Monday, December 10, 2018

Trump news on Youtube Dec 10 2018

Academy Award winner Meryl Streep sat down with Stephen Colbert earlier this month

for his annual onstage conversation to raise money for Montclair Film, where they

discussed, among other things, President Donald Trump.

After Streep criticized Trump during her Cecil B. DeMille acceptance speech at the

2017 Golden Globes for seemingly mocking a disabled reporter, Trump retorted via

Twitter that he thought Streep was "one of the most over-rated actresses in Hollywood."

When asked by Colbert how she felt about having a president who is

"indifferent to empathy," Streep replied with a sobering answer.

The conversation also had plenty of moments of levity - as the award winning actress

teased her role in the upcoming 'Mary Poppins Returns' and shared some of her favorite

recent movie releases such as 'A Star Is Born.' Streep, enthused that "nobody but Lady

Gaga" could've played Ally in Bradley Cooper's directorial debut and also raved about the

actor's approach to helming a feature film.

Streep also took the opportunity to plug her own work, recommending that the audience

goes to see the upcoming 'Mary Poppins Returns,' in which she plays Poppins' "cousin."

To read more on this story, head to THR.com.

For The Hollywood Reporter News, I'm Lyndsey Rodrigues.

For more infomation >> Meryl Streep On Why Trump Should Be Feared | THR News - Duration: 2:09.

-------------------------------------------

Pathetic Trump Can't Find Anyone Willing To Be His New Chief Of Staff - Duration: 5:41.

Over the weekend, Donald Trump announced that his chief of staff, John Kelly, is leaving

at the end of the year, something that all of us have known since probably about six

months ago when these stories first started emerging that John Kelly was going to be out

by the end of the year, but nonetheless, Donald Trump announced it and he also said, don't

worry folks.

I have a long list.

There are a lot of people out there who want this job, so everything at the White House

is gonna be awesome.

No.

As it stands right now, there's nobody that wants this job.

Nick Ayers, who was Mike Pence, his chief of staff, was the guy that was going to do

it.

And then he came out and said, nope.

Not only do I not want to do it, I'm going to go ahead and leave Mike Pence as well.

I'm out.

Thank you all.

I'm going to go work for a dark money group and make a ton of cash, but best of luck finding

new chiefs of staff, you morons.

Uh, then rumor was Mnuchin.

Mnuchin says, no, dear God.

No, I don't want that job.

I want to stay where I'm at please.

Thank you sir.

There was Mick Mulvaney from the omb who also says, no, not gonna do that.

I'm going to stay where I'm at.

There was also Robert Lighthizer, uh, with the US trays, the US trade representative

who also said, I don't think I want that position either.

So right now we have a lot of people out there saying thanks, but no thanks.

I don't want to be your chief of staff and a president out there saying, no, there are

plenty of good people who want this job.

So here's what's going to happen.

First and foremost, we're not going to get anybody taking this job that's actually going

to fix the problems of Donald Trump.

Nobody is going to reign in his Twitter feed.

That's where John Kelly's biggest failure came from trying to make Trump act like a

president.

You know, John Kelly was going to be the adult in the room.

We all heard that talking point.

John Kelly was coming to bring this, you know, maturity and respect to the office.

And he ended up ruining his entire reputation and this is now what he's going to be known

for in history books.

And he screwed over his entire legacy because he couldn't even stop a psychotic man from

tweeting.

So yeah, John Kelly's toast is reputations toasts, but so is this position because who

is going to want to go work for a man who, number one, does not want to listen to you.

He wants a spineless yes man or yes woman in that position.

John Kelly wasn't going to do that.

That's why he butted heads with the president.

That's why they argued all the time.

That's why John Kelly walked around the White House, pissed off trying to fight everybody

like the time he tried to fight John Bolton's outside of the Oval Office, but Donald Trump

was just named as an unindicted co-conspiracy, a conspirator in a federal crime who wants

to go work for that guy who wants to be a of this?

You know, as the expression goes, they're rearranging deck chairs on the titanic at

this point.

Trump's entire presidency right now is going down in flames.

There is a chance it's going to recover, there's probably a good chance it is going to recover,

but while it is sinking, no person in their right mind would take on that position and

that's what's even more scary because no person in their right mind would take that job, so

we're going to get somebody maybe not as a clear thinker, somebody who really doesn't

know what they're doing, but they just want the title and they want to work with Trump

and so they're going to tell them yes to whatever crazy idea he has that day.

That's the kind of person we're going to get to fill this slot.

Maybe it's a Sean Hannity, maybe it's the Lou Dobbs.

Maybe it's somebody even worse than those two, but I can promise you it's going to be

somebody on par with them.

Maybe a spineless.

Yes, man.

Congressmen, Hey, Matt Gaetz would make a perfect idiot.

Whipping boy, as Donald Trump's chief of staff time will tell Trump, swears he's going to

have somebody in position by the end of this year and I can promise you it's not going

to be a person that's going to make anyone in this country proud.

For more infomation >> Pathetic Trump Can't Find Anyone Willing To Be His New Chief Of Staff - Duration: 5:41.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Mocked For 'Smocking Gun' Typo In New Tweet — See Memes - News Today - Duration: 4:03.

Not only is there 'no collusion' in the Russia investigation, according to President Trump — there's 'no smocking gun,' either

Yep, it's another embarrassing/hilarious typo for Donald, and he's being thoroughly mocked for it

   Spot the typo from President Donald Trump's December 10 tweets: "Democrats can't find a Smocking Gun tying the Trump campaign to Russia after James Comey's testimony

No Smocking Gun…No Collusion." @FoxNews That's because there was NO COLLUSION. So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction, wrongly call it a campaign contribution,…

which it was not (but even if it was, it is only a CIVIL CASE, like Obama's – but it was done correctly by a lawyer and there would not even be a fine

Lawyer's liability if he made a mistake, not me). Cohen just trying to get his sentence reduced

WITCH HUNT!"    That's right; there's two! Trump is insistent that there's no "smocking gun" when it comes to tying him to the investigation into collusion with Russia during the 2016 presidential campaign

Well, he's technically not wrong, considering there's no such thing as a "smocking gun

" Obviously, the president is getting dunked on by voters who are just baffled by his new mistake

Granted, nobody is actually shocked by it; he makes these typos nearly daily. It's just… this is such a dumb one

 "I remember the old Motley Crue cover of 'Smocking in the boys' room,'" @Summerl81738362 tweeted

@emilylime wrote, "smocking gun sequel pitches: smock and mirrors, where there's smock there's fire, smocking kills, smock signals, put that in your pipe and smock it, second-hand smock, blowing smock up your ass, smock detectors, holy smocks, smock follows beauty, smock like a chimney

" @harleyb11 joked, "FunFact: Hobby Lobby sells smocking guns for under $10." Admitting to a felony on Twitter… pic

twitter.com/r0Hu1hIF3F  — I LOL @ U (@Bryan_or_Mitch) December 10, 2018   ok Individual-1 pic

twitter.com/rhnb1nDLAd  — Chris Connors (@uurf) December 10, 2018    This latest disaster comes a week after he tweeted about some dude named "Scott Free," instead of using the phrase "scot-free

" He's not great at this Twitter thing. People immediately mocked him for it, including a man actually named Scott Free, who asked to please be left out of this narrative

For more infomation >> Trump Mocked For 'Smocking Gun' Typo In New Tweet — See Memes - News Today - Duration: 4:03.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Admin Refuses to Endorse Controversial United Nations Climate Report - Duration: 2:56.

For more infomation >> Trump Admin Refuses to Endorse Controversial United Nations Climate Report - Duration: 2:56.

-------------------------------------------

'The Five' react to Trump critics pushing impeachment - Duration: 10:15.

For more infomation >> 'The Five' react to Trump critics pushing impeachment - Duration: 10:15.

-------------------------------------------

Trump prié de ne pas se mêler des gilets jaunes - Duration: 4:32.

For more infomation >> Trump prié de ne pas se mêler des gilets jaunes - Duration: 4:32.

-------------------------------------------

Trump calls ex-FBI chief James Comey's testimony "all lies" - Duration: 0:40.

President Trump has lashed out former FBI Director James Comey, accusing him of lying

to Congress.

Comey testified to two House committees last week over his handling of the Russia probe

and the FBI's probe into Hillary Clinton's emails.

According to transcripts from Friday's closed-door meeting, Comey was advised by his lawyer to

not answer certain questions about the Russia investigation.

He also said the session was a waste of time as it was consumed by questions from Republicans

about Clinton's emails.

In a tweet on Sunday, Trump suggested Comey's testimony was dishonest and evasive.

For more infomation >> Trump calls ex-FBI chief James Comey's testimony "all lies" - Duration: 0:40.

-------------------------------------------

Saudi-Approved Lobbyists Funnel Money To Trump - Duration: 6:27.

For more infomation >> Saudi-Approved Lobbyists Funnel Money To Trump - Duration: 6:27.

-------------------------------------------

FOX and Friends 12/10/18 : Trump , Comey , Mueller Breaking News - Duration: 1:48:13.

For more infomation >> FOX and Friends 12/10/18 : Trump , Comey , Mueller Breaking News - Duration: 1:48:13.

-------------------------------------------

MSNBC Stephanie Ruhle 12/10/18 :Trump , Mueller , Kushner - Duration: 44:18.

For more infomation >> MSNBC Stephanie Ruhle 12/10/18 :Trump , Mueller , Kushner - Duration: 44:18.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Is DIRECTLY Implicated In A Felony - Duration: 6:33.

On Friday, the special prosecutor's office, along with the US attorney for the southern

district of New York, made public some court filings that actually seem to directly implicate

Donald Trump in a federal crime.

Now, Donald Trump, after these filings, became public tweeted out the following instead totally

clears the president.

Thank you.

Now, based on what was in those filings, I think it's pretty obvious that individual

one here didn't actually read what was in there because yes, Mr. Trump, it did directly

implicate you in a felony offense.

Here's what happened.

There was a lot of stuff within those filings, a lot of it that said, oh, this person was

trying to reach out from Russia to Michael Cohen.

We know at this point that a lot of Russians reached out to the Trump campaign that has

been made public in these filings.

While we do not know Mueller might, I'm assuming Mueller does, is whether or not anybody in

the Trump campaign reached back and accepted their offers for help.

So that's still a big question mark.

But what's no longer a big question mark is whether or not Donald Trump specifically ordered

Michael Cohen to make the hush money payment to Stormy Daniels.

According to these new court filings, according to Michael Cohen's own testimony, he made

those payments at the direction of individual one who was running for president.

Now it's only listed as individual one.

So I guess we're going to have to speculate, but since this was 2016, um, I'm assuming

obviously this was Donald Trump, unless for some reason Hillary Clinton felt the need

to tell Michael Cohen to pay off a porn actress.

Or maybe it was Jill Stein or the Libertarian guy who I from Gary Johnson forgot his name

because he's so, uh, you know, not memorable.

Nonetheless, it's pretty obvious to everyone.

Individual one is Donald Trump.

And here's what this means.

Donald Trump's be going on a tirade the last few days saying, no, that was a personal money

that was a financial transaction by a person to another person that's not a campaign contribution.

Um, what this moron doesn't understand is that it's an in kind contribution.

We have explained this a thousand times and apparently we're going to have to explain

it a thousand more times because Donald Trump doesn't want to seem to understand or he wants

to convince his followers that everybody else is lying about it.

Any money that you spend, whether it is given directly to a campaign or if it's just money

to do something else, if it is to further the cause of that campaign to help the candidate

in any way that is considered an end kind campaign contribution.

That is what that means.

So paying Stormy Daniels, Stephanie Clifford, to remain quiet about their affair so that

it didn't impact his presidential, uh, race.

That is a campaign contribution.

I don't care what idiot tweets out that is what that is.

And according to Cohen, Trump is the one, 100 percent who directed it.

He coordinated it with Trump.

They knew it was happening, they knew the purpose of it.

And that is why they did it.

Now, the southern district of New York adds a little bit of a caveat in there.

And this is, you know, not so good for those of us who want to see Trump fall from grace.

They're not able to say at this point that he knowingly and willfully broke the law.

Now to me though, that kind of seems like a BS statement, right?

We've all heard the expression, ignorance is no excuse.

Oh, I didn't know this was illegal.

That doesn't matter.

That's not a defense that actually works in court.

So it is a bit confusing as to why the US attorney in the southern district of New York

would even bring that up because whether he knew it was illegal or not, he ordered it.

It is illegal.

He did it.

That's a crime.

What's the problem here?

At this point, Donald Trump, based on all the evidence, based on all the testimony is

by definition and unindicted co-conspirator.

That's what's happened here.

We have conspiracy to violate campaign finance laws.

We have the actual violation of campaign finance laws themselves and Donald Trump at this point

in addition to being US president, is by definition an unindicted co-conspirator.

That also helps to explain to a lot of folks why he's been freaking out so much on Twitter

over the last few days.

He feels those walls closing in on him.

He knows that this these revelations from Friday.

This is nothing compared to the other stuff that we're probably going to be finding out

within the next few months.

For more infomation >> Trump Is DIRECTLY Implicated In A Felony - Duration: 6:33.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's Twitter Feed Is A Case Study In Mental Illness - Duration: 7:41.

Over the weekend, Donald Trump engaged in what might be one of his most absurd, bizarre,

and unnecessary Twitter rants this time it was against Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal

after Blumenthal referred to Donald Trump as he is, which is an unindicted coconspirator.

Based on the filings that were released this past Friday, Donald Trump then took to Twitter

to say the following, "Watched Denang Dick Blumenthal and television spewing facts almost

as accurate as his bravery and Vietnam, which he never saw as the bullets whiz by Denang

Dick's head as he was saving soldiers' left and right.

He then woke up from his dream screaming that he lied.

Next time I go to Vietnam, I will ask the Dick to travel with me."

I will ask the Dick to travel with me, and he put the "Dick" in quotation marks here.

Okay.

Several things to unpack from this psychotic rambling of the president of the United States

here.

First and foremost, if you're not familiar with what the president is actually referring

to, it's an issue that was resolved roughly a decade ago where Blumenthal had misspoken

about his service during the Vietnam War.

He did not go to Vietnam, but unlike Donald Trump, he did enlist.

He was a part of the U.S. National guard here with the United States Marines and he, uh,

a signed up with them after he got his education deferments.

So he got his deferments, went to school, school's over, he signs up and does his duty,

didn't have to go to Vietnam.

He wasn't part of the group that did.

I'm sure there was probably some favors that exchanged hands, you know, wealthy, privileged

kid maybe didn't want to go over there with scared, but hell, at least he did something

which is more than what we can say of the president of the United States, cadette bone

spurs who did everything he could to avoid conflict or signing up at the military in

any way possible.

Now that's one thing.

Obviously everybody on Twitter responded to in these tweets.

The fact that Donald Trump didn't go to Vietnam, he had his bone spurs.

He was a little sissy kid, didn't want to go over there and do anything.

Whatever.

We get it.

That's known.

Everybody understands that and they also understand the hypocrisy.

And the irony of Donald Trump tweeting this out about somebody when he himself didn't

do that thing either.

Here's what gets me about it.

The president is psychotic.

The president is absolutely mentally unstable and should immediately be removed from office.

How about that?

How about we go with that talking point.

Instead of talking about the hypocrisy of he didn't go to Vietnam either.

Everybody knows that these tweets from the president show that this man is insane and

I don't say that lightly.

It's not like, oh, this guy's crazy.

This is insane.

This man is clinically and certifiably insane.

The 25th amendment should have been invoked months ago.

This man needs to undergo very serious psychological evaluations and further more because he is

not alone in this.

If anyone in this country reads these tweets and says, Hell Yeah, how?

Yeah, that's my president.

Then you're just as insane as he is.

No one in this country should feel like this is okay.

That it's good that the president's tweeting out about the deck.

If you think that that's okay, then your part of the problem.

This is not America.

It's who we are.

Now it's who we've allowed ourselves to evolve into, but anybody that actually cares about

this country cares about our reputation, cares about our standing with our allies.

They don't approve of this.

Anybody with a shred of intelligence in their brains wouldn't approve of this, and that's

what's so disgusting about this.

To me, this isn't a partisan issue.

This isn't a "did he or did he not serve in Vietnam" issue.

This is a psychotic man.

Donald Trump serving as the president of the United States and Republicans sitting idly

by wondering, Oh, I wish we could do something about his tweeting.

You have 100 percent of the power to do something about his tweeting.

You could have invoked the 25th amendment a year ago and you sat on your assets and

chose to do nothing.

You own this, his supporters on this and you people are all, every one of you just as horrible,

despicable and deplorable as the president himself and no, you can't change your Twitter

handle and say like, oh, the deplorable Mike Jones as if it's a badge of honor.

It's a disgusting label, but it perfectly describes the people who are out there defending

the president after saying garbage

like this.

For more infomation >> Trump's Twitter Feed Is A Case Study In Mental Illness - Duration: 7:41.

-------------------------------------------

TRUMP JUST ENDS CROOKED ROBERT MUELLER!! THE TRAITOR IS TOTALLY FINISHED - Duration: 10:03.

TRUMP JUST ENDS CROOKED ROBERT MUELLER!!

THE TRAITOR IS TOTALLY FINISHED

On Saturday, members of the media caught up with President Trump before boarding his helicopter

en route to the Army-Navy football game.

Trump confirmed White House Chief Of Staff John Kelly will he leaving at the end of the

year and his decision on who will be replacing him will be announced within the next couple

of days.

But what stood out most on Trump's brief statement was his optimism on the Mueller

probe.

Video Below

Trump was upbeat on the status of the Mueller investigation that he is often seen and heard

criticizing.

The President said, "On the Mueller situation, we are very happy with what we are reading

because there was no collusion what so ever.

There never has been.

The last thing I want is help from Russia on a campaign."

He added, "You should ask Hillary Clinton about Russia because she financed the fake

dossier.

She tried to get some information and help from Russia.

But you can ask them about that.

Very one-sided situation, but I think it's all turning around very nicely."

Before shifting to conversation to John Kelly, Trump pointed out what he has said all along,

which is, "There was absolutely no collusion."

We need your help circulating our articles.

Recently, social media platforms took strong measures to suppress our content!

Please share this and all of our other articles everywhere possible to help spread the truth!**

For more infomation >> TRUMP JUST ENDS CROOKED ROBERT MUELLER!! THE TRAITOR IS TOTALLY FINISHED - Duration: 10:03.

-------------------------------------------

Trump: Leakin James Comey Must Have Set A Record For Who Lied The Most To Congress In One Day(VIDEO) - Duration: 15:14.

Trump: Leakin James Comey Must Have Set A Record For Who Lied The Most To Congress In One Day

if you'd call it a tweet tirade or perhaps an online onslaught but by any

definition the president is once again using the virtual bully pulpit to take

shots said perhaps his political enemies or in this case is fired former FBI

director he says this Democrats can't find a smoking gun tying the Trump

campaign to Russia after James commis testimony no smoking gun no collusion at

Fox News that's because there was all caps no collusion so now the Dems go to

a simple private transaction wrongly calling it a campaign contribution which

it was not but even if it was it's only a civil case like Obama's but it was

done correctly by a lawyer and there would not even be a fine lawyers

liability if he made a mistake not me Cohen speaking of Michael Cohen his

former fixer just trying to get his sentence reduced all caps witch-hunt now

this comes after commis behind-closed-doors testimony before

House lawmakers about which the president criticized commis faulty

memory hey there he goes again I thought I was lying James Comey not

leaking James Comey we have to remind ourselves the President of the United

States of America is publicly announcing that people are committing crimes they

should be in jail private citizens that's not okay of course it is also

possible that Comey bill could once again have to testify you heard senator

Goodlatte mention that's Lindsey Graham and others have said as much as well

bill White House saying about the Washington Post story suggesting Trump

campaign officials were in contact with Russians during the transition Kevin

lizard on the record bill they're not saying a great deal off the record there

sort of tried to poke holes in some of the reporting that you've seen out there

in particular in the Washington Post I want to lay it out slowly for the people

at home who haven't had a chance to sort of wash in it the way we have inside the

beltway what they're suggesting is this idea that general Flynn interacted with

officials representing Moscow is not on its face uncommon or even unlawful the

White House officials that I've talked to point to the fact that among other

topics Flynn is said to have discussed getting the Kremlin to side with the US

on an issue involving Israel however the pose citing Michael Cohen's testimony

said that he was also in contact with Russians about building a Trump property

in Moscow and again their argument is so what that's not nefarious nor is it

illegal but the question obviously becomes bill was there a quid pro quo

and that is yet to be proven all right one more question for you what's the

latest on a new White House chief of staff and that search Kevin yeah a real

surprise over the weekend a lot of people felt like it would be Nick Aires

the vice president's chief of staff he is very very highly regarded here in the

nation's capital and in particular here at the White House very strong

reputation but he didn't want to commit to working for the Trump White House

through 2020 and so that leaves the outgoing chief of staff John Kelly in a

bit of a holding pattern waiting to get his replacement up to speed that is of

course depending on who he is or she is but the generals departure bill is also

raising questions about homeland security secretary Kirsten Nielsen she

is said to be very close to Kelly his departure it is thought could signal

hers as well as for possible Kelly replacement names were most often

hearing here at the White House Mick Mulvaney mark meadows Matt Whitaker a

trio they're all qualified we'll see what if anything the president decides

to do in the day ahead well we're still going through the transcript John it's

over 200 pages documenting that six-hour closed-door transcribed interview and

certainly an indication of the frustration from the Republican chairman

of the House Government Oversight Committee

trey Gowdy he put out a statement a short time ago documented what he

described were the number of times that the former FBI director couldn't

remember didn't know or did not recall and the figures he released was a 71 166

and then eight as you see here and if you do some quick mental arithmetic you

see that's about 230 times in a document that is about 240 pages in length some

of the topics that he could not provide information on were key topics of

interest to the Republicans which would be the dossier that was used to secure

surveillance weren't on a trump campaign a quarter page he could not say who paid

for it he does not recall seeing the the key details of the fisa

application itself and he was unaware of this relationship between the former

British spy Christopher Steele who did the research on the dossier a Justice

Department official who helped get some of that information to the FBI in the

fall of 2016 the FBI was also gaining the dossier

it's important to note through other through other channels and then also

this issue of the funding it was funded by the DNC in the Clinton campaign but

director Comey says in his testimony and a line of questioning to one of the

Democrats on the committee that he just didn't feel that that information about

which political party was funding it was really that germane or irrelevant to the

Surveillance Court what mattered is that they knew it was some kind of political

document John hmm that brings us to the Russia

investigation what have you learned about that based on these transcripts

well going through the transcripts one of the key headlines at least to us here

at Fox based on our reporting is that he documents that in the summer of 2016

when they opened the Russia counterintelligence investigation that

was looking at alleged contacts or coordination between Trump campaign

officials and Russia that there were four individuals that they were

investigating at that time so we know about the a Carter page he was the

subject of the surveillance warrant we know about George papadopolis who

recently applied guilty to lying to federal investigators but the other two

are kind of a blank one could be Paul Manafort and another could be the former

national security adviser Mike Flynn but were not clear on that at this point

it's important to note that director Comey goes on to say that there was

never a direction from the Obama administration to open the campaign on

the Trump campaign at that time pardon me and he says in a line of questioning

with the Democrats quote I know that we never investigated the Trump campaign

for political purposes congressman Deutsch did President Obama

or anyone in his administration ever make a demand or a request the FBI or

the Justice Department infiltrate or surveil the Trump campaign mr. Comey no

not to my knowledge the other footnote I would say in this section is that we

have new detail about the director Comey's decision

to draft a memo documenting his meeting with the president about the former

national security advisor Mike Flynn that was a meeting they had in February

and it was at that meeting according to the FBI director that the president said

I want to see if you can let go of this Flint situation because Flint had

resigned at that time what we know from the transcript is that there was a

meeting among senior FBI officials about commis conversation with the president

about Flynn and based on the transcript the focus of that is whether it mounted

to obstruction of justice what's worth noting here is that they decided in a

very conscious way to keep that information with the FBI and not to

share it with then Attorney General Jeff Sessions because they had already

calculated that he would recuse himself from the investigation and I mentioned

this because it was this type of behavior during the Clinton email case

or the FBI taking over a lot of responsibilities with various that might

naturally fall to the Justice Department that they were highly criticized for

doing with the emails and now we see something similar happened with the

obstruction of justice justice question in the Russia case yeah I mean you can

tell from reading the transcripts that many members of Congress weren't happy

about that decision what about Lisa Paige and Peter struck FBI employees at

the time worked for mr. Comey What did he say about them well I think there's a

very important section about Peter struck one of the questions for

Republicans has been whether the political bias that was exhibited in the

text messages exchanged by Peter struck and Lisa Paige bled into the

investigations either the email investigations or the Russia

investigation and what director Comey testified to were Struck's involvement

in that letter in October of 2016 which went to Congress and led them to reopen

the email investigation right before the election and he says in his testimony

quote in fact Peter struck helped draft my letter to Congress on October 28th

that Hillary Clinton blames for her defeat so it's hard for me to see how he

was on Team Clinton secretly at that point in time and he also was one of the

handful people in the entire world who knew we

were investigating for Americans remember we talked about this earlier

for Americans who had some connection to mr. Trump during the summer of 2016 and

he didn't tell a soul so on the one hand the former FBI director is very critical

of strucken page for the anti-trump bias or political bias that's shown but he

also doesn't throw them under the bus in the sense that he says here the Peter

struck was one of the only people who knew about the Russia CIA investigation

involving the Trump campaign he did not leak that information and he also helped

draft that letter that went to Congress that reopened the email case on the eve

of the election as the director notes Hillary Clinton has blamed as one of the

main reasons for her defeat in 2016 John I know those transcripts have been out

just a couple of hours you've done a great job digesting it on the fly really

great reading actually if you're interested in this subject there's a lot

of great detail welcome back to Fox and Friends first lawmakers sifting through

more than 200 pages of transcripts from former FBI director james comey x'

marathon testimony so what did we learn joining me now to break it all down is

the president of Judicial Watch tom Fitton

thank you so much for joining us I know you were up late last night gonna be a

very busy day again today so we appreciate your time let's get right to

it though some of the main takeaways one of them obviously was that James Comey

didn't appear to remember a lot or he didn't know a lot to begin with I don't

know which it is but he said I don't know at least 156 times amongst a lot of

other variations of that so what's your take away from that well it wouldn't be

so bad if you use the profess ignorant on minor topics but he professed

ignorance on a lot of key aspects of the FISA the details about for instance who

funded it about because he signed off on at least one of the FISA warrants the

targeted Carter page in the Trump team and he professed not to know much about

the origins beyond what he read in the newspapers later and you know that's

concerning given that a review of the partial FISA applications that have been

released and judicial watch's lawsuits show

that the courts were misled that they were told that this FISA the dossier for

instance had origins in a political opposition to President Trump but wasn't

told the court wasn't told the Clinton campaign was behind and let's go to this

next point that came out and there's pages and pages of testimony that the

anti-trump dossier was in fact unverified yeah he confirmed what we

already knew that it was minimally corroborated remember Devon Nunez

concluded that in his report earlier this year and he was excoriated by the

left for saying that but it's true it was nemily corroborated when they first

applied to the course and when it was renewed and as best I know it stills

been really corroborated and remember the dossier was used by created with the

help of Russia Intel the court in fusion fusion GPS so it looks like a smear

operation by the Russians through the Clinton camp with the willing help of

the FBI and frankly now the mole around that's specifically important that the

issue of verification because Intel sources say that presenting a single

unverified fact that and throws and took out this whole woods procedure which

needs to be followed in order for this FISA to be granted you know it's one

thing to say hey look we like this source but if they can't find

substantiation for what the source is telling them and they're not telling the

court that that's a real problem okay so let's move to the next one the four

Americans that were apparently under investigation but not President Trump

yeah so that is important those were all people associated with the Clinton

campaign they excuse me the Trump campaign they include a Carter Page

Michael Flynn George papadopolis and the four themes escaping me but James Comey

tried to pretend just because we're targeting four people

on the Trump campaign doesn't mean which are targeting the Trump campaign who is

he kidding and of course Carter page was

right upon later in the year yeah so let's move to the fourth one he defended

the FBI agent Peter struck he said there was no indication of bias you just said

you know who are you kidding you could probably say that here too yeah well he

said that if he was on the that this is what's really frustrating because he

said if he knew what the texts were at the time he would have pulled him off

the Clinton and the Russia case but then later he said it was a conspiracy theory

that struck was pro-pro Clinton and anti-trump so he wants to have it both

ways and it shows you that mr. Comey may have some struck problems too given his

biases but he's not friends with robert muller he pointed that out he said he

doesn't have his personal cell phone number said he hasn't been over to his

house I said he's not friends with Robert Muller what do you think about

that you know there's a Washington Post story not too long ago talking about

them being brothers in arms' they're close professionally and it doesn't

matter in the sense that Comey and Muller had a professional relationship

and mr. Comey specifically leaked information to get a special counsel

going and now Muller is using Co me as his witness and people are concerned

about the conflicts legitimately since they had this long and close working

relationship and Tom you're testifying before Congress on December 13th correct

yes it's Thursday on the Clinton Foundation issue this is the hearing

they've been put off right a few weeks and we'll see what happens but we broke

open the Clinton Foundation pay-to-play scandal thank you god bless you and God

bless america

For more infomation >> Trump: Leakin James Comey Must Have Set A Record For Who Lied The Most To Congress In One Day(VIDEO) - Duration: 15:14.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Admin Wants Corporations To Put MORE Pollutants Into Our Water - Duration: 3:47.

Good News, everyone, the Trump administration has decided that we're not exposed to enough

toxic pollutants in the United States the way it is today, so they're going to rewrite

some of the EPA rules to make sure that you get your daily dose of corporate toxins.

Here's what's happening right now.

The EPA is working on a new proposal that would absolutely kill and Obama era regulations

that expanded the definition of waters of the US by expanding that definition of waters

of the US that made smaller bodies of water subject to the clean water act, which meant

that corporations couldn't dump their pollutants into those bodies of water.

We're talking about smaller rivers and streams and ponds and things like that that could

and do feed into aquifers and water tables that American citizens use every single day.

The goal of it in the Obama era was, hey, maybe we should do this.

Expand the rule.

Expand the definition so that people aren't ingesting as many toxins you.

You'd have to be a comic book villain to not think that that's a good idea, and yet here

we are dealing with an administration that says, no.

If you ask me, people aren't getting enough toxins everyday, it toughens them up, make

some better, stronger kids, right, and that's what they're doing.

They will.

They want to allow corporations to be able to pour more toxic waste into our waterways.

This is insanity and I feel bad because I have to constantly say that with this administration,

but it feels like every single day they're coming out with some new crazy way to poison

the citizens to benefit corporations all because they have some kind of grudge against Obama

who's going to be held to a much higher level of history than they ever could hope for,

and that's what's at the heart of all of this, not just helping out corporations, which we

know they'll bend over backwards to do.

It's about repealing Obama's legacy.

They know they'll never live up to him.

They can never be as good as him.

They'll never be as liked as him, so they're trying to tear down every accomplishment that

he had.

And this clean water rule, this expansion of the definition of waterways of the U. s

is just another one.

And here's the thing.

You know, reading this article in the hill, they actually had a line that said this, the

Obama rule written in 2015 and known as the clean water rule was highly controversial.

That's a load of crap that is a load of crap.

Highly controversial.

I mean the hill has proven itself to be sometimes a decent or a publication where you get some

information, but for the most part it's for Republican shills.

It wasn't a highly controversial role.

What happened was that idiot Republicans jumped on it and said, oh, they want to regulate

the puddles on the street.

That's what it means.

Go back and watch Fox News because they literally say that.

They literally say that because they were either too stupid to understand what it meant

or they think their audience is too stupid to look up what it actually means.

Honestly, both are true.

Both are true.

There's no need to be nice about it.

You guys are idiots.

There was nothing controversial about this rule.

All it did was say, you know what?

Maybe we shouldn't give people as much poison every single day, but now the Trump administration

has come in and said, ah, you know what?

A little poison never killed anyone.

Right?

Yeah.

Good luck with that.

No comments:

Post a Comment