Trump news on Youtube Sep 12 2018

President Donald Trump is definitely not a fan of his predecessor and has also proven

himself to be one who says, at whim, whatever he wants…no matter who it offends.

It's an honest and brutal approach to presidency that seems to work considering he keeps on

winning as president and certainly more so in his first year than Barack Obama did in

two terms.

Supporters love his blatant truthful approach to calling things like it is and not sugar

coating anyone or any action to appease the establishment.

Trump is a president of the American people and an nemesis to career politicians who don't

appreciate him "draining the swamp" and shaking things up.

However, in all of his daily Twitter rants, perhaps the best are when he takes jabs at

the man whose mess he's done a masterful job cleaning up.

The best jab yet came after Obama's recent speech in which he arrogantly touted himself

throughout.

His seemingly narcissistic address came across as an attempt to not be forgotten or replaced

by a capable and successful leader that Trump is, although, his real motive for glorifying

himself is unknown…he could just believe what he's actually convinced himself of,

while trying to convince the country what a incapable president Trump is.

President Trump couldn't and wouldn't let this self-indulgent address go without

response and used the perfect insult of his predecessor that had to have been a massive

slap in the face…which, in my opinion, couldn't have been better.

Here's one reason why so many Americans love and appreciate our current president!

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service in the world, RWN offers the following

information published by proven trustworthy news outlet Western Journalism:

President Donald Trump responded to former President Barack Obama's attack on him during

a speech Friday, joking his predecessor is good for inducing sleep.

In a speech at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign on Friday, Obama told the

students they were coming of age when "the privileged … want to keep us divided and

keep us angry and keep us cynical, because it helps them maintain the status quo and

keep their power and keep their privilege."

ShareTweetFlipPlusEmail

President Donald Trump is definitely not a fan of his predecessor and has also proven

himself to be one who says, at whim, whatever he wants…no matter who it offends.

It's an honest and brutal approach to presidency that seems to work considering he keeps on

winning as president and certainly more so in his first year than Barack Obama did in

two terms.

Supporters love his blatant truthful approach to calling things like it is and not sugar

coating anyone or any action to appease the establishment.

Trump is a president of the American people and an nemesis to career politicians who don't

appreciate him "draining the swamp" and shaking things up.

However, in all of his daily Twitter rants, perhaps the best are when he takes jabs at

the man whose mess he's done a masterful job cleaning up.

The best jab yet came after Obama's recent speech in which he arrogantly touted himself

throughout.

His seemingly narcissistic address came across as an attempt to not be forgotten or replaced

by a capable and successful leader that Trump is, although, his real motive for glorifying

himself is unknown…he could just believe what he's actually convinced himself of,

while trying to convince the country what a incapable president Trump is.

President Trump couldn't and wouldn't let this self-indulgent address go without

response and used the perfect insult of his predecessor that had to have been a massive

slap in the face…which, in my opinion, couldn't have been better.

Trending: Dairy Queen Enraged Every Democrat With New Warning Sign To Liberals That Went

Up Overnight

Here's one reason why so many Americans love and appreciate our current president!

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service in the world, RWN offers the following

information published by proven trustworthy news outlet Western Journalism:

President Donald Trump responded to former President Barack Obama's attack on him during

a speech Friday, joking his predecessor is good for inducing sleep.

In a speech at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign on Friday, Obama told the

students they were coming of age when "the privileged … want to keep us divided and

keep us angry and keep us cynical, because it helps them maintain the status quo and

keep their power and keep their privilege."

He added that the current administration is "a symptom, not the cause" of that division.

"It did not start with Donald Trump," he said.

At a Friday campaign fundraiser in Fargo, North Dakota, Trump told the audience he had

been asked by a journalist if he watched Obama's speech given earlier in the day.

"I'm sorry.

I watched it but I fell asleep," the president said.

"I found he's very good, very good for sleeping."

Trump did directly address Obama's claim in his remarks that the current robust economy,

at least in part, is due to the steps taken during the previous administration.

Obama said that under his leadership, the country initiated the longest job creation

streak on record and ensured that wealthier Americans paid their "fair share" in taxes

to "help folks coming up behind them."

Trump responded by saying Obama "was trying to take credit for this incredible thing that

is happening to our country … I have to say this to President Obama, it wasn't him."

"If the Democrats got in with their agenda in November, two years ago, instead of having

(a Gross Domestic Product) 4.2 (percent) up, I believe honestly you'd have 4.2 down.

You'd be in negative numbers right now.

We were heading south."

"It was the weakest recovery … since the Great Depression," Trump said.

"It was barely a recovery, and now this is called not recovery.

This is called rocket ship."

The president pointed to the newly released August jobs report numbers, which showed hourly

wages increased 2.9 percent, while unemployment remained at a low of 3.9 percent, matching

a number not seen since 2000.

Trump has often touted that the nation is experiencing the lowest unemployment rates

for African-Americans, Asians and Hispanics ever recorded.

The GDP grew at 1.6 percent during Obama's final year in office in 2016.

During Trump's first year in office, the rate was 2.3 percent.

The day after Trump's election in 2016, the Dow Jones Industrial Average spiked over

250 points, closing at a record high of 18,589.

Over the next year, it steadily increased and now sits just under 26,000.

The 31 percent rise in the stock market during Trump's first year represents the best tally

since the 1930s, when the market was recovering from the 1929 crash.

Earlier this summer, Trump's top economic adviser, Larry Kudlow, credited the economy's

strength to four very un-Obama policies his boss implemented since taking office.

"We've lowered tax rates, we've rolled back regulations, we've unleashed energy,

we're moving to fix the broken world trading system," Kudlow said.

For more infomation >> After Obama Slams Trump In Speech, The President Slaps Back Hard With The Perfect Insult - Duration: 7:53.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's Approval Rating Is Sinking, New Poll Shows - Duration: 0:18.

For more infomation >> Trump's Approval Rating Is Sinking, New Poll Shows - Duration: 0:18.

-------------------------------------------

Irate Democratic Congressman Blasts Lazy Trump For Killing People In Puerto Rico - Duration: 2:03.

country from disaster.

Joining me now, representative

Luis Gutierrez.

He's giving up his seat in

congress next year, move to the

island next year to help with

the recovery efforts.

Your response to what the

president had to say about

Puerto Rico today?

>> It might be, although I'm

sure that there are others that

will compete.

One of his just biggest

fabrications and lies.

How do you celebrate and declare

a success when officially now

the deaths are over 3,000?

And, you know, Chris, that's the

latest study.

One accepted by the government

of Puerto Rico that never wanted

to change the numbers and was

complicit with this president in

trying to hide the real calamity

and deaths and the lack of

action of the American

government.

But let me say this.

The Harvard study said it was

over 4,000.

And, Chris, I was there within

ten days.

I was there within ten days, not

because the government allowed

me to go facilitate it, because

Donald Trump did everything he

could to stop any oversight,

over the conduct of the American

government, and what it was

doing to facilitate.

I think the mayor of San Juan

was absolutely correct, you let

people die.

And, you know, if you think a

success is having the deaths of

people on your hands, let me --

because I think it's important

to put it into context, Chris.

He said two things.

He said, well, you know, the

people of Puerto Rico would be

better off, but they want us to

do everything for them.

So he called us lazy.

And then he said, wow, you're

busting my budget.

He called us worthless, or

not -- of sufficient government.

This is a president of the

United States with a

catastrophic situation in Puerto

Rico unprecedented in Puerto

Rico with thousands of people

dying and saying how expensive

and how lazy we are.

The only one who was lazy was

For more infomation >> Irate Democratic Congressman Blasts Lazy Trump For Killing People In Puerto Rico - Duration: 2:03.

-------------------------------------------

PLOT THICKENS: More Disturbing Details Emerge on 2016 Trump Tower Meeting - Duration: 12:51.

It turns out that the Don Jr. Trump Tower/Russia meeting was indeed one gigantic setup, put

in motion by Hillary Clinton.

We have heard this before, however, now, we are learning of even deeper ties to Hillary.

NEW YORK — Multiple recent Breitbart News investigations into the infamous brief meeting

at Trump Tower on June 9, 2016 between individuals tied to Russia, Donald Trump Jr. and other

campaign officials point to the increasing likelihood of the confab being set up as a

dirty trick against Donald Trump's presidential campaign.

Three Russian participants at the meeting have ties to the controversial Fusion GPS

outfit, and two have confirmed ties to Hillary Clinton.

The Russia collusion conspiracy was sparked by the dossier produced by Fusion GPS, which

was paid for its anti-Trump work by Trump's primary political opponents, namely Clinton's

2016 presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) via the Perkins Coie

law firm.

Also, email logs brought to light show numerous emails were exchanged between a Clinton associate,

Fusion GPS and Trump Tower participants, with the subjects of some of those emails listing

the Magnitsky Act, which sanctions Russian officials and was by all accounts the very

topic of the Trump Tower meeting.

One Russian participant in the Trump Tower presentation admits to personally knowing

Hillary Clinton since the late 1990s and says he "knew" some of the people who worked

on Clinton's 2016 campaign.

Another Russian attendee, a translator, testified that he was previously an interpreter for

Hillary herself as well as for John Kerry and Barack Obama.

Questions are also raised by a timeline showing numerous personal meetings between Fusion

GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson and Trump Tower participants.

A Clinton associate, Ed Lieberman, was listed as being present at one and possibly two of

those meetings.

Separately, Lieberman met with one Russian participant the same day of the Trump Tower

meeting, according to separate testimony.

There are also questions about the initial setup of the Trump Tower meeting, with the

publicist who sent the infamous email to Donald Trump Jr. promising "information that would

incriminate" Clinton later admitting that he used deliberately hyperbolic language to

ensure that the meeting took place.

No such incriminating information on Hillary was provided, according to all meeting participants.

In testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee, Robert Goldstone, the publicist, further said

that he believes the meeting was a "bait and switch" by a Russian lobbyist seeking

a meeting on another matter by misleadingly claiming to be bringing the Trump campaign

dirt on Clinton.

Dinners with Fusion GPS Russian-born Washington lobbyist Rinat Akhmetshin,

who was present at the meeting, and Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya, who led the

Trump Tower meeting along with Akhmetshin, both worked with Fusion GPS on a case involving

the Magnitsky Act, which was the central topic of the Trump Tower meeting.

The work included the period of the Trump Tower gathering.

Anatoli Samochornov, the Russian translator who was present at the Trump Tower meeting,

also did translation work associated with that case and was present for the meetings

with Fusion GPS.

According to testimony, Akhmetshin, Veselnitskaya and Samochornov held several dinner meetings,

including during the time of the June 9, 2016 Trump Tower confab.

We are your ONE source for the most vital

world event and stories happening every day!

We always want to know what YOU think!

Stay

tuned

for updates.

------------------------------------------------------------------------ ► President Trump Latest News : https://bit.ly/2N3r42C

► Latest news videos: https://bit.ly/2NvSnSI ------------------------------------------------------------------------

Copyright Disclaimer: Citation

of articles and authors in this report does not imply ownership.

Works and images presented here fall under Fair Use Section 107 and are used for commentary

on globally significant newsworthy events.

Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made

for fair use

for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

nbc briefing english news fox news.

For more infomation >> PLOT THICKENS: More Disturbing Details Emerge on 2016 Trump Tower Meeting - Duration: 12:51.

-------------------------------------------

Dem Disaster: Trump 5 Points Ahead of Obama at Same Point in Presidency - Duration: 4:53.

For more infomation >> Dem Disaster: Trump 5 Points Ahead of Obama at Same Point in Presidency - Duration: 4:53.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING NEWS TRUMP CAPTURED HIM OVERNIGHT, HE'S IN CUSTODY – This Is HUGE! - Duration: 10:12.

BREAKING NEWS TRUMP CAPTURED HIM OVERNIGHT, HE'S IN CUSTODY – This Is HUGE!

President Donald Trump just scored a major victory when U.S. officialс announced that

special operations forces have captured a key militant in the 2012 Benghazi attack on

a U.S. consulate that left four Americans dead.

loading...

CBS News reported that the suspect has been identified as Mustafa al-Imаm, who was captured

in Libya and transported back to the U.S., where he is in the custody of the Department

of Justice.

President Trump released a statement saying that al-Imam will face justice for his alleged

role in the attack.

The Benghazi attack, which took place on September 11, 2012, killed Ambassador Chris Stevens,

U.S. State Department computer expert Sean Smith and CIA contractors Glen Doherty and

Tyrone Woods.

Stevens and Smith perished in the burning diplomatic outpost as American forces tried

to rescue them.

While Doherty and Woods died eight hours later in a mortar attack on a nearby CIA complex.

U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson discharged an articulation saying that he was "deeply

grateful" to the U.S. military and the insights community for capturing the militant.

"Department of State family continues to mourn"

The four Americans killed in the attack and those officials

"will spare no effort to ensure that justice is served," Tillerson said.

"I spoke with some of their family members to underscore the U.S. government's unwavering

support."

Hillary Clinton will without a doubt be freezing approximately this, as she needs everybody

to disregard that the Benghazi assault ever happened.

As Secretary of State, Clinton overlooked Stevens' as often as possible supplications

for offer assistance sometime recently the assault took put.

She may have ceased the assault from taking put, however, she did nothing and let four

Americans pass on on her watch.

What do you think about this?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments section.

For more infomation >> BREAKING NEWS TRUMP CAPTURED HIM OVERNIGHT, HE'S IN CUSTODY – This Is HUGE! - Duration: 10:12.

-------------------------------------------

This Lie Just Destroyed Robert Mueller's Case To Impeach Trump - Duration: 5:10.

This Lie Just Destroyed Robert Mueller's Case To Impeach Trump

Robert Mueller's witch hunt against Donald Trump has one goal.

Frame the President for the crime of collusion with Russia so Congress can impeach him.

But this lie just destroyed Robert Mueller's case to impeach the President.

Robert Mueller Sets His Sights on a Trump Associate

Robert Mueller is out to get longtime Trump associate Roger Stone.

Stone made several statements during the 2016 campaign that indicated he communicated with

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.

Mueller latched onto these statements to dig into Stone's life and terrorized 10 of his

associates with grand jury appearances.

Mueller has failed to produce evidence that any Trump associate colluded with the Russians.

Roger Stone is his last shot to justify his witch hunt.

So Mueller turned his attack dog investigators on him.

What the Evidence Actually Shows

Mueller is focusing on statements made by Stone in August of 2016.

Stone claimed that Julian Assange told him WikiLeaks would be releasing damaging information

about the Clinton Foundation in October 2016.

That month he also wrote a tweet claiming it would soon be "the Podestas time in the

barrel."

Mueller and anti-Trump journalists took these statements to mean Stone had advanced knowledge

of WikiLeaks obtaining hacked emails from Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta.

Collusion conspiracy theorists hang their hat on these statements.

But what is the truth?

The truth is Julian Assange has publicly stated that Roger Stone never said or predicted anything

that WikiLeaks hadn't already said publicly.

"Roger Stone has never said or tweeted anything we at Wikileaks had not already said publicly,"

Assange declared.

WikiLeaks and Roger Stone also exchanged twitter direct messages in 2016.

In those messages, WikiLeaks insisted that Stone stop falsely claiming to have a relationship

with the group.

Stone associate Sam Nunberg also told the press that Stone had never spoken to Julian

Assange.

"Roger didn't communicate with Assange.

If he had communicated with Assange, then I would be concerned that he would go to jail,

but he didn't," Nunberg declared.

Stone also stated that his comment about the "Podestas time in the barrel" was referring

to the Podesta brothers, since his tweet used "Podestas" as plural.

He claimed his tweet referenced the fact that the Podesta brothers business practices would

soon come under scrutiny.

And Stone was on to something.

Mueller referred Podesta for a criminal referral for his work as a foreign lobbyist.

More FISA Abuses

Stone published an op-ed in the Daily Caller where he claimed an FBI whistleblower informed

him he had been under FISA surveillance since 2016:

"A whistleblower has told my lawyers where my name and the fact that application had

been made for a FISA warrant on me was redacted from the stunning Carter Page FISA warrant

application released by the FBI last week with 300 of 400 pages blacked out.

A FISA warrant can only be issued against a U.S. Citizen who is engaged in espionage

for a foreign power against the United States.

I have never engaged in any such thing."

Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper appeared on Erin Burnett's CNN program

and did not shoot down that claim.

Burnett tweeted:

Roger Stone tells me whistleblower told his attys that Page FISA confirms there was a

FISA app. on Stone.

Frmr NSA Clapper responds: l do not have any direct knowledge (of it)…BUT it seems logical

that the FBI would consider seeking authorization for FISA surveillance of Stone"

If Stone really was under FISA surveillance, this shows that the FBI abused its power and

was out to get Trump.

Stone was not a Russian agent.

And he never colluded with WikiLeaks.

But Mueller needs to frame Stone for collusion so he can try and squeeze him to turn on the

President.

This is Mueller's last chance to come up with dirt on the President.

But it's turning into another dead end.

We will keep you up to date on any developments in this story.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> This Lie Just Destroyed Robert Mueller's Case To Impeach Trump - Duration: 5:10.

-------------------------------------------

During 9/11 Speech, Trump Issues 3 Words Obama Would Never Dare Say In Public - Duration: 4:14.

For more infomation >> During 9/11 Speech, Trump Issues 3 Words Obama Would Never Dare Say In Public - Duration: 4:14.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Wins ANOTHER Legal Battle Against the Left - Duration: 2:18.

For more infomation >> Trump Wins ANOTHER Legal Battle Against the Left - Duration: 2:18.

-------------------------------------------

Joy's Shocked, Show Cuts Off After Mueller's Witness Drops Bombshell Clearing Trump - Duration: 5:58.

George Papadopoulos is the campaign worker who became Special Counsel Robert Mueller's

big witness in his case to prove President Donald Trump colluded with the Russians.

Papadopoulos appeared on The View, and Joy Behar was jumping with excitement, thinking

he would shed light on how Mueller will get Trump impeached.

Then, it all went wrong as Papadopoulos cleared Trump with bombshell evidence, and a shocked

Behar lost it as the show was cut off.

You'll love this.

The View is having a tough start to their new season.

Yesterday, it was Omarosa playing her "secret Trump tape" which proved Hillary Clinton

was guilty of paying for the bogus "Trump-Russia" dossier and setting up a go-between using

the law firm "Perkins-Coie" to pay for it thinking it could never be traced back

to her.

That segment caused Whoopi to freak out.

Mad World News previously reported, "What did Whoopi do immediately after the [secret

Trump] tape was done playing?

She panicked, cutting the show and went to commercial.

Then, they never mentioned this tape again during the entire show!"

That was on Monday.

The next day, Robert Mueller's so-called key witness against Trump, George Papadopoulos,

shows up as The View's main guest.

The shrews of The View were no doubt sure this key witness would spill the beans about

how the Special Counsel was so close to proving the president is guilty and needs to be impeached.

Except, once again, no one over at ABC did their homework.

And it was almost like déjà vu with Omarosa.

But before we get to Behar's histrionics, you have to understand who Papadopolous was

to the Trump campaign,

In reality, George Papadopoulos was a minor player living in London.

He was only 28 years old and had been soliciting the Trump campaign for a position.

He was an unofficial volunteer "foreign advisor" to the campaign in spring of 2016.

He was targeted by the cabal at the DOJ and FBI as someone they could set up, hoping he

would take the bait they fed him through a now outed British CIA asset named Alexander

Downer.

Downer "ran into" George at a bar in London and told him, "I have a ton of Hillary's

emails.

Don't you think the Trump campaign would love to get a hold of them?"

So, here's the kicker and why Joy was so shocked and was rendered utterly speechless.

On The View, Joy asked George, "You never told anyone at the Trump campaign about the

emails?

Is that what you are saying?!"

Papadopoulos answered, "Yeah, I have no recollection of doing it…"

Which at that point, snarky Sunny Hostin rudely cuts him off saying, "Not having any recollection

of not doing it and not doing it are two different things."

The leftist audience burst into applause, and Joy can be heard chuckling, all of them

totally clueless of what is to come.

George says, "Let's not forget I was living in London at the time.

I wasn't in some sort of headquarters…"

Again rude Sunny Hostin cuts him off sarcastically saying, "But that doesn't affect your

memory."

Now, Joy's excited to get the Trump dirt that she is positive is coming.

She tells George, "Quickly, we are running out of time."

The truth is they had an entire second segment coming up with George and his wife.

Remember, the topic is Hillary's emails and the shrews on The View are sure Papadopolous

somehow is the link who got those emails to the Trump campaign.

They think the emails are the smoking gun proving Trump colluded with Russia.

Papadolopolous says, "Ok, but here's how I was transmitting information to the campaign

and it was 99% over email.

And so if it would have been sent it would have been over email and obviously that email

has never been discovered because I don't remember sending it."

Boom!

Pure silence.

A pin could have dropped in that studio and we could have heard it.

Since Joy was rendered speechless, quickly Whoopi says dejected, "Well, OK, your wife

is coming out…she'll join us when we come back," and they go to commercial.

Of course, if an email like that existed, Mueller would have found it and George Papadopolous

wouldn't be giving interviews.

Also, isn't it obvious Papadopolous was being set-up to send those emails to the Trump

campaign?

This was a very rough day over at The View for the Trump-haters:

When they come back from commercial with Papadolopous' wife joining them, you'd think the shrews

would be excited continue their inquiry into the damning Hillary emails, right?

Wrong.

They know they have struck out once again.

Instead, they talk about fluff with his wife and never re-visit the hardcore questioning

to get the Trump dirt.

When will these idiots figure out evidence against Trump doesn't exist?

Not one of them asks the right questions like who is this guy Downer working for who fed

you this information about Hillary's emails?

Well, all over, even in the mainstream media, Downer has been identified as a CIA asset.

It's the Obama administration setting up Trump.

But the shrews on The View are now 0-2.

Omarosa's tape proved Hillary's guilty and Pappadolpolous proved Trump's campaign

was being infiltrated by foreign spies working for the CIA.

When the entire truth comes out, they better have rubber rooms ready for those leftist

nitwits hosting The View.

For more infomation >> Joy's Shocked, Show Cuts Off After Mueller's Witness Drops Bombshell Clearing Trump - Duration: 5:58.

-------------------------------------------

GOWDY GOES NUCLEAR – EXPOSES ANTI TRUMP FBI OFFICIAL, RAINS DOWN HELL - Duration: 11:14.

GOWDY GOES NUCLEAR – EXPOSES ANTI-TRUMP FBI OFFICIAL, RAINS DOWN HELL

Last week, the Justice Department gave Congress less than 15 percent of the texts between

FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page.

Now, Rep. Trey Gowdy has had enough of this nonsense and is saying that both FBI officials

Peter Strzok and Lisa Page should testify before Congress.

Western Journalism reported that Gowdy explained that this move for accountability would help

lawmakers deem whether or not the two FBI officials actually held enough power to take

down President Donald Trump or even protect Hillary Clinton from criminal charges over

email allegations.

"I can't prove that they were the final decision makers, nor do I have to," Gowdy

admitted.

"What I have to prove to you is two really important people hated (Trump); would have

done anything to protect (Clinton)."

He went on to suggest that the texts were evidence that the two "hated" then-presidential

candidate Trump, alluding to their bias against the current administration and alleged efforts

to assist those within Democratic National Committee.

One example of the FBI helping Clinton came when Strzok interviewed Clinton about her

use of private email servers during her time as secretary of state, soon after which the

classified information was discovered.

Gowdy explained that Strzok allegedly "scrubbed" the language about Clinton's "grossly

negligent" behavior from the final FBI report.

"Did they have the power to protect her?"

Gowdy asked.

"The decision not to charge (Clinton) was made even before they interviewed her.

How would you like that deal?"

He then pointed to the two FBI officials and how they had been removed from the Special

Counsel Robert Mueller's Russia-collusion investigation after Mueller learned of the

"insidious" political bias against Trump.

"These are the same two people, whose bias was so insidious, that Bob Mueller fired them

the second he found out about it," Gowdy said.

"These witnesses need to come in and tell us what they meant [by these texts] and everything

else they said over the course of eighteen months."

However, Gowdy refused to comment on whether he thinks the text which referred to a "secret

society" of FBI agents was a joke or real.

"Republicans are better served by letting the texts speak for themselves," Gowdy admitted.

"These witnesses need to come in and tell us what they meant by it."

What do you think about this?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments section.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with

your

friends

and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> GOWDY GOES NUCLEAR – EXPOSES ANTI TRUMP FBI OFFICIAL, RAINS DOWN HELL - Duration: 11:14.

-------------------------------------------

After The Towers Fell, Trump Had A Very Different Plan For The NY Skyline - Duration: 1:28.

For more infomation >> After The Towers Fell, Trump Had A Very Different Plan For The NY Skyline - Duration: 1:28.

-------------------------------------------

Obamas Must Be Panicked & Calling Attorneys, Trump Gave Them 'FINAL WARNING' - Duration: 5:21.

For more infomation >> Obamas Must Be Panicked & Calling Attorneys, Trump Gave Them 'FINAL WARNING' - Duration: 5:21.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump Honors Flight 93 Victims In Pennsylvania - Duration: 1:00.

For more infomation >> President Trump Honors Flight 93 Victims In Pennsylvania - Duration: 1:00.

-------------------------------------------

The Latest Trump Impeachment Odds [September 11] | Heavy.com - Duration: 4:47.

The Latest Trump Impeachment Odds [September 11] | Heavy.com

Trump's impeachment odds have hovered in the forty-percent range for several months, and might increase in the coming months leading up to the midterms.

In the wake of the shocking op-ed published by The New York Times by an anonymous senior Trump official who detailed a "secret resistance" inside the administration, Trump's approval rating has dropped into the thirties in several recent polls.

A recent ABC News/Washington Post poll revealed that Trump's approval rating was just around 36%, while an IBD/TIPP poll reflected the same.

Trump's marked drop in approval is not good news for Republicans as the 2018 midterms loom.

If the Democratic party is able to win a majority of seats in the house, then impeachment for the president would start to look like a real possibility.

Here's what you need to know about Trump's latest odds of impeachment.

Trump Impeachment Odds Over the Last 90 Days.

PredictIt odds reflect a 6% likelihood of Trump being impeached by 2018, but a current 46% likelihood of Trump being impeached within his first term, which reflects a 2% increase since September 7.

MyBookie reflects a slightly different story, predicting Trump to be at -500/+300 odds for making it through his first term.

Of course, prediction markets are not polls, and do not reflect an accurate representation of the American demographic.

But they do serve as a barometer for at least one audience's perspective of the administration, which is a valuable angle to add for consideration.

Likelihood That Democrats Take the House in the 2018 Midterms.

FiveThirtyEightThe Democratic party currently has an estimated 78% likelihood of taking the house in the 2018 midterms.One thing to watch for in the coming weeks won't just be the unfolding drama around the source of the op-ed, but the increasing or decreasing likelihood that Democrats take over the house after the 2018 midterms.

Should Democrats take the house, the likelihood of Trump's impeachment should skyrocket past 50%.

Currently, FiveThirtyEight predicts there to be a seven in nine chance, or 78% chance, that Democrats will take the house.

Trump Tells Montana Crowd That Impeachment Will Be Their Fault If it Occurs.

At a Montana rally on September 6, Trump told the crowd, "If it does happen, it's your fault because you did not go out and vote.

You didn't go out to vote — that's the only way it could happen.

I'll be the only president in history they'll say: 'What a job he's done! By the way, we're impeaching him.'".

Trump continued, "This election you aren't just voting for a candidate.

You're voting for which party controls Congress.".

A recent ABC News/Washington Post poll revealed that 49% of people polled would support Congress if it initiated impeachment proceedings.

For more infomation >> The Latest Trump Impeachment Odds [September 11] | Heavy.com - Duration: 4:47.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's Former Lawyer Said He Was "Mentally Disabled" And Can't Testify To Mueller - Duration: 3:34.

Well, Bob Woodward's new book, Fear: Trump in the White House, is officially available

for everybody to go pick up a copy if you so choose, but so far we already know a lot

of what's in the book, maybe just not some of the backstory on it, but one of the more

explosive things to come out that came out this morning was the fact that Donald Trump's

own lawyer, or former lawyer at this point, John Dowd, actually told Donald Trump that

he was mentally disabled and therefore unable to testify before Robert Mueller.

This is an accusation made in Bob Woodward's new book, and given the credibility that Woodward

has, and what we've seen recently from Donald Trump himself, what we've heard from his lawyers,

it's pretty likely that this actually did happen.

Here's how it's described in the book.

John Dowd decided to sit Donald Trump down for a mock interview, Dowd pretending to be

Robert Mueller, Donald Trump pretending to not be absolutely insane.

Dowd is asking him these questions that they believe Robert Mueller would answer, then

after this role-playing Dowd told Trump that there is no way you can testify because you

are mentally disabled, specifically mentally disabled because you're incapable of telling

the truth.

Now, that's the kind of thing that would obviously set off a lot of red flags for Robert Mueller

if he ever did sit down with Donald Trump, and the worst part is that John Dowd is gone.

John Dowd obviously understood that yeah, there is something mentally wrong with Donald

Trump, and not just his crazy narcissism, but the fact that this man has a pathological

need to not tell the truth.

That's not normal.

That's not something a normally functioning brain does, but according to Dowd that is

exactly how Donald Trump's brain operates.

Eventually Donald Trump is going to have to testify, either in front of Robert Mueller,

perhaps with the New York attorney general, perhaps in any one of these other investigations

going on into his life, but someday this man is going to have to sit down with a prosecutor

or investigator and answer questions, and based on what we've seen, the crazy things

the man has tweeted out, the stories we're now hearing from his former lawyer, it's not

going to end well for him, because again, there is something so disturbed within his

psyche that he is incapable of telling the truth.

He just happens to be in a position where he's been able to get away with it for his

entire life, because he's never had to be really investigated.

Nobody's ever really had to vet him, or look into his business dealings, or his private

life, or anything like that, but the day this man chose to run for president of the United

States, all of that changed, and now that people are starting to pay attention, now

that investigators are starting to look into it, something is likely to ruin what is left

of this man's life, and the biggest cause is going to be the fact that he truly is mentally

disabled, as John Dowd allegedly said, because he has a pathological need to lie to everyone

he speaks to.

For more infomation >> Trump's Former Lawyer Said He Was "Mentally Disabled" And Can't Testify To Mueller - Duration: 3:34.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's Row With Google - Duration: 6:29.

Trump took to Twitter with a new target: Google.

His row is with Search-Results which he calls 'rigged.'

[Clip: "President Donald Trump is targeting Google.

'They have it rigged for me and others.'

'Well, I think that Google, and Facebook, and Twitter, I think they treat conservatives

and Republicans very unfairly.'"]

"Trump News Results," sez the prez, "are from left-wing media, like CNN," who after gutting

every conservative voice, act as if they're squeaky clean.

[Clip: "This is all part of the President's appeal toward his base kind of placing an

"us versus them."

The same sort of thing that he does with the media, painting these big groups that work

in these centers of San Francisco, New York, or Los Angeles as the "them" that are against

the President and his supporters when that's not necessarily the case."]

There they go again.

Those "deplorables" that Hillary dissed are paraded again as all that matters to Trump,

rather than him bringing to light buried issues.

CNN got some competition.

A WSJ headline reports that various State Attorney Generals are talking "antitrust regulations;"

"breaking up Google" and "stopping suppression of conservative speech."

The article targets the big three Information Gateways: Google, Facebook, and Twitter.

Where you be, Sundar?

[Clip] ["More breaking news now after President Trump hammers Google censorship.

Its CEO making a move, a defiant move he will regret forever.

Bloomberg reports that Google's Sundar Pichai is now facing bi-partisan criticism for refusing

to testify at a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing next week, but the panel's chairman signaled

he's unlikely to issue a subpoena to force the chief executive officer to appear.

I say subpoena the guy."]

Waste of time.

It's Google's parent company, Alphabet...in toto, with whom Trump has to do.

Now tell me, whatever happened to Sergei Brin and Larry Page?

You don't see them anymore.

Did they fall off the face of the earth?

And, did they ever really own Google?

For as Stanford students in the 90's they shaped their craft in a top research university

that does lots of R&D for the Pentagon and Intelligence Agencies.

But Zuckerberg is a whole different story.

[Clip] ["Mr. Zuckerberg, I will say there are a great many Americans who I think are

deeply concerned that, that Facebook and other tech companies are engaged in a pervasive

pattern of bias and political censorship.

There have been numerous instances with Facebook.

In May of 2016, Gizmodo reported that Facebook had purposely and routinely suppressed conservative

stories from trending news, including stories about CPAC, including stories about Mitt Romney,

including stories about the Lois Lerner-IRS scandal, including stories about Glen Beck."

"In addition to that, Facebook has initially shut down the Chick-Fil-A Appreciation Day

page, has blocked a post of a Fox News reporter, has blocked over two dozen Catholic pages,

and most recently blocked Trump supporters Diamond and Silk's page with 1.2 million Facebook

followers after determining their content and brand were quote 'unsafe to the community.'

To a great many Americans, that appears to be a pervasive pattern of political bias.

Do you agree with that assessment?"

"Senator, let me say a few things about this.

First, I understand where that concern is coming from, because Facebook and the tech

industry are located in Silicon Valley which is an extremely left-leaning place.

This is is actually a concern that I have and try to root out in the company is making

sure that we don't have, um, any bias in the work that we do.

And I think it is a fair concern that, um that people would, would, would at least wonder

about this.

Now--" "Let me, let me ask this question.

Are you aware of any ad or page that has been taken down from Planned Parenthood?"

"Senator, I'm, I'm not.

But let me just -- can I finish?"

"How about MoveOn.org?"

"Sorry?"

"How about Moveon.org?"

"I'm not specifically aware of those."]

George Soros, Zuck--the hidden hand behind MoveOn.org--branded for allegedly funding

Antifa and other, sometimes violent, anti-Trump protest groups.

[Clip: "How about any Democratic candidate for office?"

"I'm not specifically aware.

I mean, I'm not, I'm not sure."]

Busted!

Let's hammer a few more nails in the censorship coffin.

Since Social Media are vehicles for person-to-person communications --put them on par with Telecommunication

Companies which operate as 'quasi-public utilities' that provide wide communal services.

You're not banned, yet, for being 'politically incorrect' by AT&T when you use your phone.

The paradigm should apply to the Information Gateways--not by Big Gov--but by all of us

net-heads who deserve a free flow of information.

"Oh," the tech giants cry, "we're private and can do what we decide!"

But bakeries are public?

C'mon, The tech giants are inflicting pervasive censorship while hiding behind "oh, we're

private and privileged."

They're only "private" because America has a Constitution that permits companies to be

private.

Those who live by the sword will die by the sword.

If you live under the Constitution, tech giants, then...live and let live, and kill censorship

before it kills you.

For more infomation >> Trump's Row With Google - Duration: 6:29.

-------------------------------------------

Migrant Families Sue Trump Administration Over Emotional Trauma Of His Zero Tolerance Policies - Duration: 3:15.

Migrant families that were victims of the Trump Administration's zero tolerance policy,

have now banded together to sue the United States Government for the emotional and mental

trauma that they suffered as result of the zero tolerance family separation policy.

Here's what's happening right now; these families have come together, some of them, most of

them have been reunited, we still have a little over 400 children remaining in cages in detention

facilities according to reports this week, some of whom have actually been in detention

of over a year.

They've not been reunited with their parents, and the majority of them can't be because

their parents were deported and the Government kept such poor records that we don't know

who their parents were or where we sent them back to.

That's gonna cause a lot of emotional trauma.

But even the ones that were separated for only a few months, that did get to meet their

parents again, some of them greeted their parents as strangers; they didn't recognize

them, they didn't remember them.

That's the kind of emotional scar that doesn't go away overnight, it doesn't go away in a

year or two.

That's something that that person's gonna live with for the rest of their life, as well

as all of the other detainees that we threw in cages for coming here seeking a better

life.

I mean at the end of the day, that's what this is all about right?

These people were coming here to escape oppression, domestic violence, gang warfare, bad economic

conditions, hoping to make a better life for themselves, but instead we made it our policy

as a country, from Jeff Sessions at the Justice Department, to make their lives a living hell.

And now, rightfully so, they're suing the Federal Government in hopes of creating a

fund that will pay for the therapy for these children and some of the parents.

And if you ask me, that's the least we could do for these people.

We know that there have been instances of horrid abuse, rape and all kinds of other

abuses suffered mentally and physically by the children and the parents in some of these

detention facilities.

And this didn't just happen under the Trump Administration; it got so much worse under

them, but abuses also took place during the Obama Administration.

So hopefully, those families will also come together, join in this lawsuit and demand

that the Government pay for the therapy and counseling that some of these people are going

to need for the rest of their lives.

We chose to do this to them, okay?

That's the thing we have to understand.

We made that conscious choice to violate the most basic human rights of these people, human

rights violations that have been condemned by the United Nations.

We chose to do that but now as a country we need to make the right choice, preempt the

lawsuit altogether and agree to pay for whatever counseling or therapy that these people will

ever require.

We did this to them and that is the least we could do for them.

For more infomation >> Migrant Families Sue Trump Administration Over Emotional Trauma Of His Zero Tolerance Policies - Duration: 3:15.

-------------------------------------------

Media Asks Sarah Sanders About Using 25th Amendment On Trump She SHREDS Them(VIDEO)!!! - Duration: 7:50.

Media Asks Sarah Sanders About Using 25th Amendment On Trump She SHREDS Them

David is the president make of all of

this talk of the 25th amendment and some

of what he hears on media outlets

regarding the word crazy talk there's a

lot of it seems like there's a lot of

talk about that how many of the

mainstream media outlets I think we

would say that it's about as ridiculous

as most of Bob Woodward's book the fact

that that's actually being honestly

discussed is ridiculous and frankly it's

insulting to the nearly 62 million

people that came out and overwhelmingly

supported this president voted for him

supported his agenda and are watching

and cheering on as he successfully

implements that agenda every single day

David sir thank you very much I'm

assuming you've read Bob Woodward's book

I know a lot of us have can we expect

other than repeating denials from

general mattis Jerome Kelly John Dowd

can we expect the White House to give us

a list of all the things in the book

that are wrong and that qualified what

were to be alive I think that would be a

complete and utter waste of our time so

no because then that goes to this

Quinnipiac poll that came out today that

says 55 percent of Americans believe

that the op-ed writer The Times is right

and the president's getting a 60 percent

negative rating on the honest and

truthful that 60% of Americans think

he's a dishonest person so is the

president think he can actually win a

credibility battle with Bob Woodward

who's a you know an august member of the

press corps help take richard nixon down

and as a legend how can he win that

credibility bailout once again i think i

would certainly rather take the actual

on record account from people who are

here who have been working in this

building who have interacted with the

president day-in day-out like general

mattis like general kelly like myself

not disgruntled former employees that

refuse to put their name on things when

they come out to attack the president i

think that those are far more credible

sources and certainly far more reliable

voices within this administration and

that can accurately tell what's taking

place on them in the building behind

so incredible voice absolutely John

thanks a lot Sarah you said a lot the

president has said a lot about the

publication of this op ed you've called

it the president has called it a

betrayal you've called it an act of

disloyalty but the president has has

been mentioned quite a few times even

here in this briefing is called on the

Department of Justice to investigate the

publication of this op-ed there is no

violation of the Criminal Code that goes

along with the publication of this up

that's a little curious as to what it is

that the President believes may have

been violated in the ball as it relates

to the publication of this conduct

once again we would consider someone who

is actively trying to undermine the

executive branch of our government

inappropriate and something certainly to

cause concern and they should take a

look at it violation once again we're

just saying that this gives a great

level of concern and they should look

into it

concern is not a violation I'm not an

attorney it's the Department of Justice

to term make that determination and

we're asking them to look into it and

make that determination and they

certainly are fully capable of doing

that but someone actively trying to

undermine the duly elected president and

the entire executive branch of

government that seems quite problematic

to me and something that they should

take a look at John thank you Sarah

just to try to specify this a bit is the

White House treating the anonymous op-ed

writer as a full-fledged breach of

security matter and is the FBI

investigating both staff and their means

of communications cellphones

like I'm not aware of that level that

wouldn't be something I would be a part

of but certainly as I just told your

colleague we think that there is a

concern here and it should be looked

into John if I could start out sort of

with the topic of today and there's the

anonymous up at the New York Times but

the president said on Friday that he

thought it would be a good idea for Jeff

Sessions to look into this is there

anything about what was published by the

New York Times that would warrant an

investigation by the Department of

Justice certainly if there's an

individual whether or not since we don't

know who they are if that individual is

in meetings that where national security

is being discussed or other important

topics and they are attempting to

undermine the executive branch that

would certainly be problematic and

something that the Department of Justice

should look into do you suggest you to

misuse of classified information and

what wrong with that follow once again

it's something that the Department of

Justice should simply look into and

that's for them to make that

determination is the White House

actively trying to find out who this

person is or do you not really care

we're certainly focused on things that

actually matter and the staff here that

is here to do their job and not

undermine the great work that this

president and this administration has

done and we're gonna continue focusing

on that it's frankly I think sad and

pathetic that a gutless anonymous source

could receive so much attention from the

media and I think that the American

people would be much better served if we

actually spent some time talking about

some of the really important things that

are facing our country and the things

that this administration is doing to

help fix that happen continues to call

him a liar and says his book is

completely a work of fiction

he's also mentioned libel laws quite a

bit is president Trump considering

filing a lawsuit against Woodward

certainly keep you posted on that but I

think we've been extremely clear from

the beginning that many of the books

sources have already spoken out to

refute a couple of them chief of staff

John Kelly aggressively pushed back in

this general mattis aggressively pushing

back into claims John Dowd also pushing

back against the things that are

attributed him and a number of people

have come out and said that Woodward

never even reached out to corroborate

statements that were attributed to them

which seems incredibly reckless for a

book to make such outrageous claims to

not even take the time to get a

ten-dollar fact checker to call around

and verify that some of these quotes

were happened when no effort was made it

seems like a very careless and reckless

way to write a book Jeff you know if the

President believes these denials that

have been coming

one of his top advisors where does he

believe that it's someone from within

and does he believe that lie-detector

tests should be issued as the

vice-president volunteered to do on

Sunday no lie detectors are being used

or talked about or looked at as a

possibility

frankly the White House and the staff

here are focused on doing our jobs and

trying to show up here every day and do

what we can to help better the American

people not deal with cowards that refuse

to put their names in an anonymous

letter thank you god bless you and God

bless america

For more infomation >> Media Asks Sarah Sanders About Using 25th Amendment On Trump She SHREDS Them(VIDEO)!!! - Duration: 7:50.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Blames San Juan Mayor And Geography For Nearly 3,000 Puerto Rico Deaths - Duration: 4:02.

Since becoming President of the United States, Donald Trump has been the Commander in Chief

for the United States throughout several different major natural disasters.

One of the biggest ones obviously was Hurricane Maria that devastated Puerto Rico.

Yesterday, as this administration was gearing up for Hurricane Florence to come batter the

Eastern seaboard of the United States, Donald Trump took the time to remind us of how great

his disaster response was last year during hurricane season.

He tweeted the following out: He said, "We got A pluses for our recent hurricane work

in Texas and Florida, and did an unappreciated great job in Puerto Rico, even though an inaccessible

island with very poor electricity and a totally incompetent Mayor of San Juan.

We are ready for the big one that is coming!"

So rather than take the fault for the fact that on his watch, on an island that is a

United States territory filled with U.S. citizens, the fact that 2,975 Americans died in that

storm, totally not his fault.

"The island is inaccessible," he says.

I guess there's no way to get to it because that is what inaccessible means.

It means that there is literally no way to get to something.

So it's curious to know how FEMA did end up down there or the National Guard or hell,

even all the people on the island.

How do you get to and from Puerto Rico if it's inaccessible?

Second, this man will not miss an opportunity to attack a strong woman, and that is the

Mayor of San Juan, who he's attacking in this tweet, who he attacked relentlessly after

the storm hit the island.

And again, it is 100% because she's a very strong woman, dealing with a very intense

circumstance down there on the island, and island, by the way, yeah poor electricity.

You can go ahead and blame that on the big banks who help decimate the island's economy

by robbing them blind.

That is not the fault of the citizens of Puerto Rico, that is the fault of the major bankers

here in the United States.

They did that.

You underfunded FEMA.

You wouldn't let them go down as early as they wanted to.

That organization claimed in an internal document itself that they were about 5,000 staffers

short of where they needed to be to be properly prepared for the 2017 hurricane season.

That's all on you, buddy.

And if you can't accept responsibility as the Commander in Chief of the United States,

the leader of this country, then you're unfit to lead on that fact alone, let alone obviously

all of the other reasons why you're unfit.

And if you want to talk about the other responses here on the mainland, down in Texas and Florida,

well guess what, FEMA sucked there too.

You know who came in and had to save those areas?

The people that you hate so much, the NFL.

If it wasn't for JJ Watt and other members of the Houston Texans raising money and helping

fund relief efforts down there for Harvey in Houston, and the Tampa Bay Buccaneers'

NFL players raising money for victims down there in Florida, the responses wouldn't have

nearly been as good as they were.

But you don't care about that.

You don't want to give any credit to NFL teams and players for helping save their own cities,

you want to take all the credit for that and then blame this woman down in Puerto Rico

for the 2,975 deaths that took place on your watch.

Every single one of those deaths is on you.