Trump news on Youtube Mar 25 2018

For more infomation >> Donald trump is banning guns from games - Duration: 22:36.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING! Trump Just Signed It! It's LAW! - Duration: 6:09.

For more infomation >> BREAKING! Trump Just Signed It! It's LAW! - Duration: 6:09.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's Latest Move Restores Obama's Weak Military Back to GREATNESS - Duration: 5:51.

For more infomation >> Trump's Latest Move Restores Obama's Weak Military Back to GREATNESS - Duration: 5:51.

-------------------------------------------

HOLY CRAP! It's Official! Here's The Exact Time and Location Trump Will Meet Kim Jong - Duration: 5:48.

For more infomation >> HOLY CRAP! It's Official! Here's The Exact Time and Location Trump Will Meet Kim Jong - Duration: 5:48.

-------------------------------------------

Pres Trump Just Did The One Thing For The Military That Obama Never Could - Duration: 5:20.

For more infomation >> Pres Trump Just Did The One Thing For The Military That Obama Never Could - Duration: 5:20.

-------------------------------------------

After Trying To Jump Trump, Woods Pushes Schiff Back In The Dumpster Truck He Fell Out Of - Duration: 2:57.

For more infomation >> After Trying To Jump Trump, Woods Pushes Schiff Back In The Dumpster Truck He Fell Out Of - Duration: 2:57.

-------------------------------------------

Bafouée et humiliée, Mela­nia Trump a pardonné à son mari -[Nouvelles 24h] - Duration: 2:35.

For more infomation >> Bafouée et humiliée, Mela­nia Trump a pardonné à son mari -[Nouvelles 24h] - Duration: 2:35.

-------------------------------------------

Potawatomi Hotel and Casino's CEO once worked for Trump - Duration: 1:47.

For more infomation >> Potawatomi Hotel and Casino's CEO once worked for Trump - Duration: 1:47.

-------------------------------------------

'He will fail' Trump has NO chance of stopping North Korea nuclear weapons - DAILY NEWS - Duration: 4:42.

'He will fail' Trump has NO chance of stopping North Korea nuclear weapons

DONALD Trump's chances of successfully persuading North Korean leader Kim Jong-un to give up

his nuclear weapons are "very low", an expert has warned.

Mr Trump is believed to be ready to travel to the Korean peninsular in May for talks

in the village of Panmunjom, in the demilitarised zone which acts as a buffer zone between North

and South Korea – although no details have yet been confirmed by the White House.

However, writing for North Korea watchdog 38 North, Pennsylvania State University Professor

Joseph DeThomas was downbeat on his assessment of the chances of North Korea agreeing to

"denuclearise".

And he cautioned against squeezing too hard by turning up the heat with more economic

sanctions in advance of the visit, which he warned could backfire and derail the summit

before it had even begun.

Mr DeThomas, who is also a former US Ambassador to Estonia, said: "Achieving the Trump administration's

stated goal for this summit, the complete denuclearisation of North Korea, has a very

low probability of success.

Misplaying our sanctions leverage will guarantee either no summit or a failed one."

He said negotiators needed to find a balance between acknowledging the success sanctions

had had two far, and overplaying their hand in the days leading up to Mr Trump's proposed

visit.

He said: "While a number of factors may have played a role in prompting Kim Jong Un

during his New Year's speech to make the opening gambit of his peace offensive—such

as US sabre-rattling, rapid progress in the North's ICBM program, the change in the

ROK administration, and preexisting DPRK strategic and economic plans—there is a strong probability

that strengthened UN sanctions gave Kim's decision urgency.

"Sanctions are having a significant impact on North Korea.

This is particularly apparent in the area of Sino-North Korean Trade.

"Since Chinese trade accounts for 93 percent of North Korean exports and 88 percent of

its imports, the China trade numbers are decisive for determining sanctions impact.

"If the summit does take place, it will be in part because the Chinese have enforced

the series of UN sanctions that have been passed since March 2016 and especially in

2017.

"The Republic of Korea's termination of lucrative economic projects and its humanitarian

assistance programs in 2016 were almost as important.

"Both countries, however, could be tempted to relent on their pressure sooner rather

than later."

One of the challenges Mr Trump's administration faced, Mr DeThomas said, was to keep South

Korea and China on-side when it came to sanctions, with the possibility that China might begin

to fear that North Korea was on the brink of collapse if they were seen to be working

"too well".

He added: "Beijing might also fear being eclipsed by the Trump-Kim summit and wish

to buy back some of the influence it so badly frittered away in Pyongyang.

"It might even do so to dim the chances of success of such a summit if it felt Washington

was ignoring Chinese interests.

It is unlikely Beijing will sit back and silently watch the process unfold, or be willing to

accept the same treatment Japanese Prime Minister Abe has felt from Washington regarding the

summit.

"Finally, if President Trump were to take some sanctions or trade enforcement action

against the PRC in the run-up to the summit that truly infuriated Beijing, it could retaliate

by loosening sanctions enforcement vis-à-vis North Korea."

Mr DeThomas stressed that good leadership was crucial in such situations – but added:

"It remains to be seen whether the Trump administration, which is known for vicious

White House feuds and an incoherent, disorganised, and haphazard policy process, can provide

such leadership."

For more infomation >> 'He will fail' Trump has NO chance of stopping North Korea nuclear weapons - DAILY NEWS - Duration: 4:42.

-------------------------------------------

China fights back: Beijing poised to hit Trump with tariffs as USA trade war tensions SOAR - Duration: 5:39.

China fights back: Beijing poised to hit Trump with tariffs as USA trade war tensions SOAR

CHINA is set to launch a fightback against US President Donald Trump's tariffs by proposing

levies on 128 US imports as trade war tensions soar.

The Chinese government warned that Beijing might place tariffs on $3 billion of US goods

such as pork, apples and steel pipes.

China also wants to place a 15 percent tariff on US fresh fruit and wine.

Taking a hardline against the US, the Chinese government made it clear the penalties were

in response to Mr Trump's tariffs on steel and aluminium imports that he announced earlier

this month.

He Weiwan, a trade expert told the FT: "China's overall attitude was that it didn't want

a trade war.

But now tariffs have been announced it's purpose is to stop a trade war from continuing."

Zhang Zhaoxiang, senior vice president of China Minmetals Corp, said that while the

state-owned mining group's steel exports to the US are tiny, the impact could come indirectly.

He said: "China's direct exports to the U.S. are not big.

But there will be some impact due to our exports via the United States or indirect exports."

China's state-run Global Times said Beijing was only just beginning to look at means to

retaliate.

"We believe it is only part of China's countermeasures, and soybeans and other U.S. farm products

will be targeted," the widely-read tabloid said in a Saturday editorial.

Wei Jianguo, vice chairman of Beijing-based think tank China Centre for International

Economic Exchanges, told China Daily that Beijing could impose tariffs on more US products,

and is considering a second and even third list of targets

Today China's Vice Premier Liu He declared the US has flouted trade rules with an inquiry

into intellectual property and China will defend its interests.

In a phone call with US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, Chinese state media reported,

Liu said China still hoped both sides would remain "rational" and work together to keep

trade relations stable.

The call between Mnuchin and Liu, a confidante of President Xi Jinping, was the highest-level

contact between the two governments since Mr Trump announced plans for tariffs on up

to $60 billion of Chinese goods on Thursday.

The deepening rift has sent a chill through financial markets and the corporate world

as investors predicted dire consequences for the global economy should trade barriers start

going up.

Stocks sagged at the start of this month after the tariffs on aluminium and steel were announced,

but they quickly recovered as the administration said the tariffs would not be as severe as

they first looked.

The losses this week were worse, and investors are hoping for hints the sanctions on China

are more of a negotiating tactic.

In Geneva, officials from the EU, Japan, China and Russia, gathered at the World Trade Organisation

and criticised the US tariffs.

This week, the S&P 500 index dropped 55.43 points, or 2.1 percent, to 2,588.26.

The index skidded 6 per cent this week, its worst since January 2016.

The Dow Jones industrial average lost 424.69 points, or 1.8 per cent, to 23,533.20.

The Nasdaq composite fell 174.01 points, or 2.4 per cent, to 6,992.67.

Banks also took steep losses as interest rates decreased.

Lisa Erickson, chief investment officer at US Bank Wealth Management said: "There could

be a possibility of a bounce back if, as this progresses, both sides look like they're

negotiating.

"There could be further decline if people get a sense there could be more trade restrictions

in place."

If the tariffs and counter-tariffs reduce economic growth in the US, the Fed is likely

to raise rates at a slower pace.

Alex Wolf, a former US diplomat, who works for Aberdeen Standard Investments warned that

Beijing could retaliate further by targeting US multinationals outside China.

He told the FT: "Apple, Microsoft, Starbucks and Nike could be in the firing line."

Apple's Tim Cook called for "calm heads" amid the dispute.

The sparring has cast a spotlight on hardware makers such as Apple, which assemble the majority

of their products in China for export to other countries.

Electrical goods and tech are the largest US import item from China.

For more infomation >> China fights back: Beijing poised to hit Trump with tariffs as USA trade war tensions SOAR - Duration: 5:39.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING! Trump Just Signed It! It's LAW! - Duration: 6:05.

For more infomation >> BREAKING! Trump Just Signed It! It's LAW! - Duration: 6:05.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's Latest Move Restores Obama's Weak Military Back to GREATNESS - Duration: 5:49.

For more infomation >> Trump's Latest Move Restores Obama's Weak Military Back to GREATNESS - Duration: 5:49.

-------------------------------------------

world war 3 China fight back Beijing poised to hit Trump with tariffs as USA trade war tensions SOAR - Duration: 4:59.

news

welcome to USA breaking news today please subscribe and click notification

box to get all breaking news alert breaking news today China fights back

Beijing poised to hit Trump with tariffs as US a trade war tensions soar China is

set to launch a fight back against US President Donald Trump's tariffs by

proposing levies on 128 US imports as trade war tensions soar the Chinese

government warned that Beijing might place tariffs on three billion dollars

of US goods such as pork apples and steel pipes China also wants to place a

15 percent tariff on u.s. fresh fruit and wine taking a hard line against the

US the Chinese government made it clear the penalties were in response to mr.

Trump's tariffs on steel and aluminium imports that he announced earlier this

month he women a trade expert told the FT China's overall attitude was that it

didn't want a trade war but now tariffs have been announced its purpose is to

stop a trade war from continuing Zhang Xiao yang

senior vice president of China min metals Corp said that while the

state-owned mining group steel exports to the US are tiny the impact could come

indirectly he said China's direct exports to the US

are not big but there will be some impact due to our exports via the United

States or indirect exports China's state-run Global Times said Beijing was

only just beginning to look at means to retaliate we believe it is only part of

China's countermeasures and soybeans and other US farm products will be targeted

the widely read tabloid said in a Saturday editorial dot wei jia guo vice

chairman of beijing based think tank china center for international economic

exchanges told china daily that beijing could impose tariffs on more US products

and is considering a second and even third list of targets today China's vice

premier Liu he declared the US has floated trade rules with an inquiry into

intellectual property and China will defend its interests in a phone call

with US Treasury Secretary Steven Oken chinese state media reported Liu said

China still hoped both sides would remain rational

and work together to keep trade relations stable the call between Nokia

and Lu a confident of President X AI Jinping was the highest level contact

between the two governments since mr. Trump announced plans for tariffs on up

to sixty billion dollars of Chinese goods on Thursday dot the deepening rift

has sent a chill through financial markets in the corporate world as

investors predicted dire consequences for the global economy should trade

barriers start going up stocks sacked at the start of this month after the

tariffs on aluminium and steel were announced but they quickly recovered as

the administration said the tariffs would not be as severe as they first

looked the losses this week were worse and investors are hoping for hints the

sanctions on China are more of a negotiating tactic in Geneva officials

from the EU Japan China and Russia gathered at the World Trade Organization

and criticized the u.s. tariffs this week the S&P 500 index dropped fifty

five point four three points or two point one percent to two comma 588 point

twenty six dot the index skidded six percent err this week its worst since

January 2016 the Dow Jones Industrial Average lost four hundred and twenty

four point six nine points or one point eight percent to twenty three thousand

five hundred and thirty three point two zero the Nasdaq Composite fell one

hundred and seventy four point zero one points or two point four percent to six

thousand nine hundred and ninety two point six seven banks also took steep

losses as interest rates decreased Lisa Erikson chief investment officer at US

bank wealth management said there could be a possibility of a bounce back if as

this progresses both sides look like they're negotiating

there could be further decline if people get a sense there could be more trade

restrictions in place if the tariffs encounter tariffs reduce economic growth

in the u.s. the Fed is likely to raise rates at a slower pace

Alex wolf a former US diplomat who works for Aberdeen standard investments warned

that Beijing could retaliate further by targeting US multinationals outside

China he told the FT Apple Microsoft Starbucks and Nike could be in the

firing line Apple's Tim Cook called for calm heads amid the dispute the sparring

has cast a spotlight on hardware makers such as Apple which assemble the

majority of their products in China for export to other countries electrical

goods and tech are the largest u.s. import item from China thanks for watch

please share like comment this video and subscribe channel for latest news

For more infomation >> world war 3 China fight back Beijing poised to hit Trump with tariffs as USA trade war tensions SOAR - Duration: 4:59.

-------------------------------------------

【MAD】Yu-Gi-Oh! ZEXAL - Kirifuda/Trump Card - Duration: 1:30.

The time is now, raise up your trump card.

This future belongs to you!

Burning dazzlingly, like I'm dreaming an endless dream.

My body yearns for the place where the strong are.

Swaying dizzily, because there's nothing here for certain.

So I only yearn, for a place overflowing with power.

The next battle is waiting for me.

I can hear the signal of the new days!

The time is now, raise up your trump card.

This future belongs to you!

If you can shake the world with your smile.

What comes next is up to you.

Write out this story.

You're the main character, after all!

For more infomation >> 【MAD】Yu-Gi-Oh! ZEXAL - Kirifuda/Trump Card - Duration: 1:30.

-------------------------------------------

Pres Trump KNOCKS OUT Clapper And Schiff With His Signature One-Two Punch - Duration: 2:42.

For more infomation >> Pres Trump KNOCKS OUT Clapper And Schiff With His Signature One-Two Punch - Duration: 2:42.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING: Trump Just Dropped BAD NEWS On Every Anti-Gun Marcher Today! - Duration: 10:16.

For more infomation >> BREAKING: Trump Just Dropped BAD NEWS On Every Anti-Gun Marcher Today! - Duration: 10:16.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING! Trump Just Signed It! It's LAW! - Duration: 5:59.

BREAKING! Trump Just Signed It!

It's LAW!

Earlier under President Trump's administration, there was debate over whether LGBT individuals

would be able to continue to serve in the military.

However, the subject was pretty much dropped and has not been spoken of since.

But a recent action by President Trump could change this result, and very quickly.

This past Friday the President authorized the Pentagon to prohibit transgender American

citizens from joining the military.

The President gave leeway in a limited exception.

After the announcement, the White House press office released a memo detailing the reason

behind the decision in the following statement,

"Among other things, the policies set forth by the Secretary of Defense state that transgender

persons with a history or diagnosis of gender dysphoria — individuals who the policies

state may require substantial medical treatment, including medications and surgery — are

disqualified from military service except under certain limited circumstances."

While this might be concerning for some a Pentagon spokesman, Maj. David Eastburn, noted

to the media that this announcement will have no practical effect on the military as of

now.

Furthermore, he indicated that the military will continue to recruit American citizens

who identify as LGBT in accordance with federal and state law.

In addition to the White House and Pentagon, the Department of Justice issued a statement

of their own where they defended the Pentagon saying,

"After comprehensive study and analysis, the Secretary of Defense concluded that new

policies should be adopted regarding individuals with gender dysphoria that are consistent

with military effectiveness and lethality, budgetary constraints, and applicable law.

The Department of Justice will continue to defend DOD's lawful authority to create

and implement personnel policies they have determined are necessary to best defend our

nation.

Consistent with this new policy, we are asking the courts to lift all related preliminary

injunctions in order to ensure the safety and security of the American people and the

best fighting force in the world."

Last year, Trump tweeted out some statements of his own regarding the issue on his social

media page, Shortly after the announcement, Congressional

Democrats and some non-profit organizations came out in opposition to the recent announcement.

The Human Rights Campaign, Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic National Committee,

and high profile members of the Democratic National Committee all vehemently spoke out

against it.

Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez, DNC Treasurer Bill Derrough, and DNC

LGBT Caucus Chair Earl Fowlkes released a joint announcement in regards to the news

saying,

"This decision is an insult to our brave transgender service members and all who wear

our nation's uniform.

Instead of fulfilling his oath to protect the American people, Donald Trump and Mike

Pence are putting our nation's security at risk and shoving real American patriots

back in the closet."

Minority Leader Pelosi further said,

"This latest memorandum is the same cowardly, disgusting ban the President announced last

summer.

No one with the strength and bravery to serve in the U.S. military should be turned away

because of who they are."

The American Civil Liberties Union also took issue with the announcement and released comments

of their own where they denounced the administration and called for the elimination of this prohibition

saying,"What the White House has released tonight is transphobia masquerading as policy.

This policy is not based on an evaluation of new evidence.

It is reverse-engineered for the sole purpose of carrying out President Trump's reckless

and unconstitutional ban, undermining the ability of transgender service members to

serve openly and military readiness as a whole."

Despite this announcement being made just this past week the Department of Defense had

been researching the issue for months.

A month ago, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sent the President a memorandum where he discussed

his stance on allowing LGBT individuals into the military, specifically transgender individuals.

The memorandum read,

"Based on the work of the Panel and the Department's best military judgment, the

Department of Defense concludes that there are substantial risks associated with allowing

the accession and retention of individuals with a history or diagnosis of gender dysphoria

and require, or have already undertaken, a course of treatment to change their gender.

Furthermore, the Department also finds that exempting such persons from well-established

mental health, physical health, and sex-based standards, which apply to all Service members,

including transgender Service members without gender dysphoria, could undermine readiness,

disrupt unit cohesion, and impose an unreasonable burden of the military that is not conducive

to military effectiveness and lethality."

Fox News reported,

"Trump's push for the ban has been blocked by several legal challenges and the Pentagon

began allowing transgender recruits to seek enlistment in January.

A 2016 study by the Rand Corp. estimated that nearly 4,000 transgender troops were on active

duty and in the reserves, Politico reported.

But LGBT advocacy groups in the military put the figure at around 15,000, the report said."

Since military agencies have indicated they will continue to recruit transgender individuals

in accordance with federal and state law it is unclear what this announcement from the

White House will actually do in the long run.

For more infomation >> BREAKING! Trump Just Signed It! It's LAW! - Duration: 5:59.

-------------------------------------------

THỜI SỰ HOA KỲ mới nhất 25/3/2018 - Donald Trump và WHITE HOUSE KHỦNG HOẢNG - TIN TỨC HOA KỲ E4U - Duration: 40:21.

For more infomation >> THỜI SỰ HOA KỲ mới nhất 25/3/2018 - Donald Trump và WHITE HOUSE KHỦNG HOẢNG - TIN TỨC HOA KỲ E4U - Duration: 40:21.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's Latest Move Restores Obama's Weak Military Back to GREATNESS - Duration: 5:41.

Trump's Latest Move Restores Obama's Weak Military Back to GREATNESS

The White House issued a memorandum on Friday, that states 'Transgender people are disqualified

to serve in the military with limited exceptions."

"This new policy will enable the military to apply well-established mental and physical

health standards—including those regarding the use of medical drugs—equally to all

individuals who want to join and fight for the best military force the world has ever

seen," Sanders said.

Trump's move once again, unravels yet another Obama-era policy.

From The Hill

President Trump is moving ahead with his plan to ban most transgender people from serving

in the military, with limited exceptions, following up on a proposal he called for last

summer.

The White House issued a memorandum late Friday on policies determined by Defense Secretary

Jim Mattis, stating that transgender people are "disqualified from military service

except under limited circumstances."

The memo, filed in U.S. District Court in Seattle, states that "transgender persons

with a history or diagnosis of gender dysphoria — individuals who the policies state may

require substantial medical treatment, including medications and surgery — are disqualified

from military service except under certain limited circumstances."

Mattis will have some leeway in implementing the policy, the memo states, as will Homeland

Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen when it comes to the Coast Guard.

The ban is something Mattis "concluded should be adopted," it notes.

White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders issued a statement saying that the

decision to implement the ban came after "extensive study by senior uniformed and civilian leaders,

including combat veterans."

"This new policy will enable the military to apply well-established mental and physical

health standards—including those regarding the use of medical drugs—equally to all

individuals who want to join and fight for the best military force the world has ever

seen," Sanders said.

LGBT advocates quickly denounced the move, which they say is expected to be constrained

by existing court orders unless there is further court action.

There is simply no way to spin it, the Trump-Pence Administration is going all in on its discriminatory,

unconstitutional and despicable ban on transgender troops," Human Rights Campaign president

Chad Griffin said in a statement.

"The Trump-Pence administration's continued insistence on targeting our military families

for discrimination is appalling, reckless, and unpatriotic," added American Military

Partner Association president Ashley Broadway-Mack.

The Palm Center, a group that promotes the study of LGBT people in the military, accused

the Pentagon of having "distorted the science on transgender health to prop up irrational

and legally untenable discrimination that will erode military readiness."

"There is no evidence to support a policy that bars from military service patriotic

Americans who are medically fit and able to deploy.

Our troops and our nation deserve better," the group said.

Trump first called for a ban on transgender troops in a series of tweets last summer,

and followed up in August by issuing a memo banning transgender people from enlisting.

The ban has since been battled over in court, with Mattis in February giving Trump a final

recommendation.

It was expected that he would recommend Trump allow transgender troops to remain in the

military.

A Pentagon spokesman declined to comment on Mattis's recommendation in February, only

confirming that the Defense chief had advised the president on the subject.

In a court filing to dissolve an injunction, however, Mattis's unclassified memo to the

president states that the Defense Department concluded there were "substantial risks

associated with allowing the accession and retention of individuals with a history or

diagnosis of gender dysphoria and require, or have already undertaken, a course of treatment

to change their gender."

Mattis went on to say that exempting transgender individuals from mental fitness tests undergone

by other service members would have a negative effect on overall troop readiness.

"Furthermore, the Department also finds that exempting such persons from well-established

mental health, physical health, and sex-based standards, which apply to all Service members,

including transgender Service members without gender dysphoria, could undermine readiness,

disrupt unit cohesion, and impose an unreasonable burden on the military that is not conducive

to military effectiveness and lethality," Mattis wrote.

Several federal courts blocked Trump's initial ban, with one ruling in November that the

military would be forced to resume accepting transgender recruits starting this year.

In February, the Pentagon confirmed that one transgender recruit had joined a branch of

the military after the ban was lifted due to the court order.

That individual passed all tests including medical, officials said.

While the exact number of transgender individuals in active duty service is unknown, a 2016

Rand Corporation study commissioned by the Pentagon estimated the number to be anywhere

from 1,320 and 6,630, with 830 to 4,160 others serving in the reserves.

For more infomation >> Trump's Latest Move Restores Obama's Weak Military Back to GREATNESS - Duration: 5:41.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING Trump Unleashes Brutal Surprise On United Nations "We Simply Cannot… - Duration: 33:12.

BREAKING: Trump Unleashes Brutal Surprise On United Nations: "We Simply Cannot…

Another win for the America First crowd!

Under Barack Obama, America was steadily becoming a slave to globalism.

Pacts like the Paris Climate Accord required the U.S. to submit to rules crafted by outsiders.

Every America would be forced to follow rules we had no say in.

The accord was not brought to the America people.

Congress wasn't allowed to vote.

It was tyranny, plain and simple.

But that was only one move by Obama to force globalism onto America.

He pushed the country to agree to ridiculous rules from the U.N.

Again, not rules decided by Congress or the American people.

Rules crafted by bureaucrats from other countries.

Of course, the rules dictated America's policy on immigration.

From CNN:

The United States notified the United Nations that it will no longer take part in the global

compact on migration, saying it undermines the nation's sovereignty.

The US has been a part of the New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants since it was formed

last year.

The declaration aims to ensure the rights of migrants, help them resettle and provide

them with access to education and jobs.

It calls for the negotiation of a global compact on migration, which is expected to be adopted

next year.

"While we will continue to engage on a number of fronts at the United Nations," Secretary

of State Rex Tillerson said in a statement Sunday, "in this case, we simply cannot

in good faith support a process that could undermine the sovereign right of the United

States to enforce our immigration laws and secure our borders."

The US supports "international cooperation on migration issues," the statement added,

"but it is the primary responsibility of sovereign states to help ensure that migration

is safe, orderly, and legal."

In explaining its withdrawal Saturday, the US said the pact contains provisions that

are inconsistent with the nation's immigration policies.

While the US is proud of its leadership on migration and refugee issues, the global approach

is not compatible with the nation's sovereignty, according to Nikki Haley, the US ambassador

to the UN.

CNN and other liberal outlets make this seem like a drastic measure.

Keep in mind the "compact" was formed last year.

It was hardly a pillar of the United Nations.

This compact was a scheme to force the United States and other nations to accept refugees

and other migrants.

It would force us to face the crisis Europe is enduring.

Millions of strangers would flood our country, all because George Soros or some other globalist

says so.

Our migrant policy should be decided by our leaders, plain and simple.

Those leaders—members of Congress—answer to the American people.

If we don't like the laws they write, we can vote them out.

We can't do that with members of the U.N.

We might not even know who is writing these rules!

It was necessary to pull the U.S. from this compact.

Our policies must reflect our values and concerns.

We cannot allow rogue nations, corrupt bureaucrats, and foreign interests to control

our country.