Wednesday, July 11, 2018

Trump news on Youtube Jul 11 2018

Judge Exposed The Deep State's Plan To Frame Trump for This Crime

y believe — Mueller's people believe they can convict them of," he said.

"Whether it's money laundering or whether it's Russian interference with the election."

"I don't think this has gotten anywhere near the president and I don't think it

will," Napolitano concluded."

The collusion story originated with the Democrats.

It has no basis in fact.

Hillary Clinton and her team came up with this fairy tale the night she lost the election

as an excuse to explain her defeat.

Since the media always reports what Democrats say as fact, they uncritically took it as

gospel that Trump must have cheated to win the election.

Once Comey briefed Trump on the existence of the golden showers dossier, it gave the

press the excuse they needed to run with the story.

And now this witch hunt that is based on nothing more than a hoax is threatening to consume

the Trump administration.

It was a set up from the word "go."

We will keep you up to date on any new developments in this story.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends

and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> Judge Exposed The Deep State's Plan To Frame Trump for This Crime - Duration: 11:08.

-------------------------------------------

HKYTV★Trump laughs when he met Huh Kyung young(트럼프와 허경영이 만났다!) - Duration: 6:26.

Trump president is smiling. I saw it for the first time.

Trump is not a good laugh. But he laughs.

He is the same height as the Germans in here.

The Germans are 190 cm tall.

A couple of kilograms from Germany weighs about 110kg. The height is 185cm.

Trump is very tall.

Similar with me? haha(joke)

Why did Trump smile like that? Because the tie is the same with me, the color of the suit is the same with me.

Both hands and face are handsome, I also like to play with Trump

He got his belly button(Trump laughs a lot.)

Ha ha ha ha ha.

Tie is all the same shape with me. it is.

Only I can laugh at the President of the United States. I'm the only one.

Trump's sign is fake if you don't have this signature It's a fake.

This Trump's signature is on my suit. If without this signature,

It's a fake.

This is my suit. This trump sign. It's in front of his suit.

.

I stood his side. and Trump stood straight.

I'm so thin, I look thin. Trump looks old and hahaha.

So when I take a picture, I take delicate pictures.

So when the presidential election is on TV When I go out with other candidates,

People do not know the basics pose. .

What they have learned is what people don't like.

What people like is my style It's.

It has to be natural.

This way, like Trump, He does not have a mind to think others.

Trump has to be a little bit in my direction.

This is a cock of the walk

So human beings pose is very important.

So When you take pictures with your opponent, It's important to be considerate.

You have to.

When you take a picture with your wife, You have to pretend to be ugly a little bit.

Therefore, Mrs. Yuk Young-su ,the wife of president Park, She must kneel when taking pictures with Park.

Because she is tall.

So she puts a lot of bandages here in her skirt.

Always she bends and walks. .

Because the President Park is so small, She has to do that.

.

Trump must have bent his knees too. do.

I wonder if the Germans will bend. The Koreans are very caring.

Reduce her height and turn your body sideways.

Even when I smile, It's attractive to smile a little bit.

If you smile like Trump, It's called fool.

So when I count Trump's teeth. It got twelve.

He smiles like that in front of me.

Awesome? Among photos from 7 billion worldwide, The person who took with him is inside your finger.

Because I am the world president.

I still go even I drink the dust, I went there and met him.

.

I can not go unless he calls me. .

So I do not mean to meet anyone.

So the picture together. There is.

The government will review the pictures to see if it is real.

.

It's a real picture of together.

For more infomation >> HKYTV★Trump laughs when he met Huh Kyung young(트럼프와 허경영이 만났다!) - Duration: 6:26.

-------------------------------------------

Avenatti Needs a Mental Evaluation ASAP, Appears To Believe He Can Take Out Trump in 2020 - Duration: 1:48.

For more infomation >> Avenatti Needs a Mental Evaluation ASAP, Appears To Believe He Can Take Out Trump in 2020 - Duration: 1:48.

-------------------------------------------

Donald Trump Picked Up The Phone And You Won't Believe What He Heard - Duration: 12:23.

Donald Trump Picked Up The Phone And You Won't Believe What He Heard

The silent coup against Donald Trump has reached a dangerous new level.

The Russia investigation is turning out to be a bust, so the investigation has expanded

into the President's personal life.

And President Trump took one phone call that brought him the worst news of his Presidency.

The FBI raided the office and home of his attorney, Michael Cohen.

Prosecutors revealed that Cohen had been under investigation for months due to his business

dealings.

But since he was Trump's lawyer for over a decade, there are some insiders who worry

about what he knows or what evidence he possesses.

So one of Trump's top legal advisors called Trump to warn him that Cohen would sing like

a canary for prosecutors if they squeezed him with criminal charges.

The Wall Street Journal reports:

"One of President Donald Trump's longtime legal advisers said he warned the president

in a phone call Friday that Michael Cohen, Mr. Trump's personal lawyer and close friend,

would turn against the president and cooperate with federal prosecutors if faced with criminal

charges.

Mr. Trump made the call seeking advice from Jay Goldberg, who represented Mr. Trump in

the 1990s and early 2000s.

Mr. Goldberg said he cautioned the president not to trust Mr. Cohen.

On a scale of 100 to 1, where 100 is fully protecting the president, Mr. Cohen "isn't

even a 1," he said he told Mr. Trump.

Mr. Cohen is under criminal investigation for potential bank fraud and campaign-finance

violations.

FBI agents raided Mr. Cohen's home, hotel and office last week, seeking documents about,

among other things, a $130,000 payment he made in October 2016 to a former adult-film

actress to prevent her from publicly discussing an alleged sexual encounter with Mr. Trump

in 2006, The Wall Street Journal previously reported, citing people familiar with the

matter.?Messrs. Trump and Cohen deny such an encounter occurred.

Investigators are examining whether Mr. Cohen committed bank fraud in using a home-equity

line of credit to pay the former porn star for her silence, as well as potential campaign-finance

violations related to the payment, the people said.

"Michael will never stand up [for you]" if charged by the government, Mr. Goldberg

said he cautioned the president."

But will Cohen flip?

He recently tweeted that he will never turn on the President.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends

and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> Donald Trump Picked Up The Phone And You Won't Believe What He Heard - Duration: 12:23.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Trolls Media, Makes Big Announcement About Special Gift For Putin - Duration: 5:02.

For more infomation >> Trump Trolls Media, Makes Big Announcement About Special Gift For Putin - Duration: 5:02.

-------------------------------------------

MICHAEL AVENATTI JOINING LONDON DONALD TRUMP PROTEST: 'THE CAUSE IS A GLOBAL ONE' - Duration: 3:02.

For more infomation >> MICHAEL AVENATTI JOINING LONDON DONALD TRUMP PROTEST: 'THE CAUSE IS A GLOBAL ONE' - Duration: 3:02.

-------------------------------------------

Barack Obama Could Not Believe What Donald Trump Just Did - Duration: 11:08.

Barack Obama Could Not Believe What Donald Trump Just Did

Barack Obama schemed to fundamentally transform America.

He put one policy in place after another that was designed to damage America.

But now he can't believe what Donald Trump just did.

Trump was elected to undo Obama's anti-American legacy.

The President has made good on rolling back large chucks of Obama's regulatory agenda.

And that includes net neutrality – the Obama era government takeover of the internet.

The media and their liberal allies praised these Stalinist rules which dictate how internet

service providers must provide content.

After President Trump appointed the majority of FCC commissioners, a majority voted last

December to repeal this big government power grab.

The media freaked out.

CNN even declared it "the end of the internet as we know it."

But Obama only imposed net neutrality in 2015.

Americans didn't suffer any disruptions or poor internet service before then.

There were uprisings in the streets over internet service providers throttling the connection

speed to certain websites.

That didn't stop the left from losing their minds over the move.

Mairead McArdle writes on National Review:

"Media outlets have raised the alarm about the repeal of net neutrality, which took effect

on Monday.

Federal Communications Commission chairman Ajit Pai initially introduced the Restoring

Internet Freedom Order, which repeals the Obama-era Open Internet Order net-neutrality

rules.

It was passed by a vote of the FCC in December.

The "internet as we know it may not exist," CNET said on Monday as the repeal took effect.

"Net neutrality is officially dead today, but the fight to revive it lives on, " TechCrunch

declared.

The "end of the Internet as we know it," read the main headline on CNN.com after December's

vote.

Net neutrality imposed heavy regulations on Internet-service providers, classifying them

as public utilities.

Critics said that the rules choked companies like popular streaming services by regulating

how they present content to consumers.

Those pushing for the rules argued that control of the Internet should not be left to the

whims of private companies."

Do you support Trump rolling back Obama's net neutrality internet takeover?

Let us know your thoughts in the comment section.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream

media sources.

When you

share

to

your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your

friends

and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> Barack Obama Could Not Believe What Donald Trump Just Did - Duration: 11:08.

-------------------------------------------

Donald Trump trade CRACKDOWN could cripple EU's €58bn-per-year subsidy scheme - Duration: 4:02.

For more infomation >> Donald Trump trade CRACKDOWN could cripple EU's €58bn-per-year subsidy scheme - Duration: 4:02.

-------------------------------------------

ALAN PERSHOWITZ TRUMP NOMINATES KAVANAUGH TO SUPREME COURT - Duration: 8:00.

wants to be the next governor of New York and this is what she thinks about

ice I think we need to abolish ice that seems really clear what it's turned into

is is frankly a terrorist organization of its own Aris well the White House is

calling her out Alan Dershowitz is here live with his reaction

next Harvard Law Professor and constitutional law expert he's also the

author of the new book the case against impeaching Trump it is out today get

could it could a topic be more pertinent than this one I don't think so professor

thank you very much congratulations Giuliani was on yesterday talking about

how wonderful the book is and we'll get to vadym now the president's reading

your book president's lawyers reading your book you're earning your money

something so but of course we're talking about the president Supreme Court pick

Brett Kavanaugh what do you make well you know he went to Yale Law School and

he taught at Harvard what could be wrong with that he has a lot of support from

centrist academics he's regarded as a very scholarly very smart person I

probably will disagree with many of his opinions but it's hard to question his

qualifications for the job those of us who are Center liberals hope he is more

like Justice Kennedy maybe more like a Chief Justice Roberts then like Justice

Gorsuch but only time will tell you look he'll be on the court 30 40 years we

don't even know what the issues are gonna be 30 40 years from now so a

reasonable reaction that says he's scholarly he's highly respected

wonderful credentials that's not what we heard last night from the left

fighting

we are in the fight of our lives he is hostile to just about anyone I

will be voting no I am not going to kill anybody this is a tough fight but it is

a fight that we did would professor this seems to me the point which is that this

notion there by senator Warren that he's hostile to everyone every race and she

and she knows him they served together on the law school faculty he is not a

hostile person she is obviously saying what her base wants to hear and you know

it what's happened to Supreme Court confirmation battles is just a tragic

you see all this resist and you hear their their statements and their sound

bites and the women's March releasing a press release saying that whoever the

nominee and not even whoever the nominee is they forgot to fill in the name of

the nominated when they hit so put some blame where blame belongs the

Republicans get some blame for this too they didn't allow the Merrick garland

case nomination to come before Congress I think that was a violation of the

spirit of the Constitution and the Democrats are going to fight back and

the losers of the American public because we lose very qualified people to

pollute you would you would acknowledge that in in in bygone eras someone like

Brett would have been confirmed no Scalia got 99 but you know Justice

Ginsburg got 90 some hard votes yeah Willie go through well the Democrats

with some of the Democrats in the red states I think he'll go through so we're

talking about the left and another thing that's become sort of a flashpoint is

this idea of not reforming ice or reforming immigration let's just abolish

the agency created after 9/11 which was supposed to root out terrorists angle

after illegal immigrants here's Cynthia Nixon talking about ice

has strayed so far from its mission it's supposed to be here to keep

Americans safe but what it's turned into is is frankly a terrorist organization

of its own that is terrorizing people who are coming to this country so

there's no nuance there's no hey let's fix this maybe there are some problems

it's let's abolish the folks who are trying to protect

it's outrageous she is the gift that keeps giving to the Republican Party she

is becoming a face of the Democratic extremism the idea calling ice a

terrorist organization this is a woman who supports boycotting Israel which

means supporting real terrorists who are attacking Israel she should understand

what real terrorism is she should go to a cafe in Tel Aviv or a bus that's been

blown up and she supports opposition to Israel through BDS and she's calling an

American institution a terrorist organization it's outrageous and people

should vote against her with enthusiasm particularly if you're a Democrat here's

the White House statement it's deeply disturbing that Cynthia Nixon has no

clue of what I studs to protect Americans and New Yorkers every day from

dangerous criminals terrorists child smugglers and human traffickers well

interesting um another obviously flashpoint we've mentioned we talked

about Supreme Court we talked about this battle over immigration the Mulder

investigation it's out there president wants it to be done with it's gone on

for well over a year and your book takes this on it sort of takes a fresh look at

what is the bar that should be crossed to impeach a president well first of all

in my book I prove that you cannot impeach a president unless he commits a

crime a specified crime while in office and you can't prosecute him while he's

in office that's why we didn't need a special counsel we needed an independent

investigation getting the facts making sure Russia doesn't try to intrude in

our elections again look every other academic in the world practically

disagrees with my conclusion that you need a crime but I go back to the

history I show Hamilton I show Madison and I think I proved conclusively that

impeachment is not just a political act it's a constitutional act and for it to

be satisfying the Constitution you need to prove that the president committed

bribery treason or other high crimes and misdemeanors without that any

impeachment would be unconstitutional so what's your message to Maxine Waters

I have a lot of messages when she says that it's a lawless process she's

reflecting her own ignorance look I posed in this a very dangerous

hypothetical what if the Senate were to remove a president without him

committing a crime and the President refused to leave office as a president

might very well do we'd have a major constitutional crisis and that case

would ultimately get to the United States Supreme Court

so I also argue that impeachment might be reviewable in the United States

Supreme Court which brings together the Kavanagh an appointment to my book about

he made me voting on whether or not a subpoena should be enforced he might be

voting on a lot of issues but remember that when Bill Clinton had his issues

his two appointees voted against him in Japan Nixon's appointees voting the

Kavanagh was helped write the Starr report right eventually now he had you

know he has an open mind he's been thinking back about whether he was right

or wrong look the issue of impeaching or prosecuting a president as I say in this

book is a momentous constitutional event and we have to stick to the Constitution

and I lay out in this book a very persuasive case about what the

Constitution demands Constitution didn't want to make it easy to remove a

president yeah they didn't want the British system where Parliament can

remove a president they wanted specific crimes to have been committed while in

office we're not close to that and I think we're wasting the time and money

if the book is called the case against impeaching Trump check it out

the highest of the high levels are reading this it's probably worth reading

turning now to some more headline

you

For more infomation >> ALAN PERSHOWITZ TRUMP NOMINATES KAVANAUGH TO SUPREME COURT - Duration: 8:00.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump Nominates Federal Appeals Court Judge Brett Kavanaugh for Supreme Court - Duration: 1:51.

For more infomation >> President Trump Nominates Federal Appeals Court Judge Brett Kavanaugh for Supreme Court - Duration: 1:51.

-------------------------------------------

Dobbs:Trump's Supreme Court pick will need McConnell for confirmation: Gregg Jarrett - Duration: 12:33.

attorneys for our ex Trump campaign chairman Paul mana for raising concerns

about a 2017 meeting that occurred between top Justice Department officials

and Associated Press reporters memos revealed those reporters offered FBI

agents and DOJ officials a code pertaining to Manafort storage facility

a possible violation of the criminal justice process

joining us tonight I am pleased to say Victoria tensing and Joe digenova

the founding partners of Geneva and tensing law firm great to have you both

with us and I know you were impressed Joe that I said your last name twice in

succession it was brilliantly producing and pronouncing the words great to have

you here great to be with you let's start with Manta Ford and in the

campaign between the Department of Justice the FBI and national left-wing

media lovingly refer to them Lou this is the modus operandi for the FBI nowadays

they disclose grand jury information to reporters which is illegal in return for

the reporters giving them information about their supposed target we have a

client I'll be really fast about it Billy Walters

who the FBI first of all big-time gambler and a humanitarian businessman

and giving lots of money to charity right and the FBI leak did he and Phil

Mickelson the golfer were under investigation for insider trading

regarding Clorox it was absolutely false though not to give up the FBI comes back

and tries to get a member of a board of directors of another company to testify

against Billy and he keeps refusing saying nothing went on so what did they

do they squeezed the guy leaked that he the board of directors was under

investigation he lost his job he became desperate and of course after being

squeezed he agreed to testify falsely I'll be at falsely against Billy and as

in the words of Alan Dershowitz he he not only sang he composed

and and let me just say one other thing because this is a great time Alan came

up with did I adopted it but I attributed it one last thing about the

Department of Justice ethos and that is that the the US Attorney's Office for

the New York denied that the leak ever came from them even though there there

were emails to prove otherwise and also only when the judge ordered a hearing

did they admit it and then the last thing is they promoted the agent who

leaked the grand jury information that's not nice

tie into that 2017 meeting which was apparently arranged by Andrew Weissman

Pitbull of robert muller special counsel which on fame yes and what we now know

is that Weissman who had done this before and what is now recognized widely

in the United States among lawyers has one of the most unethical prosecutors in

the history of the department Weissman engineered this meeting between DOJ

lawyers and FBI agents and The Associated Press for them to basically

share information amongst themselves including grand jury information and in

order to put pressure on manna for we are watching the destruction of the FBI

by people actually inside the Muller investigation like Weisman this has to

stop and it's where the president's attorneys why isn't there

why aren't they raising hell over this stuff I why in the world would anyone

who knows that information from a grand jury is being sent through a conduit

that runs straight through the heart of the FBI official them to the National

left-wing media I mean that's a violation as law is Victoria said yes

absolutely Lou and in fact Matta Forte's attorneys have asked for a hearing I

actually think the judge is going to grant it I think there is going to be a

hearing it'll be an opportunity to put Weissman on the witness stand along with

a lot of other FBI and DOJ employees who were involved in setting up these

meetings remember the IG report about struck and everybody else laid out cold

how the FBI had a policy of working with the media to leak information and these

people in the bureau about it to the IG but they eventually

had to admit that it was occurring it's it's it's destroying the bureau and it's

destroyed destroying the department of justice and chris ray and rod Rosenstein

will do nothing about it they're so interested in protecting the institution

that they're willing to overlook this type of village illegality their own

skin disgraceful when rod Rosenstein says he's feel psychic it's extortion

when it's oversight from the congressional committee that really says

a thing I don't know about you but I find myself less and less concerned

about how rod Rosen Stein feels on any given day the Muller probe effectively

it seems to me may be dead if yes and this is an extension if the trumpeter

knees are right demanding before there's any further discussion with the Special

Counsel that they demonstrate a some sort of evidence that there was

collusion some reason to have a further discussion there's there's no doubt the

President of the United States enjoys a special status under the law and in

order to interview him for any reason whatsoever here it's an obviously an

impeachment investigation is not a criminal dress there's no evidence that

any crime has been committed so Muller is trying to interview the

president in an impeachment / counterintelligence investigation and

the law is very clear the president is unavailable for such inquiries and

questions and and and under no circumstances should the President had

agree to this interview and if Muller decides he wants to issue a subpoena

I tell you Lou the president's gonna win that in the Supreme Court because Muller

can show no reason why all the evidence that he has once hasn't already been

obtained for us from other people joining me now Fox Business legal

analyst Greg Jarrett author of the brand-new book this is what we've been

waiting for I'm holding it in my very hands the Russia hoax the illicit scheme

declare Hillary Clinton and frame Donald Trump it is now available for pre-order

President Trump calls the book a must read and almost as importantly I would

agree with the president United States that's not a bad endorsement coming it's

president it's pretty good but yours is just as good and vowed

bless you for lying like its congratulations thank you thank you

rific then we're so we're delighted for you and and congratulations you

important important I think it is subject without question and getting

only more important so we recommend it to you not only highly but this is the

highest recommendation that we can give here on Lou Dobbs tonight so please go

out and buy grapes book the Russia hoax great to have you here nice to be here

let's turn to the business at hand and that of course the the president's

announcement of his nominee to the Supreme Court seat that will be vacated

at the end of this month by Anthony Kennedy there are four or five finalists

you could put all their names in a hat and pick any one of them and Republicans

and conservatives and the president come out of winner all three all four or five

depending satisfy the three main requirements a their ardent

conservatives there are either originalist or textual lists be they're

all so young forty-five to fifty three which means they'd be on a court for a

very long time whippersnappers I would call them yes and see they're all

confirmable given the composition of the US Senate

although the caveat is some are more easily confirmable than others for

example the gentleman on the far right-hand side Hardiman he was voted a

decade ago on the court of appeals 96 to zero by the US Senate now yes the

composition of the Senate has changed somewhat but it would be very hard

argument for Democrats to now say we oppose him even though not long ago

without dissent they approved of him and he does have the advantage of been

recommended by the president's sister yeah you know you were you were right to

point that out if if the president's relationship with his older sister is

anything like mine with my older sister you take your marching orders well he

he's a hard man to you may have no Mars permitting quarter

but I would guess that his sister holds us about as much influence as one could

imagine I think so with this president is by the way I've actually been in her

courtroom when she was a judge and she is as she is a remarkable talent or so

she really is she's a highly respected as she should be

I I find it interesting that the McConnell the speaker has come out with

his view that there are certain people here amongst them you know when you just

mentioned who will be easier nominated I you know that just seems like the most

specious recommendation that a majority leader could make to the president in

itíd States yeah I think that the president has demonstrated his

intellectual superiority to the leadership of the party on camp and

Capitol Hill on Capitol Hill in both houses so why would McConnell state the

obvious which is effectively you know mr. president if you just nominate a

damn Democrat this would be free you know I think McConnell wants to do

whatever's easiest for a Mitch McConnell which is kind of a sad commentary on

insulin a Minter turtle yeah I don't know what that means but I think I do

yeah it's very slow-moving the fact is that if Mitch McConnell puts his mind to

it he can get any one of those people that were up on your screen confirmed

they're all you know noted scholars and jurists Kavanagh would be an excellent

choice Barrett would be a wonderful choice although she's only been on the

bench as a judge for eight months maybe hold her a bit for the next selection

Kavanagh would be wonderful although you know there are a couple of things that

Democrats would seize upon the hell yeah it's it's this president's nomination

exactly what I find interesting or the number of people have been so

presumptuous they advise the president you know

this is the president's right that's his choice sure if there is anything about

this that is critically important it that it be his man or woman on that

bench and the president has experience in this because he guided Gorsuch

through the process right knows how to do it successfully and they've had the

better part of 18 months to properly vet all of the people on the list and let's

do this because he's had the help oh yeah of the of the Federalist Society

at the Heritage Foundation they've come up with what from every account I heard

the initial 25 certainly right listed potential nominees I mean they have been

remarkable in in in I think finding these qualified by helping the president

in finding these qualified highly qualified candidates right and you know

stealth candidates like David Souter are a thing of the past because you know

Republican presidents learned their lesson you don't pick somebody who

doesn't have a proven track record you don't honestly know anything about it

Souter was picked because John Sununu the chief of staff at the time

recommended him because he came from the same state and he allegedly knew him and

of course you have to be disastrous oh no no I'm sure regrets it to this day

these are just an absolutely religious viewer of this program because we are so

establishment Republican perspective Gregg is always great to have you here

thank you thanks oh my pleasure

For more infomation >> Dobbs:Trump's Supreme Court pick will need McConnell for confirmation: Gregg Jarrett - Duration: 12:33.

-------------------------------------------

Donald Trump Is About To Say The One Word That Will End Robert Mueller's Probe - Duration: 15:09.

Donald Trump Is About To Say The One Word That Will End Robert Mueller's Probe

Robert Mueller's witch hunt against the President is reaching its end game.

Mueller is in search of the one final piece of the puzzle he can use to recommend Congress

impeach Donald Trump.

But Trump is about to say the one word that will shut him down for good.

Mueller is looking for an interview with the President.

Prosecutors are billing it as a way to clear up the record by getting the President's

side of the story.

Any instinct Trump had to take them at their word flew out the window when Mueller passed

along information that led to the FBI invading the offices and home of his attorney Michael

Cohen.

Now Trump may be on the verge of telling Mueller there will be no interview.

NBC News reports:

"Special counsel Robert Mueller's office and President Donald Trump's legal team

are now proceeding with strategies that presume a presidential interview will likely not take

place as part of the Russia investigation, after months of talks between the two sides

collapsed earlier this week, according to multiple people familiar with the matter.

On Monday Trump's lawyers were discussing a possible interview with Mueller's team

and had begun to hash out the final sticking points, including the timing, scope and length,

according to people familiar with the discussions.

One person familiar with the strategy said the president's lawyers had sought over

the weekend to expand his legal team to include individuals who would prepare him for an interview.

Another person familiar with the matter, however, said preparations had not yet gone that far.

But the prospects for a presidential interview drastically dimmed once the FBI raided the

home, office and hotel room of Trump's long-time personal lawyer, Michael Cohen on Monday,

these people said.

The president criticized the raid as out of bounds in Mueller's investigation into Russia's

interference in the 2016 election and possible collusion with Trump aides."

NBC also reports that Mueller's team hope to use the interview as the basis for a report

on whether Trump intended to obstruct justice between May and July last year.

Trump supporters have warned the President that Mueller is not acting in good faith.

The only reason he wants an interview with the President is to set up a perjury trap.

Mueller has nothing on collusion or obstruction of justice.

So he needs to create the grounds for Congress to remove the President.

He can only do that if Trump sits for an interview.

If in the course of the prosecutors questioning him, should Trump misremember the date of

a meeting, what was said in a meeting, or who attended the meeting, Mueller can claim

Trump lied to investigators.

Trump and his lawyers are absolutely correct in rejecting an interview with Mueller.

Do you agree?

Let us know your thoughts in the comment section.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your

friends

and family.

Thank you.

No comments:

Post a Comment