>> IN HIS 30 YEARS A A JOURNAL I
OLBERMAN HAS NEVER BEEN A LACK
FOR WORDS AND HE HAS NEVER BEEN
RELUCTANT TO TELL WHAT YOU HE
BELIEVES.
HE HAS A BOOK OUT WITH A
COLLECTION EVER HIS COMMENTARIES
CALLED TRUMP IS F.ING CRAZY THIS
IS NOT A JOKE.
WE BEGAN OUR CONVERSATION WITH
KEITH ABOUT THE BOOK AND WHY HE
DECIDED TO PUT THE COMMENTARIES
TOGETHER.
WE CONTINUE OUR CONVERSATION
WITH HIM NOW.
>> I AM VERY CURIOUS AND I'VE
ASKED A NUMBER OF OF POLITICAL
OBSERVERS IN SAME QUESTION.
AND THAT IS WHEN WE FIRST START
HEARING ABOUT DONALD TRUMP
RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT, WHAT DID
YOU THINK HIS PLAN REALLY WAS AT
THAT TIME?
>> I GUESS A BETTER QUESTION DO
YOU THINK HE REALLY WANTED TO BE
PRESIDENT OR WAS THERE SOMETHING
ELSE GOING ON.
>> I THINK HE HAS THE SAME
EMOTION EVERY ONE HAS HAD IN
THIS COUNTRY.
I'D LIKE TO GET ELECTED
PRESIDENT.
SERVING AND BEING PRESIDENT.
>> REALLY DOING THE JOB.
>> MOST AMERICANS GO HELL, NO, I
WANT NO PART.
BECAUSE YOU SEE BEFORE AND AFTER
PICTURES OF ALL MTS THERE FOR
EIGHT YEARS OR FOUR.
IT'S JUST -- WHY DO WE ELECT
THEM TO KILL THEM AS QUICKLY AS
POSSIBLE IN TERMS OF HOW QUICKLY
WE WEAR THEM DOWN?
I THINK HE DOESN'T HAVE THAT
MONITOR THAT SAYS DON'T DO THIS
YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO ACTUALLY
INTEREST THE JOB.
ALL THE FEW JOKES HE MAKES DO I
I HAVE HAVE COME BACK NEXT YEAR
I'M TAKING MORE TIME.
YONTD THAT HE WANTED TO BE
PRESIDENT.
IF YOU ARE THE SORT OF BACK
ENGINEER EVERYTHING HE HAS DONE
IN OFFICE THE FEW THINGS THAT
ACTUALLY REPLIED TO POLICY
SOMETHING REALLY INFUTURED HIM
ABOUT OBAMA BEING ELECTED
INSTEAD OF HIM.
THAT'S THE WAY HE SAW IT.
THAT ANIMATED THIS.
WHEN I SAW HIM COME DOWN THAT HE
IS CLATER.
I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S SIMPLY A
PUBLICITY STUNT BUT IT WON'T
MATTER BECAUSE THERE IS
SOMETHING -- THERE IS SOMETHING
ABOUT THE WAY HE APPROACHED THAT
TELEVISION SHOW MADE NO SENSE TO
ME.
PEOPLE WHO LIKED IT, LOVED IT,
THERE IS A CONNECTIVE FACTOR HE
HAS A A INDID HE FAT IG ABILITY
WHICH I CREDIT HIM FOR.
THOSE ARE THE PRINCIPLES YOU
COULD START A DEMAGOGUERY SCHOOL
IF YOU WANTED TO.
MY SUGGESTION IS HE DID.
WHAT WE KNOW AND DIDN'T KNOW, I
TOOK IT SERIOUSLY.
>> YOU STARTED ACTUALLY WITH THE
COMMENTARIES BEFORE THE SFWLEEKS
NO, YES, WE STARTED THEM AT G.Q.
IN SEPTEMBER OF 2016.
I STARTED TRUMP PIECES FOR OTHER
OUTLETS BACK IN MARCH.
>> DID YOU HAVE ANY SUSPICIONS
THAT -- THAT HE INDEED MAY WELL
BE ELECTED PRESIDENT OF THE
UNITED STATES BACK WHEN YOU
FIRST STARTED DOING THIS.
>> WELL HE IS THE NOMINEE.
THUS THERE IS ALWAYS THE CHANCE
OF THE ELECTION.
IT WAS AS MANY PEOPLE SAID WITH
SARAH PALIN'S NOMINATION AS VICE
PRESIDENT IN 2008, WE BELIEVE
LOOK SHE IS GOING TO CRASH JOHN
McCAIN.
WHAT IF SHE DOESN'T.
WHAT IF SHE IS VICE PRESIDENT?
YOU MUST TAKE THAT POSSIBILITY
SERIOUSLY.
I DON'T THINK ANYBODY WOULD
ARGUE THAT HILLARY CLINTON WAS
THE GREATEST CANDIDATE OF ALL
TIMES.
SHE HAS SAID SHE WOULD HAVE BEEN
FAR BETTER IN THE JOB THAN THE
INTERVIEW.
THERE WAS A SERIES OF PERFECT
STORMS COMING TOGETHER.
THE THING I NOTICED EARLY IN
2006 THAT AS HE NEARED THE
NOMINATION EVEN LATE 2015 WE ARE
NOW STUCK IN MOST NEWS MEDIA,
PARTICULAR MRI IN TELEVISION IN
THIS THIS WELL YOU'VE GOT THREE
PEOPLE WHO SAY HE IS ABSOLUTELY
OUT OF HIS MIND AND MIGHT AS
WELL BE A FACIST DICTATOR OR
INVAEDER FROM ANOTHER COUNTRY.
THEREFORE WE HAVE TO HAVE THREE
OTHER PEOPLE ON DISAGREEING.
SOMEONE ELSE NODS GRAVELY AND
GOES TO BREAK.
WE ARE SO MARRIED ON TELEVISION
TO THE IDEA OF BALANCE AND IT'S
A FALSE GOD TO MY MIND AND THE
OBJECTIVITY IS ANOTHER FALSE GOD
THAT -- THE SYSTEM BOTH IN TERMS
OF JOURNALISM AND EVEN THE
DEMOCRACY IS NOT DSH IS NO
LONGER SHARP EDGED ENOUGH TO PUT
DOWN THE EQUIVALENT OF AN
INTERNAL REVOLUTION.
ALL THE THINGS WE THOUGHT AND
FWRU UP AND WATCHED AND KNEW
NOTHING LIKE THIS COULD HAPPEN
HERE WERE NOT STRONG ENOUGH TO
WITHSTAND SOMEBODY WHO WOULD
SIMPLY SAY I'M NOT PLAYING BY
THE RULES.
BY THE WAY OFF AND ON OF THEM
ARE IN LAW.
YOU THINK THEY'RE LAW AND
THEY'RE JUST CUSTOM.
THIS IS WHAT I SAW COMING.
AND I DON'T CLAIM TO HAVE
PREDICTED HIS WIN.
BUT I THOUGHT IT WAS GOING TO BE
CLOSER THAN MOST DID.
AND THERE WERE IN FACT
PERFECT -- ANOTHER SERIES OF
PERFECT STORMS ON ELECTION DAYNA
ALLOWED THIS TO HAPPEN AND THEY
WERE PERCEIVABLE.
TO ME THE BEST USE OF MY TIME
LAST YEAR WAS TO TRY TO YOU KNOW
SORT OF SAY, HEY, THIS -- TAKE
IT SERIOUSLY AND HERE IS WHAT
YOU NEED TO TAKE SERIOUSLY.
THE FIRST PIECE WE DID WAS 176
REASONS HE SHOULDN'T HAVE BEEN
PRESIDENT.
>> THE REPUBLICAN PARTY HAS
NOMINATED A PRESIDENT A MAN WHO
ATTACKED THE POPE, ATTACKED JOHN
McCAIN FOR BEING CAPTURED BY THE
NORTH VIETNAMESE.
ATTACKED GOLD STAR PARENTS AND
JUKT POSSESSED THEIR NAMES WITH
THE PHRASE RADICAL ISLAMIC
TERRORISM.
ATTACKED HILLING AS UNHINGED, AS
THE DEVIL AS THE MOST CORRUPT
CANDIDATE EVER.
THE REPUBLICAN PARTY HAS
ACTUALLY NOMINATED FOR PRESIDENT
AN ERR RESPONSIBLE, UNREALISTIC,
KNIFE, PET LANT, CHILISH WSH
PITHED.
MISOGYNISTIC AUTHORITIARIAN,
INSENSE ERR RATIONAL, INHUMAN
INDIVIDUAL.
NAMED DAWNED JOHN TRUMP.
THIS IS MADNESS.
>> WITH ALL OF THAT YOU LAID
OUT, 176 REASONS WHY HE
SHOULDN'T BE PRESIDENT, MANY OF
WHICH WOULD HAVE DITTES
QUALIFIED OTHER PEEN PEOPLE AND
WE MARVEL AT THAT AS WE LOOK
BACK ON THE ELECTION.
IF YOU CAME ACROSS A PERSON WHO
SAYS TO YOU, LOOK I WAS A TRUMP
SUPPORTER.
>> RIGHT.
>> ON A YOU KNOW WHAT EVERYTHING
YOU SAY IN THE 176 REASONS IS
ABSOLUTELY ACCURATE AND TRUE AND
CORRECT.
>> UM-HUM.
>> BUT I VOTED FOR HIM ANYWAY.
>> RIGHT SFWLA BECAUSE I DON'T
CARE ABOUT THE MAN.
I JUST CARE ABOUT WHAT HE SAID
HE WOULD DO FOR US AND LOWER
TAXES A, AND I'M A BUSINESS
PERSON.
AND I WANT TO -- DID MAYBE I'M
BIG BUSINESS I WANT TO BRING MY
MONEY BACK FROM ABROAD.
ALL THE THINGS HE TALKED ABOUT.
THAT PERSON SAYS YOU'RE RIGHT.
I DON'T CARE.
HOW DO YOU ANSWER THAT PERSON?
BECAUSE THEY'RE AROUND.
>> MY POINT TO THEM HAS ALWAYS
BEEN THE SAME.
HE HAS SOLD OUT EVERYBODY.
AT SOME POINT.
HE WILL SELL YOU OUT.
AND MANY OF THE -- I MEAN THE
REASON THAT THOSE FIRM
SUPPORTERS, VERY ENTHUSIASTIC
ABOUT HI PRESIDENCY WHY THOSE
NUMBERS TANK AND DON'T GET THE
ATTENTION OF THE FLAT
DISAPPROVAL, APPROVAL NUMBER IS
PEOPLE REALIZING I'VE BEEN
CONNED.
THAT'S WHAT HE DOES.
THAT'S THE PREMISES.
THAT'S HOW HE SUCCEEDED BECAUSE
HE CONVINCED EVERYBODY THERE IN
A MANNER THAT HASN'T BEEN SEEN I
THINK IN AMERICAN POLITICKINGS
SINCE FDR WHERE HE WAS ABLE TO
SAY YOU'RE THE ONLY PERSON I'M
TALKING IT TOP FDR DID IT WITH
FIRESIDE TRIETS WITH TWIST
TWITTER.
>> BILL CLINTON HAD A WAY OF
DOING THAT HE WOULD WALK OUT OF
THE ROOM YOU KNEW THAT YOU WALK
OUT SAYING I'M HIS NEW BEST
FRIEND.
>> SO MANY POLITICIANS GO IN A
ROOM AND YOU GO THAT'S THE OWN
PERSON IN THE ROOM THE
BRILLIANTS WILL BE ABLE TO SAY
THAT USEFUL FEEL YOU'RE THE OWN
PERSON IN THE ROOM.
BUT WITH TWITTER YOU DON'T READ
TWITTER IN A GROUP OF 25 PEOPLE
OR A CROWD.
YOU'RE READ GOING DIRECTLY.
IF I TWEET SOMETHING, SOMEBODY
READS IT AND IT'S THE
CONVERSATION BACK IS NO DID YOU
SEE WHAT KEITH OLBERMAN SAID?
IT'S ADDRESSED TO ME AS IF I'M
ONLY TALKING TO THE RECIPIENT.
HE HAS MANAGED TO USE USE AS FDR
DID DID A STATE OF THE ART
CHANGE IN MEDIA TO GET PAST THE
ESTABLISHED MEDIA WHICH WAS THE
POINT OF THE FIRESIDE CHATS
STARTED AS FRANKLIN ROOSEVELT AS
GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK TRYING TO
GET PASSED A CONSERVATIVE
LEGISLATURE AND DRUM UP SUPPORT
WITH THE AUDIENCE.
>> TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THE NEW
TECHNOLOGY, THE RADIO.
>> MY POINT TO THE SUPPORTERS
IS, YEAH, THIS IS COINED OF --
THIS IS THE THING.
EVERY CONTRACT, EVERYTHING HE
EVER HAS PAID FOR HE HAS PAID 85
TO 90% OF BECAUSE HE KNOWS YOU'D
HAVE TO SUE HIM FOR THE OTHER
10% AND IT WOULD COST YOU MORE
THAN THE OTHER 10%.
MY POINT TO ALL OF THEM HAS
ALWAYS BEEN YEAH BUT IT'S
EVENTUALLY GOING TO BE YOUR
TURN.
WHAT DO YOU THINK YOU'RE GETTING
OUT OF THIS LONG-TERM?
AND THE POINT IS THAT THE PEOPLE
WHO ARE SUPPORTING HIM -- I MEAN
THAT THOSE IN POWER CAN BE
SUMMARIZED BY AT OPERATIVE,
POLITICKING OPERATIVE WHO WORKED
WITH HIM ON HIS CAMPAIGN
THROUGHOUT.
I WAS SITTING DO AGO PANEL
DISCUSSION ON ANOTHER TELEVISION
PROGRAM AND MY ARGUMENT -- THIS
IS SEPTEMBER OF LAST YEAR -- MY
ARGUMENT WAS HE WAS NOT STABLE
ENOUGH TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE
UNITED STATES.
I SAID NOT TO PUT TOO FINE A
POINT ON IT BUT I THINK HE IS
CRAZY.
WE CAN FIGURE OUT WHAT THAT
MEANS AND WHAT THE DIAGNOSIS I'M
NOT A PROFESSIONAL I CAN'T TELL
YOU WHAT BUT I KNOW CRAZY WHEN I
SEE IT.
AND YOU SHOULD MEET MY FAMILY.
I KNOW ENOUGH CRAZY PEOPLE.
BUT MY POINT WAS REPEATING IN
ONE PREMISES, AT THE ENOF IT
ONCE THE CAMERAS WERE OFF THIS
GUY IN THE POLITICAL BUSINESS
FOR 60 YEARS HE TURNS TO ME BY
THE WAY YOU'RE RIGHT HE IS CRAZY
BUT HE IS GETTING US INTO POWER.
AND THAT'S AN AWFUL SFAT OF
AFFAIRS TO THE COUNTRY.
I DON'T MEAN TO MAKE LIGHT BUT
THAT'S WHY PAUL RYAN SAYS WELL
WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO?
AND THESE CHARACTERS COMING OUT
OF THE WOODWORK TO RUN FOR
OFFICE IN THE PUBLIC SERVICE
HOSPITAL TO MAKE HOMOSEXUALITY
ILLEGAL.
IN THE PAST TIME THE MEDIA
COMPLEX WOULD ENGULF THEM LIKE
THE WHITE BLOOD CELLS GO AFTER A
GRM.
>> WHY NOT IN AND OUT WHY
DIFFERENT.
>> THE MONEY I SUSPECT IS AT THE
ROOT OF IT.
IF THAT MUCH MONEY IS REQUIRED
FOR YOU TO GET PENNSYLVANIA
HOUSE SEAT YOU'RE NOT EVER GOING
TO HAVE PEOPLE WHO CAN AFFORD IT
O TO DO IT ON THEIR OWN.
EVEN MOUA MY YOUTH PEOPLE WERE
ELECTED TO CONGRESS AND DIDN'T
SPEND 100,000 ON THE CAMPAIGN.
THAT'S NOT THE CASE ANYMORE.
WE'RE MOVING TO MULTIMILLION
DOLLARS AND WE'LL BE BEYOND THAT
SHORTLY JUST FOR A SEAT IN THE
HOUSE.
WITH THAT MUCH MONEY AND POWER
BEHIND IT COMES PERKS AND AN
INCESTANT NEED TO BE RE-ELECTED
AND CONSTANT STATE OF GETTING
THE PEOPLE MOST LIKELY TO VOTE
WHO ARE ALWAYS THE MOST
ENTHUSIASTIC, ALWAYS THE MOST
ZEALOUS.
AND THEY'RE GOING TO BE THE ONES
WHO WANT TO CHANGE LAWS AND TO
RESTRICT BEHAVIOR OR TO -- TO BE
FAIR TO BOTH SIDES.
THE PEOPLE WHO ARE LIKELIEST TO
VOTE AGAINST THE DEM A GOING
WITH ONES WITH SPECIAL INTERESTS
OF THEIR OWN.
I AGREE WITH THEM.
THAT'S WHERE WE ARE NOW.
THE PERCENTAGE OF WHO DIDN'T
VOTE, WHO DIDN'T, MOUM VOTES
TRUMP GOT.
WE'RE STILL WITH A ELECTION
WHERE THE TOTAL VOTE IS THE
MINORITY IN THE COUNTRY.
THERE ARE SO MANY PEOPLE THIS
DON'T MATTER, WHO VOTED LAST
NOTIFY.
>> AREN'T CONCERNED ENOUGH TO GO
TO THE LOCAL PLACE AND PULL A
LEVER.
>> EVEN THE ONES WHO DID WSH
SHALL WSH -- WE'RE IN THE MIDDLE
OF THIS IF YOU REMIND YOURSELF
YOU'RE IN A BUBBLE BECAUSE
YOU'RE POLITICALLY ACTIVE OR IN
FLIKT POLITICS OR COVERING
POLITICS.
THAT'S HEALTHY ENOUGH WHO YOU
DON'T NEGLECT PEOPLE WHO DON'T
SPEND 24 HOURS A DAY DOING IT.
BUT MOST VOTERS ARE NOT GOING TO
SEND -- NOT HAVING A MEETING
EVERY WEEK TO DECIDE WHO THEY'RE
VOTING.
THEY'RE DECIDE THAT DAY.
IF THEY DON'T ALREADY INS
TRINSICALLY KNOW.
THE ONES UNDECIDED WOULD DECIDE
THE WEEK BEFORE HAND AND SPEND
FIVE TEN MINUTES ON IT THAT'S
ALL IT IS WORTH.
BECAUSE THEY DON'T PERCEIVE IT
AS IMPORTANT.
IF THERE IS ANYTHING POSITIVE
COMING OUT OF THIS SHALL DID
SHALL I'M O I'M HOPING PEOPLE
REALIZE HOW IMPORTANT IT IS.
>> LET ME GET BACK TO THE WHAT
YOU MENTIONED BEFORE WSH THE
CHARACTERIZATION OF OF DONALD
TRUMP BEING CRAZY.
>> YES.
>> CLEARLY AS I SAID IN THE
INTRODUCTION YOU HAVE ALWAYS
BEEN PROVOCATIVE AND THOUGHTFUL
IN YOUR COMMENTS, COMMENTARIES
YOUR APPROACH TO THINGS.
I CAN SAY THAT HAVING WORKED
WITH YOU AND BEEN A GUEST ON
YOUR SHOW.
>> YES.
>> SO YOU'VE NEVER SHIED AWAY
FROM THAT.
IF YOU GENUINELY BELIEVED IT.
MY QUESTION IS THIS, YOU ARE
TALKING ABOUT THE PRESIDENT OF
THE UNITED STATES.
>> YEAH.
>> AND WE OFTEN HEAR PEOPLE SAY
ALL RIGHT I MIGHT NOT LIKE THE
OCCUPANTS BUT WE NEED TO HAVE A
CERTAIN DEGREE OF RESPECT FOR
THE OFFICE.
>> YES.
>> DOES THAT THEN IN ANY WAY
CONCERN YOU ABOUT SAYING --
YOU'RE NOT SAYING HE IS I HAD
OWE SIN KRATIC BE WITH ODE OR
QUICKIE.
>> SOMETHING CLINICAL.
>> SOMETHING CLINICAL.
>> YES IS THERE A PART OF YOU
THAT SAYS MAYBE I SHOULDN'T BE
CHARACTERIZING THE PRESIDENT OF
THE UNITED STATES LIKE THAT.
>> WELLS IT THERE IS TWO
ANSWERS.
ONE IS WE DID PUT THE STAR OVER
ONE OF THE LETTERS IN THE MIDDLE
WORD.
WE DID BACK OFF.
WE DID TONE IT DOWN A LITTLE
BIT.
NOT ALL THE COMMENTARIES HAVE
THIS -- ARE NOT PREDICATED ON
THIS.
>> RIGHT THEY'RE NOT I WANT TO
MAKE IT CLEAR TO PEOPLE IT'S NOT
ALL THAT.
BUT IT'S A LOT OF DIFFERENT
LOOKS AT DIFFERENT ISSUES.
>> ALSO, I DID ADDRESS MY
OPINION OF HIS MENTAL HEALTH AS
LONG AGO AS NOVEMBER OF 2015.
SO IT IS TO SOME DEGREE -- HE
THE ONE WHO DECIDED TO BE
PRESIDENT.
IT'S NOT MY FAULT THAT THIS MAN
WHO I CALLED CRAZY IS NOW THE
CRAZY PRESIDENT AS OPPOSED TO
THE CRAZY EXTV STAR OR WHATEVER
YOU WOULD HAVE DESCRIBED HIM AS
A YEAR AND A HALF AGO.
THE ISSUE OF THE RESPECT FOR THE
OFFICE ABE PAINS ME BITTERLY
EACH TIME I HAVE TO ADDRESS IT.
BUT I -- I THINK THIS IS PART OF
THE PROBLEM.
WE HAVE -- WE ARE ALL -- ALL OF
US WHO POLITICAL NEWS
WHEREAS YOU'LL KNOW YOU AND I
BOTH WORK IN BOTH SPORTS AND
POLITICS.
IN SPORTS YOU GO TO ANY GAME AND
YOU THINK, SOMETHING WILL LIKELY
HAPPEN HERE THAT I'VE NEVER SEEN
BEFORE, EVEN IF IT'S JUST A
SEQUENCE OF EVENTS.
>> YOU ALMOST HOPE IT WILL.
>> BUT I'M READY FOR IT'S THE
TIM McCARVER BASEBALL GAME.
I'VE BEEN TO 30,000 GAMES.
ALL RIGHT FAIR ENOUGH.
IN POLITICKING IT'S THE REVERSE.
WE WANT TO NARROW EVERYTHING
DOWN BACK INTO A FORMULA WE CAN
UNDERSTAND BECAUSE WE HAVE
CERTAIN PROCEDURES AND RULES.
AND THIS IS -- WELL MAYBE THIS
IS LIKE LYNDON JOHNSON AFTER HIS
GALL BLADDER SURGERY IN 1965 OR
WHEN WOODROW WILSON HAD HIS
STROKE AND THEN DIDN'T PERCEIVE
HE HAD A STROKE.
NIECE ARE UNPRECEDENTED THINGS.
AND IF THE FORMS OF POLITICS AND
GOVERNMENT AND BEING PRESIDENT
ARE TO BE TORN DOWN BY THE
PRESIDENT, I DON'T THINK IT'S
BEHOLDEN ON THE REST OF US TO
PLAY BY THE RULES.
IF HE HAS TAKEN THE RULES AND
SAID SCREW THIS I'M DOING WHAT I
WANT, WHICH I THINK NK WHO HATES
HIM AND LOVES HIM IS A GOOD
DESCRIPTION.
SCREW THIS I'M DOING WHATEVER I
WANT.
IF THAT'S THE CASE THOSE WHO ARE
ASSESSING AND CRITICIZING AND
SUPPORTING HIM I THINK ARE
ENTITLED TO FOLLOW HIS RULES
HERE.
AND I DON'T -- I'M NOT PROUD OF
SAYING THAT I THINK THE CHT OF
THE UNITED STATES IS NOT --
IS -- HIS BRAIN DOESN'T WORK
RIGHT.
I'M NOT PROUD OF THAT I WISH IT
WEREN'T THE CASE.
BUT THE IDEA THAT I CAN'T SAY IT
BECAUSE HE IS PRESIDENT IS TO ME
A LITTLE -- IT'S SOWETO IN A
WAY.
IT'S GOD BLESS AMERICA AND IT'S
MR. SMITH GOES TO WASHINGTON.
BUT THAT'S NOT WHERE WE ARE AT
THE MOMENT.
TO ME WE'RE IN DESPERATE TROUBLE
IN THE SAME KIND OF WAY IF SOME
OTHER COUNTRY HAD INVADED AND
INSTALLED A PRESIDENT, CALLED
HIM PRESIDENT.
DO WE HAVE TO RESPECT HIM THE
WAY WE SPECULATED THE LAST
PRESIDENTS ELECTED IN?
I DON'T THINK SO.
THERE IS UNDERTONES OF THE
POSSIBILITY THAT MIGHT BE
PARTIALLY TRUE THE SCENARIO I
JUST DESCRIBED RELATED TO RUSSIA
ANYWAY.
>> WE COULD TAKE HOURS TO DO
THIS.
UNFORTUNATELY WE ARE LIMITED IN
THE SITUATION.
>> WE ALL SPEND HOURS TALKING
ABOUT IN EVERY DAY.
>> YOU AND I HAVE TO TALK MORE
THAN EVERY 20 YEARS.
>> THAT WOULD BE GOOD.
>> AGAIN IT'S CALLED "TRUMP IS
F-ING CRAZY.
THIS IS NOT A JOKE."
IT'S A THOUGHT PROVOKING
COLLECTION OF COMMENTARIES WE
APPRECIATE YOUR SPENDING TIME
WITH US GET YOU BACK SOMETIME
TOON.
>> MY PLEASURE I LIVE IN THE
NEIGHBORHOOD.
>> YOU BE WELL.
No comments:
Post a Comment