Monday, February 4, 2019

Trump news on Youtube Feb 4 2019

and with the second summit between North Korea and the United States coming up

soon president Trump is sounding optimistic about the prospects for a

deal on denuclearization Trump says Kim jong-un has a chance to make North Korea

an economic powerhouse but warns it can't be done if Kim keeps his nuclear

weapons conn-young new reports US president Donald Trump says there's a

very good chance that he and Kim jong-un will reach at the univers Asian deal at

their upcoming second summit Trump was speaking to us broadcaster CBS in their

interview airs Sunday local time he also said that Kim jong-un has an opportunity

to make North Korea a tremendous economic behemoth but that won't happen

he said with nuclear weapons citing his experience in real estate

Trump pointed to North Korea's location between South Korea China and Russia as

why he thinks it could become an economic powerhouse Trump added that he

thinks Kim jong-un wants to make a deal on denuclearization because Kim is tired

of going through what is going through referring to the international sanctions

on the regime it's widely believed but not confirmed that the second summit

will happen in Vietnam Trump did not say exactly when and where it will be

but hinted that the date and venue might be revealed in his State of the Union

address slated for Tuesday local time in Washington DC when asked about the

possibility of pulling out the US forces stationed in South Korea Trump said it's

expensive to keep them on the peninsula but there are no plans to remove them

and claimed he has never discussed such an option

Penuel arirang news

For more infomation >> Kim Jong-un has chance to make N. Korea economic powerhouse: Trump - Duration: 1:40.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump Reveals His Super Bowl Pick! - Duration: 2:44.

For more infomation >> President Trump Reveals His Super Bowl Pick! - Duration: 2:44.

-------------------------------------------

AFTER MEDIA TRIES TO IMPEACH TRUMP – MUELLER DROPS HAMMER ON THEM, DEFENDS DONALD - Duration: 17:16.

AFTER MEDIA TRIES TO IMPEACH TRUMP – MUELLER DROPS HAMMER ON THEM, DEFENDS DONALD

after media tries to impeach Trump Muller hammers them defends Donald the

liberal media tried to take down the president but it was so bad Muller came down on them

the big headline news at least in the mainstream media

has been BuzzFeed's breaking news that Trump is about to be impeached they

published a story that Michael Cohen accused President Trump of telling Cohen to lie to

Congress under oath information obtained through the Muller investigation

by directing him to commit perjury Trump himself would be guilty of

a high crime and misdemeanor immediately every liberal media outlet repeated endlessly how

this was finally what they needed to impeach Trump except they missed

one important thing it was all a big lie from Axios in a rare move the

Office of Special Counsel Robert Muller has gone on the record to dispute the bombshell

BuzzFeed report from Thursday night which claimed that the special counsel

has evidence that President Trump directed Michael Cohen to lie to

Congress BuzzFeed's description of specific statements to the special counsels office

and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office

regarding Michael Cohen's congressional testimony are not accurate

spokesperson Peter Carr oops nothing to see here move along folks share to boycott BuzzFeed

and all the other fake news outlets BuzzFeed literally

accused Trump of a felony that could bring down his presidency and

everyone immediately believed them and it took Muller the man investigating Trump to

call them out on it clearly Muller is not on Trump's side but he's smart

enough to know that he cannot let the media lie about his investigation

and get away with it wait did you hear that banging it's the final nail in the media's

coffin please don't believe anything the media writes their liberal track

record is proof they can't be trusted this is why Patriot journal and

other conservative publications exist to give you the truth when the media will lie to you

to take down our present share to tell the media you are never listening

to them again what do you think about this let us know your

thoughts in the comment section don't you forget like share and subscribe

For more infomation >> AFTER MEDIA TRIES TO IMPEACH TRUMP – MUELLER DROPS HAMMER ON THEM, DEFENDS DONALD - Duration: 17:16.

-------------------------------------------

El equipo favorito de Donald Trump, anuncios millonarios y excesos: 12 datos curiosos sobre el Super - Duration: 7:42.

(REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque) Un día en el que se pagan 5 millones de dólares por 30 segundos de televisión, 1

300 millones de alitas de pollo se untan en salsa barbacoa y toneladas de aguacates llegan al país, así es la final del fútbol americano, el evento de los eventos y un emblema para la cultura pop y el deporte

A continuación, 15 datos y curiosidades sobre el el evento deportivo del año en Estados Unidos: 1) Más de 100 millones de televisores se conectaron en EE

UU. con la gran final de la liga de fútbol americano (NFL, por su sigla en inglés), una cita anual que desborda el ámbito deportivo y se convierte en un gran evento que, en cierto modo, paraliza al país en una fiesta que celebra lo más reconocible -y manido- de la cultura de masas estadounidense

(Reuters) 2) Durante este evento los estadounidenses consumen más de 1.300 millones de alitas de pollo, según cálculos del Consejo Nacional del Pollo, que acaba de poner en marcha una campaña para pedir al presidente de EE

UU., Donald Trump, y al Congreso que declaren el día después del Super Bowl como fiesta nacional

3) El presidente estadounidense se refirió al Super Bowl en una entrevista difundida el domingo por la mañana en CBS en la que afirmaba que se sentía aliviado por ver a su hijo Barron jugar al fútbol (soccer) en lugar de al fútbol americano, "un deporte peligroso"

El mandatario, sin embargo, en hincha de los New England Patriots y felicitó a su equipo por llegar a la final

Congratulations to Bob Kraft, Bill Belichick, Tom Brady and the entire New England Patriots team on a great game and season

Will be a fantastic Super Bowl!  — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 21, 2019 4) El consumo de cerveza también se dispara en esta fecha, con más de 1

200 millones de litros según varias estadísticas. De hecho, en 2016 los repartidores de cerveza tuvieron serios problemas para abastecer a la ciudad de San Francisco (California), sede de la final aquel año y que dio grandes problemas a los camiones con sus pronunciadas cuestas

(Christopher Hanewinckel-USA TODAY Sports) 5) Atlanta fue la ciudad anfitriona de este año

Las estadísticas estiman que unas 150.000 personas han llegado a la capital del estado de Georgia con motivo del Super Bowl, y entre sus visitantes más destacados, además de los jugadores de fútbol americano, sobresale la banda Maroon 5, que encabezó el show del medio tiempo

6) La pausa, que para los espectadores es de todo menos un descanso, tiene tal importancia que las marcas están dispuestas a pagar millones de euros por un puñado de segundos que intenten captar la atención de los televidentes

 Este año, además, han marcado récord, pues la cadena anfitriona, la CBS, cobró  5,3 millones de dólares por 30 segundos de anuncio publicitario

 Un segundo sale a unos 175.000 dólares en este mercado. La marca Michelob Ultra también pagó el monto para el anuncio protagonizado por Maluma

MÁS SOBRE ESTE TEMA: Los comerciales más memorables que se estrenaron durante la transmisión del juego 7)  Durante la transmisión en español del Super Bowl LIII, un taquero de origen mexicano tuvo un comercial de 30 segundos para promover los tacos de birria que vende en Los Angeles, California

 Se trata de una iniciativa de ESPN Deportes y Remezcla, que destaca las vidas profesionales y personales de los hispanos fanáticos del deporte

El taquero Teddy Vázquez (Foto: YouTube L.A. TACO) 8) En México, los productores de aguacates aumentan la exportación a EE

UU. las semanas previas a la cita deportiva hasta el punto en el que llegan unas 120 toneladas de este fruto para hacer principalmente guacamole, según la Asociación de Productores y Empacadores Exportadores de Aguacate de México

9) Y no sólo los aguacates cruzan la frontera, la señal de la Super Bowl también lo hizo para sintonizarse en 15 millones de televisores mexicanos

10)  Hay agencias de viaje que ofrecieron paquetes especiales para el Super Bowl

En Argentina la agencia 4Tourists vendía un paquete por alrededor de $5 mil 546 dólares que incluye el hospedaje en un hotel de tres estrellas (3 noches), el desayuno y el boleto al partido en la zona de arriba del estadio

  En el caso de México la empresa Despegar ofrece un paquete por $4 mil 900 dólares 11) Este año huno un duelo particular entre los mariscales de campo

Tom Brady, máxima figura de la NFL, tiene 41 años, disputó su novena final y ganó su sexto título, lo que lo situó como el jugador más exitoso de todos los tiempos

En frente, estuvo Jarden Goff, de 24 años, quien estaba en primaria cuando Brady levantó su primer trofeo

Tom Brady es una de las figuras de ese deporte (Foto: AP) 12) Los Rams se han garantizado ya su lugar en la historia del Super Bowl gracias a Quinton Peron y Napoleon Jinnis, dos animadores que han integrado esta campaña la tropa de cheerleaders del equipo y que animarán a lo largo de la banda durante el encuentro, algo nunca visto hasta ahora en la NFL

Así, toda una coreografía de números imposibles y circunstancias paralelas para ver a Los Patriots de Nueva Inglaterra y Los Rams de Los Ángeles disputarse el "gran tazón"

MÁS SOBRE ESTE TEMA: Los memes tras el show de Maroon 5 en el Super Bowl LIII: el homenaje a Bob Esponja recibió catarata de críticas El show de medio tiempo del Super Bowl LIII: así fue el espectáculo encabezado por Maroon 5

For more infomation >> El equipo favorito de Donald Trump, anuncios millonarios y excesos: 12 datos curiosos sobre el Super - Duration: 7:42.

-------------------------------------------

NYC Judge Rules That Bars Can Discriminate Against Trump Supporters - Duration: 3:09.

For more infomation >> NYC Judge Rules That Bars Can Discriminate Against Trump Supporters - Duration: 3:09.

-------------------------------------------

Kim Jong-un has chance to make N. Korea economic powerhouse: Trump - Duration: 1:41.

with the second summit between North Korea and the United States set for late

February president Trump is sounding optimistic about the prospects for a

deal on denuclearization Trump says Kim jong-un has a chance to make North Korea

an economic powerhouse but warns it can't be done if Kim keeps his nuclear

weapons conn-young new reports US president Donald Trump says there's a

very good chance that he and Kim jong-un will reach at the univers Asian deal at

their upcoming second summit Trump was speaking to us broadcaster CBS in their

interview airs Sunday local time he also said that Kim jong-un has an opportunity

to make North Korea a tremendous economic behemoth but that won't happen

he said with nuclear weapons citing his experience in real estate

Trump pointed to North Korea's location between South Korea China and Russia as

why he thinks it could become an economic powerhouse Trump added that he

thinks Kim jong-un wants to make a deal on denuclearization because Kim is tired

of going through what is going through referring to the international sanctions

on the regime it's widely believed but not confirmed that the second summit

will happen in Vietnam Trump did not say exactly when and where it will be

but hinted that the date and venue might be revealed in his State of the Union

address slated for Tuesday local time in Washington DC when asked about the

possibility of pulling out the US forces stationed in South Korea Trump said it's

expensive to keep them on the peninsula but there are no plans to remove them

and claimed he has never discussed such an option Penuel

arirang news

For more infomation >> Kim Jong-un has chance to make N. Korea economic powerhouse: Trump - Duration: 1:41.

-------------------------------------------

Sending U.S. troops to Venezuela is 'an option,' Trump says - Duration: 7:38.

President Donald Trump said on Sunday that sending U.S.troops to Venezuela is 'an option' but he ruled out a meeting with socialist leader Nicolas Maduro

In an interview with CBS News, Trump reiterated that military intervention was a possibility

'Certainly, it's something that's on the - it's an option,' Trump said, adding that Maduro requested a meeting months ago

'I've turned it down because we're very far along in the process,' he said in a CBS 'Face the Nation' interview

'So, I think the process is playing out - very, very big tremendous protests.' His comments come as Western nations are piling pressure on Maduro to hand over power to opposition leader and self-proclaimed President Juan Guaido

The United States, Canada and several Latin American countries have disavowed Maduro over his disputed re-election last year and recognize Guaido as the rightful leader of the economically troubled OPEC nation

Maduro however still maintains the powerful backing of Russia, China and Turkey, whose foreign minister said on Sunday that Western meddling was fueling Venezuela's troubles and punishing millions of its people

Trump spoke with Guaido on Thursday to 'congratulate him on his historic assumption of the presidency,' according to a White House statement

Tens of thousands of people thronged the streets of various Venezuelan cities on Saturday to protest Maduro's government and a senior air force general recognized interim-chief Guaido

France and Austria said on Sunday they would recognize Guaido if Maduro did not respond to the European Union's call for a free and fair presidential election by Sunday night

The Trump administration last week issued crippling sanctions that are likely to further weaken the country's struggling oil industry

While that could weaken Maduro, it risks also exacerbating Venezuela's economic collapse

Venezuela is suffering medicine shortages, malnutrition and hyperinflation that has prompted millions to emigrate in recent years

Venezuela's ambassador to Iraq, Jonathan Velasco, became the latest of a handful of officials to defect from Maduro's government this weekend in a video published on social media on Saturday

Guaido told his supporters in a major rally in Caracas on Saturday that he would on Sunday announce when they would seek to bring in international humanitarian aid from Colombia, Brazil and a Caribbean island

It is unclear whether Maduro's government, which denies the country is suffering a humanitarian crisis, will let any foreign aid through

Last week Maduro accused the United States of orchestrating a coup, and appealed to American citizens on social media early Wednesday morning to stop its government from interfering in the affairs of Latin America

'People of the # USA , I ask for your support to reject the interference of the Donald Trump government that intends to make of My Homeland a Vietnam in Latin America

Do not Let Him!' Maduro tweeted.He shared a direct to camera video on Twitter and Facebook, in Spanish, alongside the message in which he made a similar plea

Maduro also claimed that Trump ordered the Colombian government and mafia to assassinate him, after a mystery Russian jet landed in Venezuela this week 'to ship out gold from the central bank

' He said that he has no doubt that the U.S.President 'gave the order to Colombia to kill me' and that if something happens to him 'Donald Trump will be responsible

' The Trump administration has been ratcheting up pressure on Maduro, granting Guaido the ability to access the regime's frozen U

S.bank accounts and issuing new sanctions intended to dry up Maduro's remaining funds

On Monday the U.S.Treasury Department slapped sanctions on Venezuela's state-owned oil companies and set in place a system to freeze accounts that also could be placed under Guaido's control

Maduro has struck back at the U.S.action.'Do you think you are the emperor of the world?' he asked Trump

'Do you think Venezuela is going to give up and obey your orders? We will not surrender,' he said

On Saturday, Maduro said he was willing to sit down for talks with the opposition in an effort to promote national 'harmony

' But that offer has been rejected by Guaido, who describes it as a ploy by the Maduro administration to buy time

Previous talks between the government and opposition have failed to change electoral conditions in the South American country, and many political leaders have been forced into exile

For more infomation >> Sending U.S. troops to Venezuela is 'an option,' Trump says - Duration: 7:38.

-------------------------------------------

Трамп против НАТО - Duration: 10:05.

Hello, dear friends! I am Professor Panarin Igor Nikolaevich,

Doctor of Political Sciences, and today we will look

at a very important and conceptual topic.

It is called so: "Trump against NATO." Why are

we considering it today? But the fact is that on January

22, 2019, the House of Representatives of the US

Congress, which is controlled by Democrats, adopts a resolution.

This resolution is shocking to any normal analyst. The

essence of this resolution: it prohibits Donald Trump from

taking action to withdraw from NATO. Just think, one of the

US House of Representatives demands exactly this. On

January 28, the main newspaper not only of the United States,

but also of the world, The New York Times comes out

with a global article in which says that this is not

enough for only the House of

Representatives to make such a decision!

It is necessary that the Senate, the second

Chamber, that is, the Congress as a whole, support the resolution

of the House of Representatives controlled by Democrats.

In general, she demanded that Trump should not leave NATO.

Well, it seems to any sensible person that it

comes to mind: "how can the United States in general go

out of NATO?" That's how! The fact is that back in 2016,

during his election campaign, Trump repeatedly spoke of his

displeasure with NATO. But he created a sensation in

July 2018 at the NATO summit, when he said during a press

conference: "In general, the United States should withdraw

from NATO, but for now I think it is not very appropriate."

But this statement caused a shock. Then Trump repeatedly

made statements at the end of 2018, which made the

Democrats, in fact, come to the adoption of such a resolution

prohibiting Trump to carry out actions to remove the

United States from NATO. The question arises: why is Trump

against the NATO bloc? In order to sort out this

issue, we will consider some historical aspects of the

creation of this aggressive military-political organization

that bombed, I remind, in 1999 fraternal Serbia and committed

many heinous crimes in other regions of the world. So, I

remind you that on July 1, 1945, that is, just a few months

after the defeat of fascism, Great Britain, the main

historical enemy of the Soviet Union and Russia, of historical

and present-day Russia, carried out preparations for

the attack on the USSR. Just think, the 22 German divisions

of the Wehrmacht were saved by Churchill and were to

attack the Red Army in Germany together with the British army.

The ultimate goal is to reach the borders of

Western Belarus and Western Ukraine, in the Shepetovka area,

a town on the territory of Ukraine. Here is the global

goal of this operation. This information was obtained

through the channels of Soviet intelligence and on June 27

Stalin ordered to transfer to the territory of Germany

additional tank units and several tank divisions that were

stationed on the border with the occupation zones, on the

border with British influence. This was a complete surprise

for the British. And the plan of attack on the Soviet Union,

on the Red Army on July 1, 1945 was canceled. I draw

your attention that in 1998 a part of this plan was

declassified, then, in fact, the public learned about the existence

of such a plan. But, of course, our intelligence knew

about it then. Why did the British cancel this plan? The

fact is that when our tank wedges were placed additionally

in Germany, the T-34 tanks were horrified, thinking that

this Russian group of tanks would take ticks, the entire

British army and the remnants of the Wehrmacht's army in 2

days , and will be released to the English Channel. And

it will prepare a landing operation to eliminate the main

historical enemy - Britain. And the British were confused

and canceled the attack. But they did not cancel the

common intention to harm Soviet Russia or just Russia, despite

the changing situation. The leadership of the British

intelligence MI6 began

preparations for the creation of NATO.

Maybe everyone does not

know, but the basis of NATO was 5 states.

These are the countries of the National Park

called BenNiLux: Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg,

(one of them is Holland - the British satellite has long

been like Luxembourg, well, and Belgium is partly under

British influence), Britain and France. The United States

joined this Union later. How? We had a video about a

traitor, an agent of British intelligence, Admiral Kolchak. I

recall that the representative at the headquarters of Kolchak

was Donovan, an American, the creator of the US strategic

services department. But Donovan was appointed to

this position due to Churchill's personal pressure on Roosevelt.

And Donovan from 1939 to 1940 passed an

internship in the management of special operations of the

British intelligence MI-6. And the British insisted that he

headed the Office of Strategic Services of the United States.

And Roosevelt had his own candidacy. That's exactly

Donovan and the former heads of the special operations

department of the British

intelligence MI-6 created a NATO plan.

Further, within the framework of NATO, the Gladio

project was created, and

then we will talk about it separately.

Under the auspices of this project, terrorist

acts were committed in Italy and Germany, they were accused

of communists and socialists. But the American branch of

the Gladio project was also created. I emphasize that,

by British intelligence, the Special Operations Directorate

in 1946 began, even before the creation of the NATO bloc,

the creation of terrorist networks in the territory of

Western European states and the United States. And so

Donovan began to create this Gladio network in the United States.

In this regard, we can express another hypothesis

about the gold of the Russian Empire, which the

British agent Kolchak exported through the territory of

Japan, which suddenly demands from us, according to the British

"kick", some territorial concessions, retaining hundreds

of tons (1,300 tons of gold admiral Kolchak brought out).

It is possible to express the hypothesis that Donovan

just supervised Kolchak and the export of gold of the Russian

Empire through Japan and the United Kingdom. This gold

became the financial basis for the formation of an aggressive

military-political bloc of NATO. At least, we can

assume that this gold was used by Donovan and British

intelligence MI6 in the formation of the structure of the new

aggressive military-political bloc. My version is that the

"deep state", about which people talk a lot today,

especially the Western media, is what Donovan began to create in 1946.

It has sprouted and is completely under British control.

It is a tool other than a financial instrument

of British influence on the decision-making process in the

United States of America.

Then a reasonable question arises, and the answer to this

question is: why is Trump fighting the NATO bloc? Just

NATO is a British project.

Hillary Clinton and her entire team are proteges of Britain

in the United States. This is, in fact, the political sphere

of the Gladio project, a British project in the United States.

Therefore, Trump is attempting to deal with the

NATO bloc, as with the British project, and bring America

back to its true roots, for which it has always been famous.

Thanks for attention!

For more infomation >> Трамп против НАТО - Duration: 10:05.

-------------------------------------------

Democrats Are Coming For Trump's Tax Returns - Duration: 4:45.

On February Seventh, Democrats in the House of Representatives on the ways and means committee

headed by Democratic Representative John Lewis. They're going to have a meeting and what they're

going to talk about is donald Trump's tax returns and of course Mike Pence is tax returns.

They're going to have this meeting to try to figure out how can we get access to these

tax returns and then make this information available to the public. Now the Democrats

on this committee, they're trying to go about this, you know, by the law. They're doing

what they can. They're doing what they are allowed to do. They're handling it legislatively

as they are supposed to because after all, Donald Trump is under numerous different investigations.

He was one of the first president in the last 40 years, or actually the only president last

40 years I should say, to not give us any of his tax information.

And so it kind of seems likely that the man's trying to hide something and if he wanted

to shut everybody in this country up about his alleged business dealings that may have

compromised him, release the tax returns. Show us that nothing happened and then you're

good to go. You might even put an end to some of these investigations into you, but you

won't do that because we know you have something to hide and the Democrats on this panel also

know that and that's why they want these tax returns. Now they're going to try to go through

the rules and see what they can do, see if they can get it from the White House, make

it available to the public. They're gonna. Get opposition and resistance from the Republican

Party. They'll get opposition from the White House, but there is a provision in a 19, 24

tax rule that says that the chairman of any of the three tax committees can access any

taxpayers' information. Anybody's tax return, any single person in

this country, if you're the chairperson of one of those three tax committees, they have

access to it. They are legally allowed to get access to it so Trump could fight it all

he wants and they don't want to have to go through using this provision, but they will

if they have to and they will if they need to, and that's the key word here. This is

information that we need to know. It could completely show us how corrupt Donald Trump

is and I'm not talking about the Russia probe. I think to me, what's more intriguing? His

water, his deals with Saudi Arabia, what's going on with UAE, what's going on with Qatar?

There is so much shady dealings happening with those Middle Eastern countries and the

Trump family and we need answers into that. We need to know where money is going or coming

or whatever and that information could be contained in those tax returns.

Or as I said, these tax returns may show that this is a guy who's on the level. He just

sometimes acts like an but in reality never committed a single crime whatsoever. Everybody

calmed down. He's just stupid. He's not criminal. That could be something we find out. We don't

know what's in those returns because he's been too cowardly to release them to the public.

That's not good. Democrats also have a a provision and a new bill they want to get past that

would force presidential and vice presidential candidates to a release tax information to

the public when running for president or vice president. That is something I think is desperately

needed. If you want to be president of the United States, you got to come clean. You

got to show us what you got. You got to put all your cards on the table so that we can

make decisions and we can make sure that you're not doing things that you're not supposed

to with your money. I don't care about how much money you have or don't have. What I

care about is where it's coming from and what it got you and I think that's what a lot of

people in this country care about. You know, I don't care if he is a billionaire or not

a billionaire. Whoa. Well, what matters is, was he taking money from other countries that

could eventually influenced his policy, is president of the United States, and that is

something that all of us desperately deserve an answer to.

For more infomation >> Democrats Are Coming For Trump's Tax Returns - Duration: 4:45.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's Nuclear Treaty Withdrawal Is A HUGE Gift To Defense Contractors - Duration: 6:04.

Well, more and more and more and more Democrats continue entering the 2020 election, which

by the way is a good thing.

I am in favor of a big, broad primary with lots of different people to choose from so

that we actually have a good selection, a nice variety of people representing different

backgrounds, different cultures, different political beliefs so that we're able to make

a better decision and get somebody who truly represents what we want us in public.

And I'm 20 seconds in and I'm already way off topic here.

So back to the point, we've got a lot of Democrats that have already jumped into the 2020 election,

but there is some good news.

Some of the worst ones are actually starting to rethink their decision of possibly running

for 2020.

And here's what it is.

Axios reported a few days ago that some of the more moderate, you know the centrist Democrats.

You're Michael Bloomberg's, you're Terry McAuliffe's, and probably even your Joe Biden are now having

second thoughts about entering the presidential race, either as a Democrat or an independent

in Bloomberg's case, because they see how far left the entire American public has shifted,

not just the Democratic Party, the entire American public, including those on the right,

because when you strip an issue away from a politician, even Republican support, things

like Medicare for all increased wages, debt free college, a green, new deal, and that

is terrifying to the centrist Democrats like McAuliffe, the independence, like Bloomberg

and yes, even Joe Biden, because according to this report from Axios, Biden is now being

advised to delay any announcement of entering the 2020 race until they get a better sense

on whether or not this socialism thing is, is what the public really wants.

Because if it dies down in the public, backs off it Biden's coming in, but if the public

continues to lurch, left and say, we want these once radical ideas, Biden may not run.

Biden may say, I can't do that.

That's not who I am, but I see where the party's going and I respect that so I'm not going

to get in there and honestly honestly would be the best thing Biden could do at this point.

That would be the best thing.

Another thing that's terrifying, these centrist Democrats, there's polling coming out of Iowa

that shows that socialism has a net positive approval rating.

Well, capitalism has a net negative approval rating.

The American public is speaking loud and clear, and again, this is people on both sides of

the aisle.

Okay?

This is not just a Democrat phenomenon.

These are Republicans are saying they want it to.

We want them Medicare for all.

We want the $15 minimum wage debt free college and a green new deal in action on climate

change, in any expanded social security and all of these great things.

We want the government to work for the people is what they're saying because right now it

doesn't and it hasn't for a very long time.

The government, since the days of Reagan has worked for corporations and nothing has changed

since then, other than taxes for the wealthy.

They go up, they go down, Democrats attempt to raise them sometimes.

Maybe they'll repeal it, but they usually end up not doing it and we all get nothing.

The rich get better tax breaks.

We get nothing, and we've gotten nothing since the Reagan days.

They've killed our unions.

They've killed our wages.

They've shipped our jobs over the seas overseas with the bad trade deals.

Nafta from Clinton, Cafta from Bush, almost TPP from Obama.

You know, pipelines running through our country polluting everywhere they go, corporate toxins

going into our waterways while we're deregulating them and not holding them accountable.

The public left and rights as enough of this shit.

Enough, we're done.

We're done.

We want a government that goes out there and says, hey, it's dumped a bunch of cancer causing

chemicals in here.

We're going to have to throw you in jail.

Hey, the American public is dying because of the massive costs of healthcare.

So we're going to offer everybody Medicare.

Hey, people aren't being paid a living wage and have to work two or even three jobs just

to be able to afford rent and food, so we're going to raise the minimum wage to $15.

Hey, the planet's dying because of our addiction to fossil fuels.

We're going to stop that right now and reverse the course before it's too late.

Everything I just mentioned is what a majority of people in this country again, left hand,

right?

There's what a majority of them want, and these centrist Democrats who are now getting

cold feet, they understand they would never be able to offer this because that is not

who they are.

That is not what they want to do, but at least they have enough sense to say then you know

what?

Maybe being president is and for me, after all.

For more infomation >> Trump's Nuclear Treaty Withdrawal Is A HUGE Gift To Defense Contractors - Duration: 6:04.

-------------------------------------------

TRUMP Just Made It OFFICIAL Promises EXCITING Announcement At State Of The Union(VIDEO)!!! - Duration: 13:25.

TRUMP Just Made It OFFICIAL Promises EXCITING Announcement At State Of The Union

we're gonna see what happens on February 15

no I'm not concerned I'm not concerned but you don't think there's gonna be a

deal but you're not gonna declare it now don't you think I'm not waitin excuse me

I didn't say I said I'm waiting till February 15 one February 15th the

committee will come back and if they don't have a wall I don't even want to

waste my time reading what they have because it's a waste of time because the

only thing that works for security and safety for our country is a wall now

when you couple the wall with sensors and drones and all of these other things

that works as a combination but if you don't have a wall they're all just

wasting their time it's just politics thank you all for now by privately you

know what's in my mind certainly thinking about it I think there's a good

chance that we'll have to do that but we will at the same time be building

regardless were building wall and we're building a lot of wall but I could do it

a lot faster the other way well I'm saying listen closely to the State of

the Union I think you'll find it very exciting

no I don't want to say that but it's always an option everything's an option

I take no options off the table okay yes so what you're saying now do you believe

that on February the 15th the only option you will have left is either

close down the government or declare an emergency because you don't have any

faith this committee will come up with an answer and if you do declare

are you concerned that you will almost be immediately and being joined by the

support in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals just when we have very very

strong legal standing it would be very hard to do that but they tend to go to

the Ninth Circuit and when they go to the Ninth Circuit things happen for

instance the ban it missed and then missed and then was approved in the

United States Supreme Court well we have had a very good record they go to the

Ninth Circuit in many cases and in fact in most cases it has nothing to do with

the Ninth Circuit it's a shame what they do so let's see what happens I can only

tell you this job we have very very strong legal standing to when we are

doing it regardless I mean we don't have we haven't declared the national

emergency yet and what yet we're building a lot of wall we're continuing

to build a lot of wall with as we would say in business cash on hand and we're

negotiating tough prices we have a great system a great wall system it's very

uniform they used to have all these different systems nobody knew what was

going on we have a very good solid system that looks good and it is very

powerful as a well I don't want to say you'll hear the State of the Union and

then you'll see what happens right after the State of the Union

okay let's focus on the big event of next week president Trump's State of the

Union address he will rightly set out the incredible economic progress we're

seeing the lowest unemployment in half a century the best manufacturing

performance in a quarter century wages rising strongly after decades of

stagnation the last two years have been a crystal clear case study of the

difference it makes when you have a Pro Enterprise president and a tax cutting

deregulating agenda on Tuesday the president will also reached

his commitment to border security and fixing America's broken immigration

system a problem that's been allowed to fester by both parties for years we'll

soon see if Democrats are capable of being reasonable and constructive don't

hold your breath in fact the Democrats are racing off to the left but that

gives President Trump a big strategic opportunity in this State of the Union

however crazy their new policies may be the Democrats lurch to the left is a

response to people's real anxieties Republicans can bloviate all they like

about how a new left wing populism is not the answer but frankly the old

establishment conservatism isn't the answer either

that's why Donald Trump won in 2016 so mr. president if you want to win again

in 2020 Tuesday is the moment to get out there with a positive populism of your

own speak to the majority in the country looking for practical non-ideological

solutions to the problems faced by working Americans number one must be

health care mr. president the main reason it will be Nancy Pelosi's BDI

staring at the back of your head on Tuesday is health care Republicans lost

the house last year because they made a mess of health care simple as that in

2016 you understood what Americans wanted on health care far better than

any of the establishment Republicans or conservative ideologues remember what

you said in the campaign that's the right answer people just want to know

they'll be taken care of that doesn't mean government-run health

care but it does mean government guaranteed health care it's not the same

thing so make a commitment to universal health care universal free-market health

care take the issue of universal coverage away from the Democrats and

leave them defending government-run closed-down the private sector Medicare

for all see how far that gets them in 2020 next on the list jobs help American

workers fight the threat of automation by guaranteeing retraining for every

worker who needs it boost your National Council for the

American worker a fantastic effort led by Volker Trump

which helps prepare Americans for the needs of the future workforce three

infrastructure everyone in Congress says they agree on it well challenge them to

deliver it let's make sure that by 2030 America not China we'll have the world's

most modern systems for transportation communication at energy for rebuild

America's struggling neighborhoods to urban suburban and rural use your White

House opportunity and revitalization Council and your new opportunities owns

as vehicles for a real transformation that helps exactly the people who backed

you in 2016 and five keep draining that swamp banned foreign government lobbying

and challenged Congress to outlaw conflict donors no more donations by big

business to the exact same lawmakers who regulate them

mr. president we know the Democrats brand of populism will set the country

back on Tuesday show the country how your version can move America forward

here to discuss former Bernie Sanders national staffer Teslin Figueroa author

of the working class Republican Ronald Reagan and the return of blue-collar

conservatism and senior fellow at the ethics and Public Policy Center Henry

Olson and Fox News contributor and national security analyst Morgan

Ortega's Morgan first time on the show it's very exciting thank you I'm happy

to be here all right so you don't have the long title that Henry has very very

short and sweet so I want to go straight to healthcare sure I think that there's

a sort of sense that among the Republicans the well we tried to do it

didn't work let's move on let's do something else I think that's really

fatal I think they've got to have an answer yeah your opening monologue was

spot-on and that's what the polling indicates as well going into 2018 that's

what voters are most concerned about and I think it was actually surprising to a

lot of us who were you know we thought it would be the president's tweets or

the tone or this and that it wasn't people didn't care about that exactly

what you said people cared about knowing that they were going to be taken care of

and it is unconscionable that the Congress the republican-led Congress

I'll be out beat up on them we don't even have the Democrats have what 8 to

10 years to do something and here's what's even worse the

her vote failed we still haven't attempted anything new again the

Republicans have not so if you go into 2020 without some sort of message you

can't just roll your eyes at a hace and say oh well she's a socialist and

dismiss her that's not a message that's not fixing things and so hopefully we

were getting to a message very well I totally agree

look I'm a Ronald Reagan biographer what Donald Trump needs to tell the

Republicans that when Ronald Reagan endorsed Barry Goldwater on national

television 1964 he endorsed national universal coverage he said that we

should we are conservatives are for telling every American telling senior

citizens that no one should be denied health care because of a lack of funds

quoting Ronald Reagan of Reagan Ronald Reagan since Barry Goldwater in 1964

made that promise and Donald Trump should throw Ronald Reagan and the

conservative Republicans face and he should say I'm for Reagan was for it you

should be for it let's make it happen that's really I'm getting I'm just

thrilled that you know that's why we need Henry here to tell us that history

that's really really interesting I didn't know that that yeah that's me

yeah and he had said it for years before that's what Brian earth in my research

for my book is this is a commitment to the idea that everyone should be able to

have health care even it's funded by the government yeah but it shouldn't be

government-run it should be private so I said so what I've used that phrase I use

it in my bag you know universal free-market health care and I said well

that's a contradiction in terms know the universal means everyone's covered but

it's delivered through the market Ronald Reagan was there in 1961 and that's the

difference says in but you're like you know the the Medicare for all that's

popped up this week as a I can argument amongst the Democratic presidential

contenders well what does that really mean does it really mean the government

running the whole thing and closing down private insurance and you know there's a

sort of argument going on about that but I was interested that Bernie Sanders who

really got this whole thing going and you were part of that and really he's

the one that made this the kind of message that all Democrats are getting

behind he shifted towards that I noticed today he was he was in a in a piece

today saying of course it means no private health and rosy base I think he

said so right look the only private stuff will ever you want to get your

nose fixed plastic surgery private everything else that's the

government that's what he that's what he thinks medicare-for-all means I think he

understands a medicare-for-all means but I don't think most people do you know

when you talk about who's gonna actually pay for it I think people here universal

health care they hear that everyone wants to be covered because even though

I believe that health insurance is important for all there's still some

issues with Medicare for all that still needs to be explained even though I

worked on his campaign yeah I believe it just coming from the people standpoint

you know the other day I moved I went through some paperwork with my mom who

you know she passed in 2016 while I was on the campaign her seven-day bill was

fifty six thousand dollars to be in the hospital and she actually worked for the

Oklahoma State state of Oklahoma in the faith-based initiative program my father

passed away with zero health care insurance so there's a big you know gap

between those who don't have it at all both versus those Suzanne ever do as

anything from the government that still can't afford to stay in the hospital

state so I think it is the emotion behind what Bernie Sanders is talking

about Medicare for all universal health care for all

but people Democrats have yet to define a message much like the Republicans on

how is it really going to be paid for and what does it really mean yeah but I

mean like it's very dangerous for the Republicans to step outside of that and

say well give the impression which is what they have been doing which is like

well we don't really care no you're absolutely right it's not just

a cost issue it's that I think that the Republicans in the Congress don't really

have a plan that they can get behind the last plan that we saw was the Cassidy

Graham bill which would take which would pull the fund I think perhaps that bill

could be revived again I think that there might be a Republican appetite

there again for that but you know Republicans are missing an opportunity

here to point out if you're unhappy with the current health care system that is

the system that President Obama and the Democrats put in place and if you're

running is a 2020 contender Medicare for all you're running against a plan that a

Democrat president put in place so a smart Republican could sort of make this

make this argument and say this is why the current Democrat plan doesn't work

but instead the Republicans have inherited a faulty plan that they

criticized but without a viable replacement yeah and you see I'm just

thinking you know we started with President Trump and the State of the

Union and his 20/20 message you know in the end I mean it is Congress that is

that has got to sort of make the law but if he

puts his weight behind that kind of now we now we know Reaganite Republican

version of universal healthcare I think that's really powerful you know you're

just gonna have to drag this Congress kicking and screaming I think I mean

it's amazing to me the lack of innovative ideas yes I mean I really

think the only the only one that we've seen come before is the Graham Cassidy

bill so hopefully they'll revive that but let's see it's also important we

talk about businesses as well you know even though I know we need health care I

also have to shut my business down because I couldn't afford to put

temporary employees on health care insurance so there's a gap with that as

well how does a great deal of relaxed real nitty-gritty problems that people

want on sister thank you God bless you and God bless america

For more infomation >> TRUMP Just Made It OFFICIAL Promises EXCITING Announcement At State Of The Union(VIDEO)!!! - Duration: 13:25.

-------------------------------------------

Alec Baldwin's Kids Are Sick of His 'SNL' Trump Impression - Duration: 5:23.

You were here about a year ago.

Your wife had either just had a baby, something like that?

She just had a baby, yeah.

OK.

And now here you are a year later.

And now you have another baby.

I try to have a baby every time we come here.

That's great.

I can't come do this show without presenting

to you, as an offering, a baby.

It gives you material.

It's good that you come to--

that is a precious little baby.

The only reason to have a baby is to have material.

So what is this baby's name?

This is Rom-ay-oh.

Or people say Roh-mee-oh.

How is it spelled?

It's spelled like Romeo.

Well then it's Romeo.

Yeah.

Why do you say Roh-may-oh?

I'm so glad I--

whenever I have a baby you clear these things up for me,

it's great.

I've been calling my son the wrong name for the last eight

months.

What's your son's name?

Roh-may-oh or--

No.

It's for Roh-may-oh.

Why do you do that to him?

Well I live with my family that I speak the least Spanish.

Like, Carmen is fully bilingual.

In fact I think I might have said this last time I was here.

She leans into her mother and she's like, Daddy only

speaks English.

They really like, ride me.

So I say Roh-may-oh.

And my wife was like, no Alek.

It's Romeo.

It's Romeo.

But don't you think about it, I used

to say to my wife you want to give your son a name or--

I think maybe this is a sexist thing to say.

Because it's true with women too.

Like, if you were at a bar in Princeton.

You're going to college.

You don't want to say my name is Avocado.

You want to have a normal name.

Right.

You know, like some people, celebrities,

name their children exotic names and different names.

Like who?

Who are you thinking of?

You know, that guy.

Yeah.

That girl that got married, had a baby.

That name was just crazy.

It is.

With that name, Avocado.

But no.

But the thing is that I always say to my wife,

well give him a name that he's going

to be socially adept with.

He's at a bar everyone's like, what's your name?

He's like--

What's he going to say?

Superman, Superman.

Imagine naming your child Superman.

That would be horrible.

That'd work perfectly.

All right, so this was hilarious.

He's eating hummus?

Is that what he's trying for the first time?

Oh, yes.

We have a clip of this.

This is him eating hummus.

All right.

It's a long reaction.

It lasts for quite a while.

Still not sure-- oh, no.

Good.

He gets that from me.

Because that's the face I make when they tell me

the ratings of the talk show we're replicating.

Have like a spasm.

So OK, let's give the names and ages of them.

So there's Roh-may-oh, Romeo.

And he's eight months.

He's eight months.

OK, and then?

Leo is two years old.

Two years?

Rafael is three years old.

Three.

And Carmen is five years old, yeah.

OK, and then you have Ireland.

And then we have Ireland who's 23 years old.

Right, but she doesn't live with you.

No, she is she lives with her boyfriend in a house in LA.

OK.

Because she's too cool to live with us.

How many strollers do you have?

At one point we had like 11 strollers in our house.

Had 11 strollers.

And I remember that was like a sign.

I looked at my wife I go, you don't

think we're going to have 11 children do you?

That's not what you're implying is it?

Does she want more?

I think she wants one more.

Really?

She wants another.

She wants have a girl.

She wants Carmen to have a little sister.

Because you have three boys.

We have three-- oh, we have three boys.

Yeah.

It sounds like they're a handful.

No, but they're boys.

My son he would watch the space shuttle launch.

And he said to me, who were the men in the capsule?

They cut to the men in the capsule.

So oh, I think of John Glenn from when I was a boy.

And I go, that's John.

That's Captain John.

So he walked around for like a year saying,

I'm John, John, Captain John.

He did this very deep voice.

I'd say, good morning sir.

He'd go-- and his salute was--

he goes--.

That was a salute to me.

I go a salute sir.

He'd be-- Captain John.

And he talks like this.

I'd say, what are we going to have for breakfast?

Flakes, flakes, my flakes.

Sounds like he would say, good day sir, like that.

So do they watch you on TV?

Do they see your impressions?

Yeah, well they know on Saturday that I go do the show.

Because the weekends are pretty sacred.

We all stick together and do our thing.

And I would go to SNL.

And I used to do these things online

where I'd have them refer to it as Saturday.

They would always think I'd work Saturday.

[APPLAUSE]

I'd say Daddy's going to go to work.

Where's Daddy going to go to work?

And they'd say, Saturday, Saturday.

They did it.

They would really-- we have a clip of that somewhere.

But I think they're a little sick of it too.

They're sick of it too.

They're sick of it.

They can't be.

Yeah they're sick of it.

They think that Trump is--

like whatever you assigned to them, whatever

you teach them is something they shouldn't

do they immediately assign that horrible thing to Trump.

My son will look at me and go, does Trump pick his nose, Dad?

And I go, yes he does.

He does.

It's a horrible thing to do.

You're raising them right.

We'll be right back.

For more infomation >> Alec Baldwin's Kids Are Sick of His 'SNL' Trump Impression - Duration: 5:23.

-------------------------------------------

MIGRANT CARAVAN LATEST NEWS TODAY Feb 4, 2019 , TRUMP RIPS Democrat ON block border funds - Duration: 11:06.

For more infomation >> MIGRANT CARAVAN LATEST NEWS TODAY Feb 4, 2019 , TRUMP RIPS Democrat ON block border funds - Duration: 11:06.

-------------------------------------------

THE END! PRESIDENT Trump Just PULLS THE LAST MOVE On BORDER After Pelosi DID THIS(VIDEO)!!! - Duration: 10:56.

THE END! PRESIDENT Trump Just PULLS THE LAST MOVE On BORDER After Pelosi DID THIS

by the way one of the top priorities for the radical left is to do absolutely

nothing about the looming crisis at our southern border they don't care about

the depth destruction and devastation caused by our poorest open border they

don't care about the thousands of migrants making the perilous journey

north they just want to deny president Trump yet another accomplishment take a

look I can tell you the Republicans want to have a wall but the Democrats are

told that you can't do that they are doing a tremendous disservice the

Democrats are doing a tremendous disservice to our country I don't think

Nancy hasn't clue and I see that when she says walls are immoral she doesn't

have she doesn't know and and I wish he did because she's hurting this country

so badly joining us now is freedom caucus chairman mark meadows and the

author of the Russia hoax Fox News legal analyst Greg Jarrett all

right congressman meadows you know I heard something interesting and that is

that there is talk of biometrically tagging some of these illegals sent and

if they send them back if they come back then they face some serious penalties

are you familiar with that concept at all well that's part of that smart

technology that a lot of our Democrats have been talking about but really the

problem what we have judge is this is not only do they come back but they come

back over and over and over again because we don't have a border wall or

barrier at our southern border and so listen part of this smart technology is

certainly part of the solution but I can tell you the bigger problem right now is

that we have a bicameral bipartisan conference that supposedly has been

meeting and they've only met one time in the last week they're not even here in

Washington DC and they're supposedly coming up with solutions they're not

serious about negotiating all right so they have three weeks the president said

look I'm giving you three weeks guys go in there and hammer something out you

know bi-partisan both houses and you're

telling me they met once and now they're gone again yeah they've only met one

time they met Wednesday they don't have any scheduled meetings to meet again

until possibly at the earliest next Wednesday so it's not really serious

about coming up to a solution and I can tell you when the Democrats rolled out

their first offer it has zero money for a border wall and I mean you know at

this point you have to wonder if they ever had an intention of negotiating in

the first place you know what I don't know who's on this committee but I'm

gonna find out I'm gonna talk about it on my show tomorrow night because you

know why do you meet once when you've got three weeks to resolve one of the

most important issues in our country right now you plan on meeting once next

week that's an outrage but I'm gonna go to Greg Jarrett all right Greg

the president says there's a good chance and based on what we just heard from

congressman Mark meadows if they don't come up with something Congress is not

wanted to come up with something since 1986 they don't come up with anything

the president has the right to declare an emergency correct as under the

national emergencies act of 1976 Congress actually delegated unfettered

authority and discretion to the president they can whine all they want

but they're the ones who gave him that power once he invokes it he then turns

to another law that Congress passed six years after that in 1982 which says

specifically he is authorized to undertake military construction projects

not otherwise authorized by Congress so they they gave him another tool that he

can utilize they can complain all they want they can sue in the end they have

no legal basis to prevail okay so he doesn't need Congress for this he

doesn't you know I I just realized you know that there have been 58 national

emergencies declared since 1976 I believe the law was passed but 79 when

they first did something and all of a sudden the president wants to do this

we've got bet no opioids we've got human trafficking or extra yeah humanitarian

crisis on toughest way Barack Obama can declare a national emergency with

respect to run South Sudan and the Central African

Republic this president can certainly declare an emergency with respect to

Mexico because you just identified the acute imminent crisis and insofar as

drugs is concerned more than hundred people die a day it has now doubled over

the last decade this is a serious emergency and you know congressman

meadows I believe it was just today yesterday one of the biggest caches of

fentanyl coming across the border enough fentanyl I don't know if people realize

our viewers realize this but if you inhale that stuff it can take out a

state I mean just the mere presence of it you don't have to be a drug user you

don't have to have a needle nothing the presence of this stuff can kill off

millions of people well you're exactly right even our law enforcement officers

many times have to wear gloves when they're doing a search because if they

happen to to have it and and get even a small dose of this and I'm not talking

about taking it I'm just saying getting on their skin we're inhaling it in some

way you know they they can have just unbelievable in and fatal outcomes of

that so you know it's not just about the drugs though and and Greg is exactly

right the president has some executive tools in his toolbox members of Congress

we always want to restrain those but President Barack Obama used it over and

over and over again I can tell you he spent and sent 1.8 billion dollars to

the Iranians I didn't appropriate that so if he can

do that certainly the president can find a couple of billion dollars to to

support the efforts at the border 1.8 billion to the Iranians that's that's

interesting all right Greg I'm going back to you for a second so let's assume

that this committee comes up with nothing because they won't because

they're not meeting they're not working they don't care right all right I say

that freely the president declares a national emergency somebody goes to

court to stop it to get an injunction Kamala Harris is vowing to do it all

right come on Harris is vowing to do it which means it gets done and then it

goes to the Ninth Circuit right how quickly can it go

to the United States Supreme Court well the president could actually preempt at

all by filing a declaratory relief action to get an immediate judgment from

a federal court but if he waits for the Ninth Circuit and they decide against

him which would be wrong by them but they always get it well then he would

seek an emergency petition to the US Supreme Court but you know Kamala Harris

how embarrassing she was the state Attorney General in California she says

this is an abuse of power clearly she hasn't read the law that Congress passed

giving the president the authority and she's a member of Congress well the

amazing part of it congressman meadows is that you know you know the right is

wrong and wrong is right and it's almost as though we're living I'm gonna date

myself here in a twilight zone it's like what they say is what goes out there and

they believe it even though facts have nothing to do with it well you're

exactly right man and when they do that they forget that they voted for border

walls before or the border fencing they forget all of that

and you know even if senator Harris thinks she's going to file a lawsuit

there's such a thing as standing I'm not sure that any member of Congress has

standing it's probably going to be someone else but Greg's right there's no

doubt they'll file a lawsuit if they can they'll file it in the Ninth Circuit but

here's what we have to understand one party is for securing our borders and

keeping our community safe another party the democrat party is for open borders

and saying whoever wants to come in can come in we've got to make sure we stand

up for the rule of law judge could have been said better thank you both for

being on this evening holmen's former acting director of ice

he joins us now Tom good morning to you and the

president said that in a new interview with the New York Times a waste of time

I agree with a little eye something day one the Democrats are not going to

negotiate in good faith and and look we've seen it they haven't offered $1

for a border barrier they haven't offered $1 to hire more patrol agent if

you look at San Diego we just use a caravan and saying there for example two

things stop that surge of caravans rushing to

the border and women agreeing and a border barrier

if it wasn't for those two things everybody that Caravan would be sitting

in San Diego today so so what does the president supposed to do because this

interview and those words sort of leave you wondering what his next move will be

what would you like to see him do well I seem declare a state of emergency and

build that barrier that men and women aboard which I deserve it'll keep this

country safe every place they built a border barrier it has had an a direct

and immediate impact on illegal immigration it works

the data shows it but but the Democrats will not listen to the experts they hate

this president more than they they want to secure this country they said they

listened to the experts they're ignoring the experts so declaring a national

emergency is in the cards obviously this is a direction the president could go in

he faces quite possibly a big legal battle constitutional battle over that

well you guys they assume and everything he does this president's done more for

immigration enforcement and border security in any of the six presidents I

work for but every time he tries to do something to secure this border he gets

sued by the ACLU or they'll find some judges in Ninth Circuit and that's what

continued but that doesn't mean the president's gonna stop doing his job and

keep us all to protected citizen this country he's doing the right thing and

and I salute him for obviously this leaves a lot of room for for all the

pundits to talk about whether or not the president is winning or losing on this

issue as this as this stalemate continues every white go ahead

it isn't about it isn't about winning losing for this president they say what

did Nancy win that President Trump when the American people are losing the

American people do not have a secure border so everybody wants who's winning

losing air the American people are losing were losing sovereignty in this

country and we're not protecting American people at the level we should

be protecting them always appreciate your time on the subject Tom Holman I'm

joining us thank you thank you god bless you and God bless

america

For more infomation >> THE END! PRESIDENT Trump Just PULLS THE LAST MOVE On BORDER After Pelosi DID THIS(VIDEO)!!! - Duration: 10:56.

-------------------------------------------

Steve Rattner Scores President Donald Trump's Economy Ahead Of SOTU | Morning Joe | MSNBC - Duration: 6:25.

For more infomation >> Steve Rattner Scores President Donald Trump's Economy Ahead Of SOTU | Morning Joe | MSNBC - Duration: 6:25.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump Participates in a Naturalization Ceremony in the Oval Office - Duration: 0:48.

The President: There is no higher honor

or greater privilege than becoming an American Citizen.

Our whole nation embraces you with open arms

and joyful hearts,

and I know that you will treasure this day forever.

By taking this oath, you have forged a sacred bond

with this nation, its traditions,

its culture and its values.

Each of you worked hard for this moment.

You followed the rules, upheld our laws

and contributed to the strength and success

and vitality of our nation.

I am truly thrilled to welcome the five newest

members of our great American family.

That's what you are.

American Family.

[applause]

For more infomation >> President Trump Participates in a Naturalization Ceremony in the Oval Office - Duration: 0:48.

-------------------------------------------

DONALD TRUMP MAKES HIS MOVE SENDS SHOCKWAVES THROUGH NATION WITH OBAMA ANNOUNCEMENT - Duration: 10:40.

DONALD TRUMP MAKES HIS MOVE SENDS SHOCKWAVES THROUGH NATION WITH OBAMA ANNOUNCEMENT

Trump makes his turn since shockwaves through country with

Obama declaration as the most solid and adjusted news collection benefit on the planet rwn

offers the accompanying

data distributed by Washington Times while a significant part of the country is centered

around the soundness of feeble Supreme.

Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg president Trump's increasingly quick and unending concern

is the famously

liberal US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit everything goes to the Ninth Circuit

mr. Trump griped.

Friday in a touch of overstatement everything Senate Republicans cushioning of their dominant

part in the midterm races will

permit mr. Trump to push ahead with his objective of reshaping the ninth circuit as a component

of his record-setting push to put

increasingly traditionalist judges on circuit courts the Senate Judiciary Committee will

take up five a greater amount of mr. Trump's.

legal candidates Tuesday including one interests court judge slanting Sarah Sanders has at

long last had enough drops

sudden declaration amid live meeting the ninth circuit areas on a solitary day a week ago

shown why.

mr. Trump needs to change the ideological cosmetics of the rambling interests court

which covers nine Western

states and two domains a three-judge board of the Ninth Circuit decided on Thursday that

mr. Trump can't stop an

Obama organization program that secures youthful settlers living in the US unlawfully from

expelling on the.

same day a government area judge in Montana part of the Ninth Circuit blocked development

of the Keystone XL

oil pipeline saying the Trump organization disregarded the venture's effect on environmental

change the judge Brian

Morris is an Obama representative mr. Trump marked an official request on his second day

in office favoring the Keystone.

pipeline which had been hindered by President Obama the vitality venture turned into an

image of mr. Trump's America

first financial resurgence it was a political choice made by a judge mr. Trump mourned Friday

I

it's a disrespect it's 48,000 occupations I affirmed it's prepared to begin he knows

where the case is going in the interests.

pipeline I surmise they'll finish up setting off to the ninth circuit as regular mr. Trump

said critically the interests court

situated in San Francisco is approved 429 judges and it has six opening of the 23 current

judges 16 were named by

Democrats and 7 by Republicans that implies if mr. Trump fills every one of the opening

the Ninth Circuit's parity.

would be 16 Democratic representatives and 13 Republican not a flip in belief system

but rather closer to divided equality the president

has three designations pending we're gradually putting new judges in the Ninth Circuit the

president said Democratic congresspersons are not glad about it either

representative patty Murray of Washington state protested before the end of last month

to mr. Trump's designation of Seattle legal advisor Eric Miller.

an individual from the preservationist Federalist Society to the Ninth Circuit I am NOT going

to be complicit in this most recent

hurried procedure to stack the courts with Trump candidates in the intermediary session

she said calling the president's

candidates extraordinary preservationists mrs.

Murray declined to return her blue slip on the chosen one a senatorial custom.

basically giving veto capacity to a congressperson over legal applicants from their home state

however requirement of the

affability has differed throughout the years and Senate Republican pioneers state the won't

permit the protest of a home state.

congressperson to obstruct a selection Senator Lindsey Graham South Carolina Republican who

is looking at the chairmanship of the

Legal executive Committee one year from now said he won't enable Democrats to exploit

the blue slip convention we'll get

their info however they're not going to have a veto on the circuit court Mr Graham told

radio host Hugh Hewitt last.

week in 2013 Democrats eradicated the 60-vote limit to end a delay for generally selections

that implies Republicans can keep on pushing forward with mr. Trump's legal chosen people

after as of now having set a

record with 29 Circuit Court affirmations so far in his administration Senate Majority

Leader.

Mitch McConnell Kentucky Republican said the midterm race consequences of Democrats winning

the house larger part

ought to give considerably more energy to the gops drive to introduce mr. Trump's judges

I think we'll have likely more.

time for designations in the following Congress than we've had in this one on the grounds

that the zones of authoritative

assention will be progressively constrained between a Democratic House and a Republican

Senate mr.

McConnell said a week ago I don't

think we'll experience any difficulty discovering time to do assignments the president said

the Ninth Circuit's decision on the.

Obama period migration program called conceded activity for youth entries or daca was really

a positive for his

organization notwithstanding losing the case the activity implies the case is no longer

in the hands of the Ninth Circuit you

infrequently win in the ninth circuit mr. Trump said the uplifting news is by dismissing

daca in the ninth circuit we've been.

hanging tight for that we get to the Supreme Court and we need to be in the Supreme Court

on daca while mr. Trump is

effectively endeavoring to change the cosmetics of the ninth circuit he's basically officially

done that with the Supreme Court

in under two years his two high court assignments judges stoop in Gorsuch and Brett M Kavanaugh

have given.

the court a five-to-four moderate larger part while equity Ginsburg's hospitalization a

week ago for broken

ribs started extreme hypothesis about a conceivable open seat on the High Court her retirement

wouldn't be as urgent as the.

flight of Justice Anthony M Kennedy who was a swing vote mr. Trump has an outstanding

rundown of potential Supreme

Court chosen people including makes a decision about Thomas Hardiman of the US Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit.

Leaner Space Force woos skeptics in Congress

The Pentagon is putting the final touches on its proposal for establishing a Space Force

- and it's not quite as ambitious as the vision President Donald Trump turned into one of

his signature rallying cries.

The current version, considered a historic first step in elevating the military's space

mission, is already getting a far more welcoming reception among Democratic and Republican

skeptics on Capitol Hill.

The latest plan calls for creating a sixth branch of the military, as Trump has proposed,

by combining troops dedicated to space missions into a new armed service commanded by its

own four-star general.

Instead of the "Separate but equal" Space Force that Trump advocated last year, it would

fall under the purview of the Air Force, which would manage and host many of its operations

and acquire most of its equipment.

The Space Force would be loosely modeled on the Marine Corps, which is overseen and funded

by the Department of the Navy even though it operates independently.

It would have somewhat less stature than the Army, Navy and Air Force, each of which has

its own civilian secretary, control over its budgets and a network of bases and training

facilities.

Several defense and administration officials said the White House has informally blessed

the new proposal, which they describe as meeting the president's intent of a sixth military

branch.

The approach is shaping up to be much more politically palatable on Capitol Hill than

Trump's original, more grandiose version.

"I actually think this is a promising proposal," House Armed Services Chairman Adam Smith told

POLITICO in an interview.

"Not sure we're going to do it, but we can certainly work with it.

That's probably a good template to work off of, and then the devil is in the details."

He added: "I believe that space needs to be emphasized."

Senate Armed Services Chairman Jim Inhofe, another early opponent, said he could go along

with it, too, despite his initial misgivings about creating a Space Force.

"I was opposed to it altogether because [what] we don't need is another bureaucracy and we're

handling it pretty well right now," Inhofe told POLITICO.

"But I would go ahead and support it."

"If we could do it, centralize this under the Air Force, that would probably accomplish

the same thing," he added.

"At least it centralizes it."

The plan has emerged after what several officials described as a bruising fight inside the Pentagon,

where powerful interests were always wary of creating a new branch that could siphon

off authority and dollars from current programs.

Early drafts of a White House directive prepared for Trump called for establishing a standalone

Department of the Space Force with its own civilian secretary like the Army, Navy and

Air Force.

Under the latest proposal the Space Force would not be on par with those branches.

It would not oversee the development of new space technologies as the Army, Navy and Air

Force now do.

It also would not wrap in an emerging Space Development Agency that Congress mandated

last year to speed up the acquisition of new space technologies, officials said.

Nor would the Space Force control its own military bases, according to several officials

with direct knowledge of the deliberations.

The proposal does call for shifting thousands of Air Force, Army and Navy personnel that

now carry out space-related missions into the Space Force, with a separate training

system and four-star general as commander, who would be a member of the Joint Chiefs

of Staff.

"That's why it's - you know, recommended it sits underneath the Air Force."

The plan has similarities to previous proposals in Congress to create a dedicated Space Corps

within the Air Force, but not as a full-fledged military branch - proposals the Pentagon brass

initially opposed.

"What's emerging appears to be the Space Corps concept - the Marine Corps kind of thing inside

the Department of the Air Force," said Brian Weeden, a space expert at the Secure World

Foundation in Washington who has closely followed the deliberations.

The Pentagon appears to have won over Trump's advisers.

"There are a lot of things a department would have to have," said one administration official

who is involved in the discussions.

"You pile on those things, it becomes a lot more hampered down.

It is a well thought-out proposal that meets the president's intent.

"The bottom line is it will be the sixth branch of the military," the official added.

"It depends on what expenses are attached to it," Inhofe told POLITICO.

"There's a way of making it cheaper I wouldn't want to commit to what he's proposing now

because we might get a better deal when it comes up."

And then there's the question of how much Trump's stamp on the Space Force could sour

rank-and-file Democrats, especially in the House - no matter what the details.

"On one hand you can give Trump credit for elevating this issue and forcing the debate

on it," Weeden said.

For more infomation >> DONALD TRUMP MAKES HIS MOVE SENDS SHOCKWAVES THROUGH NATION WITH OBAMA ANNOUNCEMENT - Duration: 10:40.

-------------------------------------------

Trump says he plans to keep troops in Iraq to monitor Iran - Duration: 4:58.

For more infomation >> Trump says he plans to keep troops in Iraq to monitor Iran - Duration: 4:58.

-------------------------------------------

Migrant Caravan BREAKING , Democrats want Trump to fail , real reason why Dems don't want a wall - Duration: 10:54.

No comments:

Post a Comment