Monday, December 10, 2018

Trump news on Youtube Dec 10 2018

Academy Award winner Meryl Streep sat down with Stephen Colbert earlier this month

for his annual onstage conversation to raise money for Montclair Film, where they

discussed, among other things, President Donald Trump.

After Streep criticized Trump during her Cecil B. DeMille acceptance speech at the

2017 Golden Globes for seemingly mocking a disabled reporter, Trump retorted via

Twitter that he thought Streep was "one of the most over-rated actresses in Hollywood."

When asked by Colbert how she felt about having a president who is

"indifferent to empathy," Streep replied with a sobering answer.

The conversation also had plenty of moments of levity - as the award winning actress

teased her role in the upcoming 'Mary Poppins Returns' and shared some of her favorite

recent movie releases such as 'A Star Is Born.' Streep, enthused that "nobody but Lady

Gaga" could've played Ally in Bradley Cooper's directorial debut and also raved about the

actor's approach to helming a feature film.

Streep also took the opportunity to plug her own work, recommending that the audience

goes to see the upcoming 'Mary Poppins Returns,' in which she plays Poppins' "cousin."

To read more on this story, head to THR.com.

For The Hollywood Reporter News, I'm Lyndsey Rodrigues.

For more infomation >> Meryl Streep On Why Trump Should Be Feared | THR News - Duration: 2:09.

-------------------------------------------

FOX and Friends 12/10/18 : Trump , Comey , Mueller Breaking News - Duration: 1:48:35.

For more infomation >> FOX and Friends 12/10/18 : Trump , Comey , Mueller Breaking News - Duration: 1:48:35.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Mocked For 'Smocking Gun' Typo In New Tweet — See Memes - News Today - Duration: 4:03.

Not only is there 'no collusion' in the Russia investigation, according to President Trump — there's 'no smocking gun,' either

Yep, it's another embarrassing/hilarious typo for Donald, and he's being thoroughly mocked for it

   Spot the typo from President Donald Trump's December 10 tweets: "Democrats can't find a Smocking Gun tying the Trump campaign to Russia after James Comey's testimony

No Smocking Gun…No Collusion." @FoxNews That's because there was NO COLLUSION. So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction, wrongly call it a campaign contribution,…

which it was not (but even if it was, it is only a CIVIL CASE, like Obama's – but it was done correctly by a lawyer and there would not even be a fine

Lawyer's liability if he made a mistake, not me). Cohen just trying to get his sentence reduced

WITCH HUNT!"    That's right; there's two! Trump is insistent that there's no "smocking gun" when it comes to tying him to the investigation into collusion with Russia during the 2016 presidential campaign

Well, he's technically not wrong, considering there's no such thing as a "smocking gun

" Obviously, the president is getting dunked on by voters who are just baffled by his new mistake

Granted, nobody is actually shocked by it; he makes these typos nearly daily. It's just… this is such a dumb one

 "I remember the old Motley Crue cover of 'Smocking in the boys' room,'" @Summerl81738362 tweeted

@emilylime wrote, "smocking gun sequel pitches: smock and mirrors, where there's smock there's fire, smocking kills, smock signals, put that in your pipe and smock it, second-hand smock, blowing smock up your ass, smock detectors, holy smocks, smock follows beauty, smock like a chimney

" @harleyb11 joked, "FunFact: Hobby Lobby sells smocking guns for under $10." Admitting to a felony on Twitter… pic

twitter.com/r0Hu1hIF3F  — I LOL @ U (@Bryan_or_Mitch) December 10, 2018   ok Individual-1 pic

twitter.com/rhnb1nDLAd  — Chris Connors (@uurf) December 10, 2018    This latest disaster comes a week after he tweeted about some dude named "Scott Free," instead of using the phrase "scot-free

" He's not great at this Twitter thing. People immediately mocked him for it, including a man actually named Scott Free, who asked to please be left out of this narrative

For more infomation >> Trump Mocked For 'Smocking Gun' Typo In New Tweet — See Memes - News Today - Duration: 4:03.

-------------------------------------------

Trump prié de ne pas se mêler des gilets jaunes - Duration: 4:32.

For more infomation >> Trump prié de ne pas se mêler des gilets jaunes - Duration: 4:32.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's Attacks On Mueller Make The President Look Weak, Scared, And Crazy - Duration: 4:28.

I'm going to start by asking a really weird question here.

You ever tried to obey the cat?

If you haven't?

I. I don't recommend it at all, but let me tell you what happens when you try to give

a cat a bath.

First and foremost, most cats, most average house cats do not like the thought of water.

They do not like being approached by a big giant human being trying to snatch them either.

So when you have a cat and you're in the bathroom with the cat and you got the tub ready to

go, they will try to run.

They will try to flee, but eventually being in such a confined area, they find out they

have nowhere to go, so they backed themselves into a corner, hissing, scratching, clawing,

freaking out because they see the inevitable that is about to happen.

Eventually you get them in the tub regardless.

They can hiss and scratch and bite all they want, but it still happened.

That scenario is what we're seeing play itself out with Donald Trump's tweets this week.

On Friday morning, the president opened his day by tweeting out these asinine, absurd,

unhinged attacks on this special prosecutor.

None of these attacks, by the way, backed up by any evidence whatsoever.

He tweeted out is used well, witch hunt in all caps, followed by an exclamation point

or to talk about all the conflicts of interests from Robert Mueller, talked about the fact

that they're not investigating Hillary Clinton.

All of these attacks that made Donald Trump like a backed up cat in a corner, panicked,

freaked out, scared, and most importantly week, anyone who looks at Donald trump and

thinks, that's a strong man, that is a, that is a man I like, and as a manly man, go read

his tweets.

Seriously.

These are the tweets of a panicked, scared, weak child who sees the walls closing him

or around him.

He knows what's happening.

He knows bad things are coming.

He knows that there is nothing he can do to stop it, even if he were to fire Robert Mueller.

Mueller is covered his bases very well.

Mueller, who by the way, is a Republican.

He is not conflicted.

Why is he not investigating Hillary?

Because he wasn't given the task of investigating.

Hillary Republicans Investigated Hillary for years and years and years and years, and I'm

not even a fan of hers, but I know that she didn't break any laws.

Give it a rest.

You are that backed up, freaked out cat in a corner.

You're terrified.

You're hissing, you're scratching your biting, but none of those can do any damage and none

of them are going to stop the inevitable from happening.

So my message to conservatives out there who look at Donald trump as a good leader and

a strong human being, again, read his tweets.

Are these the tweets?

Have a strong man.

Are these the tweets?

Have a confident man or are these the tweets of a petulant, whiny narcissist who has been

able to get away with every single thing he's wanted to get away with in his entire life

until now?

Suddenly he's having to face the consequences, suddenlies having to be investigated and suddenly

he could lose it all.

The only question that remains is will these attacks on the special prosecutor resonate

with the public among dunks?

Donald Trump's base probably depends on how they view them.

If they view them as the tweets have a weak man terrified about his own future, then they

could lose support.

After all, studies have shown that Donald Trump did appeal more to men who are insecure

in their manhood and thought Donald trump was the vision of what a dude is supposed

to be.

These tweets don't reflect that.

These tweets reflect a very scared man.

So if these insecure men look at that and say, Hey, he's not what I thought he was,

maybe he could actually lose support from it.

As for the rest of the public, the independence, the Democrats and everybody in between, I

don't think they're swayed one way or another with these Donald Trump tweets.

Well, I can't say one way or the other.

They are swayed.

They see the same thing that I see the same thing that most rational people see.

They see a, a weak person who is scared of the future and possibly somebody who's gone

a little bit crazy because that is exactly what has happened with Donald trump.

For more infomation >> Trump's Attacks On Mueller Make The President Look Weak, Scared, And Crazy - Duration: 4:28.

-------------------------------------------

TRUMP JUST ENDS CROOKED ROBERT MUELLER!! THE TRAITOR IS TOTALLY FINISHED - Duration: 10:03.

TRUMP JUST ENDS CROOKED ROBERT MUELLER!!

THE TRAITOR IS TOTALLY FINISHED

On Saturday, members of the media caught up with President Trump before boarding his helicopter

en route to the Army-Navy football game.

Trump confirmed White House Chief Of Staff John Kelly will he leaving at the end of the

year and his decision on who will be replacing him will be announced within the next couple

of days.

But what stood out most on Trump's brief statement was his optimism on the Mueller

probe.

Video Below

Trump was upbeat on the status of the Mueller investigation that he is often seen and heard

criticizing.

The President said, "On the Mueller situation, we are very happy with what we are reading

because there was no collusion what so ever.

There never has been.

The last thing I want is help from Russia on a campaign."

He added, "You should ask Hillary Clinton about Russia because she financed the fake

dossier.

She tried to get some information and help from Russia.

But you can ask them about that.

Very one-sided situation, but I think it's all turning around very nicely."

Before shifting to conversation to John Kelly, Trump pointed out what he has said all along,

which is, "There was absolutely no collusion."

We need your help circulating our articles.

Recently, social media platforms took strong measures to suppress our content!

Please share this and all of our other articles everywhere possible to help spread the truth!**

For more infomation >> TRUMP JUST ENDS CROOKED ROBERT MUELLER!! THE TRAITOR IS TOTALLY FINISHED - Duration: 10:03.

-------------------------------------------

Trump calls ex-FBI chief James Comey's testimony "all lies" - Duration: 0:40.

President Trump has lashed out former FBI Director James Comey, accusing him of lying

to Congress.

Comey testified to two House committees last week over his handling of the Russia probe

and the FBI's probe into Hillary Clinton's emails.

According to transcripts from Friday's closed-door meeting, Comey was advised by his lawyer to

not answer certain questions about the Russia investigation.

He also said the session was a waste of time as it was consumed by questions from Republicans

about Clinton's emails.

In a tweet on Sunday, Trump suggested Comey's testimony was dishonest and evasive.

For more infomation >> Trump calls ex-FBI chief James Comey's testimony "all lies" - Duration: 0:40.

-------------------------------------------

Saudi-Approved Lobbyists Funnel Money To Trump - Duration: 6:27.

For more infomation >> Saudi-Approved Lobbyists Funnel Money To Trump - Duration: 6:27.

-------------------------------------------

MSNBC Stephanie Ruhle 12/10/18 :Trump , Mueller , Kushner - Duration: 44:18.

For more infomation >> MSNBC Stephanie Ruhle 12/10/18 :Trump , Mueller , Kushner - Duration: 44:18.

-------------------------------------------

Trump: Leakin James Comey Must Have Set A Record For Who Lied The Most To Congress In One Day(VIDEO) - Duration: 15:14.

Trump: Leakin James Comey Must Have Set A Record For Who Lied The Most To Congress In One Day

if you'd call it a tweet tirade or perhaps an online onslaught but by any

definition the president is once again using the virtual bully pulpit to take

shots said perhaps his political enemies or in this case is fired former FBI

director he says this Democrats can't find a smoking gun tying the Trump

campaign to Russia after James commis testimony no smoking gun no collusion at

Fox News that's because there was all caps no collusion so now the Dems go to

a simple private transaction wrongly calling it a campaign contribution which

it was not but even if it was it's only a civil case like Obama's but it was

done correctly by a lawyer and there would not even be a fine lawyers

liability if he made a mistake not me Cohen speaking of Michael Cohen his

former fixer just trying to get his sentence reduced all caps witch-hunt now

this comes after commis behind-closed-doors testimony before

House lawmakers about which the president criticized commis faulty

memory hey there he goes again I thought I was lying James Comey not

leaking James Comey we have to remind ourselves the President of the United

States of America is publicly announcing that people are committing crimes they

should be in jail private citizens that's not okay of course it is also

possible that Comey bill could once again have to testify you heard senator

Goodlatte mention that's Lindsey Graham and others have said as much as well

bill White House saying about the Washington Post story suggesting Trump

campaign officials were in contact with Russians during the transition Kevin

lizard on the record bill they're not saying a great deal off the record there

sort of tried to poke holes in some of the reporting that you've seen out there

in particular in the Washington Post I want to lay it out slowly for the people

at home who haven't had a chance to sort of wash in it the way we have inside the

beltway what they're suggesting is this idea that general Flynn interacted with

officials representing Moscow is not on its face uncommon or even unlawful the

White House officials that I've talked to point to the fact that among other

topics Flynn is said to have discussed getting the Kremlin to side with the US

on an issue involving Israel however the pose citing Michael Cohen's testimony

said that he was also in contact with Russians about building a Trump property

in Moscow and again their argument is so what that's not nefarious nor is it

illegal but the question obviously becomes bill was there a quid pro quo

and that is yet to be proven all right one more question for you what's the

latest on a new White House chief of staff and that search Kevin yeah a real

surprise over the weekend a lot of people felt like it would be Nick Aires

the vice president's chief of staff he is very very highly regarded here in the

nation's capital and in particular here at the White House very strong

reputation but he didn't want to commit to working for the Trump White House

through 2020 and so that leaves the outgoing chief of staff John Kelly in a

bit of a holding pattern waiting to get his replacement up to speed that is of

course depending on who he is or she is but the generals departure bill is also

raising questions about homeland security secretary Kirsten Nielsen she

is said to be very close to Kelly his departure it is thought could signal

hers as well as for possible Kelly replacement names were most often

hearing here at the White House Mick Mulvaney mark meadows Matt Whitaker a

trio they're all qualified we'll see what if anything the president decides

to do in the day ahead well we're still going through the transcript John it's

over 200 pages documenting that six-hour closed-door transcribed interview and

certainly an indication of the frustration from the Republican chairman

of the House Government Oversight Committee

trey Gowdy he put out a statement a short time ago documented what he

described were the number of times that the former FBI director couldn't

remember didn't know or did not recall and the figures he released was a 71 166

and then eight as you see here and if you do some quick mental arithmetic you

see that's about 230 times in a document that is about 240 pages in length some

of the topics that he could not provide information on were key topics of

interest to the Republicans which would be the dossier that was used to secure

surveillance weren't on a trump campaign a quarter page he could not say who paid

for it he does not recall seeing the the key details of the fisa

application itself and he was unaware of this relationship between the former

British spy Christopher Steele who did the research on the dossier a Justice

Department official who helped get some of that information to the FBI in the

fall of 2016 the FBI was also gaining the dossier

it's important to note through other through other channels and then also

this issue of the funding it was funded by the DNC in the Clinton campaign but

director Comey says in his testimony and a line of questioning to one of the

Democrats on the committee that he just didn't feel that that information about

which political party was funding it was really that germane or irrelevant to the

Surveillance Court what mattered is that they knew it was some kind of political

document John hmm that brings us to the Russia

investigation what have you learned about that based on these transcripts

well going through the transcripts one of the key headlines at least to us here

at Fox based on our reporting is that he documents that in the summer of 2016

when they opened the Russia counterintelligence investigation that

was looking at alleged contacts or coordination between Trump campaign

officials and Russia that there were four individuals that they were

investigating at that time so we know about the a Carter page he was the

subject of the surveillance warrant we know about George papadopolis who

recently applied guilty to lying to federal investigators but the other two

are kind of a blank one could be Paul Manafort and another could be the former

national security adviser Mike Flynn but were not clear on that at this point

it's important to note that director Comey goes on to say that there was

never a direction from the Obama administration to open the campaign on

the Trump campaign at that time pardon me and he says in a line of questioning

with the Democrats quote I know that we never investigated the Trump campaign

for political purposes congressman Deutsch did President Obama

or anyone in his administration ever make a demand or a request the FBI or

the Justice Department infiltrate or surveil the Trump campaign mr. Comey no

not to my knowledge the other footnote I would say in this section is that we

have new detail about the director Comey's decision

to draft a memo documenting his meeting with the president about the former

national security advisor Mike Flynn that was a meeting they had in February

and it was at that meeting according to the FBI director that the president said

I want to see if you can let go of this Flint situation because Flint had

resigned at that time what we know from the transcript is that there was a

meeting among senior FBI officials about commis conversation with the president

about Flynn and based on the transcript the focus of that is whether it mounted

to obstruction of justice what's worth noting here is that they decided in a

very conscious way to keep that information with the FBI and not to

share it with then Attorney General Jeff Sessions because they had already

calculated that he would recuse himself from the investigation and I mentioned

this because it was this type of behavior during the Clinton email case

or the FBI taking over a lot of responsibilities with various that might

naturally fall to the Justice Department that they were highly criticized for

doing with the emails and now we see something similar happened with the

obstruction of justice justice question in the Russia case yeah I mean you can

tell from reading the transcripts that many members of Congress weren't happy

about that decision what about Lisa Paige and Peter struck FBI employees at

the time worked for mr. Comey What did he say about them well I think there's a

very important section about Peter struck one of the questions for

Republicans has been whether the political bias that was exhibited in the

text messages exchanged by Peter struck and Lisa Paige bled into the

investigations either the email investigations or the Russia

investigation and what director Comey testified to were Struck's involvement

in that letter in October of 2016 which went to Congress and led them to reopen

the email investigation right before the election and he says in his testimony

quote in fact Peter struck helped draft my letter to Congress on October 28th

that Hillary Clinton blames for her defeat so it's hard for me to see how he

was on Team Clinton secretly at that point in time and he also was one of the

handful people in the entire world who knew we

were investigating for Americans remember we talked about this earlier

for Americans who had some connection to mr. Trump during the summer of 2016 and

he didn't tell a soul so on the one hand the former FBI director is very critical

of strucken page for the anti-trump bias or political bias that's shown but he

also doesn't throw them under the bus in the sense that he says here the Peter

struck was one of the only people who knew about the Russia CIA investigation

involving the Trump campaign he did not leak that information and he also helped

draft that letter that went to Congress that reopened the email case on the eve

of the election as the director notes Hillary Clinton has blamed as one of the

main reasons for her defeat in 2016 John I know those transcripts have been out

just a couple of hours you've done a great job digesting it on the fly really

great reading actually if you're interested in this subject there's a lot

of great detail welcome back to Fox and Friends first lawmakers sifting through

more than 200 pages of transcripts from former FBI director james comey x'

marathon testimony so what did we learn joining me now to break it all down is

the president of Judicial Watch tom Fitton

thank you so much for joining us I know you were up late last night gonna be a

very busy day again today so we appreciate your time let's get right to

it though some of the main takeaways one of them obviously was that James Comey

didn't appear to remember a lot or he didn't know a lot to begin with I don't

know which it is but he said I don't know at least 156 times amongst a lot of

other variations of that so what's your take away from that well it wouldn't be

so bad if you use the profess ignorant on minor topics but he professed

ignorance on a lot of key aspects of the FISA the details about for instance who

funded it about because he signed off on at least one of the FISA warrants the

targeted Carter page in the Trump team and he professed not to know much about

the origins beyond what he read in the newspapers later and you know that's

concerning given that a review of the partial FISA applications that have been

released and judicial watch's lawsuits show

that the courts were misled that they were told that this FISA the dossier for

instance had origins in a political opposition to President Trump but wasn't

told the court wasn't told the Clinton campaign was behind and let's go to this

next point that came out and there's pages and pages of testimony that the

anti-trump dossier was in fact unverified yeah he confirmed what we

already knew that it was minimally corroborated remember Devon Nunez

concluded that in his report earlier this year and he was excoriated by the

left for saying that but it's true it was nemily corroborated when they first

applied to the course and when it was renewed and as best I know it stills

been really corroborated and remember the dossier was used by created with the

help of Russia Intel the court in fusion fusion GPS so it looks like a smear

operation by the Russians through the Clinton camp with the willing help of

the FBI and frankly now the mole around that's specifically important that the

issue of verification because Intel sources say that presenting a single

unverified fact that and throws and took out this whole woods procedure which

needs to be followed in order for this FISA to be granted you know it's one

thing to say hey look we like this source but if they can't find

substantiation for what the source is telling them and they're not telling the

court that that's a real problem okay so let's move to the next one the four

Americans that were apparently under investigation but not President Trump

yeah so that is important those were all people associated with the Clinton

campaign they excuse me the Trump campaign they include a Carter Page

Michael Flynn George papadopolis and the four themes escaping me but James Comey

tried to pretend just because we're targeting four people

on the Trump campaign doesn't mean which are targeting the Trump campaign who is

he kidding and of course Carter page was

right upon later in the year yeah so let's move to the fourth one he defended

the FBI agent Peter struck he said there was no indication of bias you just said

you know who are you kidding you could probably say that here too yeah well he

said that if he was on the that this is what's really frustrating because he

said if he knew what the texts were at the time he would have pulled him off

the Clinton and the Russia case but then later he said it was a conspiracy theory

that struck was pro-pro Clinton and anti-trump so he wants to have it both

ways and it shows you that mr. Comey may have some struck problems too given his

biases but he's not friends with robert muller he pointed that out he said he

doesn't have his personal cell phone number said he hasn't been over to his

house I said he's not friends with Robert Muller what do you think about

that you know there's a Washington Post story not too long ago talking about

them being brothers in arms' they're close professionally and it doesn't

matter in the sense that Comey and Muller had a professional relationship

and mr. Comey specifically leaked information to get a special counsel

going and now Muller is using Co me as his witness and people are concerned

about the conflicts legitimately since they had this long and close working

relationship and Tom you're testifying before Congress on December 13th correct

yes it's Thursday on the Clinton Foundation issue this is the hearing

they've been put off right a few weeks and we'll see what happens but we broke

open the Clinton Foundation pay-to-play scandal thank you god bless you and God

bless america

For more infomation >> Trump: Leakin James Comey Must Have Set A Record For Who Lied The Most To Congress In One Day(VIDEO) - Duration: 15:14.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Already Has List Of People To Blame If Recession Hits - Duration: 3:03.

According to a new report and Politico, Republican sources say that Donald Trump is putting together

a list of people he can blame if the economy goes into a recession.

Now, Politico says that they have spoken to Republican sources.

They've talked to people inside the White House.

Maybe these people are being honest.

Maybe they're not.

Maybe they exist and maybe they don't, but here's the thing.

Regardless of whether or not this actually happened, we do know 100 percent that Donald

Trump is preparing to blame the Democrats in case there is any economic downturn.

After the Democrats get sworn in, he has already blamed drops in the stock market on the fact

that Democrats got elected prior to the midterms.

He had already been throwing a, or excuse me, laying the ground work to try to say,

the Democrats will crash the economy should they take office.

He has been doing this for months.

We know this is his game plan because we know that he knows that the economy is not stable

right now and that his own policies have made it so much weaker as I have been repeatedly

saying for a very long time.

Now we have built our economy out of Straw, except we didn't just build it out of Straw.

We built it out of Straw on top of quicksand and everything is about to come tumbling down

the tariffs that Donald Trump has put in place.

The tax cuts for the wealthy elite, the stagnant wages of American workers, the growing, uh,

a difference in CEO to worker pay.

The gap between the haves and the have nots continues to get wider people losing food

stamp coverage, people losing their health insurance.

Any one of those things has the potential to wreak havoc on a fragile economy.

We've got all of them.

We have every single one of those things happening in this country right now.

All of the best economists in this country say that we are headed in a downward path

very soon.

You may not be able to see it at the moment, but the recent drops in the stock market based

solely on Donald Trump's tweets.

That tells you something.

The stock market is highly volatile right now and it's because of Donald Trump.

The trade wars have lost us billions upon billions of dollars, and that is because of

Donald Trump.

The tax cuts are screwing over American workers, and that's because of Donald Trump and the

Republicans.

There is no way to spin this to where you could actually blame it on the Democrats,

but that is exactly what Donald Trump is going to do.

We have known that from the start.

So regardless of whether or not this political story, whether they talk to actual people

and whether there's actual people, we're being honest, it doesn't matter because we already

know who Donald Trump is going to blame if the recession happens and it's literally going

to be everyone except for the actual people responsible for it.

For more infomation >> Trump Already Has List Of People To Blame If Recession Hits - Duration: 3:03.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's Twitter Feed Is A Case Study In Mental Illness - Duration: 7:41.

Over the weekend, Donald Trump engaged in what might be one of his most absurd, bizarre,

and unnecessary Twitter rants this time it was against Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal

after Blumenthal referred to Donald Trump as he is, which is an unindicted coconspirator.

Based on the filings that were released this past Friday, Donald Trump then took to Twitter

to say the following, "Watched Denang Dick Blumenthal and television spewing facts almost

as accurate as his bravery and Vietnam, which he never saw as the bullets whiz by Denang

Dick's head as he was saving soldiers' left and right.

He then woke up from his dream screaming that he lied.

Next time I go to Vietnam, I will ask the Dick to travel with me."

I will ask the Dick to travel with me, and he put the "Dick" in quotation marks here.

Okay.

Several things to unpack from this psychotic rambling of the president of the United States

here.

First and foremost, if you're not familiar with what the president is actually referring

to, it's an issue that was resolved roughly a decade ago where Blumenthal had misspoken

about his service during the Vietnam War.

He did not go to Vietnam, but unlike Donald Trump, he did enlist.

He was a part of the U.S. National guard here with the United States Marines and he, uh,

a signed up with them after he got his education deferments.

So he got his deferments, went to school, school's over, he signs up and does his duty,

didn't have to go to Vietnam.

He wasn't part of the group that did.

I'm sure there was probably some favors that exchanged hands, you know, wealthy, privileged

kid maybe didn't want to go over there with scared, but hell, at least he did something

which is more than what we can say of the president of the United States, cadette bone

spurs who did everything he could to avoid conflict or signing up at the military in

any way possible.

Now that's one thing.

Obviously everybody on Twitter responded to in these tweets.

The fact that Donald Trump didn't go to Vietnam, he had his bone spurs.

He was a little sissy kid, didn't want to go over there and do anything.

Whatever.

We get it.

That's known.

Everybody understands that and they also understand the hypocrisy.

And the irony of Donald Trump tweeting this out about somebody when he himself didn't

do that thing either.

Here's what gets me about it.

The president is psychotic.

The president is absolutely mentally unstable and should immediately be removed from office.

How about that?

How about we go with that talking point.

Instead of talking about the hypocrisy of he didn't go to Vietnam either.

Everybody knows that these tweets from the president show that this man is insane and

I don't say that lightly.

It's not like, oh, this guy's crazy.

This is insane.

This man is clinically and certifiably insane.

The 25th amendment should have been invoked months ago.

This man needs to undergo very serious psychological evaluations and further more because he is

not alone in this.

If anyone in this country reads these tweets and says, Hell Yeah, how?

Yeah, that's my president.

Then you're just as insane as he is.

No one in this country should feel like this is okay.

That it's good that the president's tweeting out about the deck.

If you think that that's okay, then your part of the problem.

This is not America.

It's who we are.

Now it's who we've allowed ourselves to evolve into, but anybody that actually cares about

this country cares about our reputation, cares about our standing with our allies.

They don't approve of this.

Anybody with a shred of intelligence in their brains wouldn't approve of this, and that's

what's so disgusting about this.

To me, this isn't a partisan issue.

This isn't a "did he or did he not serve in Vietnam" issue.

This is a psychotic man.

Donald Trump serving as the president of the United States and Republicans sitting idly

by wondering, Oh, I wish we could do something about his tweeting.

You have 100 percent of the power to do something about his tweeting.

You could have invoked the 25th amendment a year ago and you sat on your assets and

chose to do nothing.

You own this, his supporters on this and you people are all, every one of you just as horrible,

despicable and deplorable as the president himself and no, you can't change your Twitter

handle and say like, oh, the deplorable Mike Jones as if it's a badge of honor.

It's a disgusting label, but it perfectly describes the people who are out there defending

the president after saying garbage

like this.

For more infomation >> Trump's Twitter Feed Is A Case Study In Mental Illness - Duration: 7:41.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Is DIRECTLY Implicated In A Felony - Duration: 6:33.

On Friday, the special prosecutor's office, along with the US attorney for the southern

district of New York, made public some court filings that actually seem to directly implicate

Donald Trump in a federal crime.

Now, Donald Trump, after these filings, became public tweeted out the following instead totally

clears the president.

Thank you.

Now, based on what was in those filings, I think it's pretty obvious that individual

one here didn't actually read what was in there because yes, Mr. Trump, it did directly

implicate you in a felony offense.

Here's what happened.

There was a lot of stuff within those filings, a lot of it that said, oh, this person was

trying to reach out from Russia to Michael Cohen.

We know at this point that a lot of Russians reached out to the Trump campaign that has

been made public in these filings.

While we do not know Mueller might, I'm assuming Mueller does, is whether or not anybody in

the Trump campaign reached back and accepted their offers for help.

So that's still a big question mark.

But what's no longer a big question mark is whether or not Donald Trump specifically ordered

Michael Cohen to make the hush money payment to Stormy Daniels.

According to these new court filings, according to Michael Cohen's own testimony, he made

those payments at the direction of individual one who was running for president.

Now it's only listed as individual one.

So I guess we're going to have to speculate, but since this was 2016, um, I'm assuming

obviously this was Donald Trump, unless for some reason Hillary Clinton felt the need

to tell Michael Cohen to pay off a porn actress.

Or maybe it was Jill Stein or the Libertarian guy who I from Gary Johnson forgot his name

because he's so, uh, you know, not memorable.

Nonetheless, it's pretty obvious to everyone.

Individual one is Donald Trump.

And here's what this means.

Donald Trump's be going on a tirade the last few days saying, no, that was a personal money

that was a financial transaction by a person to another person that's not a campaign contribution.

Um, what this moron doesn't understand is that it's an in kind contribution.

We have explained this a thousand times and apparently we're going to have to explain

it a thousand more times because Donald Trump doesn't want to seem to understand or he wants

to convince his followers that everybody else is lying about it.

Any money that you spend, whether it is given directly to a campaign or if it's just money

to do something else, if it is to further the cause of that campaign to help the candidate

in any way that is considered an end kind campaign contribution.

That is what that means.

So paying Stormy Daniels, Stephanie Clifford, to remain quiet about their affair so that

it didn't impact his presidential, uh, race.

That is a campaign contribution.

I don't care what idiot tweets out that is what that is.

And according to Cohen, Trump is the one, 100 percent who directed it.

He coordinated it with Trump.

They knew it was happening, they knew the purpose of it.

And that is why they did it.

Now, the southern district of New York adds a little bit of a caveat in there.

And this is, you know, not so good for those of us who want to see Trump fall from grace.

They're not able to say at this point that he knowingly and willfully broke the law.

Now to me though, that kind of seems like a BS statement, right?

We've all heard the expression, ignorance is no excuse.

Oh, I didn't know this was illegal.

That doesn't matter.

That's not a defense that actually works in court.

So it is a bit confusing as to why the US attorney in the southern district of New York

would even bring that up because whether he knew it was illegal or not, he ordered it.

It is illegal.

He did it.

That's a crime.

What's the problem here?

At this point, Donald Trump, based on all the evidence, based on all the testimony is

by definition and unindicted co-conspirator.

That's what's happened here.

We have conspiracy to violate campaign finance laws.

We have the actual violation of campaign finance laws themselves and Donald Trump at this point

in addition to being US president, is by definition an unindicted co-conspirator.

That also helps to explain to a lot of folks why he's been freaking out so much on Twitter

over the last few days.

He feels those walls closing in on him.

He knows that this these revelations from Friday.

This is nothing compared to the other stuff that we're probably going to be finding out

within the next few months.

For more infomation >> Trump Is DIRECTLY Implicated In A Felony - Duration: 6:33.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Just Issued THIS ORDER On Comey! NEW EVIDENCE CONFIRMED Comey's WORST NIGHTMARE!(VIDEO)!!! - Duration: 16:13.

Trump Just Issued THIS ORDER On Comey! NEW EVIDENCE CONFIRMED Comey's WORST NIGHTMARE!

former Clinton pollster advisor Mark Penn California Congressman darrell ice

at Fox News contributor Tammy Bruce good to see you all

congressman I see you were in there hopefully we'll get the transcript

tomorrow I just went over the problems with these FISA applications is it true

the bulk of information came from the dossier that Christopher Steele doesn't

even stand by that's exactly right that it not only

came from the dossier but as you know Christopher Steele hasn't been in in

Russia in 20 years so even the people the unknown people responsible for it

could easily easily have in fact been agents of the Russian government which

would mean that Hillary Clinton is the one guilty of the so-called collusion

well that's a great irony there you have been very critical mark pen of this

process from from the get-go here as you should be I don't I believe if we have a

dual justice system I'm looking at taxi medallions I'm looking at loan

applications I'm looking at tax violations I'm not seeing any collusion

here at all this has gone so far but I do see issues with Russia with uranium

one and that is that we had a spy within that network and we did have a lot of

money kickback in the end then I do see issues with this dossier because it's

full of Russian lies and the FBI used it as the basis of the FISA applications

and in fact they never verified it well James Comey just said is false

because we know they didn't verify it because steel doesn't stand by it

well I typically urge all Americans to read the dossier because anyone who

actually reads the dossier understands that it's a it's a joke document it's a

document filled with nonsense that couldn't possibly be true that almost

reads like an April Fool's joke and now that we've spent you know I don't know

30 million dollars you know investigated almost everyone in the campaign and the

administration there's still no evidence of anything that one would call

collusion and certainly not related to the individual case

if anything we're drifting more and more back to Monica Lewinski days by talking

about payments to stormy Daniels and trying to take payments that are clearly

not you know campaign related under the definitions that have been ruled by the

FEC and try to turn those into crimes that you associate the president with

it's that whole creep of the Special Counsel to get the president all over

again and Tammy it seems the great Jared

explained it very well in terms of the law and I watched the history on TV in

the same campaign finance violations well I've got campaign violations from

96 over here and from 2008 over here and from Bob Dole over here and from Al Gore

over here and the biggest fine paid by Obama my question to you is as you look

at where this is now gone I mean I feel bad for the men involved in the things

that happen but I feel that they're victims of what is selective prosecution

and a political witch-hunt that they got caught up and by no other reason that

they like Donald Trump well look this is why we're nervous when there's more

regulations and more laws because we pretty much wake up in the morning as

Americans and we're breaking some kind of a law but then it's selective about

how it gets applied but it's always kind of hovering over you this entire dynamic

ranging from the dossier to what catherine herridge described about their

writing and in the filing that they just did is fan fiction and we're talking

about criminal justice reform on one hand from the the Trump administration

of course and the American people see this fraud this hoax being unleashed

upon people in Washington but we experience it also at the local level in

our daily lives whether it's the disenfranchised or people of color this

is a very chilling event Americans recognize it they do not like it and

it's up to the President to make sure this dynamic remains clear to the

American people about what's happening to them he could still release the

applications the gang of eight information the 302s and the email chain

do you believe last question Darryl Isis we just had comments from James Comey do

you believe what he said about the FISA warrants was accurate or did he lie well

he certainly inaccurate the idea that these things were anything

other than falsely granted based on deceiving a federal judge is LAT is more

laughable than what Mark said about the dossier itself ultimately this dossier

is what got them into a business of looking for a crime that didn't happen

unbelievable I thank you all our next guest in the closed-door Komi hearing

today joining us tonight Congressman Matt Gaetz remember the House Judiciary

and armed services committee congressman not were you impressed by the candor of

the former fired FBI director not at all Lou you know I was deeply concerned

because there were a number of circumstances where James Comey wouldn't

give us honest answers wouldn't tell us the truth and would hide behind

attorneys who were trying to suggest that even though his service concluded a

year and a half ago that somehow he couldn't tell us what happened I that's

on its face as you suggest preposterous but on the other hand how are you to

conduct your constitutional oversight responsibilities if you can't have in a

closed-door hearing candid responses by by a witness well that is the problem

and I think what was most troubling is that Comey would not share with us

information about communication he'd had with the Department of Justice in

October of 2017 about how insufficient the evidence was to be spying on people

close to president Trump I think that's one of the reasons why there's a lack of

confidence in that FISA process but Lou even beyond what you'll read on the

record I've just got to share with you that during the breaks in this committee

the behavior of the Democrats was disgusting the same Democrats who wanted

Comey fired when he provided information about emails on Anthony Weiner's laptop

were begging Comey to sign their copies of his book they had written while we're

supposed to be conducting oversight they're begging for Jim Comey's

autograph they're doing a victory dance that they ran out the clock on the

Republicans for the past two years well that is a fair criticism Lou because

Devin Nunez gave the Judiciary and oversight committees 42 names and he

said look let's get the information on the record let's

get the evidence together let's compile it for a report and we didn't even make

it a third of the way through the list that the Intelligence Committee Chairman

provided and I don't think that's an accident Lou I think that the Republican

leadership did not want us to get to the bottom of the facts they did not want to

truly uh extend of the deep state and that's why we're here with the clock

running out and the Democrats about to be in control

remember the broadcast where you heard that first about Paul Ryan and the RINO

cabal that he put together and called your leadership for two years it is

appalling it is disgusting but let's turn to not a happier note that a

different subject and that is this is Mark Meadows congressman meadows saying

that Comey is coming back for a second round that we also hear that there will

be a hearing on the Hilary emails scandal because there are some

whistleblowers are you kidding me and the final weeks this is suddenly there

is action here this is like a student being like a d-minus student for the

entire semester and then at the very end running to the teacher and begging for

extra credit to get an A we should have been doing our job all along

we should have interviewed rod Rosenstein about wearing a wire on the

president we should have had Loretta Lynch giving truthful testimony about

the tarmac meeting but instead we slow rolled we didn't take the appropriate

pace we should have and now here we are without the majority with the Democrats

about to be in control and while I'm pleased that we were able to expose

McCabe expose Peter struck and Lisa page get people like Jenna thinking about now

well mccabe has been referred for criminal prosecution and look we took

over I forgot there have been letters written he's been referred now one of

them have suffered the consequences of their actions look who the Attorney

General was you had the Keebler Elf overrun in the Justice Department unable

to make a decision and unable to exercise you know any sort of control or

jurisdiction over the deep state actors there who totally had their had him

under their spell the spell is bro and I believe and now you're going to

hear the gavel come down and in and holding that gavel believe none other

than Nancy Pelosi what what do the Republicans do now about the deep state

and the radical Dems who have run the Justice Department and the FBI for all

these years and have gotten away with what looks like the greatest political

corruption in this country's history well I don't disagree or I do disagree I

should say with the Democrats but I do not in any way impair their talent there

are Democrats on the Judiciary Committee who are going to be more aggressive and

who are going to I think wield the power of the committee far better than we did

and then we'll run back to our constituents and say we can't stop them

they're in the majority and then our constituents will reasonably ask of us

why we didn't hold the people to account who had clearly broken the law when we

had control and and honestly I think the answer is a lack of vigor and a lack of

focus and a lack of determination and if we bring that same low energy game into

the hundred and sixteenth Congress Donald Trump will be impeached and it

will be viewed as more politically legitimate than it is because we won't

be there to put up our best fight so I'm concerned about where we're going I

think that we really were not tough enough on the people the FBI and

Department of Justice and I think that came from the top yeah I I think it came

from the top too and I think that the shame is that with a president who sees

who is so entitled to the support of his party that the leadership of the House

was not worthy of this president his efforts imagine losing 40 seats with the

record of this president and his achievements his successes his

philosophy and his commitment to the people who put him in office and you

know I believe the house got the faith that it it earned and I and by the way I

think this president is such a fighter that even without the snowflakes of the

Republican Party behind him he will show the Democrats how to fight and I think

you can take that to the bank and I know he'll have the support of Congressman

Matt Gaetz and a lot of others help him out in the times no matter how

tell congressman it's great to have you with us we appreciate it

put me on the hot seat the former FBI director clamming up on Capitol Hill

today silenced by his attorneys while testifying behind closed doors here now

is congressman darrell Issa one of the lawmakers who questioned him today he

sits on the House Oversight Judiciary and foreign affairs committee sir I

heard you say earlier today that his lawyers were sort of gleefully telling

him not to answer question well I think when it was specifically the FBI's

lawyer in other words it's still the Department of Justice blocking justice

if it if it's being done by the American people's representatives here in

Congress so what were the questions that you asked that he wouldn't answer well I

want to be careful to keep keep the no specifics rule until the transcript

comes out but they clearly involved the general categories of Hillary Clinton

and decisions there Loretta Lynch and decisions there and very much the FISA

investigations those were some of the areas the the thing that is creating a

problem is of course everyone knew including the FBI and the attorneys the

Department of Justice what the questions were going to be and so to surprise us

by coming up with very broad prohibitions to be candid we could have

just as easily not had the Department of Justice in the room stuck to the the

subpoena that chairman Goodlatte II issued and gotten past some of this but

they're now essentially forcing us to go to Department of Justice negotiate a lot

more information being allowed and bring Comey back because he said an artificial

surprised us but an artificial I've got to leave at 4:15

and with these not answers clearly the American people are not getting the

answers to questions they have and if you notice today what was what came out

from Judicial Watch and the the terrible violations of protocols that were done

by the Department of Justice when they were looking in the FBI when they were

looking at Hillary Clinton it's very clear there are still problems there and

the new Attorney General's got a lot too well so I mean if he's just gonna evade

no matter what I mean he needed specific terms you guys did it now you're saying

you gonna have to go back and renegotiate seems like he would just

have another surprise roadblock that he doesn't want to cooperate so where do

you go from there I mean what's the point of trying to do this again well

first of all getting the truth from American people is something you keep

trying until you get it let's remember that Comey was a man who came before

Congress voluntarily and lied to us about his need to get a backdoor into

Apple phones millions of phones that he wanted to be able to essentially unlock

and look at remotely and you know he was later proved to have clearly not checked

out how to unlock one phone from the San Bernardino killer so this is a man who

plays fast and loose with the truth and now is sitting behind a Department of

Justice that is still stonewalling the American people well but he you know

he's not in the position any longer so what is the point of continuing down

this path as opposed to trying to either go into the department reform it change

who's there change the rules around it I mean it seems like this path is not the

most direct path in order to you know get to justice within the Justice

Department well you know sometimes you have to go to each of the areas that

need to be discovered or reformed in this case remember we're still spending

we the American people are still spending millions of dollars every month

investigating collusion if you will and by the way that is clearly been

understood is not a legal term there is no such thing as collusion under the law

Comey couldn't answer what collusion was because it's not a term that has a law

attached to it but the fact is that we're still spending that money the

special investigator is investigating based on and these were a lot of our

questions obviously based on this false narrative of the the so-called steel

dossier which was an outright lie paid for by the Democratic National Committee

and Hillary Clinton that is still going on so he may be out but the predicate

the false predicate the lies told to a FISA judge to get it is still something

the American people deserve more than just a promise

that it won't happen in the future people have to be held accountable for

lying to a federal judge and those people who lie to a federal judge

knowingly they are Department of Justice employees and FBI agents I know one of

the main questions was what did you know before you went to the FISA Court to the

answer that question no all right congressman I said thank you thank you

god bless you and God bless america

No comments:

Post a Comment