Tuesday, October 9, 2018

Trump news on Youtube Oct 9 2018

Donald Trump not only disagreed with Taylor Swift's political opinions ahead of the midterm elections, but he took jabs at her music

Watch the shocking video from Oct. 8, here!    President Donald Trump, 72, is fired up after Taylor Swift, 28, put Tennessee's Republican Senate candidate Marsha Blackburn on blast

In an unprecedented move for the pop star, Taylor broke her silence on political affairs in a lengthy Instagram post on Oct

7, slamming the Senate candidate for voting against "equal pay for women" and the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act, among other things

But Trump didn't appreciate Taylor joining the conversation. "Let's say that I like Taylor's music about 25% less now," the POTUS said to reporters outside the White House on Oct

8.    In lieu of Marsha, Taylor said she'll be casting her vote for Democratic Senate candidate Phil Bredesen and Democrat Jim Cooper for the House of Representatives

But Trump wasn't only happy that she's voting for the opposing party. He took her callout towards the Republican Senate candidate personally! "Marsha Blackburn is doing a very good job now in Tennessee

She's leading now substantially, which she should," Trump also told the reporters

"She's a tremendous woman. I'm sure Taylor Swift doesn't know anything about her

" Ouch! Watch Trump say the words himself, below.  Many were shocked after Taylor shared her midterm voting plans to her 112 million Instagram followers

The "Look What You Made Me Do" singer has received backlash in the past for not being vocal about her political standing, after being heralded as an "Aryan Goddess" by Andrew Anglin, a white supremacist, among others

But Taylor put to bed any rumors that she's a supporter of the alt-right with her latest Instagram post! "In the past I've been reluctant to publicly voice my political opinions, but due to several events in my life and in the world in the past two years, I feel very differently about that now," Taylor wrote in Sunday's post

"I always have and always will cast my vote based on which candidate will protect and fight for the human rights I believe we all deserve in this country

" "Let's say that I like Taylor's music about 25% less now," Pres. Trump jokes following Taylor Swift's endorsement of Democratic Tennessee senatorial candidate Phil Bredesen

https://t.co/D0fh71pQFl pic.twitter.com/4qeR6fCZcr  — ABC News (@ABC) October 8, 2018    "I cannot vote for someone who will not be willing to fight for dignity for ALL Americans, no matter their skin color, gender or who they love," Taylor continued to write

Oct. 9 is the last day for Tennesseans to register to vote for the midterms, as Taylor pointed out in her post

For more infomation >> Donald Trump Slams Taylor Swift For Endorsing TN Democrat Candidate: I Like Her 'Less Now' - Daily N - Duration: 3:27.

-------------------------------------------

DONALD TRUMP - WikiVidi Documentary - Duration: 24:45.

For more infomation >> DONALD TRUMP - WikiVidi Documentary - Duration: 24:45.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump made remarks about Kavanaugh being confirmed in the Supreme Court - Duration: 1:47.

For more infomation >> President Trump made remarks about Kavanaugh being confirmed in the Supreme Court - Duration: 1:47.

-------------------------------------------

Trump apologizes to Kavanaugh during swearing-in ceremony - Duration: 0:41.

For more infomation >> Trump apologizes to Kavanaugh during swearing-in ceremony - Duration: 0:41.

-------------------------------------------

History Project- Trump's Executive Order (Final Draft) - Duration: 5:41.

Folks we have no choice. We have no choice. Without looking at the data, it is

clear that Muslim hatred against Americans is beyond comprehension. We

have to figure out where the hatred comes from because we can't live like

this. It's just gonna get worse and worse and were going to have more world

trade center events. Folks those days are over, we have to be tough, we have to be

smart, we have to be vigilant. Yes, we have to look at mosques and we have to

respect mosques. Folks we have no choice.

Good morning and welcome to Channel 84. I'm Janna Hannington with the latest on

Executive Order 13769. You've just heard President Trump address the

order, also known as the Muslim Travel Ban, that was issued 4 days ago, on

January 27, 2017. This order bans entry from seven majority-Muslim countries for

90 days following the signing of the order. Let's hear from Murt Doorknob,

legislation expert, to give us more detail on this executive order.

Thank you Janna. Yes, President Trump's Executive Order 13769 enacts 6 new policies.

First, it suspends the Syrian refugee program indefinitely. This means that no

Syrian refugees are allowed in the country at all.

Second, it bans seven majority-Muslim countries – Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan,

Syria and Yemen – for 90 days after the signing of the executive order.

This temporarily banned entry of dual-nationals who are from those seven

countries, but have an additional passport for 90 days following the

signing of the order. This is the part of the ban that caused a lot of confusion.

Now, back to Janna. Thank you, Murt Doorknob. Now let's hear

from Bruce Hemmington—here to tell us about his experience being held at an

airport trying to travel to the US the day Executive Order 13769 was signed.

Thank you Janna. My name is Bruce Hemmington and I have a Syrian citizenship and a U.K. passport.

When I arrived at the airport, I was not allowed to enter

the U.S. even though the U.K. is not banned. I was told the reason is because I

have a Syrian citizenship. It isn't until 90 days after the executive order was

signed I was allowed back in the country.

Thank you, Bruce Hemmington, for sharing your story. We hope the confusion gets resolved soon.

Anything to add, Murt Doorknob?

What happened to Bruce Hemmington was a common confusion at the airport that day. Lawsuits are currently being enacted.

The ban also suspended the Syrian refugee program for 120 days.

This means that no Syrian refugees can enter the country during these 4 months.

During this period, the government can accept refugees on a case by case basis, but

only in the following scenarios: if they are a religious minority facing

religious persecution, if the U.S. must admit the person to meet an international

agreement, or if they are already in transit and denying admission would cause

undue hardship. It capped the total refugee admissions for the fiscal year 2017 at 50,000.

Thank you, Murt Doorknob, for giving us the specifics.

It seems this ban has put a lot of restriction on immigration.

I have Hubert Manuel, an immigration expert, here to talk about the negative impacts of the ban.

The executive order brings up the issue that there are simply not enough workers in the US.

"Employers nationwide are grappling with a problem

that threatens to stall economic growth" reported by the Washington Post.

The order not only hurts the economy but it also separates children from their parents.

"More than 2,000 children already separated from their parents;

the executive order does nothing to address that nightmare,"

said Michelle Brané, director of the Migrant Rights and Justice Program

at the Women's Refugee Commission. Back to you, Janna.

Thank you, Hubert Manuel, for sharing the impact of the Travel Ban. Executive Order 13796

created a lot of unrest and protest. Here's a field reporter

Brucelle Burtigan on site at one of the many airport protests.

Thank you, Janna. Currently, there are thousands of people gathered at

airports all around the country; in Chicago, San Francisco, and Washington DC, and more.

We're here today at The John F. Kennedy International Airport in Queens, New York City.

Over 2,000 families, children and neighbors are gathered here today

for the 11 people that are being held at JFK's airport. Julia Carmel, an organizer and

one of the protesters at the scene, said: "The purpose of our protest at JFK airport

is twofold. First, we are demanding the safe release of refugees

and other visa-holders, all of whom cooperated with a long and gruelling

vetting process in order to get here. Additionally, the central message of our

protest is that we are all immigrants or children of immigrants and refugees.

The executive order is not only inhumane; it is absurd and hypocritical."

Thank you, Brucelle Burtigan, for sharing the emotional response of the ban.

And thank you to all our guests today for sharing your point of views and knowledge!

Before forming an opinion about an issue, the most important thing is to be educated.

Once again, I'm Janna Hannington with Channel 84.

Stay tuned for updates on Executive Order 13769 at 10pm.

you

For more infomation >> History Project- Trump's Executive Order (Final Draft) - Duration: 5:41.

-------------------------------------------

Si ganan los demócratas, EU se convertirá en Venezuela: Trump - Duration: 2:58.

Al estilo de las pasadas elecciones, cuando los opositores advertían a la ciudadanía que un voto para AMLO significaba dar un paso hacia lo que Venezuela vive actualmente, el mandatario de Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, aplicó la fórmula y, en contexto de las próximas elecciones, advirtió a sus fans y detractores que el Partido Demócrata hundirá a su país a los niveles de la República Bolivariana

A menos de un mes de que se celebren los comicios del 6 de noviembre —en el que se elegirán 35 senadores, 435 diputados y 36 gobernadores— declaró que los demócratas impulsan una política de izquierda similar a la de Nicolás Maduro, presidente de Venezuela: "La base principal de los demócratas está tan a la izquierda que terminará siendo Venezuela, este país terminará siendo Venezuela"

"Los demócratas se han vuelto extremos y muy peligrosos para gobernar… ¡Vota Republicano!", escribió en Twitter

¿Por qué lo dice? Más allá de una alerta bien fundamentada, Trump entiende la posibilidad de que el Partido Republicano pierda lugares en el Congreso —es casi una tradición que el partido que lleve las riendas en la Casa Blanca, pierda en las elecciones intermedias—, en las elecciones que se realizarán en todos los estados de ese país y en 36, se elegirán gobernadores

Y es que el magnate se ha encargado de presumir avances durante su gestión, con datos y declaraciones imprecisas que tienen como finalidad tranquilizar a sus seguidores y no tan seguidores, en un escenario donde la desigualdad económica continúa imperando

De hecho, BBC publicó un reporte —a comienzos del año— en el que se dio a la tarea de desmenuzar las declaraciones de Trump

Lo que encontró fue: varios de los avances fueron una consecuencia de las políticas del gobierno de Barack Obama

Van ejemplos: el descenso del desempleo comenzó desde la gestión del demócrata, aún no se incentiva el crecimiento económico y desde la administración de Obama, el proceso ha sido lento

Y el escenario en los mercados presentaron una recuperación… pero a partir de 2013, comenzaron los récords en la Bolsa de Valores norteamericana

Todo con ayuda de la bandera demócrata. Sin embargo, para Trump la apuesta está hecha y en tablero político lo importante es preservar escaños, sin importar las precisiones o lanzar declaraciones que comparen una política gringa con la de Nicolás Maduro y Venezuela, en donde realmente las cosas están críticas y el nivel de austeridad en el país ha empujado a su población a migrar a otros países latinoamericanos

Pero así es Trump

For more infomation >> Si ganan los demócratas, EU se convertirá en Venezuela: Trump - Duration: 2:58.

-------------------------------------------

After Life Destroying Allegations And Torment, Trump Delivers Unexpected Surprise To The Kavanaughs - Duration: 6:23.

For more infomation >> After Life Destroying Allegations And Torment, Trump Delivers Unexpected Surprise To The Kavanaughs - Duration: 6:23.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Turns from Mic Mid Speech, Personally Addresses Kavanaugh After Heartfelt Apology - Duration: 4:31.

For more infomation >> Trump Turns from Mic Mid Speech, Personally Addresses Kavanaugh After Heartfelt Apology - Duration: 4:31.

-------------------------------------------

Trump team's contact with Mueller targets could taint findings - Duration: 10:44.

Donald Trump's lawyers have maintained an unusual level of contact with

attorneys representing clients court up in the expanding Russia probe

communication that could taint evidence that Special Counsel Robert Newell air

is collecting in his investigation of the president they're not being shy

about it either the president's attorneys talk openly

about these joint defense agreements that they say were established to keep

them connected with lawyers tied to the president's aides allies and associates

they took the lead in organizing weekly conference calls earlier this year to

strategize with other counsel during an intense period of Mueller's

investigation in total Trump's lawyers have publicly noted they

have more than 30 so-called jTA's with Mullah probe targets under these

agreements Trump's attorneys can seek details on everything from what

questions and documents Mueller's team is asking about to who's on the verge of

criminal indictment the arrangement itself is routine for complex

investigations where scores of people get drawn in as witnesses subjects and

even targets staying in touch through formalized jTA's is a way to share

information under the protection of attorney/client privilege

but the Trump teams use of jTA's has pushed legal boundaries especially in

the instances where the president's lawyers claim to have maintained these

relationships with defense teams representing Morley targets who have

flipped to cooperate with the Russia probe for legal experts it's an approach

in line with the team's broader strategy to ignore well-established norms

whether through campaign style attacks on the special counsel or blunt public

assessments of Mueller's movements this president is mounting a full-court

defensive press and is not particularly concerned with the optics of anything

said a white-collar lawyer who represents a senior Trump official in

the Russia investigation discerning Trump's legal strategy is always the

risky endeavor it changes frequently at the whim of a temperamental president

who has cycled through attorneys at a dizzying pace during the 17 month-old

investigation but legal experts say recent public

from trompe l'oeil rudy giuliani about jTA's could be part of a longer-term

plate to question the legitimacy of evidence the special council is

collecting from cooperating witnesses including former Trump campaign Chairman

Paul Manafort they may be trying to plant the seed that something about his

cooperation is improper somehow sadly Hoenig a former assistant u-s attorney

who prosecuted organized crime cases like the first rule preached in the

movie Fight Club commenting publicly about the existence of joint defense

agreements is supposed to be verboten but that doesn't seem to be the case for

the president's lawyers in a recent interview Giuliani said the president's

lawyers still have jTA's with attorneys representing at least 32 other people

pulled into the Russia probe that number doesn't include Michael Cohen the former

Trump personal lawyer who pleaded guilty in August to tax evasion financial fraud

and campaign finance charges and has since confirmed on Twitter that he met

with Mueller even though his plea didn't specifically call for cooperation

it also doesn't include former national security adviser Michael Flynn who ended

his jda with Trump's lawyers last November just a week before Flynn

pleaded guilty in the marula probe for lying to the FBI this is not entirely

unexpected Trump personal attorney Jay Sekulow said in a statement issued

shortly before Flynn pleaded guilty but it does apparently include a few

unexpected figures including manna Fitz the longtime GOP operative who pleaded

guilty in September to charges stemming from his lobbying work in Ukraine as

part of his deal with the moola team Manafort agreed to cooperate fully

truthfully completely and forthrightly on all relevant matters manifests degree

of cooperation will factor into the severity of the prison sentence

Mueller's team recommends to a federal judge such cooperation deals usually

signal the end of jTA's with others involved in the investigation similar to

how Flynn cut off his arrangement shortly before agreeing to cooperate

according to Giuliani though Trump's attorneys have maintained contact with

man it's lawyers throughout the Mulhare

investigation including during his high-profile trial in Alexandria

Virginia and in the days leading up to and after Manafort made his decision to

plead guilty in mid-september in Giuliani's telling mana Fitz lawyers

have remained in the JD a with the president's attorneys throughout the

process because the client has no useful information for Mueller about Trump

legal experts say they're perplexed by Giuliani's public insistence that jTA's

still exist for people known to be talking with federal prosecutors a

practice they say verges on unethical such arrangements are also almost

guaranteed to raise the ire of mullah as prosecutors typically only strike

cooperation deals with defendants on the condition that they withdraw from many

joints defense set up the only way they can still be in jda is if they have told

prosecutors the defendant has nothing on Trump and they believe him a second

defense lawyer working on the Russia investigation said of the Manafort

situation but Giuliani's comments also could be seen as a warning that the

president's lawyers are primed to challenge Mueller's authority to use

some of the evidence collected from Manafort or other cooperating witnesses

through jTA's as the bulk of information shared in this manner is supposed to be

covered by attorney-client privileges that means Trump's lawyers could try and

block Mualla from using evidence in court if they believe the details were

gleaned from attorneys operating under the terms of a JD a the special counsels

team does have plenty of room to maneuver though for starters jTA's don't

cover facts a witness knows independent of a JTA and while information Manafort

shared with trump under the JTA is privileged the former campaign chairman

can also waive that right if he wants to share the information with prosecutors

outside of the courtroom a different standard applies for instance Trump's

lawyers can't stop Mualla from putting the evidence a witness gleaned under a

JTA into a report to congr s the more likely forum for Mueller's findings

given indications that his team won't indict a sitting president

I am sure that Trump leaning members of Congress would claim the information is

tainted for all purposes but I don't think there is any authority for that

proposition said Jack Townsend a Virginia based tax attorney and former

Justice Department lawyer Morrell are also isn't prohibited from using

criminally incriminating details that were shared through a JTA such as a

discussion about a presidential pardon for Manafort in exchange for continuing

to fight the special counsels charges imagine if the Mafia used a jd8 are

trying to hide a conspiracy to commit crimes

that'll go no place said norm Ison a former top ethics official in the Obama

White House and a frequent critic of the Trump administration

manuf its attorneys declined comment when asked about the status of the JD a

with the Trump lawyers their client met last Monday with Mueller's team at its

washington d.c office joint defense agreements are new to high-profile

political investigations lawyers representing President Bill Clinton and

his White House staffers relied on them during the Independent Counsel

investigation into everything from the Clintons whitewater land deal to the

Monica Lewinsky scandal president george w bush's staffers but not the President

himself had their own jda arrangements during the special counsel investigation

into who leaked the identity of CIA operative Valerie Plame similarly those

pulled into the moola probe and other lawsuits stemming from the 2016 election

have established both formal and informal means to stay informed lawyers

for the longtime Trump operative Roger stone maintained a JD a with attorneys

from Trump's 2016 campaign as they battled a civil lawsuit brought by two

Democratic National Committee donors and a former staffer tied to the hacking of

their emails stones attorneys also have a JD a with lawyers for another former

Trump campaign staffer Michael Caputo who has been questioned by mullah in the

early stages of manifests defense against Mueller's charges his lawyers

even shared information with lawyers representing manaphy

long time deputy Rick gates that arrangements dissolved before gates

flipped and pleaded guilty claims of who's in and who's out of the Trump

legal teams jda arrangements aren't so simple either Giuliani told Reuters in

August that the president maintained a joint defense agreement with white House

Counsel Don McDonough but bill Burke the defense lawyer from a

gun said he never signed on to any jTA's with the president's attorneys my guys

are there to be witnesses Burke told POLITICO in January they're there to

tell whatever it is they're supposed to tell to answer questions truthfully

they're not coordinating strategy with the White House two other book clients

former White House chief of staff Reince Priebus and ex White House senior

strategist Steven Bannon also don't have jTA's with the president's lawyers

lawyers close to the Russia probe said Giuliani's comments about the use of

jTA's may also just be his way of spinning through a sensitive topic that

could ignite his famously cantankerous client one attorney close to the White

House warned against interpreting his comments as part of a larger long-term

strategy to undermine Mueller's efforts that gives Rudy way too much credit for

sanity and clarity as a strategist he's just not in the game said an attorney

close to the White House Ann Marie McAvoy a former defense attorney and

media consultant for gates said Giuliani's remarks about jTA's may be

aimed more at influencing the court of public opinion ahead of the midterm

elections and with the prospect that Democrats could soon be armed with

Mueller's findings and launched impeachment proceedings they're trying

to quash any thought that Trump is somehow at risk by coming

For more infomation >> Trump team's contact with Mueller targets could taint findings - Duration: 10:44.

-------------------------------------------

Republicans excited about President Trump's rally Tuesday - Duration: 1:39.

For more infomation >> Republicans excited about President Trump's rally Tuesday - Duration: 1:39.

-------------------------------------------

Kanye West Is Meeting With President Trump - Duration: 0:18.

For more infomation >> Kanye West Is Meeting With President Trump - Duration: 0:18.

-------------------------------------------

EKU Prepares For Trump's Visit - Duration: 1:41.

For more infomation >> EKU Prepares For Trump's Visit - Duration: 1:41.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Responds To Taylor Swift Political Endorsement - Duration: 0:43.

For more infomation >> Trump Responds To Taylor Swift Political Endorsement - Duration: 0:43.

-------------------------------------------

TRUMP - This is America - Duration: 1:21.

For more infomation >> TRUMP - This is America - Duration: 1:21.

-------------------------------------------

Middle Class Paying The Price Of Trump's Trade Wars - Duration: 3:50.

Donald Trump continues to escalate his trade wars, especially with China.

Now, they're not the only country we're currently trade warring with, but they are Donald Trump's

biggest targets.

He has imposed more tariffs on Chinese goods than any other countries, and like clockwork,

every single time he puts a new tariff on them they slap one on US goods, because, hey,

they can afford it, too.

Here's the problem, and this is something that economists in the US are starting to

warn us about, the people who are actually paying the price tag for Donald Trump's trade

wars are middle class consumers.

The majority of the goods that the Trump Administration has slapped these tariffs on, which could

be as much as $20 to $40 billion per year, are middle class spenders.

You know, think about it, they're not putting massive tariffs on yachts, or, you know, granite

countertops for new mansions.

No, it's consumer goods.

Refrigerators, air conditioners, toys, things like that, construction equipment.

You know, those are the things that average American citizens, you know, actually regardless

of your income level, those are things we have to purchase.

Now, it doesn't affect the wealthy elite.

I mean the top one percent, if they have to $100 to $200 dollars more for a refrigerator,

that doesn't matter to them, it doesn't affect them.

They go about their daily lives, they don't even notice that they've spent that, because

they got a million dollars sitting in the bank.

Meanwhile, the average consumer, who's living paycheck to paycheck, hoping to have maybe

$20 or $30 left in their bank account by the time that next paycheck hits, they can't afford

those price increases.

I mean, I've been in that position, I'm still in that position, to be perfectly honest with

you, to where a price increase on a major purchase already, of $100 to $200 can immediately

price it out of that person's range, for the middle class and the underclass.

And I know a lot of people watching this are in that same boat.

You know, there's a big difference between going down to the appliance store and spending

$800 on a new refrigerator, which is already painful, and spending $1000 on a new refrigerator.

You know, buying that new TV for $400 instead of buying it for $700.

But those are the kinds of price increases that we will see, some areas of the country

are already seeing them, under Donald Trump's trade wars.

And he can do that because people like him and all of his buddies in his cabinet, they're

all multi-millionaires, some multi-billionaires, they don't notice it.

It doesn't matter to them.

This is a trade war, like so many other things Trump has done, that was started out of vanity.

He picked a fight with China during his presidential campaign, he escalated it now that he's become

president, and he doesn't know how to end it because he doesn't even know what he's

doing.

So let me give him some very, very clear advice about what he's doing.

You're screwing over the middle class Mr. President.

You're screwing over the underclass.

Your wealthy friends, your family, you don't notice these price increases.

To you they are minuscule.

You even had members of your administration, Wilbur Ross, Commerce Secretary, come out

recently and tell us that, eh, they're not really gonna notice, it's not that bad.

Well guess what?

We've noticed.

It hurts, it's affecting consumer spending, and if it continues it's going to send your

economy into a death spiral that nothing you do is gonna be able to stop.

For more infomation >> Middle Class Paying The Price Of Trump's Trade Wars - Duration: 3:50.

-------------------------------------------

Democrats Freak As Trump Unveils 'Special Gift' For Obama On Columbus Day - Duration: 4:33.

For more infomation >> Democrats Freak As Trump Unveils 'Special Gift' For Obama On Columbus Day - Duration: 4:33.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Exposed Democrats Shameful Ways That Will Result In A Big Red Wave(VIDEO)!!! - Duration: 11:59.

Trump Exposed Democrats Shameful Ways That Will Result In A Big Red Wave

no I don't I thought the way they behaved was absolutely atrocious I've

never seen anything like it from the leaks of important documents to

the statements they made to watching a Blumenthal who was a fraud stirrer when

it came to Vietnam and what he did was horrible I thought that the way they

conducted themselves the way they dealt dealt with a high-level brilliant going

to be a great justice of the Supreme Court the way they really tortured him

and his family I thought it was a disgrace I don't know I thought it was

one of the most disgraceful performances I've ever seen

so I've been hearing that that now they're thinking about impeaching a

brilliant jurist a man that did nothing wrong a man that was caught up in a hoax

that was set up by the Democrats using the Democrats lawyers and now they want

to impeach him I've heard this from many people I think it's an insult to the

American public and I think you're gonna see a lot of things happen on November 6

that would not have happened before the amendment the American public has seen

this charade has seen this dishonesty by the Democrats and when you would mention

impeach a Justice of the United States Supreme Court who was a top scholar top

student top intellect and who did nothing wrong and there was no

corroboration of any kind and went through seven FBI investigations had

nothing to do with any of this stuff I mean you had the last one take a look at

the last one the things they said about him I don't even think he ever heard of

the words it was all made up that was fabricated and it's it this straight and

I think it's going to really show you something come November 6

I don't hear you

I think a lot of Democrats are going to vote Republican because I have many

friends that are Democrats the main base of the Democrats have shifted so far

left that will end up being Venezuela this country would end up being

Venezuela I think a lot of Democrats are going to be voting Republican on

November 6

very well document very well document it's been documented for many years very

well all public documents say it

I don't know what

I don't understand the words

not at all

look I'm traveling with rod I didn't know rod before but I've gotten to know

him and I get along very well with

right he's already on the court but that doesn't mean that Brett Kavanaugh is in

the eyes of some Democrats gonna stay on the court a number of leading efforts

especially if they gain the majority in the house to begin impeachment

proceedings against him C Boyden gray is the former White House Counsel for

Ronald Reagan and George Herbert Walker Bush expert in all these matters I don't

see where that would go but where do you think they would go I don't see where

would go either you you can impeach and that's like an indictment but the trial

is in the Senate it takes 2/3 two convicts it's really impossible to see

how you could get 2/3 of the vote now and especially if by the Republicans

pick up a seat or two which is entirely possible so I don't see where it goes

except more embarrassment more you know harm to the court and if the intention

is a media war against the legitimacy of the Supreme Court that is really that is

really dangerous in my view now you dealt with this over the days of

Clarence Thomas and capacity as being an advisor to him and he always had like a

target on him and I'm wondering did that ever dissipate after those controversial

hearings he was approved 52 48 in the Democratic Senate we might point out but

it was tooth Annelle the whole battle and there were promises much like in

this case to make him a marked man well I don't think it worked and remember he

got 11th Democratic votes so this was not a song right this was not a partisan

thing I think he suffered something of a cloud for a few years but he's now one

of the most respected members of the court he's known by by Democratic

scholars as well as Republican or conservative if you will as being one of

the leaders of the court he's the go-to man often when they can't remember what

they decided you know 15 years early in a particular case he's adored by his

colleagues and he's one of the most fun people to be with and he's very very fun

even though he doesn't talk when he's on the court that's right I forget about

that you know one of the things I've heard about trying to pursue impeachment

is that the judge Kavanagh perjured himself and then and I'm not a lawyer or

an expert on these things like you are but I started digging into it

well we're and how would he approach it himself and apparently it would Center

on the degree to which he might have minimize how often he got drunk in high

school and I'm thinking of myself boy are you kidding me

what do you make of it well my gosh I think god I never gonna be questioned

about my drinking at high school in college

don't go there we don't know but again a warrant man that's really what it comes

down to that that is where he was not very honest or forthcoming about

something he was doing in high school well I got the impression listening to

the hearings without the commentary that he he liked beer and he drank a lot

that's I never had he had any different view he liked to drink and that happens

to people in college it happens to people in high school and you know most

of us grow out of it but I can't say that I wouldn't be in

the same pickle season if I were in his shoes because I can't I can't make a

relative judgement about my own drinking when I was in college and I did some

things that I regret today and wouldn't do again and have done everything to

make sure that my my one daughter doesn't do hasn't done you know III see

a method to this and again I have no legal expertise that's one happy to have

you here but that didn't create doubts about his authenticity under oath and

that he might have misstated or minimize the potential that he could have blacked

out or you know just falling asleep after a heavy drinking thereby making

possible the claims of dr. Ford so I know what they're getting out here but

it does seem to stretch and maybe a dangerous precedent to use that as

precedent in future you know Supreme Court picks and that will go that far

back and asked those types of questions I think that's a very dangerous route to

take and if they do that they open up they take a risk that I wouldn't take if

I were they they open up de Blasio herself to the same kind of scrutiny and

I'm not sure she comes out so well if she's put under the spotlights away the

way they might do to to him so what what's needed by the country is some

sort of you know all right congratulation guys

you won let bygones be bygones we'll see you in court on another day and and

let's this accept this outcome and and and you know and get together because

the court is one of the prized crown jewels of our electoral system fair and

out see Boyd and great thank you very much our President Trump is

participating in a ceremonial swearing-in of Supreme Court justice

Brent Cavanaugh as Trump in this GOP celebrate the victory the nation's top

Democrats well the urging supporters to quote make

Republicans pay the price for break heaven on here now to discuss carry

seven RINO she's a former clerk for Justice Thomas are also current a

judicial crisis Network chief counsel Carrie let's talk about justice Kavanagh

uh he's he's starting to hiring some folks today he's putting his team

together and there's a lot of speculation on what kind of a justice he

will be yeah he had to have provisional clerks hired just to get ready because

he starts hearing cases on Tuesday tomorrow so it's it's it's getting a lot

up to speed so he already had his clerk kind of waiting in the wings ready to go

and this is gonna be the first time in history that any Supreme Court justice

says all four female clerks that'll be exciting to see even you know even

someone like Justice Ginsburg has not done that before so that that's really

in keeping with his pattern he feels very strongly about encouraging women

and minorities to get into clerking and it's a good leg up and in the legal

field so he's putting his money where his mouth was is a purse a carry you

spend time with Justice Thomas some some speculation some people thinking out

loud maybe the process may be as grueling and it's vitriolic as this

process was that something could have occurred within Brett Kavanaugh that

couldn't that it could actually influence his decisions from era now

there's any chance of that look he's someone who has been on the

bench for 12 years he's already hit his stride really I don't think you're gonna

see this affect him and that's great news because when you look at his 300

plus opinions so far it's a a very reasoned careful jurisprudence

he's very clear about sticking with the original understanding of the

Constitution sticking with the text of the laws trying his very hardest not to

let politics get in there and be very even-handed that's why you had people

like Obama's Solicitor General Don Verrilli stepping out and saying he'd be

great on the court Lisa Blatt a liberal feminist well the woman who's argued the

most cases before the Supreme Court she testified for him Akhil amar a yale law

professor as well so all of these are are people who really respect his

judicial approach it'll be it'll be the same going forward very even-handed but

but connected to the text of the law real quick area the 5/4 looks like the

balance of the court a lot of people are concerned the politicos ation of the

Supreme Court do you see it that way I think it's people who are trying to

make a pitch to say oh no I do I want the courts to shift back to the left

more look guys this is we have someone here who's going to follow the

constitutional law that means the law that's a liberal law he'll applied the

text that just like a conservative law but I don't think he's gonna be

susceptible to those arguments what will help the integrity of the court the most

is someone who's faithful to that oath that he took on Saturday and they just

taking again tonight at the White House I'm excited I'm gonna be heading to

there shortly to watch that if he's faithful that oath to the Constitution

that's the best recipe for deep politicizing the court thank you very

much Kerry we by the way appreciate you helping us with this throughout the

entire saga we appreciate a thing thank you

god bless you and God bless america

No comments:

Post a Comment