Trump news on Youtube May 20 2018

five major developments again tonight on the deep state spying on the Trump

campaign James clapper Barack Obama's former Director of National Intelligence

is actually today saying it was a good thing that the Trump campaign had a spy

for the FBI in their campaign during an election I can't believe it watch it

they may had someone who was talking to them in in the campaign but you know the

focus here and as it was with the intelligent he is not on the campaign

per se but what the Russians were doing to try to to instantiate themselves in

the campaign or the influence or leverage it so if there was someone that

was observing that sort of thing well that's a good thing

yeah where was the spy in the Hillary campaign where she did pay for Russian

lies clappers so pompous so arrogant this is so illegal he's actually

bragging about surveilling an opposition party during a presidential election

year if that's the case this is not America we don't have a constitution

this is something you'd expect from the former Soviet Union Venezuela then again

you got clappers buddy John Brennan who's also up to his eyeballs in the

scandal probably knows a lot about it since remember he's the guy that voted

for a communist for president last night we had the great one Mark Levin reacting

to all of this his analysis dead spot on take a look we have a cabal of FBI

agents who took it upon themselves to investigate a candidate and his campaign

and then we have of course actual spies one or more in the Trump campaign what

the hell is this the Soviet Union Venezuela it's the United States of

America I want to know what Brennan did I want to know what clapper did I want

to know what Comey did not because I'm going to punish them

you'll make determinations about this right something something is terribly

wrong we need to fix this we cannot have in another election where the federal

government our United State government is fair interfering with an

election the great ones right we've been right everyone on this program has have

been right we need to fix it because this is about the Constitution of the

United States and it's literally hanging in the balance at this hour

you have unelected deep state actors shredding our Fourth Amendment rights

your right to privacy protection against unreasonable search and seizure this is

as I've been telling you one of the darkest chapters in American history the

Trump campaign is targeted but there's people like clapper Brennan Comey and

others they think that they knew better than you did the American people about

who should be the president they've weaponized the powerful tools of

intelligence turned it on us and they are now politicizing differences

political differences and by the way clapper since you're so concerned about

Russian influence in the election did you have a spy in the Clinton campaign

now we know for a fact her campaign was colluding had a foreign agent

Christopher Steele paying for Russian lies and propaganda to lie to the

American people and Clinton in the DNC remember they paid over what 12 million

dollars for the Russian dossier full of Russian lies where's the FBI where's the

CIA where the spies of course there weren't any instead of investigating it

well they used former spy Christopher Steele who they fired as a trusted

source and they used falls completely unverified never corroborated a dossier

he put together to get a warrant and then spy on the Trump campaign never

tell the judges she paid for it and in the process lying to FISA Court judges

on four separate occasions never revealing Hillary paid for all this this

is the biggest abuse of power corruption scandal we have seen in the history of

this country talk about Watergate this is Watergate

on steroids and human growth hormone Watergate what a third-rate break-in

that eventually forced the President to resign you may remember this oh is

nothing compared to Watergate spying on an opposition party during an election

it makes Watergate look like stealing a candy bar from a candy store now here's

why now the details of this abuse of power are so far worse the New York

Times now confirming this week everything we have been telling you

The Times didn't all of a sudden decide oh we want to tell people the truth this

is about actively now assisting the deep state and what The Times is doing is

they're helping these bad actors get in front of this scandal because they know

it's all coming out so they're twisting and spinning the facts and crafting

their own narrative now to steal a page from the FBI's playbook well they now

know crossfire hurricane is coming now here's why the deep state is about to be

exposed it's all happening now a portion of the DOJ IG report is set to come out

now in a couple of weeks Congress well they'll eventually get the documents

that led up to the IG report we'll see it all the DOJ is now slowly leaking

this information to friendly news outlets like The Washington Post in new

york times here's the thing what they're now reporting is now corroborating

everything we have been uncovering let's run through the details starting with

this quote the FBI obtained phone records other documents using National

Security Letters a secret type of subpoena officials said and at least one

government informant ie spy met several times with mr. Page and mr. Papadopoulos

and current and former officials say that confirms the FBI had a spy and

informant that infiltrated the Trump campaign where's the warrant and in

addition to lying to the four FISA judges four times to get the FISA

warrant to spy on the Trump campaign the FBI is using secret spies was there

another secret subpoena now it sounds like the deep state was using every

single option available to go after the Trump campaign and by the way after they

of course rigged the Hillary investigation here's another significant

quote that matches our reporting days after they closed their investigation

into Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server agents began scrutinizing

the campaign of our Republican rival The Times adds that both the

investigations were made up of a small group of the same top officials so the

same officials that rigged the Clinton email investigation even though we know

she broke laws and obstructed justice well then they went after Donald Trump

and set their sights on him now next now is this shocking part that directly

implicates here John Kerry and Barack Obama nobody's picked up on this Capo

Australian officials broke with diplomatic protocol allowed the

Ambassador Alexander Downer to sit for an FBI interview to describe his meeting

with campaign adviser George papadopolis all right diplomatic protocol broken

that means John Kerry from the get-go this is the beginning the Obama State

Department and I'm sure the president that means Obama all involved that means

they knew about the spying from the start and as we have been saying for

months John Kerry Barack Obama need to answer two simple questions what did you

both know and when did you both know it now these are there are other disturbing

details in this now these deep state sources revealed to the New York Times a

four Trump campaign Associates were being investigated by the FBI wasn't

just Carter Page and George papadopolis whoever he is

the FBI was also going after General Michael Flynn and Paul Manafort from the

get-go this was a major intelligence operation and finally these unnamed

sources also tried to spin that Peter struck Lisa page text messages you know

what they were talking about who we now think is Andrew McCabe about their

so-called insurance policy in case the unthinkable happened and Donald Trump

won they're actually claiming now quote they said that anything the FBI did

publicly would only give fodder to mr. Trump's campaigns and claims that the

election was rigged now mr. struck countered that even if

mr. Trump's chances of victory were low like dying before you're 40 the stakes

are too high to justify inaction well that's

laughable and it proves our point the deep State these top players not

rank-and-file desperately trying to spend all of this damning all of this

incriminating evidence now another new breaking story to tell you about tonight

and on government sources have been repeatedly

leaking to the media details about the FBI informant who did spy on the Trump

campaign and at the same time they're accusing the president Republicans even

people like me of putting this informants life in danger I've known the

guy's name for the full week here's the latest example from the Washington Post

bigger than Watergate Trump joins push by allies to expose the role of an FBI

source they are falsely smearing not only the president and congressional

Republicans and yours truly know we're trying to conduct an investigation

Congress is they have constitutional oversight Authority they're supposed to

do this in the process Washington Post as biased as they are is revealing key

details about who the person is for example quote the source is a US citizen

and it's provided information over the years to both the FBI and the CIA as the

post previously reported and aided the Russia investigation both before and

after Muller's appointment in May of 2017 according to people familiar with

his activities okay on the face of this it's ridiculous and for the record the

person's name has been out there in the media I've known it for over a week and

by the way it's not some closely held state secret

what is withholding now or unfolding before our rises utter insanity and the

total hypocrisy on display for the cold country to see you got the DOJ FBI or

accusing the president Republicans people like me of endangering a source

at the same time anonymous law enforcement intelligence they're the

ones leaking the details about who the informant is that is what we call a

deliberative smear now here's point number two this is really important

these unnamed federal officials have leaked more information to the New York

Times and Washington Post then they've given to Congress because they're trying

to get a friendly audience and remember rod Rosenstein has been slow-walking

obstructing stonewalling every congressional attempt to do their

constitutional authority of oversight every chance he gets

and when Rosenstein does actually comply while he turned over what heavily

redacted information and the claims of national security what we've seen that's

just a lie it's not true look at these leaks about the FBI

informant you know what would they really be doing all this if

it was a national security threat this is about getting out in front of

Congress in front of the IG in front of what they know is coming they're trying

to control the narrative slowly bleed it out has nothing to do with national

security just like Rosenstein word acting the

fact that James Comey didn't think that general Flynn lied to the FBI neither

did anyone else in the FBI that had nothing to do with national security

that was a cya and Rosenstein protecting his corrupt friends he and Jeff Sessions

they either need to go or do their job also tonight the president reacting to

this horrible shooting yes another sad school shooting this time in Texas

earlier today let's take a look unfortunately I have to begin by

expressing our sadness and heartbreak over the deadly shooting at Santa Fe

High School in Texas this has been going on too long in our country too many

years too many decades now we grieve for the terrible loss of life and send our

support and love to everyone affected by this absolutely horrific attack to the

students families teachers and personnel at Santa Fe High we're with you in this

tragic hour and we will be with you forever

very sad and this has to stop at our prayers and thoughts do go to these

families in Texas they lost their children trace calories Gallagher is

gonna have a full report in a few minutes as we've been saying on this

program it is so far beyond time that everything be done to protect our kids

in school it's simple we can solve this this is not a political issue harden up

the schools every school in this country needs a full threat security assessment

every school we've got to secure the perimeter and entry points of every

school we must require and mandate IDs for anybody that walks into a school

metal detectors in every single school and we need to hire retired concealed

carry police officers retired military members and we should have two on every

floor of every school in America that's what I think is a simple answer and

here's an idea by the way in case you're interested in new ideas if these people

work 15 hours retired military retired police concealed carry let's give them

federal state local tax breaks as incentives it won't cost a lot of money

it's not political it shouldn't be political we protect our athletes we

protect our politicians we protect those on the red carpet how about we do this

for our kids let's do it in their best interest I'm gonna more coming up later

in the program another disturbing steen sadly to tell you about this one taking

place at Trump national Doral Golf Course where police officers had to

shoot a deranged man in his legs earlier today after he reported started yelling

anti Trump rhetoric and opened fire inside of the resort police are saying

this lunatic wanted to lure officers into an ambush-style attack thank God

they were able to stop this particular nutcase

you

For more infomation >> Hannity: Clapper is proud of spying on the Trump campaign - Duration: 15:02.

-------------------------------------------

YUGE!!! Trump Just Unveiled A New Program That Will Turn Millions Of Democrats Into Republicans - Duration: 5:11.

YUGE!!! Trump Just Unveiled A New Program That Will Turn Millions Of Democrats Into

Republicans

When President Trump was campaigning to the American people on why he would be the greatest

jobs president of all time, he meant what he said.

Millions of Americans are on food stamps thanks to the previously failed administrations.

Barack Obama will go down in history as the biggest welfare president of all time.

During Obama's reign of terror, food stamp claims rose 70 percent.

This means 47.6 MILLION Americans were on food stamps after either long miserable years

of the Obama presidency putting Barack Obama as the "Food Stamp President".

It's not racist when it's true.

Facts seem to slip the minds of liberals.

The Farm Bill known as Resolution 2, would actually make able-bodied adults ranging from

18-59 to work a minimum of twenty hours a week in order to keep receiving Food Stamps.

SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) provides food to people who can't afford

it, or are unable to work.

These new requirements would put Americans back to work, and get them off welfare for

good.

This would be another promise the President will keep.

1.2 MILLION Americans would discontinue using SNAP claims the CBO because they would be

able to work, and provide for their families.

This is a concept that Barack Obama and the rest of the liberal communists couldn't

seem to get inline with.

The constant push of welfare is what we call redistribution of wealth where we take from

the rich and give to the those who really don't need the money.

I'm not saying there aren't people out there that actually need the help, but many

are just lazy, and could actually get off their butts and go to work.

You will see millions of Democrats change their voter registration to vote Republican

after this happens.

The political shift will take place because people will finally start realizing that Republicans

are the only ones who offer REAL solutions to America's problems while Democrats inflate

ideas that only hurt America in the long run, and fits the bill to our next few generations.

An additional 400,000 could drop off the food stamp rolls over ten years because of a provision

in the bill that would close a loophole allowing individuals to qualify for food stamps without

meeting an "asset test," according to the CBO estimate.

But the number of people getting off food stamps could be more than what the CBO or

the House bill is projecting, according to House Agriculture Committee spokeswoman Rachel

Millard.

"They don't distinguish in their analysis who will come off due to the fact they have

found employment providing them enough money to no longer need SNAP, or those who have

chosen to remove themselves from the program due to the fact they haven't fulfilled the

work requirement, which can also be fulfilled through training," Millard told Breitbart

News Wednesday evening.

Millard added that the provision in the House bill causing 400,000 of the 1.6 million Americans

estimated to drop their SNAP benefits would close a loophole used under the Obama administration

called Broad Base Categorical Eligibility (BBCE).

Under BBCE, American households were eligible to receive SNAP benefits if they were authorized

to receive "a TANF-funded brochure" or "hotline number" without qualifying for

SNAP's income and asset thresholds.

However, the farm bill would still allow those who meet the "asset test" to receive benefits.

The idea of reforming the food stamp program has remained popular with the American public.

A Foundation for Government Accountability (FGA) survey published in April revealed that

more than 82 percent of Americans support the idea of food stamp recipients having to

meet work requirements.

The survey stated that 94 percent of Republicans and 71 percent of Democrats are in favor of

work requirements.

Some House Democrats, however, say the farm bill's cuts to SNAP are "unjust": –Breitbart.

"We should strengthen and #ProtectSNAP" screams socialism.

To "Strengthen" SNAP would actually mean raising taxes or taking away tax dollars from

one program to fund it.

That's unjust if you ask me.

This is the solution Democrats offer their voter base.

They promise them all these free programs in order to get their votes.

I've said in many articles before that Democrats known the only way they will be able to stay

in power is to pander to the people that want free stuff and keep promising more free stuff.

What they can't seem to understand is nothing is free.

Someone somewhere is paying for it.

That's not freedom, that's tyranny.

**Update**

The Farm Bill has been defeated.

A sweeping farm bill failed in the House on Friday in a blow to GOP leaders who were unable

to placate conservative lawmakers demanding commitments on immigration.

The House leadership put the bill on the floor gambling it would pass despite unanimous Democratic

opposition.

They negotiated with members of the conservative House Freedom Caucus up to the last minutes.

But their gamble failed.

The vote was 213 to 198, with 30 Republicans joined 183 Democrats in defeating the bill.

The outcome exposed what is becoming an all-out war within the House GOP over immigration.

The bill will come up again, though.

The current bill expires in September & the Senate is working on a new one.

Trump will eventually get his way & a new day will dawn in America.

For more infomation >> YUGE!!! Trump Just Unveiled A New Program That Will Turn Millions Of Democrats Into Republicans - Duration: 5:11.

-------------------------------------------

Trump just announced his most dangerous and extreme attack on abortion yet - Duration: 3:00.

For more infomation >> Trump just announced his most dangerous and extreme attack on abortion yet - Duration: 3:00.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING News From President Trump! HE'S GOING TO DO IT!!! - Duration: 11:23.

BREAKING News From President Trump!

HE'S GOING TO DO IT!!!

PISSED!!!

President Trump is obviously getting fed up with this garbage witch hunt by the a hole

Robert Mueller and his team of Hillary lovers and tweeted that they very well could face

legal action over alleged "conflicts of interest."

This comes after the investigation has already run into numerous snags, including Mueller's

inability to produce any evidence at all!

"The 13 Angry Democrats in charge of the Russian Witch Hunt are starting to find out

that there is a Court System in place that actually protects people from injustice…and

just wait 'till the Courts get to see your unrevealed Conflicts of Interest!" Trump

tweeted.

Mac Slavo at SHTFplan.com reports that Trump did not provide proof of the alleged conflicts,

yet Mueller has yet to provide any evidence in his two-year-long investigation that would

warrant keeping it open.

CNN has reported that several members of Mueller's team have donated to Democrats, and the dossier

which allegedly spurred the investigation was paid for by Hillary Clinton's team.

Russia's meddling in the 2016 election also has been being pushed hard by propagandists

and puppets in the mainstream media.

As if it adds any credence, CNN thought it noteworthy to mention that Mueller is a Republican

who was appointed by President George W. Bush, and the man who appointed him as special counsel,

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, was appointed by Trump.

So if Mueller is a Republican, then Trump probably wasn't referring to him as one

of the " 13 angry Democrats."

But that's only if one was expecting CNN to not spin this into some kind of propaganda

piece.

Trump has repeatedly denied collusion with Russia to win the election, and considering

the investigation into such has gone on for two years without any evidentiary basis for

it, it certainly looks like it's a witch hunt.

He denied that he's obstructed the probe and has defended his actions as "fighting

back" against "the Russia Witch Hunt."

"The Russia Witch Hunt is rapidly losing credibility.

House Intelligence Committee found No Collusion, Coordination or anything else with Russia.

So now the Probe says OK, what else is there?

How about Obstruction for a made up, phony crime.There is no O, it's called Fighting

Back" Trump tweeted.

"There is no O, it's called Fighting Back," the President tweeted, later suggesting that

the investigation was being dragged out so it could damage Republicans in the midterm

elections.

"Is this Phony Witch Hunt going to go on even longer so it wrongfully impacts the Mid-Term

Elections, which is what the Democrats always intended?

Republicans better get tough and smart before it is too late!"

Several of the questions that Mueller is interested in asking Trump have been leaked.

Many are related to possible obstruction of justice actions.

Trump said last week that such questions amount to a "setup and trap" and that it would

"seem very hard to obstruct justice for a crime that never happened!"

Last month, Trump hinted to Fox & Friends that he might "at some point" step in

and take some kind of action against the Justice Department, which is overseeing the special

counsel investigation.

LOCK ALL THESE LIBERAL SCUMBAGS UP- WE

HAVE

HAD ENOUGH.

God Bless.

For more infomation >> BREAKING News From President Trump! HE'S GOING TO DO IT!!! - Duration: 11:23.

-------------------------------------------

Tucker: Apparently, President Trump deserves to be dehumanized more than MS-13 - Duration: 9:28.

the left's love affair with the nation's deadliest criminal gang continues

tonight the howls of outrage reverberating president Trump dared

criticize ms-13 by calling them animals watch he basically seems to assume that

everybody is part of ms-13 very strange to here with President United States

speak in such dehumanizing terms clearly the president wants a war against

Latinos you might make that distinction between members of ms-13 and the rest of

the Latino community in the rest of the immigrant community

I assure you that most of Americans don't make that distinction when he says

were animals when he says we're animals things are moving fast in this country

by 2020 defending Central American Street gangs will likely be a key plank

in the Democratic platform it's close now you can see it may be Bernie Sanders

will feel the burn a little more literally Kamel Harris's campaign will

certainly be stronger together with the added muscle of guatemalan street gangs

don't laugh it's actually more plausible than you think it is don't believe us

here's what CNN contributor Anna Navarro said this wednesday about Trump's animal

remark quote Trump is in very bad company Nazis referred to Jews as rats

slave owners viewed slaves as subhuman animals now here's what Navarro herself

had to say about Trump just two years ago quote should Trump drop out of the

race yes he should drop out of the human race he's an animal apologies to animals

apparently Donald Trump can mean to humanize and that's fine ms-13 though a

gang that butchers high schoolers with machetes that's too far but on the Left

that's exactly the state of play as of this evening ms-13 runs drugs of course

it commits murders and it terrorizes entire immigrant communities but they

don't ask questions about diversity so they're okay

questioning diversity is the highest crime you can commit according to the

left question diversity imperils their entire worldview it suggests that people

are not interchangeable in the particular people who inhabit a tick

country matter that's unacceptable far more unacceptable than say murdering a

teenager in Long Island that doesn't even warrant a serious attempt at

deportation joining us is Leslie Marshall she's a

progressive radio show host and a keen observer for the Democratic Party was he

good to see it good to see you Tucker so you're seeing

all the leaders of the Democratic Party Schumer Pelosi it's surrogates the

entire American news media virtually singing from the same song sheet this is

a coordinated storyline who thought of this what consultant convinced Democrats

running in defense of ms-13 was a good way to go into the midterms well first

of all I think it was very clear quite frankly and I know fellow Democrats get

angry at me that the president was answering a question that the sheriff

posed regarding the gang members the issue here Tucker is not supportive

gangs or gang members I have an eleven year old son and as you know ms-13

starts as young as 11 and goes up to 40 it's calming human beings animals now

wait a minute I know when you look at what ms-13 does it's hard to say well

are they human beings when you have an eleven year old child who was fearful

for their and their family's life in a very impoverished area and you think how

can I protect myself and you're offered protection by some of these older ms-13

gang members regardless of the fact they're going to beat you to a pulp or

perhaps even take your life in 13 seconds very slow 13 seconds you look to

them because you think how can I be considered tough how can I and my family

not right I don't think those 11-year old children are quite frankly our

animals and I don't think we should refer to human beings even if they're

bad human beings animals well but look people have all kinds of reasons for

doing what they do and sometimes it's understandable but I mean people had

reasons for becoming concentration camp guards but if I call the concentration

camp guard an animal you would say you know he's not strictly speaking an

animal he's a human being but I get it he's horrible like you're you're

expressing your outrage of what he does if I said that no one would bat an eye

but that's because concentration camp guards aren't potential Democratic

voters I mean this is really about winning up a constituency isn't it this

is a political decision Democrats are made we're inside of

ms-13 not because we love murder I'm not saying Democrats love murder I don't

think they do but they don't want to alienate anybody on that side including

I guess ms-13 members themselves I mean let's be honest about what's happening I

don't agree with you there although we are certainly in an era where left or

right a lot of things come into the landscape and our argued for a political

gain especially midterm elections coming up I don't think that's the the point

here at all Tucker I mean you know that we liberals claim to be pacifist we

claim to care about everyone and it is the terminology that is very unsettling

how do a lot of people in the Democratic yes liberals are passive liberals are

pushing I mean you're watching liberals across the spectrum from you know nikki

Haley to Chuck Schumer pushing for more war in Syria they're bloodthirsty

actually Haley's start wearing a Democratic cape I must have missed that

one she started pushing for more pointless

worse but here here's the point if I came out and described a concentration

camp guard as an animal nobody would have a problem with it I certainly

wouldn't have a problem with that you wouldn't no normal person would have a

problem with that normal people don't defend murderers but

the Democratic Party is defending ms-13 and I'm just making a political

observation which is that's not a wise strategy going into election because

normal people aren't going to go for that are they I'm gonna go back to your

concentration camp argument okay well being that I have one Jewish parent I

think you know and being that I have relatives that did parish in

concentration camps there were there were a few types of guards in the camps

quite frankly one would be fellow Jews who wanted to survive and have a lot of

guilt and there many documentaries about that too okay there are many people that

said they were just following orders they were not referred to as animals and

quite frankly many of them escaped any type of criminal look I I don't want to

get off on a World War two tangent I and that was one of a hundred examples

Jeffrey Dahmer you know anybody who commits murder for the pleasure of

committing it I think it's fair to criticize in the harshest possible terms

and it would be surprising if an entire political party came to that person's

aid and defense as the Democrats now are 2ms there

and I'm just asking like whose idea was this it's not happening accidentally

when you have john harwood from the New York Times in Chuck Schumer and Nancy

Pelosi singing exactly the same thing somebody thought up this line and I'm

just wondering do you think it's a smart thing to say I don't think anybody

thought up the line I think what happens and it's happening almost every day is

the president says something or tweet something and then there's a reaction

and certainly there's a strong reaction on the left and there's been a reaction

in the Latino community because you know a lot of the headlines were that the

president said this about all immigrants at first and then when people read the

transcript or they listened to the actual taping of what occurred in that

meeting then it became more clear that he was speaking about ms-13 and it was

response by the sheriffs question regarding Innes 13 but you also have to

remember Tucker some people that are in ms-13 in this

country begging not to be deported aren't a part of the gang they just

can't get out cuz the only way out is to be killed but let me ask you this the

final question but this is the deep irony undergirding all of this which is

ms-13 preys upon immigrants who do you think their victims are overwhelmingly

Honduran Salvadoran immigrants often illegal by the way so if you say if

Democrats say you know we are the champions of immigrants why are they

defending people who prey upon immigrants it doesn't my any sense I

don't feel that Democrats are in any way defending murderers I feel that

Democrats are saying that the president's choice of words was not

palatable for them and that no human being how terrible human being they

maybe should be called an animal because an animal doesn't shoes that hold on

let's be honest they're holding the president to a different standard in the

holding ms-13 if you came out and said Trump is an animal I don't think for a

second Nancy Pelosi would give you a lecture about Christianity or whatever

she was pretending to believe the other day the spirit of God in every part

means they would just they would even notice it because they think Trump is an

animal right but they're offended when you say that about a Salvadoran street

gang I mean I'm sincere question honestly I'm a fan of the president but

I would defend him if somebody called him okay I don't think a human being

should be called that and a Birkin I hope you will drink it

dan out said I can't even remember her name but that's CNN contributors

oh it's getting crazy on TV who called it an animal anyway Leslie thank you

it's great to see you

you

For more infomation >> Tucker: Apparently, President Trump deserves to be dehumanized more than MS-13 - Duration: 9:28.

-------------------------------------------

Kristin Gaspar Media take Trump's 'animals' comment out of context - Duration: 5:08.

all right the Homeland Security Secretary talking about comments alleged

come to the president referring to all illegal immigrants maybe all immigrants

period as animals when in fact he was talking about ms-13 members who are

violent ruthless and well animals the chairwoman of the San Diego County Board

of Supervisors Christian Gaspard was at that meeting with the president when he

made those comments and that was the group to which he was specifically

referring she joins me right now there's no mystery to this supervisor so are you

surprised so many media groups that pounced on this wrongly and generalized

about it wrongly that no matter what you'd think of the president he did not

say what they said he said the media owes us an apology in this case they

were in the very same room where I sat they knew the context of this and the

media was reckless using this to further a narrative that is absolutely false

everybody in that room including the media knew the president was referring

to ms-13 gang members the worst of the worst offenders out there that kill

people in public decapitate people murder for fun the to use the word

animals doesn't even begin to describe ms-13 gang members if anything the

president was soft using that term shame on the media for sharing this narrative

it didn't happen and by the way NBC's Chuck Todd you know

not one broom to give the president an easy time did agree with him on the

reference to ms-13 members for being just that but having said that I mean

III was hearing one discussion I don't even remember the network so if you'll

indulge me arisen where they were saying well that sounds like something Donald

Trump would say and not even thinking for a moment to to retract the comment

that was obviously wrong and and and misinterpreted and just say we botched

it people hear what they want to hear to the reality is watch the full tape you

will see exactly the context of this comment it's really

quite unfortunate you can see where the president feels the way he does calling

the media fake news if this is what he experiences on a daily basis I can

support what the president is feeling about the media you know I trained at

the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism Walter Cronkite was still alive he

shared stories about covering the war up in a plane a gun in one hand writing the

story in the other where half journalists like Walter Cronkite gone

well I mean I on this particularly show I mean they were clearly wrong I mean

not the president sometimes fake news is anything that's negative or nasty about

him so he wouldn't be the first president to get flummoxed by a media

that seems to go after him but this is the comment itself to which you refer

Crist and I think that's quite quite clear what he's talking about and we'll

talk about it right afterwards this from the president will be an ms-13 gang

member I know about if they don't we just passed certain threshold

I cannot tell ice about them we have people coming into the country of trying

to come in we're stopping a lot of them but we're taking people out of the

country you wouldn't believe how bad these people are these aren't people

these are animals and we're taking them out of the country at a level and at a

rate that's never happened before and because of the weak laws they come in

fast we get them we release them we get them again we bring them out it's crazy

you know of the reluctance to even identify ms-13 members any other way

is also kind of crazy isn't it Kristen absolutely it is and what the president

was referring to these weak sanctuary state laws that have been implemented by

the governor of California and across the country in other cities as well you

know they're placing back into our country 142 gang members California has

taken the brunt of it with nearly 90 gang members put right back into our

states you know in California we have a governor who has compromised the safety

of our residents it's put our sovereignty at as a nation

at risk we're fighting back against our own governor who's so soft on crime that

he's rolling out the welcome mat for ms-13 gang members it's entirely

unacceptable all right Kristen gasps well thank you for taking the time we

appreciate it

you

For more infomation >> Kristin Gaspar Media take Trump's 'animals' comment out of context - Duration: 5:08.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump Saves Taxpayers $260M, Cuts Funding To Liberal 'Holy Grail' - Duration: 3:57.

President Trump Saves Taxpayers $260M, Cuts Funding To Liberal 'Holy Grail'

During his campaign, President Trump vowed to drain the swamp.

That means many things to many people.

But overall, it's a promise to rid our government of corruption.

Also, it includes ending the support for anything that is unacceptable.

Already in his first two years, President Trump has made good on his word.

His strict leadership has slashed the size of the federal government.

He killed regulations that choked businesses and job creation.

On top of that, he continues to go after the vile policies and projects of his predecessor.

But perhaps the biggest move is happening today.

President Trump vowed to go after this one Holy Grail of the left.

This organization is fiercely protected by liberals.

Despite it being downright evil.

For decades, conservatives have tried to defund it.

But now it looks like Trump is the man to do it.

From NBC News:

The Trump administration moved forward with a proposal Friday that would effectively ban

Planned Parenthood and similar organizations from providing abortion and related services

under the same roof as operations funded by federal family-planning grants, according

to an administration official.More from Weekly Standard:

"The proposal would require a bright line of physical as well as financial separation

between Title X programs and any program (or facility) where abortion is performed, supported,

or referred for as a method of family planning," a Trump administration official tells THE

WEEKLY STANDARD in an email.

The 1988 Reagan regulation was immediately challenged in court and never enforced, but

it was upheld by the Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision in the case Rust v. Sullivan.

By the time abortionists might have actually lost their Title X funds, however, Bill Clinton

took office and killed the Reagan regulation, a policy that has remained in effect to this

day.

This anti-abortion regulation wasn't reinstated by the George W. Bush administration.

Defunding Planned Parenthood seems almost impossible.

Their lobbyists are entrenched in D.C. like blood-sucking tics.

They have bought and sold numerous Democrats.

Abortionists push their practice through the media like some kind of godsend.

They even claim the act of killing a child is feminist.

And they called us deplorable.

This move will not prevent clinics from counseling for clients about abortion, but it will end

the mandate that they push for it.

Groups like Planned Parenthood claim they provide "healthcare" to low-income women.

The reality?

They just provide abortions.

All their other services only exist for patients who are getting an abortion.

This move will prevent Title X funds from going to Planned Parenthood.

That amounts to roughly $260 million a year.

But make no mistake, the group won't disappear.

They still get plenty of cash from the government (in other ways) and through private donors.

However, this step is a clear sign that Trump is far from finished in his crusade to end

abortion.

In fact, this is powerful move.

It will empower pro-life groups to campaign even harder.

Planned Parenthood will get a massive black eye.

Americans will see what kind of vile organization they are.

Make no mistake, they are going to fight back tooth and nail.

Leftists don't like to see their free money get taken away.

Planned Parenthood and their puppets in D.C. will try to oppose Trump's move.

The liberal media will shriek.

But they will fail.

For more infomation >> President Trump Saves Taxpayers $260M, Cuts Funding To Liberal 'Holy Grail' - Duration: 3:57.

-------------------------------------------

South Korean President Drops a Bombshell on Trump! Americans Can't Believe What He Said - Duration: 6:18.

South Korean President Drops a Bombshell on Trump!

Americans Can't Believe What He Said.

Over the past month, tensions with North Korea have drastically diminished.

Especially after North and South Korean leaders met with one another and broke bread over

dinner to celebrate the new era.

They both declared the end of the truce, the end of the Korean War.

Now the latest developments regarding this issue will be a little surprising.

While many people back home, specifically Democrats, would argue that President Trump

is a terrible President and that he is a danger to this country, the truth is the opposite.

Even the South Korean President said as much when he gave him credit for the recent de-escalation

in tensions between North and South Korea.

After meetings with North Korean leader Kim Jung Un, the South Korean President said the

following about President Trump,

"I give President Trump huge credit for bringing about the inter-Korean talks, and

I'd like to thank him for that."

The Conservative Post reported, "Moon insisted that it was precisely because

of Trump's willingness to commit the "full power" of American might to facing down

North Korea, and his propensity for sharing that commitment on Twitter, that these talks

were even possible.

Now, that's something to remember, because Democrats have been claiming for the past

year that Trump was nothing but a "warmonger" and that his threatening tweets would only

lead to disaster.

But, miracle of miracles, the very opposite has happened – Trump's threatening tweets

have brought PEACE to a region that has known only war (at least officially) for the past

50 YEARS."

This comes at the same time that a new United States Ambassador to South Korea has been

nominated.

Adm. Harry B. Harris Jr., who currently serves as the Commander of the U.S. Pacific Command

was officially nominated by the President.

He will be the Ambassador just in time for the President of South Korea's visit to

the United States in just a few short weeks.

Fox News reported,

"Harris, who currently resides in Hawaii with his wife, is "a highly decorated, combat

proven Naval officer with extensive knowledge, leadership, and geopolitical experiences in

the Indo-Pacific region," the statement said.

Over the course of 40 years, Harris has "served in every geographic combatant command region,"

it continued, and he has commanded the U.S. Pacific Fleet, the U.S. Sixth Fleet and VP-46,

among others.

Trump's announcement comes as he prepares to host the South Korean president on Tuesday,

marking the third summit for the leaders.

The schedule meeting "affirms the enduring strength" of the "alliance and deep friendship

between our two countries," the news release said.

Trump and Moon are expected to discuss the upcoming meeting between the U.S. and North

Korea, set to be held on June 12 in Singapore.

However, that meeting was recently called into question after North Korea threatened

to pull out of talks."

This is really good news.

It will be interesting to see how the new ambassador feels about the President's decision

to try and reduce the number of troops in South Korea.

Recent reports from high-level officials have indicated that President Trump wants this

done ahead of the high profile talks set forth with the South Korean and North Korean leaders.

"A statement released by the office of the South Korean President Friday also refuted

suggestions the US was considering a reduction in troop numbers.

According to the statement, an official at the US National Security Council told South

Korean National Security Adviser Chung Eui-yong the New York Times report was "not true

at all."

Chung had raised the issue Thursday night with Bolton in a phone call, an official familiar

with the conversation told CNN.

Bolton told Chung it was untrue that Trump is ordering plans to withdraw US troops, according

to the official.

The official also acknowledged that Trump has publicly expressed frustrations at the

cost and size of the US presence in South Korea and noted if the Korean War officially

comes to an end, there would have to be some sort of reduction.

The official said the troop withdrawal would not be on the table in talks with Kim, and

that Kim has not raised this as a possibility ahead of the summit.

When asked about the administration's current position on removing US troops from the Korean

Peninsula, a source close to the White House told CNN Thursday that it is viewed as something

that could possibly happen in the future but "not until long after the nukes are verifiably

gone."

"That is the position," the source said.

The source, who is familiar with the administration's internal discussions, added removing US troops

is not something currently being considered as a bargaining chip but as a possibility

should there be no need for them down the line.

According to the New York Times report, the officials would not say if Trump was seeking

options on a partial withdrawal or a full withdrawal, but said the latter was unlikely.

During a South Korean presidential briefing Wednesday, officials linked the presence of

US forces in South Korea to wider issues of peace and regional security.

"A peace treaty cannot be achieved between South Korea-North Korea or North Korea-United

States.

A peace treaty signifies an agreement to establish legal and systematic policies for the whole

Korean peninsula," the official said, referencing the pledge made by South Korean President

Moon Jae-in and Kim to bring a formal end to the Korean War, 65 years after hostilities

ceased.

"The status of the US forces was brought up from that relevance and I can reiterate

South Korean government's stance: we believe the US forces are needed to take a role of

a mediator in the region of tensions and military conflicts in other nations such as Japan and

China," they added."

Whatever the result may be it is clear that President Trump's policy with South Korea

and North Korea has been working.

He was able to achieve what no one else could prior to him in past administrations… the

end of the Korean War.

If the future is any indication of the past then it looks like negotiations with North

Korea will go well when they do sit down in the coming weeks.

what do you think about this?

Please Share this news and Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe

USA facts today.

For more infomation >> South Korean President Drops a Bombshell on Trump! Americans Can't Believe What He Said - Duration: 6:18.

-------------------------------------------

LOU DOBBS: GIULIANI-MUELLER WILL not indict the PRESIDENT TRUMP - Duration: 14:53.

special counsel robert muller will not seek an indictment against President

Trump presidential attorney Rudy Giuliani confirming to Fox News a

conversation that took place two weeks ago between the president's legal team

and Muller mower is bound by a Department of Justice guidance from 1999

that states a sitting president cannot be indicted end of story

well not quite joining us now Judicial Watch president tom Fitton Tom good to

have you with us this is a blockbuster statement from Rudy Giuliani even though

he told our White House chief correspondent John Roberts that he had

basically said that two weeks ago this is is it not a blockbuster well it is

because it suggests now the mauler operation is purely political with

respect to the president and looking at what the president did or did not do

because if he can't be indicted than what was is justice what's the Special

Counsel supposed to be doing other than writing a report for potential

impeachment well that's a political process as Justice Department shouldn't

be doing that and you know the president should stop cooperating with the special

counsel and should be shut down respect to the president in the least now the

only caveat there is he says if a president a sitting president can't be

indicted and my guess is there are anti-trump prosecutors on Muller's team

would like to see the president removed from office and then indicted so there's

still significant legal risk for the president from these anti-trump errs

targeting him through this out-of-control investigation these but

but preliminary what's there to do here if they're not going to indict them shut

it down yeah III think you're absolutely right in those anti-trump errs I had

best understand that no matter how vitriolic and how energized they are

there are millions tens of millions of pro-trump errs in this country who will

not stand for anymore political nonsense emanating from the center of the

the leftist minds in this country who just have been feasting on our judicial

system and the legal profession well and the other big news today is the New York

Times trying to get out ahead of the IG report Lou with confirmation that the

FBI and Justice Department were had taken the phone records of Trump

campaign officials through National Security Letters had a mole or spy close

to or in the campaign but despite all of that noise all that abuse it's 15 months

later however months later they still have no evidence of russia' collusion

again shut it down it's a well past time and the

congressional leadership needs to take ownership here Rosenstein needs to take

ownership and get this administration this justice warming back under control

you know it's embarrassing I have to tell you it's embarrassing I think to

this nation that the Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell this Speaker of

the House Paul Ryan the judiciary itself certainly the Supreme Court has a role

here just utter its voice the ABA left-wing as it is but Wall Street

corporate America all should be standing up for this president and standing

solidly against any further exploitation politically of what has been a just a

searing two years first almost a year investigation by the FBI of this

so-called Russian collusion then another year by the Special Counsel producing

nothing it is extraordinary the conflicts the nonsense that has been

produced it is it is nothing blessed than a farce you know Lou and I'm sure

you agree you know I was pretty darn critical of President Obama we sued that

administration hundreds of times we thought he exercised powers beyond his

constitutional role it just didn't occur to me that we'd have Criminal

Investigations targeting the president every time we didn't like what he did

what that's the approach now and it's like and it's and it's completely

outside the norms in terms of the rule of law

our constitutional republic the presidents got to be able to be

president here and if you don't like him in office and you think he's abused his

power then there's a political process for removing him either through

impeachment or through elections but the Justice Department investigating its own

president over things he did with respect to managing the Justice

Department is absurd and makes her as you point out makes our government look

like a joke yeah and it is the deep state is not a joke the left in this

country is not a joke nor is the business establishment the globalist

elites because they are arrayed with the National left-wing media against one

person one man the President of the United States and he has too few people

standing with him against the the onslaught and this serious just off

injustice that all of those forces represent arrayed against the

constitutionally elected leader of this nation I want to turn to the Senate

Judiciary Committee doing it again Senator Chuck Grassley releasing over

2,000 pages of documents on Donald Trump jr. following the the the lead of Dianne

Feinstein when she was vice chair of the committee releasing transcripts in it

all do you find anything surprising or compelling

they took a beating because they thought they might be some Clinton emails they

might want to let see get a hold of and the meeting was not about that and

nothing came of it there was no illegal collusion there was no evidence of

collusion there was no evidence anything went raw went on at that meeting other

than this Russian again associated with the Clinton DNC campaign vendor fusion

GPS wanted to lobby Don Trump jr. on this sanctions issue on behalf of her

Russian overlords what does that have to do with anything I and we've spent

millions and millions of dollars investigating this one meeting and while

they're still looking at it and there's evidence of no wrongdoing or criminality

at all and in very quickly we're out of time but

Senate Intel chair Richard Burr basically is turned over the

intelligence committee to Mark Warner I made a declaration today after huddling

with spy Chiefs former spy chiefs and without any any corroboration without

any statement of reason for their their claim that Vladimir Putin preferred

Donald Trump well that's straight out of the dossier that's straight out of the

Clinton DNC dossier anyone who thinks the deep State is just running the

executive branch it's well representative in the United States

Senate yeah unfortunately and we're well represented by Judicial Watch and your

time we appreciate it I'm fit good have you with us

up next Muller says he won't indict President Trump but that hasn't stopped

him from issuing another another round of subpoenas will tell you who he's

targeted next stay with us the Russia witch-hunt should have ended long ago

but guess what Robert Muller is expanding it even as the special counsel

is admitted that he cannot and will not indict President Trump

Robert Muller has issued two grand jury subpoenas those targeting Roger stones

Chiefs social media consultant the subpoenas request that Jason Sullivan

appear before a grand jury this Friday in DC where he will have to turn over

all documents and electronically stored information joining us now to assess all

of this legal analyst Greg Jarrod Fox legal analyst and author of the

brand-new book so brand new that it will not be published for a week or two you

can still little late can still put in your pre-order the Russia hoax the

illicit scheme to clear Hillary Clinton and frame Donald Trump available for a

pre-order and we are delighted to have you here good to be here let's start

with Rudy Giuliani's a blockbuster and not to overstate it but a blockbuster a

revelation that two weeks ago Muller told the president's legal team he will

not indict the president well you know Muller has finally grasped the obvious

it's been a long-standing rule at the Department of Justice you can't indict

the sitting president and she what a revelation he's actually gonna bide by a

rule you know that that's an important statement here because he has really not

abided by lots of rules oh yeah and the conflicts that he has just simply

ignored rather than react to it it's as if Republicans recused themselves when

there's a conflict or step back from a job or a post Democrats seem to go full

full on tilt I can teach an entire semester Law

School class on Professional Responsibility and just use Robert

Muller as an example he is saturated with conflicts of interest and for a man

who has such a reputation of integrity I seriously questioned his judgment or

lack thereof if you just look at the canons of ethics the rules of

Professional Responsibility seems to have violated a myriad of them in his

determination to stay on this case where he does not belong and at this point the

president is it too early for him to breathe a sigh of relief is it too early

for the legal team to start discussing with the Special Counsel the wind down

here yeah as long as there's a special counsel I'd be apprehensive just because

you never know what a guy like Muller will do and his team of hyper partisans

who appeared to be so rapidly anti-trump that I wouldn't trust them frankly there

are a couple of things here that give me pause about Giuliani's remarks about no

indictment of Trump one Nixon was an unindicted co-conspirator and Jerry Ford

pardoned who offered up Watergate yes who and Ford pardoned Nixon peremptorily

because he knew prosecutors were going to pretty soon indict Nixon as a

defendant so you worry about that aspect of the

other is when he read the special counsel regulations it calls for Muller

to issue a report I've always believed this was muck Mulder's goal issue a

report hedges and calls into question all he

has to do is one line say there may be some evidence that Trump might have

obstructed justice in his comments of Flynn and his firing have coming that

would be enough for Democrats to glom on to it and he final four articles of

impeachment not for Democrats Adam Schiff would if he found him absolutely

pure as the driven snow yeah uh Turley innocent in all regards Adam Schiff

would be out there screaming for his head but no these are louts Schiff is a

low-life ideologue who is just you know I mean he's he's bouncing along the

bottom of the swamp he's a bottom feeder for sure he's lost

all credibility by virtue of all of his vacuous claims that have come to nothing

he's he's proven nothing and you know Schiff is shift let's turn to if we may

they Senate Judiciary Committee dropping all of these pages from the top junior

yeah I you know if we look at all of this again there's nothing here right

there is nothing and yet they you know I think as big a problem as the Special

Counsel is and the deep state that is driving the Department of Justice and

the FBI obviously and beyond that in the intelligence community the the Craven

cowardice and opportunism of the leadership of the Republican Party in

the House and the Senate and I'm talking Ryan and I'm talking McConnell I the

absence of any voice in the legal profession standing up to say come to

your senses America this has got to end now yeah the longest time I felt like

The Lone Ranger I wrote article columns saying wait a minute what's wrong with a

meeting with a Russian in the Trump Tower the First Amendment protects it

and the Federal Campaign election act specifically permits it and I would

write where in the criminal codes does this constitute a crime call collusion

it doesn't and the pages released today prove it well

one thing the FBI the CIA the intelligence community wasn't they

weren't smart enough to stop Russian intervention they weren't smart enough

to detect it or to produce any evidence that would be helpful of collusion or in

any gate engagement and so that raises another question who are these so-called

spy masters I'm talking about clapper right and Brennan and call me why bother

why bother if you're in Congress even bring them forward because their

agencies failed altogether yeah - stop that intervention and to produce any

evidence of collusion or cooperation I mean it's just disgusting on that level

alone well like Adam Schiff clapper and Brennan have zero credibility they were

the instigators of the Russia hoax I think I think Senator Mark Warner really

thinks they're neat guys yeah place Warner there's another one there you go

Gregg Jarrett good to have you here really up next Congress turning to

President Trump to put an end to the Justice Department stonewalling we take

it up with congressman Ron De Santis here next they've got an idea and it's a

dog gun good one stay with us

you

For more infomation >> LOU DOBBS: GIULIANI-MUELLER WILL not indict the PRESIDENT TRUMP - Duration: 14:53.

-------------------------------------------

Breaking news - Can the Republic Recover from Donald Trump? - Duration: 3:00.

For more infomation >> Breaking news - Can the Republic Recover from Donald Trump? - Duration: 3:00.

-------------------------------------------

CONFIRMED: John Kerry Committed Treason… Should Trump Throw Him in Jail? - Duration: 4:49.

For more infomation >> CONFIRMED: John Kerry Committed Treason… Should Trump Throw Him in Jail? - Duration: 4:49.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING: President Trump Just Made Immediate Order To Jeff Sessions…YES! - Duration: 2:03.

For more infomation >> BREAKING: President Trump Just Made Immediate Order To Jeff Sessions…YES! - Duration: 2:03.

-------------------------------------------

Trump is Gearing Up to Fulfill a HUGE - Duration: 17:43.

For more infomation >> Trump is Gearing Up to Fulfill a HUGE - Duration: 17:43.

-------------------------------------------

HAPPENING NOW: Trump Calls Out Mueller for - Duration: 10:36.

HAPPENING NOW: Trump Calls Out Mueller for His Latest DIRTY TRICK

Robert Mueller can't find any "collusion," so instead of closing the sham "Russia probe,"

he just switches gears on his own, and is now hunting for "obstruction."

Gee, that doesn't sound like a Deep State set up, does it?

The good news is, President Trump is not taking this sitting down, as a matter of fact, he's

swinging back hard and has Mueller on the ropes!

From Washington Examiner

President Trump defended himself against obstruction of justice claims, arguing that he had to

fight back against a "made up, phony crime."

"The Russia Witch Hunt is rapidly losing credibility.

House Intelligence Committee found No Collusion, Coordination or anything else with Russia.

So now the Probe says OK, what else is there?

How about Obstruction for a made up, phony crime.There is no O, it's called Fighting

Back," Trump tweeted early Monday.

The Russia Witch Hunt is rapidly losing credibility.

House Intelligence Committee found No Collusion, Coordination or anything else with Russia.

So now the Probe says OK, what else is there?

How about Obstruction for a made up, phony crime.There is no O, it's called Fighting

Back

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 7, 2018

Special counsel Robert Mueller is said to be looking into whether Trump obstructed his

investigation into Russia's meddling in the 2016 election.

Trump has long called the investigation a "witch hunt."

It's unclear whether Trump plans to sit for an interview with Mueller.

Trump's lawyers have advised him against doing so, but Trump has repeatedly said he'd

be OK being interview as long as the special counsel is fair to him.

Several Trump aides and Russian entities have already been charged in the investigation.

Trump continued to lash out at the investigation in a subsequent tweet targeting the political

affiliations of some of Mueller's investigators.

"The 13 Angry Democrats in charge of the Russian Witch Hunt are starting to find out

that there is a Court System in place that actually protects people from injustice…and

just wait 'till the Courts get to see your unrevealed Conflicts of Interest!"

The 13 Angry Democrats in charge of the Russian Witch Hunt are starting to find out that there

is a Court System in place that actually protects people from injustice…and just wait 'till

the Courts get to see your unrevealed Conflicts

of Interest!

— Donald J.

Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 7, 2018

For more infomation >> HAPPENING NOW: Trump Calls Out Mueller for - Duration: 10:36.

-------------------------------------------

How Trump and Melania Responded to - Duration: 13:42.

How Trump and Melania Responded to Royal Wedding Invite Snub is PURE CLASS

President Trump and First Lady Melania took the high road on not being invited to the

royal wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.

Instead of sending the traditional gift of a glass bowl, Trump and Melania will be making

a contribution to one of the 7 charities the royal couple has chosen.

From IJR

"President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump will be making a contribution to one

of the 7 charities the royal couple has designatedin lieu of gifts," White House deputy press

secretary Lindsay Walters shared with ABC reporter Meridith McGraw.

Traditionally, U.S. presidents have given members of the U.K.'s royal family bowls

as wedding presents, sparking rumors that the Trumps might send another gift in addition

to their charitable donation.

In fact, former President Ronald Reagan and former first lady Nancy Reagan gave Princess

Diana and Prince Charles a glass bowl for their wedding in 1981.

Meanwhile, former President Harry Truman gifted Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip a bowl

on their 1947 wedding day.

Although rumors had been swirling that former President Barack Obama and former first lady

Michelle Obama may get the royal inviteto Prince Harry's nuptials due to their recent

bonding, the prince and his bride decided against inviting political leaders.

"It has been decided that an official list of political leaders — both U.K. and international

— is not required for Prince Harry and Ms. Markle's wedding," Kensington Palace said

in a statement.

"Her Majesty's Government was consulted on this decision, which was taken by The Royal

Household."

"They are not commenting on individual guests being invited or not, but President and Mrs.

Obama will not be attending the wedding," a palace source added.

"But the couples look forward to seeing each other soon."

For more infomation >> How Trump and Melania Responded to - Duration: 13:42.

-------------------------------------------

Donald Trump nicht eingeladen: Das schenkt er Meghan & Harry - Duration: 2:38.

For more infomation >> Donald Trump nicht eingeladen: Das schenkt er Meghan & Harry - Duration: 2:38.

-------------------------------------------

Trump puts pressure on DOJ, FBI to release documents amid spying claims - Duration: 4:40.

For more infomation >> Trump puts pressure on DOJ, FBI to release documents amid spying claims - Duration: 4:40.

-------------------------------------------

BOMBSHELL: Comey Had SECRET PROGRAM To Spy On Trump – They Found EVERYTHING! - Duration: 6:21.

BOMBSHELL: Comey Had SECRET PROGRAM To Spy On Trump – They Found EVERYTHING!

After seeing a comprehensive report on the origins of the Russian investigation which

confirmed that a government informant met with Trump campaign advisors multiple times

President Donald Trump questioned if the Obama's FBI actually spied on his campaign back in

2016.

And the answer appears to be yes.

In an interview for "Fox & Friends" the head of the President's legal team, Rudy

Giuliani stated that if this is indeed true and Trump's campaign was indeed spied on

by the FBI then former FBI Director James Comey should be prosecuted to the fullest

extent of the law.

Guiliani's statements came on the one-year anniversary of the Special Counsel Robert

Mueller's Democrat-led the investigation which picked up right where the FBI left off.

The New York Times who was out to give an accounting Thursday of the original investigation

confirmed in the middle of their report that at least one government informant met several

times with Mr. Carter Page and George Papadopoulos.

Both of which were former Trump campaign advisers.

The NY Times report went on to detail how the probe, which was originally called "Crossfire

Hurricane" got started.

It also goes on to confirm that all this began during the final days of the FBI's investigation

into Hillary Clinton's private email server fiasco and that Comey's FBI used a secret

program to circumvent judicial approval in order to spy on the president.

Here is more on the program Comey used to spy on Candidate Trump via The Daily Wire:

"A report released by The New York Times on Wednesday revealed that the FBI, under

Director James Comey's leadership, used a secret program that does not require the

approval of a judge to gather phone records and "other documents" on Donald Trump's

presidential campaign.

The report also revealed that a government informant met several times with Trump campaign

officials, which validates a March 8, 2018 report from The Washington Post.

The New York Times reports:

The F.B.I. obtained phone records and other documents using national security letters

— a secret type of subpoena — officials said.

And at least one government informant met several times with Mr. Page and Mr. Papadopoulos,

current and former officials said.

That has become a politically contentious point, with Mr. Trump's allies questioning

whether the F.B.I. was spying on the Trump campaign or trying to entrap campaign officials.

National security letters (NSL) are secret orders that the FBI uses on a regular basis

to obtain sensitive electronic data and phone records.

The Intercept reports:

They are controversial in part because they carry the force of law but are created entirely

outside the judicial system: To issue one, an FBI official just needs to attest that

the information sought is relevant to a national security investigation.

The letters have also been criticized because they are shrouded in secrecy.

Companies that receive them are for the most part forbidden from notifying their customers

or the public.

The government has fought to keep even basic rules governing them secret.

Companies that receive NSLs might not be legally required to hand over the information demanded

by the FBI.

The Intercept continues: The FBI's internal guidelines suggest that

the bureau uses the letters to demand sensitive information on email transactions — even

though the Justice Department has specifically advised the FBI that it does not have the

authority to use the letters this way.

The documents also indicate that the FBI can use national security letters to surveil a

"community of interest" by obtaining information from a business about a customer and every

person that customer has contacted.

This is a controversial practice that the bureau once halted amid scrutiny.

But the documents reveal that a secretive unit that mines phone records can still initiate

such requests.

The most recent document on national security letter policy was made public on January 31,

2017, by The Intercept and reveals which FBI officials have the authority to sign NSLs.

The Director has delegated the authority to sign NSLs and to certify the nondisclosure

requirement to the following FBI officials:

Deputy Director Executive Assistant Director

Assistant EAD for the National Security Branch Assistant Directors and all DADs for CT, CI,

CyD, and the Weapons of Mass Destruction Directorate General Counsel

Deputy General Counsel for the National Security Law Branch

Assistant Directors in Charge in NY, LA, and D.C.

All Special Agents in Charge (SAC) The Electronic Communications Privacy Act

lists four types of information that the FBI is allowed to obtain using NSLs, as noted

by The Intercept:

Name of the owner of an account How long that person has owned it

The person's address Toll billing records, which reveal phone numbers

that are called and include the date, time, and length of each call

The Intercept further noted that lawyers with the Justice Department specifically stated

in 2008 that the FBI did not have the legal authority to demand that tech companies hand

over records beyond the four types listed, but "FBI agents may have expected that other

companies, especially small ones, would be too ignorant or weak to fight back."

This all came together as Fox News had previously reported that back in August 2017 at a Senate

testimony from Glenn Simpson who owns Fusion GPS had thought up the dossier.

At that time Simpson testified that former British spy and dossier author Christopher

Steele had confirmed to him that the FBI had intelligence from an "internal Trump campaign

source."

But it's not clear if the person Simpson referred to was the same person which has

been confirmed by the New York Times.

For more infomation >> BOMBSHELL: Comey Had SECRET PROGRAM To Spy On Trump – They Found EVERYTHING! - Duration: 6:21.

-------------------------------------------

Bill Gates' Account of His Meetings With Trump Is Hilarious - Duration: 1:54.

For more infomation >> Bill Gates' Account of His Meetings With Trump Is Hilarious - Duration: 1:54.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING: President Trump Just Sent BRUTAL Message To Kim Jong Un… LOOK WHAT HE SAID! - Duration: 2:38.

BREAKING: President Trump Just Sent BRUTAL Message To Kim Jong Un…

LOOK WHAT HE SAID!

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump laid out a stark choice for North Korea's Kim

Jong Un ahead of their planned summit next month: Abandon nuclear weapons and be rewarded

with "protections," or risk being overthrown and possible death if the arsenal remains,

Fox News reports.

Trump maintained the scheduled June 12 meeting in Singapore is on track, despite the North's

threat Wednesday to cancel over concerns about the U.S. push to see the complete denuclearization

of the Korean Peninsula.

"Failure to make a deal could have grave consequences.

The Libyan model isn't the model we have at all.

In Libya we decimated that country.There was no deal to keep Gadhafi.

I'm Willing to do a lot to provide security guarantees to Kim.

The best thing he could do is make a deal."

It was North Korea that brought up Libya and the overthrow of Moammar Gadhafi in 2011.

North Korea stated they need their nuclear program to ensure security against those who

would want to overthrow Kim Jong Un's Regime.North Korea also canceled a high-level summit with

South Korea and is threatening to cancel its meeting with the United States over American

military drills with South Korea.

"This exercise targeting us, which is being carried out across South Korea, is a flagrant

challenge to the Panmunjom Declaration and an intentional military provocation running

counter to the positive political development on the Korean Peninsula," KCNA said, according

to Yonhap News.

"The United States will also have to undertake careful deliberations about the fate of the

planned North Korea-U.S. summit in light of this provocative military ruckus jointly conducted

with the South Korean authorities."

RWT Intel report

The U.S. intends to maintain military pressure on North Korea to ensure America engages the

Kim Jong-un regime from a "position of strength" to achieve significant steps towards the denuclearization

of the Korean Peninsula, a top Pentagon official indicated on Tuesday.

RWT News

President Trump also called out China for influencing North Korea's thinking regarding

the summit meeting, pointing to Kim's visit to China immediately before Secretary of State

Mike Pompeo visited Pyongyang last week to finalize the summit date and location.