Tuesday, October 9, 2018

Trump news on Youtube Oct 10 2018

protests, not only in the civil

rights movement, but the labor

movement was able to get better

wages, able to get better

working conditions, able to get

better way, everything because

they learned to March and

protest.

And they still do it today.

We know that protest is

guaranteed to a democratic

we know that this is guaranteed

to us by the constitution.

They're trying to change the

description of protest and call

it a mob.

Well, this president is the

poster boy for what a mob

protester looks like.

He is -- matter of fact he's the

one who has been violent in his

he's the one in his rallies have

said things like this, I'd like

to punch him in the face.

Trump said that at one of his

rallies, he said knock the crap

out of them, would you, and

seriously, okay, just knock the

hell -- I mean, I promise I will

pay the legal fees.

That's the kind of talk that he

has done.

That's violent talk.

With don't have that kind of

talk that has come from the

women who are protesting.

As a matter of fact, this

country is past due for the kind

of protests that we have seen

women do in the last few days.

As we have gone through this

confirmation process of

Kavanaugh.

It is time for women to say that

we're tired of being

disrespected.

We're tired of being, you know,

called out our names, et cetera,

et cetera, and, of course, this

sexual assault that so many have

gotten away with for so long is

over.

The me too movement have gotten

us started, the marches that

we've been doing, we're not

going to back down, you're not

going to intimidate us, you're

not going to frighten us, you're

not going to take away our right

to stand up for ourselves.

And guess what?

While they're trying to say to

families you've got to be

worried about your boys,

families know, families know,

first of all, they've got to be

worried about all of their

children.

But they also understand, if

their daughters are to grow up

and to have careers and to have

confidence and to be able to

realize their full potential,

now is the time to embrace them

and stand with them as they push

For more infomation >> Rep. Maxine Waters Goes Off And Blows Up Trump's Claims That Protesters Are A Mob - Duration: 2:19.

-------------------------------------------

DONALD TRUMP - WikiVidi Documentary - Duration: 24:45.

For more infomation >> DONALD TRUMP - WikiVidi Documentary - Duration: 24:45.

-------------------------------------------

THE RINO IS BACK: Kasich Bashes Trump For Celebrating Justice Kavanaugh's Victory - Duration: 3:23.

Ohio Governor John Kasich spoke with CNN's Anderson Cooper and highly criticized and

rejected President Trump's celebratory attacks and celebrations after he defeats Democrats.

Kasich stated that he believed Trump's way of winning is detrimental to the future of

bipartisan politics and wants Republicans to reach out and help Democrats so that they

are not left with "nothing" upon defeat.

"Name-calling or celebrating in the locker room, that's not the way to move forward.

In fact, when you win that's when you should really go out of your way to figure out how

to hand something to those who've lost."

Ohio Governor John Kasich reacts to Trump's attacks on Democrats

Kasich brings up good points that both parties should work together to solve problems, utilizing

common sense and reaching agreements that bring people together, instead of pushing

them further apart, but there's just one big problem with that.

Does Kasich have any idea what Democrats just did to Brett Kavanaugh?

Was Kasich paying any attention at all to the defamation of character and plot to take

Kavanaugh out of the Supreme Court?

If Kasich wants a more bipartisan approach to solving problems, then most people would

be OK with that.

However, how are the Republicans supposed to approach a Democratic Party who stoops

to levels so low that they'll ruin a man's career and life just on the glimmer of hope

that they can prevent President Trump from appointing a conservative to the Supreme Court?

Is that the type of bipartisanship that Kasich is talking about?

How should Brett Kavanaugh feel about the Democrats after what just happened to him?

John Kasich called out President Trump for criticizing the people he doesn't like,

but he needs to take a long look at the people on the left side of politics and the shady

tactics they're using to undercut Republicans.

They are literally ruining people's lives just to defeat their enemy.

Where is the bipartisanship from the Democrats?

Next time Kasich criticizes Trump, he better have words to describe the Democrats as of

well.

Aren't the Democrats the ones tearing the country apart every time something doesn't

go their way?

Maybe bipartisanship isn't what they need, but a jail sentence sounds more like it.

Everything from protests, riots, assaulting people, and crying in public – it's hard

not to criticize that.

When people are pounding on the door of the Supreme Court because they don't like Brett

Kavanaugh, then how are Republicans supposed to act cordial and find themselves a way to

work together?

When Sen. Dianne Feinstein is granted the chance to read an FBI report on Christine

Blasey Ford and Brett Kavanaugh but claims she has to leave and refused to read the entire

report – then has the nerve to call it "incomplete" – what is Trump supposed to do with that?

There are so many problems with the Democratic Party and Trump is calling them out on it.

What's happening now is that others are seeing what their party has become and many

more will #WalkAway.

For more infomation >> THE RINO IS BACK: Kasich Bashes Trump For Celebrating Justice Kavanaugh's Victory - Duration: 3:23.

-------------------------------------------

Three or four sites being considered for North Korea summit: Trump - Duration: 2:15.

as president Donald Trump says three or four locations are being considered for

his upcoming summit with North Korean leader Kim jong-un

he said the list does not include Singapore the site for their first

summit in Juna Easton J starts us off

speaking at the White House on Tuesday President Trump discussed possible

locations for the highly anticipated second summit between himself and North

Korean leader Kim jong-un but among the possible locations Singapore probably

isn't going to be one of them well it is happening and we were setting that up

right now that was part of the reason that Mike was going over to meet there

setting up the meeting and we'll be announcing that probably a different

location Singapore was fantastic but we'll probably do a different location

when asked whether his Marle ago Resort in Florida could be a possible location

the US leaders say it might be he'd probably like that I'd like that too I

think it would be good we'll see what we're talking about three or four

different locations timing won't be too far away

president Trump also boasted of his very good relationship with chairman Kim and

cited the recent lack of nuclear and missile tests as a sign of progress in

the denuclearization process he added he believes North Korea will be incredibly

economically successful if 50 nuke arises critics however say there's no

evidence that the North has started to abandon its nuclear program but North

Korea argues it demolished a nuclear testing site in may has plans to

permanently shut down a missile engine testing site and would also shut its

main nuclear complex in Yangon if the u.s. takes corresponding steps

this comes as US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told reporters at the White House

on Tuesday that he made real progress on his four nation Asia Swing that took him

through Japan North Korea South Korea and China

Pompeyo said that while there's still much work to be done Washington can now

see a path where they will achieve the ultimate goal of the full and verified

denuclearization of North Korea is MJ young news

For more infomation >> Three or four sites being considered for North Korea summit: Trump - Duration: 2:15.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Explains How Kavanaugh Has Been "Proven Innocent" - Duration: 0:52.

On behalf of our entire nation,

I want to apologize to Brett-y boy here

for almost having to be held somewhat accountable.

You're rich and white.

We do not do that in the U.S., ok.

And to decree that he has been "proven innocent."

How you ask?

Well, even though he's lied numerous times under oath,

he says he's innocent,

and since you're now a Supreme,

how do YOU find... yourself?

SNIFF.

Innocent.

SNIFF.

There! You see? You see?

Proven innocent!

Now do me! Do me!

Prove me innocent of all my crimes!

SNIFF

For more infomation >> Trump Explains How Kavanaugh Has Been "Proven Innocent" - Duration: 0:52.

-------------------------------------------

Trump apologizes to Kavanaugh during swearing-in ceremony - Duration: 0:41.

For more infomation >> Trump apologizes to Kavanaugh during swearing-in ceremony - Duration: 0:41.

-------------------------------------------

History Project- Trump's Executive Order (Final Draft) - Duration: 5:41.

Folks we have no choice. We have no choice. Without looking at the data, it is

clear that Muslim hatred against Americans is beyond comprehension. We

have to figure out where the hatred comes from because we can't live like

this. It's just gonna get worse and worse and were going to have more world

trade center events. Folks those days are over, we have to be tough, we have to be

smart, we have to be vigilant. Yes, we have to look at mosques and we have to

respect mosques. Folks we have no choice.

Good morning and welcome to Channel 84. I'm Janna Hannington with the latest on

Executive Order 13769. You've just heard President Trump address the

order, also known as the Muslim Travel Ban, that was issued 4 days ago, on

January 27, 2017. This order bans entry from seven majority-Muslim countries for

90 days following the signing of the order. Let's hear from Murt Doorknob,

legislation expert, to give us more detail on this executive order.

Thank you Janna. Yes, President Trump's Executive Order 13769 enacts 6 new policies.

First, it suspends the Syrian refugee program indefinitely. This means that no

Syrian refugees are allowed in the country at all.

Second, it bans seven majority-Muslim countries – Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan,

Syria and Yemen – for 90 days after the signing of the executive order.

This temporarily banned entry of dual-nationals who are from those seven

countries, but have an additional passport for 90 days following the

signing of the order. This is the part of the ban that caused a lot of confusion.

Now, back to Janna. Thank you, Murt Doorknob. Now let's hear

from Bruce Hemmington—here to tell us about his experience being held at an

airport trying to travel to the US the day Executive Order 13769 was signed.

Thank you Janna. My name is Bruce Hemmington and I have a Syrian citizenship and a U.K. passport.

When I arrived at the airport, I was not allowed to enter

the U.S. even though the U.K. is not banned. I was told the reason is because I

have a Syrian citizenship. It isn't until 90 days after the executive order was

signed I was allowed back in the country.

Thank you, Bruce Hemmington, for sharing your story. We hope the confusion gets resolved soon.

Anything to add, Murt Doorknob?

What happened to Bruce Hemmington was a common confusion at the airport that day. Lawsuits are currently being enacted.

The ban also suspended the Syrian refugee program for 120 days.

This means that no Syrian refugees can enter the country during these 4 months.

During this period, the government can accept refugees on a case by case basis, but

only in the following scenarios: if they are a religious minority facing

religious persecution, if the U.S. must admit the person to meet an international

agreement, or if they are already in transit and denying admission would cause

undue hardship. It capped the total refugee admissions for the fiscal year 2017 at 50,000.

Thank you, Murt Doorknob, for giving us the specifics.

It seems this ban has put a lot of restriction on immigration.

I have Hubert Manuel, an immigration expert, here to talk about the negative impacts of the ban.

The executive order brings up the issue that there are simply not enough workers in the US.

"Employers nationwide are grappling with a problem

that threatens to stall economic growth" reported by the Washington Post.

The order not only hurts the economy but it also separates children from their parents.

"More than 2,000 children already separated from their parents;

the executive order does nothing to address that nightmare,"

said Michelle Brané, director of the Migrant Rights and Justice Program

at the Women's Refugee Commission. Back to you, Janna.

Thank you, Hubert Manuel, for sharing the impact of the Travel Ban. Executive Order 13796

created a lot of unrest and protest. Here's a field reporter

Brucelle Burtigan on site at one of the many airport protests.

Thank you, Janna. Currently, there are thousands of people gathered at

airports all around the country; in Chicago, San Francisco, and Washington DC, and more.

We're here today at The John F. Kennedy International Airport in Queens, New York City.

Over 2,000 families, children and neighbors are gathered here today

for the 11 people that are being held at JFK's airport. Julia Carmel, an organizer and

one of the protesters at the scene, said: "The purpose of our protest at JFK airport

is twofold. First, we are demanding the safe release of refugees

and other visa-holders, all of whom cooperated with a long and gruelling

vetting process in order to get here. Additionally, the central message of our

protest is that we are all immigrants or children of immigrants and refugees.

The executive order is not only inhumane; it is absurd and hypocritical."

Thank you, Brucelle Burtigan, for sharing the emotional response of the ban.

And thank you to all our guests today for sharing your point of views and knowledge!

Before forming an opinion about an issue, the most important thing is to be educated.

Once again, I'm Janna Hannington with Channel 84.

Stay tuned for updates on Executive Order 13769 at 10pm.

you

For more infomation >> History Project- Trump's Executive Order (Final Draft) - Duration: 5:41.

-------------------------------------------

Si ganan los demócratas, EU se convertirá en Venezuela: Trump - Duration: 2:58.

Al estilo de las pasadas elecciones, cuando los opositores advertían a la ciudadanía que un voto para AMLO significaba dar un paso hacia lo que Venezuela vive actualmente, el mandatario de Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, aplicó la fórmula y, en contexto de las próximas elecciones, advirtió a sus fans y detractores que el Partido Demócrata hundirá a su país a los niveles de la República Bolivariana

A menos de un mes de que se celebren los comicios del 6 de noviembre —en el que se elegirán 35 senadores, 435 diputados y 36 gobernadores— declaró que los demócratas impulsan una política de izquierda similar a la de Nicolás Maduro, presidente de Venezuela: "La base principal de los demócratas está tan a la izquierda que terminará siendo Venezuela, este país terminará siendo Venezuela"

"Los demócratas se han vuelto extremos y muy peligrosos para gobernar… ¡Vota Republicano!", escribió en Twitter

¿Por qué lo dice? Más allá de una alerta bien fundamentada, Trump entiende la posibilidad de que el Partido Republicano pierda lugares en el Congreso —es casi una tradición que el partido que lleve las riendas en la Casa Blanca, pierda en las elecciones intermedias—, en las elecciones que se realizarán en todos los estados de ese país y en 36, se elegirán gobernadores

Y es que el magnate se ha encargado de presumir avances durante su gestión, con datos y declaraciones imprecisas que tienen como finalidad tranquilizar a sus seguidores y no tan seguidores, en un escenario donde la desigualdad económica continúa imperando

De hecho, BBC publicó un reporte —a comienzos del año— en el que se dio a la tarea de desmenuzar las declaraciones de Trump

Lo que encontró fue: varios de los avances fueron una consecuencia de las políticas del gobierno de Barack Obama

Van ejemplos: el descenso del desempleo comenzó desde la gestión del demócrata, aún no se incentiva el crecimiento económico y desde la administración de Obama, el proceso ha sido lento

Y el escenario en los mercados presentaron una recuperación… pero a partir de 2013, comenzaron los récords en la Bolsa de Valores norteamericana

Todo con ayuda de la bandera demócrata. Sin embargo, para Trump la apuesta está hecha y en tablero político lo importante es preservar escaños, sin importar las precisiones o lanzar declaraciones que comparen una política gringa con la de Nicolás Maduro y Venezuela, en donde realmente las cosas están críticas y el nivel de austeridad en el país ha empujado a su población a migrar a otros países latinoamericanos

Pero así es Trump

For more infomation >> Si ganan los demócratas, EU se convertirá en Venezuela: Trump - Duration: 2:58.

-------------------------------------------

Michigan 11th Congressional District Ad: Women Vote! - Epstein/Trump (2018) - Duration: 0:30.

For more infomation >> Michigan 11th Congressional District Ad: Women Vote! - Epstein/Trump (2018) - Duration: 0:30.

-------------------------------------------

After Life Destroying Allegations And Torment, Trump Delivers Unexpected Surprise To The Kavanaughs - Duration: 6:23.

For more infomation >> After Life Destroying Allegations And Torment, Trump Delivers Unexpected Surprise To The Kavanaughs - Duration: 6:23.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Turns from Mic Mid Speech, Personally Addresses Kavanaugh After Heartfelt Apology - Duration: 4:31.

For more infomation >> Trump Turns from Mic Mid Speech, Personally Addresses Kavanaugh After Heartfelt Apology - Duration: 4:31.

-------------------------------------------

Trump team's contact with Mueller targets could taint findings - Duration: 10:44.

Donald Trump's lawyers have maintained an unusual level of contact with

attorneys representing clients court up in the expanding Russia probe

communication that could taint evidence that Special Counsel Robert Newell air

is collecting in his investigation of the president they're not being shy

about it either the president's attorneys talk openly

about these joint defense agreements that they say were established to keep

them connected with lawyers tied to the president's aides allies and associates

they took the lead in organizing weekly conference calls earlier this year to

strategize with other counsel during an intense period of Mueller's

investigation in total Trump's lawyers have publicly noted they

have more than 30 so-called jTA's with Mullah probe targets under these

agreements Trump's attorneys can seek details on everything from what

questions and documents Mueller's team is asking about to who's on the verge of

criminal indictment the arrangement itself is routine for complex

investigations where scores of people get drawn in as witnesses subjects and

even targets staying in touch through formalized jTA's is a way to share

information under the protection of attorney/client privilege

but the Trump teams use of jTA's has pushed legal boundaries especially in

the instances where the president's lawyers claim to have maintained these

relationships with defense teams representing Morley targets who have

flipped to cooperate with the Russia probe for legal experts it's an approach

in line with the team's broader strategy to ignore well-established norms

whether through campaign style attacks on the special counsel or blunt public

assessments of Mueller's movements this president is mounting a full-court

defensive press and is not particularly concerned with the optics of anything

said a white-collar lawyer who represents a senior Trump official in

the Russia investigation discerning Trump's legal strategy is always the

risky endeavor it changes frequently at the whim of a temperamental president

who has cycled through attorneys at a dizzying pace during the 17 month-old

investigation but legal experts say recent public

from trompe l'oeil rudy giuliani about jTA's could be part of a longer-term

plate to question the legitimacy of evidence the special council is

collecting from cooperating witnesses including former Trump campaign Chairman

Paul Manafort they may be trying to plant the seed that something about his

cooperation is improper somehow sadly Hoenig a former assistant u-s attorney

who prosecuted organized crime cases like the first rule preached in the

movie Fight Club commenting publicly about the existence of joint defense

agreements is supposed to be verboten but that doesn't seem to be the case for

the president's lawyers in a recent interview Giuliani said the president's

lawyers still have jTA's with attorneys representing at least 32 other people

pulled into the Russia probe that number doesn't include Michael Cohen the former

Trump personal lawyer who pleaded guilty in August to tax evasion financial fraud

and campaign finance charges and has since confirmed on Twitter that he met

with Mueller even though his plea didn't specifically call for cooperation

it also doesn't include former national security adviser Michael Flynn who ended

his jda with Trump's lawyers last November just a week before Flynn

pleaded guilty in the marula probe for lying to the FBI this is not entirely

unexpected Trump personal attorney Jay Sekulow said in a statement issued

shortly before Flynn pleaded guilty but it does apparently include a few

unexpected figures including manna Fitz the longtime GOP operative who pleaded

guilty in September to charges stemming from his lobbying work in Ukraine as

part of his deal with the moola team Manafort agreed to cooperate fully

truthfully completely and forthrightly on all relevant matters manifests degree

of cooperation will factor into the severity of the prison sentence

Mueller's team recommends to a federal judge such cooperation deals usually

signal the end of jTA's with others involved in the investigation similar to

how Flynn cut off his arrangement shortly before agreeing to cooperate

according to Giuliani though Trump's attorneys have maintained contact with

man it's lawyers throughout the Mulhare

investigation including during his high-profile trial in Alexandria

Virginia and in the days leading up to and after Manafort made his decision to

plead guilty in mid-september in Giuliani's telling mana Fitz lawyers

have remained in the JD a with the president's attorneys throughout the

process because the client has no useful information for Mueller about Trump

legal experts say they're perplexed by Giuliani's public insistence that jTA's

still exist for people known to be talking with federal prosecutors a

practice they say verges on unethical such arrangements are also almost

guaranteed to raise the ire of mullah as prosecutors typically only strike

cooperation deals with defendants on the condition that they withdraw from many

joints defense set up the only way they can still be in jda is if they have told

prosecutors the defendant has nothing on Trump and they believe him a second

defense lawyer working on the Russia investigation said of the Manafort

situation but Giuliani's comments also could be seen as a warning that the

president's lawyers are primed to challenge Mueller's authority to use

some of the evidence collected from Manafort or other cooperating witnesses

through jTA's as the bulk of information shared in this manner is supposed to be

covered by attorney-client privileges that means Trump's lawyers could try and

block Mualla from using evidence in court if they believe the details were

gleaned from attorneys operating under the terms of a JD a the special counsels

team does have plenty of room to maneuver though for starters jTA's don't

cover facts a witness knows independent of a JTA and while information Manafort

shared with trump under the JTA is privileged the former campaign chairman

can also waive that right if he wants to share the information with prosecutors

outside of the courtroom a different standard applies for instance Trump's

lawyers can't stop Mualla from putting the evidence a witness gleaned under a

JTA into a report to congr s the more likely forum for Mueller's findings

given indications that his team won't indict a sitting president

I am sure that Trump leaning members of Congress would claim the information is

tainted for all purposes but I don't think there is any authority for that

proposition said Jack Townsend a Virginia based tax attorney and former

Justice Department lawyer Morrell are also isn't prohibited from using

criminally incriminating details that were shared through a JTA such as a

discussion about a presidential pardon for Manafort in exchange for continuing

to fight the special counsels charges imagine if the Mafia used a jd8 are

trying to hide a conspiracy to commit crimes

that'll go no place said norm Ison a former top ethics official in the Obama

White House and a frequent critic of the Trump administration

manuf its attorneys declined comment when asked about the status of the JD a

with the Trump lawyers their client met last Monday with Mueller's team at its

washington d.c office joint defense agreements are new to high-profile

political investigations lawyers representing President Bill Clinton and

his White House staffers relied on them during the Independent Counsel

investigation into everything from the Clintons whitewater land deal to the

Monica Lewinsky scandal president george w bush's staffers but not the President

himself had their own jda arrangements during the special counsel investigation

into who leaked the identity of CIA operative Valerie Plame similarly those

pulled into the moola probe and other lawsuits stemming from the 2016 election

have established both formal and informal means to stay informed lawyers

for the longtime Trump operative Roger stone maintained a JD a with attorneys

from Trump's 2016 campaign as they battled a civil lawsuit brought by two

Democratic National Committee donors and a former staffer tied to the hacking of

their emails stones attorneys also have a JD a with lawyers for another former

Trump campaign staffer Michael Caputo who has been questioned by mullah in the

early stages of manifests defense against Mueller's charges his lawyers

even shared information with lawyers representing manaphy

long time deputy Rick gates that arrangements dissolved before gates

flipped and pleaded guilty claims of who's in and who's out of the Trump

legal teams jda arrangements aren't so simple either Giuliani told Reuters in

August that the president maintained a joint defense agreement with white House

Counsel Don McDonough but bill Burke the defense lawyer from a

gun said he never signed on to any jTA's with the president's attorneys my guys

are there to be witnesses Burke told POLITICO in January they're there to

tell whatever it is they're supposed to tell to answer questions truthfully

they're not coordinating strategy with the White House two other book clients

former White House chief of staff Reince Priebus and ex White House senior

strategist Steven Bannon also don't have jTA's with the president's lawyers

lawyers close to the Russia probe said Giuliani's comments about the use of

jTA's may also just be his way of spinning through a sensitive topic that

could ignite his famously cantankerous client one attorney close to the White

House warned against interpreting his comments as part of a larger long-term

strategy to undermine Mueller's efforts that gives Rudy way too much credit for

sanity and clarity as a strategist he's just not in the game said an attorney

close to the White House Ann Marie McAvoy a former defense attorney and

media consultant for gates said Giuliani's remarks about jTA's may be

aimed more at influencing the court of public opinion ahead of the midterm

elections and with the prospect that Democrats could soon be armed with

Mueller's findings and launched impeachment proceedings they're trying

to quash any thought that Trump is somehow at risk by coming

For more infomation >> Trump team's contact with Mueller targets could taint findings - Duration: 10:44.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump Eases Ethanol Restrictions - Duration: 0:25.

For more infomation >> President Trump Eases Ethanol Restrictions - Duration: 0:25.

-------------------------------------------

Reporter Asks Trump About Hillary Criticizing Kavanaugh, President UNLOADS Hilarious Answer - Duration: 2:24.

Nikki Haley just resigned and President Trump was fielding questions from a pool of reporters

when one of them broke into a new topic.

This person asked what Trump thought about Hillary Clinton's criticism of the newly

confirmed Supreme Court Justice, Brett Kavanaugh, and the president unloaded a hilarious answer.

President asked about Hillary Clinton harshly criticizing Kavanaugh confirmation.

Trump: "That's why she lost.

She doesn't get it.

She never did.

I knew that a long time ago.

Hillary never got it.

That's why she lost."

Just.

Rekt."

Trump lit up the room and caused many watching the live video feed to laugh out loud.

This might be a good time for all journalists and reporters to remember to remain on topic.

SIGN THE PLEDGE To Vote Red On November 6th

If the topic of the moment is Nikki Haley, then maybe bringing up Hillary Clinton, who

is completely irrelevant to Haley's resignation, is not a good idea.

Then again, it was also a great idea because we just got to enjoy an absolutely comedic

performance a la classic Trump.

If there's one thing that President Trump won't do, then it's holding back.

Trump has no problem expressing how he feels about people he genuinely does not like.

That part of Trump is highly criticized by many of the people who do not support him.

Some people claim that it is "not presidential" of him to speak the way he does.

A quick reminder – Trump is not a politician.

His career spanned across reality television and real estate with a lot of books sprinkled

in.

We cannot expect a non-politician to change the way they speak based on the job they were

voted to do.

Trump being Trump is all people can expect.

In this case, he was a comedy genius as he criticized Hillary Clinton.

Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet's conservative frontpage founded by ex-military.

For more infomation >> Reporter Asks Trump About Hillary Criticizing Kavanaugh, President UNLOADS Hilarious Answer - Duration: 2:24.

-------------------------------------------

Kanye West Is Meeting With President Trump - Duration: 0:18.

For more infomation >> Kanye West Is Meeting With President Trump - Duration: 0:18.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Responds To Taylor Swift Political Endorsement - Duration: 0:43.

For more infomation >> Trump Responds To Taylor Swift Political Endorsement - Duration: 0:43.

-------------------------------------------

TRUMP - This is America - Duration: 1:21.

For more infomation >> TRUMP - This is America - Duration: 1:21.

-------------------------------------------

Democrats Freak As Trump Unveils 'Special Gift' For Obama On Columbus Day - Duration: 4:33.

For more infomation >> Democrats Freak As Trump Unveils 'Special Gift' For Obama On Columbus Day - Duration: 4:33.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Exposed Democrats Shameful Ways That Will Result In A Big Red Wave(VIDEO)!!! - Duration: 11:59.

Trump Exposed Democrats Shameful Ways That Will Result In A Big Red Wave

no I don't I thought the way they behaved was absolutely atrocious I've

never seen anything like it from the leaks of important documents to

the statements they made to watching a Blumenthal who was a fraud stirrer when

it came to Vietnam and what he did was horrible I thought that the way they

conducted themselves the way they dealt dealt with a high-level brilliant going

to be a great justice of the Supreme Court the way they really tortured him

and his family I thought it was a disgrace I don't know I thought it was

one of the most disgraceful performances I've ever seen

so I've been hearing that that now they're thinking about impeaching a

brilliant jurist a man that did nothing wrong a man that was caught up in a hoax

that was set up by the Democrats using the Democrats lawyers and now they want

to impeach him I've heard this from many people I think it's an insult to the

American public and I think you're gonna see a lot of things happen on November 6

that would not have happened before the amendment the American public has seen

this charade has seen this dishonesty by the Democrats and when you would mention

impeach a Justice of the United States Supreme Court who was a top scholar top

student top intellect and who did nothing wrong and there was no

corroboration of any kind and went through seven FBI investigations had

nothing to do with any of this stuff I mean you had the last one take a look at

the last one the things they said about him I don't even think he ever heard of

the words it was all made up that was fabricated and it's it this straight and

I think it's going to really show you something come November 6

I don't hear you

I think a lot of Democrats are going to vote Republican because I have many

friends that are Democrats the main base of the Democrats have shifted so far

left that will end up being Venezuela this country would end up being

Venezuela I think a lot of Democrats are going to be voting Republican on

November 6

very well document very well document it's been documented for many years very

well all public documents say it

I don't know what

I don't understand the words

not at all

look I'm traveling with rod I didn't know rod before but I've gotten to know

him and I get along very well with

right he's already on the court but that doesn't mean that Brett Kavanaugh is in

the eyes of some Democrats gonna stay on the court a number of leading efforts

especially if they gain the majority in the house to begin impeachment

proceedings against him C Boyden gray is the former White House Counsel for

Ronald Reagan and George Herbert Walker Bush expert in all these matters I don't

see where that would go but where do you think they would go I don't see where

would go either you you can impeach and that's like an indictment but the trial

is in the Senate it takes 2/3 two convicts it's really impossible to see

how you could get 2/3 of the vote now and especially if by the Republicans

pick up a seat or two which is entirely possible so I don't see where it goes

except more embarrassment more you know harm to the court and if the intention

is a media war against the legitimacy of the Supreme Court that is really that is

really dangerous in my view now you dealt with this over the days of

Clarence Thomas and capacity as being an advisor to him and he always had like a

target on him and I'm wondering did that ever dissipate after those controversial

hearings he was approved 52 48 in the Democratic Senate we might point out but

it was tooth Annelle the whole battle and there were promises much like in

this case to make him a marked man well I don't think it worked and remember he

got 11th Democratic votes so this was not a song right this was not a partisan

thing I think he suffered something of a cloud for a few years but he's now one

of the most respected members of the court he's known by by Democratic

scholars as well as Republican or conservative if you will as being one of

the leaders of the court he's the go-to man often when they can't remember what

they decided you know 15 years early in a particular case he's adored by his

colleagues and he's one of the most fun people to be with and he's very very fun

even though he doesn't talk when he's on the court that's right I forget about

that you know one of the things I've heard about trying to pursue impeachment

is that the judge Kavanagh perjured himself and then and I'm not a lawyer or

an expert on these things like you are but I started digging into it

well we're and how would he approach it himself and apparently it would Center

on the degree to which he might have minimize how often he got drunk in high

school and I'm thinking of myself boy are you kidding me

what do you make of it well my gosh I think god I never gonna be questioned

about my drinking at high school in college

don't go there we don't know but again a warrant man that's really what it comes

down to that that is where he was not very honest or forthcoming about

something he was doing in high school well I got the impression listening to

the hearings without the commentary that he he liked beer and he drank a lot

that's I never had he had any different view he liked to drink and that happens

to people in college it happens to people in high school and you know most

of us grow out of it but I can't say that I wouldn't be in

the same pickle season if I were in his shoes because I can't I can't make a

relative judgement about my own drinking when I was in college and I did some

things that I regret today and wouldn't do again and have done everything to

make sure that my my one daughter doesn't do hasn't done you know III see

a method to this and again I have no legal expertise that's one happy to have

you here but that didn't create doubts about his authenticity under oath and

that he might have misstated or minimize the potential that he could have blacked

out or you know just falling asleep after a heavy drinking thereby making

possible the claims of dr. Ford so I know what they're getting out here but

it does seem to stretch and maybe a dangerous precedent to use that as

precedent in future you know Supreme Court picks and that will go that far

back and asked those types of questions I think that's a very dangerous route to

take and if they do that they open up they take a risk that I wouldn't take if

I were they they open up de Blasio herself to the same kind of scrutiny and

I'm not sure she comes out so well if she's put under the spotlights away the

way they might do to to him so what what's needed by the country is some

sort of you know all right congratulation guys

you won let bygones be bygones we'll see you in court on another day and and

let's this accept this outcome and and and you know and get together because

the court is one of the prized crown jewels of our electoral system fair and

out see Boyd and great thank you very much our President Trump is

participating in a ceremonial swearing-in of Supreme Court justice

Brent Cavanaugh as Trump in this GOP celebrate the victory the nation's top

Democrats well the urging supporters to quote make

Republicans pay the price for break heaven on here now to discuss carry

seven RINO she's a former clerk for Justice Thomas are also current a

judicial crisis Network chief counsel Carrie let's talk about justice Kavanagh

uh he's he's starting to hiring some folks today he's putting his team

together and there's a lot of speculation on what kind of a justice he

will be yeah he had to have provisional clerks hired just to get ready because

he starts hearing cases on Tuesday tomorrow so it's it's it's getting a lot

up to speed so he already had his clerk kind of waiting in the wings ready to go

and this is gonna be the first time in history that any Supreme Court justice

says all four female clerks that'll be exciting to see even you know even

someone like Justice Ginsburg has not done that before so that that's really

in keeping with his pattern he feels very strongly about encouraging women

and minorities to get into clerking and it's a good leg up and in the legal

field so he's putting his money where his mouth was is a purse a carry you

spend time with Justice Thomas some some speculation some people thinking out

loud maybe the process may be as grueling and it's vitriolic as this

process was that something could have occurred within Brett Kavanaugh that

couldn't that it could actually influence his decisions from era now

there's any chance of that look he's someone who has been on the

bench for 12 years he's already hit his stride really I don't think you're gonna

see this affect him and that's great news because when you look at his 300

plus opinions so far it's a a very reasoned careful jurisprudence

he's very clear about sticking with the original understanding of the

Constitution sticking with the text of the laws trying his very hardest not to

let politics get in there and be very even-handed that's why you had people

like Obama's Solicitor General Don Verrilli stepping out and saying he'd be

great on the court Lisa Blatt a liberal feminist well the woman who's argued the

most cases before the Supreme Court she testified for him Akhil amar a yale law

professor as well so all of these are are people who really respect his

judicial approach it'll be it'll be the same going forward very even-handed but

but connected to the text of the law real quick area the 5/4 looks like the

balance of the court a lot of people are concerned the politicos ation of the

Supreme Court do you see it that way I think it's people who are trying to

make a pitch to say oh no I do I want the courts to shift back to the left

more look guys this is we have someone here who's going to follow the

constitutional law that means the law that's a liberal law he'll applied the

text that just like a conservative law but I don't think he's gonna be

susceptible to those arguments what will help the integrity of the court the most

is someone who's faithful to that oath that he took on Saturday and they just

taking again tonight at the White House I'm excited I'm gonna be heading to

there shortly to watch that if he's faithful that oath to the Constitution

that's the best recipe for deep politicizing the court thank you very

much Kerry we by the way appreciate you helping us with this throughout the

entire saga we appreciate a thing thank you

god bless you and God bless america

No comments:

Post a Comment