Sunday, May 6, 2018

Trump news on Youtube May 7 2018

as the world awaits the historic meeting between President Trump and North

Korea's Kim jong-un president Trump's self-imposed deadline to decide whether

to stay in the Iran nuclear deal is also fast approaching joining me here in

Washington the chair of the House Armed Services Committee congressman Mac

Thornberry mr. chairman welcome back to Fox News Sunday thanks for having me

here was President Trump this week talking very positively about what seems

like an almost certain summit with North Korea's Kim I think you're going to see

very good things the trip is being scheduled we now have a date and we have

a location we'll be announcing a trip you have expressed serious reservations

about the possibility of this summit how concerned are you that the North Koreans

may be trying to play Donald Trump the way they have played previous US

presidents I think the history of these negotiations through several

administrations shows that they try to manipulate world opinion for their

benefit and it may also be that they have conducted enough nuclear tests

enough missile tests that they're pretty confident with what they're with their

capabilities but at the same time because of sanctions because of Chinese

pressure because of the president's rather unconventional rhetoric they may

feel a need to have a PR offensive and and I have no doubt their hope is to

divide us from our allies in South Korea to ease some of the sanctions to ease

the pressure coming from China so that they are not so isolated in the world

it's it's so there's a military aspect and then there's a world opinion aspect

of what's going on here so when there's talk about complete denuclearization and

according to the trunk camp we had john bolton on last sunday

that would mean shipping all of the of the nuclear bombs out all of the fuel

all of the missiles you don't think they're going to do that i'm very

skeptical what it also means is inspections to make sure they do not

restart a a program so i think you can hope for the best

but we have to prepare for the worst and that means of beefing up our ability to

defend against missile attack modernizing our own nuclear deterrent

increasing our defense for ships and other military capabilities in that

region so we have to go into this clear-eyed but also understand this

other battlefield of world public opinion which is one of the things the

president has his eye on the New York Times reports that the president has

asked the Pentagon for options on not eliminating but reducing the 28 thousand

troops who are now in US troops that are now in South Korea while the u.s. denies

that that is part of any negotiation now as part of a summit if you were to get a

peace deal between the two Koreas wouldn't a reduction in troops naturally

follow at the end of the day maybe and the president may be dangling a carrot

out there to try to entice the North Koreans I think the the wisest thing

I've ever heard though on this topic came from former senator Phil Gramm

where he said if the lion and the lamb are to lie down together we have to make

sure that America is the lion so maybe everything will history is is wrong that

maybe everything will come together they will voluntarily permanently verifiably

give up their whole nuclear program I'm a skeptic if that happens we can talk

about troop reductions but in the meantime we have to be militarily strong

I want to switch to another very hot topic the president has a deadline next

Saturday as to whether or not to reimpose economic sanctions on Iran and

pull out of the nuclear deal Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu and you

defense secretary Jim mattis had very different takes this week on the merits

of the deal take a look the Iran deal the nuclear deal is based on lies it's

based on Iranian lies an Iranian deception heat is written almost with an

assumption that Iran would try to cheat so the verification what what is in

there is is actually pretty robust should president Trump pull out of the

Iran nuclear deal next Saturday by next Saturday

even if the Europeans decide to stay in it and continued to do business with

Tehran I would counsel against it I was opposed to the Iran deal I thought it

was a bad deal Iran got most of the benefit up front with relief of

sanctions and a plane load of cash that President Obama sent over there so we

lost a lot of our leverage but the key question is okay now we are where we are

what happens next if the u.s. pulls out do the secretary mattis talked about the

inspectors that are in there does Iran kick those inspectors out so that we

lose what visibility we have there the Europeans are not going to reimpose

sanctions so where does that leave us and and Iran so I'm not necessarily

opposed to sticking with this deal forever but you need to have a clear

idea about next steps if we are going to pull out and and especially given the

larger context of Iran's aggressive activity in the Middle East well so

let's pick up on that because the French and the Germans and the British are all

basically pleading with President Trump stay in the Iran deal and we will add

some toughening side agreements that will agree on unilaterally without going

to the Iranians and these side agreements would be to limit Iran's

ballistic missile program sanction regional aggression and n the 2025

sunset clause when Iran can start resuming some of its program I guess the

question is is the Iran deal fixable and if so should the president stay in

it if he can get these add-ons with his European allies well I think these

add-ons would be very important is it possible it's hard to say until you try

so maybe the best thing is for the president to delay a bit more his

deadline of this month and put the French and the British up to the test

about whether it is possible to get this other sort of agreement I think one of

the key things going on here and and Prime Minister Netanyahu is exactly

right the Iranians always cheat and lie one of the other things they're doing is

they are shipping in arms to Hezbollah right on Israel's doorstep and and the

the temperature is being turned up there the possibility of conflict is probably

greater than it's been in quite some time and it will be very important for

the international community to be united to prevent that conflict which is

another reason staying with our allies and trying to curtail all of these

aggressive actions from Iran is important right now all right I got two

minutes left I want to get into one last issue with you a delegation of top US

officials has just returned from trade talks in Beijing and the Chinese at the

end of the talks said that quote big differences remain how concern to you

about a possible trade war with China I Balat of countries are very concerned

about Chinese trade practices and working with them I think we have the

best chance of pushing back against a lot of what China is doing one example

in the defense world is China is stealing and obtaining through all sorts

of ways critical intellectual property that they are going to use for their

defence purposes we have to close the door on that what I worry about is that

the steel and aluminum tariffs have alienated some of our friends that we

need to work with to push back against the Chinese trade tactics so again we've

to be more effective we've got to have allies and we need to not alienate

allies in order to push back on so briefly I want to pick

up on that because the president is talking about imposing tariffs not just

on China but other countries around the world including the European Union how

how concerned to you about the fact that the president has apparently decided to

use tariffs in general as part of this trade policy well I believe that we are

better off with free and fair trade I also have seen firsthand what China is

doing around the world I was in East Africa not long ago as they are

extending their tentacles out to all sorts of places we have to have a group

of allies working together to push back against what China is doing and and so

that comes from having folks on the same page not alienating our friends I hope

the president follows through in in his statement that he would like to consider

getting back into the trans-pacific partnership because those sorts of trade

agreements are the most effective way we can push back Trevin Thornbury thank you

thanks for joining with us always good to talk with you sir thank you sure

For more infomation >> Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace: Thornberry on Trump's efforts to curb nuclear proliferation - Duration: 10:10.

-------------------------------------------

AWESOME! Trump Tweeted The Best Cinco De Mayo Photo Of Himself And Sent Every Liberal Into Cardiac A - Duration: 6:04.

AWESOME! Trump Tweeted The Best Cinco De Mayo Photo Of Himself And Sent Every Liberal Into

Cardiac Arrest.

President Trump marked Cinco de Mayo on Saturday by hailing "the significant contributions

of Mexican Americans to the United States."

"Today, we honor the heritage of our neighbors to the south, and we celebrate the significant

contributions of Mexican Americans to the United States," Trump said in a statement.

The statement also went on to recount the Battle of Puebla, the 1862 confrontation between

the Mexican Army and the French Empire that Cinco De Mayo memorializes.

"Though they were outnumbered and facing one of the strongest militaries in the world,

the determined Mexican soldiers overcame the French force and proved their place in history

as valiant defenders of Mexico's liberty and right to self-government," Trump said.

"Melania joins me in sending our best wishes for an enjoyable day.

Feliz Cinco de Mayo!"

The statement echoed Trump's comments last year when he said that the U.S. honored "the

Mexican-Americans whose fighting spirit and patriotism have been influential in shaping

the character of our great Nation."

But today for Cinco de Mayo Donald Trump Jr. decided to start the day off by ruffling a

few liberal feathers by calling attention to the second anniversary of his favorite

tweet his father has ever sent.

Liberals continue to tout that President Trump has a controversial record on Mexico and people

of Mexican heritage.

They whine that he launched his presidential campaign in 2016 by accusing Mexico of "sending

people that have lots of problems" to the U.S. and has repeatedly vowed to build a border

wall between the two nations, not unlike the one Mexico has on its southern border.

But they conveniently always forget to mention that the statistics actually back up his claims

and even Mexico has a tough immigration policy.

One where if you are caught illegally in that nation you are subject to a mandatory two-year

prison term before you actually even get deported to whatever nation you snuck in from.

But the U.S. is never afforded that luxury, for who knows what reason."Mexican President

Felipe Calderon denounced as "racial discrimination" an Arizona law giving state and local police

the authority to arrest suspected illegal immigrants and vowed to use all means at his

disposal to defend Mexican nationals against a law he called a "violation of human rights."

But the legislation, signed April 23 by Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer, is similar to Reglamento

de la Ley General de Poblacion — the General Law on Population enacted in Mexico in April

2000, which mandates that federal, local and municipal police cooperate with federal immigration

authorities in that country in the arrests of illegal immigrants.

Under the Mexican law, illegal immigration is a felony, punishable by up to two years

in prison.

Immigrants who are deported and attempt to re-enter can be imprisoned for 10 years.

Visa violators can be sentenced to six-year terms.

Mexicans who help illegal immigrants are considered criminals.

The law also says Mexico can deport foreigners who are deemed detrimental to "economic

or national interests," violate Mexican law, are not "physically or mentally healthy"

or lack the "necessary funds for their sustenance" and for their dependents.

"This sounds like the kind of law that a rational nation would have to protect itself

against illegal immigrants — that would stop and punish the very people who are violating

the law," said Rep. Steve King of Iowa, ranking Republican on the House Judiciary

subcommittee on immigration, citizenship, refugees, border security and international

law.

"Why would Mr. Calderon have any objections to an Arizona law that is less draconian than

his own, one he has pledged to enforce?"

Mr. King said.

Sen. Jon Kyl of Arizona, the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary subcommittee on terrorism

and homeland security, described Mr. Calderon's comments as "hypocritical to say the least."

"I would have expected more from Mr. Calderon," said Mr. Kyl, who serves as the Senate minority

whip.

"We are spending millions of dollars to help Mexico fight the drug cartels that pose

a threat to his government, and he doesn't seem to recognize our concerns.

He ought to be apologizing to us instead of condemning us."

Mr. Kyl, along with fellow Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain, has introduced a 10-point

comprehensive border security plan to combat illegal immigration, drug and human smuggling,

and violent crime along the southwestern border.

It includes the deployment of National Guard troops, an increase in U.S. Border Patrol

agents and 700 miles of fencing, along with other equipment and funding upgrades.

He said skyrocketing violence on the border, including the recent killing of an Arizona

rancher by an illegal immigrant he had gone to assist, has not gone unnoticed by the public,

adding that until the federal government provides the necessary funding and manpower to adequately

secure the southwestern border, Arizona will not long remain the only state to pass legislation

to do it on its own.

Rep. Ted Poe, Texas Republican and a member of the House Judiciary and Foreign Affairs

committees, described Mr. Calderon's criticism as "arrogant and hypocritical."

He said Mexico's immigration laws are "even tougher than those in the United States"

and it was inappropriate to denounce the Arizona law when "Mexico does the very same thing."

"Mexico wants people to come to the United States and to send their money home," he

said.

"They want to make their problems our problems — that's their foreign policy.

President Calderon should spend more time focusing on problems in his own country instead

of criticizing Arizona for doing what Mexican law requires its own to do."

what do you think about this?

Please Share this news and Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe

USA facts today.

For more infomation >> AWESOME! Trump Tweeted The Best Cinco De Mayo Photo Of Himself And Sent Every Liberal Into Cardiac A - Duration: 6:04.

-------------------------------------------

WATCH: Tim Allen Goes On Jimmy Kimmel, Sends Anti-Trump Hollywood Elites A Message They Can't Ignore - Duration: 4:45.

WATCH: Tim Allen Goes On Jimmy Kimmel, Sends Anti-Trump Hollywood Elites A Message They

Can't Ignore

Tim Allen is one of the few well-known conservatives and Republicans in Hollywood.

Ordinarily, they are shunned and refused work because of how liberal the rest of the entertainment

industry is.

The alienation of Allen worsened when he expressed his support for President Trump.

But his support for the President was never more clear than when he appeared on Jimmy

Kimmel's late-night talk show.

Deadline.com reported,

"Tim Allen stopped by Jimmy Kimmel Live! on Friday night, where he shared his experience

about going to Donald Trump's inauguration and how being a conservative in Hollywood

is like living in 1930s Germany.

I was invited, we did a VIP thing for the vets, and went to a veterans ball, so I went

to go see Democrats and Republicans," the Last Man Standing actor said.

"Yeah I went to the inauguration."

"I'm not attacking you," laughed Jimmy Kimmel, after Allen turned defensive.

"You've gotta be real careful around here," Allen replied.

"You get beat up if don't believe what everybody believes.

This is like '30s Germany.

I don't know what happened.

If you're not part of the group, 'You know what we believe is right,' I go, 'Well,

I might have a problem with that.'

I'm a comedian, I like going on both sides."

Allen, who's previously spoken out about Hollywood being "hypocritical," told Megyn

Kelly on Fox News last year that he finds it "odd" that Hollywood didn't like

Trump because he was a bully.

"But if you had any kind of inkling that you were for Trump, you got bullied," he

explained.

During his interview with Kimmel, Allen also discussed how people should be paranoid about

our privacy being compromised by the government and other major companies.

"If a government drove by with a gray sedan with a camera on it, you'd be rioting and

going to Washington," he explained.

"But if it's white, with emojis and Google on it, 'Yay,' you're waving at it.

They're taking pictures of your house!""

Allen is most known for his old show Home Improvement and his more recent show that

he starred in Last Man Standing.

A great show, that got amazing reviews, yet was pulled from the network.

Something Allen attributes to his conservative-leaning character.

A Los Angeles Times article event reported that there are 2,500 of his entertainment

colleagues who joined a secret group for entertainers who are conservative because of the fear that

if they are open about it they will be ostracized from the industry.

The Washington Post reported,

"In 30 years of show business, I've never seen it like this," an unnamed actor told

the outlet.

"If you are even lukewarm to Republicans, you are excommunicated from the church of

tolerance."

Since it premiered several years ago, Allen's show has been hailed as a rare counterexample

to Hollywood politics.

"Finally, we have a hero who hunts, fishes, watches sports, and occasionally drives a

tank," the Imaginative Conservative wrote.

But Allen himself has complained of network censorship when his protagonist, an alpha-male

family man whom the actor has called 'an educated Archie Bunker,' tries to go after

liberal icons.

Allen "admits he has gotten more than one warning to stop calling President Obama a

'communist,'" the TV Page reported in 2015.

Allen didn't sound so dire during the Republican primaries, when the Hollywood Reporter asked

whether he vented his own political views through his character.

"It's getting more and more comfortable," he said.

"These guys know me so well that they're writing stuff that is exactly what I would've

said.

It's a marvelous thing when you have lib­eral people writing for [a show like this]."

And he sounded lukewarm about the prospect of a Trump presidency.

"Forget the stupid s— he says about immigrants," Allen said.

"That's just ignorant.

But he might be able to do the stuff that really needs fixing."

After the election, on Fox News, Allen compared Trump to an amateur performer with "very

bad comic timing."

"I don't want to defend the guy," he said.

The industry has become more toxic to conservatives since Trump took office, the Los Angeles Times

reported.

Workers complained of political shouting matches on set and the professional shunning of those

known to hold right-leaning views — although some had enough celebrity to speak out safely."

Tim Allen is a comedic genius who has found success in the entertainment industry for

over 30 years.

He has been able to carve out a spot for himself as a high profile, high profiting, and well

known conservative actor.

Something that almost none of his other counterparts have been able to do.

Which is exactly why he has found success, especially with Last Man Standing.

It was something that spoke to real people, middle-class Americans.

And it is this messaging that won Republicans power in the general elections as well as

the midterm elections.

For more infomation >> WATCH: Tim Allen Goes On Jimmy Kimmel, Sends Anti-Trump Hollywood Elites A Message They Can't Ignore - Duration: 4:45.

-------------------------------------------

SDA Ecumenical Unity. National Day of Prayer. Trump Empowered Evangelicals to Legislate Morality - Duration: 1:52:41.

For more infomation >> SDA Ecumenical Unity. National Day of Prayer. Trump Empowered Evangelicals to Legislate Morality - Duration: 1:52:41.

-------------------------------------------

62% OF AMERICANS WANT PRESIDENT TRUMP TO ELIMINATE WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS – DO YOU AGREE - Duration: 13:25.

62% OF AMERICANS WANT PRESIDENT TRUMP TO ELIMINATE WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS – DO YOU AGREE?

According to the polls, the American people are actually far more aligned with President

Trump's policies and ideologies than the leftist mainstream media likes to portray

on television.

As reported by Breitbart, in a new Rasmussen poll, 62 percent of likely voters said they

support barring new immigrants to the US from receiving welfare benefits for at least five

years, which is a policy that Trump mentioned in a recent speech.

Most likely to support the ban are middle-class Americans making $30,000 to $50,000, with

72 percent in favor.

Even those who describe themselves as "moderates" support it at a rate of 61 percent.

This poll indicates that Americans don't want just any immigration, but those that

are capable and willing to work without receiving government handouts aka OUR tax dollars.

Questions about illegal immigration were also asked for the poll, and the results are definitive.

Would you support this too.

Please comment your opinion below

For more infomation >> 62% OF AMERICANS WANT PRESIDENT TRUMP TO ELIMINATE WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS – DO YOU AGREE - Duration: 13:25.

-------------------------------------------

Report McCain Insiders Planning Trump Snub for Eventual Funeral - Duration: 13:49.

Report McCain Insiders Planning Trump Snub for Eventual Funeral

John McCain has been one of the strongest critics of Donald Trump on the Republican

side of the aisle … and it looks like that animosity will be going with him all the way

to the grave.

The 81-year-old senator's time is limited, and he knows it.

McCain was diagnosed with aggressive brain cancer last year, and although he has continued

to fight it and stay active as a lawmaker, he acknowledges that the battle is not one

that he can actually win.

It seems he isn't letting bygones be bygones, either, at least when it comes to President

Trump.

According to The New York Times, the Arizona senator and his staff have already begun planning

for his funeral, and inviting the president is not on the agenda..

"His intimates have informed the White House that their current plan for his funeral is

for Vice President Mike Pence to attend the service to be held in Washington's National

Cathedral but not President Trump, with whom Mr. McCain has had a rocky relationship,"

reported the newspaper.

That service, when it comes, will no doubt be a major affair with VIP attendance and

national news coverage.

McCain and Trump may have such a bad relationship that the commander in chief isn't invited

to the funeral, but the senator is keeping close contact with a few other big names.

Former Vice President Joe Biden — a Democrat — is one of them.

According to The Times, he's been spending hours at the McCain residence in Arizona,

which apparently included a bit of veiled Trump bashing.

"Here John knows he's in a very, very, very precarious situation, and yet he's

still concerned about the state of the country," Biden told The Times.

"We talked about how our international reputation is being damaged and we talked about the need

for people to stand up and speak out."

Barack Obama's running mate didn't say Trump's name, but he was clearly implying

that the current president was bad for the direction of the country.

Another liberal, Senator Joe Lieberman, has also been chummy with McCain during the last

few months.

In fact, McCain admitted in his upcoming book "The Restless Wave" that he largely blames

his 2008 presidential loss on not choosing Lieberman as his running mate.

"He also recalls how his campaign advisers argued that picking Lieberman as his running

mate would divide the Republican Party, because of his political affiliations," explained

The Hill.

"It was sound advice that I could reason for myself," McCain wrote.

"But my gut told me to ignore it

Lieberman, a moderate liberal, was the running mate of Al Gore in the 2000 race.

Had McCain picked him, the Connecticut senator would have been the vice presidential pick

for Democrats one year and Republicans less than a decade later.

In a way, John McCain's insistence on clinging to moderate liberalism, exemplified by Lieberman

and Biden, perfectly illustrates the problem with his political career.

Nobody disputes that McCain is a fighter, but he always seemed to be somewhat confused

about which side he was fighting for.

Take the sweepingly unpopular Obamacare measure, for instance.

After repeatedly promising his constituents and the American people that he would do whatever

it took to repeal and replace the legislation, McCain had a chance to finally keep his word

last year — and caved.

Whom a man invites to his own funeral is, of course, his business, and a somber service

without the inevitable distractions of a Trump appearance is not the worst idea in the world.

If that decision is meant as a personal snub against the president, however, it strikes

of pettiness from a politician who twice failed to reach the Oval Office.

Continuing to play politics even while looking at the sunset of life is rather bittersweet.

Hopefully, John McCain will be able to let regrets and squabbles fade away, and face

his final months with tranquility.

What do you think?

Scroll down to comment below!

For more infomation >> Report McCain Insiders Planning Trump Snub for Eventual Funeral - Duration: 13:49.

-------------------------------------------

Giuliani: Trump Could Plead Fifth In Mueller Probe - Duration: 1:35.

For more infomation >> Giuliani: Trump Could Plead Fifth In Mueller Probe - Duration: 1:35.

-------------------------------------------

Federal Judge Drops Crushing Anvil On Mueller Investigation, Delivers Trump Victory - Duration: 5:46.

For more infomation >> Federal Judge Drops Crushing Anvil On Mueller Investigation, Delivers Trump Victory - Duration: 5:46.

-------------------------------------------

BAD MOVE! 8 Huge Retailers Just Turned On Trump, Will Now Never Be The Same – Backlash Has Begun! - Duration: 4:21.

For more infomation >> BAD MOVE! 8 Huge Retailers Just Turned On Trump, Will Now Never Be The Same – Backlash Has Begun! - Duration: 4:21.

-------------------------------------------

After Michelle Says Stupid Women Elected Trump, Melania Gives Her Nasty Surprise - Duration: 4:59.

After Michelle Says Stupid Women Elected Trump, Melania Gives Her Nasty Surprise.

Michelle Obama offended half the country as she spoke out at the Women's Summit in Los

Angeles on Saturday.

The former first lady said stupid women voted for Donald Trump "when the best candidate

was clearly a woman."

Thankfully, First Lady Melania Trump acted just in time to give her a nasty surprise.

Michelle Obama has been raking in the cash as she goes around the country speaking at

liberal events.

Yesterday, she was in Los Angeles at the Women's Summit, some leftist convention where host

Tracee Ellis Ross sat down with the former first lady to have a "conversation."

One question Ross asked Michelle was how do we make sure that young girls grow up to think

"beyond gender", and "to dream beyond limitations" with how our society is today?

Michelle mused for a minute and decided this would be the Trump bashing portion of the

presentation.

Michelle Obama said, "Sorry, in light of this last election, I'm concerned about

us as women and how we think.

And what is really going on.

What is going on in our heads where we let that happen, you know?"

She continued, "When the most qualified person running was a woman, and look what

we did instead, I mean that says something about where we are.

Forget everybody else.

That's what we have to explore, because if we as women are still suspicious of one

another, if we still have this crazy, crazy bar for each other that we don't have for

men."

Michelle finished with, "If we are still doing that today.

If we're not comfortable with the notion that a woman could be our president compared

to what, then we have to have those conversations with ourselves as women."

Hilarious, isn't she?

According to Michelle, "how did we [women] let that happen" translates into any women

who voted for Trump was stupid.

Well, Michelle wasn't in charge of the women who voted for Trump, thank God, and she didn't

"let anything happen."

She's not that powerful.

Actor James Woods thought so too, tweeting to Ms. Obama, "You didn't let anything

happen.

The citizens of the United States, through the power of the Constitution, duly elected

a President of their choice.

May come as a shock to you, madam, but the People speak in America.

We don't do what you let us do."

Female Trump supporters agreed, with Twitter user Carole posting, "Dear MichelleObama

Here's OUR FOREVER FIRST LADY."

In fact, Michelle Obama's comment, bashing women who voted for Trump as stupid, might

be her reality, but it's not accurate at all.

It's not what really happened.

Smart women weren't duped to vote for a gender.

We did our homework and learned Hillary Clinton wasn't on our side as women, she was an

opportunist who used her political position to commit crimes.

The former first lady's timing was perfect in bashing women who voted for Trump.

Our first lady will be front and center in the Rose Garden on Monday as she expands her

role.

This flies in the face of Michelle Obama's recent comments and makes her look like a

fool.

CNN reports, "Melania Trump will announce her eagerly awaited formal platform Monday

during a Rose Garden event, nearly 16 months into her tenure as first lady.

While Trump has since September of last year said she plans to focus her efforts on the

well-being of children, she had yet to define what exactly that means, instead delving into

a broad range of topics under a wide umbrella of issues."

They add, "That changes with a planned Rose Garden announcement, her first speech from

that historic location on the West Wing side of the White House, feet from the Oval Office."

Former First Lady Michelle Obama did not announce her "Let's Move" campaign until February

2010, 11 months into her tenure in the position, according to CNN.

So for all the naysayers who constantly complain Melania isn't "doing anything," maybe

it's time they laid off the first lady.

In fact, Melania had been more of a traditional first lady, which makes the leftist go nuts.

They were silent after she pulled off the first White House State Dinner without an

event planner, doing something no recent first lady has ever done.

It all comes down to your values.

This host at the Women's Summit said to Michelle, "A girl who just dreams about

her wedding is a sad thing we need to change."

Ms. Obama agreed.

To those at that Women's Summit, a young girl wanting a family and being a stay at

home mom is obscene.

That is why we love Melania Trump.

She has been a successful businesswoman in her own right, but she chose to be "just

a mom," after she had her son Barron.

Raising a family is probably the most important job in the world, and traditional values should

never go out of style.

What do you think about this?

Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe

USA facts today.

For more infomation >> After Michelle Says Stupid Women Elected Trump, Melania Gives Her Nasty Surprise - Duration: 4:59.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING: John Kerry Just Caught Going Behind Trump's Back To Make Secret Deal With Iran - Duration: 6:27.

BREAKING: John Kerry Just Caught Going Behind Trump's Back To Make Secret Deal With Iran

Former President Obama's Secretary of State, John Kerry and a group of his former State

Department officials, have been unofficially busy being unofficial diplomats in recent

weeks.

While the duly elected current President Donald Trump prepares to pull the plug on the infamous

Iran deal, Kerry has been lurking and clandestinely sneaking around the world trying to salvage

his pet project just ahead of its May 12 renewal deadline.

The Boston Globe reports –

"John Kerry's bid to save one of his most significant accomplishments as secretary of

state took him to New York on a Sunday afternoon two weeks ago, where, more than a year after

he left office, he engaged in some unusual shadow diplomacy with a top-ranking Iranian

official.

He sat down at the United Nations with Foreign Minister Javad Zarif to discuss ways of preserving

the pact limiting Iran's nuclear weapons program.

It was the second time in about two months that the two had met to strategize over salvaging

a deal they spent years negotiating during the Obama administration, according to a person

briefed on the meetings."

While on his clandestine unofficially official diplomatic venture Kerry has met with world

leaders from Europe including German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier, EU official Federica

Mogherini and French President Emmanuel Macron in both Paris and New York, where they discussed

sanctions and regional nuclear threats in both French and English.

This type of "rogue" diplomacy is very rare for a former Secretary of State and many

may even consider it to be considered "espionage" or even "treason."

Kerry is reportedly actively working with world leaders and foreign governments to undermine

American foreign policy and try to salvage the Iran deal.

Apparently losing is hard.

As The Globe notes, the effort to salvage the Iran deal "highlight the stakes for

Kerry personally, as well as for other Obama-era diplomats who are dismayed by what they see

as Trump's disruptive approach to diplomacy, and who view the Iran nuclear deal as a factor

for stability in the Middle East and for global nuclear nonproliferation."

Foreign policy expert Michael O'Hanlon of the Brookings Institution states – "It

is unusual for a former secretary of state to engage in foreign policy like this, as

an actual diplomat and quasi-negotiator.

Of course, former secretaries of state often remain quite engaged with foreign leaders,

as they should, but it's rarely so issue-specific, especially when they have just left office."

In fact, Kerry is conducting his meetings "below the radar" because he recognizes

that they would "provoke Trump."

Another concerning aspect of the story are the parallels to the actions of former national

security adviser Michael Flynn, who was accused of violating the Logan Act by talking to foreign

officials prior to President Trump taking office.

Kerry is clearly significantly more out of bounds, in that he is functioning in the capacity

of a private citizen, and not that of a member of the transition team for an incoming president.

Yet If you believe that the Logan Act was legitimately used as a means to question Michael

Flynn, then how are you NOT demanding the same DOJ/FBI investigation against John Kerry?

There should be equal application of the law.

Fox News reports –

"Kerry's reported actions immediately sparked criticism and raised claims that such

dealings with Iranian and European officials could violate the Logan Act — which prohibits

private citizens from negotiating on behalf of the U.S. government without authorization

While no one has ever been successfully prosecuted under the law, the Logan Act was raised last

year over former national security adviser Michael Flynn's negotiations at the United

Nations over a resolution with Israel during the Trump transition.

"John Kerry helped craft a flaccid deal that granted the terror regime in Tehran vast

monetary and geopolitical concessions, even as it put them on the glide path to nuclear

weapons by its own terms," Sohrab Ahmari, senior writer at Commentary magazine, told

Fox News.

"The biggest public service he can render now is to go away."

Florida Sen. Marco Rubio said Kerry's move "certainly raises Logan Act questions.'"

Zero Hedge reports –

Meanwhile, Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has accused Iran of developing a

secret project to "test and build nuclear weapons" before the 2015 Iran deal was reached.

In a global televised address, Netanyahu unveiled a cache of 55,000 pages of documents and 183

CDs, comprising Iran's alleged "atomic archive" of documents on its nuclear program;

the files allegedly prove Tehran ran a secret program, called Project Amad, to "test and

build nuclear weapons."

While Iranian leaders have long said their nuclear program is only for peaceful purposes,

Netanyahu claimed this was not the case according to tens of thousands of pages of documents,

which he said were copied from a "highly secret location" in Iran.

Those files allegedly detail Project Amad, which Netanyahu described as "a comprehensive

program to design, build and test nuclear weapons."

"These files conclusively prove that Iran is brazenly lying when it says it never had

a nuclear weapons program," Netanyahu said.

"The files prove that."

Kerry responded to Netanyahu's evidence – stating that the documents were nothing

new, and simply prove that all that's needed are inspections to ensure that Iran is complying

with the current agreement.

"Every detail PM Netanyahu presented yesterday was every reason the world came together to

apply years of sanctions and negotiate the Iran nuclear agreement — because the threat

was real and had to be stopped," Kerry tweeted Tuesday.

"It's working!"

Kerry is coordinating his push with a group of officials who were his top advisers at

the State Department, and who helped craft and negotiate the Iran deal in the first place.

The group, called Diplomacy Works, has an advisory council that includes lead Iran-deal

negotiator Wendy Sherman, former State Department chief of staff Jon Finer, and former spokeswoman

Jen Psaki.The group claims to be responsible for 100 news articles, 34 television and radio

hits, and 37 opinion pieces on the Iran question.

They do fact checks of criticisms of the agreement and blast them out to an e-mail list of nearly

4,000 policymakers and foreign policy experts.

-Boston Globe

In other words, a former US Secretary of State is working with his former colleagues to conduct

United States diplomacy with foreign leaders with no official permission.

We can only guess what the pitch is "He'll be out

in 2020, just hang on…"

For more infomation >> BREAKING: John Kerry Just Caught Going Behind Trump's Back To Make Secret Deal With Iran - Duration: 6:27.

-------------------------------------------

Look What President Trump Is About To Release That Put Obama In Panic Mode – Will RUIN HIM! - Duration: 14:27.

Look What President Trump Is About To Release That Put Obama In Panic Mode – Will RUIN

HIM!

Barack Obama could easily be the most corrupt president of modern times, but do not try

to tell him or his millions of adoring followers that.

Since Obama left office, he has been busy traipsing around the world bashing President

Trump and telling throngs of his rabid supporters how he is the most loved, transparent, and

scandal-free president of our time.

Well, Obama may want to keep quiet about being open and scandal-free considering what Trump

is about to release on him that will have Obama in panic mode.

The reason that the left has been in absolute hysterics since Donald Trump won the election

is not only based on irrational hatred and childish antics but the fact that Hillary

Clinton was supposed to make sure that all the horrible crimes committed under Obama's

watch stayed hidden.

However, that plan did not work out as intended and Trump and the DOJ are busy revealing the

corruption that took place in the Obama administration.

One of the biggest scandals that occurred during Obama's terrible presidency was the

detestable Fast and Furious Operation that the Obama administration tried to cover up

with absurd excuses.

For years, that entire scandal has been shrouded in mystery as the American people have wondered

what the truth behind this gun running operation was, and now we may finally have some answers.

Just last Wednesday, the Department of Justice announced that they were in possession of

additional documents concerning Fast and Furious and that they were being released to the House

Oversight Committee.

The documents shed light on the gun-running scandal that not only implicates Barack Obama

but also his good buddy and former Attorney General Eric Holder.

Here is more from SHTF Plan:

"We may finally get some answers to the high-level Obama administration's gun-running

scandal dubbed "Fast and Furious."

The Trump administration is promising to release the documents pertaining to that scandal that

were withheld by former Attorney General, Eric Holderperation Fast and Furious was the

Obama-era operation in coordination with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and

Explosives (ATF) in which the federal government allowed criminals to buy guns in Phoenix-area

shops with the intention of tracking them as they were transported into Mexico.

But the agency lost track of more than 1,400 of the 2,000 guns they allowed smugglers to

buy.

"For over six years, the House Oversight Committee has fought for additional documents

related to Operation Fast and Furious.

Today, the Committee finally reached a conditional settlement with the Department of Justice,"

Amanda Gonzalez, spokeswoman for the House Oversight Committee, said in a statement to

Fox News.

"The Committee seeks all relevant facts so we can learn from the mistakes made by

the Justice Department.

We have a responsibility to uncover why they worked so hard to hide this information from

the Committee, the family of [slain border patrol agent] Brian Terry, and the American

people.Brian Terry was killed in 2010 by an illegal immigrant with a weapon used in the

botched Operation Fast and Furious.

Terry died in a gunfight between Border Patrol agents and members of a six-man cartel "rip

crew," which patrolled the desert along the U.S.-Mexico border looking for drug dealers

to rob.

The cartel member suspected of killing Terry was apprehended in 2017.

Terry's brother, Kent Terry also wants the scandal investigated"We need to find out

the truth, exactly what happened, how it happened, why it happened," Kent Terry said on Fox

& Friends Tuesday.

"We need Mr. Trump, President Trump, to unseal the documents, reverse executive privilege

so that we know what happened, and that we can hold the people accountable that are responsible."

According to Fox News, the Justice Department entered into a conditional settlement agreement

with the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

The settlement agreement was filed in federal court in Washington D.C. and ends six years

of litigation arising out of the previous administration's refusal to produce records

requested by the committee."

For years, the American people and most importantly the family of border patrol agent Brian Terry

deserve answers and is now the time that we receive them.

It is evident that the Obama administration is again involved in another criminal cover

up that is worthy of being exposed and as quickly as possible.

President Trump needs to release these documents so that the criminals involved in this case

can finally be held accountable once

and

for all.

For more infomation >> Look What President Trump Is About To Release That Put Obama In Panic Mode – Will RUIN HIM! - Duration: 14:27.

-------------------------------------------

First Roseanne, Now Another Major Pro Trump Actor Is Infuriating Libs With Huge New Show! - Duration: 12:22.

First Roseanne, Now Another Major Pro-Trump Actor Is Infuriating Libs With Huge New Show!

America has once again come together to show Hollywood that what we will support pro-Conservative,

decent content.

That was shown to them very clearly after the smashing successes of the pro-Trump Roseanne

re-boot that broke records earlier this week.

The show, which was a remake of a classic comedy, came back into our lives with big

success, breaking records and surprising liberals.

The all original cast (plus a few new faces) showed the world that you don't have to

be politically correct to make good on television.

Their success has in fact drawn not just views, but executives to examine why exactly we are

watching this show.

Previously.

Hollywood has been a liberal monopoly and conservatives were wary if that could ever

be changed.

Roseanne might be bringing back with it another conservative favorite that was previously

snuffed out in the prime of its life.

The Daily Caller reports that Fox Entertainment is considering bringing back it's former

hit "Last Man Standing" in the wake of Rosanne's success:

"Tim Allen's 'Last Man Standing,' could be next in line for a reboot on Fox

thanks to the massive ratings from Tuesday night's premiere of 'Roseanne.'

Over 18 million viewers tuned in to see the blue-collar Conner family return to the small

screen, and that is at least partly attributed to the fact that Roseanne is a Trump supporter.

This, according to a report from TMZ, could open the door for Allen's conservative character

Mike Baxter.

"Last Man Standing," which was produced by Fox for ABC, was canceled [sic] in 2017.

Although at the time ABC denied rumors that politics played a part in the cancellation,

Allen wasn't sure that was the case.

'There's nothing more dangerous to me, especially in this climate, than a funny,

likable conservative,' Allen said at the time.

'That was the most dangerous thing, because he was mitigated on his show by a family of

women that had different opinions — but the guy was a likable guy, a principled guy,

just about work and ethics and all this stuff.

I think there's nothing more dangerous now than a likable conservative character.'

Allen, who always wanted Mike Baxter to be an Archie Bunker-type and 'push boundaries,'

may get a second chance to do just that.

TMZ's report suggests that 'Last Man Standing' now tops the short list, followed by 'That

70s Show' and 'Malcolm in the Middle.'

If it all comes down to Allen, the reboot is as good as made.

He told Fox News in January, 'I, along with the talented writers, wonderful crew and terrific

actors would definitely entertain the idea of bringing the show back as there is so much

gas left in the tank, more to be said, and laughs to be had.'"

Just how big a success was Rosanne, you might be wondering?

Here are some of the statistics that Daily Vine reported earlier in the week, provided

by Yahoo about how many viewers the conservative-friendly sit-com brought in:

"The first episode in the double episode opener is reported to have drawn 17.7 million

pairs of eyes and have a 4.9 rating in adults 18-49.

The second episode at 8:30 PM rose even higher to 18.6 million viewers and a 5.3 in 18-49.

For the 8 PM hour, Roseanne averaged a 5.1 in 18-49 and 18.2 million viewers.

To make the success even more impressive is the fact that this broadcast shows an audience

that was up 10% from the May 1997 finale telecast 21 years ago and topped the viewership of

the final 12 telecasts of the original run's 1996-97 season.

Despite the obviously pro-Trump main character, Roseanne scored as the highest rated show

on entertainment television in 6 years among adults 18-49 and TV's highest-rated comedy

telecast on any night in 3-1/2 years– since 9/22/14.

It is the top scripted telecast this season only behind the post-Super Bowl episode of

This Is Us."

The limousine liberals that run the left coast have all bought into the theory that their

idealistic and unrealistic visions of how they think life should be, displayed on our

TV screens, day after day, will make us want to strive for a better world.

In reality, it's just alienating their audience and making way for the more relateable genre

of programming.

What we might have hoped that the entire nation would have learned from the Trump election

is that the silent majority might not be as loud and obnoxious as their counterparts on

the left, but when something great comes along, they show up and support it.

That's what they saw a peak of with "Last Man Standing" and it's what they saw in

a big way in November of 2016.

Hopefully Hollywood will soon understand that any time the target audience is hardworking,

taxpaying middle Americans, conservative values will win the day.

Will you watch "Last Man Standing" if Fox produces new episodes?

Let us know in the comments and share with your friends!

For more infomation >> First Roseanne, Now Another Major Pro Trump Actor Is Infuriating Libs With Huge New Show! - Duration: 12:22.

-------------------------------------------

Teacher Of The Year Honored By Trump Immediately Stabs Him Back – Now People Want Her Stripped Of Aw - Duration: 15:23.

Teacher Of The Year Honored By Trump Immediately Stabs Him Back – Now People Want Her Stripped

Of Award

The winner if this year's National Teacher of the year award met with President Donald

Trump during a White House ceremony to present her with the prestigious award.

However, there was quite a catch that turned the congratulatory honor into a bit of a scandal

that has social media bursting in outrage.

President Trump entered and everyone applauded.

However, the teacher, Mandy Manning, remained silent and even made a dissatisfied facial

gesture when the president congratulated her.

What was perhaps the most interesting of the debacle was what the teacher was wearing.

Manning wore six badges on her black dress.

One was a poster for the Women's March that followed Trump's inauguration, one said

"Trans Equality Now" and one in the shape of an apple with a rainbow.

What could have been a wonderful moment for all teachers was unfortunately marred by bitterness

and silent protest.

A perfect moment for a conversation perhaps became a moment of division.

Here is more on what President Trump had to say via The Hill: "Trump praised Manning

and the other award finalists and teachers from each state.

"Her incredible devotion has earned her the adoration — total adoration, actually

— and respect of students and colleagues throughout her school district, community

and the entire state," Trump said during the award ceremony.

Teachers like Mandy play a vital role in the well-being of our children, the strength of

our communities and the success of our nation," he added.

Manning was not the only teacher to vocalize her concerns about the Trump administration's

education policies."

Manning teaches refugees and immigrant students at Joel E Ferris high school in Spokane, Washington,

which is a school that specializes in English language development for new refugees and

immigrant students.

A teacher who leads a classroom for teenage refugees staged a silent protest by wearing

several overtly political badges while receiving an award from Donald Trump at the White House.

Mandy Manning works at the Newcomer Center at Joel E Ferris high school in Spokane, Washington,

which specializes in English language development for new refugees and immigrant students.

Trump presented her with the National Teacher of the Year award in the East Room and praised

her "incredible devotion".

The US president said: "Teachers like Mandy play a vital role in the wellbeing of our

children, the strength of our communities and the success of our nation."

Manning wore six badges on her black dress.

According to a pooled report, they included one with a poster for the Women's March

that followed Trump's inauguration, one that said "Trans Equality Now" and one

in the shape of an apple with a rainbow.

The badges also represented the teacher of the year programme, National Education Association

and Peace Corps, where she began her teaching career.

Handing her the clear glass, apple-shaped award on a podium, Trump did not appear to

notice the badges.

He smiled as he and Manning posed for photographers.

The education secretary, Betsy DeVos; the labor secretary, Alex Acosta; and the Peace

Corps director, Jody Olsen, looked on.

Manning told the Associated Press after the ceremony that she used a private moment with

Trump to give him stacks of letters written by her students and members of the Spokane

community.

She said she told Trump she hoped he would read them, and she encouraged him to visit

her school.

"I just had a very, very brief moment so I made it clear that the students that I teach

… are dedicated and focused," Manning said in an interview.

"They make the United States the beautiful place that it is.

Manning said the letters conveyed important messages about what coming to the US meant

to the immigrants and refugees.

The long-running annual event took place against the backdrop of teachers' strikes in Arizona,

Colorado, Kentucky, Oklahoma and West Virginia amid complaints over stagnant pay.

Trump has cracked down on both legal and illegal immigration and suspended the US refugee programme

for a period.

He has demanded that a wall be built on the Mexican border to keep out murderers, drugs

gangs and other criminals."

Towards the end of the ceremony, the President went to shake Manning's hand but she seemed

to keep to herself.

It was later revealed that the teacher handed President Trump a stack of handwritten letters

from the immigrants and refugees she teaches.

She also told CNN that her main goal was to share her students' stories and to let the

immigrants, refugees, and the LGBT community know that they are wanted, that they are loved

and that they matter.

Even though she had other plans for the ceremony, the President continued to praise her for

"incredible devotion" to her job.

Did the teacher miss a chance to have a good chat with President Trump?

Was her silent protest unneccessary?

Share your thoughts on her in the comments and post this story to a teacher friend!

For more infomation >> Teacher Of The Year Honored By Trump Immediately Stabs Him Back – Now People Want Her Stripped Of Aw - Duration: 15:23.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Taunts Gun-Grabby Liberals at NRA Conference 'Come and Take It!' - Duration: 3:57.

For more infomation >> Trump Taunts Gun-Grabby Liberals at NRA Conference 'Come and Take It!' - Duration: 3:57.

-------------------------------------------

Newt Gingrich: Trump should 'just say no' to Mueller's absurd questions - Duration: 11:16.

For more infomation >> Newt Gingrich: Trump should 'just say no' to Mueller's absurd questions - Duration: 11:16.

-------------------------------------------

No Good Democrats Blast Trump For Attacking Syria After He Did Not Seek Approval From Them - Duration: 15:25.

No Good Democrats Blast Trump For Attacking Syria After He Did Not Seek Approval From

Them

Congressional Democrats have indicated their opinion that the President's actions authorizing

strikes against Syria are unconstitutional

The hottest news over the past few days has been President Trump ordering air strikes

against Syria which is currently ruled by Bashar-al-Assad and his regime.

Assad came under fire last year for ordering a chemical weapons attack against his own

people that left many women and especially children mortally wounded.

Now Congressional Democrats are pissed off at President Trump for his recent orders and

they are making him aware.

Congressional Democrats have indicated their opinion that the President's actions authorizing

strikes against Syria are unconstitutional and an attempt to circumvent the authority

of Congress.

Moreover, they are questioning his strategy in dealing with Syria.

Whereas many Republicans are applauding the Presidents move.

Senator Tim Kaine from Virginia, who formerly ran for Vice President under the presidential

ticket of Hillary Clinton, made it clear he believes the Presidents actions are illegal

going as far as to say,

"President Trump's decision to launch airstrikes against the Syrian government without

Congress's approval is illegal and — absent a broader strategy.

Today, it's a strike on Syria — what's going to stop him from bombing Iran or North

Korea next?

The last thing Congress should be doing is giving this president a blank check to wage

war against anyone, anywhere."

While House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of California argued that due to the brutal and

inhumane nature of the war crimes perpetrated by Syria it requires a smarter and more calculated

response.

She further argued that the President needed to present a far more comprehensive strategy

for how he plans to deal with Syria to Congress so that he can gain their approval.

NBC News reported, "Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., tweeted that it was the same as

when Trump struck Syria last year without congressional approval.

"What changed?

Zero," Swalwell tweeted.

"They're still using chemical weapons.

This is the result of a failure to have a strategy and engage Middle East countries

to solve this problem."

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said.

"A pinpointed, limited action to punish and hopefully deter Assad from doing this

again is appropriate, but the administration has to be careful about not getting us into

a greater and more involved war in Syria."

The president announced in an address to the nation from the White House that U.S.

Airstrikes, in tandem with the United Kingdom and France, were underway in Syria, in response

to an alleged chemical attack near Damascus last weekend."

At a later Pentagon briefing, Defense Secretary James Mattis said that the president had the

authority to launch the strikes under Article II of the Constitution.

Because Mattis said Trump was defending U.S. interests.

Key Republicans on Capitol Hill said Friday night that they supported Trump's decision.

"The United States has taken decisive action in coordination with our allies," said Speaker

Paul Ryan, R-Wis.,

Who said at his weekly news conference Thursday that he believed that Trump had authority

to act against Syria with any new congressional approval.

"We are united in our resolve that Assad's barbaric use of chemical weapons cannot go

unanswered.

His regime's unconscionable brutality against innocent civilians cannot be tolerated."

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said he supports "both the action and the

objective."

"I applaud the president for taking military action against the Assad regime for its latest

use of chemical weapons, and for signaling his resolve to do so again if these heinous

attacks continue," said Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., chairman of the Senate Armed Services

Committee.

Of note was Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., who faces a tough re-election fight against Florida's

Republican Gov. Rick Scott, and who backed Trump's response to Syria, tweeting, "I

support the attack because Assad must be held accountable for the use of chemical weapons.""

Regardless of what Congressional Members think the President had a press conference on the

attack and detailed why he took the actions he took and what he plans to do.

President Trump emphasized that he completed the attack in conjunction with the French

and British military.

This was following weeks upon weeks of potential threats of retaliation over the chemical attacks

on civilians.

The Pentagon announced that at the order of the President a total of 105 missiles were

launched and that they successfully hit every target.

Furthermore, that the allies took every measure and caution necessary to minimize civilian

death and to hit the intended military targets.

They noted that at this time they are unaware of any civilian casualties at this time.

However, Syrian state television refuted this statement arguing that three civilians were

wounded in the city of Homs after several missiles hit the area and were later intercepted

by the air-defense systems of Syria.

But, this is refuted as well because the director of the Joint Staff, Lt. Gen. Kenneth McKenzie

argued that the missiles involved in the operation were not at all engaged either positively

or negatively by Syrian air defenses.

CNN reported,

"Syrian armed forces said in a statement, however, that the country's defense systems

"intercepted most of the missiles, but some hit targets including the Research Center

in Barzeh," a suburb of Damascus.

Russian Army Colonel Gen. Sergey Rudskoy put a number to the claim, telling reporters that

71 of the cruise missiles were intercepted by Syria's air defense systems.

"It proves high efficiency of the Syrian armament and professional skills of the Syrian

servicemen trained by the Russian specialists," Rudskoy said at a Ministry of Defense media

briefing.

"Over the last 18 months, Russia has completely recovered the Syrian air defense systems,

and continues its development."

The Pentagon assessed that nerve agents were present in the Barzah research center and

that the Syrian regime employed about 40 surface-to-air missiles, but those launches occurred after

the last impact of the US and its allies' strike.

White also said Russia has begun a disinformation campaign on the situation.

"There has been a 2000 percent increase in Russian trolls in the last 24 hours,"

White said.

"Therefore, we will keep you all abreast of the facts moving forward."

Defense Secretary James Mattis said Friday night that the US was expecting a disinformation

campaign by those aligned with the Assad regime."

It remains to be seen whether Syria will respond to the United States attacks yet.

As of right now Syrian ally Russia has called for an emergency meeting of the United Nations

Security Council and it is no doubt for reasons related to the rising tensions between Syria

and the United States.

No comments:

Post a Comment