Trump news on Youtube May 4 2018

Well North Korea Just Bowed Down To Another Trump Demand – This Is YUGE!

When Americans are detained and imprisoned within the boundaries of North Korea, they

can expect exceedingly harsh conditions with tiny prison cells, very little food or water,

and even less daylight.

Their stories follow an eerily similar pattern with a forced confession, a mock trial where

they are then sentenced to years of hard labor with little chance of appeal.

Routine beatings and even torture are expected.

"It was a 5-by-6-foot cell, and there were a couple of slats on the doors," Laura Ling,

a journalist detained in 2009.

The experiences of other Americans who have been detained and eventually released by North

Korea, often with the help of prominent American politicians, crack open the door on the secretive

regime's network of prison camps and the deprivation found there.

The release of Otto F. Warmbier on June 13, 2017, and his subsequent d***h shortly after

his return home left the families of three other American citizens known to be imprisoned

by the North Koreans' dictatorial regime highly disturbed and fearing the worst.

Warmbier was an American college student who was arrested and held a prisoner in North

Korea, died just days after being returned to his family in the US while in a coma.National

Security Adviser John R. Bolton had called for the release of the detainees, and Secretary

of State Mike Pompeo reportedly raised the issue during secret face-to-face talks with

Mr. Kim last month in Pyongyang.Kim Hak-song and Kim Sang Duk worked at the Pyongyang University

of Science and Technology.

Kim Dong Chul is the president of a company involved in international trade and hotel

services.

He was sentenced to 10 years on espionage charges.

Now those families are resting easier as North Korea has chosen to free the three U.S. citizens

detained under Kim Jong Un's tyranny in the communist country, again choosing to bow

to yet another demand made from President Donald Trump just ahead of their upcoming

planned meeting.

The former Navy SEAL who took out Osama bin Laden, Robert O'Neill, tweeted about it,

as did others.The New York Post reports –

"North Korea has released three US citizens who had been held prisoner by the communist

dictatorship, the South Korean news agency Yonhap reported, citing a South Korean activist

who lobbies for the release of detainees.

The releases — which have not been confirmed by the State Department — would meet one

of the Trump administration's conditions before President Trump would meet with North

Korean leader Kim Jong Un."

According to the Financial Times –

"The three Korean-American detainees — Kim Dong-cheol, Kim Sang-deok and Kim Hak-seong

— were released from the labour correction centre in early April and are getting health

treatment and ideological education at a hotel near Pyongyang, according to Choi Sung-ryong,

the country's most vocal campaigner for South Korean abductees held in North Korea.

"We heard it through our sources in North Korea late last month.

We believe that Mr. Trump can take them back on the day of the US-North Korea summit or

he can send an envoy to take them back to the US before the summit," said Mr. Choi.The

news came after John Bolton, Mr. Trump's newly appointed national security adviser,

told Fox News on Sunday: "If North Korea releases the detained Americans before the

North-US summit, it will be an opportunity to demonstrate their authenticity."

Mike Pompeo, US secretary of state, is believed to have discussed the issue in his secret

meeting in Pyongyang with the North Korean dictator over the Easter weekend."

Though out of the brutal labor camp, the men remain in the grasp of Mr. Kim's regime

and not at risk of being returned.

They currently are believed to be convalescing in a hotel outside Pyongyang.

"We believe that Mr. Trump can take them back on the day of the U.S.-North Korea summit,

or he can send an envoy to take them back to the U.S. before the summit," said Choi

Sung-ryong, an activist pursuing release of North Korea's political prisoners.

The release of the three Americans marked another significant victory for the Trump

administration, which also won North Korea's agreement to discuss giving up its nuclear

weapon program as a prerequisite for the talks.

According to WPXI –

With the date of a summit meeting with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un still to be determined,

President Donald Trump continued this weekend to press the case that major changes are on

the horizon on the Korean Peninsula, as Mr. Trump spoke with both the South Korean and

Japanese leaders about progress on a deal with the Pyongyang regime to rein in its nuclear

weapons program.

"Things are going very well, time and location of meeting with North Korea is being set,"

Mr. Trump tweeted.

On Monday morning, Mr. Trump tweeted that a meeting with Kim Jong Un could take place

in the Demilitarized zone along the border between North and South Korea.The meeting

last week of the leaders of North and South Korea was evidence alone of the dramatic shift

in the situation – it was not so long ago that Mr. Trump was deriding the North Korean

leader on Twitter as "Rocket Man," amid threats from Kim that North Korea might attack

Guam or the U.S. mainland with nuclear missiles.

In Congress, some Republicans have said that Mr. Trump's tough line on Pyongyang – "maximum

pressure" as it is known – has been responsible for the change in tune by the Communist North."Donald

Trump convinced North Korea and China he was serious about bringing about change," said

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC).

"We're not there yet, but if this happens, President Trump deserves the Nobel Peace Prize,"

Graham said.

Last week, the President did not deny that he has been in personal contact with Kim Jong

Un, as Mr. Trump shrugged off a question at a news conference with the German Chancellor.

"Have you spoken with Kim Jong Un himself?"

a reporter asked.

"I don't want to comment on that," the President said.

For more infomation >> Well North Korea Just Bowed Down To Another Trump Demand – This Is YUGE! - Duration: 6:29.

-------------------------------------------

Tucker :GIULIANI REVEALS TRUMP REIMVURSED - Duration: 14:32.

well good evening and welcome to Tucker Carlson tonight it's been an amazing 24

hours even by the action-packed standards of 2018 there's been a lot of

drama in Washington last night as you doubtless know former New York City

Mayor Rudy Giuliani revealed on Sean Hannity's show that President Trump did

in fact reimburse his lawyer Michael Cohen for payments Cohan made to porn

star store McDaniels that seemed like a major story at the time but within hours

it wasn't even the biggest story of the day NBC News reported that federal law

enforcement had wiretap Michael Cohen's phone and apparently recorded at least

one conversation he'd had with the White House presumably with the President of

the United States but then that story changed NBC's new account claims that

the FBI simply recorded the numbers that Cohen dialed and not the content of the

calls he made and that's where we are as of right now 8:00 p.m. Eastern Time one

thing we know for sure is that NBC screwed up and there's no surprise there

obviously but that's pretty much all we can be certain of if NBC's first story

was wrong why do we assume the second is right we really don't know what the

truth is and we have no way of knowing in the absence of honesty from our

government we're totally dependent upon leaks for our news and many of those are

dishonest Michael Cohen by the way still doesn't know why his office was raided

and his phones and email were apparently monitored by the government because

nobody in government will tell him and they're not required to tell him how our

well ian is that by the way imagine if it happened to you if one day armed men

arrived to your office or your home and seized your phone your computers and

your files at gunpoint but never explained why they were doing it and the

next thing you knew cable news anchors were calling you a criminal

now Michael Cohen certainly looks like a shady character but so what

shadiness is not a crime the FBI can't destroy your life just because you talk

like a character from The Sopranos or because you work for Donald Trump those

are not felonies basic norms were violated here attorney-client privilege

is an ancient and a vital concept and by the way so is privacy

the FBI bulldoze to all of that let's hope they had a very good reason for

doing it the government better have evidence that

Michael Cohen was doing something awful putting lives at stake or betraying his

country or something really beyond the pale in order to justify this

if it turns out that all of this was just about a financial sediment with

some pornstar which by the way is a story that not a single American is

honestly shocked by or threatened by no matter what anderson cooper tells you if

that's all it's about then what we're watching is a grotesque violation of

civil liberties and that would be a real crime one with actual victims every

American who believed in representative democracy for example James Kallstrom is

a former assistant director of the FBI he joins this time mr. Kallstrom you

spent your life at the FBI we're very obviously famous leader at

the FBI when you watch the last years you've watched it unfold how do you

think the bureau is doing well the leadership of the bureau and the

leadership of the apartment are doing well at all

Tucker I mean it's just outrageous you know I look back at some records and

during the SNL's in the 80s and 90s you remember that you know yes literally

thousands of SNL's that they went belly-up and a lot of corruption a lot

of criminality not one law firm in the United States not one law firm was ever

served with a search warrant for that whole period of time and yet this little

four person or a five person law firm that just happens to be the laws the law

firm of the president United States is attacked by pen registers by

surveillance by search warrants and you know to get a search warrant from a

federal judge in the criminal side you have to you have to talk about a

criminal act that's that's taking place a criminal predicate and on the national

security side for the FISA judge you have to talk about the threat to

national security and and talk about you know why it's going to be affected it

negatively in both cases without these extraordinary measures

I think it's far-fetched I'll be I'll be corrected if I'm wrong but to see what

kind of a predicate they could have possibly had in this case well so if it

turns out that this really is all about a payment to a porn star and I hate to

say it but let's be honest it's just not a surprising story nobody voting in 2016

is going to be surprised by this if it turns out that's really the

predicate for this and nor is it surprising that Bob Muller

would do something like this it's Bob what was it well I mean look at the

history look at how we wanted to Paul Manafort house and had four o'clock in

the morning here so is that potential if by worse cases a white-collar crime

stuff and you go into a house at 4:00 or 5:00 in the morning with the with

weapons shown you drag a woman out of bed in her nightgown and the children

are I assume screaming yelling around the house I mean that's just an outrage

we don't operate like that in the United States if I was the head of the FBI I

would I would have not let the agents participate now this is something that

came from Mullah up to the US attorney in New York and they apparently put

together an affidavit and I guess the FBI was involved with that and that was

presented to a federal judge and when you go into a lawyer's office you're

going to be really careful in the way it works today you have really two teams of

people one team goes in and does the search another team kind of looks

through the material to try to segment out anything that would it be privileged

and in this case the federal judge who now has control over this case has gone

a step further and is turning all that material over to a senior federal judge

Barbara Jones who's a fantastic judge a good friend of mine over the years and

she'll decide you know what the US government gets to see and what the US

government doesn't get to see right but you think and I should just clear it up

for audience we weren't familiar with your career I wouldn't describe you as a

soft on crime liberal at all but you think based on decades at the FBI that

what you're watching now is out of line there's no precedent for it

Tucker I don't believe in kicking in doors unless there's a reason for it and

I don't believe having outrageous search warrants you know unless there's a real

bona fide reason is there a criminal predicate for this I'd be surprised if

there was if it is it's probably some concoction from some you know stupid

intelligence contact or is it a national-security predicate I find that

would be preposterous you know I just think these people out of control from

the very time that Donald Trump was the nominee of the Republican Party there

has been a conspiracy a Fifth Column call it what you want that has tried to

stop him from getting elected and number two

stop his effective work for the people of this country and look at the

magnificent job he's done in the anecca no economic front in the Foreign

Relations Front in a year and a half in my view more than the last three

presidents combined I I'm just I'm awestruck that you're saying this

because you're not a cable news talking head and any of our viewers are not

familiar with your career ought to go to Google and look it up you speak with

authority on this subject and so I'm I'm I'm shocked by what she said and

saddened but I believe you because you are believable on this subject mr.

Kallstrom thank you for joining us tonight

my pleasure no I don't have the facts but that's my record that's what I think

is the situation Tucker well you have perspective that's for sure I appreciate

it thank you go Danny Colson is a former

Deputy Assistant Director of the FBI and he joins us tonight Mr Coulson thank you

for coming on I want to ask you about Daniel Richmond and we're learning that

James Comey when he ran the FBI hired a friend of his called Daniel Richmond who

was a professor at Columbia a lawyer in a kind of gray area job as a crypto

government employee basically to do PR for him and to leak information he

thought would be helpful to his reputation you spent a long time at the

FBI have you ever seen anything like that before I've never seen anything

like that Tucker and I've talked to a number of former executives in the FBI

and neither have they you know this is this is not like a junior membership in

the Garden Club this is given a man who really has no job except this give some

advice and do publicity for the director getting a security clearance and access

to the FBI building that's that's really significant to me and I think there's a

another issue here and the fact that this individual was the one they call me

leaked to gave the memos too and that didn't come

up and comb his hearings that's that's troubling to me and the fact that they

they did that I wouldn't want an inquiry done if I were back there I'd be looking

at that how'd this happen who generated it and did the guy get a rule background

it was an FBI background or a name check or database check or do they go out and

let me clear this guy that's there's a lot of unanswered questions here and it

kind of reflects the way of the director of the FBI then James Comey ran it well

so since you served in the FBI under other directors things were not done

this way before no I've never seen this we hire contractors and they're

essential and they're needed and they get paid and they're vetted and they

participate in a lot of really important things but I've never seen anything like

this where it's an unpaid crony of the director of the FBI that that doesn't

make any sense to me and I I just wish there was somebody back there that that

during that regime that would say director this is not the way to go

somebody that's not owing to him for a promotion or a transfer says right don't

do this they say this father sent Letha at least to look bad rule and the FBI

has an image and and I don't think that he promoted that and bringing this man

on board I think that was foolhardy speaking of the way the public perceives

the FBI what do you make of commis book tour where he's taken a series of very

political positions how does that affect the way citizens feel about your agency

well it's troubling and I think that his book tour and his comments his book

itself reflects why he was not a successful director of the FBI the book

is entitled in part higher authority and I think that he didn't respect the

authority of our Constitution and I think that King it comes out loud and

clear when he goes out and makes these outrageous statements that wasn't a leak

I talks they justified what he did he ran the most weak feckless investigation

ever in the history of the FBI and I think that reflects not on the FBI

reflects on him not us yeah thank you for that

I appreciate your perspective on that since again thank you I enjoyed it it's

always fun mark Penn was for many years one of the highest levels

visors to Hillary Clinton he's the author of the new book micro-trend

squared and he joins us tonight mark thanks a lot for coming on thank you sue

you wrote kind of an amazing piece the other day in the hill title something

like questions I have for for Robert Muller tell us some of the questions

that if you could ask you would well remember Tucker I spent a year working

with President Clinton against the Ken Starr and that effort and I just

remember very well I just find that that that was child's play to what's going on

here and I think that well Muller has some questions about what the president

was thinking when he fired coming well I certainly have some questions about what

he was thinking when first he went to apply for the FBI job in the first place

with Rosen Stein and then turns around the next day didn't you already have a

plan when he turned around boy when he put that team together and there wasn't

a single Trump donor what was he thinking then and when he looked at the

these dossiers and discovered that that there was no foundation here how did he

deal with that and how does he justify you know these kinds of really

stormtrooper tactics I think is is perhaps not an exaggeration when you go

guns drawn to political consultants wire taps all over the place over payments to

porn stars this thing has gotten out of control and while he wants to question

the president it seems that no one could really questioned either Muller work or

call me or Rosenstein and that is precisely the problem yeah it is the

problem and and I hate to admit it since I supported the ken starr Independent

Counsel investigation and I look back in the shame because of that but that was

the case that the Clinton people made at the time there's no oversight here and

that's a huge problem and it turns out you were right about that in your piece

you made reference to his behavior in Boston when he worked there in the weddi

Bulger case briefly summarize that if you would because I thought it was

really interesting well really the the question and I think professor

Dershowitz has has really been out on on this thing then in the Bulger case there

were four innocent people in jail due to prosecutorial misconduct and he was head

of the office and so he you do not really find him in the

cases but that means he waited until the courts overturned things to release the

people and so what was he thinking when that when that was happening how did he

permit that how did he permit these kinds of gross abuses and how does he

then supervise an investigation now that seems to be filled with them mark pent

again you have authority on the subject and so it's nice to to hear from you

thanks al went through at once I hope America doesn't go through it again yeah

Hillary never would pull out this too smart for this there's no doubt thank

you thank you China has a plan in place to displace

this country as the world's strongest power a top expert on this Civic will

explain how that's working unfortunately it is working and then we'll talk to

Marco Rubio who's taken a profound interest in this all of a sudden it's an

interesting conversation Station

For more infomation >> Tucker :GIULIANI REVEALS TRUMP REIMVURSED - Duration: 14:32.

-------------------------------------------

Breaking News Today⚠️Donald Trump REPAID lawyer £95k hush money over porn star Stormy Daniels - Duration: 2:36.

Breaking News Today⚠️Donald Trump REPAID lawyer £95k hush money over porn star Stormy Daniels

For more infomation >> Breaking News Today⚠️Donald Trump REPAID lawyer £95k hush money over porn star Stormy Daniels - Duration: 2:36.

-------------------------------------------

Robert Mueller's Coup Against Trump Is Even Worse Than You Think - Duration: 15:19.

Robert Mueller's Coup Against Trump Is Even Worse Than You Think

Special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia investigation is part of a coup against Trump.

The fake news collusion narrative was deployed to launch a sprawling investigation into the

Trump administration.

But new developments reveal Mueller's scheme is even worse than you think.

Trump's lawyers believe the special counsel is just weeks away from requesting an interview

with the President.

And they are determined to manage the setting to limit Mueller's trouble making.

The Washington Post reports:

"Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III has told President Trump's legal team that his

office is likely to seek an interview with the president, triggering a discussion among

his attorneys about how to avoid a sit-down encounter or set limits on such a session,

according to two people familiar with the talks.

Mueller raised the issue of interviewing Trump during a late-December meeting with the president's

lawyers John Dowd and Jay Sekulow.

Mueller deputy James Quarles, who oversees the White House portion of the special counsel

investigation, also attended.

The special counsel's team could interview Trump soon on some limited portion of questions

— possibly within the next several weeks, according to a person close to the president,

who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe internal conversations.

"This is moving faster than anyone really realizes," the person said.

Trump is comfortable participating in an interview and believes it would put to rest questions

about whether his campaign coordinated with Russia in the 2016 election, the person added."

But Mueller isn't investigating collusion anymore.

He's trained his sights on inventing grounds to charge Trump with obstruction of justice.

The swamp has pinned their hopes on the termination of former FBI Director James Comey as their

best bet to remove the President.

Firing Comey cannot be an act of obstruction by itself.

As head of the executive branch, Trump is free to fire any employee for whatever reason.

He also has the ability to order the FBI Director to shut down any investigation he wants.

Trump cannot be charged with obstruction for executing his constitutional duties as President.

Mueller knows this.

So he wants to use the interview to trap Trump in a process crime.

If the President misremembers a date or a fact, then Mueller can claim he lied and charge

him with making false statements.

Such a move would prove the investigation was a farce to begin with and was put into

motion for the sole purpose of impeaching Trump.

We will keep you up to date on any new developments in

this story.

For more infomation >> Robert Mueller's Coup Against Trump Is Even Worse Than You Think - Duration: 15:19.

-------------------------------------------

Turley: Giuliani-Hannity Interview 'Caused Some Damage' for Trump - Duration: 4:29.

so here now jonathan turley constitutional attorney and law

professor at george washington university Jonathan always good to have

you here so how do you think rudy guiliani is doing so far is he helping

or hurting this case well I don't think this was a particularly stellar

performance I'm to be absolutely honest you know you take a these interviews

under type of legal Hippocratic oath at first do no harm I do think that he

caused some damage for the president and much of it is not necessarily the

defense but the delivery in these two interviews now I don't see that the the

intelligent design behind this you know for example trying to convert what was

treated as a gift into a loan does not take you out of the campaign finance

problem now we can talk about how serious a campaign finance allegation

may be these are not often prosecuted but it is simply not true that just

because the money didn't come from the campaign this is clearly not a campaign

finance violation indeed by saying that it's a loan it can trip other wires

including new reporting problems even tax problems so I was a little bit

surprised by that whole take now in other respects I think that he's been

unfairly criticized you know for example people have said that he implicated

Trump in an obstruction of justice by saying that Trump fired call me because

he refused to make public what he had said privately I wrote a column today in

the hill saying over a year ago I wrote that I was surprised the media was not

addressing that very obvious defense because the president stayed at that

defense saying that he clearly said that that was something that bothered him way

back right to be one specific reason that he decided to usually when you

decided to fire someone it's a culmination of a lot of different things

isn't it it is and what what concerns me is that the media has focused on one

narrative to the exclusion of others and this explanation is actually the best

supported other witnesses have said that the president was very upset that

come--it old people outside the FBI in Congress that he

wasn't a target and I and he clearly felt that he's being treated unfairly

now should he have raised that with Comey no I don't think he should have

but that's not a crime but also this is not a new defense and it's certainly not

obstruction of justice in my view all right so what about this wiretapping

issue because there was sort of this you know heated reporting this afternoon

from NBC that the calls had been recorded from Michael Cohen's office and

that one of them was to the White House then they had to come back and retract

that and say no it's surveillance which I think we can describe very much as

metadata you know sort of the the numbers the phone numbers that come in

and go out and the length of the call right

what sort of ironic isn't it because the media is now saying well it was

surveillance these are often the same outfits that criticized the president

for using the term wiretap instead of surveillance even though his generation

often referred to wiretapping as surveillance so it does sound like what

they are describing as a pen register to capture all of the numbers and durations

and that is often sort of freely granted and freely implemented by the Justice

Department it does not include content of the communications all right you know

in terms of the approach which is sort of like a scorched earth you know very

aggressive approach that they're taking now why do you think they're doing that

and do you think it's wise I don't think it's wise but it clearly is a change in

strategy Ty Cobb was known for someone who wanted to try to thread this needle

wanted to see if they could narrow the categories sit down the president and

get this over with I don't see the endgame here because if they force a

subpoena and it is challenged I think Moeller will win now they could narrow

the the subject and narrow the time but at the end of the day the case law

favors a mauler the biggest danger is if he forces the president into a grand

jury he goes in there without counsel and that is a significant danger for the

president Jonathan Turley thank you always good to see it thanks for coming

on time you

For more infomation >> Turley: Giuliani-Hannity Interview 'Caused Some Damage' for Trump - Duration: 4:29.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump slams John Kerry during NRA speech - Duration: 1:49.

[Applause]

Same thing with Iran.

You remember?

We are signing that horrible

deal.

And they're marching in the

streets saying, "Death to

America."

Who signs a deal when they are

marching saying, "Death to

America"?

Who marches?

They are saying, "Death to

America" and we have the

former administration.

As represented by John Kerry.

Not the best negotiator we

have ever seen.

He never walked away from the

table.

Except to be in that bicycle

race where he fell and broke

his leg.

That was the only time.

I said don't tell him you

broke your leg.

Stay inside and say you don't

want to negotiate and you will

make a much better deal.

But he broke his leg.

And I learned from that.

At 73 years old, you never go

into a bicycle race.

Okay?

You just don't do that.

I'm not 73.

He was.

Okay.

But I'll be there.

But we have great things going

on.

And you know, with respect to

North Korea, remember how

strong it was and they were

saying this is going to be

nuclear war?

No.

You know what gets you nuclear

war?

Weakness gets you nuclear war.

Being weak gets you nuclear

war.

That's what gets you nuclear

war.

For more infomation >> President Trump slams John Kerry during NRA speech - Duration: 1:49.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Made A Big Announcement That Will Have You Jumping For Joy - Duration: 15:19.

Trump Made A Big Announcement That Will Have You Jumping For Joy

Donald Trump won the 2016 election on the back of one issue – immigration.

And his signature promise was to build the wall.

He just made a major announcement that is everything his supporters have been waiting

for.

When Donald Trump ended the Obama administration's illegal executive DACA amnesty program, the

President said he was open to a deal that secured pro-American immigration reforms.

At the top of the list was funding for the border wall.

As part of the January budget negotiations, the Trump administration has submitted a request

for $18 billion over ten years to fund construction of a border wall.

Following his State of the Union address, Trump will travel to San Diego to visit the

border wall prototypes that have been constructed.

The Daily Caller reports:

"President Donald Trump will visit border wall prototypes in San Diego after his State

of the Union address on January 30, Axios reports.

The president is rushing to deliver a fully funded secure border wall before the 2018

mid-term congressional elections.

Trump's most likely path to getting the necessary 18 billion dollars in funding for

his border wall likely comes from a potential bi-partisan deal to save the DACA program.

DACA is an Obama-era program which issues work permits to illegal immigrants brought

to the U.S. as children and protects them from deportation.

Trump ended the program in September and told Congress it had six months to act before it

would expire, insisting that any bill to save the program must be accompanied by wall funding

and an end to chain migration.

Trump's proposed wall will install fencing on 316 miles of the U.S.-Mexico border and

bolster security along the other 407 miles.

The $18 billion appropriation will also go towards hiring more border security agents.

The president reiterated his campaign promise that the Mexican government must pay for the

wall in a Saturday press conference saying "I believe Mexico will pay for the wall.

I have a very good relationship with Mexico…

Mexico will pay, in some form, Mexico will pay for the wall."

Democrats – as well as establishment Republicans – dug their heels in on stopping Trump's

border wall.

But Trump has held firm.

And he appears on the verge of scoring a major victory in fulfilling his signature campaign

promise.

Trump's win on the border wall could have another significant impact.

Democrats will be furious if their leaders are outfoxed by Trump and it could cause them

to sit home next November.

Any drop in Democrat voter enthusiasm could keep Congress in Republican hands.

Do you agree?

Let us know your thoughts

in the

comment section.

For more infomation >> Trump Made A Big Announcement That Will Have You Jumping For Joy - Duration: 15:19.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Just Hired Patriots Coach Bill Belichick For Huge New Job And Some Are NOT Happy About It! - Duration: 5:19.

For more infomation >> Trump Just Hired Patriots Coach Bill Belichick For Huge New Job And Some Are NOT Happy About It! - Duration: 5:19.

-------------------------------------------

THANK YOU KANYE: President Trump Says Kanye West Boosted His Appeal To African Americans - Duration: 0:16.

For more infomation >> THANK YOU KANYE: President Trump Says Kanye West Boosted His Appeal To African Americans - Duration: 0:16.

-------------------------------------------

Rudy Giuliani, attorney for President Trump, on the payment Robert Mueller investigation - Duration: 5:12.

joining me right now is former New York City Mayor the leader of the president's

private legal team Rudy Giuliani mr. mayor it's great to see you again oh

it's great to see you thank you so much for joining us so explain what went on

here a lot of people feel like last time you spoke with Hannity it was a

bombshell that used to yes in fact the president did hey this and this has

nothing to do with campaign finance explain well it was only a bombshell in

the sense that it blew up their case I mean this whole case began as a illegal

campaign contribution 130,000 dollars must have been campaign funds they go

after they invade Cohen's office as a lawyer disgraceful I do not know how

they could put their their signatures on that affidavit but they do they invade

it because of this issue about the hundred and thirty and a couple other

things and they don't bother to tell you because they don't have any honor that

their whole case is falling apart no I had we want to get it out of the way the

money was paid by by Michael Cohen in October of 2016 of course he didn't talk

to the presidential candidates then because the man was would have even

remembered I wouldn't remember if you talked to me then I was with him 24

hours a day after it was over there was the opportunity to reimburse and the

president reimbursed him out of non campaign non campaign contribution money

private money his money and he did it over a course of 2017 but it was it was

mixed in with a couple of other things that have nothing to do with them or

anybody else just things that a lawyer would take care of for his client you

know a lot of lawyers make out checks for their clients millions of dollars

just remember I don't want to say this in any kind of demeaning way right but

135 thousand dollars when he put it 100 million dollars in this campaign it's

hardly the biggest check that Iran could it be that when the president was asked

about this on the on Air Force One and he said look I don't know you're gonna

have to ask my lawyer I don't know anything about it he didn't realize that

they could actually tie it to campaign finance and that would be that would be

doctor good question Maria because this was

never about the campaign it's about personal reputation the money wasn't

paid to help the campaign or hurt the campaign the money was paid because of

the embarrassment in an allegation like this right and people pay that kind of

money even when it's not true in fact sometimes they pay it what it's not true

even more than when it's true because they it's so unfair

so the president had this one-night stand and then no one it said it not he

didn't he says no she said go she said no in a letter that they had a one-night

stand I so then why did he pay the money because she because what tom brokaw have

faded if you kept his reputation do you know the people pay money like this he

just wanted her to come they want to admit it cuz he was embarrassed

yeah how many people how many people have done that I'm a lawyer I have

settled cases for people that are innocent for people that are partially

innocent of people that are guilty it's equally damaging it's more damaging than

the person who's innocent because nobody ever forgets it so so was it more

important for you to just get the campaign finance off the table Vince the

president look mr. president I have to forget about the embarrassment of it you

all suck it up and admit you pay is that what you say how many times do you have

to go back to your checkbook to see what out you know you forget did I make that

contribution didn't I make it was it $2,000 $5,000 did I take it from this

account or that account if you have to speak off the cuff you're gonna say well

I did it from here or I did it from there now now we have the records we can

see exactly what it was now they should drop it will they drop it I mean you

said a couple of weeks ago when you I mean when you were first joining the

president you said this is gonna go away in a couple of weeks this no no I told

you we get the agreement in a couple weeks I don't think the investigators

apparently people in the Muller teamers chuckling they said this is not going

away well I mean someday they have to go away

they've been there for a year haven't gotten anything yet I mean someday they

have to go bye-bye I mean it's not a permanent prosecute

well well how do you how do you insure that I mean that's I'm talking about mr.

mayor I mean let's face it this has been and sensor and sort of hanging over this

present the entire year when you when you look at the misconduct involved in

this where the only crimes committed by the investigators or their supervisors

largely their supervisors when you look at the leaking by by by combing when you

look at the invading of an attorney's office when you look at putting out

those 49 questions the Attorney General should step in and say this is a this is

a disgraceful exercise and injustice and therefore as a Department of Justice

this investigation should be dismissed in fact it should volunteer that

For more infomation >> Rudy Giuliani, attorney for President Trump, on the payment Robert Mueller investigation - Duration: 5:12.

-------------------------------------------

Rudy Giuliani Claims President Donald Trump Learned Recently About Stormy Daniels Payment | TODAY - Duration: 3:36.

For more infomation >> Rudy Giuliani Claims President Donald Trump Learned Recently About Stormy Daniels Payment | TODAY - Duration: 3:36.

-------------------------------------------

TRUMP SKIPS IMPEACHMENT – ALAN DERSHOWITZ GIVES HIM HIS FULL SUPPORT - Duration: 11:59.

TRUMP SKIPS IMPEACHMENT – ALAN DERSHOWITZ GIVES HIM HIS FULL SUPPORT

There are a few top lawyers in America, however Alan Dershowitz has them beat when it comes

to justice.

He just told the entire world that he has Trump's back when it comes to Comey's

case.

Dershowitz is a man of justice.

When liberals started rioting about Trump firing James Comey, he couldn't stand by

and watch.

He took on to the media and explained from top to bottom why Trump is innocent.

Dershowitz started with explaining what the president can and can't do.

That of course got to the point if Trump has the power to fire the head of the FBI department.

The answer is yes and everyone is aware of that, even Democrats.

Then Dershowitz opened another topic.

He made a hypothesis that Trump fired Comey with bad intent.

He just didn't like the guy and wanted him removed.

Even if that were the case, Trump didn't brake the law.

It's simple as that.

He magnificently ruined all of Democrat's hard work to bury Trump into this case.

Not only did he remove all false accusations, but he even set the facts straight and away

from the speculations.

The man is a legend and he deserves a good pat on the back.

Comment below and share the news.

Let everyone know that Trump never broke

the law.

For more infomation >> TRUMP SKIPS IMPEACHMENT – ALAN DERSHOWITZ GIVES HIM HIS FULL SUPPORT - Duration: 11:59.

-------------------------------------------

Liberals Livid As Trump Makes 'Yuge' Promise At National Prayer Day Ceremony - Duration: 4:40.

For more infomation >> Liberals Livid As Trump Makes 'Yuge' Promise At National Prayer Day Ceremony - Duration: 4:40.

-------------------------------------------

South Korea's top office denies reports of Trump U.S. forces reduction review - Duration: 1:57.

Weeks ahead of the maiden meeting between the leaders of Washington and Pyongyang, there

are reports of President Trump considering options to reduce the number of American troops

stationed in South Korea.

Seoul's top office dismissed such reports.

Kwon Jang-ho has our top story.

Seoul's Presidential office has dismissed reports that U.S. President Donald Trump had

requested plans to reduce American troop numbers in South Korea, describing them as 'not true'.

The Blue House's senior press secretary Yoon Young-chan released a statement on Friday

saying that President Moon's national security adviser Chung Eui-yong, who is currently in

Washington, had discussed this report with a key member of the U.S. National Security

Council... who flatly denied it, calling it "groundless."

The Pentagon refused to confirm the report, but a spokesperson said, "The Department of

Defense's mission in South Korea remains the same" and that their "force posture has not

changed."

The New York Times on Thursday quoted several unnamed officials, who said Trump had ordered

the Pentagon to draw up such plans.

The review is said not to be intended as a bargaining chip for North Korea's denuclearization

in Trump's upcoming summit with Kim Jong-un, but it is being considered as an option if

a peace treaty on the Korean peninsula is reached.

Although the sources declined to confirm whether Trump was considering a full withdrawal, they

said it was unlikely.

Trump has long criticized the costs of stationing the 28-thousand-500 troops in South Korea,

saying that Seoul needs to pay more towards those costs.

In March he even suggested during a fundraising speech that he wanted to pull out troops in

order to balance out the trade deficit.

Currently South Korea pays around 820-million dollars a year towards troop costs, about

half of the total cost of stationing U.S. forces on the peninsula, but that amount is

expected to increase with Seoul and Washington currently in negotiations over a new deal.

Kwon Jang-ho, Arirang News.

For more infomation >> South Korea's top office denies reports of Trump U.S. forces reduction review - Duration: 1:57.

-------------------------------------------

WATCH: Trump gives 'full endorsement' to Ted Cruz - Duration: 1:09.

For more infomation >> WATCH: Trump gives 'full endorsement' to Ted Cruz - Duration: 1:09.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump Nominated By 18 Lawmakers For The Highest Honor On Earth - Duration: 2:55.

For more infomation >> President Trump Nominated By 18 Lawmakers For The Highest Honor On Earth - Duration: 2:55.

-------------------------------------------

South Korea's top office denies reports of Trump U.S. forces reduction review - Duration: 1:56.

Weeks ahead of the maiden meeting between the leaders of Washington and Pyongyang, there

are reports of President Trump considering options to reduce the number of American troops

stationed in South Korea.

But according to our Kwon Jang-ho, Seoul's top office flatly dismissed such claims.

Seoul's Presidential office has dismissed reports that U.S. President Donald Trump had

requested plans to reduce American troop numbers in South Korea, describing them as 'not true'.

The Blue House's senior press secretary Yoon Young-chan released a statement on Friday

saying that President Moon's national security adviser Chung Eui-yong, who is currently in

Washington, had discussed this report with a key member of the U.S. National Security

Council... who flatly denied it, calling it "groundless."

The Pentagon refused to confirm the report, but a spokesperson said, "The Department of

Defense's mission in South Korea remains the same" and that their "force posture has not

changed."

The New York Times on Thursday quoted several unnamed officials, who said Trump had ordered

the Pentagon to draw up such plans.

The review is said not to be intended as a bargaining chip for North Korea's denuclearization

in Trump's upcoming summit with Kim Jong-un, but it is being considered as an option if

a peace treaty on the Korean peninsula is reached.

Although the sources declined to confirm whether Trump was considering a full withdrawal, they

said it was unlikely.

Trump has long criticized the costs of stationing the 28-thousand-500 troops in South Korea,

saying that Seoul needs to pay more towards those costs.

In March he even suggested during a fundraising speech that he wanted to pull out troops in

order to balance out the trade deficit.

Currently South Korea pays around 820-million dollars a year towards troop costs, about

half of the total cost of stationing U.S. forces on the peninsula, but that amount is

expected to increase with Seoul and Washington currently in negotiations over a new deal.

Kwon Jang-ho, Arirang News.