Tuesday, May 8, 2018

Trump news on Youtube May 9 2018

The Trump administration will announce its decision on whether the United States will

pull out of the Iran nuclear deal on Tuesday.

President Trump tweeted that he will make the announcement at 2 p.m. Eastern Time from

the White House.

He has long threatened to pull out of the 2015 deal,...which lifted certain economic

sanctions on Iran in exchange for curbs on Tehran's nuclear program.

The announcement comes ahead of the May 12th deadline in which he has to decide whether

to continue the sanctions waiver or leave the agreement.

For more infomation >> Trump to announce decision on Iran nuclear deal on Tuesday - Duration: 0:32.

-------------------------------------------

Melania Trump announced new campaign against online bullying Be Best - Duration: 1:19.

For more infomation >> Melania Trump announced new campaign against online bullying Be Best - Duration: 1:19.

-------------------------------------------

New Poll Reveals Mueller's Raid On Trump's Lawyer Is Beginning To Backfire Majorly - Duration: 15:52.

New Poll Reveals Mueller's Raid On Trump's Lawyer Is Beginning To Backfire Majorly

This has to be one of the finest examples ever seen of a man whose power and intent

to take down a president has driven him to make such a foolish mistake that he botched

the whole deal.

Although President Trump has made it extremely clear that he believes special counsel Robert

Mueller's investigation into Russia and his 2016 presidential campaign is for all

intent and purpose a political "Witch Hunt," Mueller still enjoyed a vast majority of public

approval.

But now after Mueller's order to the FBI to raid Trump's attorney Michael Cohen's

office over what may have been a campaign law violation when he paid off Stormy Daniels

during the 2016 campaign the tables have finally turned.

According to a new Rasmussen poll released only last week, just 46 percent of likely

U.S. voters now believe Mueller's investigation is an honest attempt to determine criminal

wrongdoing by the President and his administration.

That's down from 52 percent when the same question was asked in the same survey in October

of 2017.

But at the same time, 40 percent of respondents also told Rasmussen they believe Mueller's

investigation has now morphed into a partisan witch hunt.

That's an 8 point rise from October's poll when only 32% believed Mueller's investigation

was indeed partisan.

17% are still undecided.

Trending: True Patriot Tom Selleck Destroys Rosie O'Donnell, Leaves Her Silent

The tides seem to have turned after Michael Cohen who is Trump's longtime personal attorney

had his office, his home and a hotel room raided by the FBI.

All for what has nothing to do with Russian collusion during the 2016 campaign.

Instead, Cohen is under investigation for campaign finance violations, bank fraud, and

wire fraud.

Someday we will all open a dictionary to the words "Witch Hunt" and we will see a picture

of Former FBI Director Robert Mueller and his merry band of Democrat operatives who

sit on his panel.

Here is more on what Mueller lost thanks to his astronomical misstep via Breitbart:

"Any chance special counsel Robert Mueller had to get an interview with President Trump

was likely k****d with the unprecedented FBI raid on Trump's personal attorney, the far-left

NBC News reports.

Prior to this week's raid, which has shifted public opinion against Mueller, detailed that

talks had been ongoing between the special counsel's office and Trump's attorneys

about a potential interview, an opportunity for Mueller to question the president directly.

NBC reports that the negotiation was nearly concluded, had reached the "final sticking

points" about the "timing, scope and length" of Trump's testimony.

Things were close enough that, in an effort to fully prepare for the interview, Trump

was talking about expanding his legal team.

But the raid, which many see as a mixture of prosecutorial overreach and desperation,

has scrambled negotiations.

The chances of Trump's sitting down with a special counsel, who is obviously out of

control and working way outside his stated mission to investigate collusion between the

Trump campaign and Russia, are probably nil.

Moreover, Mueller's disastrous stunt gives Trump cover with the public to not sit down

with Mueller.

By all accounts, the FBI's raid on Michael Cohen is centered on Trump's personal s*x

life, including, for some bizarre reason, the Access Hollywood tape and the perfectly

legal non-disclosure agreement signed by a porn star and Playboy bunny who claim to have

had consensual affairs with Trump more than a decade ago.

The public just does not care about this stuff.

Because it gave Trump what the public will see as a perfectly legitimate excuse not to

sit for an interview, the Cohen raid is probably the first big mistake Mueller has made.

The interview was Mueller's best chance to nail the president in a process crime,

to lure him into a perjury trap.

As of now, Mueller's investigation is floundering.

Thus far, he has only been able to charge a few people with process or financial crimes,

none of which have anything to do with Trump or his campaign.

In another dramatic move, Mueller did indict a handful of Russians, but this ultimately

proved to be a showy and symbolic gesture.

The accused will never be extradited, will never see the inside of a courtroom, and are

not even charged with "election meddling."

Whatever they might be guilty of, it was small potatoes and more anti-Trump than not.

What's more, the Russian investigation has backfired on the political left.

The Democrats and their allies in the media and intelligence community are the ones facing

the blowback.

Partisan FBI personnel have been fired or demoted, and the congressional investigation

into the Obama's administration's obvious surveillance abuses has only just begun.

As far as Trump's obstructing justice, even the non-stop leaks coming from Mueller's

office to anti-Trump outlets like NBC News cannot make anything close to a credible case

for that:

Three sources familiar with the investigation said the findings Mueller has collected on

Trump's attempts to obstruct justice include: His intent to fire former FBI Director James

Comey; his role in the crafting of a misleading public statement on the nature of a June 2016

Trump Tower meeting between his son and Russians; Trump's dangling of pardons before grand

jury witnesses who might testify against him; and pressuring Attorney General Jeff Sessions

not to recuse himself from the Russia investigation.

This is a laughable pile of nonsense, and Mueller knows it.

So now, Mueller is chasing the s*x angle, but in doing so, he almost certainly blew

his chance to achieve his goal of overturning a presidential election with a perjury charge.

The only thing that might have persuaded Trump to risk an interview was public pressure,

which Trump no longer has to worry about.

Trump has plenty of other things to worry about.

Mueller is more likely than not to make more empty but grandiose moves in the hopes of

affecting the outcomes of the 2018 mid-terms and Trump's 2020 re-election campaign.

But the interview is where Trump would have faced the most risk, and Mueller appears to

have blown that.

Up till now, unlike others at his level under investigation, Trump has been incredibly cooperative.

While Obama officials pleaded the Fifth, Hillary deleted and bleached emails and Bill Clinton

hid what he could behind executive privilege, no one on Team Trump has done

any

of this.

For more infomation >> New Poll Reveals Mueller's Raid On Trump's Lawyer Is Beginning To Backfire Majorly - Duration: 15:52.

-------------------------------------------

'Dangerous' for Trump to Expend Political Capital Opposing Blankenship - Duration: 4:29.

Fox News Alert voters heading to the polls in four states that could test

president Trump's clout with GOP voters particularly in West Virginia

president Trump urging fellow Republicans to vote against former coal

exec Don Blankenship who has been to prison

Blankenship saying he is quote trump e'er than Trump and not backing down the

four states with primaries today it has at least to me felt like this is the

only one that's going on here in in West Virginia Giano as our guest here what do

you think happens in the end is that Trump ear than Trump headed to mansion

land I think the president has learned a lesson from his past failings when it

comes to Roy Moore in Alabama I think that Joe Manchin who is currently the

sitting senator day is very popular and I know that there's ten seats that's

being targeted by Republicans in areas that Democrats or President Trump won

and Democrat area so this is by a lot so this is a very important seat and just

the fact that this is a great example as to what we can do in terms of moving

forward with the strategy this impeachment talk has been coming up

across the spectrum is something that's very serious and I spoke with a House

member of the House of Representatives recently who said that if we don't get

the Senate if we don't keep the Senate and we lose the house then there can be

some very serious implications so this is beyond just moving the President's

agenda forth this is can go into the impeachment conversation and we don't

pick up seats or maintain the control of the Senate so rachel is this a place

where the president shooter should not step in because what he did was draw

attention to erase that now is split among three people you know

statistically I think Blankenship is up by a couple points he has and I don't

think he should step in I don't and much I know you worked for president for

Governor Romney when Romney ran against Obama in that second term Romney felt

like a pre Obama candidate in a post Obama world and when I saw the debate

between the Virginia candidates of our West Virginia candidates I didn't know

anything about any of them right but it struck me that the other two candidates

were pre trumpets and that Blankenship was a was

so authentic I remember they asked all three of them really difficult questions

and the two other candidates did the sort of politician talking point where

they avoided the difficult question didn't answer directly and the other guy

who had really the worst thing on his you know prison and people who died in

his my charge like he answers very directly to the people and I think this

is a new era of authenticity and candidates will be rewarded and so I

think it's a little dangerous for the president to expend his capital but

against Blankenship on this we do have to take a stand though and this is a man

who uses racist language he's talked about Mitch McConnell is it China people

he calls him cocaine Mitch which is a complete fallacy about his wife's

family's shipping company here I do think the president should have stepped

in to at least be on the record not like he was for one more you know an accused

pedophile but Katie I'm curious as to your thoughts in Ohio because that's a

race I'm really interested yeah right I was just reading that eight million

voters and they're expecting north of 1.6 million to vote today yeah it's

gonna cuz sherrod Brown is he's always been my Dark Horse yeah certainly for a

VP candidate so how do you think it shapes up I think he has a pretty good

chance and obviously Republicans are playing close attention to it but I

agree with you that West Virginia is something that we've had a lot more

attention focused on and because the president has gotten involved and said

Blankenship shouldn't it be voted for I'm wondering if he wins tomorrow night

whether the president then will campaign for him and pull back those comments

well and I had mentioned in West Virginia something that we might see his

joe Manchin go a little bit farther to the right right he might look over it

like a Connor Lam down and say I'm a Republican now changing which makes

November really complicated Joe Manchin votes with Trump sixty percent of the

time times as well we have to go they had taken you and I stepped in and

prefer to hear your voice in mind

you

For more infomation >> 'Dangerous' for Trump to Expend Political Capital Opposing Blankenship - Duration: 4:29.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Just Got PRICELESS Justice! Legal Action Is Finally Coming And The Timing Couldn't Be Better! - Duration: 8:20.

For more infomation >> Trump Just Got PRICELESS Justice! Legal Action Is Finally Coming And The Timing Couldn't Be Better! - Duration: 8:20.

-------------------------------------------

Trump is Gearing Up to Give Dems This BRUTAL ULTIMATUM in Order to Fund #TheWall - Duration: 11:59.

Trump is Gearing Up to Give Dems This BRUTAL ULTIMATUM in Order to Fund #TheWall

President Trump has had it with the obstruction over the border wall.

Our country is in dire need of law & order and border security, and the Democrats, who

want to build a new political base of "illegal voters," are fighting him every step of

the way.

So, President Trump is ready to shut down the government over the funding of his border

wall.

From The Blaze

President Donald Trump suggested Saturday that a government shutdown might be needed

to secure his proposed wall for the U.S.-Mexico border, ABC News reported.

What happened?

"We're going to get the wall, even if we have to think about closing up the country

for a little while," Trump said during a tax reform roundtable meeting in Cleveland

on Saturday.

"We're going to get the wall.

We have no choice."

Trump did not specify what he meant by "closing up the country," according to the report.

But he told supporters last month that there could be an autumn shutdown if Congress fails

to meet his funding demands on border security.

The president wrote on Twitter this week that the border is "under siege," adding: "Congress

must act now to change our weak and ineffective immigration laws.

Must build a Wall.

Mexico, which has a massive crime problem, is doing little to help!"

Our Southern Border is under siege.

Congress must act now to change our weak and ineffective immigration laws.

Must build a Wall.

Mexico, which has a massive crime problem, is doing little to help!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 4, 2018

One week ago, Trump also suggested a shutdown over the border wall.

His comment came in reference to a "caravan" of migrants seeking asylum in the U.S.

"I really thought they'd be much better to us and tougher on the caravan.

Didn't work out that way," Trump said in the report.

"They allow these people to come up through Mexico and come into our country."

The migrants entered the U.S. several days ago and their requests for asylum are under

consideration.

The president also used the event as an opportunity to support Rep. Jim Renacci (R-Ohio), who

is running for U.S. Senate.

He was seated alongside Trump on the stage.

Trump said Renacci is "doing really great" and "has my full support," the report

stated.

"We need your vote.

We need your help, so go out and help Jim," Trump said.

Anything else? Trump also participated in an RNC fundraiser

in Cleveland, where he spoke to 250 people and helped raise $3 million, ABC News reported.

For more infomation >> Trump is Gearing Up to Give Dems This BRUTAL ULTIMATUM in Order to Fund #TheWall - Duration: 11:59.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump Announces U.S. Withdrawl From Iran Nuclear Deal - Duration: 1:37.

For more infomation >> President Trump Announces U.S. Withdrawl From Iran Nuclear Deal - Duration: 1:37.

-------------------------------------------

Happening: "Trump To Announce Iran Deal Decision AT 2 PM" - Duration: 11:36.

we begin with a fox news alert it is decision day on the Iran nuclear

deal President Trump set to announce whether he will follow

through on his threat pull out of that landmark agreement negotiated by his

predecessor good morning to you I'm John Scott and I'm Melissa Francis big days

so will he mix it or fix it less than three hours from now the president will

reveal his plan for the Iran deal an agreement he's blasted for years calling

it a disaster among other things are you or P and allies still strongly back this

agreement which could collapse if the u.s. withdraws well critics cite very

real concerns about trusting Iran the Iranians have been lying lie every time

their lips move they're lying the Iranians were working with the North

Koreans until just a few weeks ago on their nuclear program and their ICBM

program and the Europeans who simply want to get keep things as they are for

the trade value the fact is if we sanction them again we ought to sanction

anybody else who does business with them that'll stop the euros from helping to

bail them out while they cheat on this program chief White House correspondent

John Roberts is live with more John John good morning to you gauging

the percentages between Nick's or fix Nick's would appear to have the edge

right now that the president would still like to fix it the overall with a deal

that takes care of everything that Iran is accused of doing its

short-term nuclear program its long-term nuclear program its ballistic missile

program and its destabilizing behavior the White House is playing this one very

close to the best today we do know that the president within the last hour spoke

to French President Emmanuel macron and we understand that the jcpoa joint

comprehensive plan of action was the centerpiece of that phone call the

president also spoke to President Xi of China this morning the jcpoa might have

come up at that phone call we're told was mostly about trade and North Korea

certainly though the president has made no secret of the fact that he does not

like this deal and indications are at this point that he will not sign a new

waiver of sanctions the waivers that he and the president obama had signed every

90 days under the terms of the agreement of this deal and

that could begin the process of the United States pulling out of the joint

comprehensive plan of action White House legislative affairs director mark short

saying as some saying a short time ago here on fox news that it would be no

surprise if the president pulled out listen it's kind of hard to think that

Iran is following the the spirit of the deal and so I think the president has

been clear about his demands for for a better deal and I think that he will

make his case to the American people today the idea that Iran is cheating on

this deal took on new life after the Israeli prime minister last week laid

out intelligence and evidence that Iran had a secret program to build a nuclear

weapon still there's a difference of opinion in how to deal with this in the

administration Mike Pompeo the newly minted Secretary of State John Bolton

the national security adviser both in favor of pulling out James Madison

secretary defense thinks it would be better to stay in the president has also

heard from our European allies French President McCrone a couple of weeks ago

and again on the telephone this morning Angela Merkel the Chancellor of Germany

Teresa made the UK prime minister all urging him to stay in and then seek a

second deal to deal with those other three items that I talked about Iran

threatening to restart its nuclear program if the u.s. pulls out of the

jcpoa when he met with president Park rone last month the president warned

Iran against doing that listen here won't be so easy for them to restart

this president they're not going to be restarting anything they restarted

taking up big problems bigger than they've ever had before and you can mark

it down they restart their nuclear program they will have bigger problems

than they have ever had before thank you very much everybody

the president also taking aim at former Secretary of State John Kerry after

reports that he has been engaging in below the radar contacts with Iranian

and European leaders about the deal the president this morning saying John Kerry

has to get off the stage quote John Kerry can't get over the fact that he

had his chance and blew it stay away from negotiations John you are hurting

our country the president has been given a range of options on what to do from

his advisors I'm being told that he went through a very methodical

decision-making process and John today decision day two o'clock this afternoon

and we will have that live obviously John Roberts our chief White House

correspondent Thank You thanks New York's Attorney General resigning after

a stunning report in which four women accused him of the salting them well

they were romantically involved with him the Manhattan district attorney opening

a criminal investigation into Eric Schneiderman who had been a high-profile

advocate for women's issues in a fierce opponent of President Trump Laura Engel

is live in our newsroom with more on this Laura hi Melissa well the details

of the New York Attorney General's alleged misdeeds were revealed last

night in a searing article put out by the New Yorker for women alleged

Sneiderman slapped choked and abused them while they were in a romantic

relationship with him or had an encounter with him and two of the women

who went on the record say they had to receive medical attention after their

encounters which they described as assault happened

the NYPD tells Fox they have no record of any complaints filed by the women who

both told The New Yorker they were too frightened to come forward because

Schneiderman warned them he could have them followed their phones tapped and he

threatened to quote kill them if they broke up with him after last night's

story broke Nidoran issued the following statement in the privacy of intimate

relationships I have engaged in role-playing and other consensual sexual

activity I have not assaulted anyone I have never

engaged in non-consensual sex which is a line I would not cross Snyderman

resigned and stepped down saying the allegations would be too much of a

distraction for him to continue after quickly losing the support of Democratic

leaders including Governor Andrew Cuomo who spoke out this morning

listen change comes when people demand change and change comes when the problem

is revealed and exposed that is always step one if true the ironic twist

becomes his role as an outspoken figure in the need to movement against sexual

harassment which angered at least two of his accusers all

so in 2016 his office published a know your rights brochure for victims of

domestic violence and in 2010 when he was a state senator from Manhattan he

introduced a bill to contention 'el strangulation of violent felony

Solicitor General Barbara Underwood will take over for now and an interim

replacement will be chosen by the state legislature with voters deciding on a

new Attorney General in November it goes on Melissa Wow

Laura Ingalls thank you thanks for more let's bring in John McCormick senior

writer for the Weekly Standard I mean what a 24-hours the allegations come out

John the governor goes after the Attorney General and the Attorney

General tenders his resignation it doesn't usually happen that quickly not

usually but these were really some pretty horrific allegations for all the

everything that meets who has brought to light the allegations of slapping

choking multiple allegations multiple people confirming that these stories

were told at the time really hard to see how it would have played out any

differently so first I think you just have to to praise the victims here for

speaking out in the journalists who help them tell their story you know what one

thing that it underscored for me is reading my part where one of the alleged

victims says that her friends urged her not to come forward because Schneider

was simply too important of a democratic politician and so that just really

underscored the fact that you know the poison of partisanship or tribalism it

really in fact either party whether that's Democrats who originally defended

people like you know dismissed allegations against Bill Clinton or

Republicans who dismissed them against Roy Moore or even Donald Trump so I

think that is one lesson to take away from this yeah Trump obviously no fan of

Schneiderman Schneiderman was going after Trump all in court on several

issues but it brings to light this tweet the Donald Trump sent out in 2013 so

we're talking five years ago he writes Weiner is gone Spitzer is gone

next will be lightweight Attorney General Eric Schneiderman is he a crook

wait and see worse than Spitzer or Weiner that was put out on September

11th which has its own hallmarks of 2013 do you know anything about

the now president knew them I do not so you don't know if that was speculation

or if he had heard a rumor or if you had heard something more than that when you

put that out what you see a lot of Democrats saying now is they're saying

hey Al Franken for very for much much much less worse things he's gone you

know now Schneiderman for very horrific allegations is gone well people like in

Missouri there are very horrific allegations against the Missouri

Republican governor Eric Greitens who is refusing to step down you know they

would point out that multiple allegations of you know sexual assaults

against sitting president Republican president Donald Trump he is still in

office so I think that you'll have both sides you know pointing fingers here but

what really underscores is not this isn't a partisan issue that that

malfeasance can can occur near the party and as you point out hats off to Ronan

Farrow who is the guy who exposed Harvey Weinstein and and now it's the Attorney

General of the state of New York yeah he's in a really excellent job I think

Jane Mayer also working the story you know he without without a dog and

journalists to help these stories come to light even with the bravery of the

victims you don't know if they ever would have felt comfortable enough to

have spoken out I think in many of these cases especially the Weinstein case that

they wouldn't have I think and in terms of the political impact of this you know

I don't know if this will have any impact on New York politics

Governor Cuomo spoke out very quickly calling for Schneiderman's resignation

Cuomo does face a primary challenge from the left from a feminist Cynthia Nixon

so you wonder if this just sort of maybe alter the environment the way people and

viewing this race and maybe just think they're sick of the whole system and

they want someone fresh that could have an impact helping someone like some yeah

because the the early polls showed are way behind but that race is getting a

bit tighter so kind of interesting to watch and we will be John McCormick from

the Weekly Standard John thank you thank you Attorney General Jack sessions with

some very tough talk on immigration what he's now threatening to do to those who

enter this country illegally pussy I age nominee Gina Haskell back on the Conn

Capitol Hill ahead of tomorrow's confirmation hearing why some charge

she's the target of a smear campaign by Democrats as the White House back sir to

the hill we wanted to get a fair hearing a thorough hearing and we're very

confident that not only will all of the members of the Senate see what the rest

of us see and certainly even some of the people that have held that position see

but that G knows more than qualified to to run Italy the agency

you

For more infomation >> Happening: "Trump To Announce Iran Deal Decision AT 2 PM" - Duration: 11:36.

-------------------------------------------

Trump to announce decision on Iran nuclear deal on Tuesday - Duration: 2:15.

A decision will be made on whether America stays or leave the Iran nuclear deal.

President Trump who harshly criticized the accord... and the process could have an effect

on the hotly anticipated summit between Washington and Pyongyang.

Cha Sang-mi explains further.

The Trump administration will announce its decision on whether to withdraw from Iran

nuclear deal on Tuesday.

The deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, was signed in 2015 by the

Obama administration, and seven other signatories including China, Russia, several European

countries, and of course, Iran.

President Trump tweeted on Monday that he will be making the announcement at 2 p.m.

Eastern Time from the White House.

He has long threatened to pull out of the 2015 agreement, calling it "terrible" or a

"catastrophe".

The deal lifted certain economic sanctions on Iran's energy and banking sectors in exchange

for limiting Tehran's nuclear program.

"It should have never been made.

And we're going to see what happens on the 12th.

But I will say if Iran threatens us in any way they will pay a price like few countries

have ever paid."

The decision will have a ripple effect beyond Iran, and some say it could affect any potential

deal over Pyongyang's denuclearization.

However opinions divide on the matter; some experts say Pyongyang will worry about the

case if they aren't convinced their safety is guaranteed.

"North Korea will be worried that the U.S. could scrap the deal with Pyongyang or won't

keep its promise to guarantee North Korea's safety.

If Pyongyang feels threatened because of decision on Iran, it will be less enthusiastic about

implementing the agreement."

Another expert says North Korea's case is completely different from Iran's.

"I think they have learned a lot of lessons from not only the Iranian cases, but from

the Libyan cases as well.

So because of this I think there will be a little impact on the another possible summit

meeting between Washington and Pyongyang."

And he says that North Korea and the U.S. may even come up with a better deal after

learning from the Iran nuclear deal.

Cha Sang-mi, Arirang News.

For more infomation >> Trump to announce decision on Iran nuclear deal on Tuesday - Duration: 2:15.

-------------------------------------------

Hillary Announces She's MOVING Out Of U.S. Because Of Trump – Isn't Going To Like Place She Picked! - Duration: 5:23.

For more infomation >> Hillary Announces She's MOVING Out Of U.S. Because Of Trump – Isn't Going To Like Place She Picked! - Duration: 5:23.

-------------------------------------------

Rep. McCarthy: Trump Can Negotiate Better Deal to Prevent Nuclear Iran - Duration: 6:11.

let's bring in House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy sir there's there was

never a lot of bipartisan support for this deal at least on Capitol Hill

President Obama declined to put four put it forward for a vote because they said

they wouldn't have had the vote so they took action unilaterally and now the

President of the United States the current president Donald Trump is going

to apparently reverse that decision your thoughts today well my thought is

remember this is this is not a treaty and this is probably the problem with

the agreement even if you look back on those who we respect and have seen this

you go to condi rice former Secretary of State she said she never would have

signed this agreement she also said if the president does pull out it's not the

end of the world because I think from what you're hearing if the President

does end up pulling out you have a number of days here for Iran to come

back and actually negotiate a better deal if the whole concept of this

agreement was to keep Iran for having a nuclear weapon the agreement does not

stop that at the end of it they would be allowed to have it they continue to test

their ballistic missiles they take the billions of dollars that were provided

to them to fund terrorism around the world I think it's only appropriate that

the world together comes involved and gets a better agreement or make sure

Iran does not have a nuclear weapon and this is something the president

campaigned on remember and if it did come to the floor the only bipartisan

vote that would have taken place was it would have voted this down that's why it

was never a treaty right which was it never should have been moved forward as

an agreement because it was always in jeopardy with the next administration is

the White House asking the Congress to try to pass anything now after this step

that the president takes today no they haven't asked us anything yet I've been

briefed on a few things the president will do today but our own Foreign

Affairs have had hearings on this as well and remember here we are with North

Korea now sitting down with South Korea something the past administration wasn't

able to do as well I think President Trump understands foreign policy able to

get people together that haven't been in the past and if our main goal here is

not to have Iran to have a nuclear weapon I would trust this president to

actually get it done and I think you would have

look at this Agreement differently if that's your goal to set out to make

happen I see I see your point of view on that how do you respond to critics who

say that the president by withdrawing from this deal that if the previous

president made that it makes talks with North Korea harder because it looks like

the president the United States isn't able to confirm that the United States

will keep its word in the future now United States keeps its word to any

treaty we go forward with and remember this is not an agreement that was agreed

to by President Trump what I would look at is is quite the opposite if the

president says he's going to do something he would follow through with

it just as he would move the embassy to Jerusalem just as other presidents

promised they would but they would not do that

so I think because the president does keep his word that's the reason why Kim

jong-il is talking to South Korea as well and the one thing I would look at

you would want to create a treaty with America because that's what we keep

agreements was always the argument against this and what's more importantly

if America when it was President Obama said he wanted to stop Iran from a

nuclear weapon but would agree to a treaty our agreement not a treaty that

would allow it to happen I think America loses credibility in the long run with

that what would you say to your constituents and people across America

who are maybe not steeped in the details on the Iran deal but they are concerned

about rising gas prices and what this might do to the summers gas prices going

forward well what I tell my voters in California the reason the gas prices are

rising in California because the Democrats raised that the tax on it and

we have an initiative on the ballot to actually even peel those 12 cents so we

won't be paying in California a dollar higher than those in other states as

well and and America is becoming energy independent so no we're moving in the

right direction and the one thing I would say any American why would they

want to give Iran money for their oil if they're going to fund terrorism

throughout the world that we watch time and time again I know as an American I

would never want that you know I'm waiting for the president he's going to

step to the lectern any moment now then diplomatic reception room we'll take

that to you live just a non international question for you

going forward it's you tomorrow there's several primaries that are today I'm

sorry that's the boys that are happening all across America Republicans

I just curious where you think you are in the midterms because you know the a

lot of conventional wisdom would say that the Republicans are definitely

going to lose a house in this midterm election year it's not unusual for a

sitting president for his party to lose seats in a midterm looking ahead at some

of your candidates going forward and what their positioning how are you

feeling about their chances today I actually feel very good because you know

why unemployment is at three point nine percent it hasn't been this low in 18

years 48 out of 50 states just had their energy bills lowered because our tax

bill millions of people just got a bonus we have actually on human trafficking

shut down Backpage and others the opioid crisis we're moving 60 bills to do

something with that if you ask the American people how they feel is the

omit is America going in a good place this is CNN 57% say yes to that the last

time that happened that was back in the early 2000s so you know what I think

it's election today it's no doubt we'd keep the majority and the thing that

actually promises that more is because Nancy Pelosi even today said if they win

the majority she would become Speaker and she would raise your taxes right she

said she would roll back what President Trump put forward so and we're gonna

talk about that later in the show House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy thanks

for joining me thank you for having me Dina

you

For more infomation >> Rep. McCarthy: Trump Can Negotiate Better Deal to Prevent Nuclear Iran - Duration: 6:11.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Withdraws US From Iran Nuclear Deal - Duration: 1:02.

For more infomation >> Trump Withdraws US From Iran Nuclear Deal - Duration: 1:02.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Just Got PRICELESS Justice! Legal Action Is Finally Coming And The Timing Couldn't Be Better! - Duration: 7:55.

Trump Just Got PRICELESS Justice!

Legal Action Is Finally Coming And The Timing Couldn't Be Better!

As more is revealed about the level of corruption and the degree of conflict of interest that

exists within Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team, it becomes more abundantly clear Mueller's

many actions are a stain upon the legacy of American jurisprudence.

President Donald Trump is now suggesting that "angry Democrats" on special counsel Robert

Mueller's team, could potentially face legal action over these "conflicts of interest."

President Trump states "The 13 Angry Democrats in charge of the Russian Witch Hunt are starting

to find out, that there is a Court System in place that actually protects people from

injustice, and just wait till the Courts get to see your unrevealed Conflicts of Interest!"

Naturally, CNN was quick to point out that President Trump did not provide proof of the

alleged conflicts.

Yet, CNN themselves has previously reported that several members of Mueller's team have

donated to Democrats, several exclusively so.

A handful more either worked directly with or for Hillary Clinton or Barrack Obama in

some prior capacity.

Russia's meddling in the 2016 election also has been the subject of several Republican-led

congressional inquiries.

President Trump has suggested this probe is being drug out as a means to damage Republican

chances at reelection.

Several leaked questions that Mueller is interested in asking President Trump are related to possible

obstruction of justice actions.

President Trump states that such questions amount to a "setup and trap" and that

it would "seem very hard to obstruct justice for a crime that never happened!"

Last month, President Trump also stated on "Fox & Friends" that he might "at some

point" step in and take action against the Justice Department, which is overseeing the

special counsel investigation.

Mueller is a Republican who was appointed by President George W. Bush, and the man who

appointed him as special counsel, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, was appointed by current

President Trump.

Meanwhile, Rep. Louis Gohmert from Texas 1st congressional district attempted to shed some

light on Mueller's rather long, troubling, and sordid history of illicitly targeting

innocent people.

Gohmert states "Judging by Mueller's history, it doesn't matter who he has to threaten,

harass, prosecute or bankrupt to get to allege something or, for that matter, anything.

It certainly appears Mueller will do whatever it takes to bring down his target ethically,

or unethically based on my findings.

What does former Attorney General Eric Holder say?

Sounds like much the same thing I just said.

Holder has stated, "I've known Bob Mueller for 20, 30 years; my guess is he's just

trying to make the case as good as he possibly can."

Holder does know him.

He has seen Mueller at work when Holder was obstructing justice and was therefore held

in Contempt of Congress.

He knows Mueller's FBI framed innocent people and had no remorse in doing so."

Gohmert describes Mueller's disreputable, twisted history and how it speaks to the character

of the man placed in a position to attempt to legalize a coup against a lawfully-elected

President.

He explains "Any Republican who says anything resembling, "Bob Mueller will do a good

job as Special Counsel," "Bob Mueller has a great reputation for being fair,"

or anything similar; either (a) wants President Trump indicted for something and removed from

office regardless of his innocence; (b) is intentionally ignorant of the myriad of outrageous

problems permeating Mueller's professional history; or (c) is cultivating future Democrat

votes when he or she comes before the Senate someday for a confirmation hearing."

From his early years as an FBI Director, Gohmert describes how Mueller was given a pass in

oversight hearing from most Republican members of Congress.

This allowed him to avoid answering any tough questions.

Gohmert states they were continually told "Bush appointed him."

so it was okay to proceed.

He also describes how glaring problems because evident very quickly.

The Boston Globe noted Mueller's connection with the Whitey Bulger case in an article

entitled, "One Lingering Question for FBI Director Robert Mueller" during his FBI

tenure.

The Globe stated this

"[Mike] Albano [former Parole Board Member who was threatened by two FBI agents for considering

parole for the men imprisoned for a crime they did not commit] was appalled that, later

that same year, Mueller was appointed FBI director, because it was Mueller, first as

an assistant US attorney then as the acting U.S. attorney in Boston, who wrote letters

to the parole and pardons board throughout the 1980s opposing clemency for the four men

framed by FBI lies.

Of course, Mueller was also in that position while Whitey Bulger was helping the FBI cart

off his criminal competitors, even as he buried bodies in shallow graves along the Neponset"

During this time Mueller was the head of the Criminal Division as Assistant U.S. Attorney,

and then later as Acting U.S. Attorney.

No explanation as to exactly WHY Mueller insisted on keeping the defendants in prison that FBI

agents, in the pocket of Whitey Bulger had framed for they did not commit can be found

anywhere.

Perhaps not good people themselves, nevertheless not guilty of these crimes.

However, it is indicative of a larger and more insidious pattern demonstrating Mueller's

penchant for convicting and putting people in jail he disliked, even if they were innocent

of the charges, much more so than he was with ferreting out the truth.

Mueller bore no responsibility for $100 million paid to the defendants who were framed by

FBI agents under his control either.

As the Boston Globe noted "Thanks to the FBI corruption, taxpayers got stuck with the

$100 million bill for compensating the framed men, two of whom, Greco and Tameleo, died

in prison."

Of note, The New York Times had this to say of the relationship

"In the 1980, while [FBI Agent] Mr. Connolly was working with Whitey Bulger, Mr. Mueller

was assistant United States attorney in Boston in charge of the criminal division, and for

a period was the acting United States attorney here, presiding over Mr. Connolly and Mr.

Bulger as a top echelon informant.

Officials of the Massachusetts State Police and the Boston Police Department had long

wondered, why their investigations of Mr. Bulger were always compromised before they

could gather evidence against him, and they suspected that the FBI was protecting him."

Frankly, if Mueller had no knowledge that the FBI agents he employed were actively engaging

in criminal activity, then he was so blind as to be woefully unfit for any type of criminal

case supervision.

Either way, Mueller actively helped to contribute to the damages as he helped to frame individuals

by working to prevent them from being paroled from prison even, while their charges were

in the process of being completely thrown out of court.

Notice also the evidence of a pattern throughout Mueller's career: the leaking of information

to disparage Mueller's targets.

In the Whitey Bulger case, the leaks were too organized crime the Mafia.

One the most fundamental tenets of our Republic is that of the rights of an individual to

be free from "unreasonable searches and seizures."

An arrest is a seizure of your person.

Anyone imprisoned has to have committed a specific crime for which they are found guilty.

Yet Mueller has literally made a mockery of everything this country stands for as Gohmert

points out Mueller has the anti-Santa Claus list; and, if you are on his list, you get

punished even if you are framed.

What do you think about this?

Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe

top stories today.

For more infomation >> Trump Just Got PRICELESS Justice! Legal Action Is Finally Coming And The Timing Couldn't Be Better! - Duration: 7:55.

-------------------------------------------

Clay Travis ‒ Trump Stormy Legal Analysis, WWE Value, ESPN Throws Jemele Under Bus, Witten To MNF - Duration: 31:00.

Clay Travis ‒ Trump Stormy Legal Analysis, WWE Value, ESPN Throws Jemele Under Bus, Witten To MNF

For more infomation >> Clay Travis ‒ Trump Stormy Legal Analysis, WWE Value, ESPN Throws Jemele Under Bus, Witten To MNF - Duration: 31:00.

-------------------------------------------

If Trump Dumps Nuclear Deal Tomorrow, Iran Threatens 'Historic' Response - Duration: 2:44.

For more infomation >> If Trump Dumps Nuclear Deal Tomorrow, Iran Threatens 'Historic' Response - Duration: 2:44.

-------------------------------------------

Trump unveils Be Best campaign - Duration: 2:15.

For more infomation >> Trump unveils Be Best campaign - Duration: 2:15.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Set To Announce Decision On Iran Nuclear Deal - Duration: 2:14.

For more infomation >> Trump Set To Announce Decision On Iran Nuclear Deal - Duration: 2:14.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Just Got PRICELESS Justice! Legal Action Is Finally Coming And The Timing Couldn't Be Better! - Duration: 8:23.

For more infomation >> Trump Just Got PRICELESS Justice! Legal Action Is Finally Coming And The Timing Couldn't Be Better! - Duration: 8:23.

-------------------------------------------

Finally Its HAPPENING NOW: Trump Just Dropped A Bomb On John Kerry's SHADOW Diplomacy(VIDEO)!!! - Duration: 15:50.

Finally Its HAPPENING NOW: Trump Just Dropped A Bomb On John Kerry's SHADOW Diplomacy

Trump says John Kerry's efforts to try to keep the u.s. in the Iran nuclear

deal might be illegal let's get more from correspondent Richardson at the

State Department tonight the Secretary of State is meeting with officials from

Iran Germany France and the European Union to hold together the Iran nuclear

deal the problem for the Trump administration that's former Secretary

of State John Kerry the White House is dismissing Kerry's effort President

Trump tweeted quote the United States does not need John Kerry's possibly

illegal shadow diplomacy on the very badly negotiated Iran deal he was the

one that created this mess in the first place I don't think that we would take

advice from somebody who created what the president sees to be one of the

worst deals ever made I'm not sure why we would start listening to him now a

source close to Kerry says the US should be pushing for Iran to continue sticking

to its obligations under the deal and there's nothing wrong with advocating

that in a statement the former secretary spokesperson says quote secretary Kerry

stays in touch with his former counterparts around the world just like

every previous Secretary of State like America's closest allies he believes it

is important that the nuclear agreement which took the world years to negotiate

remain effective his country's focus on stability in the region one former

senator disagrees John Kerry is not negotiating on behalf of the US

government I hope everybody he's talking to knows that but in my opinion what

he's doing is inappropriate and he shouldn't be doing it Republicans

complain of a double standard claiming the criticism of John Kerry's light are

non-existent where many objected to then eventual national security adviser

Michael Flynn as he discussed Russian sanctions with Russian officials before

President Trump took office the Boston Globe first reported Kerry's quiet

diplomacy for weeks the Europeans have publicly lobbied the Trump

administration to stay in the deal the United Kingdom's foreign secretary Boris

Johnson did so this morning visiting Secretary of State Mike Pompeo as the

public lobbying campaign concludes less than 24 hours before President Trump

announces his decision one European diplomat says the chances the u.s. stays

in this deal are very small and that it's pretty obvious that unless

something changes soon the president will refuse to waive the

sanctions that keep the United States in the Iran deal

Brett Richardson live the State Department rich thanks what do you think

do you think former Secretary of State John Kerry is breaking the law by

conducting the shadow diplomacy I'm telling you across the board

economically politically militarily and even morally we would pay in a

miserable price for this unilateral reversal back in 2015 when Secretary of

State John Kerry stumped for his Iran nuke deal he really liked it as you

heard there he thought that this was the solution to everything and apparently he

still does because he's out there talking his own book talking to France

talking to Iran and he's certainly under fire right now there's a report that

says he is engaged in what you would call shadow diplomacy out there meeting

with the Iranian Foreign Minister to brainstorm ways to somehow save this

deal this deal which by the way everybody agrees it's not such a great

deal it's a deal that actually could lead to problems down the road and then

we have some kind of deal like this with North Korea and now look at what we're

dealing with with North Korea a lot of people are calling this a violation of

what is known as the Logan act this is very interesting and I want to share

with you exactly what this act is it's written to say the Logan Act is

basically a law that makes it a crime for unauthorized citizens to negotiate

with foreign governments having a dispute with the u.s. in other words if

you're in a challenging situation like we are right now with Iran you as a

private individual and that's what he is now a private individual can't go and

start negotiating or trying to work with the French and work with the Iranians to

come to some kind of deal I want to share again with you what the Logan Act

is it it it's written to say any citizen in the United States wherever he may be

who without authority of the United States directly or indirectly commences

or carries on any correspondence or horse with a foreign government of any

officer or agent thereof in relation to any disputes or controversies with the

United States or to defeat the measures of the United States

so specifically controversies notice that with the United States shall be

fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years or both so what is

John Kerry thinking here trying to preserve his legacy I mean is this a

legacy that you even want to pursue maybe he would be better off sitting by

the sidelines and allowing the current administration to decide what is best

for us and work with our allies in Europe to get them on board as well mr.

Kerry says in response to this report actually this is a spokesperson I should

say for John Kerry like America's closest allies he believes it is

important that the nuclear agreement which took the world years to negotiate

remain effective as countries focus on stability in the region

so again John Kerry really likes the agreement he really wants it to stick he

wants it to stay I guess the big question is is he actually crossing a

line it feels almost like a kind of espionage if he's out there talking to

the Iranians and talking to the French and say no no wait we can make this

happen is he basically over using his former position Robert I mean I saw this

story and I thought my goodness I mean they talk about Trump colluding with the

Russians how about Kerry colluding with the Iranians it seems as though if the

president is trying to negotiate some kind of better deal I guess I just have

to ask what's Kerry doing in there mixing it up yeah Trish you're exactly

right and your analysis is exactly right it's very disappointing at best it's a

gross indiscretion at worst it's really extreme disloyalty and you know it's

hard to get inside John Kerry's head I'm not sure I'd want to be there but he's

he's a very he believes that he's doing God's work no doubt out there is the

same guy that opposed the Vietnam War and called it

war-crime the same guy that opposed the 2001 george w bush would draw from the

ABM anti-ballistic missile treaty and it would be as if he was over with the

Russians trying to figure out a way how to not get out of the ABM Treaty it does

raise legal issues and there two of them right off the top you mentioned the

Logan Act it's difficult that Act hasn't been enforced in 119 years although it

has been referred to by the Supreme Court three times it is a act that

prevents exactly what you suggest it per it prevents someone from doing private

diplomacy no matter how smart they think they are the second piece of it is

article 3 section 3 Clause 1 of the United States Constitution which says

that you cannot provide aid and comfort or adhere to the enemy and I think there

is frankly just about no country in the world that fits more precisely into the

definition of a sworn enemy of the United States than Iran you know my

final thought for you is on this sort of what do you do about it

people say well prosecute and I you know again it's an iffy proposition you know

professor Dershowitz up at Harvard has said that it's probably

unconstitutionally vague the Logan Act and if it is then let's just get it off

the books and if it isn't then let's use it it's certainly disloyal if nothing

else yeah it certainly is its extreme disloyalty I would say the four things

you ought to do right now is the Justice Department ought to issue a cease and

desist order and say just stop doing this he's been for months negotiating

with the foreign minister of Iran the second thing I think I'd do is do

exactly what Sally Yates did to Mike Flynn I'd send two or three FBI agents

over and have a debrief and say exactly what information did you share as a

former secretary of state with Iran as well as with the Europeans third thing I

would do I think you know whether you call that an investigation or a matter

doesn't really matter but the bottom line is I would send somebody over there

to talk with him and the third thing I would do is he has a courtesy clearance

that he maintains as a secretary of state former I think I would suspend

that temporarily and sit down with him at the State Department and say what

exactly did you provide I think the agency the CIA might also have a

discussion with him the last thing I think I might do is have the White House

Counsel issue some kind of a deterrent letter saying henceforth and forevermore

we're not we're not we frown on the idea of you

going over and encouraging another country to negotiate against the United

States in an area that governs national security Maleeva Bolivian Carter did a

bit of this too didn't he Robert you know not really Jimmy Carter Jimmy

Carter was kind of a free agent that everybody understood was Jimmy Carter

and he would go over and try to get get people released from foreign countries

like Bill Richardson did and you know honestly it's it's not this kind of an

egregious offence what you're talking about Trish is months of negotiation

behind the scenes genuine shadow diplomacy he's got his own private State

Department working here trying to undermine the president and I think that

goes to a bigger point very simply put he has not accepted the 2016 election

results and still wants to play the game he played before Wow Wow

so what would you advise the Trump administration to do on this just and

say would you say yeah I think you start there I mean if it turns out that he has

shared information to which he was privileged by virtue of his clearance

and then that raises another another that raises another question it's

mind-boggling right Robert because they're going on about the Russians and

I'm like wait a second if this guy's talking to the Iranians yeah and he's

more than talking he's really having conversations about how to prevent the

withdrawal Robert it's good to see you thank you there too you didn't have your

perspective John is a shadow diplomacy how does that impact

I don't think it impacts it at all I think the president spoke out about that

pretty clearly and I don't think that we would take advice from somebody who

created what the president sees to be one of the worst deals ever made I'm not

sure why we would start listening to him now so the administration slamming John

Kerry for engaging in what they called shadow diplomacy after the former

Secretary of State no longer the Secretary of State is holding meetings

privately with Iranian officials trying to save the nuclear deal with Iran that

he helped broker but that deal could come to a halt potentially tomorrow

because we know now that the president will make his feelings known his

decision known on this he said I'll announce my decision on the deal

tomorrow from the White House at 2:00 p.m. and so now the countdown is on so

what will happen and will world leaders buy into this here now mark Tisa

American Enterprise Institute scholar and Fox News contributor mark good to

have you with us good morning you know when you look at

the definition of the Logan Act it essentially says that you know private

individuals are not allowed to make any kind of deal or negotiation with any

foreign leader or or attempt it seems pretty clear even though it's never used

yeah it's never used and it's a if you talk to most conservative legal scholars

they would tell you it's unconstitutional but I don't know

whether what John Kerry did was illegal but it is certainly outrageous and it's

certainly hypocritical I mean if you recall in 2015 when John Kerry was

negotiating this horrible Iran deal Tom cotton and 46 Republican senators wrote

a letter to Iran's leaders in which they explained simply explained the Senate's

role in an advice and consent in the approval of international agreements and

John Kerry was outraged he expressed is at his utter disbelief at their

irresponsible actions he said this is a quote to write the leaders in the middle

of a negotiation is quite stunning and ignores more than two centuries of

precedent in the conduct of American foreign policy

now Tom cotton was and is a sitting united state senator the Senate has a

constitutional role in American foreign policy John Kerry has a constitutional

role in nothing he's a former official he has new people move off this stage

and you know as I think you pointed out and some thoughts that you sent to me

earlier you know be one thing if he was trying to rally with some of our allies

and encourage them to stand firm you know against any attempt to pull out of

the deal but instead he's rallying with the enemy yes he's working with a terror

he's he's working with collaborating with a terrorist state a regime that

hasn't that has rallies where people chant death to America in order to

undermine the foreign policy of the United States of America that now I hate

the tape to say this but that could be collusion with a foreign power wanted to

charge Mike Flynn with with the Logan Act the violations of the Logan Act she

was outraged that he was discussing things as a transition official with a

foreign ambassador I mean he was on the way in into government at that point so

you know it just you just have to deal with both things as apples and apples so

if it was outraged about that she should absolutely be outraged about this as

well right absolutely and look John Kerry is transitioned out of government

he is a private private citizen now his defenders what they say as well all

former secretaries of state keep in touch with with with their food their

colleagues around the world and Henry Kissinger did this he was a

globe-trotting diplomat for years after leaving government well there's a big

difference Henry Kissinger with especially at a time oment like this he

would actually ask the permission of the White House whether whether was a

Republican or Democrat president to go out and talk he would probably key was

sometimes carry a message from the president conversation or not let me

know I don't want to be you know unhealthy here let's take a look Ben

Rhodes obviously who was very involved as a member of the Obama administration

with this whole Iran deal as well is outraged because he is and he has the

understanding that there was an Israeli u.s. attempt to dig up dirt on the

people who developed this deal in order to discredit them but like a you know a

sort of dossier against the people who built this deal he says this is not

behavior that should be acceptable in a democracy at his thuggish mean-spirited

and Casta chilling and threatening cloud of over public service that risks

extending far beyond me and Colin cow was also named

what do you think mark you know what sit unacceptable in our democracy ben

rhoades ben rhoades is unacceptable in our

democracy ben rhoades is the is the least qualified person to ever sit in a

position of authority and foreign policy I doubt that the story is true I doubt

that Donald Trump's White House was doing this that maybe they say the Trump

team may have been involved in this that could be anybody I think Mike Pompeo and

John Bolton have better things to do cleaning up Ben Rhodes as messes than

than just to dig up dirt on Ben Rhodes we're worth remembering that Ben Rhodes

bragged about the echo chamber and the young journalists in their 20s who

didn't know anything about foreign policy that he was able to create this

echo chamber to support this Iran deal so I'm just worth worth pointing out

mark thank you good to see you as always thank you Thanks thank you god bless you

and God bless america

No comments:

Post a Comment