Saturday, September 9, 2017

Trump news on Youtube Sep 10 2017

One of the more, I guess, ambitious things that Donald Trump talked about relentlessly

on the campaign trail was the need to invest in American infrastructure.

Now, this was one of those talking points that he would throw out there that actually

did get some liberals and some independents saying, "You know what?

That's actually a really good idea."

Because it is a really good idea.

But like most things, a lot of us didn't believe him for one second when he was actually going

to do this.

After all, the infrastructure has been crumbling since George W. Bush took office.

He did nothing, Obama did very little if anything at all, so why should we expect anything different

from Donald Trump?

Well, apparently, Donald Trump does have a close to one trillion dollar infrastructure

plan that he actually wants to put in action.

The unfortunate part of it is that it's going to make things so much worse here in the United

States.

Because Donald Trump's plan is not necessarily to spend on trillion dollars, sending construction

workers out there to fix our roads, and bridges, and buildings.

It's a one trillion dollar plan that basically involves selling off a lot of our public infrastructure

over to private corporations who can then repair it and then charge us for using the

things that we've been using our entire lives completely for free.

The things we paid for with our tax dollars.

That is Donald Trump's infrastructure plan.

He wants to privatize the whole damn thing, sell it to corporations, and then let them

charge us for using it.

Again, we've paid for it.

That's where our taxes go.

Those are our roads and our bridges.

We've been paying money for years to the government to fix them, not to sell them off to corporations.

This was actually what Mike Pence did as governor of Indiana.

They had a huge infrastructure problem, but rather than investing state money or asking

the federal government to come in, he decided to sell it off.

One of the biggest things, I believe, was interstate 69 running through Indiana.

He sold it off.

And the company that bought it, that took it over, did a horrible job rebuilding it.

And of course, people were then charged to use it.

Imagine having to go to work every single day using roads that you usually do, and then

suddenly you realize you've got to stop for a toll.

And then a couple feet further, there's another stole because there was another intersection

and more people got on it.

That's what we're looking at here.

Privatization here in the United States has never worked.

When the federal government tries to privatize something or use a private company, these

government contracts to come in and do something instead, it hasn't worked out.

It hasn't worked out since the Civil War.

That's why we have key Qui tam laws in the United States because military ... The US

government, excuse me, has been getting ripped off by contractors since at least the Civil

War.

It's a system that never ends.

Any time a corporation sees that they can get their hands on a lucrative government

contract worth billions of dollars, they're going to jump at that opportunity, provide

the bare minimum in services, and pocket all of the rest of it.

And that is what Donald Trump wants to do with our infrastructure, an infrastructure

that is becoming dangerously inadequate, inept, and decrepit.

It needs to be fixed.

It doesn't need to be privatized.

Unfortunately, the only thing Republicans in this country know how to do is to sell

their problems to somebody else and let those other people make a killing off of it.

And then the Republican doesn't have to worry about it anymore.

For more infomation >> The Trump Infrastructure Plan – Sell It All To Corporations And Let Them Profit From It - Duration: 4:04.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's EPA Is Cutting Grants For Climate Research - Duration: 4:51.

To say that Donald Trump's Environmental Protection Agency has been hostile towards the environment

would be a very gross understatement, but what they have decided to do recently puts

them really at odds with the actual thing that they're supposed to be protecting, which

is the environment.

Donald Trump's EPA has decided that they're going to stop issuing grants to organizations

or individuals or universities that want to study the climate.

They want to study climate change.

They want to conduct climate research, and the Scott Pruitt led EPA is now telling them,

"Guess what?

We're taking back your funding and we're not going to issue any new grants to you to study

all of the horrible things that are happening in the environment."

So far, $2 million worth of grants that were supposed to go to public universities and

nonprofit organizations have been rescinded by the Environmental Protection Agency because

those grants were going to be used to study the effects of climate change.

I need to reiterate this fact right now, folks.

Hurricane Harvey happened less than two weeks ago in the state of Texas.

It intensified very rapidly, and scientists are telling us that that rapid intensification

was due to climate change.

The West, western part of the United States is on fire, sending [inaudible 00:01:28] of

smoke as far as east as New York and Kentucky.

Hurricane Irma is about to make landfall in the state of Florida as one of the most destructive

storms in the history of the United States.

So yeah, let's stop funding research into climate change, which is directly responsible

for each one of those three catastrophes that we have had in the span of two weeks.

We as a country have made a lot of advances in the field of sciences.

We have studied a lot of things.

We've invented cures for things.

We've invented vehicles and airplanes and all kinds of great things, and we did it because

we had a federal government that allowed us to do those things.

We have a federal government that is at the forefront of funding of medical research in

the world, and yet we still pay higher prescription drug prices than any other country on this

planet.

We have a federal government that subsidize renewable energy, but they subsidize fossil

fuels even more so that those things could stay alive and try to snuff out renewable

energy.

Our federal government at this point, instead of advancing us forward in the field of science,

they're taking us backwards.

They're literally taking money away from organizations that want to study the way the world is working

now because they don't want to know.

That's what's at the heart of this.

The Trump administration doesn't want to know.

They don't want to see the truth.

They don't want to accept the truth, and they don't want anybody else out there to know

it either because a dumb down American public is more likely to vote Republican than a public

that understands the catastrophic threat that climate change poses to this country, and

that's what the EPA's trying to do here.

They want to keep burying their heads in their sands, not even realizing that the tide is

starting to come up and cover those holes of their heads.

We don't have a whole lot of time left to study climate change, folks.

We are seeing the effects of it today.

We saw them yesterday.

We saw them two weeks ago.

We're about to see them again in a very big way in a few days.

How many more disasters, how many more catastrophes, how many more deaths do we have to suffer

before the Trump administration and the entire Republican Party understands that climate

change is not a partisan issue?

It doesn't stop happening because we have a climate change denier in the White House.

Climate change is coming regardless of who's in power, regardless of how much money corporations

give to politicians, regardless of the banter and the bickering.

It's happening and it's time for the Trump administration to admit that, so that we can

move forward and jump back to the front lines of the scientific research that's going to

be absolutely necessary to help fend off the pending catastrophes.

For more infomation >> Trump's EPA Is Cutting Grants For Climate Research - Duration: 4:51.

-------------------------------------------

Nancy Pelosi Gets Trump to Tweet, Patriots Lose to Kansas City Chiefs - Monologue - Duration: 4:38.

For more infomation >> Nancy Pelosi Gets Trump to Tweet, Patriots Lose to Kansas City Chiefs - Monologue - Duration: 4:38.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's Pick To Head NASA Has No Background In Science - Duration: 3:04.

BUT MAYBE THE SCARIEST RUSSIA

STORY OUT THERE RIGHT NOW IS THE REVELATION THAT RUSSIA-LINKED

HACKERS BREACHED 100 NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL POWER PLANTS

JUST THIS YEAR, WHICH EXPLAINS WHY THE PALO VERDE NUCLEAR POWER

STATION'S EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH WAS DON.

( LAUGHTER ) SO FAR, THE HACKERS' INTRUSIONS

HAVE BEEN GATHERING INTELLIGENCE: TECHNICAL

DIAGRAMS, REPORTS, PASSWORDS, AND CRYPTO KEYS.

"CRYPTO KEYS," BY THE WAY, WAS ALSO THE TITLE OF MY

ALL-SYNTHESIZER CONCEPT ALBUM.

( LAUGHTER ) ( APPLAUSE )

, OF COURSE,-- IT WAS THE 80s.

>> Jon: I LIKE THAT ALBUM!

>> Stephen: OF COURSE, EVERY HACKER GROUP NEEDS A COOL NAME,

AND THIS BEING RUSSIA, THEY WENT WITH "ENERGETIC BEAR."

"ENERGETIC BEAR--" YOU MIGHT REMEMBER HIM AS THE MOST

SEXUALLY ACTIVE CAREBEAR.

WE MIGHT HAVE MADE THAT UP, FOR LEGAL REASONS.

NOW, SO FAR, ALL THESE HACKERS HAVE DONE IS POKE AROUND.

BUT SOME EXPERTS FEAR THAT IT'S THE FIRST STEP OF A PLAN TO

CAUSE ELECTRICAL BLACKOUTS.

BUT WITHOUT ELECTRICITY, I WON'T BE ABLE TO WATCH THE NEWS AND--

PLEASE, GOD, HACK OUR POWER PLANTS!

( LAUGHTER ) I HAVEN'T SLEPT SINCE JANUARY

20th.

( LAUGHTER ) MEANWHILE, DONALD TRUMP HAS JUST

NAMED A NEW HEAD OF NASA, OKLAHOMA CONGRESSMAN JIM

BRIDENSTEIN.

BRIDENSTINE, OF COURSE, WAS SHORTENED AT ELLIS ISLAND FROM

"BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN."

( LAUGHTER ) BUT-- BUT-- HAD A NATURAL THERE

FOR A WHILE.

LOOKED VERY NICE.

HERE'S THE DEAL: BRIDENSTINE DOESN'T BELIEVE THAT HUMANS ARE

CAUSING CLIMATE CHANGE.

INTERESTING.

THE GUY WHO DOESN'T BELIEVE IN CLIMATE CHANGE IS THE ONE WITH

EASY ACCESS TO SPACESHIPS.

"EVERYTHING'S FINE.

NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT.

YOU KEEP FIGHTING THOSE STORMS.

I'LL BE IN THIS ESCAPE ROCKET."

( LAUGHTER ) NOW, CRITICS POINT OUT THAT

BRIDENSTINE IS NOT A SCIENTIST OR AND ENGINEER, THOUGH HE WAS

INVOLVED WITH A ROCKET-POWERED AIRCRAFT LEAGUE.

THINK NASCAR, BUT WITH ROCKET PLANES.

THAT SENTENCE, "THINK NASCAR, BUT WITH ROCKET PLANES," IS THE

LEADING CAUSE OF DEATH IN NORTH CAROLINA.

( LAUGHTER ) AND WHILE BRIDENSTINE WOULD BE

THE FIRST HEAD OF NASA WITHOUT A SCIENCE OR ENGINEERING

BACKGROUND, DO NOT WORRY, BECAUSE ACCORDING TO NPR, HE'S A

BIG FAN OF THE MOON.

( LAUGHTER ) ( APPLAUSE )

GREAT!

BIG FAN OF THE MOON!

WHY NOT?

SO HE'S JUST AS QUALIFIED AS MY DOG.

For more infomation >> Trump's Pick To Head NASA Has No Background In Science - Duration: 3:04.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Just Permanently Made America Great Again While Media Was Looking The Other Way | Top Stories - Duration: 1:59.

Trump is one smart man and he's taking full advantage of the fact that the media and his

other detractors assume he's an idiot.

While they continue to focus on Russia, fuel division by inciting Antifa violence and try

to say he isn't helping hurricane victims (which is totally ridiculous), he is quietly

and with efficient laser focus, changing the country to ensure his promise to

MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.

He is doing this by re-designing the Federal courts.

For instance, the 9th Circuit court has continually stamped down Trump's travel ban, his plan

to keep our country safe from terrorists.

Trump is working to change that, though.

He just named more judges to sit on the Federal appeals courts, where, for example, there

are now 4 vacancies on the 9th Circuit.

He has named Ryan Bounds to that court, a federal prosecutor with great credentials,

who served in the Bush administration.

He also just named Gregory Katsas to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit.

Mr. Katsas currently serves as deputy White House counsel.

In Trump's White House, of course.

He, too, has a stellar reputation.

I can't emphasize enough how important what Trump is doing in U.S. courts while no one

is paying attention is.

Our courts have more power over our lives than most people realize on a day to day basis.

They shape the laws under which we live every single day.

As an attorney, I am keenly aware of how important our judges' personal political views are

on cases, no matter how objective they may try to be.

If you are happy about Trump's performance as a President, please get this Shared and

comment "way to go Trump."

what do you think about this?

Please Share this news and Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe

top stories today.

For more infomation >> Trump Just Permanently Made America Great Again While Media Was Looking The Other Way | Top Stories - Duration: 1:59.

-------------------------------------------

TIN BIỂN ĐÔNG 10\9 - Bất Ngờ khi KHÔNG PHẢI Donald Trump Kim Jong Un NHẮM ĐẾN Dằ.n Mặ.t Tập cận Bình - Duration: 29:40.

For more infomation >> TIN BIỂN ĐÔNG 10\9 - Bất Ngờ khi KHÔNG PHẢI Donald Trump Kim Jong Un NHẮM ĐẾN Dằ.n Mặ.t Tập cận Bình - Duration: 29:40.

-------------------------------------------

Mexican President Has A Message For Trump (VIDEO) - Duration: 3:21.

DONALD TRUMP APPARENTLY ALREADY HAS A CHALLENGER IN THE

2020 ELECTION, AND IT'S A LONG TIME EXTREMELY VOCAL CRITIC OF

HIS WHO ALSO JUST HAPPENS TO BE THE FORMER PRESIDENT OF MEXICO,

VICENTE FOX.

HERE'S A VIDEO ANNOUNCING HIS CANDIDACY.

THIS AD WAS PAID FOR THE BY

THE GHOST OF DONALD TRUMP'S DEAD

DAD, WHO IS LOOKING UP FROM HELL WITH SHAME IN HIS EYES.

SUPER DELUXE DID THAT, GIVE THEM CREDIT, WE PUT THE LINK TO

THE ENTIRE VIDEO --

THERE'S WAY MORE.

JAYAR HAD TO DO HIS BEST EFFORT TO CUT THAT DOWN SO WE

COULD FIT IT IN THE SHOW, BUT I WANT TO ALSO GIVE ALL THE CREDIT

IN THE WORLD TO VICENTE FOX WHO IS THE FORMER PRESIDENT OF A

VERY LARGE COUNTRY WHO WAS WILLING TO DO A COMPLETE BALLS

TO THE WALL VIDEO UNLIKE I'VE EVER SEEN FROM ANY WORLD LEADER

BEFORE.

FROM ANY WORLD LEADER?

I DON'T THINK ANY WORLD LEADER HAS EVER

DONE ANYTHING APPROACHING THAT.

MAYBE A GAG REEL FOR THE

CORRESPONDENTS DINNER.

OBAMA WAS ON BETWEEN TWO FERNS, I GUESS.

THAT WAS

AMAZING, I WATCHED IT ON MOBILE AT FIRST SO I MISSED ALL THAT

STUFF IN THE BACK, LIKE THE PEE TAPE AND THE FAKE TIME MAGAZINE

COVER.

WATCH THE WHOLE VIDEO.

BRILLIANT JOB, THANK YOU, VICENTE, AND HOW MUCH BETTER OFF

WOULD WE BE WITH HIM AS PRESIDENT?

I REALLY HOPE DONALD TRUMP WATCHES THAT.

For more infomation >> Mexican President Has A Message For Trump (VIDEO) - Duration: 3:21.

-------------------------------------------

Zuckerberg, Trump, Breitbart, And, Similarly, Clowns - Some News - Duration: 7:44.

(dramatic music)

- Hello, I'm a newsperson and here's some news.

It's being reported that Mark Zuckerberg's company,

Facebook, sold $100,000 of political ads

during the 2016 US presidential campaign

to fake Russian accounts.

And after flipping a coin to decide if this should be

about Russia's influence on our election

or about Zuckerberg being the worst,

we're proud to introduce our new segment

called Zuckerberg 2020, but sarcastically.

Great job, Mark.

You're really bringing the country together

with your bubble-enforcing data-mining

ad-centric social network that didn't fix its fake news

problem because it was worried about losing profit.

Zuck 2020, I mean it.

Here's some news, the president got a do-over

for his Hurricane Harvey relief photo-op

in Texas when, sorry, breaking news,

Hurricane Irma has formed and is, sorry, breaking news

Hurricane Jose has, sorry, breaking news,

Hurricane Katia has.

Can we just put a pin in this onslaught of record-breaking

hurricanes for, just, a (beep), second.

So President Trump got to visit Texas again,

and as conservative talk fellow

Charlie Kirk pointed out, here are the photos

the Mainstream Media won't show you.

Photos he found on these Main Stream Media outlets.

But to be fair, there is a lot of focus on embarrassing

or dumb or cruel or bat (beep) things that Trump does

instead of on the good things he's done, like,

you know, the thing.

Do we have a clip?

- No.

- Worth a shot, so let's check out some of these pics

the lamestream greedia won't show us.

Here's one of him holding an object near a truck.

If only there was video of it oh good there is.

There he goes.

Loading the item in the back of the pickup, nope,

handing it to the driver, okay.

Telling the driver to have a good time, cool, that's normal.

Handed another item by someone who could just put it

in the truck but there he goes, into the back, nice, yeah.

Another box into the back, yeah.

One more from that person,

to that person, to the president, into the back.

All right, look around a little bit for a thing to put in.

Up, there you go buddy, one more.

There's a lot more room, but nope,

he just says, you're all set.

And let's wrap it up with a.

- That's good exercise.

- And just a reminder to call the number on your screen

to order our five-tape set of Presidential Exercise videos,

like Get Handed Four Items By Four Different People

Near A Truck, or Footage Not Found.

Some News, brought to you by Exercise.

Exercise, something that the president literally

thinks depletes a human's finite amount of energy,

which humans do not have.

But that was unfair, pointless mockery

of our very dumb president.

It's funny that he signed a wall in a gym,

but it doesn't matter.

Who cares, the important stuff that the lamestream greedia

won't tell you is that the president is going

to donate one million dollars to these charities.

Pretty cool, considering he has a well-documented history

of saying he'll donate to charities but doesn't.

Like that one time he went to a charity event,

didn't donate anything, snuck up onto the dais,

sat down, got his picture taken, and then left.

That happened.

He also has a history of implementing policy he contradicts.

Like cutting the interior and education budgets

by billions but donating thousands to them,

or claiming climate change is a hoax

while trying to build a sea wall at his golf resort

because of climate change, or cutting FEMA's budget

and then donating to help disaster relief,

and so here's a brief segment called,

You Know You're The President, right?

Hey, buddy.

You're the president.

You can fix some of these problems by doing,

like, president stuff.

Anyway.

Later the president went to North Dakota

during three hurricanes and gave a speech

about climate, nope, tax reform.

Also oil, coal, fossil fuels in general, and pulling out

of the job-killing Paris Climate Accord,

which is about climate change,

which the president thinks is a hoax

created by the Chinese, which if true seems

to be going really well for them.

Maybe if we called Climate Change Freedom Weather

he'd take it seriously.

Let's see, how else does the president suck.

- Me cares!

We cares?

Anyway, here's some news, since very serious man John Kelly

became White House Chief of Staff,

the president has become upset that his daily news

has fewer Breitbart articles, perhaps

because it reinforces his racist views,

but that's unfair, let's take a look at a Breitbart article.

Here's one about all of the crimes committed

by people staying here under DACA,

citing 2,139 people being arrested for a crime.

To illustrate these tax-paying DREAMers,

Breitbart originally used a photo of notorious gang MS-13.

Because DREAMers are gangs.

The photo was later changed and the really good

Breitbart article failed to mention that 2,139 people

arrested for crimes out of 800,000 DREAMers

is about one out of 374, and in America,

one in three citizens have been arrested by the age of 23.

This concludes our segment,

Get The Smart President More Honest

Breitbart Articles To Fuel Is Good Opinions.

What a clown person.

Hey, speaking of (beep) clown people,

according to the clown president

of the World Clown Association, the new evil clown film

It is hurting the clown industry.

According to one clown, it all started

with the original It, and Pennywise is not a clown

and has nothing to do with pro clowning.

Not to be confused with Extreme Pro Clowning

or Mixed Martial Arts Clowning.

Anyway, this clowndemnation has been going on for some time.

First with American Horror Story,

and later when real life creepy clowns assaulted people

last year, prompting one clown to throw

a Clown Lives Matter march like

that's not totally messed up.

Here's the thing, clowns.

I did some clown Googling, and it seems

that your World Clown Association admitted

in 2014 that the clown industry has been

on a decline since the early 2000s.

And according to the clown secretary of the prestigious

clown institute Clowns International,

modern birthday clowning is being replaced by princesses,

pirates, and superheroes.

In other words, the clown industry is hurting regardless

of the creepy clown stereotype,

a cultural idea that has existed since Ancient Rome.

It didn't start with a book in the 80s.

Clowns are historically sinister.

The most famous real life clown is famous for killing

at least 33 people.

Clowns are the coal industry of birthday parties.

Their industries have been caustic from day one.

But instead of admitting that, they point gloved fingers

at critics while refusing to recognize modern

improvements like superheroes or solar power

or natural gas or pirates.

The longer they ignore the real problem,

the harder the industry will crash into oblivion.

Get over it, clowns.

It's time to move on, look.

Anyone can clown.

It's (beep) easy.

Now it's time for you paleface monsters to put on

a Batman cowl and do some pushups.

Or, if it's easier, believe in climate change

and then carry a few items handed

to you by four people near a truck.

(upbeat dramatic music)

(electronic music)

Hey everybody, thanks for watching

make sure to click the C to subscribe

and the bell to get notifications

and visit our contribution page to help

us bring you the content.

(laughing)

Visit our contributions page to help us bring you the con.

To help us bring you the content.

I can't believe that.

Visit our contributions page

to help us bring you the content you crave.

Whoa, whoa.

Wow!

For more infomation >> Zuckerberg, Trump, Breitbart, And, Similarly, Clowns - Some News - Duration: 7:44.

-------------------------------------------

Laura Ingraham Bluntly Explains Why Republicans OWN Trump's Democrat Deal(VIDEO) - Duration: 8:23.

For more infomation >> Laura Ingraham Bluntly Explains Why Republicans OWN Trump's Democrat Deal(VIDEO) - Duration: 8:23.

-------------------------------------------

Robert Mueller's Russia Investigation Targets Donald Trump Inner Circle | The Last Word | MSNBC - Duration: 7:37.

For more infomation >> Robert Mueller's Russia Investigation Targets Donald Trump Inner Circle | The Last Word | MSNBC - Duration: 7:37.

-------------------------------------------

Hollywood Hack Jennifer Lawrence Blames Trump Voters For Recent Hurricanes(VIDEO)! - Duration: 5:52.

For more infomation >> Hollywood Hack Jennifer Lawrence Blames Trump Voters For Recent Hurricanes(VIDEO)! - Duration: 5:52.

-------------------------------------------

Universidad de California demanda al gobierno Trump | Noticiero | Noticias Telemundo - Duration: 0:36.

For more infomation >> Universidad de California demanda al gobierno Trump | Noticiero | Noticias Telemundo - Duration: 0:36.

-------------------------------------------

A Liberal Idiot Says President Trump Caused The Hurricane!!! - Duration: 2:13.

For more infomation >> A Liberal Idiot Says President Trump Caused The Hurricane!!! - Duration: 2:13.

-------------------------------------------

Bob Mueller Reportedly Wants To Talk To Donald Trump Aides About Russia | The 11th Hour | MSNBC - Duration: 5:18.

For more infomation >> Bob Mueller Reportedly Wants To Talk To Donald Trump Aides About Russia | The 11th Hour | MSNBC - Duration: 5:18.

-------------------------------------------

Donald Trump Jr. testifies before Senate committee, Steve Bannon vs. Gary Cohn - Duration: 16:07.

ROBERT COSTA: Hello. I'm Robert Costa. And this is the Washington Week Extra, where we

pick up online where we left off on the broadcast. President Trump's eldest son

testified before a Senate Judiciary Committee looking into Russian meddling. Donald Jr.

admitted during closed-door hearings that in 2016 he met with a Kremlin-connected

attorney because he was looking for damaging information about Secretary Clinton's

fitness to be president. His remarks came one day after we learned that Facebook sold

approximately $100,000 of political ads to fake accounts linked to Russian-operated

troll farms during last year's election. Most of the ads didn't mention either

candidate and centered on divisive issues like immigration, race, and gun rights.

Donald Jr. testified for five hours, but senators say that isn't enough.

They want him to answer more questions during a public session.

Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein of California says she has prepared a subpoena if

necessary if he doesn't come back voluntarily. Nancy and Michael, but let's start

with Nancy on this, you've been on Capitol Hill. Tell us about Don Jr.'s visit there.

And is this really a step forward in the Russia probe?

NANCY CORDES: It was a step forward that they were able to get him there.

There had been several months of haggling about when and how exactly he would appear.

And appear is sort of a relative term because we didn't actually see him.

He came in through the basement. He was escorted past a partition blocking our view.

So we never saw him, although he did spend, obviously, several hours with staffers and

some senators. What I heard from staffers afterwards was that he was obviously scripted.

He came in with this prepared opening statement that they felt clearly had been written

by someone else. He looked a little bit nervous at times, although we probably all

would be if we were facing a phalanx of investigators who were trained to ask questions.

But the thing that was most eyebrow raising to them, first of all, the fact that he said

that he never told his father about this meeting, he never brought them to meet his

father, that kind of strained credulity, particularly for a Democratic senator like Chris

Coons, who said afterwards, you know, so these Russians come in, they meet with Don Jr.

and several other top-ranking campaign officials, and the president never hears about it?

And yet, the next day he comes out and says, oh, well, we've got some information about

Hillary Clinton. You better wait. It's going to be really amazing. And then, beyond

that, the fact that he went before these staffers and said that he didn't know anything

about his father supposedly helping to craft the statement about Don Jr.'s interaction with -

ROBERT COSTA: Just a few months ago.

NANCY CORDES: Just a few months ago. How would you not know that your father had been

involved in crafting that statement? So, you know, clearly his story has shifted several

times. It seems to have shifted once again when he said that he really wanted to hear from

these people because he wanted to get to the bottom of whether there were questions about

Hillary Clinton's fitness for office. Think about how far we've come from his

original explanation, which was that this was a meeting about adoptions.

ROBERT COSTA: Michael, what about the Facebook story?

MICHAEL SCHERER: The Facebook story is really fascinating.

If you remember back in January, when President Obama released a public version of the

CIA report on Russian hacking, like, almost two-thirds of it was about online operations

that the Russians had run, most of them clandestinely, in public social networks, in more

private ways. The Russian operation during the last election was not just to break

into people's email accounts and steal them and, you know, make them public.

It was to try and manipulate public sentiment in the United States in a clandestine way,

using a bunch of front accounts on Twitter, on Facebook.

And what's so alarming about it is that Facebook had no idea this was happening.

Facebook has issued several denials, you know, from the beginning.

Mark Zuckerberg came out right after the election saying fake news wasn't really a

problem, before he had to sort of eat those words.

And what we now know is that Facebook has found several basically front accounts that

were buying ads as early as 2015 to sort of test the persuadability of people on

different issues - you know, gay/lesbian issues, gun rights issues.

And so Russia was using our private sector to sort of test their ability to manipulate

the public long before the election actually happened. And if you talk to Democratic

senators, people who are working on the investigation on Capitol Hill, they believe

there's much more here. This is just really the tip of the iceberg. And we still don't

know the full extent of this - of this operation. And it could be really consequential.

Not as much for the Mueller investigation and whether, you know, someone in the Trump

campaign gets in trouble - although, if they coordinated with this, they would be in

trouble - but more about, how are we going to run our future elections if foreign powers,

foreign adversaries can basically come in, in a way we're - you know, under our old campaign

finance law foreign governments couldn't spend money on our elections, and start manipulating.

JEFF ZELENY: And the questions that we have - I mean, after covering the campaign so

closely, as Nancy and I did on the Clinton side, I mean, the extent to which that they

targeted and microtargeted specific precincts and counties to change public opinion in, you

know, be it Wisconsin, Michigan, whatever. It's, A, astounding that the Clinton campaign

didn't know this was happening in real time because they had what they advertised

were the best of the best in the digital world. That obviously wasn't true.

So I think as we learn more about this, as Senator Mark Warner said this week, this is

the tip of the iceberg. This is absolutely fascinating, whether you're a Republican

or a Democrat. This is - we're about to learn a lot more about what happened last year.

ROBERT COSTA: One month after being dismissed as White House chief strategist, Steve

Bannon says he stands by the president. But his loyalty does not extend to other members

of Trump's inner circle. Bannon called out Gary Cohn, the White House economic advisor,

who said he considered resigning following the president's comments about Charlottesville,

and said the administration must do better to condemn white supremacists.

STEVE BANNON: (From video.) If you're going to break with him, resign. The stuff

that was leaked out that week by certain members of the White House I thought was

unacceptable. If you find it unacceptable, you should resign.

CHARLIE ROSE: (From video.) So who are you talking about?

STEVE BANNON: (From video.) I'm talking about - obviously about Gary Cohn and some other

people, that if you don't like what he's doing and you don't agree with it, you have an

obligation to resign, not to say that - not to say -

CHARLIE ROSE: (From video.) So Gary Cohn - Gary Cohn should have resigned?

STEVE BANNON: (From video.) Absolutely.

ROBERT COSTA: Jeff, you've been following this all week.

JEFF ZELENY: The question all week is, is there going to be another Friday round of

resignations or firing? As we speak, at this moment, on Friday evening, if you're watching -

ROBERT COSTA: Everybody check Twitter. (Laughter.)

JEFF ZELENY: - later on in the weekend, Gary Cohn is still there.

One friend of his, associate of his, told me he's not going to give them the satisfaction

- meaning Steve Bannon and others - the satisfaction at this point of leaving.

But, look, there's no question that Gary Cohn, who only weeks ago was one of the

president's closest advisors - he's a - you know, he's been a Democrat his entire life.

He came from Goldman Sachs. But the president liked him. Now, he's on the outs.

The question is, you know, a lot of people on the outs have - you know, have rebuilt

their - themselves. So now we don't know if he's leaving immediately. I think he's

not around for the long term, but he is one of the lead negotiators on tax reform.

And that is one of the reasons that he could stay. But, you know, Steve Bannon - you

know, he said that for a reason in his first 60 Minutes interview.

So that's going to sort of prime the pump for Gary Cohn to leave.

YAMICHE ALCINDOR: I think this interview reminds me of a really fascinating conversation

I had with a White House aide, who said that the one thing that General Kelly is really

struggling with is prying from Donald Trump's hands his personal cellphone number, where

he's calling up everybody whose numbers he has memorized and asking them for advice.

And he's calling up Steve Bannon, Omarosa, other people who have been around him for

decades, and it's driving General Kelly crazy.

And this is reminding me that, while Steve Bannon is gone from the White House and other

people might be gone from the White House and not be on the official rolls, they are very

much playing a part in the White House's strategy and in Donald Trump's strategy.

NANCY CORDES: I think what's also clear is that Steve Bannon has a pretty fluid view of

the term "loyalty," because on one hand he's saying that loyalty means, you know, you

always stand by the president. And he may have done that when he was in the White

House, but he sure had a lot of negative things to say about other people on the

White House staff, and that created or contributed to an image of turmoil in the

White House, and that's not necessarily being very loyal to the president.

Beyond that, once he left the White House, he said, hey, if I don't like something the

president's doing, I'm going to use my megaphone - I'm going to use Breitbart to call him

out. That's not necessarily all that loyal either.

JEFF ZELENY: And the president's family.

He had plenty of things to say about the president's son-in-law, Jared Kushner, so.

MICHAEL SCHERER: And Bannon didn't agree with everything the president said.

It's a remarkable statement for him to say if you don't agree with everything the

president believes you have to resign. I mean, the purpose of advisors is to challenge

the president. They're not all supposed to think in the same mind as the president.

YAMICHE ALCINDOR: Unless you're a president who wants loyalty and doesn't want people to

push back against you.

MICHAEL SCHERER: I don't think that's Trump. Trump wants loyalty, but I think Trump

enjoys the give and take. I don't think Trump is - Trump is not a person who surrounds

himself with just yes people who agree with what he says.

YAMICHE ALCINDOR: That's true. I think that the problem with Gary Cohn is that he

came out and publicly said that he didn't like his response to Charlottesville.

I think there is playing games and having to deal with in the room and arguing within the

room, and then there's going out and interviewing - and giving an interview to a

publication that says, you know what, I really thought that the president should have

done better with distancing himself from white supremacists.

When I think he did that, that was already a signal that he was going to be going down a

road that Donald Trump was not going to be - was not going to like, and he was going to

have to deal with the consequences of that decision.

ROBERT COSTA: Steve Bannon, on - he says he's going to be the president's wingman.

We'll see about that. (Laughter.) I also want to return to a topic we were discussing

on the show tonight, DACA. That's the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.

There's been a lot of talk about the policy fight that President Trump has set up with

Congress over whether the estimated 800,000 undocumented people brought to the United

States as children should be allowed to stay here. Sometimes what gets lost in the

conversation is the stories of the people involved, the self-described DREAMers.

These are people that have just started to emerge from the shadows to get a job or an

education. Yamiche, how do they feel in light of all the tumult this week?

YAMICHE ALCINDOR: People are terrified. The people that I've talked to, the DACA

recipients that I've talked to, are waiting to see whether or not they have to drop

out of medical school or whether or not they have to pack up and leave college or

pack up their businesses. A lot of them are business owners.

A lot of them came here from countries when they were two or three or four years old,

don't speak the language if they came here from Mexico, and now they're facing having to

pack up all of their things and move back to a foreign country which essentially they

know nothing about. So I interviewed - I go back to that interview that I had where

I went to go cover this Democratic presser and this girl was completely in tears,

couldn't hold herself together at all. And I interviewed Dick Durbin this week, and

he told me about what made him - inspired him to write the DREAM Act.

I thought it had to do with border security or something having to do with what was going

on in 2001, and he said no, it was a young girl in her teens who had gotten - who was

trying to get into college, a girl from South Korea who didn't realize she was

undocumented until she was applying for school and she realized that she - that she was

in a bind, and I felt so bad for her that I introduced this legislation. So this

legislation is really born out of someone facing odds and facing a really bad problem.

So this legislation, I think, is life or death for a lot of people because some of these

countries people fled because of death threats, because of drug wars, because of real

issues that are going on that are threatening people's lives. And now they're

hoping that the Congress can do again in six months what they didn't do in 16 years.

JEFF ZELENY: It's fascinating in the sense that - where President Trump is ending the

week on this. By starting the week with Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who's one of

the most hardline immigration opponents, you know, being the face of the

administration, the president clearly did not like the tone that that set.

So I'm thinking back to that meeting last November between President-elect Trump and

President Obama in the Oval Office, their really only substantive meeting.

It lasted about 90 minutes. I'm told that, you know, now about two-thirds of that

time was talking about DACA, this very thing, and President Obama urged him to

sort of have a heart and think about that, and think of the images and the pictures.

And I think that that has shaped the president's view, and also what he's hearing from

his daughter and son-in-law.

So President Trump, on what he does from here on DACA, is going to be fascinating.

MICHAEL SCHERER: The other voice that matters with DACA with the president is a lot of

his Evangelical advisors. Conservative white Evangelical Christians are very much

in favor of protecting these and giving work permits or some path to citizenship for

these people, and they have said to him during the campaign a condition of my

support for you is that you don't leave these people behind.

You know, they have him some of the other immigration rhetoric, but not this.

NANCY CORDES: I think, though, you have to remember how complicated the Republican

politics is when it comes to immigration. You could even see it in everything that

the president said this week. On one hand, he's saying, look, this is unconstitutional,

we've got the rule of law here, folks. On the other hand, he's saying, but they're

going to be fine, we're going to take care of them, don't worry.

And, you know, that is a microcosm of what's really playing out in the broader Republican

Party, you know, a feeling that you do need to get in line, and if you don't - if you're

not in line, you jump the line, then you shouldn't be able to get any kind of advantage

for that. And so, you know, for the past four years immigration reform has been such

a lightning rod on Capitol Hill they haven't even bothered to try to do anything.

It fell apart in the House in 2013, and they basically haven't revisited it since.

So the notion that now suddenly they're going to be able to reopen this wound and address

it in a thoughtful manner, that's a really, really tough obstacle.

ROBERT COSTA: Nancy, how do they do it? If DACA comes up in December or sometime

early next year, do they attach it to the budget, to the debt ceiling extension?

Do they do it as a standalone bill?

NANCY CORDES: I think that matters - whether it's standalone or attached to the debt

ceiling may matter less than what you attach to DACA, what kind of border security

measures. I think everyone is in agreement that it's kind of a waste of time to try

to do some massive comprehensive immigration reform bill. That takes an incredible

amount of time - Republicans want to focus on tax reform - and it's just so tricky

politically. So maybe attach DACA to one or two other things.

The tricky thing for Democrats here is that they always saw the DREAM Act as something

that you could use as a sweetener in a larger, comprehensive reform package - how can you

not be for these kids, you know? And it's something that brings people together on

a larger immigration reform package that deals with the 11 million people who are

here in this country illegally, and in many cases in the shadows.

And some of them worry, as much as they want to help these DREAMers, if you do pass the

DREAM Act, then how do you ever get back to comprehensive immigration reform where you do

something to address the legal status of these 11 million people?

ROBERT COSTA: We'll leave it there. Thanks, everyone, for joining us. Great to

have you. And that's it for this edition of the Washington Week Extra. While you're

online, test your knowledge of current events on the Washington Week-ly News Quiz.

And go to our Facebook page, where you can watch the video from today's Facebook Live

event. I'm Robert Costa. See you next time.

For more infomation >> Donald Trump Jr. testifies before Senate committee, Steve Bannon vs. Gary Cohn - Duration: 16:07.

-------------------------------------------

Stephen Colbert Monologue 9/8/2017: Trump Jr. claimed innocence to senate investigators - Duration: 11:32.

Stephen Colbert Monologue 9-8 : The Late show Colbert Trump Jr. claimed innocence to senate investigators

Everybody welcome welcome to the Late Show I'm your host Stephen Colbert

Crowd there's no there's no mistake on Friday crowd man

You can take a core sample this crowd pull it out and count the rings of Friday

That's how pure the party crowd is tonight now us and I hope everybody out there is staying safe or evacuated away from Hurricane

Thermos thing is serious

Look at the Weather Channel's apt

actual forecast for Miami Beach this weekend

100 percent chance of rain wins a hundred and twenty seven miles an hour

still

less chaotic than Spring Break at Daytona Beach

But we want to send our thoughts and prayers to everyone affected also

Thoughts and money if you don't know where to give

Tuning on Tuesday to hand-in-hand a telefon to benefit everyone affected by both hurricanes

Irma and Harvey I will be there Manning the phones. Give me a call who knows you might learn something. You don't know about me

like my pin number

Which would also allow you to give more money

Good luck with that meanwhile. What else is going on. Oh yes yesterday?

Eldest son and man whose head makes its own gravy Donald Trump jr.

Had a really big day on Capitol Hill. He met with Senate Judiciary Committee

Investigators you see he's been accused of having met with a Russian lawyer in hopes of getting dirt on Hillary, Clinton

But he explained. It was all big misunderstanding in fact. He actually

Met with a Russian lawyer in hopes of getting dirt on Hillary, Clinton

See nothing to see here folks

because his testimony was not on camera, but that

Doesn't mean Don Jr. Is hiding right?

He came in he avoided the cameras on his way

and they clearly do not want pictures of him doing this they came in through a

hidden loading dock deep in the bowels of the Capitol

Yes, the bowels of the Capitol where all of America's most courageous leaders are pooped out

Now the New York Times has obtained a copy of Don Jr

Statements where he reportedly maintains that nothing came of the Trump Tower meeting therefore

He never colluded with the Russian government right that makes it perfectly legal

You know like if you rob a bank and the vault turns out to be empty

no harm no foul

Can I still have a free calendar

but

Maybe the scariest Russia story out there right now is the revelation that Russia linked hackers breached

100 nuclear and conventional power plants just this year which explains why the Palo Verde nuclear power stations employee of the month

was done

So far the hackers intrusions have been gathering intelligence

Technical diagrams reports passwords and crypto keys crypto keys by the way was also the title of my all

synthesizer concept album

Of course jeez

Of course every hacker group needs a cool name and this being Russia they went with an energetic bear

Energetic bear yes, you might remember him as the most sexually active Care Bear

Now

You might have made that up now

For legal reasons now so far so far all these hackers have done is poke around but some experts fear

But it's the first step to a plan of causing electrical

blackouts what but without electricity I will be able to watch the news and

please God hack our power plants I

Haven't slept since January 20th

Meanwhile Donald Trump has just named a new head of NASA

Oklahoma Congressman Jim Bryden Stein

Bryden Stein of course was shortened at Ellis Island from Bride of Frankenstein

But

Get a natural there for a while very nice

But here's the deal Bryden Steinem does not believe that humans are causing climate change

Interesting the guy who doesn't believe in climate change is the one with easy access to the spaceships?

Everything's fine nothing to worry about you keep fighting those storms. I'll be in the escape rocket

Now

Critics point out that bridenstine is not a scientist or an engineer

Though he was involved with a rocket-powered aircraft League think NASCAR, but with rocket planes

That sentence think NASCAR, but with rocket planes is the leading cause of death in North Carolina

and

and while bridenstine would be the first head of NASA without any science or engineering background do not worry because

according to NPR

He's a big fan of the moon

Great oh

Why not

So he's just as qualified as my dog. Oh

speaking of space

Speaking of space. This is actually pretty bean is big news from a galaxy far far away

Recently Thank You, Wookiee. I'm not sure

Who that is out in the audience?

Recently we learned that Jurassic world director Colin Trevorrow

Is out as director of Star Wars Episode nine I believe we have a video of how he was fired

They always choke you on a Friday

Lucasfilm has released a statement saying that they have mutually chosen to part ways with

Director while Colin Trevorrow released a statement saying if you strike me down I should become more powerful than you can possibly imagine

That his robe just collapsed. It was weird there's nobody there

Now this turnover is just the latest indication

They're not always well in that wretched hive of scum and villainy we call Hollywood

Because it comes after doesn't he fired the directors of the young Han Solo movie and headed to expensive reshoots on Star Wars rogue one

Plus the ASPCA came down on them pretty hard for their treatment of Chewbacca

Sorry

Episode 9 is slated to come out in less than two years so obviously Disney is scrambling to find a replacement

Director as fast as possible we thought we'd help here at the Late Show by suggesting some people

We thought would do a great job first up if there's one thing we can all agree on is the Star Wars films

we're missing 70s music and extended conversations about

cheeseburgers so get ready for Quentin Tarantino's Star Wars Episode nine

everybody shoots first

Of course I'd watch that

I'd watch of course Tarantino can be a little polarizing, but everybody loves romantic comedy

So what about Nancy Meyers Star Wars Episode nine?

what wookies plot

Sometimes sometimes the droids you were looking for right in front of you the whole time

But one director is really throwing his hat into the ring for this job. Even going ahead and making his own trailer ladies and gentlemen

Presenting a new take on Star Wars from the knee allistic German director of Fitzcarraldo and Grizzly Man

Verna Herzog a

Long time ago in the galaxy far far away

As far away as a mother's affectionate glance or too cold touch of your sobbing lava

The evil force toward us seeks control of the galaxy

Forgetting that the galaxy itself is not but the infinite void this is the very of things

In the desert there is nothing but suffering life cannot sustain here

But truly it cannot sustain anywhere that is inevitable and in this we find comfort

look

mosquitos dancing on the carcass of infinity our agony lends us brilliance I

Love this guy. He is a spunky little robot ball, and I like that

This earring cart of the lightsaber cannot compare to the unfeeling violence of our endless universe

Star Wars Episode nine

By doing me the subtitle and 100 years from now each of us will be dead buried in the cold dark brown

We are coming up on the weekend, this is a Friday Friday means

We're about to do Stephen Colbert's midnight confessions, which reminds me this weekend go out

Get my new book Stephen Colbert's midnight confessions. We are going to milk this thing

Until there is nothing left. There's gonna be an audiobook

midnight confessions the Broadway musical

Which will then be adapted into a movie midnight confessions?

Tokyo Drift

Who's there to be novelized in book form so don't miss the boat get it on the ground floor?

With midnight confessions all right now we do

Know don't fight it bring it

Now we do midnight confessions because even though I'm a Catholic. I don't make it to church as often as there is Church and

What I miss most about the sacraments is confession so if you don't mind I'd like to confess to you my audience you won't

Tell anybody right

Great this is Stephen Colbert's midnight confessions

For more infomation >> Stephen Colbert Monologue 9/8/2017: Trump Jr. claimed innocence to senate investigators - Duration: 11:32.

-------------------------------------------

Trump planning SECRET ATTACK to cripple North Korea as WW3 tensions explode - DAILY NEWS - Duration: 2:18.

Trump planning SECRET ATTACK to cripple North Korea as World War 3 tensions explode

US supremo Donald Trump is preparing to launch a secret attack on North Korea that he hopes

will bring down Kim Jong-un's regime.

Washington spies are primed to launch a series of cyberattacks in a bid to bring Kim Jong-un

to his knees, according to Pentagon officials.

Hackers would be given free reign to cripple the North's computer network – preventing

it from firing missiles at its enemies.

The US is also considering targeting ships powering towards North Korea carrying missile

parts and technology that Pyongyang uses to make its deadly bombs.

It is the latest event in s steep trend of rapid US military escalation.

In recent days Donald Trump has sent in tanks, marines and nuclear-powered warships.

The US strongman warned the North it would experience "fire and fury" if it dared

to fire any long-ranged missiles at the US heartland.

But tubster Kim has so-far ignored the Donald's warnings and has brazenly continued to order

a series of intercontinental ballistic missile launches.

The brash regime became so confident that it carried out a hydrogen bomb test, which

was so powerful that it was registered as a 6.3 magnitude quake.

North Korea is widely expected to provoke the US again today by launching another long-rang

explosive as part of its anniversary celebrations.

Last year it detonated a nuclear bomb sending shockwaves through the international community.

For more infomation >> Trump planning SECRET ATTACK to cripple North Korea as WW3 tensions explode - DAILY NEWS - Duration: 2:18.

-------------------------------------------

#NOTICIAS #MEXICO Donald Trump Ignora Mexicanos por #Sismo #FuerzaMéxico #OaxacaTeNecesita - Duration: 1:27.

For more infomation >> #NOTICIAS #MEXICO Donald Trump Ignora Mexicanos por #Sismo #FuerzaMéxico #OaxacaTeNecesita - Duration: 1:27.

-------------------------------------------

President Donald Trump strikes a deal with Democrats - Duration: 23:50.

ROBERT COSTA: No regrets. President Trump upends both parties, cuts a surprise deal with

Democrats, and rattles Republicans. I'm Robert Costa. Why is the president reaching

across the aisle, and will the GOP revolt? Tonight on Washington Week.

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: (From video.) I had a great bipartisan meeting with Democrat and

Republican leaders in Congress, and I'm committed to working with both parties to deliver

for our wonderful, wonderful citizens. It's about time.

ROBERT COSTA: President Trump undercuts Republicans, strikes a deal with Democrats, and wraps

hurricane aid to a fiscal package. Stunned GOP leaders didn't grumble, at least publicly.

SENATE MAJORITY LEADER MITCH MCCONNELL: (From video.) His feeling was that we needed to

come together to not create a picture of divisiveness.

ROBERT COSTA: Hardline conservatives see it differently, blaming the Republican

establishment, not the White House.

STEVE BANNON: (From video.) The Republican establishment is trying to nullify the 2016

election. That's a brutal fact we have to face.

CHARLIE ROSE: (From video.) Who?

STEVE BANNON: (From video.) I think - I think Mitch McConnell and to a degree Paul Ryan.

They do not want Donald Trump's populist, economic nationalist agenda to be implemented.

It's very obvious. It's obvious as - it's obvious as - it's obvious as night follows day.

ROBERT COSTA: Will the president's alliance with Democrats spark a Republican rebellion?

Plus, the president opens the door to an immigration bill -

PROTESTERS: (From video.) DREAMers here to say! DREAMers here to stay!

ROBERT COSTA: - just days after the administration announced it would phase out the

program protecting young undocumented immigrants.

We will talk policy and politics with Yamiche Alcindor of The New York Times, Michael

Scherer of The Washington Post, Nancy Cordes of CBS News, and Jeff Zeleny of CNN.

ANNOUNCER: Celebrating 50 years, this is Washington Week.

Once again, live from Washington, moderator Robert Costa.

ROBERT COSTA: Good evening. President Trump welcomed Congress back from its summer

recess with a curveball: he bucked Republicans and aligned with Democrats on a three-part

agreement to bundle hurricane relief with a short-term extension to fund the government

and lift the debt limit. It all happened inside the Oval Office, where Senate Majority

Leader Mitch McConnell and House Speaker Paul Ryan sat side by side with Democratic

leaders Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi. The president threw the usual playbook of fiscal

showdowns out the window, and the Senate and the House soon approved the

multibillion-dollar package. It marked a significant legislative victory for the

president. Trump is calling this a bipartisan moment that Americans want, but there

wasn't really any compromise where the two sides met in the middle.

Instead, he caught the GOP off-guard and embraced the Democrats.

Michael, what drove the president to go in this direction?

MICHAEL SCHERER: He's been frustrated - obviously, when you read his Twitter - for

months at Republican leaders' inability to get anything done in Congress, and he saw an

opportunity here to create essentially a competition between Democrats and Republicans.

And by not only making this deal, where he accepts the Democrats' terms on their face,

but then going around for the next two days and bragging about his close relationship

with "Nancy and Chuck" - (laughter) - people who he's spent, you know, months excoriating

on Twitter and elsewhere, he's basically put a challenge in front of the Republican

leadership to get their act together to begin passing his platform, you know.

And the most interesting part, it's sort of a double win for him.

He gets to do this sort of victory dance. The most interesting part to me is that the

conservatives have largely not blamed him for this. He essentially gave away negotiating

leverage in December that's going to mean probably more government spending, a different

compromise with DACA, maybe less leverage for him to build his wall.

And conservatives, instead of blaming the president for doing something that wouldn't

have been allowed before, you know, in their philosophy, are blaming their own leaders.

JEFF ZELENY: It's fascinating in the sense that without a doubt it's the most, you know,

mysterious move he's made. It's something that really no one was expecting.

But I am told by, you know, talking to a variety of people, even his own Cabinet, they

were not expecting this. I'm told that Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin was in the

middle of talking about, you know, the argument for a longer-term deal, the president

cut him off and said we're siding with the Democratic plan.

So it is - I think the shortest answer is he wanted a win. He wanted a short-term win

that showed that he's in charge, you know, this sugar-rush high of the press coverage.

And, you know, talking to someone - the next day he called Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer

and the other leaders on the phone as well, and I'm told that he was raving about the

press coverage, you know - "I looked so good." He told Senator Schumer: you look good on

my channels, I look good on your channels. So he really was taken with this.

The question is, where does this go from here? And it's - you know, it's why covering

this White House and this administration and this town at this moment, there's not a

script for it. And he liked this. You know, he was walking out - I was watching him on

Friday afternoon, this afternoon, walking to Marine One as he flew to Camp David, a

bounce in his step like we've not seen for a while. We talk a lot about his bad weeks.

This was, I think, one of his best.

NANCY CORDES: But I think we also have to consider the possibility that the main driver

for him making this deal was simply presidential impatience.

Nancy Pelosi recounted the next day how this conversation went down.

She said it was going back and forth for a long time there in the White House, and the

president finally said, OK, well, you know, the Democrats, you know, want three months,

the Republicans want 18 months, the Republicans don't have the votes for 18 months on

their own, let's just do three months. And this is someone who is well-known for

having a short attention span and someone who - Jeff, you've been watching him all

week - clearly was very fixated on hurricane preps, hurricane relief.

He had a lot more details at his fingertips when it came to hurricane relief than he has

on other issues that have been facing the White House and Congress lately.

And I think it's possible that he just wanted to wrap up that conversation and get back

to focusing on the hurricanes.

ROBERT COSTA: And wrapping up that conversation - I ran into Yamiche at the Senate

carryout at the Capitol. We were talking to lawmakers all week.

And they got - they actually got stuff done. The debt ceiling's extended into December.

The budget is extended into December. And they got hurricane relief to Texas.

So is Washington working?

YAMICHE ALCINDOR: It's incredible that with this president that people have said is

impulsive, that can't get things done, who's really faced a lot of criticism for not

really getting a lot of wins, that this is the week where Washington is actually

functioning in a way that it's supposed to, in some ways, function.

Of course, the debt ceiling probably should not be something that is a continual crisis,

but the idea that you actually have things functioning, I think, is why you see that pep

in his step. But I think I will go back to the idea that there are so many Republicans

that were talking to me. I think Darrell Issa who told me, Republicans essentially

need to up their game. That now - we're now dealing with a president that's not just a

Republican who's going to be in our corner, but now he's really set himself up as this

neutral arbitrator where if we go to the White House with an issue we should not think

that he's just going to take the side of the Republicans because he's a Republican.

So I think that that, to me, changes the game for a lot of Republican leaders.

And the fact that there are people blaming the Republican leadership rather than the

president tells me that he has - that the president understands his stance, understands

that he is the one who's leading the Republican Party now, and that he is the one with

the leverage. When he's talking to Mitch McConnell and Paul Ryan, that he can

say, look, this is what I want and you have to do what I want to do.

JEFF ZELENY: I think, though - I mean, despite - I think the reason he got so much good

coverage and we're sort of giving glowing praise, is because it's just so different.

We've seen eight months of just, you know, no action, inaction. It is, you know,

setting up a very hectic end of the year. I mean, we've all be on Capitol Hill - Nancy

and I have logged holidays it seems on Capitol Hill doing deals and stuff.

So this is where it's going to come down to in December.

So I still think, again, the next day the president said - he was in the Cabinet Room.

He said, look, this is signaling a new governing style. I think that's yet to be seen

because what you said earlier, that the base doesn't blame him.

They don't this week, which is remarkable. We'll see if that lasts, though, because

once the coverage of this sort of deal moves beyond, you know, the actual substance,

I think some conservatives will have some, you know, buyer's remorse.

MICHAEL SCHERER: And it could definitely backfire in December because Democrats will

have much more leverage than they would have had otherwise. But I think what it

highlights is something Nancy said. Trump has come to terms - when he came into office,

he was told by his advisors that the House and the Senate had it under control.

Go through - we're going to do, you know, Obamacare repeal first, then we're going to go

to the tax cuts. They're going to take care of it. You know, you'll have to make some

calls, but we're going to get this done. It's going to go like this.

None of it went anywhere. And the president's realized that there just is no

functioning Republican majority in the House or the Senate. And what you said, he was

sitting in a meeting in which one side was saying, we could sign this today and make

it happen. And the other side was saying, well, we can work on this and negotiate and

do all this stuff.

If Republicans can't get their act together and start coming to him and saying, OK,

here's how we're going to do this, he is saying to the country, to the Republicans, I'm

going to start moving away from you. And that puts enormous pressure on them.

ROBERT COSTA: And, Nancy, it wasn't just the deal that was cut. The president made

other gestures to Democrats. He really championed Senator Heidi Heitkamp of North

Dakota at a presidential event. And he's working with Chuck Schumer, the minority

leader, on a possible deal to get rid of the debt ceiling extension process entirely.

So Republicans have to be watching this and wondering.

NANCY CORDES: And Pelosi asked him, hey, would you mind just tweeting to the DREAMers and

telling them not to worry, they won't be deported over the next six months? And he was

like, duh, duh, duh, done. And so, you know, that raised some eyebrows on Capitol Hill as

well. And I asked Pelosi after that, so, does this signal some kind of renaissance in your

relationship with the president, some new era of cooperation?

And she said, well, that would assume - if you use the word renaissance - that there was

a relationship before that is now being reborn.

And she said, no, the reality is, and this is a political reality that all of these

leaders know, they've very savvy, is, you know, sometimes your opponents on many other

issues can be your - you know, your wingmen on areas of agreement.

And you've already - always got to be open to that, she said.

So she wasn't ready to embrace this notion that suddenly they're besties and they're

going to get all kinds of things done together.

ROBERT COSTA: Yamiche, what about her counterpart in the House, House Speaker Paul Ryan?

He's under siege. Conservatives are still blaming him for a lot of the inaction on

Capitol Hill. There's talk of even a rebellion, though it's probably not going to happen.

Ryan retains support. Where does Ryan go from here?

YAMICHE ALCINDOR: Ryan is facing so much pressure.

I think where Ryan goes from here is trying to really figure out how - really trying to

lay out a plan for how the next couple months are going to go, and really trying to shore

up his base and say, OK, what do you guys actually want? What can we actually get done?

Because when I was on Capitol Hill this week and I was watching Mark Meadows and Freedom

Caucus members hold court as if they were the speaker of the House, it made me sit back

and think: This is not the way that this is supposed to function.

And Paul Ryan has to be frustrated when he watches these people say, well, we might come

out with our own tax reform plan if Paul Ryan doesn't get it together.

ROBERT COSTA: Can the speaker, Yamiche, can he count on the president on tax reform to follow through?

YAMICHE ALCINDOR: I think that - I mean, I think that Donald Trump has been, in some

ways, pretty clear that he wants to get this done. Can he count on the president, I

think, as a president who's so impulsive, and, as Nancy said, as someone who wants to

get a deal done? If tax reform starts looking like health care, where it's going to

start dragging on and on and on, I can imagine the president saying, let's just go with

the deal that we can get done.

JEFF ZELENY: Maybe, I mean, but tax reform is, I mean, harder than health care in some

respects. And it's - you know, hasn't been done - we'll see.

I'm a little skeptical that, given the - you know, the other, you know, crises -

Hurricane Irma, of course, at this moment, this weekend, you know, might be worse than

Harvey, likely will be. There's a lot for this government to sort of deal with now.

So I'm a little skeptical of tax reform. But now, you know, there's a new possibility

as Senator Schumer is suddenly his new partner on this. I mean, at some point will

Republicans rebel on this? Seventeen Republicans in the Senate, 90 Republicans in the

House voted against this. What if they sort of reach a critical mass against a deal?

That's a problem for this White House.

ROBERT COSTA: But what have Republicans missed in understanding President Trump,

Michael, that Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi recognized?

MICHAEL SCHERER: Well, in that meeting, it's that President Trump is always

transactional. And he operates in the moment and he operates in the room.

And he will change from day to day on what he's saying based on who he's talking to.

And he doesn't see a problem with that. I mean, that's the way he's always been.

They came in with a deal. Republicans didn't have a deal. They presented a deal.

And Trump was willing to make the jump. I think the difference -

I'm not super optimistic about tax reform either. But the difference between tax

reform and Obamacare repeal and replace is that tax reform is sort of a sliding scale.

You can keep moving the numbers to get more votes - even Democratic votes.

You couldn't do that with Obamacare, because it was such a black and white issue.

Democrats were never going to go along and provide any help.

And so there's a lot of places here for negotiation.

And if Ryan and McConnell can't come up with the votes, that's the signal the president's

saying, to get something done on their own - you know, that brings the rates really low,

that does what the president wants - the president's saying, well, look, we'll just

change the numbers, I'll go talk to my friend Chuck.

ROBERT COSTA: That's exactly what Jeff was talking about too.

Are we seeing, Nancy, a new coalition on Capitol Hill - mainstream Democrats, mainstream

Republicans, and maybe not having the Freedom Caucus and the fringes of both parties

dictate where everything goes?

NANCY CORDES: Well, I think they would like that. And they're certainly eager to work

together, been eager to work together on issues like health care and tax reform.

But as recently as the middle of this week, Paul Ryan reiterated that they are going

strictly in the Republican direction when it comes to tax reform. They are not going

to try to work on some bipartisan deal. His definition of bipartisanship when it comes

to tax reform is: I think some Democrats might like our Republican plan. But that's it.

They're still going to - you know, they experienced a failure on that front when they

tried to go that way with health care. But they think that they can get it done this time.

It's not at all clear, because, you know, when you talk about tax reform and you're going

to lower individual rates, corporate rates. You're going to cut a huge hole in the

revenue, how are you going to make it up? There are going to be at least a handful

of Republicans who are going to be very concerned about that.

ROBERT COSTA: But, Jeff, who's the president listening to? We saw in the open

Steve Bannon, his former chief strategist, talking to 60 Minutes. Bannon had often

advised the president to work with Democrats. Is he - is he talking to the

president, or is there someone else who's pushing the president to the center?

JEFF ZELENY: I have no doubt that the president and Steve Bannon are still

communicating. We know who the president's not listening to, that's members of his

own team, his Cabinet.

I mean, the Treasury secretary is a key negotiator in this, he cut him off at the knees.

I mean, so I think that - the president, I think, largely is operating on his own

instinct after - and we see all presidents grow in the job and learn in the job.

You know, this president has seen now for seven-plus months what doesn't work.

I think he wanted to sort of take the reins a little bit.

But there's no doubt he wanted to mix things up this week.

And he likes the outcome, at least in the short term. But again, this does not solve

all of, you know, the challenges before him - never mind Russia and everything else.

ROBERT COSTA: Let's turn to a big issue that's going to be a consequence of all of these

swirling forces in Washington, because the president says he also wants to work with the

Democrats on a new immigration plan to protect an estimated 800,000 undocumented young

people from deportation. Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced that the administration

will begin phasing out the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program over six months.

That's how much time the president is giving Congress to create a legal alternative, or

he has threatened to take action himself. Michael, we're looking at a president who really

seems to want to make a deal to protect these 800,000 people, working with the Democrats.

Is that what we should expect in December, when all of these deadlines come up again?

MICHAEL SCHERER: I think so, in part because he just gave them leverage with the deal he

made over the debt ceiling. You know, the president has been very consistent since the

election that he doesn't - he sees the childhood arrival group as a very distinct group

from the other illegal immigration problem, and that he wants to take care of them.

I think he did have a real problem and the Justice Department had a real problem with the

fact that it was put through in an executive order, and so he wanted to handle it.

And again, this is sort of a twofer. He's released the executive order program, but

now he gets to play the moderating, you know, bipartisan hero here, at least so far

through tweets. He's made very clear, for instance, that he's - you know, that the

people who are here under DACA don't have to worry, at least for the moment.

ROBERT COSTA: Well, they do have to worry a little bit, Yamiche. They're in flux.

YAMICHE ALCINDOR: Everyone I've talked to that's a DACA recipient is very worried.

When the Democrats had this press conference just this week talking - with Nancy Pelosi

and other leaders talking about how they wanted to push for DACA, I interviewed this

young girl who was crying the entire press conference because she's a young DACA

recipient who owns a cleaning business, who's a student in college.

And she says even as this deal is being - is really being brokered, her life and the life

of her family really hangs in the balance, so there's - she's under such intense pressure

and such intense stress when this is happening. But I think that the thing that goes

back to me as a reporter, this has been going on for 16 years.

For 16 years - before there was DACA, there was the DREAM Act.

In 2001, when Senator Dick Durbin introduced this - and I interviewed him this week - he

said I would never have thought that 16 years later we would still be trying to figure

out how to deal with this. Now Congress is going to try to do in six months what

it couldn't do in 16 years. Now, while that sounds like we're in this critical mass

where everyone really agrees, I'm very skeptical of the fact that these two parties

are going to come together and really broker a deal.

ROBERT COSTA: But, Nancy, the Republican leadership - House Speaker Paul Ryan, McConnell

in the Senate - they seem to be willing to move in the direction of approving a DACA fix.

NANCY CORDES: Sure, and Paul Ryan said this week he hopes that Congress can find

consensus, which is very different from saying he's confident that Congress can find

consensus. There is a lot of support on the right and the left for the DREAM Act, but

the challenge is that on the right there's a lot of discomfort with the notion of just

pushing through the DREAM Act by itself, because many Republicans will argue that if you

do that you are only encouraging more people to bring their young children to this

country illegally. So they say it's got to be combined with border security measures.

ROBERT COSTA: Exactly.

NANCY CORDES: What are those border security measures? Democrats would happily go

along with some of them. If you're talking about billions of dollars in wall funding,

they're going to argue that that's a nonstarter.

ROBERT COSTA: Nancy, you nailed it. What is going to be the deal? If the president's

going to be this big dealmaker right now, in December, Jeff, he's going to have to maybe

cut a deal for the border wall. But if he's - the Democrats don't want a physical wall.

JEFF ZELENY: They don't want a physical wall, and they're probably, I mean, not going to

get one. The reality here is as these proposals for the wall have come in - this

hasn't gotten a lot of attention - it's a fence more than a wall.

And, you know, the experts here are saying a wall, a concrete wall that we heard about on

the campaign trail, is not feasible here. But we've seen the president's flexibility,

as Michael was talking about earlier. He wants to cut a deal. So I think that, you

know, there may be a piece of a wall, the rest of it's a fence, whatever.

He'll call it a wall whether it is or not, and he'll call it a victory.

He can claim victory on something and move on, and his base seems to follow along with

him. You know, we'll see how far that goes.

MICHAEL SCHERER: You essentially could have a debate about building materials -

(laughter) - you know, whether you're just steel or how much concrete is OK in this bill.

And Democrats, like you said, they say border security, fine, so there is room to

maneuver here. Both sides have room to maneuver, they just will have to fight over

whether they're calling it a wall or not.

YAMICHE ALCINDOR: But for years Democrats have used the DREAM Act and DACA to really ask

for comprehensive immigration reform that includes millions of other people, and I think

there are a lot of Democrats - some that I've interviewed this week - who say they still

want that. And it's a less sympathetic group; it's not just the people, it's their

parents. So I think that that's a big part of this deal.

ROBERT COSTA: We're going to have to leave it there.

And I want to take a moment to tell you about a new program premiering on PBS tonight,

Third Rail with OZY. Each week, the program will ask the hard questions that many

people are debating among their friends and family. Host Carlos Watson joins us now

from New York. And tonight you debate the provocative question: Is truth overrated?

With all the talk about fake news, do Americans see the truth as relative?

CARLOS WATSON (Host, Third Rail with OZY): Hey, Robert. It's really good to be with

you tonight, and I think that's a terrific question. I think the reality is that more

Americans are worried that the truth has become relative. In fact, in the poll that we

did for the Third Rail with OZY, almost double the number of people now say that they

feel like they're lied to some of the time versus 30 years ago, so we've seen a huge surge.

No doubt part of that is the critique that President Trump has lied not just as much as

other politicians in the past, but maybe more.

So a lot of muddiness, really heated question, and it's a big reason that the Third Rail

with OZY wanted to dive right in and kind of hit one of the main veins of conversation.

ROBERT COSTA: Carlos, you're also inviting the audience to be part of the debate.

Tell me about that.

CARLOS WATSON: You know, Robert, one of the things that we love at the Third Rail with

OZY is, one, we're getting really great, important guests like Malcolm Gladwell, Amber

Rose, Mark Cuban, Jeb Bush, others to jump into the arena on these important questions.

But maybe more important, we think we're allowing the audience to weigh in.

I mean, so many people have talked about this at home, debating it, frankly sometimes in

incredibly frustrated ways. And we want to provide a forum, whether it's online or

whether people come and join us in the studio audience, that they get a chance to

share their voice. We think it's really important.

We hope it's a big part of the reason that the Third Rail with OZY becomes a main staple.

ROBERT COSTA: Thanks, Carlos. Should be a fascinating discussion. I'll be watching.

The Third Rail with OZY premieres tonight on PBS. Check your local listings.

And that's it for us. Our conversation will continue on the Washington Week Extra,

where we'll tell you about Donald Trump Jr. and what he revealed to Senate

investigators about his meeting with a Russian attorney during last year's election.

You can find that later tonight at PBS.org/WashingtonWeek. And a quick thanks to

everyone who joined me this afternoon for my Facebook Live chat. That was fun.

And if you missed it, you can watch the chat on the Washington Week Facebook page.

Before we go, we really want to send our thoughts to those in the path of Irma and to

those in Texas who are still recovering from Harvey. Stay safe.

I'm Robert Costa. See you next time.

No comments:

Post a Comment