

They did that.

You underfunded FEMA.

You wouldn't let them go down as early as they wanted to.

That organization claimed in an internal document itself that they were about 5,000 staffers

short of where they needed to be to be properly prepared for the 2017 hurricane season.

That's all on you, buddy.

And if you can't accept responsibility as the Commander in Chief of the United States,

the leader of this country, then you're unfit to lead on that fact alone, let alone obviously

all of the other reasons why you're unfit.

And if you want to talk about the other responses here on the mainland, down in Texas and Florida,

well guess what, FEMA sucked there too.

You know who came in and had to save those areas?

The people that you hate so much, the NFL.

If it wasn't for JJ Watt and other members of the Houston Texans raising money and helping

fund relief efforts down there for Harvey in Houston, and the Tampa Bay Buccaneers'

NFL players raising money for victims down there in Florida, the responses wouldn't have

nearly been as good as they were.

But you don't care about that.

You don't want to give any credit to NFL teams and players for helping save their own cities,

you want to take all the credit for that and then blame this woman down in Puerto Rico

for the 2,975 deaths that took place on your watch.

Every single one of those deaths is on you.

For more infomation >> Trump Blames San Juan Mayor And Geography For Nearly 3,000 Puerto Rico Deaths - Duration: 4:02.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's Row With Google - Duration: 6:29.

Trump took to Twitter with a new target: Google.

His row is with Search-Results which he calls 'rigged.'

[Clip: "President Donald Trump is targeting Google.

'They have it rigged for me and others.'

'Well, I think that Google, and Facebook, and Twitter, I think they treat conservatives

and Republicans very unfairly.'"]

"Trump News Results," sez the prez, "are from left-wing media, like CNN," who after gutting

every conservative voice, act as if they're squeaky clean.

[Clip: "This is all part of the President's appeal toward his base kind of placing an

"us versus them."

The same sort of thing that he does with the media, painting these big groups that work

in these centers of San Francisco, New York, or Los Angeles as the "them" that are against

the President and his supporters when that's not necessarily the case."]

There they go again.

Those "deplorables" that Hillary dissed are paraded again as all that matters to Trump,

rather than him bringing to light buried issues.

CNN got some competition.

A WSJ headline reports that various State Attorney Generals are talking "antitrust regulations;"

"breaking up Google" and "stopping suppression of conservative speech."

The article targets the big three Information Gateways: Google, Facebook, and Twitter.

Where you be, Sundar?

[Clip] ["More breaking news now after President Trump hammers Google censorship.

Its CEO making a move, a defiant move he will regret forever.

Bloomberg reports that Google's Sundar Pichai is now facing bi-partisan criticism for refusing

to testify at a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing next week, but the panel's chairman signaled

he's unlikely to issue a subpoena to force the chief executive officer to appear.

I say subpoena the guy."]

Waste of time.

It's Google's parent company, Alphabet...in toto, with whom Trump has to do.

Now tell me, whatever happened to Sergei Brin and Larry Page?

You don't see them anymore.

Did they fall off the face of the earth?

And, did they ever really own Google?

For as Stanford students in the 90's they shaped their craft in a top research university

that does lots of R&D for the Pentagon and Intelligence Agencies.

But Zuckerberg is a whole different story.

[Clip] ["Mr. Zuckerberg, I will say there are a great many Americans who I think are

deeply concerned that, that Facebook and other tech companies are engaged in a pervasive

pattern of bias and political censorship.

There have been numerous instances with Facebook.

In May of 2016, Gizmodo reported that Facebook had purposely and routinely suppressed conservative

stories from trending news, including stories about CPAC, including stories about Mitt Romney,

including stories about the Lois Lerner-IRS scandal, including stories about Glen Beck."

"In addition to that, Facebook has initially shut down the Chick-Fil-A Appreciation Day

page, has blocked a post of a Fox News reporter, has blocked over two dozen Catholic pages,

and most recently blocked Trump supporters Diamond and Silk's page with 1.2 million Facebook

followers after determining their content and brand were quote 'unsafe to the community.'

To a great many Americans, that appears to be a pervasive pattern of political bias.

Do you agree with that assessment?"

"Senator, let me say a few things about this.

First, I understand where that concern is coming from, because Facebook and the tech

industry are located in Silicon Valley which is an extremely left-leaning place.

This is is actually a concern that I have and try to root out in the company is making

sure that we don't have, um, any bias in the work that we do.

And I think it is a fair concern that, um that people would, would, would at least wonder

about this.

Now--" "Let me, let me ask this question.

Are you aware of any ad or page that has been taken down from Planned Parenthood?"

"Senator, I'm, I'm not.

But let me just -- can I finish?"

"How about MoveOn.org?"

"Sorry?"

"How about Moveon.org?"

"I'm not specifically aware of those."]

George Soros, Zuck--the hidden hand behind MoveOn.org--branded for allegedly funding

Antifa and other, sometimes violent, anti-Trump protest groups.

[Clip: "How about any Democratic candidate for office?"

"I'm not specifically aware.

I mean, I'm not, I'm not sure."]

Busted!

Let's hammer a few more nails in the censorship coffin.

Since Social Media are vehicles for person-to-person communications --put them on par with Telecommunication

Companies which operate as 'quasi-public utilities' that provide wide communal services.

You're not banned, yet, for being 'politically incorrect' by AT&T when you use your phone.

The paradigm should apply to the Information Gateways--not by Big Gov--but by all of us

net-heads who deserve a free flow of information.

"Oh," the tech giants cry, "we're private and can do what we decide!"

But bakeries are public?

C'mon, The tech giants are inflicting pervasive censorship while hiding behind "oh, we're

private and privileged."

They're only "private" because America has a Constitution that permits companies to be

private.

Those who live by the sword will die by the sword.

If you live under the Constitution, tech giants, then...live and let live, and kill censorship

before it kills you.

For more infomation >> Trump's Row With Google - Duration: 6:29.

-------------------------------------------

Media Asks Sarah Sanders About Using 25th Amendment On Trump She SHREDS Them(VIDEO)!!! - Duration: 7:50.

Media Asks Sarah Sanders About Using 25th Amendment On Trump She SHREDS Them

David is the president make of all of

this talk of the 25th amendment and some

of what he hears on media outlets

regarding the word crazy talk there's a

lot of it seems like there's a lot of

talk about that how many of the

mainstream media outlets I think we

would say that it's about as ridiculous

as most of Bob Woodward's book the fact

that that's actually being honestly

discussed is ridiculous and frankly it's

insulting to the nearly 62 million

people that came out and overwhelmingly

supported this president voted for him

supported his agenda and are watching

and cheering on as he successfully

implements that agenda every single day

David sir thank you very much I'm

assuming you've read Bob Woodward's book

I know a lot of us have can we expect

other than repeating denials from

general mattis Jerome Kelly John Dowd

can we expect the White House to give us

a list of all the things in the book

that are wrong and that qualified what

were to be alive I think that would be a

complete and utter waste of our time so

no because then that goes to this

Quinnipiac poll that came out today that

says 55 percent of Americans believe

that the op-ed writer The Times is right

and the president's getting a 60 percent

negative rating on the honest and

truthful that 60% of Americans think

he's a dishonest person so is the

president think he can actually win a

credibility battle with Bob Woodward

who's a you know an august member of the

press corps help take richard nixon down

and as a legend how can he win that

credibility bailout once again i think i

would certainly rather take the actual

on record account from people who are

here who have been working in this

building who have interacted with the

president day-in day-out like general

mattis like general kelly like myself

not disgruntled former employees that

refuse to put their name on things when

they come out to attack the president i

think that those are far more credible

sources and certainly far more reliable

voices within this administration and

that can accurately tell what's taking

place on them in the building behind

so incredible voice absolutely John

thanks a lot Sarah you said a lot the

president has said a lot about the

publication of this op ed you've called

it the president has called it a

betrayal you've called it an act of

disloyalty but the president has has

been mentioned quite a few times even

here in this briefing is called on the

Department of Justice to investigate the

publication of this op-ed there is no

violation of the Criminal Code that goes

along with the publication of this up

that's a little curious as to what it is

that the President believes may have

been violated in the ball as it relates

to the publication of this conduct

once again we would consider someone who

is actively trying to undermine the

executive branch of our government

inappropriate and something certainly to

cause concern and they should take a

look at it violation once again we're

just saying that this gives a great

level of concern and they should look

into it

concern is not a violation I'm not an

attorney it's the Department of Justice

to term make that determination and

we're asking them to look into it and

make that determination and they

certainly are fully capable of doing

that but someone actively trying to

undermine the duly elected president and

the entire executive branch of

government that seems quite problematic

to me and something that they should

take a look at John thank you Sarah

just to try to specify this a bit is the

White House treating the anonymous op-ed

writer as a full-fledged breach of

security matter and is the FBI

investigating both staff and their means

of communications cellphones

like I'm not aware of that level that

wouldn't be something I would be a part

of but certainly as I just told your

colleague we think that there is a

concern here and it should be looked

into John if I could start out sort of

with the topic of today and there's the

anonymous up at the New York Times but

the president said on Friday that he

thought it would be a good idea for Jeff

Sessions to look into this is there

anything about what was published by the

New York Times that would warrant an

investigation by the Department of

Justice certainly if there's an

individual whether or not since we don't

know who they are if that individual is

in meetings that where national security

is being discussed or other important

topics and they are attempting to

undermine the executive branch that

would certainly be problematic and

something that the Department of Justice

should look into do you suggest you to

misuse of classified information and

what wrong with that follow once again

it's something that the Department of

Justice should simply look into and

that's for them to make that

determination is the White House

actively trying to find out who this

person is or do you not really care

we're certainly focused on things that

actually matter and the staff here that

is here to do their job and not

undermine the great work that this

president and this administration has

done and we're gonna continue focusing

on that it's frankly I think sad and

pathetic that a gutless anonymous source

could receive so much attention from the

media and I think that the American

people would be much better served if we

actually spent some time talking about

some of the really important things that

are facing our country and the things

that this administration is doing to

help fix that happen continues to call

him a liar and says his book is

completely a work of fiction

he's also mentioned libel laws quite a

bit is president Trump considering

filing a lawsuit against Woodward

certainly keep you posted on that but I

think we've been extremely clear from

the beginning that many of the books

sources have already spoken out to

refute a couple of them chief of staff

John Kelly aggressively pushed back in

this general mattis aggressively pushing

back into claims John Dowd also pushing

back against the things that are

attributed him and a number of people

have come out and said that Woodward

never even reached out to corroborate

statements that were attributed to them

which seems incredibly reckless for a

book to make such outrageous claims to

not even take the time to get a

ten-dollar fact checker to call around

and verify that some of these quotes

were happened when no effort was made it

seems like a very careless and reckless

way to write a book Jeff you know if the

President believes these denials that

have been coming

one of his top advisors where does he

believe that it's someone from within

and does he believe that lie-detector

tests should be issued as the

vice-president volunteered to do on

Sunday no lie detectors are being used

or talked about or looked at as a

possibility

frankly the White House and the staff

here are focused on doing our jobs and

trying to show up here every day and do

what we can to help better the American

people not deal with cowards that refuse

to put their names in an anonymous

letter thank you god bless you and God

bless america

For more infomation >> Media Asks Sarah Sanders About Using 25th Amendment On Trump She SHREDS Them(VIDEO)!!! - Duration: 7:50.

-------------------------------------------

Obamas Must Be Panicked & Calling Attorneys, Trump Gave Them 'FINAL WARNING' - Duration: 5:21.

For more infomation >> Obamas Must Be Panicked & Calling Attorneys, Trump Gave Them 'FINAL WARNING' - Duration: 5:21.

-------------------------------------------

Federal Judge Drops Anvil On Democrat Protesters, Delivers Trump Victory - Duration: 2:35.

For more infomation >> Federal Judge Drops Anvil On Democrat Protesters, Delivers Trump Victory - Duration: 2:35.

-------------------------------------------

As Hurricane Florence Threatens US, Trump Takes $10 Million From FEMA & Gives It To ICE - Duration: 3:30.

As Hurricane Florence approaches the eastern seaboard of the United States, actually threatening

to be one of the largest hurricanes to hit the eastern seaboard in the last six decades.

Donald Trump is out there assuring citizens in the Carolinas, Virginia, and everywhere

else that FEMA, the government, the National Guard, we are all ready to act to as soon

as you need us.

That is a good message to send.

And hopefully he's telling the truth.

Statistically speaking, it's unlikely that he's telling the truth.

And we actually got a little bit more information last night from democratic senator Jeff Merkley

about just how much the administration is lying about their preparedness for this storm.

According to a previously unreleased document that Jeff Merkley aired on MSNBC's Rachel

Maddow program on Tuesday evening, the Trump administration recently moved ten million

dollars from FEMA's budget over to ICE so that they could detain more migrant children.

We took money from FEMA, even coming off of a horrible hurricane season 2017 where FEMA

was already underfunded to the point they couldn't do their jobs.

We took more money from them because this administration wants to put more kids in cages.

That is literally what happened.

Ten million from FEMA to pay for ICE.

To pay for these detention facilities.

Specifically to put more beds in them so we can put more kids in them, separated from

their parents.

This administration is not ready for what is about to happen from Hurricane Florence.

They don't understand how bad this storm truly is.

This is going to be an absolute disaster.

They are predicting as much as 40 inches of rain on top of what is predicted to be a possibly

ten foot or more storm surge.

There is going to be unprecedented flooding in the areas where this storm makes landfall

and everywhere else it continues to go after that.

We are looking at a disaster on the scale that the United States has not seen very often.

And the Trump administration's best way to prepare for it was to take money away from

the one federal agency that's supposed to help us in these situations and give it to

an organization that is hated by most Americans because they're putting kids in cages and

he gave them that money because he wants to make even more cages for children.

That is the priority of this administration.

It's not the safety and security of American citizens.

It's not protecting them and helping them after a natural disaster.

It's being as cruel and heartless as possible.

And this is a twofer for the administration.

So, not only are you screwing over the people about to get slammed by this hurricane, but

you're also being doubly evil by using that hurricane relief money to put more kids in

cages.

That, ladies and gentleman, is what the Trump administration stands for.

That is what they're all about and hopefully that is what every single American citizen

remembers when they go to the ballot box this coming November.

No comments:

Post a Comment