Trump news on Youtube Nov 4 2018

Nigeria's army uses Trump's words to justify shooting protesters

For more infomation >> Nigeria's army uses Trump's words to justify shooting protesters - Duration: 4:16.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump visiting Macon to campaign for Brian Kemp - Duration: 1:01.

For more infomation >> President Trump visiting Macon to campaign for Brian Kemp - Duration: 1:01.

-------------------------------------------

Is President Trump bad for the Jewish People? - Duration: 2:28.

For more infomation >> Is President Trump bad for the Jewish People? - Duration: 2:28.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump Seizes Obama Slush Fund, Gives Millions Back To Taxpayers - Duration: 5:46.

Since President Trump has been in office, he's scuttled a number of Obama slush funds,

saving us millions in doing so.

Every time he does something like this, a little more of the corruption that was so

rampant under Obama is wiped away.

Obama hid things like this all over the place.

People and entities were making money in a myriad of ways that straddled the legal boundaries

by doing so.

So, every time President Trump trips across one of these caches of ill-gotten gains, he

does all he can to return the money to the taxpayers.

I don't know about you, but I love that.

The Trump administration announced yesterday that it was ending what looks to be an illegal

Obama-era rule allowing unions to collect dues from state subsidies intended for home

health workers, including family caregivers.

It's another slush fund and millions are being given back to hard working Americans

thanks to President Trump.

Federal law prohibits states from skimming money from Medicaid payments bound for independent

in-home personal care workers.

But Obama changed that in 2014.

He created an exception, saying that states could divert some Medicaid money to unions.

The corrupted theory was that these workers effectively were public-sector employees.

This is how Obama twisted the law to serve his purposes and enrich his cronies.

Eleven blue states utilized the provision to raise more than $200 million a year for

unions by taking it from health workers who often didn't even realize it, according

to top GOP officials.

That's called theft in my book.

I'd be furious over it.

Included in the list of states are California, Massachusetts, New Jersey and Illinois.

Illinois is now at the heart of SCOTUS rulings that strip power from organized labor.

Republicans are pointing out that the Obama administration exception violates the federal

Social Security Act, as well as the rights of home health workers.

It certainly does.

No doubt about it.

Just when you think unions can't get anymore corrupt, they outdo themselves with the help

of Obama.

Thanks to President Trump, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) have begun

the formal process of proposing a new rule to roll back the Obama regulation.

"The law provides that Medicaid providers must be paid directly and cannot have part

of their payments diverted to third parties outside of a few very specific exceptions,"

Tim Hill, who is the acting director of the Center for Medicaid and CHIP Services, said

in a statement.

"This proposed rule is intended to ensure that providers receive their complete payment,

and any circumstances in which a state does divert part of a provider's payment must

be clearly allowed under the law."

GOP Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson, who chairs the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

Committee, stated that, "Union dues skimming diverts Medicaid funds from the very people

that the program is supposed to help."

Exactly.

This is a rule that Republicans have fought against and tried to get rid of for a long

time.

It is unethical and illegal.

In a statement, Johnson said that he would continue to monitor Medicaid funding, "I

applaud the Trump Administration for taking the first steps to rein in this abuse.

My committee will continue to conduct oversight of CMS's stewardship of Medicaid funds so

that American taxpayers can have confidence the funds flow to those in need."

In 2014, a Supreme Court ruling stated that home health workers couldn't constitutionally

be required to pay union agency fees because they were not public-sector workers.

However, dues skimming by the unions continued unmolested under Barack Obama's protection

of the unions.

Now, the unions' illegal skimming is being shut down by Trump.

Last month, the Supreme Court dealt another tough blow to organized labor in Janus v.

AFSCME, which held that nonunion public workers could not be forced to pay agency fees to

public-sector unions, either.

Bummer for the communist unions.

Fox News stated: "It had long been illegal for unions to force non-members to pay for

their explicitly political activity, but the Supreme Court's ruling extended that prohibition

to the payment of the agency fees, saying even those expenditures amounted to unconstitutionally

coerced participation in the political activity of collective bargaining."

SEIU, the Service Employees International Union, is not happy over this.

They called Trump's action over this a "broad, coordinated attack against working people,"

and said it would hurt minorities.

No, it won't.

It takes ill-gotten monies back from the unions and gives it to those that earned the money.

"The proposed CMS rule, combined with the Janus ruling, are two more efforts by the

Trump Administration and billionaire-funded special interest groups to silence a workforce

comprised of 90 percent women, most of whom are women of color, and to reduce the power

of working people by making it more difficult for them to join together in a union to fight

to ensure that our loved ones can get the care they need to live at home with dignity,"

read a statement by Melody Benjamin, who SEIU said is a home care worker.

That's sheer propaganda.

President Trump is not only cleaning out the swamp, he's cleaning up Obama's corrupt

mess he left behind.

This is yet one more instance of that.

The unions may kick and scream, but their days of stealing from workers instead of protecting

them are just about over.

For more infomation >> President Trump Seizes Obama Slush Fund, Gives Millions Back To Taxpayers - Duration: 5:46.

-------------------------------------------

Trump tweet targets Donnelly - Duration: 0:54.

For more infomation >> Trump tweet targets Donnelly - Duration: 0:54.

-------------------------------------------

Nigerian Army Defends Shooting Of Shi'ites With Trump's 'Firearm' Video - Duration: 1:51.

Nigerian Army Defends Shooting Of Shi'ites With Trump's 'Firearm' Video

The Nigerian Army has defended its shooting of members of the Islamic Movement in Nigeria (IMN) by sharing a video of United States President Donald Trump issuing a warning to migrants.

The Nigerian Army had opened fire on Shi'a protesters during their annual religious trek, which led to the death of more than 40 members of the sect.

In the video, which was originally aired on November 1, 2018, Trump was recorded issuing a warning to migrants who attempt to forcefully gain entry into the country.

According to Trump, the United States would not tolerate the treatment meted out to Mexican security operatives who were pelted with stones by migrants trying to forcefully pass through its borders.

In the video, Trump said the US government will not tolerate anyone who throws a rock at the military as soldiers will "consider that a firearm" because "there's not much difference".

The Nigerian Army shared the video on its official Twitter handle on Friday morning and called on Nigerians to "make deductions".

This was ostensibly in reference to the raging debate that soldiers pelted with stoned by Shi'ites in Abuja should not have responded by firing gunshots.

A check by SaharaReporters on Friday evening revealed that the video had 'vanished' from the Twitter feed of the Nigerian Army's official handle.

For more infomation >> Nigerian Army Defends Shooting Of Shi'ites With Trump's 'Firearm' Video - Duration: 1:51.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump Slams Dem Silence After Second Kavanaugh Accuser Admits To Fake Allegations - Duration: 2:35.

Moments ago President Trump took to twitter to address the admittedly false sexual assault

allegations created and presented by left wing activist of Judy Munro-Leighton.

Her graphic claims, which were originally made anonymously alleged that Justice Kavanaugh

and a friend raped her "several times each" in the backseat of a car.

Her original claim came in the form of a handwritten letter signed by a Jane Doe from Oceanside,

California, which was reportedly mailed to the offices of Senator Kamala Harris in California,

with no return address.

As reported by ILMF yesterday, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley referred

a second Kavanaugh accuser to the Department of Justice for a criminal investigation after

making false statement to the committee and others associated with the investigation.

Grassley's letter which provided a very detailed timeline of the events can be seen

below.

In the letter it was identified that Ms. Munro-Leighton was worried that the name Jane Doe would not

garner enough attention to her claims, she then gave her real name and a typed version

of the letter, but was afraid to come forward publicly.

In the end investigators were able to search her unique name, and identify Ms. Monroe-Leighton

as a known left wing activist who is decades older than Justice Kavanaugh, and lives in

neither Washington, DC or California.

Via phone she further confessed she was just trying to get attention, that it was a tactic,

and that it was a ploy.

Chairman Grassley's letter provided clear proof the accusation were false, by the accusers

own admission.

He has asked that the Justice Department to give this matter the utmost consideration

citing the seriousness of the issue.

President Trump has since weighed in, mincing no words when doing so.

"A vicious accuser of Justice Kavanough has just admitted that she was lying, her

story was totally made up, or FAKE!

Can you imagine if he didn't become a Justice of the Supreme Court because of her disgusting

False Statements.

What about the others?

Where are the Dems on this?" he wrote on twitter.

Top level democrats have yet to respond to the bombshell report.

For more infomation >> President Trump Slams Dem Silence After Second Kavanaugh Accuser Admits To Fake Allegations - Duration: 2:35.

-------------------------------------------

People line up early to see President Trump, Kemp - Duration: 1:58.

For more infomation >> People line up early to see President Trump, Kemp - Duration: 1:58.

-------------------------------------------

Reporter Accuses Trump Of Encouraging Political Violence Trump Instantly Shuts Her Down(VIDEO)!!! - Duration: 11:26.

Reporter Accuses Trump Of Encouraging Political Violence Trump Instantly Shuts Her Down

no no you know what you're creating violence by your questions you know you

are created you and also a lot of the reporters of creating violence by not

writing the truth the fake news is creating violence and you know what the

people that support Trump and the people that support us which is a lot of people

most people many people those people know what a story is true and they know

what a story is false and I'll tell you what if the media would write correctly

and write accurately headright fairly you'd have a lot less violence in the

country

the games like that which are you talking about who you know is going to

determine that the Supreme Court of the United States Supreme Court will the

Supreme Court will determine that the Supreme Court is going to determine that

sure I would

now they won't have to fire what I don't want is I don't want these people

throwing rocks it's turned out in fact it was just announced by Homeland

Security you have in just certain areas over 300 people that they know are

troubled what they did to the Mexican military is a disgrace they hit him with

rocks some were very seriously injured and they were throwing rocks in their

face they do that with us they're going to be arrested there's going to be

problems I didn't say shoot I didn't say shoot

but they do that with us they're going to be arrested for a long

time well arrest them but ice and Border Patrol is there with the military

you're not advocating actually shooting people who are having another but if our

soldiers or Border Patrol arise are going to be hit in the face where the

rocks we're going to arrest those people that doesn't mean shoot them but whether

to arrest those people quickly and for a long period of time

everything we're doing is totally legal it's all gone through the courts but we

have one of the few systems where instead of telling people you can't come

in we take them in and we have to bring them through a court system that is the

most ridiculous system in the world it's obsolete but that's not the problem the

problem is it's a stupid system and it doesn't work and the Democrats and the

Republicans could change it immediately we could do it in one day we could have

it fixed but the Democrats don't want to do it because they're playing politics

and actually I think it's very bad politics because the people of this

country know what's going on better than they do and you know what we could fix

our immigration system in one day if we could sit down with them but they don't

want to do it because they want open border and open borders begrimed

but they want they want those people coming up by the thousands and you know

honestly they always have come up they want them to pour into our country and

in the group and you just saw the report that came out you have a lot of bad

people you have people that are criminals you have people with records

you're people with criminal records we can fix this system so quickly so easily

but we need some Democrat votes or vote all Republicans if we had more

Republicans it would be fixed immediately

they have any intention only sexual suckle Monday that's right sanctions

start on Iran they're very serious sanctions they're very big they'll be

elevated from there but as you know sanctions are starting on Iran and you

know Iran is taking a very big hit the country is not the same country as when

I started almost two years ago Iran is a much different country since I

terminated that deal that was one of the most ridiculous deals ever made by any

country at any time the Iran nuclear deal but sanctions very much are

elevated as of you know when next time a movie review at the military are asking

a prior to the alone behind that bipartisan agreement on immigration but

you won't back it the Democrats never had a bipartisan

agreement they're trying to say that they never had a bar then tell them come

to come around and see me they had an agreement that was a one-sided agreement

that I would never approve you've got to get rid of catch-and-release

you've got to get rid of chain migration you've got to get rid of the Visa

Lottery they never agreed to any of that asked him if they agreed they never

agreed well I hope they won't we're gonna see I hope they walk but you know

what we're not going to stand for people doing what they did to the Mexican

military and to the Mexican police what they did to those people that were very

badly hurt very badly injured the military and the police what they did

with rocks being thrown in their faces not going to happen to our soldiers

what's your next question what an anger they haven't read how many questions you

have no more

we're doing a perfect executive order and the border is closed to these people

they're not coming in they will go through the system and then they'll be

shipped back depending on what happens with the silo

Ric's Honduran food you would say understand Honduras El Salvador all of

these countries they're getting millions and millions of dollars they're doing

nothing for us they're doing nothing they let their people come up and they

form their caravans in the country they are doing nothing we're paying them

hundreds of millions of dollars guess what that money's going to stop very

soon thank you all very much it's a few days to go in the liberal

media switching into high gear with its verbal attacks against President Trump

joining me now to debate conservative commentator Rob Smith and liberal

commentator Kathy aroo all right guys so this is just breaking one of the women

who accused Kavanaugh of rape her name Judy Monroe lightin she was just you

know investigated and it turns out she made the whole thing up and admitted to

making the whole thing up and wasted everybody's time Grassley sent

investigators to talk to her and she said I did it because I just wanted to

draw attention to the issue and I lied I don't I don't see the media making any

noise about this Kathy why do you think that is well I'm glad the media is not

making any noise because Kavanaugh doesn't need the media to make more

noise about these things so don't you think they should say you know what this

is a woman that came forward with a false rape plan and put it in the

context of the entire hearing because there were also a lot of other great

things to remember with our vanadis people we don't need to hear that but

you do need to hear that they spent so much time on all of these other claims

that were out there just an onslaught to

give this accuser backtracking the same amount of time that they gave I did not

need that no no I don't think let it go let it go absolutely

you wanna let it go no I said dr. Ford should not have been given so much

attention I thought Cavanaugh should have been just a lot of battle that was

a lot of people that were unsure about that in the first place that were made

to feel bad because they weren't sure I need this to be out there so that they

can feel a little bit more confident and hey maybe dividing the country right

right a poll just came out right has the national news media done more to unite

or divide the country since Trump took office 64% said there are dividers and

then they did the same question with Donald Trump and it turns out the media

is viewed as more divisive than Donald Trump by the American people absolutely

if you believe that no I cannot what the media's been saying

well the thing about it is is that the media is drunk on the president they are

drunk on Donald Trump anything that they can possibly say to make this

administration appear negative or racist or anything like that they go for it and

so often a lot of these social media platforms they are used to put together

like put forth information that is just not true or that's mr. Gordan social

media so everyone's drunk is the one at the very top leading it what do you what

do you make of the fact that the American people after two years of this

nonsense and after the media saying that Trump is the divider in chief they are

the ones viewed as the divisive ones this is a political poll I know it's not

I know but Trump is like they're puppets and he's pulling those strings I think

Trump is wonderful at controlling the media he's the president control has

Trump derangement syndrome and I think it is terminal I think that they want to

push out anything that is negative about this person because they know he gets

clay no he's amazing at driving the message he's amazing at putting that

fear out and then the confidence absolutely

just last week the media lectured everybody on divisive rhetoric and

violence and racism and then literally a week later Jane Fonda called Trump

Hitler Alec Baldwin punched someone in the face and then CNN says white men are

the biggest threat to America I mean did they look in the mirror yeah don't look

in the mirror from an anchor that's partnered with a white man but that's

neither here never said anything that's divisive or negative about minorities

well you know what Kathy we gotta go oh thank you very much

thank you god bless you and God bless america

For more infomation >> Reporter Accuses Trump Of Encouraging Political Violence Trump Instantly Shuts Her Down(VIDEO)!!! - Duration: 11:26.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump's supporters impressed by rally speech - Duration: 1:39.

For more infomation >> President Trump's supporters impressed by rally speech - Duration: 1:39.

-------------------------------------------

What Will It Take For Republicans To Turn Against Trump? - Duration: 3:25.

Our last question today comes from @tracytweetstv who says, "So you think losing their social

security will be enough for the Trumpers to finally turn on him and the republican party?"

No, no I don't unfortunately.

I think it would make some republicans possibly switch parties, but we've seen this play out

before.

We had so many people in the United States last December when republicans passed their

big tax cut, so many of them thought it was going to trickle down.

They thought absolutely, yeah, cutting taxes for the wealthy, that sounds like a good idea

because if my boss has more money then obviously he's going to give it to me.

Greed isn't a think, right?

No, they realized oh crap, the same thing that happened in 2003 happened again, and

the same thing that happened in the 1980s happened in 2003 and it happened again in

2018.

Darn it, fooled me again but don't worry.

When they propose it again in 2024 totally going to work that time.

I promise you fourth time's the charm, right?

That's the mentality that a lot of these republicans have.

It's very sad, it's not very intelligent, but they're not going to change who they are.

They understand republicans have made it unequivocal that we're coming.

We're going to cut your social security.

We're going to cut your Medicare.

We're going to cut your Medicaid.

We're going to cut your SNAP assistance, food stamps.

We're going to cut money for education.

We're going to leave your kids with a subpar education that doesn't prepare them for life

because we've got to give all that money to millionaires and billionaires.

Do you know why republicans don't get mad about that?

There was a study many years ago, polls taken.

Almost 68% of republicans, actually 68% of Americans, most republicans though, they believe

that eventually in their lifetime, even if they're already over the age of 60, they're

going to make it into the top 1%.

68% of people in this country think that no matter low old they are they can be on death's

door, they still think they're going to make it into that top 1%.

They're going to be rich one day.

When they are all these cuts the republicans have made aren't going to matter other than

the tax cuts.

That's why they keep doing it.

We as Americans tend to hold on to these false beliefs that we're going to hit the lottery

next week.

Everybody earlier this week thought I'm going to be the one to win the mega millions.

I'm going to be the one to win the power ball.

It didn't pan our for 99.9999999% of us, probably even greater percentage than that.

We're not rich now, probably not ever going to be.

We don't have that billion dollar idea in the back of our heads like we think we might.

It's fun to have hope, but at the same time it can be dangerous.

In the case of people voting for the republican party because they think in the off chance

in the near future they're going to qualify for that tax break it's not only damaging

to that person but it's damaging to the entire country as well.

We'll be right back.

For more infomation >> What Will It Take For Republicans To Turn Against Trump? - Duration: 3:25.

-------------------------------------------

Scaramucci, Pierson on Trump's midterm campaign blitz - Duration: 7:05.

For more infomation >> Scaramucci, Pierson on Trump's midterm campaign blitz - Duration: 7:05.

-------------------------------------------

Ana Navarro - Trump's Effect on the GOP & Florida's Heated Gubernatorial Race | The Daily Show - Duration: 11:18.

Before you sit down,

in case people missed it, can we...

What does that say?

(cheering and applause)

-Okay. -Yeah, you know, since it's Halloween,

I thought I'd come dressed

as a first lady who really does care.

(cheering and applause)

-Welcome back to the show. -Thank you. It's been a while.

-Thank you for being here. -Welcome to Mi...

-Bienvenidos a Miami. -Oh.

-(cheering and applause) -Muchas gracias.

-Have you had Cuban coffee? -Have I had...?

-Cuban coffee. -I've had Cuban coffee.

I've had Cuban sandwiches. I've had, um, Cuban friends.

-I've had Cuban nights out. -(laughs)

-Cuban everything. -Stop right there.

(laughter)

Um, this is quite a time.

You know, you know, what's interesting is, I mean,

I have a lot of people who come to the show,

and we talk about politics, and a lot of the time--

I won't lie-- many of the people who come to The Daily Show

have political views that match with mine or the audience.

But you're in an interesting position

because you are a Republican.

Are you still a Republican?

You know, here's the thing.

I was a Republican when Donald Trump was a Democrat.

I was a Republican when Donald Trump was an independent.

And I'm a Republican

now that he's pretending to be a Republican

and so many other Republicans are enabling him

and allowing him to pretend.

(cheering and applause)

So, that-that presents an interesting dilemma for you

-and for many Republicans out there, right? -Yeah.

-Because a day like today's... -Like Paul Ryan.

Yeah. A day like today's a perfect example.

So, you have Donald Trump, who comes out and says,

"I want to change the Constitution.

"I want to say that birthright citizenship

is no longer part of the Fourteenth Amendment."

And Paul Ryan comes out and says,

"Hey, that's-that's not something that you can do.

That's unethical. It's impeachable."

And Donald Trump replied, and he said to Paul Ryan, um,

"You need to focus on maintaining the House.

"I'm gonna do

what the new Republican party needs to be done."

-(booing) -And that's... No, no, hold on, hold on.

That's an interesting space for many people to be in,

because it does feel like in some ways,

Donald Trump is redefining

what the Republican party is all about.

-What does that mean to you? -I, uh...

Look, I think Donald Trump,

in a very short time, in less than two years,

has redefined the Republican party.

He has redefined the presidency.

It is now a place that is used to bully other Americans.

It is a place that is used to lie and spread fear.

And he has changed America. He has changed the country.

He has polarized us in a way

-that's much greater than we were already. -Right.

He has fabricated culture wars.

He has sown discord.

And he's handed the keys to the kingdom to the Russians.

(cheering and applause)

So...

But I-I grew up--

You know, to answer your question, look,

I grew up in the Republican Party.

And many of us here in Miami understand this,

where, uh, it-it was--

you know, we-we tried to be more inclusive,

tried to win, have a bigger tent.

Dinosaurs were not roaming the Earth

when George W. Bush got 44% of the Hispanic vote.

That was way before they were doing things

like separating children at the border

and putting them in little pens.

If you-- if you look at-- if you look at the situation

that-that America's in now,

in many ways, you see Donald Trump and his effect

mirrored in politics on a local level, you know?

For many Republican politicians,

it has now become a clear choice:

either you are with Donald Trump

or you have to see your way out of the Republican Party.

And people like Jeff Flake have chosen that.

People like Paul Ryan are saying, like,

"I'm out of the game."

Um, and then you have people,

like, politicians locally like DeSantis,

who have run specifically on a message of

"I am everything that Trump embodies."

-Are you seeing that connecting with people? -(loud booing)

Certainly. Certainly so in primaries.

Look, um, Ron DeSantis is Donald Trump's parasitic twin.

-But for Donald Trump, -(cheering and applause)

-Ron DeSantis would not have won the Republican primary. -Right.

And even after the primary,

instead of distancing himself from Trump--

as, for example, Rick Scott has done,

who's treating him like a Zika mosquito--

Ron DeSantis embraces him.

Uh, Donald Trump is going to be rallying for Ron DeSantis

in Florida today and again before the elections.

And so he's, you know-- he's modeled himself as a mini Trump.

He is now saying that he, too, agrees

with, uh, repealing the 14th Amendment

through executive order, which is ridiculous

and unconstitutional.

And, uh, that's just the way he's playing it.

Look, Donald Trump had so much to do

on both sides in deciding primaries.

Often, the ones who won in Republican primaries

-were the ones who embraced him the most, -Mm-hmm.

and the ones who won in Democratic primaries

were the ones who opposed him and confronted him the most.

And, you know, unfortunately, many of the Republicans,

so many of the Republicans who tried to stand up to Trump,

who tried to rebuke him when he merited it,

uh, are either retiring,

like Flake,

have lost elections,

or have died.

And so you are-- you are left

with a Republican Party

that is more and more like Trump

and that depends on him and knows him more.

If Ron DeSantis wins in Florida,

he owes it to Donald Trump.

He is indebted to Donald Trump.

At that point, Donald Trump owns the guy.

But then here's a question I have for you as a Republican

who says you've been a Republican your whole life.

We always speak about it as if Donald Trump operates

in isolation, as if...

Politicians operate in isolation,

-but somebody has to vote for them. -True.

And if Republican voters are voting for these people,

and Republicans are choosing people who go with Trump,

Republicans are choosing to oust people like Jeff Flake,

choosing to oust people who stand up to Donald Trump,

then do you think that maybe there was a side

of the Republican Party that either you were not seeing,

or you were choosing to not see?

-Both. Both. -(applause and cheering)

And, um...

Look, there were 15...

I think two things happened. I think you're right.

I think there was a shift in the base,

and a... and a side of it that many of us didn't see,

including the 15 other Republicans

who ran for the Republican primary,

people like Jeb Bush, people like John Kasich.

But I also think Trump brought out a, uh...

a-a different type of people,

a different class of people, diff...

He brought out people who had not been engaged

-in politics before... -Right.

...who had not been motivated to vote.

Well, we saw that with the mail bomber, funny enough.

People said he wasn't political,

-and then, Donald Trump ignited something in him. -So, he...

-Look, I-I think... -(laughter, groaning)

That was not intended.

I'm... That was not... Sorry.

Excuse the pun.

The, um...

You know, like him or not, I think

he has awoken something in America on both sides.

(indistinct shouting)

Uh, I think, you know, he has brought out people

on one side, but on the other--

you know, on the Democratic side--

we're also seeing people more engaged.

We're seeing candidates running for the first time.

-(applause and cheering) -We're seeing more LGBTQ,

people of color, women running as candidates

because... because they got, uh, energized,

because they got enraged,

and because they decided to be part of the process.

I think you, uh, you owe the #MeToo movement

-in large part to Donald Trump... -(applause)

...and women said, you know...

Because women were silent and didn't talk

-about the Donald Trump issues before... -Right.

...we ended up with his as president,

and-and that ignited a frustration and anger in women

that motivated them to speak up, and not remain silent,

and, you know, and-and stick together in numbers.

So when you look at, let's just say Florida itself,

let's look at the-the governor's race.

You look at race between Andrew Gillum, Ron DeSantis,

and you see Gillum exciting people

in a different way.

You see people who are engaged with him,

not just on policy, but also in the way

that he actually, you know, I guess conveys his message.

When you look at that race

as a Republican in Miami, what do you make of it?

Look, I... You know, for me... It's a very...

For me, I'm a centrist.

I'm a moderate Republican, I'm a centrist.

And so when I look at that race, on the one hand,

I've got Ron DeSantis, who is increasingly...

Or forget increasingly.

-He's not an option. -(applause and cheering)

-(cheering, applause) -And on the other hand...

I've got Andrew Gillum,

who is a progressive Democrat

who is much further to the left than I am on policy issues.

I had not met him before.

I met him a couple of days ago, and I got to tell you something,

part of the reason that guy is awakening something

is 'cause he's likable.

-(cheering) -I had forgotten what it was like

to have a likable person running in Florida.

He... he's, uh, you know,

he could charm a cat out of a tree.

-(laughter) -He actually likes people.

You know, he's relatable.

He tells jokes. He smiles.

He inspires.

He's working through a message of unity and being positive.

-(cheering) -And so, you know, look,

I think...

I think it's a...

it's a huge contrast

that Florida voters have to choose from.

They're going to have to choose from a message of...

-fear... -Mm-hmm.

and, uh, scare tactics.

Like, for example, one of the things

that's got me really upset, um, in the last few days is--

and I know there's somebody here from Venezuela--

-(indistinct shouts) -Donald Trump is out there

saying that Andrew Gillum-- and by the way,

he's also saying it about Beto O'Rourke in Texas--

but he's saying that Andrew Gillum is going to turn Florida

-into Venezuela. -Right.

People are dying in Venezuela.

It is ruled by a murderous dictator

who beats, kills,

jails, harasses his opponents,

who expropriates property.

There is no food in Venezuela.

There is no medicine in Venezuela.

People are starving. It is a dictatorship.

So to be... to-to...

to incite that level of fear in people

and to cheapen the trauma of the Venezuelan exiles

who live here in Florida,

-(cheering, applause) -the Nicaraguan exiles,

the Cuban exiles, who have actually fled communism,

who have suffered under those systems,

by casually and cavalierly saying

Andrew Gillum is going to turn Florida into Venezuela...

Well, if he does, we've got a real problem,

'cause you know what, we got a Republican legislature

in Florida, we got a conservative Supreme Court

in Florida, we've got checks and balances in Florida.

That is not going to happen.

And I hope Florida voters reject a campaign of fearmongering

-(cheering, applause) -and scare tactics.

We can't fall for that again.

Thank you so much for being on the show again.

-Thank you. -Always wonderful having you.

Ana Navarro, everybody.

For more infomation >> Ana Navarro - Trump's Effect on the GOP & Florida's Heated Gubernatorial Race | The Daily Show - Duration: 11:18.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump holds rally at Bozeman airport - Duration: 1:13:44.

For more infomation >> President Trump holds rally at Bozeman airport - Duration: 1:13:44.

-------------------------------------------

Michael Moore: Take Trump Seriously And Don't Listen To Pelosi Or The Polls | MSNBC - Duration: 12:54.

For more infomation >> Michael Moore: Take Trump Seriously And Don't Listen To Pelosi Or The Polls | MSNBC - Duration: 12:54.

-------------------------------------------

Migrants From Caravan Sue Trump And His Administration Proves Why They Must Be Stopped(VIDEO)!!! - Duration: 18:50.

Migrants From Caravan Sue Trump And His Administration Proves Why They Must Be Stopped

president Trump described some members of the migrant caravan but if you listen

to the mainstream media they're all angels fleeing cartel violence so what

is the truth joining me now Fox News contributor and fellow at the

Independent Women's Forum Sarah Carter who was recently in Guatemala covering

the caravan all right Sarah so you know you've heard the media to describe these

people as you know good people you know women and children was that your

understanding when you were seeing them face to face unfortunately no I mean

there were women and children at the front end I was in Guatemala I was there

for the second wave that was coming across the Honduran border so I was

right there in a town called cheeky mullah right on the Honduran border as

they were moving across and they put the women and children's lives actually in

danger with these organizers of the caravan would do would put maybe a

hundred to two hundred women and children some disabled some elderly at

the front of the group and then the rest of the group and this is what I saw with

my own eyes were men I mean there were roughly

fourteen to fifteen hundred men behind them they would start pushing against

the women and children the Guatemalan government was telling them please turn

around go back you will not be allowed into the United States but as in Europe

Central America has a process by which if you have papers you can cross through

the border system so they didn't want the women and children to be harmed

so they process the women and children through so it's an early women and

children first but not in a good way not in a good way and so the men are really

taking advantage and using the women and children it's kind of the tip of the

spear you absolutely you talked about you know the organizers of the caravan

did you get any information on that well according to the intelligence officers

that I spoke to on the ground now I was with Guatemalan intelligence as well as

other intelligence officials on the ground they were informed that a lot of

the leftist groups in honde in El Salvador were organizing these

caravans and it appeared to me to be very highly organized because one I

speak Spanish I know what's going on there were people within the group that

were kind of guiding the other men in the group now and there's the purpose of

the left-wing groups in Central America for organizing the caravan north well

they have multiple reasons one they want to divide the government's conservative

governments of Guatemala or Honduras from the United States that might

surprise a ruckus that makes SOTA so it's about domestic politics and causing

mass mayhem down there internally in order to maybe overturn some exactly

exactly is the president speaking about the caravan let's listen to the

president United States is down in Florida talking about government legally

folks you can't come in that way and by the way Caravan after Caravan and we pay

these countries with they're formed on doors all of them we pay them hundreds

of millions of dollars they do nothing for us they do nothing they do nothing

for us they had a new one just formed in El Salvador we pay them a lot we pay

them all hundreds of millions of dollars they do nothing and did you see Mexico

strong they are trying and their military and their police stood guard

and the level of viciousness with the rocks being thrown in their face

the military was hurt their police their law enforcement they were hurt we don't

put up with it we don't put up with it we don't want we don't want that in our

country we're not gonna have it in our country they broke through think of it

they broke through the Mexican military and the Mexico they broke through okay

say the presidents are talking about it we've all seen the images of this of

these young men throwing rocks and bloodying up Mexican law enforcement

officials it seems like kind of a rowdy crew down there and it it doesn't look

like the kind of people that you want to say oh yes come on into the country as

they're throwing elbows and rocks at Mexico

law enforcement when you were talking to people down there what was the criminal

element like a pop I did well I did I did see visibly ms-13 members within the

group that I was with a lot of them were very demanding they said we're going

there we're going to get jobs they were also talking badly about President Trump

they were saying if he doesn't give us jobs you know we're coming into the

country and we're gonna demand our rights and I said well what would it

take for you to return home I mean you're coming to the United States word

that before it's it sounds like I've heard that here and it's our loopholes

Jesse I mean look we have so many loopholes in our system and they know it

and they play these loopholes whether it's family units which we've seen over

a 40 percent increase this year in family units they know how to play this

game and they're also being taught so once they get into Mexico and once they

start moving through Mexico believe me the drug cartels are watching this as

well as the smugglers course when you get there without safe passage from the

drug cartels and then they got lawyers down there coaching them on what to say

what the left or doesn't understand though is once if you're essential

American and you come in with some family member who knows if they're

actually a family member there am i right

you have to stay they have to let them here in America until their Asylum case

is heard and I'm thinking to myself you guys want to take that risk we don't

know who these people are you got a venom at a port of entry like every

other Russian that comes but for some reason they don't want to get vetted

when they're in the Texas border I got a yes right that's that's under the Ninth

Circuit and this is the reason why another loophole got a closing but we

got to close the border and the loophole Sara great reporting down there I really

appreciate it thank you well members that migrant Caravan are

not American they're not even in the United States yet according to left that

makes no difference to the left there are two groups of people in the world

current American citizens and American citizens who simply haven't shown up yet

if you don't want them here immediately then you are a monster people have

gotten so much dumber in the last two years it's unbelievable and it shouldn't

surprise us that in the face programming like that a dozen hundred

migrants have sued the administration for supposedly violating their

constitutional rights even though once again they have not yet reached the

border yet and they are of course not American citizens Mike Donovan is CEO of

Nexus services which is financing that lawsuit he joins us - Mike thanks a lot

for coming on and for explained to make sure having me of course a sincere

question and I'm really am glad that you're here because it's hard to see

what the standing is here these are people who are not American citizens or

not an American soil and some of them have declared intent to violate American

law how are their constitutional rights the constitution of the country they're

not part of how are those rights being violated exactly well so of the of the

named plaintiffs in this lawsuit each of them and each of the individuals and the

in the purported class our individuals who want to seek asylum and do so

legally so I think that's an important part of this conversation but Tucker

it's it's a good question the asylum so we have an immigration law it's a series

of immigration laws and one of those elements is asylum and and those laws

are specific to the individuals in this Caravan who are coming to claim asylum

that that in alone it may not be enough but the president of the United States

has taken to making this caravan a symbol of an invasion of our country and

he has taken a great deal of time to defame the individuals who are

travelling fleeing bloodshed in their home countries trying to find a place

where they can live and and and support their family what does that have to and

I understand you don't like that and you're on their side you don't like

Trump fine but what is that how does that mean that they have a

constitutional right that is being violated what is that right where in the

Constitution does it reside as just a normal American I'm confused can you

help me yeah absolutely it's a right to due process these individuals are coming

to the country they have in one way or another stated their intent to come to

the country and the chief executive of this country has taken aim and attacked

them so what I'm saying is that their standing is very simple there are asylum

seekers they want clarification I think that we should respect these migrants

for this is a legal question so I get it we

should respect them you you're on the side of the migrants that's that's

that's your right I just want to know where my responsibility begins as an

American citizen you're saying they have a constitutional right to due process

but they're not Americans and they're not on US soil they're hundreds of miles

from the United States they're not here so in what sense are they covered by our

due process protect but this is insane and you know what's insane I just want

you to admit that it's no it's no it's not insane Tucker they are claiming

rights under the asylum provisions of our statutes that affords them due

process rights under that law we have due process under the law this is a law

that is specifically directed to them so of course they have due process right

they do not possess those rights if they're in another country and not US

citizens so if they possessed those rights then I don't know the entire

country of Nigeria or a bigger country that's poor the United States and say we

want to come there president says you can't come and all of a sudden 800

million people sue you for violating their constitutional rights in the

country they'd ever been to with what we thought do you respect doctor you know

that that's not exact that's not what we're talking about here we're talking

about individual migrants who are coming together who are on their way to the

border to exercise their rights under US law nobody I'm processing because it's a

few it is different what's the principle in what sense is it different what's the

principle if if you freeze it foreigners residing in the foreign country okay

well I don't know if they're in Router the entire nation of if the if the

entire nation of Nigeria were in route to the United States perhaps it would be

apples to apples but that's what you said it's not correct the individuals

coming to this country to seek asylum okay officially you don't know that we

don't know what their intent is the show actually you don't they're hundreds of

miles away and asylum claims have to be made on US soil either in an embassy a

consulate or at our border okay that's the loss because someone who purportedly

defends the law you know that I know so you can't actually claim that you're

covered by the US Constitution again if you're not on US soil and you're not a

US citizen because if you could before jangly no I

but Tucker what's on our courts don't the courts don't agree with you there's

a court case in the DC Circuit that is in the matter of re r L Johnson where

judge Boasberg said that the administration can't use deterrence to

curb asylum seekers who are coming to this country I'm afraid that this is an

area of law that's already been litigated I'm not sorry sir you are

incorrect you are no you're factually correct not the United States on the

United States Supreme Court has never said that due process protection applies

to non-citizens on foreign soil that has never happened to it the the the

District of Columbia federal courts have and that's where this shows are you be

one day we'll get to the Supreme here's what's important is that the rest of us

know with the precedent is and so is by this standard anyone in any country who

says he's on his way to the United States and is walking in our direction

can sue the United States for saying we don't want you like you really want to

set their president ABB's do I do I want to set the precedent Tucker if the

President of the United States engages an abusive violent rhetoric toward a

group of people you know what your this president is behaving badly and you you

don't you don't get to know it's not one of these people I don't like do you if

you honestly believe that CNN said do I think it's okay I want to talk about

adult things like what is the Constitution guarantee foreigners is it

okay that he's mean okay thank you legal eagles are here to break down the

migrants case against the Trump administration criminal defense

attorneys prosecutor David Bruno and former criminal defense attorney Emily

company oh and they are kind enough to take the sides we assign them regardless

of how they may personally feel about this case but let's start with this

Emily we have this case it looks like six adults who say they're Honduran

citizens were traveling six children that they are also suing on behalf of

and they are claiming their due process violation due process violations under

the fifth amendment saying this the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment

applies to all persons on United States soil and thus applies to plaintiffs when

seeking admission at the southern United States border clearly they're not on US

soil yet but they say they're gonna get here and that's when these rights kick

in you're right that's part of the multiple issues with this lawsuit that

render it um just absolutely ridiculous frankly it

one of them is standing now the lawsuit or the case that the lawsuit points to

out at the Supreme Court specifically references deportation proceedings that

the Fifth Amendment will be construed to afford all aliens participating in

deportation proceedings due process and that's partly the fallacy here is the

fact that as you pointed out they're not yet on our border they do not have that

standing under the proceedings and legally it is not the same thing as an

asylum applicant secondly and then the second large issue is the it's the

ripeness of the case the timeliness the president's comments the lawsuit points

to it it hasn't resulted yet in an executive order although with the

military decision that falls squarely under the exception of the Posse

Comitatus Act which is that active-duty military can provide support roles at

the border as long as it's not law enforcement the third issue here is

overreach frankly the courts the courts Accord great deference to the president

and his exercising of power as does Congress which provides to him the

authority to prevent classes of aliens including all classes of aliens from

entering or crossing the border in in for for facially positive reasons and

taking it a step further that they're not allowed essentially to go behind the

scenes the courts are to determine whether or not it's legal so here

there's just multiple issues yeah let me bring in David on the first one there or

first or second what about you both standing but about ripeness too I mean

the president says this executive order or this executive action is coming

should they wait then until that they actually have something to challenge

David I mean you know are they getting the cart ahead of the horse at this

point I do I do believe I do believe it's premature to file this action

number one they are not at the port of entry and number two the president has

not taken official action I think whoever brought this lawsuit failed to

read the the United States Supreme Court decision

in Trump versus Hawaii which granted him a tremendous amount of discretion to act

this way but it does bring up some issues it does bring up some issues

there there is a procedure there for any asylum seekers that everyone should be

taken in for a credible fear interview and then thereafter if they're granted

that then there is a hearing you know interesting enough I read some

statistics us today printed out that 93% of the four hundred and one asylum

seekers in the March Caravan the April Caravan were actually cleared through

the first interview that was very surprising to me I couldn't believe it

because III thought that there were many people taking advantage of the situation

but here I mean it does raise some issues there is a process under our

federal code and if there's no executive action and they're denied those rights

they will have claims for due process violation well and one of the things

that they're really objecting to in this lawsuit is this idea that people caught

at the border are not gonna be allowed to proceed into the country they're

gonna be held in temporary dwellings here's what the president said about the

plan we're gonna build 10 cities we're going to put tents up all over the place

we're not going to build structures and spend all of this you know hundreds of

millions of dollars we're gonna have tents they're going to be very nice and

they're gonna wait and if they don't get asylum they get out in the claim not so

sure they think that the tents are going to be nice they say there's no evidence

that Trump's policy position initiative of placing people in tents and tent

cities is in compliance with the requirements that alien children such as

those at issue in this case are being placed in facilities run by licensed

programs that provide adequate temperature control and ventilation

access drink to drinking water and supervision as required by the Flores

agreement I want you both quickly to weigh in on that issue Emily to you

first absolutely I think the biggest issue

here again is the rightness now what the president says is an interview it does

not translate to an executive order an actual decision so while the points made

there are absolutely true a tent city would have to comply with a Forres

agreement the fact of the matter is that he hasn't issued or created that yet and

thus it's just it's simply not timely I do think it's also important to note

in the lawsuit a lot of the grievances that it talks about is both rhetoric and

also things that it is incumbent upon Congress to change so to me it would

behoove these attorneys to spend their time more lobbying our representatives

in Congress rather than clogging the courts with this lawsuit Dave does it

stand up against that first hurdle there at the district court where it's been

filed well with the language that you've extracted there the key term is children

so yes you cannot put the children in the tents pursuant to the Flores

agreement they're mandatory requirements in that agreement and a tent will not

will not be sufficient all right well the children yeah and then that's very

specific in that Flores agreement and decree and the DOJ says that's not part

of what they're gonna be doing they're not setting up ten cities so we'll see

what the reality is as this plays out David and Emily thank you very much

thank you god bless you and God bless america

you

For more infomation >> Migrants From Caravan Sue Trump And His Administration Proves Why They Must Be Stopped(VIDEO)!!! - Duration: 18:50.

-------------------------------------------

Leaked White House Memo Shows Trump Prepared To Blame Republicans For Midterm Losses - Duration: 4:54.

Last week I told you how the Republicans running for office in this year's midterms, and even

the ones who don't have to run for office, they had already been preparing, according

to GOP strategists who talked to Axios, they were already preparing their talking points

to blame Donald Trump for the expected midterm losses that they think are going to happen

on Tuesday.

Now, earlier this week, we got a copy of a leaked memo, of Politico, or Bloomberg, excuse

me, got a copy of a leaked memo from the White House where they're actually planning to draft

their message, and they're laying the framework right now to say that the Republicans are

the reason they lost, not Donald Trump.

Donald Trump is totally exonerated according to this leaked White House memo.

These were Donald Trump voters.

This was Donald Trump's state.

It wasn't a red state or a blue state.

It was a Trump state, is actually what it says in that crazy memo, and Republicans failed

to capitalize on the popularity of President Donald Trump in that particular state, and

that's why they lost.

What they're going to try to do is say that Donald Trump came out there, he did X number

of rallies, he raised X number of millions of dollars for each candidate, and they still

couldn't do it right because they didn't fully embrace the president.

Had they embraced Trumpism, had they worn that big MAGA banner on their back, they would

have won because the people want little Donald Trumps running as their Congress people, little

Donald Trumps meeting with them, and holding their own little rallies.

Millions of little Donald Trumps running all over the country, but the Republicans didn't

give it to them, so that's why we got Democrats.

It's all the Republicans' fault.

Flock to me, Americans, Donald Trump, and I'll make everything better in 2020.

That's going to be their message, but like I said last week, with Republicans preparing

to blame Trump, and now Trump preparing to blame Republicans, I think those two groups

both need to buy some mirrors, and just look in them, and see who is really to blame, because

it's every single one of you.

Again, let's not put the cart before the horse.

The midterms haven't happened.

There may not be a blue wave.

Signs point to yes, but signs have been wrong in the past, so Republicans may be preparing

these talking points for no reason at all.

I don't think that's likely, but need to throw that out there just in case, but here's the

thing.

The reason voters are pissed off right now is because they understand how crazy the man

in the White House is, but it's not just that they're mad at him.

They're mad at every single Republican that is enabling him, and they're the ones up for

reelection, so they're the ones who have to pay the price.

They refuse to stand up to Donald Trump.

The few who've had the courage to occasionally speak out against him publicly while voting

with him more than 90% of the time, by the way, but they spoke out publicly, but they're

not even seeking reelection, so they're gone, those mealy-mouthed, brave Twitter conservatives

who bow down before Trump any time they have to actually cast a vote.

Voters are angry about that.

Voters don't want that.

Voters want a check on the seemingly endless power that Republicans have in our government

today.

That's why Republicans are poised to lose.

Part of it is Donald Trump.

Part of it is Republicans, and most of it has to do with their horrible policies.

A week and a half ago Republicans in the Senate actually did vote to strip one and a half

trillion dollars from Medicaid and Medicare.

They did.

They voted for that.

Voters don't like that.

Voters depend on those programs.

They pay into those programs, and if you're going to cut money to the beneficiaries, and

we're still paying all that money, each paycheck, every single check, it comes out, where's

it going?

They know where it's going now.

It's going to the wealthy elite, and they're pissed about it, because they don't get a

dime from that tax cut.

Republicans, Trump, Fox News, you can blame every single one of them, and that's pretty

much what's going to happen if Republicans lose the midterm.

There is going to once again be even more finger pointing among them.

You're going to say, "You did it.

No, you did it.

No, they did it.

No, he did it.

No, she did it."

At the end of the day, kind of like when Democrats lose, a lot of finger pointing, a lot of yelling,

a lot of shouting, but no one actually taking the time to look in that mirror and say, "You

know what?

Maybe it was me."