Wednesday, July 11, 2018

Trump news on Youtube Jul 11 2018

 CIUDAD DE MÉXICO (apro).- Tras reiterar que la política de separación de familias migrantes puesta en marcha por la administración estadunidense de Donald Trump es "cruel e inhumana", el canciller Luis Videgaray Caso celebró el "liderazgo" de Kirstjen Nielsen, la titular del Departamento de Seguridad Interna (DHS) que aplica las políticas antiinmigrantes del magnate

 Es más: los gobiernos de México, de los países del Triángulo Norte de Centroamérica y de Estados Unidos acordaron hoy seguir la agenda de Washington y adoptar medidas diseñadas para desincentivar la migración indocumentada -organismos internacionales y organizaciones defensoras de derechos humanos hablan de crisis de refugiados- hacia Estados Unidos

 Estas acciones consisten, entre otras, en combatir el "cáncer que son las organizaciones criminales que se dedican al tráfico de personas" mediante "acciones de inteligencia y operativos integrales", indicó Videgaray

 Además, los países de la región se comprometieron a "hacer una campaña de información simultánea e inmediata para asegurar que quienes tienen la intención de hacer el viaje o emigrar, conozcan realmente lo que ocurre, cuál es la realidad y cuáles son las opciones que tienen sin tener que violar la ley y sin tener que incurrir en el grave peligro que esto implica", según el canciller mexicano

 Esta propuesta hace eco a las declaraciones que pronunció Trump ayer, cuando aseveró: "Digan a la gente que no venga a nuestro país ilegalmente

Ésa es la solución. No vengan a nuestro país ilegalmente. Vengan como los demás: vengan legalmente

Tenemos leyes, tenemos frontera. No entren ilegalmente".  Según el titular de la SRE, no será sino hasta "finales del mes de agosto o principios de septiembre" que los gobiernos se reunirán en la Conferencia sobre Seguridad y Prosperidad para hablar sobre "lo que al final de cuentas es lo más importante: que son las causas estructurales de la migración, que tiene que ver con la seguridad económica, la prosperidad, la creación de empleos y la estabilidad, que mucho podemos hacer juntos para fomentarlo"

 Videgaray declaró que los gobiernos de la región resolvieron "tomar acciones concretas" para evitar que la administración estadunidense vuelva a separar a familias migrantes y, "en segundo lugar, lograr una pronta reunificación de los niños que están separados"

 La reunión entre cancilleres, llevada a cabo hoy en Guatemala, se convocó en medio de la llamada política de "tolerancia cero" que Trump lanzó contra los indocumentados, la cual implicó entre otras medidas la separación de los niños y sus padres, a los que el DHS encarceló en centros de detención distintos

 Ante la indignación internacional y una embestida del propio Partido Republicano, Trump dio marcha atrás a la separación de familias el pasado 20 de junio, y la justicia emplazó a la administración a reunir los niños menores de cinco años este martes a más tardar, y a los demás antes del próximo 26 de julio

 Hasta ayer, la administración de Trump había reunido con sus padres a apenas dos de los 102 niños menores de cinco años separados en la frontera sur, y se esperaba que hoy 54 de ellos alcanzarían a sus padres

For more infomation >> Videgaray celebra "liderazgo" de Nielsen, encargada de aplicar política antiinmigrante de Trump - Duration: 3:17.

-------------------------------------------

Trump cuts funding for ACA navigator program - Duration: 0:58.

The Trump administration is cutting more funding for the Affordable Care Act.

The cuts announced Tuesday are to a navigator program that helps Americans sign up for the

ACA.

The program will only get $10 million for this fall's open enrollment season.

That's down from $36 million last year.

Navigators are usually members of nonprofit and community organizations.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said navigators aren't effective.

Navigators say some of the work they do, like with Medicaid, isn't counted by the government.

The move is just the latest in a line of decisions by the Trump administration to undermine the

ACA.

On Saturday the administration announced it was suspending a risk adjustment program.

And in June the Justice Department decided not to defend key parts of the ACA in court.

Navigators applying for the federal money will now be asked how they educate customers

on new alternatives to the ACA that were put in place by the Trump administration.

For more infomation >> Trump cuts funding for ACA navigator program - Duration: 0:58.

-------------------------------------------

Trump In Brussels - Duration: 2:33.

For more infomation >> Trump In Brussels - Duration: 2:33.

-------------------------------------------

MICHAEL AVENATTI JOINING LONDON DONALD TRUMP PROTEST: 'THE CAUSE IS A GLOBAL ONE' - Duration: 3:02.

For more infomation >> MICHAEL AVENATTI JOINING LONDON DONALD TRUMP PROTEST: 'THE CAUSE IS A GLOBAL ONE' - Duration: 3:02.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Kicks Off NATO Trip - Duration: 1:27.

For more infomation >> Trump Kicks Off NATO Trip - Duration: 1:27.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Nominates Brett Kavanaugh to US Supreme Court - Duration: 1:02.

For more infomation >> Trump Nominates Brett Kavanaugh to US Supreme Court - Duration: 1:02.

-------------------------------------------

BMW just retaliated against Trump with a devastating move - Duration: 2:40.

For more infomation >> BMW just retaliated against Trump with a devastating move - Duration: 2:40.

-------------------------------------------

Donald Trump trade CRACKDOWN could cripple EU's €58bn-per-year subsidy scheme - Duration: 4:02.

For more infomation >> Donald Trump trade CRACKDOWN could cripple EU's €58bn-per-year subsidy scheme - Duration: 4:02.

-------------------------------------------

Dobbs:Trump's Supreme Court pick will need McConnell for confirmation: Gregg Jarrett - Duration: 12:33.

attorneys for our ex Trump campaign chairman Paul mana for raising concerns

about a 2017 meeting that occurred between top Justice Department officials

and Associated Press reporters memos revealed those reporters offered FBI

agents and DOJ officials a code pertaining to Manafort storage facility

a possible violation of the criminal justice process

joining us tonight I am pleased to say Victoria tensing and Joe digenova

the founding partners of Geneva and tensing law firm great to have you both

with us and I know you were impressed Joe that I said your last name twice in

succession it was brilliantly producing and pronouncing the words great to have

you here great to be with you let's start with Manta Ford and in the

campaign between the Department of Justice the FBI and national left-wing

media lovingly refer to them Lou this is the modus operandi for the FBI nowadays

they disclose grand jury information to reporters which is illegal in return for

the reporters giving them information about their supposed target we have a

client I'll be really fast about it Billy Walters

who the FBI first of all big-time gambler and a humanitarian businessman

and giving lots of money to charity right and the FBI leak did he and Phil

Mickelson the golfer were under investigation for insider trading

regarding Clorox it was absolutely false though not to give up the FBI comes back

and tries to get a member of a board of directors of another company to testify

against Billy and he keeps refusing saying nothing went on so what did they

do they squeezed the guy leaked that he the board of directors was under

investigation he lost his job he became desperate and of course after being

squeezed he agreed to testify falsely I'll be at falsely against Billy and as

in the words of Alan Dershowitz he he not only sang he composed

and and let me just say one other thing because this is a great time Alan came

up with did I adopted it but I attributed it one last thing about the

Department of Justice ethos and that is that the the US Attorney's Office for

the New York denied that the leak ever came from them even though there there

were emails to prove otherwise and also only when the judge ordered a hearing

did they admit it and then the last thing is they promoted the agent who

leaked the grand jury information that's not nice

tie into that 2017 meeting which was apparently arranged by Andrew Weissman

Pitbull of robert muller special counsel which on fame yes and what we now know

is that Weissman who had done this before and what is now recognized widely

in the United States among lawyers has one of the most unethical prosecutors in

the history of the department Weissman engineered this meeting between DOJ

lawyers and FBI agents and The Associated Press for them to basically

share information amongst themselves including grand jury information and in

order to put pressure on manna for we are watching the destruction of the FBI

by people actually inside the Muller investigation like Weisman this has to

stop and it's where the president's attorneys why isn't there

why aren't they raising hell over this stuff I why in the world would anyone

who knows that information from a grand jury is being sent through a conduit

that runs straight through the heart of the FBI official them to the National

left-wing media I mean that's a violation as law is Victoria said yes

absolutely Lou and in fact Matta Forte's attorneys have asked for a hearing I

actually think the judge is going to grant it I think there is going to be a

hearing it'll be an opportunity to put Weissman on the witness stand along with

a lot of other FBI and DOJ employees who were involved in setting up these

meetings remember the IG report about struck and everybody else laid out cold

how the FBI had a policy of working with the media to leak information and these

people in the bureau about it to the IG but they eventually

had to admit that it was occurring it's it's it's destroying the bureau and it's

destroyed destroying the department of justice and chris ray and rod Rosenstein

will do nothing about it they're so interested in protecting the institution

that they're willing to overlook this type of village illegality their own

skin disgraceful when rod Rosenstein says he's feel psychic it's extortion

when it's oversight from the congressional committee that really says

a thing I don't know about you but I find myself less and less concerned

about how rod Rosen Stein feels on any given day the Muller probe effectively

it seems to me may be dead if yes and this is an extension if the trumpeter

knees are right demanding before there's any further discussion with the Special

Counsel that they demonstrate a some sort of evidence that there was

collusion some reason to have a further discussion there's there's no doubt the

President of the United States enjoys a special status under the law and in

order to interview him for any reason whatsoever here it's an obviously an

impeachment investigation is not a criminal dress there's no evidence that

any crime has been committed so Muller is trying to interview the

president in an impeachment / counterintelligence investigation and

the law is very clear the president is unavailable for such inquiries and

questions and and and under no circumstances should the President had

agree to this interview and if Muller decides he wants to issue a subpoena

I tell you Lou the president's gonna win that in the Supreme Court because Muller

can show no reason why all the evidence that he has once hasn't already been

obtained for us from other people joining me now Fox Business legal

analyst Greg Jarrett author of the brand-new book this is what we've been

waiting for I'm holding it in my very hands the Russia hoax the illicit scheme

declare Hillary Clinton and frame Donald Trump it is now available for pre-order

President Trump calls the book a must read and almost as importantly I would

agree with the president United States that's not a bad endorsement coming it's

president it's pretty good but yours is just as good and vowed

bless you for lying like its congratulations thank you thank you

rific then we're so we're delighted for you and and congratulations you

important important I think it is subject without question and getting

only more important so we recommend it to you not only highly but this is the

highest recommendation that we can give here on Lou Dobbs tonight so please go

out and buy grapes book the Russia hoax great to have you here nice to be here

let's turn to the business at hand and that of course the the president's

announcement of his nominee to the Supreme Court seat that will be vacated

at the end of this month by Anthony Kennedy there are four or five finalists

you could put all their names in a hat and pick any one of them and Republicans

and conservatives and the president come out of winner all three all four or five

depending satisfy the three main requirements a their ardent

conservatives there are either originalist or textual lists be they're

all so young forty-five to fifty three which means they'd be on a court for a

very long time whippersnappers I would call them yes and see they're all

confirmable given the composition of the US Senate

although the caveat is some are more easily confirmable than others for

example the gentleman on the far right-hand side Hardiman he was voted a

decade ago on the court of appeals 96 to zero by the US Senate now yes the

composition of the Senate has changed somewhat but it would be very hard

argument for Democrats to now say we oppose him even though not long ago

without dissent they approved of him and he does have the advantage of been

recommended by the president's sister yeah you know you were you were right to

point that out if if the president's relationship with his older sister is

anything like mine with my older sister you take your marching orders well he

he's a hard man to you may have no Mars permitting quarter

but I would guess that his sister holds us about as much influence as one could

imagine I think so with this president is by the way I've actually been in her

courtroom when she was a judge and she is as she is a remarkable talent or so

she really is she's a highly respected as she should be

I I find it interesting that the McConnell the speaker has come out with

his view that there are certain people here amongst them you know when you just

mentioned who will be easier nominated I you know that just seems like the most

specious recommendation that a majority leader could make to the president in

itíd States yeah I think that the president has demonstrated his

intellectual superiority to the leadership of the party on camp and

Capitol Hill on Capitol Hill in both houses so why would McConnell state the

obvious which is effectively you know mr. president if you just nominate a

damn Democrat this would be free you know I think McConnell wants to do

whatever's easiest for a Mitch McConnell which is kind of a sad commentary on

insulin a Minter turtle yeah I don't know what that means but I think I do

yeah it's very slow-moving the fact is that if Mitch McConnell puts his mind to

it he can get any one of those people that were up on your screen confirmed

they're all you know noted scholars and jurists Kavanagh would be an excellent

choice Barrett would be a wonderful choice although she's only been on the

bench as a judge for eight months maybe hold her a bit for the next selection

Kavanagh would be wonderful although you know there are a couple of things that

Democrats would seize upon the hell yeah it's it's this president's nomination

exactly what I find interesting or the number of people have been so

presumptuous they advise the president you know

this is the president's right that's his choice sure if there is anything about

this that is critically important it that it be his man or woman on that

bench and the president has experience in this because he guided Gorsuch

through the process right knows how to do it successfully and they've had the

better part of 18 months to properly vet all of the people on the list and let's

do this because he's had the help oh yeah of the of the Federalist Society

at the Heritage Foundation they've come up with what from every account I heard

the initial 25 certainly right listed potential nominees I mean they have been

remarkable in in in I think finding these qualified by helping the president

in finding these qualified highly qualified candidates right and you know

stealth candidates like David Souter are a thing of the past because you know

Republican presidents learned their lesson you don't pick somebody who

doesn't have a proven track record you don't honestly know anything about it

Souter was picked because John Sununu the chief of staff at the time

recommended him because he came from the same state and he allegedly knew him and

of course you have to be disastrous oh no no I'm sure regrets it to this day

these are just an absolutely religious viewer of this program because we are so

establishment Republican perspective Gregg is always great to have you here

thank you thanks oh my pleasure

For more infomation >> Dobbs:Trump's Supreme Court pick will need McConnell for confirmation: Gregg Jarrett - Duration: 12:33.

-------------------------------------------

Pres. Trump hopes to win Democratic support for Supreme Court pick - Duration: 1:43.

For more infomation >> Pres. Trump hopes to win Democratic support for Supreme Court pick - Duration: 1:43.

-------------------------------------------

Michael Cohen's lawyer issues cryptic warning to Giuliani and Trump - Duration: 5:05.

For more infomation >> Michael Cohen's lawyer issues cryptic warning to Giuliani and Trump - Duration: 5:05.

-------------------------------------------

Mueller is Grasping at STRAWS! He's Now Desperately Trying to Link Trump to THIS Crime - Duration: 5:30.

For more infomation >> Mueller is Grasping at STRAWS! He's Now Desperately Trying to Link Trump to THIS Crime - Duration: 5:30.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Just Called Out Germany's CROOKED Dealings Right to Merkel's Face! - Duration: 1:23.

For more infomation >> Trump Just Called Out Germany's CROOKED Dealings Right to Merkel's Face! - Duration: 1:23.

-------------------------------------------

Federal judge orders Trump administration to reunite immigrant families faster, skip most DNA tests - Duration: 3:22.

For more infomation >> Federal judge orders Trump administration to reunite immigrant families faster, skip most DNA tests - Duration: 3:22.

-------------------------------------------

Watch John Kelly's Face As Trump Claims Germany Is Controlled By Russia - Duration: 0:13.

Mitchell reports," wrecking

president trump blasts our nato

allies, accusing Germany of

being, quote, captive of Russia.

>> Germany is totally controlled

by Russia.

They're getting 60 to 70% of

For more infomation >> Watch John Kelly's Face As Trump Claims Germany Is Controlled By Russia - Duration: 0:13.

-------------------------------------------

Queen will meet Donald Trump at Windsor Castle during president's London visit - Duration: 1:48.

  The Queen will meet US President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump at Windsor Castle on Friday, Buckingham Palace has confirmed

 The monarch will welcome the American leader and his wife at the dais in the quadrangle of the castle

 A guard of honour, formed of the Coldstream Guards, will give a royal salute and the US national anthem will be played

 The Queen and Mr Trump will inspect the guard of honour before watching the military march past

 The President and First Lady will then join the Queen for tea at the castle.  We'll be bringing you the very latest updates, pictures and video on this breaking news story

  For the latest news and breaking news visit Mirror.co.uk/news .  Get all the big headlines, pictures, analysis, opinion and video on the stories that matter to you

 Follow us on Twitter @DailyMirror - the official Daily Mirror & Mirror Online Twitter account - real news in real time

  We're also on Facebook /dailymirror - your must-see news, features, videos and pictures throughout the day from the Daily Mirror, Sunday Mirror and Mirror Online

For more infomation >> Queen will meet Donald Trump at Windsor Castle during president's London visit - Duration: 1:48.

-------------------------------------------

Can Trump Solve Afghanistan? - Duration: 10:13.

"One way or another, these problems will be solved — I'm a problem solver

— and, in the end, we will win."

President Trump doesn't want to be the president who quote "lost Afghanistan"

17 years, tens of thousands of deaths and billions of American dollars gone.

The war on terror has changed but Afghanistan is still torn apart by conflict.

To understand the problem, we have to go back to the day that changed the world forever.

The terrorist cell Al-Qaeda had flourished under the Islamic

fundamentalist Taliban ruling Afghanistan.

After they carried out the 9/11 attacks, the U.S. sought to bring the group, and it's

leader, Osama bin Laden, to justice.

"Our war on terror begins with Al Qaeda, but it does not end there.

It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach

has been found, stopped

and defeated."

Without 9/11, we would never have gone into Afghanistan at all.

I think you need to see Afghanistan as a sort of shifting mosaic of competing alliances

and essentially a civil war.

Most of the ground combat was between the Taliban and it's Afghan opponents but with

international support the Taliban regime quickly unravelled and Kabul fell in November 2001.

They were annihilated, not even weakened, they were destroyed,

as a political entity, they ceased to exist.

"My fellow citizens, at this hour American and coalition forces are in the early stages

of military operations to disarm Iraq,

to free its people

and to defend the world from grave danger."

In 2003, the U.S. turned its attention to toppling Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq

after President Bush alleged the country was stockpiling weapons of mass destruction.

Afghanistan was too easy and therefore it didn't really assuage American outrage at the 9/11 attack.

So there's a sort of pent up rage, if you will,

that needed a target and the administration redirected that rage to Iraq.

Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld declared an end to 'major combat' in Afghanistan

and attention turned towards establishing a reconstruction model.

The very specific objectives which was to

end the safe havens, to prevent Afghanistan being a base for international terrorism again,

you could say that they were successful, but in the long term they didn't make the necessary

moves to enable those initial successes to be held.

We used this attitude like "let's just get it done today", "Afghan good enough"

that was the phrase everybody used.

Well the problem is that's expediative, it's like putting band aids on everything

when you needed major reconstruction surgery.

In 2005, the U.S. doubled down on its commitment to the rebuilding of Afghanistan, but the

actions didn't seem to match the declarations.

If you look at the scale of resources committed, in Bosnia in the first few years after the

peace, the average Bosnian got $800 a year in economic assistance from the United States

and the rest of the world.

In Afghanistan, it was $50. if you look at the security side, the disparity is even greater,

so in Bosnia, a country of 3 million people, we deployed 60,000 NATO troops.

In Afghanistan, a country of 30 million people, we deployed 10,000 western troops.

So if you want to know why Afghanistan was more insecure and slower to reconstruct, it

was a simple matter of mathematics.

When Barack Obama came into power,

he re-asserted that Afghanistan is an important U.S. front against terrorist forces.

"As Commander-in-Chief, I have determined that it is in our vital national interest

to send an additional 30,000 U.S. troops to Afghanistan."

I think Obama tried to replicate what Bush had done Iraq, which was reinforce and surge

resources both civilian and military into Iraq.

But the president himself wasn't really convinced that this was worth a long-term investment.

Obama's surge meant that by August 2010,

there were as many as 100,000 U.S. troops in the country.

The increase of soldiers also meant a surge in operations and airstrikes and this meant

more casualties, on both sides.

A poll by CNN in 2010 said 52% felt the war had turned into another 'Vietnam' and

only 37% of Americans were in support of it.

"Tonight, I can report to the American people and to the world that the United States has

conducted an operation that killed Osama bin Laden, the leader of Al-Qaeda"

It was a significant victory for Obama but not necessarily in the war on terror.

It didn't make any difference operationally.

No matter, how many people you take out, there will never be a shortage of replacements.

Plans to get all combat troops out by 2014 were made by the Obama administration, but

many doubted the capacity of the Afghan government to sustain control.

Afghan forces eventually began to take the lead in security responsibilities in 2013

and military training became  the focus, with 9,800 U.S. troops remaining through to 2016.

The troop drawdown approach wasn't necessarily wrong

because no one wanted to have this never-ending

conflict but setting that deadline, potentially, and vocally setting it, was misconceived and

that's something that Trump has obviously tried to avoid, he very clearly said there is

no fixed timetable, which has been really welcomed inside Kabul.

"The American people are weary of war without victory"

In Trump's first year, the Afghanistan problem caused a rift between members of his administration.

Whilst Trump's initial instinct was an immediate withdrawal, his advisors successfully persuaded

him to press ahead with a military commitment.

We pulled out of Iraq in 2011 and we didn't like the results.

In 2014 the Islamic State burst out of Syria, marched all the way to the gates of Baghdad

and was only stopped at the very suburbs of the city, from taking over the city and the

country and we said god that could happen in Afghanistan too and it's also what led

to President Trump against his own instincts to sustain that commitment.

"The men and women who serve our nation in combat deserve a plan for victory.

They deserve the tools they need, and the trust they have earned, to fight and to win."

It's physical impossibility to win anything militarily over there.

Now there's no standard, we're not even shooting for anything, there's nothing written

down, there's no strategic objectives that once you have changed these three things then

you'll know you'll win.

I don't really believe that anyone thinks that - well and they admit themselves - it

can't be won, it's managing and trying to capitalize on any opportunities to bring

the Taliban into the peace process.

So if the U.S. can't win, what can President Trump realistically hope to achieve?

He won the election because he's a disruptive figure and he's a non-politician and that's

what people were sick of the status quo and they were looking for that.

He needs to hire somebody like him.

Somebody who's not status quo,

somebody who's willing to look at this with fresh eyes, and he'll then listen to.

The best case scenario would be, and what I think needs to happen is,

we're going to have to shut the mission down.

It will be chaotic, it will be problematic, they'll be winners and they'll be losers.

But the people on the ground, who have to live with the outcome,

have to be the ones that find a solution.

The Taliban's strength comes from the fact that they don't need to win.

Firstly, they just need to continue,

secondly they win through perception, so even if they're not actually

winning, and everyone knows that they can't win this war militarily,

the fact that the Afghan government is losing, is what matters.

Now perhaps at some point, a negotiated peace might be available,

I don't think anybody thinks that's in the near-term,

but until then, if [Trump] adheres to the policy set out in that speech,

it's an open-ended commitment to sustain support for the Afghan government

to provide advice and assistance for as long as is necessary

to prevent the Taliban from overturning the government and taking control of the country.

What Afghanistan needs more than anything is a legitimate state.

This is increasingly an Afghan civil war,  it's an internal Afghan conflict,

it's based on this lack of legitimacy, that

we've never been able to really get our heads around,

how to actually build that legitimate state.

We have to recognize that military power can not solve political problems.

For more infomation >> Can Trump Solve Afghanistan? - Duration: 10:13.

-------------------------------------------

Brett kavanaugh has power to strengthen donald trump - Duration: 6:47.

For more infomation >> Brett kavanaugh has power to strengthen donald trump - Duration: 6:47.

-------------------------------------------

Pres. Trump signs firefighter cancer registry bill - Duration: 2:16.

For more infomation >> Pres. Trump signs firefighter cancer registry bill - Duration: 2:16.

-------------------------------------------

Trump urges NATO nations to up defense spending - Duration: 0:45.

President Donald Trump is calling on NATO members to double their spending targets on

defense.

According to White House press secretary Sarah Sanders, Trump suggested at the NATO summit

Wednesday that countries increase defense spending goals from 2 percent of their gross

domestic product to 4 percent.

Sanders said in a statement: "President Trump wants to see our allies share more of the

burden and at a very minimum meet their already stated obligations."

It's a high number to spend on defense every year.

Even the U.S., which spends more on defense than any other nation in the world, hasn't

forked over 4 percent of its GDP for defense since 2013.

Only eight NATO nations are expected to meet the 2 percent goal this year.

No comments:

Post a Comment