Trump news on Youtube May 29 2018

Trump Destroys Blue Wave, Schumer & Dems Humiliated By Embarrassing Truth

So much for the left's blue wave of victory.

On the heels of the mid-term elections, a report has come out about how both the GOP

and Democrats performed last month.

Let's just say, it was pretty bad for the liberals.

For a while now, the left has been predicting a "blue wave."

Meaning, they claim they are poised to win back seats within our government from Republicans.

They have no real evidence for this.

Instead, it's really just wishful thinking, like how Maxine Waters thinks she's going

to impeach President Donald Trump, Vice President Mike Pence, House Speaker Paul Ryan, and everyone

else in line for the White House.

When we look at what's really going on in America, we discover this "blue wave"

is so much fake news.

President Trump is winning again and again.

Ever since he entered office, he's been doing the impossible.

Everything the experts said he couldn't do, he is doing.

The president is fulfilling every promise he made during the campaign.

That includes bringing back jobs, helping our veterans, slashing taxes, and ending the

Iran Nuclear Deal.

Let's not forget how the GOP was instrumental in passing the tax cuts bill.

Not a signal Democrat voted for the tax cuts that now millions of Americans are enjoying.

They'd rather you suffer from high taxes and low salaries.

And, they think they are going to take back the government?

Suuuuure.

That hasn't stopped their goons in the media from predicting this blue wave.

But, it's based on nothing.

The Democrats have delivered nothing in the last year and a half — aside from shocking

betrayals of their own supporters and country.

The left has become a party of obstruction, crime, and illegal immigration.

Their policies are destroying once great states like New York and California.

Now, all that toxic leadership is hitting them where it hurts most: their pocketbook.

ProPublica reports the Republican National Committee (RNC) has set yet another fundraising

record, while the Democratic National Committee (DNC) registered its lowest figure in April

during a midterm election cycle since 2006.

In the same month, the report reveals the DNC had expenditures totaling $8.3 million

and finished up with $8.7 million in cash.

The party currently owes $5.3 million…

Under the leadership of chairman Tom Perez (pictured), the party has struggled in comparison

to the Republican National Committee, which has seen fundraising soar since President

Donald Trump entered the White House in January 2017.

According to filings, the RNC took in $13 million in April — a fundraising record

during a midterm election year — and spent $12.1 million.

The Party finished the month with a whopping $43.8 million in its coffers.

[Source: Breitbart]

Let's break this all down.

Obviously, money does not equal victory.

Hillary Clinton had two billion dollars and was crush by Donald Trump.

But, where the money comes from is key.

Democrats have always said they are the party "of the people."

Yet, they have benefited from big donations from billionaires.

Hollywood celebrities and Silicon Valley bigwigs always dish out a lot.

However, even with these one percenters supporting the left, the DNC has a dismal bank account.

So, who is supporting the GOP?

Like Donald Trump during the election, the Republican Party is benefiting from regular

Americans like you and me.

Americans across the country are contributing small amounts of cash, but it's adding up

big time.

That is an indicator of the enthusiasm felt among patriots.

We are charged up like never before, thanks to the fearless leadership of Donald Trump.

Only one and half years into his presidency, and he's already demolished former President

Barack Obama's legacy.

What will things look like in two years?

In six?

Now's is the time to support conservative leaders.

With the mid-terms coming up, the president will need all the help he can get.

Putting more Republicans in Washington, D.C., will mean President Trump will have a greater

momentum to make America great again.

It seems like, according to this report, I'm not the only one who thinks that way.

America is putting their money behind the winning team.

For more infomation >> Trump Destroys Blue Wave, Schumer - Duration: 11:51.

-------------------------------------------

INCREDIBLE New Bill Funds Trump's BIGGEST - Duration: 13:23.

INCREDIBLE New Bill Funds Trump's BIGGEST Promise In Seconds – Dems LIVID At How He's

Doing It!

A congresswoman in Tennessee will introduce a bill that could provide President Donald

Trump with the funds he needs to fulfill one of his biggest promises that he made to his

supporters during his campaign.

The idea behind her bill will utilize everything that embodies social media and possibly provide

Trump with enough funding in just a few days and he will finally be able to act on that

one big promise.

When we say big, we mean YUGE, and the promise could be fulfilled if the Tennesee Congresswoman

is successful in getting her bill to reach Donald's desk and he also believes it to

be a great idea.

Chances are if it ever gets to Trump's desk that he'll be all about it.

The idea comes from Rep. Diane Black who is a Republican in Tennessee who's running

for governor.

She'd like to provide Americans with the option of crowdfunding to raise money for

the wall to place on along the Mexican border to help prevent illegal immigration.

Her bill is called H.R. 5876 and it would create a "border wall trust fund" so people

could donate to it.

Essentially, it's just like the typical crowdfunding websites that many people see

today.

Since people can utilize crowdfunding on the Internet to donate to people in need, musicians,

teachers, and everything else – then why not allow American citizens to help donate

to their own border wall to secure the border?

Trending: Mother Lost Her Son In Afghanistan And NEVER Got Call From Obama, But Look What

She Just Got From Melania

Warner Todd Huston reported more at Breitbart: "Rep. Diane Black, a Tennessee Republican

who is also running for governor of her state, promised to introduce H.R. 5876, legislation

that would create a "border wall trust fund" to which average citizens could donate.

The funds would be used for "whatever it takes to build the wall," according to Fox

News.

"While Democrats block commonsense border security and put illegal immigrants before

our families, we are going to put America first.

Real immigration reform cannot be achieved without a secure border — President Trump

has been clear about this since day one," Black said in a May 18 statement.

"The most important job of the federal government is the safety and security of the American

people, and if citizens in our country wish to contribute to this effort, they absolutely

should be given the opportunity."

In an interview with Fox, Rep. Black, a member of the House Budget Committee, said that her

bill would allow any American to donate money to help fund the wall.

"I support President Trump in building the wall.

It's going to take big funds to do that," she said, noting that Congress seems unwilling

to raise the money for the job.

Black said that the bill is patterned after the popular private enterprises such as GoFundMe

where people can gather to support favored causes and help people who need assistance.

The rep. also said that an effort such as this to fund work for a public monument has

precedent.

Indeed, a private group launched in 1833 to raise the funds that eventually led to the

building of the Washington Monument.

Black spokesperson Heather Douglass told Fox News, "We're hoping to see [the bill]

go through to the president's desk."

Republicans expect the bill to face backlash by Democrats who will likely utilize their

own method of "whatever it takes" to block the bill from turning into a success.

There's a great chance that if Black's idea comes to fruition, then the wall could

be heavily funded in a short period of time.

However, they might have to create their own platform or find a current platform to agree

to manage the funding.

There's a good chance that some current crowdfunding websites might now agree to allow

donations for the border wall.

That, of course is another hurdle that would need to be jumped whenever the time comes

– if it comes at all.

In a joking manner, people might ask if they can have their name on a brick that goes on

the wall.

Do you think Rep. Black's idea will make it to Trump's desk?

If the crowdfunding for the border wall becomes a thing, then will you donate to it?

What is your idea on the border wall in general?

Do you want it?

Do you have another idea for protecting the border?

What will Democrats do to go against this?

Write your comments below and then share this story to a friend who supports Trump and wants

better protection at

the border!

For more infomation >> INCREDIBLE New Bill Funds Trump's BIGGEST - Duration: 13:23.

-------------------------------------------

Michelle's Furious! Barack Breaks $65 Million Deal After Trump Drops Nasty Surprise - Duration: 6:27.

For more infomation >> Michelle's Furious! Barack Breaks $65 Million Deal After Trump Drops Nasty Surprise - Duration: 6:27.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Announces $60M Cut To Democrat Holy Grail—They'll Never Recover - Duration: 3:33.

For more infomation >> Trump Announces $60M Cut To Democrat Holy Grail—They'll Never Recover - Duration: 3:33.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Unbelievably Rips Dems For Immigrant Kids Being Separated From Parents - Duration: 12:16.

Trump Unbelievably Rips Dems For Immigrant Kids Being Separated From Parents

He's the one who launched the policy.

President Donald Trump has bashed the Democrats for a hugely controversial policy created

by his own administration: separating undocumented immigrant children from their parents.

He urged Americans in a Saturday morning tweet to "put pressure" on the Democrats to

"end the horrible law that separates children from there [sic] parents."

Despite what Trump tweeted, there is no law requiring children to be separated from their

parents.

The separation policy was adopted by his own administration.

It was underscored in a speech in early May by Attorney General Jeff Sessions

The policy has been hit with a firestorm of criticism, with some even comparing the increasing

dehumanization of immigrants in America as similar to the ugly atmosphere in Germany

before the Holocaust.

Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) took first lady Melania Trump to task in light of her new "Be Best"

mission for children.

"Separating toddlers from parents is definitely not a 'Be Best' policy," he tweeted.

"Are you going to do anything about it?"

In chilling Senate testimony last month, a Health and Human Services official said the

government was unable to locate nearly 1,500 children who had been released from its custody.

Steve Wagner, acting assistant secretary with the Administration for Children and Families

of HHS, insisted that the federal agency is "not legally responsible for children"

once they're handed over to a sponsor.

Until recently, families that illegally crossed the Mexican border together generally faced

civil deportation proceedings.

But as of May, the Trump administration is sending all parents to jails run by the U.S.

Marshals Service.

Because migrant children cannot be held in jails, they are placed elsewhere by the HHS

Office of Refugee Resettlement.

Before the Trump administration, the office handled children who crossed the border alone.

White House chief of staff John Kelly, who called the harsh new policy a "technique"

and a "tough deterrent," explained earlier this month to NPR: "They'll be sent to

foster care — or whatever.

But the big point is they elected to come illegally into the United States."

For more infomation >> Trump Unbelievably Rips Dems For Immigrant Kids Being Separated From Parents - Duration: 12:16.

-------------------------------------------

Anti Trump Cali Mayor Who Honored Stormy Daniels Has ABUSIVE Past - Duration: 12:41.

Anti-Trump Cali Mayor Who Honored Stormy Daniels Has ABUSIVE Past

The West Hollywood Mayor John Duran honored aging porn star Stormy Daniels with her own

special day and a key to the city, for her work "helping" the anti-Trump #Resistance.

Not sure how she's "helped," since polling shows Americans are "turned off" by Daniels

and her sleazy lawyer, but liberals seem to love the vulgar woman, regardless.

Now, we're learning that the anti-Trump mayor has an abusive past.

Duran settled a 2016 sexual harassment claim, which cost the city a whopping $500k.

Yet another anti-Trump liberal, who treats others like garbage, while claiming President

Trump is a "monster."

From Breitbart

West Hollywood Mayor John Duran, who honored porn star Stormy Daniels last week for her

role in leading the "resistance" to President Donald Trump, faced sexual harassment claims

that led to the city paying out $500,000 on his behalf in 2016.

The Los Angeles Times reported at the time:

A former aide to West Hollywood City Councilman John Duran who sued the city and his boss

alleging sexual harassment and wrongful punishment is set to receive $500,000 after settling

with both parties earlier this month, according to the agreement obtained by The Times.

Under the terms of the settlement with former City Council deputy Ian Owens, Duran and the

city admitted no wrongdoing.

…

Duran has repeatedly denied the allegations, saying Owens did not accuse him of harassment

until he was accused of wrongdoing himself.

Duran has acknowledged that he and Owens were intimate and that they met through Grindr.

He said they became friends and that he hired Owens because his degree in finance and experience

in hotel development and real estate made him well-qualified for the job.

Duran, now mayor of the city, escaped pressure to resign.

The accusations and settlement happened almost two years before the "#metoo" and "Time's

Up" movements began to champion the victims of sexual harassment and violence.

Mayor Duran declared May 23 "Stormy Daniels Day" and gave her a symbolic key to the

city.

"Our values have been under threat by the Trump administration for the past year-and-a-half,"

he said at the ceremony, praising Daniels and her attorney, Michael Avenatti, for fighting

back.

One angry member of the public actually mentioned the sexual harassment claims against Duran

at the event outside the Chi Chi LaRue gay sex shop on Santa Monica Boulevard.

"I think it's complete B.S.," she said, referring to the award ceremony, shortly before

it began.

"This is so ridiculous.

It's completely hypocritical.

The mayor who is giving this to her has silenced people who have filed sexual harassment lawsuits

against him.

And what connection does this woman have to the City of West Hollywood?

I would say none."

The woman's comments were caught on video at 4:23, below.

She added: "I'm definitely not a fan of '45,' however, what happened between [Stormy

Daniels] and him happened about 12 years ago, so what does it matter to me now?

And I don't see her as a feminist leader."

For more infomation >> Anti Trump Cali Mayor Who Honored Stormy Daniels Has ABUSIVE Past - Duration: 12:41.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Blindsides Washington Swamp Slackers With 3 Executive Orders - Duration: 3:38.

For more infomation >> Trump Blindsides Washington Swamp Slackers With 3 Executive Orders - Duration: 3:38.

-------------------------------------------

SHERIFF CLARKE Says "Obama DID know" About FBI Spy In Trump Campaign - Duration: 11:23.

For more infomation >> SHERIFF CLARKE Says "Obama DID know" About FBI Spy In Trump Campaign - Duration: 11:23.

-------------------------------------------

Melania Trump HUMILIATES Meghan Markle During Her First Week as a Royal - Duration: 14:58.

Melania Trump HUMILIATES Meghan Markle During Her First Week as a Royal

It's been one week since Prince Harry married American actress Meghan Markle.

The couple attempted to send a rude message to Donald and Melania Trump by refusing to

invite them to the royal wedding.

However, Melania responded with a classy move that was sure to humiliate Meghan.

Rather than stoop to Meghan's immature level, Melania rose above the drama and sent a thoughtful

gift to the couple.

Yahoo News reported that though the Trumps were not invited to the royal wedding, they

are sending a gift in the form of a cash donation.

"President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump will be making a contribution to one

of the seven charities the royal couple has designated in lieu of gifts," White House

spokesperson Lindsay Walters said in a statement.

Last month, Harry and Meghan requested that their wedding guests donate money to one of

their favorite charities rather than give gifts.

"Prince Harry and Ms. Meghan Markle are incredibly grateful for the goodwill shown

to them since the announcement of their engagement and are keen that as many people as possible

benefit from this generosity of spirit," read the statement.

"The couple have therefore asked that anyone who might wish to mark the occasion considers

making a donation to charity, rather than sending a wedding gift."

The couple chose seven different U.K.-based organizations: CHIVA (Children's HIV Association);

Crisis, which aims to end homelessness; the Myna Mahila Foundation,which provides professional

support for aspiring businesswomen; Scotty's Little Soldiers,for bereaved armed forces

children; StreetGames, a sports charity for low-income communities, Surfers Against Sewage,

a national marine conservation; and the Wilderness Foundation U.K., a nature program for at-risk

youth.

Harry and Meghan did not invite the Trumps to their wedding because they chose not to

invite any foreign dignitaries to the ceremony.

"It has been decided that an official list of political leaders — both U.K. and international

— is not required for Prince Harry and Ms. Markle's wedding.

Her Majesty's Government was consulted on this decision, which was taken by The Royal

Household," a palace spokesman said in a statement.

What do you think about this?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments section.

For more infomation >> Melania Trump HUMILIATES Meghan Markle During Her First Week as a Royal - Duration: 14:58.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Blindsides Washington Swamp Slackers With 3 Executive Orders - Duration: 3:15.

For more infomation >> Trump Blindsides Washington Swamp Slackers With 3 Executive Orders - Duration: 3:15.

-------------------------------------------

US Delegation Meets With North Korea, Negotiating Summit For President Donald Trump - Duration: 0:25.

For more infomation >> US Delegation Meets With North Korea, Negotiating Summit For President Donald Trump - Duration: 0:25.

-------------------------------------------

Trump stumps for Rep. Blackburn's Senate bid - Duration: 2:48.

For more infomation >> Trump stumps for Rep. Blackburn's Senate bid - Duration: 2:48.

-------------------------------------------

WASHINGTON BUREAU: Trump Agoma Kuonana na Kim Jong UN - Duration: 5:54.

For more infomation >> WASHINGTON BUREAU: Trump Agoma Kuonana na Kim Jong UN - Duration: 5:54.

-------------------------------------------

Donald Trump volvió a suavizar la regulación financiera | Un Nuevo Día | Telemundo - Duration: 7:44.

For more infomation >> Donald Trump volvió a suavizar la regulación financiera | Un Nuevo Día | Telemundo - Duration: 7:44.

-------------------------------------------

Sick Judge Just Ruled Against Trump Giving Anyone Who Wants To Attack Him One Major Power - Duration: 12:37.

Sick Judge Just Ruled Against Trump Giving Anyone Who Wants To Attack Him One Major Power

In a bizarre ruling that has many shaking their heads, a federal judge has deemed it

unconstitutional for President Donald Trump to block anyone on social media.

It is a victory of sorts for far left hecklers like Rosie O' Donnell, Stephen King, and

many others, even of the not so famous variety.

Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York,

ruled that it is unconstitutional for President Trump to block anyone on the social media

platform simply because they disagree with him or his policies.

The judge states that because President Trump is a government official, using social media

in his official capacity as a public forum.

The president cannot censor dissent or opposing views as this is considered viewpoint discrimination

and in violation of the First Amendment.

Judge Buchwald issued the ruling in a lawsuit filed by the Knight First Amendment Institute

at Columbia University stating the fact that President Trump's Twitter account predates

his time in the White House is irrelevant.

The fact is that he is in the White House now and serving as the President.

He works for the American people, all of them, even those that strongly disagree or troll

him on the internet.

She suggested in her 75-page opinion that Trump could have ignored his opponents'

reply tweets, stating in her ruling – "This case requires us to consider whether a public

official may, consistent with the First Amendment, 'block' a person from his Twitter account

in response to the political views that person has expressed, and whether the analysis differs

because that public official is the President of the United States.

The answer to both questions is no."

Trending: Mother Lost Her Son In Afghanistan And NEVER Got Call From Obama, But Look What

She Just Got From Melania

According to the Hill, "the court's ruling is a major win for the Knight First Amendment

Institute at Columbia University, which brought the lawsuit on behalf of seven people who

were blocked from the @realDonaldTrump account because of opinions they expressed in reply

tweets.

Buchwald, who was appointed by former President Clinton, rejected Trump's argument that

the First Amendment does not apply in this case and that the president's personal First

Amendment interests supersede those of the plaintiffs.

She suggested in her 75-page opinion that Trump could have ignored his opponents'

reply tweets.

"No First Amendment harm arises when a government's 'challenged conduct' is simply to ignore

the [speaker], as the Supreme Court has affirmed 'that it is free to do,' " she wrote.

"Stated otherwise, 'a person's right to speak is not infringed when government

simply ignores that person while listening to others,' or when the government 'amplifies'

the voice of one speaker over those of others."

Buchwald explained that blocking someone on Twitter goes further than just muting them.

"Muting preserves the muted account's ability to reply to a tweet sent by the muting

account, blocking precludes the blocked user from 'seeing or replying to the blocking

user's tweets' entirely," she said."

The lawsuit also named White House social media director and assistant to the president

Daniel Scavino as Defendant in the lawsuit.

However, in an interesting twist on the ruling Judge Buchwald did not order President Trump

or Scavino to unblock the individual plaintiffs in the case or those previously blocked for

dissenting views or prohibit them from blocking others from the account based on their views

as the plaintiffs' had asked.

Instead she stated her belief that a declaratory judgment should be sufficient, stating in

her ruling – "Because no government official is above the law and because all government

officials are presumed to follow the law once the judiciary has said what the law is, we

must assume that the President and Scavino will remedy the blocking we have held to be

unconstitutional."

Naturally, the left took this portion of the ruling to mean that all those previously blocked

must be unblocked immediately.

Director of the Knight First Amendment Institute, Jameel Jaffer, tweeted a screenshot of that

specific line from Buchwald's opinion with the caption

Executive Director of Georgetown Law's Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection,

Josh Geltzer states the court's ruling is a vital and critical victory in preserving

free speech in the digital age.

Geltzer said in a statement regarding the ruling – "The court's thorough decision

recognizes that the President's use of @realDonaldTrump on Twitter makes it the type of public forum

in which the government may not, under the First Amendment, silence its critics."

The Department of Justice has actively expressed their respectful disagreement with the court's

decision and is looking into next steps for a possible appeal of the ruling.

Many Conservatives, Republicans, and right-leaning individuals are also asking the obvious question.

Why are social media platforms such as Twitter or Facebook allowed to essentially "shadow

ban" individuals for differing points of view be it on political and social issues

or issues of religion and culture?

It is clear that a double standard exists and now a judge is enforcing that same double

standard.

1984 here

we come!

For more infomation >> Sick Judge Just Ruled Against Trump Giving Anyone Who Wants To Attack Him One Major Power - Duration: 12:37.

-------------------------------------------

Trump DEFIES Ruling From Activist Judge Who CENSORED His Twitter - Duration: 5:31.

For more infomation >> Trump DEFIES Ruling From Activist Judge Who CENSORED His Twitter - Duration: 5:31.

-------------------------------------------

Andrea Mitchell Calls Trump Tweet False On Missing Immigrant Children - Duration: 0:33.

>>> The trump administration's

tough new immigration tough new

crackdown is facing new scrutiny

after a top official revealed

the department lost track of

nearly 1500 migrant children

separated.

They say their sponsors family

member fail to follow up to

safety checks.

This is president trump falsely

tries to blame Democrats