Trump news on Youtube Mar 25 2018

For more infomation >> Donald trump is banning guns from games - Duration: 22:36.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's Latest Move Restores Obama's Weak Military Back to GREATNESS - Duration: 5:51.

For more infomation >> Trump's Latest Move Restores Obama's Weak Military Back to GREATNESS - Duration: 5:51.

-------------------------------------------

Melania Trump honors International Women of Courage at State Department - Duration: 3:13.

For more infomation >> Melania Trump honors International Women of Courage at State Department - Duration: 3:13.

-------------------------------------------

Treason And Sedition Charges Await Hillary, Obama & High Level Appointees – Trump to DROP THE HAMMER - Duration: 33:12.

Treason And Sedition Charges Await Hillary, Obama & High-Level Appointees – Trump to

DROP THE HAMMER

The MSM did its best to conceal sworn testimony given to the Senate Judiciary Committee last

Thursday by William Browder a U.S.-born businessman who was instrumental in passing the Magnitsky

Act that imposed targeted sanctions on Russia's kleptocrats.

Browder told the committee that, "Targeted sanctions are a hundred times more upsetting

to the Russian kleptocracy than broad sanctions," and that

Among the revelations that Browder provided to the committee:

Fusion GPS — the firm hired by Clinton operatives to smear Donald Trump — also ran a smear

campaign against Browder to bolster Russia's effort to get the Magnitsky Act repealed.

The Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya who met with Donald Trump Jr. in June 2016 was

a leading player in Russia's effort to get the Magnitsky Act repealed.

He saw no evidence that the Russians were trying to help Trump rather that Russian operatives

were reaching out to everyone who might be convinced to repeal the Magnitsky Act and

that is why Veselnitskyaka requested the meeting with Trump Jr.

So, repealing the Magnitsky Act was Putin's "single most important foreign policy,"

because Putin and his cronies stood to personally lose significant sums of money under the sanctions.

There was simply no case for collusion to be made.

If anything, Hillary Clintons' opposition to the Magnitsky Act that netted Bill $500,000

for a one hour speech that trashed the sanctions imposed by the act, reeks of collusion.

Hillary had previously colluded with Russia in selling off 20% of our uranium stock for

$145MM dollars in Russian "donations" to the Clintons' slush fund aka the Clinton

Foundation.

If you're wondering why we didn't we hear about this exculpatory testimony it's because

the MSM is still taking its marching orders from Obama and Valery Jarrett through "twice

daily conference calls….

8:30 and 9:45 every morning and they develop talking points for the media for the day to

how to sabotage and how to undermine Trump," according to Bill Clinton's former senior

advisor Dick Morris.

Further proof that the Russia-Trump collusion lie is and always was an organized effort

to subvert and overthrow the duly elected president of the United States was exposed

by us late last week when we revealed that Obama's post-election strategy was to strip

Trump of any loyalists that might be in position to prove that if anyone colluded with Russia

it was Clinton and Obama, not Trump, by:

Demanding the recusal of Trump's Attorney General that promoted lifelong Democrat Deputy

A.G. Rod Rosenstein to replace him.

Demanding Devin Nunes, Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee recuse himself that

tilted the committee towards the hysteria of Democrat Adam Schiff – a virulent anti-Trumper

intent on convincing someone that Russia and Trump colluded together.

Rewarding the two leading Dems on the House Ethics Committee for grinding the investigation

into Nunes to a halt in order to block his return to the leadership of the Intel Committee.

As we pointed out, this was to give the Russia-Trump narrative time to fully bloom so that the

Dems' crimes under Obama might forever be obscured with the removal of President Trump.

It should also come as no surprise that the Deep State was similarly looking to obscure

its role in criminally turning the intelligence community into a partisan political operation.

So the Dems' mobilized large numbers of treasonous Obama-Clinton sycophants planted

throughout every government agency to destroy the Trump presidency to conceal the criminal

enterprise that they had turned the government into.

What they've done and what they're continuing to do isn't simply partisan politics.

They long ago crossed the line into seditious and treasonous behavior as clearly outlined

in:

18 US Code Chapter 115 – TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES

18 U.S. Code § 2381 – Treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their

enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty

of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and

fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office

under the United States.

18 U.S. Code § 2382 – Misprision of treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of

any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make

known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor

or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason

and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.

18 U.S. Code § 2383 – Rebellion or insurrection

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against

the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto,

shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall

be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

18 U.S. Code § 2384 – Seditious conspiracy

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction

of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government

of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority

thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United

States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary

to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not

more than twenty years, or both.

Here's a section of the law that applies to our vaunted teachers and university professors

and Obama's OFA and Valery Jarrett:

18 U.S. Code § 2385 – Advocating overthrow of Government

Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity,

desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United

States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government

of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any

officer of any such government; or

Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints,

publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written

or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability,

or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force

or violence, or attempts to do so; or

Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of

persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government

by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society,

group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall

be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof,

for the five years next following his conviction.

If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in this section, each shall

be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall

be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof,

for the five years next following his conviction.

As used in this section, the terms "organizes" and "organize", with respect to any society,

group, or assembly of persons, include the recruiting of new members, the forming of

new units, and the regrouping or expansion of existing clubs, classes, and other units

of such society, group, or assembly of persons.

There's still more violations of 18 U.S. Code Chapter 115 governing sedition and treason

that the Obama administration engaged in while first mobilizing the levers of power (unlawful

surveillance, widespread dissemination of classified information, and leaking that implicated

our entire intelligence community) against candidate Donald Trump and then pivoting and

attempting to unlawfully remove him from office using those same unlawful means.

Trump can no longer allow the Obama-Clinton criminal machine to hide behind Hillary's

pre-emptive defense that in the United States "we don't jail our political opponents."

When anyone, or any group of people – including politicians – engages in the unlawful sale

of United States' assets to foreign powers for their personal enrichment and then conspires

against the duly elected authorities (President Trump and members of his administration) who

have been empowered by the Constitution and the American people to enforce the law and

bring violators to justice, they have engaged in sedition and treason.

They are no longer simply political opponents they have crossed the line into Manchurian

traitors that must be exorcised

from society.

For more infomation >> Treason And Sedition Charges Await Hillary, Obama & High Level Appointees – Trump to DROP THE HAMMER - Duration: 33:12.

-------------------------------------------

Potawatomi Hotel and Casino's CEO once worked for Trump - Duration: 1:47.

For more infomation >> Potawatomi Hotel and Casino's CEO once worked for Trump - Duration: 1:47.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING: Trump Just Dropped BAD NEWS On Every Anti-Gun Marcher Today! - Duration: 10:10.

BREAKING: Trump Just Dropped BAD NEWS On Every Anti-Gun Marcher Today!

Adolf Hitler once stated that "to conquer a nation, first disarm its citizens."

It seems the Democrats and even some Republicans are intent on doing just that, willing to

trade in liberty for security and clearly doing a brain dump of what history shows is

the result of disarming a people over and over and over and over again.

One would think that given the plethora of examples of the genocides that have occurred

as a result of disarmament and the success of armed teachers and school resource officers

as evidenced by the recent school shooting in Maryland, this would be a no-brainer.

Yet here we are being confronted by the gun control crowd protesting in Washington demanding

their version of safer schools in what has been dubbed as the March for Our Lives in

Washington DC.

Some are even screeching about the Omnibus spending bill signed by President Trump on

Friday amid much backlash from both sides of the aisle.

Instead of being concerned about the more than a trillion dollars added to the National

Deficit and the multitude of American taxpayer dollars going to fund other countries, leftist

progressives like David Brock are claiming President Trump did not do enough.

One of the few cuts made in the Omnibus bill was cuts to funding for two safety initiatives

implemented after the Sandy Hook massacre in 2012.

Known as the Comprehensive School Safety Initiative (CSSI) and Research and Evaluation of Technologies

to Improve School Safety, the measures were both canceled as a result of cuts to funding.

According to a message on the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) website – "With the enactment

of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2018, the funding planned for these solicitations

is no longer available for research and evaluation," noting that the funding would be "used for

other purposes under the Stop School Violence Act of 2018."

Brock's media publication – ShareBlue, whines about the funding cuts and lack of

gun-control legislation found in the Omnibus stating – "It doesn't even have any

provisions related specifically to guns.

Instead, it focuses on training students, teachers, and law enforcement to respond to

mental health issues.

And it provides funding for measures meant to "harden" schools, like metal detectors."

Brock also attempts to draw some sort of correlation between the fact that the Trump administration

made the initial request to Congress to cancel funding for these two programs on February

12 and just two days later on Valentine's Day, Nikolas Cruz went on his rampage through

Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, leaving 17 people dead, as well drawing

some correlation regarding the rise in school shootings.

Except a recent study published by Northeastern University shows that school shootings are

actually fewer, demonstrating there is no growing trend, with findings showing shooting

incidents involving students has been declining since the 1990s.

However, the timing was merely coincidental and funding ceased on these programs because

they were unsuccessful.

These programs have been in place for years and it is certainly clear something needs

to be done.

The new spending accord actually raises overall federal school safety funding.

It also shifts funds from these two current and existing programs into what is known as

the STOP School Violence Act or STOP.

STOP is included as part of the omnibus and allows for funding to be used for physical

security measures, like metal detectors.

The $75 million that was previously appropriated to fund the CSSI has also been rerouted to

help fund STOP.

The CSSI was a program in the Department of Justice that funds research and implementation

of a wide range of evidence-based safety programs that range from bullying prevention to innovative

approaches to school policing.

This policy gave birth to programs such as the PROMISE program – a program that allowed

Cruz to effectively escape arrest, indictment, and conviction which potentially could have

blocked him from purchasing the firearms used to take the lives of his 17 victims.

What is the PROMISE program?

American Thinker describes the program and its effect on Broward County Public Schools

like this –

"In the 2011-2012 school year, Broward County Public Schools had the highest number of school-related

arrests statewide at 1,062.

Newly hired Superintendent Robert Runcie, with strong connections to the Obama administration,

teamed up with community organizations like the NAACP, local law enforcement, and government

agencies to sign the Collaborative Agreement on School Discipline to eliminate the "schoolhouse

to jailhouse pipeline" through programs such as PROMISE (Preventing Recidivism through

Opportunities, Mentoring, Interventions, Support, and Education).

One of the program's participants, Juvenile Court judge Elijah Williams, speaking at a

2013 signing ceremony for PROMISE, made it clear it was all about the stats:

We already bought the ticket.

We are waiting for our numbers to come in.

We know we have hit the jackpot when our school-related arrests go down, down down.

The collaborative agreement, signed by Runcie; Sheriff Scott Israel, now fully embroiled

in his agency's failure to get Cruz off the streets; state's attorneys; the president

of the Broward chapter of the NAACP; and many others, has the fundamental goal of keeping

minority students involved in various "transgressions" away from law enforcement and out of the courts.

In one feature of PROMISE, Judge Williams circumvents the criminal justice system by

participating in a simulated court hearing called "The Juvenile Justice System of Care,"

where he encourages the delinquent student to participate in the program rather than

risk arrest.

The Obama administration's Department of Education was also involved in implementing

PROMISE.

Obama, who routinely dangled carrots in the form of matching federal grants to local districts

for their participation in Common Core and Race to the Top, doled out millions to Broward.

With the promise of federal monies, it's no surprise that Superintendent Runcie (annual

salary: $335,000) was happy to oblige his friends in D.C.

Within a year of Runcie's arrival, student arrest rates were down 66 percent, and Broward

County Schools were about to hit the federal jackpot.

On October 5, 2016, the School Board of Broward County Public Schools and its community partners

signed the PROMISE agreement for the second time.

After the 2016 signing, it was announced a couple of weeks later on October 18, BCPS

was the only large urban district in the country to receive a Teacher Incentive Fund (TIF)

grant from the U.S. Dept. of Education totaling $53,808, 909.

One of the TIF's grant priorities is listed as "improved life for students in poverty/students

of color."The February 14 Parkland school shooting is shedding light on PROMISE, and

now some officials in Broward are speaking out about the school district's push to

keep police out of the loop when crimes occur in schools.

"

Yet very few people seem to grasp the gravity of exactly what was done in Broward County.

Many are advocating for more and continued and ever more intrusive government involvement.

In a move straight out of 1984, many have even spoken of asking the FBI and local law

enforcement to begin charging people with what they MIGHT do instead of actual crimes.

Why would anyone want to give an agency that has shown repeatedly to have a significant

political bias, no concept of human rights, or the Constitution the task of predicting

future events?

This leads to exceedingly bad places if one knows their history even slightly.

That is in effect what is being advocated for when those such as Brock and even Parkland

students such as David Hogg demand disarmament or refuse to allow teachers to be armed in

the classroom.

Rather than recognizing that Parkland is an example of an epic failure of home, family,

church, community, school, law enforcement, and others, many of these people are blaming

inanimate and nonsentient objects.

It never seems to occur to many of these people that playing pass the buck can have dire consequences.

People mean something and they are not garbage to be thrown away.

The horrific events in Parkland, Florida demonstrate one thing loudly over and over and over again

– WE HAVE FAILED!

You and me, WE have failed a person, allowing him to be thrown away with no means or mechanism

to cope and no mental capacity to deal with all life threw at him.

Murderers are not born.

They are created, created by hundreds of failures over the course of a 19-year-old boy's life

where a mother noted that her son needed mental health assistance, yet did nothing.

A school resource officer named Scott Peterson noted that Cruz should be involuntarily committed

for a mental health evaluation due to the danger he posed and many others.

Yet no one did a thing.

Everyone thought it was someone else's problem.

Perhaps had someone taken the time to care, to make Cruz their problem, to follow through

17 people would still be here and a 19-year-old boy would not be facing the end of his life

so early and Brock would find something else to fuss about.

But I guess it is easier to let people down, pretend they are nothing, and simply walk

away – safe in your sanctimonious outrage that "well it's not me or mine….it doesn't

affect me or mine" and never stop to consider the long-reaching ramifications.

For more infomation >> BREAKING: Trump Just Dropped BAD NEWS On Every Anti-Gun Marcher Today! - Duration: 10:10.

-------------------------------------------

China fights back: Beijing poised to hit Trump with tariffs as USA trade war tensions SOAR - Duration: 5:39.

China fights back: Beijing poised to hit Trump with tariffs as USA trade war tensions SOAR

CHINA is set to launch a fightback against US President Donald Trump's tariffs by proposing

levies on 128 US imports as trade war tensions soar.

The Chinese government warned that Beijing might place tariffs on $3 billion of US goods

such as pork, apples and steel pipes.

China also wants to place a 15 percent tariff on US fresh fruit and wine.

Taking a hardline against the US, the Chinese government made it clear the penalties were

in response to Mr Trump's tariffs on steel and aluminium imports that he announced earlier

this month.

He Weiwan, a trade expert told the FT: "China's overall attitude was that it didn't want

a trade war.

But now tariffs have been announced it's purpose is to stop a trade war from continuing."

Zhang Zhaoxiang, senior vice president of China Minmetals Corp, said that while the

state-owned mining group's steel exports to the US are tiny, the impact could come indirectly.

He said: "China's direct exports to the U.S. are not big.

But there will be some impact due to our exports via the United States or indirect exports."

China's state-run Global Times said Beijing was only just beginning to look at means to

retaliate.

"We believe it is only part of China's countermeasures, and soybeans and other U.S. farm products

will be targeted," the widely-read tabloid said in a Saturday editorial.

Wei Jianguo, vice chairman of Beijing-based think tank China Centre for International

Economic Exchanges, told China Daily that Beijing could impose tariffs on more US products,

and is considering a second and even third list of targets

Today China's Vice Premier Liu He declared the US has flouted trade rules with an inquiry

into intellectual property and China will defend its interests.

In a phone call with US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, Chinese state media reported,

Liu said China still hoped both sides would remain "rational" and work together to keep

trade relations stable.

The call between Mnuchin and Liu, a confidante of President Xi Jinping, was the highest-level

contact between the two governments since Mr Trump announced plans for tariffs on up

to $60 billion of Chinese goods on Thursday.

The deepening rift has sent a chill through financial markets and the corporate world

as investors predicted dire consequences for the global economy should trade barriers start

going up.

Stocks sagged at the start of this month after the tariffs on aluminium and steel were announced,

but they quickly recovered as the administration said the tariffs would not be as severe as

they first looked.

The losses this week were worse, and investors are hoping for hints the sanctions on China

are more of a negotiating tactic.

In Geneva, officials from the EU, Japan, China and Russia, gathered at the World Trade Organisation

and criticised the US tariffs.

This week, the S&P 500 index dropped 55.43 points, or 2.1 percent, to 2,588.26.

The index skidded 6 per cent this week, its worst since January 2016.

The Dow Jones industrial average lost 424.69 points, or 1.8 per cent, to 23,533.20.

The Nasdaq composite fell 174.01 points, or 2.4 per cent, to 6,992.67.

Banks also took steep losses as interest rates decreased.

Lisa Erickson, chief investment officer at US Bank Wealth Management said: "There could

be a possibility of a bounce back if, as this progresses, both sides look like they're

negotiating.

"There could be further decline if people get a sense there could be more trade restrictions

in place."

If the tariffs and counter-tariffs reduce economic growth in the US, the Fed is likely

to raise rates at a slower pace.

Alex Wolf, a former US diplomat, who works for Aberdeen Standard Investments warned that

Beijing could retaliate further by targeting US multinationals outside China.

He told the FT: "Apple, Microsoft, Starbucks and Nike could be in the firing line."

Apple's Tim Cook called for "calm heads" amid the dispute.

The sparring has cast a spotlight on hardware makers such as Apple, which assemble the majority

of their products in China for export to other countries.

Electrical goods and tech are the largest US import item from China.

For more infomation >> China fights back: Beijing poised to hit Trump with tariffs as USA trade war tensions SOAR - Duration: 5:39.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING! Trump Just Signed It! It's LAW! - Duration: 6:05.

For more infomation >> BREAKING! Trump Just Signed It! It's LAW! - Duration: 6:05.

-------------------------------------------

Trump-Hater "Crazy" Joe Biden Suffers Epic Meltdown When Reporter Asks 1 Question - Duration: 4:39.

Trump-Hater "Crazy" Joe Biden Suffers Epic Meltdown When Reporter Asks 1 Question

Crazy Joe Biden lost his mind and suffered an epic meltdown when a reporter asked him

one question.

After this, it's clear, Biden should really duck out of the public eye.According to Daily

Caller, former Vice President Joe Biden has been a little too heavy on the Trump-hating

rhetoric lately, even saying that, if he met President Donald Trump in high school, he'd

have beat him up.

Supposedly, Biden was making a statement about defending the honor of women, but in order

for that to work, Biden would have to be someone who hasn't made a career out of creeping

on vulnerable members of the opposite sex.

According to ABC News, Biden made his idiotic comments about Trump at an anti-sexual assault

rally at the University of Miami on Tuesday, March 20, 2018.

"A guy who ended up becoming our national leader said, 'I can grab a woman anywhere

and she likes it,'" Biden said.

"They asked me if I'd like to debate this gentleman, and I said 'no.'

I said, 'If we were in high school, I'd take him behind the gym and beat the hell

out of him.'"

Creepy old Biden didn't stop there.

He then told his audience about his perspective based on the enormous amount of time that

he'd spent in locker rooms.

"I've been in a lot of locker rooms my whole life," Biden continued.

"I'm a pretty damn good athlete.

Any guy that talked that way was usually the fattest, ugliest S.O.B. in the room."

Could this tired sack of crap get any more ridiculous?

Apparently, Biden doesn't have an internal filter that tells him when he's being a

complete asshat or when to stop running at the mouth.

While most other Democrats are out there doing their part to "resist" Trump, Biden is

making crazy speeches based on fantasies of being in high school with the President.

I wonder what kind of lascivious stories Biden's high school buddies might be able to tell.

President Trump responded to Biden's ridiculous tough guy talk on Twitter recently.

"Crazy Joe Biden is trying to act like a tough guy.

Actually, he is weak, both mentally and physically, and yet he threatens me, for the second time,

with physical assault.

He doesn't know me, but he would go down fast and hard, crying all the way.

Don't threaten people Joe!"

Crazy Joe Biden is trying to act like a tough guy.

Actually, he is weak, both mentally and physically, and yet he threatens me, for the second time,

with physical assault.

He doesn't know me, but he would go down fast and hard, crying all the way.

Don't threaten people Joe!Biden seemed a whole lot less confident of his statements

as he tried to avoid reporters on Friday, March 23, 2018.

"Vice President, do you care to respond to the President's tweet sir?" the reporter

asked as she followed Biden.

At first, Biden just kept walking until the reporter got in front of him.

Biden then whispered a creepy, "No," as he continued walking.

The reporter then asked Biden, "Would you really fight the President sir?"

This is when Biden snaps.

The former Vice President stopped walking and angrily faced the reporter.

"I was talking about high school.

Go back and read what I said," he replied.

"I said high school," Biden exclaimed again as he pointed his finger before walking

away.It would just seem like common sense that, if Joe Biden doesn't want to get caught

up in these pointless situations and hypothetical merry go rounds with media reporters, the

former Vice President might want to think about a couple of things.

To begin with, how about not creating those situations where reporters hound him for stupid

answers?

Biden hasn't figured out that if he keeps his mouth shut and doesn't make hypothetical

statements about wanting to beat up the President in "high school," then he wouldn't get

slammed in the first place.

However, self-control is not one of Joe Biden's strongest attributes.

The former Vice President has been anything but tempered in his rhetoric about our President

since he left office and most people don't take "Crazy Joe" very seriously anymore.

For more infomation >> Trump-Hater "Crazy" Joe Biden Suffers Epic Meltdown When Reporter Asks 1 Question - Duration: 4:39.

-------------------------------------------

world war 3 China fight back Beijing poised to hit Trump with tariffs as USA trade war tensions SOAR - Duration: 4:59.

news

welcome to USA breaking news today please subscribe and click notification

box to get all breaking news alert breaking news today China fights back

Beijing poised to hit Trump with tariffs as US a trade war tensions soar China is

set to launch a fight back against US President Donald Trump's tariffs by

proposing levies on 128 US imports as trade war tensions soar the Chinese

government warned that Beijing might place tariffs on three billion dollars

of US goods such as pork apples and steel pipes China also wants to place a

15 percent tariff on u.s. fresh fruit and wine taking a hard line against the

US the Chinese government made it clear the penalties were in response to mr.

Trump's tariffs on steel and aluminium imports that he announced earlier this

month he women a trade expert told the FT China's overall attitude was that it

didn't want a trade war but now tariffs have been announced its purpose is to

stop a trade war from continuing Zhang Xiao yang

senior vice president of China min metals Corp said that while the

state-owned mining group steel exports to the US are tiny the impact could come

indirectly he said China's direct exports to the US

are not big but there will be some impact due to our exports via the United

States or indirect exports China's state-run Global Times said Beijing was

only just beginning to look at means to retaliate we believe it is only part of

China's countermeasures and soybeans and other US farm products will be targeted

the widely read tabloid said in a Saturday editorial dot wei jia guo vice

chairman of beijing based think tank china center for international economic

exchanges told china daily that beijing could impose tariffs on more US products

and is considering a second and even third list of targets today China's vice

premier Liu he declared the US has floated trade rules with an inquiry into

intellectual property and China will defend its interests in a phone call

with US Treasury Secretary Steven Oken chinese state media reported Liu said

China still hoped both sides would remain rational

and work together to keep trade relations stable the call between Nokia

and Lu a confident of President X AI Jinping was the highest level contact

between the two governments since mr. Trump announced plans for tariffs on up

to sixty billion dollars of Chinese goods on Thursday dot the deepening rift

has sent a chill through financial markets in the corporate world as

investors predicted dire consequences for the global economy should trade

barriers start going up stocks sacked at the start of this month after the

tariffs on aluminium and steel were announced but they quickly recovered as

the administration said the tariffs would not be as severe as they first

looked the losses this week were worse and investors are hoping for hints the

sanctions on China are more of a negotiating tactic in Geneva officials

from the EU Japan China and Russia gathered at the World Trade Organization

and criticized the u.s. tariffs this week the S&P 500 index dropped fifty

five point four three points or two point one percent to two comma 588 point

twenty six dot the index skidded six percent err this week its worst since

January 2016 the Dow Jones Industrial Average lost four hundred and twenty

four point six nine points or one point eight percent to twenty three thousand

five hundred and thirty three point two zero the Nasdaq Composite fell one

hundred and seventy four point zero one points or two point four percent to six

thousand nine hundred and ninety two point six seven banks also took steep

losses as interest rates decreased Lisa Erikson chief investment officer at US

bank wealth management said there could be a possibility of a bounce back if as

this progresses both sides look like they're negotiating

there could be further decline if people get a sense there could be more trade

restrictions in place if the tariffs encounter tariffs reduce economic growth

in the u.s. the Fed is likely to raise rates at a slower pace

Alex wolf a former US diplomat who works for Aberdeen standard investments warned

that Beijing could retaliate further by targeting US multinationals outside

China he told the FT Apple Microsoft Starbucks and Nike could be in the

firing line Apple's Tim Cook called for calm heads amid the dispute the sparring

has cast a spotlight on hardware makers such as Apple which assemble the

majority of their products in China for export to other countries electrical

goods and tech are the largest u.s. import item from China thanks for watch

please share like comment this video and subscribe channel for latest news

For more infomation >> world war 3 China fight back Beijing poised to hit Trump with tariffs as USA trade war tensions SOAR - Duration: 4:59.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Signs Spending Bill After Complaining About How Much He Dislikes It - Duration: 6:12.

For more infomation >> Trump Signs Spending Bill After Complaining About How Much He Dislikes It - Duration: 6:12.

-------------------------------------------

Trump-Hater "Crazy" Joe Biden Suffers Epic Meltdown When Reporter Asks 1 Question - Duration: 4:21.

For more infomation >> Trump-Hater "Crazy" Joe Biden Suffers Epic Meltdown When Reporter Asks 1 Question - Duration: 4:21.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump bans transgender troops - Duration: 0:35.

For more infomation >> President Trump bans transgender troops - Duration: 0:35.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING NEWS ALERT , URGENT , Hannity: Media cheer the deep state attacks on Trump - Duration: 15:47.

For more infomation >> BREAKING NEWS ALERT , URGENT , Hannity: Media cheer the deep state attacks on Trump - Duration: 15:47.

-------------------------------------------

HOLY CRAP! It's Official! Here's The Exact Time and Location Trump Will Meet Kim Jong - Duration: 5:42.

For more infomation >> HOLY CRAP! It's Official! Here's The Exact Time and Location Trump Will Meet Kim Jong - Duration: 5:42.

-------------------------------------------

CNN Bashes Trump Over Drug Dealer Death Penalty, Kellyanne Has Perfect Response - Duration: 4:07.

CNN Bashes Trump Over Drug Dealer Death Penalty, Kellyanne Has Perfect Response

CNN's Chris Cuomo recently bashed President Donald Trump for his drug dealer death penalty

solution.

Watch as Kellyanne Conway destroys him with the perfect response.Leave it to fake news

network CNN to criticize Trump for proposing the death penalty for drug dealers who undoubtedly

destroy thousands of lives in America every year.

In a recent interview with Chris Cuomo, one of Kellyanne Conway ripped the liberal narrative

apart.

According to Daily Caller, Conway appeared on CNN's "New Day" to discuss a few

topics which liberals are always enraged by.

When Cuomo decided to bash the President over the idea of giving the death penalty to drug

dealers, Conway took him to school.

After the Department of Justice proposed the idea on Wednesday, March 26, 2017, Trump echoed

it and immediately lit the liberal world on fire.

"Tough talk won't work to stem the drug crisis," Cuomo told Conway.

"There's a place for tough talk," Cuomo continued.

"The tough talk about let's kill the drug kingpins — I know that that appeals to the

base, and harshness is often perceived as strength, but you're not going to punish

your way out of this problem.

You know that, right?"

Cuomo tried to make the liberal argument that the death penalty wouldn't be a deterrent

for drug dealers.

Not that I think China is a great place, but they don't have a drug dealer problem specifically

because drug peddlers are often publicly executed in that country.

I think Cuomo is dead wrong, and so does Conway.

"The death penalty is barely a deterrent on any level let alone when it comes to addiction,"

Cuomo said.

"And it's not about killing the drug kingpins.

Nobody's going to defend the drug kingpins; but you're not going to punish your way

out of the problem, no matter how good that sounds," he added.

This is when Conway showed Cuomo the one reason conservatives are better at winning a debate

— common sense.

"You may think no one is defending the drug kingpins — some are — but very few have

been punishing them," Conway replied.

"What the president is saying is, and he's absolutely right, that we don't have tough

sentences because a lot of those minimum sentences go by the weight of the drug."

I could not agree more with Conway.

The penalties for drug dealers are outdated and need to be a direct reflection of the

destruction and death that drugs bring to our communities.

Cuomo continued to try to score a point in the conversation to no avail.

"You can change the sentencing; I'm just saying the call was to kill them," Cuomo

added.

"He said kill drug dealers; that's what caught people's attention."

Conway flatly replied, "Well, good."Of course, it caught people's attention, and

hopefully, the majority of them were drug dealers.

The truth of the matter here is that past administrations have ignored and in some cases

even helped the drug problem in America with their irresponsible policies.

Barack Obama and his former Attorney General Eric Holder were two of the worst when it

came to empowering drug dealers and cartels.

The massive failure of an operation known as Fast and Furious basically walked guns

into the hands of drug cartels in hopes that they would be used on the streets in America.

The general idea behind it was to build support for gun control by helping drug cartels commit

violent crimes against American citizens.

It's almost comical how a liberal hack like Cuomo will say that drug kingpins shouldn't

be defended but then turns around and does that exact thing.

There's never a shortage of stupidity or fake news spilling out of CNN.

For more infomation >> CNN Bashes Trump Over Drug Dealer Death Penalty, Kellyanne Has Perfect Response - Duration: 4:07.

-------------------------------------------

Breaking news today⚠️ Frightened' EU SLAMS Donald Trump for ' 'trade WAR_us news _News In English - Duration: 3:06.

Breaking news today⚠️ Frightened' EU SLAMS Donald Trump for ' 'trade WAR_us news _News In English

For more infomation >> Breaking news today⚠️ Frightened' EU SLAMS Donald Trump for ' 'trade WAR_us news _News In English - Duration: 3:06.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING! Trump Just Signed It! It's LAW! - Duration: 5:59.

BREAKING! Trump Just Signed It!

It's LAW!

Earlier under President Trump's administration, there was debate over whether LGBT individuals

would be able to continue to serve in the military.

However, the subject was pretty much dropped and has not been spoken of since.

But a recent action by President Trump could change this result, and very quickly.

This past Friday the President authorized the Pentagon to prohibit transgender American

citizens from joining the military.

The President gave leeway in a limited exception.

After the announcement, the White House press office released a memo detailing the reason

behind the decision in the following statement,

"Among other things, the policies set forth by the Secretary of Defense state that transgender

persons with a history or diagnosis of gender dysphoria — individuals who the policies

state may require substantial medical treatment, including medications and surgery — are

disqualified from military service except under certain limited circumstances."

While this might be concerning for some a Pentagon spokesman, Maj. David Eastburn, noted

to the media that this announcement will have no practical effect on the military as of

now.

Furthermore, he indicated that the military will continue to recruit American citizens

who identify as LGBT in accordance with federal and state law.

In addition to the White House and Pentagon, the Department of Justice issued a statement

of their own where they defended the Pentagon saying,

"After comprehensive study and analysis, the Secretary of Defense concluded that new

policies should be adopted regarding individuals with gender dysphoria that are consistent

with military effectiveness and lethality, budgetary constraints, and applicable law.

The Department of Justice will continue to defend DOD's lawful authority to create

and implement personnel policies they have determined are necessary to best defend our

nation.

Consistent with this new policy, we are asking the courts to lift all related preliminary

injunctions in order to ensure the safety and security of the American people and the

best fighting force in the world."

Last year, Trump tweeted out some statements of his own regarding the issue on his social

media page, Shortly after the announcement, Congressional

Democrats and some non-profit organizations came out in opposition to the recent announcement.

The Human Rights Campaign, Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic National Committee,

and high profile members of the Democratic National Committee all vehemently spoke out

against it.

Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez, DNC Treasurer Bill Derrough, and DNC

LGBT Caucus Chair Earl Fowlkes released a joint announcement in regards to the news

saying,

"This decision is an insult to our brave transgender service members and all who wear

our nation's uniform.

Instead of fulfilling his oath to protect the American people, Donald Trump and Mike

Pence are putting our nation's security at risk and shoving real American patriots

back in the closet."

Minority Leader Pelosi further said,

"This latest memorandum is the same cowardly, disgusting ban the President announced last

summer.

No one with the strength and bravery to serve in the U.S. military should be turned away

because of who they are."

The American Civil Liberties Union also took issue with the announcement and released comments

of their own where they denounced the administration and called for the elimination of this prohibition

saying,"What the White House has released tonight is transphobia masquerading as policy.

This policy is not based on an evaluation of new evidence.

It is reverse-engineered for the sole purpose of carrying out President Trump's reckless

and unconstitutional ban, undermining the ability of transgender service members to

serve openly and military readiness as a whole."

Despite this announcement being made just this past week the Department of Defense had

been researching the issue for months.

A month ago, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sent the President a memorandum where he discussed

his stance on allowing LGBT individuals into the military, specifically transgender individuals.

The memorandum read,

"Based on the work of the Panel and the Department's best military judgment, the

Department of Defense concludes that there are substantial risks associated with allowing

the accession and retention of individuals with a history or diagnosis of gender dysphoria

and require, or have already undertaken, a course of treatment to change their gender.

Furthermore, the Department also finds that exempting such persons from well-established

mental health, physical health, and sex-based standards, which apply to all Service members,

including transgender Service members without gender dysphoria, could undermine readiness,

disrupt unit cohesion, and impose an unreasonable burden of the military that is not conducive

to military effectiveness and lethality."

Fox News reported,

"Trump's push for the ban has been blocked by several legal challenges and the Pentagon

began allowing transgender recruits to seek enlistment in January.

A 2016 study by the Rand Corp. estimated that nearly 4,000 transgender troops were on active

duty and in the reserves, Politico reported.

But LGBT advocacy groups in the military put the figure at around 15,000, the report said."

Since military agencies have indicated they will continue to recruit transgender individuals

in accordance with federal and state law it is unclear what this announcement from the

White House will actually do in the long run.